I'll bite. I am familiar with every device you name except one. What the hell is a GEYSER??? The only geyser I know is a natural hot spring which periodically emits a fountain of water and steam.
I can tell you there is a very tiny chance any significant number of readers will feel differently about it in a century, and zero readers will feel differently about it in two centuries.
That is simply because very, very few readers will still be alive in a century, and none of them will be so in two centuries.
Yes, and maybe some dark night they will get fucked up for fucking up the wrong guy.
They have the ability; they have the power. But do they have the right before... oh, excuse my presumption, I almost said the G word... before whatever authority they swear to with their right hand upheld when they are sworn in to testify in court?
I would +1 Insightful you if I could. You could even posit a scenario where somebody invades your home and gains access to your mail that way. Or it gets placed in the wrong mail slot or P.O. box by mistake. Or a meteor strikes your front hall, destroying the front door, and some of your mail is carried on the breeze to the sidewalk where someone else picks it up and reads it. Just as you say, none of these are reasonable expectations.
I would say it is NOT unreasonable to expect that your cellphone might on occasion be answered by your wife, but I WOULD say it is unreasonable to expect that your cellphone might be answered by the police without announcing before pursuing a conversation that they are the police.
No, they cannot "force" you to provide your password. They can demand it; they can threaten you with consequences if you don't comply; they can likely detain or arrest you; they can try to trick you; they can bully you; they can (in the sense of can = they have the power to) drug or torture you; they can (same def.) do the same to your loved ones. The one thing they CANNOT do is literally force you to provide it. It may be a distinction without a difference to you, since the final word is they can probably get it if they want it bad enough, but words and concepts mean a lot to me.
Entrapment is the INDUCEMENT to commit a crime which specific crime you would not have otherwise committed. It has nothing to do with FORCING.
Your understanding is, to be kind, mistaken. I'd be careful about telling people to look something up when you don't have the faintest idea what they will find out when they do look it up. That is not meant as an unfriendly suggestion. I believe you can still argue your point with some degree of persuasion if you use the true definition of entrapment rather than your own bogus definition.
Slackware is great for what it is. I remember working with it in the early 90s. I think Arch is also excellent. But none of these fill the same niche as RHEL.
No, Coward, actually I use two different RHEL6 clones and an RHEL5 clone on a total of 7 different machines every day. Try telling anyone who demands enterprise reliability you don't want to cope with RHEL, dipstick. Sayonara, loser.
Your lack of knowledge is showing. Up2date was not a package manager. It's an update utility. You don't use it to uninstall anything. Yum is the package manager. The best package manager.
reiserfs? bwahahaha, get serious.
Slackware and Debian are excellent quality distros for what they are. Slackware is certainly in no way comparable to RHEL, but Debian is to a certain extent - support is handled quite differently.
Civil and criminal proceedings are not mutually exclusive. Sometimes criminal proceedings miscarry and then at least civil proceedings result in a measure of justice - see O. J. Simpson.
Three wheels makes sense described thus. There are a fair number of outright 3 wheel motorcycles. Four wheels described thus, the wheels positioned exactly like on a car, on a vehicle that looks very much like a car, makes no sense. The only 4 wheel motorcycles I have ever seen have been open air, steered by handlebars, with a ridiculously close spacing of the tires on each end, and could NEVER be mistaken as cars, while this thing is obviously trying very hard to look and operate like a very small car.
P.S. - I know the Reliant Regal 3-wheeler from Mr. Bean. It tipped over ridiculously easily if not handled with proper care. I wouldn't hesitate to classify it as a form of motorcycle. Thanks for mentioning the Morgan 3 wheeler. I did not know about that. Not my cup of tea, but fascinating.
Sorry, that information has been overcome by events - as if anyone had any doubts it would be, given that it showed a virtual tie. I was waiting for someone to complacently fall for the trap.
Yeah, I bet until they came for you, things didn't seem so bad. Crime was down, the trains ran on time, the economy was under control, banks paid interest, and you had a job.
But you can carry an old model, the kind you can turn fully off and even remove the battery, and keep it turned off except if you have to make a call to AAA, the police, or the paramedics. Call friends when you are at home or someplace you don't care if anybody knows you're there.
America is still the #1 manufacturer of all globally produced goods.
I think you're going to have to back that statement up. And while you're at it, let's leave out military "products", which have no bearing whatsoever on consumers or the normal infrastructure.
Sorry; nice try, but copying material which is copyright or patented is not counterfeiting either. To be counterfeiting, there has to be a sale with intent to defraud. If you copy a dollar bill and frame it on your own wall, that is not counterfeiting. If you copy a song or movie or painting and then play it or enjoy it on your own wall for yourself, that is not counterfeiting. And it is glaringly obvious that if you copy a Ferrari in your own garage for yourself, not trying to sell it as a Ferrari, it is not counterfeiting.
Slashdot Mirror
I'll take that under advisement, but I'll raise you one Fukushima. Now, who was NOT bowing to whom to set up that cluster fsck?
So in other words it's an ordinary hot water tap fed by a water heater. But it doesn't fountain upward, right?
They are.
Parent would be correct, or at the very least it's a tie. Mod'ing someone down for telling the truth only shows what a sack of shit the moderator is.
I'll bite. I am familiar with every device you name except one. What the hell is a GEYSER??? The only geyser I know is a natural hot spring which periodically emits a fountain of water and steam.
