The things that went wrong weren't on the technical or software side, so there's nothing to discuss there. They made 1 complete and functional game and were working on an MMO. The money and management ARE the "what went wrong."
Are you trying to say R-Type, which came out in 1987 in the arcade, was the model that Elite, which came out in 1984 for a home computer, had to compete with?
Awesome. I'm totally down with that. Can I play that file on my android phone or tablet or other third party boxes? Oh? No? Then I don't own it and I don't want any part of the whole affair.
Housing and condo boards will also be total assholes about this. I've had them browbeat me about satellite dishes even after showing evidence that there's a federal law that says they can't tell me how many dishes I'm allowed to have (I had 2). All they care about is that every house looks the same and their devotion to local housing politics pays off in the form of pushing people around.
There seems to be a lot of crossover between "whimsi-geek" and "useless executive desk toys" but whatever makes you happy. I'd rather get an arduino or another raspberry pi or something.
"And therefore they can be herded into giving up their freedom by a combination of convenient features, pressure from institutions and the network effect." Or, perhaps, they judged what they want and what they are giving up and chose something of their own accord because they don't care about the same things in their computing experience that RMS does. Crazy, I know.
Sadly, most most locks are easily opened by "bumping," (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lock_bumping) which is something any casual thief can do, and which is discussed in one of the books. I wish it got more time in the review.
To me this looks like the 3D printing version of an " X but on a phone" patent. Using a break-away scaffolding on a solid object is a classic part of casting.
I read the whole review where the Atom N570 fared extremely poorly in comparison for more power draw. Nothing in that review supports anything you are saying. And I don't see any links to any Haswell demos in any of your quotes.
If you can find me anything showing equivalent performance per watt on the Intel side, please link it. I would be interested in seeing it.
I was thinking of EXACTLY that review, where they mention all it needs is a lower clock speed. As opposed to the much slower atom used there, which has a higher consumption, or the apparently equal performing atom used in the test above which has a 35W draw AT IDLE with chipset. The Exynos 5 chromebook as a whole system including display has a draw of just over 11W when running a benchmark.
So no, the Atom isn't even close on power draw, and clocking it down will not make it work in a phone.
What the hell? Maybe if the Atom was operating in the same power margins. The whole point is the arm is using way less power, hence why you can see it in phones.
Slashdot Mirror
Maybe my copy of 1984 was defective? Where did it cover voluntary donation of tracking data while at an amusement park?
The things that went wrong weren't on the technical or software side, so there's nothing to discuss there. They made 1 complete and functional game and were working on an MMO. The money and management ARE the "what went wrong."
Are you trying to say R-Type, which came out in 1987 in the arcade, was the model that Elite, which came out in 1984 for a home computer, had to compete with?
So it's just like any other CEO's public inbox, then?
Awesome. I'm totally down with that. Can I play that file on my android phone or tablet or other third party boxes? Oh? No? Then I don't own it and I don't want any part of the whole affair.
Really? "Stifle descent?" You couldn't have corrected that to something that makes sense?
So you don't have any competent Windows administrators? That's all I got out of this.
Housing and condo boards will also be total assholes about this. I've had them browbeat me about satellite dishes even after showing evidence that there's a federal law that says they can't tell me how many dishes I'm allowed to have (I had 2). All they care about is that every house looks the same and their devotion to local housing politics pays off in the form of pushing people around.
There seems to be a lot of crossover between "whimsi-geek" and "useless executive desk toys" but whatever makes you happy. I'd rather get an arduino or another raspberry pi or something.
Yes, because we should put people in jail based on wether we like them or not.
"And therefore they can be herded into giving up their freedom by a combination of convenient features, pressure from institutions and the network effect." Or, perhaps, they judged what they want and what they are giving up and chose something of their own accord because they don't care about the same things in their computing experience that RMS does. Crazy, I know.
Sadly, most most locks are easily opened by "bumping," (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lock_bumping) which is something any casual thief can do, and which is discussed in one of the books. I wish it got more time in the review.
Oh. That sounds pretty valid. My bad.
To me this looks like the 3D printing version of an " X but on a phone" patent. Using a break-away scaffolding on a solid object is a classic part of casting.
There is not. Chrome OS is literally that: an OS that runs a browser and only the apps that work inside of it.
Find me the Atom chip that has more performance per watt. Go ahead.
I read the whole review where the Atom N570 fared extremely poorly in comparison for more power draw. Nothing in that review supports anything you are saying. And I don't see any links to any Haswell demos in any of your quotes. If you can find me anything showing equivalent performance per watt on the Intel side, please link it. I would be interested in seeing it.
I was thinking of EXACTLY that review, where they mention all it needs is a lower clock speed. As opposed to the much slower atom used there, which has a higher consumption, or the apparently equal performing atom used in the test above which has a 35W draw AT IDLE with chipset. The Exynos 5 chromebook as a whole system including display has a draw of just over 11W when running a benchmark. So no, the Atom isn't even close on power draw, and clocking it down will not make it work in a phone.
What the hell? Maybe if the Atom was operating in the same power margins. The whole point is the arm is using way less power, hence why you can see it in phones.
They do compare it to an Intel Atom based netbox, which is the desktop form factor of your "regular Intel CPU based netbook."
Reading the blog is sounds like he is on the lam with his 20 year old girlfriend and has left the 17 year old one at the house.
A lot of people still have Power-based IBM workstations and servers, too. AIX is still alive and...sort of...well on them.
Same experience here. That's a good thing.
I was talking specifically of his list of other alternatives.
So we can vote the right way! How will I know who to vote for if I don't know who everyone else is voting for?