Slashdot Mirror


Spammer Faces Decades In Prison For Sending More Than 1 Million Spam Emails (suntimes.com)

mi quotes a report from Chicago Sun-Times: A man has been indicted on federal fraud charges for allegedly sending more than a million spam emails. The indictment charges 36-year-old Michael Persaud of Scottsdale, Arizona, with 10 counts of wire fraud and seeks the forfeiture of four computers, according to a statement from the U.S. attorney's office. The indictment was returned Dec. 9, 2016, and was unsealed after Persaud was arrested last month in Arizona. Between 2012 and 2015, Persaud used multiple IP addresses and domains to send spam emails over at least nine networks, including several servers in Chicago, according to the indictment. He sent more than a million spam emails to people in the U.S. and abroad, using false names to register domains and creating fraudulent "from address" fields to conceal the fact that he was the one sending the emails. Each count carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison.
mi leaves us with some rather unpleasant imagery, writing: "Personally, I wish [the sentence] carried removal of 1 square millimeter of skin for each message instead."

146 comments

  1. Good! by nospam007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A good beginning.

    1. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldn't agree more, congrats to the US Justice dept that nabbed the bastard

    2. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait!... You don't think the punishment may be a bit... draconian?!!! What is wrong with you people?

    3. Re:Good! by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now Mr. Persaud will get to enjoy the feeling of loads of unsolicited male in his inbox.

    4. Re:Good! by thegreatbob · · Score: 0

      Contextually relevant usernames are always in style :3

      --
      There is no XUL, only WebExtensions...
    5. Re:Good! by amiga3D · · Score: 2

      I was thinking the death penalty would be better. But I guess I can settle for life in prison for him.

    6. Re: Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sy what point is it too much? Frauding elderly people? Child porn? Scam products? Huh? That's what spam is.

      If its not spam, its legitimate advertising.

      Spam is spam because it's illegal. The source is concealed. The content is illegitimate. Viruses are distributed. Nothing good about spam.

    7. Re: Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I love to hate spam as much as the next guy. In fact I don't even like the actual spam, the meat sold in a can. Matter of fact, I agree that the bastard should spend some time in jail and I won't go and visit, but.... decades?!!! really!!!??? Outrageous!

    8. Re:Good! by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 5, Informative

      Wait!... You don't think the punishment may be a bit... draconian?!!! What is wrong with you people?

      The headline is inaccurate clickbait, which unfortunately, seems to be happening a lot more with Slashdot lately.

      That the maximum sentence based on the law - 10 counts of wire fraud of 20 years each. He's not going to be sentenced for 200, or even 20 years. Sentences anywhere from one to four years seems to be the norm for similar spam-related cases.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    9. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean outbox, right?

    10. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably also in the outbox too... the irony!

    11. Re:Good! by mmell · · Score: 1
      I'll settle for a pound of flesh - but with over a million victims, I don't think he'll have enough.

      OTOH, I'll miss having Cheri waiting for me. I need to have Cheri waiting for me!!

    12. Re:Good! by KiloByte · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You don't think the punishment may be a bit... draconian?!!!

      The numbers are the max allowed for that indictment, sentences that spammers get are a ridiculously low fraction of that.

      I do think spamming should be punished harsher than murder, as the cost for the society is greater. Somehow people underestimate the harm if it is spread among many people. Like: you build a coal power plant that reduces the lives of 100k people by a year each -- you've committed the equivalent of more than 1000 murders, yet don't even get a fine for that.

      On the other hand, I find the count of "more than 1 million spam emails" to be suspicious. A decade ago, spam response rate was 1 in 12.5M, and I'd expect it to be way lower today. A spammer doesn't spam "for the evulz", he spams because it is profitable. A billion mails per campaign is a low figure, and a spammer doesn't build the infrastructure for just a single run.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    13. Re: Good! by knightghost · · Score: 2

      The only thing outrageous about it is taking 4 years to do anything about it. 4 seconds would be acceptable.

    14. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, it's definitely his inbox now.

    15. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet when Aaron Schwarz faced jail time for a similarly brazen criminal act, in terms of sheer numbers of documents, people here were outraged at the thought that such a precious young man who traveled in top academic circles of computer science could be subject to the cruel realities of prison time.

      Then he killed himself and it was the fault of the prosecutors, or of MIT for recommending prosecution.

    16. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spam isn't even real.Trading years of his life over electrons. Making him broke and some shame is enough. They could sentence him to death and it won't deter spammers unless they actually start catching them regularly.

    17. Re:Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aaron Swartz was a fucking moron.

    18. Re:Good! by sjames · · Score: 1

      In practice, he won't get nearly the max and will be eligible for parole even sooner. Personally, I would be fine with a suspended sentence as long as he never sends or receives another email.

