Slashdot Mirror


Is IT Work Getting More Stressful, Or Is It the Millennials?

dcblogs writes: A survey of IT professionals that has been conducted in each of the last four years is showing an increase in IT work stress levels. It's a small survey, just over 200 IT workers, and it doesn't account for the age of the respondents. But some are asking whether Millennials, those ages 18 to 34, are pushing up stress levels either as IT workers or end users. The reason Millennials may be less able to handle stress is that they interact with others in person far less than other generations do, since most of their social interactions have been through Internet-based, arms-length contact, said Billie Blair, who holds a doctorate in organizational psychology. This generation has also been protected from many real-life situations by their parents, "so the workplace tends to be more stressful for them than for others," she said. Others are wondering if Millennials are more demanding of IT workers. Millennials are also expert users, and "are no longer in awe of technology specialists and therefore demand higher service levels," said Mitch Ellis, managing director of executive search firm Sanford Rose Associates in St. Louis.

405 comments

  1. sampling bias by Sadsfae · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lots of conclusions drawn from a very small sampling size, there may be some truth to these generalizations but I'd prefer to see more data.

    --
    Have a squat over at the hobo house.
    1. Re:sampling bias by peragrin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When it comes to older generations thinking younger generations are whiney, lazy, idiots sample size doesn't matter.

      Old people almost always think that. I am not sure if it is a product of getting old, jealousy of the young, or what.

      But you can read newspapers from 100 years ago that had the same articles in them.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    2. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As socrates said 'Kids these days...'

    3. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Old people are different than young people. Naturally, each group believes that the differences in question make them superior to the other group.

    4. Re:sampling bias by odie5533 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The children now love luxury; they have bad manners, contempt for authority; they show disrespect for elders and love chatter in place of exercise. Children are now tyrants, not the servants of their households. They no longer rise when elders enter the room. They contradict their parents, chatter before company, gobble up dainties at the table, cross their legs, and tyrannize their teachers.
      -- Socrates (470 BC – 399 BC)

    5. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where are these articles from 1915 then? Huh? Cite your sources bitch.

    6. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a member of the younger generation, I feel that the younger generation is whinier and lazier. I feel like half the man that both of my grandfathers were, one who fought in a war I see in movies, was an amazing cook, a skilled gardener, and worked two job back breaking jobs to raise his kids while the other paid his way through university while still finding time to play university football and did his stint in the military. When they wanted to work, they'd knock down doors to get employed while kids these days drop off a resume and consider that job hunting. I could go on and on about how the current day generation pales in comparison to the generations before us but I'm sure it will fall on deaf ears.

    7. Re:sampling bias by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 4, Informative

      Pretty much this. When I started work, using email was seen as a kind of rising trend, why use email when you can call someone? Why use a website to get a datasheet when you can call the vendor and have him fax it? I used to get strange looks about my methods, I'm putting too much on myself they said, or don't want to leave my office, etc.

      Now the "new trrend" (about as new as email and WWW was in the 90s) is IM, webex, wiki's. The older crowd understands these things but generally thinks they're a pain in the ass, but the younger crowd not only sees them as office furniture but doesn't think twice about setting up a webex on the spot and summoning the mages, without a day of advanced warning and a calendar invite.

      I'm not sure we think they're lazy, but certainly hasty, a little inconsiderate and not used to solving problems on their own or at least thinking them through before calling in for reinforcements. It tends to be very raw. But that's just how it will be 15 years hence.

    8. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it's the "damned kids these days!" because "back in my day!" etc.

    9. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Bad example, this was written just before the collapse of the Athenian empire, so the guy had a point. Socrates himself was tried and executed by the invading forces.

    10. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is quite true. I was born in the 90s and my superior (who isn't working in the same city as me) hates IM, while I love it and find it the easiest way to communicate next to email. He seems to vastly prefer phone conversations, which I hate because I feel like I don't have enough time to formulate questions that are actually going to generate useful answers and there's no written record of the conversation I can go back to if I get confused about what I'm supposed to be doing. Plus phone connections have such shitty sound quality, I can sometimes barely understand what he's saying...

    11. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Today I was shown but yet another example of how much history repeats itself with this post.

      I wish I had mod points to send this comment string into the heavens where it belongs.

    12. Re:sampling bias by chipschap · · Score: 1

      What's changed over the generations?

      I submit that people are people and fundamentally haven't changed.

      Culture has changed, though, and that makes quite a difference. The older generation comes from a different culture than the younger generation, but when us 'oldsters" were "younguns" the "oldsters" of our day thought we were pretty worthless, too. And so on back through the years.

      Different cultures, different life experiences. Not different people at the fundamental level.

    13. Re:sampling bias by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      The point being made here is that there is nothing new under the sun. People pissing and moaning about *how times have changed* are full of it. Nothing has 'changed' except the pace of events.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    14. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting you pulled a quote about children and not about the 20 something adults that have entered into the workforce. But it is understandable that you would conflate children with young adult nowdays, since our society has infantilized an entire generation.

    15. Re:sampling bias by pkinetics · · Score: 1

      As socrates said 'Kids these days...'

      Socrates: "back in my day... we only had hemlock, none of those fancy apples..."

    16. Re: sampling bias by mattwarden · · Score: 2

      It is just as much of a logical fallacy to use past examples of times not changing as proof that times are not changing now. If someone cries wolf, past cryings of wolf do not change the probability that there is a wolf.

    17. Re:sampling bias by Cafe+Alpha · · Score: 4, Funny

      I say this as a relatively older person. It turns out that it's older people who are whiny and immature.

      People get worse with age, and they no longer have people telling them when they get out of hand.

      People used to complain about 4chan, but when the God damn 70 year olds figured out Disqus they turned out to be much more heartless and disgusting trolls than any 13 year olds. The 13 year olds try to pretend to be racist sexist sh**s but the old people are THE REAL THING. The kids will grow out of it.

    18. Re:sampling bias by khallow · · Score: 1

      No, he didn't have a point (nor did he actually say that). But why would you expect well behaved children in a situation where they're expecting to fight and possibly die in an incompetently run, losing conflict? Let us keep in mind that just before the collapse of the Athenian empire, they would still be reeling from their humiliating defeat at the hands of Syracuse, a city state with inferior military power (but a far better tactical and strategic position than the invading Athenian forces had).

    19. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you missed his point entirely. you're dismissing a warning that precluded a downfall by saying "adults have always been saying that. this time it's different, we have the internet!"

    20. Re: sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think this is an argument against millennials. The previous generations assume instructions can/will be followed without excessive documentation and follow up. IE - Byproduct of shortened attention spans, memory retainment...

    21. Re:sampling bias by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but now we have unprecedented levels of Global Whining, and unless we do something about it fast, we'll see mass destruction of the workplace environment.

    22. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are some differences. My grandfather told my father to shave, get a haircut, and dress well to be taken seriously. My father told me the same thing, that facial hair is great if I wanted to drive a truck or be a farmer. If I wanted to play Fu Manchu, then sprout a goatee. If I wanted to hide stretch marks, grow a mustache. If I wanted a meaningful job, I have to shave and dress the part, and he pointed out that you don't see politicians in Congress sporting full hipster facial hair.

      This still applies. One of the reasons politicians took the Tea Party members seriously is because they dressed and groomed themselves. Some Occupy person with more fecal matter germs in their beard than in a shitter just turns off politicians on first glance, which was one reason why no politicians even bothered with that movement, and why the Tea Party has at least two Presidential candidates while Occupy is in the ashbin of history.

      Want a job and are male? Shave and get a haircut. Was true in the 1960s, is true now.

    23. Re: sampling bias by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      It is just as much of a logical fallacy...

      Maybe it's merely a hypothetical fallacy. I do believe it needs to be proven false, logically anyway. Things are changing, but at an evolutionary pace. It is only perceptible on a geological time scale.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    24. Re:sampling bias by sexconker · · Score: 1

      When it comes to older generations thinking younger generations are whiney, lazy, idiots sample size doesn't matter.

      Old people almost always think that. I am not sure if it is a product of getting old, jealousy of the young, or what.

      But you can read newspapers from 100 years ago that had the same articles in them.

      And the old people are right nearly every time. Young people are trash.

    25. Re:sampling bias by grasshoppa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It could very well be that they're right ( the old people ).

      When I started training the new employees ( 18-25 ), I noticed how much bitching and moaning they did. It was shocking, really. Enough so that I stopped and thought about it, and realized that when I was first entering the work force I did much the same thing.

      Maybe I'm old, and maybe you kids really should get the fuck off my lawn, but young adults DO whine incessantly.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    26. Re:sampling bias by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      But it's the "damned kids these days!" because "back in my day!" etc.

      The one I heard a lot growing up was: "Kids these days need to learn the value of a dollar!"

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    27. Re:sampling bias by Beck_Neard · · Score: 2

      To be fair, there are amazing old people as well. One of the oldest guys at my workplace is 80 or something; he's been retired for 15 years but he still regularly shows up and in his retirement he's written tons of technical articles and books. And when asked of his opinion of the newer generation, "They are enthusiastic and accepting, and this place has never been better." I couldn't imagine that guy saying a single hateful word. I don't know what happens to people that causes them to become hateful pricks as they get older, but I know that simply being old is no excuse.

      --
      A fool and his hard drive are soon parted.
    28. Re:sampling bias by hawguy · · Score: 1

      As a member of the younger generation, I feel that the younger generation is whinier and lazier. I feel like half the man that both of my grandfathers were, one who fought in a war I see in movies, was an amazing cook, a skilled gardener, and worked two job back breaking jobs to raise his kids while the other paid his way through university while still finding time to play university football and did his stint in the military. When they wanted to work, they'd knock down doors to get employed while kids these days drop off a resume and consider that job hunting. I could go on and on about how the current day generation pales in comparison to the generations before us but I'm sure it will fall on deaf ears.

      I'll agree with you there -- my great grandfather started working in a coal mine when he was 17, fought in a war, smoked every day of his life since he was 16 (with hand rolled cigarettes), maintained a 4 acre yard and large garden, raised (and slaughtered) his own chickens. He spent the last 20 years of his life living alone (his wife died "young" at 60). Up until the last year of his life he maintained he house and yard on his own, reroofed his garage on his own when he was 70 - didn't even tell family he was going to do it, no one knew about it until he was done, he shoveled the coal into his coal fired furnace every winter, he eventually stopped raising chickens after one time when the wolves or coyotes got into the coop and he got tired of patching it. He lived to be 82 years old. He never could get accustomed to those new-fangled remote controls for the TV (back when state of the art was an audio based remote) and walked up to the set to turn it on and off. He still managed to keep ice cream and cookies ready for the grand kids when they visited

      Me? I'm too lazy to even cut the grass so I bought a condo with no yard, and the grocery delivers my groceries so I don't even go to the store, let alone slaughter my own meat.

    29. Re: sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Email also gives you a "paper" trail. It will save your ass.

    30. Re:sampling bias by stridebird · · Score: 1

      oh yeah, you get time on IM to formulate questions. Lots of time. That's because you are 'talking' to people typing with one finger, whilst simultaneously 'multitasking' (aka not really paying attention anyway). I sit there watching the little pen icon scribbling away thinking, ok , this will be good. Then a 7 word response comes back. It's shit. A chat is so much more efficient. Jot down notes as you talk, then summarise the salient details in an email. Old school? I know it is. But it is simply better work practice.

    31. Re: sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except the problem is that with all this technology, accountability and expectations on the low end of the corporate structure are increasing. Phone calls and other untraceable communications can lead to someone changing the requirements or communicating them badly without any recourse for the person on the receiving end. In other words, if millennials get the old saying "always get it in writing" intuitively, that is not an argument against them but an outstanding mark on their ability to understand the world around them.

    32. Re:sampling bias by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Old people are different than young people. Naturally, each group believes that the differences in question make them superior to the other group.

      True in many ways....HOWEVER, this latest generation has been more coddled and has more of an entitlement attitude than previous generations. They seem to feel "owed" by society a job, and to be treated nicely and fairly. They are the generation of everyone getting a trophy just for showing up.

      This was not something as prevalent in pevious generations, where when growing up, people DID keep score, there were winners and loser, parent spanked kids when they fucked up, neighbors had just as much a hand in disciplining kids in the neighborhoods as the parents....and kids grew up more independently than they do now.

      Hell, my parents in today's society likely would have hand child services called on them...they spanked my ass when I was bad. They both worked and I entertained myself much more...I played with the other kids in the neighborhood. I often left the house (unescorted) during the summer in the morning and showed back up at home in time for dinner. I rode my bike and skateboard for miles away from home.

      I didn't even have a cell phone, but was under orders to call in (when very young) every hour or so from wherever I was at a neighbor friends' home.

      I played and LOST football games, I didn't always get congratulated JUST for trying. I got praise for winning. I had fun, I interacted with numerous friends in the neighborhood I grew up with and got praise for success and well, it sucked when I lost but I learned how to deal with it and deal with all types of people. I got my first job washing dishes at a restaurant when I was 16+ or so, and worked all during high school on weekends and some week nights, but had to keep my grades up to keep the job and enjoy that extra $$$.

      Yes....every generation gets to a point where it doesn't understand the next one that well, but I think we have a bona fide GAP in how folks in the US have been raised in a very sharp and distinct manner with the mils.

      Let's face it...the term "helicopter parent" is a very new term. And it is sadly accurate, and I think has had a very detrimental effect on this new generation of folks just growing up enough to set foot in the real world that doesn't really give a shit about your showing up. That is expected....

      It is what you do after you show up that earns the dollars and you ARE in competition for real with everyone you are in the workforce with.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    33. Re:sampling bias by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

      Hell, my parents in today's society likely would have hand child services called on them...they spanked my ass when I was bad. They both worked and I entertained myself much more...I played with the other kids in the neighborhood. I often left the house (unescorted) during the summer in the morning and showed back up at home in time for dinner. I rode my bike and skateboard for miles away from home.

      Uphill both ways.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    34. Re:sampling bias by mbkennel · · Score: 2

      | One of the reasons politicians took the Tea Party members seriously is because

      their attitudes were useful to advance the desires of the exceptionally wealthy and powerful who sponsor politiicans

      But you think it's really the haircut? If they just cleaned up a bit then substantial efforts to restrain the privileges of the powerful would materialize?

    35. Re:sampling bias by mbkennel · · Score: 1

      | "Kids these days need to learn the value of a dollar!"

      They have. Very well.

      One dollar means squat. But if you have a billion, you matter.

    36. Re:sampling bias by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      my great grandfather started working in a coal mine when he was 17, fought in a war, smoked every day of his life since he was 16 (with hand rolled cigarettes), maintained a 4 acre yard and large garden, raised (and slaughtered) his own chickens. He spent the last 20 years of his life living alone (his wife died "young" at 60). Up until the last year of his life he maintained he house and yard on his own, reroofed his garage on his own when he was 70 - didn't even tell family he was going to do it, no one knew about it until he was done, he shoveled the coal into his coal fired furnace every winter, he eventually stopped raising chickens after one time when the wolves or coyotes got into the coop and he got tired of patching it. He lived to be 82 years old.

      And boy, were his arms tired.

      Me? I'm too lazy to even cut the grass so I bought a condo with no yard, and the grocery delivers my groceries so I don't even go to the store, let alone slaughter my own meat.

      Is "slaughter my own meat" something I need to look up on Urban Dictionary?

      One can't be too careful these days.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    37. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kids these days don't know the value of a dollar, because the value has dropped considerably over any significant time scale. It is occasionally fun to turn that around on older folks by showing them the value of a dollar when they were young compared to what it is worth now.

      Just the other day, my grandmother on my dad's side was talking about how she only made $5/hr working when she was younger. Today, that is well over $15/hr. While not a huge salary by any means, it is far beyond minimum wage today, and double anything I made working summers during high school and college.

    38. Re:sampling bias by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The latest generation works harder, for longer hours, with higher productivity, than any other generation before them and is the first generation in history to be worse off than their parents.

      They're stressed because they're being fucked AND blamed for it at the same time.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    39. Re:sampling bias by slew · · Score: 0

      Hell, my parents in today's society likely would have hand child services called on them...they spanked my ass when I was bad. They both worked and I entertained myself much more...I played with the other kids in the neighborhood. I often left the house (unescorted) during the summer in the morning and showed back up at home in time for dinner. I rode my bike and skateboard for miles away from home.

      4 o'clock every morning with no shoes on, uphill, both ways, in 5 feet of snow.

      FTFY

    40. Re:sampling bias by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      first generation in history to be worse off than their parents.

      Very true, as long as you believe that history started in 1945.

    41. Re:sampling bias by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Bad example, this was written just before the collapse of the Athenian empire, so the guy had a point.

      It is a bad example, but for a different reason: Socrates never said it. The quote is actually from Aristophanes, who was writing a caricature of Socrates.

      Socrates himself was tried and executed by the invading forces.

      No, Socrates was executed by the Athenians themselves, not by the Spartan alliance.

    42. Re:sampling bias by bigfinger76 · · Score: 1

      Minimum wage was $4.25/hr in the mid 90's. How old is your grandmother?

    43. Re:sampling bias by slew · · Score: 1

      Hmm, Socrates didn't actually write/say this (apparently someone else wrote this as part of their thesis in the 1900's and it's been misattributed many times since then) as there are no actual surviving works of Socrates (most of our information about Socrates comes from Plato, one of his disciples).

      It is also seems highly unlikely he would say something anything like this except as part of the losing part of a Socratic argument exploration. As I recall he was essentially tried on charges like corrupting the youth and blasphemy and generally being a devil's advocate and disavowing being a teacher which would seem to put his politics on the other side of this quote...

    44. Re:sampling bias by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

      "And I would have gotten away with it, too, if it weren't for you meddling kids!" - Old Computer Hacker

    45. Re: sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try sending an email with seven questions and see how many will be answered in the reply. My most common experience is 1. Then I have to resend the email 6 more times chopping off the "first" question each time.

      I'm 33.

    46. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of sampling bias, what are you basing this on?

      From my own sampled bias of the office I work in (around 40 people across a range of roles including sales, marketing, IT and engineering), The gen x people are still working pretty hard, but some of the younger people seem to think it is perfectly acceptable to spend half their time on twitter (only the single PR person in our office has a job role that needs to use twitter) and at the team meetings always have big talk about what they are going to do, but little results to show.

    47. Re:sampling bias by Miguelito · · Score: 2

      The 13 year olds try to pretend to be racist sexist sh**s but the old people are THE REAL THING. The kids will grow out of it.

      It's cute that you think they'll grow out of it.

      --
      - My favorite error message: xscreensaver, running on an old Sparc 5 w/ 8bit color: bsod: Couldn't allocate color Blue
    48. Re:sampling bias by Miguelito · · Score: 2

      but the younger crowd not only sees them as office furniture but doesn't think twice about setting up a webex on the spot and summoning the mages, without a day of advanced warning and a calendar invite.

      Ugh.. yes. Not just the younger crowd, but seems more likely from them. One of my largest pet peeves is people that simply think that if you don't have time on the calendar blocked out, that it means you're not busy. Even with a calendar invite, it drives me crazy when people will send one shortly before a meeting they want to hold, then get all pissy when you don't go. Sometimes I'm just too busy, sometimes it's because I don't sit there all day watching for stuff to pop up in email or on the calendar.

      I have a basic rule of common courtesy where meetings are involved: invites should be sent at least a full business day before a meeting. I know that myself, and several coworkers plan our day around the meetings we have (and that we're actually going to attend). Not to mention, page/txt/whatever invitees if the meeting plans change close to the meeting time, and I'd defined "close" to be anytime within an hour. Just this week I had another case where I travelled to another building, went to re-check the room as I walked in the lobby, and found that in the last 15 minutes, they'd lost the room and converted to online only. Man that pisses me off. If I'd gotten a page/txt I could've saved most of the trip and avoided wasting nearly as much of my time.

      Now for a "Holy crap! We've got a fire to put out!" Yeah, setting up a shared session/chat-room/conf-call whatever on short to no notice.. that makes sense. For your little "boy I'm having a hard time working through this..." no.

      --
      - My favorite error message: xscreensaver, running on an old Sparc 5 w/ 8bit color: bsod: Couldn't allocate color Blue
    49. Re:sampling bias by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Your grandfather did those things to survive. Refrigerators didn't exist you had ice boxes may e if you were wealthy. So food wouldn't keep people canned food to preserve it so they could eat. You want fresh chicken you had to slaughter it, or buy it from a butcher who recently slaughtered it.

      They didn't clothing stores like we do know, or grocery stores. You want fresh fruits they were only available in season.

      If he didn't shovel coal in his furnace he would freeze to death. Many did from that or from carbon monoxide from said furnace. Hell indoor plumbing only became a thing in the 1920's. At least on a Practical level. Most areas didn't get electritcy until after WW2.

      You will quickly figure out how to kill to survive if you find yourself starving with a knife in hand.

      You have learned more by the time you are 18 than he did by the time he was 40. At least for book knowledge. Street smarts and expirence not included. We are teaching calculus to high schoolers. Half of his high school class wouldn't have had a 5th grade reading level in today world.

      Standards change. Accept all of them and not just the tiny fraction you can see. Or in the words of an iwa jima vet I once knew. I fought so we can disagree. That is the right. For that I will never forget him.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    50. Re:sampling bias by AmazingRuss · · Score: 1

      We always heard that future generations were being sold out for short term gain. This is the first of many.

    51. Re: sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Summary emails after the fact suck. Someone writes it and they get to decide what goes in. Then he sends it to the group and their bosses three days later at 5 pm with the infamous "if you dont reply by this evening with corrections...". Sooo much better yes.

      With my teams I write down things on the computer shared with everyone via screen and everyone can have a say as to the exact wording and we send (or preferrably its just something in a ticket somewhere anyway) it right before everyone leaves the meeting. Anything you can't type up in the meeting anyway will never be read if you write it a week later. Making nice graphs for something might be different but we're talking decisions on whether to go left or right here, not doing the actual work of going left.

    52. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When it comes to older generations thinking younger generations are whiney, lazy, idiots sample size doesn't matter.

      Old people almost always think that. I am not sure if it is a product of getting old, jealousy of the young, or what.

      But you can read newspapers from 100 years ago that had the same articles in them.

      And the old people are right nearly every time. Young people are trash.

      I've accumulated some years (77) and it appears to me that the problem is that the elders seem to forget that they were once young and obnoxious to their elders. The result being that every older generation knocks the younger for being what they once were, differing only in the particulars, since for each the environment in which you/they were/are obnoxious is radically different from that of the respective elders and so it only appears that things are going downhill.

    53. Re:sampling bias by lgw · · Score: 0

      The latest generation works harder, for longer hours, with higher productivity, than any other generation before them

      Hahahahaha. Productivity, sure, that's what technology means but harder? Longer hours? Do you even history?

      and is the first generation in history to be worse off than their parents.

