Slashdot Mirror


The Story of Tron

An anonymouse reader writes "Tom's Hardware has a feature up on the makings of Tron which may interest latent fans. Through interviews with the creators they explore the makings of Tron, from how it came to be picked up by Disney to how the effects were put together ('While the majority of the film takes place in the computer world, only 15 minutes worth of footage actually used CGI', because it would have taken years to make the film otherwise). They then explore why the film flopped at the box office. 'It was like we put LSD in the punch at the school prom and it was just way more than they can handle,' said Steven Lisberger."

367 comments

  1. Can anyone... by fredistheking · · Score: 5, Funny

    honestly think about tron without the image of the tron guy coming to mind?

    1. Re:Can anyone... by Runefox · · Score: 1

      Not any more, I can't. Not any more.

      I'm going to go take a shower now. Make that three.

      --
      Screw the rules, I have green hair!
    2. Re:Can anyone... by solarbob · · Score: 1

      http://www.tronguy.net/TRONguard/ has just managed to put me off my breakfast which is nice

      --
      SolarVPS - Quality Windows and Linux Virtual Servers
    3. Re:Can anyone... by Sepodati · · Score: 1

      Yes. I could until you brought it up again. Damn you.

    4. Re:Can anyone... by include($dysmas) · · Score: 1

      erm ... skip to page 8 then, he is in there ...

      feel the need to shower now.

    5. Re:Can anyone... by Clifton+Beach · · Score: 1

      He'll still be recognised - even with the nose-glasses-and-moustache disguise.

      --
      42 hidden comments
    6. Re:Can anyone... by Agram · · Score: 2, Funny

      LOL! The only thing that I could think of when I visited the "pictures" page with the link "headshot" was... BOOM HEADSHOT

    7. Re:Can anyone... by beantherio · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thank you for erasing my childhood sir!

    8. Re:Can anyone... by ettlz · · Score: 3, Funny
      http://www.tronguy.net/TRONguard/ has just managed to put me off my breakfast which is nice

      Time to "crack out" Goatse again, eh? ;)

    9. Re:Can anyone... by BRSloth · · Score: 4, Funny

      honestly think about tron without the image of the tron guy coming to mind?

      I could, just before clicking the link. Thanks for nothing.

    10. Re:Can anyone... by Firewheels · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wasn't aware of him before you mentioned it.

      Now I have to go brillo my brain.

      Thanks. Thanks a lot.

    11. Re:Can anyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure he'll pop up here soon; he has a slashdot account and is a well-known GPL hater.

    12. Re:Can anyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He looks like Peter Griffin to me.

    13. Re:Can anyone... by Jay+Maynard · · Score: 1

      Why, no, I can't.

      Greetings, programs!

      While I'm here, I'll note that the folks from Tom's Hardware tell me this article was the first of a series. I'm looking forward to reading the rest of it.

      --
      Disinfect the GNU General Public Virus!
    14. Re:Can anyone... by CMiYC · · Score: 1

      No because if you RTFA, he's mentioned several times.

    15. Re:Can anyone... by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      Yes, since I've never heard of him until now.

    16. Re:Can anyone... by chord.wav · · Score: 1

      OMFG WHAT DID YOU JUST DO TO MEEEE??!?!?!

      I wish I'd never seen that website!!

      Advisory to sentitive people: Sometimes is better to stick to your happy childhood memories.

    17. Re:Can anyone... by loki1978 · · Score: 0

      yes, me

      --
      According to prophecy
    18. Re:Can anyone... by ByteGuerrilla · · Score: 0

      You just ruined Tron for me... thanks. :P

      --

      A block of code, sufficiently well-written, is indistinguishable from magick.

    19. Re:Can anyone... by klenwell · · Score: 1

      It was from Tron Guy that I learned the most important lesson of life on the Game Grid:

      When going up against a Master Control Program, always wear your finest fabric-painted unitard.

      --
      Innovation makes enemies of all those who prospered under the old regime... -- Machiavelli
    20. Re:Can anyone... by ThinkWeak · · Score: 1

      For being such a strong follower of the movie, why is his suit yellow? I mean, I can get past the fact he's wearing a leotard, but where was the yellow suit in the movie? Was it a deleted scene or something?

    21. Re:Can anyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work at the same company as Tron Guy's mom.... No joke...

    22. Re:Can anyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Phew...thanks to your post being modded up I didn't click the link. My finger was already applying pressure to the button as I read "goatse". YIKES!

    23. Re:Can anyone... by Jay+Maynard · · Score: 1

      It's actually a light yellowish green. In retrospect, I should have picked a slightly greener color, but it's far too late now.

      --
      Disinfect the GNU General Public Virus!
    24. Re:Can anyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it does, that is the cyberharrassers from my old school in 15 years...

    25. Re:Can anyone... by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Absolutely, because I have seen Tron dozens of times over the last two decades, and have never heard of the "Tron Guy."

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    26. Re:Can anyone... by kimvette · · Score: 1

      So does my uncle's brother-in-law's cousin's sister's best friend's husband. Know what that makes us?

      Absolutely nothing. ;)

      </Obvious Spaceballs ripoff>

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  2. Well, by include($dysmas) · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the box office flop is all the proof that I need that people really are idiots, I mean, did they even see the lightcycles?!

    ptsch.

    1. Re:Well, by Goffee71 · · Score: 1

      This is the one film I always watch on TV at Christmas or whenever along with Raiders, true back to your childhood stuff!

      --
      If he's the Walrus then can I be a penguin please?
    2. Re:Well, by rspress · · Score: 1

      Tron was so cutting edge that a lot of people did not like it. I have always liked the film and I really wish Disney would reshoot the film using the CGI of today. Maybe a Tron version II.

    3. Re:Well, by include($dysmas) · · Score: 1

      I agree with that, but I wasnt ahead of my time yet still loved it?! ... I've always wondered what would have happened if it was re-release say 5 years later ... after word of it had got around a bit ...

      im not sure id like to see a sequel, obviously in principle id love to see more of the Tron world ... but id worry about it destroying the charm of the original.

    4. Re:Well, by operagost · · Score: 1

      Tron 2: Electronic Boogaloo

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    5. Re:Well, by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      Tron was so cutting edge that a lot of people did not like it. I have always liked the film and I really wish Disney would reshoot the film using the CGI of today. Maybe a Tron version II.

      If you're into gaming you might want to check out Tron 2.0. It can be found at pretty much any used game store for 10 or 15 bucks nowdays. It's an FPS and not really ... not normal, you get upgraded to a point release with experience, and with each release you get to upgrade yourself, upgrade weapons, all kinds of stuff, while traveling throughout the network fighting viruses and malware in PCs, PDAs, mainframes, etc etc.. That's part of the reason I enjoyed it so much was the creativity, which more than makes up for the awkwardness of the control, either way, for 15 bucks it's a good deal IMO.

    6. Re:Well, by rspress · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the tip. I am not much of a gamer anymore. I may get one and play it for a while and then I am good for game playing for a while. The last two games I really played are Battlefield:1942 and Alice....so you can see it is a while between FPS games.

    7. Re:Well, by rspress · · Score: 1

      Yes, I had to see them go back and redo the original like they did to E.T. and the like. I mean picking up several years later or now for that fact. It could play into the fact that computers are a lot more powerful and even make use of the internet.

      If you look at films like Sky Captain which was nearly all CGI I think the world of tron would make better fodder.

      I liked it when it was released as well. Even the arcade game was pretty cool but I was never too good at that. Burgertime was my game.

    8. Re:Well, by rspress · · Score: 1

      Speaking of the gaming museum I use Mame to play all those games that ate my quarters back in the 80's. Dig Dug anyone?

  3. Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Special effects != Return Investment

    May the wind be always at your back,
    -Empyrealmortal

  4. Where is our Pixar/Disney Sequal? by cbuskirk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The rumours few around a few years back but with this years aquissition of Pixar by Disney it could be a huge blockbuster.

    1. Re:Where is our Pixar/Disney Sequal? by solarbob · · Score: 5, Funny

      Prehaps the plot should be about the redux of the MCP trying to taking over the internet and enforce its own standards which everyone else has to confirm to ... Oh sorry that was Verisign wasn't it. OK What about a multi-national company that tries to get into every corner of your home to control the environment that has an evil overlord at the top... no sorry thats microsoft Right ok definitly good idea this time My Little Pony attack the Care Bares .... (goes off into a strange, caffine induced rant)

      --
      SolarVPS - Quality Windows and Linux Virtual Servers
    2. Re:Where is our Pixar/Disney Sequal? by otherniceman · · Score: 1

      I has already been made, it was called The Matrix AKA Tron with trenchcoats and gun.

    3. Re:Where is our Pixar/Disney Sequal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Monolith Productions already created it. Tron 2.0 was originally planned to be a film, however they moved the concept into a video game instead. Actually, it makes sense since Tron was about video games in the first place.

      The game isn't fantastic, but it's fun and the storyline is moderately interesting. I especially like the internet hub level.

    4. Re:Where is our Pixar/Disney Sequal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a sequel, a reimagining. That way they can keep the same name. And call the TV series "Tron: SP1".

    5. Re:Where is our Pixar/Disney Sequal? by Cat_Byte · · Score: 5, Funny

      How about a prequel where they have it all taking place inside a calculator and everything is slow motion and LCD black on grey?

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    6. Re:Where is our Pixar/Disney Sequal? by fbjon · · Score: 1

      I loved the old mainframe computer, with the slow processors and limited memory.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    7. Re:Where is our Pixar/Disney Sequal? by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 2, Funny

      As long as there's a scene where somebody slashes a giant talking paperclip with a lightsaber, I'm there!

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
    8. Re:Where is our Pixar/Disney Sequal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or how about a killer penguin trying to take over the world by forcing people regress 20 years and use a command line.

    9. Re:Where is our Pixar/Disney Sequal? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      I was kinda hoping for an entirely text-based, CLI version.

      The soundtrack would be performed entirely on 300 baud modem.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    10. Re:Where is our Pixar/Disney Sequal? by Nephster · · Score: 1

      It was a game:
      http://buenavistagames.go.com/product/tronPC.html

      As games go, it was actually pretty good. Some of the original cast did voice work for it, and the graphics are really well done. But they didn't market it at all - hardly anyone knows it existed.

      Nephs

    11. Re:Where is our Pixar/Disney Sequal? by stalky14 · · Score: 1

      I remember reading in Variety or something a few years back that they were
      working on a sequel: Tron 2.0, and I'm not talking about the video game. It
      was supposed to coincide with the 20th anniversary. But all we got was a
      "special edition" DVD and the video game. What happened to this? Was it cancelled
      in favor of just doing the video game?

    12. Re:Where is our Pixar/Disney Sequal? by ezeecheez · · Score: 1

      Rated PG-13 because of 58008

    13. Re:Where is our Pixar/Disney Sequal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shame they had to nick it from someone who nicked it from the developers, eh? You might have been onto something, if it hadn't involved theft of IP.

      Do your research before trolling, spanky.

      (If they can call someone copying their stuff theft, then I can call their taking an idea theft.)

  5. Easy answer by gowen · · Score: 3, Insightful
    They then explore why the film flopped at the box office.
    Same reason many special-effect movies flop at the box office.

    They started with a lousy script, and an implausibly silly plot that its very hard to look past. The market for movies that look pretty but don't engage on a human level is very, very small.
    "The Master Control Program has chosen you to serve your system on the Game Grid. Those of you who continue to profess a belief in the Users will receive the standard substandard training, which will result in your eventual elimination."
    See? That's dialogue bad enough to have come from one of the Matrix sequels.
    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    1. Re:Easy answer by include($dysmas) · · Score: 5, Funny

      ""The Master Control Program has chosen you to serve your system on the Game Grid. Those of you who continue to profess a belief in the Users will receive the standard substandard training, which will result in your eventual elimination.""

      hey! but thats what i tell all my new sysadmins!?!

    2. Re:Easy answer by solarbob · · Score: 1

      Thats exactly what my last boss said to me....hmm makes you wonder

      --
      SolarVPS - Quality Windows and Linux Virtual Servers
    3. Re:Easy answer by solarbob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Pretty film that flopped. Final Fantasy:- The Spirits Within. Looked nice but just was so very very boring. You can get something that looks nice (Toy Story) and still have a decent plot (Toy Story) and does well (Toy Story)

      --
      SolarVPS - Quality Windows and Linux Virtual Servers
    4. Re:Easy answer by zakezuke · · Score: 4, Insightful
      "The Master Control Program has chosen you to serve your system on the Game Grid. Those of you who continue to profess a belief in the Users will receive the standard substandard training, which will result in your eventual elimination."

      See? That's dialogue bad enough to have come from one of the Matrix sequels


      It's a laugh isn't it? Take this for example

      The ships hung in the sky in much the same way that bricks don't. --Douglas Adams


      In order to take Tron seriously, you have to not take it so seriously. This was what 1981 or 1982 or so... video arcades were newish and computers were fancy mystical machines no one understood, esp this whole concept of easily editable word processed documents I.E. how someone with no real skills can delete someone else's name and take credit for their work, or worse yet create a program which will do this automaticly. Take into the account the 1980s mindset of computers which for the most part would be arcade style video games, using them and some spiffy new computer animation and you have the perfect vehicel for satire. And yes, the dialog is the likes of which that you would find in a Matrix sequal... and *that* is what makes it so funny.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    5. Re:Easy answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      They started with a lousy script, and an implausibly silly plot that its very hard to look past. The market for movies that look pretty but don't engage on a human level is very, very small.
      "The Master Control Program has chosen you to serve your system on the Game Grid. Those of you who continue to profess a belief in the Users will receive the standard substandard training, which will result in your eventual elimination."
      See? That's dialogue bad enough to have come from one of the Matrix sequels.

      Speak for yourself. It was the only movie that I have ever seen that has engaged me on a human level. But engaged on a human level I mean human-machine-human which is a lot closer that I usually get.

      And for once I really understood the dialogue. I can't say that it connected very well, sort of like an RS-45 to a DE-9. But like any other dialogue, a little solder and a little rewiring made it work. And after that movie I finally understood the philosophical significance of an open collector logic gate! The bit really spoke to me! Yes, no, and when you didn't ask him anything, nothing!
    6. Re:Easy answer by 91degrees · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I liked the plot. It was just badly handled with a poor script. The basic idea of going into the computer and teaming up with a superhero program is kinda goofy but a pretty cool idea for kids. Plus I think the idea of anthropomorphic computer programs working in the computer was pretty cute. The same basic concept was used fairly well on Reboot.

    7. Re:Easy answer by solarbob · · Score: 2, Funny

      It works the same for us people in tech support. Users always seem to go one step further and break things

      --
      SolarVPS - Quality Windows and Linux Virtual Servers
    8. Re:Easy answer by ettlz · · Score: 1
      See? That's dialogue bad enough to have come from one of the Matrix sequels.

      Yeah, I mean... um... er, OK, I've got a Zardoz quote in my sig. I'll shut up now.

