One.1 Increased warmth causes increased water vapor.
One.2 Increased water vapor causes increased cloud cover.
One.3 Increased cloud cover causes increased reflection of sunlight, resulting in less warming at surface.
One.4 Less warming at surface means it gets cooler
One.5 Goto One
OR
One.6 Increased warmth causes increased Thunderstorm formation
One.7 Increased thunderstorms causes increased movement of surface heat to upper atmosphere, where CO2 is not active
One.8 Surface gets cooler
One.9 Goto One
Fossil Fuel isn't running out in your or your children's lifetime. There's now enough proven reserves of oil and gas to keep us going for 50+ years. That doesn't include any new finds in 2016 or 2017, of which there were several significant large finds. Technology will also continue to improve, increasing our ability to find new reserves and extract reserves from previously uneconomical formations. There's also over 100 years worth known reserves of coal. There's also enough Uranium to power the world for a thousand years if the fossil fuels actually do look like they're getting close to end of life.
Killing the oceans? Maybe you should take a Geology 101 course. If anything, a slightly warmer climate will result in life thriving. It's already been proven from satellite readings that increased CO2 is resulting in increased vegetation cover. The oceans will likewise benefit from an increase in CO2. CO2 is a necessity for plant life, and plant life is a necessity for the multitude of creatures on this planet.
And you are aware that ice still doesn't melt at -20C, even though it's 30 degrees above seasonal norms, right? Current temperature in Iqaluit is -22C. The record high for this date is 0C in 1965. The record low is -37.8C in 1964. That's a variance of almost 40 degrees in back to back winters. One winter does not mean every winter. Especially when that winter followed a strong El Nino. But carry on with your preaching, I'm sure you're firmly committed to your beliefs and nothing anyone else says will budge you.
Well here are just a few of the predictions regarding an ice free Arctic by scientists...
Arctic Specialist Bernt Balchen, in 1972 predicted an ice free Arctic by the year 2000: https://news.google.com/newspa...
NASA Climate Scientist Jay Zwally, in 2007, predicted an ice free Arctic by 2013: http://news.nationalgeographic...
Professor Wieslaw Maslowski, in 2007, predicted an ice free Arctic by 2013: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/713...
Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment Report, completed by eight Arctic Council Nations, in 2009 predicted an ice free Arctic by 2015: http://www.theepochtimes.com/n...
Oh look, they deleted the page. Good thing I saved a quote:
Because climate change in the Arctic region is occurring faster and to a greater extent than anywhere else, the Arctic Ocean may be ice-free for a short period of time as early as the summer of 2015, according to the 2009 Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment Report completed by the eight Arctic Council Nations.
Scientific Director of ArcticNet, Louis Fortier, in 2007 predicted an ice free Arctic by 2010 or 2015: https://www.pressreader.com/ca...
Arctic Specialist Bernt Balchen, in 1972 predicted an ice free Arctic by the year 2000: https://news.google.com/newspa...
NASA Climate Scientist Jay Zwally, in 2007, predicted an ice free Arctic by 2013: http://news.nationalgeographic...
Professor Wieslaw Maslowski, in 2007, predicted an ice free Arctic by 2013: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/713...
Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment Report, completed by eight Arctic Council Nations, in 2009 predicted an ice free Arctic by 2015: http://www.theepochtimes.com/n...
Oh look, they deleted the page. Good thing I saved a quote:
Because climate change in the Arctic region is occurring faster and to a greater extent than anywhere else, the Arctic Ocean may be ice-free for a short period of time as early as the summer of 2015, according to the 2009 Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment Report completed by the eight Arctic Council Nations.
Scientific Director of ArcticNet, Louis Fortier, in 2007 predicted an ice free Arctic by 2010 or 2015: https://www.pressreader.com/ca...
Ok angry Martian man, I'll bite. What is the total direct atmospheric increase in temperature caused by a doubling of CO2 concentration? Please show me the science experiment and math that calculates this value. I want to see the actual science that you keep spouting off about. Don't show me the IPCC reports, or the outputs from climate simulations.
