What is the latest Android phone and what is GoogleOS? There are many phones out there, many of which run a version of Android. Your statement is like saying that a mac with OSX is better than the latest PC with an OS on it. Meaningless and simple.
So turning off networking completely (or giving it a disconnected IP) and rebooting my macbook pro 11 times will make it so I cannot log into the laptop? That I had not heard about, and it sounds like pure gibberish. Since you aren't willing to test your hypothesis you deserve the accuracy that your query yields.
The laws preventing local ISPs/community ISP's and competition are rampant in the US. Therefore competition is stymied from the onset. Remove those barriers to competition and then what you are asking is valid.
"the framers did not foresee a future where we would be constantly under threat of non-state actors wishing to do us harm"
Exactly how much liberty has to be given up to stop all terrorism? (since you're playing stupid absolutist games). Can you stop threats from occurring if you give up every single liberty we have? The answer is no. If you worked with any of the departments protecting us from evil, you would know the best anyone can do is make their presence known and hope that it makes it easier for them to go elsewhere.
They hand that warrant out. It isn't generalized, it covers thousands or tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands per warrant. But you know to make us safer from those that would seek to harm us.
You are saying that since IM and Video are private affairs you trust them to the largest network to protect your privacy? Maybe you should spend the time to figure out why you are making a bad decision by trusting skype to protect your privacy. Signal is open source. You don't need to trust much but the code. Have you viewed the code for Skype?
IT Directors and CIO/CTO's look at Skype as a threat to data/privacy and corporate security. It is not installed by default, in Windows, so your suggestion that it is BY FAR the dominant program is wholly meaningless. For corporate users, Microsoft has many more paid Lync subscribers. Skype is mostly geared to and used by consumers. Those consumers are switching to Whats App, or webRTC apps from Google or Facebook chat or many other competitors. MS has not grown the Skype user base.
It is ego driven for him to say Win 10 is a turd in a punchbowl and that he won't touch anything from Microsoft any more? He was self aware enough to comment that it was only a big deal to him. Ego is you throwing your hat in the ring with with sophomoric drivel.
People who can't afford to care for their children properly, shouldn't be able to breed as their offspring become a burden on society. The only answer is controlled breeding, Your logic is the same as those who justified eugenics.
The artificial scarcity here is not ADVANTAGING ANYONE. That is a big distinction. There is no bank to manipulate or be manipulated. The BTC from here to the very last one mined are able to be mined at a known rate. When they are mined, the currency functions without any scarcity. The only alternative here would be to have all bitcoin already in the wild. That wouldn't work. How would you solve the equation?
I know many people who mine. Only one of them has a libertarian appreciation. As for stealing to get bitcoin. Well that is hardly different when people hack ATM's, or steal peoples banking info online. But because people are criminal when it comes to bitcoin obviously people are fools to trust the system?
The banking industry in this world generates a vastly larger carbon footprint. Not to mention all of the other evils they inflict on the world. Too big to fail should be too big to exist.
Who do you think we learned the tactic from? You might not realize this but Soviet Russia had to justify their surveillance state to the people. It has and always will be under the guise of a foreign threat. We are simply doing to American Citizens exactly what we used as rhetoric to claim Russia was the evil empire. The very politicians we have today in office should all easily remember the 80's.
It is censorship the moment they decide to what you should or shouldn't be shown. In fact, the defense you offer of this being able to be turned off means you receive censored information at all times, unless you asked to have it unfiltered. Even if you are censoring yourself it is censorship.
If you didn't have three kids, who would you be using this filter for? Is it because you are afraid you will find porn by searching accidentally for bukkake? What other parts of your parenting and self preservation do you want to hand off to an ISP?
Why should Google waste their developer time on an adversarial prick of a company with less than 2%, and dive bombing mobile platform? Remember scroogled, fairsearch.org and the android tax? What would google benefit by bringing their apps to help out Win Mobile?
