Slashdot Mirror


Thunderbird 1.0 RC1 Released

KingDaveRa writes "Mozilla.org has quietly released Thunderbird 1.0 RC1. 1.0 RC1 includes lots of bug fixes and improvements for features like saved search folders, the RSS reader, mail migration, and message grouping. The default themes have both been updated with new and improved artwork as well."

460 comments

  1. Popularity by fembots · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is Thunderbird as "spread-like-wild-fire" as Firefox? I just don't hear people talking about TB as much as FF.

    Even in newsgroups where you need a news reader to do anything, people still talk about FF. I'm using TB but I don't have the same enthusiasm to discuss it.

    Is this due to lack of usage, or lack of competition, or something else? Or just me?

    1. Re:Popularity by pcmanjon · · Score: 1

      I don't know.. EMAIL clients just aren't 'the thing'

      I use GMAIL, and haven't really tried TB out at all really. Once my ISP fucked me by accidently deleting my account (and then, worse, somehow the account name becoming 'reserved' making the whois contact in my domains wrong... so I can't claim ownership (forgot the pass, but always figured if i needed in the config I could have a recovery email sent)) is when I went to gmail -- hopefully I won't get fucked there

    2. Re:Popularity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Any serious usenet junkie will tell you TB won't cut it-- same with OE, though. I like pan. ;)

    3. Re:Popularity by FlipmodePlaya · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm thinking lack of usage. Especially during the aKadamy, KMail seems to have sapped up all the available attention. KDE's whole PIM suite is evolving so rapidly, it's obviously being doted upon by the geek community.

      Outside of that afformentioned community, it seems Outlook/Express is absolutely dominant. Personally, I like Opera's M2.

    4. Re:Popularity by skids · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The geek fanbase for thunderbird is smaller, so it gets less free publicity.

      You can't really live without a graphical web browser (well, at least without impairing access to a lot of stuff), but the same isn't true of email. There are a number af very good text-mode mail readers, and most people I know prefer something like PINE, and really dread the day when you can't live without a graphical email reader.

      So far we've done a fair job of beating back the perpetually looming encroachment of non-plain-text email. (There's even an ASCII ribbon campaign :-)

    5. Re:Popularity by carninja · · Score: 0

      I've noticed this same thing. Perhaps it's similar to the "In Korea, old people us e email" situation, where email usage has declined in relation to IM usage. People still use browsers as much as they used to, if not more.

    6. Re:Popularity by Umbral+Blot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well it defnintely has competition form Outlook, and of course many other free third party clients. The difference is that, unlike FIrefox, Thunderbird does not incoperate many more features than outlook. Also it has few extensions and themes, which could make up for its lack of brilliance. I can give people planty of reason for people to switch from ie to Firefox, but from outlook to Thunderbird I can only pester people about security. And I have no way at all of "converting" users of other mail programs, like Eudora.

    7. Re:Popularity by TheBurningDog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I suggest thunderbird to my friends because of the ease that PGP integrates into it with the enigmail plugin.

      Not many webmail sites offer good PGP support.

    8. Re:Popularity by pcmanjon · · Score: 4, Funny

      "and most people I know prefer something like PINE"

      Wow, and I'm still using the GNU ``mail`` command. I didn't know they had an ncurses based mail client yet.

    9. Re:Popularity by ral315 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The difference is, while there are numerous e-mail programs out there that threaten Outlook's market share, Firefox is the only browser that is a true threat to IE.

    10. Re:Popularity by oneeyedelf1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Outlook has so many more features then thunderbird. Since I dont use outlook I will give my mom's answer when she looked at thunderbird for her office. Can I use it to schedule the presentation rooms? Can I use it to sync? With email filters pretty much grabbing all the outlook viruses anyways, most buisness shouldnt be too concerned running outlook. Firefox was different it has MORE features and protects in ways that just arent too realistic on win2k in an office enviroment. When employees go home, generally they like to keep the same stuff. Besides most users stupid enough to get a virus with outlook will get a virus with thunderbird, so there's no real reason to get people to switch.

    11. Re:Popularity by secolactico · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I like pan. ;)

      I like pan, too, tho I'm partial to xnews. Too bad it (xnews) looks like crap under wine.

      --
      No sig
    12. Re:Popularity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I use it to schedule the presentation rooms?
      It's a fucking mail client! If your server will accept an email and automatically schedule said rooms, sure. Else, why the fuck should it? *sigh* This is why I hate Outlook at work: I have to open a calendar, scheduler, and general PIM in order to fucking read my email. (and sorry, but based on the current poll, I had to split an infinitive)

    13. Re:Popularity by AstroDrabb · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Outlook has so many more features then thunderbird. Since I dont use outlook I will give my mom's answer when she looked at thunderbird for her office. Can I use it to schedule the presentation rooms?
      Why would you compare MS Outlook, a groupware application, to an email application? A better comparison would be MS Outlook Express to Thunderbird. MS Outlook Express cannot schedule the presentation rooms either. Thunderbird is far better then OE and has far better default security.

      For office type groupware, MS Outlook is currently the best product out there. But for a typical _home_ user email program, Thunderbird is very good and much better then MS Outlook Express IMO.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    14. Re:Popularity by Flower · · Score: 2, Funny

      Huh, news to me. Didn't even know it existed.

      --
      I don't want knowledge. I want certainty. - Law, David Bowie
    15. Re:Popularity by nukem996 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think thunderbird is an amazing mail client. But as said above many people dont use mail client any more. Most people use webmail, even when a mail client is avalible. When people do use a mail client most of the time its Outlook. We need a spread thunderbird campain, it probably would help with the spam/worm problem.

    16. Re:Popularity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've switched my wife to TB. The absolute main thing over any of the MS offerings is the "Don't download images from the web" that are IMG tagged in the html spam e-mail. Many of the spams use web-bugs to track valid e-mail addresses, and the preview pane loads the suckers up.

      TB by DEFAULT will not load these web images, thus provides more security and a little better hidding from spammers.

    17. Re:Popularity by Gnascher · · Score: 1

      Latest versions of Outlook don't download images anymore either. ...by default.

      --
      It's not my fault! It was this way when I got here.
    18. Re:Popularity by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      I really like Pan as well, except I've not seen it run well on my setup in quite some time. My system usually grinds to a halt after it's been running about a half hour or so. Which is rather a pity since I usually fall in love with it during that half hour.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    19. Re:Popularity by Albanach · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You make a very fair point - Thunderbird is a sound replacement for anyone usine OE at home.

      However, the Moz suite - either as one application, Mozilla, or as a pick and choose set of Firefox, Thunderbird and Sunbird will, eventually pose a serious threat to Outlook's dominance on the corporate desktop.

      One thing that I do wonder about though is syncing with other programs, especially mobile phones. Is there any pressure being put on Symbian etc to make their phones sync contacts with an LDAP server, email with thunderbird, calendar with iCal etc? Even when folk can book the meeting room, the next big problem will be all the other corporate stuff that intigrates with Outlook won't work with the Moz suite unless pressure starts getting applied now.

    20. Re:Popularity by LnxRocks · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thunderbird's usefulness to me is cross platform e-mail. Since the linux and and windows versions use the same mail store format, just setup the store in a mutually accesible spot to all OS software and it works.

    21. Re:Popularity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you compare MS Outlook, a groupware application, to an email application? A better comparison would be MS Outlook Express to Thunderbird. MS Outlook Express cannot schedule the presentation rooms either. Thunderbird is far better then OE and has far better default security.

      It doesn't matter that it is not a fair comparison. MS Outlook is still one of Thunderbird's competitors.

      That said, where I work, everyone is switching to Thunderbird (from MS Outlook). We only rarely used the groupware features (its a very small company), so it didn't make a difference.

      Maybe if Sunbird or whatever takes off Thunderbird will REALLY be able to compete with Outlook.

    22. Re:Popularity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm using TB but I don't have the same enthusiasm to discuss it.

      yeah know one wants to get TB

      Maybe it turns off older generations when Tuberculosis was more prevalent.

    23. Re:Popularity by shawb · · Score: 1

      Ahh... you're looking for Sunbird. Still really in the production stages, but...

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    24. Re:Popularity by I_Love_Pocky! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Even if you don't use it for email, the RSS viewer is really slick. I just tried it out on my own feed: http://tfp.rajohnston.com/rdf.php, and it worked seamlessly. There are probably other viewers out there that do a good job, but this one is the best I have found so far.

    25. Re:Popularity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't worry, it's a pine in the ass to use anyway.

    26. Re:Popularity by rsidd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wow, and I'm still using the GNU ``mail`` command.

      You mean the BSD mail command?

      rpm -qif /bin/mail
      Name : mailx...
      License: BSD ...
      Packager : Red Hat, Inc.

      Not everything in the world is GNU...

    27. Re:Popularity by cryogenix · · Score: 1

      Novell Groupwise does the 98% of the features that people actually use of Outlook and does them without the security issues. It also scales better, the message stores are better and last time I checked, webaccess was better :)

    28. Re:Popularity by Apathetic1 · · Score: 1

      GPG integration with the EnigMail extension has been the killer app for Thunderbird for me. I recommended it to a few of my geek friends (just like I did with Firefox way back when it was still Phoenix). A month or two later they sent me a message saying they had switched and wondering idly why they hadn't done it when I suggested it.

      The only reason I keep Outlook installed now is time management. Last I checked, Mozilla Calendar (currently at version 0.9) is aiming for handheld synchronization after version 2.0 which is unforunate because I would love to ditch Outlook completely.

      --

      My username does not make me Apathetic. It's irony, get it?

    29. Re:Popularity by natd · · Score: 1

      98%? Novell GroupWise has significant *useful* features which Outlook simply can't touch. Novell GroupWise is a significantly better product to administer AND use.

      --
      Only big ligs use sigs.
    30. Re:Popularity by cryogenix · · Score: 1

      I agree 100% But you will always get those that say "Well outlook can do this and GW can't" to which I respond, and how many people actually use that feature... and the answer is most often, not many. I admin a GW 6.5 system and I'm happy with it.

    31. Re:Popularity by sean23007 · · Score: 1

      It probably has a lot to do with the fact that a lot of people use webmail. So for them, Firefox is their email client as well. Indeed, why use Thunderbird when you could be using Gmail? Gmail is better (I was shocked, to be completely honest) and rather more convenient.

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    32. Re:Popularity by arivanov · · Score: 1

      I am not junkie, but I have to deal with a list of complaints from users who are annoyed by the fact that its search facility in newsgroups magestically sucks rotten eggz. Only subject and date. No search on header fields or message body.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    33. Re:Popularity by icedevil · · Score: 3, Insightful

      True, not everything is GNU.

      However there is a GPLed version of this, which reminds me ... not every distro in the world is Red Hat.

    34. Re:Popularity by EvilStein · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've itched about this before as well - Thunderbird very well could blow away Outlook in many organizations, but the CALENDAR *SUCKS* - Sorry, Sunbird sucks more ass than anything that has even sucked ass before. The last time I tried it, it was incapable of recognizing its own calendar files, instead they were opening as plain old text in Mozilla.

      Here's my idea: Ditch flippin Chatzilla. Put a lot of effort towards the calendar.

      The Calendar is one of the big reasons (that I have found) that people stick with Microsoft Outlook.

      It doesn't even have to be the whiz-bang calendar like Outlook has, but it'd be nice if it would actually work worth a crap.

    35. Re:Popularity by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 2, Funny

      But everything old is gnu again... har! har! har! ... ummm... sorry ... bad pun... bad pun...

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    36. Re:Popularity by roju · · Score: 1

      Is that store format called IMAP? Because then pine and mutt and Mozilla and Evolution can all play too.

    37. Re:Popularity by Swaffs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think much moreso than text-mode mail readers is that many people use only webmail. I know a lot of people who don't realize they can get an email address through their ISP, but have hotmail addresses because that's what they know. Also, many use gmail or their ISP's webmail option since its so portable.

      --

      --
      "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." - Homer Simpson [1F10]

    38. Re:Popularity by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      I'm personally using PINE, too. Actually, I've been thinking about migrating to Mutt because of freeness issues, but never managed to get myself to actually do that.

      But, for all the non-geek users, Thunderbird is the way to go. It's what I've installed for my boss during the last big spyware disaster he had, and that's what I'm installing for all the other non-savvy users around who ask me for help. And somehow, not a single one of them complained yet, even though they're the kind of people who complain all the time when even an icon they got used to gets changed.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    39. Re:Popularity by S3D · · Score: 1

      I have read that Nokia considering to port mozilla browser to Symbian, as possible alternative to Opera. However no major Symbian players (Nokia, SE, Symbian etc) would do anything for synching with Thunderbird or Sunbird - user segment too small for them, and they probaly lack competence for it. Nokia can't even produce a good PC suit as it is - existing is unstable and have very limited functionality. May be some 3d party developer would make a sync client for thunderbird, but it will not be free/open sourced probably - there is no strong open source movment in Symbian for now...

    40. Re:Popularity by Erik+Piper · · Score: 1

      Sadly, in much of the world, you do have to compare them, because much of the OSS-lukewarm semi-geek crowd that helped spark the fire for Firefox is using pirated copies of Outlook at home. Sorry, but that's the way it is throughout post-communist Central Europe, at least.

      Erik Piper

    41. Re:Popularity by zsau · · Score: 1

      I hate Firefox (preferring Galeon), but Thunderbird is the best graphical MUA for 'nixes that I've found, so I use it...

      --
      Look out!
    42. Re:Popularity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about "in order to read my fucking email"?

      </pedantic>

    43. Re:Popularity by Metteyya · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wow, and I'm still using the GNU ``mail`` command. I didn't know they had an ncurses based mail client yet.

      You must be using Debian Stable, don't you?

    44. Re:Popularity by Bulln-Bulln · · Score: 1

      Quote from http://kmgerich.com/archive/000079.html and I think it hits the nail on the head:
      "At first I found it hard to get around the "Netscape Messenger 4" feel of Thunderbird. I wish that the UI had been burnt down and redesigned from the ground up as Firefox was. There seem to be many opportunities for simplification in the menus, preferences and settings windows. Perhaps this is coming."

      While the default theme has changed, the structure of the UI is more or less still the same old shit. Just look how to configure multiple SMTP servers in TB - it's a mess.
      TB is nice, but its UI really needs work. I'm hoping for TB 1.1 in March 2005...

    45. Re:Popularity by nmg196 · · Score: 1

      > any people dont use mail client any more.
      > Most people use webmail, even when a mail client is avalible.

      What utter bulls**t. I presume you just made that up as you were typing it. How on earth that got modded UP I really don't know.

      MOST people obviously do NOT use webmail. In fact MOST people use Outlook or Outlook Express (neither of which, could you pursuade me is "webmail").

      Somebody recently sent me some survey results via e-mail which showed the following usage stats:

      Outlook - 29%
      Outlook Express - 18%
      AOL - 10%
      Eudora - 10%
      Lotus - 7%
      Netscape - 5.5%
      Yahoo mail - 4%
      Hotmail - 2.5%
      Other - 14%

      So even if the entire of the "Other" category was webmail, that would still add up to only about 20%. If you don't want to believe these stats, then do a Google on the web and you'll find that many other surveys have very similar results.

      You and your mates are not "most" people.

    46. Re:Popularity by cammoblammo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I get pR0n spam too.

      --

      Cogito, ergo sig.

    47. Re:Popularity by Threni · · Score: 1

      > Even in newsgroups where you need a news reader to do anything

      It would be nice if TB didn't 'forget' to get new messages for your subscribed Usenet groups every few days, making it look as if there are no new messages for the group until you unsubscribe and resubscribe. I've mentioned this on the TB forum once or twice but never got a reply, so perhaps it's just me. It's been a problem on the last 3 or 4 versions of TB on both win 2k and xp sp2.

    48. Re:Popularity by PhiberOptix · · Score: 1

      Well, ymmv, but i converted more people to thunderbird than to firefox.
      Usually when I show people how the spam filter works, they wanna try it right away.

      With thunderbird ive never listened to a "side effect", like weird page rendering. it just works. I know its not firefox fault, its webdevelopers that do stuff wrong, bla blah, but people just end up firing up IE if they do not miss the cool features in firefox.

    49. Re:Popularity by say · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with KOrganizer? It can schedule meetings and stuff.

      --
      Roses are #FF0000, violets are #0000FF, all my base are belong to you
    50. Re:Popularity by Eric+Giguere · · Score: 1

      GroupWise must be gaining traction. Research In Motion is going to support it for its BlackBerry platform it:

      BlackBerry Enterprise Server support for Novell GroupWise

      Eric
      Some BlackBerry programming stuff
    51. Re:Popularity by Xabraxas · · Score: 1

      Pfft. Who needs an email client when you have telnet?

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    52. Re:Popularity by dos_dude · · Score: 0

      Why would you compare MS Outlook, a groupware application, to an email application?

      Don't have an answer for that one, sorry. But I've got another question: Why would you add an email client to a groupware client? Why read and write email with that thing that lets you schedule the presentation rooms?

    53. Re:Popularity by toofast · · Score: 1

      You'd think that with a name line Xnews....

    54. Re:Popularity by Xabraxas · · Score: 1
      That's funny because the first site that popped up when I searched for statistics showed that 60% of people used either hotmail or yahoo, which is more in line with what i've encountered. People rarely use email clients anymore compared to webmail.

      It sounds like your numbers were taken from 1997 not 2004. Just the fact that those numbers show almost 3 times as many people use the full Outlook suite as AOL is absurd.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    55. Re:Popularity by XMyth · · Score: 1

      Not sure if you're insinuating that it SHOULD run under X since it is called Xnews or....(and I find this to be true) just about any app that starts with "X" sucks UI-wise. Online identities excluded.

    56. Re:Popularity by rsidd · · Score: 1
      However there is a GPLed version of this,

      Links?

      which reminds me ... not every distro in the world is Red Hat.

      My Debian box also has BSD mail (mailx). Writing a GPL version seems pretty pointless to me.

    57. Re:Popularity by LnxRocks · · Score: 1

      No this is with POP3

    58. Re:Popularity by nickos · · Score: 1

      "The Calendar is one of the big reasons (that I have found) that people stick with Microsoft Outlook."

      Agreed. Is there an open source alternative to the Outlook calendar that is compatible. I would love to dump Outlook completely but need to be compatible with everyone else at my company...

    59. Re:Popularity by phrostypoison · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Using Gmail thru POP + Message Grouping + some toolbar tweaks... Is pretty much Gmail without labels, archives, but with folders. Of course you can use the Gmail Atom feed as well, even both... You know, RSS feed items shouldn't be considered 'mail'.

    60. Re:Popularity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See that is a geek answer. Thunderbird is more like Outlook Express than Outlook. However the average consumer doesn't use OutLook Express, they use Outlook. So the original author's comparision is valid.

      When doing comparision you have to do marketing comparisions. The email mail client market is doiminated but Outlook not Outlook Express. So when people look at Thunderbird they see that alot of the features that Outlook has aren't in Thunderbird.

      See this is why geeks like you shouldn't be saying shit when it comes to comparisions like this.

      Until Thunderbird has all the features that Outlook has I don't see it taking off like Firefox.

      The reason why Firefox is so hot right now, is because it has all the features that IE has and more! And remember that this is a marketing comparision also. I know that from a technical comparision that Firefox lacks TONS of features that are in IE. To name one how about HTA support. HTA is a great feature for us geeks, but the average consumer wouldn't know what the hell HTA means or what it is used for.

    61. Re:Popularity by Genom · · Score: 1

      Actually, IIRC it's mbox, which pretty much any *nix mailer will read =)

      There's basically two files for each one (at least in my local mailstore), an mbox file, and a .msf file (which I'm assuming is some sort of index, but since it's a seperate file, it's inconsequential to getting hte actual mail in the mbox files into another app)

    62. Re:Popularity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh yes, the ASCII ribbon campaign. Here's the problem with that. Most people against HTML mail are against it because it bloats the message size. But, then they add 10 lines (or whatever it is, it's not exactly small since it's ASCII art of a ribbon) of crap to promote plaintext email. Does anyone else see the flaw in that logic?

    63. Re:Popularity by pixelphsr · · Score: 1

      100% agreed! I keep an old copy of Outlook around to use only for the calendar. The only other thing on my must-have list is syncing with my Palm OS PDA. Add those two things and I can finally say bye-bye Outlook.

