Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Could We Deal With the End of Time Zones?

First time accepted submitter hairyfish writes "Do we still need time zones? Time zones are a relic of the past, when different parts of the world were isolated, and 12 p.m. was whenever the sun was directly above your specific location. Now, in the Internet age, time is just an arbitrary number, and time zones are just unnecessary complexity. Why can't we scrap time zones altogether, and all just use UTC across the board? So here on the eastern seaboard of Australia, lunchtime will now be at 2 a.m., In New York it will be 4 p.m., and in Moscow it will be 8 a.m. There'll be some pain with the initial changeover, but from then on it's all good. Got a meeting with colleagues on the other side of the world? 4 a.m. means 4 a.m. for everyone. Got a flight landing at 3 p.m.? 3 p.m. now means 3 p.m. for everyone. For DST, you simply change your schedule rather than the clock (i.e. work and school starts an hour earlier during DST months). No confusion ever again. For someone whose work involves travel or communication across time zones, this is the best idea I've ever heard. So why aren't we doing it?"

990 comments

  1. "So why aren't we doing it?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    In the U.S. it is because the Federal Government oversteps its bounds on everything, including telling us what the clock shall say.

    1. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This video is not available in your country."

    2. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      In the U.S. it is because the Federal Government oversteps its bounds on everything, including telling us what the clock shall say.

      Think about this: People this stupid have the right to vote.

      The US is doomed.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    3. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by no-body · · Score: 0

      In the U.S. it is because the Federal Government oversteps its bounds on everything, including telling us what the clock shall say.

      Ah - Tea Party airhead - right?

    4. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume you're being facetious, else you're the stupidest biped on the planet.

    5. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by houstonbofh · · Score: 1, Funny

      Lucky bastard... It was a Rick Roll.

    6. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Bizzeh · · Score: 0

      your clock, and what it says, is actually denoted by the Royal Observatory in Greenwich, London. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenwich_Mean_Time

    7. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 2
    8. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by voss · · Score: 1

      Wrong.

      The US government implemented in 1918 what the US and Canadian Railroads had already agreed to in 1883.
      It was the General Time Convention of 1883 that implemented the time zones , the government followed along 35 years later.

    9. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by erroneus · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Worse. People like you think the popular vote matters!

    10. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by jdpars · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If the US is doomed, then let it die. The entire point of our founders was that even "people this stupid" have the right to govern themselves. If you really don't believe that, then let the system kill itself off.

    11. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Guy+Harris · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ah - Tea Party airhead - right?

      Nope, just somebody who's never gonna give you up and never gonna let you down. (Hint, hint.)

    12. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by WidgetGuy · · Score: 3, Informative

      And here's an actual fact: the U.S. government continually broadcasts the correct time no matter where you are (in the U.S., of course). They (I believe one source is the U.S. Navy) do it by broadcasting a radio signal that, when received by the appropriately-equipt clock/watch, will set that device to the correct time based on an atomic clock maintained by the U.S. government.

      All you need to do to take advantage of this service is, when you next go clock/wristwatch shopping, make sure to ask if they have a product that features this capability (they should, even Walmart sells 'em). Most of the clocks in my house have this feature (wall clock, clocks in my computers -- the computers get the Navy time over the Internet, not via radio). Even my wristwatch (Casio) has a little radio receiver in it tuned to the government's time broadcast. Not only does this keep your watch accurate, it takes care of all of the DST stuff too. It's kind of fun to watch the wall clock get the "change DST" signal and "spin" its hands to the correct time (my wall clock can't "spin" backwards, so it has to make 11 complete revolutions in the fall). Hey, I'm easily entertained, what can I tell you?

      I can set my wall clock, my computer clocks and even my wristwatch to ignore the DST signal (as someone pointed out, some states in the U.S. -- Arizona is one, I believe -- don't abide by the DST convention). In addition, there doesn't seem to be any huge premium charged for this feature. The radio-equipt clock on my wall only cost $20USD and my radio-equipt Casio wristwatch cost just $38USD.

      So what was the "problem" again?

      P.S. I can't believe Firefox's spell checker couldn't spell "equipt." I know the more commonly used word ("equipped") has the same meaning and Firefox could spell that version. But, c'mon, gang: "equipt" is two-characters shorter!

      --
      One "Aw, Shit!" is worth 100 "Ata boys!"
    13. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 2

      and people as stupid as you think he said anything about popular vote.

      even worse... people as stupid as you think that the president is the most important figure in the government, as opposed to your senator or congressperson.

    14. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by homey+of+my+owney · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think you've confused your fantasy ideologues with our founders. Jefferson thought that only the elite were smart enough to vote and initially suggested excluding the rif-raf (that and the non-white and non-male folk). If your idea of democracy is "Let's reduce to the least common denominator, and if you don't like that, then let's fail", well then, indeed, the system will kill itself off. Oh, and on no time-zones: It seems a little self important to suggest that if I want a 3pm meeting then everybody can attend because it's 3pm everywhere. One time-zone means that *some* of us will need to be sleeping at 3pm.

    15. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by kbolino · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, the Federal government has every right to regulate its own agencies, which is all the time-keeping regulations do. They have no authority to tell you how to set your own clocks, nor do they even have any such laws. You have CHOSEN to use the same time convention, for reasons of convenience. Go ahead, set your clocks to whatever time you want, hell you can even invent your own clocks. I guarantee you they will not levy any fines, charge you with any crimes, nor make any other attempt to coerce you into adopting their system of keeping time.

      Don't be an idiot.

    16. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      You've heard of the electoral collage, right? That was created by the founders to protect the Presidency from the whims of the stupid commoners.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    17. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by eliphalet · · Score: 1

      Feel free to set your own clock to any time you want -- or turn it off since your personal time zone won't matter to anyone else.

    18. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by tftp · · Score: 1

      One time-zone means that *some* of us will need to be sleeping at 3pm.

      Don't worry, the next proposal will be for everyone to go to sleep at 00:00Z regardless of the position of the Sun. Of course a few people, like farmers, may have to work night shifts...

    19. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We're not doing it because it's retarded. Somehow the submitter thinks this will help people who travel for business. Excuse me?

      When you land, you've got to say to yourself: "Ok...at home, I started work at 3AM, which was after the sun came up, so here, I have to get to work at....wait....what time does the sun rise here? 5PM? WTF?"

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    20. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by NoMaster · · Score: 4, Funny

      So, what you're saying is that the U.S. government controls your clocks by beaming invisible rays into them?

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    21. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by FrankSchwab · · Score: 3, Informative

      Exactly so.

      Living in the great state of Arizona, we've chosen to ignore the Federal Government's pronouncements on time, and their constant meddling with when time should change.

      --
      And the worms ate into his brain.
    22. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by monkyyy · · Score: 0

      that matters even less where i live, yay jenny-mandering

      --
      warning pointless sig
    23. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      It's kind of fun to watch the wall clock get the "change DST" signal and "spin" its hands to the correct time (my wall clock can't "spin" backwards, so it has to make 11 complete revolutions in the fall). Hey, I'm easily entertained, what can I tell you?

      You know that happens at 2 AM, right? You stay up just to watch your clocks change?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    24. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by raodin · · Score: 2

      This isn't "a bit valid," it is just intentionally obtuse. No one will stop you from creating a new unit, but it will be your responsibility to do the conversion. Aside from that, the current definition of a second wasn't set by any government.

    25. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by realityimpaired · · Score: 2

      It seems a little self important to suggest that if I want a 3pm meeting then everybody can attend because it's 3pm everywhere. One time-zone means that *some* of us will need to be sleeping at 3pm.

      It's more than that. We've had UTC for a long time, and before that, we have had GMT for over a century. People decided not to adopt GMT as their local time, because of the psychological impact... how would you feel if you had to get up and go to work at 2am every day?

      In time, sure, people would adjust... but if would still screw you over if you moved to a different part of the world... your mind is used to the sun rising at 1am, and now it suddenly has to adjust to the sun rising at 7pm?

      What boggles the mind the most, though, is that the submitter actually thinks he's the first person to come up with this idea. Short answer: if you can't wrap your head around timezones, then perhaps you shouldn't be doing business at the level where you need to deal with people in different timezones. They aren't exactly a difficult concept... even my 4-year old nephew doesn't have problems understanding that his aunt is an hour ahead of him, and that his grandparents are 6 hours ahead.

    26. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      It would have been better if it had been called Coordinated Universal Normal Time.

    27. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      The entire point of our founders was that even "people this stupid" have the right to govern themselves.

      I'm not sure that's true.

      If you really don't believe that, then let the system kill itself off.

      I hardly think it needs my permission.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    28. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Noitatsidem · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that it was a joke, but I could be missing something.

      --
      Feel free to mod me down, just know that unlike some Anonymous Cowards I'm not afraid to express my views as myself.
    29. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by macs4all · · Score: 1

      P.S. I can't believe Firefox's spell checker couldn't spell "equipt." I know the more commonly used word ("equipped") has the same meaning and Firefox could spell that version. But, c'mon, gang: "equipt" is two-characters shorter!

      "equipt." is the common abbreviation for the word "equipment", not some Newspeak ebonification of "equipped".

      Learn to speak the language or GTFO. Just because you're lazy, doesn't mean you get to lay waste to the language.

      Now, if half the population starts using "equipt" to mean "equipped", then it will be added to the dictionary.

    30. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      It's kind of fun to watch the wall clock get the "change DST" signal and "spin" its hands to the correct time (my wall clock can't "spin" backwards, so it has to make 11 complete revolutions in the fall). Hey, I'm easily entertained, what can I tell you?

      You know that happens at 2 AM, right? You stay up just to watch your clocks change?

      It is only for two nights a year... and plus, your work is always understanding about why you're crazy late... "Sorry I'm late... stupid daylight savings... *everyone nods in agreement*"

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    31. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Dr+Fro · · Score: 1

      I think this entire article is a rickroll, but I'll bite.

      It wasn't the feds that created timezones. It was the railroads who told the government what was going to happen - one of the best examples that corporate/government relationships weren't pure as the wind-driven snow until 50 years ago.

      --
      ********************
      I object to Intellect without Discipline.
    32. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by CyberDong · · Score: 1

      LOFL!

    33. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by kbolino · · Score: 1

      I freely accept the idiot designation upon myself, unless of course Rick Astley is somehow supporting OP's position.

    34. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by hedwards · · Score: 2

      In general yes, however the Bureau of Weights and Measures will come down on you hard if you try to use any of those invented measures in commerce. I saw a picture in the paper a few months back for 80 or so years ago where the agents had piled all the scales they had confiscated for failing to meet the accepted definition of weight in use in the US at the time.

      But, in general you're correct about that, they're not going to arrest you for using GMT or refusing to acknowledge DST if you don't want to.

    35. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by kbolino · · Score: 2

      No, you are not within the law.

      The law provides its own definitions of the terms "second," "foot," "mile," and "hour" (actually, the definition is made by NIST/BIPM, and adopted into the law, but the effect is the same). Thus, when the law says you are limited to 55 miles per hour, it is specifying a quantitative limit that is independent of the chosen units. You may convert that value into whatever measurements you choose, but the limit does not change even if its numerical value in a particular system of measurement does.

      You are not obligated to accept the government's definitions for your own purposes, but you are obligated to obey the law as it is written; if the law does not permit you to substitute your own definition of "foot" and "second" then you may not do so (and still have a legal defense, anyway).

    36. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by shentino · · Score: 1

      If the feds actually managed to eliminate time zones *in other nations* I would laugh.

    37. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Thangodin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bingo. When you go to a different place, you don't want to be somewhere where the sun rises at 11 PM and sets at 12 AM. You want a normal day, and the timezone tells you what the range of that day is. Timezones don't interfere with travel, they facilitate travel.

      Look, can we just start ignoring libertarians? I mean, when someone is wrong once, you shrug. When they're wrong ten times, you raise an eyebrow. But when they're wrong hundreds of times, they need to be added to the twit filter. These people are the new bolsheviks, who also promised that the state would vanish under their leadership. Never trusted the communists, don't trust the libertarians. Same shit, different bucket.

    38. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Founding Fathers, for the most part, believed only white, male property owners should be allowed to vote.

    39. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by DamienNightbane · · Score: 0

      You know that this is Slashdot, right?

    40. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Except that they don't tell everyone what to do. Different states have different rules.

    41. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will never understand why so many people think the trillions we've borrowed from the chinese is such an amazingly good idea they'll attack those that are opposed to it. Please explain why selling america to the chinese is something you'll defend so vigorously that you'll attack anyone against it?

    42. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the Federal government has every right to regulate its own agencies, which is all the time-keeping regulations do. They have no authority to tell you how to set your own clocks, nor do they even have any such laws. You have CHOSEN to use the same time convention, for reasons of convenience. Go ahead, set your clocks to whatever time you want, hell you can even invent your own clocks. I guarantee you they will not levy any fines, charge you with any crimes, nor make any other attempt to coerce you into adopting their system of keeping time.

      Don't be an idiot.

      Too late

    43. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      That's the first thing I thought of. I'm in the Eastern time zone. I typically wake up at 7am and go to sleep at 12am. Suppose we switched to GMT. (Eastern is GMT -5.) I'd have to go to wake up at 12 noon (hey, not so bad) and go to sleep at 5am (wait... what?!!!) Unless the post submitter meant that everyone should go to sleep/wake up at the same time regardless of sunrise-sunset. In that case, everyone would need room darkening shades to keep their rooms dark during the day when they slept and would need to consume more power lighting up their houses during the night when they were awake. It would be like being in a permanent state of jet lag.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    44. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      while they may not have the authority to tell you how to set your clocks, try using that argument when you get a ticket for parking, hunting, or purchasing alcohol past posted hours.

    45. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      I saw a picture in the paper a few months back for 80 or so years ago where the agents had piled all the scales they had confiscated for failing to meet the accepted definition of weight in use in the US at the time.

      "They just didn't see the *beautiful logic* of having pounds that were 20% lighter!"

    46. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by obsess5 · · Score: 1

      And we all know that businessmen, honest to a fault one and all, would never weight the scales in their favor.

    47. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Lanteran · · Score: 1

      Wooooooooosh.

      --
      "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
    48. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by no-body · · Score: 1

      No - it goes PFFffffiii;;;,,,.... - and the air is out, nothing left inside. Actually in reality they seem to scream a bit more at times.

    49. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by deniable · · Score: 2

      UCNT? I don't get it. I'm sure many other Slashdotters don't either.

    50. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) you are wrong
      2) you are a moron
      3) please move to a country without a central government, they are all doing so well.

    51. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by deniable · · Score: 1

      Exactly. It's conservation of complexity. You've moved the time adjustment logic away from changing the clocks to changing people's internal scheduling. A watch or clock is a machine that can handle drudge work for us. This is us taking work back from the machine that's been doing the job well enough for several centuries.

    52. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by deniable · · Score: 1

      No, the article is flame-bait. The first post is a rickroll. Both would be good for ad revenue except this crowd has probably been blocking ads for as long as there's been ads.

    53. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by tqk · · Score: 0

      Look, can we just start ignoring libertarians?

      Maybe, as soon as you stop vilifying us.

      We're not the Tea Party, FFS! We only want all of us to be free of BS interventions in our lives. We'd like to be left alone, ideally. Laissez nous faire! WTF is so difficult about that? Leave us alone! Geez!

      Unfortunately, that's so far from the present "those in power"'s agenda, we tend to get vocal about their intrusions upon our lives.

      Demopublican, Republicrat, whatever, I can get along with any of you if you'll just leave me alone. [Ll]ibertarians are a lot like the Amish; we chose not to drink your Koolaid. If you like it, carry on, none of my damned business.

      No, the Koch Bros. don't speak for me. L. Neill Smith comes closer.

      Laissez nous faire!

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    54. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by SnarfQuest · · Score: 0

      So, what you're saying is that the U.S. government controls your clocks by beaming invisible rays into them?

      That's what they want you to think. What they really do is send mind control rays out there that force you to manually reset the clock, then forget that you did it. You think they are going to set up a separate network just to change your clock, when they already have this other one up and running?

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    55. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by nacturation · · Score: 1

      You've heard of the electoral collage, right?

      Is that where they arrange pretty pictures of those running for office?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    56. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by nacturation · · Score: 1

      And when you get a ticket, you can pay the fine in "cynyr dollars" which conveniently uses Monopoly money as its currency.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    57. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're not doing it because it's retarded. Somehow the submitter thinks this will help people who travel for business. Excuse me?

      When you land, you've got to say to yourself: "Ok...at home, I started work at 3AM, which was after the sun came up, so here, I have to get to work at....wait....what time does the sun rise here? 5PM? WTF?"

      The reason we have time zones is because of trains. Little thing called timetables....

    58. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone from Indiana who has seen the adoption of DST, Arizonians should know now that they have made the right decision.

      It doesn't do anything useful. It's been proven that it doesn't save energy. It doesn't make people more productive, it doesn't change traffic fatalities. It doesn't do a damn thing that's beneficial. it's actually the opposite in nearly every case.

      I'm actually mildly allergic to sunlight and heat (i get hives on exposed areas like nose, ears, arms if I'm outside around noon.) so I'm more opposed to DST than anyone here. I would move to Arizona, but I think might die or something.

    59. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. Right up until you you make the argument, "I didn't pay my taxes on time because I disagree with your method of measuring time, and those of the USPS."

    60. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like that wouldnt be an issues already. (hint: where I live the sun occasionally does rise before 3AM)

    61. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Pheredhel · · Score: 1

      The major problem with this is not that the scales used anothe system I think... The problem is that they claimed to use the "official system" but didn't.

      If you claim your scale measures 1kg , but it's only 900g , then it is fraud. If you say your scale measures 1 ASMU (Arbitrary Stupid Measurement Unit), and it follows the definition of 1 ASMU, then it should be fine... though, nobody will want to do business with you.

    62. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by jellomizer · · Score: 0

      The case of democracy isn't really a case of putting the best people in charge, but putting the one that the population will hate the least.
      People didn't like how Carter was running the US so they elected Reagan. Now Reagan wasn't smarter or better then Carter but they felt better with him then with Carter. People were overall happy with Reagan so he had 2 terms. They were actually still happy with him so they elected George Bush Sr., but the economy faltered under George Bush so Clinton was elected. The economy was strong so they elected Clinton again although he had a lot of baggage that the Christen Groups didn't like. Now Gore won over Bush in the popular vote but failed (arguably) to get the electoral votes. But we got 911 at the right time where people wanted a strong military president and the Democrats where too stupid to elect a good moderate Democrat, So they elected Bush again because they felt he was better then Kerry. But by the end of the Bush Administration the population was unhappy. So Obama won, Now we will see what the republican party does. If they pick someone who is too far gone or too right, Obama will still win, however there are people unhappy with him so if the republicans somehow get a good moderate candidate they will win.

      The value of democracy isn't the best person for the job but getting the person who people will hate the least and be unwilling to take up arms and fight against. And if they do, there will be the majority of the population to defend the government. We look at dictatorships such as Libia, where the population goes and takes over the government because the greater population is against the leadership.

      Democracy isn't getting great leadership, it value is keeping the government predictable and safe.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    63. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      Now, if half the population starts using "equipt" to mean "equipped", then it will be added to the dictionary.

      http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/equipt
      See also:
      Burnt,
      Learnt,
      Earnt,
      Slept,
      Spelt
      Smelt,
      Dreamt.

      Equipt probably isn't exactly standard these days (I use all those other -t words, but would still use equipped), but it's hardly "newspeak ebonification".

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    64. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by jellomizer · · Score: 0

      So wise sage what is your solution to the problem? OR are you just one of those people who think they are very smart by pointing out the problems, then just sits there with no solutions on the problem escalates and you can just go "Well I told you so!".

      Any Idiot and see the problems, What we need are solutions.

      Here are some solutions I can think of and their problems.

      1. Only allow Smart people to vote. How do we determine who is smart of not. (Education, IQ Test, Standardized Test, Personal Success) How do we make sure these values are fair and make sure they are not abused, as this way sub classing people and those who are deemed smart may not want to help the rest of the population who is not smart.

      2. Groom a leader. Well during the grooming process, they will be influenced by the previous leader thus will think the same way, and be slower to adapt with the times. Also during this grooming phase the person will be isolated with the plight of the people.

      3. Nepotism. Hey you're passing on those genetic traits for leadership right? Do they have genetic traits for leadership or does environment take place, and how do you know if the right stuff gets passed? Hey if he appoints a hours to be part of the console, so what he must be better then the rest of us.

      4. The strongest shall rule. Lets do it Old School who ever wins the Civil War every few years becomes the leader.

      5. A religious leader. |SARCASTIC| I don't see any problems with that right? We never had problems with countries who elect the religious leader to lead a government. |SARCASTIC|

      6. Communism. Tried it didn't work. China is the only really successful Communist government they were able to succeed by bastardizing it to a point where it is just a Strong Socialist Government.

      The United States is Unique in a lot of areas.
      There is a large population of people.
      There is a low population density.
      Population is quite diverse.
      Americans are self reliant (culturally)

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    65. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      We're not doing it because it's retarded. Somehow the submitter thinks this will help people who travel for business. Excuse me?

      When you land, you've got to say to yourself: "Ok...at home, I started work at 3AM, which was after the sun came up, so here, I have to get to work at....wait....what time does the sun rise here? 5PM? WTF?"

      Bingo. Whoever suggested this hasn't done that much traveling (specially work-related traveling) at all.

    66. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      Various workplaces start work at different hours anyway, so how does this help?

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    67. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      So what if i decide to set my cars clock to read 2 seconds for every 1 standard second. Now i go out and drive 80feet/sec(~55MPH using std seconds), but now since my car uses "cynyr seconds" I still am driving 80 Feet/second, and within the law right? right?

      so yes they do sort of tell me what time scales to use

      Yes i realize that this isn't really the point the GP is making, but it is still a bit valid.

      No, it's not valid. Not at all.
      How long a second is has nothing to do with what your clock is set to. A standard second is a standard scientific unit. A standard foot is a standard scientific unit. Therefore 80 ft/sec is a speed measured by standard scientific units.
      It's obvious that this is what speed limits mean, and suing some food company because you heated your oven to 600 degrees for 6 hours to bake your cupcakes, which is equivalent to your own "units" at 325 and 15 minutes, thereby causing lots of smoke damage to your house, is going to get laughed out of court.

      We have generally accepted conventions. It's convenient to follow them. There's nothing to say we have to, but if we don't, and we screw up in the conversion somewhere, it's our own damned fault.

      Don't be an idiot.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    68. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Because with this suggestion you've still got various workplaces starting work at different hours, as well as various areas of the world starting work at different hours. You've just added a whole layer of complexity for no reason whatsoever.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    69. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by jnuzzo · · Score: 1

      Actually it makes sense. It won't happen because there aren't enough people worldwide who are able to base decisions on logic.

      The business traveler presumably has appointments/meetings that can't be satisfied by phone/video call. That same traveler wouldn't need to care when the sun rises locally as long as he's on-time for his appointments. When his flights are delayed, he wouldn't be counting time zones to determine whether he'll be late. And your scheduling software would not have to contain the code needed to track time zones, eliminating potential bugs.

      Arizone and Indiana don't observe DST. You would no longer have to change clocks while driving across state lines -- or remembering when you DON'T need to change clocks crossing state lines.

    70. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by jnuzzo · · Score: 1

      Why would we consider using UTC worldwide, and NOT synchronize UTC with the International Date Line? Why reduce 24 reference points to (2) when it could be reduced to (1)?

    71. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by gravis777 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Imagine you arrive at your destination at 9PM, and you think you are going to get a few hours of sleep in, just to find out that the sun is just coming up and you have an hour to get to said meeting.

    72. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      It would help if the acronym was written in the same order as the words. :P

    73. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Xenx · · Score: 0

      where the sun rises at 11 PM and sets at 12 AM.

      What kind of freakishly short day is that?

    74. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by ultranova · · Score: 0

      Demopublican, Republicrat, whatever, I can get along with any of you if you'll just leave me alone. [Ll]ibertarians are a lot like the Amish; we chose not to drink your Koolaid. If you like it, carry on, none of my damned business.

      The Amish separate themselves from modern society, rather than demand that said society bend over backwards to cater to their peculiarities, like libertarians do. They fail to live up to their potential, depriving said society of any meaningful contribution while still benefiting from its protection and occasional bits of modern science and technology, but ultimately spending their lifes fruitlessly due to vanity is their business, no matter how ironic it might be. Libertarians, on the other hand, actively promote their "laissez-faire" idiocy, resulting in ever-worsening economical and social problems.

      If you want to be treated like the Amish, do like the Amish: move to a Galt's Gulch somewhere and stop bothering the rest of us.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    75. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by WidgetGuy · · Score: 1

      And you're not up at 2AM? Hand over your /. membership card right now, please.

      --
      One "Aw, Shit!" is worth 100 "Ata boys!"
    76. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by WidgetGuy · · Score: 1

      Well, no. Actually what I'm saying is that I (me) chose to buy clocks and a wristwatch that allow me to take advantage of a very useful (to me) service provided by the U.S. government.

      Of course, I might have made that choice because the U.S. government brainwashed me by inserting mind-control messages in my TV's vertical blank period.

      --
      One "Aw, Shit!" is worth 100 "Ata boys!"
    77. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by WidgetGuy · · Score: 1

      That's what I like about /. It gives dicks like you a place to demonstrate their stupidity for all the (geek) world to see. From WordWeb :

      Adjective: equipt
      1. Provided or fitted out with what is necessary or useful or appropriate: "a well equipt playground"

      ...common abbreviation for the word "equipment"...

      Nope. Searched the Web and never found a reference to that. I admit that I didn't look at all 3,760,000 hits Google produced. Maybe you're the one who needs to do a little research. Oh, wait. That's something a dick would never do. GTFO yourself, asshole.

      --
      One "Aw, Shit!" is worth 100 "Ata boys!"
    78. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by tqk · · Score: 1

      The Amish separate themselves from modern society, rather than demand that said society bend over backwards to cater to their peculiarities, like libertarians do.

      What a load of crap. The Amish are treated like pets by the rest of society.

      They fail to live up to their potential, depriving said society of any meaningful contribution ...

      Define meaningful. To me, building a barn together with all your neighbours that'll last a century is a lot more meaningful than any glittering widget that comes out of Apple Inc. (et al).

      ... while still benefiting from its protection and occasional bits of modern science and technology, but ultimately spending their lifes fruitlessly due to vanity is their business, no matter how ironic it might be. Libertarians, on the other hand, actively promote their "laissez-faire" idiocy, resulting in ever-worsening economical and social problems.

      If you want to be treated like the Amish, do like the Amish: move to a Galt's Gulch somewhere and stop bothering the rest of us.

      What a poser you are. None of that makes a lick of sense. For one thing, Ayn Rand (of Galt's Gulch fame) despised libertarians, and how the hell do you get proselytizing from "leave us alone"?!? Think of it instead as, "count me out. I don't like your strychnine laced koolaid, and don't want to drink any, thanks."

      How is that in any way a threat to you if you're not intent on pushing poisoned koolaid on others? Ah, I know; you've a "social agenda" that you're pushing and expect everyone to buy into it "for the good of all" whether they want it or not. Who's the tyrannical one now?

      Show me someone who hates [Ll]ibertarians, and I'll prove to you they've no inkling of what [Ll]ibertarians actually believe or want. Read some books, FFS! Don't take all your opinions from shallow as a pane of glass six o'clock news commentators.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    79. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldnt have said it better myself... what a bunch of jack asses... there has to be some kind of standard for things like 'time'... get real people. Yeah, set your clocks however you want, and see how well that works out for you, lol.

    80. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More than a few people are already doing this. If you are a pilot, all of your weather, flight planning tools, publications showing operating hours of airports and towers, flight plans, border crossing times, etc. are all published or reported in GMT.

    81. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The entire point of our founders was that even "people this stupid" have the right to govern themselves. If you really don't believe that, then let the system kill itself off.

      Actually, the Founding Fathers were scared of the general voting population. Hence the reason for the Electoral College and the State House of Representatives voting in Senators. They were quite certain that the general voting population was not smart enough or informed enough to make a wise/correct decision so they had measures to "fix" whatever voting errors they made. The Senate was originally meant to represent the State's interests; not the people's. They were there to look at the needs of the state as a whole and do what was best for their state. They were not answerable to the people.

    82. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

      I mean, when someone is wrong once, you shrug. When they're wrong ten times, you raise an eyebrow. But when they're wrong hundreds of times, they need to be added to the twit filter.

      By that metric, what political/social ideaology are we supposed to trust? Neither the Republicans nor the Democrats have a particularly stellar record in "being right." Most of the other third parties are just as bad, if not worse than the libertarians. I suppose I like the idea of "The Independants," but they don't really stand for any cohesive ideaology.

      Thoughts?

    83. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by FrankieBaby1986 · · Score: 1

      At the very least we'd have to use 24 hour time, and get rid of the now-meaningless AM/PM. While I kind of like the idea for time coordination and computer's sakes, I think just removing DST and making work/class start an hour earlier would make much more sense. Especially since computer time records can get confusing when using DST. But, yes, I think there is way more utility in knowing that there is a time difference between two locations and having an idea of what part of the day it is just by knowing the time than this Submitter realizes.

      --
      ERROR: SIG NOT FOUND (A)bort, (R)etry, (F)ail?:
    84. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by IrquiM · · Score: 1

      I can understand the submitter - the amount of cock-ups we've had at work because of time difference and MS Exchange is in the thousands, just in 2011.

      --
      This is blinging
    85. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Grishnakh · · Score: 0

      You slept through history class, didn't you?

      The Founders never advocated letting stupid people vote. That's why the vote was limited to white, male landowners. If you weren't rich enough to own land, they didn't want you voting.

      Now I'm not saying that white males are smarter than everyone else, but that's clearly along the lines of what the Founders thought. IMO, they were partially right: while nowadays we know that whites and males aren't any smarter than others, we do know that upper-class and middle-class people tend to make better decisions (esp. when long-term consequences are involved) than lower-class people, overall (obviously, there's always a Paris Hilton or Britney Spears in there, but compared to the legions of people in prison, who are almost all lower-class, they're a tiny number). The Founders didn't want uneducated, ignorant lower-class people voting, because they knew that democracy wouldn't survive long, so they instituted the landowner requirement; in those days, non-poor people all owned land.

      These days, we do allow poor people to vote, and what has it brought us? Obviously, our democracy is failing. As some famous person said, democracies don't survive long when the People realize they can vote themselves largess from the public treasury. So what do we have now? A government that simply can't stop spending beyond its means. This isn't limited to the US; the EU is having a crisis over this issue as well.

      Of course, the other part of the equation is that democracies don't work well if they don't work for all (or at least most) of the people. So a democracy composed of a huge number of poor people, and a tiny number of rich people, and only the rich ones allowed to vote, isn't going to work very well either for obvious reasons. A democracy really only works well with a nation where the public is well-educated, and has a large middle class (larger than the other classes).

    86. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what I like about /. It gives dicks like you a place to demonstrate their stupidity for all the (geek) world to see. From WordWeb :

      Adjective: equipt

      1. Provided or fitted out with what is necessary or useful or appropriate:
      "a well equipt playground"

      ...common abbreviation for the word "equipment"...

      Nope. Searched the Web and never found a reference to that. I admit that I didn't look at all 3,760,000 hits Google produced. Maybe you're the one who needs to do a little research. Oh, wait. That's something a dick would never do. GTFO yourself, asshole.

      Posting as AC because you aren't worth wasting the time to login.

      I agree that it seems that equipt has become a synonym for "equipped". However, I notice that most of the online dictionaries use the word "equipped" in the definition of "equipt".

      As far as it being an abbreviation for "equipment", that must have fallen out of favor; because I was definitely taught that "equipt." was the accepted abbreviation for "equipment". Don't know why it changed; but apparently it did.

      I apologize. You were right, and I was apparently taught wrong.

    87. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      It's more than that. We've had UTC for a long time, and before that, we have had GMT for over a century. People decided not to adopt GMT as their local time, because of the psychological impact... how would you feel if you had to get up and go to work at 2am every day?

      If it were normal, I wouldn't care. Why would you? Where did you get the idea that it's normal to wake up at 7AM (or whatever time you wake up), instead of, say, 6PM? These are just arbitrary numbers, nothing more. The only reason you care is because you've been culturally ingrained to think that 5AM-11AM = "morning", 12PM = "noon", 1PM-6PM = "afternoon", and 6PM-11PM = "evening".

      Now eliminating time zones would require eliminating this cultural conditioning, but it'd also be a PITA because, at least for North American culture, we have two nations here (Canada and USA) which span many time zones (Canada spans more, if you ignore AK and HI). So we tend to share a common culture across our countries (and between our countries, to a large part), but we don't share the same timezones at all. However, it's very convenient to share the same expectations of what numbers map to which parts of daytime (e.g., 8AM = start of business), instead of having that time be different in different parts of the continent.

      What boggles the mind the most, though, is that the submitter actually thinks he's the first person to come up with this idea. Short answer: if you can't wrap your head around timezones,

      While people never cease to amaze me with their stupidity, I really don't think that's the case here. He's probably young and just thinks he's found a new way to improve efficiency by eliminating an "obsolete" standard, and hasn't thought it through very well. Your 4-year-old nephew may not have problems understanding offsets, but he probably hasn't given much consideration to exactly why it's like that, and how it relates to everyday life for people in different locations. The poster probably has, but not enough.

    88. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Not everyone here in Arizona has chosen to ignore the Federal government. The Navajos up north are on DST, because there's other Navajos in neighboring states who are also on DST. However, the Hopis have a reservation totally surrounded by the Navajos, and they don't follow DST (because really, following DST in the desert here with all this sunlight is utterly pointless).

    89. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by wesleyjconnor · · Score: 1

      So when i turn up to pay my speeding fine at 750th past Khartoum (5:05pm UTC) they will open their doors?

    90. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by lennier · · Score: 1

      democracies don't survive long when the People realize they can vote themselves largess from the public treasury.

      *blinks*

      We can? So how come our popularly-elected governments are all cutting social funding, then?

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    91. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      We can? So how come our popularly-elected governments are all cutting social funding, then?

      Because they have little choice at this time. With the EU, they have the added dynamic where different countries have a say in each others' financial affairs. If Greece didn't have to listen to France and Germany, they'd just continue with their system of 50% of the population being government workers, getting a giant salary, and retiring at 50, and they'd pay for it by printing more money. (Eventually of course, this would catch up with them in the form of devalued currency.) With the Euro, they can't do that, so the other countries have forced them to make cuts.

      Also, it's not so simple. Here in the USA, we've got several different groups of dummies. One group is the one that wants tons of social funding, but not useful funding, but instead funding where basically people are given free money because they're in some allegedly-disadvantaged ethnic group, and somehow this is going to raise them out of poverty even though, instead of spending it on things like education, they spend it on big SUVs and new 24" rims for their SUVs. The other group is conservative by nature, but also believes they're going to be super-rich one day, and as a result, people who really are rich (along with some twisted fundamentalist religious people) have convinced them to back their plan of giving giant tax breaks to super-rich people, so they can buy more foreign-made luxury cars and yachts as if this is supposed to "trickle down" somehow. So in the end, there's a widening gap between the rich and the poor, and the middle class is just disappearing (most of them moving to the poor side). History teaches us that this is never a healthy society.

    92. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      I would also hope that if they adopted such a stupid idea, they would at least do so without the appendix AM/AM, where M represents Meridian, when the sun is at it's highest point in the sky.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    93. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      If it were normal, I wouldn't care. Why would you? Where did you get the idea that it's normal to wake up at 7AM (or whatever time you wake up), instead of, say, 6PM? These are just arbitrary numbers, nothing more. The only reason you care is because you've been culturally ingrained to think that 5AM-11AM = "morning", 12PM = "noon", 1PM-6PM = "afternoon", and 6PM-11PM = "evening".

      Culturally ingrained, and the fact that AM means before noon (anti-meridian) and PM means after noon (post-meridian) by their very definition. If you want to change this you need to start by changing the language you use to describe it.

      Shift workers (and college students) adjust to getting up in the afternoon and going to bed in the morning when they want to. However our human system is designed to sleep when it's dark and wake when it's light. The current solution of time zones is actually a fairly elegant solution to give people a common language to describe local conditions and clearly communicates the current position of the sun to people regardless of their relative location. It ain't broken so quit trying to fix it.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    94. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      A standard foot is a standard scientific unit. Therefore 80 ft/sec is a speed measured by standard scientific units.

      Um... actually the standard scientific unit is meters.

      We have generally accepted conventions. It's convenient to follow them. There's nothing to say we have to, but if we don't, and we screw up in the conversion somewhere, it's our own damned fault.

      Don't be an idiot.

      You mean like the Hubble Telescope, if only they'd referred to my previous point...

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    95. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by crofoot · · Score: 1

      Here, here!!

    96. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      Agreed, this would never wash, as it would take "time" out of the US's controls

    97. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      I think if you research the story behind that picture, you will find that those scales were claiming to meet the "accepted definition of weight"* and were not. One is perfectly free to develop a new system of measures, but it must not use unit names that are already legally defined. One cannot make a system of measure where 14 ounces equal 1 pound. That is considered fraud. However, one can make a system of measure where 14 ounces, as defined by law, equals 10 blarts which equals 1 grobnik,

      * That phrase doesn't mean what you appear to be trying to say. The "accepted definition of weight" doesn't change regardless of the units used. What changes is the system of units and measures.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    98. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Culturally ingrained, and the fact that AM means before noon (anti-meridian) and PM means after noon (post-meridian) by their very definition. If you want to change this you need to start by changing the language you use to describe it.

      That's easy, you just dump the whole AM/PM thing altogether and join the rest of the world that already doesn't use it. It's mainly only English-speaking countries that still use this antiquated system, plus some other highly-advanced countries like Pakistan and Nigeria:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/12-hour_clock
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/24-hour_clock

      Shift workers (and college students) adjust to getting up in the afternoon and going to bed in the morning when they want to. However our human system is designed to sleep when it's dark and wake when it's light. The current solution of time zones is actually a fairly elegant solution to give people a common language to describe local conditions and clearly communicates the current position of the sun to people regardless of their relative location. It ain't broken so quit trying to fix it.

      Agreed.

    99. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by ultranova · · Score: 1

      What a load of crap. The Amish are treated like pets by the rest of society.

      Yes, that's what I said: the rest of the society protects Amish from the cruel world that's marched on since the 1800's, thus allowing them to continue their full-life LARP without getting eaten by said world.

      Define meaningful. To me, building a barn together with all your neighbours that'll last a century is a lot more meaningful than any glittering widget that comes out of Apple Inc. (et al).

      Notice the qualifier "to the society" in my post? All of us have things that are meaningful to us; that's called "hobbies". The Amish could be scientists, industrial workers, farmers, and whatever; instead, they're intentionally limiting themselves to subsistence farming, thus crippling their potential.

      Don't get me wrong: it's certainly their right to do so. And it's my right to not pretend it's something else than pathetic.

      What a poser you are. None of that makes a lick of sense. For one thing, Ayn Rand (of Galt's Gulch fame) despised libertarians, and how the hell do you get proselytizing from "leave us alone"?!? Think of it instead as, "count me out. I don't like your strychnine laced koolaid, and don't want to drink any, thanks."

      Ayn Rand was a libertarian in all meaningful ways: specifically, she advocated that the strong should be allowed to do whatever the damn they want, the weak should die, and the government should be as minimal as possible. As for "leaving us alone", following the principle of unregulated markets has been the underlaying cause to pretty much every economic crisis from the Wall Street Crash of 1929 to offshoring to the current financial crises around the world.

      How is that in any way a threat to you if you're not intent on pushing poisoned koolaid on others? Ah, I know; you've a "social agenda" that you're pushing and expect everyone to buy into it "for the good of all" whether they want it or not. Who's the tyrannical one now?

      Yes, I have a social agenda: a stable society and economy which allows both me and others to live our lives without constantly worrying about what next disaster the financial geniuses in charge will unleash upon us. I push it because it's good for me; that it's also good for others is a nice bonus.

      Also, haven't you libertarians kept pushing unregulated market economies and globalization to the entire world for decades now? Most countries and most people don't want them, for the reasons I outlined above, but that doesn't matter to you: they adopt them, either through economic sanctions or through military force. So yeah, who is the tyrannical one now?

      Show me someone who hates [Ll]ibertarians, and I'll prove to you they've no inkling of what [Ll]ibertarians actually believe or want. Read some books, FFS! Don't take all your opinions from shallow as a pane of glass six o'clock news commentators.

      Yes, I'm sure there's plenty of books about libertarian philosophy, and I'm sure they're very good. But you know what? It doesn't matter what something is in theory, it matters what it is in practice - and libertarianism in practice is about setting up a plutocracy unhindered by democracy. Except it often fails to live up to even that, and just becomes and excuse to loot as much as you can before the system collapses.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    100. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're running into a self-created problem. You'd go to work at 3AM as normal. The clocks would not change, of course. The amount of sunlight would be different, but that shouldn't matter. (and we would need to keep a 24 hour time shift because we're biologically built around that).
      The only problem with that is it would mess up the health of the general public. This is assuming, of course, that the OP suggests that we remove the annoying stigma of staying up during the night. Some of us receive health problems from sunlight, while the rest of the general population takes it as a boon.

      Basically, removing time zones would really only be beneficial for a much larger world population because of the financial and business implications related to such things.

    101. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the US is doomed, then let it die. The entire point of our founders was that even "people this stupid" have the right to govern themselves. If you really don't believe that, then let the system kill itself off.

      Not quite. They have the right to pick people to govern them. One of the ways we know is they put a minimum age on President. You just are too stupid below the age of 35. I think that we should verify every voter is an eligible citizen and bring back a minimum intellegence test. Nothing fancy. Something like - Time flows foward. Mathematically, can it flow backwards (yes)? or how about "Do you believe that all Congressmen should be required to understand how a budget works?" (yes).

    102. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      What do libertarians have to do with this? Do you have any idea what maintaining time zone information and daylight savings, and asorted other crap costs in software development alone.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    103. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by cbiltcliffe · · Score: 1

      Um... actually the standard scientific unit is meters.

      And 1 foot is 30.48 cm.
      By "scientific" I don't mean something that scientists around the world use for calculations. I mean something that has a defined, known size.

      --
      "City hall" in German is "Rathaus" Kinda explains a few things......
    104. Re:"So why aren't we doing it?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here, here

      "Hear, hear".

  2. Is this even a real question? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is this the type of crap we can come to expect now that CmdrTaco is gone?

    1. Re:Is this even a real question? by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Whoa, Rob is gone? That's far more interesting news than this story.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    2. Re:Is this even a real question? by somersault · · Score: 1, Informative

      CmdrTaco Resigns From Slashdot. There was at least one post from 3 of the editors saying goodbye as well, but that's the important one.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    3. Re:Is this even a real question? by zoloto · · Score: 1

      You must be new here. I keed, I keed!

    4. Re:Is this even a real question? by Twinbee · · Score: 2

      Unification is actually a very good idea generally. It will happen to language eventually, and it would be a good thing to happen to time, and if you despise the idea because of the low likelihood of actually being accepted worldwide, then you're just not thinking into the future far enough.

      For now, both time systems would be a great thing, and I don't even travel much yet.

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    5. Re:Is this even a real question? by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      What are the UIDs up to, anyway? Maybe we should make note so we can have pre-Taco and post-Taco elitism along with number-of-digits elitism.

    6. Re:Is this even a real question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, basically, the same kind of crap we got while he was here? Yes.

    7. Re:Is this even a real question? by Ichijo · · Score: 2

      When the best argument you can come up with is an insult, it's time to reconsider your position.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    8. Re:Is this even a real question? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Arguably, in an increasing number of cases, "unification" should be a fairly simple matter to accomplish without bugging the humans at all.

      Observe: Virtually all networked computing devices, of the sort that people routinely interact with, have some sort of UTC(or trivially convertible to UTC) internal representation of real time, along with a localization parameter that tells them whether the user wants 12 or 24 hour time, and what time zone the user is in. Static devices generally ask for timezone on setup, devices with location capabilities can adjust as they move.

