I love reading ACITSJW posts. Starts, fills and ends with ad hominem and indirect self-aggrandizement against someone who at least has a posting history to check out.
Better to be fully honest. If a felon, a prospective employer will check that. When checking, the misdemeanors will appear. Unmentioned, it could look like trying to hide the garnish.
"if it weren't for vaccinations we would have already had a flu epidemic on the scale of the 1918 Spanish flu." An example of the hyperbole being pointed out.
This undoubtedly refers to the insurance carried, what it covers and so forth. Those are medical records. It's not referring to MRI scans and detailed physical information.
Please. We *can* measure the sides of a triangle and affirm the Pythagorean Theorem. With Drake's, you have literally no hope of filling in the variables. At best one could call it an equation to come up with the answer you want to come up with.
I'm unconcerned about that particular "if" because it simply isn't going to happen in our lifetimes. Let's start pondering the needs once they reach the level of communicating and understanding on the level of say a ten year old human child.
First you'll have to prove humans have them. It makes no sense at all that suddenly in evolution, with the appearance of our species, souls sprang into being.
Seriously yourself. There was an experiment done by a college grad - meaning it was probably for a paper and not actually necessary - in which the front paws of baby mice were cut off to determine if this affected their grooming habits. Ethics board approved. What friggin' moron who had *ever* watched a mouse groom itself couldn't have given the answer?
Indeed there is someone home. That someone however, cannot and will never be able to grasp the structure of our society and the laws within it. So, no personhood. Treating them with kindness doesn't mean extending them human rights.
It's *all* anecdote. Why are her's less valuable? That central idea, research and sense of perspective you talk about is "tech guys don't like gals", "I'll craft my questions and cull the answers" and "there, I've proven my incoming bias".
So 56/44 isn't "roughly" 60/40? In a graph. Take that chart, reverse the colors and tell me truthfully if that wouldn't raise a hue and cry about discrimination.
I'm hoping by "trolling" you simply meant feeding her info. Grace is actually a pretty good example of a princess. Have you told her that England's queen was a mechanic and refused to leave London during the blitz because it would be demoralizing to her country folk?
Slashdot Mirror
"I have taken nothing from the creator." Incorrect, you have taken their right to decide distribution. That's what copyright is about.
Pedantry in both directions.
I love reading ACITSJW posts. Starts, fills and ends with ad hominem and indirect self-aggrandizement against someone who at least has a posting history to check out.
Absolutely false. I've used several that were honest and straight up.
Better to be fully honest. If a felon, a prospective employer will check that. When checking, the misdemeanors will appear. Unmentioned, it could look like trying to hide the garnish.
Unless you've got a Sugar Daddy shoveling money into the organization, you absolutely must make money to pay your bills and feed your staff.
Working better will do even more.
Does the law actually prohibit your installing an alternative? If not, all you need is the line and an account, not any consumption.
It's not so much that they've forgotten things, it's more that they don't want to accept that it's their fault, not someone or something else.
"if it weren't for vaccinations we would have already had a flu epidemic on the scale of the 1918 Spanish flu." An example of the hyperbole being pointed out.
*All* government is bloated. Reducing bloat is non-partisan and not anti-scientific.
He didn't say that at all, don't project. If anything, he said hold *all* departments accountable.
Step one, disarm public. Steps two through n, tell them what to do.
This undoubtedly refers to the insurance carried, what it covers and so forth. Those are medical records. It's not referring to MRI scans and detailed physical information.
Your last sentence is no more based on reality than someone insisting we can't be. Neither of you have anything to base it on.
I'm thinking that didn't work out all that well for the Krell.
Please. We *can* measure the sides of a triangle and affirm the Pythagorean Theorem. With Drake's, you have literally no hope of filling in the variables. At best one could call it an equation to come up with the answer you want to come up with.
I'm unconcerned about that particular "if" because it simply isn't going to happen in our lifetimes. Let's start pondering the needs once they reach the level of communicating and understanding on the level of say a ten year old human child.
First you'll have to prove humans have them. It makes no sense at all that suddenly in evolution, with the appearance of our species, souls sprang into being.
Seriously yourself. There was an experiment done by a college grad - meaning it was probably for a paper and not actually necessary - in which the front paws of baby mice were cut off to determine if this affected their grooming habits. Ethics board approved. What friggin' moron who had *ever* watched a mouse groom itself couldn't have given the answer?
Indeed there is someone home. That someone however, cannot and will never be able to grasp the structure of our society and the laws within it. So, no personhood. Treating them with kindness doesn't mean extending them human rights.
There is no spoon. It's the question that's at fault.
It's *all* anecdote. Why are her's less valuable? That central idea, research and sense of perspective you talk about is "tech guys don't like gals", "I'll craft my questions and cull the answers" and "there, I've proven my incoming bias".
So 56/44 isn't "roughly" 60/40? In a graph. Take that chart, reverse the colors and tell me truthfully if that wouldn't raise a hue and cry about discrimination.
I'm hoping by "trolling" you simply meant feeding her info. Grace is actually a pretty good example of a princess. Have you told her that England's queen was a mechanic and refused to leave London during the blitz because it would be demoralizing to her country folk?