Slashdot Mirror


Pirate Banned From Using Linux

dsinc writes "A guy who uploaded the latest Star Wars movie got arrested, pleaded guilty to 'conspiracy to commit copyright infringement' and 'criminal copyright infringement' and got jail and home confinement. As part of his home confinement, he agreed to install some tracking software on his computer. The problem is He's an Ubuntu Linux user and the gov't doesn't have any tracking software for Linux. So he's been told that he must use Windows for the term of his confinement. Looks like a case of cruel and unusual punishment to me"

698 comments

  1. So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by renehollan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And have Linux boxes behind it?

    --
    You could've hired me.
    1. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Absorbed · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He could always use VMWare.

    2. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by ajs · · Score: 5, Interesting

      One presumes that he has been required to surrender his hardware (all of it) to the authorities for the installation of the tracking software which phones home to indicate what he's doing (at whatever level of granularity it tracks such things).

      He could probably get away with VMWare or the like running Linux under Windows, but that would just run the risk of landing him in jail.

      His best bet is Cygwin, the suite of open source tools for Windows that includes everything you need to essentially subvert a Windows desktop and make it think it's a Unix-like OS. It's not 100% perfect, but it's a far cry better than pure Windows. I regularly use a Windows laptop with X running under it, ssh to my office with X-forwarding and several gnome-terminals running on my work desktop.

      Other than that, the only native Windows apps I use are Firefox and Thunderbird, so it's often hard to tell what OS it actually is.

    3. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by mark-t · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Most likely not. I expect as a concession to even allowing him internet access at ALL, they probably strictly control what computer hardware the man is allowed to have in his own home. It might sound a bit tough, but bear in mind that this is not an innocent man here... he pled guilty to the charges and this is just part of the punishment.

    4. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by pudge · · Score: 1

      Maybe he can. That'd be super-sweet.

    5. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or he could have offered them to port the tracking tool to Linux. :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    6. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Bastardchyld · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It is also important to point out that he received a shorter jail-term because of probation that was no doubt recommended by his attorney (due to the "non-violent" nature of his crimes). Now that he is on probabation he does not like the terms... My opinion is big deal, do you think a drunk driver wants to go to AA, have an ignition bypass installed? Besides he could choose to not use the internet for the remainder of his probation anyways...

      Nothing to see here.

      --
      $diff terrorists hippies
      $
      $rm -rf *terrorists *hippies
    7. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Drunk drivers kill families of 4. This guy isn't a danger to anyone, stupid analogy.

      Even so, when the state drunk drivers attend AA, they don't force them to go to a gay and lesbian AA clubhouse. That is a better analogy.

    8. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by superpulpsicle · · Score: 5, Funny

      They can really punish him by making him run windows ME.

    9. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The difference is that drunk drivers kill people and destroy actual property whereas the worst thing a pirated movie can do is prevent some other people from making money off their previously completed works.

      Not making money off something you did previously doesn't sound like a very great harm to me, not enough to justify taking away a person's freedom by putting them in jail -or- by making them use Windows. But then again in our "right to profit" society I guess that's a capital offense.

      Hang 'em.

    10. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      He could, but then HE'D be the one getting pwned by h4x0rs.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    11. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by rickb928 · · Score: 5, Funny

      "They can really punish him by making him run windows ME."

      Um, They can really punish him by making him * try* to run windows ME.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    12. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Bastardchyld · · Score: 0, Troll

      The burden of proof was on the prosectors to show that the defendant had committed the crime (not that he had caused great harm). He was found guilty, then he was sentenced based on the actual harm done, hence the small 10 month sentence (only 5 of which were behind bars).

      Perhaps we should have sentenced him to house arrest with free strippers. Would that be more fitting to the crime?

      --
      $diff terrorists hippies
      $
      $rm -rf *terrorists *hippies
    13. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1
      Don't be an ass. This topic has nothing to "enforcement of laws" only about sentencing. No one, besides yourself, has even hinted that the guy's crime should be ignored.

      Besides I think 10 months of total time served is not a huge amount considering the financial impact that he had... And what exactly is that financial impact, what quantifiable numbers are you referring to?
      The movie's profits were entirely inline with expectations.
      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    14. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Arthur+B. · · Score: 1

      Any government should not choose which laws it chooses to enforce, they are either on the books or not.
      Oh no they choose what they put on the book. That is sooooooo different.

      --
      \u262D = \u5350
    15. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He could also sponge off nearby open wireless AP if there was one. But he may need to purchase a decent antenna and add an amplifier to do so and it sounds like he is scrapped for cash. That has risks too, I suppose.

    16. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Graff · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Ahh, this makes me glad that I'm still using a PowerPC Macintosh since it can't run Windows directly. Yeah it can run it in emulation but only under the regular Mac OS operating system and there's no way the emulated Windows environment can determine what's going on in the main Mac OS. They can tell me to run Windows all they want, unless they buy me a brand new computer it ain't happening!

      Of course eventually I'll upgrade to an Intel Macintosh and those can run Windows directly.

      Hmm couldn't he just get a live Linux CD and boot his monitored computer using that? The government can install Windows and monitoring software all they want, there's no way a monitoring program can work if it's not being run. Of course if he is caught using the internet and the monitoring software isn't running then he would be in worse trouble...

    17. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Will you please stop using your stupid analogies. Most of them have nothing to do with the situation at hand and by comparing whatever situation you come up with to the one mentioned in the article, you change the basic facts of the case, thus making the entire conversation meaningless.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    18. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by pboyd2004 · · Score: 1

      First off drunk drivers could kill people, this guy didn't. Secondly, this is like saying "I'm sorry sir, you've got to buy a Ford Fiesta because we don't have an ignition bypass for your sports car."

    19. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Bastardchyld · · Score: 0, Troll

      Do you care to elaborate on which basic facts that I have changed? Or would you rather make hyped-up allegations?

      --
      $diff terrorists hippies
      $
      $rm -rf *terrorists *hippies
    20. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Cygwin is great stuff. When I'm forced to use Windoze, I have a single maximized Xterm window that runs GNU Screen. If you autohide the taskbar, it's almost like being on a real Unix box, except for the occasional popup about Windows Update needing to run or whatever.
      There is some software that doesn't compile cleanly, and it's definitely slower than native Unix, but at least it makes life bearable.
      Heck you can even run sshd under Cygwin, and shell into that box if you have to.

    21. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Bastardchyld · · Score: 1

      Oh no they choose what they put on the book. That is sooooooo different.
      Yes they do... And you choose who you put in office. Everything they do is in your name, that is how a represenative democracy works... If you don't like what they are doing in your name, then fire them...
      --
      $diff terrorists hippies
      $
      $rm -rf *terrorists *hippies
    22. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

      They can really punish him by making him run windows ME.

      Softie. Try win95, the early release that doesn't support USB.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    23. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would someone please pirate the tracking program so we can reverse engineer it?

    24. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Bastardchyld · · Score: 0, Troll

      He pled guilty... He threw himself at the mercy of the court, the court gave him 5 months jail, 5 months probation. He knew (or his lawyer knew) that the state determines the conditions of his probation... If he did not like that possibility he should have fought the charges.

      Quantifiable numbers do not exist for every possible situation, therefore it is within the courts power to determine it on a case by case basis. If they did not do it in this situation then he should move for a mistrail.

      --
      $diff terrorists hippies
      $
      $rm -rf *terrorists *hippies
    25. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by ThePromenader · · Score: 1

      I wonder: What sort of license would he have to get for his "punishment OS"? Do you think the government will splurge for a copy of Windows ME (home edition)?

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
    26. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by tungstencoil · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To be picky and argumentative, "profits were entirely inline with expectations" != no financial impact.

      If, indeed, it was not even quantified does not mean that there wasn't one (and, conversely, conviction doesn't exactly mean that there was).

      I guess that I'm in the mood to mince the hairs of the hair-mincers today.

    27. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by infaustus · · Score: 3, Funny

      Unfortunately, arson is also a crime, so I really have no say in what they do in my name.

      --
      Frosty piss posts are worthless, GNAA posts are worthless and hurtful, but they are the least of this site's neuroses.
    28. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by pegr · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Even so, when the state drunk drivers attend AA, they don't force them to go to a gay and lesbian AA clubhouse. That is a better analogy.
       
      I'm a gay/lesbian alcoholic, you insensitive clod!

    29. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by TechForensics · · Score: 1

      Naw, Microsoft Bob.

      --
      Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
    30. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Minwee · · Score: 4, Informative

      They can make it a term of my probation to run Windows, so unless I buy a brand new computer I'm not going to use a computer at all!

      There. I fixed that for you.

      The same law really does apply to people who use Macintoshes, no matter what you may think.

    31. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Jugalator · · Score: 5, Funny

      Careful now... Windows gateways, virtual machines, ... ? This is voodoo for an average gov't worker. It's technologies that can be used for terrorist activities too!

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    32. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you'll RTFA you'll notice they pretty much don't give a rat's ass about his personal situation. He's unemployed and unemployable and they're making him buy a Windows copy. It's like a fine thrown on top of the jail and home confinement. If he didn't have the hardware it would just be the same. He can sell a kidney and pay for Windows or he can stop using the Internet for all they care.

      --
      i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    33. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by carl0ski · · Score: 2, Informative

      You don't even need that
      Windows Services for Unix 3.5 is free to Windows XP and 2003 users.
      Included by default in 2003 Server R2 and all Vista editions.

      WSU allows a windows machine to run perl, bash and ruby programs much the same way as
      Cygwin.
      WSU supports native mounting unix NFS shares also
      http://www.osnews.com/story.php/5751/Review-of-Win dows-Services-for-UNIX-3.5/

      http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx? FamilyID=896c9688-601b-44f1-81a4-02878ff11778&Disp layLang=en

    34. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by dwarfsoft · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The guy did steal, he is being punished, and he is confined to home, but they make him purchase Windows? This is what I really find objectionable, how the hell is somebody who is unemployed supposed to purchase Windows? Its an expensive piece of bloatware (I use Windows on some PCs, but that is due to the nature of my work - supporting clients with Windows). If he pirates it so they can install their tracking software then he is going to be in bigger trouble (potentially).

      So whats to stop him from dual booting anyway? He goes on the Internet and visits normal sites in Windows, then reboots into Ubuntu and does whatever he wants... Unless they tap his connection at the ISP they wouldn't know, and if they did tap it at the ISP then there would be no need for monitoring tools on his PC.

      Sounds entirely retarded to me, not to mention ineffective.

      --
      Cheers, Chris
    35. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by code4fun · · Score: 1

      Forcing one to use Windows is quite a harsh punishment! That'll teach him to pirate movie. HEH

    36. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      So I'm suppose to feel sorry for someone who must serve a sentence he's been given? They could of been nice and gave him room-and-board in jail.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    37. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by cafucu · · Score: 3, Funny

      Surely this would violate his eighth amendment rights.

      --
      :%s:work:/.:g
    38. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And pirates cause RIAA and MPAA lawyers to drink causing them to kill families of 4. Now do you think piracy is such a harmless crime?

    39. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      No but it's an excellent example of how retarded the Feds are. "you must use windows, so we can Watch you"

      Yeah feds, like he cant boot from a ubuntu live cd and do his stuff without your really low grade "tracking software" ever detecting it.

      Jeebus, these guys are as dim as a 5 watt bulb aren't they. I am so glad that the nations finest mentally challenged are protecting us from evil.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    40. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

      Yes, I did it and no I will not comply!
      It will be a source of satisfaction to me that as a prisoner of your police state that I shall be costing you and your masters a fortune in housing and medical cost$$, yes all the medical procedures that I as an average American am routinely denied I will be getting as a ward (prisoner) of the state (My attorney will be contacting the ACLU)!

      I need the following
      Fill in the blanks

      Cost to the taxpayer
      Could be millions!

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    41. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Arthur+B. · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      No they are not doing anything in my name. Doing something in my name requires my consent, I do not consent to be governed by the winner of an election. When shareholders vote, the decision is taken in their name because they contractually agreed that their decision be represented by a majority vote. I never agreed to such contract with the government, and the government has no right to force me to leave, the government is not my landlord.

      --
      \u262D = \u5350
    42. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by HaMMeReD3 · · Score: 1

      I was thinking that too, but his government spying software most likely is just a simple keylogger, and even in a vm it would still trap input I would think.

    43. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by demi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Even so, when the state drunk drivers attend AA, they don't force them to go to a gay and lesbian AA clubhouse. That is a better analogy.

      Actually, that's often exactly what they do (never mind the gay/lesbian specific), it's not like you get to pick any alcohol or drug treatment program you like--there's a limited list of diversions. Now, usually you agree to a diversion to avoid a sentence like a fine or jail term; but try, for example, to find a non-smoking AA group (if that's important to you). I'd say your analogy is apt but rather undermines your point.

      --
      demi
    44. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by carbinworld · · Score: 1

      and a bootable live linux CD would be too dificult? I don't think so.

      --
      Imagine!
    45. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One might say windows is just a crippled kernel and is entirely useless on its own, needing GNU to make it a complete operating system with all the tools users expect like awk, sed and perl.

      We should be calling it GNU/Windows.

    46. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by InvalidError · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why not Windows 3.0/3.1 while we're at it? No IP stack out-of-the-box means he'd have to go back to dial-up BBSes at least long enough to download one. With neither USB nor large volume support, his download options (usable storage space) would also be severely restricted.

      This is assuming Win3.x still runs on relatively recent hardware... but IIRC, the Win3.11 installer crashed on my P3 last time I tried it just for the heck of it.

    47. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Technician · · Score: 4, Informative

      He could probably get away with VMWare or the like running Linux under Windows, but that would just run the risk of landing him in jail.

      A live CD also works wonders, but without the hard evidence of virtualization. Again, if they had a way to monitor his traffic from the upstream, it would be bad. If they rely on the monitoring software as the only monitor, than use a live CD for checking e-mail and other places where you don't want to compromise your online passwords. Monitoring online activity is one thing. Harvesting his login info for his online accounts is another. That over-reaches monitoring online activity and opens doors to stuff beyond the current monitoring.

      I I had mandatory online monitoring, I would not log in to any online account. I would not accidentally give that info to them.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    48. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Hennell · · Score: 1

      I'm not entirely sure I understand your comment...

      Is it like when you go to the zoo to see a particular animal and then that isn't there because a thief-man stole it. So then you're forced to track down this man using the skills you learnt in boy-scouts, and when you do you find the animal so take it back to the zoo, only they don't give you a reward or anything so you never go back ever again?

      Is that right?
      ---
      If a picture is worth a thousand words my dissertation is going to be a dodle
      ---

    49. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You compared him to a drunk driver and a thief. Comparing him to crimes which don't even begin to resemble what he actually did is ignoring the facts.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    50. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      If he is a real geek there are any number of ways around the problem, including running ICS or other proxy software through a Winbox, running Linux in a VM, etc.

      His position sounds like pure snivelling to me.
      Any geek worthy of the name would have set up a Windows box that didn't cost him anything (people give them away all the time) and pressed on.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    51. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by JDevers · · Score: 1

      Um, that is the point. He "fixed it" from your way too optimistic scenario to a far more realistic one. They could just as easily take away your computer, especially if it was the computer you used to commit the offense.

    52. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by iowannaski · · Score: 1, Insightful

      wow. you are pretty dumb.

      --
      i forget
    53. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Vista would be a better punishment...

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    54. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Bastardchyld · · Score: 1, Troll

      You compared him to a drunk driver and a thief. Comparing him to crimes which don't even begin to resemble what he actually did is ignoring the facts. That is probably the most ridiculous thing I have heard in this entire thread...

      1) He IS a criminal, he admitted it, he was found guilty.
      2) I compared him to other criminals http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/criminal. The crime does not matter they still share the commonality of all being criminals.
      3) Making a comparision is NOT ignoring the facts (or as you stated in your previous post "changing the facts" http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=278075&c id=20336815)
      4) You have still not outlined one fact that I have changed.

      For the record he did break the law, he was caught, he was tried, and he was sentenced... The end.
      --
      $diff terrorists hippies
      $
      $rm -rf *terrorists *hippies
    55. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Funny

      The same law really does apply to people who use Macintoshes, no matter what you may think. It does? Well that's no good. What's the point of a built in reality distortion field if you can't use it for nefarious purposes?
      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    56. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you even read the grandparent post? Here is a short summary of the conversation:

      Grandparent: Bob is not forced to do X
      You: Actually, he IS forced to do X (never mind the whole X part)

      If you're going to add in "never mind [the entire argument]", then you might as well not respond at all.

    57. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I don't think we should feel sorry for him, but I do feel slightly concerned that a court of law is insisting that part of someone's sentence is to buy a product from a company unrelated to the case. Unless, of course, they're expecting him to pirate Windows...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    58. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's often exactly what they do (never mind the gay/lesbian specific), it's not like you get to pick any alcohol or drug treatment program you like--there's a limited list of diversions. I'm not intimately familiar with AA, but is it a private company that takes money from people who attend the meetings? In this case, they are requiring him to purchase a product from a private company that has no connection to the case. For the AA analogy to be sound, he would have to be forced to attend (and pay for attending) meetings run by a for-profit organisation instead of going to the community-run self-help group.
      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    59. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      He pled guilty... Badunkadunk. Enforcement completed.

      Quantifiable numbers do not exist for every possible situation, therefore it is within the courts power to determine it on a case by case basis. Lol, quantifiable numbers are irrelevant to this trial. Just one dumb poster grandiosely waving his hands about tremendous financial losses justifying anything he personally wants them to is all. The court didn't make that claim, so the poster making that claim is just being an ass.
      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    60. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Courageous · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He could probably get away with VMWare or the like running Linux under Windows, but that would just run the risk of landing him in jail.

      I doubt it. The court order would have be very specific. Running Linux in Ubuntu is a perfectly valid application of Windows use.

      C//

    61. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by fractoid · · Score: 1

      The guy did steal, he is being punished, and he is confined to home, but they make him purchase Windows? Nope. They said he can only use Windows. They're not making him buy it, just saying he has to do so if he wants to use a computer.
      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    62. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sounds entirely retarded to me, not to mention ineffective.

      That would be the gov't in a nutshell.
    63. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by fractoid · · Score: 1

      To work around keyloggers, he could enter his password using character map, or store passwords in a text file on a thumb drive and cut and paste. (Unless the monitoring software stores the contents of all text files opened, or something, in which case have a big binary file with passwords inserted somewhere in the middle, and grep 'em out when needed?)

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    64. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 3, Funny

      They can really punish him by making him run windows ME.

      How about Vista? According to the Apple ads it comes bundled with a security guy to decide what you can and can't do, though I don't know whether to take that at face value ;)

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    65. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by o2sd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The guy did steal, he is being punished,

      No, wrong. He infringed copyright. I know in wonderland where most Americans live, a word can mean whatever you want it to mean, but legally, words have precise definitions.

      No stealing occurred.

      --
      - Nothing to see hear.
    66. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're stupid.

    67. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I don't think it would matter. His choices are use a computer loaded with the government spy crap or no computer at all. You power PC would only mean no computer at all unless there is a Mac version of the bug.

      As for monitoring if the program is running. All the have to do is capture packets at the connection and check the time stamps and compare it to the logs. Some packet capture and rendering programs will even reconstruct the web page or chat dialog for you so if they did it right, they would still know where you went and what you did. My guess is that is what those secrete black boxes at the ISPs were all about. Verifying what he does with his connection would be trivial.

    68. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      He doesn't have to buy windows. He can go without the Internet for a while. He is lucky that they didn't pull his use of a computer all together. Other people convicted of committing crimes involving computers have had that happen. Look at Kevin Mitnick or however his name is spelled. They stopped him from using a computer for a long enough time that almost nothing he knew was relevant on a practical level anymore.

    69. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by mortonda · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's no fix, that's a hack job. I meant what I said and trying to be "cool" by putting words in my mouth is no way to make a point.


      You must be new here. "Fixed it for you" is a common /. joke similar to "you mispelled ...." in which someone "hacks up" (to use your terminology) a statement - usually in a funny way, but often making a point. It's almost satire. Ok, maybe that's a stretch.

      For example, you could reply to this post with:

      in which someone "hacks up" (to use your terminology) a statement - usually in a not so funny way
      Fixed it for ya....
      ;)
    70. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by quenda · · Score: 1

      > but bear in mind that this is not an innocent man here... he pled guilty to the charges

      That in itself means nothing.
      In present-day United States, the innocent are often better off pleading guilty.
      Its called plea-bargaining: plead guilty to a lesser charge, or face prosecution
      with a _massively_ increased penalty, and long wait for trial.

      e.g. Lionel Tate. Exercising his right to a trial got him a life sentence instead
      of three years.
      Or David Hicks. Detained for five years, and then offered a trip home if he confesses.
      Its getting like Maoist China.

      So much for the constitution.

    71. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I think you meant running linux in windows.

      Anyhow. The court order isn't restricting him from using linux. It is the limitations of the court ordered on line monitoring. The program they use for this doesn't work with linux. So I would assume that running a VM of linux on a windows machine would be perfectly acceptable because the windows OS is loaded along with their monitoring software.

      However, since this revelation came from his probation officer, I would ask him first. It shouldn't be too hard of a thing to get approved seeing how windows and the monitoring software would still be running and it is just a fit or normality in his working with the computer and not exactly an attempt to get around the monitoring software (even if that is a side effect).

    72. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      You sort of got the point and missed it at the same time, then went all aggro about it. Very entertaining.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    73. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Gay/Lesbian? Are you confused about who you are?

      If your male your one, if your female your the other. If your trying to be corny reverse the order.

    74. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by phulegart · · Score: 1

      All he really did was the equivalent to sneaking into a movie theatre to see a movie for free, for every time he watched the pirated movie. He denied noone else the right to see the movie. If the movie in question was available on DVD, then he denied the movie's producers the equivalent of their share of the DVD's retail price.

      SO what he admitted to, was essentially equal to stealing a DVD from Walmart, except that noone lost any actual property (stealing a DVD from Walmart would deprive someone of the right to actually purchase it). Unless he was caught with a pirated copy of a movie that had not been released yet, which goes back to my original point, that what he did was akin to sneaking into a movie theatre... albeit sneaking in multiple times equal to the number of times he watched his pirated copy.

      We are still talking about Petty Theft, which is theft of property under the value of $400. Petty Theft is punishable by fine or up to 6 months in jail. Seems he got worse, on both counts... fine AND more than 6 months. I don't see how it was proven that what he did was equal to stealing over $400.

      --
      "I love deadlines. I love the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." -D. Adams
    75. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Unlikely_Hero · · Score: 4, Funny

      I thought it was like one of those Buddhist Zen "Koan" things... like "What is the sound of one hand clapping?"
      "how do you run windows me?"

      --
      Happiness does not come from having much, but from being attached to little.
    76. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, they aren't forcing him to buy anything.

      This is a conception that has gotten way out of hand. The courts said if he wanted to use a computer on the internet, he had to install the monitoring software. His probation officer said it doesn't work on linux so if he wanted to use it, he would have to use windows.

      The guy has a choice in the matter. It is buy windows or don't use the computer. The court isn't forcing him to do anything other then be monitored if he goes on the internet, And to this point, Most DUI cases have mandatory AA meetings. This means there really isn't a choice. In some cases it might be a requirement to stay out of jail or maybe get their license back but generally the judge just says as part of the punishment you have to goto a treatment program. And then you have to find a program they approve of and goto it.

      I imagine you could goto jail for not going to the AA meetings in that case. But it would be for new charges like contempt of court or something and not to finish some suspended sentence.

    77. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Graff · · Score: 0, Troll

      You must be new here. "Fixed it for you" is a common /. joke similar to "you mispelled ...." in which someone "hacks up" (to use your terminology) a statement - usually in a funny way, but often making a point. It's almost satire. Ok, maybe that's a stretch. Oh, I've been here quite a while and have seen the method before. Misquoting someone is never funny, you either correctly quote them and respond to the ACTUAL statement or you don't quote at all. Then again I've worked for several newspapers as a writer, copy editor, and layout editor and I've had proper quotation and attribution of sources beat into me.

      I would say that misquoting someone in this fashion can be considered to be a form of Straw Man fallacy. No matter how innocent it may seem that's no way to have a proper discussion.

      Yeah, yeah, stick up my butt and all. Being funny on Slashdot is like shooting fish in a barrel, it's not even a contest. Say something off-color and you'll be at +5 Funny in moments. I usually shoot for a real, compelling, and spirited discussion because that's a far more interesting way to spend your time here.
    78. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Repossessed · · Score: 1

      See... here's the thing. If they can monitor his traffic from the upstream, then doesn't that make the monitoring software completely redundant, and thus cruel and unnecessary?

      I really would love to see what a higher court would make out a of a cruel and unusual (or whatever kind of) appeal though. Doubt he'd win, but still, interesting to see.

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
    79. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by dwarfsoft · · Score: 1

      Well, not being an American I'll have to take your word for that. What I did mean to say was that "He is guilty of copyright infringement" and that was all I was implying. Basically what I meant was "He's guilty, but this is ridiculous".

      --
      Cheers, Chris
    80. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by AllergicToMilk · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Then again I've worked for several newspapers as a writer, copy editor, and layout editor and I've had my sense of humor beat out of me."

      There, fixed it for ya.

      --
      There are only 6,863,795,529 types of people in the world.
    81. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Spookticus · · Score: 1

      I got windows 3.11 to install on my p4 intel 875p board. It takes a whole 2 seconds to load to the desktop :(

    82. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by dwarfsoft · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is effectively the same thing. If they say "If you want to use the Internet...", (living without the Internet is tough, or was for me when I had to), "... then you have to buy Windows". The only option he has in order to use Windows is to buy it.

      For me it'd be a question of "Would you like to eat? Well you can only do it at McDonalds (eugh) and we have to monitor you with Ronald McDietitian's to make sure you aren't getting too many Vitamins". Of course you want/need food. You will be forced to using that which has been allowed.

      --
      Cheers, Chris
    83. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Bastardchyld · · Score: 1

      Lol, quantifiable numbers are irrelevant to this trial. Just one dumb poster grandiosely waving his hands about tremendous financial losses justifying anything he personally wants them to is all. The court didn't make that claim, so the poster making that claim is just being an ass. I never claimed tremendous losses on the part of anyone, I simply said that the punishment was inline with the crime and the impact that it did cause. If the losses were tremendous then the punishment should have been tremendous as well. 10 months is hardly tremendous by any standard...
      --
      $diff terrorists hippies
      $
      $rm -rf *terrorists *hippies
    84. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by dwarfsoft · · Score: 1

      Well, Kevin Mitnick mostly got his access through Social Engineering. Tricking people into giving him their passwords. This is still prevalent today, and is arguably the simplest form of Hacking still available to people.

      With Kevin they made an example out of him to emphasize the laws about Computer Crime which had up until that point not been tested. With this case, they are pushing well-established laws. The difference being that Kevin Mitnick was implicated in breaking into DEC's Secure Network and Copied their source code or whatever, whereas this is about releasing a Copyrighted movie to the public. The two are not the same and therefore the punishment should never be close to the same.

      --
      Cheers, Chris
    85. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Bastardchyld · · Score: 1

      All he really did was the equivalent to sneaking into a movie theatre to see a movie for free, for every time he watched the pirated movie. He denied noone else the right to see the movie. If the movie in question was available on DVD, then he denied the movie's producers the equivalent of their share of the DVD's retail price.

      SO what he admitted to, was essentially equal to stealing a DVD from Walmart, except that noone lost any actual property (stealing a DVD from Walmart would deprive someone of the right to actually purchase it). Unless he was caught with a pirated copy of a movie that had not been released yet, which goes back to my original point, that what he did was akin to sneaking into a movie theatre... albeit sneaking in multiple times equal to the number of times he watched his pirated copy.

      We are still talking about Petty Theft, which is theft of property under the value of $400. Petty Theft is punishable by fine or up to 6 months in jail. Seems he got worse, on both counts... fine AND more than 6 months. I don't see how it was proven that what he did was equal to stealing over $400. If this were true and he simply admitted to the equivalent of stealing a DVD, then why did he plead guilty to 2 felonies? Is petty theft a felony? I am not going to stand up and defend him. He had his chance to exonerate himself, he chose not to. He was sentenced based on the crimes that he was convicted on, the same crimes he pled guilty to. If he did not think he was guilty of the 2 felonies then he should have pled innocent and fought his case...
      --
      $diff terrorists hippies
      $
      $rm -rf *terrorists *hippies
    86. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by j_rhoden · · Score: 1

      Lionel Tate is innocent... You do realize he violated his parole and was then convicted of armed robbery after his "murder" conviction, right?

    87. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by j_rhoden · · Score: 1

      Excuse me, he wasn't convicted of armed robbery, just gun possession.

    88. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have a laptop that uses ME and it works fine. Well it worked fine when I got it, and for about five years after that. Trying to juggle two cases and the laptop while pushing a carry-on bag through the line for TSA fun have resulted in impact related hardware issues around the keyboard somewhere.