      What a crock of shit. Do the words "Great Depression" mean anything to you? We get serious economic downturns every few generations, it's nothing special, and no, history didn't begin when you were born.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    54. Re:sampling bias by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The latest generation works harder, for longer hours, with higher productivity, than any other generation before them and is the first generation in history to be worse off than their parents.

      I don't seen that in the Mils I've run into. Perhaps for the generations just prior to them, I see the hard work still, etc...but the youngest ones just in the workforce the past 3-5 years, nope, they expect a high paying job and don't understand you have to work and COMPETE for the money and job.

      Just my experience seeing the workforce I started in and quite a few subsequent ones coming in under me....the latest one has real problems.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    55. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Losing!

    56. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am 55 years old, and was taught to do the best that I could at whatever I tried to do. I have always taken pride in doing my best no matter what the job. A few years back I worked on a riverboat casino. Whenever they hired 18 year olds right out of high school, very few would show up for their second day of work. It seemed that when they found that they were going to actually have to work instead of standing around talking (or texting) on their phones, they didn't want the job. This after they (or their parents) paid $60 for a license from the racing and gaming commission and for shoes and uniform.

      And when you think about it, 100 years ago (1915) most teenagers didn't have a car. The most high tech device in the home (and not everyone had one) was an AM radio, and most people didn't have electricity, especially in rural areas. Therefore many of the appliances and devices that we have today were not invented yet or were things that only the really well off could afford to have.

      I remember when I was in high school (1975 to1978). Many of my fellow students didn't have a car, and almost none of those that did had a new car. I only had a (used) car my senior year, and had to share it with my brother. I wish I had that car now in good shape, it was a 1966 Mustang. Most teens at that time had an AM/FM Cassette player (not stereo). Most homes had one color TV, and maybe the young people had a used 12 inch black and white set. There were no home computers, no cell phones (cell phones were invented in 1973, but were not available to the general public until 1983), no MP3 players (the Walkman portable cassette player was not available un the U.S until 1980).

      Each generation seems to have more free time, and more devices that allow that time to be wasted if they are misused. IT work has always been stressful, and the most stressful part is supporting users who know little but how to use a word processor or play solitaire.

    57. Re:sampling bias by synaptic · · Score: 1

      ^ this

    58. Re:sampling bias by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      As an old timer- I don't view it as whining. It is MUCH harder for 20 to early 30 year old people today than it was for me when I was that age. There was no offshoring, outsourcing, etc. There were layoffs but only when the economy was really bad. Now things can be going fine, your company is making a profit- and you STILL get laid off and forced to train your replacement (which is humiliating) and you get the joy of knowing it is illegal since h1b's are only supposed to be used when local resources are unavailable.

      Not so much for California Utilities, Disney, etc. who lay off workers and replace them with offshore and onshore h1b resources. Companies no longer have loyalty and in many cases the severance is pitiful.

      Another factor is skill sets. I learned a skillset in IT and it was good for 20 years. The one after that was good for 15 years. The one after that was good for 5 years. I think you can see the trend. Constant training at high expense on your own time. No personal life.

      Back when I started, IT were the fucking priest kings. We made good money, worked long 55 hour weeks, and had high status. Today, IT has low status, makes good money, works crazy long 60-70+ hour weeks. At my last place we had multiple divorces and heart attacks. There were 30 year olds walking around with black eyes (DEEP black- not just a little dark under the eyes) from lack of sleep.

      It is much much worse for young IT folks today. It's worse for all of them in general. It's taking them much longer to get their careers established and even when they established they are never safe. It's much riskier to buy a house or a new car. Things my generation took for granted are gone.

      And then on top of that, the safety net we had, the inexpensive college we had, etc. etc. is all gone. Heck- tho I didn't avail myself of it- when I was in school until very near the end, any debt I took on could have been erased by bankruptcy.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    59. Re:sampling bias by anonymous_echidna · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They seem to feel "owed" by society a job, and to be treated nicely and fairly.

      These are reasonable expectations of a functioning society. That these expectations are considered to be ridiculously entitled is a reflection on society rather than the people who hold them. To look at it another way, if we don't aspire to a fair and just society where people who want to work can find work, then we've really lost the plot. Not to mention that work was easier to find back in the day, and perhaps we are the entitled ones, begrudging the younger ones wanting what we had on a plate.

      I didn't always get congratulated JUST for trying

      Noticing children's effort rather than results is better for producing successful adults, as it instils perseverance rather than a sense that your skills are innate and immutable.

      --
      In most times, most places, by most people, liars are considered contemptible. - Ursula Le Guin
    60. Re:sampling bias by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Back when I was young I remember one of the older guys feeling the same way you do when I asked a lot of questions. He saw it as whining, but I was actually just trying to get a full understanding of the issues and why things are done the way they are, not complain about them.

      Having said that, I did used to complain a bit more than I do now, but only because now I'm just resigned to the fact that everything is shit. They tell you to work hard and achieve your potential and everything will be great, but it's a lie! Coming to accept that when you have spent literally your entire life trying to better yourself and get qualified for these wonderful opportunities can be hard.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    61. Re:sampling bias by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      HOWEVER, this latest generation has been more coddled and has more of an entitlement attitude than previous generations.

      It's the other way around. The baby boomers have a massive sense of entitlement. How often have you heard phrases like "I worked hard all my life"? They are the ones who had it good, who now own a house with no mortgage and maybe another one to rent out to some poor millennial, while the younger generations can't even get on the ladder.

      Young people are stressed because they are screwed. They work long hours for little money, and pay ridiculous rents because houses are unaffordable. The baby boomers feel that they have earned those 4 bedroom properties so why the hell should they downsize and give up their spare bedrooms where they do all their hobbies, just because younger people need a place to raise a family? Why should house prices come down, when houses are valuable assets and are going to pay for their retirements?

      It's the older generation that feels entitled. They just want what is best for them, screw everyone else. They set themselves up, saddled the young with the debt and the environmental damage, and are now blaming them for being lazy and weak. They seem to forget that when they were young one person working full time could afford a house, a car and a family.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    62. Re:sampling bias by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 2

      "High paying job"? They "expect" not to be making less than the minimum wage their parents got, while working longer, harder, and being more productive than every generation before them.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    63. Re:sampling bias by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      Hahahahaha. Productivity, sure, that's what technology means but harder? Longer hours? Do you even history?

      Yes I do, do you know how to count?

      What a crock of shit. Do the words "Great Depression" mean anything to you? We get serious economic downturns every few generations, it's nothing special, and no, history didn't begin when you were born.

      Oh, nevermind, I guess you don't. The Great Depression saw some of the most far reaching and ambitious public works projects in modern history as well as an equally staggering reform of wall street. This "recession" sees people like you claiming there's no problem and people just need to work harder.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    64. Re:sampling bias by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      Go look up the PWA and WPA.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    65. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think about it, the sampling size is typical of many millennial-based social studies. Any Big3, CNN, MSNBC, Fox report typically has sample sizes of 50 or so--especially the '3 things you need to know about .... " articles.

      Just do a facebook survey for a day and post the results on buzzfeed in the morning. Hence this study has some truth in the Internet world.

    66. Re:sampling bias by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Now the "new trrend" (about as new as email and WWW was in the 90s) is IM...

      How is IM a new trend? AIM, ICQ, and XMPP have been around since the mid to late 1990s. IRC is even older, if you want to count that as IM. AIM and ICQ are only slightly older now than SMTP was when they first appeared (approximately 20 years vs. 15 years), but they were only about 5 years after HTTP and HTML, and IRC was developed before HTTP and HTML.

    67. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree it's more different.

      I see so many youngin's get promoted within 3 yrs of service into director spots. And us older folks--nobody is being promoted, salaries stagnant, I've been passed up for younger talent w/no experience (hint it's all about "talent", which equals like-ability).

      When I was young, I was promoted maybe every 3yrs, BUT all my superiors were being promoted as well. Hence, the difference.

      It's all about the baby boomers: They're all VPs now, they don't care of their current subworkers/subordinates and they promote the fresh meat--their kids basically; considering their kids will be running the companies when they retire. Us older folks now are stuck in the middle of this mess.

    68. Re: sampling bias by donscarletti · · Score: 2

      They seem to feel "owed" by society a job, and to be treated nicely and fairly.

      I'll tell you some personal anecdotes if I may. I'm right on the old end of the so called "Millenial" generation, I graduated from university in 2006. 6 months after getting my first job, the U.S. economy went to shit and the American customer for the project I was working on cancelled the project and my contract was not renewed. 8 months after getting my second job, another round of layoffs hit (based on declining U.S. sales, a failed Nasdaq IPO and the national government cancelling subsidies), with some exceptions in a last in first out pattern, until finally after a year and a half, I was the new guy again and I was actively encouraged to apply for other jobs. I tried a foreign country after that, but the company I worked for folded after 10 months.

      To my knowledge I am not a pariah and for what it's worth I am well appreciated by my current employer, I would assume this is more or less typical of those who entered the workforce with me and were laid off along side me. Compared to even Generation X, who got started during the prosperous 90s and were able to keep their first jobs for long enough to make them meaningful, or the Baby Boomers who often went through their whole careers with a single employer, it is really hard to picture those who entered the workforce along side me considering having a job as anything less than an elusive state that can only be retained through long hours, office politics and luck.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    69. Re:sampling bias by s.petry · · Score: 1

      To be pedantic, Socrates never wrote anything. Plato writes specifically about this fact. Socrates did not believe you could teach Philosophy by writing, he believed it required active arguments tailored for each individual.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    70. Re:sampling bias by tautog · · Score: 1

      I've made it personal policy to not return unexpected emails immediately. I might read the email, but I won't immediately respond to it or address it if it is not a priority by my reckoning.

      I don't even decline last-minute unsolicited meeting requests until the next working day. As a salaried professional in upper management, I believe that I've earned the right to manage my time and resources as I see fit. Fortunately, I work for an executive staff who agree with me, so the others who disagree with MY standards for time management are, invariably, told to pound salt.

      I also hate phone conversations that will set some sort of precedent. I'm perfectly content to collect data to make a decision via phone conversation (I will often also rehash the conversation via email to give the other party an opportunity to clarify or readdress my perspective), but I do not like to debate a position in a voice conversation unless I'm very well prepared. It's probably just my communication style, but I'm aware of my fallacies and try to adjust my processes to minimize their impact.

      Of course, having said all that, true emergencies exercise all potential exceptions. Again, I've earned the authority to determine what constitutes an emergency. My CEO might complain about the order in which I address his concerns, but he grants me the discretion to do so. (Yes, I know I'm very fortunate in that regard.)

    71. Re:sampling bias by tautog · · Score: 1

      Large corporations have, largely, ignored IM until it could be managed like Lync (or O.C.). Yes, XMPP and the like have been around for years, but uptake has been, mostly, limited to smaller corps. AIM, ICQ and other externally hosted IM services are taboo is larger environments (due to data exfiltration concerns).

    72. Re:sampling bias by tautog · · Score: 2

      I had to chuckle at this - it's as though the parent thinks that people learn to be bigots when they get older. It's like religion: beaten into you in your youth.

    73. Re:sampling bias by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      They are new in the corporate environment. I've had an IRC channel going now for 25 straight years, but it's always been personal. IM started being a thing at work somewhere around 2003-2005, and has since then become a virtual requirement. But even IM has evolved a lot, from something more like ICQ to an all-in-one chat/webex/sharing environment, and that has really been in the past 5 years. If you've been working for 20, that's "new". If you've been working for 5, that's "forever". Hence the generation gap.

      Similarly email existed long before I started working, but I knew many companies in the mid-90s that had no email, or were just thinking about adopting it.

    74. Re:sampling bias by Headw1nd · · Score: 1

      Athenians couldn't vote until 18, were in school until age 20, they were not allowed to participate in politics until age 30. All in all not much different than our system today.

    75. Re:sampling bias by tautog · · Score: 1

      This is how a civil society survives. It takes a generation to enact a radical new idea, because the oldsters resist the change long enough to let the youngsters really think it over. Progress can be good, but it can also be bad. It takes time to learn that.

      The young people get pissed because patience is not innate, it is learned. Eventually, (hopefully) the young will get to be old and the cycle repeats itself.

    76. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before crapping on the millennials, I'd recommend comparing the baby boomers to the lost generation or the greatest generation. Compared to those two generations, every generation thereafter is self-entitled.

    77. Re:sampling bias by tautog · · Score: 1

      The hateful pricks get that way when they stay somewhere too long or feel like they have no options. I'm closer to being old than being young and I LOVE having that youthful energy around me. It keeps me enthused about the stuff I love (and sometimes forget to love because I'm mired in the bureaucracy that is required to make it possible).

      On the wrong day, it sounds like bitching, but, really, it's like a horse chopping at his bit: Come on, you old bastard, LET'S DO THIS. I want to do it, I really do, but give me a chance to do the paperwork and get my old bones moving.

    78. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "harder" "more productive"

      I'm sensing you have no concept of what these words mean.

    79. Re: sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I am in my mid 20s and have worked in IT for 5+ years. I can't speak on the behalf of all millenials but I would like to point out one thing. My issue is not entitlement, it is inefficiency! I started out with the DoD, the Tech department on my base was miserable. All of my coworkers had shiny bachelor degrees but were awful problem solvers. Above us was a management that had zero idea on how to integrate customer service principles with technical knowledge.It was the government, not a real shock, very stressful though.

      I switched to the private sector and this company was far worse. My new colleagues were demoralized and the environment felt like it was stuck in 97. Half of the developers were h1bs and had little desire to communicate with the support side prior to releasing updates... Each update release was a support nightmare. The ticketing system had never been fully configured, everyone had been jotting down their tickets on notepads, and every single user had admin rights to their own boxes. This isnt a millenial issue, young workers get frustrated when they are constantly backlogged but are seen as to young and entitled to make improvements.

      Young workers may be impatient but that may not be such a bad thing. The traditional corporate environment is dying, it is time to blend the best qualities of each generation of worker in order to make efficient tech departments. Show me an efficient department and i will show you a department with acceptable stress levels.

    80. Re:sampling bias by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      I'm figuring out that was in the 80s or even 90s and there is nothing "uphill" in what he describes. Going on bike or board at age 10 or 12 and having a social life is great. Some kids spend their lives behind bars, virtually. Always in home, school or a car their parents use to cart them. Also it used to be if you spent all your time in front of computers you were a dork, now that's expected or accepted.

    81. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having said that, I did used to complain a bit more than I do now, but only because now I'm just resigned to the fact that everything is shit.

      Oh FFS, I just used up all my mod-points too, damnnit!

      This is exactly the truth. We have a wonderful thing here with this planet Earth and our level of social and technological development but we manage things so that 99% of everything remains shit.

      As you say one soon learns there's little point in complaining. It just pisses off your workmates.

    82. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You write like a 'tard. Run-on sentences, missing words, "iwa jima"...

      Are you a millennial, perhaps?

    83. Re: sampling bias by donscarletti · · Score: 1

      Well, Aristophanes quoting Socrates is not so much different to Plato quoting Socrates, which is where his canonical quotes come from.

      Aristophanes himself was an expert on cantankerous old people, as evinced by reading "The Wasps", an insightful critique of the classical period / Iron Age problems of increased life expectancy based on better diet and sanitation coupled with a marked decrease in violence compared to the Bronze Age leading to people living well past 40 and causing trouble for the young.

      The allegory he tells, of Procleon, an old man addicted to voting and public participation to the detriment of the state rings true today, especially in countries without mandatory voting and too many elections for a working man to attend (the U.S.).

      One also should consider that when Aristopanes was born, Rome was still a little discussed village in the middle of nowhere, so as far as knowing about old men, he would have you all bested.

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    84. Re: sampling bias by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Try putting each question as a separate paragraph, and numbering each one.

      It won't make any difference, but try it.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    85. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really do wonder how this correlates with the tides of war. Perhaps it takes a generation to see the atrocities of man to reset expectancies.

    86. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pay is a problem, but it's a symptom not the disease. The real sickness here in America is that hard work and fair play no longer cut the mustard. Increasingly, the trappings of a comfortable middle class life are slipping out of reach, even for those with a college education. Some Millennials are now beginning to realize that they and their children may never have the nice homes, decent schools and comfortable retirements that they grew up with or that their parents now enjoy. Instead, they're falling down the economic ladder into the ranks of the working poor. Most of the Millennials began working after the dot-com bust, then 9/11 happened and then, just when they were thinking about buying a home or starting a family, the worst financial crisis in 80 years struck. Contrast that with their parents. They grew up in the prosperous 1940s and 1950s where somebody fresh out of high school could get a high paying unionized manufacturing job that would buy a house, a car and time for leisure. They smoked pot and partied during the 1960s, hit their stride in the 1970s and powered through the 1980s and 1990s, maxing out their peak earning years. Now their health care, Social Security and Medicare are all being subsidized by their much poorer Millennial children who will ultimately be left holding the bills. So I can understand why Millennials are bit upset at the whole state of affairs.

    87. Re:sampling bias by lgw · · Score: 1

      Think a bit about working conditions in the South a while back. You know, before that little war we had amongst ourselves? And looking within America for hardship is a bit silly in the first place - take a look around the world if you ever think you have it rough here!

      Every century you can find a time where a generation had it worse than the one before; where working hours were "as long as you can see to work", 6 days a week. And history is full of civilizations that actually collapsed, or were invaded and slaughtered or enslaved by a stronger neighbor. But go ahead, tell me more about how young people in America are having a tough time.

      Lasting economic downturns suck, but this is no worse than the 70s, and far better than the 30s, and really the worst economic times in America in the past 100 years are still better than most of the world has it today. What a whiner.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    88. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Industrial refrigerators were in use 150 years ago. Home refrigerators were invented 100 years ago and became commonplace about 70 years ago. During that entire time, iceboxes were common.
      It's not clear exactly how old Hawguy is, but with his high ID, I'm going to guess not more than 35. It's also not clear when his grandfather died, but he clearly knew him in his lifetime and remembers him. I'd guess not younger than 10 when he passed. So, at a rough estimate, the grandfather was born ~107 years ago. That means that home refrigeration would have come in while he was still a young boy and ice boxes would have been ubiquitous.

      Flushing toilets also became common (that should be became common again since they were already common in some places 4000 years or more ago) 50 years or so before his birth. The literacy rate was around 80% (for people who weren't still struggling with the effects of a repressive society that actually made learning to read a crime for part of its population), so chances are pretty good that the reading level of his high school class was just fine.

    89. Re: sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate this, but it is true that people seem to have lost the ability to actually read past the first sentence (or subject line) of emails. Do they just not see the remaining text? Do they assume that it's just a repeat of the first sentence? Whatever the reason, I find myself fantasising about gruesome retribution when the only response I get for a multi-question email requiring explanations is a monosyllabic "yes".

    90. Re:sampling bias by Cafe+Alpha · · Score: 1

      Young men (and some girls) just like to troll people.

      They'll pretend to be racists and the like just because they know it makes people angry, it doesn't mean that they're really those things.

      in math notation P(is a troll) > P(is a racist and is a sexist)

    91. Re:sampling bias by jordanjay29 · · Score: 1

      True in many ways....HOWEVER, this latest generation has been more coddled and has more of an entitlement attitude than previous generations.

      Oh my God, you're so right!

    92. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When it comes to older generations thinking younger generations are whiney, lazy, idiots sample size doesn't matter.

      Old people almost always think that. I am not sure if it is a product of getting old, jealousy of the young, or what.

      But you can read newspapers from 100 years ago that had the same articles in them.

      Or possibly because younger generations have always been whiney, lazy, idiots.

    93. Re:sampling bias by jordanjay29 · · Score: 1

      Both my parents, both from rural areas of the Midwest, either had no refrigerator in their childhood or had one in late childhood (1960s). Icebox, sure, but if you were a farmer in the mid 20th century, which a lot of people still were, were you going to pay for ice in summer or just eat perishable goods quickly or less often? Cellars were useful in winter, smokehouses in summer, canning jars all year round, but a lot of people still didn't have an icebox, much less a refrigerator.

    94. Re:sampling bias by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      They need good pay because they have massive debts from education and need to pay insane rents. If a company wants graduates or people with graduate educations they have to pay for them, and under the current system the cost is very high.

      Look, young people just want the same things their parents had. Somewhere to live, enough money to have a family. The cost of those things has gone up massively in relation to wages, so actually the current "high" demands are not really high at all.

      Many of the older people complaining about this are the same ones who feel entitled to a second home that they can rent out at market rates, i.e. they are causing the problem.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    95. Re:sampling bias by jordanjay29 · · Score: 1

      A (face to face) chat is only efficient for the person with all the authority. For the person expected to follow it, it sucks. There's no inherent record. There's little or no time for follow-up. There are so many pieces of needless filler "um," "ah," "you know," and so forth.

      But this isn't the problem, the dilemma is not between a face-to-face chat and IM or email. The problem is bad management, caused by managers who don't know how to address their direct reports and ensure that their instructions are delivered appropriately. If Mr. Baby Boomer is perfectly fine with an in-person chat, then a good manager will know that and strive to speak face to face with them. If Ms. Millenial needs to use IM or Email, a good manager will know that and use one of those methods as much as possible.

    96. Re:sampling bias by jordanjay29 · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, please! Workplace anarchy!

    97. Re:sampling bias by jordanjay29 · · Score: 1

      Well this got political fast.

    98. Re:sampling bias by jordanjay29 · · Score: 1

      Back when I was young I remember one of the older guys feeling the same way you do when I asked a lot of questions. He saw it as whining, but I was actually just trying to get a full understanding of the issues and why things are done the way they are, not complain about them.

      That's my quintessential problem. I want to ask questions and learn everything I can about a problem before I start, because it will save me time. My boss wants me to stop asking question and figure it out myself, because it will save him time.

    99. Re: sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I started working I whined about how they use expensive legacy hw and sw and said that Linux cluster would be cheaper. They laughed but 5 years later they did exactly that.

    100. Re:sampling bias by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      I played and LOST football games, I didn't always get congratulated JUST for trying.

      Kids see through that 'participation' bullshit pretty quickly, and it practically becomes a loser badge. What a generation of parents tell a generation of children will tell you more about the parents than the children.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    101. Re:sampling bias by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 1

      Old people are different than young people. Naturally, each group believes that the differences in question make them superior to the other group.

      True in many ways....HOWEVER,

      Everything else you wrote from this point on is exactly the same thing that was, has and will be said for thousands of years prior and henceforth.

    102. Re:sampling bias by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 1

      Blah blah blah so clearly we should do nothing because I am so sure I will soon be rich and it would be terrible to have to think of my community once that happens.

      Your cynicism is neither helpful, nor deserved, nor insightful and reeks of privilege.

    103. Re:sampling bias by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 1

      No I'm pretty comfortable saying the Baby Boomers are uniquely the worst and Gen X is just the children who never had a chance to learn better.

