Well now. If you're a refugee (fleeing the town you came from) and you're lying about what town you came from, how in hell is one to make the determination that you're an actual refugee? Same with name.
Is that zero tolerance and "not fair"? Too friggin' bad, it's incumbent upon the "refugee" to satisfy the curiosity and belay the suspicions of the "host". The host is in no way encumbered with the requirement to ignore deception.
Sugar is not bad. Just don't over do it. Too much "natural unprocessed fats that are not burnt" aren't good for you either. So by the same logic, they're bad as well, just with a higher threshold.
Unlike heroin, coffee is only addictive to those who are apparently genetically disposed to that addiction. When I don't drink coffee for a while (Just don't get out of the house to get some. Sometimes a week.) I experience none of those symptoms. Not even a slight headache. So, no, it's not addictive in the same manner heroin, coke, etc are.
You neglected to mention that the abusers weren't allowed to actually, you know, *abuse* their 'charges'. It was all a scripted play. It shows nothing about people's real behavior and shouldn't convince you it does unless you're one of those that think playing GTA makes you a cold blooded killer.
Mostly they look down on social science because things like this example where the studiers actively meddled with the ongoing experiment to influence the outcome are quite common. "Social Science" is not soft, it's fucking plastic.
The entire setup was so obviously not "real world" that no one could *possibly* think they were assuming real roles, meaning there could be no natural behavior to study. Those college kids suddenly believed they were *really* prisoners and guards? Bullshit. Not even Social Science majors are that clueless.
They knew the nature of the situation then. They were all *informed* it was a play up front and how their roles were to be displayed. It was not a test. It was a production.
Slashdot Mirror
Hmmm... Explanation of what happened = apologist? Not sure how you got there.
Do not project.
Which is what she did.
Bzzt! It was a direct question. Requires a '?'.
Back at you - "collegial Internet" Are you kidding me? I remember serious flame wars from the very start.
And I should awaken at 2AM screaming with angst why? Or, if *they* do, I should *care* why?
So are the people around me and I oblige myself to support them over people who's first act is deception.
And that's not an arbitrary distinction, you just don't want it acknowledged.
Well now. If you're a refugee (fleeing the town you came from) and you're lying about what town you came from, how in hell is one to make the determination that you're an actual refugee? Same with name.
Is that zero tolerance and "not fair"? Too friggin' bad, it's incumbent upon the "refugee" to satisfy the curiosity and belay the suspicions of the "host". The host is in no way encumbered with the requirement to ignore deception.
It's difficult because completely unrelated stuff comes up under whatever genre you're searching. Amazon's the same.
Nice. Very tongue in cheek funny.
Sugar is not bad. Just don't over do it. Too much "natural unprocessed fats that are not burnt" aren't good for you either. So by the same logic, they're bad as well, just with a higher threshold.
The problem with dichotomous thought.
Unlike heroin, coffee is only addictive to those who are apparently genetically disposed to that addiction. When I don't drink coffee for a while (Just don't get out of the house to get some. Sometimes a week.) I experience none of those symptoms. Not even a slight headache. So, no, it's not addictive in the same manner heroin, coke, etc are.
Unless those dragons out in the kitchen get me.
Then again, I was never afraid to tell anyone why I was leaving, good or bad.
Read the whole post.
Telemeres disagree.
You should read up on crime statistics then. We're heading *away* from violence, despite the 24/7 coverage on TV.
it should be Patrick Stewart. His presence just made the Federation ooze pomposity.
You neglected to mention that the abusers weren't allowed to actually, you know, *abuse* their 'charges'. It was all a scripted play. It shows nothing about people's real behavior and shouldn't convince you it does unless you're one of those that think playing GTA makes you a cold blooded killer.
Mostly they look down on social science because things like this example where the studiers actively meddled with the ongoing experiment to influence the outcome are quite common. "Social Science" is not soft, it's fucking plastic.
The entire setup was so obviously not "real world" that no one could *possibly* think they were assuming real roles, meaning there could be no natural behavior to study. Those college kids suddenly believed they were *really* prisoners and guards? Bullshit. Not even Social Science majors are that clueless.
They knew the nature of the situation then. They were all *informed* it was a play up front and how their roles were to be displayed. It was not a test. It was a production.
"and they did" Knowing full well it was within the context of a staged play.
Dude, that didn't start with Trump, nor are those on that side of the fence the greatest utilizers of that technique.
What a friggin' pedantic SJW. The "human race" is a long-term and very well know phrase. Where you been all your life?