Nuclear power on a big ship would make sense if the cheap oil they currently burn is outlawed; really there's no other viable alternative. Sails on a big ship won't do anything, nor will batteries or solar panels.
This new regulation is nothing more than feel-good public relations anyway, they set the date so far out in the future nothing is going to change until it's time to kick the can down the road again.
The study's senior investigator says he's already working with a San Francisco pharmaceutical startup to develop the approach
from the article linked there is no way to gain any sense of how likely this 'new' information will lead to a cure
You need to pay more attention to how/. strings you along.
Yesterday the Goldman article was posted to stir up discussion about the evils of Big Pharma and how they don't want to cure diseases.
Today we get this nebulous article about how some altruistic researchers from San Francisco found a cure for Alzheimer's and are working with a Silicon Valley start-up to develop it.
If that start-up turns out to be Theranos it would be a clickbait trifecta.
Investigators tracked down Uadiale because this happened before Bitcoin became popular
No, they tracked him down because he was committing a crime. Whether or not it would have been easier to track him down if he'd used bitcoin is another question.
I seriously doubt you are talking about a new compiler, because you have virtually no chance of making one better than existing compilers for languages in use like C or Java.
So I'm guessing you mean a new compiled language. Rather than Linux, look at the history of Python, it's closer to what you are thinking.
If what you are proposing is neither a compiler nor a language than you need to learn a lot more about computers before anyone will take you seriously.
It's not conversion efficiencies, it's about people who think you can power a commercial airliner with solar panels on the wings. Just ignore the laws of physics and anything is possible.
The article doesn't say they can't toss a package on your lawn, it says they can't put anything in your mailbox. And what about the other subsidies it points out? (tax breaks, etc)
It's probably a good idea to look into why they're both broke and bad at their job.
Everybody knows the answer to that. They were a government service, supported by tax dollars with all the civil service rules to follow and all the benefits of being unionized government employees (infinite cash available). When it was spun off, the cow stopped giving milk but the USPS couldn't adapt to being run like a private business.
Congressman: Does Facebook exfiltorate data by regulating CPU utilization to create fluctuations in the current flow that could modulate and encode data, then propagate those variations through the power lines to the outside world?
Mr. Zuckerberg: Yes sir, but only for security purposes.
The point of negative ads isn't to get people to change their vote.
Negative ads are used to discourage voters from supporting their party's candidate. Hillary was an easy target for negative ads, every time dirt was tossed her way it stuck. Plus, she never had much support outside of the DNC. Democrats and Independents who voted for Obama in 2008 stayed home in 2016 because Clinton wasn't who they wanted for President.
The photo is worthless, either you have the symptoms or you don't. If the optometrist can't see them by looking into your eye you need to find a new optometrist.
Does your insurance cover that photo? I'm guessing not. I had an optometrist who tried the same scam on me, just an excuse to charge more for the exam to help pay for his next cruise.
It wasn't all that long ago that people said IBM was too powerful, same with Microsoft. We don't hear that talk anymore. The world changes, in a few years the same thing will happen to these "monopolies".
Getting involved with it does not necessarily prove it otherwise
Hedge funds are a bet that the market will move, you can bet on it moving either up or down. It's likely Soros was waiting until he could short the funds and profit from other people's losses.
The article doesn't claim that the decline of dinosaurs is a new theory. The fossil record clearly shows that dinosaurs were already on the decline before and died out well after Chicxulub. The asteroid contributed, but it was only one of several reasons for their extinction.
Slashdot Mirror
What's stopping the french government to eavesdrop on the communications used on this app?
Same thing that would stop other governments from eavesdropping - essentially nothing. The encryption will be cracked.
Not shipping cost, the cost of a ship. Most big ships these days are built in South Korea at around $100M apiece.
Nuclear power on a big ship would make sense if the cheap oil they currently burn is outlawed; really there's no other viable alternative. Sails on a big ship won't do anything, nor will batteries or solar panels.
This new regulation is nothing more than feel-good public relations anyway, they set the date so far out in the future nothing is going to change until it's time to kick the can down the road again.