      Those two ingredients really give you most of what you need for UIs and groupware/calendaring type software to iron timezone issues out in the background, while still letting everyone who isn't necessarily a jet-lagged globetrotter use a set of local times that roughly correspond to what the sun is doing where they are. Some packages already do support this, to a greater or lesser extent. If Bob, in the eastern US, sends Alice, in Hong Kong, a meeting request for "6pm", the system can just look at Bob's timezone localization, send the UTC equivalent of "6pm in bob world" to Alice's computer, which can then display the time that is locally meaningful to Alice according to her localization.

      As with many UI/UX problems, there will be a bunch of ugly details, legacy quirks, and other messiness; but the problem isn't really rocket surgery: we already have substantial "unification" in terms of the internal representations, and we have a set of definitions(some more idiosyncratic than others; but all convertible to/from the unified internal representation format). The rest is just ugly details.

    9. Re:Is this even a real question? by Quiet+Sound · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not all ideas deserve a long-winded, high brow response.

    10. Re:Is this even a real question? by myurr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem with the unification of time systems is that 4am may be 4am everywhere, but now you'd need to know if that was the middle of the day in New York or the middle of the night. You still need to know all the time differences to have any meaningful interaction with other people, so the problem is no simpler. If you go on holiday you still need to learn to get up at 4pm instead of 6am, and it won't be as simple as just changing your watch and trying to adjust to the normal localised times you'd do those things.

      So it's a whole load of pain changing the system for no gain, or even a step backwards. Woo.

    11. Re:Is this even a real question? by geek · · Score: 1

      This is my UID. I'm pre and post Taco, does that mean I win something?

    12. Re:Is this even a real question? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, thinkingn outside the box is something nerds NEVER do. We just blindly accept that the way things are always done is the best way to do them. Save this discussion for someone else.

    13. Re:Is this even a real question? by Kreigaffe · · Score: 2

      Thank you. Now there's a logical reason that this is a bullshit idea.

      Abolish time zones, and you still need to know what the time zones are. Sure sounds like a simplified process to me!

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    14. Re:Is this even a real question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he was honest in his dumb question.

    15. Re:Is this even a real question? by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      How your computer based system would work for, say, phone conversations? When I say "meet me at 6pm", what does it mean? 6pm UTC, 6pm local time or 6pm my personal time? How does the other person find out what time does that correspond to in his personal time zone?

      I'd say keep the time zones how they are. The conversions are already done and only bother those who have frequent contacts far away. Local time works OK for local stuff and it also happens to correspond to the position of the sun. Even if you got rid of the time zones and managed to teach everyone that thay should begin/end work, go to speed/get up x hours earlier/later, it would still be the same as now. 6pm now would mean day in one country and night in another, so you would still need to know the time difference.

    16. Re:Is this even a real question? by Zombie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, it just means you're old.
      Linux is twenty years old.
      The IBM-compatible PC is a relic.
      Modem handshake noise is no longer widely recognised.
      Most people using computers have never seen a text screen.
      And your UID has four digits, as does mine.
      Now let's kick those darn youngsters off our Slashdot!

    17. Re:Is this even a real question? by fliptout · · Score: 1

      It might be better to let the youngsters have Slashdot. :/

      --
      A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
    18. Re:Is this even a real question? by Zombie · · Score: 1

      It might be better to let the youngsters have Slashdot. :/

      I bet those were CmdTaco's real leaving words.

    19. Re:Is this even a real question? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't; but(at least in the cross-timezone conversations I've encountered, the use of "Xpm my time" or "Yam your time" seem to be adopted pretty naturally, and not to impose too much difficulty on the user. If people need clarification, they ask, if contact is frequent(eg. a company and an offshore partner) a convention is established...

      It isn't perfect; but humans are pretty good at dealing with natural-language ambiguities, probably better than dealing with times that have absolutely no correspondence to local solar position.

    20. Re:Is this even a real question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am afraid yes, some things never change

    21. Re:Is this even a real question? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 3, Funny

      It might be better to let the youngsters have Slashdot. :/

      I bet those were CmdTaco's real leaving words.

      "You damned kids can KEEP the lawn; I'm retiring to the Bahamas!"

    22. Re:Is this even a real question? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Not all ideas deserve a long-winded, high brow response.

      Indeed. I'm reminded of Wolverine's only line in the latest X-Men movie. :)

    23. Re:Is this even a real question? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 4, Funny

      Modem handshake noise is no longer widely recognised.

      *wipes tears from keyboard...*

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    24. Re:Is this even a real question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this the type of crap we can come to expect now that CmdrTaco is gone?

      This discussion has been going on since at least the end of the 19th century, when several proposals similar to that of the OP where considered. One of those was for example to use the first 24 letters of the alphabet in stead of numbers for indicating the hours.

    25. Re:Is this even a real question? by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Would you prefer a movie review from Taco or one of his jaunts to a computer center?

    26. Re:Is this even a real question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This discussion has been going on since at least the end of the 19th century, when several proposals similar to that of the OP where considered. One of those was for example to use the first 24 letters of the alphabet in stead of numbers for indicating the hours.

      Just wanted to add: the idea of using letters for the hours was because then the numbers could be used locally (so that 12 o'clock is still noon), the letters were intended for international use (so it would be A o'clock or X o'clock everywhere at the same time). There were dozens of different systems proposed around the 1880s.

      As interesting were the proposed calendar changes, for example that the same date (eg. 1st of January) would always fall on the same day (eg. Monday) by putting out-of-week-days and leap days at the end of the year (who cares if Christmas is on a Monday or a Friday, it's Xmas for Christ's sake, so they proposed to just call it just like that - there were also non-religious versions where days like "Worldday" were added at the end.) Sorry, no reference, I read several books about this over 30 years ago and I don't remember the authors, titles or even in which language I read them.

    27. Re:Is this even a real question? by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      What are the UIDs up to, anyway?

      Somewhere around my UID plus 1 million.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    28. Re:Is this even a real question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, this is a troll right on the front page.

    29. Re:Is this even a real question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because something is currently not done does not mean that it is a very clever idea and "thinking outside the box". There are reasons why some things are not done.

      I can suggest that everyone around the world should shift their clocks back 2 hours, so the middle of the day becomes 10am. Is that also "thinking outside the box" or just a stupid idea?

    30. Re:Is this even a real question? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2

      The problem with the unification of time systems is that 4am may be 4am everywhere, but now you'd need to know if that was the middle of the day in New York or the middle of the night. You still need to know all the time differences to have any meaningful interaction with other people, so the problem is no simpler. If you go on holiday you still need to learn to get up at 4pm instead of 6am, and it won't be as simple as just changing your watch and trying to adjust to the normal localised times you'd do those things.

      So it's a whole load of pain changing the system for no gain, or even a step backwards. Woo.

      Yeah, only an internet nerd wouldn't see the need to know when the sun would be up in the sky.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    31. Re:Is this even a real question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, f'kin yes. I wish i had points.
      Local solar time FTW

    32. Re:Is this even a real question? by BitterOak · · Score: 2

      The problem with the unification of time systems is that 4am may be 4am everywhere, but now you'd need to know if that was the middle of the day in New York or the middle of the night. You still need to know all the time differences to have any meaningful interaction with other people, so the problem is no simpler. If you go on holiday you still need to learn to get up at 4pm instead of 6am, and it won't be as simple as just changing your watch and trying to adjust to the normal localised times you'd do those things.

      So it's a whole load of pain changing the system for no gain, or even a step backwards. Woo.

      Exactly right! Time zones give us clues as to when to do things such as eat dinner or go to sleep when we travel. Also, it makes it easier to know when it's okay to phone someone. If you know it's 3AM where Grandma lives, you know it's probably not a good time to call her. If all you know is that it's 14:00 UTC where she lives, and where you live, you need to calculate how many hours it is between sunset and sunrise where she is living and is she therefore likely to be in bed. Time zones make that much, much easier. All you need to know is she's 5 hours ahead of you (which time zones tell you) and you can figure out if it's okay to call!

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    33. Re:Is this even a real question? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      If Bob, in the eastern US, sends Alice, in Hong Kong, a meeting request for "6pm", the system can just look at Bob's timezone localization, send the UTC equivalent of "6pm in bob world" to Alice's computer, which can then display the time that is locally meaningful to Alice according to her localization.

      Isn't that exactly what any decent calendaring solution does already?

    34. Re:Is this even a real question? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      I believe so, which is why I find the notion of flattening time zones to be pointless already, and getting more pointless as time goes on.

    35. Re:Is this even a real question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ZOMG roffle THX HEAPS we will B GR8FL 4EVA LOL well THX AGIN XoXOX L8RZ D00DZ!!!!!111!!

    36. Re:Is this even a real question? by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 2
      I agree! I too am a brilliant genius, but everyone poo-poos my suggestion to replace circular wheels on cars with dodecagonal wheels! I don't understand it, why are people so afraid to think outside the box?!

      Sorry to be obtuse, "thinking outside the box" is great, but this is not "thinking outside the box". It's "not thinking...in the box". Some dweeb on Slashdot is the first person to suggest abolishing time-zones? Hardly.

      "Could we deal with the end of Time Zones?" Yes. We could. A better question would be, "Why would we ever have to deal with the end of Time Zones?". He's trying to solve an already solved problem in a ridiculous way. As someone who organises meetings with people in several other timezones, I can honestly say that the "problems" would not magically disappear as he envisions. To wit:

      Got a meeting with colleagues on the other side of the world? 4 a.m. means 4 a.m. for everyone.

      No. Just no. This is just not how it works and it tells me that the submitter hasn't ever actually had this "problem." It's solved. I schedule a meeting in Outlook/Whatever and it handles time-differences transparently so that I don't have to e-mail everyone separately with their own personal start time. I just don't care. If you don't have the luxury of software that handles that for you (why not? And why do you have an international meeting?) his system still doesn't do away with the thinking involved before choosing a time to schedule a meeting. Under his proposed system, how do I know off-hand if people will, or won't, be asleep at 4 a.m.? Or will everyone be working from 9 a.m.-5 p.m. regardless of daylight hours? I still have to have some idea about daylight/office hours in order to schedule a meeting. How is this better?

      tl;dr He's not thinking outside the box, this is not a new idea. He's not thinking, this is not a problem. He's not thinking, this is not a solution to the percieved problem.

    37. Re:Is this even a real question? by Lanteran · · Score: 1

      2.4mil, I think.

      --
      "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
    38. Re:Is this even a real question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boo. Don't be a dick.

    39. Re:Is this even a real question? by harmic · · Score: 1

      You guys have gotten it all wrong.

      You are assuming that the idea is that we would all keep doing things at the same time according to the apparent location of the sun in the sky. How old fashioned! Instead we will ALL be waking up, going to work, having lunch, etc at the same time no matter where we live. Think how much easier it will be organizing meetings with our colleagues overseas - you can be sure that 9:00 am is a good time for a meeting no matter who is invited!

      To make it fairer though, and since the rotation of the earth is no longer relevant to the time, we should change the number of hours in a day - maybe if we made it 30 hours instead of 24. Then everyone around the world would get to be awake during daytime hours every few days. Something to really look forward to if that co-incides with a weekend too.

    40. Re:Is this even a real question? by deniable · · Score: 1

      Even Outlook/Exchange can do it as long as the politicians don't play with DST on short notice. Come to Western Australia. No DST for over a decade then five days notice. People in the same city couldn't get their meeting times right.

    41. Re:Is this even a real question? by deniable · · Score: 1

      Oh, I don't know. This thing should be an easy change. The only roadblock I can see is making everyone change their fundamental view of how time operates.

    42. Re:Is this even a real question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly what I was thinking.

    43. Re:Is this even a real question? by Tanktalus · · Score: 1

      I work in a team that is spread out over timezones for: America/Edmonton, America/Toronto, America/Halifax, Europe/Dublin, Asia/Kolkata, and Asia/Shanghai. Unification of timezones would completely mess me up. Currently, by the timezone convention, I have a reasonable expectation that coworkers will be working at 10AM in their local time and not working at 10PM in their local time. (This isn't entirely true for Asia/Kolkata, but they're an exception I can keep in my head.) By converting the current time or the desired-meeting-time to each person's local time, I can get a pretty good indication of whether they'll even be awake or not, in the office or not. But, with unification, I'd have to then know what UTC time everyone's day starts and ends. And that's far more numbers to keep track of than the current system.

      In a word, unification would suck. Worse than the current system. I can't understand the concept of global unification on timezones. The reality is that our days are zoned, and the current system, while deeply flawed, gives us at least a reasonable expectation of interaction. Heck, even when I do fly from one zone to another, the act of changing my watch tells me what time to expect to get up and go to bed based on the sun's position in the new zone. This is useful information that I can compartmentalise in a mechanical or digital object and not have to concern myself with again until I change zones again. I'm currently of the opinion that unification would be a step backwards, and have yet to see any evidence to even make me think to the contrary.

    44. Re:Is this even a real question? by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Modem handshake noise is no longer widely recognised.

      *wipes tears from keyboard...*

      Why was your keyboard crying?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    45. Re:Is this even a real question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, things have really gone downhill in the last three days. Prior to this, all Slashdot stories were pertinent, well-summarized masterpieces of technology journalism.

    46. Re:Is this even a real question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, sir, I think you're confused. You see, originally this was supposed to be a geek site.

      You know, news for those people who don't care when the sun rises or sets (you don't see much of it from the basement anyway) and stuff that matters, like consistency. In the good old days this would have been too obvious a topic to put on the front page as everyone would have agreed that the current system is silly. If that's what you were after then okay, but looking at the other comments I doubt it.

    47. Re:Is this even a real question? by thePuck77 · · Score: 1

      I only apply one form of elitism: AC *

      --
      "We live as though the world were as it should be, to show it what it can be." - Joss Whedon via Angel
    48. Re:Is this even a real question? by thePuck77 · · Score: 1

      This was supposed to be "AC less than *". WTH is with that? I tried using the character code, etc. but it just disappears. Last time I looked we didn't have special markup around here.

      --
      "We live as though the world were as it should be, to show it what it can be." - Joss Whedon via Angel
    49. Re:Is this even a real question? by jep305 · · Score: 1

      "For now, both time systems would be a great thing" Well, it is now, and we have them both. The entire global aviation system runs on UTC right now, but when you land, flight attendants announce the local time. So you don't have to argue that it would be a good thing. Its already the way it is.

      --
      In Reason We Trust
    50. Re:Is this even a real question? by bruce_the_loon · · Score: 1

      Yes

      --
      Trying to become famous by taking photos. Visit my homepage please.
    51. Re:Is this even a real question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Errr.... HTML?

    52. Re:Is this even a real question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with the unification of time systems is that 4am may be 4am everywhere, but now you'd need to know if that was the middle of the day in New York or the middle of the night. You still need to know all the time differences to have any meaningful interaction with other people, so the problem is no simpler.

      As someone who used to work for a global company with a distributed team let me let you this: with time zones now most people generally don't know the differences between locations now. And even if they did, it didn't matter, because the meeting requests that I got were often the only time when that particular group of people were available, and if that happened to be 17:00 Pacific (to my 20:00 Eastern), then it was tough luck for me, I just had to call in from home.

      Or, even if they did know, it didn't matter because the time difference was so huge that it would be messed up for at least someone (think Asia meeting with North America, which is roughly a 10-12 hour, night/day difference regardless).

    53. Re:Is this even a real question? by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Those kids will never figure out how to keep the mower going.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    54. Re:Is this even a real question? by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      If Bob, in the eastern US, sends Alice, in Hong Kong, a meeting request for "6pm", the system can just look at Bob's timezone localization, send the UTC equivalent of "6pm in bob world" to Alice's computer, which can then display the time that is locally meaningful to Alice according to her localization.

      Isn't that exactly what any decent calendaring solution does already?

      Yes. Which is exactly his point.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    55. Re:Is this even a real question? by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

      Not if the idea you are arguing against is so ludicrously ill-developed it immediately solicits a laugh from anyone with a shred of common sense.

    56. Re:Is this even a real question? by byron036 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but the question is easier.

      These days you ask "Bill can you do a meeting at 10am? What Timezone are you in? Is it DST? Ok so what time is 10am for you?"

      Without Time Zones you ask "Bill can you do a meeting at 10am? That's the middle of the night for you? Ok, how about 3pm?"

      Currently everyone needs to know what Time Zones everyone else is in and the offsets to schedule. Without timezones everyone just needs to know when they get to work (or wake up, or go to bed, etc) and then they can quickly say yes or no to a proposed time.

    57. Re:Is this even a real question? by byron036 · · Score: 1

      You don't need to know Time Zones, and you don't need to know what everyone else's Time Zones are. You just need to know what time you wake up, when you get to work, when you take lunch, when you leave work, when you go to bed. Things you already know. Then when someone says "Meeting at 10am?" you can say "That's my lunch time, how about 11am?"

    58. Re:Is this even a real question? by byron036 · · Score: 1

      But how do you know it's 3AM where Grandma lives? You would have to know what Time Zone she is in, what Time Zone you are in, what the current (they change frequently in some areas of the world) offsets are and then do some math to figure out what time it is for her.

      Or, you can just ask Grandma, "Is it ok to call you at 3am?" and she says "That's wonderful, we can talk over lunch."

    59. Re:Is this even a real question? by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

      [Unification] will happen to language eventually

      If the course of the future goes anywhere except for straight to Start Trek land, your statement is false. The odds of the future going straight to Star Trek land are very, very small.

    60. Re:Is this even a real question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A really stupid question sometimes deserves such a response. Phrased another way - this 'question' isn't worth a better argument.

    61. Re:Is this even a real question? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      How your computer based system would work for, say, phone conversations? When I say "meet me at 6pm", what does it mean? 6pm UTC, 6pm local time or 6pm my personal time?

      Actually, I can see a future where time zones will be a hinderance for situations like this. Suppose your friend in Beijing wants to meet you for coffee in a couple of hours, and you're sitting in Manhattan. If he says, "let's meet at 6PM", does he mean your time or his time, or the time of the place he wants to meet at (suppose he wants to meet you in Berlin at that time)? At this point, we'll have to transition to a single, universal time.

      However, this won't be for a long time, because obviously it would require ubiquitous planet-wide teleportation technology, or something else ridiculously fast and cheap.

    62. Re:Is this even a real question? by lennier · · Score: 1

      Modem handshake noise is no longer widely recognised.

      Ming nong TZZZNNNAARRRRRRRRRRKKKK...

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    63. Re:Is this even a real question? by lennier · · Score: 1

      Why was your keyboard crying?

      Because he looked at the floor and he knew it needed sweeping.

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    64. Re:Is this even a real question? by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      .. no, you don't get it.

      If I want to call my friend on the west coast -- not a pre-planned call, but just call them -- I WOULD NEED TO KNOW THAT THEY ARE 3 HOURS TIME-SHIFTED FROM ME.

      In other words, I'd still need to know what time zone they are in so that I could judge whether or not the hour of my calling would be appropriate or not.

      Abolish time zones, and you would still need to know what the time zones are.

      I've said in another post somewhere -- the only advantage the abolishing on time zones would create would be for office monkeys who frequently schedule meetings with business associates on the other side of the planet.

      And that advantage would be.. practically no advantage, since you can just all agree to use UTC for meeting times and have each person responsible for being aware of what time zone they are currently in and what the difference between their present time zone and UTC is (or they could just, yanno, have a watch set to UTC).

      I don't think seriously inconveniencing most of the world just so a few desk jockeys can do even less work is even remotely a good idea.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    65. Re:Is this even a real question? by elsurexiste · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Somehow I think this submission was just a huge trolling taking place...

      --
      I rarely respond to comments. Also, don't ask for clarifications: a brain and Google are faster, believe me!
    66. Re:Is this even a real question? by elsurexiste · · Score: 1

      Modem handshake noise is no longer widely recognised.

      I call people who recognize it "the baud generation".

      --
      I rarely respond to comments. Also, don't ask for clarifications: a brain and Google are faster, believe me!
    67. Re:Is this even a real question? by Zoxed · · Score: 1

      > Unification is actually a very good idea generally. It will happen to language eventually...

      I agree: we should get a head start and teach our kids Simplified Mandarin :-)

    68. Re:Is this even a real question? by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      Esperanto is apparently 4x quicker to learn than English or other languages, so maybe that ;)

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    69. Re:Is this even a real question? by jbarr · · Score: 1

      I've been wondering where all the "4-digits" have been hanging out!

      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    70. Re:Is this even a real question? by jbarr · · Score: 1

      That sounds about right. And it's about 2.4 million more than mine!

      --
      My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
    71. Re:Is this even a real question? by perlmangle · · Score: 1

      UIDs are now past 2.4 million.

    72. Re:Is this even a real question? by AdamWill · · Score: 1

      "Those two ingredients really give you most of what you need for UIs and groupware/calendaring type software to iron timezone issues out in the background, while still letting everyone who isn't necessarily a jet-lagged globetrotter use a set of local times that roughly correspond to what the sun is doing where they are. Some packages already do support this, to a greater or lesser extent."

      To a greater or lesser extent? Every groupware system, cellphone and calendaring protocol I know of does this, because it makes no sense at all to do it any other way. Appointment times are always stored and transmitted in UTC and converted to $CURRENT_DISPLAY_TIMEZONE when shown to you in your calendar.

    73. Re:Is this even a real question? by Lanteran · · Score: 1

      Around 600,000 people have joined since I joined, but most of those were Micheal Kristopeit.

      --
      "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
    74. Re:Is this even a real question? by TranquilVoid · · Score: 1

      Further, this is part of the reason that daylight savings time is implemented by changing the clocks one hour rather than everybody agreeing to start work/close the shop at a different time.

    75. Re:Is this even a real question? by Zoxed · · Score: 1

      Amen to that: as a native English speaker now living in Germany, and struggling to learn German, it would be great if we all learnt a single, *logically structured*, language like Esperanto !!

    76. Re:Is this even a real question? by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      The IBM PC standard BIOS also is just a set of ugly details. Wanna debug that mothefucker?

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    77. Re:Is this even a real question? by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      You may have a point, but daylight savings and the assorted point corrections to time are perverted.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    78. Re:Is this even a real question? by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Actually, diversifying work times might do some good to traffic congestion. And the people with non-bog standard biological clocks.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    79. Re:Is this even a real question? by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Yes, DST is perverted and should be eliminated. While for now for me it is not inconvenient other than having to reset a bunch of clocks, people who go to bed and get up at the same time every day are really inconvenienced because they either get up an hour early (thus missing some sleep) or have to get up an hour earlier than they are used to.

    80. Re:Is this even a real question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Actually", it's a shit idea. Specifically to this issue or generally.

      It will not happen to language for all the reasons it hasn't happened to language. If anything the opposite will happen. Look at the dying dialects being resurrected by people guarding their cultural estate. Look at the frankly incomprehensible pidgin English that serves as a lingua franca in Asia.

      It will not happen to timezones because, for 99% of the world's population, the movement of the sun is still the most important temporal factor.

  3. Why fix it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why do we need to fix something that isn't broken?

    1. Re:Why fix it? by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah. Why bother trying to improve anything? If it isn't completely broken, don't try to fix it.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    2. Re:Why fix it? by Warlord88 · · Score: 2

      If Time Zones in Indiana are not broken, then I don't know what is. I mean, if the times could change if you commute from one place to another. Ridiculous.

    3. Re:Why fix it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I knew that Indiana had two time zones, but I had no idea about the annoying history! Why are these last few counties even bothering?

    4. Re:Why fix it? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Not broken? I'm sorry, but I *must* disagree. But I think the conversion might be worse than the conversion to metric. Yeah, metric is better, but I'm *used to* feet, inches, yards, rods, chains, furlongs, pounds, poundals, etc.

      What, you don't know the poundal? Under standard conditions the poundal is a one pound mass. (It's the same mass anyway, but if the conditions aren't standard it may not equal the mass of something that weights a pound, i.e. produces a one pound force.)

      But conversion to metric is difficult. Did you know that the US is officially metric? What this means is that feet are defined in terms of kilometers, etc. But getting people to talk about distance in kilometers isn't something you want to try.

      So, yes, it would be desirable to use a standard time. But it ain't gonna happen. If for no other reason, think what it would do to Daylight Saving Time. Double daylight saving time, War time, etc. That's a lot of laws that would need to change.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    5. Re:Why fix it? by OldTOP · · Score: 1

      What's to stop you using UTC in any situation where you think it's convenient? Why do the rest of us have to change? The relic of the past is separate time zones in every town. Standardizing that to a couple of dozen time zones plus Newfoundland stil leaves anomalies near the boundaries but it works well enough for people in most localities. Having the day change in the middle of the morning or afternoon would strike many people as a bit of an anomaly. It might be useful to give the UTC in parentheses after the local time for a few things like airline schedules. There are benefits to setting your watch to local times once you land, though. You have some idea how soon it's likely to get dark, when hotels are likely to let you check in or out, when restaurants are likely to be serving breakfast or lunch and so on. And you can leave the time on your phone set to UTC so you'll know when that conference call is -- or if you've given up wearing a watch, get a phone that's not too dumb to display local and UTC at the same time...

      --
      The universe was intelligently designed. Unfortunately God was in a hurry so he coded it in Java.
    6. Re:Why fix it? by yotto · · Score: 1

      While Indiana's an extreme example, there are places all over the world where the hour could change during your commute.

    7. Re:Why fix it? by gmack · · Score: 1

      Forget time zones.. I'd be happy if they killed off daylight savings.

    8. Re:Why fix it? by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      And how, exactly, would this even be an improvement?

      You're aware that the number of people who let's say need to schedule meetings with someone on the other side of the planet already have a perfectly elegant solution, right? That they can just use UTC/GMT instead of their local time?

      The only difficult part would be for Americans who would also need to remember if we're on daylight savings time or not before they convert it back to local time.. which you wouldn't even need to do, honestly.. and which, honestly, if we're going to do any time-related changes, would be the best solution. Just nix daylight savings, since it doesn't do anything but make people more tired for one week a year.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    9. Re:Why fix it? by Kreigaffe · · Score: 0

      Here here. That's all we need to do. It's an archaic idea. There's no savings in heating or lighting to be realized in the modern era by daylight savings time.

      The very notion that people should constantly change the hour which they rise in the morning is just.. horrific. I think there's been enough studies done showing a detrimental effect on health caused by unnatural forced shifting of the natural sleep/wake cycle that we could declare daylight savings to be a danger and risk to our health -- the loss of sleep when we shift clocks ahead results in a week of increased strokes, heart attacks, car accidents, and I'm sure if you actually looked into it, a decrease in both overall productivity of workers and in the quality of the work that is accomplished.

      Horrible shit, compared to the bullshit reasons the daylight savings idea caught on and was implemented.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    10. Re:Why fix it? by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      And how, exactly, would this even be an improvement?

      My comment was intentionally vague. I never actually mentioned that this is an improvement. I was just implying that I thought the particular argument he used wasn't very good.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    11. Re:Why fix it? by Kagura · · Score: 1

      Wow, I knew that Indiana had two time zones, but I had no idea about the annoying history! Why are these last few counties even bothering?

      They are probably part of larger centers of commerce in neighboring states, rather than in Indiana. I'd imagine there's good reasoning behind it.

    12. Re:Why fix it? by Opportunist · · Score: 0

      Even assuming that Daylight Saving is doing what it is supposed to do, it plays no role anymore. It's supposed to save electrical energy by giving you the illusion that it's longer "light outside". Ok. So I don't use my TV, my computer, my air condition, my stove, my fridge, my hairdryer, my power drill, my... just because it's light outside.

      Has it never occured to anyone that the ONLY power consuming device this whole ordeal could possibly affect is lighting? And NOTHING else? And that we've been replacing light bulbs with LEDs for the past few years, making the whole ritual even more ridiculous?

      The whole concept just doesn't make sense anymore, even assuming it ever did.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    13. Re:Why fix it? by Kreigaffe · · Score: 1

      It's not as weak as you'd think. Fixing things that aren't completely broken -- or broken at all -- often entails a cost, but a real monetary cost but also a social cost (just look at how well the metric system has caught on in the united states).

      Or, more simply: the issues (if there even ARE any, which I'd say there are not) with time zones are far lesser than the issues that would be caused by abolishing time zones (let alone the issues that would be caused by not having time zones -- problems adjusting as well as problems simply using).

      Car analogy: if my car doesn't start on the first turnover, maybe that's a problem, but probably it is not. tearing the engine apart to correct a small issue that may or may not exist, however, will cause problems. maybe the engine will run better, maybe it won't, but it really wasn't having any problems worth noting in the first place.. and even if there was a small problem, and even if I was able to fix it, I've still lost god knows how many hours tearing the thing apart and putting it back together again. the solution, then, is a far greater cost than just not doing anything, with no clear benefit at the end -- AND a chance that it'll just introduce a serious problem when none existed previously.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    14. Re:Why fix it? by Ritchie70 · · Score: 1

      That has historically been a mess, but it seems like they've pretty well resolved it in a sensible fashion.

      The counties that are arguably part of the greater Chicago metro area are in Central time, same as Chicago.

      The rest are in Eastern time.

      I'm really not sure what you think the problem is. The line between time zones has to fall somewhere, and lots of people commute across state lines, so putting it at state boundaries doesn't help.

      --
      The preferred solution is to not have a problem.
    15. Re:Why fix it? by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      It's not as weak as you'd think.

      Since this is just based on preference: it is to me. And his argument was vague as well. He only mentioned that if something is not broken, you should not fix it. He did not add any context. He phrased it in a way that made it sound like he was talking about everything and every situation (at least to me).

      Or, more simply: the issues (if there even ARE any, which I'd say there are not) with time zones are far lesser than the issues that would be caused by abolishing time zones (let alone the issues that would be caused by not having time zones -- problems adjusting as well as problems simply using).

      That depends on what you define as an issue. Some people may not have issues with something someone else does.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    16. Re:Why fix it? by mrbester · · Score: 1

      I stopped changing my watch from UTC to whatever timezone I was in over 20 years ago...

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    17. Re:Why fix it? by uncqual · · Score: 1

      At least Indiana finally adheres to DST in every county. Before that, it was really confusing!

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    18. Re:Why fix it? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Even assuming that Daylight Saving is doing what it is supposed to do, it plays no role anymore. It's supposed to save electrical energy by giving you the illusion that it's longer "light outside". Ok. So I don't use my TV, my computer, my air condition, my stove, my fridge, my hairdryer, my power drill, my... just because it's light outside.

      Has it never occured to anyone that the ONLY power consuming device this whole ordeal could possibly affect is lighting? And NOTHING else? And that we've been replacing light bulbs with LEDs for the past few years, making the whole ritual even more ridiculous?

      The whole concept just doesn't make sense anymore, even assuming it ever did.

      The latest studies on the facts of DST that I've heard of over the last couple of years have shown that DST actually uses a bit MORE energy. A flawed concept from the start, and we're stuck with it until someone has the balls to end it.

    19. Re:Why fix it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Here here.

      No, over here!

      If we got rid of DST then we could just change our business hours in the summer, like we should have done in the first place.

    20. Re:Why fix it? by cynyr · · Score: 1

      OOO i like the idea of adding UTC || GMT to airline/train schedules that would make my trips from MN to CA with a layover in CO much nicer... takeoff 8:45, land, 9:12. Depart 10:32 land 10:57... WTF!

      I'd vote GMT over UTC, as I would hate to lose or gain a second mid flight and have something goofy happen.

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
    21. Re:Why fix it? by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      Frankly, I don't care whether or not DST saves or increases the use of energy. I just want to be in it, permanently, all year. The day DST ends, evening-commute traffic in South Florida gets several orders of magnitude worse literally overnight. A drive home that takes 40 minutes on Friday *instantly* becomes an hour+ ordeal the following Monday.

      The problem? During the summer, people straggle home from work starting around 4, gradually peaking around 6 or 6:30. The moment the clock moves back, people run for the door at 5 in a desperate attempt to get home before it's totally dark outside. Same total number of people trying to get home, but now 90% of them are hitting the road between 4:30 and 5:30, instead of spread out over a much longer interval. The outcome? Gridlock everywhere, every inch of the way home.

    22. Re:Why fix it? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Because this works more efficiently than any of the alternatives that people have suggested. A system that abolished timezones would reek havoc on international business as you'd have to constantly be doing conversions of time when you're over there rather than just the few times when you need to call somebody. And for those that are constantly making those calls, then you already know how to handle it under the current system.

      Ultimately, unless the circadian rhythm gets cured we're all going to be going to work based upon the particular location of the sun in our region of the. world

    23. Re:Why fix it? by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

      That depends on what you define as an issue. Some people may not have issues with something someone else does.

      Yes, but the submitter was just as vague! He doesn't explain the issues with the current system. He alludes to meeting scheduling, but that's ridiculous. Anyone who's scheduling international meetings likely already has the software solution to make meeting scheduling trivial. For anyone who doesn't, the proposed solution to the "issues" he perceives introduces extremely similar ones all of its own! So a meeting's at 4 a.m., everywhere? Who will I be waking up/making stay late? Boston? London? Hong Kong? And what's stopping him and his friends/colleagues arranging their meeting for 4 a.m. UTC? Why does the whole world have to change to suit him?

      A more appropriate car analogy would be: "I have trouble remembering to put fuel in my car and some other people do too, therefore I think every car should be built with a loud warning siren that sounds every 5 seconds when the fuel level drops below 15% full".

    24. Re:Why fix it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My comment was intentionally vague. I never actually mentioned that this is an improvement. I was just implying that I thought the particular argument he used wasn't very good.

      What kind of retardation do you have? "oh look at me, I never said it was an improvement, I never said it was not an improvement. I am waving my hands around making no sense at all, look how clever I think I am!"

      The idea is stupid. Just because it is not currently done does not make you some pseudo-intellectual for supporting it. The idea does not need any great depth to its rebuttal because, well, it is just a retarded idea. No different to if someone was suggesting that cars should have square wheels.

    25. Re:Why fix it? by deniable · · Score: 1

      Feel free to indicate what's broken before replacing something that's at the heart of pretty much everything we do.

    26. Re:Why fix it? by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

      What kind of retardation do you have? "oh look at me, I never said it was an improvement, I never said it was not an improvement. I am waving my hands around making no sense at all, look how clever I think I am!"

      If you'll reread my comment, I never actually mentioned time zones or anything of the like. I just replied to his vague statement that seemed to be talking about anything and everything with one of my own.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    27. Re:Why fix it? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      The 'fix' is still broken because I still won't know if my colleagues are in bed or not.

       

      --
      No sig today...
    28. Re:Why fix it? by thePuck77 · · Score: 1

      Because it is broken. It pretends like time is something it isn't and introduced unnecessary complexity. Rule of Simplicity FTW.

      --
      "We live as though the world were as it should be, to show it what it can be." - Joss Whedon via Angel
    29. Re:Why fix it? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      At least Indiana finally adheres to DST in every county. Before that, it was really confusing!

      Yeah, their time always stayed the same, so only Arizona could figure out what time it was in Indiana. This discussion should really be about the abysmal waste of money and effort that is DST. Pull the rest of the world back to sanity, AZ!

    30. Re:Why fix it? by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

      I can agree with this, daylight savings time always seems to confuse people.
      People will say a meeting is at 2PM EST but expect you to be there 2PM EDT.

    31. Re:Why fix it? by lennier · · Score: 1

      War time, etc.

      Does everyone know what time it is?
      It's Wardy Doody time!
      That's right kids! And who are we gonna invade today?
      Libya! Yay!

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    32. Re:Why fix it? by znerk · · Score: 1

      How about Phoenix, AZ? It's in a different time zone from the entire rest of the state, half the year.

      And let's not forget the other unusual time zones, all over the world.

      --
      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
    33. Re:Why fix it? by sorcerykid · · Score: 1

      It's Daylight Saving Time, not "Savings" :P

  4. Most people don't travel or do business so globaly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...that it would outweigh the inconvenience locally.

  5. Before we ditch timezone...Let's kill DST first!! by sam0737 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    DST is a beast. Worse, the rules change over time!

  6. Dates get confusing by crow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do we really want the date to change in the middle of the day? No, that is not practical. Most of the world still runs based on sleeping when the sun is down, so the time zone system still works.

    1. Re:Dates get confusing by exploder · · Score: 2

      This single reason is more than enough to dismiss the idea.

      --
      Yo dawg, I heard you like the Ackermann function, so OH GOD OH GOD OH GOD
    2. Re:Dates get confusing by siride · · Score: 2

      You are the retarded one. Their point is that /since/ people sleep at night, having "midnight" (according to GMT) be in the middle of the day or at some other odd time would be ridiculous. It would be evening here in the eastern US when the day goes from Monday to Tuesday. Everyone's still up. People might still be working. It'd be worse on the west coast where going from Monday to Tuesday would happen at 4 PM!

    3. Re:Dates get confusing by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      Most of the world still runs based on sleeping when the sun is down, so the time zone system still works.

      Why can't we continue to sleep when the sun is down?

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    4. Re:Dates get confusing by HiThere · · Score: 1

      It *is* the best reason I've heard. But it isn't sufficient. The date changing in the middle of the day is just something we aren't used to. One standard time would be better. But it's not enough better to be worth the hassle of switching.

      For that matter, Daylight Saving Time is also useful, especially if you live far from the equator. It would be better to avoid it and replace it with variable hours of business, but not enough better that it will happen. (OTOH, the common justifications used to promote it are wrong. It does cost more money than it saves. But not all convenience is measured in money. And it's not clear that variable hours of business would be less expensive. It would, however, decentralize the decision of when the hours would change and by how much, and that's worth something in and of itself.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    5. Re:Dates get confusing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No but it combined with all the obvious ones not worth mentioning are.

    6. Re:Dates get confusing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time is just a number, that's the "retarded" poster's point. There is nothing inherent in the number 12 that means you have to be asleep then. There is no reason the date cannot change at 4pm. The overlapping arbitrary time zone system (Part of Canada is off by 30 minutes, Indians ignores it entirely, etc) is confusing and makes no sense.

    7. Re:Dates get confusing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For anyone that works supporting any type of international company, this is a regular occurrence. Date changing is something that just is, it already happens over the globe. It would be a shame to inconvenience all the people who still live in world where everything relevant to their life happens locally. Once one starts having to think in 24 hour time, the suggestion to ditch time zones is not that difficult and would make things far easier than dealing with all the people who don't understand there are time zones outside of their own.

    8. Re:Dates get confusing by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      Yup, the whole notion of abandoning time zones pretty much defies our biology. We're built for day-night cycles, so it's only rational that our timekeeping system reflect those cycles.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    9. Re:Dates get confusing by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      Well then we need to somehow evolve out of needing sleep, and also light the streets up to daylight levels or brighter to allow for sunshine 24 hours a day!

      (I'm only half-joking, I think it would be really cool not to have to sleep)

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    10. Re:Dates get confusing by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Alternatively, we could confuse things even more and have "day zones" instead of "time zones". You know, define the day to be whatever day it was when the sun rose. :-)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    11. Re:Dates get confusing by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1
      People are used to waking up on Monday morning and going to bed Monday evening, so all the events that happened between sleeps happened on Monday.

      People are also used to Monday turning into Tuesday at 12:00 PM (or 00:00 for sane people.)

      Which convention are you going to break?

    12. Re:Dates get confusing by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      Insensitive clod! Down here in the South pole where penguins doth tread in your imagination, we currently have night time all the time (thank FSM, not long to go before we can start living again). So I demand that the world switches to apx. 00:00 hours worldwide, and keep it fixed at that until next month.

      I have heard that my friend down under is currently in constant daylight, and we often argue whether we should stick to 12:00 or 00:00 (we swap our stances every 6 months or so). Anyway, it gets tiresome, and just hearing people like you suggest yet another alternative makes me want to hibernate forever.

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    13. Re:Dates get confusing by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1

      Why can't we continue to sleep when the sun is down?

      No reason. But now I'll have to remember if my first workday of the week is the one that's partly on Sunday but mostly on Monday, or that's partly Monday and mostly Tuesday. Or I'd have to remember if 3:30 PM is early morning one day or late evening the previous one...

    14. Re:Dates get confusing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do we really want the date to change in the middle of the day? No, that is not practical. Most of the world still runs based on sleeping when the sun is down, so the time zone system still works.

      In arabic/hebrew countries, the date changes at sunset - not midnight.

      I guess it is whatever you are used to....

    15. Re:Dates get confusing by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      But now I'll have to remember if my first workday of the week is the one that's partly on Sunday but mostly on Monday, or that's partly Monday and mostly Tuesday.

      Do you often have problems remembering whether to go to work on Sunday or on Monday?

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    16. Re:Dates get confusing by monkyyy · · Score: 0

      "The date changing in the middle of the day is just something we aren't used to."
      i disagree, im often up past midnight and its not that hard, and why not just replace dls w/ "national working hours shifting day" or something

      --
      warning pointless sig
    17. Re:Dates get confusing by monkyyy · · Score: 0

      y? wouldn't we only need 2, w/ the breaks being atlantic and pacific oceans

      --
      warning pointless sig
    18. Re:Dates get confusing by monkyyy · · Score: 0

      why do we wake up at 6 instead of 0,is it really that different to think the sun raises at 13 and we sleep at 3,

      --
      warning pointless sig
    19. Re:Dates get confusing by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Because our clock is based on noon, when the Sun is at its highest point in the sky. Whatever.point you choose it should be universal, and not based on "when I wake up".

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    20. Re:Dates get confusing by Skidborg · · Score: 1

      This uncovers that other problem with the internet, the fact that it is right now different days in different parts of the world. Having the dates synchronized might be a good idea.

      --
      Supporter of the +1 Over Dramatic mod option. In memory of apk.
    21. Re:Dates get confusing by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      What do you mean? You would still go to sleep in the night and wake up in the morning, at the sunrise. The clock might just show different numbers on those occasions.

    22. Re:Dates get confusing by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Or I'd have to remember if 3:30 PM is early morning one day or late evening the previous one...

      I don't see why that would happen. If it turned out that, say, 02:00 PM is early morning in your country, then it would be so every day.

    23. Re:Dates get confusing by supertrinko · · Score: 1

      But it's not enough better to be worth the hassle of switching.

      The majority don't need to switch between time zones, so changing how it works would just make date changing in the middle of the day annoying for them. Needs of the many and all that.

      --
      If it rhymes it must be true.
    24. Re:Dates get confusing by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      that's silly, when sun goes down has absolutely nothing to do with man's declared times or dates.

      meanwhile, our stupid time zone system has political rather than logical boundaries, and moreover has the idiocy known as "daylight saving time" which doesn't save energy and is proven to cause increase in deaths.

    25. Re:Dates get confusing by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1

      Tradition is not a good argument to use when discussing a technical issue.

      My point was that the traditional system was better because of actual properties it has, not that it was better because it was traditional. Having a convenient standard is a good thing, and human beings generally have common time periods of being active broken up by sleeping periods, and a good terminology should reflect that.

      Tradition is not a good argument to use when discussing a technical issue.

      But this isn't just a technical issue, you're talking a huge amount of effort changing the way billions of people express time, most of whom will not significantly benefit. Tradition may be irrelevant when choosing the best system, but as a practical matter the effort to change it isn't. What you have is a solution without a problem.

    26. Re:Dates get confusing by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1

      Do you often have problems remembering whether to go to work on Sunday or on Monday?

      No. But if the days change at 9 AM, and my boss asks on Friday "When did you clock in Monday?", it isn't clear if he's talking about the first day of the week where I clocked in at 9:15, or the second when I clocked in at 8:45. And in more informal situations, like when we "meet for lunch on Wednesday", there's lots of room for confusion where the day switches around midday. Yes, you can add more words to clarify, but what does the average person gain from all of this?

    27. Re:Dates get confusing by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1
      If we really wanted to we could have September 21st start as a Tuesday in 2011, go to Wednesday at 9:00 AM, and become 2012 at 2:00 PM. Heck we could even make September 21st become October 21st at 10:15 PM, (and have October 1st follow October 31st.) But all that would do is add needless confusion.

      Unless there's a good reason, why not keep with the easy standard of having longer time measurements increment when the smaller ones reset (i.e. year, month, day, and day of the week all change at the same time)?

    28. Re:Dates get confusing by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      You must be thinking the system in some other way. If we ran the whole world in the same timezone (for example similar to UTC), year would change at 00:00 everywhere, but whether it's night or day then, would depend on your country. This is how I see it.

    29. Re:Dates get confusing by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1

      You're right that there are two ways to do it, as I mentioned in my first post. One way makes "daytime" and "Monday" completely distinct things (Tuesday starts the middle of the local solar day), the other makes new days start at some arbitrary time (say 9:00 UTC) which seems at least as confusing as our current time zones.

