Slashdot Mirror


Region-free PS3

An anonymous reader writes "IGN writes that "In a QA session following the platform keynote address at GDC 2006 this morning, Sony Computer Entertainment Worldwide Studios President Phil Harrison confirmed what was heavily demanded for import gamers all over the world and yet previously thought unthinkable for a major corporation: the PS3 will be region-free for gaming." There's no chance that the MPAA members would allow the same for movies but at least it's a step in the right direction."

356 comments

  1. Not THAT surprising... by geminidomino · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One of the biggest reasons mod chips tend to be "iffy" is that, while playing illegally-copied games is illegal, playing out-of-region games isn't. This move may buy them more than it costs, since that's one less reason to give for the legitimacy of mod chips. Now if they could just do something about that pesky "backup" excuse.

    1. Re:Not THAT surprising... by DerGeist · · Score: 3, Funny

      Backups are available at affordable prices.

    2. Re:Not THAT surprising... by jlebrech · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Sell backups along with the game.

      A duplicated of the disk with backup written on it, but official.

      there's the backup.

    3. Re:Not THAT surprising... by Misfit+Taz · · Score: 2, Insightful
      that pesky "backup" excuse

      Its simple, offer free replacment for scratched disc.
      And chipping PS2's is now illegal, or at least selling/buying the mod chip(in most countries), so should be no problem getting it so that chipping the PS3 is also against the law.

    4. Re:Not THAT surprising... by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The surprising thing for us in the UK though is that we may start getting charged a similar price to what you pay in the US.

      We have long been known in the UK for our willingness to pay higher prices, maybe this will start to change if more companies adopted a similar attitude. Personally I do wish the MPAA would follow this example and allow music and dvds to be sold at american prices the world over.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    5. Re:Not THAT surprising... by DrXym · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well the backup excuse could be done away with if the HD was able to cache game content so you didn't need the disc in the drive to play it. How to stop people playing copies this way? Make them enter a registration code. Every so often it sends the code off to Sony. If more than one PS3 is found to have used the game with the same code, it challenges you to insert the disc to continue. Since this will affect few people, it makes HD gaming virtually transparent while allowing the original disc to stay in the keepcase.

    6. Re:Not THAT surprising... by MadJo · · Score: 1

      I'll just say "seeing is believing"... I don't trust Sony very much.
      My sarcastic voice tells me that they only say this to gain some more positive publicity for themselves.

    7. Re:Not THAT surprising... by Lussarn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They can ship me 100 backups for all I care. If I buy something it's mine and I will still do whatever I want with it. Like installing modchips and making backups.

      The day Sony, Microsoft, Apple, Ford and everybody else tells me I just rent the games, software and music, just rent the playsations computers, ipods and cars. Thats the day they can make restrictions.

      But as long as they sell me stuff I'm taking for granted it's mine and I will do whatever I please with it (With possibly the exception of spreading copies of copyrighted material). If what I do is not legal they can call me a criminal. I don't care. I don't see myself as a criminal.

    8. Re:Not THAT surprising... by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except that takes for granted that everyone is going to connect his/her console to the net.

    9. Re:Not THAT surprising... by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Most people will in one way or another. But I'm sure they could still implement an offline mode where you insert the disc at least once every month to get the same functionality. The leakage due to piracy would be marginal.

    10. Re:Not THAT surprising... by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why not just implement the offline mode then? That way they don't have to run authentication servers at all.

    11. Re:Not THAT surprising... by Blisshead · · Score: 1

      What about loading emulation software? Seen that time and time again for pc, why not consoles? Seems easy to get around to me.

    12. Re:Not THAT surprising... by Thaelon · · Score: 1

      So your PS3 is required to have an internet connection to play games?

      Not going to fly.

      Even if it did, what's to prevent spoofing the 'ok to play' message via a proxy server?

      --

      Question everything

    13. Re:Not THAT surprising... by DrXym · · Score: 1

      They could do that too, but running the test against servers would make the feature more useful to end users and might provide Sony with some useful metrics.

    14. Re:Not THAT surprising... by DerGeist · · Score: 1
      Dude...that is a *REALLY* good idea. Coupled with the offline mode you mentioned earlier I'd say you have something companies should actually consider using. No more carry discs around, if you know you'll be offline on vacation for a while you simply insert the disc and "refill" your days remaining until disc reauthentication to 30 (or whatever). It could work for virtually any media (CD, DVD, whatever).

      It does entail some privacy issues though, in the sense that I can pinpoint your exact PS3 using this registration coding scheme. Also you need to think about the case where a copy is made of the disc, then when an identical registration code is detected, two people insert discs and they both seem legit. Who is the "original owner"? You might say the person who owned it for longer, but did I just make a copy and sell my original to someone perhaps? It gets hairy in those annoying details, but I'm sure they can be worked out. Overall you've got a really great idea here.

    15. Re:Not THAT surprising... by forgoil · · Score: 1

      Make it easy, offline mode equals putting the DVD in to start the game, after that the DVD (blue-ray, holographic memory, punch card, your pick) isn't touched. Already done on *Gasp* computers.

      heck, online mode could equal the same thing. Just make sure that we have 1. Plenty of diskspace 2. Removable discs (a la 360).

      No need to complicate things...

    16. Re:Not THAT surprising... by DrXym · · Score: 1
      So your PS3 is required to have an internet connection to play games?

      To play games off the harddrive. A slightly more intrusive check could also be implemented for offline mode.

      Even if it did, what's to prevent spoofing the 'ok to play' message via a proxy server?

      Ever heard of encryption?

    17. Re:Not THAT surprising... by jettoki · · Score: 1

      If what I do is not legal they can call me a criminal. I don't care. I don't see myself as a criminal.

      Obi-wan: Don't you see, unlawful modification is EVIL?!?

      Anakin: From my point of view Sony is evil!!

    18. Re:Not THAT surprising... by somersault · · Score: 1

      what happens when your hard drive dies, you've lost the original disc/had it chewed by your dog, and you dont have a backup? :p I think your idea about using the net is a good one, but something more like Steam would be good, because then you can download your content anytime, to any machine, if you're using your account.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    19. Re:Not THAT surprising... by rkcallaghan · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Its simple, offer free replacment for scratched disc.

      This solution does not account for what happens if $GameProducer:
      • Goes belly up.
      • Provides 'mail in rebate' level of support.
      • Realizes in the year 2075 that producing the discs on demand is no longer a good idea.

      These are the reasons "Fair Use" allows for us to make our own backups. We as the owner of the product need to be the ones in charge of taking care of our stuff, not some distant third party who sees it as an expense they wish they didn't have.

      ~Rebecca
    20. Re:Not THAT surprising... by rkcallaghan · · Score: 1

      Well the backup excuse could be done away with if the HD was able to cache game content so you didn't need the disc in the drive to play it.
      If more than one PS3 is found to have used the game with the same code, it challenges you to insert the disc to continue.

      Uhhh...

      Explain to me please again how this allows me to not need a backup after my disc is scratched / cracked in half / otherwise damaged beyond readability?

      ~Rebecca

    21. Re:Not THAT surprising... by Xymor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's still not good enough.
      They should sell games not disks. That way if you bust your copy you could receive a new one thru mail paying as little as manufacture and shiping costs.

    22. Re:Not THAT surprising... by Tweekster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Um buying a modchip isnt illegal...selling them is

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    23. Re:Not THAT surprising... by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      To solve backups, they need to guarantee they'll replace a disc, at cost, for at least 5 years after the game was released. A lot of companies will do a replacement, but charge you a fortune for it...

    24. Re:Not THAT surprising... by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      What if I don't want to subsidize Sony's "metrics"?

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    25. Re:Not THAT surprising... by dirty · · Score: 2

      Ever heard of DeCSS?

      --

      -matt
    26. Re:Not THAT surprising... by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Bingo!
      You send in your damaged disk and they send you a replacement for $8.00 or so. That easily covers shipping, manufacturing, and all the BS costs of dealing with the return process.

      On a side note, even if this is to mitigate some of the reasons a mod chip is legal, I see this a goot thing:
      $sonyEvilScore -- ;
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    27. Re:Not THAT surprising... by Robaato · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow. That sounds a lot like "Digital Video Express" (the original DIVX)...and we all know how well that went over.

    28. Re:Not THAT surprising... by BkBen7 · · Score: 1

      Ooh, maybe starforce will make 'protection' for our Console Discs too then.

      --
      I'm a Book
      On the Bookshelf
    29. Re:Not THAT surprising... by DrXym · · Score: 1
      Ever heard of DeCSS?

      Yes. And it has nothing to do with establishing a secure connection between two machines over the internet, something that happens billions of times every single day. If you're intent on breaking SSL, I can think of consideraly more tempting targets than communication between a PS3 and a server.

    30. Re:Not THAT surprising... by IAmTheDave · · Score: 1
      And chipping PS2's is now illegal, or at least selling/buying the mod chip(in most countries), so should be no problem getting it so that chipping the PS3 is also against the law.

      Which just SUCKS because, for crying out loud, it's my hardware. But then, this argument has been hashed out again and again, and it's only a matter of time before I have to call Maytag or GE to get permission to put a longer-lasting lightbulb in my refridgerator, because without their permission, my "modding" their product will be illegal.

      --
      Excuse my speling.
      Making The Bar Project
    31. Re:Not THAT surprising... by Schitzoflink · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking that he's thinking it would increase the disk life by allowing you to keep it in a safe place and only need to take it out once and awhile.

      It's not really a solution to the disk being f'd up, it's just something that would allow you to use it alot less which would help keep the disk from getting F'd up.

      Note the capital F

      --
      Mr. T carries a postage stamp in his wallet at all times on the back is a list of all the fools he doesn't pity
    32. Re:Not THAT surprising... by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thus the reason why I think if a DRM type of system is really going to work (Steam for one example), the government needs involvement, or at least a government funded agency. Your argument about backups is just as much rellivent to current DRM ideas as the developer sending you a new disc. As I recall (as in I could very well be wrong in some ways), telcos and other utilites have been given special privlidges in the past and present since they are needed for our typical lifestyle. I think it would be a good idea for the government to sponsor or run an organization that would archive all software, music, and movies, and have that organization act as the distributor for online forms of stuff, so that you wouldn't need to worry about your software that is DRMed or not backed up being lost forever in case of problems. I know 30 years down the road I'll be lucky if I can play HL2 (Although it and the rest of the game industry will probably be swallowed into EA), and although many hate Steam with a passion (I know, you don't need to reply with hatred for Steam), it's probably the closest thing to a good working DRM system we have seen, with the biggest con (other than online activation) being the software on it being unusable 30 years from now possibly.

      --
      In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
    33. Re:Not THAT surprising... by jeremy+f · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They can ship me 100 backups for all I care. If I buy something it's mine and I will still do whatever I want with it. Like installing modchips and making backups.

      The disk they sell you most definitely is yours.

      The software contained on that disk is legally owned property of the company that sold it to you.

      So, you can do anything you want with the disk. You can paint it, tie a string through the center, and wear it as a necklace for all they care. But the software contanied on that disk isn't in any way shape or form yours. You are simply granted rights to use that software in the way the company wants you to.

      But feel free to play DVD frisbee.

    34. Re:Not THAT surprising... by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

      Both the Xbox 1 and the Xbox 360 are "region free consoles" it's the games that are region locked, not the console. So even if sony makes the PS3 region free, there will still probably be region locked games, and the modchip argument will still hold for region based reasons.

      The whole region locking thing is just dumb IMO, but who am I?

    35. Re:Not THAT surprising... by (A)*(B)!0_- · · Score: 1
      "Well the backup excuse could be done away with if the HD was able to cache game content so you didn't need the disc in the drive to play it."
      No it doesn't. Fair use says you have the right to make a copy of the disc. Providing some convoluted scheme to allow the user to play the game directly from their hard drive does not trump basic fair use.
    36. Re:Not THAT surprising... by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      Like this?

      It's a little more expensive than you were expecting, but at least there are some companies out there that think of that.

      However, I have honestly never broken a disc or even scratched it badly. I really don't think there are that many people who would got to the trouble of backing up all their games just to be on the safe side.

    37. Re:Not THAT surprising... by Changa_MC · · Score: 1

      The software contained on that disk is legally owned property of the company that sold it to you.

      You mean the copyright to that software is owned by the company. The software belongs to me just like the disk it's on, but the government has limited my right to copy my software to "fair use" in order to encourage publication and further the arts, etc.

      --
      Changa hates change.
    38. Re:Not THAT surprising... by rkcallaghan · · Score: 1

      It's not really a solution to the disk being f'd up,

      Exactly. If it doesn't solve the disc being f'd up problem, it is not a suitable backup for fair use purposes. Without solving the problem at the fair use level, it does not "eliminate the backup excuse" as per DrXym's post.

      ~Rebecca

    39. Re:Not THAT surprising... by ajs318 · · Score: 1

      You have certain rights under the Law of the Land, which nobody can take away from you -- not even if you sign a contract in blood promising you won't do them. These include "Fair Dealing" {aka "fair use" in some jurisdictions}. Making a copy of a computer program in the memory of a computer for the purpose of running the program is fair dealing, and you don't need a licence for that.

      Also, region-locking of movies is illegal in Mainland Europe, and might be found to be illegal in the UK {if the EU don't evict us first}.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    40. Re:Not THAT surprising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is that exact same system in place, already.

      its called torrents!

      I know I get my "backups" from there.

    41. Re:Not THAT surprising... by DrXym · · Score: 1

      No it isn't. It's nothing like it at all. We're talking about a way here for someone to play a game from the hard drive without inserting the disc.

    42. Re:Not THAT surprising... by Cerium · · Score: 1

      Seriously now, how often do you find your discs completely damaged beyond repair?

      In all of the years Ive ever owned a device capable of playing media stored on a disc-like object, Ive only ever had ONE that was damaged to the point where the drive had problems reading it. The solution? I drove to my local Best Buy, purchased a Disc Dr, ran my PS2 game through it and like magic it worked again, good as new.
      Im all for the 'backup' excuse, when its exactly that -- a backup. More often than not though, 'backup' translates into 'extra copy for me so I can return the original to blockbuster without paying late fees' or something equally illegal.

      I will admit though, I dont have any scrubby kids running around putting their awful peanut butter & jelly hands on everything, so my opinion may be a bit skewed.

    43. Re:Not THAT surprising... by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      It's a start, but I think it should be cheaper. At that price point it sounds liike a profit center for them. Maybe $25 without proof of purchase and $10 with?

      Anyway, it is a step in the right direction.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    44. Re:Not THAT surprising... by badasscat · · Score: 1

      Both the Xbox 1 and the Xbox 360 are "region free consoles" it's the games that are region locked, not the console.

      Give me a break - you've swallowed MS's marketing spin hook, line and sinker.

      Here's my simple question to you - if the console isn't region coded, how does the game know to lock itself out if it's being played in the wrong region?

      Of course the Xbox and Xbox 360 are region coded. MS has never claimed they're not. They've only claimed that it's up to publishers whether or not to use that coding. The same is true for the PS2 and every other system out there that isn't either a) portable, or b) a Neo Geo.

      The difference here is that Phil Harrison, at least according to IGN (who don't seem to actually quote him that I can see), is saying that PS3 software will be region-free. The hardware itself may or may not still identify it by region. But the software will ignore it if that's the case.

      This is 100% different than the Xbox 360 if true.

    45. Re:Not THAT surprising... by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

      The console knows what region it belongs to, it has to know this so it knows what type of video signal to output and what language options should be available to the user (and other things like how the date/time should be formatted etc.).

      Region free doesn't mean the console doesn't know what region it belongs in, it simply means it can play content from any region

      I don't know what "MS BS" I've been swallowing but AFAIK MS never claimed their consoles were region free... BUT the console are not actually region locked. Don't believe me? Here's a list You can see some games can play on any console, other's can't, its completely up to the developer/publisher but there are no securities built into the console nor MS regulations that would prevent them from making region free games.

      You'll note that the site I linked to does not feature a Playstation 2 region compatibility chart... WHY? because the PS2 console itself IS region locked. In that if it detects a region mis-match between itself and the game disc it wont allow it to play REGARDLESS of how the game is programed.

      That's the difference between a region locked console and a not-region locked console.

      Just because Sony decides to start doing something that others in the industry have been doing for year doesn't make it new.

    46. Re:Not THAT surprising... by Robaato · · Score: 1

      I'm referring to the whole "unit must contact the mothership once a month or you can't play" concept. The "DIVX-Enhanced DVD players had to do the same thing, communicating your viewing habits and such back to Circuit City or whoever. For many, this invasion of privacy was one of the (many) strong reasons not to go with DIVX.

    47. Re:Not THAT surprising... by araemo · · Score: 1

      Mod chips will always be legal and legitimate, because:

      You own the hardware. End of story. Mod chips that allow you to play pirated games may eventually be illegal, but modding hardware will always be legal(As long as geeks have any say about it).

    48. Re:Not THAT surprising... by joranbelar · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've got an ever better idea - people are likely to lose or misplace the disc if you only have to insert it every month or so, so why not just require the disc to be inserted every time the game starts up? The game could perform some kind of check to ensure that the disc is in the drive and authentic, by using some kind of "bad sector" identification that would prevent those nasty pirates from copying the disks bit-for-bit.

      Sure, drive emulation is an option here, but I'm sure if you maintained a list of emulator programs, let's call it a "black list", you could check to see if any were running and then refuse to run if that is the case?

      My God I may have just single-handedly solved the whole piracy problem!

    49. Re:Not THAT surprising... by chrismcdirty · · Score: 1

      And (more than) a few people feel they need to shoot people with guns, but that doesn't stop me from going to Walmart and buying one. I shouldn't have freedoms taken away because of a minority chooses to take advantage of said freedom.

      --
      It's like sex, except I'm having it!
    50. Re:Not THAT surprising... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I can't tell if you're just being snarky or not, but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.

      people are likely to lose or misplace the disc if you only have to insert it every month or so, so why not just require the disc to be inserted every time the game starts up?

      That doesn't actually solve anything. If you're going to do that, then you might as well not use the hard drive idea in the first place.

      The game could perform some kind of check to ensure that the disc is in the drive and authentic, by using some kind of "bad sector" identification that would prevent those nasty pirates from copying the disks bit-for-bit.

      Ok, I think I've been trolled, because I'm sure you know that's how the original PSX (and probably the PS2) did it.