      Once they die and Gen X has it's tantrum over all the aged-care benefits they're not going to get because of the screwed up workforce dynamics the Baby Boomers led to, all of sudden all the usual castigators of the young will switch their tune to be all about socialism and welfare.

    104. Re: sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Helicopters are relatively new, generationally speaking. Mash was probably the first exposure most older generations had. Now? They're comparatively everywhere. I hear a couple a day where I live.

    105. Re:sampling bias by dbIII · · Score: 1

      True, but people actually did read manuals and do training courses a few years ago, while now users are expected to dive in at the deep end and bother hardware support folks if they want to have two MS Excel spreadsheets on their screen at the same time (or similar trivialities).
      There does appear to be something more concrete than "kids these days", especially since older users new to office computing are as bad or worse.

    106. Re:sampling bias by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Uphill both ways.

      So true - I used to struggle to ride a bike up a hill near my house and then coast down the hill at what I thought was high speed. Twenty years later the town where I grew up was flooded and the top of that hill was a full three feet under water - not much of a hill really. "Miles" when you are small is typically one or two since everything is so big.
      Anyway, the point that we have a lot of scared parents around is valid and such a "free-range" upbringing in cities is something more likely from recent migrants than the mainstream.

    107. Re: sampling bias by dbIII · · Score: 1

      That's close to the universal reaction to questions by email.
      If I have to ask salesfolk multiple questions by email it's always one per email or any later questions are ignored.

    108. Re:sampling bias by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It appears sometimes some of them pretend so hard that physical assaults happen.
      Like it or not, there's a lot of racism about whether a few kids somewhere are "pretending" or not.

    109. Re:sampling bias by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Why should house prices come down, when houses are valuable assets and are going to pay for their retirements?

      Housing prices are purely the fault of the banks, whose mission is to own everything. They are refusing to sell empty homes at market value, with the end result that they wind up getting burned down or knocked over — and that people cannot afford homes.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    110. Re: sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a millennial, and you just described my childhood and that of a number of my friends. You're right though, we're all spoiled brats.

    111. Re:sampling bias by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Uhhh there is actually a BIG difference between Millennials and previous generations, as they were the first ones raised under the "special snowflake" political correctness doctrine, this is why this is the generation that makes up the overwhelming majority of what is now known as the social justice warrior as being fed a diet of Captain Planet, third wave feminism, and extreme political correctness when combined with 24/7 connectivity to social media has created a group of narcissists that are the absolute worst of BOTH worlds. They are a group that has been coddled so damned much they don't know shit about how things actually work but so fucking arrogant and self righteous that they perceive learning how to actually perform the task as an insult.

      Frankly I've never seen any group so fucking clueless yet so full of smugness and a sense of superiority to those around them, the generation before them was just jaded and cynical as hell but were at least willing to LEARN, whereas these Millennials are so damned full of themselves they are downright fricking insulted when the world doesn't conform to THEIR idea how things are supposed to be they practically wear their lack of knowledge as a badge of honor, like its somehow "standing up to conformity" to not learn how to do shit.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    112. Re:sampling bias by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      I absolutely agree. People raise their kids like veal now.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    113. Re:sampling bias by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      This is because in any system there will be an elete few that suck it dry. A perfect system might prevent this from happening but probably all the failures of humanity could be attributed to it and it is on its way.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    114. Re:sampling bias by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      No the real sickness is that companies shareholders and not leaving enough to be able to offer wages for the best workers, and for people to afford to make themselves into one of the best through training. I don't even expect companies to train empoloyees, though it would be nice. But for crying out loud, even the small technical improvement courses are $5K each. They are *priced for* companies to be paying so unless they do who can afford it for themselves?

      There are many good working honest people that would improve themselves to be better workers if they could afford it but they are locked in a system that keeps them in the level they are at, right down to the individual skill level.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    115. Re: sampling bias by Kjella · · Score: 2

      It is just as much of a logical fallacy to use past examples of times not changing as proof that times are not changing now. If someone cries wolf, past cryings of wolf do not change the probability that there is a wolf.

      But it does mean that people moaning about today's youth is a useless indicator, like a broken clock is right twice a day. In fact that's giving it more credit than it deserves because it implies a situation we know is true once in a while. I can cry out about unicorns every day, it doesn't change the probability that there really is a unicorns. Mostly because there's no proof that unicorns exist at all. Has there ever really been a generation that's been so much terribly worse than the last?

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    116. Re:sampling bias by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1, Informative

      They seem to feel "owed" by society a job, and to be treated nicely and fairly.

      These are reasonable expectations of a functioning society. That these expectations are considered to be ridiculously entitled is a reflection on society rather than the people who hold them.

      It is a "reasonable expectation of a functioning society" to expect that jobs exist for you to do and make money to survive.

      It is NOT reasonable to expect that society will simply provide you with the specific job you want, a job you find engaging or interesting, or a job that's fun or enjoyable. Despite huge advances in machines and technology, there still are plenty of jobs that require hard work, often physical labor, or tedious activities. Someone has to do them. Society may "owe" you a job -- but it doesn't owe you a job that will enable you to play video games all day long, or a job as an actor or a musician or whatever.

      Yet there seems to be some truth, at least in the U.S., to the idea that many immigrants (including those are not legal) do jobs that are too dirty, too laborious, or too unpleasant to find Americans who are willing to work relatively cheaply.

      Why is that? How many people end up staying at their parents for a couple years now in their 20s while "job hunting," rather than taking a hard job as a janitor, or a dishwasher or line cook in a restaurant, or mowing lawns, or doing hard manual labor? In previous generations, there would be no question -- most kids were done with any schooling they had by 4th-6th grade, and then they'd be working on the farm or apprenticing to someone or off to the mines or the factories. They needed money to survive. I'm NOT saying we should go back to that, but the reality is our expectations about THE KIND OF JOBS many younger people are willing to do have changed significantly. Society doesn't owe them a job they like.

      This is not a new trend, but if we look at the statistics for the number of people in their 20s (and even 30s) who are still dependent on their parents, we see there's a trend here... and it's not just due to lack of jobs. It's due to lack of jobs that younger people are actually willing to do. (To be fair, we've also created unreasonable expectations here. We tell kids they need to finish high school, or they need to go to college. And then when they get out, they could easily end up working a blue-collar job that my grandfathers worked at with their 4th or 5th grade educations. There's a disconnect here on multiple levels.)

      I didn't always get congratulated JUST for trying

      Noticing children's effort rather than results is better for producing successful adults, as it instils perseverance rather than a sense that your skills are innate and immutable.

      To a point. You need both. Also, studies have shown that the results are NOT as good if praise is disproportionate to achievement and effort. One should not be congratulated "JUST for trying," but only for trying HARD. When you get a trophy for "just showing up," it dilutes the actual praise for those who really win trophies, as well as for those who didn't quite win but really made their best effort.

      I absolutely agree that STRONG effort should be praised and is good reinforcement for kids. So is recognizing actual achievement and succeeding in goals, though. Both are helpful. But praising someone for any minimal effort ("just for trying") is not generally helpful. The expectation should be that we all "try" in life. When you try VERY HARD and/or actually SUCCEED, then a reward is more appropriate.

    117. Re:sampling bias by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Isn't society supposed to be getting better?

      When do we all start hitting a button for two hours and then go enjoy our life of leisure?

      Will that just be for the wealthy?

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    118. Re:sampling bias by Kjella · · Score: 1

      People used to complain about 4chan, but when the God damn 70 year olds figured out Disqus they turned out to be much more heartless and disgusting trolls than any 13 year olds. The 13 year olds try to pretend to be racist sexist sh**s but the old people are THE REAL THING. The kids will grow out of it.

      I'm not so sure it's about "growing out of it", it's mostly about who really means it and who just kicks where it hurts. The latter is "just" part of bullying and could just as well be that you're fat, skinny, tall, short, glasses, freckles, divorce kid, clothes, anything really. Those who really divide the world into superior and inferior remain bigots, those who just did it to harass mostly grows out of it. Or graduate to internet trolls, where there's apparently no age limit.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    119. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh look, Pope Fuckwit.

    120. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps, if by "working ... harder" you mean all the Facebook/Twitter, games, and incessant chatter they're always up to during work hours. I'm sure everybody's guilty of needing to take a break now and then, but that shouldn't be the default mode of operation.

    121. Re: sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all the fun of ny finance plus cultural marxism. do you want this menue with some dope ?

      folks, start to grow some balls and ban the mainstream media dreck from your life.

      show your kids how to cook, how to grow some roots, potatoes and vegetables. harden them against the hollywood venom of drugs, random sex and cynicism.

    122. Re:sampling bias by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Oh look, Pope Fuckwit.

      That's Mister Pope Fuckwit to you.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    123. Re:sampling bias by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Why do you think you deserve to be rich?

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    124. Re: sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what a romantic picture you paint. in this world you suceed by being a maximum cynic who has the best ability to screw over people.

      until people clean out the stable, that is. given the leadership corruption and cynicism, expect this to happen in your lifetime.

    125. Re:sampling bias by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Hahahahaha. Productivity, sure, that's what technology means but harder? Longer hours? Do you even history?

      Yes I do, do you know how to count?

      I do, and subtracting 5 hours of facebook/twitter/starbuck's swilling cooler time from the "9" hours they're in the office....

      Oh, nevermind, I guess you don't. The Great Depression saw some of the most far reaching and ambitious public works projects in modern history as well as an equally staggering reform of wall street. This "recession" sees people like you claiming there's no problem and people just need to work harder.

      It also saw long bread lines, sell your body for a day labor lines, and working for peanuts handouts in those government programs because peanuts were better than nothing. As for reforming wall street, I wish we'd not forgotten those lessons. We can all thank Reagan for starting the unravelling of those reforms in the 80s. I guess he "forgot" why they were needed.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    126. Re: sampling bias by nine-times · · Score: 1

      To play the devil's advocate, have you considered that maybe younger people always are "whiney, lazy, idiots," and older people are the ones with enough experience to see it.

    127. Re:sampling bias by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      I'm not even talking about asking questions. I LIKE questions from my trainees, shows they're paying attention and have a genuine interest in learning. I don't even mind the "that way is stupid, we should do it this way instead" comments as I learned they're much the same question as "why do we do it this way?", just wrapped differently.

      No, I'm talking about solely the bitching and moaning. The "they don't pay for vision?!" or "Why won't they send me to training?", or my favorite ( I hear this a lot ), "We have to clock out for lunch?". It seems to always be a shock to them how the real world operates. I'd like to think I was better than that when I was there age, but I was probably every bit as bad.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    128. Re: sampling bias by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      what a romantic picture you paint. in this world you suceed by being a maximum cynic who has the best ability to screw over people.

      What the devil are you talking about? Are you even responding to my post? I'm not encouraging anyone to "screw over" anyone else. I'm just pointing out that our system is broken in a lot of ways, and we currently have a bit of a disconnect between jobs that are offered vs. jobs that people are wiling to do. Some of that is due to "market inefficiencies," i.e., we're actually paying wages that are too low for labor. And in those cases, we should be paying more. Some of that is due to shifts in how long people tend to stay in jobs or learn enough to become "skilled workers." (A lot of low-paying dirty jobs are paid on the basis of how much volume you can do: people who work in these jobs over a few years will learn to be more efficient and can often earn decent wages. But most people who just are "looking for any job" will quit within a week after starting because it's "too hard" for what they earn.)

      And there are lots of other things going on, like I said about how we create expectations that educated workers will find better jobs when there often aren't enough such jobs to go around. Etc.

      What's your solution? Who is supposed to do the dirty and laborious jobs? Or are you just a "drive-by" AC who likes to lob insults but has nothing of value to offer in response?

    129. Re:sampling bias by lgw · · Score: 1

      Shadow of Eternity said:

      The latest generation works harder, for longer hours, with higher productivity, than any other generation before them

      and

      and is the first generation in history to be worse off than their parents.

      And people actually modded that ridiculous bullshit up. That's the only point I'm making: this hyperbole makes you sound whiny as fuck. This goes beyond "first world problems" as even by the recent history of the first world, we have it very nice.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    130. Re:sampling bias by Bengie · · Score: 1

      the worst financial crisis in 80 years struck

      Pfffft. I was getting offered $80k/year starting wages fresh out of college when I graduated during that "recession", and in cities where that'd put my personal income in the top 25% all from $16k of college education. 30 years strait of 100% job placement after graduation from my college. What do I do? Programming. I had at least one offer to fly me out to Cali and put my in a hotel just for an interview on their dime.

      If you're having a hard time finding a job as a "programmer", either you're not a programmer or you refuse to move, which I think is a valid reason. I like being near family.

      Programming isn't hard. We've got 60 year old ladies at work with no post-highschool education or training and no computers at home, able to do SQL fairly decently. They can write queries good enough to get me useful information when they come to me. Better than some "programmers" I've seen. I swear, most people are functional idiots. If they haven't been "trained", they can't figure it out themselves.

    131. Re:sampling bias by Bengie · · Score: 1

      "put my personal income in the top 25%" of household incomes. Low crime, cheap and high quality education cities to. Voted some of the best in the nation for family living.

    132. Re:sampling bias by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Unemployment rate right now is 5.4%. Unemployment rate in 1932 was 23.6%. In relative terms, there isn't a problem.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    133. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm at the end of the X generation and they said the same thing about us. Gen X is named after some book that I finally read and thought the characters weren't anything like me, or anyone I knew. Then they said the same thing about gen Yers. "They" is usually just a shitty news rag trying to get eyeballs. Pay no attention, they're just trying to get everyone riled up for money. Just goes to show news has been shitty and sensational for quite some time now. I mean pitting generations against each other, how fucking petty. Of course, Slashdot is linking the article on their journey to becoming a shitty sensationalist rag just looking for eyeballs.

      Anyhoo, any old timers who think millennial are lazy, go say that to a combat vet and see what happens.

    134. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Younger generations use to respect older generations too!

      Millennials is all about self. Pussies where I come from.

    135. Re:sampling bias by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Most areas didn't get electritcy until after WW2.

      70% of USA households had electricity by 1930. (source)

      Refrigerators didn't exist you had ice boxes maybe if you were wealthy.

      I'm pretty sure most people had an icebox. I can't find exact numbers but: "By 1884, one writer noted that refrigerators [meaning ice boxes] were as common as stoves or sewing machines in all but the poorest tenements. The use of ice in the home was growing to keep food longer and to cool drinks." (source)

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    136. Re:sampling bias by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Note that an 80% literacy rate is not good at all, since literacy is defined generously and has been over 99% for our lifetimes. I'm sure a 5th grade reading level would be considered literate. Rather than a class full of high school students reading at the 5th grade level, though, it's more likely that a lot of the would-be students weren't in class at all. High school attendance rates in the first half of the 20th century were a lot lower.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    137. Re: sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really believe unemployment is under 10%, I've got a fucking bridge to sell you.

      I don't doubt millennials are whiny, and perhaps some lazy. But that's no different than us "Generation X'ers", we have our share of whiny coddled fucks who think the world owes them something.

      But the millennials really do get fucked. The ones that do work hard still make shit, and the ones that don't work hard see the ones that do (and don't make shit) and say fuck it. I can't blame them.

      Just like no one is "owed" a living, no business is "owed" an employee that's overworked and underpaid. It goes both ways. If I had entered the job market just a few years later, I could see myself saying fuck it.

      Luckily, I got in just before the bubbles burst and the economy took a shit. It hasn't recovered. Just because a fuckton of people have given up looking for a real job doesn't make them employed. Unemployment, by many true measures, not that of a lying federal administration, is far above 10%, with many estimates approaching 20%.

      It is estimated that 93 million Americans are, for whatever reason, no longer in the labor pool. That's astronomical. 5.x% my chunky white ass.

    138. Re: sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mmmmm veal

    139. Re: sampling bias by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Increase of expected hours/week, and in 24x7 services that effectively keep us "on" around the clock. No raises, not even COLA, so earning power is decreasing constantly. Eroding benefits.

    140. Re: sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The term helicopter parent isn't all that new, though, it was already in use by 1969.

    141. Re:sampling bias by cerberusti · · Score: 1

      “The children now love luxury. They have bad manners, contempt for authority; they show disrespect for elders and love chatter in place of exercise.”

        Socrates

      Might as well actually quote it.

      --
      I'm a signature virus. Please copy me to your signature so I can replicate.
    142. Re: sampling bias by Holladon · · Score: 2

      Many/most people raised in the 80s and 90s are considered Millenials. Only a very small handful of those still in high school fall into the Millenial category. People here seem to be thinking "Millenial" means teens and brand-new employees. Depending on which of the proposed birth year cut-offs you favor, "Millenials" can include people as old as 35 this year.

    143. Re:sampling bias by Holladon · · Score: 1

      I don't seen that in the Mils I've run into. Perhaps for the generations just prior to them, I see the hard work still, etc...but the youngest ones just in the workforce the past 3-5 years, nope, they expect a high paying job and don't understand you have to work and COMPETE for the money and job.

      And what are the "generations just prior"? How prior? Prior to whom, precisely? Someone who's been in the workforce for only 3-5 years is maybe, what, mid-twenties, tops? So this is someone who was born in the early 90s. I hope you realize that the the youngest cutoff most social scientists use to describe "Millenials" is 1984, and most go with an earlier year like 1982 or 1980. So while you're bemoaning the common problem of young people new to the corporate world/professional workforce who haven't yet acclimated and attributing this to a particular generation, you're completely ignoring the fact that the "generation" in question is defined as including people about ten years older than the folks you're griping about.

      Do you have the same gripes about your 31-year-old coworkers? If not, then guess what, you're yet another person anecdotally demonstrating that this is not a generational trend, but rather the same, age-old problem of young people seeming annoyingly young to those of us who are a little bit (or a lot) older than them.

    144. Re:sampling bias by cerberusti · · Score: 1

      Where did you go to school? My experience with recent grads is bad enough that I do not give a degree in CS any consideration at all, and you must demonstrate that you know how to program before I will pay a decent salary.

      Most cannot write a simple program which prints all odd numbers between 0 and 100 (no internet access, but they get to choose any language.) Programmers do make some money, although I have found that most people graduating with a CS degree are not capable of programming.

      --
      I'm a signature virus. Please copy me to your signature so I can replicate.
    145. Re:sampling bias by cerberusti · · Score: 1

      A quick search shows others having a similar problem. I do wish colleges would actually fail those they should, but I guess it is more profitable to take their money (at least it was short term... industry is catching on.)

      http://blog.codinghorror.com/why-cant-programmers-program/

      --
      I'm a signature virus. Please copy me to your signature so I can replicate.
    146. Re:sampling bias by Holladon · · Score: 1

      It is NOT reasonable to expect that society will simply provide you with the specific job you want, a job you find engaging or interesting, or a job that's fun or enjoyable. Despite huge advances in machines and technology, there still are plenty of jobs that require hard work, often physical labor, or tedious activities. Someone has to do them. Society may "owe" you a job -- but it doesn't owe you a job that will enable you to play video games all day long, or a job as an actor or a musician or whatever.

      The "video games" remark is unfairly dismissive, and denigrating artistic aspirations is hardly the exclusive province of those of us just old enough to look down on 20-somethings. My Boomer parents were doing that decades ago, as I'm sure their parents did as well.

      My two minor peeves aside, while there's something to your point, and I appreciate your recognition elsewhere in your comment that there are larger forces at work here too, one key larger force that it seems you haven't accounted for is the resume effect: namely, if I, as a white-collar professional (or aspiring white-collar professional, or aspiring whatever-with-60k-in-student-loan-debt, etc.), find myself unexpectedly laid off and have difficulty finding work in my field, my options pretty much fall into one of three broad possibilities: (1) go back to school, (2) do something creatively/personally rewarding and/or interesting (volunteer work, something creative but still tied to my field, etc.), or (3) take whatever job I can find to put money on the table.

      I wholeheartedly agree that option (3) is worthy of consideration and respect, but most employers looking at resumes don't. Period. In fact, in my experience, the average corporate employer's respect for each of the three options has a near-perfect inverse relationship with the cost of each option. This is pure classism, and it is horrific, and it is unquestionably adding to the country's (and the world's) massive economic inequality and countless other problems. A person (with the means to be able to do so) who avoids option (3) isn't necessarily doing it out of laziness or unrealistic expectations. It's highly possible, even probable in many cases, that he or she is doing it because of insight (which may well be subconscious) into the way things are in the modern business world. I'm reluctant to apportion much blame to relatively disempowered individuals for responding in a wholly rational manner to the skewed incentives that the more-powerful create for them.

    147. Re: sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, same experience here. I as a programmer am held accountable for the wrong, vague, and missing instructions from management. That gets real old real fast.

    148. Re:sampling bias by Holladon · · Score: 1

      In fact, in my experience, the average corporate employer's respect for each of the three options has a near-perfect inverse relationship with the cost of each option.

      Of course, I proofread this five times and only after I hit "Submit" did I realize that the relationship I'm alluding to is direct, not inverse. Derp. Or as Gene Wilder (as the only Willy Wonka in existence, and I will abide no dispute on this point) more eloquently put it: "Strike that. Reverse it."

    149. Re:sampling bias by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      "High paying job"? They "expect" not to be making less than the minimum wage their parents got, while working longer, harder, and being more productive than every generation before them.

      That minimum wage job thing is really mostly a fallacy, in that most of those flipping burger jobs are not for the PRIMARY bread winner of a home, they are not the head of household. From what I've read, *most* people making minimum wage, are living in households making about $40-$50K a year, they are the kids with their first jobs.

      We're not talking about that, we're discussing here people coming out of college, or even high school into the REAL workforce.....

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    150. Re:sampling bias by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      They need good pay because they have massive debts from education and need to pay insane rents.

      Simple answer to that really..is be willing to MOVE to where there are better paying jobs, in conjunction with lower rents.

      That total cost of living thing is an equation to be worked out in life.

      There are plenty of places in the US where the cost of living is VERY low, and while the salary might not sound $$$...in an area with lower cost of living, it is easy to not only get by, but prosper on a technically lower salary in a low cost of living area.

      There are places in the US where you can get almost a 2500 sq-ft home for the $220-$230K range for God's sake....

      The day in age where you don't have to move for a job have long passed us. Are kids afraid these days to move too far from Mommy and Daddy?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    151. Re:sampling bias by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      You've read bullshit then, nearly 90% of people in minimum wage jobs are 20 or older and most are people trying to survive.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    152. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, part of the problems is that some employers are driving away good programmers.

      I was once on a contract with the state attorney general's office. A project manager told me "if everybody agrees, then nobody's thinking." That sounds great right up until you disagree and find yourself with a pink slip for your trouble. A place like that is so stifling that even mediocrity seems out of reach. From what I heard, they've had trouble keeping people; gee, I wonder why.

    153. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like you've got "every kid is entitled to go to college" confused with "every slave driver is entitled to college graduates" you fucking dunce.

