Slashdot Mirror


Can Online Reporting System Help Prevent Sexual Assaults On Campus?

jyosim writes Studies have shown that as many as 90 percent of campus rapes are committed by repeat offenders. A new system is designed to help identify serial assaulters, by letting students anonymously report incidents in order to look for patterns. But some argue that having the ability to report someone with just the click of a button may not be a good thing. Andrew T. Miltenberg, a New York lawyer who represents young men accused of sexual misconduct, says though the system seems well intended, he is concerned about dangers it may pose to students who are accused. 'We're all guilty of pressing send on an angry text or email that, had we had to put it into an actual letter and proofread, we probably wouldn't have sent,' he says.

234 comments

  1. Students + Anonimity by Needs2BeSaid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This will end very badly. Some students will use this as an attack and/or revenge tool against people they don't like. Anonymity plus rape accusations will equal lawsuits and destroyed lives.

    --
    Some things need to be said...
    1. Re:Students + Anonimity by MitchDev · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No kidding, there needs to be accountability when you claim rape.

      The accusation, even when later proven false, destroys lives.

    2. Re:Students + Anonimity by sd4f · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The problem is this whole beat up about campus rapes is blown way out of proportion. Case in point is the mattress carrying student, who now appears to just have been a woman scorned. So any systems are already being abused. If there's criminality going on, the only thing to do is go to the police. Police need to treat rape seriously, they generally do, but I get the feeling why certain people want this resolved outside police is because police will also treat fraudulent allegations of rape seriously.

    3. Re:Students + Anonimity by Snowgen · · Score: 4, Informative

      Anonymity plus rape accusations will equal lawsuits and destroyed lives.

      Actually, if you RTFA (I know, this is /., why would you?), you'll see that a student cannot accuse anonymously.

      They can either non-anonymously report the event to the authorities using the system, or they can record details but not report. If they choose to record, and someone else makes an accusation on the same person, the system will then allow the student to non-anonymously report.

    4. Re:Students + Anonimity by Needs2BeSaid · · Score: 5, Informative

      Those anonymous "details" are accusations. A system like this will be used to intentionally harm people.

      --
      Some things need to be said...
    5. Re: Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No matter what happens with the charges the nark sex offender can never be removed. /anecdote/

      A friends son got drunk but not that drunk and then got friendly a coworker but not that friendly. She passed out and he got her home, made sure she was safe and left. 3 months later she decides he raped her. 8 months later it wasn't worth her time come back and testify. Charges were dropped. The kid is now permentantly on the registered sex offenders list for having done nothing more than making sure someone was safe. /anecdote end/

      It really sucks that thus is the world we are giving our children.

    6. Re:Students + Anonimity by NotDrWho · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Did anyone else see that report last weekend on "60 Minutes" about the Duke lacrosse coach? The guy wasn't even accused of a crime, only COACHING the men who were accused. And those men were all PROVEN INNOCENT. And even still, it cost the guy his job and still follows him to this day. And that was for coaching innocent men!

      That's the kind of damage even being ASSOCIATED with someone FALSELY ACCUSED of such a crime can do.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    7. Re:Students + Anonimity by jythie · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, often being an accuser destroys lives too.

    8. Re:Students + Anonimity by jythie · · Score: 1, Interesting

      One thing to keep in mind is that the effect you get from high profile cases and how the remaining 99.99% can be vastly different. This kind of damage only really occurs either within a community (in which case, accuser or accused, the least popular person is the one who suffers) or if there is massive public attention to a case, which might only be 1 or 2 per year in a country the size of the US. When looking at best practices, we have to examine the common cases, the places where things can do the most harm or most good, NOT the super rare edge cases that get the spotlight.

    9. Re:Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It is quite easy to visit a site via TOR, put in rape allegations using other people's names, and stand back and watch the fun. Swatters do this all the time.

      This is just another method of torturing someone, using well meaning, but misguided law enforcement tools as their weapon.

      And this will succeed. Even if someone was arrested and booked for mistaken identity, as soon as their fingerprints and mug shots hit the system, they get propagated into hundreds of databases globally, be it the Federal NCIC, state databases, databases for the bail bondsmen, and so on. Once this happens, an arrestee can -never- land a job in any industry past the cashier at a McDonald's drive through.

      At a previous company I worked at, (and this was the norm across the industry), the first thing we did was look at a candidates -arrest- record. Not convictions. Arrests, as in if they saw the back of a police car with handcuffs on. If they did, and were in the NCIC or other system for -any- reason, we shitcanned their resume. This is standard policy, because convictions can be bought off, but if a cop thinks someone did something and takes the time to put them in the car and fill out paperwork... they are guilty and a criminal, and thus unemployable.

      So, this is another system that will be used to ruin someone's life.

    10. Re:Students + Anonimity by jythie · · Score: 1

      Ahm, have you ever talked to someone who tried to report rape to the police? It is a real toss up regarding how 'serious' they take it, with many victims finding that the treatment they get from the police makes them question if they should have reported it in the first place. Shaming is so embedded in our culture that even well meaning officers usually end up treating the victim like it was their fault.

    11. Re:Students + Anonimity by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      It's the same old battle of equally opposed forces. On the one hand we want victims to come forward, be listened to and get justice. On the other hand we want to protect the innocent and not have their lives ruined by false allegations or the investigation itself.

      To make matters more difficult many victims don't come forward if the are not guaranteed anonymity, or if they think they will be interrogated during the investigation or at trial. On the other hand we need to interrogate them to get to the truth of the matter some times, and the accused is likely to want to ask them some very difficult questions about their private lives in open court.

      It's basically impossible to come up with a good, fair solution. This is just another compromise.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re:Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The problem is that certain SJW/feminist groups have so broadened the definition of "rape" as to make it utterly meaningless. The word can still destroy lives just by being thrown around (because most of us still associate it with the traditional definition). Yet at the same time they've so expanded its definition that almost any form of everyday sex between a male and female can now be defined as rape. "I had sex with my girlfriend" last night suddenly becomes rape when she decides later on that she regrets it. "We met at a party and had a one night stand" becomes rape because you and she were both drinking at that party. Even "we were both sober and had sex and she didn't regret it" becomes rape, because you DIDN'T GET HER AFFIRMATIVE CONSENT first.

      Pretty soon any male-female sex that doesn't involve a notarized written contract in advance will become "rape" too.

      Meanwhile, there are a lot of REAL rapes going on out there. And the victims of those terrible crimes will suffer because normal people will lump what happened to them in with false accusations and psychos who consider any male-female sex to be rape.

    13. Re: Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can tell you first hand that false accusations destroy lives just as much.

    14. Re: Students + Anonimity by jythie · · Score: 1

      Ahm, if charges were dropped, the person would not be on the list.

      This story also assumes that she was lying and he was telling the truth, have you considered that he was lying? Most victims are given a hard enough time by going forward that they drop out of cases since they have to defend themselves over and over and fucking over from people saying 'well, it is probably just a false accusation, think of the men hurt by sluts like you!'. It gets really draining and a lot of women just give up because the process of going through the trial is just not worth it to get justice.

    15. Re:Students + Anonimity by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is especially true if the local community places a high value on the person being accused. For example, if a small town's football superstar rapes someone and she reports it, she will be treated as a horrible person for trying to ruin the team's chance at the playoffs. Accusations will be made regarding her promiscuity and her general character. Her name will be dragged through the mud. And all of this before the case even sees one day in a courtroom. She might have to leave the town entirely while the football superstar will be hailed as a hero for having to go through such trying times while still scoring points for the local team. And if the football superstar had raped other women, they will be pressured into keeping quiet having seen how women who speak out are treated.

      Does rape get falsely reported? Sure, but it also goes unreported out of fear of the victim becoming a target.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    16. Re:Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " This is standard policy, because convictions can be bought off, but if a cop thinks someone did something and takes the time to put them in the car and fill out paperwork... they are guilty and a criminal, and thus unemployable."

      This is the most fucked up thing about America I have read in a long time.

      Absolutely unbelievable.

      You guys truly are fucked...good luck!

      [A Brit, who was taken to a police station here without due cause, not charged and subsequently released, but had DNA put in the national DNA database. At least (for what that's worth) I was able to have the sample destroyed and removed from the database some six years later...and as far as I know, it would be impossible for a public individual to access those records and vet me for a job.]

    17. Re:Students + Anonimity by TraumaFox · · Score: 1

      Those are the only people who are going to use it. If a victim is too afraid to report an assailant to the university for whatever reason, why would they use this app? It's not truly anonymous. The supposed appeal of the app is that it allows you to "log" an incident without reporting it, such that your contact info only gets forwarded to the university if someone else's report "matches" the same assailant. In other words, the app is going to go, "Hey, remember that guy who raped you last month? Guess what? He raped someone else, and now the university is going to contact you to ask why you didn't report him back then. You could have prevented this!" Ironically, the target users for this app have more reason than anyone to avoid using it. Nobody wins here.

    18. Re:Students + Anonimity by xclr8r · · Score: 1

      Student body should show how this tool will be abused. Easily pick a target that is ridiculous (like the school mascot, upstanding adminstrator, or this program's coordinator) and spam it with blatantly false accusations. Point will be made rather quickly.

      --
      Beware of those who profit off the docile and persecute the unbelievers.
    19. Re:Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When looking at best practices, we have to examine the common cases, the places where things can do the most harm or most good, NOT the super rare edge cases that get the spotlight.

      Yes, who cares if a minority of innocents get their lives destroyed. Better be safe and punish the innocents this is how a good justice system works. And they're just a minority anyway, fuck minorities. (/sarc)

    20. Re: Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      AHEM...
      just being accused has destroyed men's lives. Does not matter if they are later proven innocent. No one cares at that time.
      AHEM - the poor guy is still stuck with the label.

    21. Re:Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty soon any male-female sex that doesn't involve a notarized written contract in advance will become "rape" too.

      Sex? Certainly... here, sign this contract my lawyer drew up for me saying that you give you agreement to the terms.

    22. Re:Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      My uncle was a Family Court judge for many years. He used to joke that he got so used to hearing allegations of child molestation and abuse in divorce and child custody cases that he was surprised when at least one parent DIDN'T accuse the other of molesting or abusing their kid.

      If he and other judges like him had accepted it as dogma that 99.99% of such accusations were true, then there wouldn't be enough people walking around free today to run all the prisons for everyone locked up.

    23. Re:Students + Anonimity by MitchDev · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Considering the penalty the accused faces, tough shit.

      Rape is a SERIOUS accusation, not to be made lightly.