    9. Re:Easy answer by jamshid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Tron had a really interesting message about openness that is very appropriate today. I remember seeing it again last year and thinking alot of the things it said about the freedom of programs to interact directly with their users could be applied to the Internet and the importance of everyone on the Internet being able to be a server and everyone on the Internet being able to talk directly to each other, not go through an MCP.

    10. Re:Easy answer by Dachannien · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Sure, you can take any line out of context and make it seem soulless. The point of that particular line was that it was dripping with cynicism. The MCP wasn't giving those programs a place of honor to "serve their systems" at all. Programs were sent to the Game Grid to die. In fact, Sark probably would rather have been doing something else. The only enjoyment he got from his little speech was the opportunity to kick the prisoners in their religious nadgers, which made a nice counterpoint to his later conversation with the MCP:

      Sark: I don't know, I mean, users wrote us. A user even wrote you!
      MCP: No one user wrote me. I'm worth millions of their man-years.

      It actually has interesting parallels with Cold War indoctrination and Stalinist gulags, with a hint of medieval religious indoctrination as well.

      Another interesting concept brought up by the line you quoted was the staggering difference in time scale between the real world and the computer world. The religious pogrom in the computer world had the flavor of something that had been going on for decades. But actually, users were able to work with their programs right up until the point where the MCP shut down Group 7 access ("just to be safe"). The efforts of the MCP and Sark to eliminate belief in the users must have started after that point, and it was a matter of mere hours from then to the time at which Flynn found himself trapped on the Game Grid.

    11. Re:Easy answer by ettlz · · Score: 1
      But actually, users were able to work with their programs right up until the point where the MCP shut down Group 7 access ("just to be safe").

      Um, so they couldn't print, right?!

    12. Re:Easy answer by gowen · · Score: 1

      There was nothing intrinsically wrong with the plot : Man gets zapped into machine and has to battle his way back out.

      It only got silly when they added "... using a dayglo frisbee"

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    13. Re:Easy answer by Kjella · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The ships hung in the sky in much the same way that bricks don't. --Douglas Adams

      I just wish the movie was better. I recently grabbed it on DVD, thinking it couldn't be so bad... the plot changes weren't so bad, but I really hated the parts where they kept the plot, and left out the punchline. I honestly don't know what happened. Either

      a) Adams didn't want to repeat himself and threw the baby out with the bathwater
      b) They never let him put the good parts in
      c) They ripped out the good parts after his death
      d) They weren't actually good at the movie medium

      For example, right at the very start you have the "display department" joke and the part where Ford convinces the demolition manager to lay in the mud instead of Dent. Instead they cut out two funny scenes, and replaces it with a scene that makes absolutely no sense and isn't even funny. Why do they need to go the pub if Ford already has brought beer? Instead he gives it away and they go buy beer? WTF? The bartender conversation is also a punchline short, sigh.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    14. Re:Easy answer by zakezuke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There was nothing intrinsically wrong with the plot : Man gets zapped into machine and has to battle his way back out.

      The plot was a little deeper than that. A man (Flynn?), an ecentric genius, was obsessed over video games... designs a few blockbusters but a not to bright but sneaky person takes the credit for his work and as a result gets promoted to a position of control (VP?) and uses his position and access to lock out Flynn preventing him from vindicating his name and creates a master control program who's purpose is to steal other people's work and prevent others from accessing it. This tale is told by two other employies who are attempting to figure out what is going on with the system. They express shocked disbelief but one statement has enough of the way of truth to it for them to investiate. The MVP retaliates in the only way it knows how and zaps Flynn into it's world... which as you said "man gets zapped into machine and has to battle his way back out".

      While your statement was ment with sarcasm, there is nothing wrong with the plot, nor the sub plot of romance between not only the real life characters but between their programs. It's your run of the mill heroic tale that has been told many times before. Those who want to be critical on the store should be on that point as heroic epics have been a staple of western culture even before to Roman empire was born. It was clearly made with a cookie cutter script generator that would work just as easily with an evil prince and dragons or gunmen and the wild wild west. It's redeming qualitys are the satire on bureaucracy and insight on religion, which are two things you would not expect in a film who's main purpose seems to be a vehicle for hi-tech CGI graphics.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    15. Re:Easy answer by gowen · · Score: 0, Redundant
      nor the sub plot of romance between not only the real life characters but between their programs
      We'll have to agree to differ on that. Even at age 10, I thought the love affair between avatars was completely laughable, and I haven't revised my opinion in the intervening 20+ years.

      And however good the background plot, it becomes irretrievably stupid if the method of resolution is DayGlo Frisbees.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    16. Re:Easy answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or more likely the orignal Matrix film. Out of the three, the second one was the best since it had all of the cool action and fight scenes and less of the pointless banter that plagued the original. The first contained far too much talk (which was pure drivel) and the third was a thinly veiled reiteration of the first (ie. Mr. Sweet November once again realizes that he has extraordinary powers, runs from agents, gets taken along on an Excellent Adventure aboard another one of those floating garbage scows, dies and kills Smith).

      The Matrix trilogy was meant to be a series of brainless action flicks, not some deep, eye-opening, soulful insight. You take Total Recall, mix it with a bit of Terminator, only use a scrawny and uncharismatic lead character.

    17. Re:Easy answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They started with a lousy script, and an implausibly silly plot that its very hard to look past. The market for movies that look pretty but don't engage on a human level is very, very small.
      Do you live on the same planet that the rest of us do? Last I checked, that's practically a formula for a successful movie.
    18. Re:Easy answer by tabby · · Score: 1

      And also insightful gems like: "User requests are what computers are for"

      --
      I've experiments to run, there is research to be done on the people who are still alive.
    19. Re:Easy answer by gowen · · Score: 1
      Out of the three, the second one was the best since it had all of the cool action and fight scenes and less of the pointless banter that plagued the original.
      Applause. Good troll, sir. You almost had me for a moment.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    20. Re:Easy answer by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      And however good the background plot, it becomes irretrievably stupid if the method of resolution is DayGlo Frisbees.

      No more or less stupid than gladiator combat, boxing, or martial arts except in this case it's satire. It's a look at how a computer generated culture views the macro-universe. Yes... it's stupid... that's the point... life is a series of conflict and resolutions no better than tossing around DayGlo Frisbees.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    21. Re:Easy answer by gowen · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Last I checked, that's practically a formula for a successful movie.
      The producers of Stealth, I Robot, The Island, Fantastic Four, and Pearl Harbor would like to disagree. Hell, even Kong did disappointing box office compared to how much it cost to make. Almost ever succesful recent blockbusters has had strong characters (or at least franchise characters with whom have a pre-existing relationship: Chronicles of Narnia, Batman Begins, Harry Potter, R-o-t-Sith etc. And, I've spent some of the morning reading the UK press savaging "V for Vendetta", so we may be able to add another to that disastrous list soon.

      The Matrix is the exception, but the plot in the Matrix was irrelevant compared to the effect of those incredibly novel visuals. The sequels blew because the novelty wore off enough that we could see the plot creak.

      Meanwhile, the producers of Sideways, Napoleon Dynamite, Crash, Walk The Line, Constant Gardener and Brokeback Mountain are smiling to themselves and rolling in the cash generated by their low budget successes moderate gross.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    22. Re:Easy answer by gowen · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but if you don't think physical combat between two human beings is more viscerally exciting (and more easy to empathise with) than a couple of pastel lit loonies in wet suits lobbing frisbees at one another, you're a loony.

      There's a reason why Scorcese's "Raging Bull" doesn't center on the world frisbee champion, you know.

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    23. Re:Easy answer by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What sysadmin wants to believe in the users?

    24. Re:Easy answer by srussell · · Score: 1
      See? That's dialogue bad enough to have come from one of the Matrix sequels.
      Oh dear... the MCP isn't going to be very happy with you. Oh, well. After you're gone, there will be more cycles for the rest of us.

      --- SER

    25. Re:Easy answer by AaronLawrence · · Score: 1

      Just saw the first episode of the BBC series. *Much funnier*. The effects are of course *shockingly* bad, but the humor is really the point.

      The only thing the movie really did well was the effects, and movies with good effects these days are just not special anymore. Granted, the actors seemed like decent choices, but none of them got the delivery right ... as in funny.

      --
      For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert. - Arthur C. Clarke
    26. Re:Easy answer by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1

      Pretty film that flopped. Final Fantasy:- The Spirits Within. Looked nice but just was so very very boring. You can get something that looks nice (Toy Story) and still have a decent plot (Toy Story) and does well (Toy Story)

      You could give examples for those of us who can't think of one...

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    27. Re:Easy answer by norman619 · · Score: 0

      LOL!!! You do know this film was aimed at the teens right? It wasn't meant to be some high brow Oscar contender. Films aimed at kids don't usually have the strongest of scripts. These films are just meant to be fun which is what it was. :-)

    28. Re:Easy answer by gowen · · Score: 1
      LOL!!! You do know this film was aimed at the teens right?
      Yes (hell, I was ten when it came out, and I saw it at the cinema). But "aimed at" should not necessarily be synonymous with "designed to insult the intelligence of". And besides, thanks to the Emperor's New Clothes syndrome, kids are often the first to point out when something makes no sense, or when the plot has a hole big enough to pass for the goatse.cx guy.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    29. Re:Easy answer by DannyO152 · · Score: 1

      I didn't see it in a theatre when it first came out. But, I've stumbled across it on tv, and, though I've tried to stay with it, can't watch it for more than five minutes. The plot and the story arc are well-tested. Star Trek used that plot a few times -- think of Tron's computer-space as another planet and the bad guy as this week's alien life form who is forcing the humans into a life or death competition. (The business about Tron's main character being a game designer, etc., is motivation/back story and not plot. That the two co-workers learn something and die [after telling the hero important information] is a device as old as the hills (or Homer) in order to suggest that the peril to the hero is real and the outcome is in doubt.) The film's graphical style was unique and imaginative (which is why I think any one remembers that film at all.) But, this film was one of the first victims of the synergy curse. The film was designed for easy portability to a video game (which was released and IIRC did better as a video game title than the film as a movie) and so I can see the Disney execs rubbing their hands in glee at the story boards saying "This looks great! Gentlemen, we've got ourselves Level 3," and choosing to make plot and storyline serviceable and obvious so as to not get in the way of the graphics and competitions and chases.

      So two minutes, get it, and tune out. About right for an infomercial, yes?

    30. Re:Easy answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you're saying is you get excited when you see two men fighting... Ok...

    31. Re:Easy answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In order to take Tron seriously, you have to not take it so seriously. This was what 1981 or 1982 or so... video arcades were newish and computers were fancy mystical machines no one understood, esp this whole concept of easily editable word processed documents I.E. how someone with no real skills can delete someone else's name and take credit for their work, or worse yet create a program which will do this automaticly.

      That's why I don't use Internet Explorer (aka IE)

    32. Re:Easy answer by RubberDogBone · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Matrix sequels flopped, at least in part, because of the secrecy surrounding the sequel's storylines.

      Lacking any info, virtually every one of us who saw the first film imagined what the sequel plot would be, what would be revealed, what the hell it all meant anyway, and so on.

      Once the second film came out, it was clear that nearly all of that imaginary storyline stuff turned out to be a WHOLE lot more ambitious than what they actually filmed.

      In fact, the sequels -while profitable- were more or less a huge letdown. This is pretty normal for sequels. The main difference was the incredible level of hype and the gigantic expectations from the public and the movie company. Other than that, nobody would have paid a lot of attention to the weak story or cared what the heck the thing was about.

      I cared enough to not bother seeing the third film. Caught it on HBO one lonely Christmas Day. Neo was blind and I sure wished I was.

      --
      Sig for hire.
    33. Re:Easy answer by include($dysmas) · · Score: 1

      ones that have just got a qualification... at least for a couple of months ;)

      yay, going out in london now, BYE.

    34. Re:Easy answer by Jeremi · · Score: 1
      just wish the movie was better. I recently grabbed it on DVD, thinking it couldn't be so bad...


      My advice is, go back and watch it a second time. When I saw the movie in the theaters, I was also dissappointed, as I suspect every Guide fan was... that was because I was constantly comparing it to the books, and noting where it fell short. A few months later, I watched it again on DVD, and that time I was no longer constantly comparing it to the books, but rather watching it solely as a movie in its own right. The second time I found it quite funny and enjoyable.


      Why do they need to go the pub if Ford already has brought beer?


      Hm... maybe they really needed the peanuts also.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    35. Re:Easy answer by AlterTick · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The Matrix is the exception, but the plot in the Matrix was irrelevant compared to the effect of those incredibly novel visuals. The sequels blew because the novelty wore off enough that we could see the plot creak.

      Well, I wouldn't say the plot creaked too badly in the first movie. It was a pretty much stock retelling of story number 259-A from the Film Writer's Plot Catalog*, "Rise of a Messiah from Obscurity to Ascendent Triumph", with a shitload of novel eyecandy to make it interesting. The trouble they had in the sequels was partly, just as you say, the non-novelty of the effects; but additionally they ran into the "Superman problem"-- i.e. how do you create a compelling adversary for the unstoppable, super-being? Well, you either do something interesting, like create super-equals (Superman II), or you do something utterly idiotic, like throw in magic extra dimensional creatures (Myxlplik), cast Richard Pryor as a super-genius computer nerd who builds an unstoppable computer (Superman III), or you just throw special effects at the hero till he gets (or we get) too bored or tired to let the fight go on (Reloaded, and the other Matrix one).

      * no such catalog exists, to my knowledge, but it sure seems like it should.

      --
      Conclusion: the Empire squashes the Federation like a bug. Accept it.
    36. Re:Easy answer by blincoln · · Score: 1

      I forgave the film its flaws after watching one of the "outtakes" on the DVD. "It's Arthur Dent, motherfuckers! Do panic!"

      The BBC miniseries is still far superior, but I think they both fall well short of the book.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    37. Re:Easy answer by iamlucky13 · · Score: 1

      Pearl Harbor could have benefited from just a little bit of historical accuracy (you know, like not having half a dozen hung-over guys on their own shooting down more Japanese planes than the Japanese actually lost that day), actually being about the title event, not relying on a cliches like the third wheel in the featured love-triangle looking at a picture of his love before he died, and not having ridiculously over-the-top acting for the parts of Doolittle and Roosevelt. Compared to that, I was almost able to completely ignore the fact that the Japanese were bombing Aegis cruisers and Perry class frigates.

      No point...just ranting. I still haven't forgiven Jerry Bruckheimer for his deceptive theft of 2-1/2 hours of my life.

    38. Re:Easy answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Matrix sequels flopped, at least in part, because of the secrecy surrounding the sequel's storylines.

      Yes, and they're still keeping them secret! I want to know what they are!

    39. Re:Easy answer by MikeyC01 · · Score: 1

      There's a reason why Scorcese's "Raging Bull" doesn't center on the world frisbee champion, you know

      That could explain why the score is -

      Three 6 Mafia - 1
      Martin Scorcese - 0

    40. Re:Easy answer by Petrushka · · Score: 2, Informative

      magic extra dimensional creatures (Myxlplik)

      Mxyzptlk.

