A while ago on/. I saw a comment where someone suggested a "workaround" to laws like this. The system they proposed (and I can't find the comment now) was to have 2 machines, both with completely encrypted drives. Both machines are network boot servers, and each machine holds the other machine's decryption key, and the boxes boot off each other.
So 1 of the 2 boxes can be rebooted no problem, but if both machines go down at once (ie the state remove the machines, or the user cuts the power) then neither will start again, and the data can't be decrypted because the key is on the other machine's hard drive, encrypted. Of course, during the set up process you'd need the keys on a third machine (or CD or USB stick etc.), and for "safety" you document the destruction of the machine/CD/USB drive.
In reality you probably would want to have copies of the keys elsewhere (but you never tell the state that), but the boxes booting off each other means you could run a completely encrypted system but never actually use the keys yourself apart from during initial set up.
For example, it's supposedly still legal for me, as a resident of the city of York, to shoot a Scotsman within the city walls after dark with a bow-and-arrow from horseback! Of course whether it would stand up in court or not is another thing entirely.
I've heard the essentially the same about people from Chester and the Welsh.... methinks that your or my anecdote could be verging on an urban legend.... or maybe a similar byelaw was passed in both places?!
I've only been to Amsterdam once, but the "mass produced pot" that is presumably sold in the more commercial coffee shops is still good shit, and better than some of the shitty homegrown* I've bought illegally in the UK under the pretence of "skunk". You know, small buds with chopped up leaves or something....
For example, only yesterday I bought some weed in the UK that had small amounts of the smell and taste of cannabis seeds when it was smoked, only because my man was having supply problems. If your pot has seeds in then the grower was inexpirenced or didn't know what they were doing. Any legal commercial operation will be growing just fat female buds and making sure there is no pollen allowed near the ladies.
But you are right about smokers supporting the little guy.... but because of this if weed was legalised tomorrow in our respective countries, I feel that the market would be nice and competitive... There'd be some major commercial players selling "weed", and it'd be the equivalent of Fosters or Carling in the UK beer market: a plain lager that does the job and is on sale in nearly every pub in the country, but there's still a market for premium lagers, ales, stout etc. and "guest beers". The students or equivalent groups of young people would lap up the "cheap" commercial stuff, but the more choosey would purchase from local growers or Cannabis variety specialists (e.g. Orange bud).
nasty mexican brick shit
Do you mean resin? Hashish, soapbar, solids, brown.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabis_resin Decent quality resin is OK (but nothing compared to real pot).... but due to Cannabis' illegal nature often resin gets mixed with other stuff to make the drug go further. Some nice resin in a spliff with skunk does get you nicely ripped, and makes the much more expensive pot go further.
PS Try "solaring". You get a magnifying glass and focus the sun onto a bud in the bowl of a pipe or bong. It's good!;) A real nice high because you don't inhale butane and burnt butane from a lighter, or sulphur/phosphorus from a match, just THC vapour and pot smoke!
*Homegrown weed varies in qulity massively in the UK, from a plant people have grown outside from seeds they got in a deal, to hydroponically grown set ups with lights, vetilation etc.
English police and American police, despite the fact that both governments are (per capita) about equally well-armed
Are you saying that the British police could be armed as heavily as the US police in the time it takes to change a shift? The UK military, no doubt are as well armed as the US military, but AFAIK (and I hope I'm right), the normal police in this country (the UK) are not firearm trained and the police themselves do not have enough weapons to give 1 to every policeman.
Simple solution, fake tapes. He just needed some VHS tapes out the back or under the counter, and hand them over too. They could have recordings of Miami Vice, Morse, Ironside or some other policey programme on just for the irony. America's dumbest criminal would be perfect:)
At the same time as information about the update was being released, Microsoft mentioned that it will not be able to patch Windows 98 and ME against a loophole discovered in April 2006.
Fixing this bug in the ageing software would require a major re-write of the Windows Explorer program used in these old copies of the operating system.
Microsoft is not prepared to undertake this work, given that all support for Windows 98 and ME ends on 11 July 2006.
So even though Microsoft have stated that they support 98 and ME until 11th July 2006, they will not support those two OSes today?
Yes, people are crazy if they rely on 9x in anyway, but when Gates says he'll support it until a date I'd expect support to be provided, even it means some changes to the shell. And we all know how much exageration is used when a job is being avoided... ("major re-write of the Windows Explorer").