    51. Re:Not THAT surprising... by Clith · · Score: 1
      Thus the reason why I think if a DRM type of system is really going to work (Steam for one example), the government needs involvement, or at least a government funded agency. So we have the government on one side having laws that enable DRM. Then we have government on the other side, being your external "fair-use" backup, for which you will have to pay some more. Oh, and don't forget who pays all those government employees. Yes, you.

      Wouldn't it be easier to just scrap DRM altogether? Or at least make it legal to crack DRM again, like it was for the first 30 years of the software industry's life? You know, back when poor Microsoft was barely able to double its annual income?

      While we're at it, how about completely scrapping the idea that intellectual property can be patented? At this point, it is doing the public (who are in charge of choosing people to enact law) ABSOLUTELY no good. Compare again with the old, pre-patent-frenzy days.

      When it comes to laws, I think KISS is the way to go.

      --
      [ReidNews]
    52. Re:Not THAT surprising... by David+Gould · · Score: 1


        while playing illegally-copied games is illegal, playing out-of-region games isn't.

      Of course, the same is also true of movies (much as the MPAA may wish otherwise).

      (IANAL, #include <std_disclaimer.h>, etc.)

      --
      David Gould
      main(i){putchar(340056100>>(i-1)*5&31|!!(i<6)<< 6)&&main(++i);}
    53. Re:Not THAT surprising... by xero314 · · Score: 1

      Now if they could just do something about that pesky "backup" excuse.

      That's easy and they will. All you have to do is change the licensing. Basically stop selling the physical media and instead license the code for an undetermined time which can expire at any point at the discretion of the producer. If companies want a legal way to stop people from being able to make any copies what so ever it would be really simple. Just wait untill software comes with built in Non-dislosure agreements to keep you from sharing it with others, since sharing would be disclosing the content.

      Then again when was the last time someone played a video game beyond the time covered by either the retailers replacement policy or manufacturers warranty?

    54. Re:Not THAT surprising... by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

      Thus the reason why I think if a DRM type of system is really going to work (Steam for one example), the government needs involvement,


      Well first of all, DRM is never really going to "work" the way its creators would love it to. So long as their software or content is running on hardware I control, I can break the DRM. And DRM is routinely broken...

      Since DRM proponents realize that DRM in the end can have no technical teeth, they've presuaded the government to give DRM legal teeth (a la the DMCA). But by doing that the government has created all the problems with rights of first sale, fair use, free speech, private property being interfered with.

      So to solve these problems the government has created, you propose we add more government.

      I have a far more logical idea: solve the problem created by more government through less government. No more DMCA. No more broadcast flag enforcement. No more legal teeth to DRM.

      If someone wants to sell discs full of encrypted stuff, no problem. Once you've removed the DRM's legal reinfocement, the technical problems can easily be solved through technical solutions. Technically clever people can and will break the DRM as they always have. Non technical people can readily more obtain software or products to solve their DRM problems also. Just like the old days when you could buy "video stabilizer" products that defeated the Macrovision on VHS tapes from any number of electronics stores and not be in a legal grey area.
    55. Re:Not THAT surprising... by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      Why not service each region properly. Licence a localised burner of games disc's in each capital city around the world. Take in your burnt disc and have a replacement burnt on the spot for a nominal yet still profitable fee for the legally contracted disc burner.

      If they did the logical extension they could supply a full range of software, every version of every game, burnt on the spot with a laser print of the manual. This could all be done by a legalised audited localised manufacturer/distributor all at an enormous cost saving in terms of shipping and handling, profit going begging.

      Blind greed driven by a RIAA mentality with a death grip on old ways of doing things, blocks what would be clearly the most cost efficient way of distributing all kinds software and this could be incorporated in other electronic media distribution as well.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    56. Re:Not THAT surprising... by Cerium · · Score: 1

      No, but it does require you to fill out some mind-numbing paperwork then go through a 'cool off' period. Clearly the thought of guns being used as tools of murder has influenced the (legal) purchasing process. The same can be said about digital media. Because companies feel they are losing a large amount of money due to piracy, they are implementing all kinds of methods to make it harder for their product to be duplicated.

      The people who are getting screwed here is the honest guy/gal who has no problem paying for the product (once). As soon as methods are available to the general public for creating and using legal backups, the underground super l33t hackers and pirates will have already put it to use to make nth copies of Windows Vista 2012 Corporate Server Edition and Pokemon: Cornflower Blue. Bah.

    57. Re:Not THAT surprising... by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      You are, of course, right.
      I've often wondered how this works for companies like Netflix.
      There have been times I've received my movie and it is clearly a "generic" (as opposed to pressed and 4up silkscreened) disk. Do they replicate backups and put them in circulation in place of damaged pressed disks? If so, why can we as "joe sixpack" do the same? make a backup and retain the damaged original as proof of licence?
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
  2. About fucking time. by KDR_11k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Region locks should never have existed in first place, they are only there so different publishers can publish the same game in different regions and to enable price fixing.

    No matter why this was done, whether to make sure mod chips don't have any legal functions or to really do something useful, it had to be done. Region locks are attempts to suppress international trade and competition. They have been ruled illegal in some countries and are not protected by any DMCA-like laws. There should have been some fines over region locks but well, knowing the corrupt governments we have it'd end up being 5.95$ total.

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    1. Re:About fucking time. by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 2, Interesting

      AFAIK, Ken Kutaragi once told the Sony board to take content control and shove it.

      But I can't find the source so...

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    2. Re:About fucking time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder how many complaints they will get due to consoles being bought in a region where the voltage required is different to that at home.

      Will it have a fancy multi region/voltage step up/down transformer attatched?

    3. Re:About fucking time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Switched-mode power supplies are all of a sudden fancy now?

    4. Re:About fucking time. by somersault · · Score: 1

      damn Sony and their lack of Open Source love *shakefist*

      --
      which is totally what she said
    5. Re:About fucking time. by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Considering that that problem is not unique to consoles but applies to all electronic devices it shouldn't get more complaints than any other piece of electronics.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    6. Re:About fucking time. by aikouka · · Score: 1

      Actually, region locks were created to avoid a movie being released in one country hurting the sales of the movie being released in another country at a later date. That's why the regions numbers are set the way they are. The United States is Region 1, because they assume that most movies come out in the United States first. So to avoid say... Japanese people from buying the American DVD and hurting sales when the movie is finally released in Japan, they have region locks so they "must" wait for the Region 2 DVD.

      Although, about the PS3 being region-free... I have to say I'm quite happy to see this. There've been a few games I would've enjoyed importing (enjoyed enough to ignore the fact that I have no idea what the screen says ;)). I can't remember much about the backward compatability of the PS3 as I've been a bit out of the loop, but if it can play PS2 games, this should let it play ... say a Japanese PS2 game. That'd be quite a sales perk to avoid another system being ruined to a mod-chip just to play an imported game.

    7. Re:About fucking time. by SillyHatsOnly · · Score: 1

      Don't expect them to get rid of a common prevention measure so easily. There may not be region coding as we currently know it, but any regional restrictions will likely be incorporated into the oh so consumer loving DRM of the disc or hardware.

  3. A lot less than meets the eye by clevershark · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This announcement seems all flash and no substance -- Europe will STILL have to have a separate set of games because they use PAL instead of NTSC anyway. What this *might* mean is that more Japanese-market games will be playable by NA gamers. Now don't get me wrong, that's a good thing, but it's hard not to think that the real reason for this is Sony wanting to save money where it can by not creating unnecessary "editions" of the same games.

    --

    My sig is too lon

    1. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by Bromskloss · · Score: 1

      Europe will STILL have to have a separate set of games because they use PAL instead of NTSC anyway.

      Um, surely, that is a problem for the hardware. We were talking about the different games now, right? Or were we? I mean, it's not like I have read the article or anything.

      Btw, if they stick to greyscale, PAL and NTSC are practically the same. :-)

      --
      Swedish plasma phys. PhD student; MSc EE; knows maths, programming, electronics; finance interest; seeks opportunities
    2. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by The+Warlock · · Score: 1

      They use PAL instead of NTSC for standard def TVs. HTDV all uses the same standard. Isn't that great?

      --
      I've upped my standards, so up yours.
    3. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by Jaruzel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Um, surely for there to be true 'non-region' - all PS3s have to be dual format of both PAL/NTSC (hey, what ever happened to SECAM?) - only that way will 'region-free' actually mean anything.

      PAL/NTSC are bunk terms anyway, with HDTV being a de-facto output on all these next gen consoles, surely 720p is 720p regardless where on the planet you are standing?

      Personally I still think there will be PAL PS3s and NTSC PS3s, meaning that us poor sods in Europe get games later than Japan/US, again :(

      -Jar.

      --
      Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
    4. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by GauteL · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Europe will STILL have to have a separate set of games because they use PAL instead of NTSC anyway"

      Most fairly new European televisions can display both NTSC and PAL picture.

    5. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by jcnnghm · · Score: 1

      My chipped NA XBOX attached to an NTSC TV has no problem playing PAL import games. I don't see why the PS3 would present a problem.

      --
      You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. - Winston Churchill
    6. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Informative

      720p is 720p

      Nope. 720p 60hz is different from 720p 50hz.

      There are already issues with people trying to import HDTVs from the US to Europe and finding they don't work with european broadcasts.

    7. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      this is a non issue on modern tvs... and has been for years.

    8. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      US DVDs work on my TV, and in fact most sets that I've tried it on. PS3 games are going to be designed for HDTV anyway, with PAL and NTSC just being there for compatibility, so apart from frame rate differences (which will probably be switchable) this isn't likely to cause a problem

    9. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by TEB_78 · · Score: 1

      I've a region free DVD player and that can be set to output the picture in NTSC,PAL or auto. My TV does not care if it receives a PAL or a NTSC signal, it handles both. I have both zone 2 and zone 1 DVDs and it has never been a issue for me.

      And even if not all TVs handle both the PS3 could easily reformat the output picture based on some system setting like my DVD player can.

    10. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by mausmalone · · Score: 2, Informative

      Furthermore, most current graphics hardware is capible of displaying in either PAL or NTSC or SECAM, etc ... I think there will likely still be some sort of region identification, but probably more like it's done on the DS: it'll ship with a default region selected, and you'll be able to change it in the options. It's probably the simplest solution to "What display do I use when I boot up for the first time ever?"

      --
      -=-=-=-=-=
      I'd rather be flamed than ignored.
    11. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by jmv · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Europe will STILL have to have a separate set of games because they use PAL instead of NTSC anyway

      It's actually the other way around. The US, Canada and Japan are pretty much the only places that use NTSC. Almost everything else (a few exceptions) uses PAL.

    12. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by forgoil · · Score: 1

      Don't we still have the 24/25/29.9/30/50/60 fps thing going? I know the resolution is the same, but what about the framerate? I personally would prefer to have it as high as possible after all:)

    13. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

      this is a non issue on modern tvs... and has been for years.

      Actually, it's a big issue in NTSC land (Canada, the USA, Japan and some other countries). I'm guessing that you live in either the UK or Australia or perhaps some other PAL country. PAL TVs have a way to natively support NTSC signals as a subset of PAL. There is no way to support a PAL signal under NTSC. It must be converted to NTSC. Fortunately, many DVD players are able to do this type of conversion, but it remains to be seen whether or not such conversion will be offered by the PS3.

      You should be aware that it is almost impossible to buy a multi-standard TV in the USA. If you want to do it, you will have to do a web search for specialty web sites that can sell those. In Europe, you can walk into any electronics store and buy a PAL TV that is also capable of displaying NTSC signals. This is not true at all in America. None of our big electronics stores even offer multi-standard TVs as an option. After all, "Why would anyone want that?"

    14. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by Kjella · · Score: 1

      This is completely without substance. Many modern players can choose PAL or NTSC output, most TVs can handle both. Rendered things like games have never been an issue. The trouble is usually the source content - you don't have the space to store both NTSC and PAL format, and 480i30 & 576i25 don't combine to one. With a downscaled 1080p signal that is certainly not an issue. In short, there's absolutely no legitimate technical reason for region codes - not that there really was much of one for DVD either as they play fine on most sets, but PAL/NTSC was a good excuse.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    15. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      Why is downscaling a game from HDTV to NTSC any different than downscaling a game from HDTV to PAL? I imagine the hardware is going to do the proper scaling so it will be trivial to have a single game playable on [PAL, NTSC, and HDTV] since the game will have to support either [PAL and HDTV] or [NTSC and HDTV] anyways.

    16. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Thank your modchip and/or dashboard for that. They just force the video mode to NTSC when the game boots up, plus maybe some timing fixes (talking out of my ass here). It's far different from PAL-NTSC movies because those have interlacing issues that require much more than a simple speed tweak. Games are rendered in real-time, and usually in progressive frames so to region-convert a game is typically just a matter of switching the refresh rate from 50 to 60 fps, the game engine handles the rest.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    17. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually some older games are written specifically for a certain framerate. Often they'd just play slower on PAL than NTSC, so it's possible that a PAL-native game trying to play on an NTSC machine would crash as the system couldn't keep up. Other weird effects too, sometimes the clock will run at the same speed but the cars in a racer move slower... I think Metropolis Street Racer had that problem, and Crazy Taxi certainly does in PAL 50 Hz vs PAL 60 Hz.
      PS3 games should be smart enough to handle it.

    18. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 0

      yeah but pure RGB coming out of the AV Socket is still pure RGB.

      So just take that nifty SCART connection and use that to connect your ps3 to your tv.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    19. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by eht · · Score: 4, Informative

      HDTV defeinately does not all use the same standard, there's at least 4 different SMPTE standards I know of 260M, 295M, 274M, and 296M, and most of them have multiple standards within them.

      260M is 1920x1035 at either 30Hz or 29.97Hz, 295M is 1920x1080 at 25Hz, but at more lines per frame the spec in 274M, 274M has a ton of standards, all 1920x1080, but at many varying frame rates, including 30, 29.97, and 25, at both progressive(1 field per frame) and interlaced(2 fields per frame), and also a 24Hz frame rate, and 23.976Hz, and then 296M comes in with 1280x720 at 30Hz and 29.97Hz progressive.

      So a movie running at 1920x1080@25Hz interlaced will run 20% faster at 1920x1080@30Hz.

      Isn't that great?

      Sorry, I work with television signals everyday and the massive amount of standards causes me no end of annoyance.

    20. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by jcnnghm · · Score: 1

      The point is that if a modchip can make the appropriate modifications, than there is no reason the PS3 won't be able to.

      --
      You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer. - Winston Churchill
    21. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by Fred+Or+Alive · · Score: 1

      AFAIK most PAL XBox game support PAL60 anyway, it's an option in the Dashboard on PAL consoles that you switch on once and mostly ignore, much better than having a 50/60Hz selection menu appear at the start of every game. Presumably playing a PAL game on an NTSC console they'd just see the console as being set to 60Hz and use that automatically.

      --
      10 PRINT "LOOK AROUND YOU ";
      20 GOTO 10
    22. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, most current graphics hardware is capible of displaying in either PAL or NTSC or SECAM, etc...

      You'd be surprised just how much is capable of doing PAL/NTSC (most SECAM devices support PAL), but just don't provide the user with access to that feature. If I can buy a $30 VCD discman which supports PAL/NTSC, in Asia, then I am sure that most of $100+ devices should be able to support it. In most cases I imagine that the feature disabled out of some business choice.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    23. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Resonably modern TV's (at least in Europe) can handle both 50Hz and 60Hz just fine. Even something considered an old TV can probably handle it. The problem is probably that the color information is transmitted on a different subfrequency.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    24. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's far different from PAL-NTSC movies because those have interlacing issues that require much more than a simple speed tweak.

      We all know that RTFA doesn't happen, but even the summary explicitly says that the whole region free thing won't apply to movies.

    25. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      Well lets say it that way, as you said modern dvd players almost any device which does not rely on pure analog signal processing is capable or rendering the signal away in pal or ntsc, given the fact that the internal processing does not rely on a fixed display frequency. (thinks like using the blank period of a tv set for screen updating in software has died out a long time ago)

      The question is more along the lines as you said will the PS3 be able to output the signal in both formats, which is very likely because it has to in several formats due to hdtv anyway, so adding a pal/ntsc combined output is a non issue.

    26. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      That doesn't mean the PS3 is capable of putting out both PAL and NTSC.

    27. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by bri2000 · · Score: 1

      The PS2 is (even in unmodified PAL form). I very much doubt the PS3 will be different, especially as it's going to be a Blu-ray player (and, anyway, in the HD era will the PAL/NTSC still be of much significance?)

    28. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by Brobock · · Score: 1

      "Europe will STILL have to have a separate set of games because they use PAL instead of NTSC anyway"

      Since there is support for HD for the PS3, I do not know if the games will be encoded either PAL or NTSC. I would assume it would use the global ATSC format and have the hardware dumb it down to PAL or NTSC. Therefore, the games should work "region-free." This is of course just an assumption.

    29. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by Traiklin · · Score: 1

      There is no way to support a PAL signal under NTSC. It must be converted to NTSC.

      odd, ever since hooking up my PS2 to the RGB connection I have 0 problems playing a Pal game on my NTSC TV.
      I use the Swap magic discs and don't even change the resolution to NTSC anymore (it makes it off center to a horrible degree) I tried this out with 3 different games, when I selected NTSC it moved half the picture to below the Screen, when I left it alone it was perfectly centered.

      and this is a $129.99 20" TV I got at walmart. Now I have a hard time beliving that if a $130 TV can support Pal without any problems or modifications that would allow me to Force NTSC display, That a TV that costs 10x as much with the same connection and better can't do the samething.

    30. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by Mattsson · · Score: 1

      And there are more than a few ps2-games that let you choose pal/ntsc, first booting into the default mode of your ps2.
      Since pal has higher resolution than ntsc, bitmaps created for ntsc will fit on a pal-screen.
      Thus you can take any ntsc-game, even 2D ones, and just set the display to pal and everything will work.
      Unless you've been an idiot and used the refreshrate as a timer.

      In the light of these news, I'd say that it would be lunacy for any game-producer to not make their ps3-games both pal and ntsc compatible from the start.

      --
      /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
    31. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by clevershark · · Score: 1

      *They use PAL instead of NTSC for standard def TVs. HTDV all uses the same standard. Isn't that great?*

      Not as far as I know. You see I have this *cough*cough* friend with a hacked PS2 and an HDTV set (component video input), and when, er, he puts in a European title it boots, but the image cycles vertically on his TV, making it unplayable.

      Of course his TV was made and bought in 2003, and things might have changed since then.