      Sorry, sorry, sorry ... [runs away and hides]

    41. Re:Easy answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check that - two half naked men.

    42. Re:Easy answer by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      No more or less stupid than gladiator combat, boxing, or martial arts except in this case it's satire. It's a look at how a computer generated culture views the macro-universe. Yes... it's stupid... that's the point... life is a series of conflict and resolutions no better than tossing around DayGlo Frisbees.


      Plus it brought us Deadly Discs of Tron in the arcade, which was great fun! ;D

    43. Re:Easy answer by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I said it when the matrix came out, and I'll say it again, the matrix is the new Tron.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    44. Re:Easy answer by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but if you don't think physical combat between two human beings is more viscerally exciting (and more easy to empathise with) than a couple of pastel lit loonies in wet suits lobbing frisbees at one another, you're a loony.

      I'm not a big fan of tennis my self but it is a legit sport that many people enjoy. Darts is also in the same class... it seems like rather a silly game but when you stop to think about the fact that darts are handy to catch small game you can respect the skill a bit more. And when you stop to think about it... the boomerang is also handy for that application as well, which "Discs of Tron" looks like it's modeled after with the exception that it's a disc that bounces off walls with ease and not a full blown bommerang.

      One of redeaming qualities of Tron was the series of games played on the game grid. This would include Lightcycles, "Discs of Tron" (don't know another name for it), and "Balls of Tron", not all were included on the coin-up edition but where included in the Tron 2.0 game released within the past few years. While I would lean tward lightcyles as my favorite, use of the disc does require some skill. Again keep in mind the 1980s mindset... discs were "high tech" and any fantisy virtual computer program is going to have one, and it's going to be important. Break the disc, and the program is gone (derezzed).

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    45. Re:Easy answer by geekoid · · Score: 1

      the Cinema is really a bad medium for the story.

      It should be made on DVD, with a flashing icon that appears if you want to skip to the encyclopedia.

      OTOH it's not funny at all. It was like someone wrote the script had been told the story verbally, from memory, by someone who had only heard about the story from someone else.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    46. Re:Easy answer by jonaskoelker · · Score: 2, Funny

      Toy Story? The creators are totally unoriginal--they named all the characters after Debian releases!

    47. Re:Easy answer by AlterTick · · Score: 1
      "magic extra dimensional creatures (Myxlplik)"

      Mxyzptlk. Sorry, sorry, sorry ... [runs away and hides]

      No, that's OK. I was hoping for a correction. This is one of the problems with google. If you don't have any idea how to spell a commonly misspelled name that's just a series of nonsense characters, it's hard to know what to type into google to find the answer. Google suggested that spelling, so I knew it was at least close enough to pass the desired information, as a lot of other people misspelled it that way too. I knew it started with M and ended with K, and had Y, X, P, and L somewhere in it, but was lost after that.

      --
      Conclusion: the Empire squashes the Federation like a bug. Accept it.
    48. Re:Easy answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't a troll, it was my honest opinion. You'd have to have a brain the size of a grape to think that the Matrix had a good story. That's why I accept it for what it was, a flashy action film.

    49. Re:Easy answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a not to bright but sneaky person

      "too".

      a master control program who's purpose is
      a film who's main purpose

      "whose".

      zaps Flynn into it's world

      "its".

      It's redeming qualitys

      "Its", "qualities".

      (There are a couple of others (e.g., "ment", "before to Roman empire", etc.), but those were probably just typos.)

    50. Re:Easy answer by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      Type "superman villain spelling" into Google and go from there. Context of the concept works well.

  6. welcome to slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can handled some better grammar and/or editing

    1. Re:welcome to slashdot by Soporific · · Score: 1

      I can handled a couple hits with the eight ball pictures on them about 10 years ago. :)

    2. Re:welcome to slashdot by farker+haiku · · Score: 1

      My first thought upon reading the summary was "English, motherfucker! Do you speak it?"

      --
      Your sig(k) has been stolen. There is a puff of smoke!
    3. Re:welcome to slashdot by Zantetsuken · · Score: 0

      So the guy mistyped/mixed up TWO words out of his summary - and its even more likely that the typo is the fault of the author of the article. How can you say he has bad spelling/+grammar/+word choice when the summary was not only written better than much of the quickly typed out stuff on /., but better than most of what you would see in "professionally" written memos in fortune 500 companyies?

    4. Re:welcome to slashdot by Herkum01 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Obviously the Slashdot Spell Checker program met its fate early on on the Game Grid.

    5. Re:welcome to slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love how people on slashdot assume everyone on the internet speaks English as a primary language...lol. Go post on some site that speaks a language you don't speak natively and see how you do.

    6. Re:welcome to slashdot by mink · · Score: 1

      But the Firefox spelling plug-in's soul still burns.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  7. I really like the movie by Rock-n-Rolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The movie is absolutely great. I saw it in the cinema twice. The DVD version I have contains a great making-of and I enjoyed the movie again since I bought it a couple of times. Actually I always wondered why this is a Disney film...

    --
    In Korea, all your base are Only For Old People
    1. Re:I really like the movie by solarbob · · Score: 1

      Its the spirit of people like the OP that can make badish movies great. Tron pushed the boundaries and peoples imagination just like the first Matrix. Prehaps it is something you only get once per generation..

      --
      SolarVPS - Quality Windows and Linux Virtual Servers
    2. Re:I really like the movie by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      The point of the DVD version is that you don't have to buy it every time you watch it. Or you have to upgrade your player. ;)

      Regarding the Disney bit, they apparently weren't actively involved in the design of the movie. Sometimes even the major Hollywood studios don't mess with the filming too much.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    3. Re:I really like the movie by UglyMike · · Score: 1

      Waaaw...

      You bought it a couple of times? You must LOVE that movie....

    4. Re:I really like the movie by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      You bought it a couple of times? You must LOVE that movie....

      Special Edition Addiction.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    5. Re:I really like the movie by Rock-n-Rolf · · Score: 1

      Just my bad English, actually I enjoyed it a cuple of times since I bought it once.

      --
      In Korea, all your base are Only For Old People
    6. Re:I really like the movie by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Maybe you get one movie like that per generation, but certainly more than one thing. For example, in 1994 Marathon came out. A decade later people are still speculationg about the plot. I'm pretty sure that there are a couple more gems like this one spread across the media.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    7. Re:I really like the movie by justthinkit · · Score: 1

      Apologies for the "me too" post. Just wanted to emphasize how great the 20th anniv. DVD is. The "making of" is almost 90 minutes long and one of the best I've seen (my favorite movies: http://www.just-think-it.com/), and there are about 40 minutes of other extras. Tron was a groundbreaking movie and perhaps 5 or 10 years ahead of its time, yet has many very cool scenes even when viewed by today's jaded viewers.

      --
      I come here for the love
    8. Re:I really like the movie by gilroy · · Score: 1

      I bought it a couple of times. I had just received the original no-frills DVD in the mail when that day they announced the suped-up 20th anniversay edition. *Sigh*

    9. Re:I really like the movie by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      the most interesting story on the making of was where they talked about misordering of the reels of film causing most of the racing lights in the glow effects added to the movie. apparently when film is shipped to a studio it has inherent flaws in its composition, but the flaws aren't very evident if you use the reels in the order that they were produced (because the flaws are mostly the same from one frame to the next), but they stacked the boxes of film in a random order causing the flaws to be mixed between reels and the lighting effect magnified them.

    10. Re:I really like the movie by Pope · · Score: 1

      I did as well. Special Edition Laserdisc box set (you know, way before DVDs were out) and then again the DVD because it was so cheap in comparison. Saw it in the theatre and loved it then, and have the Making Of book as well as this big fold-out poster book whose nice big pics I've scanned to make desktop pics. It's a fun flick, though the dialog is a bit wooden.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    11. Re:I really like the movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I always wondered why this is a Disney film...

      I saw it before release, as I worked at Disney World, and they had a special showing for their employees.

      I couldn't believe Disney released it, especially with the blatant drug reference in the scene where they find the "power" (what looked like a pool of water). VERY un-Disneylike

      The only thing I could figure is that it went right over their heads.

      I also couldn't believe the scene in Roger Rabbit where Donald Duck calls Daffy Duck a "God damned fucking nigger." Perhaps because Donald is so hard to understand; but rent the movie and see for yourself. It's the scene where they're both on stage playing piano, when Donald makes his racist statement Daffy goes ballistic and hauls out a cannon.

      VERY politically incorrect. I don't think Disney executives watch their own films!

  8. Reading anything on tomshardware.... by TrueKonrads · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Slightly OT, but i'd like to read TFA, but I ran out of patience clicking "next" and "next" and then watching as some overlay pops every time i accidentally move my mouse over underlined words. Sheesh. No wonder nobody reads TFA

    --
    Lone Gunmen crew.
    1. Re:Reading anything on tomshardware.... by ajs318 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Really? I don't get anything like that in Konqueror 3.4.2.

      --
      Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
    2. Re:Reading anything on tomshardware.... by nurmr · · Score: 3, Informative

      Firefox has an extension called Anti-Pagination that does the 'next', 'next', work for you. You end up with all the articles all on one page.

    3. Re:Reading anything on tomshardware.... by Attrition_cp · · Score: 1

      Firefox on WinXP.. I know the underlines you mention (damn them), but I don't have any in this article.

      --
      Touched By His Noodley Appendage.
    4. Re:Reading anything on tomshardware.... by jlarocco · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, that's just about the stupidest page layout ever. But the underlining is easy to fix if you block intellitxt.com.

    5. Re:Reading anything on tomshardware.... by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1
      watching as some overlay pops every time i accidentally move my mouse over underlined words. Sheesh. No wonder nobody reads TFA

      Overlay? What underlined words? Must require Javascript or something. Pick up the NoScript Firefox extension and you'll never see that again. The next, next, next style of all these damn review sites is certainly annoying, but that's how they get their banner ad hits. In the good old days they'd put all that text on one long page (hey, browsers have a scroll bar and the page can be really long if you want).

    6. Re:Reading anything on tomshardware.... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Or just adblock those cocksuckers at "*.intellitxt.com"

    7. Re:Reading anything on tomshardware.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So rare to find a nice solution to something that was bugging me when I'm actually armed with mod points. I'm liking antipagination...

  9. I never would have suspected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Who would have thought it was a bomb? I remember seeing it and loving it as a kid - and loving my toy lightcycle and some of the video game - and the movie seems to be so well known. If you ever mention it to someone, they know what you're talking about. It amazes me it was a flop.

    1. Re:I never would have suspected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember seeing it and loving it as a kid - and loving my toy lightcycle and some of the video game - and the movie seems to be so well known. If you ever mention it to someone, they know what you're talking about.

      Yeah, but did all of these people actually pay to see them film? The movie is pretty iconic with a strong visual style, so it has a place in pop culture even though most theater goers at the time stayed away. It also helps that the arcade game was incredibly successful, followed by a host of console games and an arcade sequel that did okay. So a lot of people know what Tron is (especially those who were 8-15 when it came out) but the masses didn't take to it (mostly because it really isn't that good of a movie, regardless of how visually compelling the world it creates is.)

      By the way, Blade Runner and Brazil were considered bombs, too-- they did poorly in the theater but word of mouth afterwards made them classics. Not that Tron is in that league by any means (and it most definitely isn't), but it does go to show that a box office flop isn't always a failure in the long run.

    2. Re:I never would have suspected by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      I saw it in college. Although I personally liked the movie (but not enough to see it more than once), I remember it being universally panned as the "Gigli" or "Showgirls" of it's day, even though it was admired for its groundbreaking special effects. I did love the video game, though.

    3. Re:I never would have suspected by Suidae · · Score: 1
  10. I thought the lines were a little short to get in by tinkertim · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I saw Tron, opening night, and its one of the things that made me really, really want to figure out how those nifty looking typewriters with screens could do so much. I didn't know what memory was, I didn't know what a processor did, I barely understood how a calculator worked and if you said Binary I'd say "Sure, I have a Huffy!".

    We're always looking at value as something monetary. Tron made me go get my first trash-80 (Err Tandy TRS-80 heheh) and later my first Commie. I wanted to know how those things worked.

    You all may remember the short lived series "Whiz Kids" , with the talking computer that looked like it was assembled from stereo components. That was another one way ahead of its time.

    The value of the film wasn't how much it grossed , if you want to calculate that, then calculate the life time earnings of those who got into computers partly because of seeing it and you may be surprised :)

    However only 15 minutes of CGI? I somehow (not sure why, because I know what was available then) thought most of it was CGI.. but yes, that would have been very very difficult at the time. My bubble sort of broke reading that article, never really thought about the making other than being fascinated as a child with the results.

    Much like the show Whiz Kids, it was just a little too abstract for most people. Entertainment isn't entertainment to most if it requires too much thought.

    Tron got to be the pavement others were able to ride in on. So wallet aside, I don't think the film was a flop. I was too young to remember any hoop-la coming from Disney about the film.. I wonder how it would have done if it had been underplayed before release.

    Cool article, if you can wade through the advertisements :)

  11. The movie flopped by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

    Because the script and the dialogs were dreadful.

    1. Re: The movie flopped by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      > Because the script and the dialogs were dreadful.

      I thought it was a yawner too, though I'm surprised to see several people posting to that effect. For some reason it seems to have a reputation of being a cool movie. I couldn't understand that even back then; how anyone could rave about it now is beyond mystery.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  12. I've grown 9,842 times smarter since then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who's your user, program?

  13. Headlines for Tron 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hollywood reports indicate Richard Stallman currently in negotiations to star as Tron in the planned sequel to Tron 2. The current negotations with Stallman include advertising of the GNU/Linux operating system in the opening credits of the film.

    Rumor has it that the upcoming plot will put Tron against a closed-source operating system developed by Bill Gates....

  14. Grossing Twice the Cost is a Flop? by Hoab · · Score: 5, Informative
    Tron cost 17 million to make and pulled in 33 million. How is this considered a flop?

    It was 22nd in the top grossing films of 1982. Blade Runner was 27th that year.

    Maybe it wasn't the smash hit they were hoping for, but it looks like it did very well.

    http://www.boxofficemojo.com/

    1. Re:Grossing Twice the Cost is a Flop? by Steve001 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the reason that many consider TRONStar Wars and that movie changed the standards for what is a hit. But TRON making back double what it original cost to make would make it a success to me.

      I think the problem with TRON was that it came out at the wrong time, a time before most people were very familiar with computers. Due to this some of the humor in the movie did not instinctively carry to the average viewer.

      But some elements of the movie still hold up to this day. The light cycle sequence has become iconic, and the interest in TRON is still there, as shown by the excitement over the inclusion of a TRON level in the upcoming Kingdom Hearts II video game, and a sequel to TRON has been released in the form of a video game: TRON 2.0.

      Although some have knocked the plot of the movie as confusing, when you distill it down to the basics it is a quest movie like Lord of the Rings. One weakness in the movie was the lack of interaction between the real world and the computer world. In the novelization of TRON they included a scene where, when Flynn refused to kill his opponent, in the real world a video game at an arcade froze while waiting for Flynn to act.

