Smart cards based around Sun's proprietary Java technology have been around for a while. Its good to see smart cards being made now based around the open standard (ISO/IEC 23270, 23271, 23272).NET techonlogy.
As chief information minister for Intel Corporation, let me assure you we will destroy the AMD infidels! The Opteron is like a snake which is going to be cut into pieces. The force that was in the airport.. this force is destroyed. Let the AMD bastards bask in their illusion, we have given them a sour taste. We have them surrounded.
Today the victorious Iraqi forces stormed the White House and arrested the tyrant war criminal Bush. Now we have apprehended the leader of the international criminal gang of bastards, we will be sure to bring him to trial for his war crimes.
The imperialist U.S. and British forces are like a snake that slithers all over the place but that doesn't control anything! Do not believe the lies, my friend! They are lying every day. They are lying always, and mainly they are lying to their public opinion.
Do not believe the lies my friend. There is only one man for this job. Make no mistake, when I am made Minister of the Information Society the blood of the spammers will flow like wine. Our low price septic tanks will be full of the corpses of the armies of slaughtered spammers. We shall strike them down like the dogs they are. They are superpower of villains. They are superpower of Al Capone. And we shall destroy them.
Re:Building a mod inside a level editor...
on
NYT on Game Mods
·
· Score: 1
Only THING, LINEDEFS, SIDEDEFS, VERTEXES, and SECTORS. The rest are generated by the BSP builder.
Re:Building a mod inside a level editor...
on
NYT on Game Mods
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
BSP building is a very tricky business, and rather processor intensive. Infact BSP building is complicated to the extent that its really a project in itself (bear in mind you dont have to build just the tree, but other data like the REJECT and BLOCKMAP data as well). There are already great tools for building the Doom BSP information.
The "standard" way to build levels is just to generate a WAD without the data and run it through one of the many existing BSP calculators. No offence, but it seems rather pointless to reinvent the wheel. (Plus, as much as I love Ruby, it might be a bit slow for this purpose..)
Re:Building a mod inside a level editor...
on
NYT on Game Mods
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
Its been done for Doom at least. SLIGE is a tool of the Zionist American pigs for generating random levels.
Re:Building a mod inside a level editor...
on
NYT on Game Mods
·
· Score: 4, Informative
Take a look at WadC, a scripting language for building Doom levels, you filthy infidel.
I've heard this breaks a lot of spam-catching tools which check if the mail was sent from an invalid domain, as all IPs in these invalid domains now resolve.
Never have so many companies fought so hard to change the law so that they can so quickly be put out of business.
Back in July, a number of filesharing companies (Blubster, Grokster, BearShare, eDonkey 2000 and LimeWire - Kazaa being conspiculously absent) formed a trade association (P2PUnited - website coming soon, apparently), to push for, among other things, compulsory licensing, as noted in this New York Post article (File-Share Firms Hire a Lobbyist). I wonder how much they have really thought this through. After all, a compulsory license that legimitized filesharing would quickly put most of these companies out of business.
The Death of Gnutella
Why do most of these companies even exist? One very simple reason: the courts put Napster out of business. Napster was an extremely elegant solution for filesharing. It acted as a massive centralized database that allowed downloaders to easily find the uploaders with the files they wanted. By comparison, decentralized P2P networks, such as those based on the Gnutella protocol, are clunky and have serious issues with scalability, search efficiency and bandwidth use. Although services based upon the Gnutella protocol have gotten better, adopting strategies such as "supernodes", they remain hampered in their efficiency by their very reason for being: avoiding contributory and vicarious copyright liability (at which they have been successful, so far - though the farther they push for efficiency and control, the more shaky the legal ground they stand on, see, Decentralization, Gnutella and Bad Actors).
However, if filesharing becomes legal through a compulsory license, what is the purpose of the Gnutella-based software anymore? Napster's liability was based on theories of contributory and vicarious liability, which requires an underlying copyright violation. To the extent that filesharing is no longer copyright infringement, Napster could no longer be held liable. Since the Napster solution is far more efficient, particularly for searches, why would anyone use a Gnutella (or any decentralized P2P) network anymore? Virtually anything a Gnutella network can do can be implemented in a Napster-like network as well. Sure, current interfaces are better than Napster's, but they could easily be ported from a Gnutella client to a Napster-like one.
All that effort, all that clever programming optimizing the Gnutella protocol, gone in a flash of compulsory licensing. Sure Gnutella will still be around, but what will it be used for? Why will so much effort be devoted to develop and optimize it? Gnutella will be, as far as I can see, a dead end technology, at least for filesharing.