      I don't see what the big deal about ME was. It worked as well as anything for the tasks it was intended.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    89. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Technician · · Score: 2, Interesting

      To work around keyloggers, he could enter his password using character map, or store passwords in a text file on a thumb drive and cut and paste.

      This appears to be not a key logger but an Internet traffic monitor. As such, it may be able to capture anything of intrest such as logging into email regardless of whatever you did to defeat a key logger. Booting a live CD and not loading anything from the hard drive will work against this mandatory software. The risk is if he got busted for being online and the log doesn't compare with an upstream log.

      More needs to be known about the mandatory software.

      With luck the ISP will protect his records. If ISP shares the list of traffic times, IP address, MAC address and such and it doesn't jive with the report from the mandatory software, then he is screwed.

      His best bet is to use the mandatory software and not log into any personal accounts of any kind to prevent disclosure. I wouldn't even use any old passwords/username for the windows install. It would all be new for the monitor to protect any accounts existing they may be trying to access.

      It's time for a new gmail account with a username like FBImonitored@gmail.com

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    90. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by fractoid · · Score: 1

      You think that net connectivity is actually a biological necessity? O_o gtfo house imo.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    91. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by kimvette · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, because [Continue][Cancel]unlike Windows[Continue][Cancel] Me, Windows [Cancel][Allow]Vista actually [Continue][Cancel]works.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    92. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      Even so, when the state drunk drivers attend AA, they don't force them to go to a gay and lesbian AA clubhouse. Actually, in many jurisdictions, the only option for addiction treatment/rehab is faith-based ones. Nearly all 12-step programs have thinly veiled religious undertones, like "I will accept a higher power into my life", etc.

      If you're an atheist or if your religious beliefs are incompatible with the program's, and a court forces you to go into such a program, then you have a much more solid analogy to what the Linux user is.

      Although in all honesty, I don't think the court is forcing the guy to use his computer. It's a step up from banning him from using one at all.

      - RG>
      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    93. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by quenda · · Score: 1

      > Lionel Tate is innocent... You do realize he violated his parole and was then convicted of armed robbery after his "murder" conviction, right?

      (He is a nasty waste of oxygen, who could be deleted from the gene-pool.)

      The point missed was the effect of plea-bargaining: 3yrs vs life.
      Seeing that, an innocent(ish) person with a weak defense may well be
      tempted to confess more than he did.

      ergo, a guilty plea is no proof of guilt.

    94. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by dwarfsoft · · Score: 1

      I find it very hard to live without communicating with my friends without the net. Considering that I work and study in the Industry I have little choice but to use the 'net. I couldn't live without it because of the nature of both work and study.

      I do get out, but that doesn't mean I could go cold turkey off the Internet for 5 months. It's almost impossible. You don't eat 24 hours a day, and you aren't on the net 24 hours a day. When I am not working and studying I am with my wife, which implies that I have been out of my house ;D at least enough to get a wife (no, she isn't a[n] [e-]mail order bride.)

      --
      Cheers, Chris
    95. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      10 months is hardly tremendous by any standard... 10 months is extreme for negligble impact, that's certainly one possible standard.
      You seem to know what the impact was, "considering the financial impact that he had..." so, what was it?
      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    96. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Technician · · Score: 1

      See... here's the thing. If they can monitor his traffic from the upstream,

      It is possible the only thing they get from the ISP is a log of Time, Port, Mac Address just like the RIAA demands from an ISP when they capture an IP address offering files and want the subscriber information.

      With that in hand they can verify if he defeated the monitoring software which would capture VPN, Encrypted Email, website logins, and other incriminating evidence. Go online from a borrowed PC and have the ISP log not match the monitor log = busted. It is unlikely the ISP captures the actual traffic, but does log traffic times and IP addresses of sites visited. Visiting The Pirate Bay and it not showing in the local monitor would be a conditions violation.

      We have ISP logs you visited, but we didn't capture what you did there..

      His only hope is an unsecured wireless next door and a live CD.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    97. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by necromcr · · Score: 0, Insightful

      One could add Tor to that and he's set!

      --
      No more I say.
    98. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or wine

    99. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Oh, believe me, I know what internet addiction is like. I feel claustrophobic on a computer without a net connection... >.> However, it's definitely possible to ditch the 'net for an extended period of time, unless you have commitments that mean it's necessary (as your work/study are), and even then you can cut out your personal net time. I went traveling last year, and for four months the only net access I had was the odd hour here and there in a 'net cafe, strictly to keep in email contact with family and friends. It feels weird at first, but pretty soon you feel freer for it, the best analogy I can think of is if you habitually wear a watch and then take it off. If you and your lady ever have the opportunity to just up roots and go walkabout I can highly, highly recommend it.

      (Hoping to go back to northern Thailand with my girlfriend, some of the most amazing countryside I've ever seen, and the most awesome motorcycling scenery. Maybe this time instead of working south to Ko Phangan we can head northeast through Laos / Cambodia / Vietnam / China...)

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    100. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by phulegart · · Score: 1

      "If this were true and he simply admitted to the equivalent of stealing a DVD, then why did he plead guilty to 2 felonies? Is petty theft a felony? I am not going to stand up and defend him. He had his chance to exonerate himself, he chose not to. He was sentenced based on the crimes that he was convicted on, the same crimes he pled guilty to. If he did not think he was guilty of the 2 felonies then he should have pled innocent and fought his case..."

      Very true. Theft over $400 would have been Grand Theft, and then can be considered either a misdemeanor OR a felony, depending on the circumstances of the case. I'm not sure why he pled guilty, or if he simply pled Nolo Contendere, which has the same result as a guilty plea.

      I was wrong in replying before RTFA, since he was directly responsible for uploading a movie before it's release in theatres, as that would have an effect on the amount of money the movie would make in theatres. Now, it might only reduce the amount by a few thousand dollars (although people who downloaded it might have been inspired to actually see it on the big screen, but that's another issue) but that amount is enough to make the difference between Petty and Grand Theft. It still seems that the book was thrown at him quite hard, as he was charged with crimes relating to copyright infringement. The impression I'm getting is that he was treated as if he was profiting from the distribution, as if he had made and sold pirated DVDs of a movie. It was kind of a landmark case at the time in 2005, which lends a bit more credibility to the possibility that the prosecution was over zealous in doing it's job. The prosecution wanted to send out a message. This unemployed admin of a bittorrent site would serve as a good example, especially with such a popular and expensive movie as a Star Wars release, that this kind of thing wasn't going to be tolerated.

      I imagine he was threatened with far more than he pled to, and that although he might have been able to fight it down to reduced charges and a lighter sentence with time and money, he chose to allow himself to be made an example of.

      The whole OS limitation thing... that just seems ignorant. But, I suppose it is better than being banned from using any computer for a set duration of time.

      --
      "I love deadlines. I love the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." -D. Adams
    101. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by pakar · · Score: 1

      If that drunk had a Ford would he be forced to switch to a Volvo just because they had not developed a Ford meter??

      And just comparing this to some dangerous crime like drunk-driving is just ridiculous.

    102. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by chuckymonkey · · Score: 1

      I had a friend who could actually clap one hand. It was the most amazing thing that I ever witnessed even though it didn't really sound all that different from the sound of two hands clapping.

      --
      "Some books contain the machinery required to create and sustain universes."-Tycho
    103. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of plain ssh and X-forwarding, you might want to try NoMachine's (http://www.nomachine.com/) NXServer (there's a free-as-in-beer server limited to two login names) or the corresponding full GPL solution FreeNX (http://freenx.berlios.de/). It's basically to X-forwarding what Citrix MetaFrame is to Windows Terminal Services, in terms of compression and speed improvement.
      Plus, all you need on the client side is their (free-as-in-beer) client, and not the entire Cygwin install.

    104. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I usually shoot for a real, compelling, and spirited discussion because that's a far more interesting way to spend your time here. Are we still talking about Slashdot here ?
    105. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't remember my login and only browse here normally but, well, aren't you consenting by your continued presence in the country?

    106. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by KlaymenDK · · Score: 3, Informative

      If one is considering a live CD in a situation such as this then let me suggest Polippix, which is a live CD which uses TOR by default and offers encrypted VOIP and other privacy-protecting goodies.

      Main site (in Danish):
      http://www.prosa.dk/om_prosa/polippix.shtml

      Review (in English):
      http://www.madpenguin.org/cms/?m=show&id=7822

    107. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Bastardchyld · · Score: 1

      If it were a negligible impact then he would not have pled guilty to 2 felonies... He would have fought it and been acquitted on most if not all counts by a jury of his peers... He did not want to take it to court and that is that.

      Nothing I say will make you understand that what he did was illegal and now he is serving his sentence. It may or may not have been morally objectionable, the law does not care. Period.

      --
      $diff terrorists hippies
      $
      $rm -rf *terrorists *hippies
    108. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by GeneJoker · · Score: 2, Informative

      They can tell me to run Windows all they want, unless they buy me a brand new computer it ain't happening!

      Your above statement is inaccurate. They will not buy you a new computer, they will inform you that, if you wish to access the internet, it must be through a pc running their software. The specifics are now their problem, it is up to you to comply. If you insist upon using a pc which is not compatible (i.e. a non-windows box) you will not be allowed access the internet, under penalty of fines and/or imprisonment. I will now for humorous effect craft a sentence similar to yours but altered to represent a more realistic take on the situation.

      They can make it a term of my probation to run Windows, so unless I buy a brand new computer I'm not going to use a computer at all!

      Since this is like your statement, but true, I declare this to be the "repaired" or "fixed" version of your statement! Haha!

      "Fixed" for the humour/common sense impaired.
    109. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      try running it on modern hardware, you'll find it takes less than 2 seconds to load the desktop.

      (You'll probably have to stick it in a virtual machine though as I remember windows 3.11 having overflow problems if you have too much memory installed)

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    110. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His only hope is an unsecured wireless next door and a live CD.

      Wait a minute... what if that seemingly unsecured wireless point was set up by the Feds? It's a trap!!!

    111. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Stooshie · · Score: 1

      Mayve he tried to leave his country, but there wasn't another country that would take him.

      --
      America, Home of the Brave. ... .and the Squaw.
    112. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Stooshie · · Score: 1

      Judging by your sig. you are quite used to making comparisons that don't make any sense. In what way is a terrorist like a hippy?

      --
      America, Home of the Brave. ... .and the Squaw.
    113. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Stooshie · · Score: 1

      ... Drunk drivers have the ABILITY to kill families of 4, but who doesn't have that ability sober? ...

      But your are putting people at much more risk by bei...

      Oh, why bother.

      --
      America, Home of the Brave. ... .and the Squaw.
    114. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Stooshie · · Score: 1

      The point that is being made is not really a point about this case. It is a point about how heinous the crime of copying music/dvds is.

      Politicians regard it as a heinous crime because big business stands to loose (and the politicians will loose their consultancy positions on boards etc). The genereal public, I suspect, would regard it as less heinous. In fact I suspect the majority of people have a few downloaded(free, as in not paid for) copies of music/films on their hard drives.

      OK, so the guy distrubited his copy. That is probably a different matter.

      --
      America, Home of the Brave. ... .and the Squaw.
    115. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      You put people at risk by getting in your car. If you sneeze or yawn you could lose control.

      Being drunk doesn't mean you're going to hurt anyone. Arresting someone for drunk driving is like arresting someone for thinking about committing a crime (also known as Conspiracy).

      If nobody gets hurt nobody should be punished. It's that simple. If they hit a car/person/tree/whatever sure, arrest 'em. But if they get home without damaging anything what have they done that a sober person hasn't?

      I worked with a woman who drove home drunk after a party. Her boyfriend drove her there but he was too drunk to drive her home. So she drove herself home. When she got into her driveway she turned her vehicle off, got out, and was almost inside when a police car pulled up behind her and gave her a ticket. She's now a convicted felon because of that incident and has lost her ability to vote. She was HOME and hadn't hit ANYTHING. Where's the harm in what she did? And don't tell me what she COULD HAVE done, because yesterday when I deposited my paycheck I COULD HAVE robbed the bank.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    116. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't something like this stop fix that problem?

      http://www.qfxsoftware.com/

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    117. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      I had a friend who could actually run Windows ME. It was the most amazing thing that I ever witnessed even though it didn't really behave all that different from 2 copies of Windows ME not running.

      --
      No Comment.
    118. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by SpiritOfGrandeur · · Score: 1

      Um, They can really punish him by making him * try* to run windows ME.
      That is taking it a bit far. With the current horsepower of Vista boxes, we might actually have boxes that could run ME!

      Any one tried this yet?!
    119. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by tryfan · · Score: 1

      You've missed the point completely. It's all about cruel and unusual punishment.
      Forcing someone to use Windows is both.

    120. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Lets see, someone shoots a person and kills then should be punished differently then some one who robs a store with a gun and no one gets hurt. Banning their use of a gun is a perfectly reasonable out come of both distinctly different crimes.

      Computers or guns. They are relatively the same except maybe that the computer has a stronger tie to society and it might be harder for a person to function without one. So yes, while Mitnick's ordeal was different then this one, the restriction on the use of a computer is still fitting. While Mitnick was banned completely for a term, this guy is only being told that he needs to be monitored if he is using them on the internet. So it does take into account the difference in the level crime that happened. There is a third choice of going back in and serving the rest of his sentence so it isn't really unfitting.

      Unlike what ti being spouted here, the guy doesn't have to buy windows. Al he has to do is either not use the computer on the internet or finish his prison term and pay his debt to society and be done with what the government or judge has to say over him.

      Actually the later is probably the best option. I know people who get placed on probation and end up racking on years of time going in and out because their PO seems to get a stiffy playing god with their lives. One guy I know got 5 years added to his sentence because he couldn't keep his PO happy. And that is pretty bad when his sentence was only 18 months and he got out on probation/parole after 9 months in the first place. You do realize that probation or parole is the same thing as being locked up except because your good or non violent, you sort of serve your sentence at home instead of behind bars.

    121. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by sYkSh0n3 · · Score: 1

      I don't feel sorry for him at all. Without him i wouldn't have seen the last star wars movie. I could really use that 2 hours of my life back.

      for government agencies that might be monitoring this discussion: this is slashdot, and that was a joke. i did pay hard earned cash to watch the last star wars movie. After turning my g/f into a star wars fanatic, i had no choice but to plunk down my $14 so the two of us could sit through that torturous piece of film making. Although, she did love it and i did get laid, i think i'd still rather have my $14 back.

    122. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by dino2gnt · · Score: 1

      >No matter how innocent it may seem that's no way to have a proper discussion.

      You must be new here.

      --
      Future events such as these may affect you in the future!
    123. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by coruscus · · Score: 1

      I don't see what the big deal about ME was. It worked as well as anything for the tasks it was intended. It was intended for crashing, right?
      --
      If we appear to seek the unattainable, as it has been said, then let it be known that we do so to avoid the unimaginable
    124. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by beckerist · · Score: 1
    125. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Pro777 · · Score: 1

      Rabbits, viruses. Somebody talk to me!

    126. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by xeoron · · Score: 1

      Why not run Xen and have a virtual MS Windows space along with Linux or run Solaris and do the samething using Virtual Spaces, or run Windows with Linux on top of using VMware... He has lots of options... but his whole point is they are forcing him to spend money he does not have, nor anytime soon, in order to run their software. I am curious what they do when a person only has Mac OS X... do they still force that same program but with virtualization or use something else?

    127. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      http://sdf.lonestar.org/

      Run putty on windows. No GUI, but does that really matter?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    128. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Kids with these modern punishments, sheesh.
      I'd make him run Windows 95A on a 486/8MB Zenith Z-Station with no CD drive.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    129. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      Exactly! If he was left alone with Windows ME, he'd just give up and go away. Now, Vista he'll be able to "use" for a long time.

    130. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by uababy · · Score: 1

      lol. Somebody bring me a flu shot.

    131. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Technician · · Score: 1

      Wait a minute... what if that seemingly unsecured wireless point was set up by the Feds? It's a trap!!!

      It could have been anybody. It is deniable.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    132. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by eodmightier · · Score: 1

      Ohhh booohooohooohooo.. *sob* *whimper* *whine*....

      He has to use/pay for windows. Why should the government give a rip about him? Not everyone's life revolves around the freaking computer. Yes they only support windows, nobody though that support the small % of people who use only linux was worth their time. Read a damn book or something so you can get a job so you don't have to warez everything.

      I'm sure he didn't make any money off banner ads on his torrent site he ran. Noo.. No sir.. Not a penny.

      --
      -Eod
    133. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever _used_ a windows box to route?
      Voting cruel and unusual.

    134. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Bastardchyld · · Score: 1

      You're completely right, I am always making comparisons of things that don't make any sense...

      Case in Point: Currently I am comparing you to someone who is way off topic.

      --
      $diff terrorists hippies
      $
      $rm -rf *terrorists *hippies
    135. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --All somebody has to do is sell him a copy of Win2kpro or XP, for $1. Problem solved -- quit whining, u copyright-flaunting biatch... (slaps Pirate)

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    136. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by GiMP · · Score: 1

      Most DUI cases have mandatory AA meetings


      But they don't hold the AA meets at the local rubbish dump, sewage treatment plant, or worse... the local water hole. If they did, people would complain. Perhaps it isn't the same thing, but there is a point where the courts demands may be unreasonable. Personally, I feel that running Windows is promoting piracy. Sorry, but most Windows software is closed-source and commercial. If he must run that software, then he will be as most people are, stuck pirating it. His choice of running Linux, as ironic as it was, means that he is probably less guilty of piracy than the average world citizen. The majority of home users, honestly, cannot afford the TCO of a MS Windows environment and pirate their software.

      Secondly... If the government feels that monitoring is necessary, that it should only be to prevent further software pirating. They should not be requiring significant changes in his ability to use his computer. If they *must* force someone to change their computing habits then making them run Linux would be much more effective than forcing them to run Microsoft Windows.
    137. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Your looking at this all the wrong way. He doesn't have the ability to use the computer. He is able to if he allows the monitoring and the monitoring can only be done on windows.

      The choice to use windows is entirely his. He could go without the Internet and continue running what he is now. He could also forgo the probation and serve the rest of his term out then not have to worry about what he accesses the Internet with. It is only that he wants something that he is being told to install windows. And to that point, I see no problem with monitoring his activities when on the medium that allowed his piracy to happen in the first place. This isn't someone saying you must install windows. It is someone saying we need to monitor you if you are going to get back online. Nothing else is relevant here.

    138. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by demi · · Score: 1

      If you're going to add in "never mind [the entire argument]", then you might as well not respond at all

      Oh, the entire argument was that he might be exposed to gays or lesbians? In that case, we're safe, since Windows is neither gay nor lesbian.

      --
      demi
    139. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Again, my personal experience was that it was far more stable than the windows 98 from which it came. In fact, it crashed/hung far less frequently than my friend's brand-new XP box. Though my experience was a laptop with limited hardware options and my friend's was a "custom" Dell desktop with pre-service pack XP trying to run several things in '98 compatibility mode. Of course, that was the intended application for ME, so that's not particularly surprising.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    140. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by mortonda · · Score: 1

      See, that's what I'm talking about.... LOL

    141. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by GiMP · · Score: 1

      someone saying you must install windows. It is someone saying we need to monitor you if you are going to get back online. Nothing else is relevant here.


      Well, thats true, but he can certainly argue that their requirement of having Windows in order to monitor his usage is an unnecessary requirement.

      Imagine the following. Lets say that a court ruled that a felon should wear an ankle bracelet without specifying the weight, and was given a 100kg bracelet. Likewise, while it might be true that the criminal might be choosing this in lieu of prison, he certainly would have the right to question this and ask the court if assignment of a more, mutually agreeable device could be assigned. Surely, if the Judge was satisfied with a 10kg weight, rather than a 100kg weight, that Judge would have no complaint with allowing the alternative.

      I think to get this opened up, he will need to indicate exactly alternative solutions that would be agreeable to him. I think he will, though, have better luck convincing them to have Windows on a gateway than to let him simply run Linux without their special software. Of course, it would be nice if they could rule Windows out here altogether, but I don't think the government could ever move quickly on supporting Linux -- no, it would be much more reasonable -- and agreeable to the judge -- to allow him to use Windows on a gateway. Argue against Windows on the gateway at another time, you need baby steps.
    142. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Maltheus · · Score: 1

      His best bet is to borrow an old laptop from a friend and install Linux on it. Who's gonna know?

    143. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I still think you are looking at it the wrong way. With you 100k ankle bracelet would still be a choice. He could forgo it and serve the rest of his term out or just stay in his home and not go anywhere. Those are the alternatives in this case, he can go back and server the rest of his sentence or not use a computer on the Internet until he is off probation.

      I don't see anything wrong with petitioning the judge for something more acceptable. But that isn't how this stuff is coming across. It is coming across in a way that makes it appear that having such restrictions is cruel or something and that he is being forced. He isn't being forced.

      As for the windows on a gateway device. It would all depend on what they are wanting to monitor. If it is only where he goes then it probably would be acceptable. If they want access to all encrypted communications and so on it might not be. And on a side note, if he created a gateway device that get them the information they want in a way they could use, he could market it to the courts as a solution to others when in a situation like he is in. The requirement to use windows is probably because of how windows is easily hijacked by trojans and so on combined with the assumption that 90% or more of every one would be running it. You also have the economic considerations of what a gateway device might cost compared to what a convict leaving jail might be able to afford. Would it be practical to make the buy a $200 device as apposed to installing a $20 Trojan that has been reworked to fit their needs?

    144. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I've heard about the time this guy spent in prison they don't much like it when they ask "what are you in for?" and your answer is "I uploaded a movie to the internet and a bunch of people downloaded it." My guess is that Prison was really hard for this guy and well I won't chime in on if its "Right" or "Wrong" to only offer monitoring software from windows I will say that I think taking probation/parole is a much better idea then staying in jail at least in this case.

    145. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give him the C64 with the 300 baud modem. Any BBS out there still?

      Jim

    146. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by kd5ujz · · Score: 1

      I am assuming the same logic that keeps a parolee from borrowing a firearm would keep him from borrowing a laptop.

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
    147. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Stooshie · · Score: 1

      It's about reducing the level of risk. Plenty people are stopped from driving because they have a medical condition (epilepsy, recent heart attack etc...). People's reaction times and motor skills, when they are drunk, are highly impaired.

      If you are seriously suggesting that you should be allowed to drink alcohol before you drive you maybe need to seriously re-think your attitude to alcohol.

      Also, many tests have been done on people's attitudes to their own driving. The majority of people rate their own driving higher than other people rate that same person's driving. It explains your attitude (which is the same attitude that alot of people have) that driving laws shouldn't apply to them.

      --
      America, Home of the Brave. ... .and the Squaw.
    148. Re:So? Can't he use a Windows box to route? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *They can really punish him by making him run windows ME*
      i just spit coffee all over my monitor. thanks.

  2. Why... by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 1, Insightful

    are they even allowed to do this? "Oh, well, we can't be bothered to make a system for your operating system, so we'll just force you to use something else!" Duh...

    1. Re:Why... by DamonHD · · Score: 1

      They are presumably *allowed* to put him in jail and deny him all Internet access, so, yes, they could probably even make him use VGA with a nasty colour scheme.

      In his case I might decline to use Windows for security and cost reasons until the sentence was complete, but maybe ask to be able to use court-supplied facilities to check email.

      Rgds

      Damon

      --
      http://m.earth.org.uk/
    2. Re:Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Take it in context...

      They probably offered him a deal to spend home time versus all jail time if he agreed to certain terms. They are not FORCING him to use windows, they are saying that if he wants the easy path of punishment, he has to abide by certain rules.

      Also the requirement would only be for if he uses a computer at all. He's perfectly welcome to simply not use one at all.

      All in all, he got off easy and just has to fullow the very simple rules in order to get the easy version of punishment.

    3. Re:Why... by shogarth · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why? Because he's a convict still serving his sentence (that's why he's under home confinement). If he doesn't like the terms of home confinement, he can always go back in the slammer and have even more restricted access.

    4. Re:Why... by Egdiroh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      are they even allowed to do this? "Oh, well, we can't be bothered to make a system for your operating system, so we'll just force you to use something else!" Duh... This is a probation, which means that the alternative is Prison, so I think that as long as they don't take away any more freedoms then would be taken away by sending him to Prison that they are allowed to do it.
    5. Re:Why... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Yes. They could tell him that he couldn't use a computer at all or they could throw him jail. His can use a computer with monitoring software on it and it is only available for Windows.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    6. Re:Why... by gad_zuki! · · Score: 3, Interesting

      >are they even allowed to do this? "Oh, well, we can't be bothered to make a system for your operating system, so we'll just force you to use something else!" Duh...

      No, the taxpayers cant be bothered to pay for more coding software. Hell, considering his crimes it just be better to not allow him computer use during probabtion, if he doesnt like that he cant spend those 5 months in prison. I know what I'd pick. Incredible how we coddle our criminals. Whats next a personal butler and compensation for jail time spent? Hot chocolate?

    7. Re:Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's not a car analogy but anyway:

      You're confined to house arrest and required to wear an ankle bracelet. But...you have no legs so they chain you into the radiator instead.

    8. Re:Why... by ystar · · Score: 1

      Penalization is in many ways a removal of freedom and choice. He has lost the freedom to use an operating system of his preference on the net. IANAL, but I assume since he's required to only get on the net with the tracking software in place, requiring windows is just like requiring that he doesn't block the software's calling home base with a firewall.

      As a side note, as others have mentioned yes this sort of restriction is probably easy to bypass in a whole slew of ways. I'm sure he knows/suspects that, but for this kid getting caught doing so is probably not worth the risk, however minimal.

    9. Re:Why... by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      I think they'd just put it on your arm.

    10. Re:Why... by db32 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, damn dirty rapist murdering prick...oh wait...he uploaded the new Star Wars. Well, I guess this is the joy of treating copyright infringement as a criminal offense. Unless of course the infringement wasn't the offense, and that subjecting that many people to the latest Star Wars is considered a crime against humanity.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    11. Re:Why... by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      compensation for jail time spent?
      Why not? Hilton got time-compensated for her weekend spent at home...
      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    12. Re:Why... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      So he's allowed to go back to *his* home, but he's not allowed to use his os of choice?
      And expected to purchase additional software to use his already perfectly working computer...
      If anything, the prison service should supply a modified locked down linux installation *as* the monitoring software, and not give him root access. It's not gonna be hard to circumvent windows based monitoring software when you have full admin rights.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    13. Re:Why... by SerpentMage · · Score: 1

      He just did not upload illegally, but he uploaded before the movie was even in the theaters. That is going to annoy many people. So while 5 months and 5 months is a pain it is definitely less than what a murderer would serve.

      You could argue that this was fair punishment.

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    14. Re:Why... by SnoopJeDi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you, him, or anybody else is THAT bothered by it, why don't you just go ahead and start up your own project and work it to government standards, so that in the future, this wouldn't have to happen to anybody.

      Honestly, this guy committed a crime. Nevermind all the complaining everybody does about whether it should or should not be a crime. The item under discussion is the punishment. I'm with a lot of posters above: his sentence could be a LOT worse. Bite the bullet.

    15. Re:Why... by It'sYerMam · · Score: 1
      What I want to know is why he can't just install Linux on the machine once they're done installing this software - in fact, I'm intrigued as to whether this tracking software requires actual complicity of the convict to work. If you buy another computer, possibly get another internet account, what can they do? Seems you may as well say, "OK, you don't need to do jail time, but only if you promise you're not going to be naughty again." And they'd only have his word for it.

      I assume I'm just unaware of some nuance of the monitoring setup, but perhaps it really is that silly.

      I'm undecided as to whether this guy is being a prat about this interesting part of his sentence, but the website, at least, is definitely retarded. There they are decrying this man's conviction when he pled guilty, for goodness' sake.

      --
      im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
    16. Re:Why... by lordtoran · · Score: 1

      Another loophole: He just sells or gives away his computer for the time of his home confinement. This method would prevent both exposure to Windows and sitting in jail. At least, that would be my approach in that situation.

      --
      Want to hear the voice of GOD? cat /boot/vmlinuz > /dev/dsp
    17. Re:Why... by marcello_dl · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      > they are saying that if he wants the easy path of punishment.

      So is windows an easier form of punishment than jail, now?

      I must have missed a release.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    18. Re:Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's more likely to get backdoor access in jail...

    19. Re:Why... by provigilman · · Score: 3, Insightful
      That is the most ridiculous argument that I've ever heard...

      The man committed a crime for which there are punishments. It's called THE LAW. In doing so he essentially forked over some of his rights to the government, things like the ability to and do whatever he wants. The government in this case was kind enough to say "Normally this is a jailable offence, however we don't think you really need to go to the pen. Instead we're going to confine you to your house and monitor you computer to ensure that you're not pirating stuff from home. Since we don't have anything compatible with your OS, you'll have to switch to Windows."

      It's no different than them saying "We'll let you out of jail early on certain conditions, such as not committing a crim for the next 3 years."