    64. Re:Popularity by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      Bull. The average office user uses outlook. Home users (and many small users) use OE, and don't need a groupware-enabled PIM.

    65. Re:Popularity by yourEgg · · Score: 1

      Very very true. Ive managed to get everyone in my company using firefox on a daily basis, and in fact IE is looked on now with fear and loathing, due to its *security* features. However, I can not get them to switch to Thunderbird, even though Outlook represents a similar security risk. Most people at a user level don't make the groupware/email distinction, and there is a good argument they *should* not have to. Im paying close attention to the sunbird development thoug, and hopefuly this will eventualy integrate perfectly, and provide the same level of functionality as outlook. Im still waiting though, and its a real shame, as many people *do* really want to switch.

    66. Re:Popularity by lazytiger · · Score: 1

      Outside the hallowed geek world of Slashdot, you'll find that a heck of a lot of people use webmail (e.g., Yahoo, Hotmail), at least for personal use. And at work they use whatever they're told to use, which is almost certainly not Thunderbird.

      The abundance of other well-established email programs definitely diminishes Thunderbird's importance, but don't forget about the millions of people who don't use "real" email clients at all! The "browser as an interface" (or even an OS) is becoming more and more of a reality every day. Thus, Firefox's popularity is far more important and predictable.

    67. Re:Popularity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WAKE UP!!! It is the 21st century. It is OKAY to use a graphical email reader. And oh, get rid of that leisure suit. No one wears those anymore either.

    68. Re:Popularity by AstroDrabb · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, it is called Novell Evolution. It is a groupware client for Linux that does e-mail, calendaring, tasks and contact management. And can work with IMAP, POP, SMTP and Authenticated SMTP, Microsoft Exchange 2000 and 2003 and Novell GroupWise. I use it at work on Linux to work with our MS Exchange 2003 server.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    69. Re:Popularity by ThePhilips · · Score: 1
      I got impression from people who develop TB, is their primary target is stability. What is very very right approach IMHO. I've being using The Bat! for quite long time on Windows. Then after switch to Linux, I started with mutt (and fetchmail). Then after HTML for e-mails became popular enough I went to Netscape Messenger. I'm just tired of switching e-mail cleints. I bet others are too. I want one, stable one, I can use anywhere I come. Web-mail doesn't cut in - I cannot take it with me anywhere I like or need it. Mail is something important to have all the time with you.

      People used to switch e-mail readers - so they are less dependant on it. And fortunately, e-mail formats are not "forked" - like M$ did with HTML/DOM/CSS for IE - they are still basicly plain text.

      Browsing experience was crippled much more by IE, than e-mail experience by Outlook. For some pople Outlook (not OE) is the only choice, even when they have no Exchage Server. Outlook is true point of M$ Desktop & Office integration, many times unfortunately overlooked and later poorly copied by Evolution. And as this integration point Outlook enjoys popularity among virus writers: it supports everything IE supports, it provides e-mails servies, it manages address book, it manages notifications, etc. This integration is very important for some people. But for others like me it is not.

      Amongst many clients I have used before only mutt and Netscape Messenger (now Mozilla Thunderbird) are most stable for me. But it is probably only me. I switched back then from mutt after couple of months getting some html messages with pictures - I have couple of friends who love this feature and use it way too much.

      --
      All hope abandon ye who enter here.
    70. Re:Popularity by nickos · · Score: 1

      Ahh, I was looking for something that will run on Windows...

    71. Re:Popularity by archen · · Score: 1

      It depends on what you are using Outlook for. Now for typical usage, it doesn't make much sense. But on a large scale corperate enviornment, having these things together is actually smarter than you might initally suppose. For some places, email isn't just a messaging tool it IS the collaboration tool. A friend of mine was marketing director for a tech company and would tell me about getting 200 emails PER DAY. Now when you use email on that level, you will quickly need 1) contacts to keep track of who is who 2) a "todo" list because you'll probably never remember all that on your own. 3) scheduling, because realistically that's what a fair portion of corperate email is about, getting together and having worthless meetings.

      As an aside I'd like to say that resource scheduling in Exchange is a joke. It makes no sense AT ALL, and looks like a sorry cheap hack which is pretty pathetic comming from Microsoft.

      Outlook isn't a bad in theory, but there are a lot of things which could be improved upon. I think the approach of "stuffing" it all together is probably the wrong way to do it. With a modular program like Kontact you have a choice at least. You can use Kontact for mail/scheduling/etc, which includes Kmail, or use Kmail as the stand alone mail client.

    72. Re:Popularity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But there are bugs in bugzilla to make the Mozilla suite handle emailed Outlook meeting invitations and schedule them in the calendar.
      And one thing that Mozilla Calendar does really well is handle multiple calendars from WebDAV sources (ie collaborative calendars).
      For smaller businesses, that's plenty of features for a lot less money than Outlook & Exchange. However for any big/serious company, yeah you're right.

    73. Re:Popularity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the grand scheme of things, Outlook blows. It's bloated. It's slow. It feels like a slug. It uses IE to render the mail. Need I go on?

      It just happens to be what people use to connect to Exchange.

    74. Re:Popularity by redivider · · Score: 1

      It's not open source, but I found a program called WinDates that works pretty well. It's far from perfect, but it may work as an alternative to the Outlook calendar.

      WinDates

      And you can publish your calendars, in iCal format, here:

      iCal Exchange

      --
      Sinch
    75. Re:Popularity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is Thunderbird as "spread-like-wild-fire" as Firefox? I just don't hear people talking about TB as much as FF.

      Maybe it's the initials.

      "Hey honey, I just got TB. I love it! Everyone should get TB!"

    76. Re:Popularity by cbcbcb · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately, (at least version 1.4.6) it's full of bugs. It segfaults randomly; the user interface hangs randomly, and it can lose mail if this happens at the wrong time. The alarm daemon part can segfault, and so subsequent calendar notifications don't happen. It's extremely slow - it takes up to 10 seconds to open a new email.

      It's just slightly better than using Outlook under VmWare. If Exchange webmail (OWA) had a search facility I would probably not bother trying to use evolution.

    77. Re:Popularity by dan14807 · · Score: 1
    78. Re:Popularity by frostman · · Score: 1

      I know a lot of people who have e-mail addresses and don't have computers.

      Of course they have webmail. A few of them even have POP3 accounts on one of my servers, but they only use the webmail.

      When one friend finally bought a home computer I explained to him how he could download all his email there etc etc, and he just kind of stared at me blankly.

      He's a chef. The bistro where he works has some rental PCs on the net. A few times a day it's slow enough he can spend 20 minutes or so e-mailing (he gives free food to the PC girl in return).

      For some people even with computers, webmail is just better. And then there are all those without computers, which at least in Europe is probably more than you'd think.

      --

      This Like That - fun with words!

    79. Re:Popularity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I have no way at all of "converting" users of other mail programs, like Eudora.

      I switched from Eudora to Thunderbird because I couldn't get Eudora to handle Japanese email. Not at all. Whatever I did. Thunderbird, on the other hand, handles ISO-2022-jp just fine.

      So you just need to teach them Japanese, and they'll convert in droves. Wait, maybe there's a slight flaw in that plan...?

    80. Re:Popularity by cryogenix · · Score: 1

      That's still a hard sell however given the cost of Blackberry Enterprise Server :) I think I'll stick with my Treo 600. I find the push to talk beeping that Nextels and Blackberries offer irritating because people feel they have to carry on an entire conversation on speaker phone :) Groupwise has the technical merits but I think Novell picked up the OS/2 marketing team which was formerly the Commodore marketing team....

    81. Re:Popularity by cryogenix · · Score: 1

      Ok I'm gonna ask... Such as what? I've admin'd a gw system from 4.x all the way up to 6.5 for as long as it's been called Groupwise, but I'm not thinking of anything "significant" that GW has that outlook doesn't? The comment I consistently get from Users who have used both, is that GW (6.5) is more intuitive as far as getting around than Outlook is.. The one significant thing that comes to mind with GW is that you can run it's back end on Netware, Windows or Linux, whereas exchange is windows only, but this isn't something Joe Enduser is going to care about. What else are you thinking of that I'm missing? I can always use an extra selling point when someone says "Why don't we run exchange like everyone else?" My CEO asked me that question in a board meeting in the form of... "Well not to sound sarcastic, but are you telling me that we are smarter than the other 95% of the world that is running exchange?" My response was "Yes". I also pointed out that there are a large amount of people who also run Lotus Notes and not exchange. We've never had a virus propogate through our system nor have we ever had a day of downtime due to one, but I can't think of a client of ours that runs exchange that can say the same thing. The problem you run into as a GW admin is that Microsoft markets to the CEO's and CEO's then issue a directive to IT departments to migrate to Exchange because they got sold.

    82. Re:Popularity by cryogenix · · Score: 1

      That's actually a problem we are running into as a Groupwise shop. We're looking at implimenting a CRM solution and there are a few that only tie in directly to Outlook. There are those that will integrate directly to GW, but if for some reason we decided on one that was Outlook only, we'd be forced into a migration. I can't think of anything major offhand that really ties into e-mail directly other than CRM. Lots of applications may send an e-mail out, but that is almost always done via SMTP. CRM as far as I know, is about the only thing that really requires a higher level of integration. What the CRM companies have to bear in mind is that if they keep up the "Outlook only" policy, eventually Microsoft's own crm will evolve enough to replace some of those people. Since they are already an outlook shop, it will be an easy argument for Microsoft to make, that being, that their own CRM is going to tie into their own e-mail application far better than a third party vendors.

    83. Re:Popularity by boaworm · · Score: 1

      Just thought you should know.. if you enable HTML mail in outlook, and write something fairly simple, you'll end up with 2 or 3 points in spamassassin. Things like "start but no end html tag", "no body tags", various illegal (non w3c) tags, lack of proper mine separations, attachments as "winmail.dat" instead of original files etc.. Outlook is a very very very crappy email client.

      I work for a small webhosting company, and every single day we have to explain to people that their mail sent with Outlook, will never reach clients because they achive too much spam score, sometimes well over 10!

      (Please note, i didn't say anything about the wiz-wiz presentation/sceduler stuff, just that it simply cannot write proper HTML mail)

      --
      Probable impossibilities are to be preferred to improbable possibilities.
      Aristotele
    84. Re:Popularity by jovlinger · · Score: 1

      Unless you encrypt the message using java script (or other turing complete language) in the browser (and also solve the problem of how to verify that the java script doesn't have a backdoor), encrypted web mail is pointless.

    85. Re:Popularity by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      I agree 100%. MS Outlook sucks for just mail. I meant in the sense of groupware such as a corp has. Most of the mail just stays in a corp. For just email, MS Outlook and MS Outlook Express are the worst. Very non-standard. I always hate when I am on a mailing list and you get a bunch of ID10T's using MS Outlook or MS Outlook Express as their client, it kills all the threading.

      As for corporate groupware, MS had the best and easiest to use suite for a long time. However, I think Novell with their Groupwise that supports MS Outlook and Evolution can be a good challenge and IMO is better. I just whish that Evolution was written in Mono and ran on more platforms then just Linux. Then it _could_ be an MS Outlook replacement.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    86. Re:Popularity by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

      I don't know of any other product that works with MS Exchange under MS windows. MS keeps that stuff locked up and most companies probably didn't think there is chance with that monopoly market. I too looked for an alternative to MS Outlook on MS Windows and found none. If you find one, reply to this post.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    87. Re:Popularity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The WebDAV interface that Evolution uses is the documented way of interoperating with Exchange, so there's nothing stopping you from writing a plugin for your mailer of choice. Your problem is that 99.9% of Exchange users are more than happy with Outlook (which comes free with the Exchange seat licence).

    88. Re:Popularity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's easy to poke holes in arguments when you make them up yourself, isn't it?

    89. Re:Popularity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell are you talking about?

    90. Re:Popularity by natd · · Score: 1
      OK, here are the ones that matter to me. I have also (8 months ago) moed to a different business unit so am now an Exchange admin and Outlook user.

      Admin:

      • User settings are all 'server side'. Outlook profiles are a major pain the the ass. And it's always some kind of trick to automate their management which never works as seamlessly as GW.
      • GW installations and updates are a few MB. I had a 15 site GW with 128k links between them. over a 7 year period I upgraded and installed across the wire all the time resulting in a 15 to 60 second outage when I finall had to unload/load the new NLM versions. In Exchange, it's just not that simple or quick. Upgrades require serious planning and users know about it.
      • Access to other mailboxes. I am convinced my Exchange guy has this wrong, but it seems in Exchange users can't really manage their mailbox rights themselves. Assuming we have it wrong and those settings are supposed to work, it again requires the other user to modify their Outlook profile AT THEIR INDIVIDUAL PC. The result is that in the Outlook world, users don't take advantage of giving rights to other users which results in everyone sharing passwords so they can 'get into their email as she is off'.
      • Reliability. GW in 7 years never caused me a moments grief. No server reinstalls, no replication problems, just 100% working while I ignored it as a utility service that shouldn't need my attention. In my Exchange experience, I have a guy who is nearly full time working on it with routine issues, patching and so on. As someone who considered email something that we got right 20 years ago, I hate the amount of resource that my new place puts into keeping it going.

      I could go on, but I'll do a few user ones .

      • #1 by far - Right click a message, properties and you can see that messages have been delivered, opened, deleted etc. Individual per recipient. This is so useful I miss it each and every day in Outlook.
      • Filter / search. Outlook filters and searches but it is so slow you only use it when desperate - it must be doing it 'client side'. Conversly, in GW I filter pretty much every time I need to see an email as it's quicker than even scrolling down a few pages - takes a few seconds even if it's some message 2 years ago.
      • 'Proxy' access to others mailboxes. This is incredible in GW and pathetic in Exchange. See above for more.
      • Rules. Outlooks rules are NOT easy for an end user to create other than a simple' I'm on holidays" and even then it encourages them to make a rule which replies to all messages (not just ones specifically to them). Outlook/Exchange rules seem to be a mix of 'server side' and 'client side'. I've been unable to make rules to move messages on mailboxes other than my own (ie ones I have added as 'additional mailboxes' unless I settle for client side. This is no use for a million reasons. Again, in a GW world basic users USE rules - in Outlook it's a 'I'm on holiday' tool and anything further is too difficult or not possible.

        In any case above where you might think 'HE DOESN"T KNOW WHAT HE IS DOING - OUTLOOK/EXCHANGE CAN DO THAT!" I'd respond that I never had to make any effort to learn GroupWise and got nothing but perfect results. I'm now managing dedicated MCSE staff who tell me 'you can't do that' and I have to trust them. I usually am sceptical and get onto the technet forums - they then tell me the same. So If YOU know how to do it, you're in a minority - and that is the crux of my complaint with Exchange etc. It does a job badly and unintuitivly.

        Now, don't get me started about address book import/export on Exchange 2000..

      --
      Only big ligs use sigs.
    91. Re:Popularity by nukem996 · · Score: 1

      Its funny you say that since my job is fixing computers and getting peoples networks up. Most of them DO use webmail and like it that way, even if they can change it.

    92. Re:Popularity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right that Outlook is a groupware product, but really does not offer anything that Thunderbird + Sunbird can't do. Even without Sunbird, the only thing that Thunderbird cannot do that Outlook does is accepting meeting schedules.

      Said that, Thunderbird is *much*, but *much* better than Outlook. Ever tried to launch Outlook without a GigaEthernet connection? It completely blocks the entire PC; it's not that Outlook does not respond for several minutes, it's that your entire PC gets blocked.

      Next, Outlook does a tremendous job in *not* supporting any basic level of IMAP or features that makes IMAP such a great protocol.

      I used Outlook for a couple of months in between Netscape 4.8 and Thunderbird 0.2 and it was a hell.

  2. i read my mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    using my OS, emacs

    1. Re:i read my mail by pmazer · · Score: 1

      But how do you send mail, without a good text editor?

    2. Re:i read my mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember when EMACS stood for "Eight Megs and Continually Swapping"? Remember when 8 Megs was a LOT?

    3. Re:i read my mail by kesuki · · Score: 1

      Remember when keeping the graphic content of a website below 15k per page For ALL IMAGES (including the background) was essential.... Well I do... and suprizingly enough one of my personal webpages I made back in those days is still around... I had modem speed simulator when testing all my layouts and I'd benchmark the optimization of my site on the 9600 baud setting... If it wasn't rendering the page at a humanly tolerable rate at 9600 baud it wasn't small enough... I can't believe I was using the whole 'Home.htm' and leaving index.html unmade so the whole directory could be read INTENTIONALLY back then LOL course I was using Win 3.11 and couldn't make a .html file back then only .htm ;)
      Sigh totally off-topic, and i dunno what i was doing still using 3.11 in 1997, I guess windows 95 hadn't matured enough to be conidered stable by me yet*, that or I was still using 486 class systems.. with dialup external modems, to tax the cpu less..

      *= windows 95 Still hasn't matured enough to be considered stable by my standards... windows 98 SE was the only relatively** stable/usable 9x/ME edition..
      **= if you consider "requires Format and reinstall every 5 months 'stable'"

    4. Re:i read my mail by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 1

      So you prefer the stability of Windows 3.11 to Windows 95.

      Could you please let us know which hallucinogens you were using at the time? Must have been some good stuff.

    5. Re:i read my mail by jimmyfergus · · Score: 1
      Huh?

      Apologies for feeding the trolls, but comparing emacs to an old version of Windows is about as inappropriate as you could get. Emacs is to "modern" GUI-intensive editors as Linux is to Windows. Perhaps not as pretty or slick and with a steep learning curve, but if you know how to use it, it's much, much easier and faster to use. It's an engineer's tool.

      Where emacs falls down for email, is html. It can barely handle it, and slowly at that. Unpalatable as it may be to some of us, html email is the reality these days.

      As someone else pointed out, it used to be criticised for being bloatware, being 8Mb in size... Those days are gone.

    6. Re:i read my mail by kesuki · · Score: 1

      Windows 3.11 was fairly stable the problem was it's total inability to handle large amounts of ram. If you only had 4 MB of ram windows 3.11 was the way to go for stability on the windows side of things. Windows 95 was a bloody horrible nightmare that crashed running a single application (mirc) on a regular basis.. and that was fully patched, and with the latest versions of mirc running etc... oh hey and remember Windows 95 was the version of windows they patched a '41 day uptime' bug in it about 4 years after it was first released. it took 4 years for anyone anywhere to get a windows 95 machine to run for 41 consecutive days... So the question really is what substances have you been abusing to call windows 3.11 less stable than windows 95?
      A known memory managment limitation can be compensated for... to achieve higher uptimes. an entirely flawed sub system that can barely remain up for 41 days consecutively when running no applications.... now that's a bit harder to compensate for.

  3. Handling in Linux? by thephotoman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How does it do with mailto: links from Firefox in Linux? That's the one question burning on my mind.

    --
    Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
    1. Re:Handling in Linux? by SlashdotOgre · · Score: 5, Informative

      Under Gnome, clicking a mailto: link in firefox launches the default mail program you select under Preferred Applications in gnome-control-center. If Thunderbird is your default mail client, it will launch that.

      --
      Sadly, PS/2 was yet another victim of USB, which doesn't care what you plug into it, the electrical slut.
    2. Re:Handling in Linux? by bob+beta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What about us FVWM2 and Tab Window Manager (twm) (it's kinda nice, actually, and is 'built into' the base X11 distribution, i.e. it;s there by default on NetBSD, without having to add a single thing)?

    3. Re:Handling in Linux? by Vireo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My question is somewhat related... can you open a link in a new tab in FF by middle-clicking in TB? And in general, from a user point of view, are FF and TB as tightly integrated as Mozilla Mail and Mozilla-the-browser?

    4. Re:Handling in Linux? by killjoe · · Score: 1

      How about going the other way. I really liked using mozilla and being able to right click on a URL in my mail and have the "open in a new tab" option.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    5. Re:Handling in Linux? by xstonedogx · · Score: 1

      It does fine after you set it up.

      I imagine there's a plugin to do this for you, but basically in about:config you give Firefox the name of a script it should run when the "mailto:" protocol is given. Then you just have the script load thunderbird with the '-mail' argument and the address in the mailto.

