Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
And how would passing a law allowing the FCC to "regulate" violence not be in violation?
What part of "Congress shall make no law" do they not understand?
The other question questions are "Why are machines with classified data able to access the internet? And why did users have permissions to install said software?"
NISPOM chapter 8 specifies the requirements for a classified machine.
Whenever I set up a classified net, one of the last things I do before I get certified is to yank the internet connection. All classified nets should be physically isolated.
Also, all software changes to a classified computer must be logged. Ordinary users should not have permissions to install such items, and any attempt to do so should be logged as a potential security risk. I would think that the network/sysadmins of these systems are NOT doing their job properly.
The key thing is that if it's shipped with any of these, especially a community supported distro, then wiping and reinstalling is cool, because you know the hardware has drivers available.
If you just buy a generic Windows version of said box, the hardware may not be supported.
I could probably make an argument baed on the Fifth Amendment that turning peoples TVs into very expensive paperweights by administrative fiat, so as to auction off the analog spectrum constitutes "private property taken for public use".
Hence, the us.gov is constitutionally required to do something like this as "just compensation".
Dell supports windows all the time, as part of their business, and you presume to say they don't know how it's done?
<ANECDOTAL> Based on my one time calling tech support (in Bangalore, I assume), Yes, I'd be willing to say that they don't know how it's done! </ANECDOTAL>
OK, They know how it's done (let script monkeys handle the caller), but they don't know how it's done *RIGHT*.
Slashdot Mirror
And how would passing a law allowing the FCC to "regulate" violence not be in violation?
What part of "Congress shall make no law" do they not understand?
An Op/Ed piece on the same subject in the LA Times.
You got it wrong. It's Fnord.
Because in every fscking novel, Baxter has to describe how people take a crap in free fall.
Clarke is one of the major writers who gives Einstein his due.
And there's only one way to write
"#DEFINE SIGKILL 9"
So that it will compile, and that's
#define SIGKILL 9
(Emphasis mine)
Hey, it's not SCO's fault that Herr Blepp's magic briefcase got lost!
It's obviously less liquider or gasser.
Linus reaffirmed that in a story on Groklaw.
Yep.
Big Y, Little Y, a Yawning Yellow Yak. Young Yolanda Yorgenson is Yelling on his back.
I guess CmdrTaco got hit with a royalty request, because I got "Nothing to see here..."
V .. v .. V - Vera Violet Vinn is very, Very VERY awful on her violin.
Actually, the appropriate Texan legal phrase is "He done need killin'."
There ya go!
No it IsNot!!!
</SARCASM>
Sarcasm tags added for the sarcasm-impaired, in compliance with the ADA.
The other question questions are "Why are machines with classified data able to access the internet? And why did users have permissions to install said software?"
NISPOM chapter 8 specifies the requirements for a classified machine.
Whenever I set up a classified net, one of the last things I do before I get certified is to yank the internet connection. All classified nets should be physically isolated.
Also, all software changes to a classified computer must be logged. Ordinary users should not have permissions to install such items, and any attempt to do so should be logged as a potential security risk. I would think that the network/sysadmins of these systems are NOT doing their job properly.
The key thing is that if it's shipped with any of these, especially a community supported distro, then wiping and reinstalling is cool, because you know the hardware has drivers available.
If you just buy a generic Windows version of said box, the hardware may not be supported.
Their fries kick ass. Well, except for Del Taco's, but only if Del Taco's are hot.
I could probably make an argument baed on the Fifth Amendment that turning peoples TVs into very expensive paperweights by administrative fiat, so as to auction off the analog spectrum constitutes "private property taken for public use".
Hence, the us.gov is constitutionally required to do something like this as "just compensation".
HELL NO!!!!
This opens the door for the FCC to regulate content on the Internet.
Come on, we all know The "Moon" Does Not Exist!!!!
Which clearly proves that the last digit of pi is 3.
You mean they offer useful support for Windows now????
Dell supports windows all the time, as part of their business, and you presume to say they don't know how it's done?
<ANECDOTAL>
Based on my one time calling tech support (in Bangalore, I assume), Yes, I'd be willing to say that they don't know how it's done!
</ANECDOTAL>
OK, They know how it's done (let script monkeys handle the caller), but they don't know how it's done *RIGHT*.
t is currently supplying the BaBar experiment with electrons and positrons and it is also undergoing modifications to accomodate the LCLS
So now we have talking French elephants doing particle physics?
What kind of virtualization do you need?
Are we talking server virtualization? Are we talking storage virtualization?
There are many kinds of virtualizations.
I admit, I didn't RTFA, but based on the comments I'm assuming server virtualization.
Storage virtualization, done right, can be done with minimal overhead inside your SAN fabric.