      --

      My sig is too lon

    32. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by Firehed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But the US and Japan still get games first.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    33. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by Mattsson · · Score: 1

      PAL/NTSC will still be significant, unless they release the PS3 *really* late.
      It will be many years before the majority of the customers have high-definition tv's.

      --
      /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
    34. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by Mprx · · Score: 1

      For low resolution 2D games, using the vertical refresh as a timer is the only way to get perfectly smooth animation. This is relevant because of emulation of old games.

    35. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by Reapman · · Score: 1

      Ya, but this is one less barrier... and I don't see how PAL vs NTSC is Sony's fault.

    36. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      The great thing about standards is there are so many to choose from.

    37. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by blincoln · · Score: 1

      That doesn't mean the PS3 is capable of putting out both PAL and NTSC.

      The PS2 is, so I assume it's more cost-effective to make one piece of video hardware that can output both than two different models.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    38. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by Surt · · Score: 1

      Nearly all of the replies here are missing the fact that there's really no need for the games to do NTSC/PAL versions. I mean, unless the xbox360/ps3 designers were utter morons, the hardware should handle the output differences.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    39. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by az_bont · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Any television that is HD-ready should be new enough to support a 60Hz signal. Almost every television from the last decade or more should be able to handle a 60Hz signal.

      The number of PS3 owners without a 60Hz compatible television will be negligable. Nintendo have already released at least two games (Metroid Prime 2 and the Zelda bonus disc) which only contained a 60Hz version of the game, and it did not seem to impact sales.

      Besides, the quality of most 50Hz conversions is dreadful. There are a lot games which suffer from the 17.5% slowdown and borders - to patch a game to the PAL format in this way takes mere seconds, and has been going on for years with the PAL/NTSC selectors found at the start of many warez releases on the original Playstation. It would take a miniscule amount of effort to add a 50Hz/60Hz selector to a game, and anyone playing on an old enough TV to not support a 60Hz signal isn't likely to complain about borders and slowdown. In fact, they're very unlikely to buy a PS3 in the first place.

    40. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by james_orr · · Score: 1
      Most fairly new European televisions can display both NTSC and PAL picture.

      Yes, but it's VERY rare for a US television to be capable of displaying PAL.

    41. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Used. Not anymore. We're in the HD console generation now, so thank goodness it's time to chuck PAL and NTSC version in the bin too. They're all 60Hz now.

      It's too much of an arse for game developers to have to retime all their animations and so on, not to mention we get games that play slower, and worse, and so on... It's a developer draw to not have to bother with that 50Hz porting crap anymore.

      Quite a few games have been PAL60 only already. Hell, the Gamecube had several PAL60 games, and in most cases where you couldn't, you could hold B while booting and it'd let you choose. I don't even think DOA4 plays in 50Hz at all. Every new TV for the last ten years I've tried has supported either PAL60 or NTSC (and that difference isn't relevant to the software). My Xbox 360 seems to output nothing but PAL60 SD, or one of the HD resolutions that's also 60Hz (720p@60 for example).

      I don't think the PS3 will *have* - or need - 50Hz compatibility.

    42. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This announcement seems all flash and no substance -- Europe will STILL have to have a separate set of games because they use PAL instead of NTSC anyway.

      At the dev studio where I work, we detect PAL/NTSC on the fly and the game engine configures itself accordingly. So we really have one game, just with different region codes burned on each version. I assume with the PS3 we'll just detect PAL/NTSC from the user settings, and go from there.

      From chatting to other developers, we aren't the only studio that works that way. It's mostly US studios that hard-code for NTSC then have problems making their game work on PAL systems. The rest of the world is aware from the beginning that they need to be in both markets. :-)

    43. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by shione · · Score: 1

      Mod Parent up. Add in a multi voltage tranny and Sony could make 1 ps3 model for all

    44. Re:A lot less than meets the eye by TakeyMcTaker · · Score: 1

      The ATSC HDTV standards are changing that -- TVs are getting more the same, and often have PC Monitor-like inputs (HDMI is practically DVI with optional sound and DRM). Sometimes they even put the output format hardware in the cable. Some systems can even set the output frequencies necessary for the different regions in software/firmware, which keeps the hardware manufacturing volumes higher, and thus the costs lower. Whether the PS3 video signal-out is as region-free as the ROM loader remains to be seen.

  4. Region-free, yes.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Root-kit free, no.

    1. Re:Region-free, yes.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let it go, no.

    2. Re:Region-free, yes.... by cortana · · Score: 3, Funny

      We will not let you go!

  5. Re:so what? by KDR_11k · · Score: 4, Informative

    Even moreso, who cares about stability if Linux allows the moon people to make your computer explode?

    (PS3 games will not be locked to anyone, stop repeating that rumour, it has been denied already)

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  6. Wow, has Sony started to LEARN? by m94mni · · Score: 1

    One cannot help but wonder if the CD copy protection disaster has taught them something. Look at the MP3 download compensation they offered, and now this.

    What's up with Sony nowadays?

    1. Re:Wow, has Sony started to LEARN? by DerGeist · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Stop thinking that just because they've made a one or two moves that seem reasonable that they've had some kind of religious experience.

      Believe me, they are still the same old rootkit slinging, DRM-pushing, grandma-jailing, DCMA-humping, RIAA-loving Sony they've always been.

      Even this move is probably just a ploy to make mod chips even less legitimate, as the first poster said. Call me cynical but companies don't make moves unless they believe that it will increase their revenue somehow. They are planning to make more money off of you in some way, don't ever doubt that.

    2. Re:Wow, has Sony started to LEARN? by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      One cannot help but wonder if the CD copy protection disaster has taught them something.

      Perhaps this is some sort of apology, and it's definitely a step in the right direction. But personally, I will avoid Sony products until there is a VERY public apology that accepts responsibility and acknowledges that the direction they took was very much not in the interest of their customers, followed by a solemn promise to never employ such tactics again.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    3. Re:Wow, has Sony started to LEARN? by m94mni · · Score: 2, Insightful
      They are planning to make more money off of you in some way, don't ever doubt that.

      Yeah, but maybe they could think about doing that by pleasing their customers, eh?

      While I see your point, I hope you are wrong :-)

    4. Re:Wow, has Sony started to LEARN? by apoc06 · · Score: 1

      er... wait, you missed that? theyve already done that. there was a letter posted. an offer to replace the cds, acknowledgement that they were wrong, and a way to remove the rootkits. as for the promise not to do it again, who knows? i doubt theyd try something stupid again, im sure hands have been slapped and heads have been rolling. maybe youre waiting on them to make it into a tv commercial. lol.

      regardless, sony is a big company. is it possible to hate one division and ignore the rest? i mean, i hate internet explorer and windows ME, but XP and the xbox is cool. the gaming division is a separate world from the music division. im not the biggest fan of certain aspects of sony myself, but then if i were to boycott sony because of something BMG did, i would feel like those people that didnt buy xboxes because microsoft makes them.

    5. Re:Wow, has Sony started to LEARN? by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, but perhaps they've learned that that pleasing customers is more important to their bottom line than preventing piracy.

      I don't care if they're only after money. Sony is a company. It's what they do. What I do care about is how much I benefit from this.

    6. Re:Wow, has Sony started to LEARN? by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      What's up with them is that they have a smart marketing team which has found nice little ways of getting you to believe that they are better than before, so people on the fence like yourself will be more likely to buy their products. Considering it like giving free food to get people to attend an event.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    7. Re:Wow, has Sony started to LEARN? by m94mni · · Score: 1

      Me? Buy Sony? Surely you jest, madame? That will be quite a while...

      I wonder, though... Isn't it a bit much to be simple marketing, like getting Linux pre-installed?

      Mind you, I'm not getting a PS3 anyway.

    8. Re:Wow, has Sony started to LEARN? by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      Well to be quite honest, I haven't seen any big company consider 'something too much' for marketing. It's really unfortunate, Sony was my goto brand name up till recently.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    9. Re:Wow, has Sony started to LEARN? by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1
      er... wait, you missed that? theyve already done that. there was a letter posted.

      Yup, missed it completely. I was probably traveling. Any shakeups in the company?

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    10. Re:Wow, has Sony started to LEARN? by apoc06 · · Score: 1

      they took the page with the apology down so they can put up info for the class action lawsuit. but you can see the page here:

      the class action lawsuit
      http://cp.sonybmg.com/xcp/

      how to un-"stealth"/ uninstall the rootkit
      http://cp.sonybmg.com/xcp/english/updates.html

      and read the drama yourself:
      http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,69601,00. html

      i dont want to be apologetic for a company that effectively put money into designing a better virus delivery system, but i for one am not buying any sony/BMG cds. if sony ever brands the playstation with anything remotely resembling a BMG logo, im avoiding that too...

      the computer industry is just as bad. read up on the latest starforce drama [real or not...] which is 10x worse than the rootkit. i for one am avoiding any computer games from companies that use it.
      http://r-force.org/modules.php?name=News&file=arti cle&sid=44&mode=&order=0&thold=0

      its a scary time when you realize that the best viruses, trojans and worms are paid for and condoned by big business.

  7. Holy carp! by BecomingLumberg · · Score: 1
    This is the second time this week Sony has done something consumer friendly...

    In other news, Beelzebub has ordered a remote start and block heater for his Lamborghini Diablo.

    --
    If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.-TJ
    1. Re:Holy carp! by frankthechicken · · Score: 1

      You mean their new controllers? I've always thought the boomerang looked kind of comfortable.

    2. Re:Holy carp! by BecomingLumberg · · Score: 1
      Well, I was more talking about Linux and the capability to use it as a Media Box (quasi-HTPC), going hand in hand with the hard drive to come standard (which was where MS really crapped the bed, IMHO).

      The new controller is also a bonus, and they are obviously listening to consumers on this. I think the Batarang looks ergonomic enough, but it just looks to silly for me not to have to put it in the drawer whenever the lady-types come over. Thank God that ball looking sketch over at Engadget is a concept and not what they are actually making (as per their disclaimer).

      --
      If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.-TJ
  8. More info... by astonish · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, what he really said is that the machine itself will not have any region restrictions, but it would be up to publishers whether they want to restrict their games to certain TV formats etc. Which they probably will for many major releases.

    Still if a publisher, especially from Japan, knows they aren't going to publish a game in the US/Euro they can leave it region free and let importers have more fun. Still a good thing. Lets hope they get the system off the ground, so far my impression is one of a very expensive hype machine that has to play catch up to Xbox Live. Still, I'm all for having two (three??) great next-gen systems in my living room.

    1. Re:More info... by somersault · · Score: 1

      I'm all for having the PS3 in my living room for console games (and backward compatible with all my PS1 games I still have lying around), and my PC to play PC games (rather than an X-Box to play PC games, but with a crappy control system) :)

      I could stretch the the Revolution also, if it turns out to be more than just a gimmick (ie good, non trivial games, that dont just take a couple of days to complete.. maybe something kinda openended like GTA but with samurais, swords controlled properly by swinging the controller.. mwahahaha) :)

      --
      which is totally what she said
  9. Re:so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "who cares about region-coding when PS3 will have games locked to the first owner?"

    do you have any proof of this?

  10. Re:so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where the hell did this come from? Link to some proof?

  11. Good start. Are Sony getting better? by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After the rootkit fiasco, it's starting to sound like Sony is trying to be more consumer friendly. With this, and the no downsampling Blu-Ray analogue output, I might actually consider buying things made by Sony.

  12. A touch of common sense? by malkavian · · Score: 3, Informative

    Perhaps Sony, touched with the debacles it's been involved in recently (the Rootkit being the most well known), has decided its time to rely on a modicum of common sense. After all, the market has done without regional coding since the dawn of time (well, until a few years ago) and prospered.
    The simplest solution being the best (as is often the case) says remove the complexity that doesn't really gain anything, and see what you have. The copy protection on a console.. I can live with that.. I've never been that interested in backups, as I take great care with the disks.. I have, however, been most peeved when buying region coded items that refuse to play just because I'm in the 'wrong country'.
    Hopefully it's the start of a new trend of business actually listening, rather than dictating. I doubt it, but hey. It's a hope.

  13. Here's hoping by hcdejong · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The blurb says 'no chance' the MPAA will get rid of region coding for movies, but if the gaming industry sees a solid business case (as in, they end up with more money), then maybe the MPAA will see the light as well. After all, greed is eternal.

    1. Re:Here's hoping by yuna49 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Unlike videogames, the movie producers need to work with distributors around the world (theater owners, etc.). Region coding makes sense for movies because they have staggered release schedules. A foreign theater chain is not going to be happy if a movie for which theatrical display rights are not yet available in that country is suddenly available on an HD videodisc. Videogames obviously don't have these issues.

    2. Re:Here's hoping by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      Staggered release schedules made sense when theaters showed the movie off an (expensive, so limited numbers were available) analog film reel. Now that digital distribution is becoming common, there's no need to stagger the schedule. A global release, taking maximum advantage of the publicity generated in the US (premiere, talkshow tie-ins) would have advantages for the producer.

    3. Re:Here's hoping by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Except that it takes time and money to dub the movie into foreign languages. Even subtitles take time, and if a movie tanks in the US you probably don't want to bother. On the other hand, if some unknown comes out of nowhere and blows away the US box office, then you might be scrambling to find voice actors to get it in your country as fast as possible.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    4. Re:Here's hoping by jonwil · · Score: 1

      2 things:
      1.The number of films being shown digitally (i.e. where there is no film print involved) is a very small number of the total screenings of films. Digital projectors for movie theaters are VERY expensive for the theater owners to buy.

      and 2.Even if the distribution was digital, that doesnt take away the need to figure out how many showings of a film are required. A large part of the delay between US releases and e.g. aus releases is aparently so that they can use box office and marketing numbers from the US release to decide how many prints to make for the australian release (and how many screenings they should have etc)

    5. Re:Here's hoping by westlake · · Score: 1
      if the gaming industry sees a solid business case (as in, they end up with more money), then maybe the MPAA will see the light as well

      There is little chance of that, I think. The import market for games and videos is small. Different languages, different cultures. Different tastes in entertainment. Think of something as simple as the sea-change in the latest Harry Potter when it migrates from the U.K. to the states.

    6. Re:Here's hoping by somersault · · Score: 1

      huh? Games producers need to work with retail outlets around the world.. region coding for movies is no different to that for games - video games also have 'staggered release schedules', and there is no reason that they should have, unless it's because the game needs to be translated to another language..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    7. Re:Here's hoping by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Except that it takes time and money to dub the movie into foreign languages. Even subtitles take time, and if a movie tanks in the US you probably don't want to bother.
       
      That is true, but it isn't true that you need to wait until the film is released before you can start doing any of this. For a lot of the big releases these days, the work on dubbing and subtitles is finished in time for a world wide release.

    8. Re:Here's hoping by The-Bus · · Score: 1
      There's two reasons a movie's release might be delayed or staggered:
      • The movie needs to be translated from the original language and subbed or dubbed into the audience's language.
      • The movie is in the same language but does not yet have distribution.


      In the former case, it's a worthless debate. As much as I would've liked to see the new Chan-wook Park movie, if I get a DVD of just the movie, with no subtitles, it doesn't do me any good. I don't speak Korean.

      This week, if you're in the U.S. you could walk into any DVD retailer and pick up Capote. It debuts theatrically in the Netherlands tomorrow. If everyone in Turkey could buy the American DVD, it doesn't mean they would want to.

      The second point then, is distribution. Well, it's time for the damn distributors to learn to adapt. Having seen how hard some of these distributors "work" I have no problem if there's a shake up that leaves only the intelligent, efficient, and competent. Get your movies out internationally at the same time, and then importing DVD releases will become useless.

      Besides, anyone that wants to circumvent regions already has a region-free player, so all it has done is inconvenienced the majority.
      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  14. Yeah, but this is a good thing. by babbling · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While this was one of the main things keeping modchips legal (as modchips SHOULD be legal), it is a good thing that restrictions like this are starting to be dropped. There's no good reason why games shouldn't work in every region.

    1. Re:Yeah, but this is a good thing. by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      This doesn't suprise me. Sony decided to make the PSP region free for its games, but region locked for its movies. I'm still just pissed that Sony decided to not add a second analong stick and two more shoulder buttons so you you could use the PSP as a PS2 controller...

      Though the way the delays keep coming, I suspect the first game available for the PS3 will be Duke Nukem Forever...

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    2. Re:Yeah, but this is a good thing. by Znork · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "There's no good reason why games shouldn't work in every region."

      There are, however, some very compelling bad reasons. The main being that intellectual monopoly products are not priced in free market competition, but priced depending on disposable income of the consumer group.

      Without regions, the price for revenue maximization will be set for a global consumption group, which will create a less evenly distributed market cover.

      This is an inevitable artefact of intellectual monopoly legislation (and any monopoly legislation), and until, and unless we get such legislation removed, we will continue seeing attempts to impose such artificial barriers in the pursuit of maximum revenue.

    3. Re:Yeah, but this is a good thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, you just keep playing your NFL '09999999, and I'll keep playing my japanese porn games, and we'll just ignore that you spouted all this useless gibberish.

    4. Re:Yeah, but this is a good thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps they didn't add all the extra buttons because it would make it more unweildy then it already is.

    5. Re:Yeah, but this is a good thing. by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      I think you just need to start shooting more HGH. Then when you have normal sized hands it wouldn't be so unweildy.

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    6. Re:Yeah, but this is a good thing. by swmccracken · · Score: 1

      Perhaps - but I suspect a lot of games are bought from local brick and mortar stores, which would allow a certain level of geographic segmentation. After all, people browse the shelves and see what there is to buy and catch up on.

      If I want a game, it's faster to go to the store and buy it. If I order it online, I can order it from a local reseller instead of a multinational - better service, faster turnaround.

    7. Re:Yeah, but this is a good thing. by kn0tw0rk · · Score: 1

      But there are games that are not available in my local area or even country for that matter (Australia). For example, all but 1 of the DDR games for the PS2 that are available in the US are not available here, and there is unlikely to be a release here of them.

      Now if the PS2 were not region locked, then I'd have happily imported the games from the US to play. This situation led me to investigate alternatives and get hold of a ps2->usb converter for my pc and use stepmania.

      I haven't modded my ps2 and am unlikely to.

