There is no post-industrial environment. Not here or anywhere else. All of our machinery doesn't magically fix itself or design newer versions. Pipe-dreams don't make for good social agendas. In fact, social agenda aren't good.
It isn't the kids who "are stupid", it's the tests. Ever read the damned questions? They aren't written appropriately and in many cases are blatant political quests. Tell what percentage of boxes are shaded - with no shaded boxes? Abe Lincoln was a Democrat? Just two, there are many.
As always, these plans call on **other people's** money to do what their little hearts desire. And note, one suggestion was government funding. You know, taking money from people who are against their idea to fund it. As always.
How pompous and self-righteous. As if you're going to throw your own earnings at this issue you find yourself on the morally superior side of. Unless you do that, you were just posing.
Yeah, we're going somewhere else. Just not soon or in a massive wave so it would be useful as a population valve. But, you're correct. If we want to lower population, we need to bring everyone else into the current century.
I think the majority are pretty aware that the majority of hackers aren't the benign little explorers the hacker community would have them believe they are.
First class example is that evolutionary criticism (missing intermediate species or disputed claims of finding them, Darwin's doubled-down denial of genetics, etc) is completely forbidden in US schools.
Much like that sentence was unadulterated bullshit.
He fears for his life, eh? And you know this how, because of your telepathy or your in-depth personal interview with him? Personally, I imagine that it's because of your own paranoia leaking into all aspects of life. See how easy it is to fabricate a crap opinion from nothing.
After removing that "vast majority", you're still left with a number of games. Some are epic, RPG, sprawling or a combo. None of those sell for $1. By the way, I play a sprawling, epic RPG almost daily. Not hard to find.
"That $1 pays for somebody to produce....." No it doesn't. The dollar store is selling rejects, overstocks, lost shipments and such. Almost everything in there is a loss to the maker, not a profit.
Hint to you: Don't kite checks.
Pedantry of that nature indicates you already know you have no real argument.
There is no post-industrial environment. Not here or anywhere else. All of our machinery doesn't magically fix itself or design newer versions. Pipe-dreams don't make for good social agendas. In fact, social agenda aren't good.
It isn't the kids who "are stupid", it's the tests. Ever read the damned questions? They aren't written appropriately and in many cases are blatant political quests. Tell what percentage of boxes are shaded - with no shaded boxes? Abe Lincoln was a Democrat? Just two, there are many.
As always, these plans call on **other people's** money to do what their little hearts desire. And note, one suggestion was government funding. You know, taking money from people who are against their idea to fund it. As always.
What should one take from a fictitious quote from a B movie?
How pompous and self-righteous. As if you're going to throw your own earnings at this issue you find yourself on the morally superior side of. Unless you do that, you were just posing.
but because social biases that exist in the system are failing the female students more often than they are failing the male students.
Despite the volumes of evidence that the opposite is actually true? All researched, all documented, all well known?
No, the men will be just as poor at it as they are.
There's only one possible outcome since Humans only think one way.
You are incorrect. Since you are incorrect at this, the rest of your logic is rather crumbly.
Only to a pedant.
That's a long way to go to stretch his accolade to what his mother did for him into a snarky, caustic tirade.
Yeah, we're going somewhere else. Just not soon or in a massive wave so it would be useful as a population valve. But, you're correct. If we want to lower population, we need to bring everyone else into the current century.
I think you're conflating normal people and pompous dipshits.
I think the majority are pretty aware that the majority of hackers aren't the benign little explorers the hacker community would have them believe they are.
Only by self.
I think you mean Biden.
Yes there are, but those require an open mind, researching your data and ***not having a social agenda***.
Not at all what the law covers. No clandestine photographing being done. What a lame extreme to promote.
First class example is that evolutionary criticism (missing intermediate species or disputed claims of finding them, Darwin's doubled-down denial of genetics, etc) is completely forbidden in US schools.
Much like that sentence was unadulterated bullshit.
Because we all know Wikipedia can't be edited by someone with an agenda.
He fears for his life, eh? And you know this how, because of your telepathy or your in-depth personal interview with him? Personally, I imagine that it's because of your own paranoia leaking into all aspects of life. See how easy it is to fabricate a crap opinion from nothing.
Attacks are, by definition, abusive.
After removing that "vast majority", you're still left with a number of games. Some are epic, RPG, sprawling or a combo. None of those sell for $1. By the way, I play a sprawling, epic RPG almost daily. Not hard to find.
"That $1 pays for somebody to produce....." No it doesn't. The dollar store is selling rejects, overstocks, lost shipments and such. Almost everything in there is a loss to the maker, not a profit.