Something a 15 year old would think of. O wait, it is a 15 year old.
Using IRC, besides the fact that it has it's own scalability issues, is not the way to implement a P2P network! If the goal was to avoid 'central servers', using an IRC server doesn't get you any closer to that goal. Instead of placing the load on your own systems, you are just outsourcing it to public chat systems (without permission might i add since most servers excplititly state no non-IRC client 'bots').
(http://www.dIRCchat.com - new Windows IRC client)
And lastly, what if we slap a thin layer of encryption over the packets (currently, the computational cost of encryption/decryption makes this unlikely, but that will soon change) so that they're not recognizable?
if you can run X over ssh, don't you think you could run VOIP over some similar type of encryption?!? You know that proccessors today run over 1000mhz, i think that is plenty of power to unencode a mpeg4, let alone descramble some audio stream.
Code morphing is a great way to transition to VLIW, but dynamic translation and parallelization will always be slower than native processes. Are there any other ways that we as a community can start moving away from the old x86? I am sick of only having 4 registers when asembly programming!
Not only does that imply a high quality product, it shows that a major
corporation does not fear legal repurcussions (repercussions) by groups
such as the MPAA.
You have to remember, that Pioneer has mad a deal with the MPAA over fair use
of DVD recordable media. It will not play in your dvd drive since the key
is pre-written as all zero's. All the big corporations don't fear
each other, they are all in bed together.
So then I called NSI, waited on hold for 20 min, and spoke with a service rep
20 minutes! Your Lucky! I had to call NetSol because a hosting company lost a crypt-pass, and i had to wait 2 hours to get a rep! Then 2 months to get a reply to the FAX, and then another 2 months to get a reply to the second FAX, then 2 more months for it to be updated!
Why do they insist on waiting for 45 days while other security organizations (bugtraq, packetstorm, securityfocus) release them immediately? Doesn't this just hurt people who rely only on CERT (like some people i know)?
He is right on one thing. The majority of internet users ignore copyright laws on music. While some of us say that these copyright laws are 'unfair', they are the current law. They protect peoples works. To draw on his 'speed limit' analogy, some of us do speed, but it is against the law and we do get caught(20 over on I-94, im still bitter!). The RIAA however is going about enforcement the wrong way!
Going after peer to peer file sharing systems is not the way to go! You should arrest the speeder, not the highway crew!
"I think the X-33 will never fly, and I'm not alone in that opinion," says Tim Kyger, a former Congressional staffer who now works for Universal Space Network, a company that provides satellite tracking services.
Personally, i would rather have seen a quote from an aerospace engineer or some other profession that actually deals with space flight. I don't know who this guy is or if he even knows anything about the X-33. And it is just his opinion, he even states it! And this is the only quote in the entire article that they use to support the authors conclusion. I was not impressed by this piece of journalism.
That is right, although it doesn't mean that. Of all the 4 word combinations starting with I L R H, you have to pick that one. =D
"not posting anonymously to not preserve my charma"
=D
How can a volunteer from Linux community help with the development of FreeMWare?
Something a 15 year old would think of. O wait, it is a 15 year old.
Using IRC, besides the fact that it has it's own scalability issues, is not the way to implement a P2P network! If the goal was to avoid 'central servers', using an IRC server doesn't get you any closer to that goal. Instead of placing the load on your own systems, you are just outsourcing it to public chat systems (without permission might i add since most servers excplititly state no non-IRC client 'bots').
(http://www.dIRCchat.com - new Windows IRC client)
This is such good spin. You should work for the Bush and Gore campaigns!
+1 funny
While the L1 is fast and you can attain a 90-99% cache hit rate, it is still at least twice as slow as hitting a register directly.
The Itanium will come with 128 floating point and 128 integer registers.
This is what i love about the Itanium! Finally getting away from that awful x86. You need more than 4 gpr's on modern chips.
And lastly, what if we slap a thin layer of encryption over the packets (currently, the computational cost of encryption/decryption makes this unlikely, but that will soon change) so that they're not recognizable?
if you can run X over ssh, don't you think you could run VOIP over some similar type of encryption?!? You know that proccessors today run over 1000mhz, i think that is plenty of power to unencode a mpeg4, let alone descramble some audio stream.
Code morphing is a great way to transition to VLIW, but dynamic translation and parallelization will always be slower than native processes. Are there any other ways that we as a community can start moving away from the old x86? I am sick of only having 4 registers when asembly programming!
You can read about the details of these wonderful devices in the Applied Physics Letters.
AnHTML version.
ASectioned HTML version
Or download thePDF.
in there, honest!
For those of you who would like to implement ipv6 on your systems, there are howto's available at http://www.ipv6.org/howtos.htmlAlso check out the USAGI Project
Not only does that imply a high quality product, it shows that a major corporation does not fear legal repurcussions (repercussions) by groups such as the MPAA.
You have to remember, that Pioneer has mad a deal with the MPAA over fair use of DVD recordable media. It will not play in your dvd drive since the key is pre-written as all zero's. All the big corporations don't fear each other, they are all in bed together.
"It must be aliens trying to contact..." -- wait, press release budget meet, never mind.
It is too late for them to jump on the wagon.
Bush won Florida. Bush won the white house
PGP wipe! 7 pases.
What do people think of the PS9 commercials? (yes, 9 as in nine).
What a vision of the future!
20 minutes! Your Lucky! I had to call NetSol because a hosting company lost a crypt-pass, and i had to wait 2 hours to get a rep! Then 2 months to get a reply to the FAX, and then another 2 months to get a reply to the second FAX, then 2 more months for it to be updated!
Why do they insist on waiting for 45 days while other security organizations (bugtraq, packetstorm, securityfocus) release them immediately? Doesn't this just hurt people who rely only on CERT (like some people i know)?
i think the poster meant NFS, and not NTFS.
I was unable to get my hands on an Iabo, but hopefully i can get one of these!
He is right on one thing. The majority of internet users ignore copyright laws on music. While some of us say that these copyright laws are 'unfair', they are the current law. They protect peoples works. To draw on his 'speed limit' analogy, some of us do speed, but it is against the law and we do get caught(20 over on I-94, im still bitter!). The RIAA however is going about enforcement the wrong way!
Going after peer to peer file sharing systems is not the way to go! You should arrest the speeder, not the highway crew!
OS X is suppose to be pronounced 'Oh Es Ten', but it sounds so much better when it is pronounced 'Ohhh Sex'.
"I think the X-33 will never fly, and I'm not alone in that opinion," says Tim Kyger, a former Congressional staffer who now works for Universal Space Network, a company that provides satellite tracking services.
Personally, i would rather have seen a quote from an aerospace engineer or some other profession that actually deals with space flight. I don't know who this guy is or if he even knows anything about the X-33. And it is just his opinion, he even states it! And this is the only quote in the entire article that they use to support the authors conclusion. I was not impressed by this piece of journalism.