Slashdot Mirror


Google Earth Launching For Free

Nathan Weinberg writes "Google launches Keyhole 3 today, rebranded Google Earth, and are dumping the subscription rate (except for a $20/year "plus" versions with prettier pictures) available soon at earth.google.com. The program lets you fly around a 3D globe, with overhead satellite photos, tilted 45-degree photos, 3D rendered buildings, and overlays that display everything from roads to hotels to bike routes. I have a lot of info and screenshots at InsideGoogle, and Search Engine Watch has a big writeup. With yesterday's Google Video release, this is shaping up to be a major week for the search giant."

405 comments

  1. Google flame, by smittyoneeach · · Score: 0, Troll

    C'mon, let's fan it!
    Soar, to the tune of
    Satriani: Crystal Planet.
    Foam poses no threat,
    Can it?
    Burma Shave

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    1. Re:Google flame, by youknowmewell · · Score: 0, Troll

      1. Buy world map service
      2. Release it for free
      3. ???
      4. Burma Shave

  2. Linux by bcmm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anyone tested this in Wine (or something with better 3D support like Cedega) yet? Any luck?

    --
    # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
    Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    1. Re:Linux by budgenator · · Score: 2, Informative

      won't run under wine on my machine, but I didn't expect it to, when a page talks about what video cards it runs with you can be pretty sure an OS emulator is out of the question.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    2. Re:Linux by dastrike · · Score: 1

      Doesn't seem to be working. Tested with Wine 20050524 and Cedega 4.3. Barfs at the installer already.

      --
      while true; do eject; eject -t; done
    3. Re:Linux by gabebear · · Score: 2, Informative

      No go on my machine (Debian Sarge)

      The installer failed with regular Wine, with WineX 3.3-1 it installed but still wouldn't run.

      Since they are working on a Mac version I imagine they will also at least look into releasing a Linux port.

    4. Re:Linux by jamesshuang · · Score: 1

      Wine worked through install and login with 20041019, but all it did was give me a window with a lot of corrupt pictures. In other words, it almost works...

    5. Re:Linux by ultramkancool · · Score: 1

      Installs but doesn't run. It show the update dialog then fails :-(

    6. Re:Linux by Akai · · Score: 1

      No go on the latest cedega. It installs if you set winver to win2k. nt40 and winxp crap out on the installer, and win98/winme the installers says OS in not compatable. Or at least it did, now I can't get it to be happy with win2k either.

      After installation, it chokes on a missing ATL.DLL. Putting an atl.dll from a dll download site into the fake windows system32 directory leads to more 0xdeadbeef stuff in kernel32.dll, advapi32.dll, etc.

      Hopefully they'll do a linux native, if not wine friendly version of this ap, as it is quite the nice little toy.

      --
      Please send all UCE to scally@devolution.com so I can f
    7. Re:Linux by dboli42 · · Score: 4, Informative

      It works under wine!!!! Version 20050111-r1. I had to switch to fluxbox after it repeatedly crashed kde, it uses qt so maybe that was problems, its also somewhat unstable and requires working opengl

    8. Re:Linux by Curtman · · Score: 1

      "Doesn't seem to be working. Tested with Wine 20050524 and Cedega 4.3. Barfs at the installer already."

      It's doing the same thing here. That's interesting because Keyhole would run, but with many rendering glitches. It wasn't very usable, but it would install.

    9. Re:Linux by Dave2+Wickham · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't see why it should be out of the question; Wine ran Doom 3 (with some slight graphical glitches), for example.

    10. Re:Linux by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      I found under Windows that the OpenGL renderer is less than perfect (it renders missing letters in words and frequent black rectangles over the map even after it's supposedly fully loaded.)

      But it also has a "DirectX" renderer (I presume they mean either Direct3D or DirectDraw but refuse to say which.)

      Does that mode work under Wine too?

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    11. Re:Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes it works under Wine.

      Here is the relevant AppDB entry with instructions and screenshots:
      http://appdb.winehq.org/appview.php?versionId=3254

    12. Re:Linux by CvD · · Score: 1

      Why would you run Doom 3 under Wine when there is a native Doom 3 client available for Linux? Or is it just another case of 'just because we can'? :-)

    13. Re:Linux by Dave2+Wickham · · Score: 1

      Because the native client was released 2 months after the game. :P

      I now use the native binaries (thanks TTimo), but at the time it was all that was available.

    14. Re:Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have a gander through the FAQs for the commercial side of Google Earth [http://earth.google.com/earth_fusion.html%5D. ...
      * 2 x 2.8 GHz Pentium 4 (or greater)
      * NVIDIA GeForce4 or higher graphics card
      * 2 GB main memory
      * 100/1000 NIC
      * SuSE Enterprise 9/SuSE Linux Pro 9 ...

      Yes, that's SuSe.

  3. Corrupted download by winkydink · · Score: 2, Funny

    I get a CRC error when I try to unpack the .exe

    Yeah, yeah, yeah... I know. IT'S BEEEEEETAAAAA.

    Google should change their logo to put that little Beta under the 'le'.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Corrupted download by swimmar132 · · Score: 1

      Then, uh, download it again. Not google's fault that your internet connection sucks.

    2. Re:Corrupted download by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

      I think your downloader or connection is crap. Mine works fine.

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    3. Re:Corrupted download by winkydink · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh yeah, that's right, I forget. I signed up for the UDP-only connection. Sheesh.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    4. Re:Corrupted download by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

      Well it's obviously Google's fault then. That you are probably the only person with a CRC error just means that they've singled you out specifically so you can harp on the "beta" thing that Google assigns to products that *gasp* happen to be in beta.

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    5. Re:Corrupted download by hostyle · · Score: 1

      Has google launched any sort of geographical sarcasm challenged countries maps yet?

      --
      Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
    6. Re:Corrupted download by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has Google launched anything that isn't in 'beta' years later?

    7. Re:Corrupted download by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beagle

    8. Re:Corrupted download by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

      Um. It's not a beta. And the CRC error is your computer's problem, a good downloader should be able to deal with that.

      --
      I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
  4. Wow! by drewzhrodague · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Looks like we need to take advantage of this to plot Wi-Fi Everywhere. Rock on, guys, see you at the next interview interval.

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
  5. Better by m85476585 · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is like NASA World Wind, but better.

    1. Re:Better by HyperChicken · · Score: 1

      They're different. NASA World Wind has no annoying streaming problems, for example. However, it doesn't have this sweet... um... Google branding?

      --
      Free of Flash! Free of Flash!
    2. Re:Better by anhdres · · Score: 2, Informative

      i'm not in the US, but in southamerica, and world wind has better names and locators for worldwide locations of towns, minor cities, lakes, etc.

    3. Re:Better by njko · · Score: 1

      Keyhole/google Earth have better images of Buenos Aires

      --
      \n.\n
    4. Re:Better by The+Bungi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Whoa, I'm sold.

    5. Re:Better by samtihen · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree about the streaming. It doesn't seem right to me that Keyhole, now Google Earth, loads more slowly than Google Maps. They clearly use the same map data in almost all cases. And in some cases, I even like the Google Maps interface better. For instance, the 'double-click to center' seems easier than the Google Earth 'double-click to center and zoom'.

      However, Google Earth does have some serious advantages in altitude sensitive data. I like being able to see what elevation my mouse curser is at, for instance.

      Additionally, Google Earth has the much needed city and road data for the rest of the world, which I would like to see incorporated into Google Maps as well.

    6. Re:Better by Negadecimal · · Score: 1

      They're different. NASA World Wind has no annoying streaming problems, for example.

      I'm wondering how much of that is just because this is their first day of free service...

    7. Re:Better by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      I haven't tried World Wind, but I checked out some screenshots. The topo feature is cool, but look at, e.g., http://worldwind.arc.nasa.gov/graphics/screenshots /24.jpg. I know all about trying to fit 2D sheets to 3D surfaces, but that's ridiculous. The whole point of elevation contours is to connect points of equal elevation. Whoo!

    8. Re:Better by dubstar · · Score: 2, Informative

      Streaming the data to your computer would have to be slower than to a localized web server, since it has to traverse the net. I think there is probably more optional data involved in the streaming version as well (topography, etc).

      ...could be a bit of the slashdot effect too.

    9. Re:Better by Transcendent · · Score: 2, Informative

      Frankly, it's downloading more data.... that's why it is slower. It's also loading the data level by level instead of the instantaneous selected view level for a given area, which of course is slower.

      Once you have the cache on your computer, this program is great... especially for free.

      Remember... this is free... you can't get everything for free.

    10. Re:Better by stg · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have to agree, at least as far as labels go. But at least in maps.google.com, you can get very high-resolution images of Brazil:

      http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=-23.547585,-46.6650 51&spn=0.005375,0.007918&t=k&hl=en

      I'm not sure how high is the resolution of this, but I imagine it's a couple of meters. WorldWind only had 15-meter stuff for those locations... A *huge* difference.

      I've been told that these Google images are a lot newer, too.

      Obviously those are only available in *very* selected areas, though.

    11. Re:Better by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      Frankly, it's downloading more data.... that's why it is slower. It's also loading the data level by level instead of the instantaneous selected view level for a given area, which of course is slower.

      Turning of the elevation feature didn't speed it up so either that's not it, or the streaming technology is ineffecient.

      Remember... this is free... you can't get everything for free.

      There's nothing advertised about faster speeds for the non-free versions (Google Earth Plus & Pro) so I doubt they use a different data center => non-free software equally slow.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    12. Re:Better by shellbeach · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is like NASA World Wind, but better.

      Except for one tiny little issue that I'm surprised no one on this site has picked up on: World Wind is open source, whereas Google Earth is not.

      I've been playing around with World Wind for a while, and it's just fantastic stuff. I'll take the OSS solution any day ...

    13. Re:Better by Transcendent · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Turning of the elevation feature didn't speed it up so either that's not it, or the streaming technology is ineffecient.

      Turning off the elevation mapping should speed it up anyway... but without measurements there's no point in arguing that point.

      On a larger, empirical argument that has more value, there's more to it than elevation... the elevation would be simple anyway since it's usually just a monochrome bitmap (well, compressed)... no color data. Like I said befure, there's more data. Street dynamics, names, multiple resolution levels for the textures (the most complex part)... all at once. With Google maps, you just download an image for the exact zoom level you are at.

      If you haven't noticed, it does download multiple resolutions before you get your final result. This is what is slowing it down.

      When I said it was free, I was making a point that you can't expect a compilation of the entire world for free... they'd have to increase their current storage (at least) capacity by more than an order of magnitude.

    14. Re:Better by jazzman251 · · Score: 1

      and slower...

    15. Re:Better by anhdres · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh that's true. For the labels, and for Argentina (that's what I can account for) it's totally right. Google's isn't that intuitive for searching locations there, and lacks a lot (most) of info and place names. I thinks it's logical, as it isn't much of an important hotspot for Google. The images looks great on Buenos Aires for example, except for some squares that has very (very) poor resolution, but leaving that mayor cities it gets poorer fast. Anyway, it's free, and it's going to change the way we do lots of things in the close future no doubt about it, as services begin to apply to it on worldwide locations as it does in the US, for example.

    16. Re:Better by stg · · Score: 3, Interesting


      I'm playing with Google Earth now. I'm currently on dial-up, and it's still usable, as long as you are very patient :-) .

      It does have quite a few labels in Brazil, and it has a neat feature with user-added places in the BBS (looks like they decided to go retro instead of just calling a forum). There are already a few in Brazil.

      Should be very neat, as long as people don't start spamming it!

      BTW, I've used the trial of Keyhole LT, and Google's free version seem much nicer... A year ago, their trial didn't have *anything* on Brazil, too - not even Landsat-7's 15 meter images, just the default NASA Visible World images.

      WorldWind is likely to take a big hit in popularity - the tiny download of Google Earth (10mb vs WW 200mb) is likely to be a major factor to some... Google's servers can also run circles around NASAs.

      Too bad for the custom apps - WW being open source gave it a huge advantage there...

    17. Re:Better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and clumsy to use. With World Wind you can do all navigation with two mouse buttons and a scroll wheel. It's far more intuitive, far faster to move around, and page loading in Google's is so slow. With World Wind it's like you're moving around in a game. Google should follow their lead.

      I must say though, the level of detail is much better in Google's. Australian cities have the same sort of detail you can only get with World Wind when you're looking at US urban areas.

      Perhaps Google should think about buying NASA ...

  6. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  7. Wow by sosume · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is the best web application I have seen for years. Now I will be able top spy on my neighbours from the other side of the house!

    1. Re:Wow by SargeantLobes · · Score: 1
      giggedy giggedy giggedy giggedy!


      Quagmire is awesome

      --
      I do love "!" but not as much as I love "..."...
  8. No linux interface.. by clueless123 · · Score: 2, Informative

    C'mon...

  9. examples of 3D buildings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been unable to find examples of 3D buildings - anyone else have luck?

    1. Re:examples of 3D buildings? by wjsteele · · Score: 2, Informative

      New York is full of them. Just use the Shift-Arrow combinations to tilt the view.

      Bill

      --
      It's my Sig and you can't have it. Mine! All Mine!
    2. Re:examples of 3D buildings? by BandwidthHog · · Score: 4, Funny

      I have been unable to find examples of 3D buildings - anyone else have luck?

      My town is littered with them. In fact, I'm sitting in one right now. They should be pretty easy to spot; a good rule of thumb is that if something is tall enough to trip over, it's 3D.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    3. Re:examples of 3D buildings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also San Fransisco.

    4. Re:examples of 3D buildings? by Le+Marteau · · Score: 1

      Denver

      --
      Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    5. Re:examples of 3D buildings? by CausticPuppy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Atlanta has them.

      Also, after installing it, it seemed that 3D Buildings is turned off by default. Make sure that option is checked in the left-hand option pane.

      --
      -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
    6. Re:examples of 3D buildings? by Sprotch · · Score: 1

      Here is Google's answer...

    7. Re:examples of 3D buildings? by nandhp · · Score: 1

      You need to turn the 3d buildings layer on first. It's in the "Layers" panel.

    8. Re:examples of 3D buildings? by ExampleUserAccount · · Score: 2, Informative

      3D Buildings are simple grey projections of major city buildings overlayed on the city map. They don't look great yet, but they are fun.

      I found Vegas by accident and compiled this list from previous answers.