Are managable switches resistent to arp cache poisoning? I think that's the right term:) I know that simple switches can be confused by an attacker and the switch will then behave like a hub... do better switches resist these attacks?
I use some select FF extensions, and will soon be setting up a tor node, along with common sense.
The FF extensions I use are:
NoScript (http://www.noscript.net/). I allow very few sites to run scripts, and the vast majority of sites work fine without JS. Even if JS is needed, it is easily enabled for good with noscript, or just for that browser session (and I use this feature more). Like flash and animated gifs, JS has been hijacked by marketters as a method to peddle their wares and they have spoilt it for everyone else. A fantastic side effect of running without JS is many sites use JS almost as a crude DRM.... There's some sites about that make you click an "I agree" button to download stuff, and often the EULA is in an HTML form textbox. The more stupid web devs protect the text of the EULA with JS to stop it being changed, even though text in boxes can be "readonly" just with HTML from 10 years ago.... then you agree to your new contract:)
RefControl (http://www.stardrifter.org/refcontrol/). A referer blocker. I block all referers as it's simply a way to provide less info to a website. A website doesn't need to know where I have come from, and what will they do with that knowledge if they have it? Probably nothing that can harm me, but it could be useful for targetted adverts. Very few sites need referers to work, and they are mostly pr0n and warez/crack sites that use referers to stop leaching. That reminds me, must whitelist fosi again:)
Adblock. (http://adblock.mozdev.org/). Everyone will be familiar with this. I use filterset.g too, and also add agressive filters for sites that are blatently tracking/trending domains. For example, one filter I have is http*.google-analytics.com/* . I have seen one tracking domain serving web bugs (those 1x1 images) by https, so my filters these days allow for that too...
Extended Cookie Manager. (http://xcm.defector.de/). I basically accept all cookies on a session basis, and then whitelist the sites that need permament cookies, or at least the sites I use that I trust not to track me (more than is necessary for the operation of the website), or that I don't want to have to log into every time.
If anyone can answer this I'd be chuffed though: Can FF be made to automatically try to use HTTPS for all surfing? For example, you type in a URL and it'll try the HTTPS site, you click on a link on a website and the browser will go to the https if it exists?.
As I said above I'm going to be setting up a tor node too on a spare machine, and will use this for searches and any communication with governmental sites, and sites where I may disclose personal info.
I can, if I want to, renew my car tax online for example. The UK government has demonstrated it's obsession with data collection with the the ID cards etc., and sooner or later they will realise really how powerful datamining is. I don't feel they need to ever be given my name/address and IP. If they ever want to determine users from IPs (eg IndyMedia servers) they can get a fucking court order and get the ISP to hand over the info. Even that's horrific, but there's not much I can directly do about that, apart from a Tor node. An extension for FF to automatically use a proxy for certain domains would be cool.
Of course common sense too protects your privacy. Always use fake details if registering for somewhere that doesn't need your details, and never use the same fake person at a bunch of sites, or even all the time. Make up names on the spot, or just munge keys. Some sites want valid info, or even check postal codes exist... We all know about 90210 for America, and the British postal code system can be abused too. I tend to use B1 1AA when a site wants a post code, or I'll go to their contact pages and find one there. Some sites are smart enough to not let
In Britian encryption is perfectly legal (I realise your.uk/.au comment was probably tongue-in-cheek), but it is a criminal offence to not hand over passwords or encryption keys to a court AFAIK.... The RIP act can be thanked for this.
The music biz wised up to the consumers (not customers, oh no) violating their IP by not buying their overpriced LP crates. The RIAA set the attack lawyers on the poor defenseless milk maids, and they had no choice but to change the format of milk bottles and crates.
About 3 years ago I had some exposure (if you'll excuse the pun) to some of Britain's nuclear power stations' IT, and several stations are no doubt still using broken thing, sorry, token ring.
The power stations have had IT infrastructure for years (probably 5+ years more than the average office, after networking kit for nuclear and safety related stuff I should think), and the kit installed at the time would have been possibly the fastest available. Upgrading doesn't happen because of the way the operation is run: Everything is long term plans to be implemented for as close to as forever is, and if a system works then changing things just presents too much risk to the day to day running of the rest of the plant. So 16Mbps token ring it is...
You had some strange bullies. The logical consequence is to track you down, in a big group.
