Actually, I think that would be good. I'm pretty sure the majority of papers would drop as well because shoddy work would get you the wrong kinds of headlines and those submissions would dwindle. You can ensure that by providing in synopsis form the papers that you rejected and the reasons.
These are not fields of science other than as repositories of anecdotal evidence. The vast bulk of each discipline's studies and experiments cannot be reproduced. You venture correctly.
Took 29 minutes to get from the story being posted to "CLIMATE SCIENTIST ARE LIREZ!!11!!1"
He neither said that nor implied it. What he said was that any criticism of AGW is met with a defense akin to a religious fervor. This is a true statement.
Let me try to explain this in simple terms for you. People do not blame Linux for Knight's trading losses because *they do not believe* the error had nothing to do with Linux. People do blame Microsoft for the LSE outage because *they believe* it had everything to do with Microsoft.
Emphasis added. You reversed the negative on your first phrase (should have be anything), but it's still a religious argument.
"Cayenne gave a specific example about stupid cyclists being on the road in poor visibility conditions. That's what this is about. And yes, pedestrians doing the same are equally stupid and equally likely to get hit."
And if you hit them, you will be the one in the wrong. You are the one driving the lethal object. That is why the laws skew against the automobile driver. It's a lethal weapon and your responsibility to control.
It may take that long now, but when I worked on Roscoe, my clearance only took about a month. More correctly, most gov contracts requiring clearance won't allow a contractee to work on the project until the clearance is granted. I didn't have it when my company contracted me, it was just dependent upon my gaining the clearance.
I was expecting camp and I got camp. Mind you, it wasn't intended. But camp can be good and this was excellent. Even the actors were chosen to imply the origins and everything else was spot on.
All that praise aside, this was very much worth one shot. A three year series to match the "6 year voyage"? Not so much.
.
Hackers come in three shades, one of which is called crackers. Unfortunately, the bulk of visible actions hackers take are from these guys and so give the general view of the group. I tend to call the good guys White Hats to avoid confusion.
Hell, here on/. you can find posters who easily fall into the gray category, quite dark.
In the 70's it basically meant anyone who knew how to code (Urban DIctionary) and that's where script kiddies came from, the derogatory nuance provided by their activities.
Of course there's a good reason 4 may be no - you may believe you will understand your emotional state beforehand but you will be executing your decisions while *in* that state. Two very different things. Hormones exert influence and you can't gauge for them.
The first question in the test is "Am I a decider?"
Please explain (without someone programming it) how an iPhone can even "hear" much less respond to that query?
Actually, I think the far more interesting question is "How the hell can someone think a test valid that he himself believes would yield a positive on a damned iPhone?"
Webster's Unabridged:
aware:
1. archaic : on guard : watchful, vigilant
2. a) : marked by realization, perception, or knowledge : conscious, sensible, cognizant
b) : showing heightened perception and ready comprehension and appreciation :
Which of those does that machine awareness fall under?
"I've worked for years in healthcare IT (insurance AND healthcare provision, government AND private)"
I've worked with government IT for decades and this has everyearmark of the same thing that the IRS has been going through since the 70's. It's a train wreck now and will continue to be so.
Slashdot Mirror
Actually, I think that would be good. I'm pretty sure the majority of papers would drop as well because shoddy work would get you the wrong kinds of headlines and those submissions would dwindle. You can ensure that by providing in synopsis form the papers that you rejected and the reasons.
These are not fields of science other than as repositories of anecdotal evidence. The vast bulk of each discipline's studies and experiments cannot be reproduced. You venture correctly.
He neither said that nor implied it. What he said was that any criticism of AGW is met with a defense akin to a religious fervor. This is a true statement.
As demonstrated.
Did you even * notice * the irony in your last sentence?
Yep. English doesn't really do glottal stops.
Emphasis added. You reversed the negative on your first phrase (should have be anything), but it's still a religious argument.
"Once the data goes in, it never comes out again. 'Out' being to a non Microsoft platform."
So all those "export as" selections are fakes?
"Cayenne gave a specific example about stupid cyclists being on the road in poor visibility conditions. That's what this is about. And yes, pedestrians doing the same are equally stupid and equally likely to get hit."
And if you hit them, you will be the one in the wrong. You are the one driving the lethal object. That is why the laws skew against the automobile driver. It's a lethal weapon and your responsibility to control.
It may take that long now, but when I worked on Roscoe, my clearance only took about a month. More correctly, most gov contracts requiring clearance won't allow a contractee to work on the project until the clearance is granted. I didn't have it when my company contracted me, it was just dependent upon my gaining the clearance.
But yes, neither I nor my contractor paid for it.
I was expecting camp and I got camp. Mind you, it wasn't intended. But camp can be good and this was excellent. Even the actors were chosen to imply the origins and everything else was spot on.
All that praise aside, this was very much worth one shot. A three year series to match the "6 year voyage"? Not so much. .
No, self-identification of being a hacker showed he could, his advocacy for open sourcing the suspect application implied the intent.
Hackers come in three shades, one of which is called crackers. Unfortunately, the bulk of visible actions hackers take are from these guys and so give the general view of the group. I tend to call the good guys White Hats to avoid confusion. Hell, here on /. you can find posters who easily fall into the gray category, quite dark.
In the 70's it basically meant anyone who knew how to code (Urban DIctionary) and that's where script kiddies came from, the derogatory nuance provided by their activities.
As an AC, your anecdote is not verifiable and so worthless. Perhaps you could link?
So you put scare quotes around legal why? Perhaps to have an out when your statement is shown to be abysmally wrong?
"Humans don't have free will."
Opinion is not fact.
Of course there's a good reason 4 may be no - you may believe you will understand your emotional state beforehand but you will be executing your decisions while *in* that state. Two very different things. Hormones exert influence and you can't gauge for them.
How fortunate there's a very clear rebuff of this idiotic view only a few posts up at the mo'.
The first question in the test is "Am I a decider?"
Please explain (without someone programming it) how an iPhone can even "hear" much less respond to that query?
Actually, I think the far more interesting question is "How the hell can someone think a test valid that he himself believes would yield a positive on a damned iPhone?"
Webster's Unabridged:
aware:
1. archaic : on guard : watchful, vigilant
2. a) : marked by realization, perception, or knowledge : conscious, sensible, cognizant
b) : showing heightened perception and ready comprehension and appreciation :
Which of those does that machine awareness fall under?
How does that follow? Could you explain please?
Interesting. Hopefully the IRS won't subpoena /. for your id. What you did was illegal. Hopefully, your future employer won't know that.
"I've worked for years in healthcare IT (insurance AND healthcare provision, government AND private)"
I've worked with government IT for decades and this has everyearmark of the same thing that the IRS has been going through since the 70's. It's a train wreck now and will continue to be so.
Our educated opinions cancel each other.
Bullshit. Bullshit made by feeding the bull straw.
And the great bulk of businesses in the US are run by Joe Sixpacks and do *not* have IT departments. His argument holds.
Pull your panties out of your ass crack. It's unusable for him. 2003 does whatever he needs and he has no reason to "upgrade" just for the ribbon.
Jeesus, people take such offense about personal preferences here. It's lame.
On the cloud, it doesn't *have* to leave on flash drives, it's already out there.
In no way can you guarantee security of your data when it is on the premises of someone else.