    24. Re:Students + Anonimity by swb · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Rightly or wrongly, the police may be influenced by their familiarity with the criminal justice system and circumstances that were reported. So many rape accusations boil down to a he said/she said situation that would be impossible to get charged by a prosecutor, let alone result in a convicton in court.

      A woman I used to know was raped by a coworker. The woman and her roommate were waitresses at a restaurant and bar. They had the company Christmas party at the restaurant and the rapist was one of the employees. Everyone had too much to drink and the rapist was too drunk to drive and asked if he could crash on their couch. They said sure. In the middle of the night, he crept into her room and raped her and left the apartment afterwards.

      In the morning, she told her boyfriend who insisted she go to the police who were basically dismissive of the claim, not because they thought she was lying but because there was no way to conclusively prove it was rape. There were witnesses who saw the three of them (the woman who was raped, her roommate, and rapist) voluntarily leave together. All had been drinking. The apartment wasn't forcibly entered. The rape itself didn't involve enough violence that she had bruises, scarring or signs of a physical struggle.

      The cops said they would bring him in for questioning but that unless he actually admitted raping her outright, what would almost certainly happen is that he would say that after they got back to the apartment she invited him into her room for sex and that he left afterwards and that the rape accusation was that she felt guilty because she had a boyfriend. And because there was no way to disprove this version of events, the prosecutor wouldn't even file charges. They also said the presence of the roommate would work against her, since he would claim that since her roommate didn't wake up she wasn't fighting or resisting.

      Are the cops insensitive? Maybe, but what can they do when there's no evidence?

      I believed her personally because I knew her fairly well, but if I think about it too long even I can start to enterain doubts. Why was there no physical struggle? Why didn't she yell and wake her roommate? If I was a cop confronted with this a lot, I can see why they come off indifferent.

    25. Re:Students + Anonimity by jcr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Worse than that, not one member of the Duke Lynch Mob has suffered any repercussions at all for their actions in demanding penalties against the accused before they were tried.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    26. Re:Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a blatantly illegal hiring practice. Name and shame or I'm calling bullshit.

    27. Re:Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those contracts, much like pre-nuptual agreements, will be thrown out.

    28. Re:Students + Anonimity by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      That doesn't strike me as indifference from the cops, just facing reality. What more could they realistically do if he denied it? It's not anyone's fault, it's just the way the universe is - there is no way to validate either claim.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    29. Re:Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believed her personally because I knew her fairly well, but if I think about it too long even I can start to entertain doubts. Why was there no physical struggle? Why didn't she yell and wake her roommate? If I was a cop confronted with this a lot, I can see why they come off indifferent.

      I hate to say I side with the police on this. You want to believe her, but if there was no fight, no yelling, etc then she was almost surely lying. The justice system should first and foremost keep innocent out or prison. Once that is accomplished it can think about guilty people. Given all the evidence (or absence thereof), the risk of locking up an innocent and destroying his life were extremely high. The fact that police avoided having the case brought to court saved a potentially innocent's man life, since even an innocent verdict is unfortunately not enough to wash off the stigma of being accused of rape.

    30. Re:Students + Anonimity by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Worse than that, not one member of the Duke Lynch Mob has suffered any repercussions at all for their actions in demanding penalties against the accused before they were tried.

      In the UVa case, "Jackie" has faced no repercussions for making false accusations, and neither has Rolling Stone Magazine. At least Jackie tried to retract the story before it was published, but RS went ahead even though the "victim" no longer stood by the story. But more significantly, the University of Virginia has suffered no repercussions, despite taking drastic and broad punitive action against the fraternities, before doing any fact checking, much less waiting for a proper investigation.

    31. Re: Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think I saw that in a movie once

    32. Re:Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and neither has Rolling Stone Magazine

      They didn't even fire the reporter who wrote that bullshit story. Her "reporting" could have gotten everyone in that fraternity expelled, or some of the even killed (they were getting crazy numbers of death threats at one point)--yet she just gets to walk away with her job. Hey, no harm, no foul, right?

      And the sad thing is that this isn't even the first time she's been accused of bogus reporting.

    33. Re:Students + Anonimity by Gramie2 · · Score: 1

      Correct conclusion, but one point is entirely wrong. The police acted correctly, but only because there was no evidence to support her story and you can only convict people if you can prove guilt. There is no reason at all to assume that she was lying. The guy can not be found guilty, but that does not mean he is innocent.

    34. Re:Students + Anonimity by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      So many rape accusations boil down to a he said/she said situation

      Well, that is the point of this app. If there is one he-said-she-said date rape situation, that isn't enough for a conviction. But if there are several women making accusations about the same guy, that is a lot more credible. If you look at a case like Bill Cosby, none of his accusers would have a lot of individual credibility, but taken together, I don't think anyone seriously doubts that Cosby is a serial rapist.

    35. Re:Students + Anonimity by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      Yup and when it was not a completely unprovable he said she said they did. A friend was the only female officer so pretty much had to show up at every domestic dispute and rape allegation while on duty. The vast majority were unprovable two people in the room no evidence of force, often the women were questionable witnesses being drunk or high at the time. Plenty of cases where when there were witnesses that were impartial the drunk/stoned girl was willing and eager to take on drunk/stoned guy before they found someplace private. I'm not saying that some of these were not rape, but if your standard is merely accusation it's broken and lets not start of the two drunks raped each other idiocy.

      It boils down to needing some physical evidence, without it cops will go yea thats nice lets go fill out useless paperwork.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    36. Re:Students + Anonimity by StikyPad · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Look, rape happens all the time. It happens more often in economically disadvantaged communities, and by family members, but we don't talk about that. We talk about frat guys, or jockeys, or the people we "least expect," because that makes headlines. Rape is not an epidemic on college campuses, although there is an epidemic of paranoia. Most guys are scared shitless of possibly doing something uncool, let alone "creepy," let alone being accused of rape. If we want to deal with the real epidemic of rape and sexual assault, then we should create programs in grade school for students to tell an adult about what happens at home. If we teach children and young teenagers that they won't be ignored, and that someone cares about them, then they won't be afraid to report things when they're adults on college campuses. Most rapes and sexual assaults are committed by people who themselves were abused or assaulted, who never found resolution. If we get to those people before they get the chance to victimize others, then we've made everyone safer. I'm not one to beat the "think of the children" drum, but this is a problem that's rooted in childhood, so that's where our focus should be.

    37. Re:Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why was there no physical struggle? Why didn't she yell and wake her roommate?

      Under the mosaic law, if a woman was raped in the city, she would be tried for adultery. If she was raped in the wilderness, the man would be tried for rape. This is, because, in the city, she could scream and people would come in and arrest/kill the rapist. In the countryside, there wasn't any such community to come to a woman's rescue.

    38. Re:Students + Anonimity by deadweight · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because NO ONE would ever think about getting all their friends to turn the same guy in that they are pissed at.

    39. Re:Students + Anonimity by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      They didn't even fire the reporter who wrote that bullshit story.

      The reason she wasn't fired, it that the decision to go with the story was made at the top. The editors and management at RS were fully aware that the story had not been vetted, and that the "victim" had tried to retract. It would have been hypocritical of them to push all the blame onto Ederly. The problems at Rolling Stone go far beyond one author. Their recent cover story that tried to make a sympathetic sex symbol out of the Boston Marathon bomber was another egregious example of a poor editorial decision.

    40. Re:Students + Anonimity by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 0

      Because NO ONE would ever think about getting all their friends to turn the same guy in that they are pissed at.

      So what if they do? The information entered into this website is not public. The site owners would look at the info, and if they found it credible, would report it to the police. If none of the accusers entered any contact info, it would go no where. If they did, they would be contacted by the police, and asked to make an official statement. At that point, it would be NO DIFFERENT than if a group of people got together and made the same accusations directly to the police. The only thing this website changes, is that the accusers don't have to know each other, which is the opposite of your scenario.

    41. Re:Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Why didn't she yell and wake her roommate?"

      It's very difficult to understand this kind of case. Not motivated enough to fight back, or even call for help, but wants his life destroyed because of a one-sided story.

      She'd probably make more noise if he opened her purse and took her money and phone.

      Probably wouldn't have slept-in afterwards too.

    42. Re:Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know of a similar situation where two coworkers got totally drunk. Later one of them accused the other of raping her, even though there were multiple witnesses that they were both completely intoxicated and they voluntarily left together.

      I was talking about this with someone the other day, and explained it this way: if it were two men, or two women, would you still come to the same conclusion as if it were a man and a woman? In a lot of cases, my guess is not.

    43. Re: Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Citation needed.

      How about: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steubenville_High_School_rape_case

    44. Re:Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Why was there no physical struggle? Why didn't she yell and wake her roommate?
      More importantly, why do you believe her? Just because you know her?
      Sounds like typical regret rape to me.

    45. Re:Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Au contraire mon frère

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Nifong

    46. Re:Students + Anonimity by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Indifferent is not the right word, but they're looking to see if there's a reasonable chance whether an investigation could result in a conviction and that's far from just rapes. I've had my car vandalized at night, no witnesses and really just reported it for the insurance claim. I've had a pair of brand new shoes stolen at the gym, no cameras pointing in that direction, I just reported it for the statistics so they know how much crime is really going on.

      They come into the police station thinking now I'm going to get him caught and punished, but what they often end up hearing is essentially "So you were raped and from what you're telling me he's going to get away with it" and that really hurts. The standard of evidence often feels unreasonable, like what do you expect a written confession or a video recording? That's the flip side to the justice system, if you know you've been the victim of a crime but the perpetrator gets away with it the illusion that the law will protect you shatters.

      Which is not to say that the gun nuts are right, it wouldn't have stopped my car from being vandalized or my shoes stolen and if she wasn't in any condition to put up a fight she wouldn't have been able to get hold of and fire a gun either. What you're really experiencing is that bad men will be able to do bad things to you and there's really no sane way of making 100% sure it doesn't. The justice system makes a difference, but it won't make things right and fair. And I'm pretty sure heaven and hell is a fairy tale for adults.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    47. Re:Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But don't forget:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McMartin_preschool_trial

    48. Re:Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And who controls the people looking at the info?

    49. Re:Students + Anonimity by deadweight · · Score: 1

      "the website is not public" Of all places on the planet, a college is the LAST place I would expect this information to stay private ROFLMAO. Can you imagine how much fun it will be when your name gets leaked as having 312 rape complaints AND a record of a police interview for sex crimes? The frat at UVA sure had some fun clearing their name of an obviously made up rape claim.

    50. Re:Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a student cannot accuse anonymously. They can either non-anonymously report the event to the authorities using the system, or they can record details but not report. If they choose to record, and someone else makes an accusation on the same person, the system will then allow the student to non-anonymously report.