    30. Re:Dates get confusing by dolmen.fr · · Score: 1

      How many represent the people working at an international level (or at least a cross-timezone level) compared to the whole world population?

      Anyway, imposing a single timezone is not more doable at the world level than it is at the level of a single state in an advanced country.

  7. Prime Hours by Deltaspectre · · Score: 1

    Alright then, who gets the prime hours? Where 12pm means noon and 12am means midnight?

    --
    My UID is prime... is yours?
    1. Re:Prime Hours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Submitter suggests using UTC. I would imagine this would be even more disruptive to the US than switching to metric.

    2. Re:Prime Hours by Relayman · · Score: 1

      England! The Queen has dominion over time!

      --
      If I used a sig over again, would anyone notice?
    3. Re:Prime Hours by SuricouRaven · · Score: 0

      Greenwich. They basically invented the modern concept of time. That is why they have the prime meridian running through the royal observatory.

    4. Re:Prime Hours by Goose+In+Orbit · · Score: 0

      Agreed... ...except for the annual campaign over here to move to GMT+1 permanently (and GMT+2 in summer) - if that ever comes in we may as well renounce any claim to being the basis for clock time.

      (To the GMT+1 crowd - I say "if you want to live by European time... move to Europe")

    5. Re:Prime Hours by Noughmad · · Score: 1

      England! The Queen has dominion over time!

      No, England's resident time lord is The Doctor.

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
    6. Re:Prime Hours by WidgetGuy · · Score: 1

      Anyone living on or near the equator?

      --
      One "Aw, Shit!" is worth 100 "Ata boys!"
    7. Re:Prime Hours by chill · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wow, nice subtle troll. I believe the French and Belgians would beg to differ with you.

      Belgian cartographer Gerardus Mercator published the first modern atlas, Theatrum Orbis Terrarum, in 1570. He showed the Prime Meridian running through Antwerp. The Royal Observatory in Greenwich wasn't commissioned until 1675 -- 105 years later.

      The Paris Observatory was commissioned in 1667 and completed in 1671, a good 4 years before the British even started on theirs.

      The Greenwich line is used because when the vote was taken in 1884, over two-thirds of all ships and tonnage used it as the reference meridian on their maps. That is, British economic dominance was at its peak and most of the ships already used it. Oh, and it pissed off the French, which was always a plus to the Brits back then.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    8. Re:Prime Hours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...prime meridian running through the royal observatory...
      In practical terms, it doesn't, now that everyone uses the default GPS system. see for example: http://www.thegreenwichmeridian.org/tgm/articles.php?article=7
      Well, the British imposed their longitude origin over the objections of the other nations, now the Americans are imposing theirs. Oh well, the UK will just have to feel good about some other world standard we invented. Tennis anyone?

    9. Re:Prime Hours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like British Summer Time, so much so that I would like it in Winter too. But still moving the clocks forward/back in Spring/Autumn so we end up with GMT+2 in Summer is retarded. I hate it getting dark so early in the Winter, but I don't think there is much need for it to be light later in the Summer, I'm aware of the arguments for it, but they are mostly that it will benefit certain tourist activities that depend on daylight but get most trade in the evening.

    10. Re:Prime Hours by instagib · · Score: 1

      > we may as well renounce any claim to being the basis for clock time
      Does this have some importance other than "oh look here is zero!" ? Does it make you feel a little bit "empire-ish"?

      > move to Europe
      GB is part of the geographical area "Europe", just like, say, Crete and Mallorca. So, the GMT+1 crowd is just practically oriented. Do you need a timezone to feel special?

      Now, if this change would disturb tea time, you might actually have a real argument.

    11. Re:Prime Hours by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1

      Oh, and it pissed off the French, which was always a plus to the Brits back then.

      Still is.

    12. Re:Prime Hours by Jonner · · Score: 1

      Alright then, who gets the prime hours? Where 12pm means noon and 12am means midnight?

      The answer is in the question, as well as historic precedent. UTC is the time at the prime meridian.

    13. Re:Prime Hours by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is.
      - A British Person.

    14. Re:Prime Hours by NickFortune · · Score: 1

      Does this have some importance other than "oh look here is zero!" ?

      Well, only in so far as TFA suggested using UTC in the first place.

      Does it make you feel a little bit "empire-ish"?

      Umm... I dunno. It's not something I think a lot about.

      Should it? Do you think?

      --
      Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
    15. Re:Prime Hours by Phillip2 · · Score: 1

      The UK and Europe. He's suggesting UTC, and the zero hour is here.

    16. Re:Prime Hours by lazybeam · · Score: 1

      Then why can't you adjust the timetable? Instead of an activity starting at 5pm, move it to 4pm. DST is a lie, just to get you up an hour earlier for half the year.

      My suggestion, instead of timezones based (approximately) on local midday (like they are now), it should be based on local sunrise (exactly)! That would make the zones and time calculations much more complex but the advantage is automatic DST, since it would adjust the UTC offset by up to a minute each day. Refer to http://www.ga.gov.au/geodesy/astro/sunrise.jsp to see when the "00:00:00" should be. In my "beamtime" I woke at 00:54 (54 minutes after sunrise). The sun set at 11:26, it is currently 16:41 (22:47 GMT+10, by the time I actually post this it will be a few minutes) and daynight will end at 23:58:59 (it's almost spring here so the time between sunrises is shorter than the "usual" 23:59:59; your daynight will almost definitely end at a different beamtime). To see what these are in your local beamtime, you'd probably need a computer of some sort, possibly with GPS data of your location and mine. :)

      Though if I was to screw with the time that much, I'd like to make it "metric" at the same time: using seconds, hectoseconds and "manseconds" (see Japanese word for 10,000). So I woke at 0,32,40 and the sun set at 4,11,60 and it is currently 6,00,60 and the daynight will end at 8,63,39 (my current information only goes to the minute, in practice it should be either to the second or rounded to the nearest hs).

      All this will guarantee that it will not be adopted anywhere.

      --
      --
      no sig for you. come back one year.
  8. Universal Time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because time is arbitrary, anyway. And not everyone uses DST, for that matter. There are some countries that dont use it, and there are states within the US that dont use it.

    1. Re:Universal Time. by OzPeter · · Score: 1

      Because time is arbitrary, anyway. And not everyone uses DST, for that matter. There are some countries that dont use it, and there are states within the US that dont use it.

      (without digging up the info) I think there is even a county or two that is inconsistent wrt DST/timezone of the state they are in.

      --
      I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  9. AM & PM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Scrap AM & PM - most people can figure out a 24 hour clock. Time zones, on the other hand, make perfect sense.

    1. Re:AM & PM by mmmmbeer · · Score: 1

      If you want to use a 24 hour clock, go ahead. Nothing is stopping you.

    2. Re:AM & PM by ByteSlicer · · Score: 1

      AM/PM would not be so bad, if only they could decide on whether 12 AM is noon or midnight...

    3. Re:AM & PM by doctormetal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      AM and PM is stupid and can be confusing. People often mention the time and assume you know whether they mean AM or PM. Most countries use a 24 hour clock so ditch the 2*12 one. And also ditch the imperial system.

    4. Re:AM & PM by ksemlerK · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I already run my schedule on a 24 hour time clock. I haven't used 12 hour time since 2004, and I don't intend on switching back to the assanine AM/PM 12 hour clock that the rest of america seems to be so enamored with. Current time is 1323 PDT.

    5. Re:AM & PM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time zones, on the other hand, make perfect sense.

      Perfect sense? Time zones make perfect sense? I've guess you've never had to code a program that needs to understand time zones. A *few* of the things that don't make sense for time zones:

      • Newfoundland is 30 minutes ahead of Atlantic time zone
      • Kenton Oklahoma observes Mountain time though they are officially in the Central zone.
      • Hyder Alaska unofficially observes Pacific time, even though they are officially in the Alaska time zone. But the post office, being a federal facility, is on Alaska time.

      More here: http://ontimezone.com/exceptions.php

    6. Re:AM & PM by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      I like AM & PM.

      It makes it fairly simple to tell 'morning' from 'afternoon'. To me 18 means diddly squat. 6 pm means something.

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    7. Re:AM & PM by Great+Big+Bird · · Score: 1

      Where is this a problem? 12AM is the start of the morning, and 12PM is noon. Where does this not work?

    8. Re:AM & PM by wootest · · Score: 2

      18 may mean diddly squat for you when you're not using a 24 hour clock, but I bet you know the difference between 2 AM and 9 AM. The 24 hour clock just extends the same idea to all hours. Having to cart around two digits and a letter seems like more work than just two digits, even if neither of the two are crushing work as such once you're used to them.

      And for the record, yes, most people in a 24 hour clock country don't say "we'll meet at 18" but "we'll meet at 6 in the evening". But they also say "we'll meet at noon" instead of worrying about which of 12 PM and 12 AM is noon and which is midnight. It seems like people assume that "24 hour people" want their time in one strict format, when it's more often about just being clear with what you mean.

    9. Re:AM & PM by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      Everywhere where someone ponders it for a moment.

      It starts with 1am, 2am, 3am... 10am, 11am... what would you expect next? Well, considering it's a base 12 system, you'd expect 12am, followed by 1pm. Nooooo, what you get is 12pm, 1pm, 2pm... WTF? Did we do a #define 12 0 and found a compiler that allowed that?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    10. Re:AM & PM by Snaller · · Score: 2

      No, we want the few people in the world who divide a 24 hour day into to halves to STOP IT and get with the program.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    11. Re:AM & PM by afabbro · · Score: 0

      I like AM & PM.

      It makes it fairly simple to tell 'morning' from 'afternoon'. To me 18 means diddly squat. 6 pm means something.

      Well, then, clearly we can't change because what numbers mean to you is the most important thing for the rest of us.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    12. Re:AM & PM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AM and PM is stupid and can be confusing. People often mention the time and assume you know whether they mean AM or PM. Most countries use a 24 hour clock so ditch the 2*12 one.

      I've gone and done this myself. All the clocks in my house are 24 hours, except for one voice-activated beast. Most modern clocks have a switch you can set; my stove, microwave, and computers are all like that.

      My bedroom clock just took a little modification: open it up, find the jumper marked "12H" and move it to "24H", and get used to the tens-of-hours digit reading ' instead of 2 because the manufacturer didn't install the LEDs for those segments and went and silicone sealed the display shut so I can't put them in.

      And also ditch the imperial system.

      One thing at a time.

    13. Re:AM & PM by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      People often mention the time and assume you know whether they mean AM or PM. Most countries use a 24 hour clock so ditch the 2*12 one. And also ditch the imperial system.

      Here in Finland (and most other countries I've been to, excluding the US) we officially have a 24-hour clock, but still talk in terms of a 12-hour one. Nobody says AM or PM, so it is generally assumed which one you mean, but we often specify them as in "morning 8".

      I wonder if this has something to do with analogue clocks; a 24-hour analogue clockface is a rare thing to see, though they do exist. I recall reading that some hundreds of years ago, there were 12 hours of daytime and 12 of nighttime, and the actual length of the hours was adjusted according to sunrise and sunset.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    14. Re:AM & PM by gstrickler · · Score: 1

      You've just indicated that you do in fact know that 18:00 is 6:00pm, so what's the problem?

      --
      make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
    15. Re:AM & PM by Intropy · · Score: 1

      Really, that the problem with AM/PM? 12 AM is unambiguously midnight just like 12 PM is unambiguously noon. If it's really that big an issue for you then just say noon or midnight. There's nothing wrong with AM and PM. The mental effort required to switch between normal time and military time is tiny. Whatever you're used to is going to be the one that has immediate intuitive meaning and the other might involve adding or subtracting 12. Big deal.

    16. Re:AM & PM by Nurgled · · Score: 1

      The concept of timezones is a compromise between each longitude having its own time-of-day origin and all longitudes sharing the same which attempts to keep the advantages of the former (easy to determine approximately what phase of the day it is at any longitude) while avoiding constant clock adjustments as one moves between longitudes. I think I'd agree with the grandparent that the idea of timezones makes sense, but the implementation of it based on arbitrary administrative boundaries (countries, states) rather than on actual longitude increments is what adds the complexity for software, since the only way to work with administrative boundaries is to maintain a database of the boundaries and each of their special cases.

    17. Re:AM & PM by hedwards · · Score: 2

      AM & PM aren't typically that big of a deal in most cases. Just use a bit of common sense and if you really need to make sure that somebody shows up at 3:00 AM, then specify. Normally there's really only a 12 hour or so period of time where people are scheduling for, in cases where you're needing more than that, chances are you're using UTC or GMT

    18. Re:AM & PM by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Let me put it another way... I make sense of 18 as 6 pm because I do math in my head: 18-12=6. That is very very different than the fact I intuitively know what 6 pm is.

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    19. Re:AM & PM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      AM/PM is only stupid and confusing if you're an idiot who doesn't understand context. "I'll call you at 8" and "I'm going to bed at 11" very rarely mean AM unless you're dealing with somebody who works graveyard shifts, or under some other circumstance where it is perfectly clear they don't mean PM. "I have class at 1230" never means half past midnight. Nobody ever accidentally shot off a nuke because they didn't understand what half of the day was meant when they were told "the mail usually shows up here around 3 or 4".

      That said, I use 24H on my phone because on more than one occasion I set my alarm for 8, and ended up late for work because I set it for 8pm instead of 8am. It's harder to make that mistake when the alarm on the phone says 20:00 ;)

    20. Re:AM & PM by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Most countries that use 24-hour clock only do that for written stuff - in speech you'd still normally say "see you at five", and they're supposed to figure out that it's 5 PM today, not 5 AM next day.

    21. Re:AM & PM by ByteSlicer · · Score: 1

      12 AM is unambiguously midnight just like 12 PM is unambiguously noon

      I'm afraid that's untrue, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AM_PM#Confusion_at_noon_and_midnight

    22. Re:AM & PM by ByteSlicer · · Score: 1
    23. Re:AM & PM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be nice to dump the imperial system but there has been to much research that was based on it, such as traveling to the moon. All future research should be done in metric, however useful information in imperial will still need to be converted over.

    24. Re:AM & PM by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      you mean confusion like "does midnight Tuesday mean 12:00 AM as Monday turns into Tuesday, or as Tuesday turns into Wednesday"?
      With you there.
      Heard some people refer to 11:59 PM or 12:01 AM to route around that issue.

      However, 24 hour clocks seem to use 0:00 for midnight, routing around that issue more elegantly.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    25. Re:AM & PM by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 0

      To me 18 means diddly squat. 6 pm means something.

      Hahahahaha! What? Are you 5?

    26. Re:AM & PM by jpapon · · Score: 1

      Actually, since, as you say, "it is a base 12 system", it would make more sense for it to go from 0-11. So 10am 11am 0pm.

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    27. Re:AM & PM by Kitsune+Inari · · Score: 1

      And also ditch the imperial system.

      Quoted for truth

    28. Re:AM & PM by supertrinko · · Score: 0

      The same argument was used by people who didn't want to change to metric. It's only because you're used to AM/PM

      --
      If it rhymes it must be true.
    29. Re:AM & PM by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      Why not go decimal time instead ?

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    30. Re:AM & PM by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      How about a mixed system? I'm used to write "16:00" but to pronounce it as "4 o'clock". If necessary add "in the morning/afternoon" to it but usually that's obvious. When you're arranging a meeting at 4, then it's pretty much always 16:00 and not 4:00. Many Dutch do it that way, the conversion goes automatically, no thinking needed. Germans do it too, but over there are also many people that will say "16 o'clock".

    31. Re:AM & PM by godrik · · Score: 1

      The most confusing thing about AM/PM is that it appears to go backward

      7AM,8AM,9AM,10AM,11AM,12PM,1PM,2PM..

      why are we going from 12PM to 1PM. That's so weird!

    32. Re:AM & PM by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      12am is midnight. It is the start of the new day, and is before noon, so therefore it is am. All but the very first moment of 12pm is after noon, so it is pm.

    33. Re:AM & PM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no problem with am and pm. It took half a minute to learn just once in my life, after all.

      But I DO have a problem with '12 am' and '12 pm'. Do you mean mid-day or midnight?

    34. Re:AM & PM by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

      Yes, and years ought to be counted solely in days! The month and week are extraneous units kept around only for historical reasons and have no real value!

    35. Re:AM & PM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, the imperial system has been ditched. The US standard system is superficially similar, but the units are all defined in terms of SI quantities, and some of the units are actually different than imperial. Notably a US pint is not the same as an imperial pint, a short ton (1 short ton = 0.892857143 imperial ton = 2000 lbs) is not the same as an imperial ton, a fluid oz is not the same as an imperial ounce, and I'd have to go through some of the less used units but there are several different "barrels" used even in the US.

  10. So why aren't we doing it? by Ark42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So why aren't we doing it? Because it's a stupid idea. We still want noon to be when the sun is overhead, and midnight to be the middle of the night. Internet be damned, it's arbitrarily more convenient for most people, because most people don't travel all that often, and spend most of their time in their local time zone.

    1. Re:So why aren't we doing it? by lattyware · · Score: 1, Insightful

      But noon and midnight can still mean those things - they just don't have to mean 12am and 12pm any more.

      --
      -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
    2. Re:So why aren't we doing it? by LowlyWorm · · Score: 1

      I agree. Many concerns were raised with Y2K. I can't even imagine the bedlem.

      --
      Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    3. Re:So why aren't we doing it? by Baloroth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yep. If you need to communicate a certain time to someone around the globe, you just list the time in UTC (basically what this idea is anyways). Or they could just, you know, look up the time difference, this being the Internet and all.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    4. Re:So why aren't we doing it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Great, so now instead of knowing that CST is -6 I have to know that in Chicago they eat lunch at 4am.

      Exactly what problem did you solve?

    5. Re:So why aren't we doing it? by lattyware · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You are right, it's not solving a problem, it's changing it.

      Current system: If someone tells you the time, you know relatively what they will be doing at said time. You can't work out when that is without your timezone and their timezone.

      Other system: If someone tells you the timezone, you know when it is. You don't know what they'll be doing at the time unless you have their timezone, and you don't know what you'll be doing a the time unless you have your time zone.

      It's the same issues but in reverse. It's about what is more useful to know by default - and that varies from person to person.

      --
      -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
    6. Re:So why aren't we doing it? by Malc · · Score: 1

      Yeah, definitely a daft idea. Presumably from somebody who doesn't travel much or doesn't work with people in other time zones.

      For example, part of my dealing with jet lag involves doing things at the right time, and at that point, I'm in no state for adding/subtracting from UTC and trying to figure out if I should be trying to stay awake a few more hours, or trying to hang on longer before giving up and going for breakfast. Or if I'm trying to schedule a meeting between California, Shanghai and London, I'll try not to start the loser after 11pm or before 5am... (yes, I do have a weekly meeting that spans these three TZs)

    7. Re:So why aren't we doing it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We still want noon to be when the sun is overhead, and midnight to be the middle of the night.

      Except in summer, when we want 1PM to be when the Sun is overhead and 1AM to be the middle of the night, in certain parts of the world anyway.

    8. Re:So why aren't we doing it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've heard of this thing called a watch? It's awesome. You wear it on your person and it tells you the time. I'm quite surprised you've never heard of it. They are quite popular.

    9. Re:So why aren't we doing it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. If you need to communicate a certain time to someone around the globe, you just list the time in UTC (basically what this idea is anyways). Or they could just, you know, look up the time difference, this being the Internet and all.

      What happens when you don't know what time zone their in? If they are moving about, or just in a unknown location?

    10. Re:So why aren't we doing it? by JoeDuncan · · Score: 1

      it's *arbitrarily* more convenient for most people

      You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

    11. Re:So why aren't we doing it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this week's Stupid Award goes to...

      Yep. If you need to communicate a certain time to someone around the globe, you just list the time in UTC...

      What happens when you don't know what time zone their in?

      *facepalm*

    12. Re:So why aren't we doing it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And more importantly, in a couple of generations no one would care that noon doesn't mean 12pm. It's us old luddites that would wine about it but our grand kids would be much better off because they would be born into the system.

    13. Re:So why aren't we doing it? by adolf · · Score: 1

      Noon will still be when the sun is directly overhead, as it always has been even before we had these silly things called clocks. And midnight will still be in the middle of the night, twelve hours later.

      All that changes is that neither of these will happen at 12:00.

      So what?

    14. Re:So why aren't we doing it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Added on to the reasons above, it's a stupid idea because then every single company that has offices or branches in multiple locations would have to set custom hours for every location they're found in - right now, a corporate website for say, Best Buy, can say "All of our stores are open Mon-Sat, 10am to 9pm, and Sunday 12am-6pm", and they can send out a mass-printed sticker to all of their stores to stick on the window in the door. Switch everyone over to UTC, and suddenly every store has to have custom hours, corporate pay systems for factories and other places will have to adjust all of their timeclock/pay software to deal with shifts that start at all odd hours of the day depending on location.

      It's a massive pain in the neck, and not worth the very long-term confusion it would cause. This is a bad idea, and hairyfish should feel bad for suggesting it, and timothy should feel bad for posting it.

    15. Re:So why aren't we doing it? by Nurgled · · Score: 1

      And the best thing is we already have both of these systems, and individuals can use whatever is appropriate for a given situation. The armed forces are a good example of where it is more important to know exactly what time something will happen than to know whether local people will be sleeping at that time.

    16. Re:So why aren't we doing it? by definate · · Score: 1

      What I'd rather, is a continuously variable timezone. Such that, the sun actually is "as overhead as it will get" at midday. This would make it a lot better standard to work with. Such that it's not arbitrary, there aren't large sudden jumps (DST), etc. What you'd have to do to set your clock/watch, is put in the date, and some variable based on where you are. Perhaps it's a GPS location, or similar. Whatever variables the time function uses.

      While this doesn't mean you can go "we all meet at 12pm" to people on opposite sides of the globes, it does means that the difference between you too should be a constant (within reason). Programs would merely need to know the formula, and wouldn't need to be perpetually updated due to "government decided to change things".

      I hate the arbitrary-ness of clock time, so I think about this quite a lot, and I think this might be the best method.

      Another good thing to get rid of would be AM/PM.

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    17. Re:So why aren't we doing it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and then find out that they meant 12pm YOUR time, not theirs.

    18. Re:So why aren't we doing it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Noon can still be when the sun is overhead, and Midnight can still be in the middle of the night - you're the one who is arbitrarily (albeit along with the many others in your Time Zone) setting "noon" to mean 12:00 (PM) and "midnight" to mean 12:00AM/24:00

    19. Re:So why aren't we doing it? by brianosaurus · · Score: 1

      We still want noon to be when the sun is overhead, and midnight to be the middle of the night.

      They would be, they just wouldn't necessarily be at 12:00. Or at 0:00. I'm not saying its a good idea, just that it descriptive time would still work, and would in fact be more useful as you travel around. Midnight and noon. Sunrise and sunset. Dusk and dawn and twilight and all that. Business hours. Hammer time.

      --
      blog
    20. Re:So why aren't we doing it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We still want noon to be when the sun is overhead, and midnight to be the middle of the night.

      Yes, noon would still be when the sun is highest and middle of the night is the midnight, or course. But at noon the clock is not 12.00 and at midnight the clock is not 24.00 ! BTW they are not even now at 12.00 and 24.00.

    21. Re:So why aren't we doing it? by chemosh6969 · · Score: 1

      Seriously, this is a stupid idea. Then it turns everything into a new question of, "What time would you consider afternoon to be where you are so we can have our meeting?" It's not like this is going to eliminate jet lag or anything. Every time you travel someplace new, it's a game of what the hell do these people consider daytime hours?

    22. Re:So why aren't we doing it? by dolmen.fr · · Score: 1

      At least a smart answer to this useless debate.

  11. Why not by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 1

    It worked so well with the Metric system conversion.

    --
    Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
    1. Re:Why not by YodasEvilTwin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The rest of the world had no problem...

  12. This is a joke right? by Doctor+Morbius · · Score: 1

    this is the dumbest idea I've ever heard of. Time zones are very useful and easy to use. Having people use UTC for local time is utterly stupid.

    --
    If I disagree with you it's because you are wrong.
    1. Re:This is a joke right? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      The only value UTC has is as a standard time for people working across timezones. It's a useful reference point that's well known and well understood.

      Noon should mean that nothing is casting any shadows. Ideas get progressively more stupid, the longer the shadows are at noon.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:This is a joke right? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      It only means no shadows if you are on the point of the earth's surface closest to the sun. That can only happen in the tropics, and even then only at a specific latitude that varies throughout the year.

    3. Re:This is a joke right? by tepples · · Score: 1

      The only value UTC has is as a standard time for people working across timezones.

      Anyone who provides goods or services for export works across time zones.

  13. End time zones but not DST? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me get this straight. You want to get rid of time zones worldwide, but not the arbitrary idea of Daylight Savings Time? I think you have things backward.

    1. Re:End time zones but not DST? by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      +1 for common sense. I'm all for shifting clocks 30 minutes to split the difference and calling it done. Time Zones are still useful because we are driven by the sun......and you need to know whether your colleague in India will be up or not if you schedule a meeting a 5pm local time (hint, probably not).

    2. Re:End time zones but not DST? by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

      and you need to know whether your colleague in India will be up or not if you schedule a meeting a 5pm local time (hint, probably not).

      So if everybody adopted UTC then you'd still need time zones to tell you when people in other parts of the world are awake.

    3. Re:End time zones but not DST? by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      If you didn't have Time Zones and everyone used UTC, you'd still be doing the same mental math you do today, just in the opposite direction.

      If it's 4am everywhere, is that "awake time" or "sleep time" for the locations involved? If it's 4am here, what time is it there? Same effort.

      Time Zones are convenient because you know the relative time (to daylight hours) easily. Otherwise, you'd need a chart that says India daylight is between X hr and Y hr while New York daylight is between A hr and B hr. Everyone knows that the typical workday is somewhere between 8am and 6pm for most office workers regardless of their location.

    4. Re:End time zones but not DST? by sorcerykid · · Score: 1

      I've been advocating for a +30 minute switch for a long time. I thought I was the only one that recognized that solution :)

      --Randall

  14. Why not? Change is baaaad, uhkay? by SgtXaos · · Score: 1

    We couldn't get the country to adopt metric measurements fer chrissakes. No way we could convince bubba that 2 AM is lunch break.

    --
    -- Don't call me "Sir," I increase entropy for a living!
    1. Re:Why not? Change is baaaad, uhkay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit.

      WWV broadcasts UTC all day, every day.

    2. Re:Why not? Change is baaaad, uhkay? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We couldn't get the country to adopt metric measurements fer chrissakes.

      That's largely because it isn't mandatory. The UK did the same over a century ago, and things started moving only when SI units became mandatory from 1965 onwards.

      That being said, I'm somewhat surprised the SI is used in the US at all. I suppose that is largely because of foreign trade.
      (see metrication on Wikipedia for details)

      Back on topic: I think the big show stopper is the fact that in most parts of the world, the date would change in the middle of the day.

    3. Re:Why not? Change is baaaad, uhkay? by Macrat · · Score: 0

      We couldn't get the country to adopt metric measurements fer chrissakes. No way we could convince bubba that 2 AM is lunch break.

      The rest of the world is supposed to care about how backwards the USA is?

    4. Re:Why not? Change is baaaad, uhkay? by Tamran · · Score: 1

      We couldn't get the country to adopt metric measurements fer chrissakes. No way we could convince bubba that 2 AM is lunch break.

      It's hard to make this argument if you don't really "try" to make it happen. Everyone else had no issues. By the way, most technical companies (Ford, GM, Caterpillar, on and on) use the METRIC system. We think in inches and miles in North America (even Canada), but good luck getting a technicians diploma or engineering degree without understanding the Metric system.

    5. Re:Why not? Change is baaaad, uhkay? by mah! · · Score: 1

      mod parent up :-)

    6. Re:Why not? Change is baaaad, uhkay? by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

      Wait, we (the U.S.) already tried that? When did I miss the memo?

  15. There is more to life than just the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I.e. farms, and people.

    1. Re:There is more to life than just the internet by lpp · · Score: 1

      Yeah... those damned chickens absolutely REFUSE to alter their method of timekeeping. Always checking the clock, looking over calendars... makes one wonder if maybe chickens built Stonehenge or something... damned chickens...

    2. Re:There is more to life than just the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Weird, I actually read this in a fortune cookie once: "CHICKENS DON'T DRIVE COMBINE HARVESTERS AND TRACTORS TO HARVEST GRAIN YOU STUPID FUCK". Seems strangely apropos now. :) What the GP should have said was:

      "There's more to life than trying to please morons who can't cope with different timezones
      I.e. Pleasing people who actually posess more than one braincell."

    3. Re:There is more to life than just the internet by Sanat · · Score: 1

      That is why they are called chickens... they are afraid to change.

      --
      And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make
  16. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Timezones are useful, more useful than any benefit that you'd get from using UTC everywhere. It is easier to set a clock than having to relearn at what time things are done when you travel. Daylight will continue to determine the daily schedule. Until that changes, timezones will stay with us.

    1. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone didn't read TFS...

      We would have 1 "timezone" called UTC. Your clock wouldn't be wrong just because you drove across a bridge (unless you're talking about the Einstein-Rosen Bridge). Everybody in the same metro area would be on the same clock as everybody else in the whole world. No "cowboy time".

  17. Agreed. by lattyware · · Score: 1, Informative

    I fully agree - and have been saying this for some time.

    The reality is though, it's very hard to get people to give up an old thing and move onto the new - look at the metric system in the UK, it's been mandated as the official thing for some time, and it's still not completely overtaken the imperial (even if only for road signs - another thing I argue, why are we not using both metric and imperial units on signs we are putting up now? It's insane to expect it to happen all at once, so why not start using dual system signs, then when most signs have both on, replace the last few and swap over, then start using metric only).

    --
    -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
    1. Re:Agreed. by lattyware · · Score: 1

      On a note I forgot, I'm sure the only time this will happen is when we start colonising other planets on a large scale, and universal time becomes necesary as converting local time becomes awkward - although then we'll probably see a metric time too.

      --
      -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
    2. Re:Agreed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you heard of UTC?

    3. Re:Agreed. by lattyware · · Score: 1

      Yes, but UTC isn't used for most things - most people use timezone-adjusted times.

      --
      -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
    4. Re:Agreed. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Universal time would actually become completly unuseable, because the duration of rotation differs. More realistically the planets would use the same time units, but introduce a fudge factor. If the day is a little too long there, for example, all clocks may stop at midnight and restart the appropriate amount of time later. Or if it's a little too short, the final hour of the say might have fewer than sixty minutes in it. Alternatively, they may dispense with subdividing the day and just count it as 'minutes since midnight.'

    5. Re:Agreed. by lattyware · · Score: 1

      I disagree, I just think time would become more arbitary. A day in time wouldn't necesarily match up to a day in that planet's time. Ideally we'd find an arbitary standard - I'll go with xs since the big bang - if we can get an accurate time for that to have happened, it seems an appropriate starting place. As to an x, it'd be some unit of time that was reproducable, so as the metre is light travelling in a set period of time, something like that. That would become our universal time.

      --
      -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
    6. Re:Agreed. by HiThere · · Score: 1

      The conversion to UTC may happen eventually. But probably not this century. The switch to a metric time, however, is just a "bad idea"(tm). Stretching the hours and switching to a 20 hour day would be practical, but a 120 minute hour is just not as useful as a 60 minute hour. In the current system we already use "a couple of hours", "half and hour", and "a quarter hour" frequently. And four hours is the time between starting work and lunch. So we go just about as far up as down...though when we get to quarter hours we're already as likely to call it 15 minutes.

      FWIW, and IIRC there was a time when days were 12 hours long (and different hours were of different length). At that time most people only told time by the strikes of the bell in the tower. And most people didn't bother. As more people started caring about time, the hours shrank until 12 hours is now half a day. So I don't think you can expect the hours to get longer.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    7. Re:Agreed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There already is a metric time, it just isn't used because... well, change is baaaad.

      Metric Time

    8. Re:Agreed. by lattyware · · Score: 2

      You are presuming a metric time where a metric day is an earth day - in a world where people live on many planets - that may not be the best option.

      --
      -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
    9. Re:Agreed. by sgage · · Score: 1

      "when we start colonising other planets on a large scale"

      I.e., never.

    10. Re:Agreed. by amorsen · · Score: 1

      If we colonize other planets on a large scale, that would imply other solar systems. It is completely uninteresting what hour it is in a different solar system when round-trip latency is 9 years.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    11. Re:Agreed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure we will - once we find other planets that rotate on their axes in 24 hours......

    12. Re:Agreed. by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Here is why it is a stupid idea. Under the current system, if I talk about scheduling a teleconference at a particular time for people in different timezones and someone says, "You realize it will be 10 PM at point A?" I know exactly how inconvenient it will be for the people at point A to be part of that teleconference. Under this system, the person would have to say, "You realize that to the people at point A, 3 PM is like 10 PM for us?" to convey the same information. Since we have computers, and usually schedule such meetings using email (or other electronic scheduling methods) isn't it simpler to just program those things to convert the times when we send a meeting invite (actually, I am pretty sure that MS Outlook already does this)?
      The thing is this system does not actually solve the problem it is trying to address, 1 PM GMT is still too early to schedule a phone call with someone in California whether the people in California call that time 5 AM or 1 PM.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    13. Re:Agreed. by bofkentucky · · Score: 1

      Planck Time is the most rational base unit for time in my mind. Set the epoch at some arbitrary value further back than any experimental theorized time for the big bang (more than 15 billion years ago should do the trick) and count planck seconds since this epoch.

      --
      09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0
    14. Re:Agreed. by Tomato42 · · Score: 1

      The length of day is dependent on rotation of the planet, not the size of the star or how far the plant from the star is.

      Mars "day", or local sol as scientists call it, is a bit over 24.5h, Venusian sol is over 243 day's long (that is 5832h)

    15. Re:Agreed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the reason for slack metric conversion has little to do with psychology and everything to do with cost. particularly in aviation there is millions of dollars worth of drawings and design data in imperial and the cost of converting it is more than its worth (literally). if you just start converting to metric then you end up with mixed units, and particularly on design drawings (where the units are often specified in the title block only) its very easy for units to get mixed up, which can have costly or deadly consequences. also, often its impractical to have both units at once (space on drawings can be restricted), and multiple units can also increase risk of errors; use of single consistent system of units = no foul ups related to unit conversion. it does get a bit tricky when you have a cam program that must generate nc code for a punch machine made in germany (metric) but the original data comes from an imperial drawing, but often cam software can read in imperial and spit out metric with little user input. imperial to metric migration will take many years as companies gradually invest in conversion, but introducing another similar problem with time would lead to the same problems (and risks), although probably more likely to be a problem in banking than aerospace.

    16. Re:Agreed. by crutchy · · Score: 1

      Yeah I could see how that would be a problem - "Captain's Log, Wednesday, 12:32 pm Jupiter time. We have entered... um. i mean... oh shit what day is it again? Spock!, are we in the Jupiter time sector still?"

    17. Re:Agreed. by lattyware · · Score: 1

      Presmuing no FTL travel.

      --
      -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
    18. Re:Agreed. by lattyware · · Score: 1

      OK, so after a great many comments debating this, I am forced to admit I was wrong, it's not a better system given it simply trades off the issues, and even though for me the issues for the replacement system are less problematic, for the majority of cases, the current system works better. That said, a lot of the issues with it are superficial and more about adoptation than the actual system.

      The real solution then is that we start being smarter about timing. The answer to the internet problem is everyone using things like the HTML5 time tag where you provide a version of the time in UTC (or at least with time zone) so that times can be automatically converted to the local time for the reader. Things like this and giving computers the ability to show things in the best format for the user is the best solution I can see.

      --
      -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
    19. Re:Agreed. by lattyware · · Score: 1

      Well there is a pessemistic viewpoint. It could happen - not saying it will for sure, but it definitely has a chance of happening. I would say it is even likely, but that is probably just me wishing that.

      --
      -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
    20. Re:Agreed. by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1
      "In a world where people live on many planets"?!?!

      Go to your room and think about what you've done! ;-p

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    21. Re:Agreed. by lattyware · · Score: 1

      Ah, indeed, that was a poor choice of term to say the least.

      --
      -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
    22. Re:Agreed. by sorcerykid · · Score: 1

      It's not impossible. There can be a civic metric unit just for use on Earth (which is capitalized btw because it's a designated planetary body, not random soil awaiting tillage). Different civic metric units could be devised once we colonize other planets.

      --Randall

    23. Re:Agreed. by dolmen.fr · · Score: 1

      That will not be so much a problem. We are already handling different calendar systems even if we are all living on the same planet.

  18. Not enough benefit by Arlet · · Score: 2

    Got a meeting with colleagues on the other side of the world?

    99.9% of the people never have a meeting with people on the other side of the world. Changing time zones would bring them only confusion.

    1. Re:Not enough benefit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suggest we shelve this idea until a significant number of people live off-world.

    2. Re:Not enough benefit by gtbritishskull · · Score: 1

      Do 99.9% of people work ONLY with people in their own time zone? You don't have to be on the other side of the world for time zones to be inconvenient. One hour to the east or west is just as bad.

    3. Re:Not enough benefit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even better... traveler goes to new city and wants to catch breakfast at local chain... shows up and they are still closed, why ... because they open at a different time in this location...

      Or the national advertisements... New Hours... opening 7pm in city A, 8pm in City B, 9PM in City C.

    4. Re:Not enough benefit by Macrat · · Score: 2

      Got a meeting with colleagues on the other side of the world?

      99.9% of the people never have a meeting with people on the other side of the world. Changing time zones would bring them only confusion.

      They're confused all the time anyway. Changing the time won't make a difference.

    5. Re:Not enough benefit by artor3 · · Score: 1

      Worse than that, the OP's proposed system would make it hell on earth to try to schedule such meetings. Let's see... I want to schedule a meeting with Japan at 3:30 EST. So okay, now that's also 3:30 in Japan. But what the hell does that mean? It gives me no information about whether or not that's a good time for them.

      The OP clearly gave this whole system about 30 seconds of thought.

  19. Can't screen such trolling? by JayHades · · Score: 0

    What kind of daft thought is that? Seriously?

    1. Re:Can't screen such trolling? by gtbritishskull · · Score: 0

      Wow... you have such a well thought out counter-argument. The only good reason I have heard against is that the day would change for some people in the middle of the "day". All the other reasons I heard do not say that it is a bad idea, just that it would be too difficult because people are too set in their ways to switch. So please explain to me what is so "daft" about it. Because your comment is trying to dismiss this as a valid discussion without raising a single valid point. Very lazy of you.

  20. Slow news day? by Doctor+Morbius · · Score: 2

    This story doesn't refer to an article? So Timothy just pulled this out of his ass because he's too dumb to figure out time zones? What an idiot.

    --
    If I disagree with you it's because you are wrong.
    1. Re:Slow news day? by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was [f]irst time accepted submitter hairyfish, though Timothy did post it, so he clearly thought that this held some sort of merit.

    2. Re:Slow news day? by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 0

      If Taco was still around... he wouldn't be able to get away with this shit!

    3. Re:Slow news day? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 3, Informative

      Lacking a link is typical of "Ask Slashdot" stories. I'd offer you coffee, but it's a bit late in the day in ${TIMEZONE} to be using the "just woke up" excuse, even for Slashdotters.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    4. Re:Slow news day? by hedwards · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What I'm curious about is how precisely this is any simpler than our current system. You do get the advantage of specifying a time that's globally valid, but for things that matter you still have to worry about what times are appropriate to expect a response from somebody in Georgia and depending upon which one the answer is likely to be different.

      The real problem is that when you're traveling you'd then have to learn what times everything is done or convert those times to ones your familiar with, rather than the current system where most of those times are the same, just happen earlier or later with respect to your home.

      The current system we have works in the instances where one needs that sort of coordination we've got GMT and UTC available.

    5. Re:Slow news day? by tqk · · Score: 1

      If Taco was still around...

      I sense a meme forming ...

      The article is right though. Timezones are a dumbing down thing which, with ubiquitous instant net connectivity, no one should need any more. Send an email, and it'll be in their inbox waiting for them to see it, regardless of when they wake up to see it. Smiple [sic].

      [Then again, considering all of those I've met recently who despise email, ...]

      We shouldn't need to bother knowing when others' sleep cycles occur. They get to it when they get to it. Much better than cell-phone always on, always interruptable.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    6. Re:Slow news day? by tqk · · Score: 1

      I'd offer you coffee, but it's a bit late in the day in ${TIMEZONE} to be using the "just woke up" excuse, even for Slashdotters.

      Love your .sig :-)

      Starbucks will do for me. Free WiFi! Woohoo!

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    7. Re:Slow news day? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      I'll admit, the car analogy part hasn't worked out too well. It's mostly been computer analogies. I wonder if removing the mention of cars would get me enough room to link to a Slashdot journal article for question-asking-at... Hmm...

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    8. Re:Slow news day? by nacturation · · Score: 2

      The grammatically correct meme is "If Taco were still around".

      Having said that, I've no doubt violated Muphry's Law somewhere in this post.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    9. Re:Slow news day? by tqk · · Score: 1

      I wonder if removing the mention of cars would get me enough room to link to a Slashdot journal article ...

      Nah, mentioning car analogies is what makes it funny. Remove the "Please ask me your questions" part, as it's redundant, and change it to "car/computer" if you need more space. Tah. :-)

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    10. Re:Slow news day? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Maybe we need a "Society for the Preservation of the Subjunctive"? Good for tilting at windmills, if nothing else...

    11. Re:Slow news day? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2

      The current system we have works...

      ...in the context of an acceptable lunchtime. I (for one) have no interest in partaking of my luncheon at 2.30 in the morning, thank you very much. ;-)

    12. Re:Slow news day? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      Magnifique. To the (.)sig editor!

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    13. Re:Slow news day? by wwphx · · Score: 1

      Sounds like someone needs to read Cory Doctorow's Eastern Standard Tribe, available free in a variety of eReader formats. http://craphound.com/est/?page_id=1574

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    14. Re:Slow news day? by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly. Suppose you're sitting in your New York office, and you want to call a colleague in an office in California, and you have to determine if now is a good time to call or not.

      The way it is now, you look at your clock, see it's 10AM, and then mentally calculate the timezone difference: EDT is 3 hours offset from PDT. So it's 7AM in California, and now is probably too early to call your colleague, as he's probably still at home or on the way to work (or maybe still sleeping, depending on when he gets in).

      Under a timezone-less scheme, you'd have a harder time, because there's no time zones to help you quickly calculate offsets. Instead, you'll think to yourself, "well, back when we had time zones, California was 3 hours apart from us, so it's like it's 7AM over there, so this is too early." But what happens in 20+ years when a younger generation comes along that doesn't remember the old time zone system? How exactly are they supposed to know that California is (roughly) three hours behind the east coast, and that it's now customary in California to start work at 5AM and leave at 2PM (unless they frequently communicate with people from there and remember this fact)? Do they have to start up some web application to tell them this? I suppose this would be one solution, but it seems pretty ridiculous when we already have a system now that doesn't require a constant internet connection or a nearby computer to tell us such a simple bit of information.

      With time zones, all I have to remember is the GMT offsets of every place I'm interested in, and it's trivial for me to calculate local times for those places, which means I know what time most places start business and close business. Without time zones, I'll have to do a lookup for everything. Maybe if we get to the point where we all have constant internet connections wired into our brains, then they'll truly be obsolete, but not before then.

    15. Re:Slow news day? by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was [f]irst time accepted submitter hairyfish, though Timothy did post it, so he clearly thought that this held some sort of merit.

      "Hairyfish", seems like we are on the way to Sea Kittens after all.

    16. Re:Slow news day? by anagama · · Score: 1

      He is, they are; he was, they were

      I don't really know not being a grammar geek and not even really wanting to be one, so grammar geeks, correct me. Isn't "Taco was around" better than "Taco were around" (assuming there is one and only one CmdrTaco).

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    17. Re:Slow news day? by nobodie · · Score: 1

      i thought the idea woukd be to use ntp and gps to be able to specify exactly what time it is for you wherever you are. That sounds more fun to me

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
    18. Re:Slow news day? by nacturation · · Score: 1
      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    19. Re:Slow news day? by anagama · · Score: 1

      Thanks. What I take away from that is that both "was" and "were" are correct, with "was" being considered informal and "were" being considered formal. Given that, I'll use "was" and "were" based on numbers because it makes more sense than the arbitrarily using "were" after "if" regardless of count.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    20. Re:Slow news day? by anagama · · Score: 1

      great ... a superfluous "the" in a grammar post. ;-)

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    21. Re:Slow news day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The younger generation you are referring to will have an App for that, duh!