      The idea of a person trapped inside a computer has become a common theme by now. It shows up in movies like The Matrix, and in anime series like .Hack. This proves that interest in a movie like TRON exists, but it has to have the right timing.

    2. Re:Grossing Twice the Cost is a Flop? by bigmouth_strikes · · Score: 1

      According to "The-Numbers.com" it only made $26,918,576 at the box office in 1982. Still, that would be a decent ROI for $17,000,000 you'd think. But that $17M number - which is only an estimate it seems - may exclude marketing etc etc, which would explain that it was considered a flop compared to the expectations.

      http://www.the-numbers.com/movies/1982/0TRON.html

      --
      Oh, I can't help quoting you because everything that you said rings true
    3. Re:Grossing Twice the Cost is a Flop? by 0123456 · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Tron cost 17 million to make and pulled in 33 million. How is this considered a flop?"

      Because you generally need to make several times the cost of the movie at the box office to break even. Theaters take a cut, distributors take a cut, then there's the advertising costs to pay on top... which can be massive: in the extreme case of low-budget movies, they can be many times the cost of the movie itself.

      $33,000,000 gross for a $17,000,000 movie probably just about paid for the advertising and the coke and hookers budget.

      "Blade Runner was 27th that year."

      If I remember correctly, 'Blade Runner' was considered a disaster when it was released: hence the voiceover and happy ending tacked on to try to raise revenue with Joe Sixpack.

    4. Re:Grossing Twice the Cost is a Flop? by skribe · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Tron cost 17 million to make and pulled in 33 million. How is this considered a flop?

      A good rule of thumb is that you need to earn 4x the budget to break even.

      --
      Blog
    5. Re:Grossing Twice the Cost is a Flop? by kg4czo · · Score: 1

      Disney didn't market it though. They relied on traditional word of mouth to fill the theaters, and it failed. That just couldn't happen with all the hype that Star Wars brought with it.

      I saw both Star Wars and Tron in the theaters. Hell, I can attribute Tron and War Games to getting me into computers. Got my first C=64 back in '83 and have kept it up ever since.

    6. Re:Grossing Twice the Cost is a Flop? by cubicledrone · · Score: 2, Funny

      ron cost 17 million to make and pulled in 33 million. How is this considered a flop?

      Well, they expected it to make $400 million, so it was a disappointment.

      And if it made $400 million, it's still a disappointment because they expected it to make $2 billion.

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    7. Re:Grossing Twice the Cost is a Flop? by mbourgon · · Score: 1

      IIRC, on Freakazoid the character Fanboy talked about how Tron really wasn't the "movie that ruined Disney" like everyone things, but instead it was The Black Hole that was the gigantic flop that everyone remembers.

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    8. Re:Grossing Twice the Cost is a Flop? by bbk · · Score: 1

      Could you elaborate on this? Is this the new math, or by "break even" do you mean "compensate for all the other horrible money losing films the company made?"

  15. And they pimped up a PDP-10! by ettlz · · Score: 3, Funny

    For Tron's special effects — The Super Foonly F-1. I bet it had a phat exhaust, blue downlighting, a killer sound system with a 16 inch subwoofer, and a stylish fibreglass skirt fitted to the front of the reel-to-reel cabinet.

    1. Re:And they pimped up a PDP-10! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I would never have considered a PDP-10 to be a fast rendering machine. This sounds like a way around paying for time on a cray.

    2. Re:And they pimped up a PDP-10! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the alloy reels.

    3. Re:And they pimped up a PDP-10! by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 1

      For Tron's special effects -- The Super Foonly F-1. I bet it had a phat exhaust, blue downlighting, a killer sound system with a 16 inch subwoofer, and a stylish fibreglass skirt fitted to the front of the reel-to-reel cabinet.

      ... And Professor Frink at the controls. M'hey!

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    4. Re:And they pimped up a PDP-10! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TFA has somewhat confused Triple-I, Foonly, and DEC. Digital did the original PDP-10 architecture. But Foonly built the fastest such machines at that time. III owned an F-1, which they used for document scanning.

    5. Re:And they pimped up a PDP-10! by Jay+Maynard · · Score: 1

      It was definitely III's F-1 that was used for a lot fo the CGI in TRON.

      I sent the author a note pointing out the error. He agreed that they'd gotten it wrong.

      --
      Disinfect the GNU General Public Virus!
    6. Re:And they pimped up a PDP-10! by Colin+Douglas+Howell · · Score: 1
      I would never have considered a PDP-10 to be a fast rendering machine. This sounds like a way around paying for time on a cray.

      Well, from the article it sounds like they weren't swimming in cash, and they seem to have been desperate for computer time. But remember, the film was made back around 1981. Commercial computer graphics were still in their infancy, and there couldn't have been many specialized rendering machines around. I'm skeptical that Crays were frequently used for that purpose--they were far too expensive for such a task, and they were designed as dedicated high-speed number crunchers anyway, not as graphics machines. You'd be a lot more likely to use a Cray to run the calculations on which a pretty animation would be based than for generating the animation itself; that would likely be rendered by some other machine offline.

      At that time PDP-10s had a strong reputation as fast timesharing systems, so it seems plausible to me that one with few users could serve as a pretty powerful rendering box by 1981 standards.

    7. Re:And they pimped up a PDP-10! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It wasn't a PDP-10. It was a Foonly F-1, which was a PDP-10 clone (it executed the PDP-10 instruction set) but was much faster.

    8. Re:And they pimped up a PDP-10! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The software was a mix of FORTRAN, MACRO-10, SAIL, and LISP. It didn't run on a Cray.

    9. Re:And they pimped up a PDP-10! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      At that time PDP-10s had a strong reputation as fast timesharing systems, so it seems plausible to me that one with few users could serve as a pretty powerful rendering box by 1981 standards

      I don't doubt the bit about timesharing systems. Around 1988 in did an interview at a hospital which ran 60 or 70 concurrent users off a single PDP.

      But I always associated the PDP line with rock solid real time stability and versatile I/O. I think the clock ran at about 1Mhz. The backplane was wirewrapped.

      I don't doubt the story of how they animated Tron. I think its impressive that they pressed on with the limited tools they had.

    10. Re:And they pimped up a PDP-10! by Colin+Douglas+Howell · · Score: 1
      But I always associated the PDP line with rock solid real time stability and versatile I/O. I think the clock ran at about 1Mhz. The backplane was wirewrapped.

      The original PDP-10 had a 1-microsecond memory cycle time, which gives a 1 MHz cycle rate. Its logic apparently wasn't synchronous, though. Instruction speed was supposedly around 1 MIPS. Later models had synchronous logic with clock rates ranging from about 10 to 30 MHz.

      The machine actually used for TRON was a Foonly F-1, a high-speed implementation of the PDP-10 not made by DEC. Only one F-1 system was ever produced, although Foonly did go on to make slower, less ambitious machines. The F-1 had a 10 MHz clock and used fast ECL logic; it was a pipelined architecture, and common instructions would execute in one cycle. Instruction throughput was supposedly around 6 MIPS.

      Check out the F-1's entry (and the links in that entry) in the first table on this page for more details.

      (Oh, by the way, one of those links does mention "the Cray at Digital Productions", so I guess I was wrong in saying that Crays weren't used much for rendering work.)

  16. The Matrix by Monte · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...was a really great sequel to TRON.

    Or at least that's what I think.

    1. Re:The Matrix by Marce1 · · Score: 1

      I would have said the Matrix trilogy makes a go.. (I can't say good, because the trilogy as whole just bloody wasn't).

      I think they become a modern remake of Tron, due to the climactic end(s), which parallel the MCP by that old AI architect chap, and Sark by Agent Smith.

      N.B.: To those of you who haven't seen the sequels, still, don't bother. Just take it from me there are some more obvious parallels than in the first Matrix.

      --
      [ insert meme here ]
    2. Re:The Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're confusing The Matrix with Lawnmower Man. Don't worry, happens to me all the time.

    3. Re:The Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      The Matrix (Score:3, Insightful)
      by Monte (48723) on Friday March 17, @05:35AM (#14940535) ...was a really great sequel to TRON.

      Or at least that's what I think.


      In 1982, computer graphics consisted of bright lines and large pixels. So the "computer world" would be expected to look like something out of Tron.

      The trend since then has been to make video games with as realistic graphics as possible. So Tron today would look like The Matrix.

    4. Re:The Matrix by smoker2 · · Score: 1
      Ok, I'm a complete Matrix troll, but I think The Matrix was the best real sci-fi film in 20 years (at least). I don't care about "bullet time" or the superman trick at the end. The acting was sketchy and the dialogue was hesitant and badly put together.

      But...

      The whole premise of humans not actually knowing the state of their own existence, and the mere fact that you can't actually disprove the main idea (ie we are all inside a computer program) makes it riveting. It is so religeous without being about god. I wish I could find words to describe the inate correctness of the whole hypothesis.

      No, I haven't tried leaping off buildings or dodging bullets, but is that air I'm breathing ? I have no real way of knowing. and thats what makes it fun.

      Of course I might add that I do believe that the whole purpose of computing is to create some kind of sentient life. We will never travel to the stars as flesh and blood, but as electricity in one form or another. I don't expect this to happen next week or next century, but I think that it will be the future. And that is why the Matrix hits home. If every thing real is in fact just computer programming, then real can be anything and anywhere you want. It won't matter that you're not really standing on Mars if you think you are, and there is nobody to say any different.

      Imagine if you could construct a silicon chip that held your conciousness. Attach it to cameras, sensors, what have you, and then send you off to the stars with a nice nuclear power pack to last a few thousand years. What a life.

      (or should that be "get a life" ;-)

      More beer please...

    5. Re:The Matrix by rhizome · · Score: 1

      >It is so religeous without being about god.

      Setting aside the self-canceling aspect of that statement, any time you have a concept of "The One" who can save everybody, it's about God.

      --
      When I was a kid, we only had one Darth.
  17. Separated at birth? by srl100 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is it just me, or does Tronguy look quite a lot like Ned Flanders at a fancy dress? "Yes indeed-e, tron-a-roony."

    1. Re:Separated at birth? by The+Wooden+Badger · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I had a professor that looked even more like Flanders than that guy. He even sounded like him. If he would have dropped a Flanders line in one of his lectures I think the class would have fallen out of their chairs laughing.

      --
      Heroscape, it's like legos combined with anachronistic wargames.
    2. Re:Separated at birth? by PhoenixPath · · Score: 1

      Father-in-Law....is....Ned Flanders.

      The mustache, the glasses, the shape, the height... This guy could win a Ned Flanders Look-alike contest hands-down.

      Thank God he doesn't watch the Simpsons... He's annoying enough without the Gibberish. I'd have to shoot the guy.

    3. Re:Separated at birth? by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      That's ok, one of my coworkers is the 40-year old virgin. He looks like him, acts similar, even rides his bike to work every day!

    4. Re:Separated at birth? by Xiaran · · Score: 1

      I had a professor that looked even more like Flanders than that guy

      Did you go to school in Canberra, Australia? And was this guy a physics lecturer. If so we had the same guy. Once I was walking past him in a hallway and he actually said "Hi-diddly-hi" to me. And he didnt know what the simpsons was(he had strongh dislikes for TV in general). Was a really nice guy tho.

    5. Re:Separated at birth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bike, as in like a motorbike or a bicycle?

    6. Re:Separated at birth? by The+Wooden+Badger · · Score: 1

      Nope, I'm in the States. The guy was teaching classes on functional anatomy and orthopedic impairments.

      --
      Heroscape, it's like legos combined with anachronistic wargames.
    7. Re:Separated at birth? by The+Wooden+Badger · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but does he have the chiselled physique that Flanders has?

      --
      Heroscape, it's like legos combined with anachronistic wargames.
    8. Re:Separated at birth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy was teaching classes on functional anatomy

      This here's a wang-diddly-doodly of an appendage!

    9. Re:Separated at birth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it matter?

  18. Sequel? by Hamster+Lover · · Score: 4, Funny

    What were they going to call it? Troff?

    1. Re:Sequel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What were they going to call it? Troff?

      No, that would require you to have some knowledge of how a computer works. To capture your sequel audience you ALWAYS have the name of the original movie in the title (exception: if major characters become so popular their names are more widely known than the title of the movie, e.g. Rambo) followed by the number of the sequel it is, which may optionally be in Arabic or Roman numerals. This is generally followed by a catchy subtitle that explains how the sequel is different from, or similar to, the original.

      Thus, the only feasible titles for a "Tron" sequel are:

      "Tron 2: Milking the Wave of '80s Nostalgia"
          -or-
      "Tron II: We Thought We Could Make a Better Movie Than The Original"

    2. Re:Sequel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tron 3: nroff

    3. Re:Sequel? by roman_mir · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And the sequel to that should be called Troll

    4. Re:Sequel? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      They're farming it out to the Japanese. They're calling it DigiTron. Oh, and something about a card game.

      Di Di Di
      DigiTron DigiTron

      Di Di Di
      DigiTron DigiTron

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    5. Re:Sequel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Tron++

    6. Re:Sequel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then there's the xxx version "Pr0n"...

    7. Re:Sequel? by operagost · · Score: 1

      Tron Part Deux: Pooping On Your Childhood.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    8. Re:Sequel? by blankmange · · Score: 1

      TRON 2: Jumping the Shark

      --
      ...we are from the government - we are here to help...
  19. Don't forget the TRON soundtrack! by farrellj · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Check out the website of Wendy Carlos, who composed and performed the soundtrack...her website is: http://wendycarlos.com/

    ttyl
              Farrell

    --
    CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
    1. Re:Don't forget the TRON soundtrack! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      She's got a great style. Sort of a more epic version of Vangelis or Tangerine Dream. It's pretty damned cool that they remixed some of those tunes into Tron 2.0.

    2. Re:Don't forget the TRON soundtrack! by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      ...her website is: http://wendycarlos.com/

      Don't you mean 'his'? : p

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    3. Re:Don't forget the TRON soundtrack! by Erbo · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have a couple of her other albums, which are also good. One is Switched-On Bach 2000, in which she revisited the material she covered in the original Switched-On Bach album, with modern synthesizer gear and period-correct Bach tunings. She added one "bonus track" as well, a rendition of the famous Tocatta and Fugue in D Minor--perfect for Halloween music. The second is her collaboration with "Weird Al" Yankovic on a rendition of Prokofiev's Peter And The Wolf, as well as a new piece, Carnival of the Animals, Part Two (parody of Camille Saint-Saëns' Carnival of the Animals). She proved she could be as much of a parody artist as Al, throwing a bunch of references to other pieces into her compositions to counterpoint Al's bizarre sense of humor.

