There's a difference between a "communications service" and a "data service"? But wouldn't you have to communicate data in order for it to appear? And wouldn't communications be meaningless without data to communicate?
Think of the difference between a layer 1 provider and a layer 3 provider. One provides the physical connectivity, the other provides the logical connectivity. The first is a communications service, the second is a data service.
Please tell me the costs of having SRS for a few million users, and a system handling over a million inbound messages a minute, quite a few of which get forwarded out directly from our servers (distributed over two continents).
If you are willing to pay to build that infrastructure for us, let me know.
Look, who cares if SPF breaks things. The things it breaks arn't really that important
Except to those of us who run real mail servers.
Let me know when you run a service handling over a million messages a minute, a few million user accounts and need to deal with forwarding mail with server farms on two continents that what SPF breaks is trivial.
Can you show me a point to point Mac desktop vs PC desktop comparison please? Take a 500 USD budget for starters (a reasonable whitebox PC fits in that range).
I hope your grandmom can administer a computer, or shje has a professional do it for her. like it or not, a computer is capable of running arbitrary code, and hiding the complexity does not make it go away.
Re:It's the responsability of the ISPs to monitor.
on
Zombie Report By ISP
·
· Score: 1
Do you really want to allow an ISP to search your PC?
What if this was a corporate laptop? The CEOs laptop? Configured to only VPN into the corporate network, and the scanner breaks something?
Do you want to fight those lawsuits?
I would just disconnect those users, and let them go to my competitors, except that there are too many idiots and any good ISP would soon go out of business that way. Plus, charging for reconnection has exactly that effect. Maybe ISPs should charge for outbound bandwidth by the byte, forcing users to clean up or pay.
So you mean that HTML email, Outlook and Outlook Express should be banned, and only plain text emails should be allowed? Any attachments must be GPG/PGP or S/MIME signed?
Good idea. Now enforce _that_ in the American workplace.
They should show up as different devices. i.e. I have a repository over here on the server, and over here on the desktop.
NFS. The remote system is just another directory. It isn't another device
Some of us need more than a pretty desktop for real work. Apples work for you. They don't work for everyone, and where their UI clashes with the requirements of other people (including device transparency), the UI will go.
The ministry of peace. The ministry of truth. The department of homeland security.
Re:Congratulations are in order!
on
A Decade of PHP
·
· Score: 1
The trick is to be able to have an abstraction interface between the database access and the rest of your code.
function get_info($dsn, $query, $parameters) { }
Now the bulk of your code not know what DB you use. tie your SQL very tightly to the database. Put an abstraction layer between DB specific code and non specific code. Works well.
Fix their security holes by taking away features which now give them a lead in companies?
The security holes created by those features are what is causing them to lose market share. They would be best served by removing ActiveX, and treating all input to the browser as malicious.
Slashdot Mirror
India has multiple fibre optic links. You wouldn't even notice it.
Unix geeks do:
$make universe
$sudo make install
You dream small if you only dream of putting up buildings.
You mean litigate? They're not writing the law...
Yet.
And the cracker walks right in via HTTP, if you forget to patch Apache.
There's a difference between a "communications service" and a "data service"?
But wouldn't you have to communicate data in order for it to appear? And wouldn't communications be meaningless without data to communicate?
Think of the difference between a layer 1 provider and a layer 3 provider. One provides the physical connectivity, the other provides the logical connectivity. The first is a communications service, the second is a data service.
You really need to go through the mail sent to the postmaster and abuse addresses, particularly if there are other users on that system.
Also, email is not a reliable protocol, so it cannot be used for delivering legal notices.
Would you pay the service fees for those call centre employees salaries?
submission is 587/tcp, not 589.
Please tell me the costs of having SRS for a few million users, and a system handling over a million inbound messages a minute, quite a few of which get forwarded out directly from our servers (distributed over two continents).
If you are willing to pay to build that infrastructure for us, let me know.
Look, who cares if SPF breaks things. The things it breaks arn't really that important
Except to those of us who run real mail servers.
Let me know when you run a service handling over a million messages a minute, a few million user accounts and need to deal with forwarding mail with server farms on two continents that what SPF breaks is trivial.
Trusted by whom? Just because your OS vendor trusts someone does not mean that the rest of us do.
A trusts B
B trusts C
does not imply A trusts C
Desktop != Laptop.
Laptop != desktop.
Can you show me a point to point Mac desktop vs PC desktop comparison please?
Take a 500 USD budget for starters (a reasonable whitebox PC fits in that range).
I hope your grandmom can administer a computer, or shje has a professional do it for her. like it or not, a computer is capable of running arbitrary code, and hiding the complexity does not make it go away.
Do you really want to allow an ISP to search your PC?
What if this was a corporate laptop? The CEOs laptop? Configured to only VPN into the corporate network, and the scanner breaks something?
Do you want to fight those lawsuits?
I would just disconnect those users, and let them go to my competitors, except that there are too many idiots and any good ISP would soon go out of business that way. Plus, charging for reconnection has exactly that effect. Maybe ISPs should charge for outbound bandwidth by the byte, forcing users to clean up or pay.
How long before a Javascript interpreter is coded into emacs?
So you mean that HTML email, Outlook and Outlook Express should be banned, and only plain text emails should be allowed? Any attachments must be GPG/PGP or S/MIME signed?
Good idea. Now enforce _that_ in the American workplace.
Dear government,
All my secret stuff is hidden in the porn. The encrypted stuff is just to lead you down a false trail.
Don't worry, Intel processors can be obtained at a mere 3 cents per CPU, with networks of upto a million CPUs available.
The world is flat, and it sits on the back of four elephants who stand on a turtle.
up2date, or yum.
Works just fine.
Think home directories shared from a central server to a bunch of desktops. AFS, Coda, NFS....
Large scale corporate requirements are different from those of a single user system.
They should show up as different devices. i.e. I have a repository over here on the server, and over here on the desktop.
NFS. The remote system is just another directory. It isn't another device
Some of us need more than a pretty desktop for real work. Apples work for you. They don't work for everyone, and where their UI clashes with the requirements of other people (including device transparency), the UI will go.
The ministry of peace.
The ministry of truth.
The department of homeland security.
The trick is to be able to have an abstraction interface between the database access and the rest of your code.
function get_info($dsn, $query, $parameters) {
}
Now the bulk of your code not know what DB you use.
tie your SQL very tightly to the database. Put an abstraction layer between DB specific code and non specific code. Works well.
Fix their security holes by taking away features which now give them a lead in companies?
The security holes created by those features are what is causing them to lose market share. They would be best served by removing ActiveX, and treating all input to the browser as malicious.