      On a personal note, I was hoping that the story was about a real pirate...that would've been infinitely more interesting. =)

      --
      "Life's short and hard, like a body building elf." -- The Bloodhound Gang
    20. Re:Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He copied a movie. There's no way that should be a criminal matter. The fact it is, and the fact he's been stuck with the cruel and unusual punishment of using windows, shows how up corporate ass the us legal system is.

    21. Re:Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, access to his anus would be unrestricted in that case.

    22. Re:Why... by wwahammy · · Score: 2

      No he's not allowed to use his OS of choice for 5 months until his confinement ends because his OS is supported for the tracking software. That's it. He broke a law, agreed to the conditions of his home confinement and doesn't like the result of it. Its like complaining that he can't go out to eat at night like he'd prefer, instead he'll have to go out to eat during the day.

      Send him to a supermax so he can see what is truly cruel and unusual punishment. No human contact, in the cell 23 hours a day, no tv, no computer. There are significantly more important issues when it comes to our corrections system than this.

    23. Re:Why... by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      he can always go back in the slammer and have even more restricted access.

      Or even a faint glimmer of the remote possibility of getting the privilege of conjugal visits.

      Oh, wait. Ubuntu? check. File upload? check. Star Wars movie? check.

      I guess he'll be 'shakin hands with the wookie' then...

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    24. Re:Why... by RareButSeriousSideEf · · Score: 1

      "It's not gonna be hard to circumvent windows based monitoring software when you have full admin rights."

      One word...

      ipfw add deny log all from me to %MONITORSERVER%

      I'm not even sure you need Admin access to run it from the command line. He just needs a thumb drive disguised as a peanut butter sandwich or something for all his portable apps...

      Anyway, good point; wouldn't the enforcement folks be better off making him use a router that they pwn instead of a Windows installation that they've tried to compromise?

    25. Re:Why... by SCHecklerX · · Score: 4, Interesting

      installing software is the wrong way to go about this anyway. The gvt. should have an appliance that they stick between his router and the ISP connection. Have that box run whatever it is they want for monitoring and reporting. It'd be easy to make sure it isn't tampered with, and is always running that way too.

      Hmm...I wonder how lucrative starting such a business to provide these things to authorities would be, seems like a fun project.

    26. Re:Why... by Spazmania · · Score: 0

      Why are they even allowed to do this?

      It's called "parole." In exchange for leaving jail early, you agree to abide by alternate restrictions on your freedom for the duration of your sentence.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    27. Re:Why... by realthing02 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm replying to this one, but i mean to reply to all the idiots here. I know you actually read a summary for once, but the punishment is not using windows. That was a clever, incredibly biased remark by the submitter/editor.

      He can only use windows because part of his probation is to be monitored. If he doesn't personally purchase/install his own windows, then he simply cannot use the internet/computer. As for "I'll do this once they leave" ideas... are you guys really that dumb? I'm sorry, but you don't think that they would monitor his usage? If nothing is being monitored, you've got two options:

      1. he's not using the internet.
      2. he's subverted the monitoring.

      A pirate uploading material is probably damn well used to the internet, and will probably use it because it's hard not to use it once you have.

      MAYBE if he used windows for some time, and then used Linux... maybe he could get away with it by showing legitimate monitored windows usage. But then he's still using windows which is apparently like pulling teeth.

      Lastly, if it was you, would you risk going back to prison for 5 months just to use Linux over windows? Or maybe i should ask that question here...

      They aren't forcing him to do anything, they are telling him if he wants to do something, he has to do it a certain way.

    28. Re:Why... by jd · · Score: 1
      Linux meets or exceeds Government standards - at least on platforms it has been certified for. Windows' certification is unclear, given the level of rewriting that has taken place and given the age. Remember, it is the combination of hardware and software that is certified, and certified components do not generally need re-certifying in later versions. How much hardware from the days of NT is still useful, let alone usable for Windows 2003 or Vista?

      Notwithstanding why he would end up using Windows, his best bet is to buy a new hard drive, place his original in safe storage, then use the new one for Windows. It'll save losing installed apps and data.

      Yes, the guy has committed a crime and I don't feel terribly sorry for him. He is guilty, he needs to face a consequence that will persuade him to choose a different path in life. I'm not sure home detention will be effective in doing that, but there aren't any generally accepted alternatives that are effective. Constructive punishments do not, yet, exist. Regardless, home detention was selected by the judge and home detention that has neither impact nor meaning is not much of anything. It is arguable, then, that the mandatory use of Windows is necessary for this to have any meaning to him.

      However, by this logic, a Windows user should be compelled to use something alien to them, to drive home that they are not going to be rewarded for an act that is deemed unacceptable by society. This is only possible if the appropriate monitoring software exists.

      I'd add one other thought: If the software is Windows-specific and is relatively trivial (it's just a sniffer/logger), then it is badly written. We're not talking about platform-specific operations, we're talking very basic I/O monitoring, and that will be almost identical on almost all OS'. If the software is, however, as badly written as all that, is it meaningful as evidence in a court of law? If there is a high risk of flaws that could potentially generate incorrect output, then courts should be deeming the evidence as unacceptable and throwing it out. They can do that. It is not required for a court to accept all evidence offered.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    29. Re:Why... by freehunter · · Score: 1

      Most likely, there is a hardware layer involved somewhere tracking if his computer is on or not. If it is on and not sending a signal to the server, he gets busted.

    30. Re:Why... by It'sYerMam · · Score: 1

      I meant punishment figuratively speaking. It was a slightly ironic nod to the ubiquitous slashdot groupthink; I am well aware that this is simply because the authorities have no monitoring software available for his chosen OS, and that it is the monitor that is his "punishment" (Or rather, as you rightly state, terms of his probation.)
      Anyway, back to the subversion of the system, which was what I was really interested in. If he's so accustomed to the internet, it can't be too difficult to either sniff the protocol, see if it's crackable, use VMWare, mingle with Windows, use a second box, or whatever. There are a multitude of ways. Also, I'm not actually suggesting he break his probation, I'm just pointing out the, should he wish to, it is unlikely to be difficult or detectable.

      --
      im in ur .sig, writin ur memes.
    31. Re:Why... by Entropius · · Score: 1

      ... and they are telling him that he has to make a specific purchase to do so.

      Telling a drunk driver that he must drive with an ignition interlock is one thing. Telling him that he must install it on a Ford is another.

    32. Re:Why... by Skreems · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You could also argue that it's completely overboard punishment. What's your point?

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    33. Re:Why... by hazem · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that called Carnivore? But instead of just watching convicted criminals, it's watching all of us?

    34. Re:Why... by Entropius · · Score: 1

      In our analogy, this corresponds to "recompile the snoopware for Linux".

    35. Re:Why... by firesquirt · · Score: 1

      He did not copy a movie he uploaded it without ever having paid for it. As for copying, yes I do believe that we should be able to make copies of property we buy...be it movies or music. That way I can use my copy in my car cd player, stolen I do not lose my music too. The kids leave the DVD out instead of putting it back, I still have my movie. My Wife loans out my DVD (you know it wont come back), I still have my movie.

    36. Re:Why... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that he'd feel really smart until they slap him back in prison for a probation violation.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    37. Re:Why... by db32 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1. It is still a stupid and overblown punishment and a waste of time and money to go after these kinds of things with such zealotry. Now, that isn't to say I think he shouldn't be punished in some fashion, but this is just insane.
      2. It is not definitely less than what a murderer would serve. There have been TONS of cases where rapists, child molesters and murderers get out to do it all again, repeatedly, and frequently in less than a year. It has been shown over and over that crimes against citizens are not the same thing as crimes against big money moving entities.

      When I don't have to worry about what part of town I am driving through at what time of night and what color my skin might be, THEN I will be interested in tracking down music/movie uploaders. He is going to serve more punishment than good ol Scooter. The system is so insanely unbalanced chasing down this kind of crap is insane. Hell they had that asshole talk about how they should quit going after murderers and bank robbers because music/movie stealing was SOOO much worse for the economy.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    38. Re:Why... by arashi+no+garou · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      ...he can always go back in the slammer and have even more restricted access.

      Where, oddly enough, the other prisoners will have unrestricted access to his inputs and outputs.
    39. Re:Why... by ericrost · · Score: 1

      My fiance lost two CD wallets full of un-backed up CD's that were ALL unreplacable old local music. She still hates the fact that she didn't burn them off and keep backups in the car. Jackass stole her stereo and 200 CD's he'd never listen to (stolen in California, music from Omaha, NE)

    40. Re:Why... by notamisfit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've got a theory that it's part of a more complicated matter, which I currently title "Punishments Get Harsher When People Don't Fucking Listen". Same mentality behind SarbOx, Three Strikes, draconian DUI penalties, all the pushups I did in boot camp, etc.

      --
      Jesus is coming -- look busy!
    41. Re:Why... by notamisfit · · Score: 1

      Ford doesn't hold 90+% of the automobile market.

      --
      Jesus is coming -- look busy!
    42. Re:Why... by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      >> just has to follow the very simple rules in order to get the easy version of punishment.

      Any rule that the government FORCES you to comply with HAS to be accessible TO ANYONE. Equal right you know. If they can offer him something to ease his sentence IT should NOT imply ANY unreasonable* financial burden, unless it's a tax or some other official government money collecting scheme. And as far as I know buying MS license is NOT a TAX.

      And Windows license price IS unreasonable.

    43. Re:Why... by Torvaun · · Score: 1

      What if they made the drunk driver rent the ignition interlock? If he doesn't want to, he's free to not drive. Windows may be pricey, but it's not quite up to buying a new car levels yet.

      --
      I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
    44. Re:Why... by geobeck · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...he uploaded before the movie was even in the theaters. That is going to annoy many people.

      So annoying many people makes a crime worse? Better hope that Gilbert Gottfried, Fran Drescher, or Simon Cowell never get picked up for shoplifting, or they'll get the chair!

      --
      Find environmentally and socially responsible products on http://buy-right.net
    45. Re:Why... by sepluv · · Score: 2, Informative

      She still hates the fact that she didn't burn them

      But that would be "pirating" the CDs...aaaarrhh...and she could go to jail. Whereas, what was done to her was only theft of CDs, a far less serious crime (as it falls into the class of crimes with human--not corporate--victims) that the police would doubtless not even bother to record.

      Umm...actually I meant to write something funny...uhh...nevermind

      --
      Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
      [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
    46. Re:Why... by bckrispi · · Score: 1

      ...it is definitely less than what a murderer would serve.
      You would think so...
      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    47. Re:Why... by sepluv · · Score: 1

      because music/movie stealing was SOOO much worse for the economy. Leaving aside the fact that the concept of anything being good or bad for the economy is a vague nonsense and what you really mean is "possibly worse for the bank balance of your local **AA corporate protection racket", I think you'll find that music/movie stealing is actually good for the **AA, because (since backing up your CDs and DVDs now makes you a criminal) you have to go out and buy new CDs and DVDs from them when they get stolen.
      --
      Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
      [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
    48. Re:Why... by ageoffri · · Score: 1

      Why shouldn't they be allowed to do this? Doesn't matter if you think what he did was a crime or not. He plead guilty and placed himself at the mercy of the court. Now his crime is Internet related so it is reasonable that he be monitored. I for one would rather that the money not be spent to develop a monitoring tool for an extremely minor OS and require that the people use Windows in cases like this.

      --
      -- Slashdot, making the Left look conservative since 1997.
    49. Re:Why... by damiam · · Score: 1

      Tracking software doesn't just recompile cleanly across OSs. They'd almost certainly have to rewrite the whole thing, costing taxpayers tens of thousands of dollars.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    50. Re:Why... by sepluv · · Score: 1

      Windows may be pricey, but it's not quite up to buying a new car levels yet. In Europe, the MSW Vista Ultimate RRP is 599 (US$808). I'm sure you could get a second hand car for that. FTR, the cheapest edition is 259 (US$349).
      --
      Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
      [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
    51. Re:Why... by NotWorkSafe · · Score: 1

      Here in New Mexico they do make you rent the interlock, from what I understand. I guess there's a monthly fee for reading the info off of it as well. But no one is forced to buy it. If they don't want to, then they don't have to drive.

      --
      There is no theory of evolution. Just a list of animals Chuck Norris allows to live.
    52. Re:Why... by Assoupis · · Score: 1

      Fuck ! The guy shared some crappy movie which the creation is already paid ! It's not even loss of profit: it's probable loss of profit. No one deserve more than an 100$ fine for that, just to prevent most people from doing so all the time. Don't even think about jail time ! It's a minor offense !

    53. Re:Why... by lowe0 · · Score: 1

      The ability to comply is well within his reach... it's called the power button. Not only does it meet the government's requirements, it's absolutely free!

      Besides, why should I have to pay via my tax dollars for the development of Linux tracking software so that he can use whatever he wants?

    54. Re:Why... by Entropius · · Score: 1

      That's still different than forcing someone to patronize a specific company.

    55. Re:Why... by euxneks · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Take it in context...

      Yes, take it in context, he pirated a bunch of movies - clearly not something that should be jailtime. At most maybe a steep fine, but jailtime is to keep the freakazoids out of society until we can get them (hopefully) rehabilitated to work properly in said society - it shouldn't really be looked at as punishment.
       
      Frankly, I don't believe punishing a wrong works all that well -- you have to psychologically change the person to prevent them from doing it again. Of course, my opinion is my own, largely untrained, based upon a relatively quick judgement =P

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
    56. Re:Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But that would be "pirating" the CDs...aaaarrhh...and she could go to jail. No one had ever gone to jail for making backups of their cds. Ever. When you make copies and start distributing them is when you get in trouble.
    57. Re:Why... by jombeewoof · · Score: 1

      ... and they are telling him that he has to make a specific purchase to do so.

      Telling a drunk driver that he must drive with an ignition interlock is one thing. Telling him that he must install it on a Ford is another. You are incorrect. When an interlock is installed, it is not the government who pays for it. It is the criminal. By making him pay for the software or hardware in the case of the ignition interlock that means that I don't have too. (I being the $200+ in taxes I pay every week)

      This is a standard punishment for internet type crimes, and is certainly no big deal. I've known a few people who have agreed to this type of monitoring to escape prison time, and they certainly didn't think it was either cruel or unusual. They realized that they had fucked up, and this was the consequence.
      The fact that there is no linux version is also not that big a deal. 98% of computers in use are windows. It stands to reason that 90% or more of computer crimes are conducted on windows machines. There is no market for a linux version (until now), and to create a linux port for this case would cause unnecessary financial hardship on the part of either the defendant or the state. (someone has to pay for the coding, and it certainly cannot be free "as in speech" this kind of app you would want to be closed source, and the gov't doesn't do anything for free "as in beer")
      Forcing him to either
      A. not use a computer (not a bad idea for some cyber-crime but this might be excessive for this particular case)
      B. purchase the software, and also the foundation that the software runs on. (cpu/ram upgrade, OS upgrade etc...)

      constitutes neither cruel or unusual punishment no matter what your opinions about Windows would be.
      --
      Linux Zealots: Smarter than Mac Zealots, but still zealots.
    58. Re:Why... by jombeewoof · · Score: 1

      Windows may be pricey, but it's not quite up to buying a new car levels yet. In Europe, the MSW Vista Ultimate RRP is 599 (US$808). I'm sure you could get a second hand car for that. FTR, the cheapest edition is 259 (US$349). Even the cheapest version is more than I've spent on my last 4 cars. (I'm cheap)
      --
      Linux Zealots: Smarter than Mac Zealots, but still zealots.
    59. Re:Why... by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      it is unlikely to be difficult or detectable.

      If they also monitor his Internet connection, and see TCP connections happening that aren't being accounted for by the monitoring software, they might investigate.

    60. Re:Why... by westlake · · Score: 1
      You could also argue that it's completely overboard punishment. What's your point?

      The point is that he accepted a plea bargain rather than risk a conviction on charges that could have put him away for five years.

    61. Re:Why... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      No, it's more like saying: You need to sell your Toyota and buy a Kia to drive, after all, you don't HAVE to drive. You will also need to stop using whatever shampoo you are using, and only use Head and Shoulders. After all, you don't HAVE to wash your hair. You are also going to be able to only where Nike shoes. After all, you don't HAVE to wear shoes. The government should not be mandating the purchase of a single vendors products when there alternative choices. Especially when the alternatives are free.

    62. Re:Why... by db32 · · Score: 1

      I think you may misunderstand me, or maybe just adding to my point, but that wasn't my argument. Your browser may have parsed incorrectly for you. It was one of those racketeering bastard's spokesman that made the claim the police should stop going after real criminals and instead chase down movie downloaders because they are stealing more "money" than is being stolen from banks. Even to someone who flunked out of economics class the lie here should be painfully obvious that a download is not the same as sale. Tons of people will want a good regardless how craptastic it is when its price approaches 0, but as the craptastic CD or DVD approaches $20 not as many people want it, so to take the numbers of people getting the good at $0 and claim that they all would purchase the same good at $20 is fucking stupid at best, lying sacks of shit at worse, and anyone that falls for that line needs to at least attend the first few weeks of a basic Microeconomics course to understand how moronic the argument is.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    63. Re:Why... by DJCacophony · · Score: 1

      In America, Vista Ultimate is US$399, and the cheapest version of Vista is US$199. I think we can all agree that it doesn't matter what the Europe pricing is, because the story isn't about any European countries, it's about the USA.
      Of course, that's assuming that he is required to use Vista, which I seriously doubt. In fact, judging from experience, the group that makes the monitoring software probably doesn't have a Vista-compatible version out anyways.
      For what it's worth, XP is $89.

      --
      Slow Down, Cowboy! It's been 60 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment.
    64. Re:Why... by DJCacophony · · Score: 1

      That's not a loophole, that's the court-ordered choice he gets. Go to prison or have your computer monitored or don't use a computer.

      --
      Slow Down, Cowboy! It's been 60 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment.
    65. Re:Why... by DJCacophony · · Score: 1

      What would they do about encrypted traffic, then?

      --
      Slow Down, Cowboy! It's been 60 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment.
    66. Re:Why... by Maxx169 · · Score: 1
      I've had many CDs stolen from my car before and have lost almost 100 original, paid for by a poor student, CDs. I cannot afford to replace them, my collection was built up over the course of 7 or 8 years and the police can't/wont do squat. What I'd like to know, is:

      because I have purchased the CDs before, am I allowed to jump onto Bittorrent/'P2P network of choice' and download my music back??

      I'd assume that the legality of this would be decided by whether, when I purchased the CDs, I had purchased a license to the music, or if I had purchased a product (that I was free to do with as I wanted).

      Personally - because I still have all the covers of my original CDs, I believe that I could make a strong case for reclaiming what I had purchased, but I think that it is a murky legal area.

    67. Re:Why... by mistahkurtz · · Score: 1

      first slippery slope warning, second, if they're going to go that far, why not just grab every packet in and out at the ISP? Then, there's no cost for the local/state/federal government besides the time and resources it takes to request and carry out a warrant..... oh, wait.... so no cost at all then. see, forcing the ISP to hand over all of the information as it happens would be a far more cost-effective solution for you and me and the powers that be.

      --
      not only is time travel possible, it's irrelevant.
    68. Re:Why... by azenpunk · · Score: 1

      he could then get a wifi card and hijack a neighbors signal and that would not be monitored. it's a deserved punishment, his convenience should not be a consideration. although i'd prefer microsoft not be given such preferential treatment.

    69. Re:Why... by kylehase · · Score: 1

      If he goes back can he use Ubuntu in the slammer?
      (use windows || slammer)

      --
      You want fun, go home and buy a monkey!
    70. Re:Why... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Step back a bit and consider the larger picture - the taxpayers are paying for expensive legal and corrective action in what really should be a civil matter between the copyright holder and the offender. Should a slice of the expense of locking up a guy who downloaded a movie really come out of your pocket when governments are crying poor, making cuts where they shouldn't be, and ignoring the blatant tax evasion of some of the major copyright holders? A big fine is cheaper all around than locking somebody up if you want governments to help out the copyright holders. House arrest - as in this case, is a lot cheaper but still a criminal solution for a civil problem. Remember that one of the reasons the USA split with England was due to the policy of locking up and transporting people for trivial offences instead of just those that can do damage to society and the people that make it up. We are making the same stupid mistakes under the third President named George as under the third King called George - but at least there are many that learned from this and impose different sentences instead of filling the jails with jaywalkers.

    71. Re:Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      could he not just run the ubuntu box and say he wasn't using a computer? they could corroberate this by seeing they had nothing in their logs showing that he hasn't been using a computer (windows)

    72. Re:Why... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Copyright infringement should never be a crime since it is not covered under force or fraud. No one is forced into giving him the movie. No one is defrauded in his attainment of it for uploading. Therefore, it's not a *real* crime, if we accept the two conditions (force and fraud) as the only valid determinants. (Hint: they're the only valid determinants, even in this age of 'pragmatism' and social proof.)

    73. Re:Why... by Tom · · Score: 1

      First comment I've read who actually mentions what the problem with this is.

      It's a software solution. Hello? Anyone at home in the government? They do have technical advisors (even if the other 99% don't know the difference between email and websites). They should realize that software is never tamper-proof. Software isn't even tamper-resistant. And for someone who knows what he's doing, it's quite possible to make it appear that the software is running and working properly when in fact it is neither. Or to selectively disable it ("hey, monitor my /. reading for all I care. But this other browser window, where I'm posting to my pirate friends' board is invisible to you").

      Unfortunately, a box at the network level isn't the solution, either. It can't tell the content of encrypted communications. And no, the IPs are worthless as well, it's easy to set up an ssh server somewhere with forwarding.

      Neither is a keystroke logger the holy grail. My Mac has fairly good speech recognition, I'm sure there is something useable for windos at well, or if all else fails then cut&paste with the mouse will also (slowly) get you there.

      Fact is: There's no easy solution. So software is probably as good as anyone, with a credible threat that if he's caught messing around with it, he'll be very sorry.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    74. Re:Why... by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Your money or your life!
      Sure, the choice is yours.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    75. Re:Why... by Fire+Dragon · · Score: 1

      wouldn't the enforcement folks be better off making him use a router
      First of all, there is the cost of router that needs to be build. Copying a software to as many computers that are moniteter currently doesn't cost anything.

      Router for what kind of internet connection? Modem, cable, ADSL, HomePNA, WLAN... Goverment would have to have a lot of different boxes to keep everybody with same sentence supplied.

    76. Re:Why... by sepluv · · Score: 1

      In case you need it spelled out for you, I, increasingly often mistakenly, assume when people (like you) talk about someone stealing their books/CDs, they are referring to the crime of theft not unauthorised copying.

      I understand totally that you were arguing against the **AA. You were also destroying your own argument by implicitly going along with their economic theory and supporting the idea theft and unauthorised copying are exactly the same thing. At risk of stating the obvious, you can't adequately explain what is wrong with the **AA's perspective by following their warped view of reality which is why they try to brainwash people with their warped view of reality in the first place.

      I am not supporting unauthorised copying BTW. I just campaign to get copyright law drastically relaxed (not removed) and don't listen to music from record companies...period...only stuff that is in the public domain, under a free license or sold to me by the artist in person.

      --
      Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
      [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
    77. Re:Why... by sepluv · · Score: 1
      I'm sure you are right. I was being a bit funny in the OP.

      However, to address your point, the record companies have been known to threaten people with jail for just making a copy of their own CD for backup purposes or to personally use with another playback device. And in some jurisdictions it is possible (although unlikely) that you might go to jail for this, and in many more there is no statute specifically allowing backup copies although you might be able to argue a fair use defence. Therefore, some scared people (especially those who need to be seen to not be breaking the law because of their position) don't make copies, so, when their CD gets scratched, they buy a new one from the store, and they buy the same music multiple times on tape, CD, MP3, &c.

      --
      Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
      [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
    78. Re:Why... by db32 · · Score: 1

      You are obviously not following. I did not call it stealing. EVER. I typed the word stealing because that is what their jackass spokesman calls it. I then go on about why their economic claims are so stupid because IT IS NOT STEALING. Though I did not actually use the word stealing because it IS NOT STEALING. I explained that their claims of lost sales (what they call stealing) is bogus because supply/demand shows that at the higher price fewer people will want the product, and the demand for the product changes at different price levels. Unauthorized copying is certainly more accurate in its description, but we already have "copyright violation" to describe it and we need to stop inventing new terms because thats how these fools get away with calling it stealing (their fault, cuz it sounds worse), or pirating (our fault, cuz it sounds cooler), or whatever.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    79. Re:Why... by sepluv · · Score: 1
      Right. I genuinely thought you generally used the term "stealing" for it yourself. Looking back, I see now you said that was what the "asshole" (I assume you're talking about a prosecution lawyer in the case) was "talking about...". Probably best to use quotes (at the very least around the word "stealing") so this is clear, or use "said that..." (which is kinda of like pseudo-quoting) not "talking about" if that is what you mean.

      Unauthorized copying is certainly more accurate in its description, but we already have "copyright violation" to describe it and we need to stop inventing new terms I was under the impression that it had been called "unauthorised copying" for quite a long time. I don't think there is anything wrong with having synonyms, but I don't see these two terms as having exactly the same semantics, anyway. "Unauthorised copying" describes the act itself (and is easier for those who don't know about the law to understand). Whereas, "copyright violation" describes the offence they commit in some jurisdictions by doing that act.
      --
      Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
      [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
    80. Re:Why... by griffjon · · Score: 1

      I'd even take it a step further; though I may not entirely agree with the punishment fitting the crime; but in a general case of person accused of computer/IT related crime on probation and still allowed to use a computer (as opposed to getting the Mitnick treatment) - require them to use a non-alterable kiosk type system. They can PortableApps some software on a flash drive; but overall it's a locked down system allowing them to practice their legal trade while restricting their ability to do (and tracking any instance of) further crime. Add a locked tower with chasis-open detection; locked bios with no flash/CD/etc. booting, and a few unscheduled visits (via VNC/RemoteDesktop/SSH/etc.) to the system to check for naughtiness, and you have a reasonably (key word) way to ensure probation compliance. Sure, a dedicated hacker (in both the original and the criminal senses of the word) could get around it, but it'd be hard to not leave any evidence; which would pretty blatantly be violating your probation.

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    81. Re:Why... by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

      No human contact, in the cell 23 hours a day, no tv, no computer...


      Sounds like the perfect vacation destination to me.

      (Anyone who's spent two weeks in a car with their family - really needing a vacation from their 'vacation' will understand where I am coming from.)
      --

      Lodragan Draoidh
      The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
    82. Re:Why... by a.d.trick · · Score: 1

      "We'll let you out of jail early on certain conditions, such as not committing a crim for the next 3 years."
      And after 3 years, your free to commit as much crime as you want?!
    83. Re:Why... by 3choTh1s · · Score: 1

      While this would probably be a better solution what would happen if say, oh I don't know, he just piggybacks on a neighbors wifi... Not that I do that... just saying.

    84. Re:Why... by provigilman · · Score: 1
      --
      "Life's short and hard, like a body building elf." -- The Bloodhound Gang
    85. Re:Why... by houghi · · Score: 1

      Sure that is easy. Then he can just put up ssh wherever and then tunnel through there. They are not interested in who he connects to. They are interested in what exactly he does.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    86. Re:Why... by db32 · · Score: 1

      I didn't quote it because I couldn't remember what he actually said specifically. He was some PR jackass type, and I imagine even a lawyers tongue would erupt in flame with such a moronic statement. PR/Marketing people seem to be the only class of people that are capable of saying such nonsense without their tongues catching fire or their heads exploding. (Politicians are a special subset of PR so they qualify too).

      As far as Unauthorized copying, it certainly is a much more accurate description. My only concern would be that using synonyms or words that are just a hair apart (act vs offense) in a rather complex legal problem is only going to buy lawyers room to tapdance and bamboozle. Force the lawyers to describe things in a simple and common way and take away the bamboozle factor. Copyright is the right to copy, he copied without the right and thus violated the copyright. Copyleft is a cute and clever term, but only serves to muddy the meaning of copyright leaving more room for bamboozling.

      When the laws are so complex that the common man cannot hope to defend himself or exercise his rights we have a failure of liberty and a dependance on a certain special class of people.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    87. Re:Why... by SerpentMage · · Score: 1

      Have you even bothered to read the article?

      >> But on the stand, Mary Winkler described a hellish 10-year marriage during which, she said, her husband struck her, screamed at her, criticized her and blamed her when things went wrong. She said he made her watch pornography and wear "slutty" costumes for sex, and that he forced her to submit to sex acts that made her uncomfortable.

      I think more does not need to be said. This was a case of abuse and mental problems.

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    88. Re:Why... by bckrispi · · Score: 1
      Yes, I did read the article, as well as many of the court transcripts. The "Slutty" costume he wanted her to wear consisted of a wig and some high heels. Now, her family history coupled with her assertion that she didn't intend to pull the trigger was found to be a cause for leniency: the jury found her guilty of Manslaughter and not Murder. Had this been a "justifiable" homicide (e.g. Battered Wife Syndrome), she would have been acquitted!

      Bottom line, someone died in the commission of a Felony. The guilty party walks free after five months. That sir, SUCKS!