Yes, that's the logical consequence, but that isn't how bullies or kids work.
Why to bullies bully? One factor is to assert their position amongst their peers, in this case a gang of bullies. If the bullies get their arses kicked individually by the bullied, then the action of one of the bullies to have to turn round to their peers and to request assistance will be a sign of weakness to the individual.... they won't do it. Instead, they will more than likely just ignore the bullied in the future. And even the dumbest sports-jock can realise that if the bullied has managed to get revenge once effectively, then they can do it again.
And we all know people fall into two categories, the Pink supporters and the Purple supporters, who for the most part tend to dislike the other color. I for one like pink and don't even recognize this 'purple' he speaks of as a color!
Real men can only deal with primary colours, red, yellow and the other one You don't need to worry about art-farty other colours, the 3 colour system works fine Black and white are allowed too, I 'spose
Real men are also so masculine that even their sentence's don't have periods
(that's blatently paraphrased from a quote I saw on some maddox site)
I watched the video in WMP 6.4 on Win2000, and no version of WMP higher than 6.4 has ever been installed... so I feel this video will probably be viewable in MPlayer, for example (i.e. this stream isn't DRM'd up).
For that feature you have to have an MS mouse, or at least have installed Gates' software at some point, intellimouse or untellimouse or something.
I'm virtuallly certain that that feature does not just appear on any version of Windows. It's not on 2000 here, and when I set up my Dad's PC with XP, once I had installed the crap that came with the cordless MS mouse and keyboard the option appeared.
Homer: "Take a look at your beloved candidates, they're nothing but hideous space reptiles!" (unmasks them)
Kang: "Yes, it's true, we're evil aliens, but there's nothing you can do about it. It's a two-party system! You'll have to vote for one of us!"
Guy in Crowd: "Well I believe I'll vote for a third-party candidate!"
Kang: "Go ahead, throw your vote away! Hahahahahaha"
This classic Simpsons quote has been modded funny (and it is), but its an incredibly insightful comment.
It's the aliens that don't represent the majority of humanity that tell us that voting for the 3rd party is a waste. On the contrary, voting for the 3rd party is the only possible thing that can break the 2-party status quo that the US (and as a consequence the rest of the world) is suffering.
People who echo the "voting for a 3rd party is a waste" are just repeating the GOP and Dems message, and it's the one thing the major 2 will always "agree" on.
Lure away some of the best people in OSS with big paychecks and then put them in a corner until they are so frustrated they quit.... until they quit and go back to working on OSS software?
But they can't go back to OSS.... They will have signed NDA's or similar with MS, and now if they release any code they risk a legal battle with MS over IP. MS would claim that the code has been influenced by what the person saw at MS, or some other far fetched farce.
Essentially MS removed those people from the OSS pool.
So if you want to have a peaceful time in the pub, best just take the battery out of your phone. This way it drops out of the network without signing off and you can always blame no reception. As an alternative, select nice pubs in cellars with no coverage.
When my phone is unavailable, Digital Dorothy tells people various things. I've had friends ask me why my phone was off, when I hadn't turned the phone off, and so must have been a reception issue... imagine the conclusions a non-technically proficient manager will jump to? And will stick to (because the computer[1] said so).
Basically, from my experience, the network can report to a user the wrong info, and this is on T-Mobile PAYG in the UK (no voicemail). Quick testing, and this is what I was told down a landline when calling my mobile:
Turned phone off - "The mobile phone you have called is switched off"
Phone turned on, then battery pulled out - "The mobile number you have called is currently unavailable, please call again later"
So it does appear that the handset does sign off the network, but the best idea is to get the "phone unavailable" message as your VM greeting:)
[1] The system that cost a lot, and he was part of the sign-off of the system, so it doesn't make mistakes.
An employer who is not willing to take my word for, for example, that it took 20 minutes longer from the airport back to work today than it does on the average is an employer I have no wish to work for. End of discussion.
Absolutley.
Just by being employed, depending on how you want to look at it, you are being fucked. An employee's pay is x per annum, but to be finacially viable to the employer the employee has to be worth more than x per annum to the employer. If this wasn't the case, then the employer would run out of money quickly. [1]
So when you tell your boss something, you expect to be believed. You don't expect your boss to pretend to believe you up until he can get on the tracking workstation to double-check your story!