    19. Re:Good! by rtb61 · · Score: 0

      Spam is just spam. The sentence seems way over the top. Consider M$ spamming every single user of Windows anal probe 10, repeatedly, or spamming all windows 7 and 8 users to switch to spamsalot windows 10. Which is worse the M$ hack of all of it's customers including spying on all the internet communications, keylogging, listening, scanning the hardisk drive, monitoring and recording all software installs. M$ has repeatedly spammed all of it's regular users right on their desktop.

      So who is worse at this time M$ or this spammer, I can filter out the spammer and windows anal probe 10 users at completely and totally at the mercy of M$, right on their desktop, completely ublockable, and M$ has purposefully hacked network controls against the will of users to ensure they can push their crap past IP address blocks. What the spammer did pales in comparison to what M$ has done.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    20. Re:Good! by KiloByte · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Spam is just spam. The sentence seems way over the top.

      And murder is just murder. Making the society lose a few decades of life worth is as bad whether it's done by offing a single person or slightly inconveniencing a million. People tend to fail to recognize spammers as just as bad as murderers, just like they obsess about a plane crash that kills 100 while ignoring thousands who died in car crashes that day.

      I can filter out the spammer and windows anal probe 10 users at completely and totally at the mercy of M$, right on their desktop, completely ublockable

      Newsflash: you can block Windows anal probe 10 too, by keeping it away from your computer. And if you need to run that one program, or test whether your software works on Win 10, or whether your webpage is not mangled by Edge, make a small VM so Microsoft can't spy on anything but that single program.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    21. Re: Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No more parole for fed crimes.

    22. Re: Good! by backslashdot · · Score: 2

      No. Causing thousands of persons to waste a few minutes of their life is not the same as killing somebody! For one thing their is no individual subject to extreme suffering. Your mind is warped, emotion driven, and cruel if you think a murderer and a spammer deserve the same punishment. Hey reading your comment wasted a lot of people's time how are you going to compensate them? Should makers of bad movies be convicted of murder too? You are a sicko if you want people killed for spamming you.

    23. Re:Good! by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Experience shows that spammers tend to re-offend.

    24. Re: Good! by xenog · · Score: 1

      I agree, it is Draconian, something that Americans don't seem to have a problem with. Seizing his equipment and fining him should be enough. Let's also fix SMTP goddammit. It's getting ridiculous.

    25. Re: Good! by Imrik · · Score: 2

      The average human lives about 40 million minutes, killing a random person will reduce their life by 20 million on average. Wasting 20 million minutes of people's time is equivalent, on a societal level, to murder.

    26. Re:Good! by amacide · · Score: 1

      I do think spamming should be punished harsher than murder

      ... and that's where you stopped making sense... Sorry.

    27. Re: Good! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Because time is all there is, and wasted time scales linearly. Right.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    28. Re:Good! by sjames · · Score: 1

      That's why parole and probation officers exist. If he re-offends, that whole sentence comes down on him without the need for a new trial.

    29. Re: Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because time is all there is, and wasted time scales linearly. Right.

      Yes. The time of our life is the most important thing we have.

      Decades for these lowlifes is entirely appropriate and if you happen to be one of these lowlifes then I do hope you get your just deserts.

      Actually, I'm surprised that no spammers appear to have been murdered by some deranged vigilante.

      I'm disappointed by the fact that law enforcement hasn't dealt with the relatively small number of spammers (spammers have an impact out of all proportion to their numbers) as it would be possible to get rid of most of them fairly quickly. A lot of people think they're inevitable and it's just not true.

    30. Re:Good! by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Wonder what sharia law would give him. Stoning to death, maybe the 4 years and 1000 lashes would work. Hanging is more western I think. Keelhaul would work too.

    31. Re: Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes raping people obviously carries a lot lighter sentence ... All about the severity of the crime huh?

    32. Re: Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "... completely and totally at the mercy of M$, right on their desktop, completely ublockable, ..."

      Or is it? At any rate blocking it may be illegal hmmm...

    33. Re: Good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think he (Aron Schwartz) was spamming anybody...

    34. Re: Good! by x_t0ken_407 · · Score: 1

      No. Causing thousands of persons to waste a few minutes of their life is not the same as killing somebody! For one thing their is no individual subject to extreme suffering. Your mind is warped, emotion driven, and cruel if you think a murderer and a spammer deserve the same punishment. Hey reading your comment wasted a lot of people's time how are you going to compensate them? Should makers of bad movies be convicted of murder too? You are a sicko if you want people killed for spamming you.

      I'm at a loss as to how GP is even arguing this with a straight face. Really? The taking of someone's life is the equivalent of spamming tf out of millions of people? We are so fucked, as a species.

  2. Maybe I'm getting old... by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 0

    15 years ago I probably would have been cheering this, but nowadays, a million emails is a drop in the ocean. Prison time for sending a million spam emails is fucking stupid, especially the potential of decades in prison. Seize his equipment, make "no more spamming" a condition of his probation, and if he fucks that up, then look at incarceration.