    154. Re: sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like my experience with a local insurance company. They have a huge help desk team but the system is so riddled with crippling bugs that the programmers are scheduled one day per week too. Of course, the senior developers responsible for many of the problems were exempt from the rotation (funny how that works). That was a soul-crushing four months of cleaning up after retards while hand-cuffed. The best part was when they surprised me one Friday afternoon and told my agent that I was "arrogant." It was like the courtroom scene from Idiocracy where all Joe had to do to set them off was speak proper English...

    155. Re:sampling bias by cerberusti · · Score: 1

      In most fields your employer only really cares that you can do the job.

      In the past a degree was an indication that you knew at least the basics of the field you were trying to enter. These days it seems colleges will pass nearly everyone in order to keep collecting tuition, and this has been going on long enough that in many cases industry is on to that scam and no longer wants to pay a premium for the degree.

      The government has also been guaranteeing student loans, and preventing discharge in bankruptcy. This means even an indigent 18 year old is seen as good for whatever amount of money they care to borrow. It does not matter to the college, the government, or the loan company that there is no need for the number of people who are graduating in many fields, that some fields do not really produce the amount of income necessary to make good on the loan, or that the graduates coming out are not competent to enter the field they were supposedly trained in.

      Despite all of that there are still plenty of jobs available, and if you want a job right now you can pretty much get one in most of the US. Some of these pay quite a bit of money as well: plumbing, electrical work, waste collection, and construction all pay a decent wage. Nursing is also a field which always needs more people.

      The real fix is to stop guaranteeing student loans and allow them to be discharged in bankruptcy. If you needed to get approved by a private loan company who could lose the money they invest, it would sort this out in short order.

      I hire programmers, and do not consider the degree at all for salary or hiring. I pay in line with demonstrated ability and work experience only. I have in fact noticed that for entry level positions applicants without a degree have a much better chance of actually being able to write a program, and as my time is limited I have begun to prefer that when doing the initial filter on applicants (it is shocking how many CS graduates cannot write even a trivial program, but those claiming to have learned on their own tend to only apply for a job after they know enough to at least do something useful.)

       

      --
      I'm a signature virus. Please copy me to your signature so I can replicate.
    156. Re:sampling bias by cerberusti · · Score: 1

      I am a millennial, although on the older side (early 30s) and I definitely see where you are coming from with that rant.

      Many people in my age group seem to think the world owes them something. Their parents told them they were special, and they could do anything they want. When something goes wrong it could not possibly be their fault, and someone else should fix it for them. There are plenty of people like that in earlier generations too, but mine seems to be especially full of it.

      I admit I was fortunate in many ways. I have parents who care (my mother especially cared enough to hit me or throw things when I annoyed her), I score very well on any test I care to take with very little effort compared to most, and I was born into a middle class US household which was not struggling.

      I really think overly protective parents, schools which do not want to leave anyone behind, awards for everyone, college for everyone, etc. have caused a bit of a problem. The thing is that once you leave childhood and enter the real world, nobody really gives a shit about you except you. That is a nasty transition for someone who has been coddled their entire life, and not everyone makes it successfully.

      As an adult it is your problem if your life is not going the way you want, and if you want to know who will fix it for you, you should go find a mirror.

      People complain about crippling student loans, but they are the ones who signed the loan. They complain that they cannot get a job, but they lack the skills which would make them employable. They complain when they lose the jobs they do get, or are not promoted, but they are the ones on facebook instead of working. They complain that they are fat, but they sit on ass all day, eat mcdonalds, and drink coke. They complain that companies have all the power, but lack the motivation to go start their own. They complain about their huge cell phone bill, but for some reason though it was a good idea to sign up for a couple year loan so they can have an iphone.

      I have made my way in the world without too much of an issue (the recession hit me just after forming a new company using my own money, which kind of sucked...but at this point that is over and done.)

      I have a decent job because I have useful skills, and control over many aspects of work because I reliably show up and remain calm when things go wrong.
      I have no debt because I avoid it when I think it is not in my interest.
      I am not fat or diabetic because I eat well and run every morning.

      That does not mean that everything has always worked out, despite what may many people think. I do get tired of people saying that I just lucked out, when what is really occurring is that I make changes in my life when I am not satisfied with the way things are going. These can sometimes be major and uncomfortable changes where I need to invest substantial effort and take some risk.

      I see so many people saying that somebody needs to fix the problems with our society, but do not even consider that they should be that somebody.

      --
      I'm a signature virus. Please copy me to your signature so I can replicate.
    157. Re:sampling bias by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

      As probably pointed out elsewhere in these comments, the same is said about every technological development.

      'Those impudent whipper-snappers writing on papyri. When I was a child, we were forced to memorise epic poetry. They are so lazy for committing things to an external medium rather than their memories!'

      'Those rascals calling on that newfangled telephone gewgaw! Why not take a ride over to the dry grocer rather than calling in an order. The height of sloth, I tell you!'

      --
      'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
    158. Re:sampling bias by Bengie · · Score: 1

      Local State uni. Lots of alumni in big companies or important government tech positions. When you graduated, you pretty much had a bunch of practice and theory to be a full-stack programmer, Database admin, network admin, server admin, and system's security. A very well rounded education. When I architect and design my projects, I consider all aspects, security, performance, maintainability, what systems it communicates with.

      The most important thing I learned was how to think from other people's positions. I bettered my ability to both be critical and creative by learning other people's point of views. Because I can put myself in a DBA's shoes, or a network admin's, or the security team, my ability to program is much better. I also get a lot of slack from the admins since I do think of them and make their jobs as easy as possible for what needs to get done. For many other programmers, coordinating several admins to setup the environment is like herding cats. I seem to have little issue.

      It's amazing how much of a difference small design decisions can make. Butterfly Effect applies to programming and being able to see the ramifications of minute design details helps a lot.

    159. Re: sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And we were thankful!

    160. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of us already have, believe it or not.

    161. Re: sampling bias by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      You're probably in the same group as me--and I've watched other Millennials who honestly do feel entitled to a job, in the sense that we're having to work hard to have any job and recognize that the current economic environment means jobs are not easily gotten...and they're complaining because the job in their (exceedingly narrow) field that pays the (nowhere near entry-level) wage they want is not magically appearing in front of them. (I've also watched them quit jobs for strange reasons--'satisfaction' is something to consider when deciding between two jobs, especially when you've debt. 'Can I afford this job?' would have been better, as too much of the money was being eaten by the travel costs and the schedule was...apparently designed for zombies.)

      Given that, frankly, I knew going into college exactly what sort of careers the various majors I was considering could get me, as well as what entry-level jobs and wages existed, and I'm at the older end of the Millennial range, I don't feel terribly sympathetic. The information to make an informed choice was there, even if it wasn't as easily obtained then as it is now.

    162. Re: sampling bias by Pubstar · · Score: 1

      I've already been warned by several supervisors that while in communication with certain people at my work, always send an email to them after the call to restate what was said on the phone conversation so I have a record of them telling me to do something. These people have a tendency to 'forget' things they tell others to do and it can lead to people getting fired.

      But that is why I love WebEx Connect/Lync/etc. I always have a record of all conversations that I had with superiors. It's saved my ass quite a few times.

    163. Re:sampling bias by Pubstar · · Score: 1

      I was born in 87, played sports my whole life. All the teams I played on that didn't win championships seemed to be happy with the participation trophy. I was one of the few kids that had the mentality of "2nd place is the first loser." Some do, but most don't.

    164. Re: sampling bias by mattwarden · · Score: 1

      The point is just that the absence of an indicator is not an indicator of absence, and people use this argument as evidence that things are not changing now. That assumes stasis and it assumes linearity. When "things change" on important dimensions, it can be very rapid non-linear change, and that change is accelerated when everyone thinks things don't change and are fragile as a result.

    165. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all right. Life extension technology won't be invented soon enough for the boomers. Soon enough they will all be decrepit and senile, we can lock them all up in care homes to be forgotten about and abused by 3rd world immigrant staff who they brought in to replace the locals, and everyone else can finally get down to fixing the damage they did to our economy, environment, society and standard of living.

    166. Re: sampling bias by mujadaddy · · Score: 1

      Do you know the word "millennium"? Become acquainted, please.

      --
      Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
      "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
    167. Re:sampling bias by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      let's see your citations. I don't see many teenagers in the $15 /hour protests.

    168. Re:sampling bias by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      I think the simple fact is that our society has been swindled.
      We've been lead to believe that saving for retirement, saving for your child's education, and saving for your medical care are achievable goals. They are only achievable for a small subset of the population, a load subset. Most people will always live on what they make. Social capital is worth more then money in the bank, whether it's kids that will help (historical), or society (European model).
      Wealth can always be stolen, it can disappear in a moment, often when it is most needed. It can be stolen by inflation, predatory financial markets, swindlers, poor planning, etc. We need to learn to invest more in our social net instead of hoarding and saying, "I got mine."

      Because what you got, is too tempting to those who ain't got, and those who got, but gotta have more.

    169. Re:sampling bias by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      That's great if your starting out in a high price area, you can save, or sell some crap and roll into a low price area with a nest egg. I see it all the time.
      It's much harder if you start out in a low price area.

    170. Re:sampling bias by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      That's funny, I get that meeting crap from oldsters, when a quick IM would handle things. They also want to call instead of using email or text.

      My guess is that your an unabashed fuckup and everyone feels the need to make it a meeting so they can gauge how much you understand and cover their asses.

    171. Re: sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And we LIKED it.

    172. Re: sampling bias by Holladon · · Score: 1

      Do you know the word "irrelevant"? It describes your comment.

    173. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "raised (and slaughtered) his own chickens. "

      How 2 red wurds?

    174. Re:sampling bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You keep saying this, but as a member of that generation, you're wrong. Most of my contemporaries don't do jack shit and are super entitled. Older generations should have done a better job teaching us about the real world, but as a group, we don't work longer or harder. If we're more productive (and that's a big if) then it's just because technology has improved enough to make that happen with less effort.

  2. yeah.. by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    It's important to say, IT people tend to be an isolated bunch to start with, but yeah, although I didn't apply the label "Millennials", it does seem that the young members of the team seem more ... brittle, I guess is the expression I'd use. And in IT, that's not a good thing.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:yeah.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "brittle" == "whiny"

    2. Re:yeah.. by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 2

      They may be more brittle than the seasoned individuals who self selected to stay in IT for 10 or 20 or 30 years. But are they actually more brittle as a group than the people who dipped their toes in the IT waters when you first started, many of whom removed themselves from the professional over the course of years because they could not hack it? I have no doubts there are aged based differences, but it is difficult to tease out the self-selection bias between generations.

    3. Re:yeah.. by roc97007 · · Score: 2

      Good point. We are seeing a group before years of selection process.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    4. Re:yeah.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      If the products these so-called experienced, older experts weren't a pile of defective garbage I might give a shit what they think about young idealists.

    5. Re:yeah.. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Considering the extent of ageism in IT (why keep an old-timer who will only work their 40 hours per week and won't put up with sh*t when we can hire 2 kids at half the price and burn them out) it's more likely that the pile of defective garbage is designed and implemented by the young'uns.

      25 years ago software wasn't shipped with continuous patching over the Internet in mind. It had to mostly work as promised because the cost of sending out patch disks was a lot higher. Today, the attitude is "ship it, we'll patch it later." That attitude doesn't come from old coders and product managers who took pride in their work and were in it for the long haul, rather than the quick cash-out.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    6. Re:yeah.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it comes from the big boss up above who only cares about profits RIGHT NOW.

    7. Re:yeah.. by tsotha · · Score: 1

      You're not the first to notice.

    8. Re:yeah.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We had it tough. We didn't sit around texting and tweeting back in the 80's. We didn't mind having wired game controllers and text-only computers. We wrote good software that worked first time, every time!

      Guaranteed that if current technology existed 25 years ago, people wouldn't have had as much "pride" in their work.

      People haven't changed at all. Technology has.

    9. Re:yeah.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you think thats because its technologically easier to make patches?

      its because actually working is a suckers game, it easier and vastly more profitable to sell a turd
      covered in gold spray paint than an actual handmade artifact of gold. and the investors, which is
      really where you are getting all your money from, dont really care about the difference.

      so there is your MVP

    10. Re:yeah.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That attitude doesn't come from old coders because they didn't have the opportunity to have it. If they had, they'd have behaved the same way.

    11. Re:yeah.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was also less reason to patch anything. The worst that would happen is your computer would crash or a file would be lost. You didn't worry about security exploits because there was no one to exploit them because any hacker had to be sitting at the computer to do anything.

      Continuous, always-on internet is, except at universities which had usenet groups since the late 1970s, a product of the last 15 years, there was no fear of a buffer underrun being exploited remotely. Now, you have to worry about all that. Hard to say how insecure software of yesteryear was. No one cared because there was no risk for the insecurity.

    12. Re:yeah.. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      And the older you are, the less likely to put up with that sh*t. Ergo, there's a strong disincentive to hire older workers who will tell you you don't know jack when you're wrong and then prove it.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    13. Re:yeah.. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      How do you think we got to today's technology? It didn't spring, fully formed, from a bunch of millennials. Also, I haven't got a clue as to who you quoted, but it certainly wasn't me,

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    14. Re:yeah.. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      If it couldn't be patched, they'd lose sales and face lots of returns. Can you imagine having to send a dvd to each user every patch tuesday?

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    15. Re:yeah.. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Absolutely not true. First off, losing data was a red flag even then. And computer viruses have been around since before the PC. And you don't need the internet for them to propagate - they can do so over the lan, or even via removable media (which with PCs meant a floppy disk). Antivirus programs have been around since the '80s.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    16. Re:yeah.. by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Sorry Barb but its NOT the method of delivery, that change just happened to coincide with the supercharging of the stock market thanks to a massive bubble that has been blown by the government pumping trillions into the market with 401Ks and 403Bs. When you have THAT much money trying to suck out the last dollar in profit? Quality no longer matters, all that matters is perception on the street.

      This is why you get CEOs that literally sell the long term future of the company and the stock gets a bounce, why you can have IPOs that are 50 times what the company could ever realistically earn, and why companies can put out shit software that is damned lucky if its even functional, because as long as they can get something out the door there is a good chance the speculators will see this as a "positive indicator" and give the stock a bounce, which allows the CEO to cash out and move on before the excrement hits the bladed cooling device.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    17. Re:yeah.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I kinda feel like the problem with most of the young'uns in that case just is that they aren't experienced enough to tell management they are full of shit other than by just trying to do what they ask and then proving that management was full of shit by implementing defective pieces of garbage. I've been in the industry for 5 years now and the thing i've learned the most is shit rolls down hill. If management would stop asking for the impossible in terms of unrealistic deadlines and poorly thought out functionality the younguns would probably end up implementing less defective garbage. It takes a few years to get the experience and balls to tell management they are in fantasy land and whats being asked for could never possibly work out.

    18. Re:yeah.. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      That makes me feel like the parrot pining for the fjord. Sturgeon's Law is going to have to be revised.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    19. Re:yeah.. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Has somebody patented the "This is a turd ... on the Internet" yet?

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  3. It's the Millenials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the millenials; they're much more stressed because they're so vulnerable to getting tasked for more and more work digitally. Just a few clicks, and their workload increases, where as my Gen X'ers just do what they want, and the Gen Y at least demand a visit before I pour more work on them.

    1. Re:It's the Millenials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gen Y = Millennial

    2. Re:It's the Millenials by nctritech · · Score: 2

      I disagree with lumping Gen Y in with millennials. The definition of the term is just stretched way too wide in most cases. You can't tell me that someone born in 1980 is going to approach the world the same way as someone born in 1995. Gen Y (the "early" millennials) grew up on BBSes, Commodore 64s, Apple //e computers with Oregon Trail, and NES consoles, while "late" millennials never knew a time that the Internet wasn't ubiquitous in society. To the early side modern technology is amazing; to the late side, it *just is*.

    3. Re:It's the Millenials by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Nope. Marketers re trying to increase "millennials" to encompass Generation Y and even Generation X, but that doesn't make it so.

    4. Re: It's the Millenials by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 I'm born 1982 and these kids today... I tell you...

      Seriously though, it also depends on the person. I know lots of peers that were born around my year that are really really like your 1995ers while our newest dev at 26 years old seems totally fine. Granted though thats not 1995 he definitely never went on a BBS or knows what IRC is.

    5. Re:It's the Millenials by lgw · · Score: 1

      45-65 = Boomers
      65-85 = Gen X
      85-05 = Millenials
      05-25 = Digital Natives

      Simple as that. No room for a Gen Y. Heck, people stopped having kids by 20 a while back, so the Millenials might stretch out to people born today.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    6. Re:It's the Millenials by Etcetera · · Score: 1

      65-85 = Gen X
      85-05 = Millenials
      05-25 = Digital Natives

      Gotta disagree on that, judging from totally unscientific personal experience watching each incoming set of undergraduates at my local state university.

      65-80 = Gen X
      80 - 88 = Gen Y (if that)
      90+ = Millennials

      For political and cultural purposes, becoming "politically aware" somewhere around 2006 is about where I'd draw the line. A quick determiner is to ask them how much they remember about 9/11. If it's vague things about the adults being worried, or their 3rd grade teacher bringing them in for an announcement, they're probably a Millennial.

  4. Think positive people!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Common core will solve everything!

    1. Re:Think positive people!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if it teaches kids that it's Bushes fault, caused by white privilege and results in racism running rampant in a city with a Black President, Black Mayor, Black Chief of Police and 50%+ minority Police Officers.

    2. Re:Think positive people!!! by chipschap · · Score: 1

      Come on, you left out global warming and save the whales.

    3. Re:Think positive people!!! by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      hole in the ozone, reduce, re-use, recycle, crack babies....

    4. Re:Think positive people!!! by chipschap · · Score: 1

      And "what about the children"

  5. IT Workers or IT Users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can see how an IT worker has had few social interactions, but that doesn't explain how IT users could be having those problems. Typical Facebook users likely have social lives outside of Facebook. I mean, I don't have a Facebook account and I don't have a social life at all.

    It doesn't help that corporations are pushing for more H1-B visa workers. They'll likely pushing everyone harder: homegrown and as well as H1-B.

  6. Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They drive up the stress levels for the rest of us, coming in thinking they know everything, implementing stupid fucking ideas that never pan out, then buggering off to another company before implementation is complete and without any strategy for support or long-term maintenance. Their turnover rates are routinely cited as reasons why our jobs are being shopped off shore, which just adds to the stress.

    1. Re:Yes by captjc · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They drive up the stress levels for the rest of us, coming in thinking they know everything, implementing stupid fucking ideas that never pan out, then buggering off to another company before implementation is complete and without any strategy for support or long-term maintenance. Their turnover rates are routinely cited as reasons why our jobs are being shopped off shore, which just adds to the stress.

      Funny, most of the people I know who are doing that are usually 40-50 year old MBA managers and CXX-titled executives.

      --
      Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
    2. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most? Usually? You either know a lot of fictional people, or your company is in trouble with so much executive turnover. Keep choking that chicken, kid.

    3. Re:Yes by nctritech · · Score: 1

      It's not a good idea to generalize so strongly about an entire demographic like that, or at least not without providing some sources to back up some of the assertions so we can read them and achieve a better understanding of what you're saying.

    4. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But hey, the other guy, whose reply you didn't have to adjust your filter to read? His generalization is just fine, right? Funny how an argument is only faulty when it disagrees with your personal worldview.

    5. Re:Yes by captjc · · Score: 1

      You either know a lot of fictional people, or your company is in trouble with so much executive turnover.

      I can tell someone hasn't worked in many large multinationals. Some VP or CXX gets hired, brings in his buddies, implements some stupid crap policies, milks the position for what its worth and then leaves after 3-5 years for greener pastures and the cycle continues. Everyone else is left to clean up the mess left behind. Usually the next guy will see the resulting disfunction and hire some consultants who recommend layoffs and various reorganizations. It is the same thing over and over again.

      When I was a kid, I used to read Dilbert and laugh. Now I read Dilbert and cry because that shit is all too real.

      --
      Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
    6. Re:Yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my company, literally everyone is a VP. I'm not joking. I'm pretty sure of 250,000 employees, only 25,000 aren't Vice Presidents.

  7. It's a small survey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    and the smaller the group the more irrelevant the resulting survey.

  8. Um... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Millennials are also expert users...

    ... define "expert" and qualify "users" - social-media apps on smartphones or things actually used in an office or real work/dev environment?

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Um... by Jhon · · Score: 2

      '... define "expert" and qualify "users" - social-media apps on smartphones or things actually used in an office or real work/dev environment?'

      I'd say by "expert" they are familiar with the basic interfaces used on many operating systems. Do they know how to create a word document without hand holding? More than likely. Can they create a basic spreadsheet? Probably. Do they understand how to use office (MS or open or whatever version you pick) to its fullest? No. My experience is that many millennials seem to think "expert" knowledge of such software suites comes easy and they actually have it but get frustrated quickly when asked to do something complicated (like db links, mutli-sheet vlookup or *gasp* vb macros ).

      I find it easier to train 40 y/o + how to arrange and manipulate their data than I do anyone under 30 years old. Well... maybe not easier, but more enjoyable. It gets old trying to train or teach someone without any real attention span.

    2. Re:Um... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      the under 30 crowd cannot survive without checking their PHONES every few minutes.

      it sort of reminds me of pidgeons and how they move their necks back and forth as they walk. would they be able to walk if you put a neck brace on them? ;)

      would the younger crowd even be able to function if you took their phones away?

      I know its a generalization, but it still strikes me as strange, every time I see someone walking down the street, face pointing downward, absorbed in some text or IM. its never an older person.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    3. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      the under 30 crowd cannot survive without checking their PHONES every few minutes.

      Had to fire a couple of under-30s over the last few months because while on the job they constantly texted while patrons stood by waiting for assistance. After the fourth time I shitcan them.

      This problem is almost exclusive to millenials, yet they're so dense they don't seem to understand what they've done wrong even after you've explained it to them.

    4. Re:Um... by prowler1 · · Score: 1

      I find people like to state this as a fact, including the generation in discussion themselves. In reality though, they just know how to use the interface of the common applications but don't really understand how it works. It would be the equivalent of saying that the generation which grew up in the 80's and 90's were more technical because they knew how to use a video player.

    5. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Millennials are also expert users...

      ... define "expert" and qualify "users" - social-media apps on smartphones or things actually used in an office or real work/dev environment?

      User: Someone who writes software to make a computer do what needs to be done.

      No. Hardly any Millennials qualify as users, most are just consumers. A dedicated few manage spread-sheet calculations...

    6. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, this is just more of that "them young people know computers" babble.

    7. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say by "expert" they are familiar with the basic interfaces used on many operating systems.
      -Do they know how to create a word document without hand holding? More than likely.
      -Can they create a basic spreadsheet? Probably.
      -Do they understand how to use office (MS or open or whatever version you pick) to its fullest? No.

      That's not an expert... that's a trainee.

