Slashdot Mirror


If Microsoft Built Cars...

trystanu writes "If Microsoft Built Cars, occasionally your car would just die on the motorway for no reason; you'd accept this, restart and drive on -- at least that was the joke a few years ago. ZDNET reports that Microsoft has persuaded a number of carmakers to use its slimmed-down Windows CE operating system to power a variety of in-car electronics, from navigation systems to music players to information devices. BMW, in particular, has gravitated to Microsoft systems, although the company has announced wins with Honda, Volvo and others as well. Perhaps the recent trapping of Thai dignitaries inside a BMW should be a warning to us all."

642 comments

  1. Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

    1. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Perhaps the recent trapping of Thai dignitaries inside a BMW should be a warning to us all.

      Of course, the FIRST line of that article is how the problem occured because of an electronics failure, rather than a Windows crash.

      Man, I'm glad that *NO ONE* reads the articles anymore, even the submitters.

    2. Re:Hmm... by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Well...whatever happened...was computer related I'm guessing. Which gives me more feeling that a car, really isn't the type of vehicle at 'NEEDS' a lot of computer controlling. I had a '97 Vette..first year of the C5, and one of the first really highly computer controlled vehicles I've owned. Well, I dropped it at 3 years...all the computer controlled 'custom seating' stuff started going haywire. I'd put the key in, and the seat would slide all the way back...the side view mirrors would turn up and down...etc. Every couple of days I'd have to readjust everything. One time driving, everything went crazy on the dash...engine slowed, all problems lights on. I drove it into the dealership close by to show them. Turned the key off. Turned it back on...like no problem every occured.

      The trouble with such a highly computerized car...I feel, is that once you get electrical demons in there...they are almost impossible to get rid of. Their diagnostic stuff could never catch the problems.

      I sold it...got a 1986 Porsche Turbo (half the price...half the monthly note). Yes, things do still break...and expensive to repair, BUT, most everything on the car is mechanical....and if something does go wrong...my mechanic can usually diagnose the problem quickly...and find a quick fix for it.

      I'm now up to almost 10 mpg....and it runs like a rocket sled on rails. I'm a definite believe in a more 'mechanical' car....much more dependable and easier to maintain IMHO.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Had a BMW 850CSi a few years ago. It had those frameless windows which drop a bit when you pull on the door handle so you can open the door. I wasn't amused when the electronics decided to suddenly activate that mechanism INSIDE THE CAR WASH. But that wasn't all. One day, I open the door, sit down on the driver's seat and the moment I turn the key, the car decides to move the driver's seat aaaaallll the way forward and pushes me against the steering wheel. I couldn't get out and had some trouble reaching the controls from that position.

      Anyway, the chicks liked that car. ;-)

    4. Re:Hmm... by JoeBaldwin · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Cars just ain't suited to compuiter systems. Trains, on the other hand, would be ideal for this sort of technology.

      Why a train? There's only a fixed way it can go and that is usually the right way, so generally a computer control system would be doubleplusgood. Also, a train is just simpler: motor on, motor off. Simple. No steering, no seat doohickeys, no stereo...simple.

      But a car can travel in virtually any direction you like at any speed, with plenty more automated gizmos, and there is no readily available way for a computer to ascertain what is a car and what is air, meaning that the possibility of failiure is huge.

      See? Simple=good.

    5. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I for one never read the articles, but I do remember reading something about BMW's(or maybe it was a Mercedes) having some anti-theft device in them for when their windows are smashed or cracked they don't start. Perhaps the security system detected a "Windows" crash and stopped the car.

    6. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't be bragging about getting the same mileage as a goddamn Hummer H2, eh? Do all of us a favor and get something that gets 20+ mpg.

    7. Re:Hmm... by wskellenger · · Score: 2, Insightful
      One time driving, everything went crazy on the dash...engine slowed, all problems lights on. I drove it into the dealership close by to show them. Turned the key off. Turned it back on...like no problem every occured.

      Why didn't you have the dealership check for trouble codes?

      The trouble with such a highly computerized car...I feel, is that once you get electrical demons in there...they are almost impossible to get rid of. Their diagnostic stuff could never catch the problems.

      This is why almost every module stores a diagnostic trouble code (DTC) to help the service tech pinpoint the problem. At exactly the moment that the module detected an "electrical demon", it should store a DTC such as "Front Left Wheel Speed Sensor Airgap". This one, for example, indicates that during the last 14 or so milliseconds, the sensor did not interrupt the processor -- when previously the module calculated a speed of 100 kph based on this sensor's interrupts.

      I'm a definite believe in a more 'mechanical' car....much more dependable and easier to maintain IMHO.

      IMHO this is not an appropriate post on a technology-based forum. Your '86 Porsche still benefits from fuel injection, which is computer-controlled. And your enthusiasm about 10 mpg amazes me.

      The technology under the hood of my 350Z enables it's normally aspirated 3.5L V6 to put out around 290 hp! This technology, namely variable valve timing and direct ignition, would not be possible without a computer orchestrating everything. (And I'm guessing that it will perform as well as your '86 Porsche, while giving me a highway fuel economy of 26 mpg)

    8. Re:Hmm... by Ripplet · · Score: 4, Interesting
      a car, really isn't the type of vehicle at 'NEEDS' a lot of computer controlling.
      'NEEDS' have nothing to do with it. How many gadgets do you need? Well, not many. How many can you have if you really want? How many fish in the sea man?
      I submitted a story about this a while ago (rejected of course because I don't know the secret handshake), in the latest high end models, the cost of the electronics is rapidly approaching 50% of the cost of the car. Yes nearly HALF!

      Well, you've got all those things like navigation, tuner, TV, MP3 player, cellphone, rearview camera, electronic windows and mirrors, A/C, let's just put it all in one box baby! And all the bits can talk to each other. So when your airbag goes off, your cellphone can automatically make an emergency call, retrieving your GPS coordinates from the navigation system. Or, when your engine management system predicts failure of some critical component within 100 miles, it navigates you straight to the nearest service centre. You need it *all* man, come on baby you know you want it?