      --
      See my art -> http://herbevore.deviantart.com
    8. Re:Yeah, but this is a good thing. by swmccracken · · Score: 1

      What I meant is the physical presence of brick and mortar stores means for most game purchases, the region locking doesn't matter as there still is a geographic segementation (allowing differential pricing). (eg: Sony can still charge more in NZ even without region locking for the majority of purchases)

      But for someone in this part of the world (I'm in NZ), getting rid of it means that, yes, we can import games from amazon.com or wherever and Sony will thus make sales that they otherwise would not have. Which is also good for their bottom line!

    9. Re:Yeah, but this is a good thing. by Znork · · Score: 1

      Ah, but you're just thinking in end-consumer terms.

      You see, if there is no geographic segmentation, the brick and mortar store itself will import from a brick and mortar store in Albania, or even a dealer in Albania, undercutting their competition and still profiting more, thus eventually killing the sales the multinational and their official dealers would do in Australia.

      The problem is simply built into the IP system, it's fundamentally incompatible with a free market and free trade.

  15. Re:Good start. Are Sony getting better? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    They'll have to do a helluva lot more before I give them the benefit of the doubt again. Too bad, though, I really dig my Vaio laptop. Hopefully they get thier collective act together before it dies. (Not holding my breath.)

  16. in other news ... by bobbyhc · · Score: 0

    sony also announced that in order to make up for losses incurred by this, while playing games from other regions, a small unobtrusive ad will run across the screen during game play. ok, not really, but what's the catch, after the whole rootkit fiasco i have trouble trusting them to not be completely evil.

    1. Re:in other news ... by mausmalone · · Score: 1

      The catch is that there's now no reason for one to mod a system except to play copied games (since you won't need to mod your system to play import games). Also, it means game makers can save money by only needing to press one disc, not a different disc for each region.

      --
      -=-=-=-=-=
      I'd rather be flamed than ignored.
    2. Re:in other news ... by Tweekster · · Score: 1

      Except for backups (which is a legit purpose but is very coupled with piracy) And backups becomes extremely useful when considering the wideranging reports of disc scratching on the 360... I know if I bought one I would damn well want a backup (for a $50 game that might become to scratched in 3 months) I have never had a problem with my cd's or dvd's scratching because I am pretty careful (well not always, but they still work) But from the reports of the 360, scratching occurs while the game is in use..

      --
      The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
    3. Re:in other news ... by AxminsterLeuven · · Score: 1
      Also, it means game makers can save money by only needing to press one disc, not a different disc for each region.
      That's not entirely true. They'll still have to make localised versions. No way the French or Germans are gonna play games in English. Still, this is good news for third rate voice actors, who'll still have jobs to do.
    4. Re:in other news ... by mausmalone · · Score: 1

      I figured it would select the language based upon your system's settings. Remember on old European Mega Drive games, there'd be a language selector at the beginning? Same thing, except handled automatically.

      --
      -=-=-=-=-=
      I'd rather be flamed than ignored.
  17. Older games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So the PS3 will be able to play PS1 and PS2 games... could this mean it'll be region free for those games as well? I finally get to play the Sakura Taisen games released for the PS2 but couldn't because they were dual-layered and wouldn't work with swap discs?

    If older games are region-free, the good word of mouth import gamers will be giving Sony will be strong enough to carry over into other markets I think.

    I might be very happy.

    1. Re:Older games? by KrisW · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting point - there are quite a few import only games I would love to get my hands on, but I'm not a modchip kind of guy.

      --


      "Think you can take me? Go ahead on. It's your move." --Joe Don Baker in Final Justice
    2. Re:Older games? by Microlith · · Score: 1

      Potentially.

      What with the 3 Sakura Taisen PS2 games I have and a pile of other JP games, I'd end up retiring both of my PS2s (Japanese and US models) and using a single machine.

      What I -still- want to know is how I can rescue my saves from my PS2 memory cards!

  18. Doubtful... by TheNoxx · · Score: 1

    Seeing as the box office is continuing it's trend into the gutter (or the sewer, if you saw the preview for the new movie "American Dreamz" with Hugh Grant... *shudder*), my guess is that seeing legal region-free dvd players in the near future is even less likely as cheap AIDS/cancer drugs finding themselves in the hands of the impoverished. As more people spent more time on the internet and playing video games, the movie industry will try harder and harder to cling to their royalties and cheap tricks for profits.

    --
    Ex nihilo nihil fit.
    1. Re:Doubtful... by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Here in australia, pretty much all DVD players are either region free out of the box or can be made region free by changing some settings.
      Stores will happily advise as to how to get a player that is region free and its all 100% legal (in fact, the ACCC has issued a ruling that basicly says "region locks are an illegal restraint of trade" IIRC)

    2. Re:Doubtful... by westlake · · Score: 1
      As more people spent more time on the internet and playing video games...

      The entertainment business is cyclical.

      The video game industry has crashed and burned before, it will crash and burn again.

  19. three words by aunticrist · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Let. It. Go. Seriously. Its not even a horse being beat any more. It's the decayed remains of its carcass.

    1. Re:three words by turnipsatemybaby · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is NOT something we should let go. It maybe a dead horse now, but it's a horse that should never have been born in the first place.

      It's this sort of "forget about it, I don't care" mentality that is allowing corporations to steadily erode our rights. It gives the corporations the artistic license to experiment with new and whacky control schemes and see which ones stick and which ones cause a backlash.

      I'm willing to bet that they'll try this exact same stunt again, or at least something similar to it, later on. They'll wait for the political environment to change a little more, maybe do a better job at testing and bug-fixing, and suddenly it'll be on all the disks again and people will think it's "normal". Just as CDs are twice as expensive as audio tapes and people consider that "normal". Or that region restrictions are "normal".

      If people were actually paying attention and fighting back as they did with the rootkit debacle, there wouldn't be the problems there are now with things like DMCA, region-coding, etc.

    2. Re:three words by DirePickle · · Score: 1

      You say that now, but just wait 'till its desiccated husk rises from the grave to terrorize the populous. Zombies are a lot harder to kill.

    3. Re:three words by hyfe · · Score: 1

      Some things are worth keeping in mind.

      --
      "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
    4. Re:three words by Aniseed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, like Microsoft-bashers let go of the BSOD or the monkeyboy-thing? Sure.

      --
      -- Aniseed the Panda
    5. Re:three words by Darth+Maul · · Score: 1

      "Let. It. Go."

      No. It's too important.

      --
      --- witty signature
    6. Re:three words by aunticrist · · Score: 1

      Keeping in mind is vastly different from trying to tie anything and everything back to it in an attempt at being funny. Maybe if more people try focusing on the here and now instead of dwelling on the past, then maybe such things won't slip by in the future. I can see it now: 5 years from now Sony will come up with some piece of hardware that will help a paralyzed person to walk and the first /. post will be along the lines of "he can walk...with a rootkit."

    7. Re:three words by lolocaust · · Score: 1

      Hell no. They screwed up, and the last thing I want them to think is that this sort of thing is acceptable.

      --
      Why does my post history abruptly stop? I want to laugh at the stupid things I posted as a kid.
    8. Re:three words by Philodoxx · · Score: 1

      The division that makes the playstation has nothing to do with the division that made the rootkits. Just the division that makes the playstation is making things region free, Sony's other arms are ensuring that things like movies and music stay region coded. I won't be so naieve to think that Sony made the games region free out of the goodness of their hearts, it was probably done for financial gain. However, it's obvious they are trying to make money from something that will benefit gamers and not punish them.

      Would I harp on Microsoft's XBOX division for the decision to require Windows activation? No. So why why are people so hard on Sony's computer enterainment branch when it was Sony Music that decided that rootkits were a good idea?

      --
      Oh, a lesson in history from Mr. I'm my own grandpa.
    9. Re:three words by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      This is NOT something we should let go. It maybe a dead horse now, but it's a horse that should never have been born in the first place.

      You're right, of course, but if you're not going to drop it you could at least stop calling it something it's not...

      We all knew that when the article originally said that the Sony spyware used root-kit technology that it would end up being called a root-kit, but that doesn't mean we should all give in and steadily erode the facts.

      If you're going to take the moral high ground, make sure you're on the right road first. (Yes, that's a mixed metaphor).

    10. Re:three words by aunticrist · · Score: 1

      As a bit of history to keep in mind? Sure. As a lame joke that offers nothing to the subject? No. And really if we want to get into the reality of it all, if you really don't want corporations having their way with you in some way or shape, I'm sure there are many bunkers off in the woods away from technology that would love to have you. Fact is all we can do is live in the -here and now- and be vigilant about what is occuring -now- and only use history as a reference, and n ot a crutch. The acts and behaviors of Sony regarding the rootkit were reprehensible, but by no means so evil that they should be completely written off as evil either. I agree that they need to go a long way to regaining consumer confidence, but that does not mean that they should also be denied the opportunity to gain that confidence back without someone constantly throwing the rootkit in their face. Just like I'm sure there are plenty of Germans out there that are sick of Nazi jokes, the folks at Sony are probably groing more and more tired of the lame rootkit jokes. Hence, let it go.

    11. Re:three words by aunticrist · · Score: 1

      What is too important exactly? That a company, with pressures from an outside source (RIAA) decided to take a strong arm tactic to "protect" something that ended up blowing up in their face and they in turn didn't handle the PR side of things quickly/intelligently enough so now anything they do (even if it s a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT division of the company) get linked back to that error in judgement? Grow up. This is the real world and its one thing to learn from mistakes and -move on- and something completely different to stagnate and dwell on the past.

    12. Re:three words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, so diversification really does work. It distracts the consumer whores who like to buy inferior products.

    13. Re:three words by aunticrist · · Score: 1

      What sort of thing exactly? Trying to appease a powerhouse like the RIAA and mishandling a PR nightmare? No offense, i know they screwed up and for that they are still paying in the form of declined consumer confidence, but to sit there and act as though they also can never be redeemed is also pretty sad. You must live in a bubble with absolutely no named brand items anywhere in your home then huh? i mean, I'm pretty sure I could point out something that some company did or something that some company supported that should take on some of your ire as well.

    14. Re:three words by Traiklin · · Score: 1

      Because Sony is Evil and they won't let that one screw up go?

      it's just like when there is a story posted about Windows, people jump right in with the same dead horse routine about how "Windows is the Sux! Linux RLZ!" without even reading the article, hell one time I did see someone say "Xbox sux! Linux Rlz!" and get modded UP for it!

      no one belive there are devisions to a company, when one part of the company does something bad then the whole company is to blame, but the odd thing is...Everyone blames sony for the root kit thing but would it of been an issue had it not been for Windows? if windows didn't auto run installers without you knowing people might of known about that little peice of software being installed without your permision. also don't forget starforce "copy protection", if you want to talk about hidden rootkits you should look no further then them, the latest one now supposedly just reboots your system without even asking you to save any work you might of been doing when you go to burn a regular disc/DVD of a movie YOU made YOURSELF.

    15. Re:three words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let go of your irrational love for SONY.

      I've had some good stuff and some bad stuff, but no more SONY products for me! :)

      Feel free to forget the crap they've pulled, but noone I speak to ever will.

    16. Re:three words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I believe the important thing here is a corporation violated the law to insure that it's comsumers wouldn't violate the law. Just a guess though...

    17. Re:three words by Innova · · Score: 1

      It's this sort of "forget about it, I don't care" mentality that is allowing corporations to steadily erode our rights. It gives the corporations the artistic license to experiment with new and whacky control schemes and see which ones stick and which ones cause a backlash.

      Yes, that attitude is very similar to this one.

    18. Re:three words by AcidLacedPenguiN · · Score: 1

      I often wonder if the whole rootkit thing is an evil they didn't get away with, what are the lower-than-evils that they are getting away with right now. . .

      --
      disclaimer: I've been known to store numbers in my ass for which to dig out when quantities are required.
    19. Re:three words by Damvan · · Score: 1

      I don't agree with that argument at all. SONY screwed up, I don't care which "division" of the company screwed up, SONY did. And I personally, am punishing SONY for the screw up by not buying their products.

    20. Re:three words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're having the same trouble ridding /. of Sony root-kit jokes as Sony music CD users had ridding their systems of the Sony root-kit.....

    21. Re:three words by Philodoxx · · Score: 1

      Why though? Sony is not a person, it's a company that employs thousands of people and has has all kinds of different goals. Sony owns a restaurant chain in Japan, would you not eat there because of the rootkit fiasco(geographical difficulties aside)?

      --
      Oh, a lesson in history from Mr. I'm my own grandpa.
  20. Not that big a problem... by meringuoid · · Score: 3, Informative
    This announcement seems all flash and no substance -- Europe will STILL have to have a separate set of games because they use PAL instead of NTSC anyway.

    I gather that a lot of modern TVs will work with either PAL or NTSC inputs, so they won't have any trouble with this; and since the PS3 is being designed with HDTV in mind, PAL vs NTSC is really kind of irrelevant. HDTV is the same everywhere.

    I personally wonder if this is something to do with Australia. They've ruled down there that region coding on DVDs is actually illegal; I hear that all Aussie DVD players are now multiregion. Region-coding the PS3 will get Sony into legal trouble in Australia. Region-coding all non-Australian PS3s will be kind of pointless - people prepared to import foreign games will presumably also be happy to import an Aussie PS3. So they may as well drop the whole thing.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    1. Re:Not that big a problem... by spongeboy · · Score: 1
      My understanding of the situation is that Region locking is considered anti-competitive, not illegal. We still have region locked DVDs and PS2s, but the circumvention devices are legal. Most new DVD players are still region locked, so i don't think you argument is correct- besides, Australia is such a small marketplace.


      I think this has to do with import games being seen as a 'gateway' drug. First you install a mod chip for Katamari or Taiko Drum Master, next thing you know you're awash in a sea of burnt "backups" of which you've just happened to have lost the originals....

    2. Re:Not that big a problem... by brumby · · Score: 1

      I personally wonder if this is something to do with Australia. They've ruled down there that region coding on DVDs is actually illegal; I hear that all Aussie DVD players are now multiregion. Region-coding the PS3 will get Sony into legal trouble in Australia. Region-coding all non-Australian PS3s will be kind of pointless - people prepared to import foreign games will presumably also be happy to import an Aussie PS3. So they may as well drop the whole thing.

      Region coding isn't illegal here, it's just legal to bypass it, and if that happens to also bypass copy protection, well, your right to watch or play what you want trumps the manufacturers right to copy protection schemes. If a device has sperate region coding and copy protection, you are only allowed to defeat the region coding. So far everything combines the two though.

      The Australian market is small enough that I doubt anyone, even Sony, would bother making a separate device just for Australia. I don't think Sony Australia's problems really register with the Sony head office.

  21. Sounds nice... by RestartLater · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Whilst it may have region-free games, will all the games actually be available in all markets at the same time? And will online retailers be allowed to ship games over to areas where a certain game hasn't been released yet?

    1. Re:Sounds nice... by somersault · · Score: 1

      well they're making a good start by releasing the console simultaneously in Japan, US and EU. There will still be some games that area made in Japan/wherever that need to be translated for the English speaking market (I know that isnt the only important market, but it's the one most relevant to me, and probably most slashdotters), but any games made in the west hopefully will be able to be released simultaneously.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:Sounds nice... by The-Bus · · Score: 1

      Retailers aren't restricted now, so I don't see why they should be in the future.

      As for consumers... I, for one, am excited to finally be able to get Pro Evolution Soccer Management 2, EA Sports' Cricket 2007, and the newest Densha de Go! Tokyo Kyuukouhen train simulator game.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

  22. Is Sony being charitable? by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or is it because Sony is satisfied with the court decisions in the UK, etc. where they successfully sued importers of the PSP for trademark violations?

    After all, why worry about the technical hassles of DRM when you can sue the pants off of somebody trying to sell Japanese games in the US, US games in the EU, etc?

    1. Re:Is Sony being charitable? by Darth+Maul · · Score: 1

      "Is Sony being charitable?"

      Isn't it funny that just because we may be able to buy their games and play them at any location in the world that we're considering them "charitable"? What a screwed up time we live in. The customer has no power anymore.

      So, to answer your question: NO. They are not being charitable.

      --
      --- witty signature
    2. Re:Is Sony being charitable? by somersault · · Score: 1

      IIRC they sued through a technicality (use of the Sony trademark in their adverts without permission) - they couldnt stop them from actually selling PSPs. Also games that run on a system are quite different from something that Sony has built themselves, though presumably Sony still has to license games (and supply some kind of code) for them to actually work on a non chipped PS (which has been true ever since the PSX, and is not any new sensational kind of DRM)

      --
      which is totally what she said
    3. Re:Is Sony being charitable? by apoc06 · · Score: 1

      if i recall correctly, the case was to prevent importers from using the name PSP or playstation portable in advertisements.

      importing PSP games isnt that big a deal to sony, never has been really... but for some reason, i guess they felt that importing the hardware was undercutting their eventual bottom line. maybe it has something to do with the fact that they lose money on the hardware? i dont expect to be able to import a ps3 from any region, but if the games are region free, thats great

    4. Re:Is Sony being charitable? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "IIRC they sued through a technicality (use of the Sony trademark in their adverts without permission) - they couldnt stop them from actually selling PSPs."

      A technicality at best. Sales understandably dropped sharply when the sellers couldn't say anything more than "new handheld imported from North America."

  23. The backup issue could be solved like this by nephridium · · Score: 1
    Just include a second CD/DVD labled 'Backup' in the box, the additional cost should be negligible. Then if the original dies the buyer can go with it to the store and request a replacement; the shop owner would order these directly from the game manufacturer. Until it arrives people can play with the 'Backup'.

    Minimal additional cost for Sony (or the game producer) - especially since this wouldn't happen that often - and it eliminates the need for the user to make/copy their own backups.

    --


    And when you gaze long enough into the code, the code will also gaze into you.
    1. Re:The backup issue could be solved like this by CYDVicious · · Score: 1

      "Just include a second CD/DVD labled 'Backup' in the box, the additional cost should be negligible" What a brilliant Idea, now I will just borrow my friends' "Backup" and he won't care because his new original will work just fine. ;) Heck, I could just buy a bunch of new games and sell the new games and keep the backups...woohoo! Or am misunderstanding how your backup system works? ~CYD

      --
      //Nothing to see here, please move along.
    2. Re:The backup issue could be solved like this by nephridium · · Score: 1
      "Just include a second CD/DVD labled 'Backup' in the box, the additional cost should be negligible" What a brilliant Idea, now I will just borrow my friends' "Backup"...

      True. There is not a big difference between the legal backup and the illegal copy. My method eliminates the need for users to make private backups. Whether or not they want to copy/use their games illegally is another problem and needs to be addressed by solutions (such as activating the game online/through the telephone).