How about the leaks that could cost him is license to practice law?
The study's senior investigator says he's already working with a San Francisco pharmaceutical startup to develop the approach
from the article linked there is no way to gain any sense of how likely this 'new' information will lead to a cure
You need to pay more attention to how /. strings you along.
Yesterday the Goldman article was posted to stir up discussion about the evils of Big Pharma and how they don't want to cure diseases.
Today we get this nebulous article about how some altruistic researchers from San Francisco found a cure for Alzheimer's and are working with a Silicon Valley start-up to develop it.
If that start-up turns out to be Theranos it would be a clickbait trifecta.
Investigators tracked down Uadiale because this happened before Bitcoin became popular
No, they tracked him down because he was committing a crime. Whether or not it would have been easier to track him down if he'd used bitcoin is another question.
It knows that you're a right wing conspiracy theorist
That's an interesting conspiracy theory you have there. Better put on the tinfoil hat to protect yourself.
I seriously doubt you are talking about a new compiler, because you have virtually no chance of making one better than existing compilers for languages in use like C or Java.
So I'm guessing you mean a new compiled language. Rather than Linux, look at the history of Python, it's closer to what you are thinking.
If what you are proposing is neither a compiler nor a language than you need to learn a lot more about computers before anyone will take you seriously.
It's not conversion efficiencies, it's about people who think you can power a commercial airliner with solar panels on the wings. Just ignore the laws of physics and anything is possible.
These would be low calorie foods such as peppers.
Nope. It could involve high calorie munchies after smoking the crop.
You don't consider calling it "downright ridiculous" a denial? Seems like it to me.
The article doesn't say they can't toss a package on your lawn, it says they can't put anything in your mailbox. And what about the other subsidies it points out? (tax breaks, etc)
You can't counter the facts so you deny them, very convincing argument.
There's two sides to every story. Costs to the taxpayer aren't always in the form of direct payments.
It's probably a good idea to look into why they're both broke and bad at their job.
Everybody knows the answer to that. They were a government service, supported by tax dollars with all the civil service rules to follow and all the benefits of being unionized government employees (infinite cash available). When it was spun off, the cow stopped giving milk but the USPS couldn't adapt to being run like a private business.
That'll happen when we get The Internet Of Sharp Things
Why not do both?
Congressman: Does Facebook exfiltorate data by regulating CPU utilization to create fluctuations in the current flow that could modulate and encode data, then propagate those variations through the power lines to the outside world?
Mr. Zuckerberg: Yes sir, but only for security purposes.
The point of negative ads isn't to get people to change their vote.
Negative ads are used to discourage voters from supporting their party's candidate. Hillary was an easy target for negative ads, every time dirt was tossed her way it stuck. Plus, she never had much support outside of the DNC. Democrats and Independents who voted for Obama in 2008 stayed home in 2016 because Clinton wasn't who they wanted for President.
Smart people voted for some other candidate, regardless of them having a chance to win.
That's every bit as stupid as not voting
The photo is worthless, either you have the symptoms or you don't. If the optometrist can't see them by looking into your eye you need to find a new optometrist.
Does your insurance cover that photo? I'm guessing not. I had an optometrist who tried the same scam on me, just an excuse to charge more for the exam to help pay for his next cruise.
It wasn't all that long ago that people said IBM was too powerful, same with Microsoft. We don't hear that talk anymore. The world changes, in a few years the same thing will happen to these "monopolies".
we strongly encourage the administration to build an international coalition that can challenge China at the World Trade Organization and beyond
That's worked so well in other places.
Getting involved with it does not necessarily prove it otherwise
Hedge funds are a bet that the market will move, you can bet on it moving either up or down. It's likely Soros was waiting until he could short the funds and profit from other people's losses.
The article doesn't claim that the decline of dinosaurs is a new theory. The fossil record clearly shows that dinosaurs were already on the decline before and died out well after Chicxulub. The asteroid contributed, but it was only one of several reasons for their extinction.