Well, there's a little straw in there. Your kids are not going to starve, other forms of support are available. And, it could easily be argued that you are grandfathered in and their requirement would constitute violating their contract with you. State dependent.
Rand, like other authors, had good and bad. Her good works were earlier, before she became wealthier and self-absorbed. Try Anthem. I feel it's the pinnacle of her writing. That's not saying much, as it's her third or fourth or so.
Both of your analogies fail because society != socialism.
Humans are not hardwired like bees, so that one is simply wrong. We don't have genetic workers, queens and drones or hard programmed responses.
Chimps are a society, but they are very far from being socialists. There is no community ownership. Fights erupt over trivial portions of resources all the time and the big guy wins. Hardly socialism.
Human personality structure is very close to chimp and, as such, there is a lot of squabbling about minutia as well as major issues and resources.
Enjoying life is the same as profit. You only get to do that after you've acquired the basics -- are fed and comfortable.
No. They eat to live with defecation necessary to clear the tract. The other reasons are a layer after the first is satisfied. Go truly hungry for a while and see if you care if the food tastes good or is presented properly.
You also have the sequence incorrect. Need is the driver of creativity which produces invention. Apes trade things for food (sex) with no invention involved. So no, at the most rudimentary level the CEO came before creativity.
After finishing my first cup of coffee, I'll change my last post to say you're wrong on all counts. I have some fifty books, written by Japanese, Korean, Chinese and others on martial arts. Most have katas in them and use photo/text to describe things quite nicely. Was going to say succinctly, but you need to read the English to appreciate how wrong that would be.
You cannot learn them at home alone, though. Many things -- like sticky hand practice -- require a partner.
Because we , for the most part, aren't LJ users (I am). If the LJ users want to decry, fine, but a bunch of uninvolved people standing on the sidelines screaming about the practices of a particular company that provides a service for friggin' free (unless you want a subscription) are just interlopers.
After all, who will learn from their example if no one makes an example of them?
Good lynch mob mentality. Why not leave it to their actual user base to "make an example of them"?
The telephone is a line of communication in emergencies.
Telecommunications is open to anyone with a telephone. You must provide an argument of a similar caliber as to the necessity for mandating higher speeds. So far, all I hear is "I want it faster!" Not a good argument of necessity.
Paranoia? Sure. Especially since some cabs already do what you fear. You're in public, using public transport. You have a right not to be photographed? Why? The cab driver has a right to exercise their paranoia of the rider who might mug them, you know.
everything else
Would be a better argument if you listed the elses.
"If we assume these gases were produced during the breakdown of organic material together with hydrogen peroxide solution, we can calculate the masses needed to produce the volume of gas measured," Houtkooper explained.
Assuming organics is a helluvan assumption.
For Pace and many other scientists, the definitive experiment performed by the Viking landers was the gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) test, which was capable of identifying substances by their chemical makeup. That test failed to turn up evidence of organic compounds.
Then you've never known any addicts. To relate; if a wino can get two bottles of legal at half the price of one "powerful" bottle, that's what he'll do. They want the quantity of the drug, not a smaller package. About the only ones that break this mold are pot smokers who enjoy a small toke for a good buzz.
Um, no. There are various theories and hypothesises as to how evolution works. All of which may be true, by the way. But evolution, unto itself, is a fact. It has been observed.
And, no, YEC have no theories in the scientific sense, only in the parlor talk sense. That was the GP(Ps?) point.
Your point about abiogenisis shows that you do not even understand what evolution is. It is the variance of life, not the origins.
The earth orbits around the sun. That is not open for debate and yet has plenty of science involved. Don't be an idiot.
What if this new major program prevented (via scheduling, resource, and location conflicts) the students ability to be engaged in multiple interests?
That type of conflict exists whether you major (I was a science major in HS) or not. Being a science major did not prevent me from being in speech or taking art classes. I doubt it will now. Those become electives for a sci major.
Right. The owner of the right of distribution should just, you know, throw that right away because asshats will break the law and distribute it anyway. Same lame rehas of "I want it free!".
I further care about those people who freak out over e-mail. A decade ago they were freaking out over phone messages and checking them every 15. COD. So what?
Slashdot Mirror
And you know he's right wing how? Lotta lefties don't mind "tagging" people they don't agree with.
Well, there's a little straw in there. Your kids are not going to starve, other forms of support are available. And, it could easily be argued that you are grandfathered in and their requirement would constitute violating their contract with you. State dependent.
I just don't see these companies surviving this.
Rand, like other authors, had good and bad. Her good works were earlier, before she became wealthier and self-absorbed. Try Anthem. I feel it's the pinnacle of her writing. That's not saying much, as it's her third or fourth or so.
