What is even with the X years of experience with product X? Why would anyone expect that someone with 5 years experience with product X would be any more proficient than someone with 3? After mastering the basics, which normally takes on the orders of magnitude of months, not years, the amount of time that passes is not really related to the number of specifics you learn about that product.
Perhaps there is an LCA application (part of the green card process) in progress where the applicant has exactly those skills?
RCMP here in Yorkton are notorious for flipping on the lights to zip through intersections and speeding through school zones on the way to Tim Horton's for their coffee and doughnuts.
Having recently tried eating at a Tim Horton's (in Vancouver) for the first time, my question would be "why?" Why hurry to Tom Horton's? Away, yes, I could understand that, but to? It's a mystery to me.
This is exactly what is needed -- how long will it be before a prominent politician is sued and his browsing history is demanded by the party that is suing?
The wording of U.S. Code 17 Ã 512(c)(vi) has been interpreted that way, and to cover the entirety of the notification. Not sure what the case law is.
I don't think that a court has looked at it yet, so I am going to believe that the plain text means what it says and that the penalty of perjury only applies to the part: "and under penalty of perjury, that the complaining party is authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed." Especially, since part (v) explicitly states: "A statement that the complaining party has a good faith belief that... See that? "Good Faith".
Bottom line, put up (with actual case law), or shut up.
Your reading skills are seriously lacking. The pianist has asked the Washington Post to remove the review. Not google. The Washington Post.
From what I read of the orginal ruling that created the right to be forgotten, it is not applicable to the original publisher (in this case the WP), only search engines like Google.
I suggest that Mr. Lazic has a discussion with Ms. Streisand. He might find it enlightening.
This. Every time I see a complaint that "some tool" makes it harder for "marketing companies" to send email I think that I should use that tool for my email servers if I am not doing that already.
Your reading skills need some more work. My point was that the tools are ineffective, irrespective of who is using them.
Actually, my central point was, as a non-email marketer, there is little value in spf, dkim and dmarc, since (according to spamassassin) they are poor indicators of whether something is spam or not.
But, what the heck, it's easier to get in a cheap shot than a reasoned comment.
Many of the problems with sysvinit have been solved in OpenRC. For example, OpenRC uses dependencies to define the order in which the services are started. My point is that such a radical change as systemd is not required to deal with many of the issues in sysvinit.
Systemd is not just about the init system. It's about complete system management from hardware, services, logins, and amongst that also the init system.
Standard systemd supporter response. "we should systemd because it will fix all the problems in sysvinit.... what's that, they are fixed in OpenRC... don't look at sysvinit.. look at the shiny over here instead". The point is that a major plank of the argument of systemd is about sysvinit and it simply isn't valid.
Before I talk about why restarting services would be a good idea I should mention to you that this is configurable. Not just configurable, but highly configurable. You can opt to restart a service based on the exact exit code of the process.
Again, you missed my central point. The value is being able to restart services automatically is exceedingly low. Processes don't die on my servers and if they do, it needs human involvement to investigate.
Let me stop you there for the first part. There is NOT VERY MUCH RUNNING AS PID1. The core systemd process exists pretty much only to catch orphans and start up some of the 70+ other systemd functions
As you point out, the very services that are replacing much of the functionality in those init scripts are running as PID 1, so your argument is irrelevant. Just because not much is running as PID 1 does mean that nothing is running as PID 1.
I would like to point out again, 200 lines to start sshd on my system.
On my Gentoo system, running OpenRC the init file for sshd is 87 lines, of which 13 are blank, and 4 more are comments. So, really 70 lines. Furthermore, those init scripts don't change much -- any bugs will have been worked out. Because systemd centralizes this, the code will change all the time.
A sort of backdoor link that leads to an ISP address for a government computer that canâ(TM)t be accessed by the general public on the Web. Itâ(TM)s an undeniable link to the U.S. government.â
BS. It's probably just one of the DOD IP addresses that T-Mobile uses for its carrier-grade NAT.
