everyone repost the articles in question. lets see him sue everyone. douche bags like him need to be taught the lesson that the courts are NOT there to shut people up who simply don't like you or disagree with your world view.
my most hated of all "natural" therapies is iridology. it's the classic example of people thinking putting an ology at the end of something makes it a science.
worst of all is the claims these idiots make, such as being able to diagnose illnesses just by the colour of your eyes. These charlatans usually try backup their nonsense with fake creditals from bogus "medical schools" of natural treatments.
the standard bullshit line is "oh look your eyes have -insert fake medical term- you must be low on -insert random vitamin- you need to buy this $80 bottle of - some product with the phrase natural whatever in it, which is filled with pills containing processed rubbish from china-"
the beauty of the "long term effects" scare tactic is no one can proof you wrong for 10 or 20 years, and even then you can say "oh but it takes LONGER to have effects".
the only way to bust assholes that make these claims is not to play the game, and demand THEY prove their statement. putting the work back on them usually shines the spot light of science and truth on them, and they run away.
it's a little more then re inventing the wheel, it's a new method of treating some cancers which doesn't invovle almost killing the person with chemo and destroying their immune system.
and they aren't claiming anything conclusive, but with such promising results with 10 people it warrants serious research.
maybe when YOU come up with a cure for cancer you can be a little more critical, ok?
attitudes like that are what make linux such a loser on the desktop - people don't give a shit about patents or copyright, they just want something that works.
If they make this thing slick and seamless, i'll be impressed. the technology is nothing special (something most OSS people sadly miss the point of ) it's the overall usefulness that's important.
This can only be applied where there's a direct electrical connection, hence ruling out it's usefulness in any real application. even IF this were applied via some software protocol it does nothing to validate that alice is actually alice and not the feds.
your whole reply tackles a none issue. i was directly comparing it kg for kg already.
"so 1 liter of gas gives 24000 to 32000 kilojoules while 1 kg starch=4/27 kg hydrogen which is 18000 kilojoules which is about 2/3 what gasoline gives"
your burning hydrogen moron, very little is coming out the tail pipe. once the fuel tank is spent it could just be off loaded, all that would be left is a kind of harmless organic sludge you could probably just use for land fill. an no landfill is not a problem dispite what whacko's like greenpeace claim.
it's a great concept if they can REALLY make it work outside a lab. it can fill all 3 of those criteria provided the reaction is quick enough to keep up with consumption. i'm betting the production of the hydrogen is too slow to be useful right now.
it takes 27 kg's of starch to make 4kg's of hydrogen... it then states 1kg of starch contains MORE energy then 1kg (or liter) of fuel. correct me if i'm wrong here, but 4kg's of hydrogen does not have the same energy potential as 27L of fuel? sounds like the journalist got a little carried away to me
super cool idea though, i'm impressed that they can even break even and produce enough energy to move the weight of the starch.
i hate to break it to you, but god is as real as the tooth fairy ok. if he isn't STRIKE ME DOWN!!!! i'm still typing so looks like i'm right and your wrong, thanks for playing
until there is a button which i can click on each email and cause the sender of the mail to explode an a bloody rain of guts and gore, spam will not end.
Slashdot Mirror
everyone repost the articles in question. lets see him sue everyone. douche bags like him need to be taught the lesson that the courts are NOT there to shut people up who simply don't like you or disagree with your world view.
you computer is a useless luxury, i'm going to come and take it. what's that, why do you even care?
worst of all is the claims these idiots make, such as being able to diagnose illnesses just by the colour of your eyes. These charlatans usually try backup their nonsense with fake creditals from bogus "medical schools" of natural treatments.
the standard bullshit line is "oh look your eyes have -insert fake medical term- you must be low on -insert random vitamin- you need to buy this $80 bottle of - some product with the phrase natural whatever in it, which is filled with pills containing processed rubbish from china-"
the only way to bust assholes that make these claims is not to play the game, and demand THEY prove their statement. putting the work back on them usually shines the spot light of science and truth on them, and they run away.
and they aren't claiming anything conclusive, but with such promising results with 10 people it warrants serious research.
maybe when YOU come up with a cure for cancer you can be a little more critical, ok?
little do they realise when you have brain cancer, long term effects are meaningless when you would otherwise die in the short term
software is not a political or social statement
i will pit my landline against your cell phone bill anyday. mobile phone calls are NOT cheaper, unless your making no calls.
If they make this thing slick and seamless, i'll be impressed. the technology is nothing special (something most OSS people sadly miss the point of ) it's the overall usefulness that's important.
see you just fucked your whole argument right there.
This can only be applied where there's a direct electrical connection, hence ruling out it's usefulness in any real application. even IF this were applied via some software protocol it does nothing to validate that alice is actually alice and not the feds.
right because thats what they use in consumer grade $10 nic's, dumbass
about stupid hienz ? how much do they think people care?
always knew this shit was up to no good.
"so 1 liter of gas gives 24000 to 32000 kilojoules while 1 kg starch=4/27 kg hydrogen which is 18000 kilojoules which is about 2/3 what gasoline gives"
you prove my point right there
your burning hydrogen moron, very little is coming out the tail pipe. once the fuel tank is spent it could just be off loaded, all that would be left is a kind of harmless organic sludge you could probably just use for land fill. an no landfill is not a problem dispite what whacko's like greenpeace claim.
errrr powder isn't the only form you can store starch in dimwit.
it's a great concept if they can REALLY make it work outside a lab. it can fill all 3 of those criteria provided the reaction is quick enough to keep up with consumption. i'm betting the production of the hydrogen is too slow to be useful right now.
super cool idea though, i'm impressed that they can even break even and produce enough energy to move the weight of the starch.
i hate to break it to you, but god is as real as the tooth fairy ok. if he isn't STRIKE ME DOWN!!!! i'm still typing so looks like i'm right and your wrong, thanks for playing
i've been hearing about how ip4 will run out in the next 5 years for the last TEN years.
until there is a button which i can click on each email and cause the sender of the mail to explode an a bloody rain of guts and gore, spam will not end.
right because novell has been making buckets of cash these days, with it's dominating products like netware....
So we can instantly assume your a lieing bastard?
since when has anyone expected privacy in public? the 2 words are the EXACT oppersite meaning to each other.