Slashdot Mirror


User: tomhath

tomhath's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
4,582
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 4,582

  1. Re:Two small comments on 'Without Action on Antibiotics, Medicine Will Return To the Dark Ages' (theguardian.com) · · Score: 1

    The antibiotics used in agriculture are not the problem. Antibiotics used on humans without proper testing and stewardship are the problem, especially in Third World countries

  2. From teh summary:

    Though the age-related mortality trend was significant overall, it broke down when researchers sorted doctors by caseloads. Older doctors who saw high volumes of patients didn't see their patients' mortality rates increase.

    My guess is that older doctors with a larger caseload is a sign that they enjoy their job and are staying current in medicine and engaged with their patients. Those with a lower caseload are burned out and getting ready to retire.

  3. Not really 85% of power used on Germany Sets New National Record With 85 Percent of Its Electricity Sourced From Renewables (digitaltrends.com) · · Score: 5, Informative

    Germany used X GWh that month. They produced 0.85X GWh from renewables.

    No they didn't. They touched 85% for an instant when the wind kicked up on a Sunday morning before people got up and increased consumption.

    It wasn't 85% for the month as you imply, and it wasn't even 85% for the weekend as the headline implies.

  4. Not sure how though.

  5. The real reason on IBM: Remote Working Is Great! (For Everyone Except Us) (theregister.co.uk) · · Score: 4, Informative
    This article in The Register (yea, I know) suggests the real reason behind IBM's decisions:

    By requiring that workers move to hub cities such as San Francisco, Austin, or New York, IBM could both rid itself of older workers and make the jobs more appealing to younger, lower-salaried professionals...

    Coincidentally, an internal IBM video distributed to staff, and seen by The Register, advocates working in an office. Funnily enough, it features a lot of young folks...

  6. Comedians are running the country now? on John Oliver Gets Fired Up Over Net Neutrality, Causes FCC's Site To Temporarily Crash (fortune.com) · · Score: 2

    I suppose some would say it's been that way for a long time.

  7. Re:Programmer skill on How Psychology Today Sees Richard Stallman (psychologytoday.com) · · Score: 1

    It's much easier to re-create features than develop new ones. No discussion about what it should do, what the priorities should be, easier to test because you have a truth model, etc.

  8. Re:Wouldn't just buying water from other countries on UAE To Drag Iceberg From Antarctica To Solve Water Shortage Set To Last 25 Years (express.co.uk) · · Score: 1

    Or, are we trying to solve the polar ice melting by drinking it?

    No, this is to solve the problem of rising ocean levels.

  9. Re:Money to burn I guess on Sergey Brin Is Reportedly Building 'Massive Airship' In NASA Research Center (bloomberg.com) · · Score: 1

    Because heaven forbid a mere citizen dares to make his viewpoint known

    Yes, it's legal and many people do it; that doesn't mean I have to like it.

  10. Re:Money to burn I guess on Sergey Brin Is Reportedly Building 'Massive Airship' In NASA Research Center (bloomberg.com) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I doubt this is intended to be a money making project. At most maybe an advertising expense/ tax deduction.

    I'd rather see a guy spending his money on something like this, which employs a bunch of people and will be pretty cool when it gets off the ground, than on political manipulation like buying the Washington Post and turning it into a political blog or funding groups like Tea Party, MoveOn, or Occupy Wall Street.

  11. Re:You always remember the first time... on Pioneering Researchers Track Sudden Learning 'Epiphanies' (sciencedaily.com) · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The one I remember most vividly was realizing that there's nothing special about solving a double integral. I'd gone to all the classes and did the homework, but it just didn't click. Heading to the first exam I knew I was going to flunk, so I stopped at a bar on the way and had a glass of beer. FIrst question was to solve one involving a function and rotation about the x axis. I looked at it and realized there was really nothing to it; solve the integral of the function, then solve the integral of the rotation. Ended up with a 99% on the test, and have disliked math teachers ever since for forcing students to solve problems by rote instead of by understanding what they're doing.

  12. Re:Just because you can doesn't mean you should on Microsoft Will Support Python In SQL Server 2017 (infoworld.com) · · Score: 1

    you lose the ability for application to leverage multiple databases or connect to different databases

    Not at all. Foreign tables or db linking is every bit as efficient as your alternatives.

    or have the ability to isolate application from the database due to application resource constraints

    Possibly, there is no one size fits all. But these days the availability of cores and memory weakens that argument too.

