Show me one time that your climate model has made an accurate prediction about the weather, then maybe your climate science will match meterology's horrific 50% failure rate.
Somehow the times when the experiment doesn't quite result in what you might expect, do not get on TV. For instance, the prediction made on In Search Of by Leonard Nimoy in 1976 about climate is practically censored.
So is the fact that New York City is not underwater, a prediction made by Al Gore back in 2002.
Climate science is HARD. Are changes going on? Yes. Do our current models accurately predict those changes? No. Does a "scientific consensus" thus fit the scientific method? No.
If your only response to deniers is to use police instead of evidence you are no longer doing science. After all, climate change scientists are deliberately publishing misinformation for financial gain.
Who made Bill Nye the arbitor of what is "legitimate"? It isn't like the climate change religion has any actual evidence behind it. The IPCC is just a religion, not science.
Came close 1947 to 1952. Of course, we were the ONLY manufacturing system still intact, we had been overproducing for 10 years previous to that, and we had 95% income taxes on the top 1% to make that after-tax income equal (in that a millionaire and a $5,000 a year ditch digger had the same after tax takehome)
For that matter, most technological advancement has the effect of eventually *shrinking* rather than growing the economy. More work done by machines means less man hours to pay, and thus, less overall payroll going out, which means less money for consumers to buy your product. It has only been because of fiat currency that we haven't already seen deflationary cycles.
Isn't this just the difference between high quality low volume and low quality high volume? Especially given the fact that in many cities in the south at the time of jim crow, blacks outnumbered whites, but had far less money?
Homosexuals and other liberals are intolerant bigots, and always have been. That is why Planned Parenthood puts clinics in black neighborhoods to abort blacks.
The day is coming, perhaps soon, when designs for physical 3D parts will not be able to be protected by either copyright or patent. A simple 3D scanner will eliminate the possibility of keeping it hidden.
Slashdot Mirror
Show me one time that your climate model has made an accurate prediction about the weather, then maybe your climate science will match meterology's horrific 50% failure rate.
Making models that fail to predict reality is play, not science.
Somehow the times when the experiment doesn't quite result in what you might expect, do not get on TV. For instance, the prediction made on In Search Of by Leonard Nimoy in 1976 about climate is practically censored.
So is the fact that New York City is not underwater, a prediction made by Al Gore back in 2002.
Climate science is HARD. Are changes going on? Yes. Do our current models accurately predict those changes? No. Does a "scientific consensus" thus fit the scientific method? No.
Actually, using slave labor rather than paying your workers is why we have illegal immigrants.
If your only response to deniers is to use police instead of evidence you are no longer doing science. After all, climate change scientists are deliberately publishing misinformation for financial gain.
Who made Bill Nye the arbitor of what is "legitimate"? It isn't like the climate change religion has any actual evidence behind it. The IPCC is just a religion, not science.
Then why is Bill Nye lobbying the government to censor climate change deniers instead of presenting his evidence?
At this point, his "scientific method" seems to consist of lobbying the government for new censorship laws.
Came close 1947 to 1952. Of course, we were the ONLY manufacturing system still intact, we had been overproducing for 10 years previous to that, and we had 95% income taxes on the top 1% to make that after-tax income equal (in that a millionaire and a $5,000 a year ditch digger had the same after tax takehome)
How actual anarchy works out: Somalia
For that matter, most technological advancement has the effect of eventually *shrinking* rather than growing the economy. More work done by machines means less man hours to pay, and thus, less overall payroll going out, which means less money for consumers to buy your product. It has only been because of fiat currency that we haven't already seen deflationary cycles.
Scientific consensus is an oxymoron. Consensus is against the scientific method.
Consensus science is mythology, not science.
And in this case- the "scientific method" prefered by climate change proponents seems to be use the police and jails rather than evidence.
Yeah, right. Evolution is settled science?
Maybe Not
Isn't this just the difference between high quality low volume and low quality high volume? Especially given the fact that in many cities in the south at the time of jim crow, blacks outnumbered whites, but had far less money?
Homosexuals and other liberals are intolerant bigots, and always have been. That is why Planned Parenthood puts clinics in black neighborhoods to abort blacks.
The day is coming, perhaps soon, when designs for physical 3D parts will not be able to be protected by either copyright or patent. A simple 3D scanner will eliminate the possibility of keeping it hidden.
I've got an easier way to get 100 million dead people. Legalize abortion for ~80 years.
Wireless on a floating swing arm. Who needs desk space if you replace the mouse with a trackball?
With a capped cesspool. http://cdrf.org/2015/08/01/five-new-central-valley-dairy-digesters-to-capture-methane-generate-renewable-energy/
Who needs synthetic methane? Pig farms, cattle ranches, and cities produce a huge natural supply.
Sounds like a damp good reason not to use that tecnique. Really, people, you are making the job far more complex than it needs to be.
Because destroying the concept of physical gender is an early step to removing parental rights, like Obergefell did.
Knew that already that your kind wants to destroy heteronormative society.