First that's already a state by state issue. Your state may not have them, others certainly do.
Second it winds up just being an opportunity for voters in opposing parties to game the system. Many people think that Trump getting the nomination was due to Hillary's lock on the Democratic nomination providing opportunity for Democrats to vote for who they thought would be the worst Republican candidate.
You're the only one here that views this as a contest.
will you piss off and stop your pathetic and childish attempts to bully me and others now?
You are on a technical discussion forum. Someone giving you the correct facts isn't bullying, it's helping you. Your inability accept when you are wrong is part of your problem. Look at the Above, there was no "Except China", "Except Russia", "Except Europe", " Except the U.S."
If you stop trying to turn it into a pissing contest when you are wrong, the problem resolves itself.
Ah - another utterly pathetic nitpick on top of the denial. A least I'm not the only one you attempt to bully according to your posting history - but fuck - you must have been incredibly bored to waste time on all that petty harassment.
Endless projection on your part. Tell me are you ever going to correct your statements about the number of coal and nuclear power plants being built or are just going to endlessly deflect ?
Sure it's hardcore conservative. What the hell is your point ? 95%+ of CNNs political donations go Democrat. For most people that would make them Hardcore Lefty. Do you consider that an indictment of their service ?
Half the stories on that page are 'debunking' TMZ
If by half you mean 1/16 then yes. Now lets look at the point of the story which is these get started then don't go away Taking your example "TMZ Trump renames black history month" googling https://www.google.com/search?... We see ABC news repeating the fake story We see Salon repeating the fake story The Inquisitr, steveharvey. wbls, and a couple of fact checkers that get it wrong.
All off the first page without even trying.
So maybe you might want to open your mind a little, because as it stands you're guilty of the crimes you are projecting onto others.
The question is not "what's the cheapest way to get electricity for March 2017?
Well for most people it actually is. For people building the plants, the proper question is what is the best return on investment for building a plant in 2017 that will be retired in 2057 ?
By investing money now, we can save money down the line,
By making bad investments now we will save the cost of making good investments later ?
Well gee all I had were numbers and calculations you might be able, with a little simple math, to follow for yourself.
But please tell me how a power plant that costs more to build now and will not get any cheaper over it's lifecycle, will cost less than one that is likely to have it's costs decline over time ?
Without tax subsidies that expensive solar plant will not pay off against the coal plant. What's more that's from the Obama EIA which was trying to kill off the coal industry.
Hey next time how about doing a little background research for yourself.
Slashdot Mirror
First that's already a state by state issue. Your state may not have them, others certainly do.
Second it winds up just being an opportunity for voters in opposing parties to game the system. Many people think that Trump getting the nomination was due to Hillary's lock on the Democratic nomination providing opportunity for Democrats to vote for who they thought would be the worst Republican candidate.
You are aware we have for profit prisons ?
He is going to be doing something.
No reason to upgrade when there aren't going to be significant performance increases over 4 and 6 year old machines.
That's wonderful let me know when they are a European party, and that tidbit is actually relevant.
Thanks
Oh, so to disguise the taste, I have to flavor it with something else?
No thanks.
You're right man, this whole eating food cooked thing is a passing fad
So you don't know, you have no idea what you are talking about. But, GMO SCARY and everyone should think that.
Is that your position, or was there nuance I missed ?
Thanks I'll probably give it a try this week.
It's about the flavor.
So you win
You're the only one here that views this as a contest.
will you piss off and stop your pathetic and childish attempts to bully me and others now?
You are on a technical discussion forum. Someone giving you the correct facts isn't bullying, it's helping you. Your inability accept when you are wrong is part of your problem. Look at the Above, there was no "Except China", "Except Russia", "Except Europe", " Except the U.S."
If you stop trying to turn it into a pissing contest when you are wrong, the problem resolves itself.
It's the GMO rice with vitamin A precursors. Sounds like it should have a different taste than regular rice.
Ah - another utterly pathetic nitpick on top of the denial. A least I'm not the only one you attempt to bully according to your posting history - but fuck - you must have been incredibly bored to waste time on all that petty harassment.
Endless projection on your part. Tell me are you ever going to correct your statements about the number of coal and nuclear power plants being built or are just going to endlessly deflect ?
How is it more convenient than rice?
It doesn't taste like glue.
If your rice tastes like glue you are cooking it wrong. Try cooking it in stock or at least toss in a few bullion cubes.
And how do you cook it ?
Dude, that's a hardcore conservative website
Sure it's hardcore conservative. What the hell is your point ?
95%+ of CNNs political donations go Democrat. For most people that would make them Hardcore Lefty.
Do you consider that an indictment of their service ?
Half the stories on that page are 'debunking' TMZ
If by half you mean 1/16 then yes.
Now lets look at the point of the story which is these get started then don't go away
Taking your example "TMZ Trump renames black history month"
googling
https://www.google.com/search?...
We see ABC news repeating the fake story
We see Salon repeating the fake story
The Inquisitr, steveharvey. wbls, and a couple of fact checkers that get it wrong.
All off the first page without even trying.
So maybe you might want to open your mind a little, because as it stands you're guilty of the crimes you are projecting onto others.
That dishonest and blaming the person you've decided to follow around? No wonder you've got an empty life.
Well I can certainly agree you are dishonest and blaming person. Freudian slip or just need to confess ?
http://thefederalist.com/2017/...
Nicely documented and sourced. Somehow I doubt wikipedia will even bother to correct the bad dentires.
The question is not "what's the cheapest way to get electricity for March 2017?
Well for most people it actually is. For people building the plants, the proper question is what is the best return on investment for building a plant in 2017 that will be retired in 2057 ?
By investing money now, we can save money down the line,
By making bad investments now we will save the cost of making good investments later ?
What's your going rate for being an idiot ?
innumerate to the end
sigh x + x*z greater than (y+y*z)
The government loans out x dollars
The government provides x+y in tax subsidies
z (Y + y*z) ? No the government lost money.
Lets see if you can learn something.
Bullshit
Well gee all I had were numbers and calculations you might be able, with a little simple math, to follow for yourself.
But please tell me how a power plant that costs more to build now and will not get any cheaper over it's lifecycle, will cost less than one that is likely to have it's costs decline over time ?
Research aays the oaid shill... as he reprats the loe that Obama tried to kill off coal.
Do you have anything besides nearly incomprehensible ad hominem ?
Oh hell why not
https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/a...
Without tax subsidies that expensive solar plant will not pay off against the coal plant. What's more that's from the Obama EIA which was trying to kill off the coal industry.
Hey next time how about doing a little background research for yourself.