Hey, did the OpenBSD guys ever think it was a temporary thing, or did they fly off the handle about it? I'll tell you, it was the latter.
All I said, if you look at the original post above, was that they got one 500 error and freaked. It was Saturday night for crying out loud, and they didn't wait even a few hours to see if the problem would go away (which it did).
I connected to adaptec's mail server, and it told me it would accept mail for the account in question. I guess they had a config problem, and these guys got snippy when they got a 500 error...
It's not ambiguous for nesting; it would just close the closest opening tag.
The only reason I can think of is readability. When I have a long "if" statement in C or Perl, for example, I'll comment the closing curly brace with the statement's conditional.
"Liberal" here refers to the classical liberals opposing monarchies and arbitrary power. Not the socialist version of the word "liberal" we have in the US.
You're talking about forwards compatibility, if you're talking about v1.x opening 2.x files. I've no doubt that backwards compatibility, 2.x opening 1.x files, will be 100%.
All government entities within a state exist at the pleasure of that state government. If the state decides that some of its people need protection against tyranny of the majority in a city, it's perfectly okay for it to step in and say no.
If your town wants to install WiFi, have the people interested form a co-op, and do it! No need to force other people to pay.
The pound (avoirdupois) or international pound, abbreviation "lb" or sometimes # in the United States, is the mass unit defined as exactly 0.45359237 kilograms
When a pound is called a "unit of weight", it is often the unit of mass.
But pounds are also used for the force definitions of weight, in which the pound force is a unit of force equal to 4.448 newtons. That is the force due to gravity of a pound (avoirdupois) where the acceleration of gravity is 32.17405 ft/s2
You could do that, but then you've got pressure as one of the fundamental units, and kilograms defined in terms of that. (Quite disruptive.) And then you would have the same trouble defining pressure that we're having defining mass.
The "standard" in the US really is the metric system. All the units that people actually used are defined in terms of their metric counterparts.
So a change in the kilogram automatically affects the pound.
However, when they do make this change, it will not be a "modded" kilogram. It will be the same mass as before; it's just that it will be possible (ultimately) to measure it much more precisly and time-invariantly (as the standard is losing mass over time).
Slashdot Mirror
Let's get some open codecs!
All I said, if you look at the original post above, was that they got one 500 error and freaked. It was Saturday night for crying out loud, and they didn't wait even a few hours to see if the problem would go away (which it did).
Note: some asterisks truncated for lameness.
I connected to adaptec's mail server, and it told me it would accept mail for the account in question. I guess they had a config problem, and these guys got snippy when they got a 500 error...
It's not ambiguous for nesting; it would just close the closest opening tag.
The only reason I can think of is readability. When I have a long "if" statement in C or Perl, for example, I'll comment the closing curly brace with the statement's conditional.
We'll get some return on that government spending. Did you realize that in 1970, the UK was allocating £348,000,000 per year for Silly Walk research?
You don't happen to live in Austin, do you? ;-)
So... You're an even bigger asshole than you were pretending to be. Is there a bell curve here? Is there an optimum level of asshole-ness?
http://validator.w3.org
"Liberal" here refers to the classical liberals opposing monarchies and arbitrary power. Not the socialist version of the word "liberal" we have in the US.
Worked for me in FF.
You're talking about forwards compatibility, if you're talking about v1.x opening 2.x files. I've no doubt that backwards compatibility, 2.x opening 1.x files, will be 100%.
Either way, hardcore!
If your town wants to install WiFi, have the people interested form a co-op, and do it! No need to force other people to pay.
If I want to get a 20% better education (or 20% better Internet service), I have to pay 220% the cost of it.
Of course, since McCain-Feingold, political speech isn't all that free anymore either...
You're looking for the translation for jackasses, Mozilla Fire-Fucking-Fox.
It's still not a good way to go about it, as you say in your other post, but not for the reason I was stating.
The pound (avoirdupois) or international pound, abbreviation "lb" or sometimes # in the United States, is the mass unit defined as exactly 0.45359237 kilograms
When a pound is called a "unit of weight", it is often the unit of mass.
But pounds are also used for the force definitions of weight, in which the pound force is a unit of force equal to 4.448 newtons. That is the force due to gravity of a pound (avoirdupois) where the acceleration of gravity is 32.17405 ft/s2
You could do that, but then you've got pressure as one of the fundamental units, and kilograms defined in terms of that. (Quite disruptive.) And then you would have the same trouble defining pressure that we're having defining mass.
Force is nothing but mass * distance / time^2. 1 Newton = 1 kg*m/s^2
So a change in the kilogram automatically affects the pound.
However, when they do make this change, it will not be a "modded" kilogram. It will be the same mass as before; it's just that it will be possible (ultimately) to measure it much more precisly and time-invariantly (as the standard is losing mass over time).
The pound (mass) is defined as a certain number of kilograms. Just like the inch is defined as a certain number of centimeters.