Slashdot Mirror


User: davecb

davecb's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
2,113
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 2,113

  1. Re:Chasing the Windows Rainbow... on Windows Compatability on the Linux Desktop · · Score: 1
    Agreed, but I'm reluctant to spend a whack of money buying Vmware, and another whack upgrading a PC to run it.

    I bacame a Win4Lin and Linux bigot the day my el-junko 133 MHz Pentium One ran MS project under Win4Lin under Linux faster than it ran on Win95 on the same hardware. A real filesystem and an MMU mke a lot of difference!

    --dave

  2. Re:If forking is a concern... on Sun Demurs On Open-Source Java · · Score: 1
    They are worried about their new best friend, who had to be stopped with a private anti-trust suit.

    It's MS that will fork anything they feel like, make it dependant on .NET, ship it on a monopoly platform and reap ... monopoly benefits from it.

    --dave

  3. Re:Clarification, Java is a brand on Sun Java Desktop System Release 2 · · Score: 1
    I hope it's also a direction. The moer thst's written in Java following Java-related standards, the less that has to be done compatable to a certain monopoly platform's ~standards.

    --dave

  4. Re:Recommended Server Requirements on Sun Java Desktop System Release 2 · · Score: 1
    It seems perfectly ok on my old "departmental loaner" portable: 400 MHZ, 256KB memory, a 10/100 Mbit/S ethernet card and a somewhat slow ide disk.

    --dave

  5. Re:Forks are a really REALLY bad thing for Java on Gosling on Opening Java · · Score: 1
    All MS has to do is take a copy, change it to prefer to use .NET objects in preference to anything else, then
    1. return the code to the community
    2. ship only that code on their monopoly platform.
    Now the majority of Java written will run only on MS servers with .NET services. Bingo, back into monopoly lock-in.

    That make Mono critical to any Java implementation, and doesn't make it any easier than Wine... which is to say, makes it a sngle point of failure.

    --dave

  6. Re:Oh come on on Should Sun Just Fold Now? · · Score: 1
    Sun is selling AMD 64, and Intel implicitly admitted that Itanic (I love that name (:-)) was doomed by releasing an AMD clone. Does that perhaps mean that Intel should close themselves down?

    --dave

  7. Re:Why is Sun an Open Source Sweetheart, anyway? on Criticizing Sun's Java Desktop System · · Score: 1
    Huh? Sweetheart???

    I thought that Sun was always getting slagged by the commentators at Slashdot (;-))

    --dave

  8. Re:Great Blog on Miguel de Icaza on Longhorn · · Score: 1
    Sorry, I meant GPL!

    --dave

  9. Re:Great Blog on Miguel de Icaza on Longhorn · · Score: 2, Interesting
    And add two more workds: "on XP".

    Omega1045 wrote "This weekend I went to install some GNU software on my WinXP Pro laptop. "

    A good, GUI-based XP apt-get, even if it only provides access to Unix-derived apps on XP, will serve two purposes:

    1. Show people currently running XP that the Gnu software is really professionally done. In particular, I want to xp-get Open Office.
    2. Give us a high-quality GUI to match or beat as we go forward with improving the ease of use of Unix apps.

    --dave

  10. Re:Farsighted plans, nethinks on Sun Sacks UltraSparc V and 3300 Employees · · Score: 1
    No, the N-way multithreaded cores are very somple and regular, and arguably a lot easier to get to work than a bleeding-edge unithreaded core.

    To me it looks like a conservative move: concentrate on something that's simple and elegant which gives more total performance at the same clock speed. Get it shipping with good yeilds, then ramp up the clock.

    --dave

  11. Re:AMD on Sun's President Dreams of a Linux Future · · Score: 1
    AMD does a pretty decent uniprocessor CPU, but you need a backplane by someone like Seymour Cray to run a serious 64-processor system. Sun, not being stupid, have a backplane first designed by... some guy named Cray.

    --dave

  12. Re:poor sun on Sun's President Dreams of a Linux Future · · Score: 2, Informative
    Er, didn't Wal-Mart announce last week that they were selling computers with the Linux Sun Java Desktop installed?

    --dave

  13. Re:"Canada's national newspaper?" on Linux in Canada · · Score: 1
    handslikesnakes wrote We have more than one, you know.

    Really? Were you thinking of the National Examiner^b^b^b^b^b^b^b^b Post, then?

    --dave
    [For those who don't know about the newspapers up here, the Post made a valiant attempt to outcompete the Globe. Alas, their accuracy was a bit low and their tendancy to spin a bit high, so they get teased a bit about that]

  14. Re:User stupidity on Linux in Canada · · Score: 1
    Many user-level programs in Unix and Linux happily install in per-user mode without asking for the root password*.

    Make this all and the end users won't have the root password, and therefor won't be able to authorize installing a virus... even assuming they don't realize that asking for the password is an unexpected behavior.

    --dave
    [* developers are doing just that]

  15. Re:Completly and totally wrong... on Why We Need a Second Moore's Law · · Score: 1
    The Elbrus group in Russia just developed a proof-of-concept SPARC chip which draws 1 watt at 500 MHz, the MCST R-500. It run Linux and Solaris.