    22. Re:Slow news day? by reason · · Score: 1

      I suppose you'd just look up "standard business hours" in California just like you'd look up the time-zone difference now, but it still adds an extra layer of complication. "It's 9pm - is it too late to call my friend in Moscow? Let's see, business hours in Moscow finish at 4pm, so it's about 5 hours after that, so I guess she could already be in bed (vs today's "It's 10pm in Moscow, so yes, it's probably too late").

      Similarly, universal time makes it easier to work out how long I'll be in transit during my long-haul flight, but makes it harder to figure out what I'll be in for when I arrive: will it be bed-time or time for breakfast? So there's no net advantage.

    23. Re:Slow news day? by nacturation · · Score: 1

      There's no hard rule about using "were" after "if". For example, it's perfectly correct to say "If I was rude to you, I apologize" since you're talking about a situation that happened in the past. However, if you know you weren't rude and you wished to make a point, you could say "If I were rude to you, I would have insulted him too". There is a difference and using only "If I was..." loses that distinction. Perhaps the subtlety is lost on those who aren't familiar with it, however.

      Wikipedia actually has a pretty good summary: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_subjunctive#Summary_of_forms

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    24. Re:Slow news day? by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      I agree that getting rid of timezones makes things more complicated. I do think we could get rid of the Daylight Savings Time offsets though. That just makes things more complicated whether you have timezones or not.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    25. Re:Slow news day? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      As an Arizona resident, I'll heartily agree with that. It's a total PITA dealing with DST because apparently no one else in the USA knows that Arizona doesn't practice it, and it's constantly causing me problems when dealing with people out-of-state.

      "You're on Mountain Time, right?"
      "yes"
      "So it's 4 o'clock there."
      "no, it's 3 o'clock."
      "but it's 6 o'clock here and I'm on Eastern time, and mountain time is two hours earlier".
      "only in the winter. In summer, there's Daylight Saving Time. We don't follow DST, so we have the same time as California right now" (note that Saving is not plural)
      "why don't you follow DST?"
      "uhh... because it's stupid? Why do you follow it?" ....

      Coupled with the fact that studies have shown that Bush's changes to DST not only didn't save any energy, but actually increased energy usage, plus costing a giant amount of money, DST needs to be eliminated.

    26. Re:Slow news day? by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Whoever needs to remember time zone information, will, as they have always done. The rest, don't.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    27. Re:Slow news day? by unitron · · Score: 1

      An "Ask Slashdot" doesn't need to be based on an article, just a question one of us wants to submit to the Slashdot community.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  21. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of the time people don't travel out of their zones. It's really not that difficult to deal with people in different zones. There are just 24 zones, so it's not that big a deal.

    The alternative? My clock is wrong because I drove across the bridge. Wow, that's a world of suck. People have a hard enough time keeping their appointments when everybody in the same metro area is on the same clock. Get rid of the unified zone and it's a world of excuses and/or confusion. We'd all end up on "cowboy time". Yeah, some parts of the world are already "laid back" like that; but the US would be in a major uproar if we did that.

  22. Re:Before we ditch timezone...Let's kill DST first by peragrin · · Score: 1

    Only if we switch to DST completely. My summers would be completely ruined on the east coast if the Sun started setting at 6:30 in the afternoon in August.

    People don't realize just how much they use DST's. especially in the northern latitudes.

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  23. seriously this is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is just stupid! its better to have the different time zones because its still convenient AND its just a stupid idea

  24. No. by Sfing_ter · · Score: 1

    No. That is all. Now go back to playing with yourself.

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Emo Philips
  25. We already use UTC! by FranTaylor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Our computer clocks are all using UTC already

    The displayed time is adjusted to local time for the benefit of us humans

    We can say "the best time to feed the animals is at 4 PM" and that applies to everyone on the planet. With your scheme we would have to give a much longer-winded explanation.

    1. Re:We already use UTC! by lattyware · · Score: 1

      Well, not really, because what you are giving there is a relative time. The best time to feed the chickens is +4h from mid-day. Then everyone knows what time mid-day is in their zone, job done. Absolute time being absolute seems like a good plan. Your issue is you are confusing the two.

      --
      -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
    2. Re:We already use UTC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "+4h from mid-day. Then everyone knows what time mid-day is in their zone, job done."

      You're expecting a lot and that was a long winded way of saying 4pm.

    3. Re:We already use UTC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +4h from mid-day

      which we can then shorten to "4 pm" since people talk about relative time more frequently than absolute time.

    4. Re:We already use UTC! by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      The chickens do not care about a few minutes here and there. We use local time because it is useful. I can call my neighbor in the next town and say "let's meet at 4" and we do not need to get into a long winded discussion about what that means

    5. Re:We already use UTC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The best time to feed the chickens is +4h from mid-day."

      So...4 PM, then?

    6. Re:We already use UTC! by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

      "The best time to feed the chickens is +4h from mid-day."

      When I say "4 PM local time", I am saying the same thing in a much less obscure manner.

    7. Re:We already use UTC! by matunos · · Score: 1

      There's no such thing as absolute time. What time is it on Mars?

      Anyway, are you telling me that "4 hours from midday" is easier to communicate than "4PM" (or "1600")? So now if midday is 21:00 for me, I have to do clock arithmetic just to figure out what time someone's talking about?

      Or... we could just continue to say "4PM" without a time-zone specifier, and let our big brains figure out if that means 4PM relative to where you are or 4PM in a particular time zone. Seems to work pretty well so far these past couple hundred years.

    8. Re:We already use UTC! by lattyware · · Score: 1

      So instead of saying '4pm' when you mean a relative time, you'd say '+4h' for example, and then everyone could take that and use it. Yes, it's a shift from the way people currently think, that doens't make it bad. Obviously, this is not something people would be willing to transition to. I'm not suggesting this is a realistic idea, just that if I were designing the system from scratch I'd do it that way.

      --
      -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
    9. Re:We already use UTC! by Urkki · · Score: 1

      Well, not really, because what you are giving there is a relative time. The best time to feed the chickens is +4h from mid-day. Then everyone knows what time mid-day is in their zone, job done. Absolute time being absolute seems like a good plan. Your issue is you are confusing the two.

      Just what do you think "4 PM" means, if not "+4h from mid-day", Post Meridiem? And the suggestion was, stop doing this, start using global time. And the answer is obviously "no". Local time is needed for some things, and it'd be hell of a more confusing to have two different ways of telling time in everyday use.

    10. Re:We already use UTC! by pikine · · Score: 1

      It is year 2038. Scientists invents local geospatial time that tracks diurnal patterns of human activity by their geographic location. The new time keeping method solves various inconveniences and confusion using UTC...

      --
      I once had a signature.
    11. Re:We already use UTC! by lattyware · · Score: 1

      Less obscure is a matter of perspective. You see it as that way as you were bought up with the relative system. It makes more sense for the absolute value to be set everywhere, rather than mixing absolute and relative time.

      --
      -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
    12. Re:We already use UTC! by lattyware · · Score: 1

      Absolute time does exist. If you call it UTC, it's absolute. Sure, it's arbitary, but it's absolute. My point is, if you use a set time and let everyone work out what that time means to them, everyone knows when you are talking about, if you use a time-zone shifted time, then if they don't know your time zone and their time zone, they can't work it out.

      --
      -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
    13. Re:We already use UTC! by swalve · · Score: 1

      So now if I wake up early, Skynet moves all my meetings up? Lame.

    14. Re:We already use UTC! by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Um, that IS what 4pm means.

    15. Re:We already use UTC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We could take it even one step further, and say that the best time to feed the chickens is 4 hours "post mid-day". We can even shorten that to 4 PM (post mid-day). And for "pre mid-day", it would be confusing to use PM as well, so we could say "after midnight", or AM. I like the way you think. Let's go with this concept of AM for midnight to mid-day, and PM for mid-day to midnight, with the offset before the abbreviation.

    16. Re:We already use UTC! by amorsen · · Score: 1

      Absolute time only exists when you are in the same frame of reference as the UTC clock. This may seem like a trivial distinction to you, but GPS would work very poorly if we did not compensate for the satellites not being on the "absolute" UTC.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    17. Re:We already use UTC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you still wouldn't if society operated on UTC. Unless 4 doesn't actually mean 4 in your neighbor's neighboring town.

      Under a UTC system, you'd be able to tell your neighbor to meet you at 4.. and you'd be able to tell your sister traveling overseas to call you at 6 because you're out to an early dinner with your neighbor without any confusion. You, your neighbor, and your sister are all freed of the need to know what time zone any of you are in. No adjustments for local time need be made. 0600 is 0600 in Sydney at the same time as it is in Los Angeles.

    18. Re:We already use UTC! by Tomato42 · · Score: 1

      Our computer clocks are all using UTC already

      Not if you use Windows

    19. Re:We already use UTC! by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Are you attempting to redefine ante meridiem and post meridiem? The Romans won't be pleased.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    20. Re:We already use UTC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh.. "4 PM local time" and "mid-day + 4 hours" is ... equally obscure. Or not obscure.

      Actually.. 4PM local time is the more obscure utterance, strictly speaking.

      Midday + 4 implies that you know midday and the length of an hour. And once you know that, you can say so from any part of the world with equal confidence.

      4PM local time implies that you need to know any and all quirks of the local timekeeping regulations. As those differ by jurisdiction, confidence cannot be equal.

    21. Re:We already use UTC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually no, my clock in my Linux Mint box is set to Central Time of the U.S., and the same in my fathers Windows 7 box and Laptop.

    22. Re:We already use UTC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with abbreviating down to "+4h" is that, by stripping out the reference time, you lose the ability to tell what time is meant. Four hours after what? Breakfast? Sunup? Noon? Dinner? Midnight? "4PM" is an absolute time locally, because we have centuries of convention behind the definition of 'local time'. If you want to make it a relative time, you have to specify what the relation is. "4PM EST" is a relative time, because 'EST' establishes an offset from GMT. What is the utility of taking a system which works for everyone and introducing a new system which doesn't change any of the numbers or the measurements, but merely makes everyone memorize an entirely new set of terminology? People will continue using the old terminology because the new one isn't more useful, the same way that people would continue to use mph even if the government decreed that speeds would be measured in furlongs per fortnight, and every speedometer and road sign in the country would be altered to use the new units.

    23. Re:We already use UTC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not suggesting this is a realistic idea, just that if I were designing the system from scratch I'd do it that way.

      Translation: "If I were tasked with implementing a really fucking stupid idea, I would try and do it in the least stupid way I could think of".

    24. Re:We already use UTC! by surveyork · · Score: 1

      +1 We already use UTC. I'd say we use our local time zones in day to day life, but when dealing with long-distant calls or long-distance travel we usually add UTC. Also, if you know the time difference between zones it's not so difficult to figure out the time in other countries. In any case, I guess we could use UTC more. MHO.

      --
      2019 is going to be the year of Linux on the desktop.
    25. Re:We already use UTC! by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      We can say "the best time to feed the animals is at 4 PM" and that applies to everyone on the planet. With your scheme we would have to give a much longer-winded explanation.

      Interestingly, it would make a lot of business calls harder, not easier. Office hours are generally 9am to 5pm. But say there are no time-zones and you are in London and you want to call the Sydney office, when do they open/close?

      Right now, you know 9-5, so you look up local-time in Sydney, it's 10:15am, so you're golden. (Actually it's 2:50am.)

      Post-timezones: How do you figure it out quickly? Don't say "Sydney is 10hrs ahead", because there's no such thing any more. Similarly, there's no simple time-zone-conversion websites, because there's no time-zones. Instead, you have to hope that every business posts its UTC operating hours on their website. If not, you have to try to convert longitude into olden-day time-zones, then back into UTC. Gak.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    26. Re:We already use UTC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I think Windows actually uses localtime for the hardware clock.
      But you are right about *nix computers anyway.

    27. Re:We already use UTC! by Mr0bvious · · Score: 1

      Because that's not longer-winded at all.. no....

      --
      Never happened. True story.
    28. Re:We already use UTC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you're in China, which has one time zone for a country that spans more longitude that the contiguous US. Communicating in local time is only as effective as the observed local time standard.

      That said, China provides an interesting experiment in a large geographic area observing the same time zone, even if it isn't UTC. Western China doesn't really care for "Beijing time", and observe the unofficial "Urumqi time".

    29. Re:We already use UTC! by dolmen.fr · · Score: 1

      But the grand-parent is talking about feeding animals, not humans.
      If you want good productivity from animals (such as chickens), you have to better follow their biological rythms, so absolute local time matters.

      For humans, synchronisation for communication with other humans (Facebook, Twitter...) seems to be more important than productivity so we use clocks and ignore biological rythms.

    30. Re:We already use UTC! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah. Windows uses local time. ;) That's why there are issues with Linux and Windows dual-boot situations.

      Read: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuTime#Make%20Windows%20use%20UTC

    31. Re:We already use UTC! by unitron · · Score: 1

      ...The best time to feed the chickens is +4h from mid-day...

      ...and midday being the meridian, +4h from the meridian is 4 post meridian, usually shortened to 4pm.

      The rooster is going to crow somewhere around 5 or 6 ante meridian, by the way.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  26. Sounds good but... by Zakabog · · Score: 1

    Sounds good but we (the US) couldn't even successfully switch over to the metric system. Yes it will be easier in the future but most people don't seem to care about long term goals when it means in the short term they'll have to remember that work is from 2-10 not 9-5. Also while we're at it we might as well switch to the 24 hour clock.

  27. No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for someone who lives in one time zone and doesn't travel i say no.

  28. And this changes what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't understand, It just a fucking number. So we should all get up at 9:00 AM UST regardless it's in the middle of the night? STUPID! Rob, Please come back! mod this shit out.

  29. Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you realize how much it would cost for companies to change their policies to say get to work at 1am and leave at 9am, instead of 9am to 5pm?

  30. Do it if you want ... by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

    Everyone is free to express time in terms of GMT: You, your business contacts, your boss, etc. If you find it useful, do it! Many people already do. The vast majority of people have never been inside an airplane and have no need for such silliness.

    1. Re:Do it if you want ... by NFN_NLN · · Score: 1

      Everyone is free to express time in terms of GMT: You, your business contacts, your boss, etc. If you find it useful, do it! Many people already do. The vast majority of people have never been inside an airplane and have no need for such silliness.

      If you're going to switch to a universal time, then technically you should use UTC.

      "UTC was used beginning in the mid-twentieth century but became the official standard of world time on January 1, 1972."

      http://geography.about.com/od/timeandtimezones/a/gmtutc.htm

  31. We can all just use Swatch Internet Time by sgage · · Score: 1
    1. Re:We can all just use Swatch Internet Time by idlemachine · · Score: 1

      I actually kinda liked it. Unfortunately, as an idea it was probably 5-7 years too soon, and is easily & freely replicated by using UTC/local time for coordinating.

    2. Re:We can all just use Swatch Internet Time by Shazback · · Score: 1

      Good idea, decent implementation, too difficult for most people.

      It's not "that" difficult once you start using it (you just remember that if you live in NY, @550 is mid-morning, @700 is lunchtime, @850 is mid-afternoon and anything from @050 to @450 is probably not good), and because the time format is different from usual convention there's no risk of mis-understanding. If someone on the telephone in HK says on a conference call with someone in LA and someone in NY "ok, next meeting on Monday the 9th @800", there's no need to wonder if that's HK, LA or NY time, or if it's the 9th in HK or the 9th in LA....

      Another reason it didn't catch on is probably because so few people need such a system. Sure, with globalization it's more common to talk to people in different time-zones, but it's still a relatively limited thing. Most of the time you just need to know the time difference with one time-zone since that's the only one you call people in. So rather than re-learning that @XXX is early and @XXX is late, you just convert into the destination time-zone.

    3. Re:We can all just use Swatch Internet Time by RandomStr · · Score: 1

      +1

      Still tempted to find one of those watches!

      I'm wondering if this is a swatch stealth viral advertising campaign!?
      Or just the ramblings of a mad man...

  32. Evpxebyyrq. Shpx lbh NP. by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 3, Funny
    Yes, the time should be available on the free market. The companies that make the best time metrics will prevail and all others will fail.

    telling us what the clock shall say

    I, too, find it completely ridiculous that they actually TOLD people what their clock shall say. I heard about this one guy who didn't listen, they killed him, last I heard. Fucking fascist with their standards. I am interested to here what great insights the good roman_mir has to say on the subject.

    Also,Qba'g guvax V qvqa'g frr jung lbh qvq gurer.

    1. Re:Evpxebyyrq. Shpx lbh NP. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Eye roll, but consider this: The US DoJ raided Gibson (the guitar people) twice to confiscate ... wood. Wood that is properly documented and properly imported (ICE had no problem with the documentation). The most recent raid was over Indian Rosewood, certified by the Indian government that it was ok for sale and ok for export. The DoJ raid was, allegedly, due to violation of Indian labor laws that require wood be finished in India by Indian labor. So now the American DoJ is trying to enforce Indian laws (which probably violate WTO agreements), not because the Indian government (which certified the wood for export) requested it, but because the DoJ felt like it.

    2. Re:Evpxebyyrq. Shpx lbh NP. by artor3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Whelp, an anonymous anarchist has given me an unsubstantiated account of what seems like the most tedious and trivial event in law enforcement history. Guess that proves it... the government is evil!

    3. Re:Evpxebyyrq. Shpx lbh NP. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The FDA is raiding Amish for sharing unpasteurized milk products... a religious observance, however wacky. Face it, our government is fascist whenever a buck can be made.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Evpxebyyrq. Shpx lbh NP. by grumling · · Score: 2

      Not only are they raiding, but the methods are straight from the ATF playbook. SWAT team tactics, automatic weapons drawn, screaming, yelling, crying. Over MILK AND WOOD, for cryin' out loud. An old documentary of a raid can be found here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nSQ5EsbT4cE

      But I guess they're just treating everyone equally under the law, right?

      --
      "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
    5. Re:Evpxebyyrq. Shpx lbh NP. by tqk · · Score: 1

      The FDA is raiding Amish for sharing unpasteurized milk products...

      According to a link found on FARK (you look it up; I'm tired), they're also checking Amish driver's licenses. You need a driver's license to drive a horse drawn carriage?!? Fsck!!!111 [sic]

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    6. Re:Evpxebyyrq. Shpx lbh NP. by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      The FDA is raiding Amish for sharing unpasteurized milk products... a religious observance, however wacky.

      How is selling bacteria-laden, potentially deadly, impure food a "religious observance"?

      Now, unless they're doing it across state lines, it's the state government, not the FDA, that should act. But the whole "raw milk" thing is amazing stupid from top to bottom, purely an attempt by small dairy producers to boost sales. The biggest raw milk advocacy organization, the Weston A. Price foundation, is a bunch of anti-vaccine, pro-homeopathy cranks who believe that soy foods make kids gay.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    7. Re:Evpxebyyrq. Shpx lbh NP. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      How is selling bacteria-laden, potentially deadly, impure food a "religious observance"?

      The congressmen who keep bringing us more shit from Monsanto (rBGH increases bacteria counts in milk) like to cite god as their reason for doing shit all the time. Meanwhile, the Amish aversion to technology has a religious basis.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Evpxebyyrq. Shpx lbh NP. by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      "Tedious and trivial" depends entirely on your point of view. If I were in the business of making guitars, I would be pretty pissed off if some fuckwit came along and confiscated my raw materials.

    9. Re:Evpxebyyrq. Shpx lbh NP. by walkerp1 · · Score: 1

      Aha! I love cryptograms...and I'm afraid that I didn't.

    10. Re:Evpxebyyrq. Shpx lbh NP. by unitron · · Score: 1

      It wasn't the Department of Justice, it was the Fish and Wildlife Service.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  33. Killing time zones makes it more arbitrary by countertrolling · · Score: 1

    Why set it to UTC? Still trying to keep the British Empire alive? If they were to do this, set the zero point at the International Date Line, something a little more neutral, and just makes more sense. But I'm for keeping time zones. The sun still makes the best, most logical clock, and it's solar powered

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    1. Re:Killing time zones makes it more arbitrary by Noughmad · · Score: 1

      How is the Date Line more natural that Greenwich? Isn't the former defined merely by being just opposite of the latter?

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
    2. Re:Killing time zones makes it more arbitrary by radianity · · Score: 1

      The IDL is where it is *because* of UTC - it's exactly opposite the UTC line. So using the IDL wouldn't be neutral at all (and there isn't such a thing as "neutral" in this case anyway).

    3. Re:Killing time zones makes it more arbitrary by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Why set it to UTC?

      Because it's already defined, it already exists, and it's already in wide usage. This idea isn't going anywhere anyway, but why put additional obstacles in it's path. (If it were done, it would be useful.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    4. Re:Killing time zones makes it more arbitrary by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      No, the IDL is where it is so the planet's day can change is a virtually uninhabited area, and that's why the prime meridian should be there also, so the day isn't already 12 hours old when it reaches the present one.

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    5. Re:Killing time zones makes it more arbitrary by radianity · · Score: 1

      The IDL is opposite the prime meridian (GMT), which was chosen over various other contenders for naval and rail reasons; it's not a coincidence the IDL is opposite the prime meridian. The "planet's day" is not a real thing, given that a new day is always beginning somewhere. The IDL is also not a line as it has to avoid Russia and other nations.

    6. Re:Killing time zones makes it more arbitrary by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      The day has to start somewhere. And it would make sense to move the prime meridian to that point instead of having it 180 degrees out of phase. It's still in England as a legacy/political thing. It's like keeping x86 architecture around for a few thousand years.

      Note: I also want to rearrange calculator keypads to be the same as those on a phone. 123 on top.

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
  34. It's a stupid idea that's why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just image you want to call someone in country where there would normally be a 9 hour timezone difference.
    Now you can just calculate what time it is over there and say well now is probably not a good time since it's 4 AM there.
    With this new system you say well it's 7PM everywhere. How does that help me? Since there is no more time difference I can't even calculate what I would be doing 9 hours from now (sleeping? working?). Now I have to know that where I'm calling sleeps from 3PM to 1AM. How does that help me?
    Sure we could keep around the old time differences for this kind of thing, but then there is no real difference with the current system.

    I do agree on DST.
    But every airline I have ever used uses the local time of your destination to indicate your arrival time so I really don't see the problem you have there.

  35. No, it would lead to confusion by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

    The function of time zones is that humans generally operate on Diurnal schedule. So wherever we are, we are going to wake in the morning and sleep at night. As such it makes sense to calibrate time to that. 08:00 is "morning", 20:00 is "evening". Change that, and it gets confusing any time someone travels. Even just across the US and you'd find everything gets thrown off.

    What we have right now works well. Local time is always similar in terms of what is day and night. In the event you are communicating across time boundaries there's a simple answer: Specify the time zone. UTC is a good choice, or depending on what you are doing something else might be convenient. In online games it is usually "server time". The game server maintains time in the timezone it is physically located and will tell the player what it is. So you just reference to that.

    Eliminating time zones wouldn't work mostly because people just wouldn't listen. They'd still use their time zone. If you desire universal time, just use it, use UTC. I do when I'm posting something to people from multiple time zones. However if you walk around and try to use it in daily life, people will just ignore you.

    1. Re:No, it would lead to confusion by lattyware · · Score: 1

      Again, you are thinking of it wrong. You'd still know that place X is in that timezone, and they are X hours ahead or behind. Instead of going 'so the time there is x o'clock' you go 'so morning there is x o'clock' and adjust that instead. The issue is the way you think about it. All the things you use the time for in local terms is relative - morning is realtive to the sunrise, breakfast is relative to morning, work is relative to morning, etc... But the time of the place should be absolute. The suggestion is totally wrong in that it would get rid of the need to know how far ahead or behind a place is - that's still information you'd need to know, but instead of adjusting the time, it'd just adjust the named times we have (noon, midnight, morning, work start etc... would change), but this way, you don't have to worry about timezones when someone gives you an absolute time: see you at 8:00 means 8:00 everywhere.

      --
      -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
    2. Re:No, it would lead to confusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if you're already accepting that every time you move about you're going to have to do some mental math to reset yourself to the local time patterns, what does this whole exercise really save you? You've just traded one complexity of dealing with/traveling to different locations for another, and confused/pissed off pretty much the entire world in the process.

      Oh, except for that 1% of business people who conduct trans-continental business on a regular basis. They're really the only people who'd benefit in any way from this scheme.

    3. Re:No, it would lead to confusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't certain parts of the military live on Zulu time? They should be used to waking up at 04:00Z the one week and 16:00Z the other week when they are halfway around the world, but they still wake up "early in the morning" in both cases. It just has a different numerical value attached to it.

      This "idea" is in fact relatively easy to implement if you do it that way: switch to 24-hour clock and use "Z" postfix to indicate Zulu time. Just remember to include the date if there can be any confusion. My watch "T2" is set up for CEST which is UTC+2 but it's just as easy to put this on Zulu (UTC).

    4. Re:No, it would lead to confusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes that sounds very convenient.
      Now instead of converting 1 time (the reference time) I need to convert every other time I might want to use (morning, noon, night, bedtime, opening/closing time).
      The system you are proposing makes more sense than the one in the summary, but I't seems like more work with no real advantage that I can figure out other than if you try to set a meeting with someone in a different time zone.
      I'd say we should optimize for the common case, and that is definitively not where I have to schedule a meeting with people in different time zones.

    5. Re:No, it would lead to confusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you are thinking of it 'wrong'.

      The earth has a 24 hour day. But people do NOT think on a global scale to raise their chickens, get the kids up and off to school, open their cafe for the day, etc. They just don't. We have terms such as dawn, duck, noon, midnight, twighlight, etc to describe times of day. We have actual time for more precise scheduling between parties for things such as being at school, being at work, holding public events. But even then, those are local times. Trying to get people who rely on local times to switch their thinking around to basing time off of one point on the earth that is 90+% likely NOT their local time is literally asking them to live by it, and you will get nowhere trying to make people make a change that literally has no bearing on 90+% of the human population.

      What are the actual benefits of switching to this versus continuing to use local time for the VAST MAJORITY or the earth's population? Cause I actually see none besides eliminating the question "Oh wow? What time is it there?" from facebook wall posts...which almost would make it worth it...

    6. Re:No, it would lead to confusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's just sophistry. so you're advocating for a big Flag Day that
      makes it so 1:00 is some arbitrary time of day in real life, and
      something meaningful on the internet. that hasn't solved the problem
      but just shifted it. are you seriously going to argue that keeping people
      in sync over the internet is more important than keeping people in
      sync in real life?

      asked another way, do you need to know the hours of walmart.com
      or the local walmart?

    7. Re:No, it would lead to confusion by lattyware · · Score: 1

      The benefit is know what absolute time people are talking about all the time, and the downside is people having to change their ways. For me, that's an easy call - I realise that that isn't the case for everyone else - and I'm not saying this is a viable idea to implement, just that for me, personally, I'd rather see it that way.

      --
      -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
    8. Re:No, it would lead to confusion by HiThere · · Score: 1

      The function of time zones is that humans generally operate on Diurnal schedule. So wherever we are, we are going to wake in the morning and sleep at night. As such it makes sense to calibrate time to that. 08:00 is "morning", 20:00 is "evening". Change that, and it gets confusing any time someone travels. Even just across the US and you'd find everything gets thrown off.

      Historically that isn't true. Personal clocks are relatively quite recent, and prior to that people didn't figure time in the way that you claim. Usually dawn was the first hour, though some groups picked sunset. Saying 08:00 is "morning" is just a convention, and an arbitrary one at that. ANY number that you get used to will work equivalently. (For that matter, you should check around the edges of the timezones now in summer of winter. Timezones were established for the convenience of railroad schedules.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    9. Re:No, it would lead to confusion by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

      And every software developer who has to deal with the fun of timezones. I've seen a bunch who can't get it right.

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
  36. Nope by Haedrian · · Score: 1

    "4 a.m. means 4 a.m. for everyone. Got a flight landing at 3 p.m.? 3 p.m. now means 3 p.m. for everyone"

    Unfortunatly now at the top of my head I don't know whether 3pm means I'm going to land in broad daylight or in the middle of the night.

    Maybe we should have an ADDITIONAL time (call it Standard Internet Time) or whatever, but for day to day use its silly.

    Shops here open at 8 and close at 7. I can assume in most countries its the same. So if I go on a holiday with the new system I need to either convert EVERYTHING in my head or remember that in country A shops open at 2am and close at 5pm.

    No thanks. Its rather silly. I'd go for an ADDITIONAL clock, but not a reaplacement.

    1. Re:Nope by Haedrian · · Score: 1

      To explain my point better.

      I travel to the other side of the world. I shift my clock. Done.

      I know that if I set my alarm for 8 am it'll be morning or so. If I need to buy something from a shop, I know when I can go, because I know already.

      I just change ONE reference point (my clock) and I'm done. WIth this new system I need to convert for EVERYTHING.

    2. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe we should have an ADDITIONAL time (call it Standard Internet Time) or whatever, but for day to day use its silly

      Brilliant idea! That solves both problems, we get to keep our relative local time AND have a sort of... for lack of a better term, a coordinated universal time.

    3. Re:Nope by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Shops here generally open somewhere between 7 AM and 10 AM, with a few exceptions. Most are open for over eight hours, a few for over 12 hours, and some never close except on holidays.

      I understand your concern, but don't worry, by the time this happens your concerns will be irrelevant. Your portable electronic whatsit will have expanded it's capabilities, and be able to tell you when and where you can get what you want, if it doesn't order it delivered.

      There may be legitimate reasons why this would be a bad idea, but I haven't heard them. And this is partially because it's not going to happen anytime soon.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    4. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont think this is really true.
      In Spain they have a long break in the eraly afternoon called "siesta": Lots of shops, banks, etc are closed from 14:00 CEST to 17:00 CEST.
      In California, lots of stores are open till 10pm PDT every day of the week.
      In Germany the stores are open till 18:30 CEST Mon thru Fri and till 14:00 CEST on Sat. Closed on Sundays.
      I could go on and go on.
      Bottom line: If you're travelling, you have to inform yourself anyway...

    5. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shops here...

      And there we have the first problem.

  37. Yes, ditch DST, time zones are useful. by impaledsunset · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With time zones you can simply look up the time at a given location to know which part of the day it is, time corresponding to a part of the day is extremely useful, especially when you're moving through different countries or working with foreign people. It's much easier to change the time zone of your clock than to adjust to a day that starts at 16 o'clock. The different time zones give you more information, and given that most electronic devices can convert between them easily and display multiple at the same time, it's not really harmful.

    DST is the beast that needs to die, because it makes it hard to represent the exact time me with the local time plus a simple offset. After DST dies, we should try to deal with unusual time zones that do not match the local solar mean time that you have in countries like Russia or offsets that have half an hour in them like you have in Iran.

    If time zones make it difficult for you, work on the better integration of the tools dealing with them.

    1. Re:Yes, ditch DST, time zones are useful. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, but some countries instead of removing summer time, switch to it. I.e. Russia...

    2. Re:Yes, ditch DST, time zones are useful. by Kjella · · Score: 1

      With time zones you can simply look up the time at a given location to know which part of the day it is (...) DST is the beast that needs to die

      Except those two are contradictory. I'm pretty close to the arctic circle, so short winter days and long summer days. In the darkest of winter, the sun rises at 10 AM and sets at 2:30 PM. As we progress towards summer both the mornings and evenings get brighter, in March before DST the sun rises at 6 AM and sets at 7 PM, after DST an hour later. It is far, far more useful for me that the sun is up 7-8 PM than 6-7 AM because of working hours, store hours and so on. We want all the rest of the sun time to be 8-9-10 PM in the evening, not 4-5-6 AM in the morning. If it's not useful to you, well then you're not living in a place where it matters. In fact, if we weren't following a European standard we could probably use another hour from mid-April to mid-September. Also, this is the reason Australia would want to do it the other way around, they want to have DST in their summer, our winter. So no, it's not going to get much simpler than it is.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:Yes, ditch DST, time zones are useful. by tricorn · · Score: 1

      DST really isn't that difficult either. Internally, everything should simply run on UTC, display time is a simple offset from that. Whether that offset is fixed for a specific geographic location or changes by an hour is mostly irrelevant to the issue. The ONLY problem it causes is the one hour that's impossible and the one hour that's ambiguous for any particular time zone at the switch time.

      I'd have no problem with DST going away, I think people should just adjust their schedule (e.g. schools can change start times depending on the season, if that's important), and not having everyone go to work from 8AM to 5PM would be a good thing overall. All of the conventions of "lunch hours" and such are fairly arbitrary anyway, few people care when local high noon is for basing when their meals are.

      But local time zones are going to always make sense as long as people have circadian rhythms that adjust to the daylight cycle. Calculating that people tend to get up at 4am UTC, have lunch around 9am-11am, and that it's too late to call at 7pm, is no more difficult than figuring out that at 7am your time it's 6pm their time. In fact, without a timezone, you'd still have to identify the time difference somehow. You'd probably call them "time zones".

      If you think time zones and DST are confusing, wait until we have interplanetary travel. Just HOPE we don't ever get instantaneous communications, the different day and year cycles alone will drive everyone crazy.

    4. Re:Yes, ditch DST, time zones are useful. by Tomato42 · · Score: 1

      Most electronic devices can convert between them easily

      Apart from the elephant in the room in the form of MS Windows that still doesn't keep hardware real time clock in UTC...

    5. Re:Yes, ditch DST, time zones are useful. by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      DST really isn't that difficult either. Internally, everything should simply run on UTC, display time is a simple offset from that. Whether that offset is fixed for a specific geographic location or changes by an hour is mostly irrelevant to the issue. The ONLY problem it causes is the one hour that's impossible and the one hour that's ambiguous for any particular time zone at the switch time.

      Doing everything internally in UTC may seem like a good idea but it causes a couple of problems.

      1: a user sets a daily alarm from 7am local time.
      2: a user sets an alarm for a meeting at 1pm local time a few months in the future. Then the DST rules change moving that month into the DST period.

      In both cases the reasonable expectation of the user (given that they set the alarm using local time) is that the alarm will continue to be set at the same local time but if the system uses UTC for everything (and doesn't apply hacky corrections) then the alarm will continue to be set at the same time local time which maps to a different time in universal time.

      Showing a user local time while working internally in UTC is a recipie for behaviours that while perfectly logical to computer geeks break basic expectations of normal users.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    6. Re:Yes, ditch DST, time zones are useful. by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      then the alarm will continue to be set at the same time local time which maps to a different time in universal time.

      That should have said the alarm will continue to be set at the same time in universal time which maps to a different time in local time.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    7. Re:Yes, ditch DST, time zones are useful. by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      I'd have no problem with DST going away, I think people should just adjust their schedule (e.g. schools can change start times depending on the season, if that's important), and not having everyone go to work from 8AM to 5PM would be a good thing overall.

      The problem is, I would expect that the bosses will end up making the decisions for their employees. Without officially recognised DST, most large companies would most likely switch to a single year-round schedule, meaning that at certain times of the year, you'd need more before-school childcare... which would end up being provided by the school, and in a few years the school system would fall into line.

      I also expect multinationals would use it as an excuse to shift the working times in some of their smaller geographies to match head office.

      Our current typical working day is defined by convention and expectation, and switching the system would confuse us just enough that the HR department would be able to sneak a few things in under the radar.

      HAL.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    8. Re:Yes, ditch DST, time zones are useful. by tricorn · · Score: 1

      The only time that would cause a problem is if the rules for DST change between when you set the alarm and when it goes off (and part of the process of changing the rules would be to go through future date/times and flag ones that would change so someone can determine if they should be modified - they could also be stored with the original time value (i.e. what specific timezone was indicated on entry, whether it was implicit or explicit).

      When you set an alarm for a future date, the interpretation of the time zone would be based on the date of the alarm, not on the current time, same for displaying times where the DST state of the future date is different from the current date.

      How you display times in different time zones is something for a user preference setting - should they be shown using your own timezone (including DST rules based on the date of the time), or should they be shown as local time for the other time zone. Both make sense for different reasons and circumstances.

      Remember, you can always set your default time zone to be UTC if you want to completely eliminate time zones and DST for yourself.

    9. Re:Yes, ditch DST, time zones are useful. by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      The only time that would cause a problem is if the rules for DST change between when you set the alarm and when it goes off

      Something that can easilly happen given the way some governments change DST rules at short notice and the only mechanism for pushing out DST rule changes is for the vendor to roll them into a software update (and to make things more fun windows system for representing DST rules is oversimplifies) or an admin to change them manually. Even worse you can get into a situation where different nodes on your network (or even different peices of software on the same computer) have different ideas of the DST rules and where (if clocks can be set manually by end users or well meaning but ignorant admins) some nodes may have correct local time but wrong universal time.

      Oh and there is the fun that afaict there is no official standard for how to represent an area with consistent time rules. Both MS and *nix seem to use city names but I don't think their use of them is consistent with each other.

      they could also be stored with the original time value (i.e. what specific timezone was indicated on entry, whether it was implicit or explicit).

      That is indeed what needs to be done. Then whenever a rule change update comes in you need to

      1: recompute the UTC equivilents for all affected timestamps
      2: recheck for conflicts
      3: generate warnings for users (both generally and pulling out any changes particually likely to surprise a given user)
      4: decide how to deal with stuff that was previously scheduled at an unambiguous time but is now scheduled at times that are either impossible or ambiguous

      It's all doable but doing it correctly (especially when you have to work against operating systems that do it incorrectly) is a lot of work and easilly written off until the change strikes. Just as many people in the UK assumed VAT would always be 17.5% and many people assumed (and now that Y2K has passed have gone back to assuming) that their systems would be dead long before their use of two digit years would become a problem.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  38. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. What a stupid idea
    2. Some stupid idea counts as news now?
    3. What a stupid idea

    1. Re:Really? by ArcadeNut · · Score: 1

      2. Some stupid idea counts as news now?

      Lots of stupid ideas count as news. If /. only posted good ideas, we wouldn't have much to read....

      Maybe the idea is that we can discuss stupid ideas to see how stupid they really are, or whether they might just have some merit? A lot of good ideas come from a lot more stupid ideas. If you're lucky, you'll have 1 good idea out of every 100 stupid ideas.

      In this case, I agree with #1 and #3 of your post :)

      --
      Visit the Arcade Restoration Workshop @ http://www.arcaderestoration.com
    2. Re:Really? by instagib · · Score: 1

      1. What a stupid idea
      2. Some stupid idea counts as news now?
      3. What a stupid idea

      4. PROFIT!!!

      There, completed that for you. It's what page impressions are all about.

  39. Seriouisly, slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the stupidest article I have ever seen on this site.
    Along with the other crap that has been posted in the last while,
    along with stories from 09, I think I have had enough of my time
    wasted here.

    Goodbye.

  40. There is such a thing by Phibz · · Score: 1

    see http://ebeats.org

  41. I've got a few better ideas by AvderTheTerrible · · Score: 1

    I think having everyone use UTC would be impractical. If the sun is out and its 2am UTC, someones gonna be confused, somewhere. And its gonna just be a giant pain in the rear end for everyone that isn't already using UTC to begin with. And even if you eliminate time zone boundaries, you still kind of need date boundaries. At one point do we say that monday is done with and tuesday begins? Is that a local thing? Do we keep time zones and just have them define the start and end points of the local day now?

    And then theres all the technology that we use. Sure, disabling DST and just setting everything to UTC would be easy, but then every scheduled process has to be converted over to UTC. And then new rules for DST have to be implemented and its all a big pain in the you no what. Why don't we just go ahead and implement metric time while were at it just to make sure everyone's sense of time is sufficiently scrambled? Ugh...

    I think something that would be much more practical would be to simply eliminate DST worldwide, and for countries that span multiple timezones to simplify. As far as the US goes, it would be easy to get the lower 48 on the same schedule. EST just falls back 90 minutes, CST falls back 30, MST jumps ahead 30, and PST jumps ahead 90. Bam, one unified timezone and no ones off by more than 90 minutes.

  42. zero longitude by nten · · Score: 2

    Zero longitude gets noon at noon, date line gets new day at noon. He said UTC which would make it thus.

    --
    refactor the law, its bloated, confusing and unmaintainable.
  43. Re:Before we ditch timezone...Let's kill DST first by impaledsunset · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Uh, the clock is just a number, if you believe the day should start earlier, talk to your management. Your colleagues would most likely disagree, but if they don't, you might convince them. It makes most sense if 12:00 is exactly at noon and the time matches the sun, not your work preferences.

  44. then why all of those phony borders? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    unless we were created to be separated, based on the fear & hate trainings of the highly profitsized never ending genocidal holycost?

    tell the truth. disarm. the only spiritually & mathematically correct options considering who we are supposed to be. read the teepeeleaks etchings. the native elders advise that the same less life stuff is still happening, except to more of us.

    1. Re:then why all of those phony borders? by Haedrian · · Score: 1

      Whatever it is you're smoking, I want some.

  45. So Midnight would be at 2pm ? by craznar · · Score: 1

    ... and midday at 2am ?

    So when the hell is noon ?

    --
    EMail: 0110001101100010010000000110001101110010 0110000101111010011011100110000101110010 0010111001100011011011110110
  46. Not a relic of the past by John3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wasn't time based on the rotation of the earth and the relative position of the sun in the sky? The hours of the day were tracked long before people started setting up multiple time zones...look at a sundial and there are numbers and those numbers were pretty much same. Time zones only date to the mid-1800's so they certainly aren't a "relic of the past".

    Don't get me wrong, there certainly are advantages to using a standard time (and plenty of scientific, military, and technical applications use either UTC or GMT), but the average person will want to track time in relationship to their day as they experience it. And face it, the average person does very little traveling, very little interaction with people outside their time zone, and probably never interacts with someone in a significantly different time zone (i.e. on the other side of the world).

    --
    "We make our world significant by the courage of our questions and by the depth of our answers." Carl Sagan
    1. Re:Not a relic of the past by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      the average person will want to track time in relationship to their day as they experience it.

      Why can't they continue to track time in relationship to their day as they experience it?

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    2. Re:Not a relic of the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Japan you inconsiderate.....

      ps: Slashdot has commented on my lame attempt to troll Captch: pathetic

    3. Re:Not a relic of the past by hairyfish · · Score: 1

      I think the biggest impact in the near future in the Internet. More and more people are using the Internet, and at greater rates. They are building online communities with people in different parts of the world, relationships that a 'normal' person might not normally experience. So right now, the need might be in the minority, but as more and more people start communicating with more and more other people all over the world, time zones will present a growing confusion.

  47. You're obviously... by falken0905 · · Score: 1

    You're obviously a time traveler from some long past century. Time zones are modern, man. Get with the program if you want to fit in.

  48. It's Internet Time all over again... by kaiidth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First thing that came to mind on reading this article was "1998 called, they want their suggestion back".

    Back in 1998 when the Web was new and cool, Swatch were attempting to market a metric alternative to the 24 hour clock, which they excitingly referred to as 'Internet Time'. It divided the day into 1,000 'beats', and was based around the Central European timezone (GMT + 1) on the basis that Swatch's headquarters are in Biel. Unsurprisingly, the concept went down like a lead balloon.

    FWIW, you'd have to think about different timezones anyway. No amount of universally-shared timezones are going to change the physical reality, so they may as well reflect it.

    1. Re:It's Internet Time all over again... by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 1

      I really liked internet time. It was great because I had a widget in my menubar that showed the @time and when I met people in chat rooms, it was easy to synchronize...

      for those of you not in the know: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatch_Internet_Time

      I've spent the better part of the last year trying to bring this back. Not to use as a primary time-telling device, but as a way of easily synchronizing across timezones, mostly for IRC/IM and teleconference meetings.

      I also think we need to completely kill daylight savings (as many people are suggesting). It is definitely time to do that worldwide.

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    2. Re:It's Internet Time all over again... by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Back in 1998 when the Web was new and cool, Swatch were attempting to market a metric alternative to the 24 hour clock, which they excitingly referred to as 'Internet Time'. It divided the day into 1,000 'beats', and was based around the Central European timezone (GMT + 1) on the basis that Swatch's headquarters are in Biel. Unsurprisingly, the concept went down like a lead balloon.

