Depends if the make-up-artist created the design, a novel design that is;)...there is however somewhere an exception that any image created on my set falls under my creative surrounding...but haven't studied that further...
It will become more difficult...if another artist will license the same footage, Youtube's automatic process will flag this new work as well as "copyright-infringement" so any licensee will get the same TDN.....
in fact the bizarre situation could be that any other licensee could do the same to Sony!
The only reason they're still allowed to use the video is because they accepted a secondary deal that explicitly credits him and his website on their video, even if it took them days to get that done.
Sony DOES own the copyright over the total project, but doesn't have the total copyright as it's a gradual distribution of copy-rights.....
If i would be photographing fashion-models....the clothing is copyrighted, and the work of the fashion-stylist is copyrighted and the work of the make-up-artist is copyrighted.....I would own the copyright of the image but can not claim the copyright of the others....
well...the copyright owner of the whole production is Sony, so far they are correct....it's what they call a gradual copyright..it's based on work that depends on other copyrights...
Lol...enough non-americans here....who can't be called traitors in any case..
US used to be "Land of the Free"...with very strong conditions not allowing the government to become a tyranny, among: The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution prohibits "unreasonable searches and seizures." Seizure – the taking of private information"
same niche market that Apple made popular;)......it was Apple who made USBpopular, with their first iMac.....USB was also original by Intel, and did hardly anything for 5 years...then came the first iMac, and suddenly almost overnight USB was hot...it took PC's about 2 years to catch up, from PS/2
It wil have the same position as SCSI, Firewire etc...meaning CPU independent throughput, and higher-end systems, and more reliable.....
as for market share compared to USB...it was Apple who made USBpopular, with their first iMac.....USB was also original by Intel, and did hardly anything for 5 years...then came the first iMac, and suddenly almost overnight USB was hot...it took PC's about 2 years to catch up, from PS/2
That's exactly the thing..."Best Scientific Evidence".....science is based upon other science, and published science....by withholding information/publication, they hinder science which could not profit from an earlier date publication....obstructing research...
I wonder...there was a lot of international research on this....and wouldn't be suspicion with such an important topic (health?!) be a consideration?...i mean...why stopping publication, that would be obstruction?!
Sue the lawyers and Industrie group frorn endangering , and having knowledge of potetial dangerous effects...and delaying that for decades...how many more victims were added because of their frivolous behaviour
you have been part of my life as well:p...almost since the beginning!...and now that you mentioned it...14 years already!!...and have witnessed your proposal of marriage to Kathleen!...since the beginning checking every day, enjoying the subtitles, and everything you have done for Slashdot!
well, Microsoft is out of the loop, as you may not recycle the software together wiht the computer...and may not be transferred or whatsoever....you need to buy new copies
additionally it's a 15 year or more proven technology, with a lot of programming and developping possibilities...from C to Java to LotusScript with already from long time a ago a range of protocols from X500 to LDAP to XML (already from year 2000 included)....
No other product has that track record;) (and no, I don't work in a IT-related job/environmet/sales or business related);)
I do agree it's not the best experience when using as an e-mail client....not as best as for example using "Mail" or Eudora
as a document, approval,tracking and knowledge system it's unmatched...
and available for multiple platforms additionally....server runs on Linux as well by the way....clients for Mac/Windows (linux i believe?) and webbased clients....
clustering, replication and security together, it's unmatched....
I wonder if they will do this for the 120, 220, 4x5, 8x10....or only 35 mm...
Especially in the medium format resolution is still higher and there are only croppped digital medium format-sensors
looking forward in any case!
Depends if the make-up-artist created the design, a novel design that is ;)...there is however somewhere an exception that any image created on my set falls under my creative surrounding...but haven't studied that further...
It will become more difficult...if another artist will license the same footage, Youtube's automatic process will flag this new work as well as "copyright-infringement" so any licensee will get the same TDN.....
in fact the bizarre situation could be that any other licensee could do the same to Sony!
....
The only reason they're still allowed to use the video is because they accepted a secondary deal that explicitly credits him and his website on their video, even if it took them days to get that done.