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    89. Re:Why... by a.d.trick · · Score: 1

      I don't understand. Regardless of parole it's still illegal to commit a crime, is it not?

    90. Re:Why... by iq+in+binary · · Score: 1

      The crime for which he is punished is copying a movie.

      Yeah.

      The day I'm staring down jail time for personal use of movies or music, the day I become an educated fugitive and probably the subject of a nationwide manhunt for the death of many people. Note the use of the word personal. Were I in business selling pirated DVDs, my stance wouldn't be so harsh.

      Law does not make the oppression of people right. Law is not what you're bound to according to what is right and just; it CAN be corrupt.

      Keep this in mind, should you find yourself the subject of prosecution for something you honestly don't think is wrong. You are the arbiter of your rights, noone else. When they're being violated, you can be complacent like this guy or you can be a man and stand up for them.

      This country was founded on the principle of freedom and liberty, of which none exists in this case.

      'Tis a sad state of affairs that people aren't willing to fight for their rights anymore.

      Ralph Waldo Emerson:

      "Be as beneficent as the sun or the sea, but if your rights as a rational being are trenched on, die on the first inch of your territory."

      --
      Of all the Universal Constants, here's one I know: Nice guys finish last ;)
  3. Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by mark-t · · Score: 1

    [NT]

    1. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't do the crime if you can't do the time.

      Sure, but he's done the jail time, and he's not complaining about the probation term at all.

      Just because someone has committed a crime does not mean that the government gets to impose arbitrary terms on them without an explicit court ruling. It especially doesn't mean that the government should be mandating specific non-optimal technical choices that interfere the livelyhood of an expert in a technical field.

      Mandating Windows to a computer expert so they can be tracked for piracy is like mandating a Chrysler mini-van to a farmer because he beat his wife. Sure, you can carry produce to market in a mini-van, but making the farmer buy a new Chrysler mini-van to replace his perfectly functional Toyota pickup truck is absurd.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    2. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crewel and unusual punishment?

    3. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by Bastardchyld · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually he has not completed his sentence. His sentence was 5 months jail time and 5 months probation...

      These terms are hardly arbitrary... He committed a crime with his computer and now he is going to have his computer activities monitored. This is the same as having ignition interlocks on automobiles in response to a DUI. When you are a "ward of the state" which you are while you are under probation, you do not have freedom, at that point you have actually had your freedom revoked. Probation is a tool for measuring your ability to fit back into society...

      By the way, they did not "mandate" he use Windows, they simply said that his internet access must be monitored... Currently they only have the monitoring software for Windows, so therefore if he wants internet access he must suck it up and buy windows if he does not already have it... He has a choice, buy Windows or wait 5 months and use whatever he wants.

      No pity here.

      --
      $diff terrorists hippies
      $
      $rm -rf *terrorists *hippies
    4. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by SerpentMage · · Score: 1

      I think this is a bit of apples and oranges comparison.

      I would sooner say, "This guy is a motorcycle driver and the monitoring device is only available for cars." So his choice is to not drive for 5 months or get himself a car.

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    5. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by mark-t · · Score: 1

      These terms are hardly arbitrary... He committed a crime with his computer and now he is going to have his computer activities monitored. This is the same as having ignition interlocks on automobiles in response to a DUI.

      As I'm sure you will receive at least 2 or three other followup posts to point out, the big difference there is that driving under the influence of alchohol endangers lives, where copyright infringement does not.

      Of course, I agree with you in principle... committing a crime related to [X] means that you get to have your activities around [X] limited and monitored.

    6. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by JazzLad · · Score: 1

      I thought he was a pirate - "buy Windows"?

      I'll say it since no one else has, Ubuntu live CDs seem the way to go.

      / shoot, do you go for +1 funny for the pirate bit or +1 insightful for the live CD. Heck, go -1 overrated for my using the Karma Bonus :)

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    7. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      I would sooner say, "This guy is a motorcycle driver and the monitoring device is only available for cars." So his choice is to not drive for 5 months or get himself a car.

      That would be appropriate only if he were a professional motorcycle courier who's job frequently require he drive places not easily accessible by car. It's entirely likely that his OS choice has a non-trivial impact on the effectiveness of his use of the computer for work.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    8. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      Actually he has not completed his sentence. His sentence was 5 months jail time and 5 months probation...

      Which fits completely with what I said.

      These terms are hardly arbitrary... He committed a crime with his computer and now he is going to have his computer activities monitored.

      That's great. If that were the terms, then it wouldn't be terribly arbitrary. Mandating operating system *is* an arbitrary term (regardless of their excuse), and as such it has no place as a probation requirement without the explicit consent of a judge.

      By the way, they did not "mandate" he use Windows, they simply said that his internet access must be monitored...

      And it's their responsibility to actually accomplish that monitoring. They wouldn't install security cameras in one Pizza Hut and then require that he buy every meal there so he can be monitored. This is no different from that.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    9. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by Bastardchyld · · Score: 1

      The illegality of a certain action is not determined by the endangerment of lives. Certain actions are illegal simply because they are illegal, not necessarily because they are morally wrong or they can harm another. Some laws are grounded in reality while others are just on the books... If they are on the books they should be enforced. 10 months is fair for the crime committed whether is was morally justifiable or not.

      --
      $diff terrorists hippies
      $
      $rm -rf *terrorists *hippies
    10. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by Bastardchyld · · Score: 1

      I thought he was a pirate - "buy Windows"?
      That is his choice. He stated that he is unemployable anyways, so why would he "need" internet access at all? He could just as easily forgoe internet until he found himself in a more "employable" state. What did he expect when he pled guilty. If he thought he was innocent then he should have fought it in court.

      I'll say it since no one else has, Ubuntu live CDs seem the way to go.
      That is also his choice. However that would most definitely be a violation of his parole, so he better be ready to deal with the consequences if/when he is caught. I don't want to see some inflammed /. post about the poor convicted felon who has to go back to jail because he violated his probation because the terms were not very fun...
      --
      $diff terrorists hippies
      $
      $rm -rf *terrorists *hippies
    11. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by JazzLad · · Score: 1

      In theory a live disk would be untraceable, although in retrospect, Puppy Linux would be a better option as they can update if using an RW (can any other distros do this?).

      The bit about buying Windows was a joke. See, he's a convicted pirate. And we're talking about buying software. Pirates have a tendency to not purchase software. So the joke implied that he would not actually purchase said Windows, but actually pirate it instead. Yes, pirating the software would likely violate his parole, that is why it was a joke (even my original post alluded as much).

      Sheesh :)

      --
      "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear." - Every fascist, ever
    12. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by gr3kgr33n · · Score: 1

      This is the same as having ignition interlocks on automobiles in response to a DUI The ignition interlocks do not require you to replace your car with a supported model. They do not require you to replace your car's control computer with a model supported by the interlocks. They are installed and paid for by the enforcing body and there are many different certified brands and types. Farmers are not required to install them on their tractors either but those are allowed on the roads. Exceptions are made depending on the circumstances.

      If you are sent to prison, internet access is supplied by the state. Computers are supplied by the state. Operating Systems are supplied by the state. Electricity, water, A/C, and food are supplied by the state.

      If they force him to use a particular OS, the OS and quite possibly the computer should be supplied by the state for the duration of the sentence. It might be the go cart of computers running windows ME, outdated and thrown out of a judges office after 6 years of service with 3 inches of dust, but it still should be supplied by the state.

      On another note, this type of monitoring should be a network device, not a piece of software.
      --
      My backup chemistry thesis stored on Data Storing Bacteria mutated; granting me a degree in forensic anthropology. v4sw7
    13. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by nxtw · · Score: 1

      This is the same as having ignition interlocks on automobiles in response to a DUI.
      ...more like ignition interlocks that are only compatible with Ford or GM cars made within the last 5 years.
    14. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by Toasty16 · · Score: 1

      Reading your comment and trying to understand the analogy is like tying my head to a stop sign and waiting for the wind to stop blowing...???

    15. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by Bastardchyld · · Score: 1

      The ignition interlocks do not require you to replace your car with a supported model. They do not require you to replace your car's control computer with a model supported by the interlocks. They are installed and paid for by the enforcing body and there are many different certified brands and types. Farmers are not required to install them on their tractors either but those are allowed on the roads. Exceptions are made depending on the circumstances. So perhaps he should be fighting to have the state furnish a copy of a supported OS, instead of bitching about the requirement.

      If you are sent to prison, internet access is supplied by the state. Computers are supplied by the state. Operating Systems are supplied by the state. Electricity, water, A/C, and food are supplied by the state. So you are suggesting he should go back? I am OK with that...

      If they force him to use a particular OS, the OS and quite possibly the computer should be supplied by the state for the duration of the sentence. It might be the go cart of computers running windows ME, outdated and thrown out of a judges office after 6 years of service with 3 inches of dust, but it still should be supplied by the state. I have no problem with that but if he requires that he should ask.

      On another note, this type of monitoring should be a network device, not a piece of software. I would agree with this but the state is not that technically saavy, so I doubt that it would work in application, but I would not be opposed to paying the ISP as a service to keep monitoring on the connection for the period of the probation.

      --
      $diff terrorists hippies
      $
      $rm -rf *terrorists *hippies
    16. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by Entropius · · Score: 4, Informative

      Some laws are grounded in reality while others are just on the books... If they are on the books they should be enforced.

      This is where I lose you. You think that the Alabama police should be arresting people for sodomy or (until a few years ago) marrying someone of a different race?

      There are many checks on dumb laws. The first is the intelligence of legislators. Since that often fails, we have other checks: the people can just not obey them, and if they don't, the police can choose to not enforce them, the judges can choose to not sentence for them... you might have heard of the Scopes trials?

      This power, to selectively enforce the law, is used more often than you might think.

    17. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by Entropius · · Score: 1

      but the state is not that technically savvy

      The state is technically savvy enough to implement GPS guidance in the bombs we're using, at great taxpayer expense, in Iraq.

      If we can afford the technical expertise to prosecute a useless war, the state can afford to hire somebody to load Ethereal on a router.

    18. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      Please. I read TFA, and there's no indication in it that using Linux is critical to his work. There really seems to be nothing interfering with his livelihood here. As so many others have said, if he doesn't like Windows, tough. He broke the law. This is much more lenient than the alternatives (no computer at all, time in prison), and it's not like Windows is some horrible disease which will kill him from a few months' exposure. Hell, it's not even that expensive (which is where the car analogy fails: buying a new car is extremely expensive, buying a new OS is not).

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    19. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by zcsteele · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mandating Windows to a computer expert so they can be tracked for piracy is like mandating a Chrysler mini-van to a farmer because he beat his wife. Sure, you can carry produce to market in a mini-van, but making the farmer buy a new Chrysler mini-van to replace his perfectly functional Toyota pickup truck is absurd.

      You have two giraffes. The government requires you to take harmonica lessons.
      --
      ...brand new, all over again.
    20. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Mandating operating system *is* an arbitrary term (regardless of their excuse) It really isn't. They don't have monitoring software, except on Windows, so he uses Windows. That's not arbitrary at all, that's merely a necessary consequence of the tools they have available. I'm glad they're making him use Windows, too, because I'd rather not have my tax dollars wasted on development of new ones just so criminals don't have to use an OS they don't like.
      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    21. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the big difference there is that driving under the influence of alchohol endangers lives, where copyright infringement does not.

      Do you believe that there exist any legitimate non-violent crimes? Surely there is some non-violent way that I can totally fuck you over, where you would argue that a crime did occur, even though your life was not endangered. How about I break into your house, steal your computer, paint graffiti on your walls, rape your hamsters, etc?

      If you have decided that there is such thing as a nonviolent crime (I'm not talking about sodomy in Alabama -- I mean something legit), then I wonder where you get the idea that there is some arbitrary boundary between weirdness of sentences for violent and nonviolent crimes. If this guy had killed someone, would requiring him to run Windows be ok then?

    22. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by domatic · · Score: 1

      "Monitoring software that only runs on Windows" is an utterly stupid way to accomplish what they're trying to do. A separate physically sealed hardware proxy would be OS and protocol agnostic and less likely to be interfered with. If such software were imposed on me then what would stop me from imaging the disk and analyzing the crap at leisure? If they make a habit of this then sooner or later some blackhat is going to make it his bitch.

    23. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by Torvaun · · Score: 1

      That would be appropriate only if he were a professional motorcycle courier who's job frequently require he drive places not easily accessible by car. It's entirely likely that his OS choice has a non-trivial impact on the effectiveness of his use of the computer for work. That would be an appropriate remark if the guy happened to be employed. The effectiveness of his OS for work is irrelevant at this point. I have very wide feet. If I want to have steel-toed boots for work, I have to have them custom ordered at not insignificant expense. Given that my job does not require steel-toed boots, they cannot be expected to pay for them.

      This guy is not expecting financial loss other than the cost of buying Windows. If he doesn't want to buy Windows, then he can unplug the router for a few months. How's an unemployed guy pay for his (presumably broadband) internet connection anyway?
      --
      I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
    24. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by sepluv · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This power, to selectively enforce the law, is used more often than you might think. I'm sure everyone here is aware that it is used a lot. That doesn't itself make it a good thing and you don't seem to have presented any valid arguments why it is a good thing.

      Maybe the parent was suggesting that it might be good to move towards a concept called equality before the law. If laws had to be enforced equally, the legislators would have to get rid of the plethora silly minor offences on the statute books that criminalise stuff that everyone does (including those same legislators). Then the police might have to spend their time going after real criminals as opposed to selectively enforcing such statutes against people they don't like the look of. I can see how that would be a terrifying dystopia..uhhh...wait

      --
      Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
      [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
    25. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by Bongo+Bill · · Score: 1

      The police should uphold the law as it is now. That's what they're there for, and that's why the law exists. If the law is a bad law, then it is the duty of the electorate to change it - not for the police to take the law into their own hands.

      --
      ...but is it art?
    26. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by Jherico · · Score: 1

      This power, to selectively enforce the law, is used more often than you might think.
      Yes, often to do things like disenfranchise voters and enable racism. Like enforcing certain laws only against poor/black people and not against right/white people. I think the grand parent's assertion that laws should be enforced uniformly if they're on the books is so that there will be backlash against unjust and unfair laws and they'll be taken off the books, or struck down as unconstitutional.

      Alabama's sodomy law is in fact invalidated by Lawrence vs. Texas. There are probably many other similar laws that wouldn't pass constitutional muster, but until they are tested, they stay on the books and can be held over the head of anyone, or more likely held over the head of people you don't like selectively.

      --

      Jherico

      What can the average user can do to ensure his security? "Nothing, you're screwed"

    27. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by DJCacophony · · Score: 1

      In case you weren't already aware, violent drunk drivers who injure or kill people don't get alcohol interlocks, they go to jail for a decade and then usually won't get to drive again for a long time. So the analogy of nonviolent drunk driving to nonviolent copyright infringement is actually more accurate than you wish it was.

      --
      Slow Down, Cowboy! It's been 60 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment.
    28. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      They don't have monitoring software, except on Windows, so he uses Windows. That's not arbitrary at all, that's merely a necessary consequence of the tools they have available.

      That'd be great if operating systems were arbitrarily interchangeable. They're not - unless you want to prove me wrong by switching to OS/2 Warp for all your computing needs for the next 5 months.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    29. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      You're assuming he's has no marketable computer skills that are even slightly OS dependent. That's a pretty big assumption. I know that if I found myself unemployed I could make pretty damn good money doing contract programming, and that being forced to use Windows on my desktop would significantly damage that opportunity.

      If computer operating systems were really arbitrarily interchangeable, then everyone would be using Linux right now because Windows would be obviously not worth the $100 in comparison.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    30. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      No, they're not, but that wasn't my point. My point was that the decision to make him switch to Windows was NOT arbitrary. If it's such a problem for this guy, then he shouldn't break the law, thus necessitating the tracking of his computer usage. Simple as that. If he doesn't break the law in the future, it won't be an issue for him, and he can use his OS of choice forever.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    31. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      If it's such a problem for this guy, then he shouldn't break the law, thus necessitating the tracking of his computer usage.

      That's not a valid argument, because you could use it to support any arbitrary requirement. They could require him to have sex with a horse on national television and that argument would still work just as well.

      In this particular case, requiring that a parolee replace all his software just to enable the use of a specific piece of monitoring software is an unreasonable requirement - unless you can personally demonstrate that either 1.) he doesn't use his computer to any non-trivial extent or 2.) Windows can easily be used as a functional replacement for Linux.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    32. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1
      I disagree (obviously), it's a very valid argument. I'm not making the argument that any punishment meted out by the law is just, I claim that this punishment is just (he pirated, they're trying to make sure he doesn't pirate again, at least while he's on parole), and that if he doesn't like receiving a just punishment, he shouldn't have broken the law. It's hardly a universal argument.

      At any rate, whether the parolee uses his computer to a non-trivial extent, or whether he can accomplish the same tasks under Windows as under Linux, is irrelevant to this case. This man is (reasonably) being prevented (as far as the law can guarantee) from pirating while he's on parole. They have a tool for this purpose, and it requires Windows. To develop a new tool would cost taxpayer money, which is unreasonable--why should the majority pay for one man's convenience?

      Not to mention, it's highly unlikely that any application which is productive, and necessary for this man's livelihood (ie, not games) won't have an analogue under Windows. You keep saying that this is arbitrary, and unreasonable--yet the fact remains that this parole is more lenient, and less disruptive to this man's life, than being in prison. No one complains when we put criminals in prison (unless it's done unjustly), how is this any different? It's still punishment, he isn't a free man yet (he's confined to his house, isn't he? That's far more restrictive than ANYTHING they do to his computer). If this were a restriction placed once he was supposedly a free man, THAT would be unreasonable. Until then, this restriction is perfectly allowable.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    33. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because the electoral system is really good at refining individual laws.

    34. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by howlingmadhowie · · Score: 1

      more importantly, it means the the DOJ or whoever it is (have read TFA, have also forgotten it), doesn't have the capability of monitoring linux boxes (wtf?). this seems like an excellent selling point for linux.

    35. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by bentcd · · Score: 1

      "Monitoring software that only runs on Windows" is an utterly stupid way to accomplish what they're trying to do. A separate physically sealed hardware proxy would be OS and protocol agnostic and less likely to be interfered with. A separate piece of hardware would represent an expense for the govt and so would be unlikely to have been offered in the first place. What they're basically saying is that if the pirate coughs up the cash for the appropriate OS, the govt will install its software on that machine and he can get off with less severe punishment than what would otherwise have been the case. As this represents no financial outlay for the govt, it is easy for them to make this offer - it would not have been had they needed to spend any money on it.
      --
      sigs are hazardous to your health
    36. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by domatic · · Score: 1

      I didn't say that it wasn't inexpensive. I said it was stupid. They'll impose this software on someone with some savvy and then an army of blackhats will either work on defanging it or customizing it for their own purposes. Incidentally, I doubt this software is public domain or open source. That means they pay to license it. A hardware proxy that phones home needs be no more expensive than a little Linksys router. Indeed, such a router could be customized for this application. The costs for such a device aren't dissimilar to what they have to pay paying for this software.

    37. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mandating Windows to a computer expert so they can be tracked for piracy is like mandating a Chrysler mini-van to a farmer because he beat his wife. I'm not sure which of those two scenarios better describes my perception of hell....
    38. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Polar bears don't mate with Chimpanzees.

    39. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by Bongo+Bill · · Score: 1

      You want to suggest that it would be preferable to give individual law enforcement officers authority to determine what is or is not against the law?

      --
      ...but is it art?
    40. Re:Don't do the crime if you can't do the time. by Kerto · · Score: 1

      This is like a convicted drink driver who as terms of their sentence must have a breathalizer device attached to the ignition of their car before they can start it up. Except the government's breath-alizer only works for Fords and if u don't own a ford u have to buy one if u wish to drive. It BS.

  4. VMware. . . by CrtxReavr · · Score: 1

    VMware. . . done. Done.

    -CR

    --
    "So is the BSD licence even more 'free' (than GPLv2)? Yes. Unquestionably." --Linus Torvalds (TinyURL.com/2vugzl)
    1. Re:VMware. . . by Rocko's+Modurn+Life · · Score: 1

      You miss the point.
      He would be forced to switch to Windows. That means purchasing a copy of Windows. That means money. And as for your solution, that would mean purchasing a copy of VMWare. That means more money. The guy says he has no job which means no money, especially since he has lawyers fees to payso he has less than no money. Here it is real simple: More money > Money > No money > Less than no money.
      So no, not done.

    2. Re:VMware. . . by bckrispi · · Score: 1
      No, *you* miss the point. A term of his probation was that he use a particular monitoring software should he choose to go online. He accepted this term in lieu of spending an additional 5 months in prison. He can either comply with the order; by using the mandated software, or staying off of the internet for five months. Or he can violate his probation and risk going back to jail.

      Probation means you lose certain freedoms. What's so hard to understand about this?

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
  5. Virtual machine by athloi · · Score: 1

    He can run Linux in a virtual machine, I hope. That will not only get him back to using his favorite operating system, but might get him around the government's silly monitoring so he can get back to uploading the movies you and I enjoy.

    1. Re:Virtual machine by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      People have made this comment on every single thread on this topic everywhere (Slashdot is the third site I've seen this story on), and it's still wrong and (frankly) nonsensical.

      The requirement is that they run software that can monitor his computer activities. The complication is that the software is Windows-only so it won't run on his Linux system. Your suggestion accomplishes neither party's goal: It wouldn't let them monitor his computer activity, and it wouldn't let him run Linux as the OS on his machine (he'd have to run Windows, and then screw around, and then maybe run some Linux apps in a VM while still paying for a Windows license and dealing with Windows crap).

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    2. Re:Virtual machine by twrake · · Score: 1

      This was my thought. It is likely that the monitoring software will have a problem with virtual machines as well.

      Perhaps switching to DOS will help, bet they can't monitor that either.

    3. Re:Virtual machine by highspl · · Score: 1

      His biggest complaint is that he would have to actually buy the Windows OS in order to use the internet again, and subsequently VMWare. I doubt he'll be downloading XP illegally anytime soon. Insult to injury, really....being forced to pay for something you never supported to begin with.

      --
      It puts the lotion on it's skin, or else it gets the hose again.
    4. Re:Virtual machine by everphilski · · Score: 1

      His biggest complaint is that he would have to actually buy the Windows OS in order to use the internet again

      Which is the funny part ... He's paying his lawyer how many dollars an hour to avoid paying for a Windows OS license?

    5. Re:Virtual machine by Raistlin77 · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, that's good advice. You're telling him to violate his probation. Good job.

    6. Re:Virtual machine by SerpentMage · · Score: 1

      Excuse me? Huh?

      Let's see you are serving out a sentence, and because you happen to not like a certain part of the decision you are going to prove the system wrong? You are going to show how smart you are and run Linux in a VMWare session.

      Yeah that's REALLY SMART, and shows what is wrong with society! They guy is SERVING a sentence and that means you do what the man says! Jail and sentences are a dictatorship not a democracy! If after the sentence you want to change things, so be it, get active and change things. But until then suggestions not welcome!

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
    7. Re:Virtual machine by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      I doubt he'll be downloading XP illegally anytime soon.


      Considering that the monitoring software can only function *after* he has installed XP...
    8. Re:Virtual machine by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      Not that it is the best solution (see my above post on how this shouldn't be software-based at all, but a 'black box' appliance between his router and ISP), but vmware would work just fine.

      Run windoze as the host OS, and NAT the linux guest behind the windoze interface. Done.

    9. Re:Virtual machine by CoolVC · · Score: 1

      being forced to pay for something you never supported to begin with
      I know just how he feels...I got put on house arrest and was forced to purchase a plain old analog phone line without any calling features to help them monitor me. Felt like a step back
    10. Re:Virtual machine by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      Like I said before, that plan accomplishes none of the goals of any party involved.

      The monitoring program will record no useful surveying information since it's designed to survey local network traffic (and application usage) rather than to monitor as a router / proxy. It would probably produce almost no useful information, but even if it produced some information the law enforcement people would still (rightfully) consider it to be an attempt at evading the monitoring.

      It also wouldn't provide many of the benefits of running Linux. Not only would it require him to run a copy of Windows, with all the cost, performance, and stability issues that that entails, but virtualizing an OS is simply not the same as running it on a machine directly for desktop use. Performance and hardware support would both be really bad - sure, you'll say that those things don't matter or can be worked around, and that sounds great until he tries to do something simple like run a video game he had installed or plug in his USB headseat microphone.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    11. Re:Virtual machine by flibuste · · Score: 1

      You are going to show how smart you are and run Linux in a VMWare session.

      Does the judgement says you are not allowed to? If the tracking software can't track activity on a VM, it's not the defendent job's to make it work.

      Jail and sentences are a dictatorship not a democracy!

      If you think that, you're far away from understanding the whole idea behind sentences. You should read Michel Foucault more often (someone who spent a lot of time thinking about the concept, and wrote books).

      If after the sentence you want to change things, so be it, get active and change things.

      Why wait? It is because people postpone the idea of "changing things" that nothing changes. If you wait for things to happen, it's too late. As an example, are you going to wait to be wiretapped by the FBI without any reason before protesting against wiretapping? Or wait 'till the bridge collapses to consider some maintenance on it?
      You should put more thoughts in your speech before blasting someone and use CAPS. Also, the "wait till it happens" behaviour never led anyone anywhere.

  6. Simple solution by fructose · · Score: 1

    Use VMware in Windoze. All the fun of Ubuntu while still meeting the terms of the punishment.

  7. Wow by rolfwind · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm glad my tax dollar are so hard at work protecting the poor corporations. I was worried there for a second.

    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Corporations pay taxes too, you know. Also consider that corporations actually serve people perhaps even people like you.

    2. Re:Wow by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Corporations pay taxes too and get tax returns, you know. Also consider that people actually serve corporations perhaps even corporations like the RIAA.
      There, fixed it for you.
      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    3. Re:Wow by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      You're both wrong, corporations don't pay any taxes, that's just what social liberals want you to think. Those tax bill costs are passed directly to regular people everywhere in the form of:

      (a) Fewer jobs
      (b) Lower paying jobs
      (c) Less profits to shareholders (your grandma is a shareholder if she has any stock)
      (d) Higher costs on goods and services

      Think about that the next time you want corporations to "pay more taxes."

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    4. Re:Wow by notamisfit · · Score: 1

      Ironically enough, I don't pay any taxes either. I just pass the costs onto the corporations by buying less stuff. Seriously, there should be a law preventing economic activity from being all interconnected and stuff.

      --
      Jesus is coming -- look busy!
    5. Re:Wow by coryking · · Score: 1

      And I'm glad my taxdollars aren't paying to port the software to every asshat's pet OS on the planet. Contrary to "free as in freedom" or whatever, it costs real cash money to port the software. That cash comes from my wallet.

      You want a convict to use your pet OS so bad, why dont you port it for us?

    6. Re:Wow by twitter · · Score: 1

      I'm glad my taxdollars aren't paying to port the software to every asshat's pet OS on the planet.

      Let's just skip the software development alltogether, shall we? I don't pay taxes so someone can write useless and easily bypassed "monitoring" software for the least secure OS in existence. That kind of thing would be little more than a sham and corporate welfare. ISP's already have everything the judge needs and the judge should know it - that's how the victim was caught.

      --

      Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    7. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where's the evidence? Conpsiracy theory!

      I hope you didn't mean to infer that the grand parent's post wasn't a conspiracy theory. Incase you forgot, when making insane assertions the burden of evidence always lies on the one making the claims.

      That's the basic foundation of science. I guess that explains why you aren't a scientist.

    8. Re:Wow by coryking · · Score: 1

      Sweet, my very own twitter comment! I feel so special!

      Tell me good sir why it is important if the monitoring software was easy to bypass? All that needs to happen for the criminal to go back to jail is proof they bypassed it in the first place regardless of what they did on the bypassed connection.

      By the way, I've had far more Linux boxes hacked than I've had Windows boxes. In fact, in the last ten years I've had about seven breakins on linux and exactly one "break in" on windows (though I'd define it more as getting botted, not broken in). Take that as you will.

    9. Re:Wow by twitter · · Score: 1

      Tell me good sir why it is important if the monitoring software was easy to bypass? All that needs to happen for the criminal to go back to jail is proof they bypassed it

      No, you first. Tell me why we need software on this man's computer when it's so easy to monitor him at the ISP level. Your objection was that it's too expensive to develop monitoring software for gnu/linux, as if it did not already exist. I say that it's too expensive to develop the software for any platform. His conviction alone should tell you that you don't need it. It's an expensive but useless show of force.

      I don't have to justify doing nothing, you have to justify the way you would spend my money.

      --

      Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    10. Re:Wow by Fire+Dragon · · Score: 1

      No, you first. Tell me why we need software on this man's computer when it's so easy to monitor him at the ISP level.
      Why would the ISP do the monitoring for govermental survaillence? What have the ISP done wrong that they have to pay for their staff members doing the monitoring.