    8. Re:Um... by frisket · · Score: 1

      I'd say by "expert" they are familiar with the basic interfaces used on many operating systems. Do they know how to create a word document without hand holding? More than likely. Can they create a basic spreadsheet? Probably. Do they understand how to use office (MS or open or whatever version you pick) to its fullest? No. My experience is that many millennials seem to think "expert" knowledge of such software suites comes easy and they actually have it but get frustrated quickly when asked to do something complicated (like db links, mutli-sheet vlookup or *gasp* vb macros ).

      Many (most?) of these so-called "expert" Millenials don't know shit. All they know is how to click on FB. Fortunately there are a few who have actually grokked IT, and those are the ones to employ. Unfortunately, most PHBs don't know this...

    9. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know its a generalization

      Then why are you saying it? I'm under 30 and rarely text, dislike facebook, etc. etc.

      Now you will say 'but I said it was only a generalization!'.

      Its like saying 4 is almost 5. Yeah, you might be right, but it is still fucking worthless.

  9. Expert Users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh huh.

    Experts at texting, or using apps perhaps, but experts in how the underlying systems work is a pretty far stretch. For the Millennial generation, you really need a GUI Rapid Response Team vs an IT group to solve most of their issues. :|

    Doesn't apply to all Millennials ( like any generation, there are always exceptions to the rule ) of course, but here's a hint:

    Anyone who is calling a support line probably isn't an "expert" in the technology they're using.

    1. Re:Expert Users by Jhon · · Score: 1

      "Anyone who is calling a support line probably isn't an "expert" in the technology they're using."

      Are we talking CONSUMER support lines or INTERNAL BUSINESS support lines? Because many of those calls are to report something is broken or not working as expected by people who are very familiar with what they do.

    2. Re:Expert Users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't even patch my own body's internal systems. It should produce ascorbic acid as most mammals do that. But I haven't figured out how to do it. So yes, I am not an expert in the technology I'm using.

  10. What I think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's stressful working for a doomed company. Most tech startups these days are doomed. Most millenials are the ones working at the tech startups.

    Seems self-explanatory to me.

    1. Re:What I think by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      This is certainly true. The last job I had was at a company just getting out of the startup phase. The company wasn't doomed in the sense that it was going under, but that it got bought out by a large tech conglomerate that started making it a shitty place to work (don't even get me started on what they did to our customers.) It's disheartening to watch a company change before your very eyes - promotion opportunities drying up, good people fired for fabricated reasons and replaced with corporate drones, the rest of the good people jumping ship, a general atmosphere of shittiness around the office, and so many other changes (big and small) to let you know the new overlords don't care about the employees or even fully understand the services the company sells.

      Born in 1989, if it makes any difference.

  11. Re:First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No.

  12. Small sample, pre-conceived notions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simply put, this study is really generally useless. IT has been around long enough that the stereotypical "IT Guy" is really more of a lampoon than an actual thing. For every neckbeard, there exist 10 IT professionals who are mature adults. The reason it is getting more stressful is ultimately because of intransigence in the managerial realm (i.e. "I'm not techie, but...." managerial mentality), and also because more and more with the whole BYOD bullshit, managing an IT department has become *harder* not easier. Before, I would need to support a known number of end-user platforms, with known capabilities and weaknesses. Today, I need to support not only desktops, but laptops, tablets, and phones. Of which, there are multiple OSes, multiple OS flavors, and limited options in central management.

  13. Re: They're just shitheads. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And lazy, lack focus, and drive.

  14. Junk science by tomhath · · Score: 4, Informative

    The survey, which started in 2012, just released its 2015 report, and found that of 78% of the IT workers surveyed consider their job stressful. That's up just 1% from 2014, but in 2013 the figure was 57% and in 2012, 67%.

    Their numbers are jumping all over the place. I also don't see how they can jump to any conclusions regarding Millennials in the workplace after only four years with such a small sample, and they don't break it out by age group.

    Someone needed to fill a column with some words - so here are some words. Come back next week for more words in this column

  15. Entitlement by TheRecklessWanderer · · Score: 1

    So are we saying that the millenials aren't a bunch of entitled rude asses?

    --
    Mean what you say...say what you mean.
    1. Re:Entitlement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like every generation before them.

  16. Demand for 24/7 systems without paying for them by swb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think some of it is the demand that everything work, all the time, without any room for maintenance while at the same time not being willing to pay for the resources to deliver systems that can provide that.

    1. Re:Demand for 24/7 systems without paying for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's certainly the type of customer that we have where I work (a data center).

      Us: "The hard drive in your server is failing. We need to swap it out and allow the array to rebuild. Is 2am tonight ok?"
      Customer: "I cannot afford to have any downtime. Can you do this without any downtime?"
      Us: "No, because you didn't pay for a hot swap chassis and all your data is on one server. If you had a load-balanced setup or a hot swap chassis, we could do that."
      Customer: "Those things cost too much. I still need you do change the hard drive without shutting anything down or it in any way affecting performance."

    2. Re:Demand for 24/7 systems without paying for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The reason you'll never find me working that job at a DC is that I'm the kind of guy that will say, "So let me get this right - you do so much business that you can't have any downtime at all, but a simple, relatively inexpensive means to protect that livelihood is too much to pay for?"

    3. Re:Demand for 24/7 systems without paying for them by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      You: "Okay, let me rephrase this. The hard drive in your server is failing. Do you want to schedule downtime for replacement, or let it fail unpredictably? Your call."

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    4. Re:Demand for 24/7 systems without paying for them by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      That's not just the young, it's how everyone feels now. They are used to things being free on the internet, and having high reliability. Don't mistake the very young who have no money for being cheap either, kids have always been that way.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Demand for 24/7 systems without paying for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno. I kind of enjoy watching the young people scramble to add logging, monitoring and troubleshooting features in-production, forgetting to document anything properly so it's bound to break at any time someone else touches the systems. As long as the business and the toddlers keep to themselves, we can keep the core systems functional and keep adding incremental improvements between the projects.

      If I'm asked, I can look into the system. However, with nothing to go on, I point at the original "developers", which then have to work out of office hours to mend their dysfunctional "innovations".

      Just learn to provide the best arguments, and you win. You probably won't get that extra $500 raise or be loved by the managing silo. However, that kind of money and people who don't provide decent inclusion and leadership, are usually not worth the trouble anyways.

    6. Re:Demand for 24/7 systems without paying for them by ladysybil · · Score: 1

      I don't work in a data center and still have that kind of boss.

      Boss: We need more harddrive space
      Me: we either buy new hds for the server and copy everything over or buy a NAS
      Boss: We can't shut down for that long and I don't want to pay overtime
      Me: The price for a NAS is $5k
      Boss: Too expensive
      ...week later...
      Boss: We need more disk space

  17. Click Bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This post has no insight. It is just a generational hate post...

  18. Expert Users? by hodet · · Score: 1

    Give me a break. They have a high percentage of clueless users like any other generation.

  19. Staffing Cuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    During the recession, many firms cut jobs and made 10 people do the work of 15. That saves money and resulted in no quantifiable loss in productivity of the group, so the firms never rehired the people they got rid of. How would this not be a more stressful work environment?

    1. Re:Staffing Cuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't stressful for the people who are making 10 do the work of 15. It's quite challenging actually.

    2. Re:Staffing Cuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back in my day, it was "best person for the job". Those that were good at the work got promotions and/or raises, and those that weren't - didn't. It had nothing to do with age. And if you fucked up - FIRED. Why so complicated now?

    3. Re:Staffing Cuts by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Let's not forget that IT was always a shitty, stressful work environment in most cases. A lot of people got out of it just because they got tired of being fucked over and then blamed for the fucking they were getting. It's a thankless, depressing, disgusting (anyone have budget for regular PC cleaning out there so they don't turn into dust monsters? hey, the PC monkey is part of the IT department, don't get all snooty network guys) job and it's no wonder that people don't want to do it unless they can get some good money. Other jobs with similar knowledge domains are highly paid, and in most of those, you don't have to crawl around on the floor ever unless you drop a contact lens.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Staffing Cuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in my 60's, in IT for 20 years, and a statistically insignificant sampling of 1 shows that outsourcing and job cuts have definitely increased the stress levels. The expectation is now that a normal work week is longer, 60 hours will get you an evaluation of "meets expectations" and a merit increase in the (very) low single digit range. Companies have become used to the recession era work environment where just keeping your job was all the incentive that was needed.

  20. Crap technology? by bored · · Score: 2

    Or maybe its all the crap, half baked technology being used over the last few years. I think we are sort of in a time period like the mid/late 90's where everyone was shoveling garbage windows apps out the door before they were done baking (and win9x itself was a pile of crap).

    It seems to me, that over half the "web stacks" are just steaming piles of unfinished garbage. Same with a lot of the core infrastructure technologies that are all the hotness (see docker, openstack, etc).

    So, its no wonder these things get stressful, someone hits a bug and suddenly they are trying to fix software that is way over their head on a deadline.

    1. Re:Crap technology? by skids · · Score: 2

      Yeah I too think the technology has devolved over time. Certainly it is next to impossible to find a competently written manual for most things these days. There's no actual contract from vendors as to what's an actual feature and what's just an implementation side effect, software hits the marketplace with things broken that should not even have gotten *to* the QA department, much less past it, and there's no shortage of glossy brochures deceiving the high level managers into believing that everyone is using newer technology than you are with none of the issues/glitches that are causing your organization grief.

      I do, however, worry about the data entry skills of the latest generation. You'd think being raised with tech would make them understand the importance of consistency and accuracy, but if my anecdotal experience is accurate they are even less thorough than the older people who had the excuse of not being familiar with the technology.

    2. Re:Crap technology? by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      I do, however, worry about the data entry skills of the latest generation. You'd think being raised with tech would make them understand the importance of consistency and accuracy, but if my anecdotal experience is accurate they are even less thorough than the older people who had the excuse of not being familiar with the technology."

      That's why businesses are hiring people with autism. Having the ability to focus on something for an extended period of time is hard for people who expect everything to just work and have the attention span of a tweet.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  21. Millennials are pussies by BigChigger · · Score: 0

    It had to be said.

  22. As Mentioned Above by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just clickbait/inconclusive.

    Let me think about what else could be different between now and 4 years ago... I know my current stress is the sole byproduct of the simple fact that business is booming and there's too much work. My workday was a little more mellow 4 years ago, coming off the tail end of an economic meltdown.

  23. "Do more with less" by Culture20 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Do more with less, and with fewer coworkers with less experience. You have four weeks of paid vacation, but no backup (fewer coworkers, less experience), so if there's a problem, you need to fix it on vacation, so your vacation needs to be a stay-cation." -New corporate management motto.

    morale = morale - 4

    1. Re:"Do more with less" by xystren · · Score: 1

      I think we are seeing the effects of the expected long hours - that 60-80 work week being a badge of honor; the effects of the dependency on IT services, without the budget/forethought to provide the needed staff/support and maintenance; the get it deployed and fix it later attitude; deliverables forcing the never having the time to do it right, but always time to do it again; unrealistic project management and project goals/deliverables; threat of outsourcing/off-shoring; corporate treating staff as resources rather than as people; etc., etc., etc.

      It doesn't surprise me to tell the truth. One of the reasons that I got out of I.T. (although, no one truly never really leaves I.T.)

    2. Re:"Do more with less" by itsenrique · · Score: 1

      It's like this in many other industries too, even thriving ones. It's the new squeeze the worker theme. The older generation is not immune, but successful older people are much less likely to feel the pinch because they have gone on to better jobs/positions.

    3. Re:"Do more with less" by RoknrolZombie · · Score: 1

      "My phone plugs into a wall, so that's your responsibility too. You need to be available by phone in case our Sales department in Germany has any problems. Oh, and we need to have you come to the morning meetings every day to explain why the Windows update broke Exchange and why we haven't upgraded to Windows 8 yet - we're supposed to be cutting edge! By the way, our website is loading slow and we need you to figure out why. And we want to fire Larry - we're pretty sure he surfs porn sites on his lunch, so go ahead and dig something up. Oh, our vendor for is charging us too much, so you'll have to clean up the database yourself. Don't worry - we'll get you help, the janitor has just started ITT."

      I won't, but I could, go on.

      That being said, my wife is also a professional and her job is pretty stressful too. Of course, she makes considerably more and actually gets some time off once in awhile, but the stress is there.

    4. Re:"Do more with less" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Do more with less, and with fewer coworkers with less experience. You have four weeks of paid vacation, but no backup (fewer coworkers, less experience), so if there's a problem, you need to fix it on vacation, so your vacation needs to be a stay-cation." -New corporate management motto.

      morale = morale - 4

      Paid vacation? The large software company I work for has abolished accrual of vacation time. They wrapped up the change in flashy prose saying you could take time whenever you want but hidden in the fine print is that you have no right to take time off. So yes stress has gone up. When they did guarantee annual vacation time it was a lot less than I got 20 years ago.

    5. Re:"Do more with less" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't shit on ITT, for starters. I went there and have a lot of friends who went there who are adult, driven people with undeniable proficiency in their fields. Your example is unrealistic in a modern company. I truly would like to know what company you're experienced that actually doesn't have a web filter in place, because I've literally never seen one before.

      Yea, my first job after graduating was a similar situation in ways. I was doing all the programming, I handled the database, I redesigned the website, I handled IVR programming when our main guy was busy or gone, I did all the imaging and software deployments and basically all troubleshooting for anything that used electricity, but it wasn't THAT bad.

  24. Of course it's getting more stressful by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Except for a few top guys and the occasional person who wins the lottery in life pay is what is was 20 years ago after 20 years of inflation. Companies are merging left and right and everytime they do it's another round of layoffs. Offshoring and onshoring (via H1-B) are nuts. If you work in IT you're probably seeing something like a 70% Indian workforce with only the occasional American to fill a spot when they ran out of visas. Meanwhile it's a statisical fact that productively is way way up, meaning you're doing more work. Even if the tools are better it still means you're responsible for a hell of a lot more. How the hell would that _not_ be stressful?

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Of course it's getting more stressful by King_TJ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      THIS! rsilvergun is 100% correct here.

      I commented already on here about my thoughts on the original topic, but the bigger, underlying issue is definitely tied to the pay rate not really keeping up with inflation. With one of the career jobs most people consider "among the better paying", like I.T., it can really sneak up on you too.

      I remember working for a place in the 90's doing server and PC support, feeling I was underpaid but enjoying the other aspects of the job enough not to care. But when I finally moved on, I realized I couldn't find work doing the same thing where my salary was going to be that much higher than what I was making before. (Combination of the dot com crash and economic depression around that time AND the fact that everyone wants to know what you made where you worked previously, and tries not to pay you much more than that.)

      Like a lot of people though, I eventually settled for what they were offering so I could at least stay gainfully employed, and believed all the promises of future bonuses and compensation for hard work. But life marches on, even if pay raises don't.... All of a sudden, I'm older and have a whole family I'm responsible for. Things I never cared about before like having a bigger house with a few bedrooms in it and more than one bathroom became big deals (not to mention having to worry about living in a "good school district", vs. just living where you could live cheap).

      Wound up not only switching jobs but relocating to get the "better paying" position, only to find cost of living was so much higher where I went, it negated most of the pay increase. One day, you just wake up and say, "WTF man!? I have 20+ years of experience, yet my overall lifestyle and buying power really feels about the same as what it was 10-15 years earlier. I know I'm *doing* way more complex stuff that should offer employers more value, but I'm just treading water."

    2. Re:Of course it's getting more stressful by MrKaos · · Score: 2

      Exactly. All the employers seem to have the attitude "well you love this stuff, so you would do it for free - so you must love working like a slave. If you don't like working like a slave then you can't be very enthusiastic or motivated".

      I've long been coming to the conclusion that IT is now fucked however I've also found that the places with mature business practices and decent project management were the ones that offer the least stress. That's because those ancillary to IT were skilled enough to manage the stakeholders, so the only stress you were under was to perform.

      Generally if I see an organization filled with a lot of young people and a disregard for experienced people, I run. You can tell what sort of organization it is going to be before even working there. The narcissistic boss, the lead tech bully, the general oppression of people with good ideas, the female office administrator who is just nasty, the 'it's just a job' people and the emotionally intelligent people who are generally liked but just passing through because they realized they made a big mistake taking this job.

      Becoming in-demand and a indispensable problem problem solver helps until you can fire them, usually with a smug polite smile, helps you maintain yourself from a mental health perspective. This is because most of them are bound to fail and spend big trying to get good, so if you give them sincere advice that they ignore which costs them money, they will never ignore you again. If find if I maintain a 'I'm here to take your money from you' attitude I can maintain some separation from the assholes and still get some enjoyment from IT work.

      Of course, at the core of this argument is *why* IT is so stressful, and it is because it has been invaded by a lot of clueless assholes. You also have to acknowledge your own propensity to assholiness, I know I can be an asshole, so try hard not to be. Get rid of the assholes from IT work and you can get good work done. If you are working with assholes, you'll spend most of your time stressing and dealing with them and their mistakes.

      Asshole management is *the* most stressful part of IT work.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    3. Re: Of course it's getting more stressful by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      You forget the most stressful ones.

      The ones not in IT but pms, vps, management, and users who view you as a peon cost center and are happy to file a complaint the second you push back at unreasonable requests. After all they pay your salary! We need results and not complainers and if you won't do it due to my lack of planning then I will find someone who will!

      Twice I was so angry I almost quit my job. However, during the great recession I took several month contract jobs so HR views me as a job hopper. Last thing I need is quit less than a year on my resume. Grrrh!

      If I did not have bills or could move on due to that several year gap I would in such environments.

      In time I will after my 3 years. Lesson for assholes in management are do not be surprised to see a mass exodus during boom times. No one owes me a job yes but no one owes you service either. Works both ways

    4. Re:Of course it's getting more stressful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well put. Fuck them, and fuck that. I moved to Houston a year ago, right, where people make SO MUCH MONEY. The standard of living here is broken. Apartments that cost more than apartments in NYC, in downtown Houston or even Midtown. The crime rate is ridiculous. The city is like 78% minorities. Literally more than half of the IT workers are from India or Pakistan.

      I'm doing essentially the same job I did in Cincinnati, getting paid - after accounting for the tax difference and cost of living difference - LESS than I was before. Unless you factor in the bonuses which are not paid out regularly when they are supposed to.

      There are people with far less experience making more money, not to mention people doing less work than me in my own office making more money. Time to start looking around or pushing the issue.

    5. Re: Of course it's getting more stressful by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      You forget the most stressful ones.

      The ones not in IT but pms, vps, management, and users who view you as a peon cost center and are happy to file a complaint the second you push back at unreasonable requests. After all they pay your salary! We need results and not complainers and if you won't do it due to my lack of planning then I will find someone who will!

      So true, I know exactly the type you are talking about!

      Twice I was so angry I almost quit my job. However, during the great recession I took several month contract jobs so HR views me as a job hopper. Last thing I need is quit less than a year on my resume. Grrrh!

      You may of noticed places aren't very well in control of their business processes, which offers a ripe opportunity to improve things which improve control when things fall apart. If they leave you alone, improve it so they pay you begrudging respect or at least leave you alone. If they continue to be assholes, two words : Manual Procedure, after all they need to protect the business data.

      I think its a good way to say "Fuck off" in geek.

      If I did not have bills or could move on due to that several year gap I would in such environments.

      It does suck, I've always tried to frame it in the context of 'what can I get out of this' because sometimes you have to put up with it. I hope I'm past that now!

      In time I will after my 3 years. Lesson for assholes in management are do not be surprised to see a mass exodus during boom times.

      The morally superior ones who kind of make you feel a little ill. Like eating super greasy food and regretting every moment of the encounter.

      No one owes me a job yes but no one owes you service either. Works both ways

      Yes, strategic foot dragging has great uses. It would seem we have had some very similar circumstances!!

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  25. Re:They're just shitheads. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what being young is about. Not knowing when to not be a shithead. You were once like that too, we all were.

  26. A question of pacing by stox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Many places are trying to adopt styles/methods/etc that are well suited to a startup in manic phase. They don't seem to realize that you can't keep this up indefinitely. Just dump bodies in the meat grinder, and code comes out the other end.

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
  27. Millennials will have a very rough landing by Opportunist · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I've seen it time and again, with the people around me who insisted to spawn child processes. The mix of helicopter parents who would not only ensure no "bad" experience would ever happen to their little precious but also made certain that anyone not seeing their brat as the special snowflake they are will get their banshee like fury, coupled with a school system that promoted feeling good and "everyone's a winner", where you would already get rewarded for showing up, whether you can actually accomplish anything or are essentially a useless waste of oxygen, that can only lead to a VERY hard fall when they come into contact with reality.

    These people are by definition not going to be able to handle stress, or even any kind of frustrating experience, well. They are by no means prepared to it. And no, that's not true for everyone born in this age of overprotectionism, but it's never been as bad as it is today.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Millennials will have a very rough landing by metlin · · Score: 1

      What rubbish. Plenty of cultures have parents who are involved in their children's education. My own parents were extremely involved, and as the only child, they put a lot of time and effort into my education and extracurricular activities. To this day, they are quite interested in my career, and are just as involved in teaching my own year old language and music.

      That is not a statement on their children's capabilities. Tiger moms are common, and it just demonstrates responsible parents who are genuinely interested in their kids' well being.

      My wife and I will certainly be taking an interest in our kids' education and lives, and that is not being overprotective -- that is good parenting.

    2. Re:Millennials will have a very rough landing by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      You're describing an entirely different kind of parent than he did.

    3. Re:Millennials will have a very rough landing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plenty of cultures have parents who are involved in their children's education. My own parents were extremely involved, and as the only child, they put a lot of time and effort into my education and extracurricular activities. To this day, they are quite interested in my career, and are just as involved in teaching my own year old language and music.

      Fair enough. Did they visit your college professors, demanding that they justify your essay scores? Have they contacted your boss to suggest you're underpaid?

      There's a difference between being involved, interested parents and being the helicopter terrors that Opportunist describes. And it's not like all of the Millenials' parents are like that, but a few stories get spread around... People only remember the outliers, they forget that 95 out of 100 kids have parents just like their own and focus on the absolute worst of the bad.

    4. Re:Millennials will have a very rough landing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a big difference between people like my parents (and hopefully the model I can follow myself) who were involved in their child's education, encouraged them, helped them and admonished them when they did not achieve the level they were capable of, and the unfortunately quite common parents of today (my wife is a high school teacher) who think their child is so special they should be getting top marks despite the lack of effort (or sometimes ability) on the part of the child and wants to hold everybody else accountable rather than their own child.

    5. Re:Millennials will have a very rough landing by Opportunist · · Score: 1
      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:Millennials will have a very rough landing by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between showing interest in a child's development and interfering with it. Further down the thread I posted a picture that shows the key difference quite bluntly, allow me to link it again. 1969 shows parents being involved in a child's learning progress. 2009 shows parents interfering with it. I hope the difference is easy to see.