      --


      And when you gaze long enough into the code, the code will also gaze into you.
  24. Japan has 810P as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Japan also has 810P as well. There are other "weird" HD formats circling around that would also need to be taken care of. North American HD is not the same HD everywhere for that very reason. Different resolutions, refresh rates, etc. makes this hell for a manufacturer. The biggest problem is that TV display equipment is not like computer monitors where they can switch around resolutions and refresh rates as necessary unless the device is designed for it. Although I don't think Sony will have much problem with this because these days most of the output circuitry/firmware will be given a certain set of allowable resolutions for each region. The only item to worry about then is whether the game will support the resolution and if it won't, then the Playstation should be able to up/down-sample the data for output.

    1. Re:Japan has 810P as well by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Japan also has 810P as well. There are other "weird" HD formats circling around that would also need to be taken care of.

      Is that why 1365x768 for plasmas and LCDs seems to be more common than 1280x720, the 720p spec?

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    2. Re:Japan has 810P as well by Jaruzel · · Score: 1

      'HD Ready' plasmas and LCDs bug the hell out of me for this very reason.

      720p HD is 1280x720
      1080i/p is 1920x1080

      Yet a LOT of 'HD Ready' flatscreens have a pixel structure of 1024x768, (some even have 1280x1024). I personally want direct pixel mapping in my viewing, so although I can handle 48 lines of pixels not being used on the screen (768-720=48) what about the horizontal mis-match? Where did those 'spare' 256 columns go? (1280-1024=256). Somewhere in all this there's a lot of up/downscaling going on - and the consumer is being ripped off (again).

      -Jar

      --
      Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
  25. BlueRay region shared by USA and Japan by LordJezo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wouldn't this be more part of the BlueRay news instead of PS3 specific news?

    Japan and USA to share BlueRay region codes.

    Import games and movies here I come!

  26. FTA: NTSC bPAL? by cyclomedia · · Score: 2, Informative

    TFA suggests the possibility of a "no play" screen if an import game demands an output signal that is incompatible with your region coding so that things dont go bang. which to me suggests two possibilities.

    1. the author is dumb
    2. all my tvs have been magic tvs

    currently (well, not this very second) i'm playing a US NTSC import of a PSone game on my PAL telly in the UK, sure the picture is a bit stretched but even this cheapo 19" tv has a 16:9 anamorphic button, squashing said picture back down to something more pleasant on the eyes. same goes for NTSC DVDs too.

    --
    If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
    1. Re:FTA: NTSC bPAL? by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you have some halfassed TV that accepts both PAL and NTSC inputs, but doesn't account for the resolution differences. Normally if you play a PAL game on an NTSC TV or vice versa, the picture will roll in addition to being squashed.

      Of course the PSx and PS2 hardware is the same on both sides of the pond. The games are pretty much the same too. The only difference is a file on the disc that has the line "FORMAT = NTSC" or "FORMAT = PAL" or something like it. It would be trivial for Sony to just get rid of that line entirely and have the owner choose which format (perhaps defaulting to the correct format based on the country it was sold in) when they first power on the console.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:FTA: NTSC bPAL? by Fred+Or+Alive · · Score: 1

      Well, in Europe most TVs won't roll, or display it squashed, they can lock onto 60Hz singals fine. I think he just has a crappy TV.

      They may display in black and white however if you're using composite connections, not every TV like NTSC colour, that's why most consoles (apart from the PS2) use PAL60 for 60Hz modes. You can bypass that bit by getting an RGB SCART cable or similar.

      Support for PAL60 is pretty high, and Nintendo and Microsoft both have 60Hz only games on their consoles, although they do have warning icons on the front. (The Zelda bonus discs, Metroid Prime 2, Geist and Dead or Alive 4 if you're wondering).

      --
      10 PRINT "LOOK AROUND YOU ";
      20 GOTO 10
    3. Re:FTA: NTSC bPAL? by iainl · · Score: 1

      Microsoft mandates that every 360 game has to be able to run at 60Hz, because otherwise people running in HD over VGA would hit problems. The vast majority of PAL Gamecube, XBox and PS2 games offer 60Hz options, and have for a long while.

      I'll be extremely disappointed with Sony if the PS3 can't do the same.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    4. Re:FTA: NTSC bPAL? by cyclomedia · · Score: 1

      halfassed indeed, it only cost about £80, but manages to show NTSC without rolling and in color. it's just the scan lines that are wrong, which is where the 16:9 button comes in handy. heh, me hax0rs the telly.

      --
      If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
  27. All Property is Theft! by YoungOnesTroll · · Score: 2, Funny

    RICK: Oh, stop being so blinking bourgousie! All property is theft, Vyvyan.

    VYVYAN: All right, then. Where's your girlie purse?

    VYVYAN: [takes Rick's coin purse, removes some money] Ha ha! Found it!

    RICK: You put that back! That's my personal property!

    --
    I'm very sober, and very very bored!
  28. The real DRM question is HDMI.

    This is a proprietary version of DVI created by Sony. Some new HDTV's have HDMI hookups in the back - most don't.

    It is rumored that Sony will require HDMI connections from the PS3 to the HDTV to prevent Blu-Ray movie piracy. If you need to run out and buy a HDMI capable TV (or an expensive DVI-HDMI adapter) there will be many unhappy people.

    HDMI IS the reason why Sony has already pushed things back.

    1. Re:HDMI by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

      HDMI will also be required for viewing HDTV broadcasts in the Netherlands over cable. Once it gets here.

      I see HDMI appearing on many more products now, all of a sudden.

    2. Re:HDMI by Hieronymus+Howard · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here's a few clues for you, since you don't seem to have any:

      Firstly, HDMI is not "a proprietary version of DVI created by Sony". See http://www.hdmi.org/

      Secondly, all "HD Ready" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HD_ready) HDTVs sold here in Europe have HDMI.

      Thirdly DVI to HDMI adapters are not expensive. You can get one for about $7 on Ebay, including postage.

      Fourthly, HDMI is not a form of DRM. HDCP is DRM, but HDCP can be implemented on DVI as well as HDMI.

    3. Re:HDMI by bilbravo · · Score: 1

      99% (made up number, by me) of new TVs have HDMI input. It's not just Sony.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDMI

    4. Re:HDMI by apoc06 · · Score: 1

      i call bull here. part of the announcements made this week were to announce that not only would the ps3 handle HDMI, but the ps3 would also be compatible with SDTVs. at this point, why do people expect sony to say they plan to not at least meet the x360 on features?

      in regards to blu-ray movie playback, who knows?

    5. Re:HDMI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both Blu ray and HD-DVD dics will need HDMI(read HDCP compliancy) to display HD MOVIES otherwise it will be down-rezed well below 720, to 540i I beleive, this will not however apply to the video games put on blu ray, and as yet there will be no video games on HD-DVD.
        still sucks to be an early HD adopter. but your HD videogaming bliss will not require a new TV.

    6. Re:HDMI by thestappa · · Score: 1

      PS3 will work on any TV. PS3 games will play in HD over component also. It's just the movies that you have to worry about. Sony said at their press conference the other day that they will put out their movies without the DRM implamened. Meaning you'll get full resolution.

  29. Re:so what? by gabebear · · Score: 1

    I think it is more likely that 360 games will be locked to a specific console. Nobody will be able to easily copy a Blu-Ray disc easily anytime soon, but pirating 360 games should be easy in a couple months.

    Locking software to a piece of hardware is generally called "product activation" is patently Microsoftish.

  30. PAL/NTSC by mwvdlee · · Score: 1
    "A PAL PS3 game, for instance, will have difficulty running on an NTSC TV, unless the developers have thought ahead and planned for that issue."


    Is that really much of a problem nowadays? I know my TV automatically switches PAL/NTSC based on the signal, and AFAIK pretty much every reasonably sized TV does, as do most smaller TV's.
    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    1. Re:PAL/NTSC by iainl · · Score: 1

      Just about every TV currently on sale in Europe will cope with a 60Hz signal (and this has been the case for years).

      However, US TVs usually won't have a clue what to do with a 50Hz PAL signal. Fortunately, Microsoft already demand Euro releases for both XBoxes have 60Hz capability, so I really hope Sony do the same.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  31. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  32. Encryption by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    Give each PS3 a unique magic number.
    When making a backup encrypt the copy so that it can only be accessed with the unique magic number.

    The backup will be tied to one machine and it doesn't stop people passing around the master disk and their mates making backup coppies of the game to play, but it does stop people making loads of coppies and selling them / passing them on.

    The backup could also prevent online games or multiplayer games from being run on more than on machine at once, to add greater protection the ps3 could be required to 'dial up' whenever you wanted to play a game from a backup.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:Encryption by Geraden · · Score: 1

      That's great - right up until your machine bites the dust and you're STILL out the content that you legally and legitimately paid for.

    2. Re:Encryption by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      You should still have the master disk, unless.....

      You lost the disk then you no longer own a copy.
      It was stolen then you technically still own a copy, but don't you have insurance and ebay for things like that, do you want to make a backup of you car too?
      Your house burnt down then re insurance, ebay and backup your house next time.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  33. Awesome by Icegryphon · · Score: 0

    Oh Hells Yeah!!

  34. Re:Good start. Are Sony getting better? by somersault · · Score: 1

    Isnt the music division separate from the laptop division and PS3 division, etc? I think they make good products.. the rootkit thing is pathetic, but overall I still think they make good products.

    --
    which is totally what she said
  35. What I don't understand .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Region locks should never have existed in first place, they are only there so different publishers can publish the same game in different regions and to enable price fixing.

    No matter why V dies in vendetta, whether to make sure mod chips don't have any legal functions or to really do something useful, it had to be done. Region locks are attempts to suppress international trade and competition. They have been ruled illegal in some countries and are not protected by any DMCA-like laws. There should have been some fines over region locks but well, knowing the corrupt governments we have it'd end up being 5.95$ total.

  36. Read between the words of what Phil is saying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When Sony says that they will 'mandate' all games to be region free then people should get excited. All they have said is they will let games be region free. I expect they will let the decision be owned by the publisher. Some will and some won't.

    Xbox & 360 are already region free in this regard. The choice is up to the game publisher.

    Sony needs to do everything possible to keep people from buying a 360 in the next 8 months, and talking about region free gaming, without actually mandating it, is just a clever way of making people wait a little more.

    "Region Free" "4D technology" "Emotion Engine" Sony is very, very good at performing the Jedi mind trick on an uneducated populous

    1. Re:Read between the words of what Phil is saying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello educated man!

  37. Backups shouldn't be fair use. by ivan256 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I don't think I could have picked a less popular subject, however...

    You don't get to make a backup of books, art, or other physical media that is non-electronic... Back when it was easy to have your electronic media easily destroyed at no fault to you, a backup exemption made sense. We no longer live in the age of VCRs eating tapes though, and on the rediculously rare (relative to tape eating) chance that your device does damage your disc, the player manufacturer should be responsible for procuring you a replacement. If, however, you roll over your favorite video game CD with your office chair (not I know anybody who has ever done that...), why should you have more right to a replacement than the guy who had his paperback fall out of his jacket pocket into the toilet on a bus (not that... well, you know)?

    DRM should never prevent you from doing something with your media that would have otherwise been legal under copyright law, but I'm not convinced that there is a good reason for the law to allow backups.

    1. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by the_B0fh · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Because you are purchasing a LICENSE!

      In case of a book, you are purchasing an OBJECT.

      A license is not dependable on a physical object, but grants you a right to use. The object/CD, is only there to help transfer that right to use. Hence, if it's broken, there should be a cheaper replacement than buying a new license.

      -b0fh

    2. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      You seem confused.

      In both cases you are purchasing both a license and an object.

      Sometimes the license is implied (books, CDs, most DVDs), and sometimes the license is explicit (software), but you are buying both in all cases.

    3. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by dodobh · · Score: 1

      I own 40+ year old books, and I can still read them. How much old electronic media is unreadable? Backups don't necessarily mean to the same format.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    4. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Ok...where to begin...

      "You don't get to make a backup of books, art, or other physical media that is non-electronic"

      This looks like a good starter. Of COURSE I can make a backup of these. You see, I own them, this entitles me to back them up should I so desire. Of course, how I go about it is left up to me. I could certainly scan in the book to store on my computer, and depending on the medium of the art I could take a hires digital image or scan.

      "We no longer live in the age of VCRs eating tapes though, and on the rediculously rare (relative to tape eating) chance that your device does damage your disc, the player manufacturer should be responsible for procuring you a replacement. "

      You're right, we live in a the age where companies actively look for ways to make our old recordings obsolete with the newer players so we have to rebuy it all over again. Add to that the pathetically short lifespan of CD and DVDs and there is a damn good chance your media will become worthless just as quickly as it did with VHS.

      "If, however, you roll over your favorite video game CD with your office chair (not I know anybody who has ever done that...), why should you have more right to a replacement than the guy who had his paperback fall out of his jacket pocket into the toilet on a bus (not that... well, you know)?"

      The answer to this one lies in the depths of property law, and while IANAL, the difference seems to be that while you actually OWN the book, the trend these days with software and music etc. is to sell/rent you a license to use it. This makes the physical media irrelevant. So if I don't actually own something, but only have a license from the company to use it, then if I break it they had damn well better get me a new physical copy for nothing more than the cost of the physical media and shipping. They can't have their cake and eat it to, despite their best efforts.

      "DRM should never prevent you from doing something with your media that would have otherwise been legal under copyright law, but I'm not convinced that there is a good reason for the law to allow backups."

      If you can't think of any good reason for the law the allow backups, perhaps you are not qualified to debate this since in order to debate something correctly you need to have a thorough understanding of BOTH sides of the matter, which you CLEARLY do not.

      Please don't take this response in a negative tone...I just wanted to point out that there are serious holes in your logic and attempted to patch them up.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    5. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      If you can't think of any good reason for the law the allow backups, perhaps you are not qualified to debate this since in order to debate something correctly you need to have a thorough understanding of BOTH sides of the matter, which you CLEARLY do not.

      I didn't say I can't think of reasons... I said I don't think they're good reasons. If you'd like to present well reasond arguments, perhaps you can change my mind.

      I just wanted to point out that there are serious holes in your logic and attempted to patch them up.

      There are holes in your logic too. You don't own the content in your books anymore than you own the content on a CD. You have an implied license to that content plus some additional rights granted by law.

      You've made a good argument for allowing format shifting, and I think that format shifting should be allowed. You have also made a good argument that backups are allowed. Again, I agree, they're allowed. But I still don't see a *good* reason to allow them.

    6. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by booyabazooka · · Score: 1
      Back when it was easy to have your electronic media easily destroyed at no fault to you, a backup exemption made sense. We no longer live in the age of VCRs eating tapes
      And when your children render a disc unreadable just by mishandling it? Cd/dvd is still a fairly easy medium to destroy, and it doesn't require any exceptional means.
    7. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Because you are purchasing a LICENSE!

      Where did you get that idea from? We're talking about console games, not PC software, remember?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    8. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by neema · · Score: 1

      My roommate listens to one of his favorite band's CDs all the time. He's had to buy three because they get scratched from use (normal use, not rolling over it with his office chair). That seems a bit absurd. Normal use can destroy most electronic media. That doesn't apply to the media of the "good ol' days". I've read an 1898 version of my favorite book over and over again (and, presumambly, so did the previous owner(s) of it) and it still is intact.

    9. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

      1) I'm not convinced that the first amendment should apply to you!
      2) DRM should be not be allowable for copywrited works.
      3) What are you going to do when your cheap dvd player breaks (this will invariably happen, eventually), and you loose your disk?

      It is not your place to question fair use, fair use is a integral part of copyright law. Furthermore, your argument against backups doesn't work. Books do not fail to work if their cover falls off, and to be completely fair, you should consider the degrade rates of different mediums. Optical disks haven't been around long enough to verify if they hold up even a similar amount of time as a properly printed book. There are books still in circulation that were written 100 years ago, and until that is the case for optical disks, there simply _isn't any argument_ that they should not be copyable.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
      1 John 4:14
    10. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by tepples · · Score: 1

      And when your children render a disc unreadable just by mishandling it?

      Publishers' retort: "Until your children are old enough to play T-rated games, keep your original discs under lock and key."

    11. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by Kjella · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You don't get to make a backup of books, art, or other physical media that is non-electronic...

      Remove the "get to" and you're fairly accurate. It's time-consuming, the result is usually inferior and generally not worth it unless you do it in volume, which would fall outside personal backups. Also, typically if a work is valuable the value is inherently contained in that instance of the work - a first edition, a signed book, an orignal painting, an antique and so on. Also, you have insurance which will cover against the biggest losses. Maybe nobody has bothered to make a fuzz over a right noone is or would be using?

      If, however, you roll over your favorite video game CD with your office chair (not I know anybody who has ever done that...), why should you have more right to a replacement than the guy who had his paperback fall out of his jacket pocket into the toilet on a bus (not that... well, you know)?

      You have a very warped perception of what the CD, as in the thin slice of plastic that something is written on, represents. If you compare the price to a blank CD, you see I pay essentially nothing for the disc, only for the information that's on it. The disc itself is detachable, replacable and infinately less durable than the content which could be moved around losslessly in perpetuity.

      To me, not being allowed to replace the media is like not being allowed to replace the windshield wiper on my car. If I ask them, they say "Ford cars and Ford windshield wipers go together, replacing it with a generic wiper is against the law." "Ok, where do I get a new wiper?" "It's included with Ford cars." It just so happens that the car (content) is intangible and the wiper (disc) is tangible, but it is none the less insane.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    12. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      I'm not convinced that the first amendment should apply to you!

      Because I don't agree with you? Asshole.

      It is not your place to question fair use, fair use is a integral part of copyright law.

      Two things. First, Bullshit, it's my place to question whatever I'd like to question. Second, I'm not saying Fair Use is bad/wrong/should go away. I'm questioning what should be considered fair use.

      There are books still in circulation that were written 100 years ago, and until that is the case for optical disks, there simply _isn't any argument_ that they should not be copyable.

      That's a rediculous argument that isn't backed up by law. Backups are allowed under law, but those reasons you came up with came straight out of your ass.

    13. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      You have a very warped perception of what the CD, as in the thin slice of plastic that something is written on, represents. If you compare the price to a blank CD, you see I pay essentially nothing for the disc, only for the information that's on it. The disc itself is detachable, replacable and infinately less durable than the content which could be moved around losslessly in perpetuity.