      Basic script is like:
      mailto=$1
      thunderbird -mail $mailto

      Of course you want to add checks to see if thunderbird is already running, et cetera. A google search will bring up some scripts.

      (This, btw, will work with any client that accepts email addresses on the command line, not just Thunderbird.)

      I imagine opening URL's from Thunderbird and opening them in Firefox (or whatever browser) works along the same lines.

    6. Re:Handling in Linux? by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      I thought TWM stood for Tom's Window Manager?

    7. Re:Handling in Linux? by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

      The gnome hack sounds good, but I don't use gnome. I've been using the two side by side, and the best way I've found is to use the "copy email address" selection for mailto: links. I copy the link in firebird, then paste it right into TB. This is a pretty elegant feature, because you can copy email addresses from within TB as well. The only real disadvantage compared to running vanilla mozilla is load time (Firefox+Thunderbird takes longer than mozilla)

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
      1 John 4:14
    8. Re:Handling in Linux? by MMMDI · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Open links from other applications in:
      [x] A new tab in the most recent window

      ...takes care of the first problem. Never used Mozilla Mail or Mozilla-the-browser, so can't compare... but the integration between FF/TB is pretty good. Optional buttons in FF that show how many new messages are in TB is one of the nicer things.

    9. Re:Handling in Linux? by Worlock93 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mozex is an extension for Firefox that can handle mailto links (just about) anyway you want. I use it with pine, as I (ALSO) don't like graphical mail. Mozex can also be configured on how to handle: news, telnet, irc, ed2k, ftp, aim, downloads, Viewing source and editing text areas. Great program, I hight recommend it.

    10. Re:Handling in Linux? by Accipiter · · Score: 2, Informative

      Additionally, you can use the mozex extension to handle these types of things, completely independent of the window manager.

      --

      -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
      (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

    11. Re:Handling in Linux? by alphan · · Score: 2, Informative
      How does it do with mailto: links from Firefox in Linux? That's the one question burning on my mind.

      enter about:config to the addressbar

      set (or create) these key-value pairs:

      network.protocol-handler.external.mailto (bool) = true

      network.protocol-handler.app.mailto (string) = mozilla-thunderbird

    12. Re:Handling in Linux? by Freultwah · · Score: 1

      My problem was the reverse: how do I teach Thunderbird to open links in a new Firefox tab.

      The solution was right there.

      It also took care of the mailto: links opening in Thunderbird.

    13. Re:Handling in Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um... is there a solution somewhere amongst some guy trying to sell us "3-D" stuff? Did I miss something?

    14. Re:Handling in Linux? by bob+beta · · Score: 1

      It's the Tab Window Manager. It's fully doccumented in O'Reilly's 'Definitive Guide to the X Windows System,' the big 8-volume set considered the 'official documentation' for X.

      The man page for Slackware has twm(1) headed:

      'twm- The Tab Window Manager for the X Window System'

      I can't find it called that in O'Reilly's Volume 3 'X Window System User's Guide'

      X is neat, and it's cool to deal with it at it's roots once in awhile. You can't run much more than TWM on, for instance, a Mac SE/30 with it's one-bit 512x342 screen. TWM runs great though, for a nice game of GNU Chess under NetBSD.

    15. Re:Handling in Linux? by Freultwah · · Score: 1

      Holy macaroni. Should have checked from which clipboard the address came.

      This is what it should have been. Although it may well be too late for that.

  4. Im surprised by OAB_X · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Im surprised that it took so long after firefox to be released in 1.0 that thunderbird went preview. Though i can understand why they did, I always thought that they would go 1.0 together.

    I use thunderbird for all my mail, and it is much better then Outlook on windows. Good job Mozilla.

    1. Re:Im surprised by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's only great if you deal with English-only mail. Just about any other language introduces some pretty serious problems that prevent the widespread adoption of this outside of the US and Canada.

      The biggest issues is the inability of the mail reader to adequately auto-detect foreign character sets, so you end up with a huge jumble of garbage instead of the expected text.

    2. Re:Im surprised by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

      Are you talking about Thunderbird here? I don't know- I've never had much problem identifying incoming character sets, since all the sane email seems to come with a proper content-type: encoding listed somewhere. I've seen plenty of spam in foreign languages/odd character sets, I can assure you, in Thunderbird and PINE alike.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    3. Re:Im surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's different from my 0.9 experience, then. Japanese, for example, has at least 3 different character sets and TB can't seem to figure out what is what, especially when the mail is sent from a webmail address. EUC, Shift-JIS, UTF-8, TB just figures it's ASCII and screws up the text.

      You can say that this is a problem with the other end of the line, not putting content types on the mail, etc. But if I can't read mail from someone, the mail reader is useless.

    4. Re:Im surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah only the US & canada use english...lol

    5. Re:Im surprised by awl · · Score: 1

      It's a real shame the English language isn't used outside of North America ;-)

      I agree that more elegant internationalization is needed for the majority of the world population, but English is a much bigger minority than just North America.

  5. Multiple identities/accounts by Nadsat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Problem with Thunderbird is that I never liked the way it handled multiple-acounts. And could not import multiple identities from Outlook very well. Hopefully this is resolved. Looking forward to Thunderbird dropping presents all over the place from the sky.

    1. Re:Multiple identities/accounts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thunderbird's identity management is much improved even in 0.9. You can now set up multiple outgoing e-mail addresses, all using the same smtp server and all linked to a single incoming account. Very handy for me as I run my own mail server which pulls e-mail from a couple of different ISP and webmail accounts.

      Previously you needed to manually edit a config file to do this but now there is a dialog box for it.

      Allan

    2. Re:Multiple identities/accounts by John_Booty · · Score: 5, Informative

      Problem with Thunderbird is that I never liked the way it handled multiple-acounts.

      I'm not sure exactly what you're referring to, but I have a feeling you didn't like the way the mail was split up, with one "Inbox" per account? A lot of people didn't like that.

      Well, the good news is that you now have a choice. For each email account, you can choose whether the mail goes into an account-specific Inbox OR a "global Inbox". So you can have all your mail in one big Inbox, if that's what you like.

      Personally, I like having separate Inboxes for each mail account, because I have many mail accounts and each one has a pretty specific purpose. One for spam, one for friends, several for business/website-related purposes, etc. But apparently the majority of users want a global Inbox, and the developers listened. Pretty cool if you ask me. :)

      --

      OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
    3. Re:Multiple identities/accounts by 100_Monkeys_Typing · · Score: 1

      The problems i have with multiple accounts is that TB will check my main account on start up, but it wont check the rest of them until i physically click "Get Mail."

    4. Re:Multiple identities/accounts by MetalSkin · · Score: 1

      As of version 0.9 importing multiple accounts from Outlook Express worked perfectly.

      My only problem was I couldn't remember the passwords for all my accounts.

      However I didn't test Outlook, my comments are only for Express.

      Btw, I love how you can group seperate accounts into seperate inboxes, a lot more logical that way. However you can specify to use only one (which was the default when i tested importing from Outlook Express).

      --
      "When you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth." - Sherlock Holmes
    5. Re:Multiple identities/accounts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, as a longtime (relative to it's age) Thunderbird user, I got used to having different profiles for each outgoing email address (all tied to the same account). A real pain. To be honest, I'm not sure how long the identity manager has been included (it certainly wasn't when I started using Thunderbird) but I noticed it a week ago and couldn't be happier. Nice work and thanks to the Thunderbird team.

    6. Re:Multiple identities/accounts by Sepodati · · Score: 1

      Make sure "Check for new messages at startup" is checked under Server Settings for the other accounts.

      ---John Holmes...

    7. Re:Multiple identities/accounts by Hungry+Student · · Score: 1

      Try Tools -> Account Settings -> (account) -> Server Settings and tick "Check for New Messages at startup" (this is on Win32 btw, don't know if different platforms have different menu structures/options).

      IMHO, the only thing preventing widespread TB adoption is the inability to export back to whatever you've migrated from. No company is ever going to change its email app without a backout avenue.

    8. Re:Multiple identities/accounts by shawb · · Score: 1

      Under server settings there is a checkbox for "check for new messages at startup." I believe that the default is unchecked. Pretty simple to turn it on.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    9. Re:Multiple identities/accounts by uunh+haun · · Score: 1

      That's why having all the options, like with apple mail, is so nice. I have the big global in box and all the individual ones right below it, then all the folders for the filtered mail and the spam folder. That said, I don't really like the rest of the apple mail interface.

    10. Re:Multiple identities/accounts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is only a single outgoing server allowed.

    11. Re:Multiple identities/accounts by Cruxus · · Score: 1

      I am in the process of establishing a presence on a new domain, and that includes an e-mail address. I also maintain a university e-mail address. I would like to be able to send my e-mail using the SMTP server specific to that account. Is that possible in Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 Release Candidate 1?

      --
      On vit, on code et puis on meurt.
    12. Re:Multiple identities/accounts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, TB 0.9 has that feature in it as well. You can choose default SMTP servers in options as you create your accounts, and you can also choose which account to send from (and hence what SMTP to use) as you compose each email.

    13. Re:Multiple identities/accounts by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    14. Re:Multiple identities/accounts by Metteyya · · Score: 1

      Another thing in Thunderbird (but despite that I'm using it) that sucks with multiple accounts is the way it handles multiple outgoing mail servers. You don't set chosen outgoing mail server to chosen account - you just have to line them up in the same order as accounts.

    15. Re:Multiple identities/accounts by cortana · · Score: 1

      Incorrect! Try again! :)

    16. Re:Multiple identities/accounts by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

      I'd really love to use Thunderbird but I'm still not 100% happy with the way it handles accounts and identities. For example, I do use it for news groups right now and for each news group "account" I have to create a new identity. So I'm (lets say) "zaiff U. ".

      So if I set up three news group accounts, I have three duplicate identities, and really usefully (not), when I create new emails/news-postings, I can select the From: identity from my list of three duplicates. "But they're all the same you stupid computer.... arrrghhh!" I thik to myself! ;-D

      I'm sure Thunderbird will evolve into something good, but right now (I'm running 0.9), I still find the whole configuration thing a bit clunky.

      That said, I keep meaning to document all my issues and come up with solutions.... but I never have time (too much time on /.!) so I shouldn't complain.

    17. Re:Multiple identities/accounts by dos_dude · · Score: 0

      The "global inbox" is indeed a cool feature. I still prefer separate inboxes for each account (probably because most of my accounts are IMAP accounts).

      But what is really bugging me is that you cannot use (or even access) the filter of one account on another account. Why would I want not use the "delete if sa score > 7"-rule on all of my accounts?

    18. Re:Multiple identities/accounts by Quizo69 · · Score: 1

      Try this little doozie to help you find your old passwords:

      http://www.nirsoft.net/utils/mailpv.html

      It'll do Outlook Express, Thunderbird (though not necessary as it is built in) and others.

    19. Re:Multiple identities/accounts by midknight32 · · Score: 1

      There is a better way of doing this.

      In Mail app for OSX, messages for every mail account are tracked and go into entirely seperate inboxes (if you look at your library folder in your home directory and dig into the mail folder, you will see entirely seperate directories for each account), different trash boxes, different drafts boxes, etc.

      How they are displayed is an entirely different story. If you click on your inbox, it shows ALL of your mail from ALL of your inboxes. If you have more than one mail account, that overall inbox will have an expansion caret that alloews you to filter your view by inbox, choosing any one inbox (or group of inboxes) so you only view the mail from the account(s) you want.

      It's done in a very intuitive manner. Between that and the superb junk-mail filtering I grind my teeth when I have to use Entourage for an account.

    20. Re:Multiple identities/accounts by CreatureComfort · · Score: 1



      What's incorrect about it?

      I'm using TB 0.9. I have it configured to load each account into it's own mailfolder, and I have a filter that copies each new message received into the general mail inbox. I could just have easily set it up in the opposite manner and had everything delivered to general mail and copied to individual folders based on the account, or used either delivery type stand alone. It works great.

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
  6. Thunderbird is missing something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm a Thunderbird user and have been for a long time, about as long as it has existed. It's a fine email client, a good one, in fact. However, it's missing something. Missing what? I don't know. But it's missing something that would make people want to switch from the client they're already using. If it's your first client, or you're not happy with the one you're using, it's a good choice. But if you are happy, I'm not sure how to convince you to change to it.

    Spam filters? Available in other clients, either natively or through add-ons. RSS reader? I think most people that read RSS already have a reader they like. It's not the fanciest looking client, and it still has some bugs. So, how would you convince someone to use it?

    1. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by jsteinfo · · Score: 1

      I need Sunbird to get further along. I use Outlook at work but, would like to have a well integrated Calendar and Email client at home.

    2. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by pcmanjon · · Score: 0

      "Spam filters? Available in other clients, either natively or through add-ons. RSS reader? I think most people that read RSS already have a reader they like. It's not the fanciest looking client, and it still has some bugs. So, how would you convince someone to use it?"

      Well, the way microsoft got 99% marketshare in Outlook express is
      1) Making it so all you have to do is click on a subject without reading email to be infected or execute a program
      2) Using IE for HTML meaning a crafted script could execute code
      3) Being slow and crashes a lot
      4) With 'outlook professional' having an ugly menu interface that is suppose to be 'hip and cool'

      Perhaps TB developers could take a hint and add those features to their client? ;-)

      (It's funny, laugh :)

    3. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by MP3Chuck · · Score: 1

      "So, how would you convince someone to use it?"

      Well, security is as much a selling point for TB as it is for FF. Outlook/OE vulnerabilities are a big reason I still get virus attachments in my inbox every now and then.

      But I think a big reason a lot of people won't find the enthusiasm that FF has behind it is that a lot of people are content to use whatever web interface they've got. Most of the world uses aol/hotmal/yahoo/gmail as far as I can tell. Not only can you not [easily] use these accounts via POP3, but if you've only got one email address there's no reason to not use the web interface.

    4. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by oddman · · Score: 3, Informative

      You know one big advantage it has over it's competition (at least the MS flavor of competition?)

      I know exactly where my e-mail is stored on my computer. If T-bird ever crashes or if I need to copy the entire in-box I can do it easilly.

      In Outlook Express, the location of the mail is hidden. With absolutely no information on how to find it in the help-files or MS website. Further you can't export your mail to any easilly accesible format. I can't count how many messages I've lost simply because I was updating to a new HD and there was absolutely no easy way to migrate with OE.

    5. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's a poor news reader

    6. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by OctaneZ · · Score: 1

      if you are running unix certainly check out evolution.
      Originally on of Ximians flag ship products, now part of Novell's linux group.

    7. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by gavinjolly · · Score: 5, Informative

      I have recently moved a client Off thunderbird due to issues. Refer here http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=1710 10 for my post to the Tunderbird forums. Here is the summary of the issues from my message for those too lazy to click on the link

      • No spell check suggester
      • Limited signatures - Only one per account and no way to insert during editing a message. A pain for us who use signatures as an Autotext/proforma facility.
      • Searching for emails - In OE and other mail clients when the list is sorted by Sender clicking M will take you to the first M entry.
      • Formatting HTML emails - You cannot select HTML text and then set to the same text size from the formatting toolbar, you must go through the menu (Format > Size > Medium)

      I still use it myself as a preference.

      --

      The weathers here - Wish you were beautiful

    8. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by ColaMan · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's a setting buried in OE for youre "Store folder"... it points to where your mail is stored.

      But it's still fairly well buried in about 50 nested subdirectories in a non-obvious place. Bastards.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    9. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by thephotoman · · Score: 1

      Well, there is one reason to use a POP3 account (managable easily through Gmail without paying extra): spell checking.

      I know I'm not the only one that can't remember how to spell.

      Unfortunately, AOL, Hotmail, and Yahoo don't do POP3 for free. Yahoo does do it, but it costs $20/year (but with that, you get 2 GB and 20 MB in attachment space for each message). Hotmail stopped the service, and I have no clue about AOL.

      --
      Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
    10. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by dracvl · · Score: 1
      Easy.

      It's missing instant full-text indexing like the Opera M2 mailer has. The power you have with 4 years worth of mail instantly searchable/accessible in under a second is life-changing.

      Getting rid of folders sounds scary in the beginning, but you have stopped categorizing links after Google arrived too, haven't you? ;)

      Opera even had this feature long before GMail, but GMail got all the buzz.

      Have a look at the Opera M2 Tutorial if you want to know why this is one of the few non-free products I use.

    11. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's missing so much, especially calendar features. I know there is a calendar the mozilla team are developing but it's no good.

      Instead I've been converting people to Bloomba and they love it more than Outlook. It's just too bad Yahoo bought it out and it's not offered. Only if Thunderbird can be somewhat like it.

    12. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Of course it is missing something. It's missing the features that allow a virus or bot to infect your machine simply by mousing-over a link, scrolling down or simply previewing the email.

    13. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you use Opera mail without the browser? It looks like something I'd give to my parents but I'd choose Firefox for them.

    14. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by Doomie · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well, there is one reason to use a POP3 account (managable easily through Gmail without paying extra): spell checking.

      Gmail has a spell-checker and it's quite fast/reliable!

      --
      Doomie
    15. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by Nimey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What T-bird is missing vs Firefox is a monopolized market. There are a lot more email clients out there than web browsers, and I doubt that Outhouse Excess's marketshare is quite as high as IE's.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    16. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by PygmySurfer · · Score: 1

      I know exactly where my e-mail is stored on my computer.

      When I used Outlook Express, I knew exactly where my email was stored (it varied between Windows & IE releases, but was relatively easy to find). I use Outlook at work, and I know where my mail is stored too (If you don't, just search for a .PST file). Conversely, I'm not sure where Thunderbird stores email by default.

      As for migrating from one PC to another, all you had to do was copy the mail store (which, unfortunately, you couldn't find) to the other machine, and then Import it into the new mail store (Copying it to the mail store might've worked also). And if you use Outlook, it exports to many different formats.

      Your ignorance of how Outlook Express stores email should hardly be considered an advantage for Thunderbird.

    17. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by aardwolf204 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      its not non-obvious, its where all your other settings go. \document and settings\local settings\application data\microsoft\outlook

      Now read this post again and pay attention to the path. not an ms fan boy, i just dont think its that hard. oh, and ever hear of the xp files and settings transfer wizzard? its under accessories, system tools, great for when upgrading hdd or pc.

      --
      Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
    18. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by Xetrov · · Score: 1

      I'd send them a virus ;)

    19. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      One of my relatives was getting an obscure error message about the address book when starting OE. He was nagging me over the phone, so I pointed him at thunderbird.
      Next time I was actually there I tried to fix OE, and I couldn't find a way to fix the broken address book. I *think* he's still using Thunderbird since it does everything he needs, but since he hasn't had any problems I can't say for sure :).

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    20. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by Phleg · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? Drag a file from OE onto your desktop. Can you guess what happens? That's right, a plain text file with the entire source of the email.

      --
      No comment.
    21. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by jasoneyre · · Score: 1

      In the registry under HKCU\Identities, there should be only one "folder" (registry key).

      Somewhere down the later branches, there is a sort of mailbox location String. Setting this to a folder on another partition works quite well (I did this for parentals for a while, until I upgraded them :)

      So it's on par with getting Thunderbird's email location.

      (Check %USERPROFILE%\Application Data\Microsoft\Identities otherwise, I believe).

      Kind Regards,
      Jason

      --
      THSsMCHshrtrTHN160chrs -- And I don't even like to SMS!
    22. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by Pionar · · Score: 1

      It's missing lots of stuff. Integrated calendar, exchange support (can't really blame them for that one), speed, an interface that isn't 10 years old, and oh, innovation!

      It's just Netscape Mail with a junk filter.

      Oh, 1.0's got message grouping? Big deal. Give me something new! How about just letting me minimize it to the taskbar!!! Is that really that hard to do?

    23. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by ColaMan · · Score: 1


      \document and settings\local settings\application data\microsoft\outlook
      Now read this post again and pay attention to the path. not an ms fan boy, i just dont think its that hard.


      Dumbass. Checked your folder settings lately?

      Your bitchy little reply would have had some merit , except that "local settings" and "application data" are hidden folders. By default, n00bs don't have them visible, what with them being set being hidden and all. That what I meant about being "non-obvious". And yes, the files and settings wizard works ok, but it doesn't help you when your .idx files get hopelessly b0rked and you need to delete them.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    24. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by Pionar · · Score: 1

      And yes, of course I meant to the system tray/notification area.