Both of your analogies fail because society != socialism.
Humans are not hardwired like bees, so that one is simply wrong. We don't have genetic workers, queens and drones or hard programmed responses.
Chimps are a society, but they are very far from being socialists. There is no community ownership. Fights erupt over trivial portions of resources all the time and the big guy wins. Hardly socialism.
Human personality structure is very close to chimp and, as such, there is a lot of squabbling about minutia as well as major issues and resources.
Enjoying life is the same as profit. You only get to do that after you've acquired the basics -- are fed and comfortable.
No. They eat to live with defecation necessary to clear the tract. The other reasons are a layer after the first is satisfied. Go truly hungry for a while and see if you care if the food tastes good or is presented properly.
You also have the sequence incorrect. Need is the driver of creativity which produces invention. Apes trade things for food (sex) with no invention involved. So no, at the most rudimentary level the CEO came before creativity.
That roof and food are your bottom line, chum. At the end of the day, you too count beans.
After finishing my first cup of coffee, I'll change my last post to say you're wrong on all counts. I have some fifty books, written by Japanese, Korean, Chinese and others on martial arts. Most have katas in them and use photo/text to describe things quite nicely. Was going to say succinctly, but you need to read the English to appreciate how wrong that would be.
You cannot learn them at home alone, though. Many things -- like sticky hand practice -- require a partner.
Not really. I developed an offshoot of choreographic notation when I ran my stunt group. You don't use drawings. Text works fine.
Provide a cite, please. I follow this and don't recall reading that. Again, cite please.
Because we , for the most part, aren't LJ users (I am). If the LJ users want to decry, fine, but a bunch of uninvolved people standing on the sidelines screaming about the practices of a particular company that provides a service for friggin' free (unless you want a subscription) are just interlopers.
After all, who will learn from their example if no one makes an example of them?
Good lynch mob mentality. Why not leave it to their actual user base to "make an example of them"?
Because being a manager does not mean you can create new positions.
The telephone is a line of communication in emergencies.
Telecommunications is open to anyone with a telephone. You must provide an argument of a similar caliber as to the necessity for mandating higher speeds. So far, all I hear is "I want it faster!" Not a good argument of necessity.
And they did not wish to modify their business on his behalf. Your point is what?
Having watched their gun episode, that's not what they said. Cite, if you will.
Paranoia? Sure. Especially since some cabs already do what you fear. You're in public, using public transport. You have a right not to be photographed? Why? The cab driver has a right to exercise their paranoia of the rider who might mug them, you know.
everything else
Would be a better argument if you listed the elses.
what do bloggers know about string theory? Seriously? PUHLEEZE And can we stop talking about what the bloggers are saying? My word.
I don't know, but maybe a blog by a friggin' physicist would do, don't you think? If not, why not?
Life on the lattice
From link:
"If we assume these gases were produced during the breakdown of organic material together with hydrogen peroxide solution, we can calculate the masses needed to produce the volume of gas measured," Houtkooper explained.
Assuming organics is a helluvan assumption.
For Pace and many other scientists, the definitive experiment performed by the Viking landers was the gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) test, which was capable of identifying substances by their chemical makeup. That test failed to turn up evidence of organic compounds.
Especially in the face of that.
He's not being compelled to buy a damned thing. He doesn't have to access the internet, so he doesn't have to buy Windows.
Then you've never known any addicts. To relate; if a wino can get two bottles of legal at half the price of one "powerful" bottle, that's what he'll do. They want the quantity of the drug, not a smaller package. About the only ones that break this mold are pot smokers who enjoy a small toke for a good buzz.
Um, no. There are various theories and hypothesises as to how evolution works. All of which may be true, by the way. But evolution, unto itself, is a fact. It has been observed.
And, no, YEC have no theories in the scientific sense, only in the parlor talk sense. That was the GP(Ps?) point.
Your point about abiogenisis shows that you do not even understand what evolution is. It is the variance of life, not the origins.
The earth orbits around the sun. That is not open for debate and yet has plenty of science involved. Don't be an idiot.
There have been coral die offs throughout Earth's history.
The human mind congeals around age 30,...
Uh, no. You are speaking gibberish. My guess is you're under 30.
What if this new major program prevented (via scheduling, resource, and location conflicts) the students ability to be engaged in multiple interests?
That type of conflict exists whether you major (I was a science major in HS) or not. Being a science major did not prevent me from being in speech or taking art classes. I doubt it will now. Those become electives for a sci major.
Right. The owner of the right of distribution should just, you know, throw that right away because asshats will break the law and distribute it anyway. Same lame rehas of "I want it free!".
I further care about those people who freak out over e-mail. A decade ago they were freaking out over phone messages and checking them every 15. COD. So what?