    It was described thusly: In late February 2004 ZAO MCST delivered samples of the first Russian-made microprocessor "MCST R-500" with a feature size of 0.13 micron, clock frequency 450-500MHz and power consumption of less than 1W.

    See http://www.elbrus.ru/mcst/eng/complex.shtml

  16. Re:Not just time... on Java Evangelist Leaves Sun After MS Settlement · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Allen Zadr writes: Java is a losing deal that can't be safely dropped.

    I'd consider Java a mechanism to keep customers from being locked into a particular hardware && software platform, thus making it possible for Sun to keep selling hardware.

    And I'd say it has succeeded, as Java's now back on Windows as part of the deal. Which is consistant with the eWeek story.

    --dave

  17. Re:Incomprehensible on Sun Plans Solaris Subscription Model · · Score: 1

    My understanding is that included the support... Solaris alone is free, and since my company only has one employee (;-)) that sounds like a fairly good deal. --dave (wearing his author hat) c-b

  18. Re:Subscription model or source code model? on Sun Plans Solaris Subscription Model · · Score: 2, Insightful
    passthecrackpipe writes A subsciption fee based model tends to be ...not so good for the end-user (expensive, bad for your cashflow).

    Actually it can be good for a company that has trouble coming up with great whacks of cash for upgrades, so long as the subscription fee is both

    • fair for the value received and
    • low enough to allow savings to finance a change-over.
    I'm biased, but $50-$100 per seat per year sounds good to me.

    --dave

  19. Re:No power. on Canadian Minister Promises to Fix Copyright Law · · Score: 1
    saforrest writes: Of course, it would be even worse under the Conservatives, so what can you do?

    Maybe change the rules so the politicians can't go to their friends to raise money for the upcoming elsction...

    Oh, never mind, we did that, just this year (;-))

    --dave

  20. Re:The bitch got bribed on Canadian Minister Promises to Fix Copyright Law · · Score: 1
    That's now illegal in Canada: the industry associations can't contribute to election campaigns. It changed just this year...

    dave

  21. Reply from an author on Canadian Minister Promises to Fix Copyright Law · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Honourable Ms. Scherrer:

    You were quoted as saying " I will, as quickly as possible, make changes to our
    copyright law", in response to concerns expressed by the Canadian music industry.

    As an author, I strongly support strong copyright protection against professional
    thieves, but you should be aware that the so-called "sharing" on the internet has
    increased the sales of my book and others. Readers go out and buy the printed
    version, as it's far more convenient and portable than a computer.

    I therefor support having my book available to "share", as it's to my financial
    benefit, and that of my publisher.

    I see the same thing happening with music. I strongly suspect that playing
    music on the internet is financially advantageous to the artists and publishers.

    As I'm elderly I don't download music: I listen to the CBC and buy CDs I like.
    My younger friends say they listen on-line and then buy CDs. I don't have sales
    figures for CDs that I do for my book, but a recent study by two academics who
    do have the figures showed that the downloading has not done any detectable
    harm.

    The study, "The Effect of File Sharing on Record Sales An Empirical Analysis",
    by Felix Oberholzer and Koleman Strumpf concluded "Downloads have an effect
    on sales which is statistically indistinguishable from zero ... and are inconsistent
    with claims that file sharing is the primary reason for the recent decline in music
    sales." That reports is available at
    http://www.unc.edu/~cigar/papers/FileSharing_M arch 2004.pdf

    I would like to see continuing stringent protection for authors, but suspect
    that playing music on the internet is about as dangerous to the artists and
    their publishers as playing it on the radio.

    I suspect this is much like the furor over VCRs and CD burners, and should
    be dealt with the same way, with a levy on blank CDs. I would be quite
    supportive of levies, including additional levies, on the CD media and
    burners I use.

    Sincerely, David Collier-Brown

  22. Re:Two things stand out on Sun and Microsoft Settle Litigation · · Score: 1
    in place of "Large proprietary unix vendor", consider instead "Large proprietary hardware vendor and medium-size Unix vendor".

    Then subsitute in "SPARC international" for proprietary and see if what you get (;-)).

    --dave (biased, you understand) c-b

  23. Re:Oh Canada. on Music Industry Loses In Canadian Downloading Case · · Score: 1
    s20451 writes: In spite of this, Canadian television has yet to produce a domestic hit television series

    Er, how about Cold Case Files, recently copied in the 'States. Not to mention North of Sixty, King of Kensington (also copied but renamed) and show after show back to Howdy Doodie (also copied in the States).

    --dave (When Howdy Doody was showing, modern televisions had 3" screens) c-b

  24. Re:While in agreement with the ruling on Music Industry Loses In Canadian Downloading Case · · Score: 1
    Actually it's not: It's a rejection of the claim that infringent has happened, on the grounds that no evidence of uploading was presented. Only downloading.

    Give evidence of a crime, though, the court certainly would do what you said, and allow a suit against uploaders (actually distributors) to go forward to the discovery stage.

    --dave

  25. Re:Programming on Novell Desktop To Standardize On Qt [updated] · · Score: 4, Funny
    I think mixing C, C, ++, GTK and QT should make programming much more fun, by making it almost totally impossible (;-))

    --dave