      Hehe, yeah I remember this one. It was around the same time some people were trying to renounce their citizenship and move to cyberspace, it was the wierdest cult thing. "Internet Time" was kinda the same, now we're all moving to cyberspace so we don't need regular time anymore. That Swatch was pushing it in all seriousness shows how completely on acid the dotcom craze was.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:It's Internet Time all over again... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I've considered that in the past. The main issue with changing minutes to be 100 seconds and hours to be 100 minutes and days to be 10 hours, which we definitely could do, we'd have to adjust the length of a second again so that it would match up with the actual length of the day.

      We could also adjust the months so that even months always have 30 days and odd months except November have 31 with November getting leap year day.

      The problem with those ideas is that while they work well on paper, you'd have to get people to adopt them, and quite frankly the advantages of them is not sufficient to justify getting 7bn people to accept and adopt them.

    4. Re:It's Internet Time all over again... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I've spent the better part of the last year trying to bring this back. Not to use as a primary time-telling device, but as a way of easily synchronizing across timezones, mostly for IRC/IM and teleconference meetings.

      What's wrong with UTC for that purpose?

    5. Re:It's Internet Time all over again... by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      Why not just use Zulu Time?

      The military has been using this for decades, it's easy to calculate based on UTC, and also has a cool name. Heck, it also has it's own web site clock:

      http://www.zulutime.net/

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    6. Re:It's Internet Time all over again... by sorcerykid · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily so. The "second" could remain for scientific use, and a separate metric unit could be designated for civic use. That's not much different than how it is now for length and weight measurement in the U.S. As long as they are separate units, they could be phased in over time (no pun intended) without interfering with the current system of measurement. --Randall

  49. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by interval1066 · · Score: 1

    The inconvenience is completely self-imposed. Its very similar to the problem of English measure here; metric is a totally superior system in every way but people don't want to recognize it because they are simply too lazy to change. If i could put a proposal before the American people I'd say "Please lets all start using the metric system, and by the way, let's just not all times in GMT, and also do away with AM/PM and use the 24 hour clock." So much simpler, but people are people and by and large, they are stupid.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  50. Might as well start then. by nten · · Score: 1

    If it will take us a century to switch, it a reason to switch sooner not later. Best get the pain out of the way. It will make things easier and less arbitrary, what scientist/engineer could be against that? Hmm...

    --
    refactor the law, its bloated, confusing and unmaintainable.
    1. Re:Might as well start then. by lattyware · · Score: 1

      I completely agree - doesn't mean I think it'll ever happen.

      --
      -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
    2. Re:Might as well start then. by Tomato42 · · Score: 1

      You're talking about the same planet on which scientists/engineers crash multi-million space probes again and again, because of conversions from ass-backwards measurement system to the universally agreed upon?

  51. pointless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering 99% of people do not travel regularly, and for the most part deal with other people in their own timezone a change like this would not be beneficial to them in any way.

  52. Timothy? What the heck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is one of the stupidest flame-bait blog-posts i've ever seen. Are you trying to troll us?

    Disappoint.

  53. We'll get right on changing to this.... by sshuber · · Score: 1

    ...as soon as the US switches to using the metric system that the rest of the civilized world uses.

  54. every time asking what locally is luchtime?? by kirthn · · Score: 1

    and all the other things...the best way for people to fall back to timezones :p...everyt timezone luchtime would be different ....lol!!

    --
    Famous last words:"but...."
  55. Re:Before we ditch timezone...Let's kill DST first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People don't realize how annoying it is to have the sun go down at 10 in the night.
    You expect me to pretend it's late when it's still light out?
    This year the summer has been very rainy and cloudy so luckily it didn't stay very light until late.
    But do you know what it's like when you go to bed at 11 and it feels like it's still the middle of the day because of the heat?

  56. AM, PM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While you are at it, get rid of AM and PM too.

  57. yes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live at 0, almost, I would certainly like that!

  58. Not Broken Don't Fix by NoMercy · · Score: 1

    I can look at my clock, see it's 9:20am in New York, and feel safe calling them or setting up a transatlantic meeting at that time..... Now, roll everyone onto the same clock, and I'll have no idea! I'd have to remember lots of stupid times or do some mental gymnastics to understand that calling at 22pm is a bad idea as that's lunch time in Singapore.

    Want to fix something, make it a global standard when the clocks move for daylight savings... that really confuses things so meetings which don't normally collide between the USA and Europe, suddenly hit but only for one or two weeks until the other side moves into daylight savings.

    1. Re:Not Broken Don't Fix by Hairy1 · · Score: 1

      And what about the countries unlucky enough to be situated below the equator?

  59. Why this makes no sense by wickerprints · · Score: 1

    A little thought shows why this isn't a good idea.

    Say this idea is implemented worldwide. You've lived in a particular place most of your life. You're accustomed to waking up at what is now called 3 pm. You eat breakfast at 3:30 pm, get to work by 4:30 pm, have lunch at 9 pm, and dinner by 4 am. All is well.

    Now say you move to another city. Now your entire concept of when things are scheduled to happen, has to change. Furthermore, the magnitude of the change depends on the change in longitude--so whereas you were eating at 3:30 pm, 9 pm, and 4 am, now suddenly you find yourself eating at completely different hours of the day. Same goes for sleeping and waking. Each time you travel, it changes.

    The point is that the hour of the day is strongly associated with specific activities. "Noon" in any part of the world tells us when most people are having lunch. It gives us a mental marker to synchronize our activities. To have to change that every time you move to a different time zone, rather than simply adjusting your watch, is backwards, and doesn't lessen the burden of having to keep track of something. It is easier to adjust our clocks than our internal concepts of when we do very basic and regular things--especially in this day and age, when we have phones capable of using GPS to automatically adjust the time zone.

    1. Re:Why this makes no sense by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      The hours are just numbers. The outcry over this idea if the time equivalent to the version numbers in Firefox and Chrome. You used to get out of bed at 07:00, now you get out of bed at 02:00, and eat lunch at 07:00. Also, I just compared the real world to software releases, and should probably get out more.

    2. Re:Why this makes no sense by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That's not really the rationale, though. The idea is that your peers are on the same time zone and if not, they're just one time zone away, and everyone who lives near the line is used to dealing with it whereas for everyone else they can at least make a pretty good guess. Well, if they have any geography. Too bad about our education system. If you told me to label the states I would laugh at you. If you held a gun to my head and told me failure to get 50% right meant death you'd have to be prepared to make a mess.

      Anyway, back on topic; we'd need to be universally better mathematicians or all have some kind of computer implant to keep track of hours past sunrise/sunset based on longitude/latitude. And for that matter, if you're going to be that precise, what about people in deep valleys?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  60. try 24h first by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 1, Insightful

    How about we first try and get america on the 24h clock. I noticed that even this crazy posting still listed things in am/pm.

    --

    ----
    Go canucks, habs, and sens!
    1. Re:try 24h first by Noughmad · · Score: 1

      Yes, but if you start your argument with such a ludicrous proposition, 24h clock will seem like a good compromize. The same might work for DST and metric system.

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
    2. Re:try 24h first by doctormetal · · Score: 1

      Americans only use old and outdated stuff, like the 12 hour clock, Fahrenheit temperatures and the imperial system. They just refuse to use what the rest of the world uses.

    3. Re:try 24h first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's try converting to metric before we try anything drastic like messing with the time...

    4. Re:try 24h first by jopsen · · Score: 1

      True, oh so very true...

    5. Re:try 24h first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about we first try and get america on the 24h clock

      How about we first try and get rid of daylight saving time? I've seen it almost kill someone (poorly written medical software that almost overdosed a patient).

    6. Re:try 24h first by bidule · · Score: 1

      Go fix your preferences

      --
      ID: the nose did not occur naturally, how would we wear glasses otherwise? (apologies to Voltaire)
    7. Re:try 24h first by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, how dare we use measures based on people using numbers! We should immediately switch to binary numbers because you can count higher on your fingers!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:try 24h first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try thai time.
      01 - 05 prefix tee 1-5
      06- 11 6-11 mong [chao]
      12:00 Tiang
      13 Bai mong
      14 bai 2 mong
      15 bai 3 mong
      16 4 mong yen
      17 5 mong yen
      18 6 mong yen
      19 1 toom
      20 2 toom
      21 3 toom
      22 4 toom
      23 5 toom
      24 kuen

    9. Re:try 24h first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans only use old and outdated stuff, like the 12 hour clock, Fahrenheit temperatures and the imperial system. They just refuse to use what the rest of the world uses.

      I would also add using the word "American" to talk about themselves (America is a continent) to that list

    10. Re:try 24h first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No; and don't try putting the month/day in the other order.

      We're not going metric either.

    11. Re:try 24h first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America has need for no more than two hours, Republican and Democrat. Thank you.

  61. What does yesterday or tomorrow mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what would yesterday mean? or tomorrow?
    People refer to these concepts before or after sleeping.
    With this concept in place we could have a meeting "tomorrow in 30 minutes" in the middle of the day?
    Moreover, discussing about what you've done a couple of days ago with someone who's used to live in a different time would not make sense as they could not rely on the time (ie: 4pm 2am, etc) you are referring to. It just doesn't make sense
    That does not seem right...

  62. good luck with that.. swatch tried that by youn · · Score: 1

    they had a very interesting concept called "internet time", they even came out with watches that displayed internet time... no time zone, only a number between 1 and 1000... each unit would be about a minute, each 10 units , would be 1/4 of an hour, each 100 units, about 2 hours... could have worked... never caught on though.

    as one person posted already, do you really want your day to change in the middle of the day? :)... though it would be fun to say let's meet tomorrow, later today :)

    --
    Never antropomorphize computers, they do not like that :p
  63. Nice try! by no-body · · Score: 1

    How about getting the US folks to use the metric system first?
     
    How long is it now? 25+ years or so...
     
    You can measure success rate on that one.

    1. Re:Nice try! by shadowone · · Score: 1

      Metric has been around since the 1799, so the US is quite behind the times (no surprises there :-P )

    2. Re:Nice try! by no-body · · Score: 1

      Metric has been around since the 1799, so the US is quite behind the times (no surprises there :-P )

      I meant "introduction" of another system replacing an existing one, as an example metric measurements in US.

      According to this:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metrication_in_the_United_States#Overview

      70/80's and lost momentum later on. So in comparison (I think Timothy had a hangover or something to post this) introducing to run everything in UTC - church towers across the world, all rail/subway stations and what else have you... The code changes alone, several magnitudes more than 1999/2000 changeover not even people's habits..
       
      Just forget it!

  64. AM/PM? by daemonc · · Score: 1

    So here on the eastern seaboard of Australia, lunchtime will now be at 2 a.m., In New York it will be 4 p.m., and in Moscow it will be 8 a.m.

    Why in the world would you go through all that trouble, and still keep a.m. and p.m.?

    I have never even seen anybody express UTC in anything other than 24 hour format.

    --
    All that we see or seem is but a dream within a dream.
  65. Amen! by matunos · · Score: 2

    But why keep the antiquated 24-hour day at all? Why not decimalize all of our time units? 10 hours per day, I say, 1000 days per year. Who cares if none of it lines up what we observe in our daily lives? That's what we all have smartphones for!

    BTW, the premise of the question is wrong: time zones were not introduced for when different parts of the world were isolated. When locations are isolated, they don't need to agree on a time. Time zones were introduced for when different parts of the world were getting connected... specifically by railroads.

    1. Re:Amen! by cjsm · · Score: 1

      I would carry this a step farther and metricize our year to a thousand days. This would involve attaching huge rockets to the earth to slow down its orbit, moving it outward until the orbit is beyond Mars. However, this would be worth it to metricize the year. This would also solve global warming.

      --
      This ad space for rent.
    2. Re:Amen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I say, 1000 days per year.

      The day and the year are the two time units that are directly tied to physical phenomena. The ratio between them is something humans have observed but have never had a say in. That's why the ratio is so impractical. It is not even an integer. At least the measurements humans have otherwise come up with have had a half-reasonable ratio when considering them pairwise. (As long as you look at measurements in the same system).

      The month was also based on a physical phenomena, namely the time it takes for the Moon to rotate around the earth. However rather than keeping this accurate the month was made to be 1/12 of a year thus being slightly different from the time it takes for the Moon to revolve once around the earth.

      The whole thing does get complicated by the difference between observing the rotation of the Earth or the rotation of the Moon around the earth relative to the Sun or to the stars on the sky. The thing is it gives a +/-1 per year because the Earth moves one time around the Sun during that time. So the Moon moves between the Sun and the Earth 13 times in a year but only around the Earth 12 times during that period? Or is it the other way around?

      Is the 12 periods of the Moon in a year the reason the number 12 was used so many times in the Number system? And why was the number 12 used rather than 13? The number 60 being used as well may have other origins. Very ancient societies used a position number system alternating between base 6 and base 10 on every other digit. Similar to the way seconds and minutes works. But that doesn't use the number 12 directly, it wasn't bases 5 and 12 after all.

      Did the week originate as one quarter of the time it took the Moon to move around the Earth? Why one quarter and not one third or one fifth? Eventually it was fixed at seven days. Even though different parts of the world seem to disagree of the meaning of the days, it seems that most of the world do agree on seven days in a week? Was the movement of the Earth and the Moon the reason seven eventually became considered as a slightly magical number?

      Of all these numeric measurements the day and the year are the two that directly affects our lives. And thus fixing the week at an integer number of days and fixing the month at an integer fraction of a year (more or less) does make things somewhat easier to deal with. Having the ratio between the week and the month being some obscure fraction rather than the 4 it should have been doesn't seem to bother most people. (It does however give rise to stupid lies on Facebook about how a certain month only starts on a certain day of the week once every 673 years, and this is somehow magical and will make you a huge fortune as long as you take part in spreading those lies on to everybody who is tired of hearing about it).

    3. Re:Amen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't own a smartphone.
      also since the current system is mostly based on the number 12 why not just refactor it?

      1 minute is 5*12 seconds
      1 hour is 5*12 minutes
      1 day is 2*12 hours

      perfectly easy to work with.already though.
      what's wrong is not the time units we use that line up with nature pretty well. what's wrong is using a decimal system for our numbers. so if you want to change something you can start there :P

  66. No, 99% no. by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    Considering that at least 99% of the world population doesn't ever leave their own time zone, particularly on a regular basis, no, I think we'll avoid INconveniencing 5.95 billion people in order to make life a teensy bit easier for the 50 million who are probably educated enough for it not to really be an inconvenience, or wealthy enough to just buy another damn watch (if it is).

    --
    -Styopa
  67. One size "fits all"? by jlbprof · · Score: 1

    Is this like GNOME assuming one desktop manager "fits all"? I like noon to be when the sun is overhead, and I do not live in the UK.

    --
    I go out of my way to complicate the simple things, so that I can simplify the complicated things.
  68. Re:Before we ditch timezone...Let's kill DST first by zoloto · · Score: 1

    Are you kidding? Wake the fark up earlier. I remember a time we woke up in the twilight of the morning and didn't need to rely on clocks to tell us when to do things like wake up or go to sleep. This is the worst kind of nonsense ever.

  69. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  70. imprecision by nten · · Score: 1

    I agree, if the best time to feed the animals is four hours after noon, then its wrong to say 4pm, as 4pm is more or less than 4h after noon depending on where in the time zone you are. Absolute time is absolutely better. I think I may switch, if I only provide times in UTC everyone is sure to jump on board, or kill me.

    --
    refactor the law, its bloated, confusing and unmaintainable.
    1. Re:imprecision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I may switch, if I only provide times in UTC everyone is sure to jump on board, or kill me.

      "Because obviously, as there are two outcomes, each has a 50% chance of occurring, and I'm important enough that everyone is sure to agree with me, so I'm willing to take that chance. It's just like flipping a coin, like this one here, and getting heads. Watch... er, getting heads THIS time. No, getting it THIS time. No, not tails. Getting HEADS. HEADS. HEADS. Okay, like flipping a coin and getting tails. Watch... damnit, coin, we rehearsed this! Work with me! TAILS. TAILS. Okay, fine, it's like rolling a six-sided die and getting something four or higher. Watch..."

  71. Let's go with 'no'. by MrLizard · · Score: 1

    Which is easier?

    "Hey, it looks like it's 2 AM in London.... I'd better not call, he's probably asleep." -- this is our current system, and finding out "If it's X here, it's Y there" is about as easy as it can get.

    OR

    "OK, it's 3 PM here, which means it's mid-afternoon.... but what's 3 PM in London? Oh, in London, 3 PM is the middle of the night."

    It's a lot easier when you can say "It's X time in Y location, and humans usually do Z at X time", then it is to remember that people on the East Coast eat lunch at 3:OO PM Universal Time, and people on the West Coast eat lunch at 11:00 AM universal time. My scheduling, etc, programs already automatically adjust events such as meetings to my local time -- if I see a phone meeting scheduled for 5:30 PM, then it's 5:30 PM *my time*, even though the person who entered it, in California, entered it as "2:30 PM".

    The more I think on this, the more likely it is this is some kind of social experiment to see how people react when presented with a self-evidently bollocks idea on a site which is otherwise generally reputable and filtered.

    1. Re:Let's go with 'no'. by sirdude · · Score: 1

      Exactly. If you want to schedule a meeting at UTC 4pm, how do you know if it is convenient for that the person halfway around the world? There is already a Universal Time Zone for business. It's 9-5 in most industries. Furthermore, in this Age of the Internet, all it takes is a little widget on your desktop or mobile to tell you the time anywhere in the world. It isn't really that inconvenient.

  72. Indian call centers by tepples · · Score: 1

    99.9% of the people never have a meeting with people on the other side of the world.

    Let me guess: you've never called a major PC maker's tech support number. In a lot of cases, that ends up becoming a phone meeting between someone in North America and someone in India.

    1. Re:Indian call centers by Dinghy · · Score: 1

      There's a big difference between a single-end initiated phone call and a meeting scheduled in advance. Also, while it may not be a significant difference to Europe and Africa, the rest of the world is likely to run in to a situation where the date will change while the sun is up, which is something most people will not be eager to accept with the given reason for the change.

    2. Re:Indian call centers by Arlet · · Score: 1

      No, I always build my own PC. But I would expect tech support to be available during my own office hours, and I'm not going to worry about it.

  73. Clock manufactuerers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you don't need multiple clocks for time zones, we will thousands of jobs as we produce less clocks. Create more jobs by making more time zones. Anonymous Coward time is UTC+13:37.

  74. If you want to get up an hour early in the summer by msobkow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you want to get up an hour early in the summer, get your ass out of bed!

    Why should the rest of us screw up our sleep rhythms because you don't want to reset your alarm clock?

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  75. Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First time accepted submitter hairyfish....

    Please let it be the last if this is the sort of shit which is being submitted.

  76. very good point by nten · · Score: 1

    this annoys me even with local time

    --
    refactor the law, its bloated, confusing and unmaintainable.
  77. Countries that cross time zones by tepples · · Score: 1

    I can call my neighbor in the next town and say "let's meet at 4" and we do not need to get into a long winded discussion about what that means

    Unless there's a state or province border between your town and the next town.

  78. Just reduce the number of timezones by Zorpheus · · Score: 1

    For example the USA could reduce the number of time zones to 1 or 2 for the main land. Just look at this map of time zones. China has only one time zone, half of Europe is in the same time zone and Russia just removed 2 of its time zones. Merging a time zone with the 2 neighbouring timezones is just a shift by one hour for the people, but already makes things much easier.

    1. Re:Just reduce the number of timezones by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 1

      In Russia, which covers 10 time zones (they eliminated one recently I think) everything transportation related is on Moscow time. Like the train schedules. They keep local time and national time straight for the world's largest country ... (by landmass not population). So ...

      In Soviet Russia, time zone changes you...

      --
      - Tjp

      I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

  79. Our money doesn't have a standard anymore.... by RL78 · · Score: 1

    Why should time ;)

  80. Ten Hour Days by revjd909 · · Score: 1

    Actually, while we're at it, we would do well to change to ten hour days. Each hour would be 144 of our present minutes. Each of the ten hours would have 100 minutes, and each of the minutes would have 100 seconds.

    Each hour would be 144 of our present minutes.
    Each minute would be 1.44x the length of a present minute.
    Each second would be slightly shorter (0.86 of our present seconds).

    The timepiece industry would have a hay-day.

    And while we're at it, let's change the timing system to NCE(New Common Era) 0, following J.R.R. Tolkien's system for adopting new eras. That would put us more in the now, instead of the "good ol' days" circa 0 A.D. people are so strangely fond of. (We can still remember Jesus without having to continue this overdue count-up to 3000 or higher.)

    All this would shake up people's reality enough that maybe our civilization could grow into something different/better and make us feel less removed from people in distant countries, with whom we're as close communication-wise as a person two miles away.

    And yes, eliminating the present location-relativistic time-system now that a significant portion of the world population is globally connected is a Good Thing(tm). Someday, people will look back and say, "Really, you had to communicate with each other in that hackey and limited way???" Imagine if every time you wanted to physically meet with a friend, and instead of just giving them an absolute time and place to meet, you had to know their location in order to tell them the place. "Let's see, you're at 21st and Broadway? Is that my 21st and Broadway, or yours? Oh, we'll need to translate your location by 4 blocks..."

    --
    *** once i really listened, the noise just went away. -liz phair
    1. Re:Ten Hour Days by revjd909 · · Score: 1

      Further, I see that if we can survive the coming economic breakdown/malaise, we could put forward technology that could keep us always in the now. We can communicate a time to meet with other people in absolute terms (e.g. next Tuesday, August 30 at 8:00) and our personal time-piece can do the translation so the time is always "now" and anything coming up can be alternately shown to us as "t - 2 days, 3 hours, 7 minutes."

      In other words, every person with a timepiece can be the center of their own world, and synched up in temporal verbiage with everybody else. E.g.- The US Civil War was "t + 150 years," World Peace Day begins in "t + 14 days" alternately Sept 11, 2011 CE.

      Almost all of our time-measurement system is in arbitrary agreed-upon units (months, weeks, hours, minutes, seconds). The things that are not flexible are days (earth rotations), moon-cycles, years (fixed at 365.x days; earth revolutions around the sun), and the frequency of a cesium atom, etc. We could choose to have 12 months a year, each with three weeks, and have a 5.x day remainder week if we wanted.... The difficult part is to gather the political will to collectively agree upon a change. The catalyst for breaking free from this long-held system has to be a strong argument, and buy-in from a sufficient power-base.

      --
      *** once i really listened, the noise just went away. -liz phair
    2. Re:Ten Hour Days by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Imagine if every time you wanted to physically meet with a friend, and instead of just giving them an absolute time and place to meet, you had to know their location in order to tell them the place. "Let's see, you're at 21st and Broadway? Is that my 21st and Broadway, or yours? Oh, we'll need to translate your location by 4 blocks..."

      This already happens - different cities have streets with the same names, and different countries have cities with the same names.

      It works fine because, like with time zones, people usually have a common reference.

    3. Re:Ten Hour Days by swalve · · Score: 1

      Fuck 'em. We've got computers now. "Now" will always be Midnight, Jan 1, year zero. All dates will automatically adjust negative and positive when you look at them. Instead of waiting for 3pm on Jan 2., we just wait for the timer on that appointment to get down to +0:15 or so and jump in a cab. What's my birthday? As of now, it is November 30, -0035. Tomorrow it will be December 1, -0035. A month from now it will be Jan 1, -0036. Super easy!

    4. Re:Ten Hour Days by burisch_research · · Score: 1

      Nice idea, but there's a big problem with that: The second is an SI unit. Changing it to a different value would require either an ugly fudge factor, or require changing the entire metric system. Either way metric depends on the second being the duration it is!

      --
      char*f="char*f=%c%s%c;main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}";main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}
    5. Re:Ten Hour Days by revjd909 · · Score: 1

      What's my birthday? As of now, it is November 30, -0035. Tomorrow it will be December 1, -0035. A month from now it will be Jan 1, -0036. Super easy!

      I'm wondering if you're being intentionally dense here to construct a strawman, or misunderstanding my proposal. My hope is the latter. Your birthday will always be the same in absolute terms (November 30,1970 CE, or whatever). Your personal calendar could show your birthday either in absolute time just like it does now, or in countdown/up terms relating the moment of its passing with the present moment.

      --
      *** once i really listened, the noise just went away. -liz phair
    6. Re:Ten Hour Days by revjd909 · · Score: 1

      Nice idea, but there's a big problem with that: The second is an SI unit. Changing it to a different value would require either an ugly fudge factor, or require changing the entire metric system. Either way metric depends on the second being the duration it is!

      Thank you for that information. I did not know that. From our trustworthy wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_System_of_Units): "Because the SI is not static, units are created and definitions are modified through international agreement among many nations as the technology of measurement progresses, and as the precision of measurements improves."

      I'm sure they knew what they were doing when they agreed in 1967 to define a second as the duration of 9,192,631,770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the caesium 133 atom.(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second) Though IMHO, it sure would be nice to be able to define a second as 1/100,000th of a day, something everyday people can grok. But of course, the "day" tends to change ever-so slightly in length each year. I can imagine people who need high degrees of scientific precision asking each other, "Are you talking about seconds in terms of today, or a year ago?"

      But creating a calendar system has *always* been a big hassle with always a little bit of fudge factor. For everyday people, 1/100000th of a mean solar day would be fine, and it wouldn't make a significant difference to anything people regularly measure, even a 100m dash run this year versus 20 years from now. The Earth's rotation slows only about 0.002 every 100 years.

      --
      *** once i really listened, the noise just went away. -liz phair
  81. Let's start small. by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    Let's do away with leap seconds first.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  82. interesting idea, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for 99% of people, time zones are rarely any issue to think about. How about we try to get rid of daylight savings first? Can't even do that...

  83. start with yourself first! by demmer · · Score: 0

    how about you and your colleagues on the other side of the world simply schedule meetings using utc? ... instant-non-confusion! ... meeting is at 10 utc ... call is at 22:30 utc ... put a utc clock on your desktop, buy a wristwatch with two zones and outlook converts the invitation to local time anyway ... done.

    you still use am/pm!? are stupid or something? the day has 24 hours. this and dst ware way more realistic things to get rid instead of forcing people to get up at 9pm in the morning and switch from eg. august 27th to 28th at 12pm during the first coffee break...

    jeeez... /.

  84. "First time accepted submitter" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope it's the last time as well.

  85. Not entirely dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A better question is why do countries have to legislate things like daylight savings time? And why do they have to come up with new days each year for a changeover? I can sympathise with people who don't want to each lunch at "2 am", but DST bullshit is not required for people who want to get up with the sun. The supposed economic benefits of one extra hour of sunlight are rubbish. It's just a make-work project for politicians and other busybodies.

  86. Good grief by sunking2 · · Score: 1

    If this mentioned post Columbine and 9/11 I would have thought Katz had returned. This is simple gibberish by someone who thinks they are smarter and more clever than they really are.

  87. Huh? by Hartree · · Score: 1

    Apparently Hairyfish's mom's basement has no windows. Maybe he should come up from it from time to time.

    Having a time that agrees with the appearance of the world consistently as you travel is a lot less confusing for most people. A given time now agrees with what activities people are doing across the world. At 8 am, you can bet that most people are doing morning related things even if in Bengal, or Botswana.

    With this proposal, I hear 0800 Z, I have to think what would someone in Auckland be doing, and would it be different than what someone in Angola would be doing.

    Unless, of course, you really want to synchronize activities and make some mow the lawn with night vision goggles, be my guest. Good luck with that.

    In communications in the military, I had to deal with using GMT (Z) to coordinate things across separated areas. It sucked. It sucked pond water.

    Yes, it would make dealing with the machines and networks easier, but the world is still more about people than the machines. At least for now.

  88. Not gonna happen by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

    Ugh, this is one of those silly ideas that lead to all those jokes about computer people having no social skills, living in the basement, etc.

    The only people that think about this are a small minority of computer geeks - a teeny, tiny fragment of the population. For the vast, VAST majority of humans... this will never even be something they'll spend more than a few seconds thinking about; and those few seconds will be when they're talking to a computer geek. There's no real benefit to the average human in switching to UTC - instead, it would probably be more trouble for them.

    Those supposed "benefits" to frequent travellers... right now, lunchtime is around noon most places. So you fly some random distance, and someone wants to have a lunch meeting or a working dinner - unless they tell you what time that is, you're not going to have a clue. You say "of course they'd tell you what time the meeting is"... well, that's the same thing that happens right now, so there's no real UTC advantage there. If you need to schedule things in advance (say you're arranging a conference that's significantly far away from you), you'll need to figure out what the time-zone-equivalent time shift is to that location so you can schedule meals, select reasonable conference room reservation times, and the like.

    Bottom line is - time zones aren't an arbitrary creation. They exist because they match how we tend to function. For most people they're actually advantageous.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Not gonna happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, I don't think there's any real benefit to the idea. But I'm also not too worried about anyone else knowing that I've considered it briefly. I don't bring up every /. article I read at the dinner table or at work around the water cooler.

  89. Ending time zones adds more complexity too by mysidia · · Score: 1

    Why aren't we doing it? Because it's a lot more complicated than the author makes it out to be.

    First of all... many people are not that bright, and the DST proposition doesn't work at all.. the workday is something like a de-facto standard. If you don't change the clock, the complexity of people having to remember every day for 6 months, that they now need to get at work at a different time creates all sorts of chaos. It's a lot easier for _everyone_ to have to know to change their clocks, and the change to the start/end of their work day is IMPLIED by the time rather than decided by each individual company.

    A decision to eliminate time zones and DST, is essentially a decision to eliminate changes of school work start/end times at various times of the year (not that I am saying that I oppose the elimination of DST, on the contrary, DST is kind of silly IMO)

    Time zones provide us with consistency, especially for travellers. Wherever you go you just change your clock, and the timing of daily customs such as lunch or work will be at similar predictable times displayed on the clock. The time change alone lets you know what times correspond to morning, afternoon, evening, and night.

    Speaking of "afternoon"; the term becomes a little bit meaningless if time zones are eliminated.

  90. Is this guy from the UK: where local time == GMT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't figure out the time difference between timezones? Perhaps consider a less taxing job (burger flipper) that doesn't require that you communicate with anyone in a different timezone.

    Let's meet for lunch at 4am and discuss it. But prepare to wait a while as I'll be sleeping at 4am (local time).

  91. I'm OK with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because it will piss off Americans.

  92. amen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    amen! I've been saying this for a while now. Time zones are useless and arbitrary and, worse, confusing!

    The convention of having the sun directly overhead at noon is merely a convention. It could just as easily be the convention, say in Phoenix AZ, to have the sun directly overhead at 7pm UTC.

    Time zones are a relic of a society in which information was not immediately accessible. So it was very reasonable for regions to normalize their time on their frame of reference to the sun.

    We now live in a society where information travels instantly and our clocks can synch without us even intervening. time zones, and DST, just add arbitrary complications to that system.

    Hip Hip Hooray to globalization, fellow earthlings!

  93. Zulu time is useful for telephony by tepples · · Score: 1

    The vast majority of people have never been inside an airplane

    Which incidentally is also why a global web of trust hasn't been proven practical. Local key signing parties lead to local webs of trust, with bottlenecks in the trust flow through those people who do travel internationally.

    and have no need for such silliness.

    Not necessarily. With foreign call centers becoming common, telephone calls between India and Indiana need some sort of common time reference.

    1. Re:Zulu time is useful for telephony by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. With foreign call centers becoming common, telephone calls between India and Indiana need some sort of common time reference.

      The caller doesn't have to know where the call centre is located. Caller uses their local time; call centre just puts up a clock set to their caller's time. After that it's just a matter of routing callers from one time zone to one group of operators, callers from another time zone to another group. And as time zones are geographic, that's easy to do. Problem solved. And I would expect it works like that in practice already.

    2. Re:Zulu time is useful for telephony by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      and have no need for such silliness.

      Not necessarily. With foreign call centers becoming common, telephone calls between India and Indiana need some sort of common time reference.

      Yes, but it's an assymetrical relationship. The call centres have to adjust to the customer. I don't have to think what time it is in India before calling my phone provider, because they've given me a contract that specifies contact hours in my time. If you think the offshore call centre industry is unpopular now, imagine what people would say if it ran on Indian office hours....

      HAL

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  94. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by Dthief · · Score: 1

    " let's just not all times in GMT .

    the only part of your comment related to time zones is completely incomprehensible

    --
    www.RacquetUp.org - Helping Detroit Youth
  95. Because it's a stupid idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What kind of stupid question is this? We have evolved over millions of years to be diurnal animals for starters. So who gets to have 9 AM as 9AM local time? How will a person in Japan know it's totally inappropriate to call someone in England? Maybe if you got outside once in a while, you'd realize how the position of The Sun in the sky affects a person's internal clock. Maybe you'd realize why they came up with local time in the first place.

  96. Yes we still need time zones... by RL78 · · Score: 1

    It's more important that what a day is be the same across the globe not what the hour is. Like you said, our time is relative to the where the sun is in the sky. It makes perfect sense.

  97. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by siride · · Score: 1

    You know a changeover to metric isn't that simple.

  98. Inertia by wagr · · Score: 1

    I personally would love it. I hate arranging conference calls only to have one person miss, no matter how I phrase the invites. "That's 9 am Mountain time, which is 11 am for you, Steve." Means Steve will call me at 7:10 Mountain time and say, "Where is everyone?"

    But why not: Inertia. TV producers will bandy about some straw man like, "Shows are used to delaying by an hour for Central, two for Mountain, and the odd hour out for the West. The common announcement that "x will be shown at y:00, z:00 West Coast" will have to be changed to "x will be shown at y:00, y-1:00 Central, y-2:00 Western, and some other time West Coast." The additional seconds it takes to say that will result in less advertising which will destroy our economy." That cable, satellite, DVR, and streaming have already made that argument pointless will not be understood by said producers or the politicians who listen to them.

    Besides, enough voters don't understand. Remember, we're smart and in the minority.

    1. Re:Inertia by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

      I personally would love it. I hate arranging conference calls only to have one person miss, no matter how I phrase the invites. "That's 9 am Mountain time, which is 11 am for you, Steve." Means Steve will call me at 7:10 Mountain time and say, "Where is everyone?"

      Solved in meatware. 1. "Steve, call me at 11 a.m., your time." Why burden him with what time it is for you if he's that dumb?
      Solved in software. 1. Schedule meeting in Outlook, or your software of choice 2. Outlook e-mails invitees with the start time wherever they are.

      But why not: Inertia. TV producers will bandy about some straw man like, "Shows are used to delaying by an hour for Central, two for Mountain, and the odd hour out for the West. The common announcement that "x will be shown at y:00, z:00 West Coast" will have to be changed to "x will be shown at y:00, y-1:00 Central, y-2:00 Western, and some other time West Coast." The additional seconds it takes to say that will result in less advertising which will destroy our economy." That cable, satellite, DVR, and streaming have already made that argument pointless will not be understood by said producers or the politicians who listen to them.

      Really? I would have thought that it's not because they're "used to" anything. The inertial problem surely exists because "prime-time" is when most people are sitting down watching, right? If they didn't delay for the different timezones, there'd be people who were still at work, or in bed when the "best" shows and most expensive ad slots were shown. Cable, satellite, DVR and streaming does not make any argument pointless unless everyone has them.

      Remember, we're smart and in the minority.

      Give them credit. The voters would understand that the existing system would be replaced by something which was just as arbitrary, had the same problems, would be costly and time-consuming to implement and which was completely new and foreign to them. 1. The minority you belong to is smaller than you think. 2. I'm not so sure it's all that smart.

  99. So when do people sleep? by jgreen1024 · · Score: 1

    "Got a meeting with colleagues on the other side of the world? 4 a.m. means 4 a.m. for everyone." Yeah, and I have no idea if anyone will be awake at 4 a.m. in that part of the world when I'm scheduling the meeting unless I consult my handy "sleeping hours around the world" chart. Or we can keep things the way they are now, where I know that 4 a.m. in India is a bad time to schedule a meeting.

  100. Agree, maybe use Internet time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree that we should use the same time, but while we're at it, we might aswell switch to a new time-value aswell.

    I hate that its swatch that have made this famous, but its a nice idea i think.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatch_Internet_Time

  101. 12 o'clock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ummm... there's no such thing as "12 a.m." or "12 p.m.". The "a.m." stands for "ante meridian" and the "p.m." stands for "post meridian." The "twelves" are precisely "at the meridians".

  102. How would this help? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When coordinating things across time zones, you still need to make sure the time you're picking is a time everyone is awake. You'd still have to consult some sort of table or map to figure out what 1pm means in the areas you're dealing with. When you move significantly east or west, you'd have to adjust what 2pm means for you, rather than just moving the dial on your watch. That seems more difficult conceptually. I'm not sure how this saves any time or in any way benefits anyone.

  103. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by interval1066 · · Score: 1

    Yeah yeah, mistype. I guess it takes a genius to figure it out.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  104. Time zones were created to fix local noon by DragonHawk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Submitter gets it wrong anyway. From TFS: "Time zones are a relic of the past, when different parts of the world were isolated, and 12 p.m. was whenever the sun was directly above your specific location."

    Um, no. Time zones were *created* to deal with the problem of local noon being whenever the sun was directly above your specific location. That's what the world used for thousands of years, until rapid transit and communications made that impractical. With the coming of railroads, for the first time, people were frequently outrunning the sun. Time zones became a necessity. You can't have a rail time table if everybody's clock is different.

    Also, I think the proposal is just moving the problem around. Currently we have to think, "Okay, they're 3 hours ahead of me, so 9 AM here is 12 PM there." With this proposal, we'd have to think, "Okay, they're 3 hours ahead of me, so when I'm starting work they're going to lunch".

    And nobody's stopping anyone from doing everything on UTC. I know at least one person who sets his schedule that way.

    DST -- as others have said -- that we can do without.

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
    1. Re:Time zones were created to fix local noon by swalve · · Score: 1

      Agree. The problem with time zones is knowing what time it is in other places (bedtime, lunchtime, Miller Time, etc.). Not what the clock says. Timezones are how we figure out whether we are calling during dinner or not.

    2. Re:Time zones were created to fix local noon by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      What this proposal fixes is the ambiguity that occurs when someone says, "call me at 1pm". Right now, you have to guess which time zone they're talking about, and if it's theirs, you have to convert that to your local time zone. With this proposal, you don't have to guess or calculate anything.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    3. Re:Time zones were created to fix local noon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The railroads were responsible for organizing time zones.

    4. Re:Time zones were created to fix local noon by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If they tell me to call at 1pm, I'll call them at 1pm. 1pm my time that is. If it's 3am for him, he will sure as hell learn the lesson to include the time zone if he happens to be in a different one.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:Time zones were created to fix local noon by gstrickler · · Score: 1

      dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
      I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.

      So your email domain is "iname..com"?

      P.S. I like the sig.

      --
      make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
    6. Re:Time zones were created to fix local noon by gstrickler · · Score: 1

      So, your contention is that this proposal is to address stupidity? You can't fix stupid.

      --
      make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
    7. Re:Time zones were created to fix local noon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't have a rail time table if everybody's clock is different.

      The Russian rail system (spanning about UTC+2 through UTC+11) ditched time zones in favour of using Moscow time on all its time tables. Not that their time tables mean much...

    8. Re:Time zones were created to fix local noon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What this proposal fixes is the ambiguity that occurs when someone says, "call me at 1pm". Right now, you have to guess which time zone they're talking about, and if it's theirs, you have to convert that to your local time zone. With this proposal, you don't have to guess or calculate anything.

      Sure, if someone says "call me at 19:00" then you wouldn't have to guess or calculate anything. But if they don't give you a time to call then you need to know their schedule. What time do they work? What time do they sleep? And for travellers it'd be a complete nightmare - instead of simply setting your watch to the new timezone you'd have to memorise the local schedule.

    9. Re:Time zones were created to fix local noon by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      But if they don't give you a time to call then you need to know their schedule. What time do they work? What time do they sleep?

      You have to remember these anyway. Not everyone keeps to the same schedule.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    10. Re:Time zones were created to fix local noon by crankyspice · · Score: 1

      And nobody's stopping anyone from doing everything on UTC.

      Indeed, every time I go flying I have to convert local time to Zulu (UTC) time for everything - flight plans, ATC communication, log entries...

      --
      geek. lawyer.
    11. Re:Time zones were created to fix local noon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Railroads made the problem acute, yes. But it was because their destinations were far enough away to routinely cross what are now time zones (such that the departing and arriving local-noons were appreciably different), not that they outran the sun. The day/night terminator sweeps across earth's surface at 1000mph.

    12. Re:Time zones were created to fix local noon by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      And nobody's stopping anyone from doing everything on UTC. I know at least one person who sets his schedule that way.

      I did that myself for several years. I liked it, overall, but it sometimes got confusing. The best thing was that it eliminated Daylight Saving Time! :)

    13. Re:Time zones were created to fix local noon by EdIII · · Score: 2

      DST -- as others have said -- that we can do without.

      It would not have been so bad if they did not change the fucking rules.

      It's so damn complex now that I have software settings that allow me to specify the exact date and time that DST starts and ends.

      That's the real problem. Consistency. How much hardware is out there with firmware not able to handle the change? I'm not shocked that legislators could not figure out that they were screwing everybody over that had hardware and software that did not allow you to change the DST start and end date.

    14. Re:Time zones were created to fix local noon by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      With this proposal, we'd have to think, "Okay, they're 3 hours ahead of me, so when I'm starting work they're going to lunch"

      And that's a perfect example of why timezones are important! Businesses and places like the Post Office will still be open 9-5, but the hours will be different for each timezone. They're not going to be the same hours on the east coast as the west coast, and they definitely wouldn't say they're open 13:42 - 21:42 if they're part way between time zones.

      The lines would still exist even if everyone was running off the same clock time.

    15. Re:Time zones were created to fix local noon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you can, but people frown on the large-scale use of high explosives, particularly in urban areas.

    16. Re:Time zones were created to fix local noon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only 1? You must not know anyone in the military.... of course we call it zulu time not UTC... but really the same deal. Makes sense really. Oh you wanted the bomb droped at 1 am local your time not 1 am our time? My bad.

    17. Re:Time zones were created to fix local noon by story645 · · Score: 1

      Right now, you have to guess which time zone they're talking about

      Or ask, which is what any sensible person would do.

      --
      open source modern art: laser taggi
    18. Re:Time zones were created to fix local noon by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      You can't fix stupid.

      and it's stupid to try.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    19. Re:Time zones were created to fix local noon by findoutmoretoday · · Score: 1

      <quote><p>If they tell me to call</p></quote>

      But they don't,  "Don't Call Us, We'll Call You"

    20. Re:Time zones were created to fix local noon by supertrinko · · Score: 1

      "Come over and meet me for lunch". Suddenly you've got to remember what time other areas have lunch. It's replacing one problem for another.

      --
      If it rhymes it must be true.
    21. Re:Time zones were created to fix local noon by Sancho · · Score: 2

      It's definitely a meatspace problem. I think another part of the problem is when people don't think about timezones. If I'm on the west coast, and I have a conference call on the east coast, and they schedule it for 11am, whose time zone is it? If they don't specify, I assume that they mean 11am their time. I assume this because if they went to the trouble of correcting the time for my time zone, I would expect them to also specify the time zone--most problems of this sort stem from people not thinking about it. But then I've assumed this and been wrong before, with someone correcting for my time but not telling me that.

      Then, of course, there are times when someone says "CST" but they really mean "CDT". At least I've never seen that problem vice versa.

      What all of this really means is that time is a difficult problem to solve, and I don't think there is one universal way to manage time that would be best for everyone.

    22. Re:Time zones were created to fix local noon by kenstcyr · · Score: 1

      It's even more wrong. If you are still clumping several longitudes into one-hour blocks, you are still using time zones, they just all say the same time.

      --
      "That machine has got to be destroyed...."
    23. Re:Time zones were created to fix local noon by sorcerykid · · Score: 1

      Timezones are an absolute necessity not just for global communication. If we eliminate timezones, it still does not obviate the need for a local standard to ensure effective interaction. Imagine if every city were then entitled to define a new standard by which its general populous is expected to adhere.

      So in Los Angeles businesses would arbitrarily open an hour earlier than San Diego and two hours earlier than San Francisco, simply because the City of Los Angeles decided to establish 0:00 to 8:00 as the operational day for city government. Thus we've come full circle by obfuscating the system of measurement that was designed specifically to simplify our lives in both a local and global context.