      Your objection was that it's too expensive to develope monitoring software for gnu/linux, as if it did not already exist.
      Why should the goverment spend money on developing systems just because somebody is given a change to have some rights under his sentance? It would cost a lot more to put people in jail than keeping them home with their survaillance software. I doubt that this person is not the only one having to install monitoring software to get out of jail, in this case it is the required operating system change that made it news(in /.)

      Sentencing somebody to use survaillance software for minor 'cyber' crimes is the easiast and cheapest way to handle these on possible future cases.
      Keep bullying on myspace -> install software for said period of time

      I say that it's too expensive to develop the software for any platform.
      Not if you convict some botnet coders to that.

      Get caught coding something minor bad stuff -> sentenced to writing software.
      Why would goverment waste resources on somebodys community sentence of some keylogger writer to keep cleaning public places when they can use their talents to create said govermental approved keyloggers

      It's an expensive but useless show of force.
      There a laws that standardize our moral consepts of what is right and wrong. I might think that it is not OK to steal, but somebody else thinks that there is nothing wrong when stealing from faceless corporations. I'd like to drive faster on streets, somebody else thinks that speeding is dangerous and therefore there are laws that restrict my freedom to drive fast.

      Sentence must fit the crime. Some sentences and their costs have to be paid by all of us by paing taxes, some come from pockets of the convicted criminal as fines. It is the judges job to find out the best way to sentence people with proper fines, community service, house arrest or jail, depending on the crime. All of those sentences have their costs. It will cost for the tax-payers to keep killers behind bars, but that is the price of having basics security.

      Cost of maintaining software and monitoring logs of hundreds(don't have any numbers) of people that have been convicted should be a lot less than paying for their housing and food in jails.

    11. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG! You're absolutely HILARIOUS!!!!!!!1111oneoneoneoneon1!!111oneoneZOMG !HilarioUOUSHILGDIOUs!!!!!pneoneone!!!!

    12. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      zOMG! You're absolutely RETARDED!!!!!!!!!!!!!11111111111111eleventy-one1!1 durrrrrrrrrrr11111!!!111fuckingidiot!111

    13. Re:Wow by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      Ironically enough, I don't pay any taxes either. I just pass the costs onto the corporations by buying less stuff.

      To not pay corporate taxes, you should also not be: (a) working for a corporation or (b) investing in corporations through stock or mutual funds.

      But based on your signature, I'm going to assume your post was just a joke. :)

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
  8. Well... by Joseph1337 · · Score: 1

    I would tell them i could use Wine or Windows on Xen... or just to stop fucking jokes

  9. Transcript from Court Case by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Funny

    United States Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle: After pleading guilty, you are hereby sentenced to confinement at your house ...
    Marc Hoaglin: No change in lifestyle there.
    Judge Carla Woehrle: ... and to serve up to 6 months jail time ...
    Marc Hoaglin: Sure, why not? I'll get a chance to lift some weights.
    Judge Carla Woehrle: ... and to install government monitoring software on your computer ...
    Marc Hoaglin: I guess that's only fair.
    Judge Carla Woehrle: ... that only runs on Windows.
    Marc Hoaglin: DO NOT WANT!!!

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Transcript from Court Case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe he can run the tracking software under WINE?

    2. Re:Transcript from Court Case by Saint+Stephen · · Score: 0, Redundant

      mod parent +1 insightful

    3. Re:Transcript from Court Case by sepluv · · Score: 1

      The judge clearly figured that by not sending him to jail he was denying him the opportunity to consort with fellow criminals. What better way to encourage him to do this than by forcing him to buy an operating system from a convicted software "pirate" and monopolist.

      --
      Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
      [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
    4. Re:Transcript from Court Case by MarsDefenseMinister · · Score: 1

      Maybe he can run Linux on vmware on top of Windows. Letter of the law.

      --
      No weapon in the arsenals of the world is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men.-Ronald Reagan
    5. Re:Transcript from Court Case by Bluesman · · Score: 1

      Why would anyone want to do that? Emacs is available for Windows, too.

      --
      If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
    6. Re:Transcript from Court Case by Annymouse+Cowherd · · Score: 1

      It probably hooks stuff, so it wouldnt work in wine.. or at least, it would be able to make sure all apps running in WINE were obeying the law.

    7. Re:Transcript from Court Case by MarsDefenseMinister · · Score: 1

      If there's one thing more annoying than a liberal, it's an emacs user.

      --
      No weapon in the arsenals of the world is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men.-Ronald Reagan
    8. Re:Transcript from Court Case by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      Damn those crazy liberals and their silly idea that the people should have personal freedoms.

      It'd be way easier if we could just burn the bill of rights and tell them what to think ... oh, and what to do, too!

      Okay, that's good now, but they're still always acting like individuals, we need to squelch that before it gets even more out of hand ... oh, I know! We can give them government-issue civilian uniforms, and government-issue civilian paychecks! Then they'll all be exactly the same, and think for themselves less!

      Yeah, less liberty is definitely what we need right now.

    9. Re:Transcript from Court Case by MarsDefenseMinister · · Score: 1

      No, less emacs is what we need right now. Damn those silly emacs users.

      But all your other ideas sound good too. Personal freedoms are something you buy. I know, because I can afford them. If you disagree, then you just aren't rich enough to know the difference. When liberals talk about extending rights, they really mean spreading money. Money is freedom in many ways, or it results from freedom. When you steal my money, you steal my freedom and trample my rights.

      As you say, the problem is that the bill of rights is not enough for liberals.

      --
      No weapon in the arsenals of the world is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men.-Ronald Reagan
    10. Re:Transcript from Court Case by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      You don't dislike liberals, you dislike big-budget federalists who like to throw money around on social programs, like welfare, that you don't benefit from.

      After all, libertarians are liberals, and they don't do any of that, right?

      It's impossible to generalize without being a dick. Take heed.

    11. Re:Transcript from Court Case by MarsDefenseMinister · · Score: 0, Troll

      I do dislike liberals. I dislike their atheism, their whinyness, their eagerness to get their hands on my money, their social programs, their hatred of the military, their celebrities, their expensive food tastes, and their unwashed hair.

      They're just not Americans in my opinion. More like French or something vaguely European.

      --
      No weapon in the arsenals of the world is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men.-Ronald Reagan
    12. Re:Transcript from Court Case by Rysc · · Score: 1

      Troll? I'll bite.

      Liberals are not necessarily atheists. Many conservatives appear, from what I can tell, to be atheists, despite their protests to the contrary. George W. Bush is a prime example. Atheistic and amoral to the core.

      As for whining... that is merely a perceptual issue. I cannot speak to that.

      The eagerness for money is not a Liberal attribute. As another poster commented, it is a federalist or big-government attribute. Unfortinately the Democratic party, which is typically considered to represent liberals, is composed of many people of this type. So, while there is a cross-section of people who are in a party known for liberals and who support this kind of behavior, it is not in any way an inherently liberal attribute.

      As with money, so with social programs. It might help if you were to indicate which social programs you find objectionable and what about them is objectionable. I am not thrilled with the amount of waste and inefficiencies I see in some social programs, and perhaps I do not always believe that large government-run programs are the best means to achieve the programs' stated ends but I am, as a liberal, completely committed to the idea of social equality. Anyone who is not also committed is, in my opinion, completely unamerican.

      Liberals in no way hate the military, though it is a common fallacy to believe so. The spectrum of opinion concerning the military is actually quite complex. There are the hawks--people who like war for some reason, whether it is for the economic effect or for less savory reasons. If you are not a hawk, must it follow that you hate the military? No. It follows only that you do not love war. I personally detest war and bemoan the sometimes necessity of it. But I do like the military; I admire it very much. When a war is in the offing and no better alternative exists I want a well-funded, well-prepared set of professionals ready to fight and win as decisively and quickly as possible. But I am not a hawk... I prefer not to seek violent conflict. I certainly want to avoid perpetual warfare. I believe in a well-funced military, but I do not believe in the insane level of funding the U.S. military currently enjoys. I believe I am a typical liberal in regards to this matter... love peace, hate war, be suspicious of hawks who tell you that war is necessary, but be prepared to fight if fighting is the best option.

      Liberal celebrities? I don't know of very many. Most celebrities are quite awful, those who claim to be conservative as well as those who claim to be liberal.

      Liberals do not necessarily have an expensive taste in food. You are confusing rich, affluent people with liberals. I personally enjoy plain fare (plainer than most); a hamburger, pasta, chili... fancy food annoys me.

      I wash my hair frequently. Most people I know of every political bent do the same. Do not confuse the styles of liberal-leaning youthful subcultures with necessary attributes of a political ideology.

      --
      I want my Cowboyneal
    13. Re:Transcript from Court Case by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      He is not an Emacs user. An Emacs user would never call that GNU editor that run on Windows Emacs, even they having the same name.

    14. Re:Transcript from Court Case by MarsDefenseMinister · · Score: 1

      Lies from the liberal media.

      --
      No weapon in the arsenals of the world is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men.-Ronald Reagan
    15. Re:Transcript from Court Case by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      You responded to him far too verbosely. I told him generalizations were ridiculous, gave an example of why his generalization was incorrect, and he responded with a ton of generalizations.

      If he isn't pulling our leg, he's literally too stupid for this conversation.

    16. Re:Transcript from Court Case by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      You don't ... get what I was saying, do you?

      You dislike liberal stereotypes and bitch about them. The definition of liberalism is actually quite broad, and as I said before, when you toss any sort of generalizations around, you're being an asshole (you know that, though, don't you?)

      It'd be like saying "I hate conservatives because they're all self-centered hipo-christian rednecks who love Nascar, McDonald's, and senseless war."

      Ron Paul is liberal, and we're talking about a man who wants to abolish the income tax. Just because he's running for the republican nomination doesn't mean he's "conservative" -- have you ever looked up the libertarian platform?

      My political ideas are more similar to classical liberalism than the perverted democratic party platform that you're so used to associating liberals with, since America is filled with idiots who never consider third party candidates.

      Also, why do you "dislike their atheism?" Out of curiosity -- I'm agnostic, and while I think atheists can sometimes be foolish, they make the same sort of ridiculous and self-righteous assumptions about the universe that judeo-christians do.

    17. Re:Transcript from Court Case by MarsDefenseMinister · · Score: 0, Troll

      If you're so smart, then why do we unsophisticated, unschooled, unthoughtful conservatives consistently beat the pants off you in elections? Sure, you're going to win this one. But check back to 1968 and your record doesn't look so good.

      No matter how many dictionary definitions you can quote, it still doesn't change the fact that you libs just want to raise taxes and give the money to welfare queens. Think hard about that one.

      --
      No weapon in the arsenals of the world is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men.-Ronald Reagan
    18. Re:Transcript from Court Case by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      If you're so smart, then why do we unsophisticated, unschooled, unthoughtful conservatives consistently beat the pants off you in elections?

      I never said you were any of that; I was satirizing you from the opposite perspective in an attempt to show how you were being shortsighted in generalizing an entire group of people.

      No matter how many dictionary definitions you can quote, it still doesn't change the fact that you libs just want to raise taxes and give the money to welfare queens.

      No, I don't want to raise the taxes. I'd rather abolish them, along with welfare, and let the free market reign supreme. That's what libertarianism is.

      Did you even bother reading the wiki on liberalism, and seeing the differences between classical and social liberalism?

    19. Re:Transcript from Court Case by MarsDefenseMinister · · Score: 1

      So then what you're saying is that in the week after a hippie takes a bath, the proper name for him is libertarian? But then for the rest of the month he's a liberal again?

      Whatever, dude. It's dawn in Hawaii and my yacht is waiting. See you back on the mainland.

      --
      No weapon in the arsenals of the world is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men.-Ronald Reagan
    20. Re:Transcript from Court Case by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      No, I didn't mention anything about bathing.

      Libertarians aren't hippies at all. They're liberals who want to abolish welfare, amongst other economic reforms.

      I'm pretty sure that abolishing welfare doesn't fit into your little "hippie" or "liberal" schema.

      Have fun on your yacht! I'm assuming you got it as part of a big inheritance or something, you don't seem sharp enough to have a job that requires a lot of critical thinking and pays a large salary.

    21. Re:Transcript from Court Case by MarsDefenseMinister · · Score: 1

      My father's still alive, thank you very much, and I don't actually have a job. I'm retired now, a wealthy self-made man, only 38 years old! Truly, in this country there's really no excuse for people to not have a life like mine. When they don't succeed it's because they suffer from a moral failing such as laziness, or promiscuity, or good direction, and not because they're not smart.

      I made my money in the embedded systems business, though ironically I hired people who knew about that. My own expertise was more along the lines of traditional consulting and computer services. My father was well off and financed my purchase of an existing business which provided the foundation to build on. The rest is history. We made some deals, made an awful lot of money, split it up, and dissolved the company.

      --
      No weapon in the arsenals of the world is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men.-Ronald Reagan
    22. Re:Transcript from Court Case by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      So the real question then is, why are your political views so polarized? It's more complicated than black vs white, and I'd think that someone who has dealt with complex issues before would see that.

      Or are you just trolling for fun?

      Congrats on the early retirement, I hope to join you in 20-30 years ... of course, I don't have any family with the money to purchase a company for me, I'm planning on finishing up college (human resources major) and then making investments with large portions of my future salary.

    23. Re:Transcript from Court Case by MarsDefenseMinister · · Score: 1

      Politics aren't black and white, it's good and evil. There's not too many ways to have something that is evil, and is also good. Literally, when you want to take money from me and give it to the poor, or buy contraception (abortions), or school lunches, or schools, it's stealing. That's bad, and no matter how you spin it, it's not good. It doesn't matter if poor children need to eat. Stealing from one person to give it to another is wrong, even if I'm rich. Jesus said do not steal. He didn't say it was OK to steal from people who are rich.

      And I'm not trolling, BTW. Is it really hard to believe that I am sincere about what I believe? Certainly you must have an idea that there are some people in the world that think like I do. Yes, of course you do. So then why when you're talking to one of those people can't you believe it? I don't understand that.

      --
      No weapon in the arsenals of the world is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men.-Ronald Reagan
    24. Re:Transcript from Court Case by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      Good and evil are entirely human concepts that just detail the two different paths to achieving our desires -- friendship, and force. There are no truly altruistic acts, we're all motivated entirely by our own desires; the sensations of pain and pleasure. That bit of philosophy aside ...

      I know you're sincere about what you believe. What I don't understand is why you think that everyone with liberal attitudes, or everyone who calls themselves a liberal, has exactly the same ideas about everything. I don't understand why you insist on insulting me, by saying I want to give money to "welfare queens," when I don't. I don't understand why you think being an idiot who supports welfare is some prerequisite of being a liberal, when "being a liberal" literally just means "believing in personal liberty."

      I think that you're trolling because I've repeatedly hammered these statements home to you, and you repeatedly accuse me of having the same beliefs over and over again. It's like you're not even listening.

      PS I'm agnostic, so as far as I'm concerned, what Jesus may or may not have said is irrelevant. Keep your religion out of our government, because I don't want anything to do with it.

    25. Re:Transcript from Court Case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm retired now, a wealthy self-made man

      My father was well off and financed my purchase of an existing business

      Are you really self-made? Or does it just make you feel better to say that?

    26. Re:Transcript from Court Case by MarsDefenseMinister · · Score: 1

      I'm listening to you, but what you're saying is nonsense. Why do you call yourself a liberal if you're not a taxerer and a spenderer? I've run into people like that before, and they just say nonsense. You say you're a libertarian, but seriously, *what the hell is that* but some irrelevant intellectualism.

      The only thing that really matters is Republican and Democrat. The other ideas are nonsense. Democrat ideas are nonsense too, but that's nonsense which is dangerously popular and thus must be taken seriously.

      When it comes right down to it, that's the only thing that matters. Are you big enough to be taken seriously, or are you big enough to survive? If not, then extinction is what nature intends. That's how I ran my business, and that's how I run my politics.

      --
      No weapon in the arsenals of the world is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men.-Ronald Reagan
    27. Re:Transcript from Court Case by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      If I meant "I am a Democrat," then I would have said that. Being a liberal != being a Democrat, as much as the media would like you to believe it. Think of it this way -- all Democrats are liberals, but not all liberals are Democrats. Follow?

      Liberalism, by itself, has nothing to do with taxing and spending. Adam Smith was a classical liberal.

      If you really think liberalism is about taxing and spending, then you need to drag yourself away from Fox News, and read those wiki's I linked you to.

      On bipartisanism: it's true that third party candidates are unlikely to win an election in our political climate. But consider this: politicians, as you suggest, are businessmen. They want to win elections over all else -- we'll come back to that in a moment.

      Do you remember all of the "a vote for Perot is a vote for Bush" rhetoric during the 2000 election? Well, that may be true -- in the short term. Votes for the Green party are votes that could have been spent on the Democratic party. But if the Democrats notice that they're consistently losing elections because voters are rallying themselves with fringe groups, dividing their numbers, then they'll respond like businessmen: by tweaking their platform to make themselves appealing to the greatest number of voters possible, including those fringe groups. After all, if they don't, they'll keep losing, and businessmen want to win, right?

      I don't agree with the entire Democratic platform or the entire Republican platform -- I'd side more with the Democrats on social issues, and more with the Republicans on economic issues. Instead of just rolling over and saying "it's hopeless," I'm taking a stand by voting third party -- even if there isn't short-term change as a result, I'm trying to work on long-term changes by showing other voters that you don't have to vote bipartisan, and showing the two major parties that they haven't earned my vote yet.

      You say you're a libertarian, but seriously, *what the hell is that* but some irrelevant intellectualism.

      Maybe you're not aware that there actually is a Libertarian party.

    28. Re:Transcript from Court Case by MarsDefenseMinister · · Score: 1

      Nope, you don't get it. Liberals are evil, because they are branded that way. Facts don't matter, truth is what we say it is, and both of them get in the way of elections.

      My existence is in the region where the rubber meets the road. The existence of libertarians is irrelevant to my concerns. Yes I know they exist, but that's not useful. The same goes for whatever detailed definitions of micro-political affiliations you might be trying to communicate.

      I exist now only for election and re-election, and that's my focus. My retirement is only from my previous profession. Now I am applying my wealth to winning back our country from what I see as the forces of evil. This requires extreme focus on what's important. I've noticed that liberals NEVER mastered this. I include libertarians in this too. Somehow they have become effete intellectuals, sipping lattes and arguing the fine points of political theory. But when it comes time to make your opponent deny that he rapes babies (or shoots Vietcong in the back), you're above it. And you lose.

      So exCUSE me if your blah blah blah isn't relevant to the marketing of the politics of identity.

      --
      No weapon in the arsenals of the world is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men.-Ronald Reagan
    29. Re:Transcript from Court Case by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      Well, hopefully after this you'll at least think twice before you accuse some random liberal of wanting to raise the taxes, before you even ask him about his views on economic policy. That was, after all, the entire point of this conversation.

    30. Re:Transcript from Court Case by MarsDefenseMinister · · Score: 1

      But, liberals DO raise taxes. They're taxers and spenders. THAT is the point of this conversation. If you've been reading closely, I've given you a subtle marketing lesson. That's image marketing.

      --
      No weapon in the arsenals of the world is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men.-Ronald Reagan
    31. Re:Transcript from Court Case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those liberals seem to be paying back the drunken spending that you so called "conservatives" are responsible for. The "conservatives" aren't fiscally conservative at all. Read through some budgets at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2007/ . The largest increases in spending have been with Reagan and the Bushes. Bush II seems to have completely burned through a budget surplus and is diving for record debt. Nobody in their right mind thinks this is good except for the apologists that fantasize that debt is good.

      I'm trying to give you a not so subtle education. I'll bet there have been many attempts at education but there hasn't been successful learning.

    32. Re:Transcript from Court Case by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      So, in short, you're not here to have real discourse, you just want to spread viral propaganda. Or, as you might phrase it (as I did earlier), you're here to Troll.

      Have fun on that "Yacht" and "Plane," you crafty "38 year old," "self-made," "retired" "conservative Republican American," with your not-so-subtle Ronald Reagan quote signature.

      It's a complete package, engineered for the completely gullible.

    33. Re:Transcript from Court Case by MarsDefenseMinister · · Score: 1

      I'm here to discuss. Seems to me like you decided to pick on me about something or other. Liberal interference, typical.

      --
      No weapon in the arsenals of the world is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men.-Ronald Reagan
    34. Re:Transcript from Court Case by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      You can't recover the image now, your last two posts were far too transparent.

  10. Damn them! by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is clearly a Ninja plot.

    1. Re:Damn them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. This looks more like the work of pirates.

    2. Re:Damn them! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod parent: -1, missed the joke.
      mod grandparent: +1, good call.
      mod self: -5, too lazy to get an account to mod them myself.

    3. Re:Damn them! by rolando2424 · · Score: 1

      Are you a bad enough dude to rescue the pirate?

      --
      Okay seriously I've just run out of pointless things to say.
  11. Yeah, but isn't... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...everybody forced to use Windows? Hell, I bet even Bill Gates would prefer to use something else, but he's afraid of a certain member of his staff.

  12. It's not the having to use windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    He's saying he can't afford the $100 to buy a copy of XP, seeing as he's unemployable and all.



    Now, a $100 fine atop 5 months in jail doesn't seem excessive to me, but the felony rap making him unemployable does.

    1. Re:It's not the having to use windows by dougmc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Now, a $100 fine atop 5 months in jail doesn't seem excessive to me, but the felony rap making him unemployable does. Having the `indirect' penalties assigned to you for a crime being much worse than the `official penalties' is hardly a new thing.


      By `indirect' I mean things like not being able to get a good job, being shunned/tormented/killed by people merely because you're a registered sex offender, etc.

      By `direct' I mean going to jail, paying fines, probation, even having to register as a sex offender.

    2. Re:It's not the having to use windows by eneville · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now, a $100 fine atop 5 months in jail doesn't seem excessive to me, but the felony rap making him unemployable does. Having the `indirect' penalties assigned to you for a crime being much worse than the `official penalties' is hardly a new thing.


      By `indirect' I mean things like not being able to get a good job, being shunned/tormented/killed by people merely because you're a registered sex offender, etc.

      By `direct' I mean going to jail, paying fines, probation, even having to register as a sex offender.

      yeah i agree with that. sex offender is vague, but because of the big issues with this, it means a minor offence is treated as if it's the worst possible.
    3. Re:It's not the having to use windows by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      He's employable; he can work at the fast food establishment of his choice.

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
  13. VMWare? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what happens if he runs Ubuntu under VMWare in Windows?

  14. Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by rjshields · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I read comments on here about video cameras in the UK and why don't we stick up for our rights. Here is a case of someone being sent to to jail for pirating a movie. This is not an offence worthy of jail time at tax payers' expense. When are you guys going to say enough of this bullshit?

    --
    In this world nothing is certain but death, taxes and flawed car analogies.
    1. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by jez9999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They're already saying that; the problem is they're not going any further.

    2. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by everphilski · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not just pirating, but releasing it before the theaters did. That's a key bit of information you and the summary missed out on. And he admits complete guilt. Game over, man.

    3. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by fm6 · · Score: 1, Troll

      Apples and oranges. Aggressively prosecuting minor crimes like this is certainly a bad allocation of government resources. But that's a lot different from a massive invasion of privacy, affecting citizens who aren't even suspected of a crime.

      Anyway, don't get bent out of shape. We've got surveillance cameras in this country too, and people are just as up in arms about them as we are about yours. More so: nobody here honestly cares whether the UK goes fascist.

    4. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by veganboyjosh · · Score: 1

      More so: nobody here honestly cares whether the US goes fascist.

      Fixed that for you.

    5. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's still not worthy of jail time. Copyright infringement is a non-violent act, imprisonment is a violent act. The punishment should fit the crime, economic consequences for economic crimes and imprisonment for violent ones.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by SydShamino · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So as long as a white-collar criminal stashes his money away where the government can't get at it, there should be no punishment?

      Sorry, jail time is appropriate for some economic crimes. Maybe not in this case, no, but your blanket statement just doesn't work in all blanket cases.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    7. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      So what? It's a property crime involving dubious law. I would never send anyone to jail for either drug OR copyright violations. And, since no money was involved in his "crime", there was no piracy. I sure wish he had the resources to avoid the guilty plea. These things need to be fought to the end, but I can understand why he did. His "admission" doesn't necessarily mean he believes he was guilty. It is simply a procedural move to bring a quick end due to lack of those needed resources. Unfortunately it just feeds the monster and makes it stronger.

      --
      What?
    8. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by metallurge · · Score: 1

      You missed the point. It's copyright infringement. One would generally not expect copyright infringement to be a criminal offense. Civil, sure. The guy should be in hock until the next jubilee year. But debtor's prison was eliminated a long time ago, for good reason.

      Really, the state should have little interest in copyright infringement, aside from fairly adjudicating alleged cases of it. Only when state interests become subordinate to corporate interests does copyright infringement become a crime.

      The beginning of the end, ironically enough, seems to have occurred in 1984.

      You are the one to finally draw me out of just lurking here on /.

    9. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by ushering05401 · · Score: 1

      Unauthorized possession of the film prior to public release is not copyright infringement. It is plain old theft at the least, and has more parallels to corporate espionage than to copy infringement.

      Anyhow, every movie copy that is released for reviews and pre-screenings etc come with very tight legal language, and usually has on-screen reminders throughout the film that there are specific legal restrictions on the use of the film. Many of the legit advanced screening DVD's that I have actually go to black & white for 10 second long periods throughout the movie so you can't 'forget' that you are watching a heavily restricted version of the movie.

      This guy could have gone away for a lot longer because of the dollar values involved in undercutting a major theatrical release.

      That being said, I agree that we use imprisonment for too many non-violent offenses.

      Regards.

    10. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by Princeofcups · · Score: 1

      > So as long as a white-collar criminal stashes his money away where the
      > government can't get at it, there should be no punishment?
      > Sorry, jail time is appropriate for some economic crimes. Maybe not
      > in this case, no, but your blanket statement just doesn't work in all blanket cases.

      There are different types of prisons here in the US. There are the maximum security lock-ups for the violent criminals, and the minimal security golf clubs for the white collar millionaires. Do you really think that the CEO of Worldcom spent time as Bubba the rapist's bunk mate? Seriously.

      jfs

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    11. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      If he can get at it, the government can get at it.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    12. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Unauthorized possession of the film prior to public release is not copyright infringement. It is plain old theft at the least

      Nope. If you have an authorized copy of the film and give it to me, you are breaking whatever contracts you signed to get the film. I, on the other hand, haven't stolen anything and since I haven't agreed to any contracts I'm not breaking any contracts. Mere posession proves nothing.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    13. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by aarku · · Score: 1

      What's an appropriate punishment that is also a deterrent, then?

    14. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by Nullav · · Score: 1

      How many more years more will it take for people to get the point? Intellectual property is not property. If I stole your lawn mower, you can press charges for theft. If I released a book you made about Scientology and its impact on western civilization, you can sue me for copyright infringement.
      That's how it should be in any sane country. Throwing IP violations into criminal court is doing nothing but wasting tax dollars on private matters. That money (court and paying people to monitor that one person for that spit of a violation) could have been better spent to help build a new jail or courthouse. It makes me sad to think I'm throwing away money just so a few well-off companies can have fewer costs.

      --
      I just read Slashdot for the articles.
    15. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by notamisfit · · Score: 1

      Where in the article does it say this kid went to a maximum security lockup?

      --
      Jesus is coming -- look busy!
    16. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a few more years more years more.

    17. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      To what extent does jail actually act as a deterrent?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    18. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Intellectual property is not property.

      Hence the "dubious law" qualifier.

      If I released a book you made about Scientology and its impact on western civilization, you can sue me for copyright infringement.

      A sane country will not recognize anybody's attempt at distribution control, but there are no "sane" countries on planet earth. The only truly legitimate claim I could have is if you were to claim that you wrote it. That's plagiarism. A whole different kettle of fish.

      Throwing IP violations into criminal court is doing nothing but wasting tax dollars on private matters.

      No, it's very profitable for some. It's only a waste to those who derive no benefit. It's not a waste at all for those contractors who build and manage the prisons, or for those who profit from prison labor or for those law enforcement institutions who receive larger budgets for said enforcement. It's all very similar to the drug war. The law exists for a specific reason, and it is working as planned. The majority has been successfully distracted from its true intent, which also includes the censorship angle.

      --
      What?
    19. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by r_jensen11 · · Score: 1

      Can you say Enron?

    20. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If you wrong me financially, then you should be ordered to repay me. If you refuse or are unable to repay me, then what would be proper punishment? You took away something of mine I can't get back. It seems jail is appropriate for someone that takes and refuses to pay restitution (either because of lack of will or lack of resources).

    21. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      It should be obvious that jail acts as a deterrent against crime to an extent that is proportional to the value that a person places on their individual freedom. The more a person prizes their freedom, the more effective jail is as a deterrent against them committing the crime in the first place. Jail does not always make an effective deterrent at preventing repeat offences because people do not necessarily learn to not take their freedoms for granted while in prison.

    22. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think home confinement for movie piracy is the real WTF, just lock him inside with nothing but his computer, what could possibly go wrong?