      I swear I'm not making this stuff up, I write software for some of these systems! And yes, there's a hell of a lot of it. And like you, it completely doesn't fill me with confidence how much of the car is being taken over by this stuff.

      For example from the article:
      "We couldn't breathe because there was no air"
      and
      "it took a long time to break the windows as the "glass proved to be very resistant"

      Now that is scary. What happened to manual backups? On my washing machine, there's an electronic door opener, but there's also a hidden tab you can pull manually in the event of a power cut etc. There's no way in hell it should be impossible to open the doors if the system crashes, that really sucks! There's no way those systems are bulletproof.

      Man, I can't wait for electronic brakes!!!

      --

      Skiing? Check out The Independant Skiers Portal

    9. Re:Hmm... by AmbyVoc · · Score: 1

      To me, the funniest part to that whole article is that the whole ``If MS made cars'' story was started by a BMW executive in the first place :).

      --
      - Voice of Ambience -
    10. Re:Hmm... by OldCrasher · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I marvel to think that anything with a 17 year old circuit board in it is still moving. Give your 350Z 17yrs of abuse, then come back and see if you wish to give this Gent the same criticism.

      For a moment think on that old IBM PC-AT, the 6Mhz one that seemed so fast back then. Then remember it's 17 yrs old, and think to yourself : do you really want your kids playing anywhere near it just in case it blows up? I suppose there are a few of those old PC-AT's out there, but nature has a way of turning silicon into junk - electronics do fail. Statistics catch up with electronics, quickly.

      The more complex, failure prone stuff in the blackboxes, the higher the probability it will all fail sooner, rather than later.

    11. Re:Hmm... by squeegee_boy · · Score: 1

      Evidently General Motors thinks the same way (they make locomotives, too :)

      http://www.gmemd.com/eu/innovations/em2000/

    12. Re:Hmm... by epiphani · · Score: 1

      I agree - computers and cars should stay mostly separate. The problem with cars these days is that, while sensors that are built into the car are useful, they're often replaced more than the part that they monitor. As an example, I've replaced two O2 sensors in my cars. When you write computer controls for anything, you generally have to assume that the hardware you're working with is in perfect condition. You can't, unfortunately, design a peice of software that can differentiate between correct or incorrect input data.

      You get the input data, and you work with it. If the input is wrong, then your output will be wrong. No avoiding that.

      --
      .
    13. Re:Hmm... by Micro$will · · Score: 1

      Well...whatever happened...was computer related I'm guessing.

      You guessed wrong. This was an older model BMW, and the problem was with the power door locks. I know, because this happened to me. Something shorted in the PDL wiring causing the engine to stall and the the PDL solonoids to force the doors locked making it impossible to unlock by hand. They can still breathe, they just panicked, and the windows only require a screwdriver to break.

      I had the same problem in an old Chrysler. Got in the car, sat down, tried to start the car, and the locks went down. I tried to open the door, but it was jammed. This is where my case is much worse. I hear a buzzing, but its not elecrical, its a friggin wasp! A damn wasp gets trapped in the car with me just as my power door locks go whacky, great. Luckily the wasp is in the back of the car, so I just reach over to the passenger side door, rip the armrest cover open that holds the power window/door lock switches, and yank the PDL switch. Doors are unlockable, I get out and get rid of the wasp.

    14. Re:Hmm... by JoeBaldwin · · Score: 1

      I know General Electric make them, no idea about them.

      Over here in the UK, one of the London Underground's lines is completely automated (forget which). No drivers. It just works. The DLR works the same too.

    15. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no problem every occured

      It must be terrible to be so piss-poor at English, know it, and not be able to do a thing about it.

    16. Re:Hmm... by qwave54 · · Score: 0

      See: Planes, Trains, And Automobiles Steve Martin gets mashed against the windshield when his powered seat breaks because John Candy was playing with the controls all day.

    17. Re:Hmm... by chrome · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Oedo line in Tokyo is fully automated. I think many others here are too.

      There is still a driver though, unlike the DLR in London.

      The guy sits there to make sure that people are clear of the doors etc before he presses a green button. He also holds another button down to keep the system under computer control like a dead man's handle.

      So, basically, the human is there to make sure nothing goes wrong, but otherwise the computer is in control.

      Advantages of this system is a wonderfully smooth ride - the computer is programmed to take off and stop in smooth motions rather than the sometimes jerky stopping/starting that humans do.

      The other advantage is that if anything DOES go wrong, a human is there watching everything to pull the plug if needs be.

      Right way to do things I think. The Japanese have their heads screwed on tight when it comes to public transport...

    18. Re:Hmm... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Like I had said...they hooked the vette up to the computer....and it gave NO error codes....even though they saw it malfunctioning.

      And, I've always liked the "Z" cars...my first car I bought was a 1978 280Z. Was a great little car. I've looked at the new ones....and I may get one for a 2nd car...but, I kinda doubt that your "normally aspirated 3.5L V6 to put out around 290 hp! will keep up very well my my 400+ HP I generate in the 911 turbo. Just ain't gonna happen. And, as for gas mileage...I can afford it...I don't even look at the gas prices...I just fill'er up, and go have fun.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    19. Re:Hmm... by wskellenger · · Score: 1
      My first car was also a Z -- an '82 280ZX.

      Is your 911 Turbo modified?

      Unfortunately, unless your '86 911 was heavily modified, it's not generating anything north of 300 horsepower. Certainly not over 400 horsepower, which would put it's output well above the current M3.

      My only explanation for your dashboard prob

    20. Re:Hmm... by wskellenger · · Score: 1
      Damn it... My mouth was open when I posted that last comment. Sorry about that.

      At any rate, my only explanation for your dashboard problem in the nightmare 'Vette is possibly noise on the vehicle bus. The 'Vette was one of the first multiplexed vehicles that GM offered. The dash and all of the warning lamps, spedometer, etc. were all controlled by data packets on a serial bus.

      I have seen EM fields wreak havoc on these sorts of systems... As this was an earlier one it probably wasn't as robust as those today.

  2. If if if by grub · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:If if if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ancient news. Must be a real slow day.
      How do moron posts like this get on slashdot when countless IT relevant posts get sent to dev\null every hour.