      Las Vegas
      New York
      San Francisco
      Boston
      Cleveland
      Denver
      Atlanta

      From Google:
      Google Earth has 3D buildings listed in a number of major US cities including Boston, MA; Cleveland, OH; and Washington, D.C. to name a few. To view these:

      1. Turn on the 3D building layer by selecting the check box in the dashboard.

      2. Position the viewer within a reasonable viewing altitude over a major city such as San Francisco. The 3D buildings start to appear from an eye-elevation of 10-12,000 feet. Check the eye-elevation meter on the lower right of the 3D viewer to determine your current viewing height. The 3D buildings appear as light grey objects over the imagery of the city. As you zoom in, more details will appear until you can see the entire shape of a building.

      3. Use the tilt and rotate tools to get the best view of the buildings.

    9. Re:examples of 3D buildings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      John Denver?

    10. Re:examples of 3D buildings? by sosume · · Score: 1

      It seems many of the pictures are rather old so your house should be built a few years ago. For example, the palmtree island in dubay is missing.

    11. Re:examples of 3D buildings? by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Funny

      I guess a 2D building would be called a flat!

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    12. Re:examples of 3D buildings? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      They should be pretty easy to spot; a good rule of thumb is that if something is tall enough to trip over, it's 3D.

      Guess that leaves out my home state of Florida.

    13. Re:examples of 3D buildings? by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      Guess that leaves out my home state of Florida.

      Okay, trip over or fall into. Happy now, Captain Pedantic?

      I started to make a crack about the lack of anything higher than a shadow being a sure indicator that you're in Kansas, but then I figured perhaps Ohio would be more appropriate, and then thought about Oklahoma, and finally realized that the eastern half of North Carolina in which I currently reside is about as flat as those places so I just dropped it.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    14. Re:examples of 3D buildings? by hisstory+student · · Score: 1

      Cities. Only in big cities.
      Check out LA or Seattle or New York or ...
      you get the idea.

      --
      Heard any good sigs lately?
  10. Recommended configuration by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 0, Troll

    512MB RAM

    Next, Google will offer free RAM over net or what?

    1. Re:Recommended configuration by Evangelion · · Score: 2, Funny

      You get 512M in cereal boxes these days.

    2. Re:Recommended configuration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello and welcome to 2005. Please enjoy your stay.

    3. Re:Recommended configuration by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      Well, considering I saw 256mb sticks of ram on newegg.com for 7.99 a few days ago, I'm not so sure it's really such a big deal. :]

    4. Re:Recommended configuration by wootest · · Score: 1

      If you run a recent Windows machine (which is what's needed) which does *not* have 512MB of RAM, I pity you.

    5. Re:Recommended configuration by pthor1231 · · Score: 1

      If you run any machine with less than 512 megs of ram, i pity you

    6. Re:Recommended configuration by Winkhorst · · Score: 1

      I have 512 and an empty slot. Maximum possible, 3GB. And my motherboard's a couple of years old. No, this program won't run on a TRS-80. ;-)

      --
      "Is this Winkhorst a nova criminal?" "No just a technical sergeant wanted for interrogation."
    7. Re:Recommended configuration by wootest · · Score: 1

      That's true to a certain extent. Light configurations can work just fine with below 512MB of RAM (however, the ones needed to a) play streaming video (and not just acceptably) in a browser plugin in Windows XP and b) not quit whatever else you're running while doing a) are not light configurations to me).

    8. Re:Recommended configuration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and everybody takes cereals in breakfast, and finds 1G RAM in one of those boxes. Thank you.

  11. Yeah... by Svartalf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Google, you're all about Linux- why can't ya come up with a Linux (and a MacOS X) version, hm?

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    1. Re:Yeah... by Nicholas+Evans · · Score: 1

      Or, you know, at least MENTION Linux...I mean, if you can say the word 'Mac', can you at least ACKNOWLEDGE the fact that us Linux users exist? But then again, it's not like your server clusters are Linux based or anything...

    2. Re:Yeah... by diegocgteleline.es · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They bought this software to another company, they didn't started it from scratch. So, I find reasonable that they are focusing on getting the first release out, then consider porting to another platforms...it's possible that the software depends too much in windows-specific things to be ported to linux at all.

    3. Re:Yeah... by paulatz · · Score: 1

      If it is written 100% OpenGL *and* it is difficult to port to Linux *then* the programmer is a moron.

      --
      this post contain no useful information, no need to mod it down
    4. Re:Yeah... by Ninwa · · Score: 1

      Don't feel left out, about 95% of all of the workstations at Google are Linux workstations. None of them get to use it either.

    5. Re:Yeah... by technix4beos · · Score: 1

      Hey, give them a break. They released the Google Video uploader utility for Windows, Linux, and Mac OSX.

      I'm willing to bet there will be versions of Googe Earth for more OS's than windows, in the future.

      It's nice enough that this application is WICKEDLY awesome for FREE. Enjoy it.

      --
      user@host$ diff /dev/urandom /dev/uspto
    6. Re:Yeah... by elrendermeister · · Score: 1

      That's absurd. I'd buy it the other way around. If anything it should work better on Linux.

    7. Re:Yeah... by Deaper · · Score: 1

      Yeah... I've tried it out on my windows box and the programmer is DEFINATELY NOT a moron.

  12. To Larry and Sergey by scovetta · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Thanks for not being evil!
    -Mike

    --
    Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. --Nietzsche
    1. Re:To Larry and Sergey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's great of those guys not to support the evil monopoly of Microsoft! They really showed them with a simulatenous Windows, Mac and *nix release!

    2. Re:To Larry and Sergey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your obesquiousness is going to waste here -- the Wil Wheaton story is crying out for you!

  13. No Mac support? by illtron · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Aw man, c'mon Google!

    --
    Slashdot: 24 hours behind every other site or your money back!
    1. Re:No Mac support? by ink_polaroid · · Score: 2, Informative
    2. Re:No Mac support? by Kichigai+Mentat · · Score: 1

      You know what, with OS X being UNIX based now, why not just release the source code? Make the Linux people happy too, while you're at it. If they can do it for Tux Racer, FreeCiv, and numerous other programs, why can't they do it for something like this?

      --
      Rawr
  14. Best Week? by zabagel · · Score: 1

    Every week for Google is a "best week." This does seem useful, as I am terrible with directions.

  15. Windoze only. by HermanAB · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Blech. 'Nuff sed.

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
    1. Re:Windoze only. by HaveNoMouth · · Score: 1
      Blech. 'Nuff sed.

      Exactly. But it's not Google's fault. Keyhole has always been Windoze only. Wake me when there's an OSX version. It sounds like Google is going to DTRT and make it happen.

  16. This is amazing by Otik2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Wow, this is great. The images are better than what they have for Google Maps, at least for my house (I can zoom in a lot farther). And the tilting and rotating are really fun. They have a few famous sightseeing places included by default, and just rotating and zooming around the Three Sisters or Yosemite was almost breathtaking. Integrating with their direction and local services is probably a good idea, though I doubt I'll use it much, but the images themselves are very well done. Good job, Google.

    1. Re:This is amazing by NGutman · · Score: 1

      Isn't it kinda spooky? To be able to zoom your house in a publicly available application? Google rocks in my opinion, but it still kinda creepy.

      --
      Trust is a weakness. (not really)
    2. Re:This is amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't had a chance to try it yet. Does it display a geometrically correct (spherically mapped) image, as opposed to the cylindrical projection used in Google Maps?

    3. Re:This is amazing by codexwriter · · Score: 1

      I concur, it has been a long time since a piece of software has impressed me as much as this one does, I feel a strong need for a palmtop with a good screen and GPS now.

    4. Re:This is amazing by Lord+Dimwit+Flathead · · Score: 1
      1. The imagery is top-down. No looking in windows or under canopies.
      2. The resolution is not such that any significant details can be made out for any objects smaller than a toolshed.
      3. The imagery is static and up to 3 years old. Nobody is tracking your movements or otherwise watching you in real-time with this.
      If you're looking for something to be creeped out about, maybe you should focus your energies on the helicopter hovering over your pool, or the neighbor who keeps looking in your bay window while walking her dog.
    5. Re:This is amazing by NGutman · · Score: 1

      Hey it may not seem creepy now! And actually google doesn't seem very evil. But it can sure lay the foundation stones for abuse in the future. When the resolution will get better, When you'll be able to look inside windows. When the imagery will be updated in real time. Who knows?. (I'm not very paranoid, I think it's just an interesting thought)

      --
      Trust is a weakness. (not really)
    6. Re:This is amazing by Rallion · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering why my house seems to be blurred out, while all the other houses around mine are clear.

      Am I that ugly? Really?

    7. Re:This is amazing by Deekin_Scalesinger · · Score: 1

      The personnel flying the black helicopters that keep watch over you also have control over all sat systems. The fact that your home is being blurred is a sign that you have been marked for "reeducation" and reassimilation into our new society. Prepare yourself, citizen!

      Conspiracy theories aside, the aforementioned black helicopter people do think you are too ugly, and since they have control over all sat systems have begun the "blurring" process of your life. Once complete, you should have double-plus goodthoughts about your new "look". Prepare for reconstructive surgery, citizen!

      Wow - I didn't get that far away from a conspiracy theory after all...

      --
      "As the intrepid kobold companion continues his journey, he begins to wonder... if priests raises dead, why anybody die?
  17. Been using often this morning.... by doormat · · Score: 5, Informative

    Its actually pretty addictive for a GIS geek like myself. Plus it was neat to have it help me plan my camping trip this weekend.

    It totally blows away any geographical user interface ESRI or Autodesk or anyone else has. They should be embarrassed with their current ArcIMS and MapGuide products - such rudimentary interfaces and poor performance.

    Whats even more interesting is the Google Earth Enterprise suite. Being able to load my own satellite data and GIS data into this would be interesting. But like I've said before in other posts about google maps, the biggest problem for GIS groups would be the lack of an "Identify" tool (perhaps its there but I havent seen it in any of the screenshots). And still no scale bar at the bottom either, though they do have a north arrow.

    --
    The Doormat

    If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
    1. Re:Been using often this morning.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Being able to load my own satellite data and GIS data into this would be interesting.

      You have your own satellite?

      I'll buy it from you for...ONE MILLION DOLLARS.

    2. Re:Been using often this morning.... by mapmaker · · Score: 1
      It totally blows away any geographical user interface ESRI or Autodesk or anyone else has.

      I dunno about that...it looks just like ArcGlobe to me. Except for the 'free' part of course.

      So are you as bummed as me that you didn't realize Google was hiring GISers? :)

    3. Re:Been using often this morning.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no scale bar, but you can measure distances, through a dialogue under tools.

    4. Re:Been using often this morning.... by doormat · · Score: 1

      Yea, but I dont think I'm smart enough to work at google. My IQ is only 130. I figure you probably need to be a member of MENSA to work there... at least, not in a janitorial capacity.

      Although if I did work there, they would have an identify tool.

      --
      The Doormat

      If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
    5. Re:Been using often this morning.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Once you're smart enough to realise that IQ is not a valid measure of intelligence, then you're smart enough to work at Google :)

    6. Re:Been using often this morning.... by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1

      It totally blows away any geographical user interface ESRI or Autodesk or anyone else has. They should be embarrassed with their current ArcIMS and MapGuide products - such rudimentary interfaces and poor performance.

      I don't know MapGuide, but as far as ESRI and others go, they're different kettles of fish. Google Earth is all about sizzle, flash, sexiness, and a degree of usefulness in that it can be a bit more intuitive way of looking at things.

      ESRI and friends are all about precision, accuracy, more formal stuff. Google Earth isn't going to let you do accurate measurements and survey plans and stuff that the traditional GIS stuff will. It's the difference between a Cad-like precision, and drawing sexy real world texturemaps in a 3D engine.

      For most people, the latter is cooler; for professionals, the former is more useful, and the latter is just a toy.

      At least, I think that's a fair assessment.

      Also, Google Earth and the like have the freedom of taking new-ish raster satellite photos and texture mapping them with 3D gaming technology.

      Traditional GIS databases are typically historical dBase format vector data. Rendering that in real time 3D isn't terribly feasible today.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    7. Re:Been using often this morning.... by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've noticed some slight offsets...

      My home is a few hundred feet away from where it's supposed to be.... I'm going to move anyway... but I didn't plan on it this soon.

      There also is some type of stadium in japan and a pool next to it. This thing is huge looking from just a 100ft up... I think the interpreted aerial view isn't quite accurrate.

      Though I can't go there and verify ;)

      It's got huge points on the neat factor though!

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    8. Re:Been using often this morning.... by KeyholeSeer · · Score: 1

      Always hiring...

      --
      Be seeing you, Seer
    9. Re:Been using often this morning.... by Nilmat · · Score: 2, Insightful
      As far as functionality is concerned, actually, ESRI and others have been able to do everything that Google Earth does since back in the days of ArcView 3.x. I remember putting together a 3D flythrough of the Presidential Range in New Hampshire with satellite imagery draped on top as well as some friends creating a map of my college campus using 3-D buildings.

      The two major innovations in Google Earth, as far as I'm concerned, are the massive amount of data available with no effort and the fact that anyone can use it without knowing anything about GIS per se.

  18. Yet again no *nix version. by caluml · · Score: 4, Informative
    Minimum configuration:

    * Operating system: Windows 2000, Windows XP
    * CPU speed: Intel® Pentium® PIII 500 MHz
    * System memory (RAM): 128MB
    * 200MB hard-disk space
    * 3D graphics card: 3D-capable video card with 16MB VRAM
    * 1024x768, 32-bit true color screen
    * Network speed: 128 kbps ("Broadband/Cable Internet")
    I/m getting a little tired of Google completely forgetting the numerous Linux and Unix users.
    1. Re:Yet again no *nix version. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on. How many Linux and Unix users have "Broadband/Cable Internet" anyway?

    2. Re:Yet again no *nix version. by choas · · Score: 1

      I use OS X, you insensitive clod!

      --
      I will work to elevate you, just enough to bring you down
    3. Re:Yet again no *nix version. by savagedome · · Score: 4, Funny

      You got it backwards. Google knows the penchant Windows users have for pretty pictures. That's why, all this 3D and 45degree angle jazz is for those snobbish Windows users. For us Unix and Linux people, Google will release a tool that will allow us to draw our own buildings on Earth. I say that will kick ass!

    4. Re:Yet again no *nix version. by iluvcapra · · Score: 2, Informative

      They're "working on" a Mac OS X version, but that's all they mention, so far.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    5. Re:Yet again no *nix version. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's really too goddamn bad you had to pay for it, and not even be able to use it.

      Oh, wait.

    6. Re:Yet again no *nix version. by ta+ma+de · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      This was going to be my post. I wish google would stop giving Bill and Steve B. rim jobs. I would think that google employees with OSX or Linux on their desk would be sick of not being able to use the products that their company develops too. WTF.