    23. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't we stand up? Because we're afraid. Speak out and fear reprisals. Anyone that makes waves in the US is picked up on bullshit police charges, tossed in jail for a few days, beaten by police and/or inmates and later released with thousands of dollars in legal fees and the stink of the "accused". Be it from the Federales or the local cop and Assistant District Attorney, you still get sucked in to that "great meat grinder" of the US justice system leaving all that enter, innocent or not, getting turned into the same thing: sausage.

      Now add in the questions about the last two Presidential elections, attacking a country on total bullshit charges and limiting the free speech of US Govt. scientists and we're one banana away from becoming one of "those" Central American countries that some enjoying ridiculing so much.

      Someone please quote us that speech from V about "being afraid" and all that. =)

    24. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "you still get sucked in to that "great meat grinder" of the US justice system leaving all that enter, innocent or not, getting turned into the same thing: sausage."

      Early this year I got arrested over putting ibuprofen in my generic Excedrin (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Excedrin) bottle.

      Long story short: Friday night ... driving on a highway ... pulled over for speeding ... cop asks to search the car and I say no but he still does ... ordered out of the car and hands on the side, feet apart ... finds about 30 generic ibuprofen in an generic (CVS) Excedrin bottle with about 20 generic Excedrin pills (I mixed the two to save space in my bag) ... he has about six inches and 50 pounds on me and tosses me to the ground HARD in some kind of "roid rage" ... says it's illegal to put one medication in another medication's container and arrests me (first arrest) ... charged with illegal drug possession and nothing about "mixing" pills ... spent the night in a nasty holding cell with nine others ... released about 16 hours later and told by the cop doing the release that they were giving me a break and letting me go ... had to pay a "victim assessment fee" of $180, an "weekend arrest release fee" of $70 and $430 for vehicle towing/storage ... also a pulled ligament in the wrist requiring some treatment for a few months (but will be fine). Got me an arrest record for a "drug" crime to explain for the rest of my life too.

      It turns out it's illegal to mix prescription meds but not nonprescription. Cop didn't know the law. As for suing, the three lawyers I talked to said that they wanted a nice chunk (between $5k and $12k) of money for a retainer. No continence fee and told little chance of success. BTW, I wasn't mouthy to the cop. I said little, just expecting the ticket and hoping to get back on the road.

    25. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by Unlikely_Hero · · Score: 1

      Never. Enough people in this wretched little place are never going to stand up to take the band of thugs congress and the 4th branch of government (the beaurocracy) out of power.
      We are done, the republic is dead. It was a beautiful experiment with high ideals that was slowly ravaged by banal evil spreading like a blight.
      This "country" does not deserve to continue, it is a blemish on the face of this planet, and mutilates the memories of the many average people who fought and died for good causes in the history of the united states of america (Revolutionary War, WWII are pretty much the only ones, but that's still a ton of people).
      Let it be known that it was the small minded people that destroyed this place, those that chose fear and violence, aggression and coercion. Those who thought they had to beat down everybody else to win slaughtered the enlightenment ideas the country was founded on, bit by bit, none likely realizing they drew a laceration on the flesh of their collective unconscious with every small minded action.

      Why that? Why do people grow complacent? Because the truth can be a very hard thing, and most people cannot bare to look at it, or like to view it through a fun-house mirror. For all the truly evil things that the gang of thugs that has comprised the US Government and its corporations have done to the world in history, it is the hope of one person living her at least, that the rest of the world can remember the United States for the many good things its average citizens tried to do to benefit their fellow human beings than the selfish and pigheaded things the loudest among us did that have left long lasting scars.

      To other nations or groups of people to whom we will come asking to be taken in, to live among you and work with you; please do not judge us too harshly. The "ugly american" syndrome many people have seen, of the rude and boorish tourist who belittles residents of the land he visits is not a picture of most of us. It is simply a reflection that most of us are too poor to do any real traveling; and that many who could do that traveling choose instead to work even more to do things like pay our health insurance costs and try to send our children to college. We apologize for those loud and bullheaded tourists that speak in our name.

      To those that write the history books and will look at the United States of America as a historical artifact, something covered in dust, please bear in mind; the majority of us did the best we could from sunup until sundown on most days, we tried to be decent people who cared about others. We were flawed, some of us (most of us) horribly, and some of us tried to cover it up more than others. We hope that some of our actions might have helped shape the world in a positive way, and for the other actions, all of them, we are deeply sorry.

      There is no excuse for the number of those damaging actions, given the amount of power we have excercised over the world.

      --
      Happiness does not come from having much, but from being attached to little.
    26. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      So, who got injured? Instead we have a situation where a guy has done something that may possibly have resulted in a movie studio getting an unknown amount of money less - but even then it's still speculation. Is the expense of jail really worth it? House arrest as in this case makes more sense than that but personally I think civil issues shouldn't be getting criminal punishments - what's wrong with a fine? The Judge can make it a big one if they think it was a serious offence.

    27. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      So as long as a white-collar criminal stashes his money away where the government can't get at it, there should be no punishment? There's more than one way to punish a person. If they're a rich person, fining them enough money should be sufficient.

      There's no point punishing the taxpayers by locking up nonviolent offenders.

      - RG>
      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    28. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many these days are taking plea bargains not because they are guilty, but because they would be in financial ruin before they could be declared innocent. "Sorry lawyer x, I can't afford that. Lawyer X: You better take a plea bargain." Personally I would rather take my chances with "12 Honest Men", but then I have nothing left to lose but my freedom or my life.

      Disclaimer: I have no idea as to his guilt or innocence or if he has admitted to doing this in any way besides his plea bargain.

    29. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by Logic+and+Reason · · Score: 1

      So as long as a white-collar criminal stashes his money away where the government can't get at it, there should be no punishment?
      If the government wants, it can probably get at the assets of someone who lives in the country it governs, unless virtually everything that person owns (including his house, physical possessions, etc.) is located in some other country. Does it seem remotely likely to you that someone would live like a hobo for the sole purpose of committing economic crimes with impunity?

      Maybe not in this case, no, but your blanket statement just doesn't work in all blanket cases.
      Sorry, but I just can't see jail time as an appropriate penalty for stealing bedsheets (har har).
    30. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      That's only obvious if you assume people are fully rational. Nobody commits a crime expecting to get caught. I don't think this film pirate ever imagined he might end up in jail. In fact I think the people committing the most and the worst crimes, who are reckless and thoughtless almost by definition, aren't deterred at all. The people who are clever enough to think(and care) about the future aren't the kind to be committing crimes at all.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    31. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by MacWiz · · Score: 1

      And he admits complete guilt.

      Really? Where did he get a copy before it even hit theatres? George Lucas sent him a preview DVD? Complete guilt is rightfully assigned to the person that smuggled the copy out of the studio. This guy is just the pigeon taking the rap so that the inside man can keep his job and get access to more films.

    32. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You haven't met any white collar career criminals, have you?

      I agree with the principle that non-violent offenses, for the most part, shouldn't result in jail time, but you underestimate how good some criminals are at making their assets untouchable.

      They don't technically own anything or have any income, but certainly don't live like hobos (big home, several expensive cars, luxury yacht). Some assets are owned by their spouse (who keeps clean), other assets are usually owned by various corporations that they control but don't own.

      I'm actually thinking of a particular example I know of.

    33. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Copyright infringement is a non-violent act, imprisonment is a violent act. The punishment should fit the crime, economic consequences for economic crimes and imprisonment for violent ones.

      So Skilling and Ebbers and Fastow and Kumar should not have gone to prison for their crimes, because fraud and theft are 'non-violent' acts?

      Burglary is a 'non-violent' act too then, by that logic; should burglers and safecrackers not go to prison either?

      How silly.
      N_J

    34. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      jail time is appropriate for some economic crimes. Maybe not in this case, no, but your blanket statement just doesn't work in all blanket cases.

      So am I to understand that you do not condone jail time for this guy but you aren't against inviting him to a Blanket Party?

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    35. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by glwtta · · Score: 1

      Copyright infringement is a non-violent act, imprisonment is a violent act.

      He inflicted the new Star Wars on people - how is that not a violent act?

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    36. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by Maltheus · · Score: 1

      That makes it especially not worthy of punishment. Who is going to go through the effort of downloading some crappy early release if they're not a fan. And what Star Wars fan doesn't watch Star Wars in the theater?

    37. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by Maltheus · · Score: 1

      That white collar criminal is stealing something real. That is, a person's wealth. Making a copy of something doesn't deprive the original owner of it. It just gives the owner the perception of the potential of a lost sale. And since there is no way to prove that a sale was actually lost, and since we're suppose to be innocent until proven guilty, then I don't understand how one could prosecute somebody on this.

    38. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      Really. I'd like to see the U.S. government try to get at someone's offshore untraceable accounts. Likewise, I'd like to see the government stop someone from anonymously reaching those accounts and anonymously wiring money in small amounts back into Western Union or other such places in the United States. Heck, he can even have and use a fake ID for this if necessary, too. After all, that's just another non-violent crime so the government would not be able to punish him for that, either.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    39. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      And if he's not rich or doesn't have any money? Just let them go? So that they can keep trying until they steal enough money to be rich, then we fine them?

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    40. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      You didn't read my part about "maybe not in this case, no", or the GP's part about claiming no nonviolent crime (including copyright infringement, embezzlement, money laundering, etc.) should ever have jail time.

      Way to argue the wrong point.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    41. Re:Jail for movie piracy? WTF? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      Clearly you did not read my comment. I said there's more than one way to punish a person.

      Although it would seem that in the U.S., it is no longer the responsibility of judges to actually judge what would be an appropriate penalty, as most crimes have specific fines and/or jail times--fines which don't discriminate whether you make seven figures or zero.

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  15. And on the seventh day, he recompiled from source by richdun · · Score: 4, Funny

    The problem is He's an Ubuntu Linux user

    And here I was hoping God used Mac OS X (yes, I'm sure there's a "daemon" joke in there, but I'll leave it at one bad joke per post).

  16. Good to know by hax0r_this · · Score: 5, Funny
    I've been wondering if that software works on Linux. Good to know that it doesn't.

    sudo apt-get install evil-government-monitoring-program
    1. Re:Good to know by fiddlesticks · · Score: 1

      #sudo apt-get install evil-government-monitoring-program

      ah, a debian user.

      this should do it - #USE=CIA emerge evil-government-monitoring-program

      By the time it's finished compiling, the sentence will be finished

    2. Re:Good to know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it could be worse. Have you seen the mess that is the GoboLinux filesystem?

    3. Re:Good to know by twitter · · Score: 1

      I think you need to add the non free universe to that install. sudu vi /etc/apt/sources.list and remove the # marks. Sooner or later, the evil tracking software will find you. It's redundant if you have a cell phone or ISP.

      --

      Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  17. The utlimate penalty by Skiron · · Score: 4, Funny

    You will install MS Vista and install tracking software; you will also pay $300.00 licence fee to MS. You will also install MSOffice2007 _and_ also pay the licence fee. Once this is done, you will ALWAYS vote yes for ooxml.

    1. Re:The utlimate penalty by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      You will install MS Vista and install tracking software
      I bet the tracking software won't run under Vista.
      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    2. Re:The utlimate penalty by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      Morgan: "Consider yourself on paid vacation." Hermes: *sob* "The ultimate penalty..."

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    3. Re:The utlimate penalty by Shemmie · · Score: 1

      The tracking software runs fine under Vista. Sure, you have to run under Windows XP SP2 compatability mode, run it as Administrator, it doesn't follow Vista's practice for file management and so files get saved in compatability storage, and the window causes Aero to reset to running in basic mode, but... sorry, what was my point again?

    4. Re:The utlimate penalty by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

      To top it all off the ankle bracelet he has to wear will look like the Office 2007 ribbon toolbar. A portable Clippy resides in the button incase he breaks curfew.

      *Tink tink tink!*

      Looks like your trying to go out past time! Would you like too...

      1> Go back inside the house and do the smart thing.

      2> Get you the latest prices on KY from Amazon.com for your all expenses paid by you trip to Shady Sing Sing resort?

      3> Find you the latest MySpace profiles for your new friends at Shady Sing Sing?

      *Tink tink WHOOSH!*

      --
      ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
  18. Oh My God!!! by spiedrazer · · Score: 1, Troll
    This poor helpless creature!!!

    Come on you people, he got caught doing something illegal and now he is being punished. I don't think it's the FBI's responsibility to make sure that their monitoring software works on all platforms.

    Get Over It!!!

    --
    Keep passing the open windows...
    1. Re:Oh My God!!! by 644bd346996 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I really don't care about the monitoring software. To me, the big wrong is that he is being compelled to purchase a software license from a third party in order to use the equipment he already owns. Not only that, but the money must go to a specific corporation: Microsoft. While it may not be unconstitutional, it certainly should be illegal for the government to require citizens to purchase commercial software.

    2. Re:Oh My God!!! by kaizokuace · · Score: 1

      This should be construed as some sort of racism or something. The FBI (or whoever is writing the software) should be required to make a multi platform software in this event. Its the government, they cant side with a corporation. At least not this openly!

      --
      Balderdash!
    3. Re:Oh My God!!! by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      He's not being compelled to buy a damned thing. He doesn't have to access the internet, so he doesn't have to buy Windows.

    4. Re:Oh My God!!! by GeePrime · · Score: 0

      I hear this, and then think of the province of Ontario - where I live. If you get caught DUI here, first offense, your car needs to be outfitted with a breathalyser monitoring system. Basically, you need to blow a clean air sample to start your car, and then every 15 minutes or so, it beeps, and you have to blow again. You have 2 minutes to do so, otherwise, the car's horn goes nuts, and the lights flash, etc...

      Here's the thing - it needs to be calibrated every few months, and at your expense. This is only done in major cities. So, if you live in Northern Ontario, you have to drive down to Toronto,. about 7.5H, to calibrate it. So, you have to pay in order to keep your PRIVILEGE of driving. This calibration cost is similar to the Windows licensing cost you refer to.

      Besides, they aren't saying they can't use his equipment (his right), they are saying he can't use the internet without being monitored (his privilege). He can use Linux on his PC all he wants, he just has to use Windows to access the internet.

    5. Re:Oh My God!!! by zullnero · · Score: 1

      Well, if I were getting my tax payer's dollar out of them, then yes, they should probably have software that works on all platforms. Obviously, to spy on citizens properly, they would need to infect 100% of the computer systems out there.

      Like I should feel fine with the government using my tax dollars to allow the FBI to be lazy!

    6. Re:Oh My God!!! by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      It's an democratic government's responsibility to treat EVERYONE equally. And yes choice of OS is also under that category.
      And the treating everyone equally goes even for convicted people. Conviction imposes some restrictions on your freedoms, but definitely NOT on the right of equality.
      Imagine if black felons would be treated not the same as white felons?(example: sent to labor camps instead of prisons)
      Can you spell "Huge equal rights movement demonstration"?

    7. Re:Oh My God!!! by bckrispi · · Score: 1

      They aren't "requiring" him to purchase anything. He can always stay offline for 5 months.

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    8. Re:Oh My God!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it is their responsibility to make it compatible. Really, if it's a matter of internet use monitoring, there should be a separate box monitoring it, not software on his computer. This would then work with *any* OS.

                I think the analogy I saw elsewhere of someone having to install a breathylizer, but then being told "oh, it only works with Chevys" is perfectly apt.

    9. Re:Oh My God!!! by lowe0 · · Score: 1

      Racism. Really. You think that:

      a.) allowing someone to resume their life outside of prison, but with a luxury highly related to his crime to be regulated at the convenience of the government, and

      b.) attacking someone's constitutional rights because of genetic factors over which they have no control

      are the same thing? How incredibly shallow. Linux isn't some epic struggle - it's just an operating system - and this man is no hero.

    10. Re:Oh My God!!! by 644bd346996 · · Score: 1

      To continue the DUI analogy, it seems like this is a case of telling a defendant that he can only drive Ford vehicles for the duration of his probation, even though he owns (and broke the law with) a Honda.

    11. Re:Oh My God!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not necessarily internet use monitoring that they are after. Otherwise all those sheeples' VMware suggestions would actually work. Therefore, a real solution is needed. You are forgetting that there is an infinite number of platforms, and that their way of having handled the matter is the cheapest.

    12. Re:Oh My God!!! by spiedrazer · · Score: 1
      What are you smoking???

      As stated in other replies, he is not being required to do anything or buy anything. He was convicted of using the Internet to conduct criminal activity. He is being let out of jail early with a restriction that if he wants to use the internet during that time (voluntarily), his use needs to be monitored.

      Are you suggesting that the FBI spend THOUSANDS of taxpayer dollars to develop a version of the monitoring software for every possible OS on the planet so he doen't have to spend $100.00 to get back on the Internet?

      You really feel that this has any kind of paralell to racial inequality????

      As my title states, Oh My God!!!

      --
      Keep passing the open windows...
  19. Re:Virtual machine / Pure Bologna! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since the host OS is MS; the government can always log into his box via terminal services and check the apps he has installed. They can even launch VMware and see what he's got and how he's using it. I'm sure they can find this out easy. His best bet is to purchase a system online in a colo and SSH to it from home. If he's kinda smart he might even use multiple proxies including TOR. That's when the fun can begin. However nothing is full-proof. He might as well just do what they say and wait.

  20. Why can he use a computer at all? by Oz0ne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    See, if I was the judge, I'd say he wasn't allowed to use a computer, period, for the duration of whatever sentence is being carried out.

    1. Re:Why can he use a computer at all? by hax0r_this · · Score: 1

      That reminds me of this guy they caught poaching sheep aruond here. Part of his sentence was that he wasn't allowed to use a computer for 10 years. Something about how he enjoyed playing Big Game Hunter or somesuch. Needless to say his defense attorney got that overturned.

    2. Re:Why can he use a computer at all? by kosmosik · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe because the judge wanted him to be punished (home arrest) but not exactly make him a retard.

      I mean nowdays Internet access is *essential*. It is like having a phone or a car. Imagine you have a job and do DUI. You will be only allowed to use car like 8-9am and 4-5pm (so you can go to work). Without your car you wouldn't be able to work and thus you will loose your job and become a citizen that parasites on others. I don't think that law system is built to punish citizens this way that they loose their jobs and became parasites on others. That would be stupid.

      So with that in mind the judge allowed the man to use Internet (maybe for working from home - quite usual) but he wishes to monitor his activity.

      I don't see anything wrong here.

      But I don't know why don't they force him (if he wishes to use the Internet) to just use a special broadband service for convicts which is monitored server-side. Such setup would not require any client side software.

    3. Re:Why can he use a computer at all? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      See, if I was the judge, I'd say he wasn't allowed to use a computer, period

      Oh gee, as if he had made a worm using the nickname "zero cool" and that worm caused a major blackout or something!

    4. Re:Why can he use a computer at all? by thryllkill · · Score: 1

      Insightful? Are you serious? All that statement does is make me thankful Oz0ne is not a judge.

      --

      Note to self: No more arguing with the faithful.

    5. Re:Why can he use a computer at all? by Hatta · · Score: 1



      But I don't know why don't they force him (if he wishes to use the Internet) to just use a special broadband service for convicts which is monitored server-side. Such setup would not require any client side software.


      I'm sure the monitoring software does lots of other stuff. Like key-logging, checking for suspicious software, etc.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:Why can he use a computer at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just speculating here but I guess he was in some sort of warez release group and if he gets in contact with the other members again, they will bust them all.

    7. Re:Why can he use a computer at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is why you'll never be a judge.

    8. Re:Why can he use a computer at all? by MadJo · · Score: 1

      You do realize that he would not be able to function in this society again if that sentence were to be given, because almost everything has computers in it.

      He wouldn't be allowed to drive a car or even use a simple calculator.

    9. Re:Why can he use a computer at all? by notamisfit · · Score: 1

      The kids they caught in Operation Sundevil about 20 years back were given the same restriction, and it got shot down in Federal court IIRC.

      --
      Jesus is coming -- look busy!
    10. Re:Why can he use a computer at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usually you don't need a car to work. There are alternatives, eg. walk, bicycle, public transport (bus, train), car pooling, etc.

    11. Re:Why can he use a computer at all? by Oz0ne · · Score: 1

      Wrong. Millions of people every day--even in the USA do not directly use a computer. Sure, they work behind the scenes but that doesn't mean everyone uses them.

      And come on, comparing the logic circuits in cars and calculators to a pc? Certainly there's some exceptions, but the general case is they're no where near each other.

    12. Re:Why can he use a computer at all? by Oz0ne · · Score: 1

      Internet access is not in any way remotely essential, you're living in a strange sheltered world if you think it is. Get out, check out the world.

      It's a great convenience and I'm all for promoting it, but you're really skewing reality. About 60% of the USA has computers in their homes. Common yes, necessary, no.

      Many people who do DUI get their licenses revoked alltogether. That's a major inconvenience that they have to work around, but they do. We're talking about criminals here. People who've endangered the lives of others. Revoking their weapon of choice is rather lenient.

      In this case, I really don't care all that much, there's not much direct impact from this kid's actions. All the same, if it was my movie I'd be pressing charges as well.

      I am with you on avoiding parasites. I don't think that means being lenient on criminals.

    13. Re:Why can he use a computer at all? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      I mean nowdays Internet access is *essential*. It is like having a phone or a car. Last I checked, suspension of a driver's license is a penalty invoked commonly enough that it doesn't show up in the news each time it happens.

      Why should Internet access be any more sacred?

      - RG>
      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    14. Re:Why can he use a computer at all? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      But I don't know why don't they force him (if he wishes to use the Internet) to just use a special broadband service for convicts which is monitored server-side.

      AT&T?

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    15. Re:Why can he use a computer at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey man... calm down..

      They said he must use MS-windows on his computer, so don't worry. The computer wont be usable at all..

    16. Re:Why can he use a computer at all? by Warod · · Score: 1

      But I don't know why don't they force him (if he wishes to use the Internet) to just use a special broadband service for convicts which is monitored server-side. Such setup would not require any client side software. If they used server-side sniffing then it'd be relatively easy to by-pass. You could just VPN outside somewhere and tunnel all the questionable traffic through. And they couldn't block VPN since it's very widely used for working outside the office etc..
    17. Re:Why can he use a computer at all? by MadJo · · Score: 1

      You did say 'computer', not 'PC'.

      Sure it may not be a pc, but there still is a computer in your cellphone, in your tv, dvd player, calculator and car.

    18. Re:Why can he use a computer at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lose. The word is LOSE.

      "loose" is NOT the same as "lose".

    19. Re:Why can he use a computer at all? by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

      "Probation"?

      I'd rather have him thrown into "Install a Rootkit" Prison.

      --
      Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  21. Feisty Fawn not so innocent by Mr.+Lwanga · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sounds like the latest "Catch a Hacker" episode of Dateline NBC. Ace investigative reporter Michelle Madigan uncovers a new operating system used by hackers, pirates and cybercriminals to go on an internet crime spree. What is Ubuntu and why is the government helpless to stop it?

    1. Re:Feisty Fawn not so innocent by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      Not to be confused with the "Hackers on Steroids" and their "Internet Hate Machine", of course.

  22. Best reason of all to swtich by Torodung · · Score: 5, Funny

    the gov't doesn't have any tracking software for Linux Gee. That sounds like a bulletproof marketing slogan for any distro.

    "Linux: The only operating system the NSA doesn't 0wn."

    --
    Toro
    1. Re:Best reason of all to swtich by eclectus · · Score: 1

      "Linux: The only operating system the NSA doesn't 0wn."

      Hate to troll here, but the *BSD variants that could claim that, too. Hell, OpenSolaris could, for that matter.

      --
      This signature is a waste of 42 characters
    2. Re:Best reason of all to swtich by dougmc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Linux: The only operating system the NSA doesn't 0wn." Clever, but who do you think developed SELinux, included in the 2.6 kernel source tree?


      pwned.

      Not that the NSA really cares about some movie pirate who got busted, and just because they wrote something useful for Linux and had it included in the kernel, that doesn't mean they're going to go write monitoring software for you too.

    3. Re:Best reason of all to swtich by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think the Puzzle Palace would share their software with law enforcement? Hell, they don't even share with the other US intel agencies...

    4. Re:Best reason of all to swtich by Blimey85 · · Score: 1

      Are you implying that FreeBSD is the NSA's bitch? Or Solaris? Or (insert some other os here)?

      --
      How is it that one careless match can start a forest fire, but it takes a whole box to start a campfire?
    5. Re:Best reason of all to swtich by metallurge · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm sure DOS is safe too...

    6. Re:Best reason of all to swtich by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose the 0wn MacOS too?

    7. Re:Best reason of all to swtich by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      The NSA doesn't pwn Windows Me, either. I think they figure that if someone uses it, the user's already been punished above and beyond what prison could do.

    8. Re:Best reason of all to swtich by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      >>"Linux: The only operating system the NSA doesn't 0wn."

      Amen to that brother...
      Been hiding from NSA for a year now under it :)
      O crap I forgot to log OUT!

    9. Re:Best reason of all to swtich by Sibko · · Score: 1

      "Linux: The only operating system the NSA doesn't 0wn." I can already see average joe going "What, you mean you're denying the NSA access to your computer!? Are you a criminal or something? Screw that, I want to help those guys, I'll stick with Windows."

      All those spy movies Hollywood pumps out are like free PR for those guys. :(
    10. Re:Best reason of all to swtich by Blackknight · · Score: 1

      Um, the NSA created selinux.

  23. I have an idea... by Arceliar · · Score: 2, Funny

    This looks like a job for a rootkit!

    Quick, someone call Sony, maybe they can help!

  24. Linux is my life man by kentrel · · Score: 4, Interesting
    "It isn't the fact that I have to be monitored that bothers me, it is the fact that I have [to] restructure my life (different OS, different software on that OS)"

    In jail for 5 months and he thinks changing Operating System needs more of a life restructuring.

    Perhaps, this sentence will give him the perfect opportunity to finally find a life outside of his linux box.

    1. Re:Linux is my life man by kaizokuace · · Score: 2, Funny

      just when he gets the chance to get a life he is not allowed to leave his house!

      --
      Balderdash!
    2. Re:Linux is my life man by kentrel · · Score: 1

      Confined to his house, and confined to Windows. Looks like the AOL chatrooms are his only hope!

      "Next on To Catch A Predator..."

    3. Re:Linux is my life man by killmofasta · · Score: 1

      Dood! There is NO LIFE out side a linux box. None. Non-existant. The search for extra-terreserial life needs to be renamed the search for non-linux life.

  25. So can he use a pirated version of Windows? by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 5, Funny

    Or are they going to buy a legit copy for him?

  26. geez by nocomment · · Score: 1

    Are they that dumb? Sure, I'll run windows, I'll just partition the drive but leave the windows bootloader intact, and install grub to a boot floppy to just switch the compy to linux. Pull the floppy, compy loads windows.

    BRILLIANT!!!

    --
    /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
    /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    1. Re:geez by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      install wubi, it boots off the ntfs partition and installs without a boot loader other than the native windows loader.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    2. Re:geez by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Or use a LiveCD. Or a virtual machine. Or a USB external hard drive....

  27. He doesn't have to use Windows by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    He could simply not use a PC. Allowing him to use a PC if monitoring software is installed is a concession.

  28. Pirate banned? by ectotherm · · Score: 1

    AAARRRRRRRRRRRRGH! Forcin' 'im to use Windows be harsher than a keel haulin'...

    --
    "Nature bats last..."
  29. Oh damn! by xgr3gx · · Score: 1

    Being forced to use Windows again is punishment enough.
    Oh well, the dude's a hacker, can't he buy another crappy pc with Windows to run the gov't spyware, and just use another box to run Linux?
    Hmm, probably violate the terms of the probation.

    --
    Shameless plug alert: Game server control panel
  30. what makes this punishment cruel? by msblack · · Score: 0
    dsinc writes:

    So he's been told that he must use Windows for the term of his confinement. Looks like a case of cruel and unusual punishment to me" In absence of a smiley face, I can only read this as an honest assertion. Can someone explain what makes this punishment cruel under the 8th Amendment? You may start your discussion here.
    --
    signature pending slashdot approval
    1. Re:what makes this punishment cruel? by 644bd346996 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Forcing somebody to pay money to a third party (ie somebody completely unaffiliated with the victim of the crime) sure seems like an unusual punishment to me. It also seems unjustified (unless you count "government laziness" as adequate justification).

      I think (and I expect most libertarians would agree) that the government should never have the power to force a citizen to do business with any corporation, especially when that corporation is an unregulated abusive monopoly.

    2. Re:what makes this punishment cruel? by Veinor · · Score: 1

      It's called a joke.

    3. Re:what makes this punishment cruel? by msblack · · Score: 2, Informative
      644bd346996 writes:

      Forcing somebody to pay money to a third party (ie somebody completely unaffiliated with the victim of the crime) sure seems like an unusual punishment to me. It also seems unjustified (unless you count "government laziness" as adequate justification).