[1] Of course, you and your colleague's low salaries might be subsidising the boards extreme salaries, but that's another disscussion.
If you don't like someone's software, you should go write your own, you shouldn't steal it.
But who does it hurt if I do "steal" MS' software? I'm writing this post now on a laptop with a "stolen" copy of Windows 2000 on. I don't feel that the quality of it is worth what MS want me to pay for it, so I didn't. And because I can't haggle over the price I chose the lower one: £0. Also, the copy I used was an MSDN one, and so no key needed to be typed in during the install (ie, the pirate copy is more convienient). If it wasn't possible for me to copy Win2k, then most likely I'd be using an alternative[1], I wouldn't cough up more for software than this hardware is worth (Tosh Sat 2180CDT).
But with me running Windows, and have been for the last 10+ years (only 3.11WFWG and 95a were 100% legit), it means that I know Windows well. As a consequence, I am professionally involved supporting MS' products, and have been indirectly responsible for my Dad purchasing an OEM Windows XP Pro license recently (a new HP base unit), and an XP home license about 3 years ago for his old system. (And responsible for getting my Mum to buy a Mac Mini).
[1] This opens up a whole other can of worms: If MS' software could not be run unless 100% legit (in the eyes of MS of course), would they have such a monopoly?
At this point I bring up a lesser known creation in these parts, the Bill of Rights.
To which he says... "Yes I understand, but the Patriot Act adresses a lot of that."
You've obviously been trolling a bit in the past, what with all your -1 posts, so I don't know if your story is true. But if it is, then what the pig said to you is a perfect example of how a person with power is happy to get more (and desires more power). Obviously to that copper, an individual's rights get in his way of being able to do what the fuck he wants!
Slashdot Mirror
A while ago on /. I saw a comment where someone suggested a "workaround" to laws like this. The system they proposed (and I can't find the comment now) was to have 2 machines, both with completely encrypted drives. Both machines are network boot servers, and each machine holds the other machine's decryption key, and the boxes boot off each other.
So 1 of the 2 boxes can be rebooted no problem, but if both machines go down at once (ie the state remove the machines, or the user cuts the power) then neither will start again, and the data can't be decrypted because the key is on the other machine's hard drive, encrypted. Of course, during the set up process you'd need the keys on a third machine (or CD or USB stick etc.), and for "safety" you document the destruction of the machine/CD/USB drive.
In reality you probably would want to have copies of the keys elsewhere (but you never tell the state that), but the boxes booting off each other means you could run a completely encrypted system but never actually use the keys yourself apart from during initial set up.
I've heard the essentially the same about people from Chester and the Welsh.... methinks that your or my anecdote could be verging on an urban legend.... or maybe a similar byelaw was passed in both places?!
I've only been to Amsterdam once, but the "mass produced pot" that is presumably sold in the more commercial coffee shops is still good shit, and better than some of the shitty homegrown* I've bought illegally in the UK under the pretence of "skunk". You know, small buds with chopped up leaves or something....
For example, only yesterday I bought some weed in the UK that had small amounts of the smell and taste of cannabis seeds when it was smoked, only because my man was having supply problems. If your pot has seeds in then the grower was inexpirenced or didn't know what they were doing. Any legal commercial operation will be growing just fat female buds and making sure there is no pollen allowed near the ladies.
But you are right about smokers supporting the little guy.... but because of this if weed was legalised tomorrow in our respective countries, I feel that the market would be nice and competitive... There'd be some major commercial players selling "weed", and it'd be the equivalent of Fosters or Carling in the UK beer market: a plain lager that does the job and is on sale in nearly every pub in the country, but there's still a market for premium lagers, ales, stout etc. and "guest beers". The students or equivalent groups of young people would lap up the "cheap" commercial stuff, but the more choosey would purchase from local growers or Cannabis variety specialists (e.g. Orange bud).
Do you mean resin? Hashish, soapbar, solids, brown....http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabis_resin
Decent quality resin is OK (but nothing compared to real pot).... but due to Cannabis' illegal nature often resin gets mixed with other stuff to make the drug go further. Some nice resin in a spliff with skunk does get you nicely ripped, and makes the much more expensive pot go further.
PS Try "solaring". You get a magnifying glass and focus the sun onto a bud in the bowl of a pipe or bong. It's good! ;) A real nice high because you don't inhale butane and burnt butane from a lighter, or sulphur/phosphorus from a match, just THC vapour and pot smoke!