Actually they mentioned him as a creator not as a copyright-holder....those are 2 separate things. Correctly they should have mentioned : "Licensed from © Mitch Martinez"
In the case they would acquire full copyright, they should still legally mention the creator.... so would be in this case creator Mitch Martinez/© Sony Music Entertainment.......
Sony DOES own the copyright over the total project, but doesn't have the total copyright as it's a gradual distribution of copy-rights.....
If i would be photographing fashion-models....the clothing is copyrighted, and the work of the fashion-stylist is copyrighted and the work of the make-up-artist is copyrighted.....I would own the copyright of the image but can not claim the copyright of the others....
hmm...was not logged in ;)...
re-quote for points :p
well...the copyright owner of the whole production is Sony, so far they are correct....it's what they call a gradual copyright..it's based on work that depends on other copyrights...
Lol...enough non-americans here....who can't be called traitors in any case..
US used to be "Land of the Free"...with very strong conditions not allowing the government to become a tyranny, among: The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution prohibits "unreasonable searches and seizures." Seizure – the taking of private information"
Apparently you are the traitor to your own constitution...I guess it will be come down between Snowden's Constitution and Obma's Constitution
and to speak with Benjamin Franklin... "Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both"
same niche market that Apple made popular ;)......it was Apple who made USBpopular, with their first iMac.....USB was also original by Intel, and did hardly anything for 5 years...then came the first iMac, and suddenly almost overnight USB was hot...it took PC's about 2 years to catch up, from PS/2
would not underestimate the influence of Apple ...
It wil have the same position as SCSI, Firewire etc...meaning CPU independent throughput, and higher-end systems, and more reliable.....
as for market share compared to USB...it was Apple who made USBpopular, with their first iMac.....USB was also original by Intel, and did hardly anything for 5 years...then came the first iMac, and suddenly almost overnight USB was hot...it took PC's about 2 years to catch up, from PS/2
would not underestimate the influence of Apple ...
so how do they want to defend that it is to foil terrorists attack??
same thing is happening with photography, websites building, graphic design, and so on...
Apparently film and analogue recording (audio?) will be allowed ;)
...before it's mis-interpreted, it's a shame it's a eulogy, he should have been alive...
amazing eulogy actually, unfortunately instead of a curriculum..
That's exactly the thing..."Best Scientific Evidence".....science is based upon other science, and published science....by withholding information/publication, they hinder science which could not profit from an earlier date publication....obstructing research...
I wonder...there was a lot of international research on this....and wouldn't be suspicion with such an important topic (health?!) be a consideration?.. .i mean...why stopping publication, that would be obstruction?!
Sue the lawyers and Industrie group frorn endangering , and having knowledge of potetial dangerous effects...and delaying that for decades...how many more victims were added because of their frivolous behaviour
and all the other things...the best way for people to fall back to timezones :p...everyt timezone luchtime would be different ....lol!!
you have been part of my life as well :p...almost since the beginning!...and now that you mentioned it...14 years already!!...and have witnessed your proposal of marriage to Kathleen!...since the beginning checking every day, enjoying the subtitles, and everything you have done for Slashdot!
and as Steve Jobs said...the day has come :)
take care buddy!!
well, Microsoft is out of the loop, as you may not recycle the software together wiht the computer...and may not be transferred or whatsoever....you need to buy new copies
and if they didn't use gcc ;) or libs...
with additionally a total undemocratic process/road...up to the executive siging of it....
it could be considered corruption if Obama would be signing this executive agreement just for the sake of business/dollars....
additionally it's a 15 year or more proven technology, with a lot of programming and developping possibilities...from C to Java to LotusScript with already from long time a ago a range of protocols from X500 to LDAP to XML (already from year 2000 included)....
No other product has that track record ;) (and no, I don't work in a IT-related job/environmet/sales or business related) ;)
I do agree it's not the best experience when using as an e-mail client....not as best as for example using "Mail" or Eudora
as a document, approval,tracking and knowledge system it's unmatched...
and available for multiple platforms additionally....server runs on Linux as well by the way....clients for Mac/Windows (linux i believe?) and webbased clients....
clustering, replication and security together, it's unmatched....