      --Randall

  105. Because timezones are fucking simple by nedlohs · · Score: 1

    And only a complete moron would get confused by them.

  106. No confusion ever again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ORLY?

    Haha! "flooded" was my Captcha word during Hurricane Irene.

  107. Lines Please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it might mess up my ability to plan ahead for a couple of weeks, but I hardly think it would be a major life adjustment. I wonder how much infrastructure and non-digital resources are committed to the current system in terms of how much it would cost to update. The cost and coordination are reasons not to get rid of the time zones for me.

    But my buggaboo has to do with the political nature of how the lines were drawn for the various zones in the first place. it looks like some sort of crazy gerrymandered district on a global scale. And some countries, like China, appear to be throwing a big middle finger to the rest of us (all of China is only 1 zone).
    http://i.imgur.com/CHRsP.jpg

  108. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1

    In that case, a gradual change (rather than no change at all) would probably be the solution.

    --
    Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
  109. I actually had this idea about 10 years ago... by arwild01 · · Score: 1

    I argued with all of my friends about it and they all thought I was an idiot. :) Since then we've had a major change to when DST (at least in the US) takes affect which makes the problem just worse.

    That said, I doubt we could convince the world to change, but for those of us that routinely communicate with friends/colleagues around the world... timezones only complicate the matter.

  110. Not an issue -- it has already begun by SlithyMagister · · Score: 1

    It is ALREADY being done in many spheres of commerce.
    Aviation and Poker, for example.
    Those who categorize the idea as "stupid" appear as luddites.
    Or perhaps they have a hard time adding or subtracting numbers < 25 in their heads.
    Who is calling who stupid?
    We all got used to the metric system -- it took barely a year -- and the benefits will last forever.
    Like all things human, time measurement and display will evolve, and there will always be luddites who will rant against whatever it evolves to.

    All of the poker rooms I deal with use GMT -4 (Eastern Time, I think), so everyone ELSE is already using a world wide time standard
    With aviation, they use UTC (symbol Z), which is roughly equal to GMT

  111. Is this a joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    try {
          {POST}
    } catch (ToMuchWeedException tmwe) {
            tmwe.printStackTrace();
    }

  112. Stop catering to the lowest common denominator by Oyjord · · Score: 1

    Stop catering to the lowest common denominator.

    If people are too stupid to understand time zones, then don't change time zones, change the stupid people (via education).

    1. Re:Stop catering to the lowest common denominator by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      Getting rid of time zones would require the entire world population to vastly revise their understanding of time. That is not the kind of solution that caters to stupid people.

  113. To make the trains run on time by tepples · · Score: 1

    Wasn't time based on the rotation of the earth and the relative position of the sun in the sky?

    It was. Now it's based most closely on cesium, with occasional corrections called leap seconds to meet the rotation of the earth.

    The hours of the day were tracked long before people started setting up multiple time zones

    In fact, I seem to remember reading that time zones (as opposed to high noon being at a different minute for each quarter degree of longitude) were invented to set railroad schedules.

    the average person [...] probably never interacts with someone in a significantly different time zone (i.e. on the other side of the world).

    That's because the median person (by average, did you mean mean or median?) by wealth lives in a developing country and thus has little need for customer service in an offshore call center. Unless, of course, you choose a measure of wealth that puts the median person in India.

    1. Re:To make the trains run on time by John3 · · Score: 1

      In fact, I seem to remember reading that time zones (as opposed to high noon being at a different minute for each quarter degree of longitude) were invented to set railroad schedules.

      Yes, British rail specifically.

      That's because the median person (by average, did you mean mean or median?) by wealth lives in a developing country and thus has little need for customer service in an offshore call center. Unless, of course, you choose a measure of wealth that puts the median person in India.

      Yes, you're correct, I forgot about call centers. However, by interact I meant in some coordinated fashion where a UTC would be advantageous. For example, if I was calling Mastercard customer service there is no need for me to notify Michael in India that I will be calling him at a specific time. However, if my daughter is traveling to India then a UTC might help since we could arrange to speak at 04:30 UTC and not have to figure out how many hours ahead or behind she is when traveling.

      As far as "mean" versus "median", I meant average as in Joe Six-Pack (for the US) and his/her equivalent in the rest of the world. The vast majority of the human population is born, grows up, and dies within a very small geographic radius and never travels beyond that radius. I live in the NY metro area, and have traveled a decent amount (Canada, Mexico, all of the US and Alaska, and several trips to Europe) but sadly that type of travel is really the exception among people I know. So for most Americans a time-zone difference never really goes beyond 3 hours (NY to CA) which is relatively manageable.

      --
      "We make our world significant by the courage of our questions and by the depth of our answers." Carl Sagan
    2. Re:To make the trains run on time by Dinghy · · Score: 1

      Wasn't time based on the rotation of the earth and the relative position of the sun in the sky?

      It was. Now it's based most closely on cesium, with occasional corrections called leap seconds to meet the rotation of the earth.

      Close. It's measured using cesium, but it's still based on the relative position of the sun in the sky. Were it truly based on cesium, there would be no need for those leap seconds to bring the "time" and the position of the sun back in agreement.

  114. Indiana has it's own issues with how things are no by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Indiana has it's own issues with how things are now and they where messed up even more in the past and now to try some like this will just mess them even more for some time. At least now all of the state uses daylight saving time.

  115. It would kill the Hollywood Western by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can you imagine what would happen to Hollywood if there will never be a "high noon" in the American Southwest ever again?

  116. Elasticity by neurosine · · Score: 1

    The metric system is still slowly and painfully gaining foothold in the US. Sure, what you're saying makes sense for cosmopolitans, but most of the world isn't even remotely there yet.

  117. This wouldn't solve the coordination problem by CalSolt · · Score: 1

    Because you still have to figure out during what hours your colleagues on the other side of the world are asleep and at work. You'd probably have to look up the conversion to local solar time anyway to figure this out.

  118. Most US citizens don't even have a passport! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your statement "the average person does very little traveling, very little interaction with people outside their time zone, and probably never interacts with someone in a significantly different time zone (i.e. on the other side of the world)." is shockingly correct

    The quick answer is: Yes, most Americans do not have a passport. The number of Americans who have a passport, according to the most recent statistics issued by the State Department in January of 2011, is 114,464,041.

    Given the country’s population of 307,006,550, about 37% of the population has one. This means that nearly 2 out of 3 Americans can’t even fly to Canada, let alone travel to anywhere else in the world (new rules allow those with “Passport Cards” to travel to Canada, Mexico and the Caribbean and Bermuda, but they are not allowed to be used for international air travel. There are about 3.5 million Americans who have this card.)

    http://www.theexpeditioner.com/2010/02/17/how-many-americans-have-a-passport-2/

    I believe this explains a lot of the strangely insular nature of American politics.

    1. Re:Most US citizens don't even have a passport! by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      However, how does having a passport correlate to using it often? Also, how many Americans without passports travel a lot domestically (which is easier to do to a large extent in a bigger country)

      might still be an issue, but from some other factor

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  119. 3 p.m. now means 3 p.m. for everyone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    3 PM means 3 o'clock post midi/past midday. One thing is asking ask a stupid question about getting rid of timezones, another is asking a stupid question about getting rid of time zones without thinking it through first. For starters you'd use a 24-hour clock now rather than the braindead ambiguous AM/PM thing. If you're going to propose a new standard that everyone is supposed to live by, you might as well come up with one that's genuinely better than the current one, perhaps one that fits better within metric thinking? Make 100 seconds a minute, 100 minutes an hour and make a day 100 hours long. Those 8-hour working days are sounding better by the metric minute!

  120. Because you are an idiot? by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

    Sure, I'm going to easily remember that lunch time here is 4pm and somewhere else it is at 6am. Get a grip. At least I can guess at the right time zones to convert here to there.

  121. 4PM? For chickens? by waldoj · · Score: 1

    What kind of weird-ass chickens do you have? This time of year, it's too hot to be feeding them at 4pm. They eat in the morning and again around 7pm.

  122. you are joking by maverickjesterx · · Score: 1

    The author is clearly a JACKASS. See what is going to become of the web site ROB!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  123. Metric Time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Divide the day into 10 hours, then you have smaller decihours, centihours, millihours, etc.

    It'll become just something else for Americans to scoff and ignore.

  124. If that's how you want it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, this is a great idea, as long as GMT is changed to my local time so 12 noon is still 12 noon for me, and you set your clocks to my time. In other news we should go Metric, every inch of the way.

  125. I Agree, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even the military can't figure out how to use UTC. I'd LOVE to switch everyone over (and I run my watch on UTC anyway, so it'd be more convenient for me for sure), but this is a great idea who's time has definitely not yet come.

  126. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by zixxt · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The metric system is NOT metric is a totally superior system in every way. Its not even as good as the Babylonian base 60.

    "The metric system, being decimal, is not well-suited to working
            with fractions. Officially, you aren't even supposed to say
            "1/3 meter," but rather "333 milliliters." For everyday uses, such
            as cooking, it is much more natural to use fractions.

            Metric units are not always appropriate amounts for convenient
            use. The 2-liter bottle seems to have become "natural," but if you
            want to buy a single drink, it's easier to say "a pint" or even "a
            12-ounce cup" rather than "400 milliliters." The metric system's
            rigidity prevents designing units for convenience.

            These practical issues lead to the use of "folk units" alongside
            the official metric units, which can lead to conflict when laws
            are too rigid."

    --
    ---- GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  127. Works for me! by bennetts2 · · Score: 1

    I think this is a great idea!
    I live in the UK, so GMT is fine for me. You can all use my timezone.

    I wonder how many people that support this live *outside* of Europe...

    --
    SteveB
  128. You go right ahead. by PinchDuck · · Score: 1

    Lead by example.

  129. The local meaning of time by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    The concept of local time is too ingrained in language and culture to be replaced in every-day usage. It's hard enough to convince many Americans to join the twentieth century and adopt the metric system; and you want people to cope with the idea of "midday" meaning 0700 in New York, 0400 in Los Angeles and 2200 in Sydney? This would at most work in military or international business contexts.

  130. i dont see how its any easier by rrossman2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Either way, you have to know where you are to determine when stuff happens.

    For example, I'm on the east coast. I travel to California, set my clock back 3 hours (or for a cell phone it adjusts its self possibly.. some phones do some don't). I still know stores open at 8 or 10 am.. lunch is at 12, done working at 5.. stores close at 9.. etc.

    Now with the op's idea.. I have to constantly remember the stores open at 5am or 7am, lunch is at 9am, done working at 2pm, stores close at 6pm.. how is that *any easier*? Instead of changing one factor and the rest fall in place, you're now keep that one the "the same" and having to remember to adjust *all* of the rest that are typically a given constant.
    And if you can't figure out UTC +/- then you have other issues.

    1. Re: i dont see how its any easier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And more than that, when I schedule a phone call with out-of-country coworker I still need to consult some sort of chart of local times for them to know when they'll be at work.

      You might not call it timezones, but it will be the same. Even worse, when I trave to visit them, instead of setting my alarm clock for 7am so I can look all professional, now I need to consult the same time chart to figure out when to set my alarm. The OP suggestion would remove one problem, replace it with a differently named problem that functions the same, and add other problems as well.

      By all means, get rid of DST, but don't make life worse in the process.

    2. Re: i dont see how its any easier by staalmannen · · Score: 1

      On the other hand we are moving to a 24/7 society where people work different hours (the typical "office hours" are hopefully a thing of the past, including the two traffic jams in the morning and evening). Some countries are clearly ahead of others. As a Swede I still can not get over that they are closing all shops around 18 or 19 o'clock here in Belgium (and they are closed on Sundays!). For me, it will be very liberating when I can choose when to work and when to do shopping etc instead of moving along with the herd. In that society we also do not need a local time.

    3. Re: i dont see how its any easier by hairyfish · · Score: 1

      Not sure if you've traveled much, but generally shops in every country are open during the day. If it's not night time, there's a good chance the shops are open. if it's recently been day time but now it's not, and you're hungry, then it's probably dinner time. If you're tired, you go to sleep. It is possible to function without a machine to tell you when to do things.

    4. Re: i dont see how its any easier by Mr+Europe · · Score: 1

      Either way, you have to know where you are to determine when stuff happens.

      Naturally.

      And if you can't figure out UTC +/- then you have other issues.

      Equals to "can't figure time" ?

      The work day is "not 9 to 5" in all countries. In here its 8 to 4.

      It would make it much easier to calculate the flight duration reading the time table.
      It would be easy to check whether that shop located on the other coast is open or not. Just see their add and glimpse your watch.
      Without DST it would be easy to check whether the guys are at work on our far-away-office.

  131. What a .... by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    Stupid rant.
    There are many many reason why it would be at least as confusing if you did the change over.
    Sure it would be easy to tell people continents apart what time to have a meeting, but far harder to figure out if you are asking one of your peers to get up in the middle of the night or stay through lunch.
    now you know what it happening in other countries based on the time, dawn is around 6-9am (based on the time of year), lunch at noon-ish, a normal working day is around 9-5, the day ends at midnight.

    This obvious would be a benefit to someone who lives in their basement and has simply stopped living by the sun, but that does not mean that it would not make everything more confusing for the vast majority.

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  132. Talk to Swatch by magusnet · · Score: 1

    Swatch did this for us already back in 1998. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatch_Internet_Time

    --magusnet

  133. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by interval1066 · · Score: 1

    I didn't say it would be simple, tons of arguments against, I'm sure. But anyone with a modicum of intelligence would have to agree that metric is the superior system. If we'd started the change over in the 60's like we were supposed to it wouldn't have been a mess that it is today.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  134. Asperger logic by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    Asperger logic at work here. Highly logical but completely unrealistic. Simply set how many people would benefit of a UTC only scheme against the people for which it would be really annoying and you'll understand. Essentially life is mainly is about being off-line. About having lunch at noon. Waking up some time between 6 and 9 am. Dining between 8 and 10 pm. Etc... You really want to sacrifice that in order to meet the whims of a hand full of geeks and business men?

    As for Asperger, I've come up with enough crappy ideas where I realised that some of my perceived logic simply doesn't fit humanity.

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    1. Re:Asperger logic by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      Stuff that seems logical to me that doesn't actually work? I have most definitely been there done that.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  135. Re:If you want to get up an hour early in the summ by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

    Waking up earlier won't give me more free time in the evening, nor would it open restaurants and other places earlier.

    If the majority of people are okay with it, then maybe you should just get up later.

    And if each establishment could open and close as it pleases, then how would you like it if shops, banks and post offices only opened when you are sleeping? It's not a big deal to me, but I know that they'll get a lot of complaints.

  136. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...but if you want to buy a single drink, it's easier to say "a pint" or even "a 12-ounce cup" rather than "400 milliliters."

    What's wrong with saying 4 deciliters?

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  137. Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, right after we finish the switch to metric!

  138. The Soviet Union Tried This by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 1

    Enough said.

  139. even stupider ideas exist... by mevets · · Score: 1

    How about fixing time around the more experiential notion of sunrise and sunset. On every day of the year the sun would rise at 6am, and set at 6pm. Noon and midnight would be the other midpoints.

    In this model, the discreet unit of time is not 'fixed', rather it is determined by geographic and 'solar' location. No need for DST or TimeZones per se, rather a continuous function over the globe.

    It would have been 'hard' with mechanical gears for tracking time, but we have better mechanisms available.

    1. Re:even stupider ideas exist... by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Wow, you are right, that is an even stupider idea than doing away with timezones!. Not only would the length of an hour vary from day to day, but an hour between sunset and sunrise would be a different length than an hour between sunrise and sunset.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    2. Re:even stupider ideas exist... by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      .... you do realize that time zones were invented specifically because of the logistical nightmare that your suggestion creates?

    3. Re:even stupider ideas exist... by mevets · · Score: 1

      well, first I thought the subject line says it all; but even ignoring that, we have technology at our service to make such an idea quite feasible.

      It would require a shift in thinking. It would make technology - clocks, computers, watches - subservient to our needs, instead of the status quo.

      It is obvious from the entire discussion that the nerd crowd has considerable difficultly handling dates - who would have guessed that?
      Perhaps part of the curriculum should include a course on what the purpose of a date is, how to treat a date, and how to make your date handling repeatable (in a good way). I don't think it could hurt.

    4. Re:even stupider ideas exist... by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      Nononono.

      What you want to do is get rid of this wacky 24*60*60 system and use the natural and obvious scale -- degrees. Midnight is zero, midday is 180. We wouldn't need really accurate clocks any more because the iPhone has GPS and we could write an app that operates as a sextant and so you can recalibrate the clock to the sun every day.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    5. Re:even stupider ideas exist... by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      That's how the Romans did things, but they went from the 1st hour when sun rose, to the 12th hour when it set, and didn't number night time hours because the sundial didn't work when it was dark.

      The problem is that people use the difference between start and finish time to work out how long something takes, and that would be a lot more difficult with the Roman system.

    6. Re:even stupider ideas exist... by lewiscr · · Score: 1

      Degrees are unnatural, use Radians (preferably in tau, not pi). Then to make things easier, we can subdivide tau into 24th pieces, and everybody can say "The time is currently 12 tau twenty-fourths." Then the lazy sods will probably create an abbreviation for tau/24, probably something silly like "o'clock".

  140. THE SUN MATTERS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd argue that the position of the sun overhead is more important than the fact humans keep time. The position of the sun overhead greatly impacts the temperature, visual range, and weather. I guess if one is in a downtown area, inside, and conducting business via communication networks, the what happens outside does not effect you, but the same could be said if you lived underground on the moon. The sun is not an abstraction, and very important. Ignore it at your peril.

  141. Re:Before we ditch timezone...Let's kill DST first by dgatwood · · Score: 1

    No big deal. Just choose some time zone where nobody lives as the standard world time. That way, 2200 hours isn't sunset for very many people. Problem solved. GMT-9 and GMT-10 are pretty good candidates.

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  142. To many more problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With 4 timezones in the US...you only have 4 different set of times you can support. Without timezones, everyone across the US will start syncing with when the sun is directly above, moving the time "Data points" from 4 to virtually infinite. So then figuring out time based on zipcode or some other point of location.

    If you need to call someone remotely...now you can say "Ohh it is 3am there, I will wait", if we switch it will be "Ohh it is 3am there...but are they generally awake or asleep? I hope google is right..."

    Plus if you travel, imagine going to a new country. We will have to have a time converter....for the frequent traveler, it is nice to know people go to work at 8, leave at 5 no matter where you are.

  143. Pretty easy for me beause by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    The field I'm in requires I pretty much live on UTC time. It's 20:25UTC at the moment. My workday runs from 13:00UTC to 21:00UTC. Lunch is at 16:00UTC. Much easier.

  144. bad idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of people are saying "most people only talk to people in their own timezone"... that's not the right objection to this idea.

    The issue is, it doesn't fix anything. It doesn't change the fact that the sun rises and sets at different times across the globe. Say I'm in London, and I want to call an associate in Melbourne. I know what time it is here, and with this new system, I know what "time" it is there... but I still need to know, how much sooner does the sun set over there? Will I be waking them up? So I still have to do a little math, and they'll still be thinking about dinner when I haven't had my coffee yet.

    Further, people aren't going to start saying "we open 2 hours after the sun comes up." They're still going to choose an on-the-hour time, and geographical areas are going to come to a de facto consensus about when the start of the workday is... and as you get farther west or east, as sunset starts to get closer or farther from that time, eventually an area's going to jump an hour. So, timezones. Sure, maybe those boundaries will be fuzzier than they are now... but if anything, that just confuses the issue and makes things more difficult to figure out.

  145. Time change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about we just get rid of daylight savings time?

    1. Re:Time change by sorcerykid · · Score: 1

      It's Daylight Saving Time. Even Slashdot can't get it right. Go to "Options" and it clearly says Daylight Savings Time.

      I laugh, and then I can't help but laugh some more. Even nerds can't get it right.

      --Randall

  146. How about unixtime? by guruevi · · Score: 1

    It's universally accepted (by computers) and easy to calculate with. If everybody used unixtime there wouldn't be any date conversion bugs (as Outlook is so famous for).

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  147. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by hde226868 · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...but if you want to buy a single drink, it's easier to say "a pint" or even "a 12-ounce cup" rather than "400 milliliters."

    What's wrong with saying 4 deciliters?

    or using what's done in most metric countries, namely use 250ml or 500ml ?

  148. Time Cube? by Chysn · · Score: 1

    Allow me to quote the only person to understand the issue:

    You can’t comprehend fact that Cube4 simultaneous 24 hour days rotate within same 24 hour rotation of Mother Earth. et cetera

    If I recall, there's some as-yet-unclaimed reward for disproving this. www.timecube.com.

    --
    --I'm so big, my sig has its own sig.
    -- See?
    1. Re:Time Cube? by wbean · · Score: 1

      Whoa! That's one of the weirder corners of the net. And there's even a second page.

  149. When is 12 equal to 0? by jabberw0k · · Score: 1

    Why is 11pm followed by 12am, and then 1 through 11am, and then 12pm? Shouldn't 12pm follow 11pm? The only sensible way surely is to have 0am..11am and then 0pm..11pm. Can anyone explain why 12 comes before 1?

    1. Re:When is 12 equal to 0? by amorsen · · Score: 0

      Yes, am/pm would make a tiny bit of sense if pm meant "add 12 hours". Alas, pm means "add 12 hours except don't do anything if the hour-number is 12" and am means "subtract 12 hours if the hour-number is 12, otherwise don't do anything". Clever.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    2. Re:When is 12 equal to 0? by coolmadsi · · Score: 1

      Why is 11pm followed by 12am, and then 1 through 11am, and then 12pm? Shouldn't 12pm follow 11pm? The only sensible way surely is to have 0am..11am and then 0pm..11pm. Can anyone explain why 12 comes before 1?

      My guess would be that, for example at midnight it turns into a new day (so it AM). It would have to be 12 AM because a minute later it will be 12:01 AM. The alternatives would be for it to be midnight as 12PM and 12:01 AM a minute later (which is strange as it switches based on the minute not the hour), or to redefine midnight as 1AM (which again would be strange - the hour is supposed to be the number of hours past midday/midnight).

  150. To early for Aprils fool by Sla$hPot · · Score: 1

    It was 23:00 in the morning when the post man woke me up. Wooooot!
    We could also skip time zones completely!
    Time should be determined by your exact longitude.
    This post shall also serve as the patent pending for the GPS enabled smart phone app. "every time".

    This might be a problem to the airforce though. Fighter pilot flight logs might be a litle bit difficult to enterpretate.

    CmdrTaco maaaaan?

  151. We sure can!! Change you clocks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Change you clocks to match mine you idiot!!! Your time is wrong and you should fix it. Now!

  152. This is stupid by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    From the stand point of lazy central planners or jet setters this is simplifier but its more complicated for everyone else. As we're talking about 10 percent of the population versus 90 percent it's very hard to understand why anyone would think this is a good idea.

    World travelers and centrally managed organizations have long ago adapted to managing multiple time zones. Local organizations do not need to generally because they assume everything is referenced to their time zone. Flipping that around helps nothing. How often do time zones really screw things up? Unless people are incompetent they're going to use an agreed upon reference.

    There's no reason to force everyone to do anything. If the government wants to use EST as their standard reference they're welcome to do it. People in PST or MST are well aware of that sort of thing and make accommodations for it.

    Here's a better question, because we have computers who cares since the computers can automatically compensate for time zone differences. Do people have electronic calenders? These things adjust for time zone already. So there's no need.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  153. So why aren't we doing it? by jgrahn · · Score: 1

    So why aren't we doing it?

    Because it would be a major inconvenience for the majority of people which only benefitted a tiny minority.

    I interact a lot with people over time zones, but it's either like Slashdot or mail (I post now, you reply later) or I need to know if you're at work, not what your wall clock says. So I still need to know what timezone you're in.

    The first situation doesn't need to be solved; the second one cannot be solved until you force half the planet to work night shifts.

  154. Sunrise tomorrow will be at ... by WebManWalking · · Score: 2

    ... 12:07 in Springfield, 12:08 in Arlington, 12:09 in Marystown, 12:10 in Winchester, 12:11 in Martinsburg, 12:12 Union City, 12:13 in St. Lawrence, ...

    1. Re:Sunrise tomorrow will be at ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ummm... that's pretty much how it is already. You don't think that the sun rises at exactly the same time across an entire time zone, do you?

  155. Pointless half-way house by Spudley · · Score: 1

    The suggestion as it's been put in the main article is pointless.

    The fact is we already have UTC (or GMT for those of us who still insist the British invented it so we ought to get to keep it), and it's perfectly easy for anyone in any country to use it. If you want to communicate with someone in another time zone, you are perfectly free to use UTC as a common reference point when deciding what time to meet.

    But while it does indeed work very well as a common reference point, it doesn't solve any of the practical issues of communicating between time zones. If I want to talk to someone in another country, we have to arrange it at a time when we're both going to be at the office -- or at the very least, when we're both going to be awake.

    The simple fact is that physics dictates that different parts of the world have different daylight hours, and biology dictates that people prefer to be awake during the daylight hours. There is nothing you can do that will change this; no amount of meddling with the time system will make it any easier to talk to someone on the other side of the world.

    Regarding the suggested adjustment for DST simply meaning that everyone adjusts their schedule by an hour while the clocks stay the same.... I can't even begin to describe how wonderfully naive this is. If it were really that simple, we wouldn't have invented DST in the first place.

    --
    (Spudley Strikes Again!)
    1. Re:Pointless half-way house by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      GMT and UCT are slightly different. GMT is based on the position of the sun at the Royal Observatory in Greenwich, London. UCT is calculated using an atomic clock, and a second is sometimes added or subtracted (usually added) every six months to keep it close to GMT. As most clocks don't deal with 61 second minutes, I guess they use something based on GMT rather than something based on UCT.

  156. timezones are here to stay by original+bit+basher · · Score: 1

    Time is a complex subject and nothing can make it simple. Sure, if you deal with local time things can be simple, but step into international times or high-precision measurements and you get complex. While the proposal to end time zones keeps popping up across the decades I've been tracking time keeping, I suspect that those who really work with time can have nightmares over it.

    Ignoring the inertia of an international timekeeping rule that has been in effect for over a century that was based on conventions going back millennium, any proposal involves revolts of both the masses and many techies who do the actual work. But ignoring all of that,

    1. If you force everyone to have a work cycle consistent around the world you will get revolts as most people like to get up near dawn and got to bed at night.
    2. If you let people get up at dawn after shifting the local dawn time numbers to a new standard you will still get revolts. Worse, you must now remember what the working hours are for each zone you contact as they are no longer 9-17 (yes, I support the 24-hour clock). Rather than simplifying your zone calculations you just added more work to the effort.

    Moon colonization and space habitats can be different due to the local day being non-existent or way different from earths.

  157. Re:If you want to get up an hour early in the summ by Splab · · Score: 1

    GP has a point, when you live in the north that extra hour in summer time actually gives us an additional hour in the evening - while it doesn't change the total hours of sun, it does give us the sun when we need it; that is, when we aren't sitting rotting in a cubicle.

  158. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by afabbro · · Score: 1

    metric is a totally superior system in every way but people don't want to recognize it because they are simply too lazy to change.

    Not every way - most ways. Fahrenheit is more accurate than Celsius and one degree Fahrenheit is the amount of temperature change humans can sense. Celsius just takes two arbitrary points for water and divides by 100.

    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
  159. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by pjt33 · · Score: 1

    For everyday uses, such as cooking, values are normally given in grams rather than fractions of a kilogram. For drinks, people buy a third of a litre or a half litre. People can adapt to almost any change: the problem isn't that the system doesn't work (or the rest of the world would have abandoned it) but that people don't like change.

  160. why UTC. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets use my timezone, UTC - 3:00.

    Could you make everyone agree to one timezone? And how? Voting?

  161. Let's change the dates! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While we are at it, let's switch to a metric calendar. Here is how it would work:

    13 x 28 = 364, so we would have 13 months with 28 days each.

    What about the 365th day? New Years Day. Doesn't even count as a weekday. Global vacation day. Call it Christmas if you'd like. It would also fall on the average of the Winter Solstice (Currently Dec 21st). The first month starts on the following day.

    Since 28 / 4 = 7, this would make Monday the 1st, 8th, 15th, and 22nd of every month. Why start the week on Monday instead of Sunday? Sunday is part of the weekEND.

    What about leap year day? It would fall on the Summer Solstice. Cuts the new month in half. Another holiday. Wiccans will love it. Let's start the Summer Olympics on that day.

    What would the new month be called. While we are at it, what would the other months be called. Are we going to spend eternity teaching school children how to spell February? For that matter, let's fix Wednesday too.

    What about lunar calendars? Since the lunar cycle is approximately 28 days, this calendar is a solar and lunar calendar. Muslims will love it. Works for Easter too. Men, you will also be able to predict when to avoid your wives and girlfriends.

    What about the signs of the Zodiac? They don't match the months anyway. Remap them.

    What about my birthday? We will remap it to the new calendar. No problem.

    Won't programmers have to adjust their code? This system makes their jobs much easier. Unix / Linux admins will be crying by 2032 if we don't rewrite the stack anyway.

    What about my paychecks, and bills. Paychecks every two weeks or twice per month would mean the same thing. Bills would come 13 times per year on a predictable schedule (don't complain - prices are rising anyway).

    Think about it, the only reason that we work within our accepted system is because we have not challenged our paradigm. Our current calendar makes little sense and was las modified by a dead pope (Gregory) and a Roman Caesar. All we need to do is collectively decide to change to something that makes more sense.

    1. Re:Let's change the dates! by Menkhaf · · Score: 1

      Brilliant.

      --
      A proud member of the Onion-in-Hand alliance
    2. Re:Let's change the dates! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid American. In some places the week starts on Friday, and winter is in June.

  162. Things that Suck by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    Daylight savings time sucks. I'd quite happily do away with that. I seem to recall that all it really does is makes people use more energy in the summertime. It DOES drive massive quantities of IT spending though (If Obama wanted to boost the economy he could just change DST rules 3 times in 1 year, and then do away with them completely.)

    Leap seconds really suck. Just give me a nice atomic clock that increments 1 second every 9.19 trillion radiations of a cesium atom (give or take a few hundred million) and I'll be happy. I really don't care if a day's .2 seconds shorter this year than last year. The Earth isn't the center of the universe, our time system should stop coddling it like it is!

    Relativity also sucks. It kind of sucks that the atomic clock on the mountain observatory doesn't agree with the one down on the beach anymore. I think we should dig Einstein up and sue him. Or make him fix it.

    POSIX time sucks goat balls. For a variety of reasons. Which I don't know you well enough to get into.

    Time zones kind of suck if you have to deal with people spread out across all of them. For the purposes of your interactions with them, you should agree that all official business should be conducted in a specific time zone, which everyone can then synchronize a clock to. GPS time is a good one. UTC is only a good one if you can agree on whether or not to use leap seconds. Otherwise people will be 34 (currently) seconds early or late depending on which way they go. Of course if you don't use leap seconds it's not really UTC, it's TAI, isn't it?

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  163. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

    The thing is that time of day is not the same everywhere.

    What I mean is: any measurement system can be used anywhere, my metric tape measure would work just as well in the US as it does in my country. A day is 24 hours long everywhere, so a 24 hour clock would work anywhere without any problem at all. Now, no measurement system is going to change the fact that when it's mid-day in one country it is midnight in another. You can deal with this two ways:

    1. (current) Assign midnight as 00:00, mid-day as 12:00 and split the world in time zones, so that 12:00 in each time zone means mid-day. Make one time zone the primary, tell all the others by their difference from the primary. To find out what time it is in another country, you need to add or subtract some time based on the difference between time zones.
    2. (proposed). Synchronize all clocks to the primary time zone. Now all the clocks show the same time, so mid-day in one country is at 12:00, in some other at 9:00 and in another at 00:00. Create a table of countries and the time of mid-day (or midnight) in each of them. You know what time it is in another country, but you still do not know if it's, say, business hours or not, so you now have to calculate the difference between your time-of-midnight and their time-of-midnight, then add or subtract it from the time on your clock to know what actual time, compared to you, is there.

    So, you have a system that is just as (if not more) complex, local time no longer corresponds to the position of the sun (without the calculations, anyway) and you gained absolutely nothing.

  164. come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most people aren't big fancy-pants globetrotters like you, ya fuckin retard.

  165. Laughable by mseeger · · Score: 1

    We didn't get rid of the a.m.-p.m. shit.

    We didn't squat the DST.

    We have Extra-Timezones (with fractional hour offsets) due to national pride.

    How do you expect something to go through that is farther reaching then abandoning all three above together.

    Yours, Martin

  166. Terrible for long-distance travel by superposed · · Score: 1

    This idea would solve one set of problems (synchronizing events across time zones or figuring out the local time while traveling), but would create a whole new set of problems for long-distance travelers.

    Currently people everywhere have a common set of expectations about what time the sun rises, when to eat meals, when to sleep, etc. If you travel to a new region, you change your clock once, and you're instantly slotted in to the local expectations. On the other hand, if we followed the proposal above, travelers would have to do timezone-type math for all these events every day.

    Say you travel from California to Japan. What time will the sun come up? Well, at home in California it comes up at 14:00 UTC. California is around 120 degrees W and Japan is around 138 degrees E, so Japan is about 360-258=102 degrees east of California. The sun travels 15 degrees per hour, so events will happen about 7 hours "later" in Japan than in California. Add 7 hours to 14:00 and you can expect the sun to come up around 21:00 UTC. Great. Now what time should you make a lunch appointment with a colleague? Usually in California you have lunch at 20:00 UTC, so add 7 hours, modulus 24 to get 03:00 UTC.

    It's a lot of work, but at least you'll know when to catch your flight home without adjusting your clock. You just won't know (without some math) whether that will be the middle of the night, first thing in the morning, etc.
    This does not strike me as easier than the current system.

  167. Uh no by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    If I need to send an email to someone before they leave the office at 5pm I need to know what time it is by them. Isn't that the whole point of time zones? They were formed because of commerce and communication with the telegraph. Shipping was disasterous when trying to give ETAs.

    It maybe only a number, but it is a number people all use at work and base it off of.

  168. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by interval1066 · · Score: 1

    That's part of the point. How necessary is it for you to know the exact position of the sun, if you know what time it is anyway? The position of the sun was wonderful for farmers and navigators who relied on the sun to do some technical things for their time. nowadays if I say I have an important meeting at 13:45, you need to be there, the position of the sun has nothing to do with it, and adds nothing to the accuracy of the time dimension.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  169. Re:Before we ditch timezone...Let's kill DST first by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 1

    DST is designed to create more jobs in the computer science fields... because we have to keep re-coding legacy systems to deal with it.

  170. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by newcastlejon · · Score: 2

    "The metric system, being decimal, is not well-suited to working with fractions.

    Half-metre, quarter-metre, third of a millimetre. It's easy. What you meant - I hope - was that some fractions don't represent an integer number of some smaller measurement. This can happen with imperial measures too; try telling me what one tenth of a foot is.

    Officially, you aren't even supposed to say "1/3 meter," but rather "333 millilitres."

    Officially? Pah. The only official proscription that would apply here is against a millilitre being a subdivision of a metre. Apart from that there's no reason you can't ask for a half-litre of something, like beer.

    For everyday uses, such as cooking, it is much more natural to use fractions.

    What's natural depends on your upbringing: I have no problems whatsoever in measuring out 100g of flour or a kilo of mince or anything like that.

    Metric units are not always appropriate amounts for convenient use. The 2-liter bottle seems to have become "natural," but if you want to buy a single drink, it's easier to say "a pint" or even "a 12-ounce cup" rather than "400 milliliters." The metric system's rigidity prevents designing units for convenience.

    Bull crap. A half-litre of milk is close enough to a traditional* pint as to make no real difference and a standard measure of spirits here has been 25ml since before I was born. No-one asks for 25ml, one just asks for "a measure of X". It's not systemic rigidity that makes things hard, it's your own: if you just accepted a slightly smaller/larger drink as being sufficient then there'd be no trouble at all. For example, our corner shop recently stopped selling pint cartons of milk and started offering 500ml ones instead at a reduced price: no-one really cared. Granted, I get perhaps one cup of coffee-worth less out of them but so what?

    These practical issues lead to the use of "folk units" alongside the official metric units, which can lead to conflict when laws are too rigid."

    You'll have to forgive me but I've yet to see any practical issues using metric alone or with imperial. The only conflict we've had is when a grocer refused to give prices for metric quantities of produce and started claiming The Man was persecuting him as part of some EU conspiracy when in fact the government had no objection to giving prices per pound so long as there was a price per kilo there as well. It didn't take long for people to see him for the attention-seeking fool he was.

    *Refer to what I said about upbringing; simply being traditional adds no objective value to anything.

    --
    If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
  171. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by Pentium100 · · Score: 2

    Officially, you aren't even supposed to say "1/3 meter," but rather "333 milliliters." For everyday uses, such as cooking, it is much more natural to use fractions.

    Well, 333mm or 330mm, depending on what precision you need. As for the "more natural", I guess it depends on tradition, decimal is more natural to me - 0.25L or 250ml, but not 1/4 L.

    The 2-liter bottle seems to have become "natural," but if you want to buy a single drink, it's easier to say "a pint" or even "a 12-ounce cup" rather than "400 milliliters."

    Is the "pint" some absolute unit or is it an arbitrary one (~473.2mL). Could you drink 0.5L of beer? That's how you can get beer where I live (completely metric country) - 0.3L, 0.5L, 1L (if we are talking about a bar). I have no trouble asking for "one beer, zero five" (literally translated) or a "one big beer" if the bar offers only two options (very common, 0.3 and 0.5). The bottles are 0.5L, and cans are 0.3 or 0.5.

    Stronger drinks are often measured in "grams", or at least when someone says 100g of vodka they mean 100mL (because 100mL of water would weigh 100g), gram is shorter than mililiter.

    Currently I cannot think of any "folk" units in use (in my country) that do not correspond directly to some of the metric units.

  172. Ditch the numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Numbers are good for groups but for labeling cyclic Z-modules they're sub-optimal because they suggest a beginning point and end (0 and 24 in the case of a 24-hour clock) when any point of the module would make a perfectly good starting point. Instead we should invent a separate set of glyphs for hours and name them by major locales. For example noon in Rio de Jeneiro could be called "Rio de Jeneiro-noon" worldwide, noon in Beijing could be called "Beijing-noon" worldwide.

        Of course it results in similar problems, If I've never been to Istanbul (and Istanbul-noon isn't one of the standard hours) then I won't be sure if by Paris-noon the will have begun dinner yet or simply afternoon break. But if I know which noon Istanbul has then I will be able to tell.

        The other obvious drawback is it means teaching a completely new set of numbers and the associated math. I don't think we would need to teach "What is Beijing-noon minus Paris-noon?" (though smart pupils will be able to do it), but we would need to teach "What is Beijing-noon plus five hours?"

  173. a narrow view by pbjones · · Score: 1

    sorry but I don't get it. Why dump time zones for the sake of business? which is the only major reason for doing so. The majority of the population would get ZERO benefit from changing the current system.

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
  174. Bad Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I came up with this idea a few months ago. I was high at the time. Like REALLY high. I spent half an hour trying to explain to someone why it was an awesome idea; "cos, like, you'll never have to deal with like 'oh its 8 here but 1 there' and it'll just simplify everything cos it's the same everywhere". The next day, I realised within about 5 minutes of waking up that all the problems I though getting rid of timezones would solve, were already solved by timezones. It's a bad idea.

  175. Popular idea among all-indoor types by Acting+Ordinant · · Score: 1

    I hate to use the word idea for something that lacks any actual backing thought. This idea crops up every now and then among technologists who only experience nature between car and building, and is especially popular in Britain and western Europe, where no one would have to change their habits or language if this nonsense were put into place. A few things technologists do might improve, but all other parts of life would be thrown into unnecessary, lasting chaos. This idea is ultimately nothing more than selfishness among Asperger's types who never consider other people.

    There are thousands of reasons why a single worldwide time zone is a massively bad idea. I'll restrict myself to one: in such a world, where would you put the international date line? With the current, well-working system, the line between today and tomorrow is drawn though the Pacific Ocean in such a way that no country or economic zone is itself divided into today portions and tomorrow portions. With a single time zone world, that line becomes the GMT line, which would place one part of England and indeed of London into today while the other half is in tomorrow. Not to mention dividing France, Spain and portions of Africa into two days. Try planning your meetings around that.

    You don't seem to understand that the time zone system was made possible by technological changes. It's not some baggage that we carry from the caves, it was invented in the 1870's when transcontinental railroads in Canada and the US had to come up with reliable timetables. The technology that allowed near-simultaneous setting of clocks hundreds of miles apart was the telegraph. Before the railroads needed time zones, and before the telegraph made them possible, all time was local and was generally based on the position of the sun locally.

    The imposition of a single worldwide time zone would require a complete break with parts of language and literature, in every human language. Words like dawn, noon, and midnight describe the position of the sun, and today, in every language, also describe roughly the same time of day. Dawn is about 0430 to 0730, depending on season, in the populated temperate zones, and that is true in all latitudes of those temperate zones. In your world, dawn would be 1230 to 1530 in one place and 2030 to 2330 in another, so the word dawn loses its current meaning to describe a time of day. Books written before the start of your brave new world would all use the old meaning of dawn and would assume the reader knows that dawn-colored sunlight is a rosy pink.

    To schedule intercontinental meetings, I rely on timeanddate.com and its cross-time-zone scheduler. If that didn't exist, I'd have to do a little math. All airlines already compute their schedules internally in terms of GMT, then publish departure and arrival times in local time. It really isn't hard to live in a world that we have very wisely divided into naturally-occurring time zones.

  176. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Plus, the joke about someone having an IQ just below room temperature makes a lot more sense in F.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  177. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by toopok4k3 · · Score: 1

    Around here it's a small or a large beer. (small is usually 333ml, large is around half a liter depending on the bar and drink").

    Even if we use metrics, that doesn't mean we have to use silly phrases in our everyday life.

  178. Re:Before we ditch timezone...Let's kill DST first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I take it you don't have kids in school?

  179. bad idea by pakar · · Score: 1

    And with this we would have big problems to know when it was morning/day/evening/night at the place you wanna call... much better to have timezones and know that "that country is 6 hours before us" so it's ok to call them... much easier to add X hours to the current time when contacting someone in another country than to adjust to a different time-schedule that is different for each country you visit...

    Sure it would be easier for the ones that never travel, but it would cause lots of confusion for the rest of us...

  180. I would mod parent down. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given even half a chance. What a fucking troll. It's not a bad question, especially if you'd like to read the Slashdot community discussion on the topic.

    1. Re:I would mod parent down. by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 2

      Paraphrasing, "An impertinent question often leads to a pertinent answer."
      Corollary: "Sometimes an impertinent question is so mind-bendingly fucking stupid that to waste time discussing the many ways in which it is stupid is an affront to all human endeavour."

      Next time on "Ask Slashdot": "Why doesn't everyone just belong to the same religion? We could consolidate all the churches, temples, synagogues and mosques and use the space to build affordable housing!"

  181. Re:If you want to get up an hour early in the summ by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Last time I checked some guy named Edison invented a nifty thing that makes light in the night, even without fire. Great thing, really, you should try it some time.

    In other words, it's the 21st century and your night life is still dependent on the sun?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  182. Time zones are useful by prefec2 · · Score: 1

    Most people live in one place or state. They meet locally, the work locally, they eat locally. For them 12:00 means noon. and 24:00 means midnight. If you have a cross country meeting on the phone, you just accept the event invitation and it is displayed in your time zone adopted to your sense of time, while your colleague in another country sees the same appointment recoded to his time zone.

    Removing time zones is an idea such as using something like a "star date". The easiest time format is an 64 bit integer counting since one reference day. However, it is totally unhandy. Therefor we use years, month, days, hours etc. and need to add extra days and seconds occasionally. Time zones fall in the same category. They help to adjust time to the locality of people. Even though the world appears global now, people are not. They live in their context and need time for their contexts.

    BTW: Some tried to "fix" time and introduce a metric form for hours, minutes and seconds. He failed.

  183. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by phoenixwade · · Score: 1

    ...but if you want to buy a single drink, it's easier to say "a pint" or even "a 12-ounce cup" rather than "400 milliliters."

