"Most abundant energy source"? Nope. Solar energy is far more abundant [mpoweruk.com] and will still be here even if we (foolishly) burn every ounce of coal from the ground.
Hows that go at night ?
Why would we do such an idiotic thing? Natural gas plants currently make a lot more economic sense and while not clean are certainly cleaner than coal plants
Really think that will be the case over the lifetime of a power plant ?
Why are you following me around? Is your life that empty?
How is it a nobody like you comes to be a paranoid megalomaniac ?
Anyway I see you are trying to derail so either come up with some data to make your case or at least apologize to the OP about trying to pass shit off to him.
Now can you just piss off and stop following me around while we get back to why the above poster is not getting a nuke plant in their state, the one next door or even the same continent?
LOL sure go grab some facts it will be a nice change of pace. I just gave you a feed straight from the horse's mouth , you could try assimilating them.
Or the way we now burn fossil fuels to include ethanol in gasoline ?
At some point solar may be the best, and when that happens there will be no stopping it, or maybe it won't. Going nuts before there is an actual advantage with power plants that don't compete on their own is stupid.
Nobody is putting money into coal because the risk of insane regulation is too high. You don't want to have a 40 year investment killed in year 10 because some fanatic at the EPA faked data.
As for nuclear try again one we just had one go live
The U.S. has the largest coal reserves on the planet it's our cheapest and most abundant energy source. If anything we should be building more coal plants instead of trying to drop our economic growth to zero and surrender comparative advantage.
Sorry if there are more than X cabs the profitability of adding an additional delta X goes down at some point it stops being profitable for people to be cabbies which btw would be influenced by how rapidly the cabs can get around. Then there is the fact that having more readily available and cheaper taxi cabs limits the desirability of using your own vehicle.
The fact there are optimum flow levels hardly means a city government is better than the continuous calculations of the actual flow network in determining how to allocate the resources.
Because god fucking forbid I take a ride in a car and don't have to worry that the driver is a rapist or murderer.
Or that I stay in a place that isn't a fire prone death trap.
Or that people make a living wage doing what they're doing, so they don't have to starve in the damn street or die of a preventable illness.
Fucking government, making rules and shit to protect people, even though most people aren't violently killed by the very things they're trying to prevent.
Or god forbid you ever grow up and take responsibility for yourself. The government isn't your mommy and it isn't your daddy and stop acting like it's a security blanket.
Of course that means the FBI has be able to host the files on the server, and has to have sufficient control to deliver a uniquely keyed file to the users they wish to target. Sort of implies you have hit a honeypot if they get you with that.
So it's OK for you to post a lot of comments but not OK for others? Get that head looked at kid.
Looks up at thread. The whole thing about needling someone is you need to be at least a little right.
Given your level of reaction and effort to flail out at me, it appears I went quite deep under your skin.
You might want to take some time off the internet at least until you can either improve your reaction to people telling you that you are wrong, or until you are able to confine your comments to subjects you are actually knowledgeable about, or at least those you are not obviously ignorant on.
Those links say one thing - you wrote something completely and utterly different as you well know and just attempted to cowardly hide behind the reputation of others. Maybe you should get that problem fixed?
Projecting yet more. How many people came on this thread and told you, you were wrong.
Slashdot Mirror
"Most abundant energy source"? Nope. Solar energy is far more abundant [mpoweruk.com] and will still be here even if we (foolishly) burn every ounce of coal from the ground.
Hows that go at night ?
Why would we do such an idiotic thing? Natural gas plants currently make a lot more economic sense and while not clean are certainly cleaner than coal plants
Really think that will be the case over the lifetime of a power plant ?
Why are you following me around?
Is your life that empty?
How is it a nobody like you comes to be a paranoid megalomaniac ?
Anyway I see you are trying to derail so either come up with some data to make your case or at least apologize to the OP about trying to pass shit off to him.
That's a levelized cost and it doesn't say what you are claiming it does.
Try reading the before Tax Credit column. Then take into consideration that Geothermal and Hydro can't supply the power coal can.
That although coal is stupid and uneconomic,
Here let me play that game, "Alternative energy is always better so we should shut down everything else right now"
The point is solar and wind are wasteful and misinvestments and likely to be so for a long time yet to come.
Now can you just piss off and stop following me around while we get back to why the above poster is not getting a nuke plant in their state, the one next door or even the same continent?
