MCN was a great guy for a CEO no doubt about this. But more interesting may be the inovative turn arround only Schwartz can bring to Sun. If we remember the Open Sourcing push for Solaris and Co. from Schwartz, or at leat the test a Server for 60 days, than we may consider, that he may be hte only one to safe the Sun!
There seems an overall very differnt adoption rate in GNU/Linux and FOSS arround the world. For example at least following my recognation (worked for a UK company) the UK lacks adoption and is still a M$ Stronghold in Europe. Does anyone can explain this further?
>I don't know...I've seeen monkeys beating off in at least three different zoos.
The zoos exchanging animals very frequently to keep the gen pool fresh. The monkeys sould than learn behavior from each other...
In wild life there should also be enough contact. Ther will be young males who have to leave their clan and will join an other therfor. Also different clans may see or here each other within some distance sometimes.;-)
>2. Start asking us EU citizens if we'd mind you spending our cash on something that isn't >really required
Yes, I'm willing to pay taxes for exactly this (despite I do not have much believing in some of the companies like DTAG in the boot).
>3. get out of the mindset that the internet is somehow defined by geographical borders and >edges - just what is an EU search engine? Does it just search the EU? What?
No, it isn'nt. What do we have yet? Ok- Google seems not to much biased from US politics now, but maybe you may have a look on CNN, which really degraded itself as US propaganda?
You may also remember Bush's total survilance order to the NSA? It included the rerouting of European Internet traffic through the US to spy on it. What do you think, is not M$ or any US search engine, or nearly every US software company providing the same means, backdoors and API's? Therefor I would more like to taken our own kind of backdoors and spyware used on us as EU citizens. Not that I believe to be free in Europe, but to be this little be more free here they may let us in the end.
I think without the GNU foundation framework (compiler, libraries, shell etc.) and the Linux Kernel there would be nothing with FOSS. Without all the foundation under the the GPL there would be nothing to build on for the other prograsms.
BTW: Where the hell is LAMP in the top 10? Apache would be nothing without Perl, PHP, Phyton, MySQL or PostGresSQL.
Its time to go on war against the RFID pestilence. This is a main assult on personal freedom and we will all end up as slaves with total awarness without able to fighting it at all soon.
Maybe we shall add a part to the GPL forbitting to use FOSS if a company uses RFID.
>>Let's cut to the chase - Bin Laden is being assisted by people - a LOT of people.
He man, the whole world knows that he is in Nordern Pakistan. He is there since before the Iraq war. The US could have got him there with much lower amount of troops.
So what? Either its better for some people in Washington to not get him, or they simply have other priorities like makeing dirty money in Iraq?
I would see the bommerang effect in an other way. All of this will fight back on innocent people in the US homeland too. There will be more innocent victims on both sides. There will be more attacks in the US. This is a simple escalation cycle. Only some guys in Washington are making the big money therewhile. They are not carrying about killed civilians in Iraq or US casulties at all as long as the TV manipulated US public is not takeing care at all. The losers of this are the common people on both sides.
The winners are the clans of Bush, the VP und Haliburton. There is not even a real interest in bring this war to an end. Right now the bad guys are making the big money without any control in Iraq, either from oil or from delivering the troops. The US tax payers are paying the bill, and the Iraqi people getting more hurt every day.
This is not a war on terror this is on oil and money. The whole world knows that to fight terror we had have to go to the Pacistan tribe areas to bring it (and Osama) to an end. Also we would have to go after Bushs business partners in Saudi Arabia from where still most of the terror money is coming. There was no link to Iraq than to robber their oil.
I just think there could be some truth with this smart cards.
It may be similiar to SCSI against ATA/IDE.
I have some older workstation with an 3Com 3cSRV97 Thyphoon smart NIC and it is quite fast despite its age. Before some days I did a dd over netcat and the load was 2.65 IDE/Realtek Crap against 0.25 15K SCSI/3c97SRV NIC.
Maybe there ist not all about CPU speed here, despite most people are only looking for this.