No, I clicked on 2006, and the two lines are extremely close, less than 200,000km2 difference. 2005 and 2007 are less than 300,000km2 difference. It's a 1 to 2% variance. Ho Hum.
I think the fact that nobody has yet claimed "Document X released by WikiLeaks is fake!" is proof enough that WikiLeaks is 100% accurate so far. Until someone finds a document that isn't authentic, they will remain 100%. We don't need to prove that ALL released documents are authentic. We need to prove that a single one isn't.
It all depends on how much the batteries are being drained before being recharged. Discharging past 80% of capacity will drastically cut the number of cycles you can get out of them. https://cleantechnica.com/2016...
Well I don't think you're going to get the smoking gun email where dude says "kill him" and minion replies "ok, I hacked his car, he just accelerated into a tree". We have motive, means, opportunity, and suspicious cause of death. It certainly requires an investigation. But who investigates the CIA?
You're missing several key points.
Michael Hastings was possibly assassinated by these very tools because he was investigating the director of the CIA.
The CIA may have lost control of all of these tools to the hacking community at large
The CIA may have been using these tools on US citizens.
The CIA may have been using these tools as a politicized weapon.
The documents published so far are largely genuine, officials said, though they are not yet certain if all of them are and whether some of the documents may have been altered. However, WikiLeaks thus far has a 100% accurate record, so it would be absolutely shocking if even a single document is not authentic. One of the biggest concerns for the federal government is if WikiLeaks publishes critical computer code on how operations are conducted, other hackers could take that code and cause havoc overseas. Of course, the federal government is merely deflecting blame on WikiLeaks, when it appears likely the CIA has already lost control of these tools to the hacking communities and agencies of the world.
They contributed the slowdown to: 1) more single people, who have less sex than married people, and 2) married people having less sex. So, in essence, people are having less sex, because people are having less sex? Clearly government funded researchers doing this one...SMH
I think the biggest revelation is the fact that the CIA can, indeed, hack a car and potentially assassinate the driver: http://yournewswire.com/wikile...
Interestingly, Michael Hastings died when his car suddenly accelerated out of control and crashed, killing him instantly. He was currently investigating the director of the CIA, John Brennan! Coincidence???????
???
??
?
Every account? How about when you're running/exercising, listening to music, and the headphone wire keeps snagging on your arms? Or it keeps bouncing around annoying you? Or even worse, the bouncing around of the wire jiggles the earbud out of your ear? I could care less about the "inferior" quality of the bluetooth headphones I picked up, because the freedom of the wireless makes them worth it, and my 256Kbps MP3's sound just fine.
When it comes to quality of audio, very few phone users are putting lossless audio on their phones. I know for myself, I prefer the wireless headphones because there's no wire to get snagged, and I want the music on my phone to be convenient and portable. When I want good quality sound, it's when I'm at home with my high-end audio equipment and lossless audio sources.
I do, and I remember all the freakouts over the lack of SCSI and ADB ports, and on the Windows side of the aisle everyone insisting manufacturers NOT kill the PS/2 ports. Ultimately, the technology advances, and old ports aren't needed any more. You may very well find phones with headphone jacks for many years to come. But more and more, the industry will shift to wireless headphones, and those jacks will get less and less use. Kind of like those PS/2 ports that still ship on a few models of motherboards....
What kind of "unusual" things would an app ask you to do? Drink 8 glasses of water a day? Get 10,000 steps? Move at least once an hour? I haven't seen anything that would be dangerous unless you're seriously out of shape or suffer from some extreme affliction. Considering how lawsuit happy people are, I doubt any of these apps are recommending anything dangerous to 99.99999% of the public.
Slashdot Mirror
One. Gets warmer
One.1 Increased warmth causes increased water vapor.
One.2 Increased water vapor causes increased cloud cover.