      Caring about your child is very laudable and shows good parenting. But it may not be taken so far that you try to "fight your kids' battles", so to speak. I see this development with too many young people. We have a growing tendency to keep our kids as kids and keeping them dependent on us rather than preparing them for an independent life. When you see people at 30 whose mom still packs them their lunch and makes their bed, and not because they just happen to be still living at home (not so impossibly out of necessity in this economy) but because they can't even do it themselves, there is something NOT right here.

      Showing interest in your kids development is commendable. Essentially keeping them from developing by taking over their life is not!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  28. "user experts"? by izm · · Score: 1

    So, yes...milenials are more immersed in technology, and have a better handle on how to use it, but that doesn't mean they have an understanding of how it works. To call every 20 year old with a cell phone an expert in mobile communications devices is a gross exaggeration. If they're more demanding its because they're used to it just being there...like water or electricity.

    --
    izm
  29. No. You're dumb. Stop being dumb. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm in my thirties. I can attest that twenty somethings freak out like little bitches and make non-issues into epic sources of pointless, unnecessary stress.

    Just like they did when I was a twenty something.

    Just like the 40+ crowd did when they were twenty-something.

    Just like they have been doing for generations.

    You're seriously talking about kids who have just left University of Daycare and are stepping into the big bad real world for the first time. They're not established. They don't have stable careers. They have no real life experience. Give 'em a decade and I'm sure we'll be treated to another asinine buzzword declaring that yet another generation is completely incomprehensible to everyone in spite of simple human nature being very easily understood.

  30. 100% sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm `100% sure that is the Millenials that are causing the stress!!!

  31. Oh, wait. You mean "Digital Natives", right? by mmell · · Score: 5, Informative
    You know - those kids who currently have over eight years experience with RHEL 7, nearly a decade with Windows Server 2012 - those kids who grew up with FaceSpace, WhoTube and YouTome? Oh, yeah . . . I remember them.

    And for the record, we who have been in the industry long enough to remember a time without all these resources - we who are decidedly not "Digital Natives" - we're the ones who created FaceBox, YouScreen and WhoBook et. al. And we still have a much older word for "Digital Natives" - we still call 'em "n00bz".

  32. My boss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is the epitome of annoying

  33. Millenials have a different mindset by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Millenials are part of the pampered generations.

    Millenial mindsets include:
    I'm a winner
    I'm special
    I get everything I want with no effort on my part.
    The world owes me everything.

    It's because of the "gosh, someone might feel bad if only 1 person can win" or "You can't say anything to hurt poor Suzy's feelings, regardless of how bad she is, or how poorly she's doing in class" or "Nobody gets held back, that might bruise their ego" attitudes that our society as a whole is sliding into the abyss, just like the government wants.

    The government wants these and later generations to just expect free money, free food, free housing and obey their overlords in every way, while they do the absolute minimum to earn their keep.

  34. This goes back to why one should hire an old fart by Ronin+Developer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Stress in the workplace has always existed. Granted, this generation tends to communicate more but using tools such as Instagram and Twitter where the communications are short, don't convey much information and are non-personal. Granted, the older generation used email (after the memo went the way of the dinosaur)- primarily to put the discussion into a more formal written form. The phone or in-person conversation allows one to hear the emotion and concerns of the other party. It's easier to resolve issues when speaking with the other parties than to try to hash it out over email or some chat technology for all but the simplest of issues.

    The other night, there was the discussion on why hiring an older person wasn't such a good idea with one person insinuated they (older workers) wouldn't work late nights on a regular basis to get the project done. Someone with experience knows that proper planning and design can alleviate most of those late night coding cycles. As such, they are inclined to find a better balance between home and work and still get their work done without burning the candle at both ends. They also know when late night exercises ARE useful or necessary.

    What we old fogies have a hard time dealing with is being treated (along with our coworkers) like a disposable napkin. Workplaces that foster that attitude coupled with limited human interactivity breeds stress. And, that stress doesn't know generational boundaries.

  35. Re:They're just shitheads. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Millennials aren't young any more. They're in their late 20s now, and some are even in their mid-30s. These people became legal adults well over a decade ago. They have kids who are in school, for crying out loud. They aren't young.

  36. Workplace changed too by Moof123 · · Score: 1

    Workplace fun has all been drummed out of existence, for better or worse. Way back when companies had more picnics, beer bashes, and tolerated more hooliganism as ways to build teams and blow off steam. Those "good old days" had issues too, but the point is that fun has been squeezed out which also reduces chances for new guys to be brought into the fold and gel with the company.

    All that said, this sounds a lot like another round of blaming the new generation for being inferior to the last one. Just as every previous generation has been judged as been inferior, and as will continue in perpetuity.

    1. Re:Workplace changed too by Maltheus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my company now has its picnic on a Sunday. Why on earth would I give up what little free time off I have to attend?

    2. Re:Workplace changed too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of when I was a contract-to-hire with the local insurance company. They had a couple of events over the four months I was there. I was "invited" to them but it was unpaid time. Naturally, they were really butthurt that I didn't attend.

      Of course, it wasn't all the company's fault. Some of the people I worked with were real assholes. They would've had to pay me overtime to socialize with them.

  37. More mature industries are more stressful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but hey lets blame the kids!

  38. I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I started out, before "Millennials" were someone's dream, things were much easier, a degree was optional. I am still programming and all I and my coworkers hear about is "you need to get this or that certification and watch to this or that on-line training", most of which is a big waste of time. So yes, more stress now because it seems these days 90% of your work hours you are dealing with corporate BS. Most of my co-workers these days do "real work" on their own time, leaving less time for their own life. Many years ago people would work OT because they wanted to due to the fact one would be dealing with an interesting IT issue, now not so much. (posting AC for a reason )

  39. Well.... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 4, Interesting
    There is something to be said for the millennial general approach to work. At least the ones we hired, all but two were pretty difficult to work with, and needed handling with kid gloves. And quit pretty regularly.

    Some highlites:

    I had one who wouldn't answer his phone. He insisted that he be texted. I put up with that for a few days, but eventually told him he had a choice of responding to my phone calls, or I would personally pay him a visit every time I needed to interact with him. If a person cannot interact except with text, he needs to get a job that requires only yes or no answers.

    Another who would panic every time I spoke with him. This guy was bizarre. I can tell a person to go to hell in such a nice way that they look forward to the trip, but he just couldn't interact properly.

    Another guy who went batshit nuts on me when I pointed at his laptop screen. He's busy screaming about "Dont touch my screen! I'm not going to tell you again!" I was so shocked at that inappropriate outburst that I was actually silenced for a few seconds.

    Then there was the young lady who we hired, and immediately after getting hired, she goes on a month and a half vacation (unpaid of course) during the year she worked with us, she went on around 3 and a half months vacation, spent most of her time on Facebook, and wouldn't interact with anyone unless absolutely necessary. She quit after a year to go live at home because she found work too stressful.

    There were other experiences, but those were the most unbalanced ones.

    In general though, they have a tendency to come into the workplace with some overblown expectations, expecting very little interaction to people other than "their friends", and those via texting or facebook updates. They also have a rather exaggerated opinion of their own technical prowess, most believing that anyone of their parents age or older have very little clue about anything, and none whatsoever about computing. At best, we were there to provide support for them.

    Amazingly enough, most were looking for a promotion and big raise after a year

    The two who we the exception were both young ladies, who were simply incredible. One who was a talented illustrator, and also had a great work ethic. The other was simply amazing, who would finish her work, accurately, on time or sooner, and then ask if there was anything else she could do. I expect to see both as leaders some day.

    We might ask why this happens?

    One of the biggest culprits IMO, is the self esteem movement. Children were and are being told they are special (and they are) and taught to think very higly of themselves. from an early age these days.

    What could be wrong with that?

    One of the first things is that people with real self esteem issues tend to have those issues no matter how much "uplifting encouragement" they get. Its a neurosis.

    Then we have the rest of the children. Its good not to hate yourself, and no doubt. But real self esteem comes from accomplishments, and not being told how special you are at every chance. High esteem with no real accomplishments is not a good combination. It tends to make you think that life is a sprint, and not a marathon.REal self esteem comes from doing good work and accomplishments, not being told you are special all the time.

    Then we have the parents. Parents want the best for their children, but since the rise of the helicopters, and especially the dreaded blackhawk mother, (this is the one who does their children's homework for them so they can take their special classes out of school) We have parents who simply refuse to allow their children to grow up. Ever see those diaper commercials showing 6 year olds? Helicopter fodder.

    So now we have the cellular//smartphone. The helicopters can now keep in constant contact and control of ther children. It's completely insane on college campuses now. These children are physical adults, but not at all mature. A friend who is a cou

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    1. Re:Well.... by Drewdad · · Score: 1

      Have you considered that maybe instead of an entire generation being antisocial morons, your company just has crappy hiring processes?

    2. Re:Well.... by cashman73 · · Score: 1

      I think a major problem with the current generation is, despite an increase in communications technology and cell phones, the younger generation has larger lost the ability to communicate and interact. Yes, they can text and they can communicate instantly with all of their "friends" in the world (100% of them, anywhere at any time). Though I do wonder how many people on one's Facebook are truly "friends". That being said, their communication is texting -- but 90% of human communication is non-verbal. They're not really communicating when you think about it; but they think they are. Go into any popular bar or restaurant and observe the crowds. The tables with the Boomers and GenXers will be mostly socializing and talking amongst each other -- interacting in person. The tables with the Milliennials will mostly have people staring down at the cell phones tapping away, and very few words will actually be said. If this is how these kids are socializing, I can only imagine how they are in the workplace.

    3. Re:Well.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then there was the young lady who we hired, and immediately after getting hired, she goes on a month and a half vacation (unpaid of course) during the year she worked with us, she went on around 3 and a half months vacation

      While it's in poor form to leave your employer as soon as you're hired, I think this young lady had the right idea about work-life balance. Rather than live to work, we should aim to work to live.

    4. Re:Well.... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Have you considered that maybe instead of an entire generation being antisocial morons, your company just has crappy hiring processes?

      Perhaps, but then the whole helicoptering parent trend, and personal experience would have to be completely wrong. Now you have to explain why it is a completely mistaken idea.

      And note, you are the one calling them "antisocial morons". I am saying that they have been victims of well meaning parents and society having gone horribly wrong by refusing to allow so many of them to become functioning adults. Mommy and daddy should never ever go along on job interviews, yes no?

      My point isn't the olde fate yapping about "Kids today". My point is that a whole lot of parents should never have parented them the overbearing and overprotective way they did. A whole lot of social "adjusters" should never have given them a false sense of superiority. I'm saying it's my generations fault.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    5. Re:Well.... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I think a major problem with the current generation is, despite an increase in communications technology and cell phones, the younger generation has larger lost the ability to communicate and interact. Yes, they can text and they can communicate instantly with all of their "friends" in the world (100% of them, anywhere at any time).

      The Toyota Venzia commercial says it all

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      The tables with the Milliennials will mostly have people staring down at the cell phones tapping away, and very few words will actually be said. If this is how these kids are socializing, I can only imagine how they are in the workplace.

      One we had was constantly on Facebook. Fortunately she quit before we fired her.

      And, a surprising number check their phones during sex. And not the one handed looking at porn version, but actual sex with another person.

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    6. Re:Well.... by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      While it's in poor form to leave your employer as soon as you're hired, I think this young lady had the right idea about work-life balance. Rather than live to work, we should aim to work to live.

      She moved in with her grandparents, who as far as I know are still paying her way through life. Great gig if you can get it.

      This is the problem. It's easy to have your version of a healthy work/life balance as long as someone else pays your bills for you.

      Just wondering though, are her grandparents going to pay for her children, and their children?

      Leisure is nice and all, but until everything is free, someone has to pay for it.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    7. Re:Well.... by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      I've seen so much more absurd non-sense from older generations. You've restored my faith in humanity.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  40. probably a little of both by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

    I don't take much stock in this story due to such a small sample size, limited history, and that the numbers over the history of it don't even show a trend at this point.

    Still, the "mystery" of IT has been diminishing for years as most people are at least familiar with computers now. The days of the BOFH are more or less over. So most people have a hard time accepting "I can't do what you want because digital Zeus says it can't be done". Everyone needs their own phone, OS, program, or whatever.

    The younger generations are also always lazier than the older ones. It was true when the baby-boomers were young, then gen-x, and now millenilals. In some ways it's true. It takes a few years to develop a good work ethic. But it's often that the newest generation just has a different way of doing things because they view the world differently.

    1. Re:probably a little of both by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the "mystery" of IT has been diminishing for years as most people are at least familiar with computers now. The days of the BOFH are more or less over. So most people have a hard time accepting "I can't do what you want because digital Zeus says it can't be done". Everyone needs their own phone, OS, program, or whatever.

      Nay. The days of the BOFH are in their infancy. Assuming you're a programmer, don't you hate it when a client comes to you and says "I coded in javascipt once, so I want full access for the git repository for this project." That's how sysadmins feel when devs say "I admin my home computers, so I should get root/administrator access here at work." "Digital Zeus" is from Olympus. He sees a lot more about the systems from up there.

    2. Re:probably a little of both by cashman73 · · Score: 1

      While it is true that technology is more prevalent today and more people are using it, that does not mean that Millennials are any better than the rest of us at using it. In fact, I can see many examples where they don't know what in the hell they are doing. The ease of use of much technology today has actually had a negative impact. 20 years ago, we learned to do some amazing things with technology, and in order to make that happen, we had to code on the command line and jury rig stuff to get it to work together. Today, everything is all menu-driven in neat little GUIs, and everything works together. If it doesn't work, the product must be defective, and you take it back to the store to get a new one. The Millennials raised with this type of mentality never learn actual trouble shooting and problem solving skills. They learn that when the going gets tough, the tough go back to Best Buy for a replacement.

  41. Nice generalization streak going on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's up with generalizing whole age groups nowadays? It seems like demonizing younger workers is a rising trend and younger workers will ultimately suffer more because people start interactions with these ludicrous presumptions about young workers' personalities and abilities. Judge people based on what they do, not on stereotypes based on their age, gender or race.

    I'm well under 30 and when I enter a new workplace, every now and then I come across these silly presumptions about my abilities because of my young age. People think I sit all day browsing Facebook and Tweeting when in fact I absolutely hate that. I've had some excellent old pros teach me a trick or two along the way so I'm not clueless about how things have been in the past, both good and bad. The funny thing is when I finally get to show my abilites through hard work, some people start to become hostile and fear for their own positions or that I make them look bad.

    I see a lot of similarities in this with the way people assume beautiful women can't be both beautiful and have excellent skills in whatever their area of expertise is.

    1. Re:Nice generalization streak going on by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      What's up with generalizing whole age groups nowadays?

      I'm well under 30....

      As you get older, you realize that generalizing whole age groups always exists. I remember being in situations where I was the "token young person" when I was in my mid-30's. The others were continually surprised when I took my position seriously and contributed something of value.

      And this was years ago. Having read a lot of literature, I know that such gripes about age generalization goes back at least as far as the written word.

      By the way, not everybody who's over 30 generalizes whole age groups ;)

  42. Dunno by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    But a lot of the IT people I talk to haven't had a vacation in years. Suggest that they take one and you get a stunned pause and then you can actually sense the wave of relief coming off them as they start to think about it. I took a three day weekend skydiving down in Phoenix after going about three years without a vacation and the change to my outlook was amazing. Taking time off and staying in town doesn't seem to have the same effect.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  43. Re:No. You're dumb. Stop being dumb. by nctritech · · Score: 1

    Someone give this coward some insightful points. Well said.

  44. As much changes, it stays the same. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've been in IT support since 1997, the users today are just as dependent as they always have been. The comment, "Millennials are also expert users...", is BS. P&G hires a lot of college interns and they hardly know how to use a computer beyond surfing the web and yet the company is pushing for more and more self support options. They tell the users to use a website to unlock/change their password and not to call the helpdesk as they will be charged for the helpdesk to unlock/reset passwords...we see a few people every day needing password help, from young to old. Millennials are becoming more demanding but only because they don't want to have to support themselves or figure something out, they just want it resolved and don't want to hear that it will take time. As far as the "awe" goes, users are still in awe of repairs even when you just reseated the battery on a laptop to get it to power on, IT support has mostly always been treated as "the help".

  45. Re:Oh, wait. You mean "Digital Natives", right? by Toth · · Score: 1

    I saw the string "n00bz" and its variations online in the days of dial up at 1200 baud and bang path emailing. I even used it myself once or twice. I didn't see or use it IRL though. We were treated like rock stars by the users. This was probably partly due to the low hanging fruit of a 25 person administrative office and no computers or "ceremonial" computers running a single industry-specific application.

    I'd go in after office hours and locate the trash baskets with the most adding machine tape. The next day I'd sit the user for an hour and bring in a computer running Lotus 123 or that Borland app whose name I forget. and show them how to use it. It was not uncommon to cut the labour time in half. A month or so later when we were implementing a custom-written app with changes in the code written the night before and the um .... occasional... user-annoying bug. The users were our friends and partners.

    The kids today on our first level support are occasional treated like crap by users/customers. Important executive is outraged because his new mobile has email on it he specifically remembers deleting on his old one. I know the sample size is less than TFA but my feeling is they are not stressed and don't hate their jobs. I do sense more stress in middle managers and the folks that the customers bitch to when they are unhappy with the service.

    I was an early adopter of all the Usenet.die.die, mud, etc. I even used ICqueue. Today - I have a gmail account, /. and perhaps one or two other blogs.

    I'm still employed by the same company for almost 30 years and I have NO stress in my job.

  46. Gen X perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speaking from the perspective of someone from generation X. Millianials can be frustrating especially when trying to build IT projects to deliver applications.

    At their heart they believe there are a multitude of paths and there are no right ways. There push to not define standards and they fight attempts to bring standards.

  47. Kind of an interesting theory, but .... by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have a few thoughts of my own on the subject, based on my own work situation, and they don't quite line up with theirs.

    First off, yes... I would say that at least for our workplace, stress levels in I.T. have generally increased over the last few years. (I work as part of a 4 person I.T. team for a marketing firm that has several locations strategically placed around the country, close to the majority of clients they have or want.)

    Marketing is definitely a business where lots of millennials are hired. Our I.T. group and upper management are really the only people in the company of an older generation than that, other than a few random exceptions.

    But to claim the I.T. stress levels are correlated with the millennial generation's lack of in-person communication skills? No... at least for our industry, that's not the case at all. You can't be successful working in marketing for us if you're not an exceptionally good in-person communicator. I know I'm far less comfortable chatting up random people in social situations than any of the millennials we've got working as creative directors, producers, designers, etc. Maybe we're constantly hiring the exceptions to the rule because of the nature of the business ... but regardless, that's the situation for the people our I.T. group supports.

    Where I see stress levels climbing has more to do with people expecting more and more from the computerized tools they're given. For example, when I started working for these guys, several of our offices literally spent 90% of their day buried in Outlook. Everything revolved around email correspondence and scheduling meetings or appointments. Sure, they had the occasional need for the rest of the Office suite (especially PowerPoint or Keynote for our Mac users, if they were preparing a presentation for a client), but the vast majority of support calls or issues were "Why did my email bounce?", "It says my mailbox is full!", "I can't find this message I know I saved someplace in here earlier today.", or "So and so received my calendar invite 3 times in a row for some reason." Stuff like that, along with trouble opening various email attachments they received.....

    Looking at how things have evolved now? We ran into issues where some of the huge Word templates they use regularly to produce client proposals got too big to keep editing reliably inside Word. (Lots of copy/pasted graphics in them and all that.) So we now paid for a cloud based service designed just for such proposals. Instead of constantly filling mailboxes with email attachments getting shared around, we set up DropBox for Teams so I.T. creates any of the "top level" folders anyone requests and makes sure the proper folks are given read or read/write access to those shared resources. As we've grown, the Finance department required better automation so they could process all the invoices in a timely manner as offices generate them. So they put in dedicated scanning stations at each office with document capture software that goes to "watched folders", with special software that can toss them into their accounting system as it sees new ones appear. The original few, designated office people with copies of Adobe Acrobat (full version, not reader) kept growing as more users saw the benefits of being able to actually edit a PDF document on their Windows PC (or saw Mac users doing it natively with Preview and asked why they can't have the same capabilities). So that led to buying Creative Cloud with user accounts I.T. again has to manage.

    On top of that, one of the offices is trying to get more serious about offering in-house video rendering capabilities instead of outsourcing it all the time, so now we're starting to build and support a rendering farm and high end video packages on the clients.

    What we haven't done is hire a single new I.T. staffer to help with any of this.... We push for it all the time (especially when one of us is out sick or on vacation and the pressure is really on). But at the end of the day, manag

    1. Re:Kind of an interesting theory, but .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel you buddy, It's still that way.

      I work in an IT department that spans 6 continents and thousands of people. And THOUSANDS of the people we support literally only need access to one, or two applications ever. Many of them just need their email. Many of them just need to access and work entirely within an environment that has been set up for them, such as a web application.

      Granted we're likely 10x bigger of a company, you should pursue automation and self-service tools like an end-user request catalog that will create those top level folders for you, or edit user permissions via script. 90% of the work will go into the coding. After that, sit back and relax, as long as you document everything wonderfully.

  48. I dont think what we live today in IT existed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've been :

    Lured to a permanent position and fired during the trial period for something that should have been factured on a project basis

    Forced to accept to live in a motel for months and working crazy hours because the company was paying a premium and expecting it but i was subcontracted i was not.

    Harassed to leave without compensations. Explaining me that else they would fire me for an imaginary fault and that i would have to reverse the charges.
    Actually twice, the first time i took it to court, but the second time knowing the stress and lawyer costs, i just asked for a low compensation amount.

    Being described a job as integrating new customers into the company IT, in fact i had to put everything in place for one then train foreign
    peoples so they could take my job.

    Basically none of this would have been a problem if i knew beforehand so i could reject the offer and not leave some good job, been working in corrects conditions or paid accordingly to a short contract or difficult position.

    Obviously in the middle you get crazy, angry, buzzwords managers. Reverse pyramid organizations with more CxO than "subcontracted" workers. But i think this part always existed.

    I fell that the IT world is sooo fucked up.

    1. Re:I dont think what we live today in IT existed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Employers absolutely do lure people away to fuck them.

      I don't know where you are but if it's PA steer clear of D&H Distributing. They are notorious for lying about positions and lying to the unemployment office. I interviewed for a C#/ASP./SQL job awhile back and got dumped in the middle of Dynamics meetings. 6 hours per day every day listening to people talk in circles. Barely even touched a compiler, didn't have access to a test server because none were even set up. Three months later they're telling the Department of Labor that I had tons of work and refused to do any of it. Not long after, lots of IT people out the door, including the CIO.