    --
    "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
    1. Re:Maybe I'm getting old... by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 2

      Consider how much life this man was wasted... probably in the aggregate several lifetimes... his sentence should roughly equal the number human hours he has wasted.

    2. Re:Maybe I'm getting old... by lazy+genes · · Score: 0

      I think they should cut off one or two of his fingers. That should slow him down.

    3. Re:Maybe I'm getting old... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      his sentence should roughly equal the number human hours he has wasted.

      No it shouldn't. The "lock em' up" mentality is why America has more than four times the incarceration rate of either China or Russia, and an even more disproportionate rate compared to almost any other country. Prison should be used to isolate irredeemably violent people from civilized society. For everyone else, there are better alternative punishments. For instance, this guy could be sentenced to spend 60 hours per week cleaning bedpans at a nursing home for the next 10 years, or some other suitable punishment where he can contribute to society rather than being a drain.

    4. Re:Maybe I'm getting old... by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      1 million is such a small number these days.

      Assuming it takes on average 10 seconds to identify and delete the email; some people are slower, the average slashdot user is faster, that's 116 days the guy wasted. Nice try though.

    5. Re:Maybe I'm getting old... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > spend 60 hours per week cleaning bedpans at a nursing home for the next 10 years

      Fantastic idea. The for profit prison industry would object, of course, but you've got my vote.

    6. Re: Maybe I'm getting old... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And who pays for his survival while he is doing his good deeds. You are clueless as the rest.

    7. Re: Maybe I'm getting old... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Took him a few years to do it. And no, it's not. Think just a little bit. From acquisition of emails, networks and servers compromised to send, and what he is selling and that setup.

      Geez, everyone thinks like simpleton these days. Oh its easy. Like you know. You don't. You have never done it. And clearly never thought through it.

      And armchair idiot like the rest.

    8. Re:Maybe I'm getting old... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm 100% with you both on this. The ease with which people are ready to send someone to prison with these insane sentences, baffles the mind. It is disgusting how all the brain washing and cool aid drinking has created a generational breed of retards. But hey, who am I to argue with evolution. Behold the successor of homo sapiens, home retardicus.

      You have to be really operated in your brain to not see that this is a for profit industry, the prison complex. What you probably don't know is who's paying for this. That is all of us that pay taxes... wait!! I should have thought this more thoroughly... you should have known that. Which brings me to the conclusion regarding evolution above mentioned.

      I'll make it easy through the formula for those of you more evolved.

      PI = prison industry
      PD = paid dough
      PB = poor bastard, the one going to the slammer
      TP = tax payer
      SF = stupidity factor
      POCF = pissed off citizenry factor

      This is like a chemical reaction formula not a math formula

      TP - PD => PI + PD
      SF ~= PD, that is SF is directly proportional to PD, which is to say the more SF the more PD goes to the other side of the equation

      The above reaction gives off POCF which is somewhat directly proportional to SF, which is to say the more SF added as catalyst, the more POCF we would observe.

      There you have it folks, so the more people we put in jail unjustly, the happier the psycho fat cats will be, and the more pissed off the rest of the humane beings might be.

      I'm really pissed off this has been going on for so long, putting people in jail for too long sentences for retarded reasons. Keep up the good work.

      As you can see, D changes to the other side of the equation

    9. Re:Maybe I'm getting old... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forgot to add that PB is left out on purpose, because PB doesn't matter and he/she never enters the equation, so for the sake of the equation is negligible.

    10. Re:Maybe I'm getting old... by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

      You are aware we have for profit prisons ?
      He is going to be doing something.

    11. Re:Maybe I'm getting old... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prison numbers have been driven by minimum mandatory sentences for drug offenses since the 90's, not a "lock 'em up" mentality.

    12. Re: Maybe I'm getting old... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I kind of like 15 years to make an example of him.

      Maybe I am spe ulating, but I bet there are motherfuckers right here and reading the comments on this forum whose anuses clenched up at the thought of 15 years for a million spams. MFs who immediately thought "that could be me! I've spammed a million pieces just in this month, so far."

      We badly need said motherfuckers to CLENCH UP TIGHT.

      Yes, I mean YOU, asshole.

    13. Re: Maybe I'm getting old... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What?

    14. Re: Maybe I'm getting old... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you care to write in such a way for us to know the idea you were thinking when you wrote your message? I mean so we can understand what thought you were trying to convey?

    15. Re: Maybe I'm getting old... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And who pays for his survival while he is doing his good deeds. You are clueless as the rest.

      The same people who pay for his survival while he is sitting in a cell, you numpty fuck.

    16. Re: Maybe I'm getting old... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excessive and inhumane. US has become a parody of of a justice system. Another reason it is not a safe place.

    17. Re: Maybe I'm getting old... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And who pays for his survival while he is doing his good deeds. You are clueless as the rest.

      The money that would otherwise be spent paying for his living expenses for the next 20 years.

    18. Re:Maybe I'm getting old... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading comprehension. Bill's objection was about locking people up in prison for non-violent crimes, not about prisoners being unproductive.