    25. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calling people a dumbass, really a great way to show people that you are one smart guy. Why does it matter that they are hidden? That is a useless complaint, and even if it was not hidden, its not likely a "n00b" (in your clever mature speak) is going to know what or how to do/copy those files.

    26. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by rolling_or_jaded · · Score: 2, Informative

      In Outlook Express, the location of the mail is hidden. With absolutely no information on how to find it in the help-files or MS website.

      Erm... in Outlook Express, click on Tools, Options, click on the Maintenance tab, and there's a 'Store Folder...' button that will tell you where your OE files live, and allow you to move them to a different location.

      Personally, I found the mail files location harder to find in TB!

    27. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by killjoe · · Score: 1

      I switched my wife over from eudora. She likes it better. For a long time she was adamant about not switching but it was only because she was afraid of learning something new. As it turned out there was no learning curve she picked it up in a few minutes.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    28. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by phallstrom · · Score: 1

      How about a lack of being vulnerable to the Outlook virus of the week?

      That's a big plus for sons-in-law :-)

    29. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know... if they can't figure out "hidden folders", maybe they shouldn't be messing around with those files...
      And can we just start calling them "b00bs" ? It would make me smile more.

    30. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All you had to do was drag and drop your e-mails from Outlook's inbox into any old folder you wanted. When your new HD is set up, drag the files from that folder back into your new inbox, and they appear same as before.

    31. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Some of us like the Netscape Mail interface..

    32. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by grotgrot · · Score: 1
      However, it's missing something. Missing what? I don't know.

      Good IMAP support. The best IMAP client I have found on any platform is Outlook Express! Every year or so I go around and evaluate all the others and they all still don't get it, usually because they are based around the belief they are your only client and they download and own all the email.

      If you have to configure things locally (eg filters) and the setting is saved locally then that is useless in the IMAP world. I use around 4 machines each and every day, and so repeating configuration 4 times and have 4 competing machines running filters and maintaining 4 sets of settings won't work.

      Even the defaults for an IMAP account appear to be to save things like Sent Messages, Drafts, Trash etc on the local machine. (Either that or the import process ignores the OE config which said to save remotely).

      Other things such as not having the ability to automatically expunge folders as you click on others is very annoying (you have to manually expunge). (It can automatically expunge your inbox only on exit, not any other folders).

      It also looks like Thunderbird doesn't check all folders for new messages although I can't tell for sure.

      And I would like deleted items to appear as strike through rather than some tiny coloured flag.

      Once Thunderbird works well no matter how many machines you run it on, then I will be happy!

    33. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by MojoStan · · Score: 2, Informative
      In Outlook Express, the location of the mail is hidden. With absolutely no information on how to find it in the help-files or MS website.

      I found this information very easily on Microsoft's web site. From the left side of Microsoft's home page, I clicked the "Support" link, then the "Outlook Express" link, then the "Backup" link. The first How-to article at the top of the "Backup" page is "OLEXP: How to Back Up and Recover Outlook Express Data."

      From Microsoft's support page, that was just three clicks on easy-to-find links. I agree that Microsoft software can sometimes be a pain in the arse, but I think their support site and knowledge base are freakin' great.

      On the other hand, I don't know why the heck this info is so hard to find in the local help files.

      From that freakin' knowledge base article:

      1. On the Tools menu, click Options.
      2. On the Maintenance tab, click Store Folder.
      3. Select the folder location, and then press CTRL+C to copy the location.
      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

    34. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by terrab0t · · Score: 1

      Personally, I use spamgourmet.com for my multiple email addresses (most are disposables) and it forwards everything to my GMail account. The GMail web interface (as you guessed) is fine for me, so I'm completely covered. I can access my mail, my multiple accounts, and my mail app from any browser. To me, conventional mail apps are pointless.

    35. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I still categorize links, from the links bar, in folders and sub-folders, because sometimes I forget the exact keywords I used to find a specific site. And because two clicks is quicker for me than clicking and typing.

      I hate gmail's non-folder-ness though. Their "labels" are nice but there often times for me, each label might as well be its own folder. Unlike data files, the emails I get generally don't fall under more than one category.

    36. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by Desert+Raven · · Score: 2, Informative

      Limited signatures

      Try Tagzilla. Works great with Thunderbird. I've been using it since TB 0.6. It's not *quite* as easy as Outlook's, but it's good enough for me, and my sig file includes a dozen different sigs.

      Can't say much about your other points. I don't use spell checkers, I deal in unusual subjects with words that drive 'em nuts. I never knew about OE's sort function jumping to a letter, so I didn't miss it. :) And I never, ever send HTML email, so no issues there.

      What TB has that OE doesn't is far easier handling of multiple send addresses. I don't have to create a separate account for each, just add new "identities" under an existing account.

    37. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by xcomm · · Score: 1

      # No spell check suggester
      # Limited signatures - Only one per account and no way to insert during editing a message. A pain for us who use signatures as an Autotext/proforma facility.
      # Searching for emails - In OE and other mail clients when the list is sorted by Sender clicking M will take you to the first M entry.
      # Formatting HTML emails - You cannot select HTML text and then set to the same text size from the formatting toolbar, you must go through the menu (Format > Size > Medium)

      Thanks for speaking this out for me too!!!!
      xcomm

    38. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by Oscar_Wilde · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No spell check suggester

      And on systems that have spell checking ability built into every GUI element that can contain text (Cocoa apps on OS X at least but I'm sure there are others) there is still no spell checking.

      It just doesn't feel right on a mac when text boxes don't let you spell check things. Perhaps this kind of thing will be more common when the rest of the software world catches up ;-)

    39. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by saurabhchandra · · Score: 3, Informative
      I made a small list of features where Thunderbird scores over Outlook express. Here use it for advocacy :-)
      1. Inbuilt junk filter
      2. Spell Checker (OE doesn't have spell checker if MS Office is not installed)
      3. Save Searches as Folders
      4. Integrated RSS reader
      5. Inline search (no separate window is popped for simple searches, has a neat search box on top)
      6. Allows creating simple Rules for filtering mail automatically
      7. Option to view contacts in a sidebar for easy finding and insertion in compose window
      8. Inline search in the To/cc field ala Outlook
      9. Quick pre-saved filters (unread messages, flagged messages, last five days, people I know etc)
      10. Option to change screen layout
      --

      Watch Out!!
    40. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by westlake · · Score: 1
      I doubt that Outhouse Excess's marketshare is quite as high as IE's

      But it must be mighty damn close. Outlook Express was introduced in 1997 with IE4.
      It is reasonable to assume that Outlook or Outlook Express shipped as the default e-mail program with every Windows PC still in service, by some estimates, that would be 300 millon.

    41. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by Technonotice_Dom · · Score: 1

      Going to revoke my mods just to reply to this...

      One thing that really cheeses me off about OE is that every time it doesn't maintain a persistent IMAP connection. It will reconnect once or twice (I have no idea why twice) every time it checks for mail, reauths, checks and disconnects.

    42. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by happymark · · Score: 0

      If you want multiple signatures, you may create a few in templates (with different signatures).

    43. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by lewp · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I don't use a spellchecker often (not sure why, just never have), but it seems to me that this is such a good idea everyone should have done it a long time ago.

      --
      Game... blouses.
    44. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by Sithgunner · · Score: 1

      For people not using just ascii charactors will notice, but charactor encoding detection is way too poor as of 0.8. I hope it gets fixed by 1.0.

      It should auto detect the charactor encoding, either from header or from the body and show it properly, not just having the user select what encoding everytime. And for Japanese, I have to guess out of 4 encoding every message!

      Though, some messages do get auto detected, but there are mails that only body is properly decoded and not the title and such.

      So, this better get fixed properly, or it'll be a big problem for many end users.

      I'm sure mozilla team is working on it.

    45. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by Kingpin · · Score: 1

      Missing something in comparison to what? Outlook? Pfft. That's not a mail client - that's an abomination.

      --
      Unable to read configuration file '/bigassraid/htdig//conf/14229.conf'
      Geocrawler error message.
    46. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really have this 'adult discussion' skill down to a fine art don't you?
      Having said that it may be premature to think you're an adult.

    47. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      Formatting HTML emails[...]

      It's bad enough thunderbird supports such evil at all without making it easy.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    48. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by ssj_195 · · Score: 1

      You can check hotmail at least using hotwayd (under Linux) and BlueHttpMail (?) under Windows. It uses the exact same WebDav protocol that OE uses to check hotmail, so it doesn't break every time hotmail change their site layout (like, e.g., the gotmail script). Basically, hotwayd acts as a WebDav (-) POP3 translator. BlueHttpMail (or whatever it's called) goes one step further, and acts as a WebDav (-) IMAP converter [damn slashdot filters!]. I think there is something similar for Yahoo.

      Unfortunately, MS are soon to remove the WebDav method of access for all but paid accounts, as it is a vector for spam. >:(

    49. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by Justus · · Score: 1

      Just so you know, by default, Thunderbird only checks the Inbox folder for new messages.

      This can be adjusted by right-clicking on each folder, selecting properties, and ticking the 'Check this folder for new messages' box. That's pretty stupid, in my opinion, and it doesn't actually work that well in my experience. For example, when I receive a new mail in my inbox and get a tray notification, if I go to the inbox, read the mail, and classify it as junk, Thunderbird will move it to my junk mail folder (which is also set to 'check for new messages') and cause another tray notification despite the fact that the mail it just received has already been read (and is flagged as such).

      Otherwise, yes, I totally agree with you about the local vs. remote preferences.

    50. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by uglyduckling · · Score: 1

      I use IMAP exclusively, and I've found Thunderbird to be streets ahead of OE. On the machines I use OE is very unresponsive. I've not noticed the complaints you make about TB - on my machines deleted messages go straight into Trash and stay there until I empty it, so the confusing expunging system doesn't affect me. I think there's an option for choosing which folders to check for new messages, but I set mine up so long ago I can't remember. I certainly get the number of new/unread messages in brackets next to each folder name.

    51. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by Trinition · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      I switched from Outlook to Thunderbird for e-mail and Palm Desktop for everything else. My intent was to cut my umbilical cord form Microsoft a few strands at a time. Unfortunately, it still hurts.

      1. Everytime I upgrade, my extensions are rendered useless and I have ti find new versions. Unfortunately, many of them never get updated.

      2. Thunderbird is a memory hog. Not as much as Outlook, but then again, Thunderbird only does e-mail. I'm guessing this is what makes it pause for a n annoying second once in a while when I switch it into focus and click something.

      3. My contacts are not synchronized between Thunderbird and my PDA. Now would I want it to be. The contact information Thunderbird supports is weak. I'd rather have Thunderbird able to support external contact lists. Perhaps Palm Desktop, Windows Address Book, or just a directory full of vCArds.

      4. Thunderbird crashes on me occasionally.

      5. The UI layout, while decent, is not flexible. Why provide me with three fixed layouts insteado f just putting ME, the USER, in control,a nd let me freely drag and arrange anyway I want (like eclipse).

      6. Why the ?^@%^%$#! is there an RSS reader in it? I don't read RSS. I'mw orking all day and don't have time for that crap. Why not throw in a web rowser too? Remember when web browsers used to come with built in e-mail clients? DIdn't make sense to me either. I'm not looking for a mega applicance. I want a dedicated applications that is good at what it does. When I want RSS, I'll use a dedicated RSS reader. ...but... I still haven't gone back to Outlook. I just have faith that things will get better.

    52. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Um... It's far easier to change the location of your mail folder in Outlook Express than in Thunderbird, it actually works without loads of profile hackery, and the default directory is perfectly sensible and fits in with the Windows standards for application data. But apart from that, your argument was great. :-)

      Seriously, Thunderbird has many things going for it over OE, but how it stores the files on disk is not one of them.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    53. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by ShadoHawk · · Score: 1

      Really? No spell check? I never noticed. But then again I use it on my power book and OS X does spelling for me in almost every app I use. I think this is just making me even more lazy!

    54. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by Matje · · Score: 1

      Limited signatures - Only one per account and no way to insert during editing a message. A pain for us who use signatures as an Autotext/proforma facility.

      Doesn't the tagzilla plugin allow you to do this?

    55. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by eric_brissette · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing the Mozilla Calendar isn't what you're looking for? I don't know what kind of integration you need, but it meets my needs, which I admit are pretty basic as far as a scheduling program goes.

      http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/

    56. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by eric_brissette · · Score: 0

      I'll also say that I'm not really clear on the differences between Sunbird and the Calendar component.. Would someone care to elaborate?

    57. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by JayTeeUK · · Score: 1
      5. Allows creating simple Rules for filtering mail automatically
      6. Option to view contacts in a sidebar for easy finding and insertion in compose window
      I don't use Outlook Express and haven't for a long time, so excuse me if I'm talking rubbish. The last time I did encounter OE, though, was when I was fixing my stepdad's installation, and I'm fairly sure it did both of these.
      --
      James Tait, Programmer and Free Software Advocate
      JID: jayteeuk@wyrddreams.org
    58. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by mizidymizark · · Score: 1

      Spam filters? Available in other clients, either natively or through add-ons.

      The reason I use Thunderbird is because I havn't found another program on the Windows side that has the Bayesian e-mail filtering built-in. Outlook has junk mail updates from Microsoft, Eudora has set rules and OE has nothing built-in. The fact that I have trained my e-mail program on what is spam has made my e-mailing much easier.

    59. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know what it's missing for me:

      1. The ability to POST a message to a folder instead of having to send yourself a message (Outlook and Evolution can do this)
      2. The ability to save my address book easily online without having to lease a VPS account and figure out how to set up OpenLDAP.

      I still use it, though, because those aren't deal breakers (although #1 is very annoying, and #2 isn't available in other non-online clients anyway).

    60. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by Flooded77 · · Score: 1

      My version (0.9/Win) has a spell checker... The dang thing nags me on every message I send. Check in Tools->Options->Composition.

      From the Thunderbird site:
      There's no need for third party spell checking software. Mozilla Thunderbird comes with an integrated spell checker developed by the Spellchecker Mozdev Project.

    61. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by GooseKirk · · Score: 1

      Hold the phone, I have the same complaint about Thunderbird! In OE, there is a place in the options for "Store Folder" - sure, by default, OE places your mail in a ridiculously obscure location... but Thunderbird, as far as I can tell so far, doesn't even HAVE the option to change the mail folder, and it doesn't tell you where it is.

      At least with OE, I didn't have to Google to figure out where my damn email is stored. OE isn't good for this, but Thunderbird is even worse!

      Same goes for Firefox, too... I should be able to easily choose where my bookmarks and settings go. At least with IE, Favorites were easy to locate.

    62. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by IncohereD · · Score: 1

      Limited signatures - Only one per account and no way to insert during editing a message. A pain for us who use signatures as an Autotext/proforma facility.

      Have you looked at Tagzilla? This is one of those things that's perfect for extensions - it would be a pain in the ass for most people if this was included by default.

    63. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by Galuvian · · Score: 1
      What I'm really missing is multiple outgoing servers. I run TB on my laptop but only send mail from this address when I'm at home because I really don't feel like messing with the settings 3x per day.

      Yeah, I could set up something on my home linux box to route my email from anywhere I happen to be. But that's not a solution everyone can implement...

      As far as a killer feature to get people to switch to Thunderbird, I don't really know. A lot of the internet community is migrating to web-based email . Some users because they don't know what the alternatives are. Other users because they can access it from anywhere. Is there any way to gain marketshare from the web-based users? Could Thunderbird be stripped down to run as a web service on UXL through Firefox?

    64. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by DaveJay · · Score: 1

      I convinced my wife to switch over after her Eudora Pro started crashing and driving her crazy (kept deleting her preferences file and whatnot) and she found out how much it would cost to upgrade to the next version.

      To be fair, I let her try Outlook Express first, but she hated it. The Thunderbird transition took a while, since it couldn't properly import Eudora mail at the time, but once somebody figured out how to make that work, it was smooth sailing.

    65. Re:Thunderbird is missing something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truly, you have a dizzying intellect.

  7. New Theme? Nice. by WeAzElMaN · · Score: 1

    I love the features of TB, but I was really turned off by the theme they were using for it. If it has new and improved graphics and design, the experience will be complete.

    Going to download my copy now.

    -WeAz

  8. Gmail by Gertlex · · Score: 1

    I think part of the problem with TB popularity is the current fad of using Gmail... Even though I assume the two are compatible. My biggest problem with the FF/TB setup is that FF can't tell me if I have new messages unless TB is an open window... Either way, iirc, TB already announces itself anyways.

    1. Re:Gmail by cetan · · Score: 4, Informative

      with gmail providing pop3 access, you /could/ integrate the two :)

      But really, I use both. gmail has taken over "web" duty from my old yahoo account and thunderbird controls mail from my domains.

      --
      In Soviet Russia...michael would be rotting in Siberia!
    2. Re:Gmail by OAB_X · · Score: 1

      They might be eventually compatible if a program like hotmail popper or yahoopops is invented for it. Im sure it wont take that long as there are tons of gmail hacks already (firefox extention, virtual drives, etc.)

    3. Re:Gmail by thephotoman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Er...you don't have to pay for POP access with Gmail. You just activate it in your settings. No hacks needed.

      --
      Haec merda tauri est. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam.
    4. Re:Gmail by fred+ugly · · Score: 1

      There is. FreePOPs supports tons of different webmail providers (hotmail, yahoo, gmail, etc...)

    5. Re:Gmail by hawaiian717 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      GMail provides specific directions for setting up POP access for many different mail clients, including Thunderbird:

      # Outlook Express and Outlook 2002 (and older) (Windows)
      # Outlook Express and Outlook 2002 (and older) (Mac)
      # Outlook 2003
      # Entourage 2004
      # Entourage X
      # Eudora 5.1 (and higher) (Sponsored & Paid Mode)
      # Eudora 5.1 (and higher) (Light Mode)
      # Netscape Mail 7.x
      # Netscape Mail 6.2
      # Netscape Mail 4.5, 4.6, or 4.7
      # Apple Mail
      # Mozilla 1.7
      # Thunderbird 0.x

      --
      End of Line.
    6. Re:Gmail by joshuaobrien · · Score: 1

      I used to download mail from my ISP using POP in Thunderbird, but backing up that mail was a headache and importing mail when i move between machines is a pain.

      Now I just download mail from my gmail account with thunderbird and gmail archives all the mail i've downloaded. If I lose my local copy, I can just download the archive again. No hassles!

    7. Re:Gmail by Vaughn+Anderson · · Score: 1

      Has anyone noticed that now with gmail you are no longer at gmail.com but at gmail.google.com? Not to be a conspiracy nut here, but what's to stop google from collecting cookies that connect your gmail account to your searches? ...I don't like it...

  9. But I just finished compiling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, whatever...

  10. Desired Features by SlashdotOgre · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What I really wish Thunderbird would do is sync with my PocketPC. At the very least I wish it was easier to sync my address book. I also hope they have better support for vCard exporting. On a side note, does anyone know the timetable for the next major mozilla.orf milestone, Mozilla Suite 2.0, to be released?

    --
    Sadly, PS/2 was yet another victim of USB, which doesn't care what you plug into it, the electrical slut.
    1. Re:Desired Features by Equis · · Score: 1

      Amen, brother. Is it really so much to ask that my laptop and smartphone have the same address book, calendar, and task information?

      I use Outlook on my PC only because it came "free" (yes, I know the cost was rolled in) with my phone and all the info syncronizes perfectly. Outlook 2000 sucks (yes, that's what came with my new phone) and I'd much rather switch to something that is standards compliant and is updated with new features regularly.

      Switching to Firefox was a no brainer, but I'll make the switch to Thunderbird and Sunbird when these couple issues have been resolved. Roll it in or make 'em extensions, whatever. Surely, I can't be the only geek that needs these features to make the jump. Unfortunately, IANAprogrammer.

    2. Re:Desired Features by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Exchange connector would be great. Evolution kicks ass, I prefer it over outlook in every way but it won't run in windows or mac (not the 2.0 version anyway).