    What's wrong with saying 4 deciliters?

    Because people, as a whole, gravitate to simplicity. They want "a cup", "A pint" or some other simple group label when they do something repeatedly (like order a beer).. and if the simple thing doesn't exist, one will, inevitably evolve. and thus, the reference to "Folk" volumes appearing alongside the rigid measurements.

    --
    A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
  184. Come back Taco! by Snaller · · Score: 1

    No sooner has he left before we get this!

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  185. Don't like international time zones ... by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

    Then blame Canada.

    "Canadian Sir Sandford Fleming proposed a worldwide system of time zones in 1879. He advocated his system at several international conferences, thus is widely credited with their invention. In 1876, his first proposal was for a global 24-hour clock, conceptually located at the center of the Earth and not linked to any surface meridian."

  186. Remember the plan to go metric? by Todd+Palin · · Score: 1

    Forty or so years ago there was this grand plan to change the USA over to the metric system. They put up new highway signs and everything. But, it turns out that the general public was too dull to see what a great idea this was, so they protested. The government backed down. End of metric for USA. The problem was the metric system was different, and people don't like that, even when it makes total sense to change. I don't think people have changed much since then. Time zones are here to stay. You can change your watch to UTM if you want, but you will soon learn to say "I don't know" if anyone asks the time, because 90% of the time the person won't even know what UTM is.

  187. Useless by Guillaume+le+Btard · · Score: 1

    As somebody who has daily communications with the other side of the globe I can not imagine any need for this. The only moment when the time difference is a bitch is when suffering from jet lag, but that is based on our biological clock.

  188. Think of the poor computers! by Katchu · · Score: 1

    Ha. We humans should go to a non-intuitive time reckoning simply to make it easier for computers to work? You obviously never worked for Apple.

    --
    Keep Doing Good.
  189. Re:If you want to get up an hour early in the summ by R.Mo_Robert · · Score: 1

    Last time I checked some guy named Edison invented a nifty thing that makes light in the night, even without fire. Great thing, really, you should try it some time.

    In other words, it's the 21st century and your night life is still dependent on the sun?

    As if nobody spends any time outdoors?

    --
    R.Mo
  190. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

    You miss the fact that it is easier to convert 1/2 ounce to 1 1/2 ounces than it is to convert 14 grams to 42 grams when you want to triple the recipe. Which is the point the poster you replied to was making. English Units are better for things like cooking because they were created for that sort of use. The area where they start to lose out is when you need to convert from one to another, say teaspoons to tablespoons to ounces to cups to quarts to gallons. However, if all you need to do is work within the scale of that particular unit (which is generally the case when cooking), they are more natural to use.

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  191. Re:If you want to get up an hour early in the summ by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Hmm... someone should invent something like a portable version of that light thingamajig. Like, say, with a portable power source.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  192. Swatch internet time by Peachy · · Score: 1

    Been there, tried that. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatch_Internet_Time

    Sold the watch at a car boot sale. Waste of time. Pun intended.

  193. Because it won't change reality by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 1

    The reality is that people's body rhythms aren't tied to the clock, they're tied to the sun and the day/night cycle. We sleep when it's dark, we're active when it's daylight. And that cycle likes to run at a roughly 24-hour frequency. Eliminating timezones won't change the fact that when it's noon in New York it's 2 hours after midnight in Sydney, Australia. Eliminating time zones won't change the fact that when you get off that flight from New York your body's clock will be 10 hours out of sync with Sydney's local day/night cycle. And it won't magically make the people in Sydney want to have meetings in the dead of their nighttime just because the sun's high in the sky in New York.

    Besides which, you don't need to eliminate timezones if all you want is a consistent clock. The military already uses Zulu time (roughly GMT) for most purposes. You can do the same.

  194. Re:Before we ditch timezone...Let's kill DST first by yacwroy · · Score: 1

    I've seen many mistakes and even one alarm go off due only to DST.

    The biggest problem with it, IMO, is that not every point in time is represented by a unique DST measurement. Typically, there's two "2 AM"s or similar on the day when the extra hour is squeezed back in.

    This could be fixed by using a 25 hour day, although I'm sure that would annoy some other code.

    --
    You agree with me.
  195. No confusion by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

    "No confusion ever again"? Haha, right. There is no possibility of confusion when while traveling instead of changing your clock you have to shift the time of everything in your day.

    --
    We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  196. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by Tomato42 · · Score: 1

    tripling 14g (instead of ½) will make your math skills less rusty so you won't make as many mistakes in your tax form...

  197. Re:If you want to get up an hour early in the summ by evilviper · · Score: 1

    If you want to get up an hour early in the summer, get your ass out of bed!

    Why should the rest of us screw up our sleep rhythms because you don't want to reset your alarm clock?

    Because most people DO STUFF. Getting up arbitrarily an hour earlier, will just mean you're sitting around doing nothing for an hour, until stores open, you start work, etc.

    If you're so concerned about your sleep, why don't you START getting up a few minutes earlier each day, leading up to DST? Are you so dense and helpless that you can't plan a week or two ahead?

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  198. Re:If you want to get up an hour early in the summ by rve · · Score: 1

    Last time I checked some guy named Edison invented a nifty thing that makes light in the night, even without fire. Great thing, really, you should try it some time.

    In other words, it's the 21st century and your night life is still dependent on the sun?

    Your comment implies that you don't see the point in ever leaving the house. Some people like to go outside in the summer. You know, hiking, cycling, canoeing, whatever. In summer, thanks to DST, I have another 5 or 6 hours of daylight for that after I get home. It's great while it lasts, without this, I wouldn't be able to cope with those 4 or 5 months of the year when the only daylight I see at all during the week is what comes through my office window.

    Just get up an hour earlier you say? I could if I was single and without responsibilities like you. For the rest of us, getting up earlier will only work if everyone else does the same. Schools and daycare open and close at a certain time, stores open and close at a certain time

  199. China has only one time zone instead of three by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_in_China .

    Quoting from the article, one sees what happens there in the west:

            Most stores and government offices in Xinjiang have modified opening hours, commonly running from 10am to 7pm Beijing Time

    So introducing a 'GMT for everybody' scheme would e.g. mean that opening hours depend on where you live etc. Not a problem if you never travel.

  200. Re:If you want to get up an hour early in the summ by Tomato42 · · Score: 1

    Now your talking pure science-fiction!

  201. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

    For some reason, most people sleep at night and are active (work etc) during the day. So, for you to say "meet me at 13:45", you still would have to know whether it will be day where I live. So, as you see, you do need to know the position of the sun, even if only to know whether other people are active or not.

    Now you have to look up what your 13:45 is in my time zone. Under the new system you would have to look up whether it will be business hours at 13:45 in my timezone (maybe it's midnight here).

  202. Re:Before we ditch timezone...Let's kill DST first by Tomato42 · · Score: 1

    You think DST is bad? Read about leap seconds! They are added twice a year and are announced only with few months of warning.

  203. Good idea by osgeek · · Score: 1

    And we should all speak Esperanto.

    1. Re:Good idea by rleibman · · Score: 1

      Kial ne?

  204. Re:If you want to get up an hour early in the summ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was talking about more daylight at the end of the day which is when most people are doing whatever activity they enjoy. An extra hour of sunlight before work doesn't really help much. Having the sun set at 7:30PM instead of 6:30PM is a big deal if you get off at 4PM.

  205. Retarded posting by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

    Hey /. editors, how can you let this shit through? With all the interesting stuff going on in the world, drivel like this counts for news?

    --
    'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
  206. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by dmomo · · Score: 1

    >> What's wrong with saying 4 deciliters?

    Because, some of us learn to drink before we learn to count or even talk. We want to express our concern for that beer as efficiently as possible.

  207. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by Ritchie70 · · Score: 1

    You need to know the approximate position of the sun for all of these meeting participants when you're scheduling the meeting, unless you're a complete self-centered asshole, of course.

    But the rest of us, who care about other people, would still need to know what time the work day starts and ends in other places. It's easier to do time zones, and assume that it starts at roughly 9 and ends at roughly 5.

    Time zones aren't that hard, and most people don't ever deal with them. I would bet my mom never thinks about time zone except when she calls her aunt, who lives in Pennsylvania, to decide if it's too early or too late to call from Illinois. A lot of people don't even have that need for them - basically everyone they know is within 50 miles of their home.

    Personally, it would take me quite a long time to learn that I have to be at work at 13:00 and can leave at 22:00.

    There's no reason to bother most of the world's population just to make international business slightly easier for assholes.

    --
    The preferred solution is to not have a problem.
  208. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by interval1066 · · Score: 1

    Now. Under GMT knowing where the sun is isn't necessary.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  209. 24 please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While we're at it, we'd better go to a 24 clock. Or we could just use Roman Numerals for time so we have a legitimate reason to learn them in school.

  210. I still like to get up at 8 in the morning by vanuda · · Score: 1

    Not 9 in the evening or whatever.. Taco.. Please unresign!

  211. Sundials and other ancient measurement systems suc by SexyKellyOsbourne · · Score: 1

    The reason time is listed as it is is due to the use of sundials. It's based on the angles of the shadows cast by the sun, which varies based on where you are on the earth and the use of a bizarre 1-12 system to measure it twice over. Not to mention humans having 10 fingers to measure with intuitively and a poor approximation of a 360 degrees being the percentage of a circle for the Sun orbiting the Earth (purposefully mis-stated).

    Perhaps one could go to metric times or stardates, but even now you could use modern SI conventions far better .In practical use these days, who cares if you use UTC and have to be at work at 0200 hours instead of 8:00AM? The usability of being able to sort dates on an orderly basis under the YYYY-MM-DD convention (e.g. 2011-08-27 instead of 8/27/11) is also another important issue.

    Of course, considering that the US still to this day considers adoption of the metric system to be far-out is a huge barrier. Even though no scientist or engineer would measure the precision of their work by the lengths of half their thumbs, size of their feet, the length of their step, or how much an ox can plow in a day. Even though the burden of such conversions caused Mars landers to crash.

  212. yes lets do it by prefec2 · · Score: 2

    I live in North Germany, 54 20 North, 10 8 East which is more to the north than Winnipeg and a little south of Calgary. So we have long days in summer and short days in winter. And DST has never helped by anything. It just costs a lot and people need weeks to adjust. If you have kids, you will observe that one day before the switch, they are awake before the "time" in the morning and the next day they are almost an hour late.

    In short DST sucks. Why should anyone have jet lag every 6 month? It is just ridiculous.

    1. Re:yes lets do it by peragrin · · Score: 1

      which is why DST should be the only time.

      I am at 77 degrees north. if I want to enjoy my summer evenings outside, I would like more than an hour after work to do so.

      The sunset sets at 7:50PM local time, I get out of work at 4:30 PM without DST I would still get out of work at 4:30PM however the sun would set at 6:50PM.

      Businesses don't change their hours due to DST. so you have to work the same hours, only use lose hours of sunlight in the evening.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  213. Stop trying to jack Mother Nature by jaklumen · · Score: 1

    Quite simply, circadian rhythms are a biological reality. I know the business world has this imperative of being always available at any hour, but until cybergenetics catches up to fictional imagination, many of us will remain bound to solar light-- vitamin D and serotonin produced by the body when it shines on the skin, and secretions of melatonin in its absence, the two regulating our waking and sleeping states, respectively. Humankind has attempted to ignore this imperative and science has shown we do so at our peril, at the risk of our health. The tragedy of Chernobyl is but one example.

  214. Beat Time, aka Swatch Internet Time by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 1

    Why not ditch the 24 hour day as well.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatch_Internet_Time

    Instead of hours and minutes, the mean solar day is divided up into 1000 parts called ".beats". Each .beat lasts 1 minute and 26.4 seconds. Times are notated as a 3-digit number out of 1000 after midnight. So, @248 would indicate a time 248 .beats after midnight representing 248/1000 of a day, just over 5 hours and 57 minutes.

    Why? Because it doesn't work.

  215. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by mrbester · · Score: 1

    Two teaspoons = one dessert spoon. One and a half dessert spoons = one tablespoon. Four gills in a pint. Two pints in a quart. Four quarts (hence the name) in a gallon. I don't see how that is difficult ;-)

    --
    "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
  216. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

    The position of the sun is still important to nearly everyone. Or do you not operate on a 24 hour schedule? Believe me, normal people care if a meeting is scheduled 4 hours before sunrise.

    --
    We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  217. fix it, and it still makes no sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One of the main things you do when talking to people in other parts of the world is determine whether it's a good time of day for them. 1am in Jakarta? Not a good time to have a meeting. So if you went to a single time for everyone, you'd still have to mentally convert and figure out what time of day that is for the other party. And there would be nothing consistent where you could say that 12pm is lunch time.

  218. 6 hour clocks and midday != 12pm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The thai clock has mid-day as 7am and midnight as 7pm. I think it is a hangover from the thai 6 hour clock.

  219. "Does anybody really know what time it is?" by gstrickler · · Score: 1

    "Does anybody really care?" - Robert Lamm of the group Chicago.

    --
    make imaginary.friends COUNT=100 VISIBLE=false
  220. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by interval1066 · · Score: 1

    You need to know the approximate position of the sun for all of these meeting participants when you're scheduling the meeting...

    Why?

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  221. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    Because people, as a whole, gravitate to simplicity. They want "a cup", "A pint" or some other simple group label when they do something repeatedly (like order a beer).. and if the simple thing doesn't exist, one will, inevitably evolve. and thus, the reference to "Folk" volumes appearing alongside the rigid measurements.

    Thanks for playing, but...

    Having lived in both countries, I'd like to inform you that 45 cl beers are the norm in Swedish pubs, and asking for 500 g of mince is the norm in Australia. No references to "folk volumes" in either case.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  222. Re:If you want to get up an hour early in the summ by peragrin · · Score: 1

    Depends. Try going out on a lake in the evening. or maybe play a round of golf in the evening,

    The problem is that businesses are open for such and such hours, rarely are they opened at 5 am for such things. however they will stay open later.

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  223. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by kwark · · Score: 1

    The problem you describe doesn't exist, unless you are thinking non metric.
    Recipes and measurement cups are both in easy units.
    5ml (teaspoon),15 ml (tablespoon), 300g, 325ml, 700ml

    For example:
    http://www.ah.nl/recepten/voor-elke-dag?lp_sortProperty=shoppingListPopular
    and pick any recipe and look under Ingredienten. All units are combinations of fractions of 10 and 4. For most ingredients it doesn't matter is you are off by 5 or 10 ml/gram.

    The same for buying lengths of stuff, you either buy something in 1/2, 1, 3, 5 or 10m and cut it down to required length if it not possible to order custom lengths/sizes.

    The "folk units" have been converted to metric a long time ago. A dutch ounce is 100gram (pre metric: 1/16 pound), a pound is 500gram (pre metric: 430-460gram). A pint (beer) is 250ml where a standard glass is 150ml. This conversion happend atleast twice (unfied futch measurements in 1820, and in 1875 the switch to S.I.).

  224. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

    How did you get from tablespoons to gills? The difficulty comes in when you have to convert teaspoons to gallons. This of course points out why most people don't see a reason to convert. How often does to the average person need to convert teaspoons to gallons? It, also, explains why "progressives" want to convert, the metric system makes it easier for government functionaries to figure out how much material different companies of different sizes are using, thus (theoretically) making it easier for them to allocate resources.

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  225. Re:Before we ditch timezone...Let's kill DST first by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    People don't realize how annoying it is to have the sun go down at 10 in the night.

    Yet, where I live, we manage to live with it every June and July...!

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  226. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by cynyr · · Score: 1

    Take a recipe that uses 2 teaspoons, and serves 4 and scale it up to feed 32 (1/3 cup*). Then simplify the units to make it easy to actually make, and let me know the outcome... This is even worse for things like 1-1/2 teaspoons oil scaled up 8x (1/4 cup*).

    I would much rather use metric there. It's simple to do unit conversions. 300mL * 8 = 2400mL or "2L + 400mL". Now this is much easier to use in your head while in a kitchen with something on the stove already.

    As for your apparent hatred of "mililiters", you could try using the widely recognized short form, "mils". so "could i have a 400mil beer please?" or "I'd like 2.3Kilos of butter", or "53 liters of petrol". "how large is your large beer? ... 450Mils sir".

    *unit conversions per wolfram alpha, which did make this much easier but isn't seemly around when I am in the kitchen with hot things on the stove, and have fish juice all over my hands.

    --
    All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
  227. If it's 4am, who am I waking up with a phone call? by spasm · · Score: 1

    Because if it's 4am everywhere I *still* won't know if the phone call I'm about to make in Los Angeles, USA to my brother in Brisbane, Australia is going to wake him up three hours before local sunrise. Not without checking some handy table, perhaps divided into convenient longitudinal 'zones' based on local sunrise/sunset times for each 'zone'. What's that you say? We already have such a system and the current proposal does nothing to improve on it?

  228. Too much time too little to do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I travel internationally all the time and this is the stupidest idea on the planet. By keeping track of the time at home I know easily what the best time to call is. This guy needs to get a life. Nothing to see here, move along. ..

  229. Day/Night does not make sense otherwise by angiasaa · · Score: 1

    Ah, there's a very good reason for keeping timezones. I'm amazed I even thought of it! :)
     
    You see, If I live in India, which happens to be GMT+5.5 If I wanted to call someone up in the UK, I'd suddenly have a problem on my hands. On the one hand, I have no interest in calculating backward from the position of the sun in my sky. On the other, I'd be hard pressed to do the same based on the star patterns in my night sky if I wanted to call during my night. I might end up calling up while he's asleep, or while he's warming up his wife.
     
    It all becomes much easier for me if I were to deduct 5.5 hours from my clock and figure out the current status of my clients sleep cycle based on my calculations and overlaying the result over my own sleep cycle.
     
    Of course, having a standardized clock for the whole planet would have its conveniences, but the inconveniences far outweigh those. Once we've encapsulated the entire planet under a nice thick blanket of steel and start living in artificial days and nights to match our clocks, the tables will turn. But until then, we're going to be eating out of the hands of God, or something very much like him/her.

    --
    Geekism is your _only_ God!
  230. Re:If you want to get up an hour early in the summ by Bert64 · · Score: 0

    Only its not an extra hour, it just has a different arbitrary number assigned to it...
    Why can't you start work at 8am instead of 9am, and then finish an hour earlier too?

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  231. Is Compromise Possible by rssrss · · Score: 1

    Putting Everyone on UTC is not really possible. An example. Insurance policies expire at 12:00 noon, for very good reasons. If everyone is is on UTC, That won't work anymore. Furthermore, in the mid-pacific time may not be very different between east and west, but places will have to change dates in the middle of the day. That is really inconvenient and confusing. In Hawaii, you would go to work on Monday, and go home on Tuesday.

    My suggestion is to reduce the number of time zones to about 8 across the world. The entire continental US would be on UTC-6 (i.e. Central Standard). No part of the contiguous states would be more than 2 hours out of sync with the sun. You would get some 4 a.m. sun rises in Maine and some 11:00 p.m. sunsets in Washington state, but it would be tolerable. South America would need a zone for the eastern part of the continent, -3 would work well. On the other side of the Andes, they already use -6.

    Around the World, Europe and Africa would be on +1,
    South Asia on +5, East Asia on +9

    --
    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
    1. Re:Is Compromise Possible by gig · · Score: 1

      Your idea about US times zones would never work. Central Standard is the least populous time zone, so you would be putting most of the US population way out of sync with the sun, including both coasts where all the action happens. The "correct" sun would be falling on big empty most of the time.

      Also, people in Eastern Time Zone do not know that time zones exist. They just think that people in California and Asia get up late, and people in Europe and Africa get up early. When it is noon in New York City, it is noon, period, for people in Eastern Time, you are not going to break them of that, especially not when they have DC.

      I don't think you're going to convince Californians that they have to stay up to 23:00 to watch the sun set over the Pacific Ocean, either, and then skip surfing in the morning because it is dark and watch the sunrise out their office window.

      I don't think it matters how many time zones we have. What matters is that they are set and don't change, so that we can make sure our software does the right calculations to make time zones transparent, so that a person in California sees "Meeting: 13:00" and a person in New York sees "Meeting: 16:00" and they both show up at the same time.

      To move from what we have now to something else, there would have to be a huge payoff. I don't see it.

  232. Re:If you want to get up an hour early in the summ by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Because that's not how it works. Getting up an hour earlier doesn't let you start an activity that may then take longer then expected (such as doing some house renovations) because accidentally working in the dark is a little different then you boss shouting at you that you're at work an hour late.

    I don't have DST where I live, but I still live by it. I am lucky because I have flexible work hours. I get to work an hour early or late no one cares. But there are plenty of other people in the office who don't, and regardless of when they wake up they still end up driving home in the dark.

  233. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by cynyr · · Score: 1

    and both of those are officially defined as parts of the kelvin scale, afaik. You could also claim that Rankin would be better than Fahrenheit as well. I'm betting some can sense smaller changes than "normal" so lets use something sensible please. At least Celsius make sense, and I can reasonable check a Celsius thermometer in my home. Freeze some water, and measure the temp, should be near 0C. now boil some filtered tap water, should be near 100C.

    Yes yes, I know that it will be very hard to tap water that boils at 100C, and freezes at 0C but i'd bet it close enough for you oven, and measuring the temp outside.

    --
    All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
  234. This means that by David+Gerard · · Score: 1

    the time will always be correct in London.

    One thing I really enjoy about Wikipedia is all timestamps being local time.

    Except in summer. But then, BST can just fuck off too.

    --
    http://rocknerd.co.uk
  235. While we're at it... by c9brown · · Score: 1

    lets, please, make time base 10. (Or even better, base 2 Pi).

  236. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by next_ghost · · Score: 1

    In Czech republic, you'll mostly hear people putting orders like this (translated from Czech):

    • For beer: A small beer/a third of beer (both 0.30L), a beer (0.5L), a double (1L, the actual Czech noun "tuplák" is only used when referring to beer or the glass, the generic adjective meaning "double" is "dvojitý"). The glass for 0.5L beer is literally called "half-liter".
    • For wine: two deci (0.2L). Other sizes are usually given in "deci" (short for deciliter).
    • Liquor in general: shot (0.05L), small shot (0.02L)
  237. am?!? by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

    All I can say is that if they DO get rid of time zones (I'm personally for it), and leave that am/pm crap in there, heads will ROLL!

  238. Re:If you want to get up an hour early in the summ by tombeard · · Score: 1

    "And if each establishment could open and close as it pleases, "

    You mean they can't?

    --
    The reason we subjugate ourselves to law is to better procure justice. If law does not accomplish this purpose then it m
  239. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by next_ghost · · Score: 1

    Celsius just takes two arbitrary points for water and divides by 100.

    Fahrenheit did pretty much the same thing. But you can measure everything in Kelvins if you want to.

  240. No, fool. by unity100 · · Score: 1

    Because, when someone in a certain timezone goes to another, they will have a lot of mishaps and long adaptation issues due to the numbers on their mind being different. while some new yorker will know the lunch time as 19.00 and conditioned to get up and even set his/her alarm clock for 11.00, japanese will e having lunch at 12.00 and getting up at 04.00.

    unfortunately it cant be done, in a global society.

  241. But not UTC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wonderful idea. One world at last! But having UTC has the standard is clearly wrong-headed. It runs through a minor city (Greenwich) in a minor country (England) of little significance. (Nice empire once upon a time, but...) The global time standard must be U.S. Pacific time, since the American west coast -- home of Steve Jobs -- is clearly the center of the world.

  242. The time is now for decimal time by Zigurd · · Score: 1

    This is a great proposal. I would no longer make mistakes about a meeting in another time zone changing to local time for an in-person versus a phone meeting. However, it can be improved. Decimal time would make calculating percentages of time spent on various activities much easier. Combine the two for Flawless Victory.

  243. Computer vs human convenience by owlstead · · Score: 1

    It always gets to me that people want something to be more convenient for computers, when computers are so much better at recalculating everything. Now, I'm all for the abolition of the 12 hour clock and of the DST, since I think they are an inconvenience for both computers *and* humans. But only UTC? Hell no, that only makes it easier for some people and computers. It does not make sense for most of us.

    And although it is easier to make mistakes in a program when calculating UTC into local time, I think that still beats people having to guess what the time of day actually means. I mean, imagine listening to the radio and the presenter said: "you know, we had lunch at 9!!! Imagine having lunch that late!!!". Then he could add "in Wisconsin" or something so people could go and start calculating (probably coming to the conclusion that what I just used as a random example does not make sense).

    For the same reason I absolutely abhor the one K = 1024 people. I don't think it makes our calculations easier, and I honestly thing that the computer does not care a bit (nor 128 bits) if it is 1000 or 1024. It was a close enough number that fortunately was 2^10 (why 10, why not 8?) but it's time to let the computer do the calculations, not us.

    In case you think I'm biased: UTC is really easy for me, since I'm into cryptography and thus into certificate and CRL validity periods. Cryptography is normally also calculated in 128 bit, 256 bit and 1024 bit calculations nowadays. I do of course use KiB and UTC date representations all the time.

    1. Re:Computer vs human convenience by gig · · Score: 1

      Yeah, standardizing the kilobytes and megabytes and gigabytes and so on in 1000's was essential and brilliant. If you need to work in 1024's, then you can go ahead and do that, but very, very few people do.

      I also think we should always use just one of the above measurements when doing a comparison. That is, express 2 gigabytes versus 500 megabytes as 2 gigabytes versus 0.5 gigabytes, if you want to make it understandable for the vast majority of readers.

  244. Yeah... right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Try working in an international company for a while and you'll realize how stupid getting rid of time zones sounds. When you have meetings between europe, asia, and the US you'll realize how important knowing what time of day it is for them.

  245. it has been done before (at least they tried) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no one remembers .beat ?

  246. So, timothy is just dumb? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Way to go cmdrtaco...

  247. People suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because people are reluctant to change. The metric system has been overall agreed as a superior system for 200 years(!), and still countries like the USA refuse to change that simple thing. This changes things for more people than the metric system ever did.

  248. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by Ritchie70 · · Score: 1

    So that you can schedule it during their work day. Since you often don't know people's exact work day (even in the same office) you just assume that 9 to 4 is fine with almost everyone.

    --
    The preferred solution is to not have a problem.
  249. Dumbest idea ever... by Beelzebud · · Score: 1

    This is right up there with TimeCube, except TimeCube had a lot more thought put in to it.

  250. Do what the US military does... by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

    Use UTC for everything.

  251. lunchtime by dominious · · Score: 1

    Got a meeting with colleagues on the other side of the world? 4 a.m. means 4 a.m. for everyone.

    YES but 4 a.m. in NYC means lunchtime. I say we move a step further and agree that all the world must have lunchtime at 13:00. UTC.

  252. Metric Time by LoudMusic · · Score: 1

    Consistent time of day is vastly more important than the 'complexity' of converting time based on time zones. If you're not converting one then you're converting the other. To everyone in the world, lunch is at noon. If you change that then you're changing more than we do already.

    More importantly! Why do we use a time system with such a bizarre base numbering system!?

    1 year
    12 months per year
    28 - 31 days per month
    52 weeks per year
    4 - 4.5 weeks per month
    7 days per week
    24 hours per day
    60 minutes per hour
    60 seconds per minute

    Metric time fixes all that by converting everything to base ten, with the exception of days per year, which is defined by the pace of our favorite rock hurling through space - something we really don't have control over.

    365 days per year
    drop months
    drop weeks
    10 hours per day
    100 minutes per hour
    100 seconds per minute

    What is currently
    2011/08/27-18:23:35
    becomes
    2011/239-7:66:37

    The cool thing is, seconds are very nearly the same length of time given the small difference between 86,400 seconds in a day versus 100,000 seconds in a day.

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    1. Re:Metric Time by gig · · Score: 1

      I have a kind of affection for this idea, because I love the idea of 100 minutes in an hour.

      However, it is a totally bogus idea. If you fall too much in love with the idea of bases of 10, you lose the idea of basing measurements on the real world, and the ultimate point of the whole exercise, which is to standardize each measurement. You can't standardize something that is so hard to use or to move to that nobody uses it or moves to it. Going from feet and inches to meters and centimeters makes things much easier, but going from 24 hour days to 10 hour days is not going to make anything easier. The day is still the fundamental unit of measurement in both cases. It doesn't matter if we split it into 10 or 24 parts, as long as we all split it into either 10 or 24 parts, not some doing 10 and some doing 24. The standardization of 24 is much easier to achieve.

      10 hour days is sort of like how the HTML4 specification described how the Web ought to be in some glorious, academically-pure, future perfect time that never came, and 24 hour days is like how the HTML5 specification describes the Web as it is right now, it says "everybody is already using 24 days, let's make that the standard and achieve standardization overnight." Then we move to a debate of should we change the standard from 24 to 10, and what are the pros (very few) and cons (very many) of that?

  253. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it makes perfect sense for Europeans talking about Americans, too.

  254. First things first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah that will be so convenient to not have local noon approximately match time where the sun is highest in the sky, really...

    What about the following instead?

    AM/PM -> 24h clock
    US Date format -> ANSI/ISO Date format (08/28/11 -> 2011-08-28 if you are wondering what that means)
    DST -> no DST (debatable)
    Timezone acronyms : GMT, EST, JST -> UTC reference only : UTC+0, UTC-5, UTC+9
    Imperial -> Metric (including non pure SI : F -> C)

  255. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 1

    Fahrenheit is "more accurate" in the sense that less temperature change corresponds with the translation of more integral units.

    Which I guess is important if you hate decimal points?

  256. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by shmlco · · Score: 1

    ".... 400 milliliters ... The metric system's rigidity prevents designing units for convenience."

    Right. That's why you can't simply say .4 liters, or just round up to a convenient "half-liter". Or, heaven forbid, simply say, "I'd like your regular cup, please...

    --
    Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
  257. Relic of the past - in the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time zones won't be a "relic of the past" until we are regularly dealing in real time communications with people not on earth. Time zones are very "Earth-specific".

  258. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

    erm, i'm pretty sure you can say 1.5 miles or 1/4 kilometres with exactly the same degree of difficulty

    --
    This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
  259. No. by mcavic · · Score: 1

    So here on the eastern seaboard of Australia, lunchtime will now be at 2 a.m.,

    That's why we need timezones. If I want to know what time is appropriate to call someone in London, I do the math, see that it's 6am there, and surmise that they're probably not up yet. If you want to know what hours someone is working in another place, that would always be tantamount to a time zone calculation.

  260. Think this through... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is an absurd idea that would actually significantly complicate travel and interactions with people in other time zones. As it stands now, no matter where you are (or where the person you're talking to is), our schedules are roughly similar. Most people wake up some time in the morning, most eat their mid-day meal around mid-day, most people eat dinner in the evenings, and most people go to sleep sometime at night. Morning, mid-day, evening, night - these are all defined by a range of times that are pretty much the same everywhere. It's easy to work out what part of the day it is in another country by simply knowing what time zone that country is in.

      If we drop time zones, how the hell are we going to figure that out? If I'm eating lunch at 05:00, what's going on in Moscow? Sure, it's 05:00 there too, but what does that mean? Are they awake, is it business hours? If I call a business there, will someone answer? And since we don't have time zones, I can't even do the math required to figure that out!

    And never mind travelling! When should I go out for dinner in London? I'd eat at 12:00 or so back home, but that won't do in Blighty. Everybody is doing lunch then!

    Spend more than two seconds thinking about this and you'll realize that it can only create more problems.

  261. Calendar software by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 1

    Having spent considerable time developing calendar software I can tell you that time zone handling is the ugliest part of the picture. It certainly would be best if everything, everywhere, was on UTC.

    For a while, we simply converted everything to UTC on the way in to the system, and all was good. We simply converted back to local time when interacting with the user. But then we had to add support for recurring events. This was a bitch and a half because of DST being observed in some parts of the world, and not being observed in other parts of the world. If you converted a recurring event to UTC, the recurrences would be an hour off the next time you entered or exited DST. Really a pain in the neck, and it required storing all recurring events in local time.

    Sadly, most people don't write and maintain calendar software, and are quite attached to their local time. So much so, in fact, that they can't even comprehend doing it any other way.

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    1. Re:Calendar software by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      Yes, by all means, we should all change our millennia-old approach to time and dates, in order to make things easier for the developers of calendar software.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    2. Re:Calendar software by arekq · · Score: 1

      That sounds like problem with DST, not Time Zone.
      I think we need to get rid of DST, but not time zone.

  262. The 24 hour clock and the 25th hour by QuasiSteve · · Score: 1

    I'm all for the 24-hour clock, although I doubt we'll be saying "X at sixteen hundred hours" like the military any time soon.

    What bothers me, though, is event calendaring.

    If a movie theater runs a sneak preview of a movie at 00.30 on Friday, what does that mean? Are they saying it's in the night of Thursday on Friday at half past midnight? Or is it the night of Friday on Saturday at half past midnight?

    am and pm don't help there. 12.30am listed for the Friday is still just as confusing, as would be 0.30am.

    It all falls apart even further with naive calendaring systems that do accept 0.30 as being the next day, and so list the event for Saturday. So if you're looking at Friday's late night shows, there will appear to be none past midnight. But if you clicked through to Saturday, you'd see them listed there as the very first show of the day.. followed by closing hours, and then firing up again at 10am or something.

    Thus the 25th hour; make the notation 24:30 and the problem is solved. There's 24 hours in the Friday, and it's 30 minutes past that Friday's 24 hours. I.e. it'll technically be on Saturday - but they can still list it for Friday's opening hours. Automated systems will no longer have to worry about ambiguity either.

    Then again.. that would pose a problem for the PCB I'm designing at the moment.. it doesn't have space for a 25th hour. Damn. Back to the drawing board :|

    1. Re:The 24 hour clock and the 25th hour by srmalloy · · Score: 1

      I'm all for the 24-hour clock, although I doubt we'll be saying "X at sixteen hundred hours" like the military any time soon.

      Better 'sixteen hundred' than, say, 'six bells of the forenoon watch'.

      What bothers me, though, is event calendaring.
       
      If a movie theater runs a sneak preview of a movie at 00.30 on Friday, what does that mean? Are they saying it's in the night of Thursday on Friday at half past midnight? Or is it the night of Friday on Saturday at half past midnight?

      At 0000 (or 2400, depending on how you want to define your endpoints) the day changes. 0030 on Friday is the morning of Friday, 30 minutes after midnight, which is the start of the day. There is no ambiguity. "O-dark-thirty Friday morning" is still Friday.

    2. Re:The 24 hour clock and the 25th hour by QuasiSteve · · Score: 1

      0030 on Friday is the morning of Friday, 30 minutes after midnight, which is the start of the day. There is no ambiguity.

      You'd think that, but go look at some event listings. It's very common to see something like:

      Event schedule Wednesday, 21/9

      • 11.00am - Item A
      • 11.50am - Item B
      • 01.00pm - Item C
      • 01.50pm - Item D
      • ...
      • 10.30pm - Item X
      • 11.20pm - Item Y
      • 00.10am - Item Z

      Where the 00.10am definitely refers to the event following the one at 11.20pm. I.e. an event on Thursday, rather than Wednesday.

      But per your logic, it would actually have been in the wee hours of Wednesday well before all the other scheduled events.

      Per automated logic, this would also have been the case. Except if they assigned it a different date specifically - but then you run the risk that it wouldn't be shown for the event schedule of Wednesday at all, but rather on that for Thursday.

      Hence 24.10.

    3. Re:The 24 hour clock and the 25th hour by sorcerykid · · Score: 1

      It drives me nuts when people use decimal points to refer to times and dates. It is called a decimal point for a reason, it refers to a base 10 system. Clocks are not based 10. Thus we use a colon as the standard. As for the calendar, we use a dash or a forward slash :P

      Geeks use decimals everywhere because it looks cooler even though it defies the standard. What then is the point of a convention if it has no basis in effective communication?

      --Randall

  263. Let's impliment this on 2012.996! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The same reason we aren't using a StarDate calendar. So, let's all shake hands and change to StarDate AND Zulu time on 12/31/2012.

    ...Anno Hijra. What, did you assume I meant Anno Domini?

    What time? Midnight, of course!

  264. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But water doesn't always boil at the same temperature. Altitude changes the boiling point. So it fails. At sea level water boils at 212 F or 100 C At the altitude where I live it boils at 203 F, which is equal to 95.5 C.

  265. Good Idea, Not Likely to Happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good idea, but as far as it actually happening..... in the USA, we never even navigated the switch over to SI measurements, we have a congress that cannot balance the budget or even pass simple bills due to gridlock, and most of them in congress question basic science and do not even believe in evolution.... Many of them likely believe that the earth is the center of the solar system and universe!

    Trying to the the current populace of the USA to agree to something like this would probably result in a massive riot, many uneducated and illiterate types would almost certainly believe that this is somehow messing with god's perfect creation, or stealing time from the universe, or some such non-sense.

    Good luck!!

  266. Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In response to the question: The vast, vast majority of the people on Earth do not travel across time zones very regularly, if ever. Most of the people who DO, are fairly wealthy, to be able or required by their job, to do so. What this means, is that despite the fact that it would be more convenient for that small percentage, the other 90%+ don't want to have to deal with the fairly significant (not "some") pain resulting from the initial changeover, as they have far more pressing problems in their lives than the convenience of time zones, like figuring out how they're going to pay their bills. So, the nigh-impossibility of getting groups the size that would be required to agree on anything aside, it's an irrelevant problem for the vast majority of the populace. /thread

  267. Best security enhancement ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I wouldn't give to get all my event logs in the same time at work. That, and it would have radically simplified my physics homework in college.

  268. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    Officially, you aren't even supposed to say 1/3 meter," but rather "333 milliliters."

    Well, yes, if you say "1/3 of a meter" where you meant "333 milliliters", I'm sure there would be some confusion.

    Nothing wrong about "1/3 of a litre", though. I don't know who that "Officially" guy is, and I don't think anyone in my home (metric) country does, either.

    if you to buy a single drink, it's easier to say "a pint" or even "a 12-ounce cup" rather than "400 milliliters."

    If I want to buy a single drink, I say "a drink, please".

    If I want to be more specific than that, I say "half a liter" (400ml? that's for wussies).

    These practical issues lead to the use of "folk units" alongside official metric units, which can lead to conflict when laws too rigid."

    Can you give some examples of said 1) folk units, and 2) laws regulating them? I'm not aware of any "folk units" from 20 years of using metric, unless you count "half a kilo" or "quarter of a litre" - which would be profoundly stupid. Even less so the laws - sure, the packaging should use plain numbers like 250g or 1.5L - but verbally people use whatever is most convenient.

  269. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

    Fahrenheit is more accurate than Celsius and one degree Fahrenheit is the amount of temperature change humans can sense.

    Says who? I definitely can't sense a change in the amount of 1 F. Heck, even 1 C is so subtle that it takes a while to register (e.g. when setting up air conditioner).

    As for accuracy, the only case I'm aware of where you need to divide one degree centigrade into fractions is when measuring body temperature. On the other hand, I'm not sure what you guys do with Fahrenheit there, since 1 F sounds like it would be too rough of a measurement for that as well (but then I'm no medic).

    Celsius just takes two arbitrary points for water and divides by 100.

    Water freezing point has a profound effect on weather, so having it on an easily located point of the scale is very convenient specifically when talking about weather (which is probably half of all contexts in which temperature is used in day to day life). Boiling point is somewhat more arbitrary even for cooking, but at least it's consistent. Compared to points that Fahrenheit took for his scale, those two are the pinnacle of rational thought - I mean, freezing point of brine? what the hell is that useful for?

  270. Re:Before we ditch timezone...Let's kill DST first by toddestan · · Score: 1

    At this point we might as well make it year-round, as the DST has been extended to the point where there are only a few months in the winter when we are actually on standard time. I'd prefer to make standard time year round and have everybody just move their schedules up by an hour which would be effectively the same thing, but I realize that it would be a lot easier to sell the former to the public than the latter.

  271. What a stupid idea, really?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How in the world is this easier? Why don't we all gone to Dvorak style keyboards too? Because it's dumb idea.

  272. Not arbitrary by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    No, its not arbitrary. High noon is still high noon. Calling it something else is just appeasing the idiots who dont actually go outside.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  273. Umm A.M and P.M have meaning ... by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 1

    A serious proposition to do this would also move to 24 hour time. It is used in a majority of places. And our military here in the US. I already set my devices to GMT/UTC when possible. Oh, and to the metric promoters and detractors of the standard system of measurement, (US or British Imperial) for almost all sizes and quantities that we routinely measure in day to day life, there is a one syllable unit of measure that keeps the total number of units easy to conceptualize. But if you must change something, change the jewelry industry over to metric.

    The biggest benefit to me would be that when I travel, if everyone used UTC, my calendars would not get messed up moving from one to the other. Sometimes birthdays move a day in one direction and not in others, so after several trips the "all day events" moved to a new week. Now it just makes multiple copies sometimes. A great way to ease into this would be have all OS'es offer the ability to set the clock to UTC, and only change the display.

    --
    - Tjp

    I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

    1. Re:Umm A.M and P.M have meaning ... by gig · · Score: 1

      The standard system of measurement is not US or Imperial, it is called International System of Units aka SI aka metric. All arguments against it have been exhausted long ago. Using any other kind of measurement is like using an AOL email address or a Windows computer you might as well get a hat that says "World's Greatest Grandpa."

  274. Silly... by athlon02 · · Score: 1

    This sounds like a solution looking for a problem.

  275. Time Zones weren't invented by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's an hour later in the next time zone, because the day actually did start an hour later. What time zones did was standardize the time across the whole of their regions so that every subsection of that region doesn't have their own offset. EG: 12:00 here, 12:03 in the next town, 12:07 in the next town, etc... it's 12:00 everywhere, for the purpose of simplicity.

  276. Lazy programmer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm guessing this was suggested by some programmer who wished they could skip time zone logic in their code. It can be a real bitch, especially when dealing with international DST rules.

    Personally, the change I would vote for would be to use DST all year long. In the winter I'd rather have it be dark when I go to work in exchange for a hope of some daylight when I get off work. Its just damn depressing to go to work in the dark, miss all the daylight while in the office, and have it be dark again by the time I leave.

  277. Imperial to Metric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is actually a metric time clock. They made it in Europe (I know thats broad but I have forgotten exactly where). I'm not sure exactly how it works, and if we switched it would probably screw with everyone's minds for awhile, but we would adapt. Just think the value of a second would change. Now there would be 100 millisecond in a second, 100 seconds in a minutes, ext. all multiples of ten!

  278. You clearly have forgotton about DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you factor in daylight saving time?

    In Sydney would they start going to work at 11pm instead of 10pm? I don't think people would buy that....

  279. And another great idea by bgspence · · Score: 1

    Everyone should work during the same 9 to 5 times, so that everyone would work at the same time and sleep at the same time. It might be a bit dark for some, but it would synchronize everyone's day (or night (or whatever))

    1. Re:And another great idea by gig · · Score: 1

      Also, all bowel movements should be synchronized, so that everyone can stay regular.

  280. for 20% only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good idea for only less than 20% of the world's population at today's scenario. Maybe its an idea to have a common planetary time is ahead by a decade.

  281. It is still as relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Noon would no longer have the meaning it once held if your proposition were adopted. The simple fact is, it is quite useful as it is, and only luddites incapable of simple geography fear the use of time zones. Why fix what is not broken?

  282. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

    That was the joke. Please calibrate your sarcasmometer.

  283. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

    I come back from lunch when people in London are either in bed or out partying, either way, they're not in the office. The approximate position of the sun and therefore whether or not people will be in the office is a fairly important consideration when scheduling a meeting, no?

  284. go for it .. it worked with the metric system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No worries .. if you try to change it, US will be fully converted to the metric system by 1979 .. so I'm sure this will take hold just as good.

  285. Re:If you want to get up an hour early in the summ by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

    Spoken like a true basement-dweller!

  286. Outrunning the sun by DragonHawk · · Score: 1

    But it was because their destinations were far enough away to routinely cross what are now time zones (such that the departing and arriving local-noons were appreciably different), not that they outran the sun. The day/night terminator sweeps across earth's surface at 1000mph.