    2. Re:If if if by torved · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ironically, 50,000 people die every year from Automobile accidents and no one looks to blame Ford or GM for these deaths.

      It's probably not too far off to say 99.9% of Windows crashing problems are due to operator error from installing bad drivers (from other manufacterers), installing bad hardware, installing crappy software.

      If GM made Windows, it would not be upgradable, it would run 1950's technology, it would cost $20000 every 5 years, and it would STILL CRASH!

      Not a Microsocks fan, but it's funny how narrowminded some can be...

      torved

      --
      I came to Athens and no one knew me. - Democritus
    3. Re:If if if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean dev/null=)

    4. Re:If if if by u-235-sentinel · · Score: 4, Informative

      What really annoyed me was when I worked as a contractor for the Air Force, they had a fighter jet with a new computer system which would fail in the middle of the flight. After some poking around I learned it was a slimmed down version of Windows they were running.

      The sad part was they tied it to the propulsion. When the computer crashed, the jet would simply shutdown and at 20,000 feet things could get interesting.

      Ironically, the manufacturer provided restart instructions for the computer and claimed this was perfectly 'normal'. I don't believe this ever moved past the prototype stage.

      --
      Has Comcast disconnected your Internet account? Same here. You can read about it at http://comcastissue.blogspot.com
    5. Re:If if if by dattaway · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Since we are posting pictures... After seeing this sign, I thought we were safe. It could be worse though, Windows could control motorcycles.

    6. Re:If if if by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Actually MS has already released tha info last year. They said according to their dr. Watson reports returned that 50% of all failures are due to windows itself. Actually they said 50%of all failures were due to third party software.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    7. Re:If if if by whoever57 · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's probably not too far off to say 99.9% of Windows crashing problems are due to operator error from installing bad drivers (from other manufacterers), installing bad hardware, installing crappy software.

      Evidently you did not read the report that stated that only 50% of Windows crashes were due to such problems. By implication, the other 50% are due to Windows itself.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    8. Re:If if if by chef_raekwon · · Score: 1

      It's probably not too far off to say 99.9% of Windows crashing problems are due to operator error from installing bad drivers (from other manufacterers), installing bad hardware, installing crappy software.

      probably. thats why, when I leave my computer running - I get VMM error blue screens (at work -- at home i run linux). Nothing to do with programming the virtual memory code...everything to do with my sound card drivers.

      --
      We're like rats, in some experiment! -- George Costanza
    9. Re:If if if by tarquin_fim_bim · · Score: 1

      By implication, the other 50% are due to Windows itself.

      Nah, was bad electric and user stupidity.

    10. Re:If if if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can't believe anybody would even *consider* Microsoft for mission critical systems, given their EULA and their past (and current) track record. There must be a lot of money involved, that's all that would make any sense.
      You have to ask yourself: whos interest are they looking out for? Mine and yours, or their own? They don't give a flying shit about us, they just want their product in every nook and cranny on this planet so there's no way you can get away from using it. That would be their perfect world. What a bunch of sick fucks.

    11. Re:If if if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jealous?

    12. Re:If if if by jafac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ironically, 50,000 people die every year from Automobile accidents and no one looks to blame Ford or GM for these deaths.

      Not nobody.

      Also, 9/11 was caused by poor airline security and lax regulation and oversight. Terrorists are a fact of life that's incredibly difficult (and expensive) to change. Airline security is something we could have changed to prevent this tragedy. And we still have not.

      It's probably not too far off to say 99.9% of Windows crashing problems are due to operator error from installing bad drivers (from other manufacterers), installing bad hardware, installing crappy software.

      But is that the user's fault? I buy a computer, I attach a printer, I expect the frickin thing to print. Is it MY fault the printer manufacturer went after the quick buck and wrote a crappy driver, and never updated it?

      If GM made Windows, it would not be upgradable, it would run 1950's technology, it would cost $20000 every 5 years, and it would STILL CRASH!

      Yeah, but the coders would have an AWESOME retirement plan. And they wouldn't be replaced by H-1B's. :)

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    13. Re:If if if by rssrss · · Score: 3, Informative

      " Ironically, 50,000 people die every year from Automobile accidents and no one looks to blame Ford or GM for these deaths."

      That is just not true. Automobile manufacturers are sued for damages created by crashes routinely. Furthermore, they are subject to Federal regulation of safety equipment and must recall defective models.

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
    14. Re:If if if by DavidLeblond · · Score: 1
      It's probably not too far off to say 99.9% of Windows crashing problems are due to operator error from installing bad drivers (from other manufacterers), installing bad hardware, installing crappy software.


      So I buy a piece of hardware (say the newest ATI video card) so that I can play my games. It causes blue screens because the people that programmed a bad driver. This is my fault how? Is it my fault for wanting new hardware? Is it my fault for not having enough time to program my own driver for every piece of hardware I buy?
    15. Re:If if if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My favorite holiday troll so far. Well done. Turkey sandwiches for everyone.

    16. Re:If if if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      probably. thats why, when I leave my computer running - I get VMM error blue screens (at work -- at home i run linux). Nothing to do with programming the virtual memory code...everything to do with my sound card drivers.

      I can't tell if you're trying to be sarcastic or not, but faulty hardware IS probably the problem you're having. If the virtual memory manager was at fault then EVERYONE would be having that problem all the time. For every legitimate Windows bug there are thousands that are bad memory modules, people overclocking their computers, etc.

    17. Re:If if if by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      Unless you're sitting in the root directory, you mean /dev/null ...

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    18. Re:If if if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Complete bull. Automotive OEMs get sues just about every time someone dies in an auto accident.

      The more obvious the driver's fault, the more likely they are to be sued.

      Why do you think they bare developing 'black box'es to go in the cars?

      -AC

    19. Re:If if if by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      In other news...

      Microsoft (NYSE: MSFT) announced today a joint partnership with Ferrari to help the Italian concern in its 2005 bid for the World Constructor's Championship.

    20. Re:If if if by PPGMD · · Score: 1

      Obviously you didn't hear about the computers for the Gyro system on the F-16's crashing. Wasn't Windows, just crappy software.