There Will Be Only One
So what, you say? Of course all these companies will swiftly shift to a Napster-like network when the law is passed. Absolutely! However, it is very likely that all but one of these companies will soon go out of business. The reason is that, like the auction market eBay, there is reason to believe that very strong network effects occur in the filesharing market. After all, in the auction market, sellers go to where the buyers are and buyers go where the sellars are. If you attract more buyers, you will attract more sellers, which then attracts more buyers, and so on in a positive feedback loop. Such network effects should operate similarly in the filesharing market, though most people will be buyers and only inadvertantly sellers. For example, if I am looking for an obscure track, I will go to the filesharing service with the most participants, since I will have the greatest chance of finding what I am looking for. Therefore, once one filesharing service clearly distinguishes itself in popularity from the others, it will take off and its competitors quickly wither away.
True, there is nothing that would prevent people from participating in several filesharing services at once, but there is little that keeps people from posting listings on multiple auction sites either. People will most likely experiment with a few services at fi
ATI provide proprietary drivers for X that give 2D acceleration. They give technical information to third party developers to help them write 3D drivers.
BSD zealots are quick to deny the "death" of BSD
nowadays by pointing to the existence of OS X, which has supposedly
given BSD "thousands" of users. Infact this is a myth propagated by Apple,
eager to tout the "Industrial Strength Unix Foundations" of their
new "Darwin" OS.
The kernel of Darwin is not the BSD kernel, but rather the Mach kernel,
Infact, the
core of Darwin is of a totally different design to BSD, being of an
elegant microkernel structure rather than the monolithic
structure that BSD still retains. It is strange that Apple
would choose to tout that their OS is based on 4.4BSD, which even
by BSD standards is obsolete by over 10 years.
Darwin includes totally rewritten filesystem and network support and
does not use the BSD code here either. Infact, BSD code is only used
in the OS
as a "skin" to wrap the underlying OS in order to provide a virtual
Unix-like environment, in much the same way as Cygwin wraps Windows.
Higher up in userland, adapted versions of the BSD tools are used
for the Unix command line, an odd choice, considering
the GNU
utilities are superior. Files are kept in odd places
and in many cases manpages are
out of date. Many basic system services such as user authentication
are provided by Apple's own proprietary system rather than the
traditional Unix methods. In general, the OS X command line is a lackluster
and messy ordeal, and certainly radically unlike any BSD system.
Slashdot Mirror
Ext4 enters kernel tree, while Reiser4 enters JAIL!
Smart cards based around Sun's proprietary Java technology have been around for a while. Its good to see smart cards being made now based around the open standard (ISO/IEC 23270, 23271, 23272) .NET techonlogy.
As chief information minister for Intel Corporation, let me assure you we will destroy the AMD infidels! The Opteron is like a snake which is going to be cut into pieces. The force that was in the airport.. this force is destroyed. Let the AMD bastards bask in their illusion, we have given them a sour taste. We have them surrounded.
FC is based on 10 generations of RedHat releasesSurely thats a reason NOT to use it :-)
Do you intend to license your patented use of the bold font tag under the GPL as well?
WAP is the sound your WAP-enabled phone makes when you throw it in the trashcan!
Dont touch those phones! It is a zionist trick! They are actually bombs!
Actually, Mono includes a VB .NET compiler, so you might be right.
car hack you!
Today the victorious Iraqi forces stormed the White House and arrested the tyrant war criminal Bush. Now we have apprehended the leader of the international criminal gang of bastards, we will be sure to bring him to trial for his war crimes.
The imperialist U.S. and British forces are like a snake that slithers all over the place but that doesn't control anything! Do not believe the lies, my friend! They are lying every day. They are lying always, and mainly they are lying to their public opinion.
I shall give you the gift of bullets and shoes!!
Do not believe the lies my friend. There is only one man for this job. Make no mistake, when I am made Minister of the Information Society the blood of the spammers will flow like wine. Our low price septic tanks will be full of the corpses of the armies of slaughtered spammers. We shall strike them down like the dogs they are. They are superpower of villains. They are superpower of Al Capone. And we shall destroy them.
Only THING, LINEDEFS, SIDEDEFS, VERTEXES, and SECTORS. The rest are generated by the BSP builder.
The "standard" way to build levels is just to generate a WAD without the data and run it through one of the many existing BSP calculators. No offence, but it seems rather pointless to reinvent the wheel. (Plus, as much as I love Ruby, it might be a bit slow for this purpose..)
Its been done for Doom at least. SLIGE is a tool of the Zionist American pigs for generating random levels.