I can tell you there is a very tiny chance any significant number of readers will feel differently about it in a century, and zero readers will feel differently about it in two centuries.
That is simply because very, very few readers will still be alive in a century, and none of them will be so in two centuries.
But you can use your Miranda rights and NOT SAY ANYTHING. Not in response to ANY question, even "what is your password".
Yes, and maybe some dark night they will get fucked up for fucking up the wrong guy.
They have the ability; they have the power. But do they have the right before ... oh, excuse my presumption, I almost said the G word ... before whatever authority they swear to with their right hand upheld when they are sworn in to testify in court?
I would +1 Insightful you if I could. You could even posit a scenario where somebody invades your home and gains access to your mail that way. Or it gets placed in the wrong mail slot or P.O. box by mistake. Or a meteor strikes your front hall, destroying the front door, and some of your mail is carried on the breeze to the sidewalk where someone else picks it up and reads it. Just as you say, none of these are reasonable expectations.
I would say it is NOT unreasonable to expect that your cellphone might on occasion be answered by your wife, but I WOULD say it is unreasonable to expect that your cellphone might be answered by the police without announcing before pursuing a conversation that they are the police.
No, they cannot "force" you to provide your password. They can demand it; they can threaten you with consequences if you don't comply; they can likely detain or arrest you; they can try to trick you; they can bully you; they can (in the sense of can = they have the power to) drug or torture you; they can (same def.) do the same to your loved ones. The one thing they CANNOT do is literally force you to provide it. It may be a distinction without a difference to you, since the final word is they can probably get it if they want it bad enough, but words and concepts mean a lot to me.
Entrapment is the INDUCEMENT to commit a crime which specific crime you would not have otherwise committed. It has nothing to do with FORCING.
Your understanding is, to be kind, mistaken. I'd be careful about telling people to look something up when you don't have the faintest idea what they will find out when they do look it up. That is not meant as an unfriendly suggestion. I believe you can still argue your point with some degree of persuasion if you use the true definition of entrapment rather than your own bogus definition.
Slackware is great for what it is. I remember working with it in the early 90s. I think Arch is also excellent. But none of these fill the same niche as RHEL.
No, Coward, actually I use two different RHEL6 clones and an RHEL5 clone on a total of 7 different machines every day. Try telling anyone who demands enterprise reliability you don't want to cope with RHEL, dipstick. Sayonara, loser.
Your lack of knowledge is showing. Up2date was not a package manager. It's an update utility. You don't use it to uninstall anything. Yum is the package manager. The best package manager.
reiserfs? bwahahaha, get serious.
Slackware and Debian are excellent quality distros for what they are. Slackware is certainly in no way comparable to RHEL, but Debian is to a certain extent - support is handled quite differently.
How about a real distro, like CentOS or Scientific Linux?
That's really encouraging that Sprint is not too far behind the worst carrier in the history of the world .
Civil and criminal proceedings are not mutually exclusive. Sometimes criminal proceedings miscarry and then at least civil proceedings result in a measure of justice - see O. J. Simpson.
Do you actually have any issue with the facts on the cited page, or are you just prejudiced against the source?
Three wheels makes sense described thus. There are a fair number of outright 3 wheel motorcycles. Four wheels described thus, the wheels positioned exactly like on a car, on a vehicle that looks very much like a car, makes no sense. The only 4 wheel motorcycles I have ever seen have been open air, steered by handlebars, with a ridiculously close spacing of the tires on each end, and could NEVER be mistaken as cars, while this thing is obviously trying very hard to look and operate like a very small car.
P.S. - I know the Reliant Regal 3-wheeler from Mr. Bean. It tipped over ridiculously easily if not handled with proper care. I wouldn't hesitate to classify it as a form of motorcycle. Thanks for mentioning the Morgan 3 wheeler. I did not know about that. Not my cup of tea, but fascinating.
How can a 4 wheel vehicle with a steering wheel be classed as a motorized bicycle in ANY country? It makes no sense whatsoever.
Sorry, that information has been overcome by events - as if anyone had any doubts it would be, given that it showed a virtual tie. I was waiting for someone to complacently fall for the trap.
China and the US changed places in 2010.
Look at the comparative graphs.
Doesn't lead to much complacency on the part of rational people in the US, and if you separate out the "defense" manufacturing, the gap is FAR wider.
Here is the authoritative statistical data.
Yeah, I bet until they came for you, things didn't seem so bad. Crime was down, the trains ran on time, the economy was under control, banks paid interest, and you had a job.
Ding ding ding ding ding. Right answer.
But you can carry an old model, the kind you can turn fully off and even remove the battery, and keep it turned off except if you have to make a call to AAA, the police, or the paramedics. Call friends when you are at home or someplace you don't care if anybody knows you're there.
I think you're going to have to back that statement up. And while you're at it, let's leave out military "products", which have no bearing whatsoever on consumers or the normal infrastructure.
Sorry; nice try, but copying material which is copyright or patented is not counterfeiting either. To be counterfeiting, there has to be a sale with intent to defraud. If you copy a dollar bill and frame it on your own wall, that is not counterfeiting. If you copy a song or movie or painting and then play it or enjoy it on your own wall for yourself, that is not counterfeiting. And it is glaringly obvious that if you copy a Ferrari in your own garage for yourself, not trying to sell it as a Ferrari, it is not counterfeiting.