    19. Re:Maybe I'm getting old... by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Prison numbers have been driven by minimum mandatory sentences for drug offenses since the 90's, not a "lock 'em up" mentality.

      It's the same thing

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    20. Re:Maybe I'm getting old... by JeffOwl · · Score: 1

      Yeah? And what about when he doesn't report to his "job?" Then what? He still hasn't done anything violent, so we still apparently shouldn't put him in jail.

    21. Re: Maybe I'm getting old... by ruir · · Score: 1

      Tell the other prisoners he was spamming them...He will be very popular.

    22. Re: Maybe I'm getting old... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. I mean just... wow.

    23. Re:Maybe I'm getting old... by minstrelmike · · Score: 1

      That's what I was thinking. A million emails is what percentage of the current number of spams? Maybe .000000000000000000000001%

    24. Re:Maybe I'm getting old... by Shalhav · · Score: 1

      Do they offer remedial arithmetic in your city?

    25. Re:Maybe I'm getting old... by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately the remaining US spammers are hardcore recidivists who have repeatedly demonstrated that once released they will continue their activities as soon as they think they can get away with it.

      Many already have a number of other convictions for assorted white collar and violent crimes by the time they're apprehended for spamming and virtually all think they have a god-given right to spam and that the authorities are impeding their rights to free speech (the idea of tresspass to chattels and "free speech ends at the mailserver operator's private system" slide off like water off a duck's back)

      Look at Sanford Wallace. He never actually stopped spamming despite the claims, just got better at covering his tracks.

      i mentioned trespass to chattels and the "free speech" aspects because the first was what was eventually used to secure his first conviction for spamming and the second (along with tortuious interference with contracts) was what he attempted to use in lawsuits to force operators to stop blocking his email - these arguments fell flat on their face in court (thankfully), however a a result he pioneered spamming vis other people's mailservers (relaying attacks) and directly cost many people and companies worldwide hundreds of millions of dollars in excess bandwidth fees precipitating the inevitable locking down and balkanisation of the Internet that's been happening ever since. (Disclosure: Sanford cost me $5000 in one month alone with the total losses in excess of $50k over a 2 year period before email systems with the ability to prevent unauthorised relaying were deployable. I'd quite happily repeatedly bang his gonads between a couple of housebricks for a few days)

      Yes, the "lock-em-up" mentality is a problem (it's primarily a systematic way of disenfranchising substantial portions of the population from voting rights - something that the UNCHR has repeatedly ruled is a rights breach, but the US continues to ignore) , however in the case of recidivist sociopaths (and they are invariably sociopaths), there are strong arguments in favour of doing so in order to prevent their economic crimewave from ever resuming. The sheer scale of economic damage that these criminals can inflict, distributed across the Internet is sufficient justification for doing so. (back in 2001, AT&T were forced to spend $60million for an emergency server buildout to cope with ONE spam attack. This isn't "a few cents here and a few cents there" - and in any case that kind of distributed economic crime has previously been punished quite severely by US courts in the past.)

  3. As much as I loathe spammers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    the punishment is a way too excessive.
    Locking people up and throwing away the keys like this should be reserved for murderers, rapists, arsonists, robbers, burglars, politicians, Madoff types, and maybe a handful of others.
    This is just wasting jail space, costing us money, and destroying lives.

    1. Re:As much as I loathe spammers... by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      No, it's not. I'm thinking it's a little light.

    2. Re:As much as I loathe spammers... by ClickOnThis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      the punishment is a way too excessive.
      Locking people up and throwing away the keys like this should be reserved for murderers, rapists, arsonists, robbers, burglars, politicians, Madoff types, and maybe a handful of others.
      This is just wasting jail space, costing us money, and destroying lives.

      TFA is quite light on details, and let's remind ourselves that the trial hasn't happened yet. Nevertheless, he may very well be a "Madoff-type." If the defendant was complicit in perpetrating (e-)mail fraud, with the result that people were bilked out of money, then hard time is appropriate.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    3. Re:As much as I loathe spammers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, it's not. spammers are the one category of criminal i would allow capital punishment for.

    4. Re: As much as I loathe spammers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For what amounts to wasting time? I want him punished too, but I want it to be proportional. What on earth is wrong with you? See a fucking therapist, why are you so vindictive. May many ex criminals live in your neighborhood, I'm sure they're all nicely rehabilitated.

    5. Re: As much as I loathe spammers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not wasting time. Wasting resources like electricity, disk space, and the man-hours of the people who manage email servers. I hope they kill him in prison.

    6. Re:As much as I loathe spammers... by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      Considering the overall scale of the economic crime of spamming, hard time is justified anyway.

        In order to even _make_ the radar of enforcement authorities a spammer needs to be churning out billions of messages per day - which equates to distributed damage totals of tens of millions of dollars per year, with occasional spikes in damages when the scale of the attack overwhelms individual systems.