    21. Re:If if if by zwaffle · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It's off topic,
      but it's true that *120* people die on the road on average each day in the USA.
      That's 120 deaths that could have been avoided for most of them. That's 120 deaths and how many crippled for live?
      Compare that to the one US soldier that gets killed on average each day in Irak... who got killed for a cause (arguable maybe) doing his job.

      I blame the media: they report once a while fatal car crashes but ignore the thousands who died in between. That gives a false sense of security.

      How about, at the end of each tv news report, display the names of yesterday's road victims in 4 columns of 3 rows? Probably too much to bear for the average viewer and that wouldn't please the car maker sponsors either...

    22. Re:If if if by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2, Informative


      Windows crashing problems are due to operator error from installing bad drivers (from other manufacterers), installing bad hardware, installing crappy software.


      Two points:

      1) You just listed three things that are NOT the operator's fault. Why call them operator errors?
      Did the operator write the buggy driver? Did the operator know the driver was buggy? Did the operator know the software package had a fatal flaw? I know your point is that they aren't Microsoft's fault, but that doesn't mean they are the operator's fault either.

      2) In the case of drivers, yes it's reasonable to expect that a third-party driver can crash the system. But in the case of higher-level software, it IS the operatiing system's fault that it allows crappy software to crash the system. That's evidence of crappy security in the OS.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    23. Re:If if if by operagost · · Score: 1

      Ironically, 50,000 people die every year from Automobile accidents and no one looks to blame Ford or GM for these deaths.

      Perhaps it's because they're nearly all caused by driver error, or by mechanical failure caused by poor maintenance (again, driver error).
      I'm not a GM fanboy, but even the most basic of their vehicles doesn't use anything like 1950's technology. About the last holdout was the small block V8 line, but they essentially replaced those a decade ago or so with the Vortec. Yes, they're still pushrod, but turbochargers and fuel injection were invented about sixty years ago as well, and no one gripes about them!
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    24. Re:If if if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod this guy up!

    25. Re:If if if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No! They were running some software on top of a slimmed down version of Windows. So let me ask does it matter if it was Windows crashing or the software running on top of Windows crashing? Either way you have a paperweight at 20,000 feet.

      Even if it's just the software/driver failing I've heard of many embedded OS just reseting after ANY failure. So lets compare apples to apples.

    26. Re:If if if by MKalus · · Score: 1
      Yeah, but the coders would have an AWESOME retirement plan. And they wouldn't be replaced by H-1B's. :)


      True, they would just ship the entire plant off-shore.... Chine I think these days works well, so does South Korea.
      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    27. Re:If if if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      So lets compare apples to apples.


      Well,

      if that would be the case at leat the UI would look good.
    28. Re:If if if by hurtstotouchfire · · Score: 4, Funny
      "It's part of the broad companywide effort to make sure that if a market emerges for software in unusual places, that Microsoft is there, so that when the revolution comes, we'll have enough footholds to launch a coup," said Directions on Microsoft analyst Matt Rosoff.

      Mangled quote:
      "The Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy defines Microsoft as 'a bunch of mindless jerks who'll be the first against the wall when the revolution comes... Curiously enough, an edition of the Encyclopaedia Galactica that had the good fortune to fall through a time warp from a thousand years in the future defined Microsoft as 'a bunch of mindless jerks who were the first against the wall when the revolution came'."

      -- Douglas Adams, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy"

    29. Re:If if if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Obviously, you know absolutely ZERO about avionics systems. Per FAA and military requirement, military aircraft use space and time partitioned real-time software per ARINC standard 653. Guess what? Microsoft doesn't MAKE anything that adheres to ARINC 653.

      While this scheme does not alleviate faults, it greatly reduces the impact of resets during flight. The cause of the problem is more likely bad non-Microsoft avionics code.

    30. Re:If if if by Ripplet · · Score: 1
      It's probably not too far off to say 99.9% of Windows crashing problems are due to operator error from installing bad drivers

      So, about the same as the road accidents then.

      --

      Skiing? Check out The Independant Skiers Portal

    31. Re:If if if by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Also, 9/11 was caused by poor airline security and lax regulation and oversight. Terrorists are a fact of life that's incredibly difficult (and expensive) to change.

      Not difficult, just expensive. Afghanistan & Iraq are certainly expensive, but there has not been so much as a car bomb in the USA ever since 9/11 even though a small attack would be incredibly simple to carry out. Heck, just look how much trouble a single sniper or careless smoker in the woods can cause.

      The reason that there has not been another attack on US soil is that the terrorist organizations have found out what happens after they attack: more bullshit terrorist-sponsoring Middle-Eastern nations fall. This is something they don't want and something that the bullshit dictatorships that sponsor terrorists don't want either.

    32. Re:If if if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, you're trying to tell me that Osama stopped targeting Americans because he got frightened after his friend Saddam lost his job? Yeah, sure...
      You're one of those slow learners, right? Expect to be painfully proven wrong.

    33. Re:If if if by Geek+of+Tech · · Score: 1
      Mod parent up!

      +1 (Use of HHGG)

      --
      Stop the Slashdot effect! Don't read the articles!
    34. Re:If if if by hurtstotouchfire · · Score: 1

      You have no publicly posted email, comments disabled in your journal, and no contact info on your site. No one can reach you, Joshua! Hey, by the by, spellcheck your blog. Nothing personal, it's just polite to the world.

    35. Re:If if if by mpe · · Score: 1

      What really annoyed me was when I worked as a contractor for the Air Force, they had a fighter jet with a new computer system which would fail in the middle of the flight. After some poking around I learned it was a slimmed down version of Windows they were running.
      The sad part was they tied it to the propulsion. When the computer crashed, the jet would simply shutdown and at 20,000 feet things could get interesting.


      Especially on an unstable, fly-by-wire aircraft.

      Ironically, the manufacturer provided restart instructions for the computer and claimed this was perfectly 'normal'. I don't believe this ever moved past the prototype stage.

      Were any of the prototypes 2 seat planes? In which case you could have taken someone from the manufacturer up to show them the problem. To save weight you'd only need to give the pilot an ejector seat...