      I think (and I expect most libertarians would agree) that the government should never have the power to force a citizen to do business with any corporation, especially when that corporation is an unregulated abusive monopoly. Defendant isn't being FORCED to PERFORM any activity. If defendant wishes to purchase a product, that is voluntary. As a condition of parole defendant is barred from ENGAGING in CERTAIN activity--the use of Linux software. Where did parent get the idea I said anything about unusual? My post asked for an explanation as to how this punishment meets the 8th Amendment definition of cruel.

      --
      signature pending slashdot approval
    4. Re:what makes this punishment cruel? by croddy · · Score: 1

      In a country which fails to recognize EXECUTING PEOPLE as cruel and unusual, you're right, I don't think this one's going to fly.

    5. Re:what makes this punishment cruel? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Forcing someone to use windows is cruel. It is also unusual. What else do you want?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:what makes this punishment cruel? by Katmando911 · · Score: 1

      "ENGAGING in CERTAIN activity--the use of Linux software" can be interpreted as "not allowed to use a computer unless he pays some money to Microsoft for a windows license". That sounds pretty cruel & unusual to me.

    7. Re:what makes this punishment cruel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He could just give up his computer. Or he could go to prison, instead of sitting at home.

      The man is a convicted criminal. He's been allowed house arrest instead of real prison. Part of his terms mean that if he uses a computer at home then he needs to have Windows on it. Nothing says he has to use Windows. Computer use is not a right a convicted criminal has during his prison term.

    8. Re:what makes this punishment cruel? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Well, one of the tests for cruel is "that a punishment must not by its severity be degrading to human dignity,". Using windows counts as being degrading to human dignity. :-)

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    9. Re:what makes this punishment cruel? by init100 · · Score: 1

      As a condition of parole defendant is barred from ENGAGING in CERTAIN activity--the use of Linux software.

      Can you quote the part of the judgement that said that? Of course you can't, since he wasn't. That the government was lazy and just created/bought Windows software to do the monitoring is a totally different matter.

    10. Re:what makes this punishment cruel? by lowe0 · · Score: 1

      Oh, lord. Paying MS money is now considered cruelty? Not being able to access the Internet is now considered cruelty?

      Do you even remember a time when you didn't have Internet access? You sound like a spoiled brat who thinks that the nation should serve at your convenience.

    11. Re:what makes this punishment cruel? by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      You can make the argument that it's cruel, if you want, but "unusual" isn't going to fly. Execution is, in fact, a pretty common punishment for first-degree murder. A punishment which is cruel but not unusual passed the "cruel and unusual" test. So does a punishment that is unusual but not cruel.

      Of course, I won't buy the argument that capital punishment is cruel, either. The closest thing a murderer has to the value of the life he/she took is his/her own life (I say closest because the victim's life was of greater value than the murderer's), and thus should be compelled to surrender his/her life in payment for the crime. Consider what murderers put victims through, it would be cruel to not execute them.

      A reporter asked Jessica Lunsford's dad if he would attend Couey's execution. He gave the same answer I would give: "I'd hold the syringe if they'd let me."

      As for Scott McCausland, yeah, it sucks to have to choose between using Windows for five months and not using a computer at all. Not sure which way I'd go on that. Of course, it sucks to go to jail for five months, too. However, maybe he should have thought about that before he did it.

      Of course, the argument could be made that what he did shouldn't be illegal. The argument could be made that he was engaging in civil disobedience. (I wouldn't buy it, but the argument could be made, and probably will be, by some.) The trouble is, people engaging in civil disobedience not only fully understand they may be jailed or fined for their actions, they fully expect to be. That's why they do it, to be a catalyst of change by their example. Scott McCausland is none of that. He's just a guy who caught violating copyright.

      To put that in perspective, if Microsoft got caught violating copyright by incorporating GPLed software into some of their products and the people who were responsible for the violation were sentenced to five months of jail + five months of monitoring their computers, many people in this forum would be complaining that it was a slap on the wrist, because we expect those copyrights to be honored. We can't have it both ways; if we want copyright to be honored, we have to honor copyright. Are copyright terms too long? Absolutely. Should copyright be abolished entirely? Some people think so. We could have national debate on that. But in the meantime...

    12. Re:what makes this punishment cruel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think that not being able to use a non-Windows computer is "cruel and unusual"? Maybe you haven't heard, but the accepted "humane and usual" punishment for criminals is to lock them in a small stone cell. This guy got off very, very light.

  31. At least he can play Dwarf Fortress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


  32. Cruel and Unusual Punishment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...he's been told that he must use Windows for the term of his confinement. Looks like a case of cruel and unusual punishment to me."

    Sounds like poetic justice to me.

  33. Can't get to TFA by Orange+Crush · · Score: 1

    (Office firewall doesn't like the site)

    What I really wonder . . . how is this conspiracy and *criminal* copyright infringement . . . aren't these usually civil cases? What's different here?

    1. Re:Can't get to TFA by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Copyright can be enforced as criminal (breaking the statutory law that it is and all that) and as civil (for the damages caused by the copying).

      IANAL, but that's basically how it goes. And no, being convicted and sued is not double jeopardy. Only being tried more than once for the criminal proceeding is.

    2. Re:Can't get to TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is that he released it before the movie was sent to theaters.

  34. i'm so tired by to_kallon · · Score: 1

    of all these linux newbs. jeez, you guys, l2wine already! kthxbye.

    (note how i resisted the urge to point out the wine-whine pun. wait...dammit!)

    --


    The only way to get rid of a temptation is to yield to it.
    -Oscar Wilde
  35. This is what VM's are for by rastoboy29 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    What could be more delightful?  Run a Win98 VM and put it in there.

    Like the government can tell the difference.

  36. Parole Officer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe he'll get Doris Day for a parole officer instead of Seymour Scagnetti. I hear he's a real asshole.

    Is the parole officer actually going to check the log?

  37. 1st time for everything by hurfy · · Score: 1

    I started wondering what you have to turn off to get the windows box pwned....

    hehe, turn down the firewall (is that even a required step?) and start testing free cursors/themes/screensavers til you find something that feels like your old system...throw in some free porn...probably want to skip the hacked programs tho!

    Battle of the rootkits :O

  38. Cruel and unusual? by deviated_prevert · · Score: 2, Funny

    If the punishment was truly cruel and unusual the judge would have sentenced him to use Gentoo.

    --
    This message was not sent from an iPhone because Peter Sellers really was a deviated prevert without a dime for the call
    1. Re:Cruel and unusual? by no_pets · · Score: 1

      If the punishment was truly cruel and unusual the judge would have sentenced him to use Gentoo. His sentence would be over before Gentoo finished compiling.
      --
      "A government is a body of people, usually notably ungoverned." - Shepard Book Quoting Malcolm Reynolds
    2. Re:Cruel and unusual? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gentoo still pwns all other distros. You guys are just retarded and/or lazy.

    3. Re:Cruel and unusual? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stage 1, loaded from floppies.

    4. Re:Cruel and unusual? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gentoo is rice
      stop fapping into your mother's underwear and get out for a change.

    5. Re:Cruel and unusual? by loftwyr · · Score: 1

      They probably considered that but realized he'd only have it finished compiling everything for the installation 3 months after his sentence was over.

  39. Perhaps the punishment... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    ...should simply be changed to make him actually watch Episodes 1-3 every day for the next few months.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  40. If He's Any Smart by xutopia · · Score: 1

    He'd run the tracking software under wine.

  41. Major security breach by monopole · · Score: 1

    Did the feds just announce that they can't track Linux distros?
    Did torrents for Ubuntu just start spiking in Baghdad and Tora Bora?

    1. Re:Major security breach by Darundal · · Score: 1

      No. They announced that software that they are willing to use to keep track of someone under probation terms is windows only. Nothing more.

    2. Re:Major security breach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      This is tracking software created for legal purposes, which doesn't need to hide itself from the user. Assuming that the same software is used for intrusive intelligence gathering is... a leap, to say the least.

      I expect the ideal software package for the first purpose would have an installer, an uninstaller(the sentence will end sometime) and report back periodically with reports on large-scale network activit (torrents and the like).

      The ideal software for the latter package is basically a worm or a virus with a rootkit included, which would maintain network silence for long stretches of time(allowing itself to spread) before "stealthily"(of course there's practically a limit as to how stealthily this can be done) reporting all collected information—the contents of incoming and outgoing emails, the contents of "interesting" local files, and so on.

      The two don't really overlap all that much.

  42. profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not to buy vista, latest office, visual studio and some extras, charge it all to the justice department and then ask for a refund for m$. Run the monitor software with wine in your armored linux box. Profit!!

  43. Well at least somebody's happy... by xednieht · · Score: 2, Funny

    Watch Redmond stop the presses and do a nationwide ad campaign on this one...

    I can see it now "Reformed Cyber-criminal chooses Vista over Linux - claims he has 'seen the light' (on his shiny new ankle bracelet)".

    --

    Hope is the currency of fools
  44. Time to get a Mac by daveywest · · Score: 1

    and run all three OS's on the same box.

  45. IP = $$$ by dazedNconfuzed · · Score: 0

    Yes, so long as society at large likes the idea that creating intellectual property should have something to do with ownership and getting a paycheck, copyright infringement SHOULD be a criminal offense.

    Guy should be happy that the punishment is having to stay home and use Windows. Cope.

    --
    Can we get a "-1 Wrong" moderation option?
    1. Re:IP = $$$ by marcello_dl · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's still unfair. I mean, he got jail for distributing that star wars fluff, while the pirates of the vastly superior space 1999 still can use linux whenever they please!

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
  46. ssh xterm by GrEp · · Score: 1

    Just use SSH+Xwin to connect with your linux box. I would use the windows xlivecd: http://xlivecd.indiana.edu/

    The judge should just ban him from using the network if that was his intention. The half way thing isn't going to do anything but create a headache for some guy who has to read through all his logs. Anyway the case is copyright, so this should be in civil not criminal court and we all know how well the RIAA is doing there...

    --

    bash-2.04$
    bash-2.04$yes "Don't you hate dialup connections?"| write USERNAME
  47. Whew . . . by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 1

    So, this "spyware" only runs on Windows? And here I thought I had to be worried about government tracking . . .

    I still can't decide if this is either appropriate, disturbing, or a little of both.

    --

    I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

  48. Look out for a BoingBoing post... by beens · · Score: 1

    in which Cory Doctorow reminds us that he, too, uses Ubuntu Linux.

  49. Incompatible software doesn't = 'Banned' by Lukano · · Score: 1

    Anyone but me very amused by the fact that we have a 'illegal to use linux' leaning slashdot entry for a story that is really rather obvious and self explanatory?

    A story about a guy who was caught doing something illegal, told that he could not use the internet without the monitoring software being present, and finding that he'll have to use windows as the monitoring software isn't linux compatible. It takes a pretty big stretch to get that to 'banned from using linux' I think.

    1. Re:Incompatible software doesn't = 'Banned' by Scamwise · · Score: 1

      I'm amused that the entire US government can't find a way to track internet usage on a linux box.

      --
      Sam "to lazy to register" Look
    2. Re:Incompatible software doesn't = 'Banned' by notamisfit · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they could if they tried; but if one program can support 90+% of the desktop users out there, what's the point? If he really wants to be that "special", he can spend 5 months playing Sudoku on his Linux box.

      --
      Jesus is coming -- look busy!
  50. Star wars? by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 1

    How many years ago was that? And this guy's only now getting in trouble? Sorry, I can't RTFA since it's torrentfreak and my network admin has it blocked...

  51. As the advert above the article say's:- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "State Government say's Linux is to much of a risk".

  52. I'm not real impressed. by igotmybfg · · Score: 1
    This is a gem:

    It isn't the fact that I have to be monitored that bothers me, it is the fact that I have restructure my life (different OS, different software on that OS)
    He doesn't mind that he's being watched, he only minds that he has to switch OSes. That's just bizarre.

    Also, has this person never considered that there are alternatives? (cygwin, wine, xen & other vms?)
    1. Re:I'm not real impressed. by sybesis · · Score: 1

      Nobody really want to be forced to use something that you thrown away...If i were him, i would just not use a computer... Except if i have to do work on it... But seriously, it may look bizarre..but it's like forcing someone to have a religion...or to believe in whatever god... Thats like if a freedom fighter was forced to figth against freedom fighter...

  53. Indeed by sterno · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If it's a choice between Windows and PMITA Prison, Windows is a slightly better option :)

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
  54. Free Advertising for Linux by BinBoy · · Score: 1

    No tracking software for Linux? I should consider switching over from Windows.

  55. if this is true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this really happened,
    this is another proof that your country is more crazy than ever.

  56. Fair? by Karl0Erik · · Score: 0

    Is this quite fair? Of course, he has broken the law, so he should be punished in some way. Still, I mean, this guy is being forced (okay, he doesn't have to use a computer, but still) to use Windows, which gives Microsoft an advantage over other companies like Apple. Is this legal/fair/taxable in the USA?

  57. but wait, there's more . . . by hawk · · Score: 3, Funny

    Surely, somewhere within the bowels of redmond, there remains a copy of "Microsoft Bob" . . .

    hawk

    1. Re:but wait, there's more . . . by Architect_sasyr · · Score: 4, Funny

      We want to torture the man, not break his spirit and destroy his soul!

      --
      Me failed English...
      FreeBSD over Linux. If my comments seem odd, this may explain...
    2. Re:but wait, there's more . . . by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Even worse consider the irony. The government is imprisoning him at home, and as part of the punishment they are forcing him to use windows, so even the government considers being forced to use M$ windows as the equivalent of being forced to be in prison. You would think M$ would do a port of the software to linux at their own expense just so their (P)OS software would be considered prison grade software and being allowed to switch to Linux is like being freed from prison.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  58. Lock me up by Droid+Rot · · Score: 1

    Ordered by the court to use Windows? Hell, if it was me, I'd rather they lock me and be some 400 pound gorilla's bitch before that happened.

  59. Law ruling: by Psicopatico · · Score: 0

    [convicted] Pirates have to run Windows!

    Take your self conclusions now...

    --
    Mastering the English language is fucking easy: all you have to do is to put an f* word in every fucking sentence.
  60. If they can't track... by dayid · · Score: 1

    ...if they can't track what he's doing on Linux - who's to say they can track that he is actually not using it?

    ...and being "assigned" to Windows is NOT being "banned from Linux", it's being banned from everything other than Windows. Please do not ever think that Windows and Linux are the only OS people use.

    1. Re:If they can't track... by Tatsh · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the exact same thing. However, I am sure that they would have people checking his computer every week or so to make sure he does not have Linux on it (of course he could run a live CD, maybe they will take those and bar him from burning CDs? He did, after all, run the 'illegal' torrent site).

      Evading in my opinion by using Linux secretly can only make things worse in this case. The US government is awful at all times.

  61. cruel and unusual punishment indeed! by cdn-programmer · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Ya - having to use winders would be worse than being in gaol!

    Here is a solution. Get a copy of VMware and use it to run a copy of windows and let them put their tracking software in there! End of issue.

    Or... see if the tracking software will run in WINE.

  62. The Description of the Crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  63. That funny scrabbling sound by sjames · · Score: 1

    The funny scrabbling sound you hear is the MS marketing department springing into action to produce their press release, "Linux user switches to Windows, gains freedom". The whole "jail thing" will be notably absent.

  64. Instead, Why not... by charlieman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    run the government software on WINE?

  65. Payback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suppose this gov't tracking software were to fall into the 'wrong hands', that is those who create & spread malicious trojan software, imagine tens or hundreds of thousands of compromised computers continually squirting info to the gov't in a form of DDOS.

    I'm not saying go ahead and to it, but it would be somewhat funny to see it happen.

  66. Geez by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    The insanity continues.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  67. The happy ending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    So he decides to break down and install Windows. After he's finished, he calls up the FBI and says "OK, I've installed Windows. How do I install the monitoring software?" and the operators says "OK. Here's what you've got to do..." and gives a loooong list of instructions. So the guy says "Holy crap! I've got to do all that?!" and the FBI operator says, "I'm just kidding. It came with the OS. Have a nice day."

    1. Re:The happy ending by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      "... good thing I installed it in a virtual machine then."

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  68. Doesn't Linux by ubuwalker31 · · Score: 1

    Doesn't Linux run on Pirate Ships?

  69. it is just simply insane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Crime: copyright infringement of a movie
    Punishment: jail time, confinement, being forced to install government software, most likely a hefty fine as well...
    My conclusion: The system is really fucking broken.

    I mean seriously, I'd consider it highly disturbing for this to be a criminal case at all, let alone jail time. Heck, if this guy gets jail time SCO's lawyers and management deserves life without parole. The US court system is simply broken ( not that this is news, but still... )

  70. Re:Virtual machine / Pure Bologna! by yo_tuco · · Score: 1

    "Since the host OS is MS; the government can always log into his box via terminal services and check the apps he has installed."

    That assumes they also have control of his gateway firewall/router (if he has one) that should be blocking TCP, port 3389 or whatever it is.

  71. What's the point of monitoring? by whoever57 · · Score: 1

    The monitoring is essentially voluntary. By that I mean that there is no software that can be placed on his PC that he cannot disable. And, given that he has physical access to the PC, disable in a manner that cannot be tracked. He's not some clueless guy who would not be able to get around the software. The most obvious means being a live CD.

    Assuming the s/w sends out the monitoring info reat time, he could easily put his PC behind a router, such running a modified version of OpenWRT, or DD-WRT and have it drop certain packets.

    He might just as well keep a log of his activities on paper and submit that to his probation officer.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    1. Re:What's the point of monitoring? by August+Lilleaas · · Score: 1

      I'd probably go insane if I had to run a OS from a CD for 5 months.

  72. Windows license? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, presumably, he won't be buying Windows just to be able to run the tracking tool. The question is, will he be getting a Windows license from the state, or will he have to *cough* download a torrent?

    That reminds me of the guy who was caught stealing parking meters. He was dragged into court and the judge set his bail bond at $2000. So the guy asks: "Can I pay that in quarters?"

  73. Obligatory... by Cryacin · · Score: 5, Funny

    NT phone home...

    --
    Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
  74. Don't link Linux to piracy by Geof · · Score: 1

    Whatever the merits of the argument, it doesn't look good for Linux to be linked to piracy. Imagine if FOSS advocates protested and the media got ahold of this: they would probably label Linux the "Pirate's OS". The guy broke the law; making him use Windows is the least of his punishments. Let this one slide.

    1. Re:Don't link Linux to piracy by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      Whatever the merits of the argument, it doesn't look good for Linux to be linked to piracy. Whatever the merits of the argument, it doesn't look good for Microsoft Windows to be linked with the punishment of a felony - is it so awful that the only people who buy it are convicted felons who are forced to buy it?
  75. RAEP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I guess it's better to get raeped by your OS at home, than to get raped by buba in prison.

  76. His problem is he's a Ubuntu user?... by Trillan · · Score: 1

    His problem is he's a Ubuntu user? I'm sure he more concerned with having to spend the five months in home confinement.

    No, wait. He's a nerd. He probably won't even notice that he's locked in the house.

  77. Re:And on the seventh day, he recompiled from sour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Jew god uses OSX, cos it only works His chosen hardware.
    The Christian god uses XP, cos when it does dies, it takes 3 days to reinstall it.
    The Muslim god uses Windows ME cos it always bombs.

  78. Parole violation by droopycom · · Score: 3, Informative

    All of which would probably be considered a violation of his parole.

    Ie: You are not allowed to use a computer if we cant see what you are doing with it.

    The point is not that he cannot do it. The point is he is not allowed to do it. He is probably not allowed to get a linux shell somewhere else either.

    When the parole officer inspect his computer and see his VMware installation with a linux VM, they would probably put him back in jail.

    But hey it could be worse, they could forbid him to use any computer. He probably should anyway, and try something else.

    1. Re:Parole violation by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 1

      The stupid part is that this isn't actually a technology crime. He isn't endangering anyone by being on the internet, it's not like he's a virus writer or a "security expert". Copyright infringement is the offense here, and it arguably could be done without the use of a computer at all. Jail time and fines are the payment for that behavior. Also, they already caught him when he was using Ubuntu...if they want to find out if he's (stupidly) back to his old tricks, why not use the method they already used to catch him once?

    2. Re:Parole violation by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      When the parole officer inspect his computer and see his VMware installation with a linux VM, they would probably put him back in jail.

      Sure. If he used vmware. But, of course, I mentioned live CDs and USB keys for a reason...

      But my point isn't that he can do it, but rather that government controls over what a person does on their computer are, ultimately futile, unless they watch him 24 hours a day. The best they could probably do is put a sniffer on his broadband connection, and make the use of encryption a violation of his parole ('course, that also outlaws any SSL-enabled websites, but so it goes, it *is* a punishment, after all).

  79. BSOD by Onion · · Score: 0

    I just hope when his Windoze box gets a BSOD, it doesn't violate his probation.

  80. thats actually quite simple good sire.. by biscon · · Score: 1

    because windows sucks ass! ;)

    oh and screw the 8th amendment

  81. A better solution by heretic108 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Windows cracking community often creates thin shims that convincingly emulate the Windows runtime environment and change its behaviour. For example, a relatively little-known framework called 'VXmon'. This is the basis of a lot of the 'loader' style cracks, that mess with API calls and responses, to fool a shareware program into thinking the trial period lasts forever, or disabling nag screens and other trialware behaviour.

    It shouldn't be too hard to put together a 'loader' for this monitoring program to make it turn a blind eye to certain classes of network access. That is, if such a loader hasn't already been written. But if not, that'd be a good assignment for the various 1337 cR4ck1ng Cr3\/\/z out there.

    Of course, the shim would need to heavily disguise its own existence. If the guy got caught using it, he'd better order a healthy supply of KY Gel ready for a holiday in Club Fed.

    --
    -- In the beginning was the WORD, and the WORD was UNSIGNED, and the main(){} was without form and void...
    1. Re:A better solution by DrSkwid · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or the feds could just release the source code. I presume they bought it as part of the contract, or else they are reckless fools.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    2. Re:A better solution by Randseed · · Score: 5, Funny

      He should just violate copyright and post the software to The Pirate Bay and let people have a crack at it (pun intended).

    3. Re:A better solution by wjsroot · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Or he could use an ubuntu live CD...

      --
      Mod others as you would have them mod you.
    4. Re:A better solution by Ben174 · · Score: 1

      But if not, that'd be a good assignment for the various 1337 cR4ck1ng Cr3\/\/z out there.
      There's only 1,337 of them? I coulda swore there was more.
      --
      Here is my home page.
    5. Re:A better solution by jgrahn · · Score: 1

      If the guy got caught using it, he'd better order a healthy supply of KY Gel ready for a holiday in Club Fed.

      This is offtopic but ... it should be obvious that you do not deserve being raped just because you are sent to prison.

      Ok, it was a joke. It's just that it isn't just a joke.

  82. Porn by tokki · · Score: 1

    You're missing the biggest issue here, is that now he can't look at porn. At least, not without someone knowing about it.

  83. Now, THAT is just BULLshit by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Isn't the REAL requirement here to make sure he's not sending malicious signals? If so, the government only need ban him from using VPN or encrypted paths except when dealing with his or trusted banks, real estate, and other trackable/fiduciary institutions.

    As for PERSONAL surfing and development and collaborative works, the government ONLY need to make sure he's not tunneling or handling 'evil content'. The so-called NSA, FBI, and other "experts" need only run protocol analyzers and flag/kick his ass IFF and only IFFF he's connecting to malicious sites AND moving traffic of a questionable volume, as in up/downloading evil content.

    To BAN him from using Ubuntu just signals how STUPID/IGNORANT the lawyers, judge, and others involved are. Besides, ISN'T the OS just another LAYER in the topology? If they can nail him on what he sent & received, then they can discriminate between and overlook by intention what is NOT offensive activity.

    Finally, it is THIS kind of ineptitude or knee-jerk reaction by low-level functionaries and lawyers that shows why many countries are kicking the US' amnesiac/ego-driven ass.

    Sheesh. Our tax dollars NOT at work...

    Goddammit, this kind of hamstringing is inexcusable, in this era of tech.

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  84. spyware or finish out his sentence by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    If he doesn't want spyware on his computer he could just go back to jail instead of having the privilege of probation.

    He should be lucky, there have been cases of hackers, phreakers, etc being banned entirely from operating any form of computer equipment, modem, teleco equipment, etc as the terms of their probation.

    Convicted drunk drivers are often not allowed to drive during their probation except to and from work, if at all. And occasionally are prohibited from drinking between certain hours of the day or at all.

    As a non-windows software engineer I would have to find a new career if my choice was jail time or use windows. same as if my choice was jail time or don't use any computers.

    You might think that pirating videos and what not is okay, or that the punishments are excessive. But if you're smart you won't go and piss off the people with all the power, money and lawyers.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  85. The really simple answer by flayzernax · · Score: 1

    If he violated laws or the computer fraud and abuse act or whatever, why not just BAN HIM from using electronic devices all-together. They do this allot... to skript1 k1dd13z and all... whoever gets dragged before court for violating some techno-taboo.

  86. Windows Required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are they forcing him to purchase windows or will they be providing it for him.. free of charge? Can he install a pirated copy of Windows?

  87. VMware Player + Moka5 by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Mind that Moka5 would be a good option as it uses the free VMWare Player, and lets him have a distribution run within Windows.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  88. Re:No Justification for the MAFIAA. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Corporations pay taxes too and get tax returns, you know. However, they exist only as an end-run about being a group, acting with the rights but not the responsibilities of individuals. Fixed that one for you.
    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  89. Dang! by pimpbott · · Score: 1

    ... and he got busted downloading a Star Wars film? Insult to injury. Too bad it wasn't a good film. :) Okay, the last one was alright, but not great. Could have been worse. At least it wasn't a Jar Jar blooper reel, a Lindsey Lohan movie or something.

  90. It is FORCE by k1e0x · · Score: 1

    Sure.. It's just like when you are being robed at gunpoint.. you *choose* to give them your money instead of getting shot.. so its ok right? They are not even forcing him to go to jail.. he has the choice to fight the cops when they come to take him, and in that case the cops will kill him. It's all his *choice* ya see.

      --

    Lesson: Coercive force *is* force.

    --
    Bringing liberty to the masses. - http://freetalklive.com/
    1. Re:It is FORCE by notamisfit · · Score: 2

      So where was Lucasfilm's choice as to whether or not their movie was going to be on this dumb kid's website? He distributed the copyrighted works of others, without their knowledge or consent, thereby initiating force (in the same sense that pickpocketing or embezzlement is an initiation of force). The government responded with force, in a concept known as "justice" (which is something we want governments to do, well, maybe not the anarchists), so he knows not to do it again and others can possibly learn from his example.

      --
      Jesus is coming -- look busy!
  91. Wow... this is hard to believe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    A guy caught pirating is a FOSSie?

    That's pretty hard to believe. I thought all FOSSies only wanted to crack DVDs to watch them on teh Lunix. That's what they've been saying all these years...

    Next thing you know, the Feds will try getting me to buy the BS claim that people using console mod chips aren't only doing so to use homebrew.

  92. he got off easy? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    He plead guilty.

    Hes a fool anyway.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  93. The issue here is not civil rights by stewartjm · · Score: 1

    The problem with this is not that a convicted criminal is having his rights infriged. This is of course ignoring whether or not whatever he/she did should be a crime with such a punishment.

    The problem here is that in enforcing this sentence the govt/courts/whatever are supporting Microsoft's monopoly on desktop operating systems and proprietary software in general. I.e a goverment agent is interfering in the market, in a way they probably shouldn't be.

    Not to mention the fact that trusting the client to report on itself is stupid. If you really want to monitor someone put in firewall that you control and make them use a very limited HTTP proxy for web access and block everything else off.

  94. Condemned to use Windows... by J4nus_slashdotter · · Score: 1

    ... no liberty of choice anymore ! ;)

  95. Hey Buddy - need a shell X/Windows Account? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey Buddy - need a shell X/Windows Account? For as much as X on windows interferes with almost everything, I suspect it could be enough to be missed by the tracking software.

    Also, load TOR.

    VMWare with Linux as the host could help too. Assuming that isn't against the rules. Public library computer or "borrow" a laptop with a 3G card.

  96. Divide by Zero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's see. Divide cost of Windows by cost of Ubuntu... Oops a divide-by-zero error. That makes Windows, what, infinitely more expensive than Ubuntu? The costs of a car vs. motorcycle and Windows vs. Linux aren't really comparable at all. Personally, I tell the gov't to keep my computer and I'll buy a better one in five months. The cost of Windows OS would go a long way toward better hardware.

    1. Re:Divide by Zero by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      The cost of a Windows OS would get you a processor. Maybe. Windows costs about $100. Also, cost comparison is done with subtraction, not division.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
  97. Remote X session? by FauxReal · · Score: 1

    So he runs a Windows OS, does that mean he can have a remote X session to another box? Doesn't sound like there's any restrictions on networking... or encrypted tunneling for that matter. Of course they probably record his keystrokes and network traffic. Sometimes I wonder about the FBI though. I worked at this net cafe that someone posted information to a NRA message board about a cop killing that happened the day before in a neighboring state that was not known to the public. So the FBI shows up to copy all our HDDs. First it was 2 people, then it was 8, 1 person working, another helping and 6 drinking coffee. They all stood around using some weird disk copy program I never saw before that took 6 hours to copy a 20gb hdd. Then they took the copies and left us the originals. I woulda thought they'd keep the original disks. At least they paid us for tying up 6 computers all day.