One.3 Increased cloud cover causes increased reflection of sunlight, resulting in less warming at surface.
One.4 Less warming at surface means it gets cooler
One.5 Goto One
OR
One.6 Increased warmth causes increased Thunderstorm formation
One.7 Increased thunderstorms causes increased movement of surface heat to upper atmosphere, where CO2 is not active
One.8 Surface gets cooler
One.9 Goto One
Fossil Fuel isn't running out in your or your children's lifetime. There's now enough proven reserves of oil and gas to keep us going for 50+ years. That doesn't include any new finds in 2016 or 2017, of which there were several significant large finds. Technology will also continue to improve, increasing our ability to find new reserves and extract reserves from previously uneconomical formations. There's also over 100 years worth known reserves of coal. There's also enough Uranium to power the world for a thousand years if the fossil fuels actually do look like they're getting close to end of life.
Killing the oceans? Maybe you should take a Geology 101 course. If anything, a slightly warmer climate will result in life thriving. It's already been proven from satellite readings that increased CO2 is resulting in increased vegetation cover. The oceans will likewise benefit from an increase in CO2. CO2 is a necessity for plant life, and plant life is a necessity for the multitude of creatures on this planet.
And you are aware that ice still doesn't melt at -20C, even though it's 30 degrees above seasonal norms, right? Current temperature in Iqaluit is -22C. The record high for this date is 0C in 1965. The record low is -37.8C in 1964. That's a variance of almost 40 degrees in back to back winters. One winter does not mean every winter. Especially when that winter followed a strong El Nino. But carry on with your preaching, I'm sure you're firmly committed to your beliefs and nothing anyone else says will budge you.
Arctic Specialist Bernt Balchen, in 1972 predicted an ice free Arctic by the year 2000: https://news.google.com/newspa...
NASA Climate Scientist Jay Zwally, in 2007, predicted an ice free Arctic by 2013: http://news.nationalgeographic...
Professor Wieslaw Maslowski, in 2007, predicted an ice free Arctic by 2013: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/713...
Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment Report, completed by eight Arctic Council Nations, in 2009 predicted an ice free Arctic by 2015: http://www.theepochtimes.com/n...
Oh look, they deleted the page. Good thing I saved a quote:
Because climate change in the Arctic region is occurring faster and to a greater extent than anywhere else, the Arctic Ocean may be ice-free for a short period of time as early as the summer of 2015, according to the 2009 Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment Report completed by the eight Arctic Council Nations.
Scientific Director of ArcticNet, Louis Fortier, in 2007 predicted an ice free Arctic by 2010 or 2015: https://www.pressreader.com/ca...
NASA Climate Scientist Jay Zwally, in 2007, predicted an ice free Arctic by 2013: http://news.nationalgeographic...
Professor Wieslaw Maslowski, in 2007, predicted an ice free Arctic by 2013: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/713...
Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment Report, completed by eight Arctic Council Nations, in 2009 predicted an ice free Arctic by 2015: http://www.theepochtimes.com/n...
Oh look, they deleted the page. Good thing I saved a quote:
Because climate change in the Arctic region is occurring faster and to a greater extent than anywhere else, the Arctic Ocean may be ice-free for a short period of time as early as the summer of 2015, according to the 2009 Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment Report completed by the eight Arctic Council Nations.
Scientific Director of ArcticNet, Louis Fortier, in 2007 predicted an ice free Arctic by 2010 or 2015: https://www.pressreader.com/ca...
Ok angry Martian man, I'll bite. What is the total direct atmospheric increase in temperature caused by a doubling of CO2 concentration? Please show me the science experiment and math that calculates this value. I want to see the actual science that you keep spouting off about. Don't show me the IPCC reports, or the outputs from climate simulations.
FYI, Iceberg calving is caused by growing ice/glaciers.
No, I clicked on 2006, and the two lines are extremely close, less than 200,000km2 difference. 2005 and 2007 are less than 300,000km2 difference. It's a 1 to 2% variance. Ho Hum.
looks like we're right on track for a repeat of 2006's ice coverage. Ho hum.