      Please have an exchange connector so I don't have to use outlook when I am at work.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    3. Re:Desired Features by Desert+Raven · · Score: 1

      Yup, lack of a reliable Palm sync is the one thing keeping me from completely moving to Thunderbird. If you really do some digging, there is a plugin for the Palm. However, it's pretty dismal, and at one point completely borked everything. I had to do a complete re-install of TB and the Palm software.

      If they get a Palm synch module that is reliable and works with Sunbird, I'll be able to dump Outlook entirely. Until then, I can only use it for some of my accounts.

    4. Re:Desired Features by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1
      Surely, I can't be the only geek that needs these features to make the jump. Unfortunately, IANAprogrammer.

      Well, then surely YANAgeek either? :-)

  11. A couple of things: by lawpoop · · Score: 4, Interesting
    1. The importing process seems to only have a wizard to import from other email programs. I would like to have the option to point to a directory or file of email to be imported.

    2. It would be really cool to have automatic virtual directories. I have my email sorted into subfolder by email address. I have rules set up to put emails into folders. Why not have this be automatic? Sort by email address, sort by folders. I wonder why no popular email client has this.

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
    1. Re:A couple of things: by jeffehobbs · · Score: 4, Informative


      It would be really cool to have automatic virtual directories. I have my email sorted into subfolder by email address. I have rules set up to put emails into folders. Why not have this be automatic?

      Saved Search Folders is exactly, precisely what you want, and it's in Thunderbird right now. It's an insanely great feature.

      ~jeff

    2. Re:A couple of things: by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      OK I RTFA... Do I have to create the search criteria first? Do I have to do this for each and every email address? If so, it is not exactly, precisely what I want. Don't wait for me to say it, just go ahead and make search folders for my entire address book.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    3. Re:A couple of things: by cmeans · · Score: 1
      Sounds like a great Extension.

      1. Observe the Address book
      2. When a new entry is made, one is deleted, or changed, add, remove or modify a search folder.

      Writing an extension isn't that hard, and it's "probably" a lot easier that writing a plug in for Outlook.

    4. Re:A couple of things: by jeffehobbs · · Score: 4, Informative


      Then it sounds like you're a candidate for "Grouped by Sort", which is a dumb name for a cool feature:

      1) sort your mail by sender.

      2) hit "G". Now all your mail is arranged in little collapsed subgroups depending on the sender/email address.

      This doesn't use folders per se, so I agree that it's not exactly, precisely what you want, but the end result is similar.

      ~jeff

    5. Re:A couple of things: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      1. The importing process seems to only have a wizard to import from other email programs. I would like to have the option to point to a directory or file of email to be imported.


      Tell me about it.

      This is an amazing feature which, for some reason, has not been in Netscape since version 3.x (that's not a typo). It was under the menu item "Add Folder...". You could just point to a raw mail file which you had downloaded or shuttled from the host where you were running pine, and bam -- instant archive of that month's email.

      I held onto a version of Netscape 3.x for the longest time because the feature was eliminated as of version 4.x, never to return.

      And even under the version 4.x regime, you could still automatically process subdirectories of email downloaded in this fashion (I'd have a date-stamped subdirectory for each download of email I schlepped home on CDR), but as of 6.x and on up, the whole .sbd thing was introduced, and the use of Netscape/Mozilla clients set loose on downloaded mail folders just doesn't work. It's doable but sufficiently painful and clunky that it's not worth the trouble, so I'm in trouble when I need to find some old email...

    6. Re:A couple of things: by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's pretty cool, but I would like actual subfolders so I can see who I'm getting new email from, instead of scrolling through an enormous sorted folder.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    7. Re:A couple of things: by kesuki · · Score: 1

      Someone mentioned thunderbird has a similar feature, but an old USENet/e-mail Client I used to use Forte Agent has had all those fearures Since Pre-Windows ME... If I actually had e-mail to read, instead of just spam to delete, maybe I'd still be using an e-mail client.
      You could even sort by filter critera, not too useful for e-mail, but great for USENet especially binaries groups er... *COUGH*

    8. Re:A couple of things: by alphageek101 · · Score: 1

      2. It would be really cool to have automatic virtual directories. I have my email sorted into subfolder by email address. I have rules set up to put emails into folders. Why not have this be automatic? Sort by email address, sort by folders. I wonder why no popular email client has this.

      I use this feature in Thunderbird all the time. To "group" your inbox by sender: select the Inbox, sort the messages by sender by clicking on the column heading, and then hit the "g" button on your keyboard. This will sort your messages into the "automatic virtual directories" you speak of. Click another column heading to return to the unsorted view. Apparently this also works for sorting your messages according to priority, sender, recipient, status, subject, or label.

    9. Re:A couple of things: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first guy told you. RTFM.

      File > New Saved Search...

    10. Re:A couple of things: by de+la+mettrie · · Score: 1

      I would like to have the option to point to a directory or file of email to be imported

      My feelings exactly. I've been using Mozilla Mail so far as a mail client, and the only thing that stops me from switching to Thunderbird is the lack of a "Mozilla Mail" import feature. I've read somewhere that it can be done by copying files from one profile folder to another... but this isn't an end-user thing to do, really, and it's not documented.

    11. Re:A couple of things: by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      And, like I replied to him, What a PITA to have to go and do that for my entire address book. Why am I doing the computer's work?

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    12. Re:A couple of things: by Espinas217 · · Score: 1

      You could try OperaMail. I've been using it for a while now and it's aproach to e-mail is really cool. It doesn't use folders but views instead and does what you say and a lot more. Give it a try, it has some rough edges but it's really usable. www.opera.com

      --
      La vida no es una pastafrola. :wq
  12. promoting Thunderbird is a timing thing by bersl2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    1. Someone complains about Outlook Express on USENET or in a forum.
    2. ???
    3. Profit!---er... Download!

  13. Pegasus Mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    Pegasus Mail is a decent mail client that handles multiple accounts better than Thunderbird. Also it's particularly robust and free for personal use.
    Pegasus Mail
    I think the only reason why someone wouldn't use it is because there may not be a lunix client.

    1. Re:Pegasus Mail by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      There's also the group that wouldn't use it for another reason: it's not (big-F) Free.

      Of course, that group is probably contained within the Linux group, so it's not really different except that they wouldn't use it even if there was a Linux client.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  14. Sure wish it.... by catbutt · · Score: 1

    ....allowed you to sort by "who" (i.e., the other party, not just sender or recipient), and allowed you to filter outgoing messages and put them in the appropriate folder based on the recipient.

    Bummer.

    1. Re:Sure wish it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make your filters and include a match for sender = you@domain.tld, then just run the filters on your Sent Mail folder.

  15. how does this compare to firefox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i know that firefox just released 1.0 also, can anyone tell me what the pros and cons of each are? i am using internet explorer right now and wondering if it is worth the trouble of trying either

    1. Re:how does this compare to firefox? by ral315 · · Score: 0
      Firefox contains many features that are not contained in IE:

      Tabbed Browsing (instead of multiple windows, you can use just one)

      Customizable (extensions allow you to add virtually any feature)

      Fewer serious bugs
      Thunderbird, while it may not be the best e-mail program out there, is better than Outlook Express (assuming you use that now)

    2. Re:how does this compare to firefox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      firefox is a browser, thunderbird is email. Firefox is a superior browser to internet explorer, more secure, has tabs, rss, blocks popups, etc.

  16. What's keeping me from switching from Outlook - TB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is the Spambayes plugin for Outlook. I've used this for a while now and I simply love it. I never end up with spam in any of my inboxes, *BUT* here's the catch. I do have to check my "Possible Spam" folder every few days and see what's in there. Every so often a legitimate e-mail will end up in that folder. I can quickly & easily recover any messages I want, and then delete the rest as actual spam (which improves the training).

    Why doesn't TB offer something like SpamBayes: Good Mail, Maybe Spam, Spam. I tried TB a few months ago and don't like the idea of having to check dozens of spam messages to make sure a good e-mail didn't end up in there. I've been using FF for a while now and love it, and I would love nothing more than to ditch Outlook, but so far my love of Spambayes is greater than my hate for Outlook.

  17. Why Mail and News? by fred911 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't understand why people want a browser that has a POP and NEWS client built in? If I want to use
    POP I use my POP client (not outhouse). If I want to use NNTP I use a NEWS client.

    Why expose yourself to such a mess?

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:Why Mail and News? by ral315 · · Score: 1, Informative

      First off, it's not a browser.

      Secondly, TB offers NNTP an option. Personally, I use TB as a POP client, and use another client as a NNTP client.

    2. Re:Why Mail and News? by fred911 · · Score: 1

      "First off, it's not a browser"

      As I take my foot out of my mouth... ...nevermind:>

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    3. Re:Why Mail and News? by znark · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I don't understand why people want a browser that has a POP and NEWS client built in? If I want to use POP I use my POP client (not outhouse). If I want to use NNTP I use a NEWS client.

      E-mail and news (and offline dial-up BBS messaging of the old days) are all sides of the same coin, communication-wise:

      • You have paragraphs of text.
      • You have quoting.
      • You have signatures.
      • You need to have a message editor.
      • You usually have a need to archive important messages into folders of your own choosing.
      • Most often you would like to keep a record of what you have yourself written.
      • You need some search facilities.
      • There must be a way to see a list of new messages, and an option to thread them into coherent discussions.

      A well-written news message is the same as a well-written e-mail message. The line between the two further blurs when you subscribe to mailing lists. Why use (and learn) two different interfaces and programs for handling what is essentially the same form of communication?

      -- znark
    4. Re:Why Mail and News? by MetalSkin · · Score: 1

      what client do you use? and is this under windows, linux or mac?

      --
      "When you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth." - Sherlock Holmes
    5. Re:Why Mail and News? by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1

      I don't know how much they're really alike as communication media; but in terms of coding, if you've written an Internet email client, then you're halfway to writing a Usenet newsreader, and vice versa. (I speak from experience.) So it makes some sense to combine them, in that respect.

      In Thunderbird's case, it's also supposed to replace the news and mail portions of the old Mozilla Communicator suite, with its all-in-one approach. I suppose they could have broken it down still further, into news and mail clients; but they probably figure that current levels of Usenet usage wouldn't justify a separate client. (Obviously some folks disagree, as there are still some standalone news clients in development. But most of those have an emphasis on binaries.)

      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    6. Re:Why Mail and News? by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      They're even closer than that, the format of the messages *is* the same.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    7. Re:Why Mail and News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      xnews is good under windows, grabit as well.

    8. Re:Why Mail and News? by slimyrubber · · Score: 1
      I don't understand why people want a browser that has a POP and NEWS client built in? If I want to use POP I use my POP client (not outhouse). If I want to use NNTP I use a NEWS client.
      I, for one use gmane with thunderbird. It funnels mailing lists into news groups. It is a bidirectional mail-to-news gateway. That way I never run out of limited space provided by my mail server. And I dont have to download the ml messages.

      It is the ultimate way to manage mailing lists.
      --
      [ I can not bring myself to believe that if knowledge presents danger, the solution is ignorance ] -- Isaac Asimov
    9. Re:Why Mail and News? by EzInKy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't understand why people want a browser that has a POP and NEWS client built in? If I want to use
      POP I use my POP client (not outhouse). If I want to use NNTP I use a NEWS client.


      The same as I consider editing, compiling, and debugging as one integrated development task I see browsing, reading email, instant messaging, and news reading as one integrated web communications task, that is why I'm sticking with Mozilla as long as I can. It's just plain convenient not to have to launch five applications to do related chores.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
    10. Re:Why Mail and News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why use (and learn) two different interfaces and programs for handling what is essentially the same form of communication?

      Because the grandparent poster thinks nntp/news is for downloading porn, not reading/writing messages.

    11. Re:Why Mail and News? by harmonica · · Score: 1

      All valid points, but I think grandparent was asking why a mail/news client has to be integrated with the browser.

      Obviously, it doesn't have to. It's nice for average users to have everything in one package, I guess. They don't want to spend time investigating the pros and cons of different clients the way /. users probably do.

    12. Re:Why Mail and News? by gowen · · Score: 1
      as one integrated web communications task,
      Integrated communications task --- check. But "web"??? What on earth does the damn web have to do with it?
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    13. Re:Why Mail and News? by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Why use (and learn) two different interfaces and programs for handling what is essentially the same form of communication?

      Because the interface for Usenet is significantly more complex than the one used for email. I know that behind the scenes, both are very much alike, but my parents might just figure out how to use an email application, but they won't ever figure out Usenet. Integrating both into the same app often creates unnecessary complexity for the email part, which should be extremely straightforward. This is crucial especially because among all the old Internet services, email is used the most (close to everyone except of course in Korea), and Usenet the least (some geeks).

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    14. Re:Why Mail and News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You need to have a message editor.
      And that message editor must be user selectable. I am so goddamn sick of being forced to use crappy editors with email clients! The email client should allow the user to select the editor used, defaulting to the crapola included editor.
    15. Re:Why Mail and News? by ral315 · · Score: 1

      Personally, I've been using SharpReader (Windows, I don't think it works on *nix/Mac). I'm sure it's not the greatest, but I basically just need it for a few different news sources- nothing big.

  18. Why I still use Outlook Express by greenreaper · · Score: 1

    Basically, Thunderbird took too much in the way of resources for too little in the way of features. No Hotmail was a big no (yes, I considered writing it myself, but I was put off by the number of people who had started and failed before :-). I just had to look at task manager, though. Why would I want to switch to an app that used 35k when I had one that worked in 20? Just not sensible. So I stay with OE.

    1. Re:Why I still use Outlook Express by bersl2 · · Score: 1

      Man, I've seen minimalism before, but 15k makes a difference? How much RAM is on that machine? Surely there's a better reason that.

    2. Re:Why I still use Outlook Express by greenreaper · · Score: 1

      That's 15 *thousand* kilobytes. Sorry, not used to working in numbers below that nowadays. Note that I said OE used 20 and TB 35 . . . if either of them actually used 35 kilobytes I'd be laughing. :-)

    3. Re:Why I still use Outlook Express by bersl2 · · Score: 1

      double sanity check failure

    4. Re:Why I still use Outlook Express by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I still have the same question the other guy did: why do you care about 15MB? Isn't there a better reason?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    5. Re:Why I still use Outlook Express by leonids · · Score: 1

      15mb is a lot, when you are a born multitasking freak, and you don't happen to own a fast computer with plenty of ram ( >512 ). Same for Firefox, it seems to eat up plenty of memory once I have been using it for a long time.

    6. Re:Why I still use Outlook Express by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it satisfying to not check on such minutiae, and to enjoy using the computer instead of fussing over the details.

    7. Re:Why I still use Outlook Express by greenreaper · · Score: 1

      The lack of Hotmail would be my better reason, but, you know, I don't really need one! If one thing is better for one reason, then why choose it over the other?

      My mail client is something I have loaded all the time. I consider the resources it uses "lost" to other programs. If I lose about 75% more resources with one mail client than another, and the one that uses fewer resources actually does more, then the decision is clear.

    8. Re:Why I still use Outlook Express by mrchaotica · · Score: 1
      If I lose about 75% more resources with one mail client than another, and the one that uses fewer resources actually does more, then the decision is clear.
      Aha! So Outlook Express has some feature that Thunderbird doesn't (apart from using less RAM). What is it?
      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    9. Re:Why I still use Outlook Express by greenreaper · · Score: 1

      Like I said, the lack of Hotmail. And yes, I know there are addon apps that do it, but frankly I see no particular reason to even consider them beyond noting that one of the most popular uses Java and is thus going to suck even more of my precious megabytes away. Thunderbird has to offer more in the way of features for me, not less. :-)

    10. Re:Why I still use Outlook Express by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Oh, sorry, I misread that part.

      Of course, I'd much rather use Yahoo or Gmail, even if POP access does have to be hacked into them (although I actually use the webpage interfaces). But that's just me...

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    11. Re:Why I still use Outlook Express by greenreaper · · Score: 1

      Well, I have a Gmail account, but Hotmail has worked fine for me. Yahoo has the same issue, same solution (I think) - a WebDAV interface, if one could be constructed.

  19. how does it stack up... to evolution ? by kiljoy001 · · Score: 1

    That's my burning question, I rather uses evolution than thunderbird. On my winbox, however it IS my client of choice. I think the fact that evo comes with a calander function (like the up coming sunbird), is what grabs me. However I am a bit dissapointed that they did away with the summary page with all the rss feeds ;)

    1. Re:how does it stack up... to evolution ? by TheLibero · · Score: 1

      The only bit that makes me consider switching from Evolution is the RSS browsing capabelities. RSS feeds are my 15 minutes way to find what things I've to read rather than scanning 10 of websites everyday spendings few hours on that. I don't understand why Ximian guys have taken that from Evolution. And now since I'm having a fresh installtion of FC3 on my laptop. Thunderbird is a very strong candidate!

      --
      "Evil thrives when good men do nothing"
  20. Re:Popularity - locked in to Outlook by sien · · Score: 1
    One factor that slows Thunderbirds success is that so many people are locked in to Outlook as there isn't cross platform alternative.

    Thunderbird also doesn't yet have the calendering and shared contacts lists and all the other stuff that Outlook has.

    This is coming in related projects, but right now would it be wise to tell Joe the sales rep that he should dump Outlook and lose his shared calendar and contacts for Thunderbird whereas getting him to use a better, faster, safer browser in Firefox is a no brainer.

  21. KMail by Helios1182 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I used Thunderbird back in the Windows days (say, 9 months ago or so). Since I switched to Linus (Suse w/ KDE) I've been using K-Mail. It works great, integrates well, and does everything I need. Quite frankly see no reason for Thunderbird at this point. I do have a copy installed so I can walk my Grandparents through when they have problems, but thats it. If I still had Windows I would probably use it still.

    1. Re:KMail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux, not Linus.

    2. Re:KMail by Ingolfke · · Score: 2, Funny

      Does Linus read you your email? Is he friendly in person? What do you have to feed him?

    3. Re:KMail by bm17 · · Score: 1

      I've used kmail for a long time. I tried Thunderbird (just now) then decided to switch back. I like KMails PIM integration.

    4. Re:KMail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Work is a Windows shop; I use Thunderbird there. I was running Linux/KDE for a while and used KMail. I can't stand Thunderbird because of my pleasant experience with KMail. Filtering seems to be much more intuitive in KMail.

      I use Linux/KDE/KMail at home too. It's a pretty damn good e-mail client.

  22. Re:New Theme? Nice. by OctaneZ · · Score: 1

    I would call it an updated theme, I wouldn't really call it new. Certainly a bit more polish to it though. If you were really put off by the "old" theme you will likely not like this one either.

  23. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  24. I'm sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This is the most redundant comment I've ever read, how did this get +4 Interesting?

    If you like outlook, keep using it. Thunderbird is a great mail app. Try it out, if you like it... fine. If not, then fine too. Thunderbird gives functionality that a good mail client should.

    Asking for some amorpheous feature that you don't even know is ridiculous. If it gives you everything you need, why are you complaining?

    1. Re:I'm sorry by ArmorFiend · · Score: 1

      I'll play the fool and assume you're not trolling.

      Mozilla & Firefox, as browsers, clearly raise the bar and make IE look really silly, with all their new features: typeahead find, tabs, and perhaps the dnd configurable toolbar.

      TB doesn't have any revolutionary features. That's what grandpa's kvetching about.

    2. Re:I'm sorry by bheer · · Score: 1

      Mozilla and Firefox, as browsers, clearly raise the bar and make IE look really silly, with all their new features: typeahead find, tabs, and perhaps the dnd configurable toolbar.

      Oh please. Typeahead find is disabled in firefox default installs for a reason: it confuses newbies no end. Tabs - unless you browse with 5+ pages open, and many users don't, tabs are not that useful. The DnD configurable toolbar? IE has had a better one since version 4.

      If you are going to evangelize, at least get it right: popup blocker, optional adblocking via Adblock, no ActiveX hassles. Security, security, security.

      Even Gecko, a superb renderer (especially for complex layouts) is not a good reason for most people to switch because the sites most people visit work very well with IE (hell, Slashdot renders better in IE than in Firefox).

  25. Re:New Theme: Nice? by oneeyedelf1 · · Score: 1

    I liked the old theme more, the new icons are just too big, and roundish styled.

  26. Does anything do that? by BugBlatterBeast · · Score: 1

    Or should I say, does anything do that well? My only experience with filing sent mail was Lotus Notes & that was a bit scabby.