  13. Re:Just because you can doesn't mean you should on Microsoft Will Support Python In SQL Server 2017 (infoworld.com) · · Score: 2

    somehow you think throwing in random code blocks in some other language where optimization for the data set is just about impossible and you don't think you're going to get serious performance hits?

    You're missing the point. Data access uses sql no matter what language your business logic is written in and no matter where the application code runs.

    The advantage of having that logic reside inside the DB server versus in a container or separate app server is that you save all the network traffic moving data back and forth; the app code is the same in either place and is just as modular either way. All that changes is where it's deployed.

  14. Re:Just because you can doesn't mean you should on Microsoft Will Support Python In SQL Server 2017 (infoworld.com) · · Score: 1

    You sound like one of those Java/Hibernate guys: "Why would I write a 20 line function in the database when I can write a few hundred lines of boilerplate, configuration, and interface code that works almost as well?" Do you still use Struts?

  15. Re:Just because you can doesn't mean you should on Microsoft Will Support Python In SQL Server 2017 (infoworld.com) · · Score: 2

    You will get hit with all of the downsides of ignoring separation dogma

    Write your business logic in the language which is most appropriate and run it where it's most convenient. The "separation dogma" was a fad that has passed.

  16. "C programmers start the day a bit later, keep using the language in the evening, and stay up the longest. This suggests C may be particularly popular among hobbyist programmers who code during their free time (or perhaps among summer school students doing homework)."

    They're spending more time to get the same amount of work done.

  17. Re:a little late to the party on Microsoft Will Support Python In SQL Server 2017 (infoworld.com) · · Score: 2

    The time it would take to learn and migrate to a new system would quickly eat up any cost savings

    Yes, that's what I said: if you're already locked in to MS and have already paid for the licenses you may as well stay locked in. I developed on SQLServer for several years and liked it. But if I was starting a new project today I'd definitely go with Postgresql.

  18. Re:Always catching up to PostgreSQL! on Microsoft Will Support Python In SQL Server 2017 (infoworld.com) · · Score: 1

    Is it webscale, or does it use joins?

    Yes to both.

  19. Re:a little late to the party on Microsoft Will Support Python In SQL Server 2017 (infoworld.com) · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As opposed to Postgresql - which is easy to use, works well, has tons of features, and is free in every sense of the word.

    Although I will concede that if you're already locked into being a MS shop and use .net for your applications then SqlServer might make sense.

  20. Re:How is Holmes not indicted yet? on Theranos Used Shell Company To Secretly Buy Outside Lab Equipment, Says Report (arstechnica.com) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's tempting to think she really believed the technology was almost working, that they just needed a little more time and money to iron out the kinks. But what makes me suspect she was a fraud from early on was her attempt to build a mystique around herself - the black turtleneck, bleached blond hair, all the VIPs she had on the board - it all reeks of snake oil.

  21. Re:Separation of powers on DOJ: Russian 'Superhacker' Gets 27 Years In Prison (thedailybeast.com) · · Score: 1

    DoJ didn't sentence him. A federal judge did.

  22. Re:Pretty obvious on Ask Slashdot: How Do You Explain 'Don't Improve My Software Syndrome' Or DIMSS? · · Score: 1

    Your two scenarios are really the same thing, but I agree with your point.

    All too often people suggest adding something that's not relevant to the application, is already there, or just wouldn't be useful.

  23. Re:It was a mistake on LinkedIn Apologizes For Trying To Connect Everyone In Real Life (vocativ.com) · · Score: 0

    You found out about this horrible feature before you clicked through the EULA without reading it.

  24. Re:For fuck sakes on Diet Sodas May Be Tied To Stroke, Dementia Risk (cnn.com) · · Score: 1

    The one of the points of medical research is to discover unknown risks associated with various activities

    But this wasn't a clinical study. It was cherry picking data from a database to try and find a correlation. Notice what they adjusted for, or more importantly what they didn't adjust for - obesity. Also, their confidence intervals aren't very convincing. I expect that someone else could look at the same data and show there is no correlation at all.

    Results—After adjustments for age, sex, education (for analysis of dementia), caloric intake, diet quality, physical activity, and smoking

  25. The correct definition is always pointed out early in the comments.

    Trolls point out the original literal translation, not the correct definition as currently used in the English language.