If the band is willing to sell the ticket for $30 so their fans can enjoy their show, then certainly the fan deserves that ticket for $30. If a bully was willing to punch the music fan in the gut and steal his ticket, by your simplistic logic, the fan, doesn't deserve the ticket. So let's extrapolate.
So the music fan gets gut punched and has his ticket stolen. He then gets up kills the gut puncher and can go to the show, and deserves to go because he wanted it more.
leaked data is always heavily politicized. Choices are made to publish the material. That in itself is a political act. Not controlling the information supplied to them, doesn't make them pro republican because they happen to get leaked data making a democrat look bad.
The regular population doesn't realize she is a crook. To the unwashed masses anything about their candidate is propaganda by the competing party to make them look bad, it "isn't a thing".
It isn't so much as wanting interference of a foreign body, it is about wanting the corruption to come to light. If Hillary hasn't done anything wrong, then she shouldn't have anything to fear and hide. Would you be less bothered if this was occurring to Trump perhaps? Personally if it happens to Obama, Trump or any politician, who has been behaving less than morally and arguably in direct violation of the Constitution it would be good for the country. The sooner people see that criminals in highest levels of the political spectrum are held unaccountable the better. People need to understand a criminal in your party of preference is no better than a criminal in the party you oppose. Let them be held accountable as the criminals they have become.
I was being sarcastic, and failed at it... To put it more directly: Root for the outcome not the company. Personally I side with Google in this, like I sided with IBM in IBM v SCO. I still wonder if there is a Ballmer connection in the back rooms to encourage these actions and put FUD back into open source, only this time against Android. However they already lost the battle, MS has no phone/mobile OS. But that too is just greed, which I believe is the single entity which motivates Oracle.
Slashdot Mirror
Yes UEFI is a blatant attempt by Microsoft to make Windows and PC's more open.
It sounds to me like you are suggesting strict gun controls do not eliminate violent and or gun related crime. Perhaps you missed his subtle intent.
What is the latest Android phone and what is GoogleOS? There are many phones out there, many of which run a version of Android. Your statement is like saying that a mac with OSX is better than the latest PC with an OS on it. Meaningless and simple.
So turning off networking completely (or giving it a disconnected IP) and rebooting my macbook pro 11 times will make it so I cannot log into the laptop? That I had not heard about, and it sounds like pure gibberish. Since you aren't willing to test your hypothesis you deserve the accuracy that your query yields.
The laws preventing local ISPs/community ISP's and competition are rampant in the US. Therefore competition is stymied from the onset. Remove those barriers to competition and then what you are asking is valid.
Doesn't DVI actually support DRM mostly as well?
"the framers did not foresee a future where we would be constantly under threat of non-state actors wishing to do us harm"
Exactly how much liberty has to be given up to stop all terrorism? (since you're playing stupid absolutist games). Can you stop threats from occurring if you give up every single liberty we have? The answer is no. If you worked with any of the departments protecting us from evil, you would know the best anyone can do is make their presence known and hope that it makes it easier for them to go elsewhere.
They hand that warrant out. It isn't generalized, it covers thousands or tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands per warrant. But you know to make us safer from those that would seek to harm us.
You are saying that since IM and Video are private affairs you trust them to the largest network to protect your privacy? Maybe you should spend the time to figure out why you are making a bad decision by trusting skype to protect your privacy. Signal is open source. You don't need to trust much but the code. Have you viewed the code for Skype?
IT Directors and CIO/CTO's look at Skype as a threat to data/privacy and corporate security. It is not installed by default, in Windows, so your suggestion that it is BY FAR the dominant program is wholly meaningless. For corporate users, Microsoft has many more paid Lync subscribers. Skype is mostly geared to and used by consumers. Those consumers are switching to Whats App, or webRTC apps from Google or Facebook chat or many other competitors. MS has not grown the Skype user base.
It is ego driven for him to say Win 10 is a turd in a punchbowl and that he won't touch anything from Microsoft any more? He was self aware enough to comment that it was only a big deal to him. Ego is you throwing your hat in the ring with with sophomoric drivel.