      This sounds like a good idea, sort of like ecrush.
        - if several women are prepared to make reports, perhaps they'll be more motivated to prevent further victims and less ashamed
        - if their story is recorded before they're introduced to each other and allowed to talk, it might be slightly better evidence
        - reporting to the system rather than to the police addresses these complaints women are re-victimized by their disappointment in the police's dismissiveness, about which they'd prefer to remain in denial.

      However I share /.'s concerns that twitter feminists will start shaming campaigns, "you are sitting on information that could prevent rapes. Why do you hate women? You are revictimizing them by your inaction. You are as bad as a rapist. #UofRape," etc. etc., and once the information is there, the pressure to release anonymous stats about how many times a perpetrator has been reported under anonymous-escrow may become too much.

      I don't know if our opinion matters, though. It's not like reasoned debate can stop people from writing on the bathroom wall at Brown. We shouldn't be able to suppress these anonymous reports any more than feminists should be able to shut down discussions of false accusations every time they come up because doubt increases the burden on victims, so we're supposed to intentionally delude ourselves and justice for the sake of victims' sanity. Both cases are "Stop saying that. People will hear you and then act less like I want them to." Both have to be allowed because free speech.

    51. Re:Students + Anonimity by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      And who controls the people looking at the info?

      The organization that owns the site.

      And who controls the people looking at police reports? How is this any different, other than that the police are less trustworthy, less likely to consider victim privacy a priority, and more willing to leak/distort information for political purposes, as happened in the Duke case?

    52. Re:Students + Anonimity by deadweight · · Score: 1

      Some professional victimologist who believes any rape claim unless the Pope and the President BOTH swear you were with them at the time AND you can prove your dick fell off last month. Otherwise, expcet to see it in the school paper.

    53. Re:Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The guy can not be found guilty, but that does not mean he is innocent.

      That's exactly what not being found guilty should mean.

    54. Re:Students + Anonimity by LaurenCates · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think anyone who was reading Rolling Stone saw the Boston Marathon bomber as a sex symbol, at least anyone who wasn't inclined to see him that way in the first place.

      It isn't like RS never covered anything but pop culture either.

      That said, when someone who commits a heinous crime is part of your target demographic, I actually think it's rather responsible to pull the veil of "it couldn't happen to you" off your readership, and if it provided some insight that could help someone recognize the signs in someone like that before it's too late, I think it's a far more responsible choice than you're willing to give it credit for.

      --
      Some people don't believe in fairies. I don't believe in The Patriarchy.
    55. Re:Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It is better to let a thousand guilty men go free, than punish a single innocent."

    56. Re:Students + Anonimity by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Glad that wasn't me(tm).

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    57. Re:Students + Anonimity by Cederic · · Score: 1

      This is one reason why rape victims get anonymity in the UK.

      This is reasonable, and public sentiment almost universally agrees with it.

      Someone found guilty in court of making a false accusation loses their anonymity, which reinforces the emphasis that the protection is for actual victims of violent sexual assault.

      Where the law goes wrong is that people accused do not also get anonymity. Witch hunts ensue. Lives get destroyed. It's a shitty situation.

    58. Re:Students + Anonimity by Cederic · · Score: 1

      No. Not being found guilty means you must be treated as innocent, not that you are innocent.

      It's a subtle difference, but it does exist.

    59. Re: Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that's not how criminal law works in the US or most other civilized countries. You are acquitted, meaning the judge, jury and prosecutors could not prove you guilty. That doesn't ever mean you're innocent. It means you're not legally culpable, and that is all.

    60. Re:Students + Anonimity by quintessencesluglord · · Score: 1

      It's a bit more than that.

      Sabrina Rubin Erdely already had a history of sensationalistic sexual abuse stories, but she was award-winning and pretty much beyond reproach.

      That no one decided to maybe look into her past history of negligent reporting was suspect, but rape culture is the zeitgeist of the times. Can't let something like facts and accountability get in the way.

      And even now, the campus rape epidemic has taken on the tenor of the satanic ritual sexual abuse moral panic of the 80s. And just like McMartin, the allegations have proven to be false, yet people seem hellbent on continuing this witch hunt with ever more extreme tactics. People old enough remember how every media outlet joined the fray as they quietly swept the sexual abuse by priests under the rug. This is bigger than Rolling Stone, who are just patsies to the madness of the times.

    61. Re:Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - several reports with no physical evidence, no chain of custody, is crap. How do you propose that the police being "motivated to prevent further victims" is going to lead them to arrests without evidence (including the ability of the accused to face their accuser)
      - You would NEVER be able to usefully prove that there wasn't collusion outside of this system.
      - It also allows them to skip all of the steps in chain-of-evidence that would ever provide a real hope of putting a rapist away.

      Due to people's inherent laziness, this is going to result in less actual rapists going to prison and far more innocent people having their lives dragged through the mud and potentially ruined through some hairbrained sidestep-the-legal-system process.

    62. Re:Students + Anonimity by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      (in which case, accuser or accused, the least popular person is the one who suffers)

      I notice you don't provide any stats to back up that bland assertion. The connection of a rape charge (even obliquely) is sufficient to ruin your life. A lot of the damage is done *prior* to being vindicated. Does the innocent party get reimbursed for the loss of time/freedom/property/job/friends/acquaintences? No. It's gone.

    63. Re:Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both party should get anonymity until a final verdict is given and the case is settle. But we don't live in the equality fantasy world feminist promised us. In reality, male live do not matter. Women are to be protect when they are victim or perpetrator, while men are thrown under the bus before facts are even known.

      Un-criminalising rape is the only solution. Rape is really just assault + sex. A puritan association designed to disproportionally punish men. Assault should be as serious as 'rape', the sex part is irrelevant.

    64. Re:Students + Anonimity by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      "even well meaning officers usually end up" You know this how? My anecdotal evidence from a friend who went through the experience is the the police were very considerate and concerned with her well-being and treated her in an utmost professional manner.

    65. Re:Students + Anonimity by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      That line of thinking is where a lot of the danger of this kind of thing comes in. Eyewitness testimony, never mind a "witness" clicking a button in an app, is incredibly unreliable. Rape is a serious crime, and should require physical evidence to convict.

      The real solution to this problem is to eliminate the stigma behind reporting rape and having the proper evidence gathered. A bunch of reports of rape don't mean anything. A bunch of reports of rape with positive rape kits is evidence.

    66. Re:Students + Anonimity by jcr · · Score: 1

      Nifong wasn't part of the mob, he was part of the government. The Duke Lynch Mob I referred to are the faculty members also known as the "gang of 88".

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    67. Re:Students + Anonimity by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      And even now, the campus rape epidemic has taken on the tenor of the satanic ritual sexual abuse moral panic of the 80s.

      The biggest similarity is that neither actually exists. The satanic ritual abuse is now believed to have had zero actual perpetrators or victims (other than the falsely accused). While there are certainly rapes on campuses, they are actually less common there than in society as a whole. So to talk about "campus rape" as if that is a specific problem, is misleading.

    68. Re:Students + Anonimity by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Recent events, such as the Rolling Stone farce, have shown that universities and the public are not responsible enough to act in the way you suggest. If the cops want to set up a rape reporting website, that's one thing, although I still think it's useless because a rape conviction should require physical evidence. Universities or random people doing this? That's just asking for a witch hunt.

    69. Re:Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The coach was thrown under the bus in part because the new president at the time (Brodhead had just replaced the very well regarded Nan Keohane that year) had not yet gathered enough power to resist the will of the [vocal minority at least] faculty. That said, while the investigation exonerated them of rape, it exposed a lack of discipline among the team as a whole - the worst behavior at tailgating and other social events on campus was often the Lacrosse team rather than any of the Fraternities during that time for instance.

    70. Re:Students + Anonimity by jythie · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it is much safer to just destroy the lives of victims instead.

    71. Re:Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it is much safer to just destroy the lives of victims instead.

      Alleged victims.

    72. Re: Students + Anonimity by jythie · · Score: 0

      Yes, it can. However, rape destroys lives too. Given how difficult it is to prosecute a case and how massively under reported it is, just how much do we need to think of the poor men when weighing things that might actually help victims? People are either forgetting (or simply do not care) that this is used to discredit rape victims at much higher rates. So all I can really read from this is 'men matter, women do not, anything that might hurt men but help women must be stopped!'

    73. Re:Students + Anonimity by jythie · · Score: 0

      Actually, people who work in domestic violence talk about that a lot. Know what happens? "oh, they must be making it up in order to get revenge on someone'

    74. Re:Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, so much better to just tell women they must be lieing and put up as many barriers to reporting as possible. Anything that might hurt men obviously takes priority over women, after all, they must have done something to deserve it, no?

      I'm sorry, how is this a man vs woman thing? Sexual assault happens both way.
      You seem to have a very sex-biased opinion and beliefs on this issue that only women are ever victims of sexual assault.

      In fact, a 2010 CDC report on sexual assault puts the number of men sexually assaulted by women nearly equal to women by men.

    75. Re:Students + Anonimity by deadweight · · Score: 1

      I get the idea of it. In a perfect world it would be kind of helpful. In real life it is barely one step ahead of writing "Call Jane for a good time" in the bathroom.

    76. Re:Students + Anonimity by clonehappy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      His common sense probably let a lot of child molesters go free. Family court judges are notorious for being dismissive about abuse claims and I know a lot of a adults who still bear a grudge because a judge would not believe one of their parents was abusing them.
      Sadly, your uncle is not a counter example, he is more likely an example of the problem.

      Sorry "you know" a lot adults who got diddled by grandpa (I don't know a single fucking one, but then again I don't hang around with people like you). That's what we call "anecdotal evidence" and it isn't worth jack shit. The exact same reason family court judges can't just throw everyone in jail based on some he-said, she-said bullshit. Common sense is not an example of the problem, pussies like you are. If you had your way, I'm sure a judge could just (without evidence, of course, like all authoritarians enjoy) throw people away because mommy said daddy touched little Johnny or Janie. Sadly, people who let emotions rather than facts or common sense (like yourself) are starting to ruin enough lives that these things are finally coming to light.

      Better to let 1,000 guilty men free than imprison 1 innocent man. You know, the way it's supposed to work. In a free country, not the kind you like (I hear Saudi Arabia, North Korea, and Iran are nice this time of year). If you want innocent people to be jailed because of feewings, get the fuck out. You don't understand what freedom and liberty really are.