Take a look at WadC, a scripting language for building Doom levels, you filthy infidel.
Isnt he the guy responsible for the muppets?
SOY comes from Thailand. They obviously forgot: SOY makes you strong! Strength crushes puny locked car doors!
I've heard this breaks a lot of spam-catching tools which check if the mail was sent from an invalid domain, as all IPs in these invalid domains now resolve.
Never have so many companies fought so hard to change the law so that they can so quickly be put out of business.
Back in July, a number of filesharing companies (Blubster, Grokster, BearShare, eDonkey 2000 and LimeWire - Kazaa being conspiculously absent) formed a trade association (P2PUnited - website coming soon, apparently), to push for, among other things, compulsory licensing, as noted in this New York Post article (File-Share Firms Hire a Lobbyist). I wonder how much they have really thought this through. After all, a compulsory license that legimitized filesharing would quickly put most of these companies out of business.
The Death of Gnutella
Why do most of these companies even exist? One very simple reason: the courts put Napster out of business. Napster was an extremely elegant solution for filesharing. It acted as a massive centralized database that allowed downloaders to easily find the uploaders with the files they wanted. By comparison, decentralized P2P networks, such as those based on the Gnutella protocol, are clunky and have serious issues with scalability, search efficiency and bandwidth use. Although services based upon the Gnutella protocol have gotten better, adopting strategies such as "supernodes", they remain hampered in their efficiency by their very reason for being: avoiding contributory and vicarious copyright liability (at which they have been successful, so far - though the farther they push for efficiency and control, the more shaky the legal ground they stand on, see, Decentralization, Gnutella and Bad Actors).
However, if filesharing becomes legal through a compulsory license, what is the purpose of the Gnutella-based software anymore? Napster's liability was based on theories of contributory and vicarious liability, which requires an underlying copyright violation. To the extent that filesharing is no longer copyright infringement, Napster could no longer be held liable. Since the Napster solution is far more efficient, particularly for searches, why would anyone use a Gnutella (or any decentralized P2P) network anymore? Virtually anything a Gnutella network can do can be implemented in a Napster-like network as well. Sure, current interfaces are better than Napster's, but they could easily be ported from a Gnutella client to a Napster-like one.
All that effort, all that clever programming optimizing the Gnutella protocol, gone in a flash of compulsory licensing. Sure Gnutella will still be around, but what will it be used for? Why will so much effort be devoted to develop and optimize it? Gnutella will be, as far as I can see, a dead end technology, at least for filesharing.
There Will Be Only One
So what, you say? Of course all these companies will swiftly shift to a Napster-like network when the law is passed. Absolutely! However, it is very likely that all but one of these companies will soon go out of business. The reason is that, like the auction market eBay, there is reason to believe that very strong network effects occur in the filesharing market. After all, in the auction market, sellers go to where the buyers are and buyers go where the sellars are. If you attract more buyers, you will attract more sellers, which then attracts more buyers, and so on in a positive feedback loop. Such network effects should operate similarly in the filesharing market, though most people will be buyers and only inadvertantly sellers. For example, if I am looking for an obscure track, I will go to the filesharing service with the most participants, since I will have the greatest chance of finding what I am looking for. Therefore, once one filesharing service clearly distinguishes itself in popularity from the others, it will take off and its competitors quickly wither away.
True, there is nothing that would prevent people from participating in several filesharing services at once, but there is little that keeps people from posting listings on multiple auction sites either. People will most likely experiment with a few services at fi
Its Xouvert, not Xoutert.
ATI provide proprietary drivers for X that give 2D acceleration. They give technical information to third party developers to help them write 3D drivers.
The kernel of Darwin is not the BSD kernel, but rather the Mach kernel, Infact, the core of Darwin is of a totally different design to BSD, being of an elegant microkernel structure rather than the monolithic structure that BSD still retains. It is strange that Apple would choose to tout that their OS is based on 4.4BSD, which even by BSD standards is obsolete by over 10 years.
Darwin includes totally rewritten filesystem and network support and does not use the BSD code here either. Infact, BSD code is only used in the OS as a "skin" to wrap the underlying OS in order to provide a virtual Unix-like environment, in much the same way as Cygwin wraps Windows.
Higher up in userland, adapted versions of the BSD tools are used for the Unix command line, an odd choice, considering the GNU utilities are superior. Files are kept in odd places and in many cases manpages are out of date. Many basic system services such as user authentication are provided by Apple's own proprietary system rather than the traditional Unix methods. In general, the OS X command line is a lackluster and messy ordeal, and certainly radically unlike any BSD system.
Can anyone actually explain what good removing the front page would bring?