      Wire fraud charges for anything related to what the spammer is peddling are simply a bonus. - As an accomplice to (and beneficiary of) the criminal enterprise, there are joint culpability statutes already on the books that cover this even if the spammer is "only sending the email".

  4. 200 years in prison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Compare to the roving pack of Muzzies that participated in the marathon rape of the mother of two in Sweden. Her anus and vagina were so badly broken she wasn't able to walk at the trial and was confined to a wheelchair. Throughout the trial she had to excuse herself frequently to go vomit. They found a dozen men's sperm in her vagina and anus.

    They got a few months each. Sort of puts this "spam" stuff into perspective.

    1. Re:200 years in prison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well one of Toronto's major newspapers, The Globe and Mail says it never happened and it's just the Swedish government misreporting numbers.

      The reality is the the entire Canadian media industry has their heads so far up the asses of the first muslims they can find they're al practically halal. The muslims already own Canada and if Trump did have any brains he'd be more worried about building a wall on his norther border.

    2. Re: 200 years in prison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should have cut off ALL their dicks, composted them, and used the compost to grow whatever vegetation pigs like most to eat. Fed it to the pigs and donated the bacon from the pigs to a Syrian orphanage.

  5. Email is nearly useless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    die to the amount of spam. My company has given up on it. We're a Microsoft supplier and they support spam so they hate us.

    1. Re: Email is nearly useless... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know we've given up on spam since we use Exhange and receive over ten k messages per day per employee. Microsoft has ruined email which I think was their plan.

  6. Alternative to prison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Offer the guy gender reassignment surgery.

    1. Re: Alternative to prison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without anaesthetic?

    2. Re: Alternative to prison? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Without gender.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  7. Re:What's so unpleasant about this imagery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I don't like spammers either, but you need professional psychiatric help as soon as possible, seriously, you've lost touch with your humanity.

  8. Not yet by a long shot. by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

    He was arrested and is out on bond, it's a long way from a conviction. And, Thailand might be looking good to him right now.

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re: Not yet by a long shot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's Muslim, no way that let him keep his passport.

    2. Re: Not yet by a long shot. by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      He's Muslim, no way that let him keep his passport.

      That makes it an act of terrorism, right?

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    3. Re:Not yet by a long shot. by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      I do hope he does bolt to Thailand.

      Thai police don't bother with extradition proceedings for wanted criminals, production of a flight warrant is more than enough to find him on a plane back to the USA within hours - and thanks to anally raping bandwith charges SE Asians generally _hate_ spammers even more than North Americans do.

  9. Re:What's so unpleasant about this imagery? by rmdingler · · Score: 1
    Pretty great post, but when you started lumping murderers in with prolific spammers you lost me...

    Come on now, bro, all the one guy did was kill someone.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  10. while in prison... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    While in prison, he should be given a diet of nothing but a certain fine Hormel product.

    Just sayin'.

    1. Re: while in prison... by mmell · · Score: 1

      HEY! I happen to like Hormel's gelatinous pink meat product, you insensitive clod!

  11. Line Copyright Infringement by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    10 counts?

    If he sent 1 million fraudulent emails, why isn't it 1 million counts?

    1. Re:Line Copyright Infringement by arth1 · · Score: 1

      10 counts?

      If he sent 1 million fraudulent emails, why isn't it 1 million counts?

      Proving one million counts would take longer than the rest of his life, and in the mean time he would be out on bail, racking up legal fees that nobody will ever pay while lawyers argued each and every case.

    2. Re:Line Copyright Infringement by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      If it was 1 million counts, he would NOT be out on bail.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
  12. Re:What's so unpleasant about this imagery? by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    OK, I don't like spammers any more than anyone else does, but this "mi" person is just making the news industry look bad with this type of evil bias.

    I don't ever want to hear Trump say that he hates how biased Slashdot is....

  13. Why I support spam and you should too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spam is the consequence of truly free system. To accept criminalizing of it is to accept a system that supports violence and totalitarianism. Nobody should have the power to dictate what you do outside of violence, theft, fraud, and coercion (threat of violence). Sending spam is none of these things and those who receive it even have a means of hindering it which is all the more of a reason for government to stay the heck out. When we let government in we end up with laws that get used for other purposes against completely peaceful people in ways we never anticipated. They get used against political activists for instance.

    I have a great example of this involving child porn legislation. Outlawing child porn sounds like a great idea. At least if you blindly follow the argument child porn leads to child rape (which just isn't true, and there is as much evidence pointing in the other direction, but never mind that). The problem is these laws are used to persecute mostly innocent people from activists to children. The majority of people on the sex offender lists have never harmed another human being. They make up children on children sex (and children can't consent legally so... guess what that 17 year old raped that 13 year old despite the 13 year old lying about her age), non-sex "sex" crimes involving drunk college students pissing in garbage cans that happen to be next to playgrounds at 2AM, and paedophiles downloading child porn (ie not child rapists).