    7. Re:Yet again no *nix version. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are these the same "numerous linux users" with 3D cards that are supported by the manufacturer? Oh that's right there aren't any.

      The amount of time they'd have to spend trying to get it to run on just a small segment of linux desktops that might have a nvidia card, that might have the latest X.org, that might have the latest closed sourced drivers. They could add a ton of functionality to the windoze version AND make an OS X version.

      Let's please try and stay in reality people.

    8. Re:Yet again no *nix version. by zero-one · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Based on Google's most recent published operating system statisics* they could make their software available to many more users by producing a version for Windows 95 or "Other" before making a Linux version.

      (* obviously June '04 was a while ago but I doubt the statistics have changed much)

    9. Re:Yet again no *nix version. by Le+Marteau · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah! How dumb can Google be? The first day they offer their beta service, and what do they go for first? Windows! Go figure! They're not going to make any money with THAT kind of thinking! Everybody KNOWS it's the Linux community which is the one to go to when you are a for-profit entity.

      --
      Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    10. Re:Yet again no *nix version. by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1

      Can't wait for Google ASCII Earth

    11. Re:Yet again no *nix version. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm.. I can't even get Google maps to work correctly with lynx. When will someone release mapping software that displays ASCII-image maps?

    12. Re:Yet again no *nix version. by turtledot · · Score: 0

      Nah, for UNIX/Linux they're releasing the version that displays the images as ASCII text pics...

    13. Re:Yet again no *nix version. by TheCabal · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ask- no, DEMAND- for your money back.

    14. Re:Yet again no *nix version. by MonkeyCookie · · Score: 1

      That's because real Unix users view the geographical data using vi. They don't need any graphical sugar sucking down their processor cycles.

    15. Re:Yet again no *nix version. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      probably a greater proportion than OSX and XP users.

    16. Re:Yet again no *nix version. by zaphod123 · · Score: 2, Funny

      It takes quite a while to convert all of the maps to ascii. :)

      --
      :q!
    17. Re:Yet again no *nix version. by nomis80 · · Score: 1

      "numerous"... You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

    18. Re:Yet again no *nix version. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shoulded been modded funny lol

    19. Re:Yet again no *nix version. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I/m getting a little tired of Google completely forgetting the numerous Linux and Unix users.

      Yeah, all 5 of them.

    20. Re:Yet again no *nix version. by lxs · · Score: 1

      Everybody KNOWS it's the Linux community which is the one to go to when you are a for-profit entity.

      Without the Linux community, Google would never have gotten off the ground as a company. (Just calculate what 4000 windows or commercial unix servers + licences cost, and ask yourself if a startup company can afford that), so it would be nice to see them giving back to the community by producing a Linux version.

      Google, you've changed man. You used to be cool, one of the guys. we could count on you, but lately with the IPO and your new tie-wearing buddies, I don't know if we can remain friends anymore. *snif*

    21. Re:Yet again no *nix version. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Oh, sure. Guys from Epic probably used magic to make UT2004 work on Linux as nice as it does, then. Ditto for id and Doom 3. C'mon, if a modern 3D game can do it, surely the application in question can?

    22. Re:Yet again no *nix version. by huge+colin · · Score: 1

      Since they're kinda giving it away for free, you'd think there would be a version for the operating system that doesn't suck. Apparently not, though.

    23. Re:Yet again no *nix version. by dodobh · · Score: 1

      Unix geeks do:
      $make universe
      $sudo make install

      You dream small if you only dream of putting up buildings.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    24. Re:Yet again no *nix version. by steve_bryan · · Score: 1

      Without the Linux community, Google would never have gotten off the ground as a company. (Just calculate what 4000 windows or commercial unix servers + licences cost, and ask yourself if a startup company can afford that), so it would be nice to see them giving back to the community by producing a Linux version.

      Arghhh, is the supply of clueless people inexhaustable? Google did not start this project. The company keyhole.com created this service and made their money by selling it to real estate agents, news reporting services and others. It only made sense for them to concentrate their efforts on a platform that gave them a chance of making money so they could continue developing it. They had the good fortune of being acquired by Google before Microsoft could innovate them out of their market.

      Google has owned keyhole for a short time but they immediately lowered prices, offered credits to existing users and are now making it available for free. Still, people find reasons to bitch. Unbelievable!

      (For those who could use a clue I assembled a Windows box specifically for HDTV and games and happily added Keyhole when I discovered it about a year ago. I would much rather have everything on my Mac OS X box but reality dictates otherwise. Having one Windows box can be very convenient.)

    25. Re:Yet again no *nix version. by HG+Slashdot · · Score: 0

      Anyone know what email address to use? money-back-earth@google.com didn't work :-(

      --
      j0b.org - A famous domain name for sale
    26. Re:Yet again no *nix version. by lxs · · Score: 1

      Thanks for sharing Steve, I hope you feel better now.

      Tell me, how hard is it to put up a notice along the lines of "Sorry, there are no plans for a Linux client." in the "Will my system run Google Earth?" This is a matter of courtesy, not a matter of practicality.

      On the other hand, doesn't it make you uneasy that Google is aquiring companies left right and center these days? I don't want one company to dominate the entire industry, not even when that company is Google.

    27. Re:Yet again no *nix version. by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      You gotta love the top 10 searches made by Japanese people that month:
      1. map (yes, just "map")
      2. Winter Sonata - a Korean TV show Japanese ladies went batshit insane over because of the male lead to the point that middle aged women were touring Korea in droves searching for their own "winter sonata" experience
      3. weather news
      4. wallpaper
      5. translation
      6. fortune telling
      7. typhoon information
      8. dictionary
      9. lottery
      10. mitsubishi motors - I find this the funniest because the previous eight are boring, normal phrases. I wonder what could have happened that put Mitsubishi up in the top 10.

      For comparison to how lame Japanese searches were, here is the top 10 overall:
      euro 2004, harry potter, paul johnson, john kerry, wimbledon, venus transit, fahrenheit 911, bill clinton, ronald reagan, scott peterson
      Note how these are all proper nouns.

      I find it interesting that the Japanese people don't just have weather and lottery information webpages bookmarked already. I'd start making all kinds of propositions here, but that's irrelevant to /.

      I just couldn't resist picking on the country I'm living in. ^_^ Call it revenge for making me eat mayonnaise on my pizza.

    28. Re:Yet again no *nix version. by steve_bryan · · Score: 1

      Yes, I do feel better now. I've been a customer of Keyhole for a while and despite the slight frustration of having to use a Windows client program my experience is that they are a first rate company and still are after acquisition by Google. The product has improved a significant amount since the acquisition and there is every reason to believe the improvements will continue.

      As a result I feel compelled to defend it from what seems to me to be unfair attacks. I am patiently awaiting a Mac OS X client but I understand that it is a tricky business making promises about pending improvements. We live in a very litigious society where "no good deed goes unpunished".

      I am not concerned that Keyhole has been acquired by Google. Since I had noticed that Microsoft has been in the process of moving toward this market I had been concerned that Microsoft might have been planning to innovate Keyhole out of existence. That is no longer an issue since Google is not so easily brushed aside. Someday when Google's actions have warranted a reassessment of their character it might make things appear more complicated. But for now it's all good.

    29. Re:Yet again no *nix version. by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

      C'mon people! 5% "Others"?? Those statistics are worthless.

  19. Google... by AsnFkr · · Score: 1

    The most giving and innovative collection of people in the world? It's cliched to say, but holy crap every day it seems like something amazing is done by this company. Big ups.

    1. Re:Google... by HyperChicken · · Score: 1

      Uhh... They bought the thing, didn't they? They bought it from Keyhole, no? And now have branded it and what not?

      --
      Free of Flash! Free of Flash!
    2. Re:Google... by AsnFkr · · Score: 1

      Uhh...and they are providing a majority of the service for free? Thats awesome.

    3. Re:Google... by HyperChicken · · Score: 1

      This feels like Deja vu: It's the dot-com bubble all over again. Give stuff away for free in hopes of making money.

      Oh, and my original post was to knock down the "innovation" argument. No, giving stuff away isn't innovation either.

      --
      Free of Flash! Free of Flash!
    4. Re:Google... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they're only doing it to make advertising money...you seriously need to start paying attention if you think Google's somehow altruistic.

    5. Re:Google... by AsnFkr · · Score: 1

      They give things away, but have ways of making money based on the technology they give away free...by selling something more powerful based of the normal "free" version. In this case they will provide people who desire higher quality images that at $20 a month. This will pull in revenue, and the free aspect of the consumer side will provide excellent word of mouth promotion to find the people with the need for the $20 a month service. I don't think they are quite as blindly flying into the night throwing money out the window as it may seem.

      They are innovative with many things, and just because someone else had a good idea and google bought them to provide excellent marketing and distribution of the product by no means that any previous efforts were not innovative.

    6. Re:Google... by Winkhorst · · Score: 1

      A year! Cheap at twice the price. And I'd imagine they're gonna sell ads like those 3d-worlds aps that never got off the ground. In fact, how long till they integrate this with a 3D virtual world?

      --
      "Is this Winkhorst a nova criminal?" "No just a technical sergeant wanted for interrogation."
    7. Re:Google... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Just wait until they announce they've figured out micropayments next week.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    8. Re:Google... by NaruVonWilkins · · Score: 1

      They bought the basic interface from Keyhole... and then added 3D buildings. They didn't just buy the whole thing.

    9. Re:Google... by steve_bryan · · Score: 1

      ...they will provide people who desire higher quality images that at $20 a month

      Naw, the price is $20 per year (I'm a subscriber). For Google Earth Pro it is $400 per year which is bit more than $33 per month. I think the only difference in resolution when you are printing, not onscreen.

  20. Does it supports GPSbabel/GSAK by Stavr0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    painting waypoint, tracks and routes over the maps?

    1. Re:Does it supports GPSbabel/GSAK by Stavr0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just answered my own question: Directory of C:\Program Files\Google\Google Earth Plus

      2005-06-25 15:15 434 241 GoogleEarth.exe
      2005-06-20 15:00 368 640 gpsbabel.exe
      2 File(s) 802 881 bytes
      gram Files\Google\Google Earth Plus

  21. For this and other google news... by Sebastian+Jansson · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, I guess Slashdot already have a quite complete coverage of Google stuff, but if you wan't to beat the rush for some hours I recommend the Google Blog (with RSS)

  22. Hell Building Instead Of Planet Building... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Won't be long before someone comes up with a version of Hell. Oh, wait a minute. I forgot that AOL cornered that market. I'm sure Microsoft is working on something, and an open source version shouldn't be too far behind. Although it's a bit hard to improve on hot, hotter, and hottest.

  23. Google FAQ Question #1. by mcg1969 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Q: How can Google afford to give away so much for free?

    A: Volume.

    1. Re:Google FAQ Question #1. by Sjobeck · · Score: 0

      like used car salesmen, what they loose in margin, they make up for in volume.

    2. Re:Google FAQ Question #1. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that it's *free*. Hence the +5 funny, duh.

    3. Re:Google FAQ Question #1. by ngrier · · Score: 1

      Close but not quite:
      "Like a student trying to expand 12 pages of text to reach the 15 page requirement, what they loose in the margin, they make up in the thickness of the volume."

      Oh, did you mean that Google is losing profit on the margin?

  24. No Mac for you! by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Just remember, if you are running an OS X box:

    "We currently do not offer a Macintosh version of Google Earth."

    Maybe next year with the Intel OS X boxes.

    1. Re:No Mac for you! by pthor1231 · · Score: 1

      No, they said a Macintosh version of Google Earth, not a PowerPC version. Just because Apple is changed to Intel chips doesn't mean that they can suddenly run Windows applications.

    2. Re:No Mac for you! by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 1

      We'll see. Since it seems to be graphic card related, the Intel Macs might be more standard in that department and thus available for this service.

    3. Re:No Mac for you! by FLAGGR · · Score: 1

      The intel chip won't make a significant difference in porting.

    4. Re:No Mac for you! by pthor1231 · · Score: 1

      I think it is less of a graphics card issue, and more of an issue that they bought the software from a company that was windows only, and wanted to bring the product to market sooner rather than later.

  25. This is cool! by Yhippa · · Score: 1
    I've been spending some time travelling the world via Google satellite imagery so far. I like the way things are coming together for this company what with this seeming philosophy of "search the world."

    I can't wait to see what else is in store. I have been reading the concept of all this tying together to be like a portable OS, which would be great. All they would need to really kick this off is some sort of office suite, storage, and calendar functionality, right?

    Who's with me?

  26. D'oh by Morganth · · Score: 1

    I just "splurged" and bought myself a $29.95 subscription to Keyhole a few days ago. Now what?

    Man, just my luck. Just when I thought being able to show girls how I zoomed into their backyard and saw a fuzzy sattelite photo of them sunbathing topless was gonna get me laid. Now every Joe Schmo geek will be able to do it.

    I guess I'll just stick to writing some social network things until it finally happens for me.

    1. Re:D'oh by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I beleive that you get earth plus. I hope so since I paid for keyhole also.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:D'oh by sketerpot · · Score: 1

      The satellite photos are not taken in realtime, nor are they clear enough to make out anything as small as a person sunbathing topless. There are many reasons why this is really cool, but by making yet another can't-get-laid joke, you're just being intensely lame.

    3. Re:D'oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you don't need to. Everybody knows chicks dig slashdotters with gmail accounts.

    4. Re:D'oh by HarvardAce · · Score: 1
      I guess I'll just stick to writing some social network things until it finally happens for me.

      I know the creator of thefacebook.com, and he was getting girls long before thefacebook. While something like that might marginally help, if you have 0 social skills it won't make any difference.

      --
      Note to self: Stop putting jokes in my insightful comments so I can get something other than +1 Funny!
    5. Re:D'oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The exact same thing happened to me, after I registered Winamp. It went freeware a week later.

      So I haven't paid for a single piece of software since, just in case.

  27. The death of paid content? by htrp · · Score: 1

    I noticed this in conjunction with the giving away of CNN video last week. Is this another death knell in the paid content arena?
    The thing I am beginning to notice is that the apparently we, internet users as a group, are against the idea of paying web based subscriptions. However, we are willing to pay money to get better services or to actually "own" a product. Case in point for google, the ability to use NMEA GPS to feed directly into google earth is worth an extra twenty dollars. And I do believe that iTunes is wildly more popular than napster for this very reason. If this trend continues to hold, should yahoo start offering us those music downloads for free, albeit at a lower quality? (Since they already stream music for free from launch).