    77. Re:Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Part of the problem? Really?

      If all you had to go on was a he-said / she-said accusation, with no evidence otherwise (judges don't collect evidence), how do you propose to go about keeping the innocent people out of prison while you punish the guilty?

      The presumption of innocence, which is SUPPOSED to be the foundation of a civilized legal system, means that we err on the side of letting the guilty walk rather than accidentally punish the innocent.

    78. Re:Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disbarred and a single day of jail for actively and knowingly concealing evidence (for months) that proved that all of the accused were innocent. That's less than a slap on the wrist. That's a bunny-fart in the general direction of one of his shoes while he's wearing them.

    79. Re:Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh goodness no, not a lack of discipline! 10 years maximum security, hard labor. And they should be raped to sleep by DickWolves.

    80. Re: Students + Anonimity by epyT-R · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That doesn't mean it's ok to falsely accuse, or for the accuser to stay hidden while she and her lawyer trash their target with impunity before a trial is even started, hell, sometimes before an arrest is made. Maybe false accusers should be dealt the same punishments their targets would've had to endure.

      In a free country everyone deserves equality before the law. What you're suggesting just encourages witchhunts and social vendettas (he cheated on me, I'll get him!). All I can really read from your post is that 'women matter, men do not.' Fuck that.

    81. Re:Students + Anonimity by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the applied definitions of 'social justice', 'diversity' and 'equality.' What they say and what they do are complete opposites. It's newspeak to a T.

    82. Re:Students + Anonimity by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      That's because of the 'girl who cried wolf' syndrome, not because of this particular judge.

    83. Re:Students + Anonimity by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      No, you're wrong.

      We have to look at *all* cases, because the justice system is designed to punish the guilty and only the guilty. By letting innocent people be punished, you're destroying the entire reason for its existence.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    84. Re:Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > implying the whole purpose of this is not to milk lulz using false rape accusation

    85. Re:Students + Anonimity by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      That's a good way of putting it. It might actually be a decent tool for the cops to use. The difference being that the police and courts are (supposed to be) knowledgeable about the law, trained in its enforcement, and accountable for their actions. The university offices in charge of these things, not so much.

      On the other hand, if you're not even willing to walk down to the campus police station and file a report, any prosecution probably isn't going to go very far anyway.

    86. Re:Students + Anonimity by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      ARE YOUR CLASSMATES JEW-^h^h^h COMMU-^h^h^h^h^h RAPISTS? Don't delay, speak out today! Report suspected sedi-^h^h^h^h sexual assaulters to Big Brother! Remember citizens, it is for YOUR protection!

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    87. Re:Students + Anonimity by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      ARE YOUR CLASSMATES JEW-^h^h^h COMMU-^h^h^h^h^h RAPISTS? Don't delay, speak out today! Report suspected sedi -^h^h^h^h sexual assaulters to Big Brother! Remember citizens, it is for YOUR protection!

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    88. Re:Students + Anonimity by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      Who stole your account?

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    89. Re:Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believed her personally because I knew her fairly well, but if I think about it too long even I can start to enterain doubts.

      I think this is inevitable, in both directions, and it's a very troubling thing. If a friend of yours tells you that they were raped, or that they were falsely accused of rape, you may think that they're the victim of a heinous crime - but there's an inescapable possibility that they're the perpetrator of one. (Me, personally, I've heard both.)

    90. Re:Students + Anonimity by sd4f · · Score: 1

      Well the problem isn't going to get resolved through attempting to force mob justice or having extrajudicial proceedings. Just how is getting university administration getting involved going to solve the problem of something which is a criminal matter? It seems to me that the desired outcome is to achieve guilt by accusation alone. No rule of law, no fair trial and most of all, no testing of evidence.

      I believe rape is a heinous crime. I think that it is wrong if police don't treat every individual matter with seriousness. Maybe certain procedures need to be adjusted, but if that happens, then the false allegations of rape also need to be treated seriously, and there have been news reports of women being sent to jail for a few years, because they were proven to have made up false rape allegations.

      I know that usually the response from police can be very poor. I have no first hand experience, but I have spoken to a primary school principal who has the unpleasantries of dealing with issues of children being molested or raped, when the school learns of it (if the school finds out about a child being abused outside of school, it's still their duty of care to report it) police come in and they just don't know how to deal with children, dealing in legalese to

    91. Re:Students + Anonimity by sd4f · · Score: 1

      There's a word limit? Dang it

      Basically the police don't deal with children properly. My thinking is that universities could essentially have people help the victim by mediate their interaction with the police. But stepping in and making decisions on criminal matters doesn't help at all.

      When rape allegations make the media, it's either because some important people are being protected, and hopefully the media is shaming corruption in the system, or it's because the accuser wants a trial by media and let the circus in, actively avoiding a police investigation.

    92. Re:Students + Anonimity by swb · · Score: 1

      It's a good question and I can't say why for any concrete reason other than the vibe I got from her personally and knowing her boyfriend.

      She struck me as a pretty demure; she didn't give off any kind of a sexual vibe or even that she was especially outgoing or adventerous. I just didn't believe she had the personality type that would be at all likely to get drunk and have a one night stand, especially with a coworker and especially not cheating on her boyfriend.

      I didn't get a "blow by blow" account of her experience, but the same kinds of personality traits made me believe that once she woke up with the guy pulling her pajamas off she probably just kind of laid there and let him do what he wanted.

      I've only had one other woman tell me about being raped in detail and what she described was pretty much the same. A guy knocked on her door, forced his way in and the shock and the fear were so great that she basically just went limp and he raped her and left. It was literally over in under five minutes, including the minute ripping her clothes off and pulling up his own pants.

      I'm guessing this is pretty common for many rape situations. The expectation of fighting and screaming is probably less realistic than just freezing from fear. There may also be some fear that if they struggle that the guy will beat the shit out of them and that the intercourse will be even more painful.

    93. Re: Students + Anonimity by guruevi · · Score: 2

      False accusations of rape is present in ~80% of disputed divorce cases. It's so bad, some lawyers are having the clauses in form paperwork. Demonstrably false accusations are around 10-20% of all investigated rape cases. If females wouldn't use rape accusations as a tool, real victims would have a much better chance.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    94. Re:Students + Anonimity by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Better to expect every accuser to present evidence. If she's not lying then she's got nothing to worry about. Equality is the radical notion that men and women are people who deserve right to due process.

    95. Re:Students + Anonimity by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The judge's job was not to convict people of child abuse, but to do divorce and child custody cases. Moreover, the judge should not base his or her decisions just on unsupported claims by one party. If said party had serious evidence, the county attorney would probably be very interested.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    96. Re:Students + Anonimity by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      I know of a woman (friend of a close relative) who was raped by a man who said he'd kill her baby if she didn't do exactly what he wanted. Under those circumstances, I'd expect a mother to do exactly as told, allow anything, and not make a fuss.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    97. Re:Students + Anonimity by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The issue is proof, on either side.

      Assume a situation in which a man and woman have sex, and the woman claims it was rape. To convict the man of rape, there should be evidence that it was rape beyond a reasonable doubt. To convict the woman of lying, there should be evidence that it was consensual beyond a reasonable doubt. Most people don't get time-stamped tamper-evident consent first, so (assuming no signs of physical abuse) there's frequently not enough evidence to conclude anything.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    98. Re:Students + Anonimity by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      What do you say is different? It used to be that almost any form of everyday sex between a male and female (or two males or two females, or more than two people) could be rape (except that many states had laws saying that a husband forcing sex on his wife wasn't rape). Nothing has changed.

      Moreover, people can remember things inaccurately. If a woman has been drinking, finds she's had sex with a man she didn't know, and thinks she'd never have sex with the guy normally, she can likely remember reasons why she didn't really consent, while the guy can likely remember things taken for consent.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    99. Re:Students + Anonimity by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      The accused is likely to ask difficult questions? The defense attorney is nearly required to attempt to slut-shame the victim. After all, if the jury thinks it's reasonable that it might have been consensual, the guy gets off. Therefore, if the defense can come up with evidence that the victim wasn't lily-pure, that helps the defendant, and it's the job of the defense attorney to do whatever it takes to get the defendant acquitted.

      The only way I can think to change this would be to transform criminal trials from the confrontational try-and-prove-I-did-it to something more investigatorial.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    100. Re:Students + Anonimity by sd4f · · Score: 1

      I suppose, while not ideal, that's how it should be, and largely is. No doubt why many rape allegations go nowhere.

    101. Re:Students + Anonimity by swb · · Score: 1

      I think the fear aspect is hard to over state, especially if a threat of violence is made and especially if the threat of violence is actually demonstrated with even the slightest show of *actual* violence coupled with an obvious power imbalence, like a larger, stronger man grabbing a woman by the neck.

      I don't remember where I read it or even if it is actually true, but I have read that women's vaginas respond physically to accomodate intercourse even when they don't want it, some kind of leftover (well, leftover in a modern sense) mechanism to protect them from serious injury from forced intercourse.

      If that's true, then the enitre response pattern I hypothesized about the woman I originally posted about makes sense and is believable.

    102. Re:Students + Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys are assholes then, because looking at arrests and not convictions is a pretty terrible way to judge guilt. Cops can arrest someone based on personal grudges, but it's a lot harder to get convictions based on those. Arrests based on false accusations are also much more prevalent than convictions.

  2. How can anyone think this is possibly a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sure, you'll get the guilty guys, and you'll probably get 500 innocent guys along with them, guys whose only crime happened to be not calling two days later, or guys who cheated on their girlfriends, or guys who were drunk, confident, and too creepy (read: not good looking enough) to be allowed to ask a girl out.

    Hey I have an idea, if we kill all the Muslims in the world, we'll really cut down on that suicide bombing.

  3. Betteridge's law of headlines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No.

  4. This won't end well by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

    If you thought swatting was bad, just wait until this one gets going.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    1. Re:This won't end well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess it depends on how mature and responsible college students are... so yeah, I agree with you!

    2. Re:This won't end well by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I guess it depends on how mature and responsible college students are... so yeah, I agree with you!

      We've forced them to be extended children, so they come out of High school with the maturity of 14 year old's of say 40 years ago. So they are sowing their wild oats in college a bit more than they used to. So with a combination of legitimate reports, vendetta and rejection reports, and simple pranks, this is a system built to fail.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  5. stakes have never been higher by nimbius · · Score: 4, Funny

    some argue that having the ability to report someone with just the click of a button may not be a good thing.