      I could say that about your perception of the paperback book, which costs the producer about the same amount as the media and associated physical materals that come with the CD. The fact that equipment exists that allows easy movement of the information doesn't mean that the law should treat the content on that media any differently.

      Arguments can be made for the elimination of copyright, but the fact that it has become easy to break isn't the best of those arguments.

    14. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      He's had to buy three because they get scratched from use (normal use, not rolling over it with his office chair)

      Normal use doesn't scratch CDs. I have hundreds of CDs that I use all the time, and none of them are scratched. CD's get scratched because I take care of them.Throw them around, put them in the tray with recless abandon, and you scratch them.

      People who treat their media like junk wreck their media. Same goes for books.

    15. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by ivan256 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And when your children render a disc unreadable just by mishandling it?

      Use the appropriate dicipline to teach your children not to mishandle your media, or don't allow your children to handle the media. Why are people so afraid to dicipline their children these days? Your kids should be scared to death of damaging your stuff. They'll grow up just fine, and they won't hate you. You can start *really young*.

      What do you do when your kid spills whatever you put in their sippy cup all over some book you left lying around? Or scribbles all over it with a crayon?

    16. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by Jetekus · · Score: 1

      You don't get to make a backup of books, art, or other physical media that is non-electronic...
      Only because it's impractical to do so. I hardly think you would be arrested for copying out a part of a book by hand, yet you seem to think it's ok to design measures to stop people doing this for CDs/DVDs. Why is that?

    17. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      I hardly think you would be arrested for copying out a part of a book by hand, yet you seem to think it's ok to design measures to stop people doing this for CDs/DVDs. Why is that?

      Who said anything about arresting anybody? Nothing related to copyright should be criminal (yes, I know that's not how existing law works). Companies should be able to design their products however they like though. You seem to think it's ok to tell them they can't. Why is that?

    18. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

      My reasons were sound, I was trying to show the parent just how rediculous his assertions were by conforming to the same style. CD's have been around what, maybe 20 years? Dvds haven't been around for ten, but someone is saying that the consumer shouldn't have backup rights simply because these new formats are reliable. Thats like arguing that your BMW is reliable because it's newer than a Model T, and it hasn't broken down in the first 30k miles. The only difference is that Books are a lot more reliable than a model T.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
      1 John 4:14
    19. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by arodland · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. There's no reason that archival copies shouldn't be fair use. The only reason that it was never considered before VHS or so was that the idea was completely impractical. Who would set up a printing press and lay type to copy a book just for personal use, if they weren't planning on selling copies? Nobody. When cheap copying of electronic media came about, the exemption was natural. It didn't have anything really to do with the fragility of cassettes, so there's no reason it shoud be held invalid in the face of more "durable" media. Besides which, DVDs scratch up pretty bad, and sometimes it's even caused by a bad player, not sticky-fingered kids.

    20. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by tagevm · · Score: 1


      I'm guessing that you don't have any kids? CD/DVDs can easily be rendered useless by young ones, in fact they are more fragile than old audio cassettes.

    21. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      I was trying to show the parent just how rediculous his assertions were by conforming to the same style.

      That confuses me. Perhaps your original comment has the wrong parent then...

      but someone is saying that the consumer shouldn't have backup rights simply because these new formats are reliable.

      That's not an argument I would make. My argument is that you shouldn't have the right simply because it's possible. I wouldn't claim the new formats are reliable, nor would I claim the old formats are reliable. It's almost as easy to wreck a book as it is a CD. I'd go as far as saying that regular use is just as likely to wreck either, though CDs are slightly easier to damage through accidental mis-use.

    22. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Please read the rest of the thread. If I respond to you here, and to everybody else who said the same thing as you, I'll have an exponentially increasing number of responses to write. Multiple others have said exactly what you just said.

    23. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      There's no reason that archival copies shouldn't be fair use.

      Fair use is something that you shouldn't be denied by design. In other words, publishers should have to go out of their way to make fair use a possibility for you. Publishers shouldn't have to go out of their way to make it possible for you to make a backup. It shoudn't necessarily be illegal, but if some other aspect of their technology makes backups difficult or impossible, then so be it. If publishers want to design their media to be difficult to backup, that's their perogative too. Nobody is forcing you to buy their product. (Bypassing their protection shouldn't be criminal though)

    24. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by noidentity · · Score: 1

      "If, however, you roll over your favorite video game CD with your office chair (not I know anybody who has ever done that...), why should you have more right to a replacement than the guy who had his paperback fall out of his jacket pocket into the toilet on a bus (not that... well, you know)?"

      - It costs me less than a dollar to make a backup of a CD, but much more than that for a book, and the copy is much less-desirable to use than the original.

      - I make copies of CDs I often carry with me and thus tend to scratch more. I don't have to worry about losing it (say it gets stolen or I drop it somewhere). It's easier to make the backup than take really careful care of discs on the go.

      - A water-damaged book or one with a gash in the edges of the pages is still entirely readable, while a CD with even a minor scratch can become completely unusable.

    25. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I still don't see a *good* reason to allow them.

      Well, your subjective judgment as to whether or not a reason is "good" will probably be different than mine.

      What are the reasons for DISallowing backups? The most common one given is that the temporary distribution monopoly creates monetary incentive to produce content. I don't consider this a "good" reason, since plenty of incentive (both monetary and non-monetary) still exists even if duplication is allowed (I won't go into the details here, but such business models exist, have been used, and have been shown effective).

      The second reason given is that content-creators have a "natural right" to control the use and distribution of the content they create. I don't consider this a *good* reason either, mainly because of the different physical laws that control physical property versus information. If one owns materials, and uses those materials to make an object, then it does seem that one has a natural right to continue to own that specific object (but not to own other similar objects made by other people out of other similar materials). If someone else were to take the original object away from the creator, such a person would be directly depriving the creator of control over his creation, and thus would be harming him. That all makes sense in the case of physical property. In the case of information, duplicates can be made ad infinitum, and used however one sees fit, with no material cost and no impact whatsoever on the original creator of the content. Therefore, the reasons for this "natural right" are not there in the case of information, and the natural right does not exist. (As an aside, even if it did exist, it does not make sense that the creator of content should be able to assume control of physical objects created by/owned by other people, in this case, their personal computers...so even if it did make sense (which it doesn't) it is unenforceable).

      The third reason given: It is already the law. This is not a good reason, since we can change laws that don't make sense.

      So, there are no good reasons to disallow copying material. Therefore, there should not be any laws that infringe upon this freedom.

      Now, about good reasons to allow it:

      From a technological and economic stand point, it is extremely difficult and harmful to prevent the unauthorized duplication of electronic content (DRM creates security holes, format incompatibility, and user frustration, so it is harmful. Content monopolies overcharge, stifle creativity by stifling competition, and put people out of work. Harmful). However, it is trivially easy (and not harmful) to allow such duplication. Therefore, such duplication should be allowed.

      I am aware of the argument that allowing such duplication will make artists starve. It is simply not true, as various successful artists have demonstrated already. Further, the lock-down on content does not help the artist so much as the distribution monopolies, who are already responsible for making artists starve.

      So there you have it.

    26. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      publishers should have to go out of their way to make fair use a possibility for you. Publishers shouldn't have to go out of their way to make it possible for you to make a backup.

      Your argument is logical and internally consistent, and your patience in presenting your case so thoroughly and politely on a hostile and often immature forum like Slashdot is admirable. However, I would appreciate it if you would be so kind as to explain in greater depth the grounds on which you are deciding that making a backup should not be considered fair use.

      Considered against the legal tests, it is not at all obvious to me that it should be excluded. It starts at a disadvantage because it involves copying the entire work. However, it is not done for commercial gain, and it does not interfere with the ability of the copyright holder to find customers, which seem to me to be the more important criteria.

    27. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      The third reason given: It is already the law. This is not a good reason, since we can change laws that don't make sense.

      Actually backups are allowed under the law as it stands, not disallowed.

        As to the rest of your points, I believe I've spoken to them elsewhere in the thread.

    28. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by samdu · · Score: 1

      Actually, he gave a very good reasoned argument to the points that you made. The fact that you chose to ignore those arguments probably says something about you. I won't hazzard to guess what, though.

      The very first (and, I'm assuming most important in your eyes) argument you made was that we don't have a right to make backup copies of other media (books, etc...). As the first resonse stated, this is patently false. We certainly DO have the right to copy any book we own as many times as we wish. The same restrictions and freedoms apply to digital media. I can legally make a thousand copies of the CIV 4 CD I bought*. What I'm legally prohibited from doing is distributing said copies. Same thing with books. I could make a thousand "backup" copies of War and Peace, I just can't distribute those copies. THAT is what is legally referred to as "Fair Use (among a few other things that also fall under Fair Use)."

      On a related note, you have to also consider the fact that Intellectual Property is an artificial construct. It doesn't exist in the "real" world. The only reason that it is protected is that we, as a country, have decided that it is worth protecting. But there is no natural "intellectual property" like there is "real property." And the reason for protecting it is to server the public, NOT the creator. Read the law, it's laid out fairly plainly.

      *The exception and the reason there's such a problem with IP and digital media is the DMCA. The DMCA basically revoked our constitutionally granted fair use rights. Not in so many words, though. Under the DMCA, it's technically still legal to make backup copies of any content/media you buy. However, if that content/media is protected in any way, it's a violation of the DMCA to circumvent that protection. So, on the one hand, it's perfectly legal to make a backup of that Perfect Dark Zero disc you just bought for your 360, but since it's protected, it's actually illegal to make the backup, not because the backup itself is illegal, but because there's a mechanism in place to keep you from backing it up. It's a legal paradox that needs to be addressed soon, because only one of those laws can stand.

    29. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said anything about arresting anybody? Nothing related to copyright should be criminal (yes, I know that's not how existing law works). Companies should be able to design their products however they like though. You seem to think it's ok to tell them they can't. Why is that?

      The media companies seem to think it's OK to get the government to forbid other companies from designing products intended to facilitate piracy. They've got that. Why should they get it for free?

      They've chosen to lobby to have their copyrights protected by criminal law. You seem to agree that this is a bad thing. So why don't you agree that it would be just to insist that they pay for this protection by forfeiting the right to use certain kinds of technological protection instead?

    30. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      The fact that you chose to ignore those arguments probably says something about you.

      Who's ignoring what now?...

      The very first (and, I'm assuming most important in your eyes) argument you made was that we don't have a right to make backup copies of other media (books, etc...). As the first resonse stated, this is patently false.

      I explicitly did not make that argument. I would prefer to engage in depat with people who have listened to my arguments and not people who are making asumptions about my arguments because something I said doesn't correspond with their views. I think if you actually read the things I've said in this thread you'll find we agree more than you expect.

    31. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by Travelsonic · · Score: 1
      Normal use doesn't scratch CDs.

      How praytell did my PS2/xbox DDRMAX2 and Dance Dance Revolution Ultramix disks get so scratched (to the point where the steps andmsic were out of sync) when I did not mishandle them at all then? Just because you were fortunate to not have this happen to your music CDs (getting heavily scratch) doesn't mean you can completely rule out regular use scratching the disk, can you?

      --
      If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
    32. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by samdu · · Score: 1

      I explicitly did not make that argument.

      You don't get to make a backup of books, art, or other physical media that is non-electronic...

      Say again?

    33. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually backups are allowed under the law as it stands, not disallowed.

      No. The DMCA has made it a federal crime to backup your DVDs. Why? Doing so requires circumvention of a copy-protection mechanism, which is illegal under the DMCA.

      Here is an article about a significant court ruling on the subject :http://money.cnn.com/2004/02/24/commentary/ontech nology/dvd_burning/

    34. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, you're right. I read your comment incorrectly.

    35. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Well...
      you certainly can make backups of nonelectronic media. It's harder (photocopying a book, for example, takes time and the result isn't ideal) but it can be done. Lots of people will photocopy part of a topo map before going hiking; a copy of just the section you need is easy to carry, and it doesn't matter if it is destroyed.

      Electronic media is _very_ easy to damage. Downloadable files go *poof* if a hard disk fails, or virus hits. Old media is difficult to access - who has a 5.25" floppy drive anymore? DVDs scratch easily if viewed often; while some people seem to take cleanroom-like precautions to keep their CDs safe, others like to take them in the car. Covertibles are particularly tough on discs, since you get lots of wind and dust everywhere. Writeable CDs do seem to degrade over time (though only amateur-produced music or custom software is issued as such). And while it takes a great deal of effort to render a paperback book completely unusable, a single incorrect byte can cause the greatest of computer programs to fail completely.

      You may argue that it's not in the public interest to prevent backups. The point of IP law is to improve the public good by encouraging the creation of books, art, music, etc. To that extent, the author is given some exclusive rights, which are more than adequate. It's important to remember that for good reason this is an entirely different set of laws from physical property - the rules can be whatever we mutually choose. The converse question is why publishers should have a revenue stream from replacing defective copies. Forbidding backups creates a perverse incentive for publishers to make defective media - the sooner it fails, the more likely it will be repurchased. That doesn't benefit society.

      All things being equal, should a family repurchase a "delicate" copy of "Finding Nemo" seven times at $2 per disc because it keeps breaking, buy a copy for $11 and get replacement disks for $0.50 each from the publisher, or purchase one copy at $14 and back it up themselves? Does it make a difference?

      I'd argue it makes more sense to "decouple" the information product (movie) from the physical product. Then, the initial purchase cost pays for the price of the information, and one physical disk. Every time the disk is damaged, you only pay the incremental cost of replacing the physical disk (cost of a new DVD/RW). You could ask the publisher to replace the disk at-cost, but what's the point? You might as well let the customer be responsible for his own backups. Decoupling the medium and the information also lets you say "the information isn't defective; it's just fine. it's the storage medium that's defective - just replace that" in the same sense that you replace the broken parts of a machine rather than the whole thing.

      But I would ask, why not backup? If in doubt, why not allow the end user a bit more freedom? How would forbidding backups improve the progress of "the Useful Arts and Sciences", or make society better off? Is there someone who said, "I was going to write the Great American Novel today, but I'm afraid people will make backup copies"? And is it enough for copyright law to try to get more works out in the marketplace, or should we also keep in mind how those works may be used and enjoyed?

    36. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have a license when you buy a CD or a book.

      You OWN it. That is what allows you to read/play it.

    37. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by the_B0fh · · Score: 0

      Please, I'm talking about the point of view of the industry. I could care less about what is the difference between a license and all that. It's what RIAA and MPAA is trying to sell to congress.

      Please notice how they weasel around, and talk about CDs and so on as OBJECTs when they want you to buy multiple copies of a song, mp3, vinyl, CD, etc. Yet, the moment you start downloading things, it's a fscking license.

    38. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by 1in10 · · Score: 1

      To substitute a few words:

      Companies should be able to polute the environment as much as they like though. You seem to think it's ok to tell them they can't. Why is that?

      I think the answer in both cases is because it's a net public good to restrict anti-social behaviour of companies.

    39. Re:Backups shouldn't be fair use. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      That's a rediculous comparison.

      One of those two things only hurts you if you choose to purchase their product.

  38. Is this just a legal tactic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe Sony is just trying to invalidate legal reasons for modchips?

    1. You don't need a modchip for homebrew development because you have PS-Linux.
    2. You don't need a modchip for region freedom anymore.

    This should make it easy to sue modchip makers.

  39. Actually, there's a good chance. by iainl · · Score: 1

    HD-DVD has already announced they won't be doing region-encoding for movies. Hopefully, BluRay will drop their one, though they haven't yet.

    They have moved the US and Japan into the same region, however, so for the vast majority of stuff you'll be fine with a US machine.

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  40. I still wont buy form them by DaEMoN128 · · Score: 1

    I bought a vaio laptop about a year ago. It was in May of last year to be exact. The dvd burner (+/-rw) will not read dvd-r's that have been burnt and will not burn anything. The onboard nic (intel proset) will not work. I have called them about getting warrenty service and while they see that my laptop has a one year warrenty, was bought in may, was built/released less than 1 year ago today, they will not give me my service because I sent in the reciept (had to be an original) to register the computer and I have to have the reciept in order to get warrenty service. They will not take a creditcard statement becuase it isn't itemized and the store didn't keep a record of the item number, just the amount paid. I may be SOL, but sony will never seen any of my money, or anyone who I consults money ever again.

    --
    Stop signs are only Suggestions
  41. Bring On The Ren'Ai Games! by blueZhift · · Score: 1

    Awesome! Now it won't be so much trouble to play all of those console based dating sim games that never get translated! Not so sure that's a good thing, but it really was the first thing I thought of... In any case, I think an announcement like this is meant to keep the PS3 in the news and hardcore gamers interested until November since region issues generally are no concern of mainstream/casual gamers. Though I must wonder if breaking down the regional barriers will result in tougher standards for PS3 game approval. There are a lot of "wacky" Japanese titles that never escape Japan and thus are unlikely to cause trouble abroad for Sony. But without the regional lockout, the world becomes one big market and we all know that we can't have little Johnny in the U.S. getting his hands on some wacky Japanese game, right? The threat of this kind of trouble might cause Sony to take a Nintendo-like approach to controlling game content allowed on the console.

    1. Re:Bring On The Ren'Ai Games! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But without the regional lockout, the world becomes one big market and we all know that we can't have little Johnny in the U.S. getting his hands on some wacky Japanese game, right? The threat of this kind of trouble might cause Sony to take a Nintendo-like approach to controlling game content allowed on the console."

      There's a reason that Sony and Microsoft dominate the console world, and Nintendo's just.. there. Not doing badly, not doing poorly, but just.. there.

      Sony doesn't target kids. Kids don't have the money to spend on games and consoles. Nor does Microsoft. Both companies target adult audiences, where you can not only find the majority of gamers, but the majority of gamers with the disposable income to spew away on recreation.

      Nintendo? Nintendo's mainly still around due to targetting kids. Niche market, a nice one, but don't expect their censorship and family nonsense to spread to either Sony or Microsoft.

  42. I'm not buying anything with RC anymore by Nice2Cats · · Score: 1
    I'm glad somebody actually has half a brain at Sony. Now, if they could get their Blu-ray people to see the light, too, I might even consider buying one some day. There is no way in hell I'm going through the trouble of figuring out how to bypass regional codes again for normal films: I paid for the player, I paid for the film, and anything that prevents me from using the two together will mean one thing: Lost sales. Thank God for VLC.

    Unfortunately, I think that part of Sony will force this part of Sony to do something stupid again ...