    Ian Freeman whose one of the leading public figures in the libertarian activist community and whom has the largest radio show airing on hundreds of stations and around the world via satellite was targeted by the FBI via child porn laws. The FBI used the fact an internet connection for an activist center, business, and multiple apartments were in his name to raid his studio (Free Talk Live) and steal / shut down his radio program- and smear his reputation publicly. No arrests were ever made and the raid occurred just two weeks after a co-host attacked the FBI for being hypocritical in that they were *distributing* child porn while making the argument that distribution is equivalent to child rape. Hundreds of people had access to this internet connection and they stole a few dozen electronic devices of his, his business, his business colleagues, and some of his tenants. It's unlikely that anybody ever actually access child porn via the connection- but that doesn't mean anybody will ever get back their computers and the FBI knows the damage has already been done. This is the danger of such laws.

    No- I don't like receiving spam- but I will accept it as a pro-proponent for a free society.
    http://freekeene.com/2016/03/22/free-talk-lives-press-release-about-fbi-raid/

    1. Re:Why I support spam and you should too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They nailed him on fraud - wire fraud.

    2. Re: Why I support spam and you should too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Look everyone. We have a child rapist. Pedophile here. Now cut his throat.

    3. Re: Why I support spam and you should too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You screwed up. Somehow, your caps-lock key disengaged while you were blatting out that wall of text.

    4. Re:Why I support spam and you should too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're one of those assholes who think "freedom" means "let's all move to one town and run off all the people who live currently there". FOAD.

  14. His punishment should consist of reading emails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He will receive a continual stream of email. When he clicks on the "I learned my lesson" link in the proper official email he can go free. However, his email address will be public and I suppose people might send him email with fake links. Or long email, or malware that tries to destroy his mailbox. Gee it might take a while...

    1. Re:His punishment should consist of reading emails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point. Cannot be considered "cruel and unusual punishment" because 1) the courts always require you to read and acknowledge all their correspondence, 2) there is always more correspondence/paperwork than seems necessary or possible, and 3) the lawyers are always sneaking in loopholes and sly phrasings so you have to scrutinize the work.

  15. Re:What's so unpleasant about this imagery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't ever want to hear Trump

    FTFY

  16. Follow the MONEY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Who was paying this guy?
    That's who should be locked up.
    BUT
    That will never happen.
    They will just find another stooge to do their dirty work.

  17. Re:What's so unpleasant about this imagery? by Archfeld · · Score: 0

    "...After eight years of being racist, dissent is patriotic once again..."

    Dissent was never patriotic, it was just accepted as a by product of freedom. Now however PC hypocrisy seems to override all things.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  18. I just don't believe this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where I work, the average employee receives nearly two hundred thousand spam messages per day. Email is just useless because of that. I doubt that the government would put a stop to something that so many people abuse.

    1. Re:I just don't believe this by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Where I work, the average employee receives nearly two hundred thousand spam messages per day.

      Something is off -- I'm on many public mailing lists, git logs and so on, yet I see ~600 rejects per day, and my email server has a few other users. So either your company is a juicy target for a specific kind of fraud, or your number was obtained by scientific rectal extraction.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    2. Re:I just don't believe this by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      $orkplace (a university department) has 250 staff and 4 years ago we were rejecting 200-500 delivery attempts PER MINUTE due to DNSBL hits (it was 10 times higher than that before I allowed the sennders to get to RCPT TO stage. so I believe this number is valid). Compare and contrast with total legitimate email volume of around 10,000 messages per day (in and out).

      Email is now centralised and farmed out. I understand the central servers are seeing upwards of 3 million DNSBL rejects per day, with the Baysian filters catching another million or so.

      Email addresses I've had for 20+ years are completely useless due to spamload. The moment I make the MX valid, crud starts pouring in - and that's despite the fact that most haven't been used since the turn of the century.

  19. Re: What's so unpleasant about this imagery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of us grow up to learn that the viciousness you embrace is itself a burden.

  20. As many as 200 billion spam emails every day. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A million emails is an incredibly small number. I've heard varying amounts of spam are sent everyday. Anywhere from 50 million to 200 billion.

    Rather than put this guy in jail, I'd slap him with anywhere from a $10,000 to $100,000 fine.

  21. "They got..." by mmell · · Score: 1

    How'd you get away?

  22. Re:What's so unpleasant about this imagery? by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

    Dissent was never patriotic, it was just accepted as a by product of freedom. Now however PC hypocrisy seems to override all things.