*Homegrown weed varies in qulity massively in the UK, from a plant people have grown outside from seeds they got in a deal, to hydroponically grown set ups with lights, vetilation etc.
Are you saying that the British police could be armed as heavily as the US police in the time it takes to change a shift? The UK military, no doubt are as well armed as the US military, but AFAIK (and I hope I'm right), the normal police in this country (the UK) are not firearm trained and the police themselves do not have enough weapons to give 1 to every policeman.
He's right. It's a much better use of the sun than this "air conditioning" or electron generation BS.
That's the Apple iShite, isn't it? ;)
Simple solution, fake tapes. He just needed some VHS tapes out the back or under the counter, and hand them over too. They could have recordings of Miami Vice, Morse, Ironside or some other policey programme on just for the irony. America's dumbest criminal would be perfect :)
So even though Microsoft have stated that they support 98 and ME until 11th July 2006, they will not support those two OSes today?
Yes, people are crazy if they rely on 9x in anyway, but when Gates says he'll support it until a date I'd expect support to be provided, even it means some changes to the shell. And we all know how much exageration is used when a job is being avoided... ("major re-write of the Windows Explorer").
That's funny. Infact, I've turned bluetooth on, and renamed my phone to "Free porn. pin 69". I'm not sure if it's a good idea, but lets see...
Are managable switches resistent to arp cache poisoning? I think that's the right term :) I know that simple switches can be confused by an attacker and the switch will then behave like a hub... do better switches resist these attacks?
The FF extensions I use are:
If anyone can answer this I'd be chuffed though: Can FF be made to automatically try to use HTTPS for all surfing? For example, you type in a URL and it'll try the HTTPS site, you click on a link on a website and the browser will go to the https if it exists?.
As I said above I'm going to be setting up a tor node too on a spare machine, and will use this for searches and any communication with governmental sites, and sites where I may disclose personal info.
I can, if I want to, renew my car tax online for example. The UK government has demonstrated it's obsession with data collection with the the ID cards etc., and sooner or later they will realise really how powerful datamining is. I don't feel they need to ever be given my name/address and IP. If they ever want to determine users from IPs (eg IndyMedia servers) they can get a fucking court order and get the ISP to hand over the info. Even that's horrific, but there's not much I can directly do about that, apart from a Tor node. An extension for FF to automatically use a proxy for certain domains would be cool.
Of course common sense too protects your privacy. Always use fake details if registering for somewhere that doesn't need your details, and never use the same fake person at a bunch of sites, or even all the time. Make up names on the spot, or just munge keys. Some sites want valid info, or even check postal codes exist... We all know about 90210 for America, and the British postal code system can be abused too. I tend to use B1 1AA when a site wants a post code, or I'll go to their contact pages and find one there. Some sites are smart enough to not let
In Britian encryption is perfectly legal (I realise your .uk/.au comment was probably tongue-in-cheek), but it is a criminal offence to not hand over passwords or encryption keys to a court AFAIK.... The RIP act can be thanked for this.
True story, or something!
The power stations have had IT infrastructure for years (probably 5+ years more than the average office, after networking kit for nuclear and safety related stuff I should think), and the kit installed at the time would have been possibly the fastest available. Upgrading doesn't happen because of the way the operation is run: Everything is long term plans to be implemented for as close to as forever is, and if a system works then changing things just presents too much risk to the day to day running of the rest of the plant. So 16Mbps token ring it is...
Yes, that's the logical consequence, but that isn't how bullies or kids work.
Why to bullies bully? One factor is to assert their position amongst their peers, in this case a gang of bullies. If the bullies get their arses kicked individually by the bullied, then the action of one of the bullies to have to turn round to their peers and to request assistance will be a sign of weakness to the individual.... they won't do it. Instead, they will more than likely just ignore the bullied in the future. And even the dumbest sports-jock can realise that if the bullied has managed to get revenge once effectively, then they can do it again.
....unless you want to be mugged!