  43. I have never understood gaming region coding by adachan · · Score: 1

    Europe is PAL and has lots of different languages, US is NTSC english, Japan is NTSC with Japanese. Dont these things already give the games somewhat of a region code to the vast amount of general users anyway. The hardcore users have a modchip and dont care. Why would 90 percent of gamers import a Japanese Final Fantasy game that they cant read or understand the language.

  44. Re:Slashdot censorship! by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    or, you could understand what "nested" means and know that when something isnt a reply to a particular comment, it wont show up in that comment's thread.

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  45. region codes by Phoenix666 · · Score: 1

    i don't even understand from a business perspective why you'd even want region coding. it's not like everybody's going to take a special trip to botswana to buy games or movies. it's just silly. it's a retarded idea from any angle and therefore must have been thought up by an MBA.

    --
    Do what you can, with what you have, where you are.
    1. Re:region codes by ZX-3 · · Score: 1

      Region coding was invented to enforce the rights of the original trademark owner for licensed games. For example, Marvel comics might sell the rights to produce a Spiderman game in North America to one company, but to another company in Japan. Alternatively, a publisher might be able to afford rights to a property in one region, but not all regions.

      That's why it's not illegal to play out-of-region media (assuming you paid for it).

  46. PAL/NTSC Encoding by MaxPowerDJ · · Score: 1

    I see a lot of people with issues about PAL releases not being able to play on NTSC consoles. This can be done on the software side (in the game). I have a Resident Evil 4 disc that boots up in PAL and lets you change to NTSC. That implementation should be a standard option in PAL games. Heck, make it a global standard. Most of us would not mind a little prompt on bootup, as long as we get a choice and the ability to play wherever we want.

    --
    --MaxPowerDJ
  47. Re:There is one exception by pl1ght · · Score: 1

    At least we can afford to do that?

  48. Have you considered small claims court? by edremy · · Score: 1
    IANAL, but it seems to me this would work well. You have a company that is failing to live up to it's contractual obligations by not fixing something under the warranty. Sue them for the cost of the laptop- without a NIC or a burner it's pretty clearly a boat anchor.

    I welcome any legal-minded /. types to correct me if I'm clueless.

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
    1. Re:Have you considered small claims court? by DaEMoN128 · · Score: 1

      Problem is, most warrenties only cover the original purchaser. Without the purchase reciept, they can claim that I may not be the orig. purchaser, hense the warrenty doesn't apply. I may talk to the BBB, but I don't see that ending up anywhere. It's not a total boat anchor. I can still network with wireless, burn cd's, just not dvd's (was I unclear on this earlier, if so, sorry), bluetooth, and I can use the firewire to hook up to my external burners. I also can use the comp for OBDCII applications for my car. I can watch dvd's also. Not a total loss, just seriously miffed for it. The DVD drive is slimline and not removeable (it was a T250, the very slimline one).

      --
      Stop signs are only Suggestions
    2. Re:Have you considered small claims court? by edremy · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, you're assuming that they'll even show up in court. A lot of companies won't bother, resulting in instant decision for you. The $1500 or so it will cost them for the laptop isn't as much as it would be to waste a couple of lawyer-hours.

      --
      "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
    3. Re:Have you considered small claims court? by DaEMoN128 · · Score: 1

      closer to 2100

      --
      Stop signs are only Suggestions
  49. Some handle both by phorm · · Score: 1

    I was in Australia (which generally uses PAL) a few years back and my friend there had a TV which handled both NTSC and PAL signals. They also had DVD players which would handle both, or at least they happily handled my NTSC DVD's I brought from Canada.

    They would still bork at region-encoding though, so I had to rip and then reburn the DVD's without the region handles. Annoying!

  50. I cant imagine NA importers being big % by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1

    I cant imagine many North American gamers or those of any other country importing virtually every game they buy, so the import percentage of the market cant be much, so I doubt it makes much of a difference in their profits as far as I can see...

    1. Re:I cant imagine NA importers being big % by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cant imagine many North American gamers or those of any other country importing virtually every game they buy, so the import percentage of the market cant be much, so I doubt it makes much of a difference in their profits as far as I can see...

      You're missing the bigger picture. Import sales provide valuable market research. You don't make money off the import sales themselves, you use them to find titles that have been mistakenly left out of certain markets. By opening up the import market to more than just hardcore gamers, you decrease the risk associated with releasing games like Katamari in other markets. This also allows you to expand your user base by providing a greater variety of content without addditional risk. In the end, everyone wins.

  51. Can they stop it? by phorm · · Score: 1

    While region-encoding seems to be a valid-practice, aren't there laws in many places against preventing such shipping. It *is* a free market after all. And even so, there's always sites like ebay, etc for downloading out-of-region DVD's, games, etc.

  52. The thing that frustrates by blueZ3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    is that companies distrbuting games and other content want to have it both ways. On one hand, they say that they have "licensed" you the content, and thus you do not have the right to make copies. Your license allows you to have one instance of the content. On the other hand, they say that they have "sold" you the physical media, and if anything happens to the CD/DVD, it's something you owned that is now distroyed. Your purchase allows you to have one instance of the physical object.

    IMO, it should work one way or the other:

    If they're licensing the content, then if the physical media is destroyed and you can't exercise your license, there should be some way to either get some money back (since you've lost the use of the "perpetual" license you were sold) or to replace the media so you can exercise your right to the license.

    If they are selling a physical object, then you should be able to duplicate its contents freely, in case the object is destroyed.

    The way things are right now, the content distributers have all the rights, and the content purchasers are in a sort of "damned if you do, damned if you don't" bind. Duplicate your content, and you're a piratical anarchist. Don't, and it's quite likely that you'll be out of luck when the physical object is damaged.

    This is currently a problem for me. I bought Civ 4 to play on my Windows game machine. I played it for about three months before the CD got scratched. While the scratches were my fault (I failed to take into account how much dust was accumulating in the PC) now the $30 game that I purchased is unusable. Since I purchased a perpetual license, is it OK for me to download an iso of the game CD and burn it so I can play? Not according to the game publisher.

    I'm not talking about what is currently legal. I'm making a point that the way things stand right now, a lot of people are frustrated with the seeming one-sideness of content distribution as it's implemented right now.

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
  53. Why this is good for England in particular by tvolpe78 · · Score: 1

    The good thing about this for those of us in England (and before you ask, I'm American) is that it means less waiting to play games we want in English. Typically it takes about 6 months for a game to get from Japan to the US, and then another 6 months for it to get to Europe. Final Fantasy X and Metal Gear Solid 3 are good examples of this. The reason it takes another 6 months is because of the need for European releases to be much more Multilingual. Also, as mentioned earlier, most TVs here (Englad) now support NTSC (Japan and US TV format) Horray for us stuck on this bloody gamming poor rock!

  54. You obviously don't have children by Comboman · · Score: 5, Insightful
    We no longer live in the age of VCRs eating tapes though, and on the rediculously rare (relative to tape eating) chance that your device does damage your disc, the player manufacturer should be responsible for procuring you a replacement.

    You obviously don't have children. After buffing the scratches out of the Finding Nemo DVD for the fifth time, I was ready to go back to VHS. Then I discovered DVD Shrink. The original stays in the case and when the kids scratch the copy too badly to be played, I throw it away and make a new copy. Consumers need the rights to protect their property.

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
    1. Re:You obviously don't have children by ivan256 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You obviously don't have children

      I hate when people say that.

      Are you implying that I wouldn't take a principled stance as soon as it was less convienient for me?

    2. Re:You obviously don't have children by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Are you implying that I wouldn't take a principled stance as soon as it was less convienient for me?

      I dunno what that guy was thinking, but I was thinking about the following line from this comment:

      DRM should never prevent you from doing something with your media that would have otherwise been legal under copyright law, but I'm not convinced that there is a good reason for the law to allow backups.

      Well, the guy just gave you a good reason. And you're going off on him half-cocked.

      If the publishers/distributors were legally obliged to provide me a replacement copy of a damaged work at their expense and within a reasonable period of time then I might agree with you. Even then, if a work goes out of print, or a distributor goes out of business, they won't be able to replace it anyway. Thus, now that I think about it, you'd still be wrong.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:You obviously don't have children by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Well, the guy just gave you a good reason. And you're going off on him half-cocked.

      That's a good point, and I didn't see it that way at first. Probably bias from all the other times people have said that to me.

      I don't think it's a good reason though.

      If the publishers/distributors were legally obliged to provide me a replacement copy of a damaged work at their expense and within a reasonable period of time then I might agree with you.

      I would respond to that with a question: Why should distributors of electronic content bear that burden when other mediums don't? At the very least you should pay for the transport and physical media of the replacement. Many software vendors will provide you a replacement for damaged media for a minimal fee already. Unfortunatly the music and movie industries aren't so nice.

      Even then, if a work goes out of print, or a distributor goes out of business, they won't be able to replace it anyway.

      Copyright should require renewals every three years. That way, works by companies that don't exist anymore wouldn't be protected after a few years of neglect. Then you could do whatever you want with the content and the backup issue would be moot.

    4. Re:You obviously don't have children by Surt · · Score: 1

      No, I'm pretty sure he's implying that we still live in the days of easily damaged electronic media. Only an extemely cautious person without children could possibly think that cd's and dvd's aren't utterly fragile, prone to ruinous scratches.

      I've had 3 DVD movie discs go bad without even any children, just from dust getting into the player and spinning against the disc surface.

      Children go through discs even faster, dropping them, stepping on them, pushing them where they don't quite fit.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    5. Re:You obviously don't have children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teach your children to take care of stuff. If they're too stupid to learn that simple lesson sell them on Ebay for $5. You'll save a lot of money in the long run.

      Glass

    6. Re:You obviously don't have children by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Why should distributors of electronic content bear that burden when other mediums don't?

      Because they're finding ways to prevent me from exercising my fair use law rights and other mediums aren't.

      Copyright should require renewals every three years. That way, works by companies that don't exist anymore wouldn't be protected after a few years of neglect. Then you could do whatever you want with the content and the backup issue would be moot.

      I'm not sure that's the answer, although copyright should certainly have a much shorter expiry period. Regardless, we have certain rights guaranteed to us under the label of "fair use" which explicitly allow making backups or doing format-shifting. I would argue that technologies which prevent us from exercising these rights should be illegal (or at least, illegal to implement on publically-distributed content.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:You obviously don't have children by wall0159 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Why should distributors of electronic content bear that burden when other mediums don't?"

      Because they're trying to sell their product as a license - *not* as a product. For example, I can buy a spade, and hire it to whomever I choose. I cannot legally do that with a cd because, although I own the cd, I've only licensed the contents.

      Thus, even if the cd breaks, I *still* own the license to listen to the music, and thus ought to be able to - using either my own backup, or a company provided replacement.

    8. Re:You obviously don't have children by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Because they're finding ways to prevent me from exercising my fair use law rights and other mediums aren't.

      And two wrongs suddenly make a right?

      I would argue that technologies which prevent us from exercising these rights should be illegal

      I agree with that, which is part of why I think backups shouldn't be considered 'fair use'. They don't have to be illegal, but I don't think the publishers should have to go out of their way to allow them, while they should be required to go out of their way to allow everything else that is 'fair use'. If a publisher implements something to prevent you from making a backup, why should you have any recourse other than choosing not to purchase from that publisher? At the same time, the publisher should be legally obligated not to prevent their work from being used to promote public interest since, after all, that's the real purpose of both copyright and fair use.

    9. Re:You obviously don't have children by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Because they're finding ways to prevent me from exercising my fair use law rights and other mediums aren't.

      And two wrongs suddenly make a right?

      Given that both fair use law and common sense suggest that I should be able to make backups, where is there more than one wrong?

      [...]I think backups shouldn't be considered 'fair use'. They don't have to be illegal, but I don't think the publishers should have to go out of their way to allow them, while they should be required to go out of their way to allow everything else that is 'fair use'. If a publisher implements something to prevent you from making a backup, why should you have any recourse other than choosing not to purchase from that publisher?

      Why should backups not be fair use? I guess that's what I'm missing here. Why shouldn't they be? Why should I not be allowed to make a copy of the data?

      Further, as long as they have all these copy controls, and take the stance that they're selling you one copy of the physical media, and one license for the content, then I should definitely have a right to make a backup copy - as I would for any licensed content, software, et cetera.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:You obviously don't have children by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Given that both fair use law and common sense suggest that I should be able to make backups, where is there more than one wrong?

      Well, given the capatalistic nature of our society, shouldn't it be the market that dictates whether these companies make backup friendly media, and not a regulation? Unlike the other things that are considered fair use, backups are a personal benefit, and not a public good...

      Why should backups not be fair use? I guess that's what I'm missing here. Why shouldn't they be?

      Because it leaves for shaky ground when you want to take to position that companies have to go out of their way to allow fair use.

      as long as they have all these copy controls, and take the stance that they're selling you one copy of the physical media, and one license for the content, then I should definitely have a right to make a backup copy

      If you're trying to tweak the current system to be more fair, I can understand where you're coming from, but I don't think we have to take the curent system as carved in stone. Don't think of it as 'as long as they're doing...', think of it as 'instead of the current way of doing things...'.

      Companies say they need copy controls to have justification to create and publish content. Since the goal of copyright is to encourage the creation of content, there should be some room for negotiation there. If they want controls, fine, give them controls, but if they're going to have a DMCA like rule that says we can't break their protection, we should also have rules that say their protection can't protect against people doing things which would otherwise be legal. Additionally, the law should be specific enough that a 'license' for copyrighted content can only be a license to copy. If they want to sell a copy, you should own the copy. Allowing backups circumvents all that though. It's allowing you to make a copy for personal benefit. It's an unplugable hole in their protection. If we're not going to give them the incentive they seek, and we're not going to try to meet them halfway, why not just do away with the system entirely (This may also be a reasonable idea).

      Reform doesn't happen unless at least one side is willing to take a flexable stance. If both sides of a debate that involves all of a society are insistant on standing their ground, things continue to progress in the direction they are moving until a breaking point is reached. I don't know what the breaking point is for this issue, but it's never pretty. Without some fresh perspectives into these issues, and given how things are currently going, you're going to end up on the dissappointed side in the near and mid-term though. Think long and hard. Are backups really a fundamental right that you're not willing to use in negotiations?

      Additionally, if backups really are such a pressing need, why does the market keep rejecting technologies that add durability? Is it really more convenient to make a backup than it is to have your media be slightly thicker and square because it's enclosed?

    11. Re:You obviously don't have children by zenhkim · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd say this: you obviously don't wrestle with corporate management critters.

      Corporations are always looking to get more money while slashing costs every which way. It's the reason that companies change the packaging so you end up buying slightly less product at the same price, replace live customer service reps with "automated phone menu systems", shut down factories and lay off masses of workers when the books still show a healthy profit, and apply for -- and receive -- goverment subsidies for business (read: welfare for the rich).

      I remember working part-time at Radio Shack (when it was still somewhat tech-friendly, not the bad joke it is now) and one of our regular customers was an engineer at a local computer manufacturer. His job was to troubleshoot RFI (radio frequency interference) problems in the hardware so that the FCC wouldn't red flag a piece of equipment, so you'd think his bosses would do their best to allow him to get things done, right?

      Wrong.

      As he described it to me, work was a constant battle with supervisors, project team leaders, department managers, etc. to *let him fix problems*! He'd identify an RFI problem, come up with a solution that involved a cheap (maybe 5-cent) part, submit his proposal ...only to have it rejected time and time again! The higher-ups didn't want solutions that involved increasing production costs, no matter how necessary they were. "It's like pulling teeth," he once said. "They'll cut corners everywhere until they turn a square into a circle."

      The sad fact is, this is business as usual. At Radio Shack, I saw our rock-solid Tandy machines phased out in favor of Packard-Bell brand PCs, and we quickly found out how flaky those damn things were. I swore that they were the worst designed, misengineered pieces of crap I had ever had the displeasure of dealing with ...until (much later) eMachines came along. Those things didn't even deserve to be called computers: they should have been labelled "Crash And Burn Machine -- Use At Your Own Risk". The power supply would burn out in a matter of months, and your expansion options for one of those systems were pathetic. Oh, and did I mention that the CPUs in some of those eMachines *didn't* have a proper cooling unit? Instead, they'd have just a heatsink with one of those plastic "ducts" that led to the power supply -- hope the internal fan doesn't choke on you!

      What really takes the cake is that, some years after that, I was asked by a coworker to troubleshoot her Compaq. It seemed that her system was plagued with problems, and she heard that I was reasonably familiar with "those computer things." When I came over to her house to check it out, I was in for a shock: here was a Compaq machine, sporting a brand name I respected, which looked inside and out like another wretched eMachine! Puny, claustrophobic case, brain-damaged motherboard with a scarcity of expansion slots, a way-underrated power supply (180W, as I recall) and -- you guessed it -- no cooling fan on the processor! It was horrifying, and when I explained to my coworker all the design flaws and cost-cutting measures in her PC she was not very pleased, either.

      I can't stress this enough: corporations do not care about anything -- product quality, popular concern, public safety -- if it interferes with the bottom line! Even ethics and law don't matter, if a company thinks it can get away with lying and stealing ...or is that advertising and acquisition? So what's the point of "letting the market decide" an important social and economic issue if the corporations habitually manipulate and deceive everyone?

      If you still want to play the apologist for corporations, fine. You've got your opinion, and you can have it ...all to yourself. As a wise man once said to me, however, "Opinions are like butts. Everyone's got one."

      --
      "All hands, BRACE FOR IMPACT!"
  55. Steam for consoles by tepples · · Score: 1

    Where did you get that idea [of purchasing a license] from? We're talking about console games, not PC software, remember?

    The following services on video game consoles roughly correspond to Valve's Steam service on the Microsoft Windows platform:

    • Xbox Live Arcade
    • PS3 Live Arcade
    • Revolution Live Arcade
    1. Re:Steam for consoles by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Those aren't really problematic in terms of backups, are they?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  56. Peter Pan by tepples · · Score: 1

    Region locks should never have existed in first place, they are only there so different publishers can publish the same game in different regions and to enable price fixing.

    Not necessarily. Copyright in a game's underlying literary or audiovisual work expire at different times in different jurisdictions. For instance, any game based on the Peter Pan story is a derivative work of Peter and Wendy by J. M. Barrie. In the United States and Canada, Peter and Wendy is a work in the public domain, while in the United Kingdom, Peter and Wendy is subject to a perpetual copyright with compulsory licensing such that Great Ormond Street Hospital receives a royalty for each sale of a copy of Peter and Wendy or any derivative thereof. Region coding could have been in place to keep copies intended for sale in North America, which do not have the royalty, out of the United Kingdom.