      --
      Be who you are...and be it in style!
    4. Re:Don't forget the TRON soundtrack! by Ex+Machina · · Score: 1
    5. Re:Don't forget the TRON soundtrack! by Kombinat · · Score: 1

      Yeah, she did also the breathtaking soundtrack to Clockwork Orange. And of course the Switch On Bach from 1968 which was groundbreaking, so much that everyone has to get a Moog Modular and spit out another redundant and goofy electronic rendition of classic pieces which usally results in total kitsch and artistic desaster.
      And she had one piece on Kubricks Shining, a very dark short drone.

  20. Simple reason for the "bomb": It was too early by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1982 it was not "cool" to be a geek. It was not cool to "live" inside the computer. 1982 was a time when computers (and even more consoles) were considered toys, not an essential part of our life.

    Especially, the audience for such a movie was too small. And the studio was the wrong one. First of all, it's Disney. Back then, what did you get from Disney? Cute li'l films about cute fuzzy animals having some cute adventures. So people did not expect a "serious" science fiction movie.

    Second, it was the wrong kind of science fiction for this time. Science fiction back then was either in a galaxy far, far away or equally far away in the future. But most certainly not NOW. How can you make science fiction in the NOW? Now is the real world. The movie was simply not credible for the audience of then.

    Before someone quotes E.T.: E.T. was credible for the simple reason that it was a "real" drama movie with an alien element. Not a "real" science fiction movie. There were no laser beams and no robots.

    Tron was also not the stereotypical science fiction movie, it didn't carter to the SciFi crowd of those times. No aliens, no space battles, no epic hero. Instead a very dramatic personal battle for Flynn and Tron, with a lot of abstraction that only someone who has at least a clue about computers can comprehend and appreciate.

    In total, it is a movie for computer and game geeks. And those were rather scarce back then.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Simple reason for the "bomb": It was too early by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "First of all, it's Disney. Back then, what did you get from Disney? Cute li'l films about cute fuzzy animals having some cute adventures. So people did not expect a "serious" science fiction movie."

      Perhaps you are forgetting 'The Black Hole'? Also a Disney film and produced in the same era. Infact, before Black Holes were widely regarded as even existing at all.

      (It kinda sucked too though)

    2. Re:Simple reason for the "bomb": It was too early by acroyear · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Disney did the Black Hole 2 years earlier, and in the 70s did a number of sci-fi films (some funny, some not - Escape/Return to Witch Mountain, Cat from Outer Space) so they'd already established that they could do serious, if teen-oriented, scifi. Hell, Disney was on the cutting edge of the "epic" film back in the 60s with 20,000 Leagues and a few others.

      I agree the timing was just a little early. We needed Wargames *first*. Show us what happens outside the computer world when a modern computer "thinks", then the audience might be ready for what might happen inside that world.

      Personally, I love Tron, always did, its a reason I'm in software now. But among this crowd, I know i'm an apologist so I'm not going to bother to try to justify it.

      And box-office flop or not, its more than in the black with HBO and home-video sales, like every disney "flop". People FAR too often complain about Disney making box office flops (about half of their animated feature canon didn't make a profit in the box office, including Fantasia, Pinnochio, Bambi, Alice in Wonderland, and the well-known flops of the 90s-00s), but over time, the films have serious legs in the home video market and continue to be watched today, which is not something you can say for many at-the-time blockbusters.

      Jim Henson's works are the same way (Dark Crystal, Labyrinth). As is Princess Bride, and other classics in hindsight like Wizard of Oz.

      Its like comparing Salieri to Mozart. Salieri was the more popular AT THE TIME, especially his operas (AFAIK, he never had a flop, Mozart had 2). But its Mozart we listen to today.

      Only Hollywood judges quality by its at the moment popularity. The real judgement happens far later, when you realize that 25 years on people ARE STILL WATCHING IT (crappy script and all), which can't be said for MOST films from 1981-1982.

      --
      "But remember, most lynch mobs aren't this nice." (H.Simpson)
      -- Joe
    3. Re:Simple reason for the "bomb": It was too early by Wylfing · · Score: 1
      it was the wrong kind of science fiction for this time. Science fiction back then was either in a galaxy far, far away or equally far away in the future. But most certainly not NOW. How can you make science fiction in the NOW? Now is the real world. The movie was simply not credible for the audience of then.

      That is really quite insightful. This was precisely the same time frame (early 80s) when Gibson and Sterling were grousing about how "science fiction" had to have giant space ships and aliens and be set in the distant future, and how that setting was getting so very stale (Star Wars notwithstanding). TRON was a pretty big step away from that, and it suffered a bit because it didn't fit the audience's expectations of what SF is.

      --
      Our intelligent designer has never created an animal that we couldn't improve by strapping a bomb to it.
    4. Re:Simple reason for the "bomb": It was too early by Bemopolis · · Score: 1
      Before someone quotes E.T.: E.T. was credible for the simple reason that it was a "real" drama movie with an alien element. Not a "real" science fiction movie. There were no laser beams and no robots.


      And, after Spielberg got done "reimagining" it, no guns.

      Bemopolis
      --
      "I guess the moral of the story is, don't paint your airship with rocket fuel." -- Addison Bain
    5. Re:Simple reason for the "bomb": It was too early by lamz · · Score: 1

      Back then, what did you get from Disney? Cute li'l films about cute fuzzy animals having some cute adventures. So people did not expect a "serious" science fiction movie.

      Actually, what you got 'back then' from Disney was the most violent film Disney ever made: The Black Hole, released in 1979.

      I was 9, and my Dad took me to see Star Trek: The Motion Picture at the early show, then The Black Hole at the late show. Even though I haven't seen the movie since 1979, the scene where a robot tears into a man's chest with big, sharp, egg-beater-looking things is still burned into my brain. The only other thing I remember is finding toy versions of some of the robots from cereal boxes.

      After The Black Hole, the "Disney" name was no longer applied to movies without "G" ratings. Such movies are now labelled "Miramax" etc.

      --

      Mike van Lammeren
      It will challenge your head, your brain, and your mind.

    6. Re:Simple reason for the "bomb": It was too early by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Especially, the audience for such a movie was too small. And the studio was the wrong one. First of all, it's Disney. Back then, what did you get from Disney? Cute li'l films about cute fuzzy animals having some cute adventures. So people did not expect a "serious" science fiction movie.

      Tron was a "serious" science fiction movie? It was ment to me?

      Disney has some science fiction. The first thing that comes to mind is "Black Hole" which was really their first attempt to entire the sci-fi market. Rated "PG", which IIRC was a first for Disney. Before that we had "Escape/Return to Witch Mountain", or perhaps the title "The Computer that wore tennis shoes" would be more approperate. And let's not forget "The Cat From Outer Space". Disney doesn't do dark pieces... which is rather why 20 people defected and went on to produce "The Secret of Nymh".

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  21. SQL? by dodobh · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cron of course.

    --
    I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    1. Re:SQL? by hitmark · · Score: 1

      why not win32?
      isnt it jobs that run stuff over at disney now?

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    2. Re:SQL? by Frogbert · · Score: 1

      Oh great, instead of lightcycles you would have a guy that goes around doing the same thing every day. You know what that is? A crappier version of groundhog day, that's what!

    3. Re:SQL? by dodobh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      you would have a guy that goes around doing the same thing every day. You know what that is?

      Work?

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    4. Re:SQL? by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or Pr0n, the X-rated version.

  22. Maybe it's the "art" thing by smchris · · Score: 1

    I suspect a lot of people saw Tron as kids. I saw it as an adult and didn't like it. From what I remember it was for much the same reasons Bladerunner works and Johnny mnemonic doesn't. Hence, Disney?

    1. Re:Maybe it's the "art" thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw Tron as an adult too, and I loved it. I have it on VHS and watched it two months ago. It is still good!

    2. Re:Maybe it's the "art" thing by Jay+Maynard · · Score: 1

      I was 22 when I first saw TRON. Adult? I suspect I'd get a lot of disagreement on that...

      --
      Disinfect the GNU General Public Virus!
  23. Chris Wedge worked on Tron by Fwoggus · · Score: 1

    Chris Wedge was an animator on Tron and latter went on to co-found Blue Sky Studios and make Ice Age and Robots.

    --
    The _best_ 3D pr0n -> http://www.hookup3d.com
  24. Noooooo! by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

    Time to "crack out" Goatse again, eh? ;)

    Please don't! The Cowboy Neal is still in therapy after the last time you did that.

    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
  25. They ignored the Bonnie MacBird/Alan Kay bit! by Rexifer · · Score: 1

    An interesting side note: Bonnie MacBird wrote a couple of the drafts of the Tron script, calling on Alan Kay (then hailing from PARC) for technical consulting and inspiration. (One of the characters is named after him.) She seldom gets any recognition for her work on the project (I've only ever heard Lisberger acknowledge that Alan Kay was an "inspiring force" for the film, while totally ignoring her). But, at least she got something out of the deal... she and Kay got hitched some time thereafter. Anyway, just an iteresting aside...

    1. Re:They ignored the Bonnie MacBird/Alan Kay bit! by bkr1_2k · · Score: 2, Funny

      Interesting to whom?

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    2. Re:They ignored the Bonnie MacBird/Alan Kay bit! by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

      I thought it was interesting myself.

    3. Re:They ignored the Bonnie MacBird/Alan Kay bit! by Rexifer · · Score: 1

      I guess probably those of us who'd found Tron interesting to begin with... (I.e. Those of us predisposed to computer nerd hero worship.) Who would've thought that I'd be outed on Slashdot for that? Oh, well...

  26. More movies like Tron should be made by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    I actually saw Tron when it came out in the theater, I thought it was great. I didn't care about any bad reviews, I enjoyed it because it was total fantasy. The effects were great (at the time) and the lightcycle bike scene was the best.

    I am not sure if it would have ever been made today, but I think this exactly the kind of movie that needs to be made - sheer fantasy to escape from the realities of this world.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  27. Tron was not a failure... by sinner0423 · · Score: 1

    Please... saying Tron flopped at the box office is like saying Gigli is a thought provoking masterpiece. Box office sales may have been somewhat pale, but they're comparing it to Raiders of the Lost Ark, E.T., and Conan the Barbarian which were also released around the same time.

    Very misleading summary. Tron was, and still is, a nice piece of movie history. The arcade game was also great, I could almost guarantee there is a Tron machine within 50 miles of wherever you're reading this from.

    I'd love to see a movie sequel, but knowing Hollywood & the way they bastardize everything, it would star Lindsay Lohan, The Rock, and a monkey that solves crime.

    1. Re:Tron was not a failure... by oudzeeman · · Score: 1

      at my last job there was a tron arcade game a few offices away. When it first arrived it was broken, but they repaired it just before I left... That is probably a little over 50 miles away from where I am right now

    2. Re:Tron was not a failure... by IL-CSIXTY4 · · Score: 1
      I could almost guarantee there is a Tron machine within 50 miles of wherever you're reading this from.
      Yes, there is. Strangely enough, it's at the Museum of Science & Industry here in Chicago, as part of their Game On! exhibit. I still can't get over the fact that the games & systems I grew up with are museum pieces now.
    3. Re:Tron was not a failure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The success of tron spawned that horrible automan series on TV, I remember watching it as a kid. Not to sound too cynical, but TV - especially if we're talking about the early 80's incarnation - doesn't jump onto a bandwagon unless it's already good and successful. Maybe the studio expected more, but I agree; calling it a flop is ridiculous.

      Calling it a good movie also borders on the ridiculous, though. I loved it as a kid, and I still watch it with my kids - wearing a nostaligic grin the whole time - when disney channel plays it, but it is a "standard faire with a twist" movie, at best. My kids groan when I refuse to change the channel. ;)

  28. Hey moderators, bite my dong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just to waste karma or a modpoint.

  29. What no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Greetings programs!

  30. Obligatory Simpsons Quote... by CrazyTalk · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Has anyone here seen Tron?"
    "No"
    "No"
    "No"
    "Yes - I mean no."

  31. great stuff by l3v1 · · Score: 1

    I first saw Tron as a small kid. Didn't understand much, but I remember that I liked it, the looks, the heroes, the glowing fresbees, everything. During the years I watched it a couple of times and I always liked it. Now I have the latest DVD, and I just watched it recently, and guess what, I still like it :D Thing is, every time I watch it with a different perspective, when a kid, I took it seriously, good guy bad guy fighting whatever, this last time I thought it was real fun, I laughed on the lines a lot. It's a great movie. It is because more than 20 years have passed and people can still have good time watching it. I could list some 15-20+ years old movies that also are similarly good, but that's another story.

    --
    I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
  32. thus we blame TRON for by way2trivial · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Some then young budding PHB or IP Lawyer to be, realizing, hey- this guy used company resources to make video games on the side, with the intent to spin-off a VERY PROFITABLE COMPANY...

    We should make job contracts that say "all your base belong to us" iffen you make them at all whilst you are working for us...

    Thanks TRON!

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  33. Obligatory lightcycle games by Stormwatch · · Score: 3, Informative
    Armagetron Advanced
    GLtron

    Both free, for Windows/MacOSX/Linux.

  34. or perhaps... by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    consider that dialogue, which is NOT from a HUMAN BEING, is in fact very good, as it's a rather mechanical and acerbic line, of the type I'd consider possible as the output of a first gen AI.

    Having experience with a great many non-native english speakers, from eastern europe and islamic countries, some asian, I know that the best of them still use funny sentence construction at times...

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  35. "first" video game ever created. by SynapseLapse · · Score: 1

    ...that a film like Tron was conceived while playing the first video game ever created.

    ehhh, not quite. Space War preceded Pong, and the table tennis game at Brookhaven preceded even Space War.

    However, Pong was the first widely popular video game and the first home game.

  36. Tron vs Titanic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The wonderful thing about creative endeavours - films, books, music, software, whatever - is that they are inherently unpredictable. I've lost track a number things I've seen that claim to be able to guarantee you a hit single or novel say. Tron probably deserved to be a hit but it wasn't. Another big special effects movie with equally laughable acting and awful dialog - Titanic, did alright.

  37. Movie critics.... by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In order to take Tron seriously, you have to not take it so seriously.

    It is amazing how many people fail to understand that simple truth. Take for example 'The Mummy' and it's sequel 'The Mummy returns' It's always funny to read reviews of those movies talking about overacting, a bad plot, bad script, over reliance on special effects etc... It's fun to read those reviews because the snobby film critics who write them have completely missed the point which is: "For god's sake man it's a MUMMY MOVIE! The fact that it's full of cheesy clichés is exactly what makes it such fun to watch!". No matter how many times I watch hat scene in 'The Mummy Returns' where the Pygmy mummys run over the log with the one in the lead carrying a stick of dynamite like an Olympic torch it always makes me laugh. It's actually worth while to go down some 'worst movie ever' list and watch those sorry pieces of cinematic catastrophe just for laughs. Just make sure 'Plan 9 from Outer Space' is on the list. It's a well known classic and watching it at least once is mandatory.

    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
    1. Re:Movie critics.... by gowen · · Score: 1

      But The Mummy is a clear genre piece. Everyone's tongue is firmly in their cheek.

