The good ISPs already have dedicated boxes. Lots of them. The ones who run SA have about 8 times as many dedicated boxes as the ones who purely block based on DNSBLs (IME).
ISPs _can't_ afford to run filters generally. If you want to run SA or other content filters, you should be doing those at the end user nodes, and not at the central hubs. Content filters work after the fact of accepting the email, at which point the only reasonable responses are to discard the spam silently, or generate a bounce.
Postfix has had two _possible_ security holes, and those would happen if there was a system misconfiguration.
On the other hand, qmail has not been developed since 1998, it still does an accept first and then bounce stance (contributing to the DoS attack of backscatter), it converts multi-recipient mail into single recipient messages when sending out, it doesn't support a lot of things natively, including TLS and SMTP AUTH.....
It is easier to be secure when your code is Hello World..
Message passing and repeated input validation imposes a performance penalty. However, with well defined interfaces, the interdependencies are highly reduced, and maintainance becomes simple.
A large monolithic program leads to complex interdependencies in the code and maintainance becomes difficult.
Security is easy to do, if you design it in right from the beginning (see Postfix, which doesn't even have a custom libc, but is simpler to run than qmail and gives better performance).
Wargames. The US just can't move its heavy artillery fast enough. Of what use is an Abrams tank, if it can't get to the battlefield before the war is over?
The point isn't how brutally advanced you are. It doesn't matter _how_ unmatched the battle is, if the other side has weapons capable of reducing the world to winter, and is willing to use them.
It doesn't matter how big your military is, they are still stuck on a single planet and if your opponent is willing to turn that into a pile of slag, you can't win.
Mutually Assured Destruction works on that basis. I don't have to win, I just don't have to lose.
Plus, remember that a small strike force can cause a hell of a lot of damage, given an element of surprise. If I wanted to strike at the US, I would just put out a rumour that there was plutonium in the water supply. No need for weapons, mass panic does everything I want it to do.
The asking price for making that copy available to you is the rental price or sale cost for the work. You have two choices: either pay the asking price or do without
Germany has a blank media tax which covers copying. So if the poster buys blank media, they have already _paid_ money to be able to copy.
And if that was less than what the creator^Wcopyright holder expects, sucks.
Billing twice for the same item has a well known term: fraud.
Most of the high value stuff is bought from US companies. Cars (GM/Ford), shoes (Nike/Reebok), computers (Dell/IBM/Sun, Intel and AMD chips), bandwidth...
Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use.
on
Region-free PS3
·
· Score: 1
I own 40+ year old books, and I can still read them. How much old electronic media is unreadable? Backups don't necessarily mean to the same format.
Former Intel CEO Craig Barrett has stated that wage differentials aren't the issue and that Intel would hire more U.S. engineers if it could find them
If both an American applicant and an H-1B applicant is qualified for a job, the manager will choose the applicant that is more qualified. That approach directly contradicts the stated intentions of managers from companies like Intel: the stated intention is that a manager will hire an American applicant meeting the qualifications but not necessarily offering better qualifications than a qualified H-1B applicant.
I don't see a contradiction there. They are offering a fixed amount of money, and looking for the best qualified candidate for that money. Barrett is claiming that they cannot find enough US engineers at that salary.
Washington should shut the Indians and the Chinese out of the American market until both the Indians and the Chinese establish free markets in their own countries.
Washington imposes quotas on H1B visas. In a truly free market, there would be no quota on H1B visas either. And American companies would be able to sell their goods in India (most of them can sell in India, the ways in which they can retail is currently limited and even that is being opened up).
When a labor shortage arises in the market for high-tech labor, such politicians attempt to damage the correcting force of the shortage by injecting H-1B workers into the market.
Or perhaps you need to realise that the labour market is now global, and not local. The countries where you want to sell things are labour rich. So they buy American goods, in exchange for labour.
You are wrong. The popular plans here are prepaid ones, where you pay a fixed amount of money and get a certain talktime upto a given date. This allows for fixed expenses, and easy quitting if the provider isn't good enough (or someone else offers a better plan).
This allows me to pay $10, and get 400 minutes of talktime to be used within 2 calendar months. I can choose to renew within that period (and extend any unused talktime), or move to another provider.
So when Slashdot links to you-know-where, you won't quickly hit the back button for fear of irreparable eye damage, because, well, it was linked from Slashdot?
By the time (s)he hits the back button, the damage has already been done. If you have time to hit the back button, the site was relatively safe.
Slashdot Mirror
The good ISPs already have dedicated boxes. Lots of them. The ones who run SA have about 8 times as many dedicated boxes as the ones who purely block based on DNSBLs (IME).
ISPs _can't_ afford to run filters generally. If you want to run SA or other content filters, you should be doing those at the end user nodes, and not at the central hubs. Content filters work after the fact of accepting the email, at which point the only reasonable responses are to discard the spam silently, or generate a bounce.
You are supposed to have more testers than developers. and testing with different hardware.