[quote] Sun is notorious for producing some of the most stable software in the world. It's not fast, or pretty; it just never, ever fails.[/quote]
I go with your first part and with your view about Java, but Solaris is not only stable it is also a nice cute. And it is fast (maybe now too under x86) no matter how much load is on the server!
SandBox, overating links - link farm impact, hilltop oligarchy, big sites oligarchy, 2x32 double index as not able to go on 64Bit therefore sites dumped in secondary index, 301 redirects not working, 302 page hijacking...
There are a lot of faults they have to be blamed for doing nothing to solve it out.
But the sandbox massacre is a real crime they are responsible for to the Web community:
They dump about a year now 90 % of the new opened domains into a secondary index (mainly its assumed tha G$$gle is be not able to go over the 32 Bit barrier for siteids as all money is pumped in opening new shops and not in the core bussines SE) and thus never pop up in top SERPs. But as well a lot of this sites would in Googles normal algo if not Google would filter them out.
They block 1 year of 10 Internet year - what a crime!
I thank god and the lonely smart guys at AOL that left Mozilla free. Otherwise we had now a ruined Firefox under AOL logo with a lot of AOL spyware...
From an other point, I can only say this: Does their management have no plan at all. They had bought Netscape before years and out of this was build the finest browser in the world now. And than right before it is really able to strike back they pushed it away. After this they build first an monster with IE and Firefox engines together as NetscapeX and now second they come up with this joke AOL browser with MSIE engine.
>If Sun are going open source then tell me why >they've changed the MPL so they can include third >party patented material without telling you (See >the section 3 changes) and which you would have no >rights to.
Sounds a bit like SCO did opening code and hoping it goes into some open source... like some trojan...
# No spell check suggester # Limited signatures - Only one per account and no way to insert during editing a message. A pain for us who use signatures as an Autotext/proforma facility. # Searching for emails - In OE and other mail clients when the list is sorted by Sender clicking M will take you to the first M entry. # Formatting HTML emails - You cannot select HTML text and then set to the same text size from the formatting toolbar, you must go through the menu (Format > Size > Medium)
The problem with Sun is not products. They have some real jewels: to mention Solaris (cute tricky bitch - I love you!), Java, Opterons. The problem is with their closed mind flip flop management. Sometimes there PR seems to be follow the mess principle from SCO.
P.S: It's time to free Sol and Java under the GPL - when will you get this at Sun?
MCN was a great guy for a CEO no doubt about this. But more interesting may be the inovative turn arround only Schwartz can bring to Sun. If we remember the Open Sourcing push for Solaris and Co. from Schwartz, or at leat the test a Server for 60 days, than we may consider, that he may be hte only one to safe the Sun!
Some plus points from me for Google! They at least stand up for our search queries a little more than I had thought.
/ motion.to.compel.pdf
http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/pdf/ne/2006/google-doj
But in short or long the NSA/CIA/FBI may got their hands on the data.
There seems an overall very differnt adoption rate in GNU/Linux and FOSS arround the world.
;-)
For example at least following my recognation (worked for a UK company) the UK lacks adoption and is still a M$ Stronghold in Europe. Does anyone can explain this further?
The Sony Rootkit Map may also show difference in Linux addoption.
* USA
* Europe
* Japan
>I don't know...I've seeen monkeys beating off in at least three different zoos.
;-)
The zoos exchanging animals very frequently to keep the gen pool fresh. The monkeys sould than learn behavior from each other...
In wild life there should also be enough contact. Ther will be young males who have to leave their clan and will join an other therfor. Also different clans may see or here each other within some distance sometimes.
>Nope, can't say that I do. Could you source it for me?
:-) )translation:F %2Fwww.heise.de%2Fnewsticker%2Fresult.xhtml%3Furl% 3D%2Fnewsticker%2Fmeldung%2F67761%26words%3DBush&l angpair=de%7Cen&hl=en&c2coff=1&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&p rev=%2Flanguage_tools
h tml
_ W._Bush's_domestic_spying
My first source for this is in German, but you may use Googles (
http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2
The original article is from the NYT - you may have an account there.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/24/politics/24spy.