    By the way is there any mention of any ads within the software, or is google just giving this out for free now?

    1. Re:The death of paid content? by yellowbkpk · · Score: 1

      There are no ads in the program. The UI is pretty packed and unless they put text ads over the image or have "geoads" on the map, there's not much room for advertisement.

    2. Re:The death of paid content? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      The days of "I'll pay $7/mo just in case I want to see some video on CNN" aren't over - they never came.

      When Google unleashes its micropayments system, though, the era of paid content on the Internet is just going to get started.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:The death of paid content? by forkazoo · · Score: 1

      All you have to do is contract with real estate developers to spell out things with the layout of homes in new subdivisions. "Buy Coke"

  28. No Mac Version by WatertonMan · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Once again no Mac version for a Google program. Come on guys. Share the love! You guys don't support OSX at all!

  29. Mac will be supported, Linux not mentioned by wealthychef · · Score: 1
    Interestingly, they nod to the Mac community:

    1. Google Earth is a broadband, 3D application that not all computers can run.
    2. Apple Macintosh computers are not supported at this time (but we are working on it).
    3. Windows-based desktop PCs older than 4 years old may not be able to run it.
    4. Windows-based notebook PCs older than 2 years old may not be able to run it.
    --
    Currently hooked on AMP
    1. Re:Mac will be supported, Linux not mentioned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, why is that interesting?

  30. I love google by Fahrvergnuugen · · Score: 1

    "Apple Macintosh computers are not supported at this time (but we are working on it)." OSX users rejoice :)

    --
    Kiteboarding Gear Mention slashdot and get 10% off!
  31. Yes it is like World Wind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    They're both Windows-only.

    Fuck you, Google, fuck you NASA.

    1. Re:Yes it is like World Wind by JPortal · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's a bit extreme. From the keyhole site: Apple Macintosh computers are not supported at this time (but we are working on it). You can at least give them credit for that...

  32. WinXP as VMWare guest - no DirectX by papaia · · Score: 1

    The title says it all - so for those of us (unlucky enouch) to be running Linux, the VMWare Windows XP install does not seem to support the faster method of DirectX ... that much for it ...

    --
    == With enough Will Power, one could move mountains. With enough Brains, one would just leave them where they are ==
  33. Patents by VanWEric · · Score: 2, Funny

    I believe Google is infringing on prior art on the whole "Earth" thing. They are attempting to rebrand it, push it as an original and then patent it away from the original creator - God.

    God will soon be unable to continue providing his "competing" Earth service due to rigorous patent laws, and everyone will PERISH - All because Google has the legal power to take a page from MS's book and assert that it was their idea in the first place.

    Please contact your local congress(wo)man today and let hir know of this nefarious plot.

    --
    www.olin.edu
    1. Re:Patents by Sjobeck · · Score: 0

      you mean Dog, dont you?

      No sweat, we'll all overlook it, just a tiny typo'.

  34. Now all I need... by tktk · · Score: 1

    is a Google-branded GPS system to tie into Google Earth. Then I could have a realtime You Are Here.

    1. Re:Now all I need... by Momoru · · Score: 2, Informative

      Its not Google branded, but you can tie into a GPS with Google Earth Pro.

  35. Windows Only by adam.conf · · Score: 1

    Google, in their holy crusade against Microsoft has launched their most powerful attack on the monopoly yet -- offering a Windows only tool. Google... What happened?

    1. Re:Windows Only by kayak334 · · Score: 1

      When did Google start a holy crusade against Microsoft?

    2. Re:Windows Only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would happen if Microsoft bought the company producing Keyhole with documented links to CIA?

      Just imagine slashdot

  36. My jaw has dropped and it can't get up! by cabazorro · · Score: 1

    The zoom effects in quaility are next to none. This people are dangerous! People at Google: we are not worthy! we are not worthy! we are not worthy! we suck!!

    --
    - these are not the droids you are looking for -
  37. when can we get a google mars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or google moon?

  38. VMware by Ken+Broadfoot · · Score: 1


    Direct X Google Earth "no worky" with my VMware Windows XP Pro either. But I did not expect it too, either.

    --ken

    --
    Bitcoin pyramid: Join here: http://www.bitcoinpyramid.com/r/1427 it's FREE!
    1. Re:VMware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't wait till VMware gets DirectX and/or OpenGL support. Sweet.

    2. Re:VMware by WhiteWolf666 · · Score: 1

      VMware 5.0 has it.

      It's experimental, and you have to tweak a text file, but its there. Go search their forums, and its in their online help database.

      --
      WhiteWolf666 an exBush supporter. All you new-school,compassionate,save the children Republicans can rot in hell
    3. Re:VMware by prjames · · Score: 1

      Works fine on mine.
      VMWare 5 on Suse 9.3 with XP Pro as guest.
      Just make sure you choose the OpenGL graphics option.

      Didn't know my house was so blurred when viewed from above.
      Must get the council to see to that!

  39. Google is all we need. by KrisCowboy · · Score: 1

    Considering the pace at which Google is moving with it's new products, looks like future computers will be needing just a web-browser to do most of the daily work. Pity we need an OS to run a browser.

    1. Re:Google is all we need. by SadPenguin · · Score: 1

      Or we need a browser to run an OS...
      JS/UIX

      --
      sigSEGV - doy!
  40. Pilots: Flight Approaches by The_Pey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wow,

    What a great way to visualize approaches to airports you haven't been to before. Just go to the airport you want, tilt the view angle and line up on the runway and you've got a perfect perspective of what the surrounding environs look like. No more trying to blindly search for the airport as you go to a new one. You can research ahead of time and get all your landmarks down pat!

    --
    Hmmm...
  41. about time /. posted this by TimeSpeak · · Score: 2, Funny

    somthing about Google and Earth in the same URL excites me.

    --
    Am no fek Buddhist, but this is enlightenment.
  42. probably a stupid question by BlackShirt · · Score: 1

    ... as most of you are drooling over new features. google maps, google earth. is there any business cases that some small company actually benefits from these? how.

    1. Re:probably a stupid question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Checking lay of the land before putting in proposals.. an example from my company, right of ways for transmission lines

    2. Re:probably a stupid question by seanvaandering · · Score: 1

      How about...

      HousingMaps: Craigslist apartment listings plotted on Google Maps.
      Found City: A community-generated map of interesting places in New York City.
      Google Sightseeing: A blog that shows "the best tourist spots in the world via Google Maps' satellite imagery."
      Cheap Gas: Find cheap gas prices, powered by gasbuddy and Google Maps.
      GoogleTraffic:

      Think of the advertising revenue that these sites are getting, and that they are the first sites that are taking advantage of this technology. Real-estate agents can give you a map of all the open houses with locations that could be given to clients. Gas prices? Well, you could map out pricing on your website with all your station locations with current prices. Your imagination is the only limitation...

    3. Re:probably a stupid question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another "stupid" question then, which would actually have been stupid if they didn't do something similar with Google Maps.

      Is this gonna be really "Google Earth", or "Google United States with some hugely inadequete maps of other places, obtained from old communistic school dumpers, thrown in for good measure". Google Maps is just in insult for the "rest of the world".

    4. Re:probably a stupid question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The maps over the UK are excellent, although the hi-res satellite data doesn't cover all the urban areas.

  43. Wine by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    Does it run in Wine? Their web page mentions the use of OpenGL for rendering, which is obviously a good sign... anyone tried that?

    1. Re:Wine by John+Girouard · · Score: 0

      Setup failed for me.

    2. Re:Wine by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1
      Ok, downloaded and tried myself. Setup fails under both Wine and Cedega.

      /me joins the "give us a Linux version!" crowd.

    3. Re:Wine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to add these 3 lines to ~/.wine/config

      ; Google Earth
      [AppDefaults\\GoogleEarth.exe\\Version]
      "W indows" = "winxp"

      I use debian testing with latest nvidia drivers
      (7667) The opengl windows is not in the right
      place but you can use Google Earth.

  44. in Soviet Russia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google launches YOU off of the earth for free???

    bah...

  45. More news: personalized search by UbuWu · · Score: 1

    I am very surprised the personalized search feature based on your search history hasn't been news on slashdot yet... I was nicely surprised with it this morning... maybe on slashdot tomorrow... making google's week complete!

    1. Re:More news: personalized search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell are you talking about? Mind linking to whatever it is and not just talking about it?

    2. Re:More news: personalized search by UbuWu · · Score: 1

      It just turned up when I was using google this morning... although I don't see any sign of it now anymore... There was a notice that my personal search history would be used to improve search results. Also the help page said that the links I would click on where used to further improve the results... see also: http://google-blog.dirson.com/post.new/0266/

    3. Re:More news: personalized search by UbuWu · · Score: 1

      Also on: http://google.blogspace.com/ But the link doesn't work anymore... just goes to the google homepage. Guess that was a very short test period??? The exact text that was shown: As you build up your search history, your personalized search results will continue to improve over time.

  46. Holy S*** by Le+Marteau · · Score: 1

    That's all I've got to say. That app is AWESOME.

    The guys at MapQuest have got to be feeling like total losers these days. It's hard to believe I once thought MapQuest was cool.

    --
    Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
  47. How long will this last? by DownTownMT · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Is it just me, or does anyone else wonder how long this service will be available to the general public for free?

    I can see the Dept of Homeland Security not liking this project one bit as anyone anywhere can get the layouts of every city and street with a broadband connection.

    Don't get me wrong, I think this is a great tool, but i feel it won't exist without debate.

    --
    "Insert Sig Here"
    1. Re:How long will this last? by yellowbkpk · · Score: 1

      Everyone could always get the layout of the entire country's road system by downloading the TIGER/Line data. I downloaded 5 counties' worth of road data just yesterday. It includes road names, lat/long coords, etc.

      http://www.census.gov/geo/www/tiger/

    2. Re:How long will this last? by Bandman · · Score: 2, Funny

      why does Rand McNally hate democracy?

    3. Re:How long will this last? by ClippyHater · · Score: 1

      Completely off topic, I know, but do you know a good resource on how to use the TIGER/Line data for generating maps in (almost) real time using streaming GPS data?

      I've been trying for awhile to find good tutorials on the subject, but so far no joy.

  48. That's nice and all... but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where's the Mac OS X version?

  49. First by BaudKarma · · Score: 1

    ...well, it would have been, except I downloaded this thing and started playing with it.

    It's seriously cool. Ran amazingly smoothly, too! Not something I'd want to run off a dialup, though.

    --
    It's the land of the brave, and the home of the free
    Where the less you know, the better off you'll be.
  50. Why should anyone else bother by msbmsb · · Score: 1

    Great products for free. Some of the best engineers/scientists in the world. Constant amazing releases and press... How many people are just giving up on their aspirations to innovate now, or are replacing their aspirations with "* work at google"?

    Is there even a desire for Google competitors? Reading /. it would seem the answer is no, that people are willing to let Google be the only software company.

    1. Re:Why should anyone else bother by KrisCowboy · · Score: 1

      "Is there even a desire for Google competitors? Reading /. it would seem the answer is no, that people are willing to let Google be the only software company."
      I wasn't even born when Mircosoft started to emerge as "The Software Company". And we know now why it should've been avoided. With Google "Don't be Evil", things could be different. Let's give it a shot.

  51. Nice. More Google spyware on your desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    More cross referencing data between your Google desktop search, your Google internet search, your Gmail, your blogspot account and now this.

    And well, when Google goes belly up it will nice to sell all that fat juicy data to whoever the highest bidder is.

    Fuck off Google. You are not wanted

  52. Nerfed! by digitac · · Score: 1

    I've been a Keyhole LT subscriber for a while now so I got to test Google Earth betas for a couple weeks now. It's pretty nice, but they actually removed one of my favorite features. In one of the betas there was the ablility to measure area by just drawing a polygon on the map with the measure tool, then it vanished! I really want that one back, it's great when looking for houses and such. For simple rectangular shapes it's not a big deal because you can still measure in 1 dimension and just do the math, but for complex shapes it's much harder now. ::Digitac

    1. Re:Nerfed! by digitac · · Score: 1

      ..and yes, you CAN measure in smoots.

    2. Re:Nerfed! by clgoh · · Score: 1

      Maybe it was buggy or inaccurate.

    3. Re:Nerfed! by seti32 · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you look at the product comparison on the Google Earth website it says that the measure area feature is in Google Earth Pro. http://earth.google.com/product_comparison.html

  53. Default install location by freeweed · · Score: 1

    Word of warning, for those that are old enough to remember when programs used to ask by default where you wanted to install them:

    GoogleEarth installs in c:\program files. No option is given, unless you choose "custom" install.

    Not a show-stopper, but I really wish developers hadn't moved to that model. I have multiple partitions for a reason! :)

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    1. Re:Default install location by richie2000 · · Score: 1

      I always select the Custom/Advanced install option for a reason. Well, actually several reasons. I also want to see what parts of the program are optional.

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    2. Re:Default install location by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

      So you're saying that, rather than the default install, you want a custom install. And to do this, you have to select custom install.

      How, precisely, does this deviate from the only sane method of software installation under Windows?

  54. Area 51 by vapor22 · · Score: 1

    So do you get to see any of Area 51?

    if you try the Area 51 coordinates on

    http://terraserver.microsoft.com/

    you just get a topo map!

    --
    -- Believe your Justice!
  55. Re:Google Earth Free As In Beer by adam31 · · Score: 1
    Ooooo! A store locator for Free Beer?

    C'mon download download! Gooooooogle!

  56. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  57. sheesh... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 1

    Just buy a cheap Windows machine and a KVM. Seriously.

    --
    My other first post is car post.
    1. Re:sheesh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hardly what I would call 'free' (in either sense)!

  58. So? by brakk · · Score: 1

    You just need higher volume to offset the cost. Something around infinity should do it.

  59. Terrorism??? by dertrieb · · Score: 0, Troll

    Sorry to have this particular topic bust everyones balls, but doesn't this promote terrorism to a certain extent? Considering that I live outside of the US, my territories are not really graphically covered (from a high resolution perspective). But the US territories seem to be beautifully depicted with high resolution. Wouldn't you use this tool to plan something? Doesn't this bother anyone? Don't get me wrong...I love this stuff! Find it to be the cheapest (and laziest) travelling alternative around, but certain security measures should be taken. For that matter, does anyone know if the people that realesed this have considered this?

    1. Re:Terrorism??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...but doesn't this promote terrorism to a certain extent?

      Since you posted this as a reply to the What about Linux? thread, it seems reasonable to assume that Google has already thought of this and they deduced that terrorists don't use Windows.