      Tron is ... well, no-ones quite sure what Tron is. Viewed from 20+ years hence, it appears deliberately arch and silly, but in 1982 it wasn't. And reading the interview in the article, it's clear that its creators didn't think they were making something that was deliberately kitsch. Similarly, Plan 9 wasn't designed to be a kitsch masterpiece. What those two movies have in common is that they're unintentionally funny.

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    2. Re:Movie critics.... by jaylene_slide · · Score: 1

      I have to wonder if Plan 9 was intended to be comic. Compare to the trailer for the Lost Skeleton of Cadavra, which seems clearly intended to be a spoof of the genre. There's not much difference in acting, plot, dialogue etc. If I didn't know better, someone could've told me that Plan 9 was a spoof of Cadavra and I'd have fallen for it. Bad spoof, but spoof nonetheless. Okay, you got me. I'm only posting so my sig can appear on-topic. :-D _______ slide

      --
      "Your proactive bipartisan synergy is indemnifying. Good work, carry on."
    3. Re:Movie critics.... by Night+Goat · · Score: 1

      I sleep now!

      The skeleton of Cadavra rules. You have to wonder if maybe the reason he stayed dead for so long was that he was such a jerk to everyone who previously stumbled across that cave!

    4. Re:Movie critics.... by MikeyToo · · Score: 1

      "You bony jackass!"

      --
      "Well Ranger Brad, I'm a scientist. I don't believe in anything." - Dr. Roger Fleming
    5. Re:Movie critics.... by robson · · Score: 1

      Kitsch an acquired taste, and something that many people are unlikely to gravitate toward without a certain set of influences.

    6. Re:Movie critics.... by magarity · · Score: 1

      I have to wonder if Plan 9 was intended to be comic
       
      Watch 'Ed Wood' starring Johnny Depp and all your questions about Plan 9 From Outer Space will be answered.

    7. Re:Movie critics.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and it's sequel

      "its".

  38. Even better: South Park by ishmalius · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I think that a wonderful homage to Tron comes from South Park. When the children at the Jewbilee camp summon Moses, and he appears in the shape of MCP, it is a precious moment.

    I suppose that people who never saw Tron missed the reference.

  39. Re:Even better: South Park by CrazyTalk · · Score: 2, Informative

    Family Guy riffed on Tron too - they had Peter driving one of those light cycles. I guess this just proves that plenty of Geeks go into animation!

  40. The memories! by SandwichHunter · · Score: 1

    I remember when Tron came out, well, it didn't last long enough in my podunk theatre for it to register. But when my parents plunked down 500 bucks for a VHS machine, it was my first rental. I loved the videogame(s), and liked it quite a bit at the age of 12 or whatever...but watching it in my early 20s, I couldn't even get through the whole thing for some reason! Must of been the drinking or something because I bought the super DVD when it came out a couple years ago and I just love it. From the first shot of the orange getting scanned, I just get hooked and can't leave until I watch the whole thing.

    1. Re:The memories! by lamz · · Score: 1

      I remember first watching Tron at a birthday party in 1983. For the kids entertainment, the hosts rented a Videodisc Player and we watched Tron. For you young'uns, Videodiscs were analog 12" discs, which had audio and video information. The player functioned much like a record player, with a needle dragged through a groove.

      And, much like a record player, they added horrible hiss to the audio and fuzz to the video, and could even 'skip'!

      --

      Mike van Lammeren
      It will challenge your head, your brain, and your mind.

  41. Earlier computer graphics by Richard+Kirk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The article says Disney experimented with using comupters for animation in the seventies. I think the first thing they tried doing was to do in-betweening of hand-plotted vector graphics, animating the series of lines on a vector scope, then drawing the lines to cells using an XY plotter. This was done using an IBM Whirlwind vector terminal in 1959 or 1960.

  42. Interesting fact they glossed over. by SynapseLapse · · Score: 5, Informative

    One thing the article failed to mention was how ardous it was to make those "mere 15 minutes of cgi." Back then, no animation tools existed nor were there any GUI based rendering tools either. All of the CGI was hard coded by hand using a text system very similar to Pov-ray. There was no animation programming either. To animate something they had to calculate how far they wanted each object to move, then calculate and enter the cordinates by hand frame-by-frame.

    Furthermore, the computers of the time didn't have enough memory to store entire movies, let alone any sort of device to output it to video tape or film like we have now. Instead, they had to render each individual frame, display the frame on a high-resolution monitor and then photograph the monitor onto regular 35mm film. Each frame would take several hours to render further complicating the process trying to keep the lighting uniform on each exposure.

    Now, fifteen minutes * 60 seconds in a minute * 24 frames per second = roughly 21,600 frames. Just an insane amount of manual labor.

    1. Re:Interesting fact they glossed over. by Suidae · · Score: 1

      You'd think they would have hired someone to write some programs to handle some of that. Honestly, hand calculating movement from frame to frame? How stupid is that? Sure, if you're only doing a few frames it might not be worth the trouble, but for 21k frames?

  43. You had to see it dossed on some good LSD! by jimijon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Obviously all the trails and glowing auras were meant for us trippies!

    --
    Mind | Body | Spirit | Cash
    1. Re:You had to see it dossed on some good LSD! by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      Obviously all the trails and glowing auras were meant for us trippies!

      The DEA busted the guys who made 95% of the North American supply of LSD in 2000 in an old missile silo in Kansas, IIRC, and add to the fact that the Grateful Dead and Phish dont tour anymore...

      these facts alone make a Tron trippie movie sequel unlikely

  44. 98 comments and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no mention of Yori in the skintight tron suit. The first and best screen geek chick.

    1. Re:98 comments and... by Jay+Maynard · · Score: 1

      Cindy Morgan (the actress who played Yori) still is babe-a-licious, 24 years later... and in that costume...yow!

      --
      Disinfect the GNU General Public Virus!
    2. Re:98 comments and... by dougrun · · Score: 1

      cindy was hot, in caddyshack as well. IMDB says she did voices for the tron 2.0 game. I know she gained a lot of weight since then but I think she got it under control.

    3. Re:98 comments and... by Jay+Maynard · · Score: 1

      She gained it, and has since lost it. She's back to a very nice shape.

      Not many folks know her from both Caddyshack and TRON...the two groups of fans are quite distinct.

      --
      Disinfect the GNU General Public Virus!
    4. Re:98 comments and... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "
      Not many folks know her from both Caddyshack and TRON...the two groups of fans are quite distinct."

      I disagree. Every computer person I know can exchange caddyshack references as fast as they can Tron references..or Star Trek, or Star Wars, or monty python.

      "He called me a baboon, he thinks I'm his wife. "

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:98 comments and... by Jay+Maynard · · Score: 1

      While this may be true of your peers, in her experience the fans almost never mention both. (We've had this conversation.) Some of my friends who recognize Caddyshack for the classic it is were quite surprised when I pointed out her role in TRON.

      --
      Disinfect the GNU General Public Virus!
  45. Didn't really bomb by suso · · Score: 1

    Somehow I think bomb is the wrong word to use. I just read this paragraph in the article:

    As it turns out, the summer of 1982 was the biggest in movie-going history at that time. E.T. was the box office juggernaut that stole America's heart, but the season also included Blade Runner, Conan the Barbarian, Fast Times at Ridgemont High, Poltergeist, Mad Max 2: The Road Warrior, Rocky III, Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan and a re-release of Raiders of the Lost Ark, which had grossed more than $200 million the previous year.

    That's a lot of movies to contend with. I suppose its simular to recent years where there have been many summers with more than 3 "must-see" movies. But that doesn't mean that movies like Fantastic Four bombed. It just means they didn't do well commericially compared with other movies of the time. Tron still made a big profit (according to the imdb).

    I think my favorite quote about Tron is one that was actually made on a newsgroup around that time. I've pasted it here for your enjoyment. From google groups

    It's enough to make one leave applications programming and
    go into graphics......

    james blasius


    Uh, yeah. I think that's what we would call an understatement.

  46. Tron 2.0? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was a sequel? I'm an 80s buff and didn't even know that. Link, please?

    1. Re:Tron 2.0? by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 2, Informative
      There was a sequel? I'm an 80s buff and didn't even know that. Link, please?

      He's talking about the game they did a couple years back. Should be cheap, I just saw it for $6 at the local Big Lots. Amusing, and it really does look very much like the movie - sobering to think we can do those kinds of graphics in real-time now.

      Music available here.

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    2. Re:Tron 2.0? by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

      Tron 2.0 a wonderful game if you have any fond memories of the movie. The game is fully intended to be the sequel to the movie and brings back many of the original actors to do the voices. Definately worth a trip to the bargain bin.

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
  47. Wendy Carlos soundtrack by zoeblade · · Score: 3, Informative

    Something the article doesn't mention is that Tron also had a futuristic soundtrack by Wendy Carlos, the same woman who composed (at least, she composed the song Timesteps) and performed the soundtrack for A Clockwork Orange.

    1. Re:Wendy Carlos soundtrack by torgosan · · Score: 1

      Picking nits, it was actually Wendy as Walter Carlos who did the Clockwork Orange work.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wendy_Carlos

      --
      "If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand". -Milton F.
    2. Re:Wendy Carlos soundtrack by murderlegendre · · Score: 1

      Since we're talking about Wendy, don't forget her excellent and very creepy soundtrack from The Shining. Her best work, IMO.

      --
      There's a Starman, waiting in the sky / He'd like to come and meet us, but he hasn't got the time.
    3. Re:Wendy Carlos soundtrack by Cybrex · · Score: 1

      It's great background music for work. I've got it on my iPod. :-)

      --
      Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
  48. Sound FX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting article. The CGI is definately impressive for it's time. But there is no mention of audio fx? I seem to remember that Atari 800's were responsible for many of the digital audio effects in Tron?

  49. Dude, this is /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Nobody here even notices that stuff... myself included.

    That's why I post anonymously. :)

    Now you make me want to find that movie on VHS, since I hadn't hit puberty when I last saw it back in the 80s.

  50. Rubber hose animation by ishmalius · · Score: 1

    I recall reading an article written by a Disney animator (sorry, don't remember who) in the 80's about the modelling and mathematics behind rubber hose animation. That is the type of animation used for early cartoon characters, like for Mickey Mouse's arms and legs. The article was basically about migrating from manual pen-and-ink animation to computer rendering. I don't know if Disney was actually in the process of doing that, but I suppose that they were considering it.

  51. Re:Why it flopped by crimperman · · Score: 1

    How's 'bout the possibility that most people just didn't think it was very good?

    erm...surely by "flopped" they mean "didn't do well at the box office", so how exactly did people think it wasn't very good without seeing it? Perhaps they didn't go to see it because of bad reviews, maybe the few that did thoguth it was bad and *everybody else* belived them, but I don't think we can ssume that people didn't watch something (the first time) because they didn't like it - can we?

  52. See, I look at that dialog... by cnelzie · · Score: 1

    ...and I see a different world with different rules of communication. It showed more of a seperation between our world and the computer world, then simply colored lights and other effects.

        The Programs understanding of their world and the Users was wholly different then our understanding of the everyday world.

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
  53. Excuse me... by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 4, Funny

    I believe he has my stapler.

    1. Re:Excuse me... by PhoenixPath · · Score: 1

      ROFBMALFO!!!

    2. Re:Excuse me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      ROFBMALFO!!!

      Do I have this right? you're Rolling On the Floor But [Y]our Ass Loves Foreign Objects? Even if so, what does that have to do with Tron? ... and that's too much sharing.

    3. Re:Excuse me... by PhoenixPath · · Score: 2, Funny

      Rolling On the Floor Because My Artificial Limbs Fell Off.

      Where the hell have you been?!?!?

    4. Re:Excuse me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you say "artificial limbs", you're talking about foreign objects in your ass, aren't you?

    5. Re:Excuse me... by PhoenixPath · · Score: 1

      Nope. Arms and Legs, hence why I'm rolling on the floor.

      You don't perhaps have some strange obsession with anal insertion, do you?

      If so, I recommend watching Bruce Allmighty. Chock full of Anal Dwelling Butt Monkeys.

  54. Re:Why it flopped by crimperman · · Score: 1

    maybe the few that did *thoguth* it was bad

    maybe they could spell too - sorry about that! :o)

  55. Raging Frisbee Bull by SeanDuggan · · Score: 4, Funny

    There's a reason why Scorcese's "Raging Bull" doesn't center on the world frisbee champion, you know.
    Obviously, because people wouldn't be able to stand the sheer thrill and excitement if it did.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  56. Re:Nice way to justify it... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
    It really had no soul about it. Wargames was a better movie.

    I was a teenager and playing with home computers, and I didn't think much of it, beyond the lifecycle sequence.

    I really hope that Disney remake it sometime. It's a movie that's got a great idea behind it, but was flabby and dull in execution and script. Keep the Wendy Carlos soundtrack, though ;)

  57. Who has seen this movie? by ke4roh · · Score: 1

    I have, and I think all the computer nerds should have already seen it, but in a graduate operating systems class at North Carolina State University in 2001, I asked for a show of hands of those who had seen the movie. Out of 80 students, only 3 had seen it! Now that could be a testament to the cultural diversity at NCSU, or it could be a testament to my age vs. theirs (I'm a few years older than most grad students, and was old enough to see it in the theater when it came out), or it could be a testament to the lack of true nerds at NCSU (my experience has been that half of my teammates on group projects have no idea how to write a program). At any rate, people need to know a little bit of history. Kudos, for once ;-) to the editors for posting this story.

    --
    I hate call waitin`~+~~~
    NO CARRIER
    1. Re:Who has seen this movie? by panda · · Score: 1

      (my experience has been that half of my teammates on group projects have no idea how to write a program)

      That's been my experience working in the software industry for ten years.

      Back on topic: Yeah, I saw Tron when it came out. I was 12. I had just gotten my own computer at home and begun hacking. I haven't stopped since. I'm not sure how much influence Tron had on my interest in programming, but I really enjoyed the film then and did again when I saw it several years later.

      --
      Just be sure to wear the gold uniform when you beam down -- you know what happens when you wear the red one.
  58. Making money on movies by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1

    Because you generally need to make several times the cost of the movie at the box office to break even. Theaters take a cut, distributors take a cut, then there's the advertising costs to pay on top... which can be massive: in the extreme case of low-budget movies, they can be many times the cost of the movie itself.
    Unless, of course, you're Uwe Boll, in which case you've already made enough money to pay for the movie before it even opens. Say what you will about the man's skills in making movies (and believe you me, I'm willing to spill quite a bit of invective in that area) but he's a near genius at raising money. Between the German tax loophole and merchandising rights, he had his Tomb Raider movie paid off before opening.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  59. An Actuarial Perspective by xactuary · · Score: 2, Funny
    I saw TRON on opening day with a bunch of pals, on mushrooms. I 'm happen to be an actuary, and when RAM announces that he is an actuarial program, believe me, it cracked me up. I've always loved that movie and have probably seen it a dozen times since.

    --
    Say hello to my little sig.
  60. Re:The Theatre takes at least 1/2 of the gross by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...which means that the investors didn't make their money back.