    36. Re:If if if by jafac · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Not difficult, just expensive.

      No - FRICKIN expensive, and frickin difficult. You take over Afghanistan, they hide in Pakistan and Iran. You take over Iraq, they hide in Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Libya, Syria. If we're actually going to do this - have a REAL war on terror - we have no real choice but to take over every frickin "bullshit terrorist-sponsoring Middle-Eastern" nation.

      We do not have the money, or the manpower to do this. But more importantly, we do not have the CAJONES. Bush has proven that. If we did, we'd have troops in Iran right now, and we'd have enough troops in Iraq that the job would be done by now, and the terrorist corpses would be stacked high and burning. Because that's what THIS path requires to be done. Any other approach than "kill them all" will result in the terrorists finding somewhere else to hide, and using our actions as propaganda for recruitment.

      Since it's clear that even after an attrocity like 9/11, we don't have the cujones to do what's really required (Afghanistan was a half-hearted try; Iraq was taking our eye off the ball) - then we should just frickin leave it alone (and, instead, spend the money on REAL airline security, like the Israelis do - oh wait, it's not THEIR money they're spending - it's ours). This war has killed far more people and cost our economy far more than 9/11 has. The only thing this war has been good for is government contractors with questionable ties to the administration, and USA Pride (and that, only amongst lamebrain rednecks or religious fanatics).

      The reason why there won't be any more attacks on US soil now, is because 9/11 achieved Osama's goal, 100%. His goal was to get the US out of Saudi Arabia. It worked. We're out of there. 9/11 was extremely expensive, risky, and complicated for Al Qaeda. That's no more true now than it was in 2001, or 1993. They get more bang for their buck attacking third world shitholes now. Notice the steep increase in terrorist attacks in Saudi Arabia? (only the ones that the state-sponsored newsmedia allows to become public). How about Turkey? One thing that I think would really SUCK for the US right now, would be to lose Turkey as an ally. All Al Qaeda needs to do is get some close ties with the Kurds (already done, really) and fire up a few more car bombs.
      Al Qaeda has moved on to their next goal - and by all accounts, it's moving along nicely too.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    37. Re:If if if by mentin · · Score: 1
      I get VMM error blue screens (at work ...

      VMM error? Guys, get real! It is 2003, why people are still running 8 years old OS (Windows 95)?

      Looks like your greedy boss is to blame for this problem.

      --
      MSDOS: 20+ years without remote hole in the default install
    38. Re:If if if by Black+Hitler · · Score: 1

      Didn't you get the memo? Only Microsoft makes crappy software.

    39. Re:If if if by mentin · · Score: 1
      So I buy a piece of hardware (say the newest ATI video card) so that I can play my games. ... Is it my fault for wanting new hardware?

      More or less true. It is also IBM's fault for creating open hardware platform where you can plug video cards and other crap, and also for creating user expectation that it should work.

      The alternative is Macintosh, where you buy a fixed configuration computer with custom build OS specifically tuned for this computer. This OS of course works rock-solid with this hardware. But you can't buy a new video card for it (well, it is possible, but at this moment you loose Apple support).

      I remember when in 1997 our company bought several Macs of different models in about 2 months. They ALL came with different OS CDs, and almost neither of them worked with CD from different computer. If you can modify OS after creating particular hardware, it is easy. If you ship OS and it should work with hardware that will be released 3 years after OS, it is much harder.

      This is also true for most non-PC hardware. E.g. my Canon camera only supports Canon lenses. Yes, I bought Sigma lens for it, but Canon will not give me any support if I have any problem with this lens, even if camera crashes while this lens is installed (yes, sometimes it happens to people).

      --
      MSDOS: 20+ years without remote hole in the default install
    40. Re:If if if by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      Dr Watson reports application crashes (ie: core dumps), not OS crashes (ie: kernel panics).

    41. Re:If if if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's probably not too far off to say 99.9% of Windows crashing problems are due to operator error

      it's funny how narrowminded some can be

      Or how downright stupid others can be.

      Troll.

    42. Re:If if if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VMM error? Guys, get real! It is 2003, why people are still running 8 years old OS (Windows 95)?

      Rather ask why MS hasn't fixed the problems with Win95... after 8 years!

    43. Re:If if if by SEE · · Score: 1

      It's probably not too far off to say 99.9% of Windows crashing problems are due to operator error from installing bad drivers (from other manufacterers), installing bad hardware, installing crappy software.

      Microsoft itself says half of Windows crashes are due to Windows or other Microsoft software.

      So, either "99.9%" is far off, or installing Microsoft software is "installing crappy software".

    44. Re:If if if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How long is a company supposed to support a product?

      They have fixed the problem, they fixes are called NT, 2000 and XP.

      Before Red Hat pulled the plug, they only had a 6 month support...

    45. Re:If if if by unixformat · · Score: 0

      "no one looks to blame Ford or GM for these deaths." You are right, we should blame the car manufacturers for being pursuaded by Microsoft and ofering us no further choice of systems powered by BSD, Linux and other non-MS systems.

    46. Re:If if if by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

      This is my fault how?

      I would suggest that you buy a 6 month old model and leave the bleeding edge crap for people who expect to have bugs in their beta-prerelease-notforpublicuse-hasafewbugs drivers.

      As someone that has bought NEW hardware, and seen the RAPID drop in prices of the same kit after 6 months, its not worth it AT ALL. The games that can use the new features of the card are still going to be there in 6 months, the speed increase you get from buying the card will still be there in 6 months ... The only thing missing is the damn bugs in the rush-to-market drivers that haven't been mass tested.

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
    47. Re:If if if by Geek+of+Tech · · Score: 1
      Sorry about that. I haven't updated my info in forever. Give me just a few minutes and it will all be up.

      --
      Stop the Slashdot effect! Don't read the articles!
    48. Re:If if if by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

      Can we get Ralf and Michael running in 2005?

      That way we don't have to worry about whether the little one can work up the balls to drive around the big one.

      Ralf's biggest problem this season was the fear of overtaking the Ferarri. The BMW could have been a great car.

      Little wonder Juan jumped ship. I imagine if Ralf pulls his socks up this year, Juan may decide to break transfer contract and stay with Williams. No point being dragged down by a Schumacher though, so right now leaving is a safe bet.

