I'm always puzzled by people who believes that they can learn all about politic from Micheal Moore movird.
The Supreme Court didn't decide that you don't need to win the popular vote in the state to win its electoral college votes, as Bush had more votes in the last "official" recount.
And can anyone here tell me why not a single Democrat Senator signed the paper contesting the election results?
And what's that got to do with the Arizona counties? As I said before, you are trying to force relationships to prove your point.
At least in Colorado, property taxes and taxable values are public record, although homeowners will laugh at your face if you offer taxable value for their houses (unless it's extremely run down) since taxable value here generally runs lower that the market value.
Any one from Arizona care to comment on taxable value vs. market value on your home state?
As a home owner, I can tell you that taxable value of a home is quite different then the market value, and they don't usually have one to one relationship. I'd say that you are trying to force the relationship on it just to prove your point.
For example, painting the house with a popular color may bring up the market value but it will not bring up your taxable value, whereas adding a bedroom may bring both of them up (although not equally).
Although that AC probably posted using a computer built by (atleast the components) one or more corporations, with Internet connection made possible by one or more corporations, on a board owned by a corporation.
Maybe Moore is posting as an AC because he got owned by Bill O'Reilly during a recent "debate" and didn't want O'Reilly to bash him in/. as well.
According to Moore, you are a lier even if you act on misinformation, and every servicemen/women in the US military was signed up by their parents (vs. volunteering).
Why would Bush try to stop Jib Jab when this threat gave Jib Jab a huge publicity? There was even an article about it on CNN.com complete with link to the site.
I'll bet that you rented about how Bush is behind in Disney's decision to not to distribute Fahrenheit 9/11 and how no one will be able to see it even tough it had the best opening for a documentary. I guess the Bush family isn't as powerful as you'd like for everyone to believe?
I suppose if your pet dog/cat/fish/hamster dies, it'll be Bush's fault, right?
Folks, this is why learning by just watching TV and movies is a bad idea. This world would be a much better place if people decided to do their own search for the "truth" instead of taking what the mass media and Hollywood dish out at face value. This AC's even to fucking lazy to view the parody in question!
In A.D. 2004
War was beginning.
BayStar: What happen ?
Investor: Somebody set up us the SCO shares.
BayStar's Lawyer: We get phone call.
BayStar: What !
BayStar's Lawyer: Main phone turn on.
BayStar: It's You !!
Darl: How are you gentlemen !!
Darl: All your share are belong to us.
Darl: You are on the way to bankruptcy.
BayStar: What you say !!
Darl: You have no chance to survive make your trade.
Darl: HA HA HA HA....
BayStar: Take off every lawsuit !!
BayStar: You know what you doing.
BayStar: Move lawsuit.
BayStar: For great justice.
In A.D. 2004
War was beginning.
BayStar: What happen ?
Investor: Somebody set up us the SCO share.
BayStar's Lawyer: We get phone call.
BayStar: What !
BayStar's Lawyer: Main phone turn on.
BayStar: It's You !!
Darl: How are you gentlemen !!
Darl: All your share are belong to us.
Darl: You are on the way to bankruptcy.
BayStar: What you say !!
Darl: You have no chance to survive make your trade.
Darl: HA HA HA HA....
BayStar: Take off every lawsuit !!
BayStar: You know what you doing.
BayStar: Move lawsuit.
BayStar: For great justice.
The worker productivity in the U.S. jumps as workers unable to search for things in Google start to do actual work. Tune in at six for the rest of the story.
On the other news, both BSD and Apple died earlier this morning when cars driven by each collided each other on the freeway.
Then why does the slashdotters go crazy on articles on sourcing of IT jobs to India? I guess outsourcing is good unless it's your job that's being oursourced, then hell's going to break lose and the economy is going to tank because the world revolves around you.
The problem is that during the 80's a lot of blue collar jobs in manufacturing were starting to be outsourced to the third worlds with much cheaper labor. Many of the white collar workers thought that their jobs were safe back then, but look at what's happening now?
Replace the word librarians with "IT workers" and the slashdotters would sing a different tune. But it's not suprising because people like you don't really give a shit if someone else may lose their jobs as long as it's not yours.
In the NK example, the point I'm trying to make is it doesn't matter how much food a country has if it makes feeding the military and party leaders a higher priority then feeding the rest of the population.
You still didn't explain who US and European economic policies create famine. Did you know that, famines existed well before US and EU were formed?
Out sourcing is bad, therefore, the government should ban robots to protect us from robots taking our jobs. Oh wait, robots are taking librarian jobs and since it doesn't affect most slashdotters, they should go ahead and replace the librarians with robots. The government should hold off on banning of the robots until they do a massive take over of IT jobs since it will cause unemployment of the geeks and cause major economic harm.
And how does the US and European domestical policies affect starving North Koreans? Maybe it's because they have oversized army to feed for such a small country?
Does US and European domestical policies somehow magically alter the weather patterns in famin stricken countries?
I'll bet they they'll still find a way to fuck that up as well, i.e., running out of toner, jammed printer, corrupted print driver, etc.
I'm always puzzled by people who believes that they can learn all about politic from Micheal Moore movird.
The Supreme Court didn't decide that you don't need to win the popular vote in the state to win its electoral college votes, as Bush had more votes in the last "official" recount.
And can anyone here tell me why not a single Democrat Senator signed the paper contesting the election results?