    No, you dont understand. This is the internet, but more importantly, its 4chan. I want you to envision a storm of millions of reports, hundreds of millions even, of the same perpetrator, Mooty McMootykins. He stands 21 inches tall and shoots cookies from his arse. The student attends $university and is majoring in hitler-did-nothing-wrong. Students should beware of a man dressed as a watermelon who propositions victims with "Has Anyone Really Been Far Even as Decided to Use Even Go Want to do Look More Like?" Students have reported that mcmootykins cannot be stopped because you cannot flim flam the zim zam. he also evades approach because you cant corner the dorner. each report ends confirming the students suspicion that the perpetrator suffers from gender ptsd caused by his planetkin alignment and inability to remove kebab.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:stakes have never been higher by asdfj · · Score: 0

      it's*

    2. Re:stakes have never been higher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      inb4v&

    3. Re:stakes have never been higher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > no baneposting reference

      You're on my list anon

    4. Re:stakes have never been higher by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      Not your personal army.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  6. giving the anti-male witch hunt more ammo by mix_left_and_right · · Score: 1

    this can only end well

    1. Re:giving the anti-male witch hunt more ammo by dave420 · · Score: 1

      Grow up. You sound worse than the feminazis.

    2. Re:giving the anti-male witch hunt more ammo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grow some irony detector.

    3. Re:giving the anti-male witch hunt more ammo by mix_left_and_right · · Score: 1

      I was not being ironic

  7. Here's what I don't get by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The way the whole campus rape thing is handled seems idiotic to me. Why is sexual assault an issue for colleges or universities to handle? IMHO, it should be a police matter. If a student reports that they were sexually assaulted to a college or university, the college or university should have to report it to the local authorities, instead of being handled internally.

    The most common reason I hear for not doing this is that the victim doesn't want their assailant to go to prison. Why? So they can continue raping other people? Chances are the victim isn't the rapists first victim, or if they were, they won't be the last. Suspending a rapist from school or making them transfer does not protect other people.

    The other problem I have with having colleges or universities handle this problem is that I've heard of several instances where there wasn't due diligence in fact finding, and there was a presumption of guilt against the alleged assailant. Let the justice system handle what the justice system was created for. Colleges & universities should stick to educating people and doing research, not adjudicating serious crimes.

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    1. Re:Here's what I don't get by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Colleges want students to feel like they are protecting them, that's why they have campus security. Students are consumers, they have a choice of where to go to college, and providing security is part of the offer.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Here's what I don't get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the college or university should have to report it to the local authorities, instead of being handled internally
      The normal boring reason. Money.

      It is about spin and making sure you do not become 'the rape college'. If you get that stigma you enrollment drops quite quickly. So it is 'handled internally'.

      The people who pay multi-million dollar endowments suddenly withdraw support. So the admin makes sure it is covered up or hushed up in some way. No need for it the hit the papers or 11oclock news. Then if they cannot cover it up those very same people may have leverage now. Sure would be a shame if this report from the 70s about how you abused that poor poor girl were to come to light. So they can put pressure on the police to 'let the college handle it'.

      Just money and greed. That is it. Not 'lets do the right thing'. Just money. Like most political organs.

    3. Re:Here's what I don't get by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      Providing their own rent-a-cops is one thing. Performing their own investigations of major crimes is entirely another.

    4. Re:Here's what I don't get by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      For some colleges, relying on local police instead of campus security would be a huge negative. The college I went to was in a bad neighborhood, but our campus was pretty safe. Generally, you could walk around the campus at night without any problem. Walk two feet off campus, though, and I couldn't guarantee your safety. The local police might have had a hand in this, but I doubt they kept only the college safe. More likely, it was campus security providing focused protection (of a kind that the surrounding area didn't have) and calling in the police where needed.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    5. Re:Here's what I don't get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Three reasons: 1) many universities have a police department 2) Universities are taking a lot of heat for fostering an environment that allows this. 3) There's still a measure of "en loco parentis" thought in higher education, though the legal backing (never statutory, merely in jurisprudence) pretty much crumbled in the 60's and early 70's.

      Anonymous tips have always been a useful tool for law enforcement, and have always been abused. There should not be a categorical rejection of this system, nor an assumption that all reports will be accurate. However, good analysis may help substantially. If a name comes up more than once months before that person is accused of rape, there may be reasonable suspicion. However, if one name gets reported a dozen or hundred times coincident with a rape accusation, there's reason to assume brigading. A name that shows up 2000 times? Well, could be trolling, and it could be an attempt to mask a signal.

    6. Re:Here's what I don't get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have all heard the 1 in 5 or 20% number. By now almost everyone should know that its a bogus number. Larger, well designed studies have the number closer to 1.5% for actual rape.

      College AGE girls are the second most likely demographic to be raped. Those girls that are IN COLLEGE are half as likely to be raped as those not in college.

      One interesting study found as many as 206 false claims of attempted rape ("I was almost raped") for every substantiated one.

      And here is the kicker, some believe that the 1.5% number may be inflated by a factor of 2 when you filter out consensual but later regretted sex.

    7. Re:Here's what I don't get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are correct. Campus security can/should be the the first stop for the victim, but the case should be forwarded to the local police for investigation. That said, campus security could appoint an advocate for the victim, making sure the case is taken seriously, possibly offering additional background on the suspect or situation.

    8. Re:Here's what I don't get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those details do not support the narrative, they most certainly must be wrong.

    9. Re:Here's what I don't get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the accused is also a student, he or she should also obtain a advocate to make sure accusation are base on facts, and also offering background on the accuser to his or her defence lawyer. This is about justice. It's only fair.

    10. Re:Here's what I don't get by Livius · · Score: 1

      Universities are private property; the have duties to their staff, their customers, and to people who take up residence there.

      But they can find a role assisting law enforcement instead of being in their way.

    11. Re:Here's what I don't get by ameoba · · Score: 1

      The universities that I went to had campus police, not just rent-a-cops. Real cops with real badges & real guns.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    12. Re: Here's what I don't get by jmac_the_man · · Score: 1
      Apparently a lot of states have a division of their state police that provides police services at state schools. Being the state police, they're sworn law enforcement officers (a.k.a. real cops.) But they're only at state schools, not private schools in the state. (My buddy went to a SUNY school, and the police were NY state troopers. I went to a private school upstate, and we had "Campus Safety" (pretend cops) but if you needed a real cop, you called the local police department (county sherrifs, because the town is too small for a dedicated police department.)

      The school encouraged everyone to go through Campus Safety rather than the cops, which is bullshit and should be illegal, but if the school had real cops, people would presumably call the real cops.

    13. Re:Here's what I don't get by david_thornley · · Score: 2

      I've seen that claimed before. Before I believe anything, I'd like to see the methodology. This strikes me as one of those things where you can prove almost anything by looking at the right numbers and making the right assumptions.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  8. Re:How can anyone think this is possibly a good id by Aerokii · · Score: 0

    This would hold more weight if it had any basis in fact whatsoever. Men actually have a much higher chance of BEING sexually assaulted than being falsely accused of it.

  9. Depends how you define "rape". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    As I understand it US Universities define rape as "lightly brushed up against me whilst dancing at a party". So this won't help with that, no.

    1. Re: Depends how you define "rape". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You don't have to touch to rape on campus now. Look up "stare rape" sometime. I wish it was a joke, but it's really a 'thing'.

    2. Re:Depends how you define "rape". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's worse than that. Simply glancing at a woman is rape, according to Academia.

    3. Re: Depends how you define "rape". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fart rape is real
      Asking a [female] to coffee on an elevator is tantamount to rape
      Asking an accuser questions about the above is 'question rape'
      I'm not being factious

    4. Re: Depends how you define "rape". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I kid you not, there was a girl where I used to teach who tried to get another student expelled for CALLING her. Yeah, this kid got her phone number somehow and called her and so princess and her parents showed up at the principal's office demanding he be expelled for it. They even threatened to go to the police.

      When the principal questioned her, she admitted that he was just asking her about some homework or some shit. But she said that, when she thought about it later, it creeped her out that he got her number and called her. Thank god the principal was fucking sane in this case. The unwitting creep was not punished and princess and her helicopter mommy and daddy were told to return to their castle.

      This is the country we live in.

  10. Listen and believe by Iamthecheese · · Score: 1

    Ignorance is strength.

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
  11. but why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    the insanely inflated rape "statistics" made up by feminists have been debunked a million times, the reality is that students getting raped is very rare and less than the average for the general population

    and repeat offenders? if it is rape and police gets involved they tend to put people in jail for long time

  12. Students + Anonimity = some false accusations by NotDrWho · · Score: 1

    I was thinking the same thing. Is there a way to report a false accusation too? Because I see a lot of innocent people having their lives destroyed by this. A rape or sex offender accusation today is like being labeled a witch in medieval Europe. It's straight to the gallows with you, innocent or not!

    --
    SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    1. Re:Students + Anonimity = some false accusations by jythie · · Score: 0

      I see far more people getting raped and not believed then I see people being falsely accused, and this is coming from someone who has had people close to me in both categories.

      The vast majority of the time, accusations are turned back on the accuser. There are occasional examples of the accusation ruining the accused, but most of the time people (including officers) assume the accusation is 'probably false' and treat the victim accordingly. Get raped, and generally one will be treated like they deserved it, or are making it up, or are just having regrets, or are simply trying to 'take advantage' of some innocent man.

    2. Re:Students + Anonimity = some false accusations by Needs2BeSaid · · Score: 1

      Have you ever reported something stolen to the police.... they treat you like you're a criminal. It's what they do... in EVERY crime, not just rapes. They first blame you. I'd hate to have my wife go missing... the media and the police would automatically assume I had something to do with it.

      --
      Some things need to be said...
    3. Re:Students + Anonimity = some false accusations by NotDrWho · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Get raped, and generally one will be treated like they deserved it, or are making it up, or are just having regrets, or are simply trying to 'take advantage' of some innocent man.

      You know, I keep HEARING that claim. But I don't think I've ever once seen any actual evidence of it (not in recent decades, anyway). When a rape victim walks into a police station today saying "I've been raped," I'm pretty damned sure they don't immediately take her to an interrogation room and start accusing her of making it up. AFAIK the SOP in just about any police station is to quickly get her story, get to her a hospital for a rape kit, and then arrest the accused if there is sufficient evidence of the crime. Many police stations and hospitals even have rape counselors who show up now and assist the victim. The standard presumption initially is to believe the accuser, particularly if there is physical evidence to back up the crime.

      It's only later in the process that good police officers (ones not being spurred on by grandstanding prosecutors) will follow up with a more thorough examination of the evidence. And then, yes, they will ask more detailed questions of both the accuser and accused--and possibly even question their stories. Because that's THEIR JOB, to not take accusations or denials at face value and to look at the evidence, question witnesses, etc.