    1. Re:Peter Pan by benzapp · · Score: 1

      Your argument would make sense if there were restrictions based upon national jurisdictions.

      However, as the name implies, regional locks are regional, not national.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
  57. Remember low margins of consoles by tepples · · Score: 1

    Switched-mode power supplies are all of a sudden fancy now?

    Power supplies that can automatically handle 100-120 V (Japan and North America) and 220-240 V (Europe) are more expensive than power supplies that handle only a single voltage range. Given the low (allegedly negative) margins on video game console hardware, I'd expect console makers to cut corners and use region-coding on the console's warranty.

  58. "TV system doesn't match" by tepples · · Score: 1

    Guppy06 wrote: "That doesn't mean the PS3 is capable of putting out both PAL and NTSC."

    bri2000 wrote: "The PS2 is"

    O rly? Then why can't my U.S. PlayStation 2 console (model SCPH-70012) play an all-region PAL DVD (Wobbl and Bob: Volume 1) that my region 1 PC DVD-ROM and region 1 Apex AD-1200 DVD player have no problem with? All I get on the PS2 is "TV system doesn't match."

    1. Re:"TV system doesn't match" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      European playstations set for Region2 should be able to output pal and ntsc (due to the range of tv systems used in region 2 countries) however that might not be the case if you're using an external modulator. Even some games when starting up suggest game play is better when displayed with a 60Hz display (usually resulting in a poor quality grey picture on my 20 year old portable) and not showing anything at all on a three year old widescreen set , although the plain old pal option is always available because of likely compatibility problems.

  59. More power to them then. by Second_Derivative · · Score: 1

    Only reason I have a modchip is for importing purposes.

    A Linux+OpenGL environment for messing around with this sucker wouldn't hurt either. God forbid Sony maybe learned their lesson with the PSP and the bitter fight going on there?

  60. PAL60 SDTV by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

    PAL/NTSC will still be significant [because] It will be many years before the majority of the customers have high-definition tv's.

    Standard-definition TV sets in Brazil use PAL color coding on the same "M" (60 Hz) scan frequencies used by NTSC. In fact, one of Nintendo of Europe's Metroid Prime titles requires support for PAL at 60 Hz.

  61. Do 2D games matter to SCEA? by tepples · · Score: 1

    low resolution 2D games [...] emulation of old games

    Does Sony Computer Entertainment want you to unlawfully copy low-resolution 2D games for the PS0 and emulate them on a PS3, or does it want you to buy brand-new high-resolution 3D games?

  62. Movie-game translations and Columbia Pictures by tepples · · Score: 1

    Isnt the music division separate from the laptop division and PS3 division, etc?

    They share revenue and expenses. Developers within SCEA more than likely get a discount on licensing scenarios and characters from a Columbia Pictures movie and music from Columbia Records artists.

  63. Regional codes are not bad!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think all of you are missunderstanding the original purpose of regional coding. I admit that they have been abused, but the original concept for region codes were with good intent.

    The overall concept of region codes was that each country has a different purchasing power (ie. GDP per capita), so different products should cost differently. This means that a game sold in Latvia is considerably cheaper than what would be sold in the US because the purchase power of the consumer is different.

    Removing the region code will now mean that Sony has given up and decided to charge the same price universally. This is fine for countries like the US, but terrible news for the less wealthy countries such as Mexico, Latvia, etc.

  64. Parallel import regulations by tepples · · Score: 1

    aren't there laws in many places against preventing such shipping. It *is* a free market after all.

    No. In fact there are laws that explicitly allow a copyright owner to prohibit importing copies of a work. See 17 USC 602 and foreign counterparts.

  65. need a reason? by tacokill · · Score: 4, Insightful

    but I'm not convinced that there is a good reason for the law to allow backups.

    I am. Why? Because
    a) it's technically possible to do
    b) *I* can do it myself
    c) It's not specifically outlawed

    1. Re:need a reason? by Cal+Paterson · · Score: 1

      Exactly. People are so indoctrinated with the legislative process that they would ban something as soon a they have no obvious use for it. Companies and destroying freedom, and what's more...people like it.

  66. Yes, HDMI is proprietary and created by Sony by tepples · · Score: 1

    Firstly, HDMI is not "a proprietary version of DVI created by Sony". See http://www.hdmi.org/

    I just looked at the web site, and Sony is a founder of the HDMI group. Created (in part) by Sony: Check.

    In addition, HDMI involves HDCP, parts of which are patented and parts of which are trade-secreted. Proprietary: Check.

  67. Kanji CAPTCHA by tepples · · Score: 1

    But without the regional lockout, the world becomes one big market and we all know that we can't have little Johnny in the U.S. getting his hands on some wacky Japanese game, right?

    Easy. Just require the player to solve a Japanese CAPTCHA every time the game starts: display a distorted kanji phrase and the grid of kana, and require the player to select the correct kana to start the game.

    CAPTJAA: Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Japanese and Americans Apart

  68. Parent is TROLL. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on. Aren't you aware of the degradation of optical media when exposed to temperature fluctuations and/or sunlight? What about the fungus that eats its way between the reflective media and the substrate? What about a chip through the painted side, rendering the disk a coaster?

    Troll.

    1. Re:Parent is TROLL. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      troll 1. v.,n. [From the Usenet group alt.folklore.urban] To utter a
                posting on {Usenet} designed to attract predictable responses or
                {flame}s;


      Read the rest of the thread and my responces, and then come back here and tell me with a straight face that I posted my comment as a troll.

  69. Not all games are full of text by tepples · · Score: 1

    Why would 90 percent of gamers import a Japanese Final Fantasy game that they cant read or understand the language.

    In general, the North American versions of Dance Dance Revolution and the Japanese versions of Dance Dance Revolution have different songs, and playing didder does not require much reading of text. Do you expect games with not much text to use a kanji CAPTCHA to enforce cultural lockout?

    1. Re:Not all games are full of text by adachan · · Score: 1

      I have actually expereimented with this. Take a jap version, and a US version. Put both infront of general US gamers. Most people will not use the game even if it has very little Kanji. The feel that they are missing something by not being able to read it. Again, as I said, hardcore gamers wont care. But most want the game that is in their native language as well as screen format. Hence my originial argument for not needing region coding on the games.

    2. Re:Not all games are full of text by tepples · · Score: 1

      Take a jap version, and a US version. Put both infront of general US gamers. Most people will not use the game even if it has very little Kanji.

      Then you have games with no on-screen text at all, such as Hot Wheels Stunt Track Driver 2 for PC.

    3. Re:Not all games are full of text by adachan · · Score: 1

      You have missed my point completely.

  70. It's about territorial copyright differences by tepples · · Score: 1

    i don't even understand from a business perspective why you'd even want region coding.

    If your work is based on an underlying work that's public domain in one region but still copyrighted in another...

  71. Subtitles, of course by tepples · · Score: 1

    They'll still have to make localised versions. No way the French or Germans are gonna play games in English. Still, this is good news for third rate voice actors, who'll still have jobs to do.

    If you don't expect a lot of pre-third-graders playing your game, then you can do it like Incubus or The Passion of the Christ. The movies were acted in a little-known language (Esperanto for Incubus and Syriac and Latin for Passion) and then subtitled into each national language. PC games Lego Loco and The Sims use the same technique.

  72. Re:Slashdot censorship! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, too bad the comment I was referring to wasn't a reply to anything but the article.

  73. "Previously thought unthinkable" by wootest · · Score: 1

    and yet previously thought unthinkable for a major corporation

    I'm guessing IGN hasn't heard of every Game Boy model, ever.

  74. I would also add by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even if I grant that I should not be allowed to make backups (which I do not grant, and I think that all of the parent's reasons for allowing backups are good ones), I will have to insist that this law should not be used to rob me of other freedoms.

    Passing a law that makes backuping illegal should not automatically make it ok for third parties to be able to conduct unwarranted searches of my property. My right to privacy should remain intact. If that produces enforcement-difficulties for some other law, then that means the other law is un-enforceable. It does not mean that I lose even more freedoms.

    Many forms of DRM perform such unwarranted searches of my property (specifically, of my computer). This includes the potential to illegally scan my own private "intellectual property" (sic) which I have created myself on the same computer. I should not have to submit to such unwarranted searches just because I might try to do something illegal.

    Also, making a no-backups law should not be used to justify passing other laws which require hardware to disobey its user. Hardware that does not do what the user wants and can reasonably expect it to do (like copy stuff) is "broken." Making it illegal to buy non-broken hardware is absurd, no matter the justification.

  75. No, saying you don't know a use case by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Are you implying that I wouldn't take a principled stance as soon as it was less convienient for me?

    I hate when people say that.

    It's not abiout convienience - it's about a valid use case. There is no "convienince" in buying or not buying another copy of a movie, it's a question of being able to make a backup so that repeated uses do not lead to more expenses to use the same product.

    Basically he's just saying you've not though the problem through, which you obviously haven't - and I don't even have kids.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:No, saying you don't know a use case by ivan256 · · Score: 1
  76. You got the rumor backwards by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    The last rumor I saw said that in fact Sony was considering allowing any HDTV player to play 1080i movies at full resolutiuon over analog (component) feeds - HDDVD downsamples to 720p (I think, could be lower) unless you are using HDMI.

    Sony has a vested interest in making things work for older TV's since they sold a lot of them. It's probably the electronics division finally getting a little backbone and beating the media division over the head with the idocy that has gone down there like the rootkit fiasco. That group has got to have lost a lot of face and therefore, power.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  77. This is the rootkit aftereffect by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    What you are seeing now is I think a direct repercussion of the whole Sony rootkit fiasco.

    Before it semed like the media division held all the cards in terms of power. They got the limitations they wanted at the cost of the electronics division feature sets and marketability.

    So after the rootkit was uncovered, the whole media division lost a lot of money, face, and therefore power. I think some of the things we are seeing come out of Sony now are a result of the electronics people having more pull than before and able to resist demands from Sony Media.

    Consider the other recent story about BluRay where Sony was going to allow movies to play at full resolution over component (non-HDMI) video. I think that's all part of the same deal, where the elctronics people are trying to drive Sony to actually be more customer friendly instead of some hulking DRM behemoth.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  78. PS3 games CAN be region-encoded by dupont54 · · Score: 1

    Parent hit the head in the nail.

    This move from Sony is just as BS as what they announced on BR : the hardware allows region control, but do not force it. So it's up to the publisher to decide if he want the protection or not.

    Just look at the already "region-free" xbox360 games. There are not that many...

    This is a PR move to appear nice, but without substance. Just expect some more trademarks lawsuits from Sony UK on importers. It was really ugly with the PSP...

  79. You haven't suffered... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Are you implying that I wouldn't take a principled stance as soon as it was less convienient for me?

    Yes.

    Suffering from the loss of favorite DVDs you can't very well replace any more will do that to a person.

  80. And NZ too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And New Zealand is region-free too. :)

  81. Given all of the different frame rates... by GWBasic · · Score: 1

    Given all of the different frame rates across the globe, I don't see how this will work. How can a game optimized for a 60fps display easily be run on a 50fps display, and vice-versa, without some serious display issues?

    1. Re:Given all of the different frame rates... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most European region console games already allow you choose between 50/60 HZ on startup. Some of them detect your console's region setting and automatically select 60 HZ if your console is sold in North America, for example. I know this for a fact because I have played European imports on my North American Dreamcast (e.g. Shenmue II, which was released only in Europe for DC).

      Based on that, I would have to guess that most games are already optimized for 60 HZ, and running in 50 HZ mode either introduces slowdown or dropped frames. (Feel free to correct me on that statement).

      Don't forget that 50/60 HZ is your display's refresh rate, which is not necessarily the same as the game's frame rate.

  82. Re:Good start. Are Sony getting better? by dan_barrett · · Score: 1

    Sony recently updated SonicStage, so you can now move atrac3-encoded tracks to and from a minidisc player with NO restrictions (provided you ripped it with no drm restrictions in the first place.) Sonicstage itself also lets you rip straght to atrac3 without any DRM restrictions - it actually asks you if you want to include DRM copy protection or not before ripping the CD. (well, duh.)

    This means I can now rip music on one PC, download it to my minidisc player and upload it to another PC and play it there, or copy it to cd, etc. I believe that's more open than the ipod these days.

    And before you start on how crap minidisc is, find me an affordable player with an AM/FM radio as well and i'll start listening. (Hi-MD - 1GB per disc - minidisc with am/fm cost me $AU140. )

    Ignoring the fact Sony still force the use of use atrac3 rather than a more open/commonly used music format, this is a 180 degree shift in their DRM policy for minidisc. A while back there were heavy restrictions even for stuff you'rd recorded on the minidisc yourself. Again, perhaps this is in response to the rootkit debacle?

  83. Sony And The Internet by highwaytohell · · Score: 1

    I suspect that the major reason for this is that Sony, after the bad PR recently is trying to be consumer friendly, but in a calculated way.

    They have realised that games purchase over the internet is also profitable. So why not make the PS3 region free and tap into the online purchase market. People will buy games that arent released in other countries just cause they have heard great things baout them. Games are notoriously released in Japan without seeing the light of day in other countries, even if there is a demand for them. They effectively create a world wide purchasing market without restricting it to zoning.

    This is also great for the consumer, because you will be able to take your PS3 to a different country, buy a plug converter and use it without having to worry about those pesky restrictions. Considering they will be losing money on the sale of a PS3, i think this is a wise a decision as it will minimise them having to produce a whole lot more just because people move countries.

    They wouldnt do something like this if they couldn't see the profit in it.

    Sales of less consoles + sales of more games = profit

  84. Mod parent up by patio11 · · Score: 1

    I was pleasantly suprised the first time I came home from Japan and my JP GBA worked fine with everything. Then my US GBA SP worked fine with my Japanese games, and I my new JP DS plays everything I put in it (US GB, US GBA, JP GBA, JP DS, etc...)

  85. OT by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    "Why are people so afraid to dicipline their children these days?"

    I don't think they are, I also suspect you don't have kids. Unless you wrap your kids up with gaffa tape for 20yrs, disipline alone will not stop "accidents". :)

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  86. non movie region free ps3 good thing by c3r3br4l · · Score: 1

    i dunno if anybody's looked into it lately but a region free ps3 would be a bad thing as far as movies go. Warner brothers and a few other production companies have recently made changes to their disks making it so that anyone using a dvd player which is 'region free' won't be able to watch them.

  87. mod the parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suspect you are bang on the money here, after the amount of lost face I guess there's been something resembling an internal bloodbath at sony and so far it seems that the customer is getting better value for it.

  88. Re:Slashdot censorship! by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

    which means that if you go to some other thread, not the article (as your link did), you won't find the unrelated comment, dipshit.

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  89. Re:There is one exception by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Awww, did the fucktarded USian moderator's feewings get huwt. One word to describe the fucktarded USian moderator. Baaahh.

    Tell us what, kindly go jump off a bridge somewhere. In fact that's what all of the USians should do.

    GO AHEAD, FUCKING FLAME AWAY 0R WASTE YOUR GOD DAMNED MOD POINTS FUCKTARDED SHITDOT SHEEPLE.

  90. Some games *will* be region locked by Pearson · · Score: 1

    It's amazing how so few have caught on to the actual truth. Obviously, PR spin actually works. It would be funny to see their faces when that import game they spent so much on is region locked. "But...but, they said...
    ^_^

    --
    I...I'm attacking the darkness!
  91. OFF TOPIC by Alsee · · Score: 1

    Sorry for the shift off topic, but I wanted to reply to you in relation to a thread that is now locked to new posts.

    Claiming TPM does not prevent you from running Linux, ever, shows a basic misunderstanding of the technology.

    No, I am a programmer and I have read and intimately understood the 300+ pages of technical documentation of how the Trusted Platform Module operates. What I said was indeed correct. The TPM does not prevent you from running Linux.

    If a motherboard maker chooses to do so, TPM can be used to lock out other OS'es that do not have the proper key.

    No it can't.

    What the motherboard certainly CAN do is have a BIOS that refuses to load an OS that does not have the proper key. However the fact is that the TPM in no way enables that, the TPM in no way even assists in that.

    Do some research; this was the basic fear of TPM when it was first unveiled.

    Oh, I agree. However this particular fear is entirely a myth. The TPM is incredibly evil, but not evil in the way many people think.

    The TPM basically does two things.
    (1) It acts as a spy recording what hardware you have and exactly what software you run, and can be used to securely send that spy report to other people across the internet. The spy report is secure against the owner. You cannot control or modify the contents of this spy report. The most you can do is refuse to send the spy report, in which case the internet connection will most likely be terminated.
    (2) The chip has your master crypto storage key locked inside with the owner forbidden to know or control his own key, and software can actively call the chip to use this key lock it's own files securely against the owner of the computer. Only the exact unmodified program that created the file can read or modify the file (or to pass that file key to another program of which the unmodified software elects to approve).

    Ability (1) above means that websites can refuse to send you any data unless you are running an approved DRM enforcing operating system and approved DRM enforcing software. And of course the approved DRM enforcing software will contain specific instructions to invoke ability (2), to lock any new files securely against you. Those files can only be opened by the exact unmodified approved operating system and only by the exact unmodifed approved application software.

    In fact ability (1) means that your ISP can refuse to grant you any internet access at all unless you are running an approved operating system along with various mandatory software such as an approved firewal and other control software. This is called Trusted Network Connect.

    So no, the chip does not and cannot prevent your computer from loading Linux. The BIOS could refuse to load Linux, but that has nothing to do with the TPM chip, and the TMP chip in no way enables or assists in it.

    The issue is that websites can lock you out for running Linux (or if you don't have a TPM), and because new software can be designed to be impossible to install and activate without a Trusted online activation process with the TPM and with an approved OS, and because new filetypes will be impossible to read and use without online activation without a TPM and approved OS, and because new webpages will be impossible to view without online activation and a TPM and appoved OS, and because new hardware will refuse to connect to your computer without a TPM and an approved OS, and ultimately because in a few years ISPs may refuse you any internet access at all unless you have a TPM and approved OS.

    So the danger and potential future is just as bad as you fear, the exact detail of the TPM "causing motherboards to be unable to run Linux" is false. What it does is send spy reports to other people (so that they can choose to refuse to communicate with you), and it allows software to optionally contain new instructions to lock your data against you. And the first part is

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.