I guess the just need to get back to the Democrat designed butterfly ballet.
And what's that got to do with the Arizona counties? As I said before, you are trying to force relationships to prove your point.
At least in Colorado, property taxes and taxable values are public record, although homeowners will laugh at your face if you offer taxable value for their houses (unless it's extremely run down) since taxable value here generally runs lower that the market value.
Any one from Arizona care to comment on taxable value vs. market value on your home state?
Most Americans their money unwisely so I'm not suprised that the US government also spends unwisely.
I suppose I should start getting programming tips from accountants now?
Why would you open a history book when they have this course called "Govermental Accounting" with books to go along with it.
As a home owner, I can tell you that taxable value of a home is quite different then the market value, and they don't usually have one to one relationship. I'd say that you are trying to force the relationship on it just to prove your point.
For example, painting the house with a popular color may bring up the market value but it will not bring up your taxable value, whereas adding a bedroom may bring both of them up (although not equally).
Although that AC probably posted using a computer built by (atleast the components) one or more corporations, with Internet connection made possible by one or more corporations, on a board owned by a corporation.
Maybe Moore is posting as an AC because he got owned by Bill O'Reilly during a recent "debate" and didn't want O'Reilly to bash him in /. as well.
According to Moore, you are a lier even if you act on misinformation, and every servicemen/women in the US military was signed up by their parents (vs. volunteering).
But according to the socialists, large coporations make money by exploitation of the workers, so they really wouldn't view Kerry as someone good.
Why would Bush try to stop Jib Jab when this threat gave Jib Jab a huge publicity? There was even an article about it on CNN.com complete with link to the site.
I'll bet that you rented about how Bush is behind in Disney's decision to not to distribute Fahrenheit 9/11 and how no one will be able to see it even tough it had the best opening for a documentary. I guess the Bush family isn't as powerful as you'd like for everyone to believe?
I suppose if your pet dog/cat/fish/hamster dies, it'll be Bush's fault, right?
Folks, this is why learning by just watching TV and movies is a bad idea. This world would be a much better place if people decided to do their own search for the "truth" instead of taking what the mass media and Hollywood dish out at face value. This AC's even to fucking lazy to view the parody in question!
I think that you are dead on about both trying to appeal to as many people as possible.
I remember seeing Kerry ads mentioning that his a hunter (to appeal to pro-gunners), and Bush is trying hard to get black votes.
How about the Kight Rider?
Shit, forgot to use linebreaks like a retard...
....
In A.D. 2004
War was beginning.
BayStar: What happen ?
Investor: Somebody set up us the SCO shares.
BayStar's Lawyer: We get phone call.
BayStar: What !
BayStar's Lawyer: Main phone turn on.
BayStar: It's You !!
Darl: How are you gentlemen !!
Darl: All your share are belong to us.
Darl: You are on the way to bankruptcy.
BayStar: What you say !!
Darl: You have no chance to survive make your trade.
Darl: HA HA HA HA
BayStar: Take off every lawsuit !!
BayStar: You know what you doing.
BayStar: Move lawsuit.
BayStar: For great justice.
In A.D. 2004 War was beginning. BayStar: What happen ? Investor: Somebody set up us the SCO share. BayStar's Lawyer: We get phone call. BayStar: What ! BayStar's Lawyer: Main phone turn on. BayStar: It's You !! Darl: How are you gentlemen !! Darl: All your share are belong to us. Darl: You are on the way to bankruptcy. BayStar: What you say !! Darl: You have no chance to survive make your trade. Darl: HA HA HA HA ....
BayStar: Take off every lawsuit !!
BayStar: You know what you doing.
BayStar: Move lawsuit.
BayStar: For great justice.
"The best lawsuit... Ever!" (comic book guy)
The worker productivity in the U.S. jumps as workers unable to search for things in Google start to do actual work. Tune in at six for the rest of the story.
On the other news, both BSD and Apple died earlier this morning when cars driven by each collided each other on the freeway.
People will still buy because some people just can't learn from past mistakes (i.e. buying inflated stocks during the boom).
Then why does the slashdotters go crazy on articles on sourcing of IT jobs to India? I guess outsourcing is good unless it's your job that's being oursourced, then hell's going to break lose and the economy is going to tank because the world revolves around you.
The problem is that during the 80's a lot of blue collar jobs in manufacturing were starting to be outsourced to the third worlds with much cheaper labor. Many of the white collar workers thought that their jobs were safe back then, but look at what's happening now?
Replace the word librarians with "IT workers" and the slashdotters would sing a different tune. But it's not suprising because people like you don't really give a shit if someone else may lose their jobs as long as it's not yours.
In the NK example, the point I'm trying to make is it doesn't matter how much food a country has if it makes feeding the military and party leaders a higher priority then feeding the rest of the population.
You still didn't explain who US and European economic policies create famine. Did you know that, famines existed well before US and EU were formed?
Out sourcing is bad, therefore, the government should ban robots to protect us from robots taking our jobs. Oh wait, robots are taking librarian jobs and since it doesn't affect most slashdotters, they should go ahead and replace the librarians with robots. The government should hold off on banning of the robots until they do a massive take over of IT jobs since it will cause unemployment of the geeks and cause major economic harm.
And how does the US and European domestical policies affect starving North Koreans? Maybe it's because they have oversized army to feed for such a small country?
Does US and European domestical policies somehow magically alter the weather patterns in famin stricken countries?