      --
      SJW's don't eliminate discrimination. They just expropriate it for themselves.
    4. Re:Students + Anonimity = some false accusations by Gramie2 · · Score: 1

      Your opinion would have more weight if it were not for the massive backlog of rape kits. Police departments seem to have no interest in clearing the backlogs.

    5. Re:Students + Anonimity = some false accusations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I guarantee you that 99.9% of those are from cold cases where the victim or prosecutor either never did any followup or dropped the case. If that weren't the case then every prosecutor and media outlet in the country would be raising holy hell every time they had to announce that they couldn't prosecute a rape case "because the crime lab won't send us the results."

    6. Re:Students + Anonimity = some false accusations by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I see far more people getting raped and not believed then I see people being falsely accused, and this is coming from someone who has had people close to me in both categories.

      The incidence and severity of the crime of rape does not excuse the life destroying impact of a false accusation.

      Both are bad. Neither should happen. It's correct to attempt to prevent both, and to draw attention to something that makes either become more likely.

      The vast majority of the time, accusations are turned back on the accuser. There are occasional examples of the accusation ruining the accused, but most of the time people (including officers) assume the accusation is 'probably false' and treat the victim accordingly. Get raped, and generally one will be treated like they deserved it, or are making it up, or are just having regrets, or are simply trying to 'take advantage' of some innocent man.

      In the UK the formal (and I believe primary informal) response of the police is to treat the accusation seriously and treat the complainant as a victim of a serious crime.

      On the flipside, a woman can now legally withdraw consent given while intoxicated after the event. So a man can technically be found guilty of rape after a woman has a glass of wine, walks up to his comatose body, pulls down his trousers and sits on his cock, if she wakes up the next morning and decides she doesn't like the Facebook post mentioning this.

      When the law is that fucking insane people need protecting from it, and protection from false accusation is very much necessary.

    7. Re:Students + Anonimity = some false accusations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That site is not at all authoritative. Half a dozen fonts and sizes screaming for attention while all the links go back on itself or similar sites. Not once was there any definitive source, proof, or even credible claim. No data, no paper trail, nothing but words. I went there believing what you said. I left shaking my head.

  13. Better by Hevel-Varik · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Girls don't hang out with drunk men. Men don't hang out with drunk women. The standard behavior on a university campus invites sexual misbehavior. Mod me into oblivion.

    1. Re:Better by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      And what happens when a sober woman hangs out with a sober man who overpowers her? Not all rape cases are alcohol related.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    2. Re:Better by Hevel-Varik · · Score: 1

      Well, yes, a woman should not hang out in private with a man, that she is not intimate with, if she wants to be completely safe. That makes sense. Don't know what happened with Kobe Bryant, but do you thing it was wise for that lady to go into a hotel room with him, with no expectation of intimacy. It's a dangerous world, the best way to navigate it is through wise behavior. It really is that simple.

    3. Re:Better by Hevel-Varik · · Score: 1

      I am certain you make a great deal of sense to yourself.

    4. Re:Better by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

      For those, there's the real police department. They can do things the campus police department can't do -- like "send someone to jail", or "be responsible for applying the due process guarantees that our constitution insists we provide to everyone (including accused and/or actual rapists)".

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    5. Re:Better by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

      So if a woman is friends with a man, they can't hang out in private ever? And if the man decides that he wants more - and to force that "more" on her - then it's the woman's fault for hanging out with him without others around?

      On the flip side, does this mean that women should regard all men as sexual predators? As a man, I'm offended by that.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    6. Re:Better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what happens when a sober woman hangs out with a sober man who overpowers her?

      An AC gets a boner?

    7. Re:Better by Hevel-Varik · · Score: 1

      I hear you. Not all men, certainly not, but some men, yes, so the woman has to use judgement, if her judgement is good, she's more likely to avoid problems, if it's not, she less likely. And yes, if she does not hang out with men in private, she isn't intimate with here chances of being raped decline precipitously. Fault is not binary and I'm thinking you know that already (here's where I insert a set of analogies that are either obvious or straw-men, so I'll spare you :) A woman can do what she whatever she wants, but there are associated risks.
       

    8. Re:Better by neminem · · Score: 1

      Fun fact: if it's nonconsentual, it's still rape even if it's your wife. Wait, actually by fun I meant "totally the opposite of fun", sorry about that.

    9. Re:Better by jsepeta · · Score: 1

      because a man never raped another man?

      --
      Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
    10. Re:Better by Hevel-Varik · · Score: 1

      I award you hevel-varik points. That is a very special comment. It's not just special cause you are special.

    11. Re:Better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >do you thing it was wise for that lady to go into a hotel room with him, with no expectation of intimacy

      Perhaps she went in wanting intimacy but changes her mind after the fact?

      > It's a dangerous world

      It is not a dangerous world. Not in the US part of the world.

      I was raped... by a family member. Best not to be around any family members either.

      I am baffled why someone would treat every potential man as a rapist... Most men don't rape.

    12. Re:Better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seemed to work for a thousand or more years. Ladies don't let drunk men sleep on their couches. Ladies don't get plastered in public and go home with stoners or drunks. Girls don't bring men into their dorm rooms.

      Women should regard all men as potential sexual predators and treat them as such, which means don't be alone with them in situation which can get out of their control.

  14. Re:How can anyone think this is possibly a good id by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... too creepy (read: not rich enough)

    FTFY.

  15. How Did We Get Here? by tiberus · · Score: 1

    While I strongly believe this is a Bad Idea(tm) of epic proportions with a list of unintended consequences that seemingly has no end, after my initial visceral reaction, I am left to wonder. What led anyone, or group of anyone's, to think this was the answer? Even assuming we are all Good People(tm), do they believe someone will report an incident just because they can do some anonymously? Okay, so we'll put their potential targets on notice but, the report isn't really actionable. The attacker will still be at large and free to prey on someone else.

    Anonymous reporting simply seems to be the wrong direction. What about actually changing how we treat and support the victims?

    1. Re:How Did We Get Here? by ckatko · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Rape culture" isn't really about solving any problems. It's about generating fear to generate money and votes.

      Rape rates have been falling drastically since the 70's.
      http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_ZlRN...

      Rape rates on colleges are LOWER than outside of college:
      http://upload.wikimedia.org/wi...

      And rape rates in some other 1st-world countries are HUGELY higher--but nobody here cares apparently:
      http://upload.wikimedia.org/wi...

      But none of these facts comply with the myth of the "oppressive white male" who thinks he can rape and take whatever he wants.

      Nobody disagrees with the idea that rape is a bad thing. But people are willing to hijack that axiom to create hysteria and generate political power.

    2. Re:How Did We Get Here? by Flavianoep · · Score: 1

      And rape rates in some other 1st-world countries are HUGELY higher--but nobody here cares apparently: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wi...

      The numbers may say so, but they comprise only official data. In more advanced countries, the case must be that less rapes go unreported, so the figures may be closer to reality, while not so in the US. Consider the Japan rates, which are among the lowest, while having a strong culture of sexual harassment, (it's the same culture that created things like RapeLay): http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.1525/as.2007.47.5.811?uid=3737664&uid=2&uid=4&sid=21106029734881; http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1373&context=jil;http://ijo.sagepub.com/content/45/3/278.short.

      --
      Linux is for people who don't mind RTFM.
    3. Re:How Did We Get Here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      coming from America, the same place that created Rambo.

    4. Re:How Did We Get Here? by RyoShin · · Score: 1

      Rape rates on colleges are LOWER than outside of college:

      I think this feeds back into it, actually.

      Consider a medium-sized city where there are fender-benders and mild accidents every day for years. In this case, no one really pays them heed, because it's accepted as a part of life.

      Now imagine the same city, which has miraculously gone years without so much as a fender-bender. Then, one day, a light collision occurs, which doesn't even require a trip to the auto-body shop (which is good, because by this point all of those shops have closed), but because it's so freakishly rare it's huge news. Newspapers and radio stations are running lengthy pieces devoted to it, and editorials are exclaiming "How could this happen?!" Politicians/community leaders and making promises left and right for how they'll stop a fender-bender from ever happening again. There's extreme focus on this situation, where someone in NYC wouldn't even bother to glance if it were to happen there.

      And so it happens in this case. As the rate of rapes on campuses continue to fall, each instance (or at least claim) gets more attention, both because of rarity in part because there are more resources available for said attention. The more attention each individual instance gets, the larger the call for someone to do something, and the larger the call the heavier the response. It's some weird inverse of conflict escalation ("If we wear bullet proof vests they'll get hollow-point bullets, if we use thick shields they'll get grenades", etc.)

      That said, I do agree with your cynicism. Because of the above, it gives those who would use bad situations to increase their own power/position/money a nice target, someone they can vilify without repercussions even if the accused is found to be completely innocent.

      (For those about to lash out, please know that I'm not saying rape is on the same severity level as a fender bender; that was merely a car-related example--as is /. tradition--of how the frequency of an event can inversely affect the proportion of the response.)

  16. Re:How can anyone think this is possibly a good id by operagost · · Score: 1

    Except when this extra-judicial kind of accusation takes place, the accused normally gets a Kafkaesque review process, devoid of actual evidence other than the original claim, that usually ends up either with an expulsion or sanctions imposed to such a degree that the student is forced to leave.

    In other words, it's not really on the record and the HuffingPaintPost is getting useless data.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  17. Re:How can anyone think this is possibly a good id by jythie · · Score: 0

    The more likely case is for every 500 guilty you will sweep up a handful of innocent. While the image of the false accuser is a powerful image in the public imagination, they are pretty rare and it is much more common for a victim to be pushed into dropping things due to the shame and harassment they get in their life.

  18. Re:How can anyone think this is possibly a good id by jythie · · Score: 1

    The problem is, too many people get their idea of how accusations pan out from MRA blogs then victims networks or even actual research. If even a tiny percentage of men have their lives ruined by women with false accusations it gets blown up in the only type of case that matters, thus women are assumed to be lying sluts unless they prove otherwise over and over and over, and even then they will be treated like they were 'probably' lying for the rest of their lives because 'so many cases of this happen!'. Even worse, many police and judges buy into this image too...

  19. Serious things treated seriously and w/ dignity by WillAdams · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There needs to absolutely be a mechanism in place for a woman to:

      - safely be transported to a hospital in a fashion which maintains chain of evidence
      - be examined by a sympathetic, but impartial medical professional using a rape kit to collect evidence
      - make a formal statement, and if it includes an accusation, that to be duly sworn out in a reasonable fashion

    There needs to be in place mechanisms for the hospital, police and other social structures to take the above seriously. If there aren't, that needs to change.

