Depends on if his employer is in the business of creating construction tools instead of just supplying construction workers. And as I pointed out elsewhere, many construction workers bring their own tools for work and just the simple ones like hammers.
No. Your 'smurfhammer' is not part of the construction. It's just a tool used to do said construction. The contract for would be for the construction, not the tools. Construction workers quite frequently bring their own tools to use at the site from hammers to air compressors. What they *cannot* take home (without it being theft) would be the nails and excess wiring purchased for the project.
And no, 'spare time' is relevant. The work this guy is doing is directly tied in with the software being constructed, to use your analogy. Only by doing it in his spare time could it become his.
Which makes this all subjective. There are already comments by people who say that anything not done in C is ugly, so how to tell that these same people didn't pepper other's code with that statement? Many people think code is an ugly hack merely because it wasn't done the way they would code it.
I've seen code written with procedures named for Alice in Wonderland characters and activities. Yet, I've seen that kind of thing defended here as 'creative'. 'Ugly hack' in a comment is a worthless indicator.
Aside from a fatwah issued by a cleric, perhaps you could provide a cite. As I stated elsewhere, Mohammed has been portrayed by Islamic artists for centuries.
If you're actually ignorant as to that, you probably shouldn't be commenting on how to alter study for the sexes. But, to give you a small push, male and female brains are structurally and hormonally different.
But, I suspect you already know this as "brains and" were the only words you elided. Unless, of course, you don't understand that emotions are based in the brain.
Have to agree, as the home owner is becoming what is essentially a competing power company. If not the entire meter, then at least the difference in cost from a typical one to the bi-directional variety.
False analogy. There's a huge difference between a personal assistant, who by definition *I* know personally, and a faceless business entity who I know not at all (read adversarial entity) scraping 'enough' information about me to presume it knows me sufficiently to second guess what I want and give me that instead of what I requested. Truthfully, why on earth would I trust such an entity?
That's the problem with hypotheticals. They don't reflect the reality we live in.
"even well meaning officers usually end up" You know this how? My anecdotal evidence from a friend who went through the experience is the the police were very considerate and concerned with her well-being and treated her in an utmost professional manner.
Slashdot Mirror
1) State dependent, contract or not.
Depends on if his employer is in the business of creating construction tools instead of just supplying construction workers. And as I pointed out elsewhere, many construction workers bring their own tools for work and just the simple ones like hammers.
No. Your 'smurfhammer' is not part of the construction. It's just a tool used to do said construction. The contract for would be for the construction, not the tools. Construction workers quite frequently bring their own tools to use at the site from hammers to air compressors. What they *cannot* take home (without it being theft) would be the nails and excess wiring purchased for the project.
And no, 'spare time' is relevant. The work this guy is doing is directly tied in with the software being constructed, to use your analogy. Only by doing it in his spare time could it become his.
You're describing an entirely different kind of parent than he did.
Which makes this all subjective. There are already comments by people who say that anything not done in C is ugly, so how to tell that these same people didn't pepper other's code with that statement? Many people think code is an ugly hack merely because it wasn't done the way they would code it.
I've seen code written with procedures named for Alice in Wonderland characters and activities. Yet, I've seen that kind of thing defended here as 'creative'. 'Ugly hack' in a comment is a worthless indicator.
Holy shit, did you actually misunderstand what I wrote that badly?!
BR Now, reread - The message is murder. Don't let the bullshit about cartoons fool you.
For you to be a synonym to his example, you would have to purchase a new camera every year just to have the latest headsup in the eyepiece.
It's the percentage of those 'someones' and the response of the rest that is revealing.
Aside from a fatwah issued by a cleric, perhaps you could provide a cite. As I stated elsewhere, Mohammed has been portrayed by Islamic artists for centuries.
Only these extremist assholes. Mohammed has been depicted many, many times in Islamic works through the ages.
The message is murder. Don't let the bullshit about cartoons fool you.
Hell, I've been retired for over eight years and I still get spammed.
Follow the money. There's a book behind this. He may not be a nut, but he has a personal agenda.
None of which matters to the persecutor.
And if one takes the rhetorical "everyone" and translates it literally, then formulating a reasonable response can be problematic as well.
If you're actually ignorant as to that, you probably shouldn't be commenting on how to alter study for the sexes. But, to give you a small push, male and female brains are structurally and hormonally different.
But, I suspect you already know this as "brains and" were the only words you elided. Unless, of course, you don't understand that emotions are based in the brain.
Have to agree, as the home owner is becoming what is essentially a competing power company. If not the entire meter, then at least the difference in cost from a typical one to the bi-directional variety.
False analogy. There's a huge difference between a personal assistant, who by definition *I* know personally, and a faceless business entity who I know not at all (read adversarial entity) scraping 'enough' information about me to presume it knows me sufficiently to second guess what I want and give me that instead of what I requested. Truthfully, why on earth would I trust such an entity?
That's the problem with hypotheticals. They don't reflect the reality we live in.
People frequently mistake not giving a shit for ADHD. Two very different things.
Reflect on that last sentence as pertains to yourself and your initial diatribe.
Sweden, arguably the most gender equal country in the world has found that their men and women *still* gravitate to what are called traditional jobs.
That's not the presence of girls, that's the bias of the teachers. So no, it's not -because of- the girls being there.
He didn't say he felt bad. Can you explain where you got that impression?
"Even worse, many police and judges buy into this image too." This would fall under the category of false accusation.
"even well meaning officers usually end up" You know this how? My anecdotal evidence from a friend who went through the experience is the the police were very considerate and concerned with her well-being and treated her in an utmost professional manner.