    2. Re:Terrorism??? by Nasarius · · Score: 1
      doesn't this promote terrorism to a certain extent?

      I really really hope that "promote" wasn't the verb you were looking for.

      What useful information does this provide to terrorists that scouting out the area doesn't?

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    3. Re:Terrorism??? by blatantdog · · Score: 1

      Tell that to Jack Bauer...

    4. Re:Terrorism??? by FlyingCheese · · Score: 1

      All this data is freely available from other sources. If they wanted to plan something, this isn't helping them any more. Besides, people need to stop being paranoid.

    5. Re:Terrorism??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Sorry to have this particular topic bust everyones balls, but doesn't this promote terrorism to a certain extent?"

      Why the hell would you even bother asking, then?

      I'm really getting sick and tired of all the paranoid fuckers just like yourself. Do you really walk around every day and ponder the probability that you might be killed by some half-assed dirty bomb? Do you sit at home at night with your head burried in spreadsheets calculating out the risks of leaving your home the next morning?

      Please, just shut the fuck up.

      Terrorist this, terrorism that. Good God. Why don't all your paranoid people just go buy an island, build a nuclear shelter, and live there for the rest of your lives and be safe from all the "Evil Doers" and big bad terrorists.

      You do realize that the only reason terrorism exists is to make people like you pussy out and start to get all squirmish anytime someone says the word "terrorist"? So, do everyone a favor, grow a pair, and knock that shit off.

      And just to answer your question: fuck no. I can go to Walmart and buy a gigantic ass atlas of the entire United States. Then I can go to the library and check out all the books about every state in this country.

    6. Re:Terrorism??? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Actually we've carefully analyzed the parameters and for the typical MIRV'd 50KT soviet warhead to achieve a 50% probability of knocking out a Minuteman 3 ICBM inside a silo with a 3m thick reinforced concete lid, the nuclear detonation would have to occur within 300m, which is very difficult to do considering that the re-entry vehicle will have an air-speed in excess of 14,000 MPH. If they have airliners full if jet A fuel it's a whole different story.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    7. Re:Terrorism??? by bfizzle · · Score: 1

      If you continue with your deductive logic, you could easily conclude that by supporting Linux you are supporting terrorists.

    8. Re:Terrorism??? by shadowknot · · Score: 1
      Besides, people need to stop being paranoid.

      OK, tell that to the families of more than 3000 people who died on 9/11. People need to be more alert, it is not paranoia to be worried about the international terrorist threat and I think people who aren't worried about it are pretty naive.

      You are correct that this tool does not aid terrorists any more than the satellite imagery available from countless sources on the web but all of this information does make it easier to scout possible locations, that's the double-edged sword of the right to freedom of information

    9. Re:Terrorism??? by Moofie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "OK, tell that to the families of more than 3000 people who died on 9/11"

      Gladly. They've got more chance of being eaten by a shark than killed by a terrorist.

      "People need to be more alert"

      And report on their neighbors for being subversives. What a wonderful society we'd have then!

      "I think people who aren't worried about it are pretty naive."

      I think people who are more worried about terrorism than they are about driving to work don't have very good threat assessment skills.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    10. Re:Terrorism??? by RichardX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OK, tell that to the families of more than 3000 people who died on 9/11. People need to be more alert, it is not paranoia to be worried about the international terrorist threat and I think people who aren't worried about it are pretty naive.

      I wonder, perchance, if you've considered why it's commonly referred to as "9/11" or "September the eleventh two thousand and one"?

      It's because that's when it happened. The only time it has ever happened.
      Yes, it was a tragedy, and a crime against humanity, and a spectacular and shocking event. but in the overall scale of things.. well.. it was no big deal, quite frankly.

      In the last 5 years - actually, in the whole of history - just over 3000 people have been killed by Al Qaeda militants on the US mainland, all on 9/11 in a single coordinated attack. It hasn't happened since, and despite plenty of fear mongering, there hasn't been any credible evidence to suggest that it could either.

      In the year 2001 ALONE there were 42,443 deaths on the US mainland due to road traffic accidents. Similar figures have occurred every year since, bringing a rough total of 210,000 deaths. I'm guessing, given your propensity to worry about terrorist attack that you'd never do something so insanely reckless and suicidal as to drive a vehicle?

      Of course, even US road deaths pale in comparison to the 250,000-and-still-rising deathtoll which resulted from the boxing day tsunami in the Indian Ocean.

      And let's not forget the 972 US citizens who have been killed on US soil by.... the US Government, since 1976. Sure, they might be criminals (At least, you'd better hope they are!) but who says some of the people in the Twin Towers weren't?

      Never mind though. So long as you can convince yourself that the sky is falling and there are terrorists lurking in every doorway and around every corner, I'm sure things will be just hunky dory. Who needs civil liberties anyways?

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    11. Re:Terrorism??? by shadowknot · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "I wonder, perchance, if you've considered why it's commonly referred to as "9/11" or "September the eleventh two thousand and one"? It's because that's when it happened. The only time it has ever happened."

      Now this is amusing, so by your logic if something has happened once it can't happen again? At least this seems to be what you are inferring. You have conveniently forgotten the 1993 World Trade Center attack, so only 6 people died, six too many in my opinion, but it does demonstrate that your presumption that it was "The only time it has ever happened" is in fact incorrect.

      "In the last 5 years - actually, in the whole of history - just over 3000 people have been killed by Al Qaeda militants on the US mainland, all on 9/11 in a single coordinated attack. It hasn't happened since, and despite plenty of fear mongering, there hasn't been any credible evidence to suggest that it could either."

      Big who cares on this little point, that's 3,000 (or more) too many innocent people dead. The fact remains that Osama Bin Laden is still out there and until he is apprehended and bought to justice (I don't care if he is a symbolic figurehead or not) we should continue to be conscientious about the possibility of a repeat attack.

      "In the year 2001 ALONE there were 42,443 deaths on the US mainland due to road traffic accidents."

      Let me get this straight, you are equating road traffic deaths to those killed, sorry, murdered by terrorists flying planes into buildings and the ground? Your values are so unbelievably out of whack that you may just be beyond help. Traffic deaths are tragic and I understand that they cause a lot of pain for the families of their victims but just because there are more that makes them more tragic? Sheesh.

      "Of course, even US road deaths pale in comparison to the 250,000-and-still-rising deathtoll which resulted from the boxing day tsunami in the Indian Ocean."

      A tragic humanitarian disaster but why do you consider this a more worthy disaster? It was a geological disaster, nobody is to blame. I believe it is just as sad and heart-wrenching that all of these people died but it was ENTIRELY unavoidable.

      "And let's not forget the 972 US citizens who have been killed on US soil by.... the US Government, since 1976. Sure, they might be criminals (At least, you'd better hope they are!) but who says some of the people in the Twin Towers weren't?"

      I believe that the US justice system has a pretty good record in this department and most of these people are criminals proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Nobody, including me, has ever said that all of the people in the twin towers, pentagon or Shanksville, PA were saints but I do happen to know that the number of bad people was 19.

      "Never mind though. So long as you can convince yourself that the sky is falling and there are terrorists lurking in every doorway and around every corner, I'm sure things will be just hunky dory. Who needs civil liberties anyways?"

      I don't live in fear but neither do I deny the existence of evil in the world. On the point of civil liberties I would just like to say that the United States is without a doubt the most free place to live in the Western world. I am originally from England where such civil liberties as the ability to design and build your own house pretty much anywhere, purchase a weapon (though you're probably against that civil liberty) or drive a large car or truck are unheard of. If the government wants to check what books I have checked out of my local library that's fine, the only people against that sort of thing either have a guilty conscience or something to hide.

      "but in the overall scale of things.. well.. it was no big deal, quite frankly."

      I left this one until last because it was the only one that made me really mad. To say that it was "no big deal" is not just naive but plain offensive and undermines al

    12. Re:Terrorism??? by shadowknot · · Score: 1

      If you are more worried about driving than terrorism you have no right to lecture anyone about "threat assessment skills". Or am I forgetting about all those bands of middle eastern car journeys plotting the downfall of the western world?

    13. Re:Terrorism??? by RichardX · · Score: 1

      You have conveniently forgotten the 1993 World Trade Center attack,
      I was actually referring to a large scale attack such as 9/11, but didn't spell that out, so fair enough, I'll give you that. It still gives you a total of around 3000 people dead from Islamic terrorist activities on US soil.
      That is, of course, 3000 too many, and of course steps should be taken to prevent it happening again. But it is simply not the case that events like this are happening on a regular basis.
      People are occasionally mauled by tigers - yes, even in the US, probably in zoos - but that doesn't mean we all need to carry around tiger repelling spray all the time. Nor, to take the other extreme, does that mean we should dive into a tiger's den. A bit of common sense is all it takes.
      I'm all for common sense, and by all means, make air travel more secure. But that's not what we've seen since 9/11. What we've seen is much posturing, flag waving, jingoistic nonsense like "freedom fries", people having their car keys and other harmless items taken off them when boarding planes, people being detained without trial in Guantanamo Bay. The latest thing is yet another attempt to make burning the American flag a crime.
      If that should pass, we will now have officially reached the point where the image of the flag is more important than the freedom it embodies (the freedom, for example, to dissent by burning it)

      Let me get this straight, you are equating road traffic deaths to those killed, sorry, murdered by terrorists flying planes into buildings and the ground? Your values are so unbelievably out of whack that you may just be beyond help. Traffic deaths are tragic and I understand that they cause a lot of pain for the families of their victims but just because there are more that makes them more tragic? Sheesh.

      My values are such that I find them exactly AS tragic in terms of loss. Are you saying that to you, the lives of people murdered by terrorists are more important, and more of a loss than those who die in accidents? Perhaps they're somewhat less dead? Or maybe you'd like to tell their familes that they don't matter as much.
      To me, all lives are of equal value. Every life lost is a tragic and unbearable loss.
      And to put it very bluntly, yes. To me, the loss of 40,000 lives IS worse than the loss of 3000 lives. Exactly 13.333 times worse.

      It is, of course, a terrible and tragic thing whenever one person is driven to kill another, and I am firmly of the belief that in an ideal world that would never occur. However, I don't see that there is a case to be made that a person's death is more tragic for having been the result of terrorist action than natural disaster or road accident.

      people died [in the Indian Ccean tsunami] but it was ENTIRELY unavoidable.
      That's easy enough. "Oh well. Couldn't have been helped. Never mind."
      I can't help but wonder if you'd dismiss it so easily if it had occurred along the Cascadia subduction zone of the Pacific Northwest, thereby affecting the USA instead?
      Regardless, a huge number of those deaths were preventable. With a small investment in communication, seismology equipment, and education, a very significant number of those people would still be alive today.
      The only major difference, apart from an order of magnitude in loss of life, is that 9/11 was an act of deliberate murder carried out by one set of people against another. It is also worth noting that, whatever your personal view of the event, the people who carried it out believed that they were doing something good and just. (just for the record, btw, I find it neither good nor just, but evil and disgusting.)

      As for my choice of words that it 9/11 no big deal in the overall scale of things, I chose those words deliberately. Yes, it is a terribly crude thing to say, and I am fully aware of that. As I said earlier every single life lost is a tragedy, but 3000 deaths are just a tiny drop in the ocean of annual lives lost. Even if you only count delib

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    14. Re:Terrorism??? by RichardX · · Score: 1

      Whoops.. quick amendment to the above.
      I quoted parent with:

      people died [in the Indian Ccean tsunami] but it was ENTIRELY unavoidable.

      My intention was to put into context what I was referring to, but I've just realised it makes the parent come across as sounding rather more flippant than in the original context. That line should instead read:

      "[the Indian Ocean tsunami] was ENTIRELY unavoidable"

      Now if only Slashdot had an "edit post" button. Oh well.

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    15. Re:Terrorism??? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I'm talking about the number of people killed in automobiles vs. the number of people killed by terrorists. I'll leave the numbers to you.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    16. Re:Terrorism??? by bizzarobuddha · · Score: 1



      This just proves that we were justified for attacking Iraq; after all, President Bush made it clear that you're either with us or with the terrorists. Saddam made his loyalties known, and he paid the price. Then again-in a liberal's mindset-if Michael Moore disagrees with it, it must be a lie.

      I'd love to see you spout this bull to a company of Marines or airborne soldiers. Your words give aid and comfort to our enemies, and do nothing but attempt to bring discouragement to the brave men and women sacrificing themselves to ensure that those towel-headed nutjobs never strike us again.

      Shame on you.

    17. Re:Terrorism??? by RichardX · · Score: 1

      Well, I really shouldn't feed the trolls - or the idiots. But here goes anyway

      This just proves that we were justified for attacking Iraq; after all, President Bush made it clear that you're either with us or with the terrorists. Saddam made his loyalties known, and he paid the price. Then again-in a liberal's mindset-if Michael Moore disagrees with it, it must be a lie.

      Ah yes. And if Bush says it it must be true.
      FWIW, I think Michael Moore is a twat with very little of any worth to say - and anything that he does say is so wrapped up in hype and drama that it's lost anyway.

      You appear to be alluding to the fact that Saddam Hussein had some kind of alleigance or connection with Al Queda when you say he "made his loyalties known". If you are in possession of such information I suggest you deliver it to George Bush or Tony Blair immediately, because they really should be informed of things like that.

      It must be so easy to live in a world where everything is black or white. You're either a good god-fearing middle class freedom-fries eating white American Christian, or you're one of them there Islamic commie terr'ist mutants - oh, I'm sorry.. I believe the correct technical term is "towel-headed nutjobs"

      I'd love to see you spout this bull to a company of Marines or airborne soldiers.
      Funny you should say that, because I have. Unlike, I suspect, you, I actually know somebody who served in Iraq, having spent six months there with the Scottish Black Watch regiment last year. His views on the matter are considerably more extreme than mine, and he's rather bitter about having risked his life and seen friends killed and injured for what he terms "a completely bullshit war". But then, he's probably an Islamic double agent or something.

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    18. Re:Terrorism??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm actually quite amazed by your post here. You said "My values are such that I find them exactly AS tragic in terms of loss." in reference to comparing traffic deaths to 9/11 deaths.

      I think EVERYONE here will say that every tragedy you listed is tragic (hence the use of the word "tragedy"). It's sad that the tsunami killied 300,000, and it's also sad that tens of thousands die by cancer, or road deaths, heart attacks, dog bites, influenza, etc. It's sad that my grandmother died when she was 97. Of COURSE it hurts those impacted. Death is like that. The reality is EVERYONE will die, the difference is only HOW, not IF everyone will die. And every death is significant, every life is valued.