    The cry has been that when war is declared, all opposition should therefore be hushed. A sentiment more unworthy of a free country could hardly be propagated. If the doctrine be admitted, rulers have only to declare war and they are screened at once from scrutiny In war, then, as in peace, assert the freedom of speech and of the press. Cling to this as the bulwark of all our rights and privileges. - William Ellery Channing (1780-1842)

    If dissent at a time of war is to be ennobled as a principle of democracy, then surely dissent at a time of peace deserves the same treatment.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  23. hack services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am Andrew Alan a hacker who has built a very good reputation and undeniably one of the best hackers you can come across.i have got access to hack into any account and also get to generate passwords for accounts like Facebook,Instagram,Twitter,gmail,yahoo mail,whats-app,we-chat,etc..I also have logins for bank like BOA,welsfargo,chase,credit union,capital one, and many other different banks for transfers and credit card top ups,Retrieving hacked social media accounts,clearing criminal records,increase credit scores,CC hack,hacking computer systems,Website hack,Catch hacker scammers,Phishing emails, that's to mention a few ... You can contact me on.......... andrewalanhacks@gmail.com or via text on +13238351741

    1. Re:hack services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I am Andrew Alan. He's fake.

  24. I just don't believe the OP by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

    Where I work, the average employee receives nearly two hundred thousand spam messages per day.

    Something is off -- I'm on many public mailing lists, git logs and so on, yet I see ~600 rejects per day, and my email server has a few other users. So either your company is a juicy target for a specific kind of fraud, or your number was obtained by scientific rectal extraction.

    This. OP is prevaricating. Nobody experiences spamming on an individual basis with that frequency.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    1. Re:I just don't believe the OP by DamonHD · · Score: 1

      Whenever I count I see 10,000 SPAM attempts per day at one mail server that would otherwise reach me.

      Rgds

      Damon

      --
      http://m.earth.org.uk/
    2. Re:I just don't believe the OP by amacide · · Score: 0

      I see 10,000 SPAM attempts per day

      LOL *yawn*

    3. Re:I just don't believe the OP by DamonHD · · Score: 0

      This contributes to meaningful debate how?

      Are you saying that I *don't* get that many SPAM attempts or that you get many more, or that I should count your post as troll/SPAM and make is 10,001 for today?

      Damon

      --
      http://m.earth.org.uk/
  25. Time for waterboarding by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Only question to ask: Who paid you?

    Then recourse.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  26. We traded spam for invasion of privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone hates spam. Corporations were also tired of ineffective ad campaigns. The solution: find Out what people are interested in by tracking them. It cuts down on spam but a Faustian deal if you ask me.

  27. Happy time in prison by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 1

    You low-life bastard.

  28. Mod IDIOT parent CONSERVATARD down! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, bro, but ur off base. Trump STOLE the election because Hilary was hacked by the Russians. What part about that do you not get? All I see you post is ur "conspiracy theory" opinion on every little thing she might have done wrong. But in essence, your theories are all wrong. That's why you were modded down once and while you will be modded down again. Have a good day.

  29. Fuck you white americans. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Throwing a man in prison for emails.

    You also ban men from marrying cute young girls (something that God (not jesus) allows).

    scum.

  30. Newsflash: the election is over by raymorris · · Score: 2

    The election is over. The criminal slimeball you have a hard-on for lost, so you can be happy now. Hillary is no longer relevant.

    Unfortunately, in the process of Hillary losing, Trump won. That sucks but oh well. He's done a couple good things, maybe he'll do more. Anyway, the election is over and he's President for the next four years.

    In three years it'll be time to talk about candidates again. Hopefully we'll have a good one. Until then, let's talk about news for nerds, stuff that matters.

  31. you get 20 years for murder, not spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The maximum sentences are much too harsh.

  32. I don't get US sentencing... by Morpeth · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A privileged college students gets caught in the act (by two other students) raping an unconscious woman, and gets out in what, 3 months? Spammers are annoying obviously, but decades for that...? I just don't get it.

    --

    'The unexamined life is not worth living' - Socrates
    1. Re:I don't get US sentencing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent....I hope they rape in the ass exactly how many times the number of spams he sent.

    2. Re:I don't get US sentencing... by Morpeth · · Score: 1

      "Excellent" That a rapist gets 3 months and a spammer gets decades? I don't get the logic

      --

      'The unexamined life is not worth living' - Socrates
    3. Re:I don't get US sentencing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent they jail those idiots for good. One less scum out here.

    4. Re:I don't get US sentencing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've answered your own question. As you pointed out, the rapist was a member of the privileged classes, his victim was not.

      The spammer is likely not a member of any privileged class, but likely somehow angered a member of the privileged class. U.S. cops would never have lifted a finger to investigate a spammer if it wasn't for someone from the ruling classes telling them to.

      The U.S. may pretend to be a free and democratic society, but it is no where near one. The U.S. is an oligarchy that just knows how to put on a good show.

  33. 1 million?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1 million? That's literally nothing in the context. It sounds more like what would be sent in ONE SMALL TEST BATCH before they actually started to do that each DAY, counting LOW... What am I missing? (Serious question.)

  34. Decades? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously? Decades? People are getting less for murder and rape ...

    1. Re:Decades? by Morpeth · · Score: 1

      yep, like this piece of shit http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/02/...

      --

      'The unexamined life is not worth living' - Socrates
  35. Re: !Good by ferret4 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's funny 'cause it's rape!

