don't forget that unions also contribute way more than corporations
Dumbfuckery. If unions gave more money than corps, Democrats and Republicans would be falling over each other in the rush to kiss union asses and put the shiv in the backs of corporations, rather than the other way around.
That's a myth dreamt up by people wanting to protect the environment, but who had never taken any higher-level math or engineering courses and had no clue how dynamic systems function.
Was that at Arrogant Douchebag U? Must not have had remedial biology as an elective.
They're not fragile at all. If you perturb them, it just re-stabilizes at a new equilibrium point.
Like how New Zealand has "re-stabilized" with a quarter of its birds extinct after the introduction of rats.
Well, the US has 2 things that none of the above countries from Sweden to Portugal have
Yes, the U.S. has more densely populated cities than Sweden or Portugal (San Francisco and Manhattan), and 1/3 more population density than Sweden. So....what's the excuse again?
Tenther cultist crap. As if states could have built an interstate highway system or the Internet, or FEMA, or put men on the moon, or ever even think about maybe building high-speed rail...
Simply put, Europeans won't stand for all the crap that happens over here.
Spain, Ireland, and Greece have been taking it far harder, longer, and with less lube than the American citizen. Yeah, great, Greece just voted in a leftier government that has promised to renegotiate the predatory loans forced on them by German banks....but the new government is committed to staying on the Euro, making any real recovery impossible.
And it's a molehill next to the American mountain.
It's because we are fucking impatient.
If impatience was the driving factor, we'd have the best internet access in the industrialized world, as opposed to some of the worst. Didn't fucking think that excuse through, did you?
Protip: it wasn't Reagan or either one of the Bush's.
You named your post
You need to Google the words Reagan and Amnesty, fucker of dumbs, which went far beyond anything Obama has proposed. Furthermore, if you weren't tripping on the shreds of your 10-pounds-of-bullshit-in-a-five-pound-sack, you'd be asking why Obama didn't do this in his first two years if he wanted to "pander", rather than deporting them at a faster rate than Bush, a fact you conveniently skipped over. This is obviously nothing more than setting up the Obamabot base into voting for Hillary "totally obliterate Iran" Clinton, along with his Very Sincere Proposals for paid leave and free-to-use community college.
You wingers should really move to an island with the Obamabots who think Obama ended the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, and fight it out so the problem resolves itself and we're left with a lot less stupidity in this world.
The point is that climate change deniers are impossible to convince, regardless of the type and/or amount of proof gathered and presented. Because they have already decided what they are going to believe, reality be damned.
Democrats traditionally favor large government and using government assistance programs to buy votes of immigrants who in effect become their clients.
Is that why Democrats have cut food stamps, killed a public option and have been trying to figure out a way to cut Social Security for 6 years, all the while deporting immigrants at a rate faster than Bush?
If someone is willing to do the job for cheaper, why do you think you deserve it?
Why do you think you should be so willfully obtuse? It's not like he's enjoying third world prices for his housing, goods and services while having to compete with third world labor.
....and that's some seriously weak partisan butthurt. That and it wouldn't matter if it was Barney the Dinosaur testifying to the committee: nuclear power is the most expensive power source ever designed by man, and only desired by corporate hacks and Tom Swift fanboys.
Think that's unfair? Then name a nuclear power company that has rolled the full cost of ore mining, enrichment, plant construction, security, complete insurance coverage, and plant decommission into the rate it charges its customers. Oh, and storing the waste for thousands of years.
2. Probably a net reduction in oil spills, because not having the pipeline would only force the oil to be transported on trains, not stop it.
That's an old chestnut, but it requires ignoring:
a) All pipelines have leaks and spills
b) Not having a pipeline serves as a bottleneck on the destruction of the tar sands. Mining companies aren't going to process far beyond their transportation capacity as that's just throwing money away.
Regardless of the scientific basis, the consensus view of the American public is that they do not want to sacrifice their lifestyles for the environment
The only thing that would be sacrificed would be the profits of the fossil fuel industry. Wind and solar are already cost competitive with coal. And the costs of addressing climate change are insignificant next to the costs of not addressing it - which of course will result in a real sacrifice in the standard of living, as opposed to some winger boogyman.
Too busy with your tantrum to come up with a coherent response, Randian? Getting rid of government, cuz NSA, is as sensible as getting rid of all businesses, cuz Enron.
Are we beginning to see that the problem is the government itself, and not the particular party in power?
If you've read so much Rand that you believe that keeping a mining company from dumping lead and arsenic into your drinking water is just as evil as illegal spying and assassinations, maybe. Cuz gubbmit.
Sorry, fucker, if I didn't give you the whole history of this.
He's wrong because you don't know the meaning of the word "pedophile" and went the full Fox News at the same time? Is anyone who calls Reagan a Republican or Warren a Democrat also a fucker? I don't think so.
You engaged in 10-pounds-of-bullshit-in-a-five-pound-sack willful dumbfuckery and are now whining like a bitch because you got caught.
Yes, blame the voters for refusing to vote for the dogshit-in-a-flaming-bag that has been served up by Democratic leadership since 2008. You think Obots could have started to get a clue after minimum wage increases and marijuana legalization passed in deep red states that sent Republicans to Washington.
Get some candidates that are to the left of Reagan's corpse and we'll talk, mmmkay?
Your bullshit. The imperial budget is as fake as the unemployment rate, because spending that is obviously military in nature - like the VA or the Department of Energy managing America's nuclear weapons - isn't counted as military spending.