  61. Just because it was cool by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

    The powers that be at the studio really resented the film with all these young conjurers, and Wilheit was looked down upon by the old Disney guard

    Computer effects were being pitched to the major studios as far back as the 1970s, but no one was interested.

    The people at Disney that were against Tron the entire making of the movie in the end stood up the week before it came out and 'said we're going to do more business than Star Wars

    vs.

    They thought it would be cool

    I wonder just how many really great ideas have been lost to society because imaginationless people "resented" them? This is truly the most expensive problem society faces: the "it will never work" people. They cost society trillions in advancement 24 hours a day. It is wrong.

    Solomon also pointed out that John Lasseter, who directed the Toy Story films, was inspired by Tron to move into computer animation.

    Oh my gosh, that computer stuff, the film was a box office flop, we don't want anything to do with that, that's craziness

    Tron became Finding Nemo, the Incredibles, Monsters Inc. and Toy Story. Hmm. Maybe they should have more box office flops?

    SOME INVESTMENTS DON'T SHOW UP IN THE QUARTERLY REPORTS. SOMETIMES IT ISN'T JUST ABOUT THE TALL DOLLARS.

    --
    Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
  62. They Fight Crime! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She's Yori, a sidekick added for the 15-34 demographic
    He's nVidia-Tron pumped up and ready to kick the MPC
    It's a CGI monkey that can crack any password in nanoseconds

    THEY FIGHT CRIME!

    http://home.epix.net/~mhryvnak/theyfightcrime.html

  63. Tron and Blade Runner were worth the trips by ianscot · · Score: 3, Insightful
    [Tron] was 22nd in the top grossing films of 1982. Blade Runner was 27th that year.

    Man, I hadn't remembered that those came out the same year. I biked maybe five miles to see Tron at the local theater that was showing it, at least a few times. I remember locking the chain around the bike rack and walking from the summer heat into that run down theater with its thinning carpet and whiff of warmed popcorn. That movie made frisbee extra fun that year. Later on the Intellivision games, with the Recognizer "bosses"...

    "Blade Runner" we were too young for, it being an R, so my older brother took us to that for my birthday. That means it was late June. What the heck was anyone doing releasing that movie as a summer blockbuster? The theater was basically empty except for us.

    Neither one of them got the box office that its studio was expecting. As investments, though? I'm not that keen on either one as a work of high art, but the ripple effect they had was really something, culturally.

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  64. Re:I thought the lines were a little short to get by Grrr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    calculate the life time earnings of those who got into computers partly because of seeing it and you may be surprised :)

    I resemble that remark. (Even ended up working with a III system later in '82, though not doing anything nearly as interesting with it...)

    Yeah, the dialogue is awful (though not as bad as The Black Hole), but the look and soundtrack are still inspiring. As another poster said, this film was ahead of its time - by at least a good twenty minutes...

    <grrr />

  65. Imagineering by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was working (learning) in the biggest graphics lab in the world at the time _Tron_ was made, Summer 1982. The New York Institute of Technology had a DEC VAX/VMS datacenter, with DEC GIGI graphics terminals and other rendering HW. We were busy scanning 1970s progressive rock album covers and inserting our own adventures into the cover art. Then Disney opened their Tron lab, and we weren't the biggest anymore - just another little college computer room.

    It was like our bong hits wore off, just as someone else at the school prom dosed us all with LSD, then they started flying around the dance hall.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  66. Box Office Flop... by xeer0 · · Score: 1

    Box office flop... what a bummer. I did my part. I saw Tron twice opening day. I went and saw it in the afternoon with my pals then went home and told my family all about it. So then back we went. What a great day.

    During Flynn's "zap-in", you zoom past pixelated, digitized clouds on the way to the surface of the digital world. I was totally transported.

    --
    "Hey... don't be mean." --Buckaroo Banzai
  67. The Delusional Director by oni · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the article: "One of the things I'm most proud about in Tron is there are no guns in the movie -- it's a killer Frisbee!" he said. "I mean, try to make an action adventure movie without a gun. I dare you."

    So, those aren't gun turrets on the tanks? I guess those are love turrets, and they fire love and happiness.

    1. Re:The Delusional Director by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They shoot daisies.

    2. Re:The Delusional Director by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing clever to say, other than the above poster's comments made me laugh out loud right here at work. Co-workers looked over at me quizzically. Yes, I can read /. at work, and my boss knows it. Life is grand.

      Love turrets. LOL.

    3. Re:The Delusional Director by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Daisy Duke or Miss Daisy?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:The Delusional Director by IsItWashable · · Score: 1

      "Make an action movie without guns"? How about HALF A KAZILLION (at least) martial arts movies?

  68. It was a brave new world by hey! · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The geeks I knew back in the day loved Tron, not as satire, but possibly something more like burlesque. But even though it was brain-dead fun, there was something more to the movie that made us accept it. That wasn't easy; we weren't an easier audience to please than modern geeks, who roll their eyes at the cliche "tap-tap-tap we're in" hacking scene. Nobody feels affection for a movie if they don't sense some level of truth in it.

    As implausible as the plot devices were, Tron actually captured something about how it felt working with computers in that era. You had a great deal of control, but programs had reached a point of complexity where different pieces of software almost had a mind of their own. And since the suits only had a vague idea of what you did, they tried to avoid you as much as possible, which meant on a day to day basis you really interacted with bits of software more than you did people. There were no ex-geek managers for the simple reason there were no ex-geeks.

    Add to that, very few of us had computers in their home; the home computers that existed were for practical purposes not much more than toys.

    The upshot was, when you sat down in front of that terminal at the start of the work day, it really felt like preparing to dive into an alternate universe, with its own population.

    And furthermore, there was no Internet. Internet means you're handling emails, IM, blogging and interacting with real, flesh and blood people; or at least what those people are pretending to be. Having the Internet means that software flows in and out of your computer like electricity. In those days your computer was isolated, like one of the Galapagos Islands, and sparsely populated with humans. The real people were, in the cast of characters a distinct minority. When you chatted at the watercooler about one program or another idiosyncracies, it was gossipping.


            "O wonder!
            How many goodly creatures are there here!
            How beautious mankind is!
            O brave new world,
            That has such people in't!"


    Tron, while it may not be Citizen Kane, captured the feeling of an unique moment in computer history.
    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  69. whiz kids by raluxs · · Score: 1

    Whiz kids, mmmmmmmmmmmhmmmmmmmmmmm, Alice was nice, she made Richie computer sing, remember that?

    1. Re:whiz kids by stalky14 · · Score: 1

      I remember Whiz Kids. It was a Simon & Simon spinoff, wasn't it?
      I haven't seen it since it originally aired. Are there downloads
      anywhere?

    2. Re:whiz kids by tinkertim · · Score: 1

      >> I remember Whiz Kids. It was a Simon & Simon spinoff, wasn't it?
      >> I haven't seen it since it originally aired. Are there downloads
      >> anywhere?

      I'm more than sure one or more good natured geeks have compiled the series however current laws would prohibit its sale or distribution, even if the network / owner itself was not distributing it. I tried to find some DVD's a few years ago hoping perhaps some compilation was released but didn't have any luck.

      Now that you mention it, It was on after Simon & Simon, but I didn't know it was a spin off of the series itself, however I do remember 'Rick & AJ' making guest appearances in the show.

      That show made me go buy BASIC magazines weekly and spend hours keying in hundreds of lines of code on the trash-80's 'slightly raised membrane' keypad (the thing was like a calculator you could hook up to a TV more than a computer). I remember saving them to tape (audio casette).

      The thing about Tron, My TRS-80 came a good .. several years after the movie was out of circulation, and the tech in the movie was still plausable, and still way more advanced than anything I had. It made me want to create things because I knew *someone* could, so why not me? :) I get a little miffed when I see it called a flop.

      Does anyone remember ADAM? First PC I can remember that shipped with a dot matrix printer, came out just after Coleco made their attempt.

      I'm going to go look for my Tron light disc frisbee, I think I still have it somewhere.

    3. Re:whiz kids by stalky14 · · Score: 1

      IIRC, the printer that came witht he Adam was daisy-wheel, and
      the power supply for the whole system was in the printer!

  70. Killer App by TheZorch · · Score: 1

    Whatever happed to "Tron: Killer App" the sequel advertised on the Tron DVD? The world is ready and waiting for a Tron sequel. What's the deal?

    --
    Michael "TheZorch" Haney
    thezorch@gmail.com
    http://thezorch.googlepages.com/home
    1. Re:Killer App by jlramirez · · Score: 0

      Its going to be awesome. A Duke Nukem Forever and Tron: Killer App simultaneous realease!!

      --
      "Me claiming Satan exist is just as valid as you claiming an atom exists" - 1inChrist
    2. Re:Killer App by Cybrex · · Score: 1

      Actually, Tron: Killer App was the X-Box version of Tron 2.0. It was the same as the other (excellent) versions of the game, but with a few additional features, such as the ability to use the rod to res up a light cycle at any time. I almost bought an X-Box just for this game.

      --
      Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
    3. Re:Killer App by Cybrex · · Score: 1

      It came out a couple of years ago. It's probably one of the most under-rated games of all time.

      http://buenavistagames.go.com/product/tronXBOX.htm l

      --
      Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
  71. The Depeche Mode Angle by ckotchey · · Score: 1

    From the website: What happens when Tron meets Depeche Mode? Surprisingly, a pretty stunning home-made edit by Justin Alt. http://www.transbuddha.com/index.php/buddha/suffer _well/

    Seeing this made me appreciate the song much more, and rekindled my interest in Tron again.

  72. Tron Remake by TomHandy · · Score: 1
    I remember a year or two ago there was some news about Disney planning a remake of Tron (rather than a sequel)....... which apparently would have been the same basic idea of Tron, except updated for things like the Internet, etc.

    Is this still happening? When I first heard about it, it struck me as a huge mistake, to do a reimagining rather than a sequel (that is, a sequel with Lisberger involved, and hopefully Wendy Carlos music.... something along the lines of the Tron 2.0 video game).

    I'd still of course love to see what Pixar might do with the "Tron" style.

    1. Re:Tron Remake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd still of course love to see what Pixar might do with the "Tron" style.

      Well, might not be the same thing, but you can catch what Squaresoft did with the idea in a couple weeks. Kingdom Hearts II features an area themed on Tron.

  73. Most evocative quote ever by hey! · · Score: 1

    It was like we put LSD in the punch at the school prom and it was just way more than they can handle.

    Holleee cow. The perfect image of the spurned geek, trying to make people understand and failing miserably.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  74. What?! by eshefer · · Score: 1

    I come from What, you insensitive clod!

  75. You were an uptight kid by Sinistar2k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When I was a kid, especially in '82 (age 9), I didn't really focus on the directing, writing, and point of a film.

    1. Re:You were an uptight kid by dbmasters · · Score: 1

      I was 15 at the time, even then a movie needed some sort of point to keep my attention, and Tron had none...cool effects only keeps one's attention so long. I agree with the other response, War Games was a much better film.

      --
      dB Masters
  76. Tron Anniversary DVD & Sony PS2: FYI by amrust · · Score: 1

    After reading this article, many of you may be hit with nostalgia, and consider purchasing 'Tron' on DVD. It's loaded with extras, and of course looks much better than the VHS version.

    But I just wanted to inform those of you who do not know: The 20th Anniversary DVD (2-disc version) of 'Tron' will not play properly on Sony PS2. The DVD plays fine on a standard DVD player. But on a PS2, it pixellates and locks up, on certain scenes.

    Just trying to save some PS2 users a few trips to the store, in an attempt to exchange a 'faulty' DVD. If you get the 20th Anniversary DVD of 'Tron', be warned it likely will not play properly in your PS2. It will play properly on a regular DVD player.

    --
    VOTE!
    1. Re:Tron Anniversary DVD & Sony PS2: FYI by Cybrex · · Score: 1

      I can verify that. I had the same problem. Fantastic DVD set, though. It was clearly put together by people who love the movie. It's extremely comprehensive, and has the coolest animated menus I've ever seen.

      --
      Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
  77. Escapism is definitely a plus by blueZ3 · · Score: 1

    I 100% agree. I'd love to see more movies of this type; the recent spate of Marvel/Superhero movies has been nice (though not all were well made). When I go to the movies, I'm hoping for something to entertain and amuse. I want to see Bruce Willis jump out of an exploding car traveling 60 mph and survive, or Brandon Fraiser fighting mummies, or Angelina Jolie swiming through Atlantis.

    I don't want to see "real life" in my movies--I see that every day, thanks.

    --
    Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    1. Re:Escapism is definitely a plus by mink · · Score: 1

      On the bright side we have 2 more movies coming with Johnny Depp bucking his swash. Hopefully they can live up to the first film at a minimum.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  78. That's the true Story of Tron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  79. Re:Nice way to justify it... by dbmasters · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    HEY, who the heck marked me a troll? Is what I am saying not a valid opinion? I'd like to hear a reason for that from the 30-something tinfoil hat wearing geeks that likely lives in hismom's basement. Come on now, seriously, the movie was horrendous, one can hardly argue that point...

    --
    dB Masters
  80. Discs Of Tron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Discs of Tron is still one of my favorite video games. It has good graphics, but the gameplay is a blast.

    Anyone else remember that game?

    I tried it on MAME a few years ago, but it wasn't the same as playing it in the arcade.

    1. Re:Discs Of Tron by JaxGator75 · · Score: 1
      One of my favorites. You cannot replicate the experience without speakers all around you and the little wheel to raise and lower your aim. Quite awesome.

      --
      Come and see the violence inherent in the system!
    2. Re:Discs Of Tron by mbowen · · Score: 1

      God, now I'm thinking that I have to get that ringtone.

      --
      fault-tolerant
  81. Re:Even better: South Park by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Family Guy riffed on Tron too - they had Peter driving one of those light cycles.

    "Man, I haven't seen you since high school. What are you up to these days?"
    "I'm the Red Guy. What about you?"
    "Oh, I'm the Green Guy."

  82. APPLE JACK BIP BIP by Pike · · Score: 1

    "Back then, what did you get from Disney? Cute li'l films about cute fuzzy animals having some cute adventures. So people did not expect a 'serious' science fiction movie.

    "Second, it was the wrong kind of science fiction for this time. Science fiction back then was either in a galaxy far, far away or equally far away in the future. But most certainly not NOW. How can you make science fiction in the NOW?"

    NO! you are forgetting The Computer Who Wore Tennis Shoes , some of the most advanced science fiction set in the NOW (the 1969 now that is), pitting Dexter Riley against the evil AJ Arno. Disney WAS a scifi powerhouse!!!

    1. Re:APPLE JACK BIP BIP by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

      What was the movie where the computer got AI and fell in love with the girlfriend of the guy in the apartment? Lol, i cannot remmeber that one at all...