      Also, I wouldn't work for the attorney general's office again. Lured me away from a civil service job. Said they had two bad ERPs and were going to replace them in house. Sounded like they might've had their act together. And then proceeded to make every mistake that every ERP I've ever seen makes. Won't listen to experienced programmer, deadline after deadline slips, serious bugs created/ignored, then suddenly...pink slip for "trouble with direction."

  49. Commoditization by lymond01 · · Score: 2

    Back in the 90s, IT people were magicians. Now they are plumbers. So much of today's infrastructure relies 100% on IT support -- people can't just write it down, or file it manually. IT folk are in charge of a giant, critical piece of the everyday workload. But expectations are that it will just work, and that things will keep moving forward as new technologies arise. Back in the day, IT could handle an entire 500 person company with 2 or 3 people -- it was all printers and email. Now it's files and databases and remote access and web apps and mobile apps and security and policies.

    The IT folk who are more stressed are the ones who haven't staffed up. I've no comment on the younger set...I'll defer to Socrates as people have suggested.

    1. Re:Commoditization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To say you could handle a 500 person company with 3 it people is ignorant, not comparative.

      My first job out of college was IT at a company of about 250 and I wore so many hats I belonged on a Curious George book.

      Imagine if all of those machines needed work at the same time. There goes your company.

  50. No by plopez · · Score: 1

    From my experience nothing has changed in 20 odd years. The same insane schedules, clueless managers, evil marketing people, etc. still rule the day. Nothing ever changes. The same mistakes made 20 years ago are made over and over again. People come along offering to make things easier with a magic bullet, and it works as they get rich and it makes their lives easier.

    As far as 'Millennials' go from my experience it is a mixed bag, some are good and some aren't. There is the natural over exuberance and naiveté but after a few years of Software Development Hell (or perhaps 'Ground Hog Day') we manage to beat that out of them.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  51. Multiple Issues by Livius · · Score: 1

    I think that IT work is getting more stressful, but that is only one factor among many for the increase in stress. Some of it is that there is no longer easy money for easy IT work, like there was during the dot com boom, some of it is that millennials really do have an inflated sense of entitlement, and some of it is that the economy is pushing management to demand more in terms of results while those results are getting more difficult to measure. Contemporary IT work involves a lot of very complex web-based work where the tools really are inadequate. There's a fabulous opportunity for someone who can fix the Internet.

  52. BYOD by mshieh · · Score: 1

    Bring Your Own Device definitely makes things more complicated, but that has nothing to do with the age of workers.

  53. Back in my day, we all died by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When I was a kid, we didn't have any of those sissy antibiotics. When we got sick, our grandmothers would perform extreme unction on us and then leave us on the roof overnight. If we were strong enough to climb down in the morning we got breakfast. If not, we got buried. It made us learn the meaning of a dollar, because for a dollar my sister would bring me a snack up there and leave the ladder against the side of the house. And there was none of this mp3 youtube nonsense. If we wanted music, we had burn the barn down and dance to the crackling fire. I can still beatbox a three-alarm blaze. And sex? We didn't have sex. We just set the women folk up on the roof and if they had the strength to climb down in the morning, grandpa would take them out to the barn and make them pregnant. And that also taught us the meaning of a dollar, because for a dollar, he'd let us hide under the hayloft to watch for Zeus to appear in the shape of a bull to impregnate the females. And if any of us showed any visible signs of arousal, we got beaten with a sickle and our parts were left on the roof to die.

    The kids these days don't know how good they got it with their quarter million dollar school loans to prepare them for jobs that don't exist or go to internet scammers in Bangalore. They don't realize how lucky they are not to have to worry about privacy any more, because by god there is none. They make me sick, with their rising sea levels and paint thinner in the water supply and multinational tech companies tracking their every movement. Because when I was a kid, my total lack of self-awareness convinced me that I got where I am today only because of my hard work and talent.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:Back in my day, we all died by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't always agree with you, but you have written a brilliant comment. +42.

    2. Re:Back in my day, we all died by germansausage · · Score: 2

      Post of the week! You win the internet.

    3. Re:Back in my day, we all died by maestroX · · Score: 2

      +1 for coaxing talent and hard work as the result of domestic violance, rape and tyranny.
      You should consider a career in marketing.

    4. Re:Back in my day, we all died by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      When you got sick, you were allowed to take a day off. That is not always accepted any longer. It is on paper sure, but you still have to have your shit done by noon when you wake up sick.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    5. Re:Back in my day, we all died by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should consider a career in marketing.

      You, OTOH, should not consider a job in the interpretation-of-cynism department.

  54. Management, not Millenials by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 2

    It's not the Millenials. They're a bit more demanding, yes, but not significantly so compared to all the other groups of clueless users I've dealt with over the last 3 decades. Mostly they can be dealt with by telling them that I'd love to be able to do what they want but management's refused to allow it so they need to go talk to $AppropriateExecutive and convince him to change the policies on it. That gets them out of my hair.

    Mostly the stress comes from management wanting more and more from fewer people with fewer resources, less funding and lower salaries. Instead of being skeptical, they buy into the salespeople's lies completely and then yell at IT when what was delivered doesn't do what was promised and never will. And gods help you if you do manage to prove the salesperson lied, because then it's your fault management bought into it. This from management's not a new thing, I've watched it growing since the early 90s.

    1. Re:Management, not Millenials by frisket · · Score: 1

      It's not the Millenials. They're a bit more demanding, yes, but not significantly so compared to all the other groups of clueless users I've dealt with over the last 3 decades...

      I think the point is that it's the Millenials who have gotten jobs in IT; they're actually supposed to know stuff.

    2. Re:Management, not Millenials by Todd+Knarr · · Score: 1

      People who know stuff don't cause me any stress. It's people who think they know stuff but don't that cause the most stress, and I haven't found Millenials to be much worse in that regard than any other age group. More often it's that they do know and what they're asking is entirely reasonable, it's just prohibited for silly reasons. Eg., they come in wanting their phone to just work with the Exchange server. Yes, it should just work. Exchange supports all the protocols needed for it to just work. I've argued repeatedly in favor of that but upper management thinks they know better and won't permit POP3/IMAP4 to be turned on, after all they're open protocols and anything open has to be an open invitation to hackers to walk into our network (grumblegriemutterstupidsuits tiesmustcutoffbloodtothebraingrowlgnashgrumble).

  55. That's not it by Rolgar · · Score: 1

    There's a book about generational cycles called Generations that talks about how there is a 4 generation cycle that repeats itself every 80 years or so cause by shared life experiences that are shaped primarily by the emotional and attitudes of society in general and their parents in particular. So, the Millenials have been shaped in attitude by 9/11, the current international conflicts, and their parents' reactions to these events.

    It's called Strauss-Howe generaitonal theory. Each generation is one of 4 types (the wikipedia page has the basics, the book is interesting). So what we have is the departure of the Baby boomers from the work force and the arrival of the Millenials and the maturing of Gen X from young adult to mature adult. With this change comes a change of attitude. So, most likely what we are experiencing (saying this as an X'er) is Gen X taking the reigns from the Boomers, and establishing efficiency and control mechanisms on the work place, within a Crisis Turning. Sometime early in the next decade, the next turning will start, as the last boomers turn 65 and we will begin a new High cycle, much like the period between the end of World War II and The assassination of JFK, the bookends of the last High.

    They predicted our current Crisis environment (I read their later book, the Fourth Turning, from 1997) with a start date between 2000 & 2005, 18-23 years from 1982, the beginning of the last Turning.

  56. Re:Oh, wait. You mean "Digital Natives", right? by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

    "nearly a decade with Windows Server 2012" old man getting senile

  57. whoosh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Old resume joke...

  58. stress by bigdavex · · Score: 1

    I find it's the millennials that are getting more stressful.
     

    --
    -Dave
  59. Actually, it's a great example. by tlambert · · Score: 2

    Bad example, this was written just before the collapse of the Athenian empire, so the guy had a point. Socrates himself was tried and executed by the invading forces.

    Totally historically inaccurate, but let's address whether it's a bad example; it's not.

    Actually, it's a great example.

    The current article was written just before the collapse of the American empire.

  60. Re:Oh, wait. You mean "Digital Natives", right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "nearly a decade with Windows Server 2012" old man getting senile

    Way to miss the joke, shit stain.

    It's like in 1995 when they were looking for people with eight years of experience in Java....

  61. People who really had it tough ... by drnb · · Score: 1

    We had very similar childhoods it seams. I'd like to add one thing.

    When I was in my college years and facing a banking crisis and economic downturn upon graduation I thought: "It could be worse. I have it so much better than my grandfathers and great-uncles who spent their childhood years in the great depression and their college-age years fighting from Normandy to Germany and Guadalcanal to Japan." Literally, front lines, not in the rear with the gear. Growing up around people who actually did have a tough life gave me some perspective on mine.

  62. Damn Lies! by s.petry · · Score: 1

    Bad example, this was written just before the collapse of the Athenian empire, so the guy had a point. Socrates himself was tried and executed by the invading forces.

    Good grief, all you have to do is read Plato's "The Apology" to see that your claim is pure bullshit. Nothing is even close to correct in your statement.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:Damn Lies! by Headw1nd · · Score: 1

      If anything, Socrates was executed for being sympathetic to the the Spartans, who had conquered Athens five years earlier.

    2. Re:Damn Lies! by s.petry · · Score: 1

      Wrong, read the books. Socrates was executed because he pissed off a guy with a lot of money. I really don't understand why people make up fairy tales when the facts are at your fingertips. All you have to do is read a bit, but I guess that is expecting way too much.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  63. Technology, same effort, more productivity by drnb · · Score: 1

    The latest generation works harder, for longer hours, ...

    Not according to what my grandparents have told me.

    ... with higher productivity, ...

    The last 5,000 years of history shows that improved technology increases worker productivity given the same worker effort.

    ... than any other generation before them and is the first generation in history to be worse off than their parents.

    Grossly exaggerated and mis-stated but true for the post WWII era, which is a very very small portion of even US History. However in its proper perspective a valid point.

    They're stressed because they're being fucked AND blamed for it at the same time.

    Its dishonest to say they have no contribution to the problem. There are genuine problems related to social skills, focus, entitlement, etc. Every generation leaves college thinking they know everything and have to get slapped upside the head and told know you don't. To be told that at best all you've done is show a potential to learn, now do this job for 10 years and we'll re-evaluate how much you know. Part, and I admit this is only part of the problem, is that past generations had an easier time adjusting to this reality.

    And to be honest this generation is not lost. With a sufficiently hard slap upside the head they can get past all that coddling and hippie BS. Those who got such a wakeup in the military have shown that they can perform as well as those of previous generations. For the rest, coming to grips with reality will just take longer than past generations.

    1. Re:Technology, same effort, more productivity by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      You're joking right? The biggest fuckups I've had to work with are people who came out of the military thinking they're better than everyone else and waving around their More Hooah Than Thou attitude problem.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    2. Re:Technology, same effort, more productivity by drnb · · Score: 1

      You're joking right? The biggest fuckups I've had to work with are people who came out of the military thinking they're better than everyone else and waving around their More Hooah Than Thou attitude problem.

      The military, like every segment of society, has their a-holes.

      The recent vets I know are not as your describe and are not that unlike Vietnam era vets that I started working for back in the day and the WWII vet I knew as a child (teachers mostly, they were generally retiring as I entered the work force).

    3. Re:Technology, same effort, more productivity by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 1

      The latest generation works harder, for longer hours, ...

      Not according to what my grandparents have told me.

      Your grandparents lived in a time when you got a job, held it for the rest of your life if you wanted to, and from that earned an income to support a stay-at-home spouse and multiple children.

    4. Re: Technology, same effort, more productivity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine if kids today expected that entitlement.

    5. Re:Technology, same effort, more productivity by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Yes, the failed NCOs and Officers who found that either a lack of ability or discipline meant they had hit their peak rank so their best bet was being bullies in private enterprise. They are so full of wind that it's hard to stand up to them but 99% of it is just wind. They give the rest a bad name. See the story of Enron as to how a few of them taken seriously can make a workplace incredibly toxic - the sort of shit the military at least tries not to let happen, but once they are loose and everyone is scared of them anything goes.

    6. Re:Technology, same effort, more productivity by drnb · · Score: 1

      The latest generation works harder, for longer hours, ...

      Not according to what my grandparents have told me.

      Your grandparents lived in a time when you got a job, held it for the rest of your life if you wanted to, ...

      Bull. Businesses failed back then too. And for successful companies holding a job for a long time was mostly due to working your ass off to keep that job. There was no guaranteed employment. You had your job as long as the boss was happy. My grandfather once talked back to the boss and he was immediately fired. The laws were not that different from today.

      ... and from that earned an income to support a stay-at-home spouse and multiple children.

      True to a degree but they also lived a much more frugal lifestyle. Didn't go for McMansions, picked a home or apartment that was well within their means. Didn't fund their life on credit cards. What little debt that generation took on would be a home mortgage and it sure as hell wasn't some variable rate loan, the thought of not knowing what a loan payment might be in 7 years was unthinkable. Stay at home moms is also mythologized a bit. When kids were older (10-12) there were often part time jobs. Those part time jobs were quite significant to the family lifestyle, ability to send a kid to college (State U not Ivy League) or a good trade school, etc. Don't confuse 50s era TV families with blue collar reality. My grandfather taught me to weld but my grandmother taught me to solder. She did electronics assembly during the war and in some part time jobs when my father was old enough. When she couldn't get a daytime shift that coincided with school at a good job like that she worked much more menial jobs that did offer such a shift. There was no this job is below my skill level or dignity. My other grandparents, all my great-uncles and great-aunts all have their own stories of a similar nature. The women were grocery store checkout ladies, department store clerks and the five that lived in or near a particular town all worked at the local garment factory for a time.

      Is it more difficult today, yes, but perhaps not to the degree you think.

    7. Re: Technology, same effort, more productivity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      given corrupt leaders like gwb and the officers (including YOU nsaers reading this) just complying with their criminal chief, i venture to say you can only retard in the western military.

    8. Re:Technology, same effort, more productivity by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Don't gloss over how much easier it was to live a frugal life then. Every company wasn't trying to dip a finger into your wallet with recurring charges. You weren't brainwashed from birth to consume. Advertising psychology was in it's infancy.
      There are plenty of other examples. You can't just toss up your hands and claim your grandpa and I are playing from the same deck.

    9. Re:Technology, same effort, more productivity by drnb · · Score: 1

      Every company wasn't trying to dip a finger into your wallet with recurring charges.

      No they were dipping their finger into your wallet through things like company script, company coins, company stores. Historical "decks" were different, however they were rarely fair, they methods of screwing the worker/consumer were just different.

    10. Re:Technology, same effort, more productivity by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Yes, and brave men banded together and outlawed those practices. Thank god for Unions, right?

    11. Re:Technology, same effort, more productivity by drnb · · Score: 1

      Yes, and brave men banded together and outlawed those practices. Thank god for Unions, right?

      Absolutely. But as my grandfather also taught me the unions of those days were very different from the unions of my grandfather's later working years. By then the unions no longer represented the workers, they like wall street, were just another racket. Union reps were no longer workers but "professionals' always seeking to protect the revenue and status and power of the union organization not the union worker. As a nearly 40 year union worker he was very disappointed in the direction unions went, glorious beginning but sold out to criminals and politicians in the end.

  64. Cubicle life is worst life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Humans weren't built to sit in a cube routing reports and pounding on a keyboard for 8-10 hours a day, which is what the daily dredge of IT often entails when things aren't on fire. Couple that with unrealistic corporate expectations, the jaded way management approaches their "resources" (since it sounds more humane to slash resources off of your payroll than it does to slash an employee) about everything, many individuals break down under the pressure. Some people don't have the mental fortitude to withstand it and maintain a healthy lifestyle after being mentally and emotionally drained by their peers and clients at work.

    These same people become depressed and ineffective as resources. Sometimes this even leads to a mental and career death spiral. I've seen it happen firsthand, and I myself often question if that's not the out for me, too. It's even worse if you're part of an IT firm: not only are you on the hook for maintaining infrastructure of several businesses, but then you often need to worry about sales to keep yourself competitive with your peers.

    I can only hope something will cave and bring reform to the corporate work environment for an IT worker, but

  65. Handshake and a "good game" not a trophy by drnb · · Score: 1

    They seem to feel "owed" by society a job, and to be treated nicely and fairly.

    These are reasonable expectations of a functioning society. That these expectations are considered to be ridiculously entitled is a reflection on society rather than the people who hold them.

    Only because you do not understand the true context of the original statement. Perhaps it was stated poorly, but the job they feel they are owed is the type of job they aspire too. So not "job" in general but "aspirational job". Previous generations had an easier time accepting that they will start with a non-aspirational job, have to spend time proving themselves and outperform others to get such aspirational jobs.

    To look at it another way, if we don't aspire to a fair and just society where people who want to work can find work, then we've really lost the plot. Not to mention that work was easier to find back in the day, and perhaps we are the entitled ones, begrudging the younger ones wanting what we had on a plate.

    Right because this is the first post-WWII generation to graduate amid a banking crisis and/or economic downturn. Not.

    I didn't always get congratulated JUST for trying

    Noticing children's effort rather than results is better for producing successful adults, as it instils perseverance rather than a sense that your skills are innate and immutable.

    Perseverance gets you a handshake and a "good game" not a trophy. Making the olympic team gets you a congratulations and a "very well done" not a medal.

  66. a good ass kicking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most Millennials never got a real ass kicking growing up. Their sheltered lives have protected them from traumatic experiences as children, making them ill equipped as adults to handle the typical pressures of everyday life.

    Come on GenXers, let's drive this world into the toilet before the millennials have a chance to make it a happy safe place where we can share our feeling through social media.

  67. Nope by s.petry · · Score: 2

    My actual statement to TFA is that it's impossible to measure so impossible to make any such claims. I don't know anyone that has worked in the IT industry and become successful without putting in loads of work early in their career. I spent about a decade working damn near every waking hour. Everyone I know in IT was doing the same thing at about the same time/age.

    Claiming this generation works harder is a bullshit generalization, just like claiming my generation worked harder would be a bullshit generalization. I know some millennials that put in a lot of work, but I see quite a few that don't as well. I don't expect them to last long working in IT, because it takes a shit ton of work to gain enough skills to become a commodity.

    The second part that becomes impossible to measure is how I rate people I no longer work with? After 30 years of work in IT I don't interface with entry level people very often. Do I have more knowledge than them? Absolutely, I have been at this for 30 years and am very good. Do I have to, or want to, work 90 hour weeks still? Hell no! I did my time in the trenches. Does that mean an entry level person does more than I do? No! Part of the reason I don't have to work 90 hour weeks is that I am more efficient than I was as an entry level person. My tasks are different today, but if I have to help someone with a bit of code I don't have to spend much time looking things up and experimenting.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  68. Kept farther from reality need more time to adjust by drnb · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The point being made here is that there is nothing new under the sun. People pissing and moaning about *how times have changed* are full of it. Nothing has 'changed' except the pace of events.

    You are having a forest and trees moment. Yes nothing changes, but the point is that when a society gets to the point that self-indulgence *greatly* exceeds a sense of duty and obligation to society then that society falls. Things sometimes change for the worse. And certain behaviors are a recurring theme prior to such changes.

    I'm not saying we are there. For example many of those of the current generation who went into the military got past the coddling and fake trophies and perform as well as any other generation. And some have faced the hard realities of the present and learned to deal with it, getting past their upbringing. Maybe its more a matter of the current generation needing more time to adjust to reality since they were kept farther away from it.

  69. IT Work Is Stressful by crywalt · · Score: 1

    IT is work getting more stressful. Three words: World Wide Web. Or if you prefer more detail: PHP, JavaScript, Content Management Systems, and malware ravaging the entire network looking for one more server with a hole in it.

  70. It's the millenials by msobkow · · Score: 1

    The millenials are so used to instant gratification that they are completely unreasonable users.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  71. Luxury! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    A DVD? I can remember applying patches with a soldering iron that ran on coal.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  72. They took the Tea Party seriously... by Nova+Express · · Score: 2

    ...because the Tea Party took scalps . They defeated Republican incumbents in primaries. They ended political careers. That's what forced Republican office-holders to take them seriously.

    As far as I can tell, an Occupy-backed candidate (if there even is such a thing) hasn't defeated a single Democratic incumbent. As such, the Democratic Party can continue to ignore them the way they ignore black voters.

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

  73. Perhap young people are just more emotional? by toadlife · · Score: 1

    I'm a good test case as I'm 36 now, and have worked in IT in the same institution since I was 20.

    Early on in my career work stressed me out a lot more than it does today, even though today I am responsible for many more things.

    I just think as you get older, the intensity of your emotions mellows out.

    These stressed out Millennials are just...young.

    --
    I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
  74. Mod parent up!! by MikeTheGreat · · Score: 1

    Parent poster is incredibly insightful (and articulate AND concise)! I wish I had mod points!!

  75. Gen X - Gen Y - Millennial differences by Etcetera · · Score: 1

    Whether it's due to accelerating change, proximity, or whatever, there's arguably a pretty large difference even across those 10 years or so. Born in '79, I graduated HS in 1996, which puts me right at the borderline of Gen X and the early Gen Y's. I spent several years working at McDonald's before leaving college to work in the tech industry (just in time for the dot com implosion, natch).

    I could more or less imagine friends of mine over the next few years also working at McDonald's... I can't imagine college friends now (born in the early/mid 90's) doing it -- it's seen as beneath them.

    1. Re:Gen X - Gen Y - Millennial differences by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      They'll work at Starbucks, though. But yes, earlier on we took whatever we could get as a job. Parents weren't giving you a free ride (or mine didn't) and I worked from high school on. Paper routes, mowing grass and taking care of yards, etc. Working fast food. None of those jobs around me are done by your average teen.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  76. Work getting wasted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe a lot of work is getting wasted too.
    We see a large number of projects/technology companies that run out of business quickly.
    A lot of their code is again rewritten. This leads to a lot of garbage in IT industry. They were all hard work of overworked IT industry people.
    We are simply not able to understand that we are doing this, because they all pile up in a relatively small area (storage per physical area).

  77. no... by Mirar · · Score: 1

    I'd say no, but we might be getting better at noticing?

  78. many causes by ruir · · Score: 1

    However, first IT or the sought after upper the ladder tech jobs (not bullshit management), are for people with experience, and older. IT is no longer for people who dabble in it like when our generation started, but for more qualified people. Also due to the "economy", often one tech is doing the work of between 3 and 5 people and that accounts for more stress. People nowadays also worry too much about things that we consider minimal, and have to do a ruckus and a meeting for nothing, and for things that are routine. (...)

  79. Much blame to go around by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

    Mellenials may be whiners, yes. But I think there are two problems. There are also many companies that are trying to do more with less.

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  80. expert users by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    Millennials are also expert users,

    Brutha, please ...

    They are users, sure. They have gadgets.

    The same kind of people who were not nerdy enough to have gadgets when I was a kid all have gadgets now. That makes them users, not expert users, I assure you from painful experience.