    --
    Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    1. Re:Serious things treated seriously and w/ dignity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      like an ambulance and any hospital anywhere ?

    2. Re:Serious things treated seriously and w/ dignity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There needs to absolutely be a mechanism in place for a woman to:

      - safely be transported to a hospital in a fashion which maintains chain of evidence - be examined by a sympathetic, but impartial medical professional using a rape kit to collect evidence - make a formal statement, and if it includes an accusation, that to be duly sworn out in a reasonable fashion

      There needs to be in place mechanisms for the hospital, police and other social structures to take the above seriously. If there aren't, that needs to change.

      None of this help prove rape. At best it can prove sex. Rape will always be difficult to prove because it is one claim against a other. No amount of women privileged added will make any of this more just. It's only getting worst.

    3. Re:Serious things treated seriously and w/ dignity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Similarly, there needs to be standards of of evidence and due process for the accused, including the right to confront witnesses against, a default of innocent until proven guilty even if the crimes are heinous, and prosecution for making false allegations.

      That we disregard these standards nearly exclusively for rape is a miscarriage of justice.

    4. Re:Serious things treated seriously and w/ dignity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There needs to absolutely be a mechanism in place for a woman to:

      What about men, are they not human too?

    5. Re:Serious things treated seriously and w/ dignity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, if you don't know her well enough to be able to trust her to not claim rape, why are you in there?

  20. "This student is a potential rapist" by karlandtanya · · Score: 1

    When I was in college oh so many years ago, this was a problem; guess it's still going on now.

    Anyhow, some student activists (turned out to be just a couple of students with access to a photocopier and a stapler) put up posters around campus. The posters had a photo of a guy with prison bars clipart overlaid and the subject tagline below. Whether the photo was actually of a student currently enrolled was never revealed.

    Their argument was "he has a penis. therefore he is a *potential* rapist. no lie; no libel". Another point that was brought up was at that time rape was legally defined as sticking a penis into a woman without her permission. So, legally only men could rape, only women could be raped. That's actually been changed in the intervening years. To answer the objection that "It may not be libel in court, but you're still causing harm" their position was that "We are promoting a social good by 'raising awareness' about rape on campus.". After a week or so the signs were gone and didn't come back.

    I don't recall if they were officially forced to stop or they just figured out they had subverted a conversation about rape into one about free speech and harassment.

    Either way, they *did* raise some sort of awareness, but not the kind they wanted to. Unless they were just trying to get the law changed. Still didn't stop the raping apparently.

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  21. Re:How can anyone think this is possibly a good id by Aerokii · · Score: 1

    Speaking of "not on the record", most rapes aren't reported which means this statistic is much higher, and contrary to your complaint, it does not "usually" end up in expulsion. We're looking at less than a third of cases ending in expulsion, and this is data for only those who are found "guilty". Suspension's a bit more likely, but I REALLY don't think it's a great idea to keep someone who has been found guilty of sexual assault on campus.

  22. Re:How can anyone think this is possibly a good id by Aerokii · · Score: 1

    YES! Thank you! It's like no one actually bothers doing research any more, and just goes to whatever blog/news site best fits their current world view, no matter how far from reality it may be.

  23. Email anger management by quax · · Score: 1

    'We're all guilty of pressing send on an angry text or email that, had we had to put it into an actual letter and proofread, we probably wouldn't have sent,'

    Ah, lawyers, thinking since they represent the highest infallibility standard, they can speak for all humanity?

    Did you ever sent an inappropriately angry email or text? I don't recall that I ever had that problem.

    1. Re: Email anger management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because YOU haven't doesn't mean other people haven't posted ANGRILY SHOUTED COMMENTS, you ASSHOLE. Of course, I never have.

  24. I think it's a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Bennett Hasleton raped me.

  25. Re:How can anyone think this is possibly a good id by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's better to let hundreds of guilty go free than for a single innocent person to be falsely convicted.

    fuck anyone who says differently.

  26. "Offenders" by ShaunC · · Score: 1

    Studies have shown that as many as 90 percent of campus rapes are committed by repeat offenders.

    Do those studies take into account so-called victims who make multiple false reports of rape and sexual assault? Do those studies take into account imaginary offenders? Do those studies tally up "offenders" like "Haven Monahan" who exist only in the mind of their demented accusers?

    But some argue that having the ability to report someone with just the click of a button may not be a good thing.

    You're damned right. I understand that rapes and sexual assaults do take place, but we've seen a number of verified false reports over the past year. It's bad enough that a woman can file a false police report and ruin someone's reputation or even send him to jail; the ability to do it at the click of a button is simply absurd.

    --
    Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
  27. Terrible idea by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

    Campus rapes? You mean like the one that occurred at the University of Virginia? Except that it never occurred. And the press is still treating the accuser like she is some sort of victim when the real victims are the young men that were falsely accused. If i were one of those guys I would be suing that devious bitch to high heaven.

    It's just too easy to make false accusations without any real consequences. I could see this sort of system very easily used as revenge or blackmail.

  28. Why don't female students shame rapists? by jsepeta · · Score: 1

    I'd think that social media would give women more ability to take a stand against their rapists, outing them for criminal, immoral, and reckless behavior.

    --
    Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
  29. Call The Real Police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is a Crime that is a Felony off Campus handled like cheating on a test?
    Do Universities handle Murder or Armed Robbery this way?
    Are they Sentenced to Campus Jail?

    Turn it over to the real police. This is not an Angie's list problem.

    1. Re:Call The Real Police by hypergreatthing · · Score: 1

      You can thank obama:
      from an article online " Title IX, the federal law that protects against discrimination in education. Schools are legally required by that law to address sexual harassment and violence on campus, and these activists filed complaints with the federal government about what they describe as lax enforcement by schools. The current administration has taken up the causeâ"the Chronicle of Higher Education describes it as âoea marquee issue for the Obama administrationââ"and praised these young women for spurring political action. âoeA new generation of student activists is effectively pressing for change,â read a statement this spring announcing new policies to address campus violence. The Department of Education has drafted new rules to address womenâ(TM)s safety, some of which have been enshrined into law by Congress, with more legislation likely on the way."

    2. Re:Call The Real Police by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Schools are legally required by that law to address sexual harassment and violence on campus

      Then they should do something to address the harassment of male students, including violence threatened and perpetrated if they dare to suggest a "Men's rights" group on campus.

  30. A Couple Friends by rally2xs · · Score: 2

    Ladies always taking a couple friends along when venturing out will solve this. Their names are Mr. Smith and Mr. Wesson.

    It has been proven over and over that citizens carrying the means of self defense greatly deters violent attack against them. The fatal flaw in this is the "defenseless victim" being present. Eliminate the defenseless victim by allowing her some effective defense. Only firearms are effective in all situations. Some a-hole hopped up on PCP won't even notice pepper spray. Tasers fail if the perpetrator is wearing heavy clothing like a parka. Only a firearm is capable of 100% effective defense.

    1. Re:A Couple Friends by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Some a-hole hopped up on PCP won't even notice pepper spray.

      It had better be a pretty big handgun, maybe something like this, otherwise they likely would just shake it off if they are on PCP.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    2. Re:A Couple Friends by asdfj · · Score: 0

      Wow, washpo really is a throwaway rag these days, effect/affect error in the very last sentence? Where have all the English-speaking editors gone?

    3. Re:A Couple Friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, you don't "shake off" a double tap to the center of mass and one to the head. The instant loss of blood pressure is incapacitating in all situations.

    4. Re:A Couple Friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As we all know, getting shot twice in the abdomen and once in the head, causes all your blood to immediately leave your body.

    5. Re:A Couple Friends by rally2xs · · Score: 1

      Yeah, pretty much, it dramatically lowers blood pressure pretty much immediately and unconsciousness results.

    6. Re:A Couple Friends by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      You assume that people are a good shot, especially in a crisis situation. Hell a lot of people can barely hit the paper 21 feet in a controlled environment like a shooting range. Also even a clean shot to the vitals with a high powered rifle isn't guaranteed to drop someone. As evidence I offer every deer I have ever shot, all through the heart, heart + one lung, or both lungs, none tipped over dead and while they didn't run much they still ran. Granted the farthest I ever had to track one was about 40 meters and the blood trail has always been like someone dumped a bucket of red paint on the ground but they all still ran. By high powered rifle I mean one that shoots 203gr soft point boat tail 7.62x54r ammunition that leaves a silver dollar sized exit wound and destroys any soft tissue in the general vicinity of the wound channel from cavitation.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    7. Re:A Couple Friends by rally2xs · · Score: 1

      You rarely know someone is a rapist until they grab you. Then, if possible, you draw your weapon, reach behind you, stick the gun in his ribs and blast away. If you can get some distance between you and him, its still not likely to be far enough for a marksmanship challenge, although people _do_ miss in some amazingly simple shooting situations.

    8. Re:A Couple Friends by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Even in your scenario I'm guessing a lot of those wounds would be non fatal as they would be to what ever was closest to the muzzle of the gun, likely a gut shot or between the lungs if it is square in the middle of the chest. The assailant would be bleeding like a stuck pig but it probably wouldn't be instant death or even guaranteed death. This isn't to say I am against having responsible law abiding citizens armed, just don't think that it is be all end all of personal safety. Also another thing to keep in mind is an attacker can take your firearm, or they may have their own. Being aware of your surroundings is probably more important for your personal safety than having a firearm.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    9. Re:A Couple Friends by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Aside from the fact that I've seen all sorts of things proven, all across the spectrum, there's a serious question here. Should the woman shoot any man within ten feet, or wait until the guy grabs her and pins her so she can't reach her handgun? I guarantee that, if you're standing there within ten feet and you don't have a weapon pointed at me, I can close to grappling range before you can do anything effective, and I'm basically an elderly non-violent guy with slow reflexes and no fighting training.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  31. let me explain my strategy by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Don't drink and do carry a taser and pepper spray. Who thinks my strategy is more effective?

    1. Re:let me explain my strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      effective at being boring ? Yes.

    2. Re:let me explain my strategy by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Because a violent attacker with greater strength and size could never remove those items from you and use them against you.

      No, I think I'd prefer alternate strategies.

    3. Re:let me explain my strategy by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      My taser looks like a flashlight. That's because it is a flashlight. Good luck identifying it or knowing it's in my pocket. And no, they couldn't likely take 2 items off opposite sides of my body at the same time nor know that they were there.