  83. "Come on, you SCSI data!!!" by b00m3rang · · Score: 1

    Great movie. Saw it in the theater when I was 6 or 7. I really can't defend the dialogue, though :)

  84. First Geek Movie by mbowen · · Score: 5, Informative
    It's rather astounding that there are so many young geeks who think Tron was lame. Of course it's lame by today's standards. But I was an actual programmer on the job in those days when it was considered incredible to get 300KB for your own program's memory. Tron was the first movie about programmers that made our style comprehensible. We were considered truly weird, and somebody as cool as Bruce Boxleitner to star as a programmer was considered a coup. That says a huge amount about the social acceptance of OGs (original geeks).

    The ethic of programs of little fighters within a sometimes incomprehensible system was very appealing. The idea of old crusty programs bearing the likeness of their users was cool. The idea of independently minded security programs running around like white blood cells was also pretty fabulous. In terms of what actual programs could do at the time, Tron was inspirational to real programmers. I mean every program in Tron could communicate to every other program. Strong programs could defeat weak programs by learning new games at the instruction of stronger still programs, all without user intervention. A super program that could heal other programs that had crashed...

    There were realistic in-jokes, like the Bit, the PacMan graphic in Stark's domain, the endless infinty of cubicles, and the fantasy that (arcade) gamers could pull chicks by getting high scores.

    Tron was true the spirit of the then-emerging hacker ethic in many ways that other movies haven't really ever captured. In fact, I can't think of any other that captures more truly on an emotional scale how programmers think about their programs. In fact there is probably only one movie that has ever been cooler to hackers and that is Swordfish.

    --
    fault-tolerant
    1. Re:First Geek Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I was a programmer geek when Tron came out. It was lame then and it's still lame.

    2. Re:First Geek Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      S-w-o-r-d-f-i-s-h

      You have to be kidding

    3. Re:First Geek Movie by sharkey · · Score: 1
      the endless infinty of cubicles

      Wasn't this added for the DVD released a few years ago?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    4. Re:First Geek Movie by mbowen · · Score: 1

      I've never seen the DVD. I'm sure it was in the original.

      --
      fault-tolerant
    5. Re:First Geek Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? You've never been forced to crack the pentagon while having a gun held to your head and being orally serviced by a blonde? You must have a really boring job...

    6. Re:First Geek Movie by MemoryDragon · · Score: 1

      I was a young geek back then, and nowadays I still think the movie is lame. Back then however I liked it. Tron did not age well, it shows its deficiencies in story and character development nowadays.

    7. Re:First Geek Movie by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Could be. I haven't seen the original in over 10 years. I thought there was a wall removed and cubes digitally added "behind" Alan's desk.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    8. Re:First Geek Movie by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, it takes more than nifty effects and appealing ideas for a film to succeed. Trivialities such as plot and characterization need to be seen to as well. In the case of Tron, they weren't. It was easy to overlook that on first viewing, and as a CS student (and working programmer, part-time) at the time it was released I fully understand the appeal from your point of view. But once the "whiz-bang" factor fades, there's very little of substance to this movie.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    9. Re:First Geek Movie by thirty2bit · · Score: 1

      I was a computer programming geek back when Tron was squirted out. Tron was lame back then, and still is lame today. The film concepts don't translate to computers, even with assistance from mind-altering drugs.

      Besides, it starred Jeff Bridges. He is teh spooky anyway.

  85. Tron's most redeeming feature by chroma · · Score: 1

    The movie's most redeeming feature is that it gets across the idea that computers should be used for the free distribution of information. The evil MCP is the one that blocks off all access to the I/O towers, forcing our heroes to embark on their quest.

    --

    Your design to a real part online: Big Blue Saw
  86. Re:Nice way to justify it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    I was going to make an argument against your claims, but since all you really said was that you didn't understand it I can't argue with that. However just because you couldn't enjoy it doesn't mean that no one can enjoy it. I for one enjoyed Tron and like the abstract viewpoint it provided. As Humans we often do not think of perspectives other than our own.

    Tron provided a realistic main plot (theft of someones work), an interesting subplot (programs having a life of there own), a drama (the strugle for freedom), and a love story. The movie was more complex that you give it credit for. A story about computers doesn't have to be accurate to how computers are at the time of the story to be a good story. It's not fact after all it's fiction.

  87. not everyone enjoys LSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...in their punch.

  88. Why the flop? It's simple. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quite frankly, "Tron" was a lousy movie. The story sucked and the computerised effects were lame. A real disappointment. Why should anyone be surprised it flopped at the box office? Now to garner some more revenue, the movie is periodically resurrected on /. as some kind of major event in computerized motion picture magic, when only 15% was CGI. I'm not at all surprised by the 15% figure. My buddies and I left the theater all with the opinion the movie was strongly overhyped for being computer generated. Tron is trash and its poor box office stands in testimony to the intelligence of the public.

  89. He flatters himself by Y2 · · Score: 1
    'It was like we put LSD in the punch at the school prom and it was just way more than they can handle,' said Steven Lisberger.

    No, it was like a completely stupid premise. Nowadays the general audience is prepared for senseless techno-premises, and the tech-savvy audience is resigned to them.

    --
    "But all your emitter and collector are belong to me!"
  90. Re:Even better: South Park by 6*7 · · Score: 1

    The Dexter's Lab. episode "Game Over" is essentially a remake of Tron.

  91. What about Space Paranoids? by metamatic · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised nobody's made a clone of "Space Paranoids".

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    1. Re:What about Space Paranoids? by Jay+Maynard · · Score: 1

      Someone is. There's a link to the project on the front page of Tron-Sector.

      --
      Disinfect the GNU General Public Virus!
  92. Hello Tronguy by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

    I'll bet all the kids making fun of you feel bad now.

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
    1. Re:Hello Tronguy by Jay+Maynard · · Score: 1

      Oh, I doubt it...but they lost their power to make me feel bad a long time ago.

      --
      Disinfect the GNU General Public Virus!
  93. Gee, thanks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for runing what was my all time favorite movie!! heh

    Anyone else think that guy looks like Milton? "I like the red Swingline because it doesn't bind up as much.." "Ok, but now I have to burn the building..."

  94. Re:Even better: South Park by Cybrex · · Score: 1

    When Moses appeared in that episode I was so amazed that I probably drooled all over myself. Suddenly I was 12 again. I couldn't believe that they'd slip in such an (I thought) obscure reference.

    For months afterwards, my wife and I would say "No cake for the impurator!" to each other at random times. It's still kind of a running joke with us.

    --
    Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
  95. I Require... by jimbonics · · Score: 0

    Macaroni Pictures.

    1. Re:I Require... by ajlitt · · Score: 1

      I believe the correct answer is "Get me some juice bitch, I'm thirsty. And a banana cognac bitch!"

    2. Re:I Require... by jimbonics · · Score: 0

      http://www.planearium2.de/pics/pics-309-2.jpg He requires macaroni pictures god damnit

  96. Re:Even better: South Park by blincoln · · Score: 1

    When Moses appeared in that episode I was so amazed that I probably drooled all over myself. Suddenly I was 12 again. I couldn't believe that they'd slip in such an (I thought) obscure reference.

    I agree about it being great (both because of the Tron reference and the context), but South Park is all about the obscure references. I haven't watched it in years, but I remember seeing the film at a theatre and being the only person who laughed at the "I... have had... enough of... YOU!" take-off on Star Trek III.

    --
    "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
  97. Tron 2.0 and the handheld game! by Cybrex · · Score: 1

    Am I the only person on the planet who played TRON 2.0?

    Lemme tell 'ya, the game is fantastic! There's simply nothing about it that isn't great. I rank it as the 2nd best video game I've ever played (after Deus Ex). It is by far the most visually appealing game I've played, hands down. So much so that I suspect that my very concept of aesthetic beauty was probably largely derived from Tron. Some of the environments are so beautiful that I'd have to stop actually playing the game for a minute and just look around.

    I've played both Armagetron and GLtron, and love them. When I found out that TRON 2.0 was coming out, and that it includes a light cycles component, I was dubious. How could it improve on what was already available out there for free? Trust me, it does.

    As far as the plot of the game goes, I think it's a worthy sequel to the original movie. The story is engaging, and they effectively update the Tron universe to the present day, staying true to the original movie while also explaining how it is that, if the technology to "digitize" people existed in 1982, we aren't zapping people back and forth all the time. I've seen an early draft script that was written for a film sequel to Tron. The TRON 2.0 game is actually better.

    The multiplayer modes are fantastic, with 3 distinct types- light cycles, team arena combat (similar to the various game grid battles in the movie, only more playable), and deathmatch (which requires a patch on the PC version).

    Obviously I'm more than a bit of a Tron nut. I wrote a light cycle game for the IBM PS/2 as my final project in a high school BASIC programming class back in `88. For the sake of completeness regarding light cycles games, does anyone else remember or have the handheld electronic game that came out? It used an LED display and had three minigames in it, including a light cycle game. Not great by any means, but nifty for the time period. I've got one. :-)

    --
    Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
  98. Idea for a real Tron 2 movie: by MsGeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Flynn, who initially started out as an innovative programmer of videogames, presides over Encom as it becomes the main provider of operating systems for personal computers. Flynn grows more and more out of touch the more money he makes, and his lust for more and more domination of the field becomes more and more intense.

    It is now 1995. Two things have emerged that he cannot control:
    1.) Arpanet becomes the Internet, and is opened to the Great Unwashed. It begins to take shape as its own cybernetic landscape, much like the interior of the Mainframe but infinitely more vast.
    2.) A Flynn-like programmer in Europe, Karl Svenson, has created an operating system which, while still rough around the edges, has the potential of blowing Encom's "Portals" system out of the water. And he's giving it away. The thought galls Flynn.

    So Flynn goes back to a wheel of paper punch tape and resurrects the MCP. The MCP's new mission: to conquer the Internet and to eliminate Svenson. The MCP gets out of Flynn's control, and Flynn and Svenson are eventually forced to work together to prevent the MCP from putting them both out of business.

    If you work at Pixar, go right ahead and take this. You're welcome.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  99. Re:Even better: South Park by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

    I desire... I desire... paper plate bean shakers!

  100. Tron 2 is obvious by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

    Tron 1: People go into the game.

    Tron 2: The game invades reality.

    Will they figure out how cool a tank crushing a bunch of cars as it warps in is? Probably not.

    1. Re:Tron 2 is obvious by Apotsy · · Score: 1
      That's an interesting idea, but it introduces a whole set of problems that could ruin the atmosphere.

      If a story takes place in an alternate universe, you can just ignore or alter the laws of physics at will. But when it takes place in the "real world", you have a lot of explaining to do, and it takes your imaginary fantasy universe and grounds it, limiting the freedom of it. It might be cool, but it would be very hard to pull it off without killing the fun.

  101. Wargames may have been a better movie... by TheAwkmaster · · Score: 1

    but which movie wins the Googlefight?

  102. A match made in heaven... by Moe+Napoli · · Score: 1

    From the last page of the article:

    Lisberger made two more movies after Tron: Hot Pursuit, a comedy starring John Cusack...

    Now there's a movie I would pay to see!!!!

  103. Reboot? by NeuroManson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just thought it was odd that they failed to mention Tron's "unofficial" sequel, which covered a lot of similar premises (almost every all of them). Since the series came out just barely 12 years after Tron, it's about as good as an homage as any.

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  104. Re:Even better: South Park by Ykant · · Score: 1

    Moses also in the episode "Super Best Friends". In this episode, we learn that Jesus, Muhammad, Budda, Krishna, Moses, Lao Tsu, and Joseph Smith are a team, fighting evildoers around the world. Oh, and Sea Man - whose name is frequently misprounced.

    --
    Spelling, grammar, punctuation? We need something that checks logic.
  105. Great Movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My dad was a programmer at the time when this came out. And I remember him telling me we were going to see a movie about a guy that gets sucked into a computer. That was the coolest thing I had heard. That movie got me hooked on computers. There were only 3 computer books in my school library and I was the only one that ever checked them out.
    ah the memories.
    I hope there can be great movies such as this to inspire my children

  106. Tron comic by sdsichero · · Score: 1

    I saw Tron as a kid and I still like it today (though not as much, but still do)... A new Tron comic is set to come out this spring... And as another poster mentioned, I really loved Reboot...

  107. The Lisberger Legacy by mutoneon · · Score: 1

    I have a friend who was Steve Lisberger's son's room-mate. Thought you might enjoy this link to a music video that he made for Daft Punk's song "Short Circuit". http://moneydick.com/videos/kitaro_-_shortcircuit_ daft_punk.mov

  108. Crash producer is broke!!!!!!!!! by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    http://www.news24.com/News24/Entertainment/Abroad/ 0,,2-1225-1243_1896256,00.html

    Los Angeles - The independent co-producer of Crash, last week's surprise winner of the Oscar for best film, said that she was broke, a Hollywood journal reported on Friday.

    Cathy Schulman mounted the stage at Hollywood's Kodak Theatre last Sunday alongside Crash director Paul Haggis to accept the golden statuette for best film, beating out the favoured Brokeback Mountain.

    But the film community's honour for her work has not translated into financial compensation.

    "I have the interesting distinction of having made five movies in a row without being paid. I can't pay my bills," Schulman said, according to the Hollywood Reporter.

    Schulman is battling Crash co-producer and former business partner Bob Yari over two million dollars in expenses and bonuses related to making films.

    Yari insisted that she go without salary for the five years she worked with him, she said.

    Yari himself is contesting in court the decision of the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, which awards the Oscars, and the Producers Guild to not credit him as a Crash producer.

    Both organisations define "producer" as someone who works actively on a film, and not just finances it.

    Crash, produced for just $6.5m, had earned $83m worldwide before it won the Oscar, according to reports.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  109. There was a Tron remake by geekoid · · Score: 1

    it was called "The Matrix".

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  110. I guess scientology dude missed out by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    Funny seeing how the scientology dude was missed, because its not really a real religeon, unless
    he can make his alien friends visit.

    Funny how the CHEF is leaving because they finaly dissed scientology.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  111. "Latent" Fans? by polyex · · Score: 1

    I am confused as to why the author of this article is using the word latent to describe the fans that may be interested in this particular story. Why would fans of Tron be hiding? -Adam

  112. Source Code for the CGI Effects... by sonicth · · Score: 1

    It would be good if the firms have released the source code for the effects from the film! I know it is not very likely to happen, at least in the near future, but how amazing it would be, even and incentive to learn PDP-10 assembly?!!!

    I think that effects are amazing; it is not the polygon that counts, but the the artistic vision, the excellence of creators' work; and tho think that most of it has been hardcoded, makes it even more appealing; think 18th century mechanical watch comparing to modern quartz wristwatch.

  113. Armagetron Advanced 0.2.8.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This story comes right after the release of Armagetron Advanced 0.2.8.0. They have rpm (x86), autopackage (x86), autopackage (x86_64), dmg (ppc-OSX), and Windows binary versions (and source code, of course). I easily installed the Autopackage on my Debian Sid (I wish more project released autopackages). Play it for a while, IMO it's the best lightcycle game around.

    http://www.armagetronad.net/downloads.php

    (BTW, an old /. post linked to this http://tinyurl.com/8g6pz picture from Kingdom Hearts 2 featuring a Tron character next to Donald Duck. Hey, Tron's Disney after all ;-) )

    Andûr