    1. Re:Remote X session? by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

      They can't take the computers if they're a source of revenue.

      US v. Indymedia.

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
  98. costs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does he have to pay for the software?
    Is it FOSS?
    Can you share it?

  99. No he can't do that either by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    The Court order also requires him to eschew alcohol and other intoxicants. I agree, though, in general, if you have to use Windows, it is much better to do so drunk.

  100. Tags for this article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cruelandunusual harsh injustice torture unfair

  101. Why not? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I mean, I understand it's really up to the FBI how they want to do this -- after all, a convict has no rights.

    I also understand that automotive analogies are lame.

    However, supposing he was allowed to leave the house, would they restrict him to one brand of car?

    I think what this shows, more than anything, is how stupidly incompatible software is. Java had the right idea (but a poor implementation). Software should be platform-agnostic -- perhaps enough so that the FBI could force him to run their own OS, and he'd still have all his favorite software.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    1. Re:Why not? by notamisfit · · Score: 1

      Software isn't platform agnostic because there's really only one platform that counts.

      --
      Jesus is coming -- look busy!
  102. He deserves it by Cyno · · Score: 1

    Never upload your pirated stuff from your own systems or networks, use the neighbor's.

  103. New wireless router/modem+live cd= by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A court that might as well tell him not to do anything naughty. Why do they even try? It's like a blind babysitter! What's the point?

  104. robed at gunpoint by Gonoff · · Score: 1

    How often does someone make a victim put a robe on while they point a gun at them where you live?

    Here, someone might get robbed at gunpoint. I like your version better...

    --
    I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
    1. Re:robed at gunpoint by k1e0x · · Score: 1

      You are too clever.

      --
      Bringing liberty to the masses. - http://freetalklive.com/
  105. That would be difficult. by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    LiveCD? He's confined to his house, and his Windows activity is monitored. How's he going to get a copy of that LiveCD without his parole officer noticing?

    Modified router? Same problem. Assuming the government has confiscated his router, he's stuck with stock. Depending on how detailed their monitoring software is, they might see him trying to mess with it.

    About the only way out is to just unplug the cable, thus removing any real incentive for him to use his computer un-monitored in the first place.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  106. Cruel and Unusual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Poor little guy. No one deserves that kind of punishment =(

  107. Where do you want to go today? by mevets · · Score: 1

    I wonder if apple have an ad in the works where pc-guy, wearing blank-and-white stripes, is talking about windows as a condition of his incarceration....

    1. Re:Where do you want to go today? by joeler · · Score: 1

      Good to know the current government has Windows to keep an eye on evildoers,someone needs to keep an eye on all the evildoers, you know the people that don't think the way they do or GOD forbid consider voting for the opposition party

      --
      >>>please remove "nospam" from email address
  108. How do you reason that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > So as long as a white-collar criminal stashes his money away where the government can't get at it, there should be no punishment?

    No, then you imprison them until they agree to fork over the cash. Otherwise, you garnish their wages to get the money back. Oh, and you don't let them leave the country until they've repaid it all.

    So long as they have control over *you* there isn't any money of yours they can't get.

  109. Incorrect tagging by Daimanta · · Score: 1

    Why is this article tagged "linux"? I thought that the guy was banned from using linux.

    Please tag "!linux"

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
  110. How will they enforce this? by Ryu2 · · Score: 1

    It says that he is free to leave his home during certain hours. What's to prevent him from using someone else's connection or going to an Internet cafe?

    --
    There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
  111. There is a loophole by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    they claim he has to install the Spyware app that monitors him on his computer.

    Just use two computers. One is a low end Windows box, install the spyware trojan on that one. Use it to browse Wikipedia, Slashdot, and other approved sites. The other is a Linux box, he can do whatever he wants to on that one.

    Either that or dual boot the hard drive. Install Windows on a spare partition, and put the Spyware trojan on it, and just boot into Ubuntu when it asks for an OS choice. That way he has the spyware trojan on his system, but can still use Ubuntu. He hasn't broken the agreement, and they never said he couldn't have two operating systems installed on his hard drive, just that he had to have Windows installed with the spyware trojan on it.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  112. Don't play games with your parole officer by westlake · · Score: 2, Insightful
    And have Linux boxes behind it?

    Brilliant. Your advice to this guy is turn a lightly supervised probation into a spanking-new charge of parole violation - playing against the two felony convictions already on his record?

    Go directly to jail, do not pass Go, do not collect $200.

    1. Re:Don't play games with your parole officer by renehollan · · Score: 1

      How is that a parole violation? He IS using Windows, and further more, the tracking software has the opportunity to check everything on the Windows box, like the traffic that enters and leaves it. Saying you MUST use Windows is NOT the same as you MUST NOT use anything else AS LONG AS the tracking software can observe what you do.

      --
      You could've hired me.
  113. Linux is free software by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

    Free as in freedom.

    I think forcing him to use windows could actually be illegal.

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  114. Gov't Banned from Using Linux by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    the gov't doesn't have any tracking software for Linux.

    That's the best news for nerds I've ever seen reported on Slashdot.
    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Gov't Banned from Using Linux by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

      That's just what they want you to think...

      --

      Lodragan Draoidh
      The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
  115. Ha by EagleEye101 · · Score: 1

    No worries he can just get a copy off of bit torrent... no but on a more serious note, whats from stopping him from setting up this windows machine and just to use some cheap linux box that he has hidden away?

  116. When I go to jail ... by jshackney · · Score: 1
    From TFA,

    "It is just a ridiculous situation. Why should I conform to them when I am consenting to the software... they should have software that conforms to me."


    Next time I find myself in jail I'll be sure to request the Presidential Suite. Hopefully it has a thermostat on the wall so I can turn up the heat when it gets cold. Oh, and no roommates. I don't get along well with some people. I'd like a nice fridge and microwave in case I need to heat up a yummy Swanson breakfast or a Hungry Man dinner. Yeah, and cable TV, none of this satellite crap, unless I can get all the hockey games. Gotta see hockey.

    I don't know why our criminals feel so entitled. You don't get punished in the U.S. anymore, you're coddled and pampered. God! It's so damn frustrating!
  117. Which version of Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they're giving him Win3.11!!

  118. Whatever happened to 'never trust the client'? by SleepyHappyDoc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This seems ludicrous to me, not that he has to use Windows, but that they are depending on a program under his complete control to monitor him. What's to stop him from subverting the monitoring...sending back 'all clear' messages to the government and doing whatever the hell he wants? If they really want to monitor him, they should install some kind of locked packet-trapping box on the line coming in to his house...anything less than that is simply untrustworthy, especially considering the person has already shown an ability to do stuff with computers that they'd rather he didn't.

    --
    Stasis is death. Embrace change.
    1. Re:Whatever happened to 'never trust the client'? by beer_maker · · Score: 1
      What makes you think they won't spot-check him in exactly that manner? Part of probation is seeing if the supervised-but-not-incarcerated-convict is still breaking the law he got put away for (or any others).

      --
      Hmmm. Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  119. Sentence Him to use Windows ME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let the Punishment fit the Crime.

    Or Maybe Vista with Full Security enabled.

  120. WebOS wormhole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What happens if he uses a browser to access a WebOS like one of these? Doesn't this entire scheme fall apart if the monitoring is anything less than a complete key- and mouse-logger?

  121. Re:Why...A Hero Shall Rise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how lucrative starting such a business to provide these things to authorities would be, seems like a fun project

    Faced with a prison sentence, he decides to take up, not law, but coding, and instead of sticking it to the man, he turns around and does the civic minded thing by providing it to the state! Showing the authorities the power of open source, not just in the business world, but in the best interests of the state!

    *wakes up

  122. yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux shows it's incompatibility once again. When is that Linux stupidity going to stop? I bet never stupids are always going to exist. Linux only means one thing. Wasted resources to make things incompatible with the rest of the world. And guess what most of us will not use it at all even if you claim that your free crap that is so bad that you can't sell it won't runs in another operating system different from windows. After all as windows can be emulated on Linux. So does Linux software.

  123. He is worried about... by glitch23 · · Score: 1

    being forced to purchase Windows when he is unemployed so I suggest he just use a pirated version of it and voila, problem solved.

    --
    this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
  124. I'd be interested in... by glitch23 · · Score: 1

    how he got a hold of the movie before its release. I wonder if his source was arrested and convicted?

    --
    this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
  125. Wrong, wrong, wrong. by DJCacophony · · Score: 1

    They're not forcing him to patronize a specific company. Besides, do you think the alcohol interlocks appeared out of thin air?

    --
    Slow Down, Cowboy! It's been 60 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment.
  126. Ubuntu Live CD by fireheadca · · Score: 1

    Luckily for him Ubuntu is a LiveCD Distro. He can leave it in the drive and if anyone asks, he can say he was installing Firefox. Problem solved.

  127. wow man by dexomn · · Score: 1

    He might as well have pirated wordstar.

  128. "2 Felonies they gave me... " by Nutty_Irishman · · Score: 1

    and that they would require (force) me to purchase software while I a currently unemployed and relatively unemployable with the 2 felonies that they gave me Christ, he speaks it as if it was some rare airborne illness that he caught from some guy on the bus.

    Let me help you Scott:

    and that they would require (force) me to purchase software while I a currently unemployed and relatively unemployable with the 2 felonies that I inflicted upon myself Maybe he should go ask someone from New York who was convicted for a DUI and had his car impounded and auctioned off and is now left with no vehicle and a $20,000 car loan to pay off (not kidding, it happens) what they think of his sentence. To be honest, I think he should just be happy that they didn't take and auction off his computer.

    1. Re:"2 Felonies they gave me... " by splatter · · Score: 1

      /i
      Maybe he should go ask someone from New York who was convicted for a DUI and had his car impounded and auctioned off and is now left with no vehicle and a $20,000 car loan /i

      This is not a solution. Don't get me wrong drunk driving is a serious problem, and as someone who got caught right on the legal limit once it's no frigging fun on the other side either.

      But seizing citizens possessions is not the solution to crime be it drunk driving, prostitution, or drug related, and goes against the original founders wanted.

      http://www.fear.org/fposit.html
      http://www.fear.org/

      --
      "(I) have this unfortunate condition that causes me not to believe a single thing any politician says when a mic's on.
  129. Re:Thank god I don't live in a retarded nation by Sneakernets · · Score: 3, Funny

    And where would that be? International Copyright Laws don't apply where you live?

    Or did you forget to post AC?

    --
    "No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Thomas Jefferson
  130. SSH?? by Danzigism · · Score: 1

    I wonder what the tracking software does exactly.. is it a full desktop monitoring software? like a vnc session type thing? or does it simply monitor web activity? i'm curious to see if he could get away with some sneaky ssh'ing and tunnelling.. i'm sure he'll figure out a way around their tracking regardless.. there's always a way ;)

    --
    *plays the Apogee theme song music*
  131. Heh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *** Looks like a case of cruel and unusual punishment to me" ***

    Fucker should go to jail and basically be paying the movie studio most of his money for the rest of his life.

  132. you fool by coryking · · Score: 1

    Clearly you haven't considered the case were the extra-terrestrial life isn't using Free Software (tm). RMS would probably show up at the alien prime ministers door and demand a meeting. I mean, alien software should be Free(tm) man, Free(tm). It is unethical for alien programmers to implement space ship software for alien money. ... Course, the counter-troll is to assume that by definition, an advanced civilization has to be using Free Software (tm). Clearly if they were using Non-Free Software (tm), they'd never be able to fly over to earth in the first place. ... And the counter-counter troll is to ask why they always crash into our planet if their alien Free Software (tm) was so good.

  133. Demonstration of intent by xixax · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Which whatever. There's many things said person might do. All of them will leave traces. All of them are likely to be poorly received by by whoever is going to assess compliance. Any sign of fiddling is probably going to be deemed as wilful violation of conditions and maybe result in a Mitnick style prohibition. The goal is not to prevent the behaviour.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
  134. I'd rather run ME than Vista. by twitter · · Score: 0, Troll

    You can buy a computer that came with ME and actually worked. It's not like Vista has better device support yet. My mom ran ME for six years, but Dell has been unable to wrangle Vista.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  135. Piracy Punishment by Moniker42 · · Score: 1

    Home confinement? For piracy?!

    I thought the worst that could happen was being sued for a bunch of money by the MPAA/RIAA?

  136. Slashdot banned from using misleading headlines by Lemming+Mark · · Score: 1

    heh - no, just kidding

  137. Re:And on the seventh day, he recompiled from sour by atomicstrawberry · · Score: 1

    What are you talking about. Of course Steve Jobs uses Mac OS X.

  138. Get Real. by twitter · · Score: 0, Troll

    By `indirect' I mean things like not being able to get a good job, being shunned/tormented/killed by people merely because you're a registered sex offender, etc.

    Who, outside a big dumb company is going to shun someone for having shared a movie? The punishment is harsh because it does not represent community outrage, it represents the will of the movie industry. There are a bunch of trolls spewing bullshit about what a bad man this guy is, but how many copyright warriors are really out there?

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  139. Super Disclaimer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi, I'm twitter. You might now me because I've posted over nine thousand times on Slashdot. While the post above this one might seem to convey humour, it's really just me venting my weird obsession with Microsoft. I haven't used Microsoft products since 1996, and so I wouldn't really know how anything in that environment works at all.

    I use terms like "M$" and "Winblows" because I believe that they're clever, and Netcraft confirms that cleverness scores people mod points around here, although it doesn't always work.

    As always, I shall ignore people who reply to me to point out I am overreacting or just flapping uselessly in the wind. I find reason and logic to be inconvenient in my quest to convince the world that they must switch to free software or suffer the consequences. I consider myself an "evangelist" and I believe people should put up with me because I Am Right.

    But, I urge you to just use your head when reading my posts. Most of what I say can safely be discarded as sophomoric fluff designed to bring out the worse in people. Make your own choices about technology and be smart.

    Thanks.

  140. He should port it by jihadist · · Score: 1

    Hacker: "Your honor, I've ported the monitoring system to Linux so you pigs can watch me not hack but also not have to deal with the fucking animated dog when I want to search for files."

    Judge: "Actually, we're just moving you to Vista..."

  141. laugh on if you like but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wouldn't it be smarter to force him to use a customized router appliance device.

    come on, so he use one computer with the tracking software installed.
    sure it can be circumvented. but it would be easier for him to use another computer.

    of course then he could also develop a little program or just adapt one of those they used back in the 'late' days that were moving the cursor around 'n clicking and generating "I'm looking at banner ads" revenue.

    but then he could also use a computer with a wireless card and hook up to the friend neighbourhood spiderweb. ..this sentence is also a joke.

    would violating this 'sentence' be compromising the DMCA?
    I just can't help myself, I'm drunk and I just helped my self.
    ohh when do I stop. ahhhhhh

  142. The video add when I hit this link.... by PoorImpulseControl · · Score: 1

    was for Windows Server 2003. On Slashdot?!? If the marketing guys at M$ saw that, they would laugh their pants off.

  143. Mod Parent UP!! by Bastardchyld · · Score: 1

    You are absolutely right. If our legislature is not fulfilling the will of the people by putting laws on the books that we want, and getting rid of the ones that we don't then we have no use for them and they should be replaced.

    Well put.

    --
    $diff terrorists hippies
    $
    $rm -rf *terrorists *hippies
  144. This sentence is a joke by Vspirit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    subject. ..use another computer on the same network ..if they implement tracking routerwise, use the friendly neighbourhood wireless spiderweb.

    1. Re:This sentence is a joke by Dan541 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or a VPN,

        if the Government cant run applications on Linux Whats the chance of them recognizing a VPN?

      ~Dan

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
  145. Mod Parent UP!! by Bastardchyld · · Score: 1

    The police should uphold the law as it is now. That's what they're there for, and that's why the law exists. If the law is a bad law, then it is the duty of the electorate to change it - not for the police to take the law into their own hands. 100% right on the money. The consitution did not include police officers as a branch of government, giving them a place in checks and balances... The only situation where non-enforcement is legal is when an executive order is issued by the President or Governor depending on where the law originates (federal or state).

    --
    $diff terrorists hippies
    $
    $rm -rf *terrorists *hippies
  146. Security problem ! by wtarreau · · Score: 1

    What if his shiny new windows gets rooted and turned into a bot ? Will he get accused of doing all the attacks himself ? They'd better install a logging appliance between his PC and the Net and let him use a more secure OS!

  147. Where's the sensationalism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Title should read: Windows OS used as punishment in piracy court case!

  148. Death sentence by kavehmz · · Score: 1

    I would perefer death sentence ;) :P

    --
    Be like shadow in the light or darkness.KMZ
  149. Oblig by jon287 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Run or run not. There is no try.

    --
    To boldly use to and too two times and get it right too! They're not gonna believe their eyes when they see it there!
  150. Abandonware? by krunchyfrog · · Score: 0

    So, why doesn't he install Windows 98 SE or NT 4.0 or some other obsolete Windows OS that MS won't give a rat's ass about? The support is dead, but the OS downloadable and usable.

    --
    printf($randomline(sigs.txt) \n "-- "$randomline(authors.txt));
    -- myself
  151. Bridge the connection by sveinhal · · Score: 1

    Why not use a windows based network bridge and run the monitor software on that? Then he could connect via the bridge, using Linux or whatever he'd like.

  152. "Banned" from Linux by mqduck · · Score: 1

    This is a strangely titled article... By the same logic, he's banned from BeOS and DOS too. ;)

    --
    Property is theft.
  153. Flamebait article now also on frontpage? by Ptur · · Score: 1

    Seriously, what's the point of the article? If a /. user posts such a remark it gets flagged as flamebait, but it seems it _is_ ok to put it on the front page. I use Windows (W2K) and Linux (Ubuntu Feisty) on a daily basis as development machines and have (minor) annoyances on both. Both will do weird stuff and crash. YES I consider the shell crashing also a crash from a user point of view, restarting it is sometimes as painfull as rebooting, it is actually worse than my W2K box (which crashes maybe once a year?) YMMV of course. So in that regard, I would say forcing him to use windows may be a good learning experience for a linux user to get to know windows intead of laughing about it without ever using it. Now go and tag this as flamebait....

  154. Wasn't this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    M$'s plan all along?

  155. Ubuntu?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was using Ubuntu? It seems to me that he was already punished...

  156. WHY?! by xenobyte · · Score: 1

    Why did this guy plead guilty in the first place?

    He was convicted according to the ACT act which even at its title equates filesharing with theft, which is fundamentally wrong. He should plead not guilty on the basis that 0's and 1's cannot be owned and that the copyright owners so far has failed to prove conclusively that an illegal download costs revenue in any way, shape or form. As this never can be proven beyond any doubt, filesharing will be legal from then on.

    --
    "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
  157. VMWare by mistralol · · Score: 1


    first install VMWare
    2nd Install FreeBSD since he isnt allow linux.

    2nd Method Have a friend fork ubuntu change the title and fork the kernel and call it something else as well. There for it is no longer ubuntu linux ;)

  158. Cry me a river. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pirate gets punished.

    Sorry, but why does anyone even care? He broke the law, he's getting a pretty fucking weak sentence.

  159. Buying Windows as an additional fine by FoamingToad · · Score: 1

    "The guy did steal, he is being punished, and he is confined to home, but they make him purchase Windows? This is what I really find objectionable, how the hell is somebody who is unemployed supposed to purchase Windows?"

    Come on, do you mean to tell me a pirate won't already have a load of warezed copies of Windows? Sheesh.

    F_T

  160. criminal copyright infringement by howlingmadhowie · · Score: 1

    criminal copyright infringement i mean seriously, wtf?
    1. Re:criminal copyright infringement by Neil · · Score: 1
  161. Not so bad.... by crhylove · · Score: 1

    YET, but fast forward 10 years, to a time when Ubuntu will own the desktop everywhere. Won't that suck THEN!?!?

    --
    I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
  162. Torrent Windows by Gojaroo · · Score: 0

    He should just use a torrent to get Windows.

  163. This just in... by Iloinen+Lohikrme · · Score: 1

    MS marketing department announced today in a bit to prove MS reputation as a socially conscious company a series of public service messages. The series includes as an example messages titled "Buying software is being American" and "Communists are evil terrorist". As an example on what to come, the MS public service team, previously known as the marketing, gave us a quick preview on one of their new public service messages. Here it comes!

    "Hi, I'm sk0t. I'm a bad person and an convict. I wasn't always like this. My family was an all around good honest hard working church going your typical American family. My life was just good and I had all good things coming at me. Then one day it all changed. I met some new people over the Internet and as I were very naive back then, I trusted them and thought they were like me, loving god fearing persons,, but I was very wrong! They talked a lot about this thing called Linux and how it was better and more free than Windows. As then I was an freedom loving American I thought that having more freedom would be good, and listened them and tried this Linux. Oh boy, if I had known then what I know now, I newer would have done that. As soon as I started using Linux and listening more of these people, my life took an more deeper turn down to a hell. My family and friends tried to stop me, they intervened and read the holy bible to me, but it was too late, I was too deep in the world of sin, that there was no going back. No, the only way for me was down, down to become an dirty criminal stealing peoples hard earned work for my own pleasure. Finally my career as an professional criminal master mind became to an end, the police got me, and I was brought in front of the law to answer for my sins. I just crumbled then, my life flashed in front of me, I saw my family and all the good that god had gave me, and I saw all the harm and wrong I had done. I repented! I confessed my quilt and throed myself in mercy of justice. Luckily for me, the good judge saw that there was still some good in me. I did some time in jail, it was good, I deserved that. After jail time I was allowed to go back home. They even were so decent that they made me install Windows back to my computer. It feels so good. Every day when I'm using Windows, it feels like that I'm becoming a better person, and I feel that I'm liberated from my wicked ways. This is my story. I hope you have learned something from this and if you haven't I have just one thing to say: kids don't do jail, don't use Linux. Thank you for your time.

    And next up we have a story about Slashdot readers having too much time in a friday.

  164. Hmmm by kurbchekt · · Score: 0

    I wonder if they would've bought him a new box if used a Commie 64 to upload 2844.4 floppies...

  165. Vista Redemption... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Vista Redemption...

  166. So...... by Igarden2 · · Score: 1

    This is what they call justice?

    --
    Normally I ascribe all life to intelligent design, but in your case I'll make an exception.
  167. Hell, just don't use the computer at all by jocknerd · · Score: 1

    Of course, the gov't would probably force him to.

  168. Yeah, right. Backups work wonders... by Gazzonyx · · Score: 1

    I, personally, love when I make an ISO of a game I've bought. I'm irresponsible, and I know it, so I file the backup copy with my old source code CDs "Just In Case". Then when I scratch or lose said CD and need my backup copy to install or play the game, I get the following: "This is not the correct CD, please insert the CD that matches the CD key you entered!", or something to that effect. This is followed by loud noises and the shattering of the first object within my reach, which usually ends up being the original copy of another game I own whose backup copy will cause the cycle to start again.

    --

    If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

  169. People use live CDs? by tinkerghost · · Score: 1

    Damn that's slow, why not build a live Flash drive & run that. Not only do you get all the advantages of a live CD, you can actually update it as patches come out without having to completely reburn it and it's shitloads faster than a CD.

    1. Re:People use live CDs? by kd5ujz · · Score: 1

      Its cheaper to smash/microwave a CD when the PO comes knocking...........

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
  170. Do they have the right to do that? by tokul · · Score: 1

    Does court have the right to force use of Windows? Person violated the law, but they are not puting him in jail and violating his right to choose software that he wants to use.

    1. Re:Do they have the right to do that? by antispam_ben · · Score: 1

      Does court have the right to force use of Windows?
      The court is NOT forcing him to use Windows, any more than they are forcing him to take showers. He is perfectly free not to use a computer.

      --
      Tag lost or not installed.
  171. He could use VMWare to spoof the tracking program by meldroc · · Score: 1

    Not only that, but he could keep the Windows virtual machine perfectly pristine, so the tracking software is always reporting data that shows he's being a good boy, even if he's doing other things in the base Ubuntu system or other virtual machines...

    Of course, if he gets too cute with his setup, the feds will find an excuse to show he violated his parole, and back to prison he goes... We do have to keep in mind that parole officers probably search his place at random.

    --

    Meldroc, Waster of Electrons
  172. Inaccurate Headline by Blackknight · · Score: 1

    First of all, this guy is not banned from using linux. Under the terms of his probation he has to install monitoring software or not use a computer, you could just as easily say that he is banned from using a Macintosh.

    Second, he's lucky he's not just sitting in jail for the next five months. He committed a crime and now he has to face the consequences, boo-hoo. Am I supposed to feel sorry for this guy? Here's a tip. If you don't want to go to jail for copyright infringement, DON'T PIRATE STUFF!

  173. So how many people killed on the road by piracy? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Quick quiz, how many people get killed on the road by drunk drivers vs how many get killed by amateur copyright infringers. You can round it down to the nearest thousand.

    Oh, absolutly nobody has even been killed by reckless torrenting or filesharing under the influence of kazaa.

    Since the two offences don't compare, why do you think you can compare the sentences? How about this, somebody gets his hand chopped off for stealing a loaf of bread, he shouldn't complain because another guy got his head cut off for murder?

    A drunk driver is a dangerous person who thinks his/her pleasure outweighs the safety of every other road user. This guy is just someone who shared a movie. Big deal, is George Lucas or anybody else in the poorhouse because of this guy? No, they are all filthy rich. So where is the harm?

    yes, it is still a crime, but in any civilized society the punishment of a crime should reflect the harm it does to society as a whole, not what some small subgroup thinks. Even the germans realize this. When the germans are more humane then you, you got a problem.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  174. Use an internet cafe instead... by fantomas · · Score: 1

    He could always use an internet cafe, perhaps get access down the local public library (many of these are free access these days).

    1. Re:Use an internet cafe instead... by phedre · · Score: 1

      That would sound like a really good option, of course... if he wasn't confined to his house and could GO to such places.

  175. What if he has a Mac? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's so dumb to try and make him run tracking software.

    Why don't they just say, don't touch a computer for this amount of time. If he has half a brain, the tracking software wouldn't catch anything anyway.

  176. Poor guy... by manowar821 · · Score: 1

    If this dude lived close to me I'd swing by and drop off my collection of LiveCDs, so he doesn't have to DL them and risk getting caught.

    Fucking anti-piracy laws, they treat these people like murderers.

    --
    Internet: Serious Business
  177. QQ More... by Zanthor · · Score: 1

    He Can download a current copy of windows from Bittorrent...

    --

    Zanthor

  178. That will keep him busy by pete.com · · Score: 0

    So really what they intend is to keep his system so busy with malicious software he can't do anything else.

  179. Windows PE - Prison Edition by textureglitch · · Score: 1

    Soooo, he's going to get a Windows that monitors everything he does, spies on all his activities and phones home about them.

    How is this any different from Vista?

    Why do they even need to install a piece of software for this? Couldn't they just subpoena Microsoft for all this info?

    --
    Never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by ignorance or stupidity. -Isaac Asimov
  180. Alternate solution by suitti · · Score: 1

    Put him on dialup for the duration.

    --
    -- Stephen.
  181. You misunderstand by athloi · · Score: 1

    The point is that he can keep using Linux for his daily tasks by running it in, say, a VMware window, which I've done in the past and is quite comfortable. Your objections are based on a misinterpretation of what I and others have posted, and probably apply elsewhere.

  182. Most hints (vmware, cygwin, wine) are misleaded by Bronzo · · Score: 1

    You deal with circumventing the duty (being monitored) by running wine, cygwin, vmware and the like. That's not the point. There is a confinement rule, and the question is: is it fair? He claims costs (buy windows) and being punished to use windows. The cost argument isn't changed by running wine, cygwin or vmware. And he might not be interested in using a technique, which brings him straigt back to jail, if he is observed to circumvent the monitoring software. Those advices aren't helpful - they just show, that all you experts know vmware, wine and cygwin. Congratulation. So is here a skandal of unfairnes? Do you expect judges to be informed about linux, and that you can't simply run a monitoring software written for MS-Xme2kista on a linux system? How does a judge work? Someone suggests running a monitoring software, the judges agrees - amen. Btw.: slashdot doesn't report, but here http://torrentfreak.com/bittorrent-admin-monitored -by-us-government-forced-to-dump-linux/ you see, he was convicted for "uploading 'Star Wars: Episode III' onto the internet hours before the theatrical release". Not the common fair-use dvd-ripper, or sometimes-torrent-user. Of course I would prefer 5 months in jail with ubuntu instead of 5 months in the MS-jail. But I guess a equivalent Linux-monitoring-software would have been accepted by the judge.

  183. ...and to ensure this, we lobotomize you. (n/t) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (n/t) in the title means that you should not miss out by not reading the message-text.