That is the observation that gases or even more generally matter retains thermal energy.
That's ignoring the fact that CO2 as a greenhouse gas was observed over 150 years ago. Are you capable of saying anything on this topic that isn't right wing BS or deflection? Anything at all?
Slashdot Mirror
Dumbfuckery. If unions gave more money than corps, Democrats and Republicans would be falling over each other in the rush to kiss union asses and put the shiv in the backs of corporations, rather than the other way around.
Was that at Arrogant Douchebag U? Must not have had remedial biology as an elective.
Like how New Zealand has "re-stabilized" with a quarter of its birds extinct after the introduction of rats.
That's an impressive amount of Randian fail, crammed into just 9 words.
So much fail in one sentence.
Yes, the U.S. has more densely populated cities than Sweden or Portugal (San Francisco and Manhattan), and 1/3 more population density than Sweden. So....what's the excuse again?
Tenther cultist crap. As if states could have built an interstate highway system or the Internet, or FEMA, or put men on the moon, or ever even think about maybe building high-speed rail...
Spain, Ireland, and Greece have been taking it far harder, longer, and with less lube than the American citizen. Yeah, great, Greece just voted in a leftier government that has promised to renegotiate the predatory loans forced on them by German banks....but the new government is committed to staying on the Euro, making any real recovery impossible.
And it's a molehill next to the American mountain.
If impatience was the driving factor, we'd have the best internet access in the industrialized world, as opposed to some of the worst. Didn't fucking think that excuse through, did you?
Protip: it wasn't Reagan or either one of the Bush's.
You need to Google the words Reagan and Amnesty, fucker of dumbs, which went far beyond anything Obama has proposed. Furthermore, if you weren't tripping on the shreds of your 10-pounds-of-bullshit-in-a-five-pound-sack, you'd be asking why Obama didn't do this in his first two years if he wanted to "pander", rather than deporting them at a faster rate than Bush, a fact you conveniently skipped over. This is obviously nothing more than setting up the Obamabot base into voting for Hillary "totally obliterate Iran" Clinton, along with his Very Sincere Proposals for paid leave and free-to-use community college.
You wingers should really move to an island with the Obamabots who think Obama ended the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, and fight it out so the problem resolves itself and we're left with a lot less stupidity in this world.
Then the point was contradicted by the analogy.
Is that why Democrats have cut food stamps, killed a public option and have been trying to figure out a way to cut Social Security for 6 years, all the while deporting immigrants at a rate faster than Bush?
Why do you think you should be so willfully obtuse? It's not like he's enjoying third world prices for his housing, goods and services while having to compete with third world labor.
Do you also tend to use lead paint over the asbestos drywall in your house? If not, why not?
....and that's some seriously weak partisan butthurt. That and it wouldn't matter if it was Barney the Dinosaur testifying to the committee: nuclear power is the most expensive power source ever designed by man, and only desired by corporate hacks and Tom Swift fanboys.
Think that's unfair? Then name a nuclear power company that has rolled the full cost of ore mining, enrichment, plant construction, security, complete insurance coverage, and plant decommission into the rate it charges its customers. Oh, and storing the waste for thousands of years.
That's an old chestnut, but it requires ignoring:
a) All pipelines have leaks and spills
b) Not having a pipeline serves as a bottleneck on the destruction of the tar sands. Mining companies aren't going to process far beyond their transportation capacity as that's just throwing money away.
The only thing that would be sacrificed would be the profits of the fossil fuel industry. Wind and solar are already cost competitive with coal. And the costs of addressing climate change are insignificant next to the costs of not addressing it - which of course will result in a real sacrifice in the standard of living, as opposed to some winger boogyman.
Too bad your analogy was inherently irrelevant, though. Temperature is testable, gods are not.
No. They don't.
When he was 24 at the time? And I suppose you have lovely oceanfront property in Kansas for sale, too.
Which would make it statutory rape, not pedophilia.
Too busy with your tantrum to come up with a coherent response, Randian? Getting rid of government, cuz NSA, is as sensible as getting rid of all businesses, cuz Enron.
Or as asinine.
If you've read so much Rand that you believe that keeping a mining company from dumping lead and arsenic into your drinking water is just as evil as illegal spying and assassinations, maybe. Cuz gubbmit.
He's wrong because you don't know the meaning of the word "pedophile" and went the full Fox News at the same time? Is anyone who calls Reagan a Republican or Warren a Democrat also a fucker? I don't think so.
You engaged in 10-pounds-of-bullshit-in-a-five-pound-sack willful dumbfuckery and are now whining like a bitch because you got caught.
Just as going from Vista to XP was a performance and usability upgrade.
Yes, blame the voters for refusing to vote for the dogshit-in-a-flaming-bag that has been served up by Democratic leadership since 2008. You think Obots could have started to get a clue after minimum wage increases and marijuana legalization passed in deep red states that sent Republicans to Washington.
Get some candidates that are to the left of Reagan's corpse and we'll talk, mmmkay?
Your bullshit. The imperial budget is as fake as the unemployment rate, because spending that is obviously military in nature - like the VA or the Department of Energy managing America's nuclear weapons - isn't counted as military spending.
That's ignoring the fact that CO2 as a greenhouse gas was observed over 150 years ago. Are you capable of saying anything on this topic that isn't right wing BS or deflection? Anything at all?