      Formula One, Grand Prix, ITV website. They even play their 200mph games in Indianapolis now!

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
    49. Re:If if if by Spruitje · · Score: 1


      Microsoft (NYSE: MSFT) announced today a joint partnership with Ferrari to help the Italian concern in its 2005 bid for the World Constructor's Championship.


      Okay, so next year will be the last year Ferrari will be number one.
      Yet another M$ disabled enterprise...
      After M$ disabled ATM's and power plants we will now have M$ disabled cars.
      Brings a whole new meaning to "where do you want to crash today"..
      What next?
      M$ disabled planes?
      The US navy already had some M$ disabled ships...

    50. Re:If if if by u-235-sentinel · · Score: 1

      Fortunately this was another system on another fighter jet. Still the results were not promising.

      --
      Has Comcast disconnected your Internet account? Same here. You can read about it at http://comcastissue.blogspot.com
    51. Re:If if if by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      Does M$ still mean Microsoft here, or are we talking about Michael Schumacher now? :P

    52. Re:If if if by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Any other approach than "kill them all"...
      I agree, Metallica lost their edge right after Ride the Lightning, and I haven't like anything since.

    53. Re:If if if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      QNX is a great reliable OS. We use it at work and have computers up for 9+ months before a reboot, and this is for controlling broadcast equipment.

    54. Re:If if if by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not true -- my brand new Win2k gave me the BSOD (or something equally as fatal) daily, even after upgrading all my drivers to the latest version, even through Microsoft's own Windows Update system. I installed some software that was supposed to make it more stable, and it ended up being less stable. Installed Linux. No crashes for a year now.

      Linux, at least, does exactly what I tell it to, even if that's something stupid. If GM made computers, they would still crash, but only if you threw them against the wall. A car turns where I tell it to turn, without second-guessing me. I expect the same from my computer. With Windows, I never know what's going to happen.

      And btw, if it's "operator error" to install third-party drivers, sue me, because there's almost no computer I've ever seen with all of its hardware compatable with Microsoft-only drivers. And there's no verification process on those drivers, and if the driver fails, it brings down the system with it.

      My worst fear of "if Microsoft made cars", though, makes me seem a conspiracy theorist. If Microsoft made cars, your car would log everywhere you go (have you manually gone through Temporary Internet Files from something other than Windows, e.g. DOS or Linux?) and at any time, due to automatically installing new components, Microsoft could replace your steering wheel with a sign that says "Don't Panic" and start driving your car.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    55. Re:If if if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is an obvious troll

    56. Re:If if if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately no fighter jet uses Windows and you're just making this up.

    57. Re:If if if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, in that case it'd just have a lot of queer "windows melting into the screen" effects.

    58. Re:If if if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately this was a prototype (you did read this right?). What does anyone have to gain by making this stuff up?

      Microsoft already has shitty software. Another poor example is unnecessary.

    59. Re:If if if by torved · · Score: 1

      My point, that I did not make very well, is that Automobiles SHOULD NOT CRASH! But they do crash, and that in many cases it is operator error, i.e. driving too fast for conditions (yet the car let's them drive too fast for conditions), driving erratically or intoxicated (again, why should the car allow itself to become an unguided missle in the hands of an intoxicated driver?).

      All these reasons are analogous to the same reasons why Windows crashes, i.e. people do stuff with their Window's boxes that they should not do...

      As for the "Linux is sooo much better than Windows crowd because its sooo much more stable than Windows", give me a break. This is because no REAL software runs on desktop linux boxes. It's all chincy crap (that crashes too often or doesn't do much, so we don't use it). Please refrain drinking from the Penguin Cooler. You're driving the rest of us (Windows/Linux/MaxOSX) users nuts with the fanaticism.

      Would you let some random person from the internet drive you and your children during the morning commute? The analogy is similar with computers. People install "random" software from the internet all the time, and they expect their machines to work FLAWLESSLY?

      Quite insane...

      --
      I came to Athens and no one knew me. - Democritus
    60. Re:If if if by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll see your troll and raise you an orc!

    61. Re:If if if by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      You don't want to set up factories in China. The Chinese government has been known to demand copies of all onsite manuals, and set up their own competing shop within a mile of the original site.

  3. Windows... by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

    Let the "crash" jokes begin

  4. Brings a whole new meaning to "system crash" by adrianbaugh · · Score: 1, Funny

    Ouch.

    --
    "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
    - JRR Tolkien.
    1. Re:Brings a whole new meaning to "system crash" by PetWolverine · · Score: 1

      I read a short in Wired a while back (probably a year or so ago) about the increasing use of desktop operating systems for embedded applications. It mentioned flight computers in commercial airliners.

      I believe the quote was, "...could give new meaning to the phrase 'Blue Screen of Death'.".

      --
      I found the meaning of life the other day, but I had write-only access.
  5. 4 words by DirtyJ · · Score: 5, Funny

    Black Pavement of Death

    1. Re:4 words by aheath · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Alan Cooper's book The Inmates Are Running the Asylum: Why High-Tech Products Drive us Crazy and How to Restore the Sanity" has a great story about a Porsche that required a factory reset if the fuel level was too low. This feature was designed to protect the fuel injectors from running on empty. Unfortunately, the engine could shut down if the tank was close to empty and the car went around a corner. The centripital force of cornering left the fuel level center high and dry. The car could only be restarted at a Porsche dealer.

    2. Re:4 words by aheath · · Score: 1

      Ooops. The second to last sentence should read: "The centripital force of cornering left the fuel level sensor high and dry." There's still too much tryptophan in my system from turkey during my American Thanksgiving day feast. I think it's time to break out the Mountain Dew before I do any more proofreading of my own writing.

    3. Re:4 words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There's still too much tryptophan in my system from turkey during my American Thanksgiving day feast

      From the page you linked to:

      Sorry to say, that if you're looking for the sedative effect, it's unlikely you'll get it from eating meats like turkey. L-tryptophan doesn't act on the brain unless you take it on an empty stomach with no protein present. So it probably isn't at fault for the sudden drowsiness that hits right after the meal when the football games come on, and the dishes are waiting!