People who can't afford to care for their children properly, shouldn't be able to breed as their offspring become a burden on society. The only answer is controlled breeding, Your logic is the same as those who justified eugenics.
The artificial scarcity here is not ADVANTAGING ANYONE. That is a big distinction. There is no bank to manipulate or be manipulated. The BTC from here to the very last one mined are able to be mined at a known rate. When they are mined, the currency functions without any scarcity. The only alternative here would be to have all bitcoin already in the wild. That wouldn't work. How would you solve the equation?
I know many people who mine. Only one of them has a libertarian appreciation. As for stealing to get bitcoin. Well that is hardly different when people hack ATM's, or steal peoples banking info online. But because people are criminal when it comes to bitcoin obviously people are fools to trust the system?
The banking industry in this world generates a vastly larger carbon footprint. Not to mention all of the other evils they inflict on the world. Too big to fail should be too big to exist.
Who do you think we learned the tactic from? You might not realize this but Soviet Russia had to justify their surveillance state to the people. It has and always will be under the guise of a foreign threat. We are simply doing to American Citizens exactly what we used as rhetoric to claim Russia was the evil empire. The very politicians we have today in office should all easily remember the 80's.
It is censorship the moment they decide to what you should or shouldn't be shown. In fact, the defense you offer of this being able to be turned off means you receive censored information at all times, unless you asked to have it unfiltered. Even if you are censoring yourself it is censorship.
If you didn't have three kids, who would you be using this filter for? Is it because you are afraid you will find porn by searching accidentally for bukkake? What other parts of your parenting and self preservation do you want to hand off to an ISP?
Microsoft only moved the spyware to the OS level to make Edge faster in testing.
Why should Google waste their developer time on an adversarial prick of a company with less than 2%, and dive bombing mobile platform? Remember scroogled, fairsearch.org and the android tax? What would google benefit by bringing their apps to help out Win Mobile?
It looks like you should be building your own OS that suits your precise needs. You could monetize it as you see fit since it is yours.
If the band is willing to sell the ticket for $30 so their fans can enjoy their show, then certainly the fan deserves that ticket for $30. If a bully was willing to punch the music fan in the gut and steal his ticket, by your simplistic logic, the fan, doesn't deserve the ticket. So let's extrapolate.
So the music fan gets gut punched and has his ticket stolen. He then gets up kills the gut puncher and can go to the show, and deserves to go because he wanted it more.
leaked data is always heavily politicized. Choices are made to publish the material. That in itself is a political act. Not controlling the information supplied to them, doesn't make them pro republican because they happen to get leaked data making a democrat look bad.
The regular population doesn't realize she is a crook. To the unwashed masses anything about their candidate is propaganda by the competing party to make them look bad, it "isn't a thing".
People want to be lied to.
Thank you for sharing.
It isn't so much as wanting interference of a foreign body, it is about wanting the corruption to come to light. If Hillary hasn't done anything wrong, then she shouldn't have anything to fear and hide. Would you be less bothered if this was occurring to Trump perhaps? Personally if it happens to Obama, Trump or any politician, who has been behaving less than morally and arguably in direct violation of the Constitution it would be good for the country. The sooner people see that criminals in highest levels of the political spectrum are held unaccountable the better. People need to understand a criminal in your party of preference is no better than a criminal in the party you oppose. Let them be held accountable as the criminals they have become.
I was being sarcastic, and failed at it... To put it more directly: Root for the outcome not the company. Personally I side with Google in this, like I sided with IBM in IBM v SCO. I still wonder if there is a Ballmer connection in the back rooms to encourage these actions and put FUD back into open source, only this time against Android. However they already lost the battle, MS has no phone/mobile OS. But that too is just greed, which I believe is the single entity which motivates Oracle.
Yes... Hillary Clinton clearly fights the slings and arrows of corporate influence to be a protector of us citizens from copyright extension.