Backwards. Social science doesn't know what scientific evidence (no scare quotes) means, rendering the field no more than the 6th dictionary entry - a particular branch of knowledge. I'd even take exception with that last word in relation to SS.
You sir, cannot read minds. That first part is a tired, old canard from long before you were born - bullshit line then and remains so. The second is you presenting yourself as some sort of judge over two people at once.
You have a set of people's perceptions about how welcome they feel. From that you can gather no factual conclusions other than percentages of those who felt thus and such.
Social science is more than a matter of "looks". It is a changing of the fundamental aspect of science, dealing with facts.
This is an appeal to what, exactly? Authority? Don't believe those folks are into research all that much, so no, no authority based on previous solid research.
That it's a report on their own baby? Vested interest skews results.
They don't list everyone involved, but [as far as I can tell,] none of the people named for assistance are in women's studies.
Are you making an attempt to equate the presence of DRM with the presence of slavery? If not, understand that the "side" referred to here is in context, as the correct side of the DRM issue to be on and your comment pedantry.
Try to explain "the importance" using logic other than "I believe!" and you'll have more luck. Try understanding that others may intelligently disagree and you'll have them listening to your side more. Both the anti-DRM and open software movements come across as pretty rabid. It's a turn off.
And their platform is rl theaters. It could be argued that those showings are the more exclusive if you want to see more than one movie a month. Just because *you* can afford more doesn't mean Jean Luque can.
The problem is all the models have predicted more warming than has happened. The basic problem is that there's no evidence that the Earth being warmer by a few degrees (has been much warmer than that many times before) will be catastrophic.
Slashdot Mirror
Seems like the appropriate way to pull out of an accord you were forced into unilaterally.
Backwards. Social science doesn't know what scientific evidence (no scare quotes) means, rendering the field no more than the 6th dictionary entry - a particular branch of knowledge. I'd even take exception with that last word in relation to SS.
My first name **is** an initial. Yes, I have to explain it all the time, but after I do, there's no issue.
You sir, cannot read minds. That first part is a tired, old canard from long before you were born - bullshit line then and remains so. The second is you presenting yourself as some sort of judge over two people at once.
You have a set of people's perceptions about how welcome they feel. From that you can gather no factual conclusions other than percentages of those who felt thus and such.
Social science is more than a matter of "looks". It is a changing of the fundamental aspect of science, dealing with facts.
Subtext is typically projection, bro.
If you mean acting as more than unthinking animals, we already do. If you mean more than that, you're just really saying acting in a you-approved way.
This is an appeal to what, exactly? Authority? Don't believe those folks are into research all that much, so no, no authority based on previous solid research.
That it's a report on their own baby? Vested interest skews results.
For accuracy.
Hmmm... That sounded like an uninformed snark.
I have highlighted your problem.
Are you making an attempt to equate the presence of DRM with the presence of slavery? If not, understand that the "side" referred to here is in context, as the correct side of the DRM issue to be on and your comment pedantry.
You're an AC and nothing you write about yourself is worth believing.
Try to explain "the importance" using logic other than "I believe!" and you'll have more luck. Try understanding that others may intelligently disagree and you'll have them listening to your side more. Both the anti-DRM and open software movements come across as pretty rabid. It's a turn off.
And their platform is rl theaters. It could be argued that those showings are the more exclusive if you want to see more than one movie a month. Just because *you* can afford more doesn't mean Jean Luque can.
I found the clairvoyant! Someone who knows that the poster wasn't on break or posting from home.
Sir, you're lying.
Typically HR will hand you a pamphlet of company policy. So, they will indeed tell you what your rights within the company are.
You're aware that state and city govs are distinct and the states typically don't interfere with city management, correct?
Indeed. Now we needs compare agendas.
Please indicate those times and the flora/fauna that existed in them.
No, you burn *other* wood or combustibles.
They aren't thinking in those terms at all. It's about socioeconomic goals.
That some say it is a problem does not make it a problem. Those saying have an agenda.
No it is not and no, it has not. Understanding chaotic systems is nowhere near understood.
The problem is all the models have predicted more warming than has happened. The basic problem is that there's no evidence that the Earth being warmer by a few degrees (has been much warmer than that many times before) will be catastrophic.