    It would be a great feature.

    --
    If you steal this sig, the only people who will profit are professional criminals.
  27. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  28. Re:New Theme? Nice. by Malevolyn · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    That's why theme support was created.

    --
    Your ad here.
  29. DANG that's a big pipe! by Matey-O · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    415 KB/sec...after 35 comments on Slashdot!

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  30. No easy way to use it at work (Exchange 2003) by mikeputnam · · Score: 1, Informative

    Despite our "corporate software standards" I run Firefox as my default browser. However, I have not found that I can replace Outlook 2003 with TB in an Exchange 2003 environment. I'm sure that Microsoft puts less effort into IMAP workings than they do integrating their client.

    --
    It is unbecoming for young men to utter maxims. -Aristotle
    1. Re:No easy way to use it at work (Exchange 2003) by killjoe · · Score: 1

      Evolution works great with exchange. It's way faster then outlook and has more features. I especially love the fact that you can view your private and public calendars together in one view and the the virtual folders.

      Give it a try, I bet you will never go back to the abomination that's outlook.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    2. Re:No easy way to use it at work (Exchange 2003) by Simulant · · Score: 1

      I use Tbird with exchange 5.5 at work and with 2003 at home. Works great. Better than expected. MS' server IMAP implementation appears to be significantly better than their client IMAP implementations.

      This is after using Outlook 2003 for 5 or 6 months and then finally getting fed up with it.

      BTW, IMAP appears to be the easiest way to move move mail from one exchange mail box to another since Outlook only allows one exchange account to be configured. I use tbird to move mail between user's accounts when they move around which occurs frequently in my organization.

      Calendars & public folders are viewable as imap folders but I don't make much use of either.

    3. Re:No easy way to use it at work (Exchange 2003) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Evolution runs on Windows now? Awesome!

    4. Re:No easy way to use it at work (Exchange 2003) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Evolution is not available for Windows.

      Good suggestion there, dipshit.

    5. Re:No easy way to use it at work (Exchange 2003) by JayTeeUK · · Score: 1
      Despite our "corporate software standards" I run Firefox as my default browser.
      Same here, and in fact so do a lot of people in my office.
      However, I have not found that I can replace Outlook 2003 with TB in an Exchange 2003 environment.
      Yep, same here. I tried running Mozilla Mail as my primary e-mail client for a few months (a while ago now), but I found I had to manually update my Calendar, meaning that resource availability wasn't available.
      I'm sure that Microsoft puts less effort into IMAP workings than they do integrating their client.
      Well of course it does. If all those cool groupware features were available to just any old IMAP client, who would actually use Outlook? Having said that, the comparison is invalid anyway -- Outlook is a groupware client, Thunderbird is an e-mail client. I still use Thunderbird at work for sending spam reports to SpamCop, as Outlook doesn't retain the full message headers when forwarding.
      --
      James Tait, Programmer and Free Software Advocate
      JID: jayteeuk@wyrddreams.org
  31. Here's a Thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps TB doesn't have the same popularity as FF as there is no spreadthunderbird.com site to whip the hardcore followers into evangelical frenzies. It also does not help that what appears to be the focus of Mozilla's calendar project, currently called Sunbird, is designed as a standalone product instead of something intergrated into program proper like Outlook has. It just seems like TB has an identity crisis: is it going to be just an e-mail client/RSS reader? Because if so, there are plenty of other programs already out there. Or, is it going to be an Outlook replacement product as some people tout it? Because if so, it is a long way from being at the same level for features.

    1. Re:Here's a Thought by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 0, Redundant

      You could view it as an Outlook Express (not Outlook) replacement -- both OE and TB do Usenet, while Outlook doesn't; neither OE nor TB does calendaring. But a better way of looking at it is as a replacement for the mail and news functionality in the old, integrated versions of Mozilla or Netscape. A lot of people still use that, and if they want to upgrade (crossgrade?) to Firefox, they need a replacement mail client. Thunderbird allows them to switch with, hopefully, the minimum of pain. In fact, that's why I put it on my sister's system.

      Believe it or not, not everyone grew up using Outlook [Express] -- nor Internet Explorer, for that matter. Me, I've been using Netscape-family browsers (including Mozilla [Firesomething]) since Netscape 0.9, off and on, and IE has never been my main browser. For mail, I've been using Pine since 1994. So, targetting Outlook is not the only plausible goal for a mail client.

      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    2. Re:Here's a Thought by svallarian · · Score: 1

      TB does have some rudimentary calendaring and task list, with the sunbird offshoot extension...

      I believe it's just called the calendar extension.

      --
      I patented screwing your mom. But it got revoked for "prior art."
  32. Editors on crack? by Mitchell+Mebane · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I submitted this yesterday with a much nicer writeup.

    --

    The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet.
    --Aristotle
  33. same here by taxman_10m · · Score: 1

    SpamBayes seemed much more on the ball at filtering spam. Maybe I haven't trained Thunderbird enough, but it lets an awful lot through.

  34. maildir by datadriven · · Score: 0

    Does it support the maildir format yet or just mbox? This was a stumbling block for me when I tried a previous version and tried to share a mailbox with kmail rather than export & import all my mail.

  35. Helpful OS X feature by Matey-O · · Score: 2, Informative

    Tbird is one of the few mail readers that support 'Secure Password Authentication' for people that want to read email off of a Windows 2003 POP server without Entourage on the Mac.

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  36. Kudos by jeffehobbs · · Score: 1


    I've eagerly watched Thunderbird shape up quite a bit on the way to version 1.0 -- all the developers involved deserve a great deal of credit for what they've accomplished. Thunderbird has come a long, long way in the past three months thanks to an inspiring collection of effort, and I'd like to wholeheartedly thank them for all the hard work and dedication. These folks have created a really great email client, and I can't wait to switch my user base over to it.

    ~jeff

  37. News reader still has a way to go by MetalSkin · · Score: 2, Informative

    I quite like TB as an email client. Its 'learning' ability for detecting spam is brillant. But as a news reader it lags a tad.

    I know the new version has impoved grouping for threads, but I'll wait till i see it tonight before i pass judgment on that feature.

    I am still waiting for:

    * combining of encoded posts that are split,
    * mark posts for download

    As I'm a lurker in alt.binaries.pictures.wallpapers , encoded post handling is important (especialy when someone split a 400k wallpaper into 20k chunks).

    --
    "When you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth." - Sherlock Holmes
    1. Re:News reader still has a way to go by mindriot · · Score: 1

      Assuming you're on a *nix system, I would recommend Pan. Nice GTK-based newsreader, and the only one for UNIX to get a perfect score on the Good Net-Keeping Seal of Approval evaluations. And it has all kinds of features for alt.binaries lurkers like you, for example yEnc support.

      I dunno, personally I'd probably never use my email client as a news client as well. I kinda like the two things separate... for some reason I never liked the user interface of a combined mail/news reader. But I read my mail with mutt anyway, so I'm not really representative anywhere outside Slashdot...

    2. Re:News reader still has a way to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to admit I'm curious how anyone can claim TB's spam-filter is "brilliant". I've been using it since 0.6 and if anything, judging by its "learning" ability TB's spam-filter belongs in the special ed class.

      I've gone through thousands of spam with each version, done the whole "reset your spam filter" when ... what, 0.7 or 0.8 came out .. you know what? It still sucks ass. I've had to gone back to using POPFile ...

    3. Re:News reader still has a way to go by MetalSkin · · Score: 1

      TB has yEnc support, gave me a good tingly feeling all over when I realised it had yEnc support.

      But as my main platform is XP, I am stuck with the limited newsgroup lameware available under windows. Seems like every man and his dog wants to charge you money for using simple software now a days.

      Spose I will have to sort out my other systems and run linux all the time so i can use that for email/news instead.

      --
      "When you have excluded the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth." - Sherlock Holmes
    4. Re:News reader still has a way to go by corrosive_nf · · Score: 1

      xnews is free, has yenc support. Lets you load as many groups in the background as you have ram and connections to the usenet provider. you can create custom filters for each groupd or for ever each newsgroup provider.

    5. Re:News reader still has a way to go by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      As I'm a lurker in alt.binaries.pictures.wallpapers
      So that's what you're telling the girlfriend. "Yeah honey, I stay online all the time downloading, ummm, wallpapers... with ummm, bunny rabbits asn cute squirrels.... really"

    6. Re:News reader still has a way to go by sho-gun · · Score: 1

      I second that. Xnews all the way, been using it for years, and while it isnt updated all that often, it still gets updated several times a year.

      It does yEnc support, and multithreaded transfers via multiple servers if you need it to.

      Its search and sort features are excellent too.

      Xnews homepage

  38. updates... shesh... by mmegremis · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Good think I just reformated. Last time I installed one of there big "updates" I ended up having 2 "Thunderbirds" installed on my Add/Remove Programs. How many releases are they going to do?

  39. I'm just impatient, that's all by kyouteki · · Score: 1, Funny

    Aw, damn, and I installed Thunderbird 0.9 on an entire workgroup yesterday. I was waiting until TB1, but I got tired of waiting. :/ That'll teach me, huh?

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:I'm just impatient, that's all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this isn't TB1, its Release Candidate 1. there will likely be 2 or 3 Release Candidates, then TB1 will be released. Just wait for that.

    2. Re:I'm just impatient, that's all by kyouteki · · Score: 1

      Okay, it's TB1RC1. I was just saving myself the trouble. :p

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  40. some screenshots by Insanity5902 · · Score: 0

    Funny I submitted this over 12 hours ago but it got rejected.

    Anyways. Some links in mine were from osdir.com

    screenshots and the article

  41. fun fun fun by davidwr · · Score: 0

    And I'll have fun fun fun
    'til my admin takes my T-bird away
    (fun fun fun 'til my admin takes my T-bird away)

    with apologies to The Beach Boys.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  42. Agreed by bogie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Contrary to what many people say its no competition for Outlook. Outlook Express, sure. But its really lacking in features for business and expecially corporate users. No built-in mature calendar, no real full featured palm syncing. How useful is syncing ONLY your address book? I'm not talking about a full blown Exchange client here, but there are certain basics people expect. Unfortunately judging by the response over the last few years those types of features and turning Thunderbird into something that competes with Outlook proper is not something the dev(s) is interested in.

    I hope Thunderbird fans don't think I'm just bashing it. I suggest and install Thunderbird for any OE users I encounter. OE is just not safe to use. I'm just kinda let down because its hasn't turned out the way I had envisioned it.

    Oh and as the other person pointed out, on Linux Evolution is very nice. Perhaps one day it will be availabe for Windows.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  43. RC1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aww...I wanted a TB "Preview Release" first!

  44. Worthless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's only available on windows. I could care less about it.

  45. Spellcheck still sucks in thunderbird by draziw · · Score: 0

    Eudora is _much_ better. (aspell w/ pine is better too - as is gmail, etc) + I have it crash in spell check on me at least once a week.

    --
    +1 for low user id

    1. Re:Spellcheck still sucks in thunderbird by hackman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      -1 for calling attention to your low user ID.

      --
      __ No registration required to read this message. They did it in the Matrix.
  46. spam filters? by darthpenguin · · Score: 1

    I've been a longtime thunderbird user, but I've had issues before with the spam filters. Basically, even after training with several hundred messages, the filter was very ineffective, letting the majority of the spam through. I decided to use popfile instead, and had great success there in terms of filtering, but usability was not as good, and configuration was a pain.

    Has anything in thunderbird's filtering changed significantly? I haven't used built-in filtering since around .6, but I thought it would be best to ask here for other's experiences before going through the training process again. I really would like the effectiveness of popfile with the usability of TB's interface.

    1. Re:spam filters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I mentioned in another post, I've resorted to this as well. However, you mentioned usability and I thought I'd point you to http://popfile.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?How Tos/MozClickable -- THAT made life a lot easier.

  47. RSS Feeds in Thunderbird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The thing that really sold me on TB is it's RSS handling. I never got into RSS at all - as an interaction designer, I read a lot of design blogs, and, stupid as it may be, I like to see the design of those sites when reading the articles. Most RSS readers put too much focus on the 'aggregation' part for me, when what I really want is a folder with subscriptions to all my design blogs, which show me the entries exactly as if I were browsing them on the web. Being that this is exactly the way TB handles RSS, I've finally gotten into RSS. I just wish there were an easier way to send RSS links to TB from FF. (I'm not into Sage or FF's "Live Bookmarks").

    Also, the "Charamel" theme, available for both Firefox and Thunderbird, rocks, although it will undoubtedly piss off those who hate non-native interfaces.

  48. Re:What's keeping me from switching from Outlook - by boomgopher · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why doesn't TB offer something like SpamBayes: Good Mail, Maybe Spam, Spam. I tried TB a few months ago and don't like the idea of having to check dozens of spam messages to make sure a good e-mail didn't end up in there

    Dude, I've used TB for year or two now, and get a few thousand spams a week on my work account - couldn't live without Tbird. TB's spam filter trains rapidly like within a day or so it seems, and is very accurate. My account would be unusable without it.

    I have a work copy of Outlook 2003, which looked neat, but tried it for a few days with SpamBayes (well, I think it was spam bayes), and... I hated it. It took longer to train than TB, and I don't know about you, but I don't trust MS with freaking anything when it comes to security. Especially not my personal and professional emails.

    Though see my sig for a humorous bug/feature of tbird :).


    --
    Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
  49. I wonder by 2mcm · · Score: 0

    First we had KDE and its KOffice , Konsole , KCalc , etc then we had Google and its Gmail , Froogle , Gbrowser , etc Now we have Firefox with Thunderbird , etc .... Hmm Before you know it you will have MS Windows with MS Office and MS Halo and MS Internet Explorer , and ... ohh.

  50. Excellent! by mjh49746 · · Score: 1

    It's been quite a while since they did an update. I was starting to get worried.

  51. MySQL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can somebody please write an address book which syncs with a MySQL (or whatever) database.

    In this way small businesses will be able to use TB as their email client and have shared contacts. We can then easily integrate the data with other apps using MySQL

    I know that this is what LDAP is for but it's too difficult to integrate.

    I would be prepared to sponsor/contribute towards this...

  52. Thunderbird adoption by pugugly · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As a helpdesk techie, I think Thunderbird is going to have a rougher ride than Firefox.

    The problem strangely enough, is that Outlook Express was so much worse than Internet Explorer. IE isn't a great browser, but for most people until this last set of security flaws (Infection via Jpg? Yeah, that's tied too bloody close), it's "Good Enuff" - they could work around it. the only other browsers out their had fanbases, but weren't so head and shoulders above to be worth dealing with. I never cared for netscape, didn't like the packaging of mozilla, and didn't wan't to pay for opera - So I tweaked IE's security and stayed with the one that was "Good Enuff".

    So when Firefox came to maturity just as the last set of flaws finally did things even my ultra paranoid security settings (Never had an adware get through) couldn't compensate for, people were primed to leave en masse. And it's great - I can tweak it, it's portable, and it does stand head and shoulders over IE.

    Outlook express on the other hand never was "Good Enuff", for anything besides simple Email. It's really only used by people that have never bothered to try anything else. Pine and Elm have more capabilities. Everybody else moved, and has gotten to using something else that *is* good enough, and doesn't have the security holes IE had to jolt them. I have fifty+ filters I'd have to port from Eudora, others use Pegasus, or elm, webmail, or whatever.

    So the people who wanted to move, have. The people who haven't moved yet aren't just waiting on Thunderbird the way I was waiting for a browser I *liked*.

    So it's not going to hit OE as hard as Firefox hit IE.

    --
    An Invisible Entity of Vast Power whose existence must be taken on faith alone: Liberal Media
    1. Re:Thunderbird adoption by ThousandStars · · Score: 1
      webmail, or whatever.

      I think that's the crux of it: so many people use webmail that Thunderbird is bound to receive less publicity than Firefox. I know an amazingly large number of people who access their mail solely through webmail, whether it's free (hotmail, etc.) or through a paid ISP (mine, www.adhost.com, has offered webmail for years, although I seldom use it).

      Because of webmail, many people view their browser as their mail client too. Therefore, the nature of how people access their e-mail means Thunderbird isn't going to get the media and blogsphere cacophony FireFox did.

    2. Re:Thunderbird adoption by mzwaterski · · Score: 0
      Curiosity:

      What features for sending and receiving email is outlook express missing? You said it wasn't good enough for anything besides "simple email"...what more do you want to do with it.

  53. Thunderbird still doesn't support MS-TNEF by ptbarnett · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I know that MS-TNEF is generated by a lame Outlook. But, I get a lot of email from corporate clients that I wouldn't be able to read (either partially or entirely), and it's not appropriate for me to tell them it's their problem.

    I have to forward it to an account where I can use Outlook, or launch a web browser and use SquirrelMail to open the IMAP folder and read the message. I had to install a plug-in to SquirrelMail to read MS-TNEF email. If the Thunderbird team doesn't want to put it into the default installation, they could at least develop an MS-TNEF extension/plug-in for Thunderbird.

    This issue is the one that prevents me (and others) from abandoning Outlook altogether and switching to Thunderbird. Yes, I know there are some programs available that will interpret MS-TNEF. But, that requires a lot of manual effort and makes it difficult to convince the typical business user to use Thunderbird.

    1. Re:Thunderbird still doesn't support MS-TNEF by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 1

      When I had this problem, I just downloaded Fentun and mapped the .tnf extension to it. Any time I got an evil MS-TNEF mail, I just saved to the dektop as yadda_yadda.tnf, and double clicked it, and poof! converted. Though not invisible, it definitely wasn't a lot of manual effort, with my caveat that I never received that many of these - I was at a UNIX shop at the time and rarely received attachments from people not on UNIX.

    2. Re:Thunderbird still doesn't support MS-TNEF by RedBear · · Score: 1

      I get a lot of email from corporate clients that I wouldn't be able to read (either partially or entirely), and it's not appropriate for me to tell them it's their problem.

      I would think it would always be appropriate to tell the people you are communicating with that they are sending you something that you can't read. If they sent you a snail-mail letter written in binary, wouldn't you say something about that, or would you go looking for a binary-to-english dictionary? If enough people speak up, things change. Sometimes it only takes one person to explain the problem before it gets fixed.

    3. Re:Thunderbird still doesn't support MS-TNEF by rduke15 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can sure understand that you don't want to bother your correspondents with stuff they wouldn't understand anyway.

      But this MS-TNEF shit most probably comes to you through their Exchange server, where I think the problem can be fixed globally.

      Try sending a mail to their administrator about it, or to postmaster@their-domain. He probably didn't reall want the users to send out TNEF mails and will be glad to fix it when he hears about the problem. As an admin for a few small businesses, I would definitely like to be notified if my clients start sending out TNEF, and would quickly fix it. It actuall did hapen a couple of times. Unfortunately, I can't remember for sure if I could fix it on the server or had to fix it on the client machine, but I think it was somewhere in Exchange.

    4. Re:Thunderbird still doesn't support MS-TNEF by Rogue+Pat · · Score: 1

      I know that MS-TNEF is generated by a lame Outlook. But, I get a lot of email from corporate clients that I wouldn't be able to read (either partially or entirely), and it's not appropriate for me to tell them it's their problem.

      This issue is the one that prevents me (and others) from abandoning Outlook altogether and switching to Thunderbird.

      How convenient for Microsoft that it works that way! If i hadn't known better you might start to think that this was an intentional lock-in.

      In all honesty though: any software intended for people to communicate with each other [like e-mail programs usually are] and then uses a format by default that pretty much only is supported out-of-the-box by itself is of course a complete misfit.

      NB: i think this is fixed in Outlook 2003 though.

    5. Re:Thunderbird still doesn't support MS-TNEF by Bricklets · · Score: 1

      I would think it would always be appropriate to tell the people you are communicating with that they are sending you something that you can't read. If they sent you a snail-mail letter written in binary, wouldn't you say something about that, or would you go looking for a binary-to-english dictionary? If enough people speak up, things change. Sometimes it only takes one person to explain the problem before it gets fixed.

      Sorry, I fully agree with the grandparent. It's not his job to convince his customers to abandon Outlook. It's his job to serve the customers. If they want to use Outlook, he'd better be able to receive emails from Outlook or those customers will find another vendor.