      But you have to admit there is a fundamental difference in these deaths. The deaths you listed were accidental, or (as they say) "Acts of God". I grant you that we might be able to put together a tsunami warning system. (FYI, it's already in existance in the Pacific, and has been for years, but it didn't matter in this instance, as there wasn't time to warn people to move) And we could set speed limits of 5 miles an hour on the highways too, reducing traffice deaths. But 9/11 was an INTENTIONAL, callous act of murder. If my son drowns in the pool, that's tragic, but if my son is held underwater by another person and murdered by drowning, that's something else entirely. It's called MURDER. All death can be tragic, but not all death is murder. Let's acknowledge that.

      You're argument also implies that unless the death rate is as high as these other tragedies, then the acts of terrorists are not an issue we should be dealing with. So, the real problem is that terrorists are not as EFFICIENT in killing as the natural causes of death you mention. Once they get more efficient, and/or find governments which are willing to support and/or fund programs which will allow them to cause this many deaths THEN we should deal with them. What you are effectively saying is that we shouldn't do anything until these guys figure out how to kill 40,000 people in an afternoon.

      By focusing on how many deaths have happened in US territory, you also imply that ONLY the deaths of americans on US soil are worthy of fighting for. The hundreds of thousands of Kurds who died via gassing in Iraq are apparently a less significant deal. Or perhaps the thousands that died in the Iraq/Iran war because of chemical weapons don't count. Or the innocent Kuwaitis crushed by Iraqi tanks in Gulf War 1. And the deaths of americans overseas don't matter, like those on the Cole, or the marine barracks in lebanon, or in the plane over Lockerbie, or the cruise ships in the med, or on the bus in Tel Aviv, etc etc etc.

      Are we to wait until the numbers of US dead on US soil are big enough before we do something? That means we let the Nazi's kill their millions because only a couple thousand people died in Pearl Harbor. (not enough to matter) It means we let the rape of Nanking continue. It means we do nothing in Bosnia, Darfur, Sudan, or for that matter, tsunami victims in Asia (Not enough american's died on US soil). I'm not saying that we are doing enough, or that we can't do more for all of these places. The reality is that we can't do everything for everyone everywhere. We can argue whether we should do this or that here or there, but I think it's childish and selfish to say we shouldn't do something somewhere because OUR personal impact 'isn't significant'. Sometimes doing the right thing is enough.

      Reality dictates that we can't fix ALL these problems. And our being in Iraq instead of Sudan (for example) might be arbitrary, or seem to be. We can argue that point, and that's a discussion to be had. The choices are do we do SOMETHING or NOTHING? You're argument is we do nothing. Those deaths don't matter. So, clearly not all deaths are as tragic as the ones you care about. I say all deaths matter, even the guy I never met over there. So where SHOULD we put our efforts? Iraq makes sense to me. Why

    19. Re:Terrorism??? by aminorex · · Score: 1

      Nah, he's using a linux seat that could have gone to a terrorist.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    20. Re:Terrorism??? by rufty_tufty · · Score: 1

      and where did you think that petrol to run your car comes from?
      Where do terrorists come from?
      I think there is a terrorist plot here somewhere???
      --
      Roll of tin foil £1.50
      1 Week of psychiatric help £150
      Keeping the neighbours dog from reading your mind - priceless!

      --
      "The weirdest thing about a mind, is that every answer that you find, is the basis of a brand new cliche" -
  60. Die Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there even a desire for Google competitors? Reading /. it would seem the answer is no, that people are willing to let Google be the only software company.

    Speak for yourself by all means you fuckwit troll. Maybe YOU want to have your entire life PWNED by Google and passed onto Government and big business but some of us don't.

    Take your Lobotomised Google Eutopia and stick it up your asshole.

  61. Security Risk by rubberbando · · Score: 1

    This makes me wonder if the US goverment would see this as a security risk as it gives such detailed info that terrorists could use against them. It wouldn't suprise me if this gets shut down for that reason.

    --
    DEAD DEAD DEAD DELETE ME
    1. Re:Security Risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the terrorists could have our maps of interstate highways! Think of what they could do with the knowledge of state boundaries and crime data! The horror! In all seriousness, almost all fed/state/local governments create and maintain these data sets. Why would they ban what they spent $millions to create?

    2. Re:Security Risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd think that was because the terrorists that attacked on 911 used flight simulation software because of its great amount of detail of the real world....dumbass

    3. Re:Security Risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what are you suggesting? Ban flight simulator software too?

    4. Re:Security Risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course they will. The US government sees everything as a security risk.

      Don't forget that in the 1980s the US lobbied successfully to ban export of C64s to Eastern Europe because of security risks (Just imagine what could happen when the Reds get hold of this awsome technology, what actually happened was the creation of Tetris which arguably decreased productivity in the so called 'free world' by enslaving a generation to the falling blocks, but that's beside the point.)

    5. Re:Security Risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets ban everything. All American citizens must immediately sign into sensory deprivation chambers to prevent the terrorists from using 'something'.

      Wow... a solution for world peace in 1 paragraph! (ok, not a solution, but a start)

  62. Whoops. by Cervantes · · Score: 1

    Who else read this and thought Google had started launching space probes and satellites for free?

    They have to do something with the exhaust from all their server farms... pipe it all into a single tube, and make the worlds largest blow-dart gun that can launch into space :)

    --
    If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
  63. Untethered Version?? by yellowbkpk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know this is really just a pipe dream because Google wouldn't do it, but I could see this being very useful in a car computer application. I have been doing some heavy duty searching and there just isn't a good app for in-car navigation available to the general public.

    If Google allowed you to cache their street data and then project colors over the topo maps instead of the "streaming" satellite images, this would be a killer navigation aid for in-car usage. Point of Interest and Address data could be stored in a few gigabytes (they do it on DVDs nowadays) on a harddrive and updated every night when you drive in to the garage (over Wifi).

    Hackers...take your mark, get set, GO!

    1. Re:Untethered Version?? by Bandman · · Score: 1

      or if they'd just let us hack away on the source code to this, we'd write it ourselves!

      in fact, someone probably will anyway

    2. Re:Untethered Version?? by cant1cle · · Score: 1

      Untethered would also be a tremendous tool for private pilots. Being able to visualize and match up landmarks from the correct altitude would be a great boon to those Sunday fliers.

      It would take a whole different set of images for those Saturday night fliers.

      j

    3. Re:Untethered Version?? by JohnGalt00 · · Score: 1

      The problem is, Google had to pay someone else for all that map data. Google doesn't have unlimited rights to all that stuff. Look at the license for the Google video player(GPL), and then the Google maps viewer(non-commerical, no reverse decompiling, etc). But yeah, this would be really cool for a car computer.

    4. Re:Untethered Version?? by KeyholeSeer · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Google Earth Plus version *does* work in offline mode, displaying data from the local disk-cache. If you upgrade to Plus, set you cache size to maximum (500MB), and then create placemarks for your waypoints, you will be able to revisit the same areas when operating in offline mode.

      --
      Be seeing you, Seer
    5. Re:Untethered Version?? by yellowbkpk · · Score: 1

      How do I login with Plus if I don't have a net connection?

    6. Re:Untethered Version?? by KeyholeSeer · · Score: 1

      The login times out, then says "Sorry, can't access the server so you are on your own and flying out of previously cached data." Then you start. If you want to rely on this then you would need to fly the areas of interest BEFORE unplugging from civilization. It works fine. I do this all the time on business travel and zoom around destination cities while on the flight. Also, edit your preferences to set the cache to 400MB.

      --
      Be seeing you, Seer
  64. Security concerns by kkith · · Score: 0

    I wonder if this tool will make the peeps in Homeland Security go nuts.

    1. Re:Security concerns by v3xt0r · · Score: 0

      they have to follow strict reviews & guidelines before they're allowed to post these photos.

      The photo quality is crap anyhow.

      Nice idea, but I like the NSA's software much better! =)

      --
      the only permanence in existence, is the impermanence of existence.
  65. You dont need google for that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    There are some pretty good satellite images available.

    http://www.lasvegasnow.com/area51/Area51-072503-LG .jpg
    http://www.lasvegasnow.com/area51/Area51-4M072503- LG.jpg

    You can compare them with google maps, it was posted yesterday.

  66. M O O N, that spells "moon" ... by aggiefalcon01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I like the map & satellite imagery Google has given for the Earth. My question: why stop there?

    Okay, so you see the "Map" and "Satellite" links in the upper right ... why not include ... "Moon" as well? In fact, we have the imagery for other celestial orbs ... why not Mars? Mercury?

    In short, why stop at Google Earth?

    --
    Global warming is neither science, nor politics. It is a religion.
    1. Re:M O O N, that spells "moon" ... by s-orbital · · Score: 2, Informative

      What you want is Celestia. It does exactly what you are looking for, even including dozens of recently discovered extrasolar planets!

      --
      Patent: from Latin patere, to be open
    2. Re:M O O N, that spells "moon" ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that's a great idea. If you just have Google redirect to a page for you, it completely eliminates the referrer, and it gets around slashdot's little domain reference! Goatse

    3. Re:M O O N, that spells "moon" ... by s-orbital · · Score: 1

      Oh God, I fel a troll...
      That was an accident, I was lazy and copied the link from Google. Now go back under your bridge you evil creature

      --
      Patent: from Latin patere, to be open
  67. Windows only? I thought Google was smart! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just not that tough to write cross-platform apps any more. What's Google doing with all that supposed brain-power that've got?

  68. The multi language maddness... by DEFFENDER · · Score: 1

    IF you type a search for Honk Kong you get nothing, but after a few minutes of figuring how to zoom down to the right place I found it clear as day. The problem here? I don't speak cantonees... and most people in HK do speak english. So why no hits for the search?

    P.S. And yes this is a big deal, HK is not part of China no matter how much the land grabing Reds in Beijing want it to be. Give it a name and it has a voice, Redmond we know complies with censorship of the people in China but has Google gone down the same dark road?

    --
    Careful what you say around me.. I will assume you mean it.
    1. Re:The multi language maddness... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try spelling it correctly first

  69. Yeah... by tratch · · Score: 0

    This was cool when I saw it at 8am on Digg.

  70. OMG by giorgiofr · · Score: 1

    OMG!
    OMGWTF!!!
    OMGWTFOMFG!!!!!!111one!!!

    Really, I love this. Mmmmmmmhhh Google. /me hugs Google. We loves it. It came to usssssssssss.

    --
    Global warming is a cube.
  71. Snow Crash by Malluck · · Score: 1

    This is really cool, but I'll be really impressed when the whole thing updates in real-time à la Snowcrash. ;-)

  72. Sweet Memories by JerkyBoy · · Score: 1

    The first thing that I did was to look up my boyhood home in Louisiana. I haven't seen it in twenty years. Tears came from my eyes as I looked down on the lake where my friends and I used to swim and fish, and I fell in the love for the first time.

    --


    Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest. -- Mark Twain
    1. Re:Sweet Memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fell in love with fish?

    2. Re:Sweet Memories by KeyholeSeer · · Score: 1

      What a charming story. Thank you for sharing it. Seeing a place is such a powerful experience.

      --
      Be seeing you, Seer
  73. ^ Not to diminish the quality of the products by msbmsb · · Score: 1

    This is just another in a long list of great work that comes from google, which I will use and enjoy for a long time.

  74. Direct evidence, blatant slashdot pro-google bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw this complaint before, about slashdot being way too pro-google.
    I generally dismissed such claims, but this is too much.
    Google launches a Windows-only client service, and slashdot doesn't even *mention* the fact that it's Windows only?
    That's just ridiculous. I know a lot of people with influence on slashdot now work for google, but this is too much.

  75. Google offers a refund to Keyhole subscribers by Sprotch · · Score: 3, Informative

    Should you consider that the "plus" version is not worth the 30 USD you shelled out for it three days ago, Google offers you a refund. The refund is pro-rated according to the number of months of the year you have been using your subscription.

    Here

  76. OS-G by hisstory+student · · Score: 1

    Remember, you heard it here first.

    OS-G is going to be FREE (except for the extensions of course).

    --
    Heard any good sigs lately?
  77. Edit by Nathan+Weinberg · · Score: 3, Informative

    I think it goes without saying that I wish I could update TFA. When I wrote it at 1 AM, 13 hours before it hit /., Earth hadn't yet been uploaded to the web, so "launching" in the title and "available soon" in the article haven't been accurate for many hours. Also, I would have mentioned the enterprise versions of Earth, which can cost a butt-load of money for those interested.

  78. Metric Options by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I might be missing something here but can anyone find a way to default it to measuring the elevation and eye alt in metres?

    I can measure distance in km, but not change the bottom info bar.

    Cheers

  79. Good God, PLEASE STFU by vectorian798 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am pissed off that everytime something innovative comes out, someone has to be a token Slashdot user and say 'No Linux Version' or 'No *nix? This sucks' or whatever other equivalent you can pull out of Slashdot's archives.

    I was checking out the comments on Threshold 5 and was surprised to find half the comments along these same lines!!!

    This is a FREE PROGRAM. It is FREE. It is also damn innovative, one of a kind (well...not quite, but for the features it has, definitely), and they even took the time to make it run on DirectX and OpenGL.

    My gut instinct tells me that there will be a Linux Port sometime - it's in freakin' beta people quit your bitching.

    Even if there isn't a linux port, you shouldn't be complaining because someone has to take the time to code all that - are you willing to go put in the time and do that work? I thought not. Now shut up while I go fly through San Francisco checking out Google Earth's awesomeness in 3D.

    1. Re:Good God, PLEASE STFU by Nasarius · · Score: 0, Redundant
      My gut instinct tells me that there will be a Linux Port sometime

      Why? No other Google software has been ported to Linux. Yes it's free, but it's still a shitty thing for them to do, considering how much of their infrastructure relies on Linux.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    2. Re:Good God, PLEASE STFU by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      They should be wondering about privacy policy while using that program as its openly backed up by CIA.

      Here is story from 2004:
      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/10/28/google_buy s_keyhole/

      Oh but for some reason, its google doing it, so must be good. they run linux etc etc

      Just imagine if MSN did it.

    3. Re:Good God, PLEASE STFU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonsense! We have absolutely every right to complain! Where is the source code? Google is built on source code (linux), yet they offer windoze binaries?! God gawd, how awful. Google has diminished in my eyes, because of this. At the very LEAST, there should be a binary linux release, at the same time as a windoze binary. Google is sliding down that slippery slope...

    4. Re:Good God, PLEASE STFU by Panoramix · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I am pissed off that everytime something innovative comes out, someone has to be a token Slashdot user and say 'No Linux Version' or 'No *nix? This sucks' or whatever other equivalent you can pull out of Slashdot's archives.