  81. Re:Oh, wait. You mean "Digital Natives", right? by sound+vision · · Score: 1

    The idea that "IT" itself has changed seems to underlie your post. I would agree with that entirely. Today, measuring by volume of jobs, IT typically means something like Geek Squad or a call center where you walk 60 ungrateful people each day through how to use Outlook. That type of work is not interesting or stimulating, or even a neutral get-'er-done laboring experience. It's straight up maddening. The atmosphere at the office is impersonal or non-existent. Your time is micromanaged to the extent that 100% of your shift is spent dealing with BS, apart from your legally-mandated breaks. Your supervisor isn't much better off, he hardly has time to exchange a couple of words as you walk by, much less an actual meeting. And forget about being promoted anywhere better yourself, because all those opportunities dried up after the corporate buyout.

    Then there's the other stuff that people bring up all the time in these articles: stagnant wages, offshoring, and generally treating employees like shit. Being at the same company for 30 years is unheard of now. If you managed to get a foot in the door somewhere back in the 80s, and that company is still around and still valuing their employees, that's like having won the Powerball. The majority of IT jobs these days aren't designed to be liveable; it's only a matter of months before burnout sets in. Virtually no one makes it past single-digit years at the same job - low single digits. At my last employer of several hundred people, I could count the guys who had been there more than 3 years on one hand. "IT" has gone mainstream now that computers have crept into every aspect of every life. IT is the new fast food.

  82. if (no data) { random_speculation() } by fygment · · Score: 1

    Small sample size without accounting for age ... and we make a sweeping age-related conclusion.

    Seriously ?

    --
    "Consensus" in science is _always_ a political construct.
  83. Yes by goarilla · · Score: 1

    We are selfish and spoiled.

  84. YOU GOT THAT WRONG!!11! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course it's fact that millenials are working mostly for boomers, which are a pain in the ass to work to with their lead poisoned, mentally challenged brains.

    Kidding aside, it's actually harder for everyone, because there is simply more information. Actually not only in IT, but in other professions as well, just ask any representable self-employed.

    Many choose to simply ignore a lot of information. Boomers may have it easier to ignore it, because it wasn't a core part of their life to begin with.

    That tends to fuck up sooner or later though, I call this "borderline focussed worker syndrome".

  85. Re:sampling bias - back in my day... by ynoref+ · · Score: 0

    Older people had it worse, back in my day we only had one setting for a bit. We only had zeros, ones were not invented until much later. Even after we actually had two setting for the bits, the bits had to flow uphill in the freezing cold on the way to and from the printing terminal, punch cards were a luxury.

    My opinion, the real "work" isn't worse, it is the people that make the work harder. Mostly politics, impatient people, and lack of clear leadership.

  86. "Do more with less" is the mantra by Drewdad · · Score: 2

    I hear it all the time from vendors and at conferences. "IT is being expected to do more with less."

    Our IT budget has been flat for five years, and we're supporting double the number of employees.

    Do we have difficult users? Yes. I haven't noticed any correlation between difficulty and age, though.

  87. Bullshit by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Millennials are also expert users

    of Basefuck & Cunty Crush

    and "are no longer in awe of technology specialists

    Probably due to the Dunning Krueger effect.

    and therefore demand higher service levels,"

    In other words, they whine until someone wipes their ass.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  88. Re:Oh, wait. You mean "Digital Natives", right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The know nothing n00b mmell speaks but nobody listens or takes him seriously.

  89. Or maybe... by EdwardFurlong · · Score: 1

    Millennials have never known anything but a 15 year recession, their entire working career. I wonder also if they breakdown stress levels by age. What kind of job in IT is an 18 year old working anyway? Where I work, after you have been there 20 years it seems like it is almost impossible to be fired. Everybody else gets paid 1/3 as much and does 3X the work.

  90. Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its good to hear that the Elders of the Internet are making new research to prove they are still elligible to "corporate funding" in the form of emploiment. Its even better that they finally realised that even communism wasn't so good (especially for the eastern countries not their own countries) it was trying to push an indoctrination for "make good for the other people", "be selfless" and don't expect profit out of it. Plus it did not offer eternal higher possitions in Christian hierarchy for people to zealosly battle for it or hate eachother for someone stollen their dreamed of place in heaven (ie being a little bit mean Christians), also somehow people under communism where told that theft is not a good thing so they have morals and not "fenses", "security concerns" or "security breaches", but ever since communism fell they together with their "westen friends" are like hungry dogs biting each other for the few meat thrown to them either by capitalism or church. And stealing like a lot. But while in the east theft is called theft in the west it has many names, some of them leagal or at least not illeagal. And while in the west there is no "moral" communism to bother about this "bitting ech other" type of economy made people somehow nervous. We are not even talking about immoral since there isnt much meanig of this wors outside "christian hierarchy" won by boosting ones own believe in Jesus that forgives us all, including theft, of course. And gives higher hierarchy places for everyone that after all succeed better in robbing other and thus having more time to contemplate on religion. So sad that after this such a great firmament people went nervous or demotivated. Millenials - nervious, elders - a bit sad and demotivated. But we are living in a great place and capitalism is just awasome. Especially when everyone around the earth creates and US just harvest the profit out of it. Making "inventions", and national "research", and so on.

  91. Oh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And lets not forget how the Elders decided to secure their own jobs. By hacking and making the Millenials miserable and too occupied with bullshit, right? So you have a bunch of Millenial ITs, lets fuck their devives and kick them out of the working market by telling "they are somehow nerveous", for an unknown reason.

    1. Re:Oh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While using their corporation's resources to get on the new hieries IPs to target them with their corporate resources. Who would have thought?

  92. Re: sampling bias - back in my day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bingo. leadership these days are 100% clueless idiots who direct their horses by pulling at the tail hairs.

  93. Re:Oh, wait. You mean "Digital Natives", right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check your irony detector. I believe it's malfunctioning.

  94. Millennials are expert users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Not the ones I've met. They're experts in posting FB updates, but most of them are dumb as rocks and can't write a sentence.
    Also they think a 3hr working day is about all they can take.
    Useless.

  95. Demanding? by Euphorinaut · · Score: 1

    From my perception as someone who answers a phone for account lockouts a lot, and resolves most of them by asking if they had capslock on while they were entering their password, I'd say the article is spot on in suggesting that when a millennial calls, they're more likely to have a complex problem, but as an IT worker I fail to see how near zero call volume for millenials having simple PIC(person in chair) problems should be stresfull to me. Isn't the least stresfull call the one that doesn't exist because the problem never existed? Sounds like someone noticed that young people always have more complicated problems when they call and is now making bizarre conclusions about it.

  96. 95% of people now own a computing device. by Peterus7 · · Score: 1

    Back in the 90s, 5-10% of people had a computer, and that 5-10% of people knew how to use it. Now, everyone has some type of computing device, but the percentage of tech literacy hasn't gone up (especially with the boomer generation.) Dealing with a much larger, scarier, black boxy world is a hell of a lot more frustrating than it used to be.

  97. Re:Oh, wait. You mean "Digital Natives", right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it's brilliant! Somewhere out there, there's an ad seeking qualified applicants with a decade of experience using Windows Server 2012.

  98. Re:Oh, wait. You mean "Digital Natives", right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Woosh.

  99. helicopters by fragilemaleego · · Score: 1

    People born in the late nineties seem to have little interest in driving or working to make a car payment until college, or later. This is completely foreign concept to a Generation Xer like me. We wanted freedom and independence away from parents as early as possible, not smothering and support well into out twenties or thirties. It is naturally difficult for these two groups of employees to understand each other.

  100. users and consumers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Millennials are also expert users, and "are no longer in awe of technology specialists and therefore demand higher service levels,

    This is not so!!! Millennials know how to use IT tools but do not know how the tools work. I have worked in IT for over 30 years now and have found the next generation to be so totally out of touch with how it works, They are nothing but a bunch of users and consumers.

    Make it so number 1.

  101. yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From what I've experienced in the last few years, IT _is_ getting more stressful.

    I left a job that I had liked alot until I started being worked to death. They wouldn't replace people and they kept piling H1B garbage on top of us, all during a pay freeze. Since then, I've seen an incredible amount of incompetence that is bad enough on its own but even worse because it's institutionalized. At interview time you're expected to have a ton of skills and experience but after hiring it all goes out the window in favor of blind obedience. So the boss, who is stupid, forces everybody to be stupid, and then when the project fails because of that stupidity, guess who the blame falls on. It's almost a relief to be fired.

  102. Yeah, you're screwed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speaking about the majority of the most recent generations here in the USA, yeah, you're screwed. Deluded, mostly.

    Social delusions:

    o You think "politically correct" is a good thing - (it isn't)
    o You think getting into debt is inevitable (it isn't) - then you complain "in debt, oh the abuse"
    o You think you need to "get out of the parents house" (you don't) - then you complain "not able to save"
    o You think an interest-bearing credit card balance is perfectly okay (it isn't)
    o You think a kid wandering around by themselves most of the day is a catastrophe (it isn't)
    o You think texting is "social interaction" (it isn't)
    o You guys think you don't need to open doors for ladies, wait for them to start eating... (you do)
    o You think "responsibility" means "call a lawyer" (it usually just means you should have thought before you acted)
    o You think sitting at dinner with your head pointed at your phone's screen is reasonable (it isn't)
    o You think being late or not even showing up is okay (it isn't)
    o You think breaking your word is okay (it isn't)
    o You think retribution trumps rehabilitation (very, very rarely)

    Sexual delusions:

    o You think sex with a co-worker is a "bad thing" (it isn't)
    o You think teenage sex with anyone is some kind of magic awfulness (it isn't)
    o You think being raped "ruins your life" (go look up self-fulfilling prophecy)
    o You think it's okay to complain, even bring the law to bear, because you were drunk or stoned and had sex (it isn't)
    o You think sex work is "bad" and "degrading" (ooo, might involve genitals!) but have no problem with plumbers whose services involve digging your fecal matter out of your toilet. THAT's not degrading and bad, no, but SEX, OMFG SEX, oh, THAT is degrading. Tip for ya: Sex is good. Really good. Most def including sex for fair exchange. YOU, on the other hand, are a pearl-clutching idiot.

    Employment delusions:

    o You'll sport hideous tattoos, horrifying piercings - then you complain "can't get or keep a job"
    o You think college is required (it isn't) - then you complain "have to pay for this"
    o You think bad grammar, bad spelling and related poor language skills are okay (they aren't)
    o You guys think "dressing nice" means jeans and a shirt (it doesn't)
    o You girls (not ladies... ladies know better) think "dressing nice" means dressing like a guy (it doesn't)
    o You girls think "natural" is better than good makeup (it isn't)
    o You girls think bare legs are better than hosiery at work. (they aren't. nor on dates, other formal occasions)
    o You think email, phone calls, texting, Facebook, blogging, are all okay at work (they aren't)
    o You encourage what you call "youth culture" and so are responsible for tossing away decades of experience
    o You buy cheap, offshore-manufactured crap and then complain there are no jobs here

    And on TOP of all this, you've inherited just about every fuck-up the previous generations have managed to cleverly throw in the pot, and you basically ignore all of it, which brings me to...

    Political delusions and lack of perception of oppression:

    Just like every generation before you in the last century or so, you have, and are, letting the politicians (and the judiciary) run roughshod over your rights, your freedoms, your travels, and your privacy while they funnel money - your money - to the rich and powerful, then raise your taxes; while they built the worlds largest and least justified collection of prisoners; while they "save you from the terrorists" (not) and "protect the children" (not) and "fight sex trafficking" (not) - and THEN you STILL don't vote your representatives out - then you complain about it. Most people in every generation do this.

    I steadily vote against the incumbent representative, and will continue to do so until one shows up who has actually read the constitution and knows what it means, along with a healthy respect for personal respon

  103. Wtf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone forgotten that in today's IT you are competing globally vs local or that security is a huge deal in today's IT. This is on top of the fact that everything is critical even non production systems have to be up 24/7. You don't need to be 20 something to be under that kind of stress. Lastly anyone who has worked with IT knows IT is not known for having great communicators.

  104. Reactionary nonsense by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 1

    Let's face it...the term "helicopter parent" is a very new term.

    Not a new concept or phenomenon. You should've seen how the Victorians did things.

    I played with the other kids in the neighborhood. I often left the house (unescorted) during the summer in the morning and showed back up at home in time for dinner. I rode my bike and skateboard for miles away from home.

    Yeah, kids still do that all the damn time. Just because in some isolated cases & areas the cops have gotten uppity and called CPS doesn't mean it's the norm. If you live within a couple miles of the schools near where I live, you are REQUIRED to walk/bike/skateboard to school--no buses are provided.

    this latest generation has been more coddled and has more of an entitlement attitude than previous generations. They seem to feel "owed" by society a job, and to be treated nicely and fairly. They are the generation of everyone getting a trophy just for showing up.

    The headline-grabbing liberals in a handful of upper-middle / upper class towns are not even remotely representative of the country as a whole. For every hyper-egalitarian anti-competitive nutjob teacher (or parent) out there, there are fifty burned out and working to get by just as their parents did. Harder, even--average weekly hours worked by Americans have been steadily increasing, not decreasing. This is not a country of millionaires. Most parents do not have the luxury of behaving like whatever punching bag O'Reilly is roasting this week.

    Ironically enough, the overprotective parents and cops are falling prey to the same trap you've apparently fallen into--believing the bullshit the infotainment media sells you. The scaremongers still seem to believe that crime is rising, well over 20 years into a major decline. And you seem to believe that most people are overreacting, despite the fact that most parents don't have the time, money or energy to bother overreacting, because they are in fact working harder (or at least longer) than their parents ever did and (adjusting for inflation) earning less for it.

    One more major detail you failed to mention: my parents didn't need a degree to get a reasonable job. My grandparents' generation didn't need a degree to get a GREAT job. The jobs themselves haven't changed very much; only the requirements have. This is a result of increased prosperity combined with an enabling government and horribly (if understandably) cynical universities that realize that fleecing millions of undergrads is the only way they are going to be able to fund their grad students' and postdocs' research. So if there is a tiny bit of increase in the so-called "entitlement attitude", well, maybe it has something to do with the fact that our society has just recently begun demanding indentured servitude for anything more complicated than flipping burgers.

  105. Yeah, LIKE YOU GUYS NEVER WHINE ABOUT SYSTEMD by foreverdisillusioned · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm old, and maybe you kids really should get the fuck off my lawn, but young adults DO whine incessantly.

    Old people do it too (arguably moreso), but it's not called "whining"--it's called "grouching" or "grumbling" or "ranting" or "bitching" something. I mean hell, just look at the "get off my lawn!" meme we have here. This phrase is always, ALWAYS attached to a rant that would, if uttered by a kid, be considered "whining".

    (Disclaimer: I am on balance anti-systemd although I freely admit I'm not familiar enough with the specifics to be confident in my appraisal.)

    Just take a look at the systemd fiasco for a great example of this. There are plenty of legitimate reasons to be against it (even vehemently against it, from what I've seen so far), but the average post I see arguing against it is a pile of self-centered, self-entitled whining I've ever seen. It introduces a new standard for "no reason", boo fucking hoo. It's not at all uncommon to hear you greybeards explicitly say that you don't want to learn a new standard, period. Just complain and complain and complain that you can't do X any more... oh wait... there's a new tool that does everything the old tool did and more? Who the hell cares--why should *you* ever have to learn anything new!? Goddamn kids fixing things that aren't broken! I'm not whining; I'm righteously indignant!

    You're too wrapped up in your "real work" to even notice that half of the claims you make against systemd are FUD-fabricated bullshit (again, my disclaimer: the other half of the criticisms seem valid. And on a big picture level, of course it's terribly anti-UNIX and Pottering's rambling justifications for this shit is terrifying.) But just stop and think--how arrogant would this attitude seem if it was coming from a recent grad? And as the experienced ones, you guys are supposed to know better.

    1. Re:Yeah, LIKE YOU GUYS NEVER WHINE ABOUT SYSTEMD by q4Fry · · Score: 1

      I think my favorite thing about this post is your handle.

  106. All generations need to get over themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm in between the middle of boomers and the millennials at my age of 36. I have two younger brothers 28 and 33 that both earn more than most in the millennial generation, and that was through nothing more than hard work and having clear cut goals and passions that were developed early in life. The middle brother is a Master Electrician and earns well more than a well off lawyer (2 years of education+apprenticeship). The youngest brother is a certified HVAC technician and leads a very comfortable lifestyle (2 years of education+apprenticeship). I am a senior software developer in the middle of the two (4 years of education). For anyone wanting to earn more, all I can say is research your job prospects today, make a clear cut plan, and have achievable goals then execute the plan and get where you need to be as quickly as you can especially in regards to the required training you need. Debt is going to be your biggest enemy in this endeavor, so research where you can get the necessary accredited education as cheaply as possible.

    As far as whining about your situation goes stop it immediately. No one is going to give you the time of day about you at the end of the day, and the older folks (who are going to probably control your future earnings) are not going to pay you any respect because you're in essence acting like a 5 year old who didn't get the candy bar in the check-out line. Instead, you need to have the resolve of iron, determination to succeed, and do your job with integrity even when others do not. If you want to earn a lot of respect, ask your older co-workers for advice on how they got there and integrate it with your plan.

    1. Re:All generations need to get over themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You yourself are whining about people whining. That's an oxymoron.

  107. Yea, no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article is a whole lot of bullshit.

    First of all, I am 29. Do not ever refer to me as a millennial. The FACT is the "millennial" generation does not have official start dates or an official age range. I grew up playing Googol and using a keyboard and a one button mouse. I grew up with Prodigy, and AOL, and giant rotary phones were still in use. Telephones and pagers were in use. I had and played NES and Atari. I did PLENTY of in person socializing and do to this day - it's physically impossible to live in the USA without interacting with people if you are an adult unless you are rich and have become a hermit.

    I've worked in IT for 7 years and throw in a few more for school.

    Are Millennials making IT more stressful? Maybe. Probably. I've noticed a profound lack of personal responsibility on the behalf of end-users and they are more often than not "millennials." Users will always be retarded. Nothing can possibly fix it. I have people routinely asking me "How do I take out the battery?" "How do I do this?" regarding company laptops. Really it doesn't matter their age - they are idiots and irresponsible and the term RTFM originated for a reason.

    Stress in IT - read "Enterprise IT" comes 100% from the system in which you are expected to work. Incompetent product owners, incompetent managers, lazy, irresponsible, misguided, selfish. Pick any term you want, pick them all. As someone who works for a MAJOR bank, one of the three biggest in the world, it would shock a normal human being with common sense how inefficient and fucked up the slightest tasks have become thanks to the Six Sigma focus of all companies. What developed as a good idea and a great process has hyperspecialized every IT department I've ever worked in to the level of Congressional ineptitude.

    Sure, user, I'd love to solve your problem. You just need me to install a simple package? Well see I'm sorry but I'm not supposed to do that because all software installation is supposed to be done through SCCM and there are literally 950 installers for the application you want and at least 100 of them are live, and then we have to break them down by your line of business, your system build, the version you need, it's dependencies etc. etc. etc. It seemed organized and efficient, to offboard as much work as possible towards self-service or automation, but really it causes as many problems as it fixes.

    This is just one of the things that leads to a surplus population of overqualified IT workers who literally get stuck in the mud in entry level jobs and have to claw and scratch their way into something real. Meanwhile, you have underqualified people in the same room getting unequal treatment and being treated with different rulesets. Then you have all the outsourcing. I literally don't remember the last time I talked to a white person. Sorry. I'm not being racist. I do not remember the last time I saw or talked to someone named Judy Smith or some shit like that.

    And I can tell you above all, the most absolutely stressful thing in my company is that the "knowledge" - the Sharepoints, the Confluence, the whatever repository, are so fragmented, so unorganized, so BLATANTLY written by 6 year olds and otherwise people who clearly have no interest or fucks to give towards improving the situation, that it's nearly impossible to learn anything even for your own benefit, much less anyone else's.

    IT has always been stressful, and it's not just because of youngins. Yea sure, some people get paid a lot of money. Most don't.

  108. Indicator of the fall of a nation by ULTROS · · Score: 1

    This tends to happen when luxury is commonplace. People always want what they don't have. More Americans have AC, cable/internet, 40"+ tv, refrigeration, and a car than ever before. Parents spoil the kids in an attempt to shut them up(Not parent). Millennial kids are even worse than my generation. I train new guys often in the oil service sector, and some of the 20 year olds are so lazy I will assign a task and come back in 20 min to see them sitting on their ass of facebook. I have to be an asshole at that point. Whiney brats.

  109. Probably both by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geeks be them in IT or otherwise aren't noted for people skills.
    Those geeks become managers, you now have a manager without any people skill and wonder why people on projects are complaining they stress ayra is going up?
    Anecdotally speaking having temped at a few places recently as a web wonk what's realistically doable vs what some suit wants aren't always in alinement.
    Some real examples:
    -Re-do this rails app and have it in to me today by 5! (and it's 4 when you have to re-write an entire app).
    -Our networks down get it back up yesterday! (even though it's down because lightning hit the trunk that services the area)
    -What do you meen the person with acess-privlidge to the git/cvs/version_management_system_here called in sick?!

    Or then there's the games you have to play just to hired in the first damn place:
    Interpert what looks like someones resume when a outfit posts what looks like someones resume for a starting position.
    I agree that dressing nicely, and being well groomed etc is premo, however some of the expctations aren't realistic a 3pc suit- just to get to know the team you might work with?
    Getting paid minimum wage wich here is about 8dollars an hour, and bairly covers gas(2.25-2.50 a gallon), All for what?

    I personally find web related work rewarding however the companies aren't helping themselves!
    Whens the last time a outfit was able or willing to do some acclimation and on the job training?
    Someone can show they know a bit about JSON, DotNet, JS and Ruby/Rails and what not. That doesn't meen that'll be how that firm does it. In my limited experience how a firm writes, and documents coding and UX testing varies from firm to firm.

    Then they wonder why the work force is on pins and needles?
    That's shouldn't be any mystery!

  110. GET OFF MY LAWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All Millennials are going to be "IT experts" in the eyes of crotchety old men who do nothing of value with their organization psychology degrees.

  111. Re:Kept farther from reality need more time to adj by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, you are profoundly mistaken, my friend.. The US became a super power because of the contributions of individuals who just wanted to make their own (and sometimes their neighbor's) life better.

    Society is a nebuluous concept. It certainly doesn't care about you, much less send anyone to die for you. It can't make decisions. It isn't committed to anything, especially not decisively to specific opinions. Caring about "society" is like caring for lukewarm oatmeal.

    Bleh.

    Let society go. It will make us all the better for it, including the poor and neglected.

  112. Al, is that you? by mmell · · Score: 1
    I knew you couldn't stay away.

    He loves me. He really, really loves me. *sniff*