The other problem is that the init scripts are effectively programs that manage the process itself, and they are often based on very manual tasks. I've lost count the number of times I've typed in "service xxxx start" got "service already running PID blah" as a response, and then typed "service xxxx stop" only to get a "Failed" message. Much of the task of the init system which is now manually programmed on a per application basis and maintained manually for each distribution really should be passed on to some helper application.
Many of the problems with sysvinit have been solved in OpenRC. For example, OpenRC uses dependencies to define the order in which the services are started. My point is that such a radical change as systemd is not required to deal with many of the issues in sysvinit.
One of the things I keep reading about systemd is that it will re-start services that have stopped. This is such a non-issue to me that I really don't care, plus, as other people have noted, there are many ways processes could die that I don't want them to be re-started without some intervention to investigate and fix the cause of the daemon dying (for example, mysqld running out if disk space).
From the point of view of a programmer, and an end user (who has on several occasions debugged problems which were the result of an init script not working properly), a 6 line upstart file, or a 10 line systemd file are far better for something that accomplishes the same thing.
But if there is a bug that prevents something from working properly, you need to debug how many lines of code from systemd, running as PID 1, versus a script. What your argument boils down to is that you don't expect systemd to have bugs.
Systemd's cgroup functionality promises to be more secure in the long run
Care to explain why that is? cgroups is a Linux kernel feature, note a systemd feature. So the question is: how does systemd use cgroups differently and why is this more secure or otherwise better; why cannot other init systems use cgroups functionality in the same way as systemd?
1. You don't realise how insanely complicated the init system is for how little it does. Let's face it you're probably an expert that can code an init script in your sleep. But why does starting a simple service require some 200 lines of scripting
I've seen that argument before and it make no sense to me. All that has happened is that the lines of code have moved from a script to a binary. Sysadmins don't routinely edit init scripts, so the number of lines in them isn't important.
You will be doing your son a grave disservice if you send him to community college when he is capable of attending a university.
That depends. Transferring into a 4-year course as a junior after some time at a community college can be a very effective way of studying for a batchelors degree.
Arpaio is pretty much regarded out here as as the devil we know.
If you are from Arizona, just don't complain about all the times the county has had to pay out compensation for something he or his office has done. It's an elected office and people continue to elect him.
When discussing him once before, someone posted some fairly awful stats for crime in MCSO jurisdiction.
Perhaps that is because the sheriff is not very good at his job. Yeah, he is great at grandstanding. It doesn't sound like he is great at actually making Maricopa County a better place. Perhaps the reason that those places are shitholes is because Arpaio has been sheriff for 22 years.....
I am just waiting for the day where every service is priced at $.01 ("plus fees and taxes"). Price comparisons are meaningless when a large chunk of the price is mandatory fees.
I don't mean baggage fees on flights, since one may choose not to take baggage, but such things as the "resort fee" which hotels add to bills in certain locations, etc.. These "fees" are a cost of business and should be included in the base price.
Other examples are rental car companies charging a fee to cover their agent's salary (yes, really!) or the property taxes for the vehicle (which the rental company must pay irrespective of whether someone rents the vehicle or it sits in the garage).
maybe there should be a fork to make place for those people.
Is there scope for a less intrusive fork of SystemD? Something that does not replace such a large number of well-established daemons?
Part of my concern is about SystemD is the scope for bugs. All the daemons that are replaced by SystemD have years of development under teams of developers. Can one expect a re-write of all these daemons by a small team with no history of working on these applications to be anywhere near free of bugs?
2. If you always pay off your credit card you can be subjected to fees to keep the card active.
Where did you get that one from? The only nearly similar thing that I have seen is that credit card accounts may be shut down due to lack of use.
4. I only had a problem with a rental company when they held a large sum of money (the agreed rental amount) and it took 7 days for the bank to remove the hold and show a credit.
So you had a problem that would never have happened if you had used a credit card. What's your point? This is a reason not to use debit cards.
5. Sometimes its better to cut your losses than to owe a shit ton of money to predatory lenders including credit card companies. You'll eventually lose your car and your house and owe money to your credit card company at an insane interest rate that will take over a decade to pay off.