BTW: Looks also intersting: http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=George
Greeting from Europe,
you may or or less right with your claims.
>You do realize, don't you, that France is a nuclear power[0], and sold[1] to Iraq 12.5kg of
>93% U-235 and "research reactor".
>And lets not forget the direct German help[2] in creating Iraqi chemical weapons.
But, I have at first the pictures in my mind, where Rumsfeld is meeting Sadam selling him US C-Waepons.
Or, maybe you remember the Antrax hipe? Wasn't it come from your own laboratories?
So the best would be to sweap before our own doors - right?
Greetings fellow EU-citizen,
>2. Start asking us EU citizens if we'd mind you spending our cash on something that isn't
>really required
Yes, I'm willing to pay taxes for exactly this (despite I do not have much believing in some of the companies like DTAG in the boot).
>3. get out of the mindset that the internet is somehow defined by geographical borders and
>edges - just what is an EU search engine? Does it just search the EU? What?
No, it isn'nt. What do we have yet? Ok- Google seems not to much biased from US politics now, but maybe you may have a look on CNN, which really degraded itself as US propaganda?
You may also remember Bush's total survilance order to the NSA? It included the rerouting of European Internet traffic through the US to spy on it. What do you think, is not M$ or any US search engine, or nearly every US software company providing the same means, backdoors and API's? Therefor I would more like to taken our own kind of backdoors and spyware used on us as EU citizens. Not that I believe to be free in Europe, but to be this little be more free here they may let us in the end.
>>If there's a true need for it, won't the market fulfil the need [google.com]?
Ha? Was Google's technology created from the market? Or maybe was the DARPA-Internet created from the market?
I think without the GNU foundation framework (compiler, libraries, shell etc.) and the Linux Kernel there would be nothing with FOSS. Without all the foundation under the the GPL there would be nothing to build on for the other prograsms.
BTW: Where the hell is LAMP in the top 10? Apache would be nothing without Perl, PHP, Phyton, MySQL or PostGresSQL.
Its time to go on war against the RFID pestilence. This is a main assult on personal freedom and we will all end up as slaves with total awarness without able to fighting it at all soon.
Maybe we shall add a part to the GPL forbitting to use FOSS if a company uses RFID.
>>Stability depends partly on systems are [NOT] writen in the ancient language C >>:), and run monolithic kernels.
This is truth following the theory, but as with most things on the planet, in real life it seems to be such the opposite.
'First they ignore you. Then they
laught at you. Then they fight you. And then you win.'
-- Mahatma Gandhi
that Cogent is undermining the market with dumping prices without having any good infrastructure instead having the last crap.
They simply got nearly a knock out from from of the worlds bigest and finest carrier.
This is not a problem of the Internet, its only a problem for such a crappy company as Cogents is.
"... that a country with our military might cannot and will not be forced."
Do you have no other idea to solve problems, e.g. building consens?
You may have a look at Paul Kennedy "The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers".
Amazon
> BBC NEWS
/. story - you are absolutely right!
> Japanese develop 'female' android
> By David Whitehouse
> Science editor, BBC News website
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4714135.stm
This is really a
>>Let's cut to the chase - Bin Laden is being assisted by people - a LOT of people.
He man, the whole world knows that he is in Nordern Pakistan. He is there since before the Iraq war. The US could have got him there with much lower amount of troops.
So what? Either its better for some people in Washington to not get him, or they simply have other priorities like makeing dirty money in Iraq?
I would see the bommerang effect in an other way. All of this will fight back on innocent people in the US homeland too. There will be more innocent victims on both sides. There will be more attacks in the US. This is a simple escalation cycle. Only some guys in Washington are making the big money therewhile. They are not carrying about killed civilians in Iraq or US casulties at all as long as the TV manipulated US public is not takeing care at all. The losers of this are the common people on both sides.