Real men can only deal with primary colours, red, yellow and the other one You don't need to worry about art-farty other colours, the 3 colour system works fine Black and white are allowed too, I 'spose
Real men are also so masculine that even their sentence's don't have periods
(that's blatently paraphrased from a quote I saw on some maddox site)
That's not quite true. The video can be accessed with WMP if you open this URL (watch for /. adding spaces)
http://www.kfor.com/Global/Video/WorldnowASX.asp?o s=&vt=v&clipid=734082
I watched the video in WMP 6.4 on Win2000, and no version of WMP higher than 6.4 has ever been installed... so I feel this video will probably be viewable in MPlayer, for example (i.e. this stream isn't DRM'd up).
I'm virtuallly certain that that feature does not just appear on any version of Windows. It's not on 2000 here, and when I set up my Dad's PC with XP, once I had installed the crap that came with the cordless MS mouse and keyboard the option appeared.
Kang: "Yes, it's true, we're evil aliens, but there's nothing you can do about it. It's a two-party system! You'll have to vote for one of us!"
Guy in Crowd: "Well I believe I'll vote for a third-party candidate!"
Kang: "Go ahead, throw your vote away! Hahahahahaha"
This classic Simpsons quote has been modded funny (and it is), but its an incredibly insightful comment.
It's the aliens that don't represent the majority of humanity that tell us that voting for the 3rd party is a waste. On the contrary, voting for the 3rd party is the only possible thing that can break the 2-party status quo that the US (and as a consequence the rest of the world) is suffering.
People who echo the "voting for a 3rd party is a waste" are just repeating the GOP and Dems message, and it's the one thing the major 2 will always "agree" on.
But they can't go back to OSS.... They will have signed NDA's or similar with MS, and now if they release any code they risk a legal battle with MS over IP. MS would claim that the code has been influenced by what the person saw at MS, or some other far fetched farce.
Essentially MS removed those people from the OSS pool.
When my phone is unavailable, Digital Dorothy tells people various things. I've had friends ask me why my phone was off, when I hadn't turned the phone off, and so must have been a reception issue... imagine the conclusions a non-technically proficient manager will jump to? And will stick to (because the computer[1] said so).
Basically, from my experience, the network can report to a user the wrong info, and this is on T-Mobile PAYG in the UK (no voicemail). Quick testing, and this is what I was told down a landline when calling my mobile:
Turned phone off - "The mobile phone you have called is switched off"
Phone turned on, then battery pulled out - "The mobile number you have called is currently unavailable, please call again later"
So it does appear that the handset does sign off the network, but the best idea is to get the "phone unavailable" message as your VM greeting :)
[1] The system that cost a lot, and he was part of the sign-off of the system, so it doesn't make mistakes.
Absolutley.
Just by being employed, depending on how you want to look at it, you are being fucked. An employee's pay is x per annum, but to be finacially viable to the employer the employee has to be worth more than x per annum to the employer. If this wasn't the case, then the employer would run out of money quickly. [1]
So when you tell your boss something, you expect to be believed. You don't expect your boss to pretend to believe you up until he can get on the tracking workstation to double-check your story!
[1] Of course, you and your colleague's low salaries might be subsidising the boards extreme salaries, but that's another disscussion.
But who does it hurt if I do "steal" MS' software? I'm writing this post now on a laptop with a "stolen" copy of Windows 2000 on. I don't feel that the quality of it is worth what MS want me to pay for it, so I didn't. And because I can't haggle over the price I chose the lower one: £0. Also, the copy I used was an MSDN one, and so no key needed to be typed in during the install (ie, the pirate copy is more convienient). If it wasn't possible for me to copy Win2k, then most likely I'd be using an alternative[1], I wouldn't cough up more for software than this hardware is worth (Tosh Sat 2180CDT).
But with me running Windows, and have been for the last 10+ years (only 3.11WFWG and 95a were 100% legit), it means that I know Windows well. As a consequence, I am professionally involved supporting MS' products, and have been indirectly responsible for my Dad purchasing an OEM Windows XP Pro license recently (a new HP base unit), and an XP home license about 3 years ago for his old system. (And responsible for getting my Mum to buy a Mac Mini).
[1] This opens up a whole other can of worms: If MS' software could not be run unless 100% legit (in the eyes of MS of course), would they have such a monopoly?
To which he says... "Yes I understand, but the Patriot Act adresses a lot of that."
You've obviously been trolling a bit in the past, what with all your -1 posts, so I don't know if your story is true. But if it is, then what the pig said to you is a perfect example of how a person with power is happy to get more (and desires more power). Obviously to that copper, an individual's rights get in his way of being able to do what the fuck he wants!