If the predicted rise in sea level in that paper had happened, New York, Lousianna, heck, most of the coasts would be underwater by now. It did not happen.
All that means really is that our models just aren't very accurate yet.
No mysterious force is stopping our emissions from warming our atmosphere. It is just that the amount of our emmissions, in total, is an extremely small fraction of the atmospheric carbon on this planet, and that there is *also* solar activity that can explain a large percentage of the warming trend (which has now hit a tripping point- melting trundra releases so much methane every year that there is NO effective way to stop the warming now).
Do you really want to do something about global warming? Stop traveling, plant edible species until your neighborhood looks like a jungle, use renewable energy, and build things out of plastic and styrofoam that lock up atmospheric carbon in nice safe long-chain stable molecules for 50,000 years.
There is also the point that climate change researchers have not stopped using fossil fuels themselves. I drive a prius and no longer fly. What are you doing to end fossil fuel usage in your life?
No, there is a warming trend *BOTH* on Earth and Mars. Fewer data points for Mars, of course, but there's a clear warming trend there as well.
You see, I'm not a climate change denier. I can look at my local mountains and see the shrinking glaciers. I'm an *anthropogenic* denier. I believe there is something else going on, and while our fossil fuel usage does have something to do with it, it is not a major component.
If the climate change people believed it was a major component, they'd stop flying.
I suggest opening up the peer review process to a generalized process with downloadable models that *anybody* can check, and actual predictions that anybody can check. Get rid of the "peer" and "consensus" nonsense, which is nothing more than eliteist cronyism.
Every single laptop sold today has more raw number crunching power than a Y2K era mainframe.
In the data from the Mars rovers. Mars is going through a warming trend too right now. If pollution causes warming trends, did the martians discover fossil fuels at the same time we did?
Actually, I usually exceled at classroom science. All you needed to do was figure out the math, dry lab it, and invent your data in accordance with the predetermined conclusion.
Slashdot Mirror
Because they can make money at it.
I did. The fact that you can't read english is not my issue.
Just pointing out that environmentalists have a long and honored track record of incredibly stupid doomsday predictions.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/04/22/seven-earth-day-predictions-that-failed-spectacularly/
He just said people that oppose him on climate change deserve to be jailed.
Oh, and BTW, here's an example of global warming 100,000 years *before* fossil fuel usage.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v493/n7433/full/nature11789.html
Shared conclusions are against the scientific method.
Methane is a much more potent greenhouse gas than CO2. And who in the precambrian was burning sutff?
Censored by people like Bill Nye, who want people who post alternative explanations *put in jail*.
And during the precambrian, atmospheric carbon was 500 ppm, without any humans at all. The amount of atmospheric carbon does fluctuate.
Also, correlation is not causation.
The solar activity is detected, but that is part of the evidence that is actively being censored.
New York is as close to sea level as New Orleans.
If the predicted rise in sea level in that paper had happened, New York, Lousianna, heck, most of the coasts would be underwater by now. It did not happen.
All that means really is that our models just aren't very accurate yet.
Not for long if other porn sites join in on the ban against bathroom laws.
also this, slightly more peer reviewed:
http://www.c2es.org/publications/sea-level-rise-global-climate-change-review-impacts-us-coasts
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0102/earthpulse/
The bad part of the Internet is that history actually exists.
Most recently http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/apr/14/bill-nye-open-criminal-charges-jail-time-climate-c/
No mysterious force is stopping our emissions from warming our atmosphere. It is just that the amount of our emmissions, in total, is an extremely small fraction of the atmospheric carbon on this planet, and that there is *also* solar activity that can explain a large percentage of the warming trend (which has now hit a tripping point- melting trundra releases so much methane every year that there is NO effective way to stop the warming now).
Do you really want to do something about global warming? Stop traveling, plant edible species until your neighborhood looks like a jungle, use renewable energy, and build things out of plastic and styrofoam that lock up atmospheric carbon in nice safe long-chain stable molecules for 50,000 years.
I've heard it come out of his mouth- that those who deny AGW should be jailed.
There is also the point that climate change researchers have not stopped using fossil fuels themselves. I drive a prius and no longer fly. What are you doing to end fossil fuel usage in your life?
No, there is a warming trend *BOTH* on Earth and Mars. Fewer data points for Mars, of course, but there's a clear warming trend there as well.
You see, I'm not a climate change denier. I can look at my local mountains and see the shrinking glaciers. I'm an *anthropogenic* denier. I believe there is something else going on, and while our fossil fuel usage does have something to do with it, it is not a major component.
If the climate change people believed it was a major component, they'd stop flying.
It's not supposed to be according to the predictions made in 1999.
I suggest opening up the peer review process to a generalized process with downloadable models that *anybody* can check, and actual predictions that anybody can check. Get rid of the "peer" and "consensus" nonsense, which is nothing more than eliteist cronyism.
Every single laptop sold today has more raw number crunching power than a Y2K era mainframe.
Why isn't New York underwater today?
In the data from the Mars rovers. Mars is going through a warming trend too right now. If pollution causes warming trends, did the martians discover fossil fuels at the same time we did?
He put himself forth as a scientist. He's as much of a scientist as Bill Nye- or in fact, you.
Actually, I usually exceled at classroom science. All you needed to do was figure out the math, dry lab it, and invent your data in accordance with the predetermined conclusion.
Peer review and consensus building is a political process, not a scientific process. Return to start.