      I agree, to some extent. It always annoys me when people complain about free software, as if they had some right to it. It is a gift. Complaining about something that was given to you is pretty lame, indeed.

      However, the lack of a GNU/Linux version is very frustrating, so I also understand the feeling. See, I do not have a Windows machine. I do have valid reasons (at least valid and important to me) for not having one, so I do not even intend to get one in the foreseeable future. So I will not be able to run this software, when otherwise I would be all over it.

      This is my choice, of course, so I am not complaining. It is just very frustrating.

      Even if there isn't a linux port, you shouldn't be complaining because someone has to take the time to code all that - are you willing to go put in the time and do that work?

      I am certain that many people here would gladly "take the time to code all that", for free even, if they only could. But this is not an open source app, so that is not possible.

      Come to think about it, this could make a great project. GPL'ed clone of Google Earth, anyone?

    5. Re:Good God, PLEASE STFU by Snaller · · Score: 1

      You mean they were paid to not make a Linux version? Interesting.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    6. Re:Good God, PLEASE STFU by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      I'm not disagreeing with the entitlement attitude some users display, but I felt like pointing out that this is not an "innovative" thing. I used Keyhole 2 years ago when I got my first NVidia card and moved away to college. It was free for a month to anyone with a new NVidia card at that point.

      The only innovative thing is giving it away to everyone for free. How long do you expect it to stay that way?

    7. Re:Good God, PLEASE STFU by Jumpin'+Jon · · Score: 1

      I'd already seen Google Earth from a post on another news site (gasp), and then saw it was Windows-only, and thought, I just HAVE to come and see the backlash here. I mean, Linux isn't even mentioned as an OS that they consider you might want to run it on!!

      These fucking Linux pricks crying and bleating and moaning... makes me laugh. You guys never let me down - pure entertainment. Thanks!

      JJ

    8. Re:Good God, PLEASE STFU by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      I'm not disagreeing with the entitlement attitude some users display

      Whoops. That should read, "I'm not disagreeing that some users have entitlement issues"

  80. Missouri by johkir · · Score: 1

    Strange things are afoot at the state of Missouri. Why would that state, and Indiana, require full coverage so soon?

    --
    These are some of the things molecules do...... given 4 billion years -Carl Sagan
    1. Re:Missouri by vegetablespork · · Score: 1

      Well, Missouri is the Show Me State.

      --

      Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

  81. Official User's BBS by Sprotch · · Score: 1

    People have been helping each other to make the most out of this software for years. To visit the most interesting landmarks and learn how to use Google Earth to its maximum potential, take a look a the official BBS.

  82. Resistance is Futile... by Winkhorst · · Score: 1

    ...You will be assimilated.

    So who's going to need whom in the near future? It will get to the point that no one will buy Windows if it won't support the Google Meta-Operating System.

    --
    "Is this Winkhorst a nova criminal?" "No just a technical sergeant wanted for interrogation."
  83. Yes, but when will they... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...index my website?

    Seriously though, have any other slashdot readers having trouble persuading googlebot to visit? I am beginning to think the google sandbox isn't a myth.

    My site is valid XHTML 1.1 and CSS 2.1, textual rather than graphical, and chock full of updated content. Any suggestions - what am I doing wrong?

  84. Earth Google and beyond by justinpfister · · Score: 1

    So if Google wants, they can add the moon or the rest of the universe. I wonder what Google would charge to put a building on Mars on universe.google.com

    --
    Is this serious?
  85. Re:Google Earth Free As In Beer by generic-man · · Score: 1

    Holy crap The Beer Store is being given away for free?! QUICK, TO CANADA.

    --
    For more information, click here.
  86. Ladies and gentlemen, by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1

    it has happened: Google has constructed a second Earth.

    I hope to see you all at the launch.

  87. Eh? Maybe you didn't actually read my post. by msbmsb · · Score: 1

    No, I'm sure of it, you didn't. Read and try again. Continue practicing as much as you need, there is no time limit.

    You may begin.

  88. Proxy? by fa2k · · Score: 1

    I don't think it is wise of the developers to use the default IE proxy settings! There's an enormous amount of data, and it is better and faster served directly from Google's server.

  89. Newest Slashdot cliche? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You seem determined to make it so.

  90. Kick ass game by macaulay805 · · Score: 1

    This would make a kick ass game if someone would hack it to the tune of "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego"

  91. Realtime Downloads? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Google's stuff is static pictures that are months old. Are there real-time satellite images that show various parts of the USA at the level of seeing actual buildings?

    I remember that there was once such images available on the web, but I forgot the URL.

    1. Re:Realtime Downloads? by Nuskrad · · Score: 1
      Google's stuff is static pictures that are months old. Are there real-time satellite images that show various parts of the USA at the level of seeing actual buildings?

      I remember that there was once such images available on the web, but I forgot the URL.

      No. There never was. The technology doesn't exist to photograph at this detail at real time, for the whole USA, and stream it over the web. The nearest you get to 'real time' in satellite images are MODIS images you can get (and pipe into WorldWind), which photographs the entire earth over a period of about 3 days (but not to a very high level of detail)

  92. Unix Version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are standing in Chicago.
    A huge green fierce snake bars the way!

  93. Not Crossover as far as I can tell by photon317 · · Score: 1

    I have a licensed Crossover Office installation (Wine + a lot of hacks to try to smooth things over for end users). I tried installing Google Earth as an "unsupported app" under the cxoffice setup. With the operating system set to "Win XP", the installer completed fine, but the application failed to launch. The most illuminating error message I could squeeze out of it was:

    err:module:import_dll No implementation for KERNEL32.dll.Module32NextW imported from L"C:\\Program Files\\Google\\Google Earth Plus\\base.dll", setting to 0xdeadbeef
    err:module:import_dll No implementation for KERNEL32.dll.Module32FirstW imported from L"C:\\Program Files\\Google\\Google Earth Plus\\base.dll", setting to 0xdeadbeef
    err:module:LdrInitializeThunk Main exe initialization for L"C:\\Program Files\\Google\\Google Earth Plus\\GoogleEarth.exe" failed, status c0000142

    I gave up for now. I'll try this out when I get home and can boot into native windows - I'm all linux here at the office.

    --
    11*43+456^2
    1. Re:Not Crossover as far as I can tell by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      I'm all linux here at the office.

      Oh, come one now. Don't tease us.

  94. Iraq search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I couldn't find any weapons of mass destruction either.

  95. Re:Windows only? I thought Google was smart! by searchr · · Score: 1

    Google is smart; they're reserving their Linux and Mac versions for the $400 pay level, because they know you whiny idiots will pay for it.

  96. Google kinda made it worse.. by vhold · · Score: 4, Informative

    I was a Keyhole subscriber for a little over a year before google bought them.

    As nice of an improvement the Google Earth software is, overall the product has become worse since google bought it.

    The overall resolution has been decreased from many covered areas and super high-res areas have been removed entirely.

    You used to be able to clearly make out the exact shapes of cars in the SF Bay Area, now they are blurry colored blobs. In the super high res areas, you could pretty much identify the model of most cars and sometimes even make out individual people.

    If you are a long time subscriber like me, google placates you with an option to login to the 'legacy' database.. but if you are new.. no dice.

    Doesn't that seem strange? I really hope they reintegrate the higher res data, it is profoundly better.

    I'd like to give them the benefit of the doubt that when they increased their coverage area they had technical issues with the highest res data, but it's been awhile now and they havn't changed their stance of "Oh.. umm yea..login to legacy.." since the new primary database came out.. so I'm fairly worried.

    1. Re:Google kinda made it worse.. by doormat · · Score: 1

      That is odd. Maybe they dont have more than one database for the base data, and they dont want to split them up, nor do they want those ultra-hires images out available for anyone to pull up via Google Maps or Earth.

      --
      The Doormat

      If you're not outraged, then you're not paying attention.
    2. Re:Google kinda made it worse.. by theqmann · · Score: 5, Informative

      They ended up changing their map supplier contracts around when Google bought em out. They now use the google map database (DigitalGlobe) instead of their older hi-res database (AirPhoto) which was negotiated with the Keyhole corporation. -QMan

  97. Why post that... by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

    ...when you skipped the first part:

    Google Earth is a broadband, 3D application that not all computers can run.

    * Apple Macintosh computers are not supported at this time (but we are working on it).
    * Windows-based desktop PCs older than 4 years old may not be able to run it.
    * Windows-based notebook PCs older than 2 years old may not be able to run it.


    It's the funniest thing I've read today. I like telling users: Your computer is too old! I'm amazed that the recommended configuration is the same as Doom III...

  98. Whoa! by rivid · · Score: 1

    I can see my house from here!

  99. Re:Pilots: Flight Approaches by thegamerformelyknown · · Score: 1, Funny

    And, for those of us who don't like to get ripped off by cab drivers (as a comedian on "Just for Laughs" did it), we can get the landmarks straight and talk about them :D

  100. It's A Trojan by plainvanilla · · Score: 1

    Tempting though it is, I am going to
    resist the temptation to install Windows
    just to run this app.

    If I want to look at things from the air,
    I'll just have to get in my airplane and fly
    around.

    Bastards.

    1. Re:It's A Trojan by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 1

      Allow me to be the first to ask:

      What?

  101. A Fun Trick with Google Earth by ubergoober · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Download Stellarium at http://stellarium.sourceforge.net/ and you can pull up our night skies, only thing you need is your Lat/Long and a form of reference (conveniently provided by Earth) to get your bearings. Select an appropriate remote location in G-earth away from city lights and voila, instant geeky-but-still romantic date. Just add wine and an appreciation for the starry nights.

    --
    * Making waffles just so I have something to Twitter *
  102. Flight Simulator by josh_freeman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Was I the only one that thought a flight simulator + google Earth = hours and hours of fun?

    1. Re:Flight Simulator by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1
      Seriously. Would kick some serious ass if FlightGear and Google Earth were somehow integrated.

      [Wouldn't mind a Terraserver and MS Flight Simulator integration either of course, just to be geek-politically-agnostic. ;-)]

    2. Re:Flight Simulator by Andy+Gardner · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, but I did think how GoogleEarth + Orbiter would = wow!

  103. Is Neal Stephenson getting royalties? by cdn · · Score: 1

    There's a remarkably similar product in Neal Stephenson's amazing book, Snow Crash. Is he getting royalties?

  104. I read through the EULA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First off: IANAL. IAAPWLTBSU (I Am A Physicist Who Likes To Blow Shit Up).

    But I did scan through the EULA, and nothing jumped out at me regarding Google's tendency to collect personal information. This is good news. It looks like Google Earth isn't going to collect obscene amounts of data or scan through my entire computer and upload all my porn to Google Videos.

    I'm not paranoid. Really.

  105. Snow Crash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone here read Neal Stephenson's "Snow Crash" this is starting to turn into that book. All they need is a voice activated Librarian. So very cool.

  106. Linux version seems likely soon... by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 1

    Though Google themselves may not provide it.

    How long will it be, really, before someone either reverse-engineers (or Google provides?) the queries and data that go back and forth? It seems pretty obvious that all of the data is kept server side, and the download for the Windows(tm) version of the application seems to only be about 10MB or so (so I'm guessing - and it IS only a guess - that there's not a lot of processing that the client side has to do).

    QT has OpenGL classes in it, doesn't it? How long before there's a "KGoogleEarth" project?...

  107. Obvious question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where are the nudie sunbathers?

  108. Re:privacy please.. by meta.chris · · Score: 1

    Perhaps on his/her typing skills. At least the poster isn't operating a big rig or heavy machinery right now. No worries.

  109. Next Product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great! Now we just have to wait for google librarian!

  110. this is really cool... by mike518 · · Score: 0

    typically i find these maps and sat. images kind of boring and not useful. This is different, you can turn on roads, county/country borders and dining locations. You can find your own house and view it in good enough resolution as to actually see and identify your car in the driveway! When scrolling out you can see locations of local pizza places and stuff, all very cool. It does all this and does it smoothy with fading transitions, very very neat. Way to go Google.

    --
    Mike
    I heart the RIAA & MPAA, im sure its mutual...
  111. Bravo, Google... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I think Hiro Protagonist (http://project.cyberpunk.ru/idb/snowcrash.html) would approve.
    What next, the Metaverse? (please???)

  112. Gearth (sic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where's the nice pun on gearth (sic). google must be losing it.

  113. Camping by freeweed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Speaking of which, for those of us into climbing/hiking, for most of the Canadian Rockies (Three Sisters in Canmore is included as a default sightseeing point, yay!) the resolution and elevation are sufficient to get a general idea of what you're heading into. I've pored over topo maps and the like, but you never get the sense of what you're getting into.

    I've used the tilt/rotate and careful zooming on some of the areas I've been this summer so far, and it's positively creepy. Having satellite textures mapped onto elevation data is the next best thing.

    I've already poked around a few backcountry places that maps don't as show much fun, but the Keyhole data is veeeery promising. There's one block a bit north of Lake Louise that is VERY highly detailed for backcountry, looks like fun!

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    1. Re:Camping by freeweed · · Score: 1

      Crap.

      Never mind, apparently the yanks also have some mountains called the "Three Sisters". Just took 5 minutes for the picture to resolve. Maybe I need a better gfx card? :)

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  114. Wow! by dep01 · · Score: 1

    It's getting to the point where i'll cream my pants whenever I see a slashdot entry with "Google" in the title.. I just wonder: "Holy crap.. What have they perfected now?"

    --
    "hey, could you pass me a paper towel? er.. I mean... DEPLOY ABSORBTION PANEL!"
  115. Interesting places to view by evildogeye · · Score: 1

    Ground Zero
    The Forbidden City
    The White House (censored!)
    The Pyramids

    1. Re:Interesting places to view by alex_ware · · Score: 1

      It's not on mine, I live in the UK and it appears fine (as well as the 3D overlay). Your country might be blacklisted?

      --
      If you have nothing useful to say post as AC.
    2. Re:Interesting places to view by jensen404 · · Score: 1

      The top of the White House is not all one shade of brown.

      When I used Keyhole a couple of years ago, there were no censored areas.

    3. Re:Interesting places to view by alex_ware · · Score: 1

      oh yeah, wow

      --
      If you have nothing useful to say post as AC.
  116. Crime Stats by celephaix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone having any luck with the crime statistics? I was kind of interested to see the crime stats in my area, but nothing's coming up when I click on the checkbox. (And I *know* there is crime around here.)