  32. Society over-reacts to sex claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your going to claim rape you better be able to 1. prove it with actual evidence 2. the accused should be sentenced appropriately

    We're taking these things out of proportion. I've been held against my will many many times throughout my life. Just recently I was held against my will when my partner was stopped for speeding (he wasn't and we later verified that). Ultimately you get over it. Sex should be no different. Yes- your psychologist will tell you the world is ending and you'll never get over it. However if you stop putting up with that bullshit you might just get over it eventually.

    I'm not for-violence. I thing its horrible that people would force you to do something against your will. The problem is the state does it all the time and its a far worse atrocity than rape. With the state there is no hope of getting out of it. It's totally illogical, unfair, and for most of us there is literally nothing we can do about it. At least with a rapist you know it'll be over and chances are won't even remember it.

    If you don't want to get "raped" stop inviting rapists over. If we're talking about a situation where that isn't the case and it's a family member. The problem is largely solvable by by enabling victims to exit such situations via external means of support. That would actually be a beneficial thing for the state to do rather than go after people who more often than not haven't done anything wrong.

    If you try and get people to come out and say they've been raped more people will come out and say it. That doesn't make it true.

  33. By Neruos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No technology system can stop or prevent what the human mind wants to do, period.
    Change the mind not the environment.
    At best any system, technical, legal, social can do is provide justice and closer, nothing more.

    This is how humanity works, plain and simple, get used to it.

  34. liability for authors of misused apps? by peter303 · · Score: 2

    If someone loses their employment becasue this app is misused to punish someone, is the author liable? Common carriers are generally immune to the content passed through them. ISPs are partially immune. But DRM, drug trades, underage porn without due dilligence can get them in trouble. But what about software authors?

  35. there are "consent apps" now by peter303 · · Score: 1

    At least show both parties are conscious and not unwilling. But I ma not sure how to avoid falsifying consent, say of a stoned person. This app probably just kicks the stone sone the road a little.

  36. law called Titlte IX forces internal ivestigation by peter303 · · Score: 1

    I dislike the two-sytem status quo too.

  37. Here's a better idea: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guys: Stop sticking your dick in crazy. It's fucking stupid and you're going to get accused of rape.

    Girls: Stop drinking until you lack the ability to "give consent". It's fucking stupid and you're going to have regretful sex.

  38. So what if they do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    http://www.nydailynews.com/new...

    So some guy gets his life ruined by a conspiracy to file false allegations. It's not like the conspirators will be charged with any crime - that might discourage future "victims" (invented or otherwise) from coming forward, right? So why not grant total anonymity to the consipirators with an app like this so that even the *idea* of justice for false-accusation conspirators can never come up?

    This disgusting witch hunt needs to end. Feminism 3.0 must die.

    1. Re:So what if they do? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      So why not grant total anonymity to the consipirators with an app like this

      You might want to RTFA. There is no "total anonymity". It is hidden from public view, but the accuser is still asked to leave contact info. If there are multiple credible accusations about the same perp, from people that are willing to identify themselves, then the police are contacted.

      This app prevents the victim from having to go public with accusations, and prevents the perp from being publicly accused before a credible case has been established. So your concerns seem completely backwards.

      If "Jackie" had used this website instead of going to Rolling Stone, her false accusations would have gone nowhere.

    2. Re:So what if they do? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      If "Jackie" had gone to the cops, which is what they're there for, there wouldn't have been a problem. She wanted a media shit show, and she got it.

  39. You are all missing the REAL point here !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just another form of witch hunt.

    It will spread into society like a fast-growing cancer. If you are misguided enough to use social networking you can already see it manifested in the form of "groupthink" in which a few busybody people go to great lengths to persuade others to disapprove of people who hold dissenting opinions. To say this is insidious is an understatement. It facilitates passive-aggressive behavior on a level which was once only seen on a small level in places like small towns, but which can now be manifested on a much larger scale. If stuff like this is not reason enough for you to question the wisdom of participating in ANY social networking situation, you need to think about it some more.

  40. The only solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem with the feminist view is that they see every man as a potential rapist when in fact most men aren't. By their very own arguments (mentioned previously), a rapist is responsible for 6 assaults before he gets caught. That's not 6 men, but sic assaults by the same man. Most men successfully suppress urges to rape everyday with great success -- if they have any urges at all -- and that's what programs like this ignore.

    The simple solution is to make sex illegal with the exception of married couples. That limits the number of rapes to only those that are married because anyone engaging in sex before marriage is breaking the law. Before anyone goes on about how ludicrous this idea is, I don't believe that humans are so base as to not be able to resist their urges. Date rape is the result of a promiscuous culture that values instant gratification.

    If you can't live without sex for a while, you're doing it wrong.

  41. Why not call the police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't understand how rape is considered something for a university to deal with - shouldn't the police be involved, or is there something magical when it happens on campus?

  42. Re:How can anyone think this is possibly a good id by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    "Even worse, many police and judges buy into this image too." This would fall under the category of false accusation.

  43. Actual effective way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a problem with rapes at my local university. They DO follow patterns and they are most definitely the same few repeat offenders, and the offenders are most likely not students.

    Best way - set them up. Find some brave reasonably-attractive female cops or highly-trained security people with martial-arts background. Dress them up to look like grad students doing late-night lab work (most common rape victims). Walk around in dark areas at 1AM.

    It will only be a matter of time before you catch the perps this way.

  44. Re:How can anyone think this is possibly a good id by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    most rapes aren't reported

    There it is, the most idiotic phrase I've seen all week. If you are confused as to why your statement is nonsensical, try slapping yourself in the face until your brain starts working.

  45. The question is.... by Simulant · · Score: 1

    Why are rapists getting the chance to be repeat offenders and what can we do about that?
    Rapists, especially of minors, deserve the worst our criminal justice system can dish out, more so than your run of the mill murderer, IMO.

    1. Re:The question is.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the study that showed something like that was done on old students. And did not measured on campus assaults, but assaults during lifetime instead.

      Also, note that "sexual assault" is defined pretty loosely in some studies - any unwanted physical contact can count as assault in some of them. Which is fine as long as people do not try to pretend results talk about rape level of crime. There is huge difference between the two.

  46. Re:How can anyone think this is possibly a good id by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're a fucking idiot. The "study" says that 20%-40% of men are raped, then says "Well, as long as fewer than 40% of men are falsely accused of rape, there's no problem, right!?!??!"

    Go fuck yourself and your stupid agenda.

  47. Studies have NOT shown that about 90% of rapes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Studies have shown that as many as 90 percent of campus rapes are committed by repeat offenders.

    They did not. One study made on highly untypical students - older doing after work college - shown that those who committed sexual assault often did more of them. That is not the same "studies" and it does not says all that much about younger (average) students. It says that it might be worth looking at that issues, but studies that would look at that issue on general college students were not done yet.

    Also, be careful because different studies define "sexual assault" differently. Sometimes it needs to be actual crime or involve violence, other times unexpected kiss unwanted at the moment from boyfriend counts as assault too. So, unless you specify how you mean the word, it can mean anything.

  48. Proceed carefully by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One has to be careful: I had a nasty breakup, and my ex-GF claimed that I had chased her to the point of near harassment before we started going out. A bunch of her female friends (in sympathy I must believe) stepped forward and claimed I had done the same to them.

    Lucky for me the entire one-on-one initial interaction with my ex-GF took place over SMS, after we had exchanged phone numbers at the party where we met. All messages were still in my smartphone starting with her inviting me out for drinks, then her asking me on that first date if she could stay at my place since she was in between places having just finished school in one town and moving to another.

    This part was enough to disprove her claims to our mutual friends. We then moved to the other girls, which all but one happened to be acquaintances I had never really talked to, so the now-on-my-side friends asked them to name the time and place where we had had a conversation beyond "good day/how's it going/hi". They couldn't name one.

    The last person I had made an advance on exactly once: I asked her out for a drink. She said no and I never contacted her again. She admitted as much and that was that.

    So in the end there were no bad consequences from those lies, but if things hadn't been so clear cut and with so much evidence at hand I could have been in real trouble.

    I know there are a ton of girls who are genuinely harassed and deserve all the support they can get. All I'm saying is: don't rush to judgement.

  49. Re: How can anyone think this is possibly a good i by Aerokii · · Score: 1

    I gave your suggestion a shot, and as it turns out the only nonsensical thing here is that you think anyone will listen to you, believe you, or give a shit what you think when you post something like this without any evidence, logic, or basis in fact. In the future, try posting some actual data if you want to not look like a complete tool.

    Long story short, you're not very good at this. Drink Coke, Play Again.

  50. Re:How can anyone think this is possibly a good id by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Careful not to get that strawman too close to an open flame, the whole thread might go up...

    The parent post never makes the claim that it's not a problem. What IS suggested is that false accusations are less prevalent than men being raped, which itself does not get enough attention in part because so many still believe that men cannot be raped (or at least, not by women.) These are all problems, and all these things ruin lives... but based on numbers alone, more resources should go towards preventing rape, and the default assumption should not be "tthe woman is lying", as seems to be so common among police, judges, and forum commenterrs.

  51. Do you have the same attitudes about prison rape? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you have the same attitudes about prison rape?

    Based on the culture, statistics, and prevalence of late-night jokes, prison rape (mostly male-on-male) is completely normalized.

    Should we provide protective custody (real=expensive and difficult), anonymity, high-quality legal, medical and psychiatric support, and most importantly a presumption of truth to those who allege they have been raped in prison? Sexually assaulted? Threatened?

    Perhaps you would be willing to fight the culture and spend all the money needed to do this. But I doubt it, because the costs would probably increase spending on incarceration 2-10 times what we already deficit spend.

    Prison rape victims are, in general, far more vulnerable than female victims in society at large. Do you have the same concern and empathy for those prisoners who have been raped?

  52. Re:How can anyone think this is possibly a good id by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not a strawman, you idiot.

  53. Re:How can anyone think this is possibly a good id by Aerokii · · Score: 1

    "STRAW MAN. 1 : a weak or imaginary opposition (as an argument or adversary) set up only to be easily confuted."

    Funny, because no one in this comment line has made the argument that false reports don't happen/aren't important. That would make the position suggested imaginary and easily confuted, because we ourselves would argue against those not mattering. As a result, it fits the definition so perfectly that were it any more obvious, it would be used to scare crows.

  54. It's not anonymous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you read the project's site projectcallisto.org there is nothing that states the system allows anonymous reporting. Rather, it seems to require identification of the user to submit an official report/name a person who has committed assault.

  55. I need this source by beastofburdon · · Score: 1

    Do you know the source for those numbers? This could be very useful in future debates.