    "outran the Sun" was perhaps a bit of poetic license -- but only a bit. Before rapid transportation, differences in local times didn't matter because by the time you traveled far enough for the difference to matter, enough time had passed that the difference didn't matter anyway. By the time you got to the next time zone, hours or even days had passed. At that scale, nobody cares about differences in local noon. Rail roads changed that; suddenly you could get there before the issue because moot. Would "outran time" be more accurate? :)

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
  287. Using one time zone is still using time zones by DragonHawk · · Score: 1

    The Russian rail system (spanning about UTC+2 through UTC+11) ditched time zones in favour of using Moscow time on all its time tables.

    Ah, but they're still using time zones. The fact that they've decided to use just one time zone still counts. The first "time zone" was British railway time, and there was only one. That's still a critical difference vs every city and town have its own local noon.

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
  288. Wouldn't work anyway by DragonHawk · · Score: 1

    In practical terms, it wouldn't help that, either, because you'd still have to qualify it with, "Do you mean 1 PM UTC, or 1 PM your time (because most people align their schedule to the sun and so haven't adopted UTC)".

    And before anyone drags out the metric system as an example of global standardization that worked, the metric unit of time is the second. We should all be using kiloseconds; this "hour" thing has no basis in la Systeme International d'unites.

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
  289. It Would Upset The Drunks . . . by tgeek · · Score: 1

    . . . if they could no longer use the old "Well, it's 5:00 somewhere!" excuse!

  290. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by interval1066 · · Score: 1

    1) Your using GMT anyway, so your all set. 2) When was the last time you called a meeting for "the hour at which the sun is 60 degrees on the horizon."? The position of the sun is immaterial. You call meetings using a position on a clock face, not where exactly where the sun is. Do you call off a meeting because its raining? Perhaps, maybe if its off site, but not because you don't know where the sun is and your scared.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  291. Swatch @ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone already had a similar idea back in 1998: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatch_Internet_Time

  292. Re:If you want to get up an hour early in the summ by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

    Good point, whether or not you intended it.

    What I meant, is that if it were as easy as the person implies, then obviously there would still be problems. So, yes, a store could open an hour early and close an hour early, but a lot of people would have a tough time coordinating their schedules. That's why the having the government enforce Day Light Savings Time, or not, is a good thing.

    My point is that getting up an hour earlier in summer isn't going to bring about the same outcome of Day Light Savings.

  293. Ante/post meridiem by DragonHawk · · Score: 2

    It starts with 1am, 2am, 3am... 10am, 11am... what would you expect next? Well, considering it's a base 12 system, you'd expect 12am, followed by 1pm. Nooooo, what you get is 12pm, 1pm, 2pm... WTF? Did we do a #define 12 0 and found a compiler that allowed that?

    AM = ante meridiem = before midday
    PM = post meridiem = after midday

    The Romans numbered the hours from noon in each direction. What we call "10:00 AM" today was "2 a.m." for them -- two hours before midday.

    At some point, people decided it was easier to always count forward. I'd guess the invention of mechanical clocks might have had something to do with that. But they kept the a.m./p.m. convention for writing down times. It refers to which half of the day you're in; it's *not* another decimal place in the time itself. The confusion around turnover prolly wasn't such a big deal back then: Digital clocks hadn't been invented yet, and precise timekeeping was rare. It usually wasn't needed when the fasting thing around was a horse.

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
  294. Saskatchewan by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

    If you want to know how it would turn out, look to Saskatchewan. We manage just fine.

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  295. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by srmalloy · · Score: 1

    You call meetings using a position on a clock face, not where exactly where the sun is.

    Actually, you do. Take an old-style clock -- one that has hands, not a digital clock. Point the hour hand at the sun. If you're north of the equator, halfway between the hour hand and 12 is due south (if you're south of the equator, it's due north). So by specifying the time of a meeting, you're also specifying where the sun will be.

  296. s/fasting/fastest/ by DragonHawk · · Score: 1

    In the parent post: s/fasting/fastest/

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
    1. Re:s/fasting/fastest/ by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the clarification. I was trying to figure out the hell not eating horse meat had to do with timekeeping. ;)

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  297. why stop there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't go GMT and still keep am and pm, you need to go on military time. And wait! The earth rotates in 23 hours 56 min and 4 seconds, so clocks are still fucked, shouldn't we change the length of a second to compensate? And why are we using base 12 or base 24 instead of base 10 to measure time? And WTF is up with imperial measurements? And holy crap tablespoons, teaspoons??

    Ah fuckit. Truth is, I don't care about existing in world time, I only care about my own back yard - and even then, I wouldn't even think about a clock if it didn't mean so much to my employer and the stores where I buy shit.

  298. Dumb idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why aren't we doing it? Because it's a retarded fucking idea you moron.

  299. 1 pint = half a liter by DragonHawk · · Score: 1

    1 pint = half a liter

    Sure, it's wrong. A two-by-four ain't really 2 inches by 4 inches, either. Chances are your 12 ounce cup isn't really 12 ounces, too.

    You might point out that a two-by-four *used* to measure 2x4, but the principle still applies: What we call something doesn't have to be its measurement, even if what we call it sounds like a measurement.

    Base 10 isn't as convenient as some other bases would be, but we've been using base 10 for so long it's never going to change. You're complaining about how people measure liquids. Try getting people to change how they *count*.

    Base 12, in particular, would have worked a lot better. You can divide it cleanly in five ways (halves, thirds, quarters, sixths, twelfths). Base ten only divides cleanly three ways (halves, fifths, tenths). You can even count in base 12 on your fingers; just bring your thumb in again at the end. But it was not to be. Sigh.

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
  300. Birth Of Who? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree to the loss of timezones but why stop there cant we move to a new date format as well.. surely as we transition to IPv6 which was designed with multiple planets of colonization in mind cant we strip off the notion of months and years?


    lets just start counting. simple at first like as soon as we pass to 2012 the date becomes 20120101 but when the failed notion of January stops we move
    20120130
    20120131
    20130132
    20130133

    we could call it a "stardate".
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stardate

  301. for once the Feds may be clearly Constitutional by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    snarkiness about the Feds and the rickroll aside, for once the Feds may be clearly Constitutional here
    "The Congress shall have power to ... fix the standard of weights and measures" (including standards for measuring time?)

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  302. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So by specifying the time of a meeting, you're also specifying where the sun will be.

    BUT it doesn't make any difference. You're completely glossing over my point. Think about it; once you get used to the fact, where the sun is is completely immaterial.

  303. try real time instead by swell · · Score: 1

    No room to reproduce my paper on the subject, but here's the executive summary:

    Real time is the actual time where you are right now. If the sun is directly overhead it is noon. A mile west it is still morning, and to the east it is afternoon.

    There is no reason that we cannot use real time with the technology we have today.

    If you drive 30 miles east or west to work, you will have to make some adjustments to get there on time by their clock. Can you handle that?

    Your biological clock can work as intended by nature and you will live longer, healthier and happier.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
  304. Dammit! by Wokan · · Score: 1

    I've been making this same argument for the last few months. I suppose it's good to know I'm not alone in this.

    1. Re:Dammit! by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      Rest assured, that with 7 billion people on the planet, there will always be someone who agrees with any given screwball idea. :)

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  305. Basic arithmetic is hard by SilverJets · · Score: 1

    derp derp derp

  306. Oh the lazines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "First time accepted submitter hairyfish" writes
    "[...]There'll be some pain with the initial changeover, but from then on it's all good. Got a meeting with colleagues on the other side of the world? 4 a.m. means 4 a.m. for everyone. Got a flight landing at 3 p.m.? 3 p.m. now means 3 p.m. for everyone. [...] So why aren't we doing it?"

    I guess after this one, no more submissions from HairyFish. LOL. Seriously, this question/dilemma is just pure stupid. Basically everyone is supposed to give up the effort of simple math but put up with the horrors that will come from doing this change ? When you would travel to another place, schedules will be completely different. If one cannot understand the simplicity of timezones, I doubt they would ever be able to adapt nearly every country having different timestamps. Either way, you`d have time differences around the globe, even if you change the numbers that indicate the time in a certain place.

  307. It would make some things easier by _3000farad · · Score: 1

    I am sort of acting as the database manager for the Global Ozone Project, an organization that sends ozone monitors to schools around the world and has them upload their data to our database. We are currently in the process of working with AIRNow, the EPA's air quality organization, to see if our data can be included in their database. So far, we have spent about a month trying to get things set up and working. The vast majority of our problems have been related to timestamps on each ozone measurement. Because there was no way to guarantee that people had set the time on the ozone monitors right at all, we had to use the time that each point was uploaded to the server. This would be almost fine except for the fact that it was a Windows server and no one had bothered to change the default timezone, so it was using the local time and daylight savings was turned on. We ended up converting all of the times to GMT, but it still meant that when daylight savings goes away there is one hour where we have twice as much data as we should and the next hour has no data. In other words, I am fed up with dealing with timezones and daylight savings. Yes, it would be very hard for things to get adjusted, especially when it comes to things like the firmware in our ozone monitors, but I believe it would be worth it. And people? People can get used to things. I would find it better anyways.

  308. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because it would disrupt the lives of 99.995 percent of people in the world to help a few jackass's who are are too stupid to set their watch..
        Really, this is just dumb..

  309. This'll be fun by Torodung · · Score: 1

    It wouldn't solve anything. In fact, it would probably make it harder to grasp when you shouldn't be calling. This is one place where having to convert to a standard that makes more tangible hours of the day like local breakfast, lunch, tea, dinner and hour of sleep, requires you to localize to someone else's schedule. With no more than double digit integer math, no less. That's a bargain. I agree that the numbers themselves can be seen to be arbitrary (why not 48 half hours?), because they are abstract concepts, but the reason we have chosen them to signify time in specific "zones" is anything but arbitrary. That's necessary.

    Now when our computer overlords finally take over, of which I heartily approve, then it will make sense for them to sync time to an agreed upon longitude at noon, as they have no such biological needs. My silicon master tells me that the prime meridian will be somewhere over New Zealand, though, for their own inscrutable reasons. It will not be "arbitrarily" chosen to be centered over a long defunct empire.

  310. EXACTLY! by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    I've had an atomic watch for years as well as a home clock. Doesn't matter where you are, you always have the correct time, to within a 1/2 second.

  311. Sort of. Windows uses local TZ for the BIOS by Sits · · Score: 2
  312. "door in the face" by KingAlanI · · Score: 1
    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  313. swatch internet time by hitmark · · Score: 1
    --
    comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  314. removeing timezones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is the stupidest idea ive ever heard of. if people get confused by time differences because they are too stupid to work it out thats their problem

  315. So...much...stupid by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

    I'm genuinely shocked at the number of stupid people in this discussion who a) can't understand timezones, b)think this would be a good idea, c) can't understand 24hr time and d) can't easily flip between GMT/UTC and their local timezone in their head. Did I miss the memo about "Get a complete fucking idiot to post using your uid day"?

  316. Oblig Simpsons by blippy · · Score: 1

    All of the problems could be solved by simply switching to a metric time.

    Remember this time people, 80 past 2 on April 47th, it's the dawn of a new enlightenment.

  317. Re:If you want to get up an hour early in the summ by Splab · · Score: 1

    Because our working times are dictated by social norms?

    Move out of the basement and see the real world...

  318. Failed before: Swatch Internet Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatch_Internet_Time

  319. Doing away with leap seconds by tepples · · Score: 1

    See previous stories posted to Slashdot about doing away with leap seconds: 2010-08-24 and 2011-06-28.

  320. Building a PC to avoid foreign tech support by tepples · · Score: 0

    No, I always build my own PC.

    How does that work? I did a Google search for build your own laptop and all I got were manufacturer sites for ordering a customized laptop that the manufacturer actually builds and ships.

  321. Raw milk vs. raw fish by Compaqt · · Score: 2

    What's your idea of a "pure" food? Food comes from animals, dirt, or fungus.

    If you don't like the idea of drinking secretions from a cow's mammary glands, just come out and say it.

    For some people (not all), the idea of drinking milk from a TB-free herd as it came from the cow is appealing. It's cooled to halt bacteria growth.

    >potentially deadly

    You've got to be kidding. I'd love to hear if you support armed raids on sushi bars. Sushi being raw fish, of course. Oh, and fugu, too.

    As long as the product is properly marked, and people do know exactly what they're getting, what's the need for busybodies to bother themselves?

    --
    I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
  322. Why we use time zones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We use time zones because people get up in the morning and go to bed at night. people do not all get up at whatever "8am" is no matter where the sun is.

  323. GMT rules OK by GerryHattrick · · Score: 1

    Great idea. And get back to driving on the left, to avoid all those 'foreign' confusions too.

  324. Timezone code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you asked me this question two years ago, I would have voted for you. I was maintaining the timezone code for a major unix distro, and I can tell you that its always tough to maintain a timezone code.

  325. Lots of good ideas suck..... by joerog · · Score: 1

    Our whole human existence is built around time, specifically morning, noon, afternoon and evening and midnight. How would you fix the title of the movie 'High Noon'? All the languages I have studied have names for these times and more. No, just because an idea is good and practical does not mean that everyone will like it. Still, if the idea of universal application of UTC has merit, then natural social pressures will bring about the change. To facilitate this conditions for change, we should quote times in the local window and include UTC reference in all communications using local time in the media. Until you get people educated and using UTC, you will never bring about the change unless we lapse into a world dictatorship and the dictator likes UTC.

  326. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by thePuck77 · · Score: 1

    Pretty much every scientific and engineering application already uses metric. Having both standards in practice have led to stupid, wasteful, and avoidable accidents, plus it's just silly. Metric is obviously superior; it's not a matter of opinion. We would have to deal with less bullshit coding for multiple units for everything, (though I practically think in pixels and ems anyway) plus (once they got used to it) people would be able to benefit from the simpler conversions.

    However, OC is wrong about the motivation. It's not that Americans are too lazy to make the switch. The real reason we don't change is because we are America and it's a way to be oppositional relative to the global community. We're the teenagers of global culture.

    --
    "We live as though the world were as it should be, to show it what it can be." - Joss Whedon via Angel
  327. Zones for the End of Time by hutsell · · Score: 1

    I thought the answer was obvious: It's not being implemented because no one has figured out a way to stop time or be able to determine when the event will naturally occur. Then I read the summary.

    --
    Yesterday's Weirdness is Tomorrow's Reason Why
  328. What is the problem we're trying to solve here? by Hazelfield · · Score: 1

    I frequently host conference calls with people from other parts of the world. Every time I schedule them it takes something like two minutes for me to check the local time for everyone. It's a minor inconvenience, sure, but nothing I can't manage, it's just a matter looking it up. Same thing goes for traveling across time zones - I mean, you have to buy tickets, wait in line to check in the baggage, wait in line for the security check, wait for the gate to open, sit on a plane for several hours, and then to everything again in reverse order on your destination. Adjusting your clock, on the other hand, only takes a few seconds to do. Time zones are good. They were invented for a reason, and those reasons still stand. In fact, in China where the whole country runs on the same time for political reasons, the Western parts of the country has adopted an unofficial local time that better matches the sun's movement.

  329. Can we get away with years numbering too ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because AFAIK having years numbered after the birth of a guy about 2000 years ago is also a "relic of the past" ...

    oh and imperial or decimal measures ? as in "I'd like 10^100 molecules of flour please"

    [/sarcasm]

  330. not just timezones. by sixsixtysix · · Score: 1

    i say we switch to six 28-hour days.

    --
    ...
  331. Switch to metric time! by jageryager · · Score: 1

    If we ever try to pull off a bug stupid change, I say lets go to metric time. This base 60 and base 12/24 stuff is a lot of bother. http://zapatopi.net/metrictime/

    --
    "They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety"-B.Franklin
  332. Is This A Taste Of Things To Come? by Seupsut · · Score: 1

    This is probably the dumbest thing I've ever witnessed on the slashdot feed. Where's quality control?

  333. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

    Of course it is, unless you expect people to start work at, say, 10am irrespective of whether it will be light or dark during their work. This won't work. People synchronize themselves to the sun, even if their job does not require them being outside.

    So, you would still need to know if the person you are going to call is asleep or not.

  334. Changing one 'problem' for another by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think about what that suggestion really means. It means that every place on earth would have to establish a set of rules about when work begins and ends. They would have to establish rules about when work begins and ends on different days of the year. When all is said and done, we would just end up with an arbitrary set of rules to define when the day begins and ends during the course of the day. It would be no different than timezones, just more arbitrary and therefore harder to keep track of and work with.

    Timezones have nothing to do with "areas being isolated". It has to do with the reality of communal creatures who are diurnal who live on a (near) spherical planet which rotates and has a tilted axis and revolves about a single sun.

  335. Too late for that by Phyer · · Score: 1

    It's far too late for the end of time zones. If that were to happen, it would ruin meetings and other incredibly important things all over the world lol

  336. Might work if not for day/night, sleep by UniAce · · Score: 1

    This would only work if there was no day/night cycle, or if the day/night cycle was completely meaningless to the entities keeping time. We're on a rotating planet near an active star, so we're stuck with a day/night cycle for now. Plus, we're still biological organisms that must sleep, which, for us, is best done at night (thanks to the way we evolved). Perhaps the elimination of time zones would work and make sense if we became digital entities (i.e., downloaded our minds into non-organic substrates), and/or if we inhabited a chunk of matter (planet or construct) that was tidally locked to a star, completely surrounded by nearby stars, or in deep space.

  337. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by interval1066 · · Score: 1

    YOUR NOT GETTING IT!. After people get accustomed to what time it is when the sun comes up, IT WON"T MATTER! When, in your local area, the sun comes up at 23:30, you'll know!!! You don't need a 12 hour clock connected to a local time zone! If you would just think about it, it will make sense. WHY do you need to know that the sun is at zenith at 12:00 pm??? You can just as easily come to learn that the sun rises at 23:30... this is not hard people.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  338. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

    Sure, I'll know when the sun is over my head and what the clock says then. Now, the question is will you know whether it is day or night _for me_ when you want to call me. You will know what my clock says, but how do you know that 02:00 is the middle of the night for me and you should not call me.

    When you want to call me now you go something like this: "my local time is 16:00, my time zone is GMT+9, his time zone is GMT+2, so his clock shows 09:00, he should be in the office, so it's OK to call". With the new system you would go something like this: "the time for both of us is 07:00, his work starts at 06:00, so he should be in the office, so it's OK to call".

  339. This is retarded.. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    get rid of time zones but keep the 100% useless DST? what complete moron thought this one up?

    honestly, Daylight Savings time does NOTHING. we are not an agricultural country anymore so catering to a handfull of farmers is dumb.

    Get rid of DST first THEN we can look at the retarded idea of getting rid of time zones.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  340. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by interval1066 · · Score: 1

    I'm not entirely sure (or convinced) I do that now. Most of these interactions occur with people in the same time zone. Its rare that I need to set a time or a date with some one in a different time zone, and on the occasions I do, they seem smart enough to know that a particular time won't work for them anyway and tell me so. Again, I don't recall the position of the sun being germain to the conversation.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  341. Outrunning the sun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "With the coming of railroads, for the first time, people were frequently outrunning the sun."

    So railroad trains travel in excess of 1000 kph?? (~1700 kph at the equator, less as you move north/south)

  342. This idea of one timezone by Boawk · · Score: 1

    will be more likely to take off in the U.S. if we first have to convert it to metric.

  343. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

    If you only communicate with those in your time zone, then wouldn't the current system be better? I mean why go trough all that change and the result would be the same. So what if the clock shows the same time everywhere in the world (or not) if the clocks of your time zone are the only ones that matter to you?

  344. astonishingly bad idea by tverbeek · · Score: 1

    "So why aren't we doing it?"

    Because it's the worst idea I've heard suggested outside of a political campaign, at least since Michael Dell suggested shutting down Apple and giving the money back to the shareholders.

    There is almost no benefit whatsoever to people who don't travel or participate in pointless teleconferences a lot. Why on earth would I care whether my clock is the same as someone's in Gdansk or Perth? Most of my communication with people these days is asynchronous, and almost none of it is based on it being scheduling by the clock, except for face-to-face meetings all in the same time zone.

    Furthermore, without time zones, the date would have to change everywhere simultaneously. Fine if you live in Europe; it'll happen while you sleep. Too damn bad if you live in Hawaii; it's going to happen around noon-ish (or will they not be allowed to call it that anymore)?

    A: "I'll see you on Tuesday."
    B: "Do you mean Tuesday afternoon tomorrow, or Tuesday morning the day after that?"

    Y: "What's the date today?"
    Z: "Let me think... um, what time is it?

    This would totally muck up most of our day-to-day usage of time and date as a reference point – undermining the whole concept of "today" – and solve a problem (it isn't "noon" everywhere at the same time) that's already been solved: with time zones.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  345. Get rid of time zones and Daylight Savings Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been whining about time zones and time changes for most of my life. As a programmer, when you see all of the overhead that is necessary to accommodate such constructs, you wonder why people don't just use the real time (GMT) instead. Sheesh, they'd get used to it in about a week or so and that would be it. The world would suddenly become a simpler and more efficient place.

  346. Meanie time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ya'll are mean. Yes, the idea is a stupid one, but its the "best" one the submitter has ever heard. So, have some pity for the submitter, he's never heard a good idea, after all.

  347. This Doesn't Even Help Travelers Or Globalists by MrLizard · · Score: 1

    The handful of people defending this idiocy choose two tactics: "Well, this is a New Global Age" and "Hey, why are you all so close minded? Remember, they laughed at continental drift!" Let's look at those defenses.

    The idea that this would help people who travel a lot, or people who do a lot of global business, is bollocks, because it removes all information content from time. Right now, "12:00 PM" conveys meaning -- it means, for most people, "around lunchtime". If it's 12:00 everywhere on Earth at once, that meaning is lost. This proposal MAKES THINGS WORSE. IT REDUCES INFORMATION CONTENT. Human biology will not change; we've evolved to a particular timescale and we're happier, healthier, and more productive when we stick to it -- though of course individuals vary. (And if it turns out that a slightly mutant internal clock leads to you producing more children, over time, the internal clocks of our whole species might change... but just because you make a fortune in currency trading because you're sharpest at 4 AM doesn't imply you'll have more kids, as wealth tends to negatively correlate with offspring in industrial nations, but I digress.)

    So, the idea that "If it's 6:00 here, it's 6:00 everywhere!" is somehow useful or helpful for the New Global Era is absolute and utter drivel, because it forces you to remember what's happening at "6:00" in any part of the world. In London, do people eat lunch at 6:00, or leave work, or are they sound asleep? In Hong Kong, is 6:00 breakfast time, the start of the work day, or rush hour? It's very easy for a computer to add/subtract hours automatically, so you can schedule things to your time and other people see it at theirs; it's harder for a computer to deal with abstractions like "It's around lunchish", without having to be programmed with something that ties activity periods to GPS systems. We could have Clippy come up and say, "You're scheduling a meeting with the Hong Kong office for 3:00 PM, which is when they're going to be home with their families. Would you like to reschedule? Y/N"

    Remember, folks: The reason we remember the wacky, far-out ideas that everyone laughed at but which turned out to be brilliant is because they're the extreme minority -- we report on planes that crash, not ones that land safely. Most of the wacky, far-out ideas that everyone laughed at.... deserved to be laughed at. Being "outside the box" is not the same as being RIGHT, and most of the time, the box is there because no one's found a USEFUL idea outside of it.

    1. Re:This Doesn't Even Help Travelers Or Globalists by gig · · Score: 1

      Obviously, computers can more easily translate times between zones for us transparently than they can translate what cultural rituals are happening at what time in each place.

  348. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by Ashtead · · Score: 1

    Over here, we say "0.4" for the drink of that size (many places sell beer in 0.4 L glasses) or the traditional 0.5L, the "half-liter" literally. Then there's the "0.6" for the thirstier people... none of this gets to be any more complicated than the "pint" or "cup". The latter is for coffee only, and comes in various sizes, so it isn't really quantified.

    --
    SIGBUS @ NO-07.308
  349. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by pjt33 · · Score: 1

    You're missing the fact that recipes aren't expressed in metric by taking recipes in Imperial, converting them as precisely as possible, and writing them down with more precision than the original Imperial values. It would be 15g, which isn't too hard to multiply by 3, leaving aside the fact that scarcely any recipes use non-integral numbers of ounces anyway. My cake book (metric with Imperial in brackets) uses 25g/ounce as a conversion factor, which given the errors inherent in using an analogue scale isn't going to have a noticeable effect on all but a vanishingly small number of recipes.

  350. Re:If you want to get up an hour early in the summ by m50d · · Score: 1

    It's useful for the people as a whole if services are available at earlier hours during summer. So the federal government changes its clock, government offices change when they open, and most businesses go along with them for convenience. So right back at you; if you want to get up at the same "absolute time" in summer, why don't you? But don't bitch that the stores are shutting an hour earlier; that's what the majority prefers.

    --
    I am trolling
  351. It's not the timezone concept... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real problem isn't time zones but the fact that there is only the need for 24 time zones. But every country has to screw that up and have different names for the same timezone (While there is PST in America, there is another timezone with the same initials...confusing). Timezone A follows DST while Timezone B does not which causes confusion. We should have 24 time-zones and their names should be as simple as their UTC offset with no DST.

    In that world, everything is a lot simpler.

  352. Re:If you want to get up an hour early in the summ by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    You should try to find a better class of golf course. Floodlight golfing has an air of decadence you simply can't beat.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  353. Re:If you want to get up an hour early in the summ by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Say what you want, one day, I will hold my very personal light making device in my hands, and it won't burn my fingers while lighting the area. In fact, I should probably go and invent it, I'll make billions! I'll call it ... umm... the personal light

    Patents pending.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  354. Amen ! by Mr+Europe · · Score: 1

    Totally agree. Get also rid of the "Daylight Saving Time". Noon would still be when sun at highest, but that would happen at different time depending of the location. Isn't that natural ?! Actually the sun is not at it's highest at 12.00 even in the current system, except when: 1) not using DST and 2) on correct latitude of the time zone. On the other side of your time zone the sun could be at highest just after 11.00 or before 13.00. And the stupid DST adds another hour mistake.

  355. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

    Ok, then it is easier to convert 1/2 oz to 4 oz when you multiply a recipe by 8 then it is to convert 15 g to 120 g.

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  356. AM/PM has to go, but not location-based time zones by gig · · Score: 1

    Time zones are less work than ever. When I travel from San Francisco to New York City, my iPhone adjusts the Time Zone accordingly. Same with Daylight Savings Time. I don't have any clocks that are not both location-aware and network-connected and neither should you unless you are a masochist. Out of all the things computers can do for us, managing the clock is the most basic.

    The thing that has to go is AM/PM. The defense of it is not everybody can count to 24, but that is fucking weak because at high noon, ask 100 people if it is 12 am or pm and half will be wrong, like flipping a coin. And if using a 24 hour clock, time zones are not that hard to deal with manually. That is, compare "15:00 GMT -8" which is 15-8 which is 7:00 GMT to "3:00 PM GMT -8" which is a much, much more complex equation to convert to GMT.

  357. Swatch tried to do this in the late 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Swatch tried to do this in the late 90s when they introduced "Swatch Internet Time." The goal was to make time more base 10 friendly and to remove the concept of time zones. Not sure if they still include it on their watches these days. I remember I actually ran a little app on my PC back then that showed the current time in beat time. After a couple of weeks I actually got used to when certain events of the day (lunch, time leave work, dinner, midnight) were supposed to be in beats.

    From wikipedia:
    Swatch Internet Time (or beat time) is a decimal time concept introduced in 1998 and marketed by the Swatch corporation as an alternative, decimal measure of time. One of the goals was to simplify the way people in different time zones communicate about time, mostly by eliminating time zones altogether.
    Instead of hours and minutes, the mean solar day is divided up into 1000 parts called ".beats". Each .beat lasts 1 minute and 26.4 seconds. Times are notated as a 3-digit number out of 1000 after midnight. So, @248 would indicate a time 248 .beats after midnight representing 248/1000 of a day, just over 5 hours and 57 minutes.
    There are no time zones in Internet Time; instead, the new time scale of Biel Mean Time (BMT) is used, based on Swatch's headquarters in Biel, Switzerland and equivalent to Central European Time, West Africa Time, and UTC+1. And unlike Civil time in most European countries, Internet Time does not observe daylight saving time.

  358. One idea for global time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure this was mentioned in one of the 800 comments I didn't have the time to read, but back when international organizations were first trying to solve the standardization of time issue, there was one intriguing idea for putting everyone on the same time, much as the first post here suggests. The process involved dividing the world up into an equal number of equal-width zones, according to longitude, and assigning each longitudinal border a letter value (A, B C, etc). The position of the son would be the hands of this global clock, and the longitudinal borders would be the numbers. Thus as the Earth rotated, the sun's position would point to A o'clock, then B o'clock, C o'clock, etc. In France, G o'clock might be lunchtime, but it would be more like M or N o'clock for lunch in Japan.

  359. TIME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time is an accommodation to allow us to know when others are doing things.
    It allows us to work and play with others at designated times, and to mark the passing of time - minutes, hours, etc.
    Most people live and work in one place; a local time is all they need to synchronize their daily activities.
    High Noon is recognized throughout the world as mid-day; to meet local needs, there's no reason it should be shifted.
    For businesses to synchronize realtime activities, GMT / UTC is all that is necessary worldwide.
    Knowing these two, Local and Universal times, would allow us all to function perfectly well.
    If people at an East - West distance are aware of the Universal time for scheduled events, worldwide time awareness is guaranteed and scheduling is EASY.
    East of you, local time is earlier; West of you, local time is later. One degree of Longitude equals 4 minutes of adjustment from GMT/UTC, fifteen degrees equals an hour - to EVERY place on earth!
    Why have a wall full of clocks to tell the Local time in distant places, when knowing Universal time and a globe or map for longitude of a location, is all that is needed.

  360. utc only will bring more problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the problems with utc will be shown when we apply it on other planets like mars it has a slightly longer solar day. UTC would make it really confusing since everyday the sun would rise and every other event would happen at a different time (train, plane, work schedules). let the computers document in UTC but for people who are required to get to work or appointments at a certain time (lets be frank having to set your alarm clock to a different UTC time everyday would get really annoying) leave time zones.

  361. Because We'd Have to Rewrite All The Software! by Paul+Slocum · · Score: 1

    If Y2K was a hassle, think what this would be like. It would probably cost billions of dollars to change the software, reprint things, train people, etc. Not only would software require backend changes, but in many cases it would also require some substantial changes to the user interface.

  362. Current system is efficient and elegant by Uggy · · Score: 1

    The hour carries with valuable meta information. Under our current system if it's 2 am, you have an idea that you probably won't get a hold of anyone if you called. With local times more or less being synchronous, 2 am is the same most everywhere and with it comes information about conditions in that time zone. Without this information using the pure UTC time, you'll still have to ask about the conditions on the ground in New Zealand. You'd have to ask follow up questions about whether 2am there is business hours or dinner time or sleeping time. It would be a nightmare. No, the current standardization is useful and communicates valuable information in a convenient format. I am convinced that OP is a troll.

    --
    Toddlers are the stormtroopers of the Lord of Entropy.
  363. Music time by gig · · Score: 1

    We split the day into 24 parts, and with microtunings we also split the octave into 24 parts so quite obviously, the replacement for our archaic time systems is to sing the time in microtunings. Midnight? 440 Hz. 8 PM? 784 Hz. It's so SIMPLE!

  364. Re:If you want to get up an hour early in the summ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Edison *perfected* the incandescent light bulb. He did not invent it. Many people had been working with the ability to get materials to become incandescent due to electrical current. Also, Tesla invented the florescent light *before* Edison got his bulb to work...

  365. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  366. Re:If you want to get up an hour early in the summ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still doesn't solve the problem that there's no sense in making your own light (usually with the help of dead dinosaurs) when there's a gigantic burning ball of gas in the sky that can do the same thing more conveniently.

  367. What does P.M. mean? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Got a meeting with colleagues on the other side of the world? 4 a.m. means 4 a.m. for everyone. Got a flight landing at 3 p.m.? 3 p.m. now means 3 p.m. for everyone.

    What exactly does p.m. and a.m. mean if 4 "O'Clock" is every where the same on the world?

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  368. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by lennier · · Score: 1

    or using what's done in most metric countries, namely use 250ml or 500ml ?

    Right, we * have what's called a "metric cup", which is defined as 250 mils. Simple.

    Soft drink cans are 300 mils, a "pint" bottle is 600 mils, what used to be "a pound" of butter is 500 grams. But we tend to buy our milk in litre bottles at the supermarket anyway. It's more than a pint, but it's still a good human size, and oh my goodness how much easier it is to not have to do weird conversions in your head all day. You just get on with life and free up whole chunks of your brain for important stuff, like putting captions on cats.

    Powers of ten for the win.

    * New Zealand

    --
    You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
  369. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by lennier · · Score: 1

    Well, yes, if you say "1/3 of a meter" where you meant "333 milliliters", I'm sure there would be some confusion.

    Nonsense! You're looking at the guy who drank the Kessel Rum in twelve parsecs.

    --
    You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
  370. Further complexity is needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We might as well just divide the world into seconds instead of hours time zones. Very exact times. eh, eh?

  371. a really, really stupid idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well because were not fuking robots, that's why !!!

    humans need sleep and they are biologically programed to a solar day.

    sounds like this schumck would like us to work continously 365 days a year.

    no i take that back, he would like to get rid of days and years too and just have people work till they are dead.

  372. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by znerk · · Score: 1

    Just picking a nit, but you converted a measure of length to a measure of volume in your rant against fractions.

    --
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
  373. Re:If you want to get up an hour early in the summ by znerk · · Score: 1

    ...if each establishment could open and close as it pleases...

    They already do... some of them choose to be open during "normal business hours", others use their customer flow as an indicator of when the best time to be open is.

    As for your comment:

    ... how would you like it if shops, banks and post offices only opened when you are sleeping?

    If you work graveyards, they already do.

    Sorry, did you have a point?

    Oh, and one more thing...

    Waking up earlier won't give me more free time in the evening, nor would it open restaurants and other places earlier.

    The restaurants that want your business will be open when you want to eat there, and will serve the type of food that you want to eat. Jack-in-the-box has always had both breakfast and lunch food available whenever the doors are open, and McDonald's just decided they're open 24 hours a day because people have such varied schedules that there's always someone upset that you didn't stay open "just one hour later" so they could grab a bite on the way home from work.

    --
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
  374. daylight saving time by CoolGenie · · Score: 1

    First eliminate daylight saving time! This causes lots of mess and is a waste of money.

  375. Meanwhile, elsewhere in the thread by DragonHawk · · Score: 1
    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
  376. Re:If you want to get up an hour early in the summ by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

    Yeah, you're right: it actually happens. My point was: "how would you like it", not whether or not it actually happens.

    People, such you, complain that Daylight Savings is disruptive. Well, get up an hour later, then.

    You remind me of somebody who might complain that he should be able to drive on the left side or the right side of the road, any time he wants. Perhaps you even tail gate ambulances, fire trucks, and police cars, too?

    The way I see it:
    * your argument against Daylight Savings is based solely on some right to not be disrupted, and the desire to be happy
    * the support for Daylight Savings is based on a coordination issue and some desire to be happy.

    I don't think that you have a right to not be disrupted in this way. It only disrupts you twice a year. You probably disrupt yourself more than that, so your body can obviously handle it, regardless of who is disrupting. It's not like the majority of people need this, but this is something that they seem to want or at least allow.

    As I said, getting up an hour earlier doesn't bring about a desirable outcome. A few restaurants and banks and places stay open, but it isn't good enough.

    Honestly, this isn't an issue that I really care about. I'm just practising defending a view.

    One thing that I thought of while I edited is that a lot people probably are less disrupted with Daylight Savings, because there is more darkness in the morning. I could imagine being disrupted with the sun coming up at 2am - 3am. I suppose that they could have thicker curtains or wear a mask, though.

  377. There will be an app for that by DrYak · · Score: 1

    But what happens in 20+ years when a younger generation comes along that doesn't remember the old time zone system?

    The first generation of them, will probably be trained in school to now that a difference in 15 lat translates into a 1h sun difference. And will mentally compute "in my timezone, the sun currently sets up at 11.00. If i want to be sure that my friend is awake, I'll have to wait until 13.00, because he's 33 west from me". Most of the kids won't bother memorising this shit and will just do what the next will be doing anyway.

    The next generation? They'll just use an App on their iDroids 13th generation.

    I suppose this would be one solution, but it seems pretty ridiculous when we already have a system now that doesn't require a constant internet connection or a nearby computer to tell us such a simple bit of information.

    I really think that internet is going to get more and more pervasive. Even before the in-brain wired connection, I really believe that soon everything including your wrist-watch will be 24/24 online. And you'll probably get free world-wide roaming, as long as you consent to your watch recording all your moves for marketing purpose.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  378. Base-12 is what nature intended by sorcerykid · · Score: 1

    I agree base-12 would have been much more practical for all purposes. I'm not sure why it was never universally adopted, except on the clock.

    Perhaps if we ever "reboot" humanity, then we can establish base-12 as the standard.

    --Randall

  379. Re:If you want to get up an hour early in the summ by sorcerykid · · Score: 1

    Um really, social norms? I know plenty of businesses that open at 8am. In fact, frankly most businesses at least here in Illinois open at 8am. I don't know where you live but it seems pretty normal here :)

    --Randall

  380. The new standard time is a half-hour ahead by sorcerykid · · Score: 1

    My proposed solution is to just advance all clocks a half-hour ahead. I advocate designating this as the standard time year round. Thus we would observe the average between daylight saving time and current standard time, and no further adjustment is necessary.

    --Randall

  381. "So why aren't we doing it?" by Sir+Realist · · Score: 1

    Because for the enormous percentage of the worlds population who _don't_ regularly travel internationally, it would be an huge pain in the arse for no benefit whatsoever.

    Any further questions?

  382. Won't Work For Any Business Open In Multiple Areas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "McDonald's Drive Thru -- Open 'Till Midnight" ...

  383. Time is already too complex by sorcerykid · · Score: 1

    I'm in total agreement. What really needs to be rectified is the 24 hour days, 30/31 day months, etc. which are impractical for anything other than perhaps astronomical observations or zodiac readings.

    When I was in high school I devising a comprehensive metric-based system of civic time measurement. I don't remember what the units were called, but the average length of the day was derived as a decimal and the annual calendar was based on degrees of revolution around the sun (with five extra days distributed evenly through the year). I'll have to go through my piles of notes to find that project again :)

    --Randall

  384. First we should learn the correct terminology by sorcerykid · · Score: 1

    You'd think the Slashdot nerds could at least be intelligent about this subject.

    Many of the posts here refer to "Daylight Savings Time". For that matter, go to Options at the top of this page, and even Slashdot calls it "Daylight Savings Time". Yet there is no such thing.

    I can't help but laugh. People aren't as smart as they often pretend to be :P

    --Randall

  385. Re:If you want to get up an hour early in the summ by Splab · · Score: 1

    So you are arguing that it isn't dictated by social norms, with an example of almost an entire town opening at the same time?

    Try going north, set your clock to winter time (in the summer) and see when the sun is up.

  386. Sure we can do it. by GeekishYogi · · Score: 1

    It might be a little more tricky to remove time zones from the entire planet than it was to convert the US to the metric system but we were able to pull that off relatively easily... err... never mind.

  387. Re:If you want to get up an hour early in the summ by sorcerykid · · Score: 1

    Uhhhh, last I checked Illinois is a state, and it is one of the northernmost states in the midwest. It is also one of the most populous states in the entire country. I don't remember Illinois being merely "a town".

  388. @time by timmy.cl · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of Swatch's failed attempt at setting a standard for "Internet Time" back in 1998 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatch_Internet_Time . Remember, those @-preceded 3 digit numbers?

  389. Re:If you want to get up an hour early in the summ by AdamWill · · Score: 1

    There aren't many floodlit public tennis courts.

  390. Swatch Internet Time by archels · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swatch_Internet_Time Swatch Internet Time (or beat time) is a decimal time concept introduced in 1998 and marketed by the Swatch corporation as an alternative, decimal measure of time. One of the goals was to simplify the way people in different time zones communicate about time, mostly by eliminating time zones altogether. Instead of hours and minutes, the mean solar day is divided up into 1000 parts called ".beats". Each .beat lasts 1 minute and 26.4 seconds. Times are notated as a 3-digit number out of 1000 after midnight. So, @248 would indicate a time 248 .beats after midnight representing 248/1000 of a day, just over 5 hours and 57 minutes. There are no time zones in Internet Time; instead, the new time scale of Biel Mean Time (BMT) is used, based on Swatch's headquarters in Biel, Switzerland and equivalent to Central European Time, West Africa Time, and UTC+1. And unlike Civil time in most European countries, Internet Time does not observe daylight saving time.

  391. DST? Ugh... by FreekyGeek · · Score: 1

    Why do something as smart as eliminating timezones and then do something as stupid as keep DST? Whatever we do with time zones, DST should already have been eliminated as an ancient, useless relic decades ago.

  392. Might be useful... by GWBasic · · Score: 1

    Might be useful is things like travel itineraries and meetings also displayed the UTC time in a font smaller then the local time. Might also be useful if some clocks displayed UTC time in smaller text. Overall, however, I really like keeping my time somewhat related to my locale.

  393. Re:If you want to get up an hour early in the summ by znerk · · Score: 1

    I think you have mistaken me for the user you were previously arguing with. My only point was that you were setting up straw men, and fantasizing about a world that matches our current one (for the parameters defined).

    --
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
  394. time is arbitrary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While we are at it why don't we change to 13 months in a year with 28 days in a month. No more 30 and 31 days blah blah blah. Just one month that changes for the leap year. How about the last month of the year. That would make sense.

  395. Decimal time by dolmen.fr · · Score: 1
  396. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by EsbenMoseHansen · · Score: 1

    Where does it say you cannot say 1/3 meter? And certainly, saying 333mm for 1/3 meter implies too much precision, even 33cm would be off. Unless you really meant 1.00 meters.

    --
    Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by rulers as useful.
  397. "First time accepted submitter hairyfish writes" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enough said!

  398. Rise up Star Trek geeks!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our time is at hand! It is finally here! STAR-DATES!!!! Yayyyyyy!!

    (now get back into momma's basement and she'll bring you some cookies and milk in a while ........... wait a minute, is that you Taco??)

  399. New Planet by evanspw · · Score: 2

    Ask yourself this. If tomorrow we (meaning "humanity") were to go colonize another earth-like planet someplace, and set up a bunch of settlements dotted all around the planet according to the local resource availability etc, do you think we'd also have a universal time reference that we'd all use all over this new planet? We'd probably align it to some natural cycle - for instance, the day as defined by an axial revolution determining sunlight/night-time distribution. Would this just be an initial convenience or would it persist past the colonization period for the rest of the time the planet is occupied?

    --
    Interstitial spaces are filled with cream.
  400. Re:If you want to get up an hour early in the summ by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

    No, I realized that you weren't the same person.

    I might be able understand why you think that I was setting up straw men.

    That being said, I don't think that I was doing that at all. Politicians decided to do this. Some people insist that I adjust my own schedule, instead of troubling everybody else. The intent of Daylight Savings wasn't to trouble people. It's just a natural consequence of Daylight Savings. His and your simplistic solutions to getting what we want wouldn't really provide what we want.

    Adjusting the clocks is the easiest way to get what we want. That doesn't justify it, but that is the easiest way.

  401. Re:Most people don't travel or do business so glob by unitron · · Score: 1

    ...metric is a totally superior system in every way ...

    No, it is not.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  402. Re:If you want to get up an hour early in the summ by znerk · · Score: 1

    I never suggested any solutions, so you're still barking up the wrong tree. All I did was correct a fallacious statement that banks and other businesses didn't operate at the hours of their own choosing. Better luck next time, thanks for playing.

    --
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
  403. Re:If you want to get up an hour early in the summ by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

    "All I did was correct a fallacious statement that banks and other businesses didn't operate at the hours of their own choosing."

    Fair enough, and I did agree with your correction.

  404. Re:If you want to get up an hour early in the summ by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

    Also, I don't think it was an issue of individuals having the freedom to do 1 thing or another. It was about how easy or how hard it would be to do it on a large scale.

  405. This is software development problem by rosencreuz · · Score: 1

    Programming languages (C#, Java, tsql, javascript, etc.) doesn't have good concepts for handling timezones and timezones are usually ignored during design and implementation. And then developers doesn't like timezones, and their software cannot support people to manage time easily. I don't think people have any problems with timezones. Better timezone support in languages, frameworks and applications are needed, not removal of timezones.