      It's more likely due to the combination of drinking alcohol and overeating - not just turkey, but also mashed potatoes, ham, creamed onions, cranberries, sweet potatoes, peas, stuffing (or dressing, if you prefer), carrots, bread, pies, and whipped cream - all of which have the effect of puling the blood away from your brain to help your digestive tract do it's work, and the sugar/insulin effect.


      But why does fish make you sleepy?
    4. Re:4 words by jafac · · Score: 1

      That's nuts.

      One of the supposed advantages of fuel injection over carbs is that when you run out of gas, you don't need to take off the air cleaners and prime the carb with a shot of gasoline (or carb cleaner;) to get the engine to start.

      Fuel injectors that can't run dry is retarded.
      Which is why one should only buy vintage Porsches.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    5. Re:4 words by chimpo13 · · Score: 1

      Fuel injectors shouldn't be run dry. That's for all cars built in any year. As I was told by a vintage Porsche mechanic in an automotive school.

    6. Re:4 words by mellonhead · · Score: 1

      "The centripital force..."

      I think you meant one of the following two words:

      centripetal (sn-trp-tl) adj.

      1. Moving or directed toward a center or axis.
      2. Operated by means of centripetal force.
      3. Physiology. Transmitting nerve impulses toward the central nervous system; afferent.
      4. Botany. Developing or progressing inward toward the center or axis, as in the head of a sunflower, in which the oldest flowers are near the edge and the youngest flowers are in the center.
      5. Tending or directed toward centralization: the centripetal effects of a homogeneous population.

      centrifugal (sen-trfy-gl, -trf-) adj.

      1. Moving or directed away from a center or axis.
      2. Operated by means of centrifugal force.
      3. Physiology. Transmitting nerve impulses away from the central nervous system; efferent.
      4. Botany. Developing or progressing outward from a center or axis, as in a flower cluster in which the oldest flowers are in the center and the youngest flowers are near the edge.
      5. Tending or directed away from centralization, as of authority: "The division of Europe into two warring blocs, each ultimately dependent on a superpower patron, is subject to ever-increasing centrifugal stress" (Scott Sullivan).

    7. Re:4 words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you are writing too many links in your post. That could explain the mistake.

    8. Re:4 words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      >The Inmates are Running the Asylum argues that, despite appearances, business executives are simply not the ones in control of the high-tech industry. They have inadvertently put programmers and engineers in charge, leading to products and processes that waste huge amounts of money, squander customer loyalty, and erode competitive advantage. They have let the inmates run the asylum. Alan Cooper offers a provocative, insightful and entertaining explanation of how talented people continuously design bad software-based products. More importantly, he uses his own work with companies big and small to show how to harness those talents to create products that will both thrill their users and grow the bottom line.

      If the engineers were running the show, things would have been much better, but whos running the show are idiots biz people who has no clue about technolgy. This book was obviously written by a biz person who wants to make a scapegoat of engineers.

  6. Music Players? by aerojad · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So... what are the chances of DRM following us to our (future) cars after it's rolled out? More specifically, the playing of mp3 cds.

    --

    SecondPageMedia - Wha
    1. Re:Music Players? by EddydaSquige · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Interesting, I could honestly see some car company not wanting to let you install an after market stereo. Especially now that several of them are trying to push things like XM radio, dvd players and like at the dealership.

    2. Re:Music Players? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares. If that happens, get or make your own non-DRM mp3 player.

    3. Re:Music Players? by PurpleWizard · · Score: 1
      Not just the stereo. Most of the components exchange (trivially) encrypted keys at regular intervals as part of the immobilisation. And I suspect to make it hard to fit pattern parts in place of the makers own.

      Since the garage door case with DCMA though I suspect stopping people reverse engineering to make cheap alternatives won't stand in the USA.

    4. Re:Music Players? by chef_raekwon · · Score: 1

      Interesting, I could honestly see some car company not wanting to let you install an after market stereo. Especially now that several of them are trying to push things like XM radio, dvd players and like at the dealership.

      this is a nice theory - however:

      the whole US market system is driven by the sale of vehicles. No sales, means no gas purchases, which means no tax for the government, which means less social programs, which means the people who have been thrown out of work because the car manufacturers stopped purchasing parts like metal, leather, nuts, bolts, prefab parts -- will revolt, causing the downfall of the current US administration as we know it.

      what this means is that there will always be 'after-market' products, because they are a huge segment of sales.

      More on this conspiracy at 5.

      --
      We're like rats, in some experiment! -- George Costanza
    5. Re:Music Players? by Geno+Z+Heinlein · · Score: 3, Informative
      So... what are the chances of DRM following us to our (future) cars after it's rolled out? More specifically, the playing of mp3 cds.

      Probably pretty good. While reading the ZDNet article, I followed the link to the Court to FBI: No spying on in-car computers article (emphasis mine):
      The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals said Tuesday that the FBI is not legally entitled to remotely activate the system and secretly use it to snoop on passengers, because doing so would render it inoperable during an emergency.

      No privacy issues involved, it's that the idiots might break the bugging system. (Which includes turning off the emergency road assistance and airbag functions, by the way, but we wouldn't be spying on them unless they were already guilty, right?)

      The US Government is moving very consistently toward monitoring and controlling everything they can lay their hands on, so the idea that the "copyright bit" or other DRM will follow us into cars certainly seems inevitable.
    6. Re:Music Players? by arivanov · · Score: 1

      They already do it:

      FIAT: no longer supports ISO standard and stereo is welded in. So if you want a CD with your Punto you should be so kind to pay for alloys and leather seats please so that your CD comes up to be only around 700 dollars.

      GM: New Corsas have the CD also built into the dashboard.

      So son on so forth... There are quite a few of them now days.