Well just so you know, they do pay taxes on all that money generated in NZ, it just doesn't go to the NZ government: https://www.bloomberg.com/view...
Ya, I'll wait for the "organic" version to come out.
I think the fact that nobody has yet claimed "Document X released by WikiLeaks is fake!" is proof enough that WikiLeaks is 100% accurate so far. Until someone finds a document that isn't authentic, they will remain 100%. We don't need to prove that ALL released documents are authentic. We need to prove that a single one isn't.
It all depends on how much the batteries are being drained before being recharged. Discharging past 80% of capacity will drastically cut the number of cycles you can get out of them. https://cleantechnica.com/2016...
Well I don't think you're going to get the smoking gun email where dude says "kill him" and minion replies "ok, I hacked his car, he just accelerated into a tree". We have motive, means, opportunity, and suspicious cause of death. It certainly requires an investigation. But who investigates the CIA?
You're missing several key points.
Michael Hastings was possibly assassinated by these very tools because he was investigating the director of the CIA.
The CIA may have lost control of all of these tools to the hacking community at large
The CIA may have been using these tools on US citizens.
The CIA may have been using these tools as a politicized weapon.
The documents published so far are largely genuine, officials said, though they are not yet certain if all of them are and whether some of the documents may have been altered. However, WikiLeaks thus far has a 100% accurate record, so it would be absolutely shocking if even a single document is not authentic. One of the biggest concerns for the federal government is if WikiLeaks publishes critical computer code on how operations are conducted, other hackers could take that code and cause havoc overseas. Of course, the federal government is merely deflecting blame on WikiLeaks, when it appears likely the CIA has already lost control of these tools to the hacking communities and agencies of the world.
They contributed the slowdown to: 1) more single people, who have less sex than married people, and 2) married people having less sex. So, in essence, people are having less sex, because people are having less sex? Clearly government funded researchers doing this one...SMH
I think the biggest revelation is the fact that the CIA can, indeed, hack a car and potentially assassinate the driver: http://yournewswire.com/wikile...
Interestingly, Michael Hastings died when his car suddenly accelerated out of control and crashed, killing him instantly. He was currently investigating the director of the CIA, John Brennan!
Coincidence???????
???
??
?
Yes, that's all we need is crowd sourcing to help determine the truth. Popular opinion should matter more than actual facts.
Every account? How about when you're running/exercising, listening to music, and the headphone wire keeps snagging on your arms? Or it keeps bouncing around annoying you? Or even worse, the bouncing around of the wire jiggles the earbud out of your ear? I could care less about the "inferior" quality of the bluetooth headphones I picked up, because the freedom of the wireless makes them worth it, and my 256Kbps MP3's sound just fine.
When it comes to quality of audio, very few phone users are putting lossless audio on their phones. I know for myself, I prefer the wireless headphones because there's no wire to get snagged, and I want the music on my phone to be convenient and portable. When I want good quality sound, it's when I'm at home with my high-end audio equipment and lossless audio sources.
I do, and I remember all the freakouts over the lack of SCSI and ADB ports, and on the Windows side of the aisle everyone insisting manufacturers NOT kill the PS/2 ports. Ultimately, the technology advances, and old ports aren't needed any more. You may very well find phones with headphone jacks for many years to come. But more and more, the industry will shift to wireless headphones, and those jacks will get less and less use. Kind of like those PS/2 ports that still ship on a few models of motherboards....
How is it better for the environment? What happens to the coating when the plastic is melted down for recycling?
What kind of "unusual" things would an app ask you to do? Drink 8 glasses of water a day? Get 10,000 steps? Move at least once an hour? I haven't seen anything that would be dangerous unless you're seriously out of shape or suffer from some extreme affliction. Considering how lawsuit happy people are, I doubt any of these apps are recommending anything dangerous to 99.99999% of the public.