The winners are the clans of Bush, the VP und Haliburton. There is not even a real interest in bring this war to an end. Right now the bad guys are making the big money without any control in Iraq, either from oil or from delivering the troops. The US tax payers are paying the bill, and the Iraqi people getting more hurt every day.
This is not a war on terror this is on oil and money. The whole world knows that to fight terror we had have to go to the Pacistan tribe areas to bring it (and Osama) to an end. Also we would have to go after Bushs business partners in Saudi Arabia from where still most of the terror money is coming. There was no link to Iraq than to robber their oil.
I just think there could be some truth with this smart cards.
It may be similiar to SCSI against ATA/IDE.
I have some older workstation with an 3Com 3cSRV97 Thyphoon smart NIC and it is quite fast despite its age.
Before some days I did a dd over netcat and the load was 2.65 IDE/Realtek Crap against 0.25 15K SCSI/3c97SRV NIC.
Maybe there ist not all about CPU speed here, despite most people are only looking for this.
>> Tried to murder her??? After the incident took place the same US soldiers applied some first aid to her
Thats just the problem the World has with with you this days. You are shooting first and thinking later.
BTW:
Just try some information from the people in Iraq itself: http://occupationwatch.org/
[quote] Sun is notorious for producing some of the most stable software in the world. It's not fast, or pretty; it just never, ever fails.[/quote]
I go with your first part and with your view about Java, but Solaris is not only stable it is also a nice cute. And it is fast (maybe now too under x86) no matter how much load is on the server!
I'm considering Google as a broken search engine.
SandBox, overating links - link farm impact, hilltop oligarchy, big sites oligarchy, 2x32 double index as not able to go on 64Bit therefore sites dumped in secondary index, 301 redirects not working, 302 page hijacking...
There are a lot of faults they have to be blamed for doing nothing to solve it out.
But the sandbox massacre is a real crime they are responsible for to the Web community:
They dump about a year now 90 % of the new opened domains into a secondary index (mainly its assumed tha G$$gle is be not able to go over the 32 Bit barrier for siteids as all money is pumped in opening new shops and not in the core bussines SE) and thus never pop up in top SERPs. But as well a lot of this sites would in Googles normal algo if not Google would filter them out.
They block 1 year of 10 Internet year - what a crime!
Try this to see unfiltered results:
keyword keyword -asdf -asdf -asdf -asdf -asdf -asdf -asdf -asdf -asdf -asdf -asdf -asdf -asdf
Or see all the great new domains filtered out for your keywords here.
I thank god and the lonely smart guys at AOL that left Mozilla free. Otherwise we had now a ruined Firefox under AOL logo with a lot of AOL spyware ...
From an other point, I can only say this: Does their management have no plan at all. They had bought Netscape before years and out of this was build the finest browser in the world now. And than right before it is really able to strike back they pushed it away.
After this they build first an monster with IE and Firefox engines together as NetscapeX and now second they come up with this joke AOL browser with MSIE engine.
Are they really knowing what they are doing?
>If Sun are going open source then tell me why >they've changed the MPL so they can include third >party patented material without telling you (See >the section 3 changes) and which you would have no >rights to.
Sounds a bit like SCO did opening code and hoping it goes into some open source... like some trojan...
# No spell check suggester
# Limited signatures - Only one per account and no way to insert during editing a message. A pain for us who use signatures as an Autotext/proforma facility.
# Searching for emails - In OE and other mail clients when the list is sorted by Sender clicking M will take you to the first M entry.
# Formatting HTML emails - You cannot select HTML text and then set to the same text size from the formatting toolbar, you must go through the menu (Format > Size > Medium)
Thanks for speaking this out for me too!!!!
xcomm
The problem with Sun is not products. They have some real jewels: to mention Solaris (cute tricky bitch - I love you!), Java, Opterons. The problem is with their closed mind flip flop management. Sometimes there PR seems to be follow the mess principle from SCO.
P.S: It's time to free Sol and Java under the GPL - when will you get this at Sun?