Yes, you can get into trouble is you spend too much money. That problem isn't limited to credit cards. Remember my initial comment about poor impulse control?
6. My bank is proactive. After the Target and Home Depot fiasco, my bank sends me a replacement card and just monitors my purchases until the new card arrives.
So are credit card companies. Typically, if I travel abroad, I get to make one purchase, then my card is temprarily locked. However, the bank sends me a text message, and by replying to that, I can get my card unblocked. Also, proactive: one of my credit cards was repaced last week because the details may have been compromised.
Because credit cards provide better protection to the consumer, credit card issues are more likely to be proactive than with debit cards.
You have failed to show a single reason to use a debit card instead of a credit card if you have reasonable impulse control. Everything you show is not an issue or is actually a reason to use credit cards. Where do you get your information and advice from? I suggest that you get a better source of financial advice.
Credit card 15-20% APR, debit card you make money though interest. How is not having a credit card is a poor financial decision?
Interest I paid on my credit card account in the last year: $0. The credit card effectively gives me a free loan. In the same way as you get interest, I get more becasue of that free loan.
I do not intend to own a credit card, I do not need one, as the same is with most people.
Need, perhaps not. Nevertheless, it is a smart decision to use one. Need to dispute a charge -- with a credit card, you have protections under Federal law. Using a debit card, you have fewer protections. Want to rent a car? Good luck doing that without a credit card. I could go on, but the list is too long.
Bottom line, unless you have very poor impulse control, not having a credit card is a poor financial decision.
Slashdot Mirror
Perhaps there is an LCA application (part of the green card process) in progress where the applicant has exactly those skills?
Having recently tried eating at a Tim Horton's (in Vancouver) for the first time, my question would be "why?" Why hurry to Tom Horton's? Away, yes, I could understand that, but to? It's a mystery to me.
This is exactly what is needed -- how long will it be before a prominent politician is sued and his browsing history is demanded by the party that is suing?
I don't think that a court has looked at it yet, so I am going to believe that the plain text means what it says and that the penalty of perjury only applies to the part: "and under penalty of perjury, that the complaining party is authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed." Especially, since part (v) explicitly states: "A statement that the complaining party has a good faith belief that ... See that? "Good Faith".
Bottom line, put up (with actual case law), or shut up.
A common misconception. The penalty of perjury only applies to the statement that the complaining party is acting on behalf of someone else.
Your reading skills are seriously lacking. The pianist has asked the Washington Post to remove the review. Not google. The Washington Post.
From what I read of the orginal ruling that created the right to be forgotten, it is not applicable to the original publisher (in this case the WP), only search engines like Google.
I suggest that Mr. Lazic has a discussion with Ms. Streisand. He might find it enlightening.
Your reading skills need some more work. My point was that the tools are ineffective, irrespective of who is using them.
Actually, my central point was, as a non-email marketer, there is little value in spf, dkim and dmarc, since (according to spamassassin) they are poor indicators of whether something is spam or not.
But, what the heck, it's easier to get in a cheap shot than a reasoned comment.
Standard systemd supporter response. "we should systemd because it will fix all the problems in sysvinit .... what's that, they are fixed in OpenRC ... don't look at sysvinit .. look at the shiny over here instead". The point is that a major plank of the argument of systemd is about sysvinit and it simply isn't valid.
Again, you missed my central point. The value is being able to restart services automatically is exceedingly low. Processes don't die on my servers and if they do, it needs human involvement to investigate.
As you point out, the very services that are replacing much of the functionality in those init scripts are running as PID 1, so your argument is irrelevant. Just because not much is running as PID 1 does mean that nothing is running as PID 1.
On my Gentoo system, running OpenRC the init file for sshd is 87 lines, of which 13 are blank, and 4 more are comments. So, really 70 lines. Furthermore, those init scripts don't change much -- any bugs will have been worked out. Because systemd centralizes this, the code will change all the time.
BS. It's probably just one of the DOD IP addresses that T-Mobile uses for its carrier-grade NAT.