  117. Plus Just Prettier? I don't think so... by lullabud · · Score: 2, Informative
    except for a $20/year "plus" versions with prettier pictures
    Uh, yeah, that and the ability to communicate with external GPS receivers to manage waypoints and track logs, which is a HUGE plus for those of us who like to get out and explore the earth in meatspace. Also, there is currently no good software to do this on the Mac, and although Google Earth doesn't currently support Mac, the site does say that they are working on it, which is an even bigger bonus for me since that's one of the only reason's I use a PC outside of work. I had e-mailed Keyhole before Google bought them and they said they weren't planning on making a Mac version... Thank God that Google bought them and is setting that right. I'll definitely pay for the plus version when it comes out for Mac.
  118. Google doesn't owe you a Linux version, stfu. by BitHive · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    To everyone complaining that it's shitty of Google not to debut with a Linux version of Earth because they use Linux, shut the fuck up. Do you expect a discount from your ISP if they use Linux on their servers? Do you expect free tickets to movies that used Linux render farms for their special effects?

    I bet most of you bitching don't even contribute to the body of open source software.

    1. Re:Google doesn't owe you a Linux version, stfu. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Do you expect a discount from your ISP if they use Linux on their servers?"

      Is my ISP built, maintained or supported by the community?

      NO.

      STFU

      "Do you expect free tickets to movies that used Linux render farms for their special effects?"

      Was the movie or theater built, maintained or supported by the community?

      NO.

      STFU

  119. Missouri??? by 75th+Trombone · · Score: 1

    What the crap is up with Missouri? Except for a little chunk out of SE MO, every low-res picture is crazily vignetted. I mean you can see the border, mile-for-mile. Does the Missouri satellite have too long a lens hood or something?

    --
    The United States of America: We do what we must because we can.
  120. Mod parent up informative... by vhold · · Score: 1

    So basically there is very little hope of seeing the highest res data reintegrated? That is a massive bummer, I most likely will not be renewing my subscription.

    1. Re:Mod parent up informative... by theqmann · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would think that Google could get similar high res data from DigitalGlobe, or to establish new relationships with AirPhoto for the old high res data. I remember reading on their forums, http://bbs.keyhole.com/, that they were comitted to reinstating the old high res data. -QMan

  121. The road direction search by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    A bummer these only seem to work in the US, despite them having already added a very detailed road network with names, road types, and all in many countries besides there.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    1. Re:The road direction search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      works fine here in the UK, the animated tour for directions is a very cool but pointless feature!

  122. Dear Linux users... by alex_ware · · Score: 3, Informative

    seeing as so many of you have started threads there is no main one to post this to, look at the screenshot. There IS A LINUX VERSION.

    --
    If you have nothing useful to say post as AC.
    1. Re:Dear Linux users... by Cyberop5 · · Score: 1

      But did you even read the system requirements?

      " Recommended configurations:

      * 2 x 2.8 GHz Pentium 4 (or greater)
      * NVIDIA GeForce4 or higher graphics card
      * 2 GB main memory
      * 100/1000 NIC
      * SuSE Enterprise 9/SuSE Linux Pro 9
      "

      That isn't a toaster.

      --
      Urgo: "I want to live. I want to experience the universe and I want to eat pie!"
      Jack: "Who doesn't??"
    2. Re:Dear Linux users... by alex_ware · · Score: 1

      No but that is for the enterprize version, it shows that google can run it on linux.

      --
      If you have nothing useful to say post as AC.
  123. Very Cool by Hack+Jandy · · Score: 1

    Ok, so usually I am a bit annoyed by the fact that everytime google sneezes someone writes an article about it.

    On the other hand, I used this thing for about an hour and it was probably the coolest thing I've ever seen google do. This rocks.

    HJ

  124. Late to the game, but I misread the title as... by DarthWiggle · · Score: 1

    something about Google offering free Earth launches to orbit... heh.

  125. That's $20 a YEAR. by MDMurphy · · Score: 1

    It's $20 a year, not $20 a month, $10 less than what the used to charge for the paid version.

  126. Worse 3d ever... by TibbonZero · · Score: 1

    I think i'll stay with the Google Maps for now thank you. These images are about as 3d (actually a little less it seems) than the ones in MSFT Flight Sims. I have only looked at the Boston area so far (but it is a Major US city that Google has been looking at putting a Campus in even) and it's just flat. Not even the 60 floor John Hancock tower or Fenway park are in 3d. It's just putting an image on it's side.

    Now let me note that I am running it in Virtual PC as Windows Users obviously still get preference due to shear numbers alone and OS X gets shafted, but I don't think that would change the 3dness of it. Also it's slower than... well it is Virtual PC trying to do 3d so i'll forgive that part.

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
    1. Re:Worse 3d ever... by slim · · Score: 1

      For 3D buildings, check the "buildings" checkbox. Building models are only available for a few major US cities, but Boston is one of them.

      For the rest of the world, check "terrain" and go somewhere mountainous or deep. If you're not impressed by that, I give up.

      Great example, navigate to the South Rim of the Grand Canyon, where the buildings are. Rotate so South is up, then tilt. Woah!

  127. Teletransport by nektra · · Score: 1

    May Google add teletransportation within?

  128. hey by Saturninus · · Score: 0

    This is a lot of fun. Google never ceases to amaze me.

  129. Doing evil by inches.. by Snaller · · Score: 1

    ..look at the download page - instead of a normal download link, they use a form action - tsk tsk.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  130. Used to be fed up with the Google hype... by kronocide · · Score: 1

    But I, very unwillingly, take it all back and claim the opposite.

    I used to love Map Quest as one of the few originally useful websites. Someone whined about the poor 3D graphics here, but really... It's not about making it look like Doom 3, but about compiling massive amounts of geographical data covering the whole goddamn planet.

    I can see the roof of my house in Stockholm, Sweden. I can see the house of my friend in Absecon, NJ. I can see cars in the streets. I actually had to stick my head out my window and check that my backyard really looks the way it does in the application. It does of course.

    This is about building a scalable infrastructure, that you can then stuff with information about not only streets and hotels, but all kinds of things. As image resolution improves and updates become more frequent, and people stuff more and more information about places in it, this will be a real step toward realizing Google's ultimate vision--to create an interface to all human knowledge (originally inspired by the ship computer on the USS Enterprise).

  131. when running google earth in vmware by e**(i+pi)-1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Google earth is fantastic. It worked very well for me with vmware workstation 5.0 under linux. I had to select OpenGL at the startup of liveearth. When selecting Divx, liveearth will lock up terribly under vmware and you need to do remove the program and and reinstall to get rid of the broken cache. Here is a screenshotfrom the building I work in.

  132. Google Earth can measure Hahvahd Bridge in Smoots! by SkinnyTurkey · · Score: 1

    Here is how to determine the accuracy of Google Earth's measure tool (goto Tool menu, select Measure).

    1. Launch Google Earth
    2. Locate Harvard Bridge just south of MIT, Cambridge, MA
    3. Turn on the measure tool, select "Smoots" for units.
    4. Measure the length of Harvard Bridge using the tool.

    It has been measured, in 1958, that Harvard Bridge is 364.4 Smoots plus one ear. I tried, and yes, it was about 364.4 smoots according to Google Earth.

  133. Now to combine them, new CNN? by Kamiza+Ikioi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now, when Google decides to combine the two, with links to the Google personalized homepage news... will this become the new CNN? Fire in your home state? Just load up Google Earth, search news inside your state, double click fire, go to location, and click on icon to bring up list of pre-recorded and currently streaming video of the site. (And maybe with Google's new payment system, make small micropayments to whoever is doing the video/audio that you are watching.)

    Next big thing in Google Adsense... amature video journalism.

    --
    I8-D
  134. Cloud coverage by homerito · · Score: 1

    Damn... My whole city is covered with clouds... How come we have better coverage of satellite pictures from mars than earth???

    1. Re:Cloud coverage by kronocide · · Score: 1

      Are there clouds on Mars??

    2. Re:Cloud coverage by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

      Nope, but they got one hell of a sandstorm there.

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
  135. area 51 by HaynieMatt · · Score: 1

    Finally I can see my girl friend.

  136. Compared to the real thing? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

    Anyone else got a real photo and a Google Earth image to compare side by side?

  137. NOT free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Google Earth Launching For Free"

    Recommended configuration:

    Operating system: Windows XP


    It is only free if you pay for Windows :(

    1. Re:NOT free by kronocide · · Score: 1

      Actually, you also need a computer, a power outlet, and an Internet connection, none of which usuallly are free. But there is no cost for using this particular software.

  138. Free version? by phatslug · · Score: 1

    I downloaded the google earth installer, but it's actually the google earth plus version. Where is the free version?

  139. NASA 1 x 0 Google by BinLadenMyHero · · Score: 1

    At least World Wind is open source, so there's a much greater hope for a Linux port.

  140. Snow Crash? by databeast · · Score: 1

    Earth: Check
    Swords: Check
    Business card that says I am an uber-leet h4x0r: check

    now all I need is an obnoxious british butler AI Construct, and a deliverator, and I can finally fulfil my goals of becoming Hiro Protagonist..

  141. I can see my house from here!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow...i love google

  142. Even better... by Radojevic · · Score: 1

    Click on the following maps.google.com link and then click the zoom one extra time for maximum zoom to view from around 2,200 feet above:
    http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=-23.547585,-46.6650 51&spn=0.005375,0.007918&t=k&hl=en
    ...then compare it to Google Earth zoomed to around 500 feet above:
    http://www.radojevic.com/-23.547585,-46.665051%20( 500%20ft%20above).jpg
    g

    1. Re:Even better... by stg · · Score: 1


      It's effectivelly better, but...

      AFAIK they have the same information - it's just that Google Earth allows you zoom further than the images resolution...

      However, I can see much smaller details with Google Earth's zoom, since instead of a 3-pixel car I can see a (blurrier) much larger version of the same content. Plus, you get caching!

      Very, very neat!

  143. Google Earth by durbnpoisn · · Score: 1

    I didn't read the whole thread. So shoot me.

    I just ran the program, and MAN, I am blown away! That is some really awesome work.

    Someone should give them Google programmers a cookie. They are writing some tremendous stuff!

  144. differences to google maps by majello · · Score: 1

    Has anyone noticed the differences between google maps and google earth. for instance, when looking at the place where my office is in tokyo, google maps shows the office tower it is in, while google earth shows a picture of the area before the tower was built. funny, me thinks cheers Majello

    --
    This opinion is mine, you can't have it.
  145. Bicycle Path layer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you switch on the bicycle path that the slashdot article mentioned? Where is it getting the bike path routes? Is it like what the NYC has which is really great? Imagine you could bike from one side of the continent to the other without any problems...

  146. Re:Security Risk - madlibs! by LordEd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Pick a technology and its benefit:

    Technology: the wheel
    Benefit: mobility

    This makes me wonder if the US government would see inventing the wheel as a security risk as it gives such mobility that terrorists could use against them. It wouldn't surprise me if the wheel gets shut down for that reason.

    Technology: the Internet
    Benefit: gathering information

    This makes me wonder if the US government would see the Internet as a security risk as it gives such easy access to gathering information that terrorists could use against them. It wouldn't surprise me if the Internet gets shut down for that reason.

    ___________________________
    Don't blame me for this post. Blame the terrorists!

  147. What a great way to show your fav. camping spots! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's mine (it's free to stay and miles from anywhere). (You need to save the follow as yadboro.kml )
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <kml xmlns="http://earth.google.com/kml/2.0">
    <Placema rk>
    <name>yadboro</name>
    <LookAt>
    <longitude>150.2305882505102</longitude>
    <latitude>-35.3322946558368</latitude>
    <range>8087.96444245141</range>
    <tilt>60.19050406521917</tilt>
    <heading>-48.92496827168389</heading>
    </LookAt>
    <styleUrl>root://styles#khStyle550</styleUrl>
    <Style>
    <IconStyle>
    <Icon>
    <href>root://icons/palette-2.png</href>
    <x>128</x><y>192</y><w>32</w><h>32</h>
    </Icon>
    </IconStyle>
    </Style>
    <Point> <coordinates>150.2177301272593,-35.33895705890842, 0</coordinates>
    </Point>
    </Placemark>
    </kml>

  148. Google Military Spy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On Google Earth, I can see the navy ships in Norfolk pretty well.

    Also in Europe practically all military bases are showed in pretty high detail, while most cities are not.

    Isn't this odd?

    Maybe we should better call it "Google Military Spy".

    1. Re:Google Military Spy by KD5YPT · · Score: 1

      Or maybe because google got those photo from sat imaging company, who receives most of their request from intelligence agencies, who mostly wants to see important military assets, and said imaging company just give google most of the stuff they have, a large portion of which are military related?

      --
      In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
    2. Re:Google Military Spy by Phrak · · Score: 1

      So what?
      The images are >1yr old, who cares what ships were at anchor last year?
      It's not like you can't drive up to the bases and have a look with your own eyes anyway.

  149. Google Browser Quietly Released! by samkim · · Score: 1

    Google Earth has a web browser integrated in it. And it uses IE, not Firefox. To access it, just search for a business and click on a link in the pop-up.

  150. look like google earth is taking a breather! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    from the earth.google.com download web site :-
    Google Earth downloads temporarily delayed

    Thanks for your interest in Google Earth, but we're sorry we can't offer you a download right now. As you know, Google Earth is in beta, and we're still building out our ability to take on new users. We're making good progress, and expect to be able to accept new downloads shortly, so we recommend you check back daily at earth.google.com. We hope to be able to welcome you and other new planet surfers soon.

    We appreciate your patience,

    The Google Earth Team
  151. GE Downloads closed - Mirrors available by Phrak · · Score: 4, Informative

    Google have closed their downloads for Earth.
    See http://www.majorgeeks.com/download4659.html for mirrors.
    Not sure which version is the latest, but MajorGeeks have "Google Earth 3.0.0336 Beta"

  152. porting to linux... by dovf · · Score: 1
    I am certain that many people here would gladly "take the time to code all that", for free even, if they only could. But this is not an open source app, so that is not possible.

    Come to think about it, this could make a great project. GPL'ed clone of Google Earth, anyone?

    So how about joining the effort for porting NASA's World Wind, instead? (Also check out this thread, with comments from the World Wind developer)
  153. Alternatives to Google Earth by runeaa · · Score: 1

    Actually there exists (has existed for some years even) alternatives to Google Earth that also can be used by Mac and Linux users. Try the Virtual Globe at: http://globe.sintef.no/ (Java required). As it doesn't have the money for the hi-detail data Google can buy, it only uses the data NASA aand USGS gives avay for free. And in many cases 15m horizontal resolution Landsat images and 100m SRTM elevations are sufficient.