  36. Oh, come now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is exactly what the cat-o-nine-tails was made for.

  37. Decades is a bit excessive by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    People who pull off Ponzi schemes rarely spend that much time in prison. Why would a spammer have to? Usually the people behind the Ponzi schemes do very well for themselves financially before being caught, while the spammers are generally eking out an upper-middle-class existence.

    Don't get me wrong, I don't have much pity for the spammers but I don't see justification in grave prison sentences for them either.

    If we really want to say we believe in criminal rehabilitation, this is a prime opportunity for it. The spammers could work to right the wrongs they committed. They could be put to work developing better tools to stop spam - and not just more lousy filters. This guy got into spam for the money, have him show how the money moves so that the government and NGOs can work to reduce the profit margin of spamming. When it ceases to be profitable, the volume will crash as it won't be worth the effort for most spammers.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  38. so 6 months for 20 seconds, or 20 years? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So a guy who rapes a drunk woman by a dumpster gets 6 months, and what amounts to 20 seconds of spam gets a person 20+ years...what????

    1. Re:so 6 months for 20 seconds, or 20 years? by Morpeth · · Score: 1

      I made the same comment above, there seems to be no rhyme or reason to how people are sentenced in the US.

      By the way, the drunk woman was actually unconscious, and the guy was caught in the act by 2 other students --- how that equates with only 6 months (he got let out in 3 actually) is beyond me.

      --

      'The unexamined life is not worth living' - Socrates
  39. Proper sentence by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1
    --
    I've got better things to do tonight than die.
  40. sanford wallace by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

    sanford wallace

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanford_Wallace

    got 2 1/2 years for a decade of spamming has maybe over a billion dollars in fines/previous lawsuits over the years. a true human scum bag. but the guy from this artiels is scum also but a flea in a sea of spammers.

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
  41. What are the exact charges? by pjv936 · · Score: 0

    Is it against the law to send advertisement in the mail? Or is he being charge for using forge instruments like fake driver licenses and debit cards?

    1. Re:What are the exact charges? by ruir · · Score: 1

      Are you a fucking low life spammer too? So it seems...

  42. F this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So we received some spam from this guy and now have to pay for him staying in jail for decades? WTF? Sentence to some public works cleaning roadkill. Fine bastard but sentencing to decades is effing stupid.

  43. He owes me over $4M as a result of spamming me. by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1

    I obtained a $3.9M million judgment against him back in 2015. I identified over 5,000 e-mails transmitted by him using domain names obtained by fraud from NameCheap. That does not include e-mails using e-mails utilizing other domain name registrars.

    I suspect that the number of spam identified by the FBI / DOJ is based upon the hosting providers that were identified in the indictment. I suspect that Persaud used IP space that was from registrars outside the USA to send spam that were not addressed by the current indictment.

    Maybe the prosecutors thought that 10 counts at 20 years each is sufficient. If he gets 200 years, why do the extra work?

    1. Re:He owes me over $4M as a result of spamming me. by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

      Question since you have a judgement against him why are you not making his life a living hell taking everything he owns? unless hes living in his parent basement lol wage garnishments? and so on. seems having a judgement means not much just look at spamford Wallace, billions plus in fines and judgements plus i don't see on your site a final result in your dealing with "e360Insight and Bargain"

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    2. Re:He owes me over $4M as a result of spamming me. by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1

      It is a matter of finding the assets and not to stepping on the toes of the FBI.

      All I can say about e360Insight is that it has been resolved to our mutual satisfaction.

  44. Re:What's so unpleasant about this imagery? by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    A truer measure of freedom of speech and democracy would be harder to find than the ability to criticize publicly the policies and actions of a government. I may not agree with your point of view but I will defend your right to voice it.

    I was responding to Mir's sig file specifically but your comments are spot on.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  45. Re:What's so unpleasant about this imagery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What humanity? I hope they rape in the ass one million times till he drops dead.

  46. Just 1 million? by ForexShakes · · Score: 1

    I wish they gave a ballpark figure. Because 1 million seems quite low over 3 years. As someone I know used send 1 million SMS messages a day..

  47. Punishment is incorrect... by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

    I would prefer that the punishment be an opportunity for any recipient of any of the mail messages sent be allowed to literally give the jackass an electric shock, each varying in intensity to keep him from becoming accustomed to the shock.

    I was initially thinking each person be allowed a punch to jackass' face or gut, but damage may occur and that's unfair ;)

    No, I'm not joking. I wish fucking asshats like this paid for their "gains" in equal pain and suffering for all combined, unwilling recipients.

    Hey, severe punishment is used in other countries and we're seen in the USA to be "too civilized" to resort to such measures. On the other hand, the ones that wish to commit crimes know that they're doing so in a manner where the outcome won't be unimaginable and ruin them for life. I should shut up. I'll just summarize it with "I wish I were allowed to be on the appeals jury because you KNOW that's coming."