Many of the problems with sysvinit have been solved in OpenRC. For example, OpenRC uses dependencies to define the order in which the services are started. My point is that such a radical change as systemd is not required to deal with many of the issues in sysvinit.
One of the things I keep reading about systemd is that it will re-start services that have stopped. This is such a non-issue to me that I really don't care, plus, as other people have noted, there are many ways processes could die that I don't want them to be re-started without some intervention to investigate and fix the cause of the daemon dying (for example, mysqld running out if disk space).
But if there is a bug that prevents something from working properly, you need to debug how many lines of code from systemd, running as PID 1, versus a script. What your argument boils down to is that you don't expect systemd to have bugs.
Care to explain why that is? cgroups is a Linux kernel feature, note a systemd feature. So the question is: how does systemd use cgroups differently and why is this more secure or otherwise better; why cannot other init systems use cgroups functionality in the same way as systemd?
I've seen that argument before and it make no sense to me. All that has happened is that the lines of code have moved from a script to a binary. Sysadmins don't routinely edit init scripts, so the number of lines in them isn't important.
That depends. Transferring into a 4-year course as a junior after some time at a community college can be a very effective way of studying for a batchelors degree.
It's possible to attend a major UC school and spend less.
No, it doesn't. A safer architecture would be to use an unprivileged user for downloading and only use root for installing.
If you are from Arizona, just don't complain about all the times the county has had to pay out compensation for something he or his office has done. It's an elected office and people continue to elect him.
Perhaps that is because the sheriff is not very good at his job. Yeah, he is great at grandstanding. It doesn't sound like he is great at actually making Maricopa County a better place. Perhaps the reason that those places are shitholes is because Arpaio has been sheriff for 22 years.....
I am just waiting for the day where every service is priced at $.01 ("plus fees and taxes"). Price comparisons are meaningless when a large chunk of the price is mandatory fees.
I don't mean baggage fees on flights, since one may choose not to take baggage, but such things as the "resort fee" which hotels add to bills in certain locations, etc.. These "fees" are a cost of business and should be included in the base price.
Other examples are rental car companies charging a fee to cover their agent's salary (yes, really!) or the property taxes for the vehicle (which the rental company must pay irrespective of whether someone rents the vehicle or it sits in the garage).
Is there scope for a less intrusive fork of SystemD? Something that does not replace such a large number of well-established daemons?
Part of my concern is about SystemD is the scope for bugs. All the daemons that are replaced by SystemD have years of development under teams of developers. Can one expect a re-write of all these daemons by a small team with no history of working on these applications to be anywhere near free of bugs?
Where did you get that one from? The only nearly similar thing that I have seen is that credit card accounts may be shut down due to lack of use.
So you had a problem that would never have happened if you had used a credit card. What's your point? This is a reason not to use debit cards.
Yes, you can get into trouble is you spend too much money. That problem isn't limited to credit cards. Remember my initial comment about poor impulse control?
So are credit card companies. Typically, if I travel abroad, I get to make one purchase, then my card is temprarily locked. However, the bank sends me a text message, and by replying to that, I can get my card unblocked. Also, proactive: one of my credit cards was repaced last week because the details may have been compromised.
Because credit cards provide better protection to the consumer, credit card issues are more likely to be proactive than with debit cards.
You have failed to show a single reason to use a debit card instead of a credit card if you have reasonable impulse control. Everything you show is not an issue or is actually a reason to use credit cards. Where do you get your information and advice from? I suggest that you get a better source of financial advice.
Neither do many credit cards in Canada. Your point?
Interest I paid on my credit card account in the last year: $0. The credit card effectively gives me a free loan. In the same way as you get interest, I get more becasue of that free loan.
You were saying how credit cards are a bad idea?
Need, perhaps not. Nevertheless, it is a smart decision to use one. Need to dispute a charge -- with a credit card, you have protections under Federal law. Using a debit card, you have fewer protections. Want to rent a car? Good luck doing that without a credit card. I could go on, but the list is too long.
Bottom line, unless you have very poor impulse control, not having a credit card is a poor financial decision.
UK terminology.
The consitituion does not require proof, only process.