      --
      Little Bricklets
    6. Re:Thunderbird still doesn't support MS-TNEF by hendridm · · Score: 1

      You can use Fentun to open them. The interface is a pile of shit, but if you associate winmail.dat with fentun.exe in Thunderbird, it's not too bad. At least you don't have to forward it to another account.

    7. Re:Thunderbird still doesn't support MS-TNEF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.google.com/search?q=MS-TNEF&btnI=

      Because some people don't know WTF a MS-TNEF is. Not me, of course. I know everything. Yes, even that.

    8. Re:Thunderbird still doesn't support MS-TNEF by ptbarnett · · Score: 1
      How convenient for Microsoft that it works that way! If i hadn't known better you might start to think that this was an intentional lock-in.

      Actually, it's even worse than that.

      Outlook Express doesn't understand MS-TNEF email.

    9. Re:Thunderbird still doesn't support MS-TNEF by ptbarnett · · Score: 1
      When I had this problem, I just downloaded Fentun and mapped the .tnf extension to it. Any time I got an evil MS-TNEF mail, I just saved to the dektop as yadda_yadda.tnf, and double clicked it, and poof! converted.

      Actually, you can map *.dat files to Fentun and launch the application right from Thunderbird (as a subsequent replier has noted). I've done exactly that, but that's already a blackmark against Thunderbird when I had to explain to someone that it requires special handling.

      But, even that doesn't work (and for that matter, neither does SquirrelMail) for S/MIME encrypted MS-TNEF messages. And it doesn't verify the integrity of signed MS-TNEF messages. However, Thunderbird doesn't any problem with S/MIME messages from Outlook if it isn't MS-TNEF.

  54. What I'd like in TB by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 1

    A single button sync after you set your sync prefs thru the file - offline - download/sync menu.

    Seriously, once set, I usually don't change it, but it is rather annoying to traverse the menu when a single click on a button could be done.

    Of course why would I sync "often"?

    I leave my mail client at work on all the time and when at home, a sync will bring up mail that's been filtered.

    Works well for me, save for the .7 release which would bomb after a few days, but the .8 moox build has gone 60+ days w/o a hiccup. (had to reboot after ultravnc rc11 uninstall...ah, well)

    Minor note: TB .3 and above have been very good, if not excellent mail clients, but I'd like to have the news reader ripped out, or emulate agent/free agent, other wise I couldn't care less if TB had a news reader.

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  55. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  56. TB is phantastic! by Searinox · · Score: 1

    I especially like the new icon set ;>

  57. No Enigmail support yet.... by domenic+v1.0 · · Score: 1

    The current version of Enigmail, 0.89.0, is not supported in Thunderbird 1.0RC1, so I had to roll back to Thunderbird 0.9 so I could use my GnuPG encryption. Hopefully the guys at mozdev.org see this soon for the upcomign release of Thunderbird 1.0.

  58. the new mozilla empire by phoric · · Score: 2, Funny

    I like Firefox 1.0 so much that I've been putting it on my client's computers to spread the love... Maybe I should secretly replace their Outlook as well?

  59. Pretty LAME gripe for a /. reader by Goldenhawk · · Score: 1

    Why on EARTH was the parent mod'ed INFORMATIVE?! Where's the "CLUELESS" mod when you need it?

    >In Outlook Express, the location of the mail is hidden.

    This is a pretty lame gripe, since most /. readers wouldn't hesitate to install Linux or dive into that arcane art of a command line interface - which requires an intimate knowledge of the directory structure.

    C'mon already. It's THIS SIMPLE: Tools:Options:Maintenance:Store Folder, and OE helpfully tells you where it's stored. One simple setting change in OE, and your email will be stored in My Documents/Email, like mine is. Not that hard, is it? Now, whenever I go on a trip, I just burn a CD with the contents of that one folder. And if I need to move my email to another PC with OE, I just overwrite that other computer's store folder, and Voila, there's all my email. The only legit gripe would be that something is by default stored in the normally hidden Application Data folder, but that's hardly MS-specific; many apps do that.

    >Further you can't export your mail to any easilly accesible format.

    Oh? How about "Save As..." to a .txt or .eml format. Pretty straightforward. And for that matter, you can simply open the email store files in any text editor. Again, this is really a no-brainer for any /. reader.

    Geez, save the complaints for something that is REALLY arcane or hard to handle. This just doesn't qualify.

    --
    --Brandon / Split Infinity Music

  60. RSS feeds on Mac OS X?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Hi.
    Since the introduction of RSS into Thunderbird, it has not worked on my mac (running Mac OS 10.3.X).
    Under Tools->Accounts->News&Blogs->manage subscriptions->add it only says: "http://slashdot.org/index.rss is not a valid RSS feed."

    Does anyone experience the same problem, or is there anyone successfully using Thunderbird/Mac for RSS reading?
    Thanks.

    Your Anonymous Cow (too lazy to get a /. login)

    1. Re:RSS feeds on Mac OS X?? by m50d · · Score: 1

      The rss feed was at http://slashdot.org/slashdot.rdf last time I checked.

      --
      I am trolling
    2. Re:RSS feeds on Mac OS X?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The RSS feed makes no difference. Thunderbird hates them all :(

      Anonymous Cow

  61. maildir support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any word on that?

  62. Eportable Filters? by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 1

    How come I cannot export filters from one installation of Thunderbird to another? Thats a gimme.

  63. Re:What's keeping me from switching from Outlook - by neirboj · · Score: 1

    I've been using TB as my primary email client for some time now and would like to comment on your spam issues. Just for the sake of context I use five different email accounts and receive over 1000 spams per month on average. However I have never used SpamBayes so I am not in a position to make a direct comparison.

    1. Training: For the initial training I waiting until a rather large number of spam messages had accumulated in the trash, then selected all of them and chose Message->Mark->As Junk. This, of course, works best if the folder is local. Following that I chose several large folders of personal correspondance (both from and to) and chose Message->Mark->As Not Junk. Judging by your comments it seems possible that you have not found these two menu items but rather have been relying on the junk toggle column in the main message list.

    2. False-positives/false-negatives: I have a little trouble reconciling "I do have to check my 'Possible Spam' folder every few days and see what's in there." with "...and don't like the idea of having to check dozens of spam messages to make sure a good e-mail didn't end up in there.". There must be some distinction with SpamBayes that is lost on me. Be that as it may, I have found that operating a mostly-trained system is relatively headache free. TB is set to move suspect messages (i.e. "Possible Spam") into a Junk folder locally that is common to all five accounts. Every few days I scan the list of suspect spams for false-positives. Since my eyes are sensitive to the exceptions the misses are easy to spot and fix with the junk status toggle. False-negatives are even easier since there are rarely more than one or two per day and they are naturally left in the inbox.

    I currently have over 3,700 spams sitting in my trash folder at the moment. I suppose that I could generate a training.dat file with info on those messages to which anyone could add their own non-spam data (which is important to reduce false-positives).

    The difference that you mentioned between "Maybe Spam" and "Spam" is a bit shaky since I imagine that it's only a matter of liklihood. You should still keep an eye on the Spam folder for false-positives.

    Regards

  64. Filter improvements by dreadlock9 · · Score: 1

    I like to set up my own filters to help deal with the spam, along with using the adaptive filters. A lot of the spam I get share the same subject matter and keywords. I wish the manual filters were improved a bit so I could make more effective filters.

    It is annoying to have to create a separate filter rule for each word I want to filter. There should be a way to have one rule look for a list of keywords. There should also be a case-insensitive mode.

    A lot of spammers will put spaces or symbols between the letters in a keyword to trick filters. It would be nice if the filter could strip out extra characters before checking for matches.

    Lastly, many spammers misspell words likely to be filtered, so it would be great if the filter could use the spell checker to find close word matches.

  65. Show Passwords Button by briango · · Score: 1

    Last time I checked, Tbird it was completely inappropriate for work because there was a button that revealed your e-mail login passwords. You clicked this button and had to click past an "are you sure message" (or something like that) then it showed a chart with your login names and unmasked passwords. Has this been fixed or AT LEAST set up so it requires a "master password" to use it? When I'm using Linux--I like Ximian evolution. Tbird is not a real Outlook competitor, but Ximian is. Now Ximian belongs to Novell and I'm not sure if it's still free. I know there is a project at Mozilla to develop a calendar (I'm pretty sure it's supposed to be groupware)that will work with Firefox and Tbird and bring Tbird more in line with the sort of things Outlook can do.

    1. Re:Show Passwords Button by briango · · Score: 1

      Downloaded and checked. The show passwords (unmask passwords) button is still there but if you use a master password it must be supplied before the other passwords can be viewed.

      Easy to setup the master password too. So this problem was fixed somewhere along the way.

  66. Intersting wording.. by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    "The default themes have both been updated with new and improved artwork as well."

    As opposed to updating the themese with old and broken artwork?

    1. Re:Intersting wording.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New Hotness *points* Old and Busted
      -New- -Hotness- *points more emphatically* Old and Busted

  67. OMFG I GOT HIGGED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it burns, it burns!!

  68. Close, but so sigar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    TB seems to be lacking some features most other serious e-mail clienst have. One of the things that affect me is the non-functional attachment handling. I want all my attachments to be saved into a specific directory. TB doesn't do this. It has the settings that from what I gather SHOULD do that, but those don't work. Alternatively, it doesn't allow me to select a whole bunch of messages and then do a "save to.." either...

    Until basic issues like those are fixed, I doubt TB will be even remotely close to FF' popularity.

    1. Re:Close, but so sigar. by The+One+KEA · · Score: 2, Informative

      Somebody else probably agrees with you. Check the Thunderbird Extensions section of The Extensions Mirror and see if there's anything in there you might be able to use.

      --
      SCREW THE ADS! http://adblock.mozdev.org/ Proud user of teh Fox of Fire - Registered Linux User #289618
  69. Re:you can run Evolution through Cygwin by killjoe · · Score: 1

    No I haven't. Do you know anybody who has?

    --
    evil is as evil does
  70. Re:Popularity - locked in to Outlook by MMMDI · · Score: 2, Informative
    he should dump Outlook and lose his shared calendar
    Disclaimer: I've never used Outlook. I have no idea how their calendar system works, and I also have no idea if it's better.

    Mozilla does have an official calendar extension that works with either Firefox or Thunderbird, and it allows for shared calendars (either via a secure mod_dav setup, or via a highly-insecure FTP setup). I choose FTP, but then, the worst that would happen if someone were to stumble across my calendar would be that they'd know my work schedule and other such mundane info.

    Using the FTP method, the calendar works like this. I add / edit something on my calendar, hit ok to confirm it, it then uploads a copy of the calendar to my server. When either my ol' lady or I open our calendar, it downloads the fresh calendar from the server. I instantly see any changes she made, she instantly sees any I made, and they're always in sync. Also, I could hand out the FTP info to anyone, and they'd have the same adding / editing options (I'd imagine piracy nuts / businesses would want something a wee bit more secure, but this works for me).
  71. Seconded by RedBear · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That signature issue in particular is a good indicator, I think, of the general reason why Thunderbird (and Mozilla Mail before it) never really "spread like wildfire". I'm not sure what somebody was thinking. I mean, come on. You have to create some kind of text file outside of Mozilla with Notepad or something, save it somewhere (no default location), and then go in to the preferences and browse to the location of that text file that you somehow figured out how to create. And you can only have that one text file, so only one signature unless you go through that process again. And it's either there or it isn't.

    The whole process is totally nonsensical to your average user. Other email clients will just let you choose a signature to insert from a list. That's the kind of thing people like. Thunderbird and Mozilla Mail have just been kind of rough in spots until now. Built in mail filtering not withstanding, it just hasn't had anything special to pull people away from Eudora, OE, Pegasus or Opera Mail.

    And yes, we are talking about the average Windows user here, the 95% of the population that this software is supposedly being marketed to. In that world there are a lot of users who do not know how to create a simple plain text file with Notepad.

    On Mac OS X the case for TB is pretty hopeless. Apple Mail integrates with the rest of the OS like clockwork and is a hell of a lot prettier. I'm actually kind of surprised to see Thunderbird getting to 1.0 so fast. In my opinion it still needs a lot of usability enhancements and beautifying to really compete with other email clients the way Firefox can compete on level ground with all the other browsers. Maybe a miracle has happened since 0.9, but I doubt it.

    Of course I'll still be forcing my users to use it anyway, since it's a hell of a lot better than OE on Windows.

    1. Re:Seconded by Jokkey · · Score: 2, Informative
      You have to create some kind of text file outside of Mozilla with Notepad or something, save it somewhere (no default location), and then go in to the preferences and browse to the location of that text file that you somehow figured out how to create. And you can only have that one text file, so only one signature unless you go through that process again. And it's either there or it isn't.

      It's not quite that bad. You can write the signature within Thunderbird itself, rather than using Notepad, then save it to a text or HTML file. And you can set up multiple identities, each with their own signature, and change them on the fly while composing a new message.

      I would agree that it's still a lot kludgier than it should be.

    2. Re:Seconded by RedBear · · Score: 1

      Sure, you could have created the sig in TB itself and saved it as text, but that is just as far beyond most people as creating it in Notepad. You still have to decide where to save the file on your drive (on the desktop, of course) and then enter the preferences and browse to that location. That "browsing to a file they've just saved" thing seems to be a real challenge for a lot of people too. I haven't really figured out why that is.

      That multiple identities thing just appeared in TB recently, and it's not a real answer to the signature problem. One shouldn't have to change their whole identity just to insert a different sig. Definitely kludgier than it should ever have been.

      All in all there are a lot of things about TB that haven't been very well thought out. Yet. Here's to the future. And it's not going to keep me from recommending it to Windows users as a free replacement for OE.

    3. Re:Seconded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      On Mac OS X the case for TB is pretty hopeless.
      Until Apple mail lets me force the display of all HTML emails as text only and supress display of images in email, I will use Thunderbird on the Mac.
  72. Quietly? by Godman · · Score: 2

    "Mozilla.org has quietly released Thunderbird 1.0 RC1" How is it "quiet" if its been /.ed?

    --
    I have this really funny quote that I like to put here. Unfortunately, there's this really annoying thing called a char
    1. Re:Quietly? by KiloByte · · Score: 1
      If a judge accepts a bribe, and someone else spreads the news about this around -- this doesn't change the fact that the judge did everything he could to hide that. In other words, he did that quietly, it was just the others who were loud.

      This is a RC1 release -- it is supposed to be tested by just the current userbase. RC2 will get a semi-loud announcement to get wider testing, while the final version will be the one which is supposed to get all the publicity.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    2. Re:Quietly? by tinkerton · · Score: 1

      I'd think that usually, /.ed and quiet are the same thing.

  73. Quite stable by phorm · · Score: 1

    I've been using TB since earlier (pre 0.6) versions, and done well by it. Upgrading hasn't nuked my inbox at any time or such things. One of the versions had an issue wherein it lost email folders for some reason, but upgrading to a more recent version fixed that up.

    All-in-all, TB is a great email program. I've currently looking at seeing whether the linux and windows versions can both use the same inbox file... if so that gives it an even bigger advantage than most clients in our multi-OS (networked mail directory) environment.

  74. Equivilent Groupware by phorm · · Score: 1

    Is there then an equivilent groupware application for linux/windows?

    Personally I've found that many of the functions that groupware software performs are easily replaced by web-applications. Yes, you could install a program with a user manager, room scheduling, etc etc etc... or you could make it accessible anywhere via an https webpage with secure login (and there are lots of different PHP/other projects that fill the groupware functions).

    Still, in regards to groupware software, what else is there in the OS world - or is it generally replaced by web-based apps?

    1. Re:Equivilent Groupware by upside · · Score: 1

      Funnily enough, one is called OpenGroupware
      Then there's PHP groupware
      And Amphora

      Finally, always check Freshmeat. It happens to return 76 results for "groupware".

      --
      I'm sorry if I haven't offended anyone
    2. Re:Equivilent Groupware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work at a school with a slim budget. Network-wise, Office/Exchange licensing prices us out. Then I came across The Project which uses Comunigate Pro www.stalker.com. All web-based. Does the job nicely, and is fairly priced at least for education.

    3. Re:Equivilent Groupware by 1967+Ferrari+312 · · Score: 1

      Novell (Ximian) Evolution is the closest thing to Outlook. Some would say too close, in fact.

    4. Re:Equivilent Groupware by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

      Novell has Evolution (which was previously Ximian Evolution). It is excellent and very similar to MS Outlook. It can work with an MS Exchange server, Novell Groupwise and others. You can do your scheduling, contacts and most of the things MS Outlook can. Granted, MS Outlook is an older product and more mature with a few more "power" fetures that some corps may need.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
  75. Why not handle this in FF? by phorm · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be nice to have this as an option in firefox (or maybe it is already and just not easily found)?

    Simply have an option for "mail handler," with options to select common/installer apps including TB and/or the default system handler, or type in your own command-line.

  76. POP3 by ilithiiri · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Did they manage to solve the POP3 problem that's preventing me to fully use Thunderbird? If no-one knows what I'm talking about, there are many cases in which Thunderbird just "hangs" while receiving messages from POP3 servers, like "Receiving message 1 of 10...". No solutions found 'til now.. I think it's a stopper.. I had to fwd all my e-mails to gmail in order to have a "central repository" for the e-mail.. Sigh.. Please solve it! ;)

    --
    If anyone can hear me, slap some sense into me But you turn your head, and I end up talking to myself
  77. Problems, problems, problems... by Animaether · · Score: 2, Informative

    I made the switch to Thunderbird a while ago because Outlook Express kept locking up on me for unknown reasons. (That's right, not because of security issues - my OE was locked down tight. And yes, this would be on the Win32 platform.)

    However, I found many issues with Thunderbird which have convinced me that although Thunderbird has more options and probably more long-term viability, it is not the better e-mail client for the average user.

    I'll list some of the issues I found in 2 weeks' time, just in regular use, below.

    And yes, don't worry, I'll go waste* an hour or two of my time perusing a giant bugzilla database to see if there's any previous report of the issues I encountered. Wouldn't want anybody just reporting it and have some sort of moderator just label it a dupe, after all. Even though they are probably able to tell, from memory, whether it is a dupe or not, and I have to spend a serious amount of time to find out :P
    ( I moderate a private Bugzilla, so I do know the issues involved. )
    * waste, depending on whether the issues get addressed. I'll happily concede if a majority of users believe that how I think things should work is not the right way.

    1. Mail Filters not applied to Local Folders on incoming mail.
    Problem: When fetching mail, the Mail Filters specified for the Local Folders group is not run automatically.
    Solution: Tools > Run Message Filters... manually
    Expected: Mail to be filtered automatically, dur.

    2. Headers area does not scroll
    Problem: When dealing with an e-mail with a lot of headers, viewing all headers causes the header area to be sufficiently large to extend outside of the screen, and there is no scrollbar to scroll down!
    Solution: View > Message Source (Ctrl+U) manually
    Expected: I'd expect a scrollbar where scrolling is required for proper operation.

    3. Message filters have no quick summary preview
    Problem: There is no quick way to see what a specific message filter does.
    Solution: Double-click the message filter or choose Edit... to see the full details
    Expected: See Outlook Express's Mail Rules dialog.
    ( yes, OE's mail rules ruleset is much more limited, but its user-friendliness is much better )

    4. Cannot rename with change-of-caps only
    Problem: When renaming a folder, say, 'test' to, say, 'Test', the warning about a folder with that name already existing pops up.
    Solution: Rename to something else first, e.g. 'Test dammit', then rename to proper target, g.g. 'Test'.
    Expected: I'd expect to just be able to change the case of a folder without it thinking I'm making 2 folders of the same name.

    5. Save dialog uses an internal variable, rather than the actual filename field, causing issues.
    Problem:
    Step1: Save an e-mail to a file called 'test'
    Step2: Start saving an e-mail to a file called 'test', but rather than hitting the Save button select the previous 'test' file and rename it (hit F2) to 'test2'
    Step3: Hit the save button
    Watch as Thunderbird complains how the file 'test2' already exists. Now check the filename field.. still reads 'test', right ? So it shouldn't try saving to 'test2'
    Solution: Go to filename field, add a character, backspace it, then hit Save.
    Expected: I expect whatever application to save the file under the filename I actually specify in the filename field - and not what it has stored in some variable.
    Note: ThunderBird isn't the only application to have this issue. Is it the use of a particular file dialog handling API ?