Postfix has had two _possible_ security holes, and those would happen if there was a system misconfiguration.
On the other hand, qmail has not been developed since 1998, it still does an accept first and then bounce stance (contributing to the DoS attack of backscatter), it converts multi-recipient mail into single recipient messages when sending out, it doesn't support a lot of things natively, including TLS and SMTP AUTH.....
It is easier to be secure when your code is Hello World..
Uhm, no.
Message passing and repeated input validation imposes a performance penalty. However, with well defined interfaces, the interdependencies are highly reduced, and maintainance becomes simple.
A large monolithic program leads to complex interdependencies in the code and maintainance becomes difficult.
Security is easy to do, if you design it in right from the beginning (see Postfix, which doesn't even have a custom libc, but is simpler to run than qmail and gives better performance).
Or for that matter, Bush.
After all, the only winning move is not to play at all.
Wargames. The US just can't move its heavy artillery fast enough. Of what use is an Abrams tank, if it can't get to the battlefield before the war is over?
The only way to win is not to play at all.
The point isn't how brutally advanced you are. It doesn't matter _how_ unmatched the battle is, if the other side has weapons capable of reducing the world to winter, and is willing to use them.
It doesn't matter how big your military is, they are still stuck on a single planet and if your opponent is willing to turn that into a pile of slag, you can't win.
Mutually Assured Destruction works on that basis. I don't have to win, I just don't have to lose.
Plus, remember that a small strike force can cause a hell of a lot of damage, given an element of surprise. If I wanted to strike at the US, I would just put out a rumour that there was plutonium in the water supply. No need for weapons, mass panic does everything I want it to do.
Because the important part of these sites is the storage service they offer.
The asking price for making that copy available to you is the rental price or sale cost for the work. You have two choices: either pay the asking price or do without
Germany has a blank media tax which covers copying. So if the poster buys blank media, they have already _paid_ money to be able to copy.
And if that was less than what the creator^Wcopyright holder expects, sucks.
Billing twice for the same item has a well known term: fraud.
If I was a developer, my _compile_ boxes would be separate from my development boxes. Normal work needs horrendous amounts of RAM, not CPU.
Don't bother. qmail is a kludge after you have used Postfix. Having to patch source to get anything done?
Most of the high value stuff is bought from US companies. Cars (GM/Ford), shoes (Nike/Reebok), computers (Dell/IBM/Sun, Intel and AMD chips), bandwidth...
I own 40+ year old books, and I can still read them. How much old electronic media is unreadable? Backups don't necessarily mean to the same format.
Upload DVD. Encode. Download results. Remove old data. Loop.
In my day, we called it emacs.
Former Intel CEO Craig Barrett has stated that wage differentials aren't the issue and that Intel would hire more U.S. engineers if it could find them
If both an American applicant and an H-1B applicant is qualified for a job, the manager will choose the applicant that is more qualified. That approach directly contradicts the stated intentions of managers from companies like Intel: the stated intention is that a manager will hire an American applicant meeting the qualifications but not necessarily offering better qualifications than a qualified H-1B applicant.
I don't see a contradiction there. They are offering a fixed amount of money, and looking for the best qualified candidate for that money. Barrett is claiming that they cannot find enough US engineers at that salary.
Washington should shut the Indians and the Chinese out of the American market until both the Indians and the Chinese establish free markets in their own countries.
Washington imposes quotas on H1B visas. In a truly free market, there would be no quota on H1B visas either. And American companies would be able to sell their goods in India (most of them can sell in India, the ways in which they can retail is currently limited and even that is being opened up).
When a labor shortage arises in the market for high-tech labor, such politicians attempt to damage the correcting force of the shortage by injecting H-1B workers into the market.
Or perhaps you need to realise that the labour market is now global, and not local. The countries where you want to sell things are labour rich. So they buy American goods, in exchange for labour.
At that time, argue that you are going to use the thermal output to generate power for the cooling systems. Bonus, massive uptimes!
Implying that this is a good card for use when reading usenet, slashdot and talking on IRC?
You are wrong. The popular plans here are prepaid ones, where you pay a fixed amount of money and get a certain talktime upto a given date. This allows for fixed expenses, and easy quitting if the provider isn't good enough (or someone else offers a better plan).
This allows me to pay $10, and get 400 minutes of talktime to be used within 2 calendar months. I can choose to renew within that period (and extend any unused talktime), or move to another provider.
So when Slashdot links to you-know-where, you won't quickly hit the back button for fear of irreparable eye damage, because, well, it was linked from Slashdot?
By the time (s)he hits the back button, the damage has already been done. If you have time to hit the back button, the site was relatively safe.
Latency in non-overloaded devices is a function of the speed of light. Perhaps you can tell us how to transmit information faster than light.
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1925.txt is an important read.
About 100 have reached Jupiter's moon Europa - but they landed at 24 miles/sec
All these world's are yours, except Europa. Do not land there.
you would have a guy that goes around doing the same thing every day. You know what that is?
Work?
Cron of course.