LOL sure go grab some facts it will be a nice change of pace. I just gave you a feed straight from the horse's mouth , you could try assimilating them.
Hardly a strawman, evidence of past misdeeds and a willingness to distort the facts on the part of the environmental lobby.
Once again why is it important to invest in deploying technologies that will never pay off ?
Start *
* Latest announced year of proposed commercial operation
It really does help to read the fiddly bits.
Matter of fact if you were clever enough to follow the links
http://www.world-nuclear.org/i...
You would see the number of "PLANNED OR ON ORDER" is actually 160 nuclear reactors
That's one hell of a lot for something no one is building, according to you.
Nuclear power capacity worldwide is increasing steadily, with over 60 reactors under construction in 15 countries.
Over 60 power reactors are currently being constructed in 13 countries plus Taiwan (see Table below), notably China, South Korea, UAE and Russia
Ho hum ho hum.Maybe you shouldn't try searching before speaking. You do need to comprehend the results after all.
You mean the way biofuels were the way to the future ?
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/0...
Or the way we now burn fossil fuels to include ethanol in gasoline ?
At some point solar may be the best, and when that happens there will be no stopping it, or maybe it won't. Going nuts before there is an actual advantage with power plants that don't compete on their own is stupid.
Correct I should have stably priced over the long term.
P.S. Really at least hit the wikipedia or something before you say shit like that.
I mean were you just hoping that nobody knew nuclear power plants were built ?
Facepalm.
Nobody is putting money into coal because the risk of insane regulation is too high. You don't want to have a 40 year investment killed in year 10 because some fanatic at the EPA faked data.
As for nuclear try again one we just had one go live
https://www.washingtonpost.com...
There's 60 reactors under construction worldwide
http://www.world-nuclear.org/i...
The reason more nuclear isn't being built at a high rate are liability issues and nimby.
https://www.scientificamerican...
12 cents a kwh before transmission ?
Sorry but it's disingenuous to say that made a profit when it's subsidized.
Misleading ? What a thing to complain about in this thread the whole topic is meant to be misleading.
It's the broken window fallacy dressed up for rubes to stupid to know of it.
http://www.investopedia.com/as...
The U.S. has the largest coal reserves on the planet it's our cheapest and most abundant energy source. If anything we should be building more coal plants instead of trying to drop our economic growth to zero and surrender comparative advantage.
So you reduce the demand for new paper you cut down on the trees planted.
Then get a good copy of the 7400 line data sheets.
Who would of thought that.
Sorry if there are more than X cabs the profitability of adding an additional delta X goes down at some point it stops being profitable for people to be cabbies which btw would be influenced by how rapidly the cabs can get around. Then there is the fact that having more readily available and cheaper taxi cabs limits the desirability of using your own vehicle.
The fact there are optimum flow levels hardly means a city government is better than the continuous calculations of the actual flow network in determining how to allocate the resources.
Because god fucking forbid I take a ride in a car and don't have to worry that the driver is a rapist or murderer.
Or that I stay in a place that isn't a fire prone death trap.
Or that people make a living wage doing what they're doing, so they don't have to starve in the damn street or die of a preventable illness.
Fucking government, making rules and shit to protect people, even though most people aren't violently killed by the very things they're trying to prevent.
Or god forbid you ever grow up and take responsibility for yourself. The government isn't your mommy and it isn't your daddy and stop acting like it's a security blanket.
I don't know that I am comfortable with that. Should everyone who bought a copy of the Anarchist's cookbook expect a higher level of surveillance ?
I can see an argument for a right of privacy on the internet
Just what right of privacy do you expect when you punch people in a public place ?
Of course that means the FBI has be able to host the files on the server, and has to have sufficient control to deliver a uniquely keyed file to the users they wish to target. Sort of implies you have hit a honeypot if they get you with that.
So it's OK for you to post a lot of comments but not OK for others?
Get that head looked at kid.
Looks up at thread. The whole thing about needling someone is you need to be at least a little right.
Given your level of reaction and effort to flail out at me, it appears I went quite deep under your skin.
You might want to take some time off the internet at least until you can either improve your reaction to people telling you that you are wrong, or until you are able to confine your comments to subjects you are actually knowledgeable about, or at least those you are not obviously ignorant on.
Those links say one thing - you wrote something completely and utterly different as you well know and just attempted to cowardly hide behind the reputation of others.
Maybe you should get that problem fixed?
Projecting yet more. How many people came on this thread and told you, you were wrong.