    6. Mail imported from OE excludes 'read/unread' flag.
    Problem: Mail imported from OE is all unread. Solution: Means you have to go mark all of them read, and then compare with OE side-by-side to mark unread that which was actually unread.
    Expected: I would've expected the read/unread status to have come across properly.

    7. There's no 'Stop processing any more rules/filters' option in Mail Filters.
    Problem:
    Filter A: [Message subject] contains [hello] move to

  78. long live Thunderbird! by kendoka · · Score: 1

    Thunderbird is an awesome email program - I gave up Outlook for it a long time ago and have never been happier!

    Firefox kicks some ass too - I was fairly critical of Mozilla products for a while, but I've been using firefox and thunderbird on all my platforms for the past year and couldn't be happier!

    Mozilla, my new favorite open-source project!

  79. "quietly released" ? by 095 · · Score: 1

    It's a release candidate, not a release.

  80. Always a gamble, upgrading TB/FF by Toby+The+Economist · · Score: 1

    ...because you never know exactly what's been changed.

    When I've upgrade TB/FF, sometimes I find a new feature has been added which I like; but I always find the theme has changed and something I do like or use in the GUI has changed, moved or gone.

    --
    Toby

  81. How fast is Search? by dcavens · · Score: 1

    I'm currently a Mozilla Mail user, and the one thing that I want is an indexed message search. I have about 500mb of mail from the past 4 years, and trying to find old messages in my Mozilla client are a pain, and very, very slow.

    My interim hack is to upload everything to Gmail, and search for it from there. I'd much rather keep the mail locally (for security reasons), but I can't find a search client that works for me.

    I'm eagerly awaiting Google Desktop's support for Linux and mbox formats..

    Anybody have any other suggestions?

  82. Problems by AaronLawrence · · Score: 2, Informative

    I still use Mozilla Mail (it's largely the same as TB) but there are a few serious issues that keep me unhappy:
    - frequently fills in addresses wrong (bug 93453)
    - searching body text is extremely slow (no indexing) and you can't make it faster by pre-filtering on subject (bug 154867)
    - can't delete attachments from received mail (bug 2920)
    - can't copy the name from displayed addresses (bug 232021)
    - can't paste images into mail (bug 47838) although this is supposedly fixed in TB itself.

    These bother me on a regular basis. Seeing something like "saved searches" go in while these much more basic things remain unfixed makes me wonder if there is anyone seriously working on TB/Moz mail. (I am trying to learn how to develop Mozilla - so far got a working build - but most of these are quite involved).

    --
    For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert. - Arthur C. Clarke
  83. Colourful Quoting by a_peckover · · Score: 1

    I don't suppose this version makes it possible to turn the damned coloured quote bars down each side of a reply to an e-mail/newsgroup posting off, does it ?

    The extension I used to do this before doesn't work with 1.0PR.

    1. Re:Colourful Quoting by BeeRockxs · · Score: 1

      You can disable them with a pref in user.js in your profile directory, though I don't know off-hand which one. Google around a bit.

  84. What about 'copies to self filtering'? by daveewart · · Score: 1

    Can Thunderbird filter your 'copies to self' yet? This is one very important feature if you are sending a lot of mail ...

    --
    "If you think the problem is bad now, just wait until we've solved it." --- Arthur Kasspe
  85. Endless bug fixes by Viol8 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Thats all we hear with Mozilla - "new version - bug fixes". Jesus christ , how long have they been developing this now? Isn't it about time they got rid of any bugs relating to the core engine??

  86. Reasons to use Outlook Express by Famatra · · Score: 1

    The reason I use outlook express is because there is a nonfree utililty (Express archiver) that archives all my messages, including attachments, in text/html format.

    I have no way to get my messages out of Thunderbird without having to manually save each one. If thunderbird came with the ability of outlook express + exress archiver (to archive emails in a text/html format) I'd switch over in an instant :).

    1. Re:Reasons to use Outlook Express by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      I have no way to get my messages out of Thunderbird without having to manually save each one

      There is: imap.

    2. Re:Reasons to use Outlook Express by Genom · · Score: 1

      Hmm...select message, right-click, save as...

      Formats: .eml, HTML, TXT

      Doesn't seem to work with multiple messages selected, but I'd assume if there's not a plugin that'll allow you to do that already, one wouldn't be terribly difficult to write.

    3. Re:Reasons to use Outlook Express by Pxtl · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Speaking of which, Thunderbird's IMAP support, while pretty, has one idiotic fault: there's no built-in way to purge deleted email messages. If you do manual purges with the purge button extension, you can't use the "move to deleted items folder" mode.

      The "move to deleted items folder" doesn't actually remove the deleted messages from the inbox, just flags them as deleted. This sucks if your IMAP system is ever accessed from anywhere else (which is the whole freaking point of IMAP) because when you log in, you find that all the junk-email and deleted items are still sitting flagged right in your inbox.

      This is a serious pisser.

    4. Re:Reasons to use Outlook Express by Khazunga · · Score: 4, Informative

      Right click on folder, click "Compact this folder". It's idiotic, but TB is following the spec to the letter. Blame the spec.

      --
      If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you
    5. Re:Reasons to use Outlook Express by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      Hmmph. I eagerly await the invention of the "auto-compact folder" option.

    6. Re:Reasons to use Outlook Express by djchristensen · · Score: 1

      Speaking of which, Thunderbird's IMAP support, while pretty, has one idiotic fault: there's no built-in way to purge deleted email messages. If you do manual purges with the purge button extension, you can't use the "move to deleted items folder" mode.

      The "move to deleted items folder" doesn't actually remove the deleted messages from the inbox, just flags them as deleted. This sucks if your IMAP system is ever accessed from anywhere else (which is the whole freaking point of IMAP) because when you log in, you find that all the junk-email and deleted items are still sitting flagged right in your inbox.

      This is a serious pisser.

      I don't have any such problem, although I do use Thunderbird both at work and at home. To the best of my understanding, the messages that you "delete" are marked as such at the IMAP server, so they don't show up in your inbox from another machine.

      I also thought that folders got expunged when there is more than some amount of deleted messages in them, but I could be wrong on that. I haven't used Pine for quite some time, but if I recall correctly, it showed messages as deleted if I had deleted them in Thunderbird (actually, Mozilla at the time).

  87. 1.0RC by meckardt · · Score: 1

    I first looked at the download directory and thought I saw a bunch of Orcs...

  88. Localisation by david.given · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I use Thunderbird at home. I think it's great. I do think kmail is better, and I use that at work, but Thunderbird is still damn good.

    There's just one thing I don't know how to do: Thunderbird displays all dates in the bizarre M/D/Y format. Is there any way I can persuade it do display them in either D/M/Y, which is more common in this country, or in Y/M/D, which is the preferred format everywhere? There seem to be no localisation options.

    1. Re:Localisation by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 1

      Is there any way I can persuade it do display them in either D/M/Y...?

      My TBird does it "by default", which probably means I set it circa v0.3 and it's been the same ever since! However, this looks like what you're after.

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    2. Re:Localisation by david.given · · Score: 1
      My TBird does it "by default", which probably means I set it circa v0.3 and it's been the same ever since! However, this looks like what you're after.

      Thanks, but... locales. Oh my gawd. If there's one thing Linux does really badly, it's locales.

      Yeah, I know I could just change LANG to en_GB, but then half my scripts stop working because upperlower case mappings change. Yeah, I know that it's really a problem with the scripts, but... it'll still stop them working. Sigh.

      I'll try setting LC_TIME and see if that helps. Thanks again.

  89. Obligatory by michaelhood · · Score: 1

    Welcome to Slashdot, Mitchell!

  90. Great...BUT by Ecio · · Score: 0

    Im using TB on a daily basis and i consider it very good BUT i think its memory usage is a bit too heavy: 35-60MB on my windows machine. I used for years Pegasus Mail that, if i remember well, consumed 12-15MB of memory.
    My PC has 512 of RAM so i have not so many problems using it, but i think i'll use another client on a 128MB RAM PC.
    I'm waitin for the future to see (as AFAIK it's planned) the XUL framework separated and TB and FF running over it. Maybe this will lower the memory usage of the TB+FF combo (now it's 35MB + 47MB but maximum usage is reported to 47MB for TB and 72MB for FF)

    Also the interface looks a bit less responsive when you load folders with many emails and also when it loads a single email (or you choose to write a new email). I suppose it's due to XUL too.

    Sorry for my english

  91. How many of them are useful features? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's true that Outlook can do much more than Thunderbird, and as someone else already pointed out, Outlook Express would be a fairer alternative to compare against.

    Still, I prefer Thunderbird even to Outlook, for a simple reason: I don't need those extra features. All I want is a mail client that can:

    • read mail effectively (including avoiding HTML bugs, not filtering out genuine .exes, etc.)
    • provide a simple and effective address book
    • provide decent mail processing rules
    • back up and restore mail without losing data
    without zillions of stability and security issues. I switched to Thunderbird after a system failure (caused by an official MS update, in fact) took out my MS-based mail system.

    I doubt I'm the only one in the world who really doesn't care about scheduling meetings and booking rooms using Outlook. I'd rather just have a simple, effective tool that helps me do my job. Trying to schedule meetings using Outlook is far less efficient than simply e-mailing, picking up the phone or (shock!) walking around and talking to people, IME.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  92. IMAP ACL support... by curious.corn · · Score: 1

    Or better, Mozilla's lack thereof. This is something that has always baffled me; why on earth does Mozilla (or Thunderbird) only display the ACLs in ro mode? It must have the getAcl() (or whatever) command and some stupid little parseAcl() in order to display them. So why, why... again why hasn't anybody whipped up a stinkin' setAcl() function is beyond me.
    LDAP write support is another sorely missing feature. Evolution can do it.
    These two miserable little features would make TB an instant Winner, no question. And oh yes... vcf support, please!

    --
    Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
  93. Ximian Connector by Danathar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Would it be possible to integrate Ximian exchange connector into thunderbird? That would be a feature that I'm sure MANY people would like.

  94. Quietly released? by techstar25 · · Score: 0

    Let's announce it to Slashdot. That ought to keep it quiet.

  95. We'll be gone but not forgotten by Pac · · Score: 2, Funny

    /"\
    \ /
    X ASCII Ribbon Campaign - Say NO to HTML in email
    / \

    Another cause KISS loses to "cute"...

    1. Re:We'll be gone but not forgotten by Damek · · Score: 1

      But HTML email *is* simple, except where programs like Thunderbird make it difficult. It must be pretty simple, my mom uses it all the time. *shudder*

      In fact, in a way, HTML email is simpler than plain text, because plain text email just confuses people as to why they can type in different styles in other programs like Word, but not in their email. HTML email allows them to do what they expect to be able to do.

      I never thought I'd be defending HTML email, but there you go.

    2. Re:We'll be gone but not forgotten by Haeleth · · Score: 1

      HTML email is simpler than plain text, because plain text email just confuses people as to why they can type in different styles in other programs like Word, but not in their email. HTML email allows them to do what they expect to be able to do.

      The difference, and the reason that word processors are not evil but HTML email is, is that people generally have the sense not to use green Comic Sans MS on a pink background in Word.

  96. Tabbed email reading? by Pac · · Score: 1

    POP3 blocking?

  97. Mail migration by dapyx · · Score: 1

    Does anybody knows how to (or if it is possible) import emails from The Bat client ?

    --
    I'm sorry, the number you have dialed is an imaginary number. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and dial again.
    1. Re:Mail migration by ps_inkling · · Score: 1

      Get The Bat to export its email as mbox format. Then you can import into Thunderbird.

  98. Re:What's keeping me from switching from Outlook - by The_Morgan · · Score: 1

    One problem I can't solve, once the junk mail is moved to the junk folder I want that message marked "as read". I would rather not see a new mail notification in my task tray unless it is an important message.

    It would also cut down on training the program since it would mark the message "as read" and junk with one click.

  99. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yech! Crackers...

  100. Mmmmm... I don't know. by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    I like the idea of a theme-able, CSS-toting IRC client. It makes for interesting possibilities (think JerkCity).

    Can't we have both? ^_^

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  101. Threaded Messages by gathas · · Score: 1

    I switched to Thunderbird from Outlook because of the mail threading feature. I know you can do this in Outlook, but I hate the way it looks, and it wastes lots of space.

  102. Sensible Browser support by FreeUser · · Score: 1

    Thunderbird is missing sensible browser support, at least under GNU/Linux.

    It defaults to the gnome browser for some reason, and short of hand editing user.js files, doesn't seem to let you define something sensible (like, say, firefox ... now there's a novel idea: have the mozilla mail reader default to a mozilla browser).

    This is beyond irritating, and I hope they've fixed it for version 1.0.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  103. editor bugs by edxwelch · · Score: 1

    Thunderbird is the best free email client that I have seen.
    My one grip is the buggy editing behaviour, for instance sometimes when you are typing the caret disappears, often the font size reverts back to the default when you don't want it to and also the keyboard navigation doesn't work too well (ctrl -> should behave like ctrl - and move one word)

  104. Re:What's keeping me from switching from Outlook - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi. I'm new here. What's all this talk about sigs?

  105. Mod Parent Up by Damek · · Score: 1

    Lord forgive me for simply posting a "Mod Parent Up" post, but at this point all I can really do is second everything RedBear just said. 100% beyond my utopia, full stop!!

  106. Re:Popularity - locked in to Outlook by GweeDo · · Score: 1

    I am pretty sure what you just said here will make one of my friends day. He was looking for something exactly like this just yesterday. Thank you.

  107. What's New In 1.0 by clarkie.mg · · Score: 1

    It's not yet on mozilla.org (or I missed it) but you can read on http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=1020 843 :

    What's New In 1.0

    Significant theme improvements for all platforms.

    Migration improvements for Outlook 2003, Eudora and Mozilla Suite users.

    Fix for a 0.9 regression on Mac OS X when creating folders with non ascii characters.

    Saved Search Folder Improvements (i.e. lots of bug fixes)

    Message Grouping Improvements (i.e. lots of bug fixes)

    Improved RSS support (i.e. lots of bug fixes)

    Improved support for Multiple Identities for an account.

    Improved Account Central for Windows and Linux

    Improvements to Global Inbox, in particular how we manage filters.

    Fix problems creating folders with semicolons or # signs in the name

    Stability Improvements

    POP3 Filters can now filter messages to IMAP folders

    RSS Feeds that require http authentication now work in Thunderbird

    Fix an issue on Mac OS X where you could not paste text from Microsoft Word into the compose window

    Offline UI is now installed by default for Windows (it already was for Linux and Mac OS X)

    New quick search bar for address book and mail compose contacts sidebar.

    Deleting a saved search folder now prompts you before it gets deleted.

    New end user license agreeement.

    --
    Men are born ignorant, not stupid; they are made stupid by education. Bertrand Russel
  108. Norton/Symantec Antivirus - Watch out! by DrLungoon · · Score: 1

    We use Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition and it does not play well with Thunderbird/Mozilla mail. If you receive an email with a virus, the Autoprotect will quarantine your ENTIRE inbox - NOT just the bad file. I use TB, BTW, so I've just blocked Autoprotect from scanning the TB mail directory.

    --
    Some people are like Slinkies - Not good for anything, but you can't help smiling when you push 'em down the stairs.
  109. Thunderbird + Norton = :( by gopher_hunt · · Score: 2, Informative

    Beware if you have norton antivirus configured to scan incoming email and remove infected files.

    I lost my inbox 1 day ago because norton flagged a virus and removed the inbox.mdf file. I didn't remember having this problem with other software.

    1. Re:Thunderbird + Norton = :( by smimi10 · · Score: 2, Informative
  110. Sure, if you have no local mail spool by n8willis · · Score: 2, Informative

    For each email account, you can choose whether the mail goes into an account-specific Inbox OR a "global Inbox". So you can have all your mail in one big Inbox, if that's what you like.

    Yeah, unless you want to use Thunderbird with your local mail spool (or "movemail" as the code calls it for no reason) -- in which case, you're out of luck: it doesn't use the global inbox (see bugzilla bug 263013) the mail notification sounds don't work (see bug 270186), and in general you get treated like a third-class citizen.

    Which is inconvenient, ironic, and a shame, considering the disproportionate number of Thunderbird users who are on Unix-like systems, and thus have local mail delivery as an important (if not THE most important) account.

    --
    -- Watch the REAL Jon Katz.
  111. sync with iPod? by professorhojo · · Score: 1

    that would be a killer feature.

    if i could do that, i would be over on thunderbird in a new york second.

    does this exist? :-)

    1. Re:sync with iPod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      write a plugin

    2. Re:sync with iPod? by professorhojo · · Score: 1

      a what now? ;-)

  112. Hotmail integration by undercanopy · · Score: 1

    Is there somethign myterious about hotmail that keeps OSS clients from accessing it? We have samba, but no hotmail interface.

    I use TB but most of the peeople i could sell on it have at least 1 hotmail account that they CAN access through O and OE. In some cases it's their only mailbox.

    what's the story on hotmail support?

    --
    -- D-23994, Muff#2613
    1. Re:Hotmail integration by ssj_195 · · Score: 1

      See my comment here:

      http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=131547&c id=10984354

      for a little bit about hotmail. As to why it is not integrated into more clients, I really can't speculate. I seem to recall that the Thunderbird developers were amenable to the inclusion of hotmail support (which, as I stated in the comment above, is going to be less useful once it becomes a "pay-only" feature) but simply don't have enough manpower to add it - odd, as the protocol is well-understood and there are GPL'd solutions already written.

  113. Re:What's keeping me from switching from Outlook - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're short bits of text that you can set in your preferences that no one ever cares about. We use them to make people look like jerks when they refer to their sigs and many people have them turned off.

  114. Re:Popularity - locked in to Outlook by the+unbeliever · · Score: 1

    Would you mind emailing me instructions on how to sync the calendar via FTP, even as insecure as it is? That's the only thing keeping me from using Calendar more.

    (or respond here if you have karma to burn)

  115. Wow. Just wow. by IncohereD · · Score: 1

    Your bitchy little reply would have had some merit , except that "local settings" and "application data" are hidden folders. By default, n00bs don't have them visible, what with them being set being hidden and all.

    Uhhh...Thunderbird stores it's mail in "Application Data", too. Think before you speak.

  116. Re:What's keeping me from switching from Outlook - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, you can always press CTRL+ALT+C on the junk folder to mark everything as read. Not a fix, but a workaround.

  117. take another hit, bro by Clover_Kicker · · Score: 1

    While you're at it, take a look at which post I'm replying to.

    1. Re:take another hit, bro by jimmyfergus · · Score: 1

      er... oh yeah. Embarassing. Browsing at +2, it just showed yours replying to the top level... Good suggestion though, it is a Friday afternoon.

  118. Calendar works. by k2r · · Score: 1

    Well, obviously my mileage does vary :-)

    I have 8 people using sunbird/sunbird-firefox/iCal/phpiCal/RSS since october on 4 files shared using webDAV.

    Though I had to write some very simple scripts to fix some line ending quirks (iCal seems to be a little choosy) it works fine, stable and is exactly the right solution in this case.
    It's a small non-profit organisation where people with very different computer skills living in different towns have to coordinate.

    I planned to install ogo first, but this seemed to be overkill though ogo a very decent product for more complex calendaring and real groupware issues.
    And I was wary at first because I already made some bad experiences using mozilla-calendar and ogo together.

    But if you just need a little shared calendaring, firefox-sunbird/WebDAV works quite well.

    k2r

  119. ressource planning using sunbird-calendar by k2r · · Score: 1

    > Can I use it to schedule the presentation rooms?

    If a simple solution ist what she needs - give the calendar-plugin a try and share a calendar file for every ressource to schedule.

    It might not be enough for you/her - or it might be just right.

    Have a look at my previous posting on
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=131547&cid =109 92754

    k2r

  120. Wrong by gottabeme · · Score: 1

    I've been using Tb since 0.6 with an IMAP account. Simply turn on these two options:

    "When I delete a message: Move it to the Trash folder"
    "Clean up ('Expunge') Inbox on Exit"

    When you close Tb or leave the folder, it will purge messages marked as deleted.

    --
    "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."