      Anyway the funniest thing about windows in cars was an ad on UK TV networks about "Four Onboard Computers reBOOTED". You may laugh or cry, but this was an ad for the new C5 estate which in fact has 4 (!) onboard computers running WinCE. Why 4 - kill me if I know, but the fact that you have to reboot a car was not just considered normal. It was considered an advantage by the relevant marketing cretinoignoramus.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    7. Re:Music Players? by ksheff · · Score: 1

      Easy. Don't buy those cars.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  7. Microsoft security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    So long as they don't use Windows for the car security system, I mean imagine... "Insert any key to begin"

    1. Re:Microsoft security by stunami · · Score: 1, Funny

      No no its hit any Window to begin :)

    2. Re:Microsoft security by pi+radians · · Score: 4, Funny

      And on the dash are 3 new buttons between AM/FM and the volume; Control, Alt, and DELETE.

      --

      sin(6cos(r)+5A)
    3. Re:Microsoft security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I 'borrow cars' for a living...

      Can you computer programmer geeks please tell me where I could source some "ANY-KEY" lock picking tools?

    4. Re:Microsoft security by DrWhizBang · · Score: 4, Funny

      /me fumbles through dozens of keys on my keychain

      "I wonder which one of these is the 'any' key?"

      --
      Schrodinger's cat is either dead or really pissed off...
    5. Re:Microsoft security by schnits0r · · Score: 1

      Those doesn't of keys, are they registery keys?

    6. Re:Microsoft security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no. You click on the Start button, and then click on Run.

    7. Re:Microsoft security by arkulkis · · Score: 1

      Close Windows would give you a place to put a key...but if you don't have one, you can just press the Cancel button and get in anyways.

  8. If Microsoft built cars.. by nnnneedles · · Score: 4, Funny

    Competing with Microsoft woulbe so hard that other companies would start offering open-engine cars for free!

    --
    Will code a sig generator for food
    1. Re:If Microsoft built cars.. by arivanov · · Score: 2, Informative

      They do. At least one car maker nowdays has a specific selling point in the fact that you can program the ECU to understand additional keys in the field and ALL maintenance operations (even cambelt changes) are fully described and listed in the car manual. That is besides strictly adhering to ISO and any other standard applicable in every single component they can. In btw - as a result they make bloody good cars. Possibly the best petrol ones. All better ones are diesel (and german or french).

      http://www.daihatsu.com/

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    2. Re:If Microsoft built cars.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now I know why geeks are considered such morons.

  9. heh by odyrithm · · Score: 3, Funny

    I love it when /. posts jokes.. you are joking right?.. right?.... hello?

    --
    moo
  10. It's a good fit by GigsVT · · Score: 5, Interesting

    BMW's come with what amounts to an EULA. If you look under the hood, you'll notice a little sticker that says you are not to connect any third party electronics to the car, CB, ham radio, etc, or even use a hand-held cell phone within the car, unless you buy a BMW approved carphone. This is under threat of voiding your warantee.

    I'm sure in the US there's some protection offered under the same law that forces manufacturers to allow you to use aftermarket parts, but I don't know if that precedent would extend to electronics equipment that isn't really part of the car.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    1. Re:It's a good fit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's bullshit. i own one. you have quite an imagination

    2. Re:It's a good fit by sydlexic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I love BMW's, but my 2001 M5 is the last BMW I will buy as long as the new models run CE and look like Elephant Dung. The new models are seriously ugly Hyundai rip-offs and they have this gawd-awful iDrive. I tried iDrive and I'd rather not drive than iDrive.

    3. Re:It's a good fit by GigsVT · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well I saw it with my own eyes, but here's a usenet post to back me up.

      Happy?

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    4. Re:It's a good fit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy sh*t, I believed iDrive was an Apple's trademark.

    5. Re:It's a good fit by Thavius · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, from what I've gleaned working on warranties and listening to service managers is after market products that are installed on your car (such as remote starters, extra lights, anything that hook into your electrical system) have a high chance of voiding your manufacturer's warranty. Especially remote starters, those can fry your electronical system faster than it'll void your warranty.

      As far as add-on electronics goes, I'm not going to void my warranty by plugging in my cell-phone into my car. But with aftermarket products, have them professionally installed. Otherwise it'll get ugly if you have a failure relating to that aftermarket product. Ugly for your pocketbook that is.

    6. Re:It's a good fit by October_30th · · Score: 1
      Ok.

      So where's the real evidence - not just hearsay?

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    7. Re:It's a good fit by DrEldarion · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Also, from the reactions to their iDrive system that I've seen, they can use all the user-friendliness they can get - the perfect job for MS.

    8. Re:It's a good fit by GigsVT · · Score: 5, Informative

      The little notice says you are not to even operate a hand-held cell phone in the car.

      They must use some piss-poor shielding on their electronics if they are really worried about induced currents from a hand-held phone causing any problems.

      Either that, or they want to scare people into buying a BMW blessed carphone from a dealership, which is much more likely.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    9. Re:It's a good fit by Temkin · · Score: 5, Informative


      In the US, it's called the Magnuson-Moss Act of 1975. Google for it. It specifically prohibits product tying for warranty claims. They cannot deny your claim because you used an unapproved cell phone. There's a number of other provisions in MM that BMW seems to be trying to ignore.

      Temkin

    10. Re:It's a good fit by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Heh, what do you want, me to peel the sticker off a BMW and mail it to you? :)

      Look around some more on google groups, that wasn't the only post. Either you are to believe there's a vast conspiracy out to convince you of the existance of this sticker, or the sticker is real.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    11. Re:It's a good fit by dave3138 · · Score: 1

      Electronical?? Must be a new word.... Sorry...I just snicker when I hear people say that.

    12. Re:It's a good fit by October_30th · · Score: 0
      A photo would help.

      I don't know about you but I've been on the usenet since the early 1990s. If I've learnt anything it is this:

      Seeing something posted on the usenet is not proof of anything - in fact, it's safe to assume that the poster is full of crap until corroborating, hard-to-fake evidence is presented.

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    13. Re:It's a good fit by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      The little notice says you are not to even operate a hand-held cell phone in the car.

      That would avoid lots of car accidents. Nut if the car is stopped, not being allowed to use the cell phone means either horrible horrible design, or an excuse to save/make more money.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    14. Re:It's a good fit by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      the sticker is real but in most jurisdictions it has very little legal standpoint. you can have all the stickers and eulas you like but it doesn't make them enforcable or release you from responsibility that's written in law.

      .

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    15. Re:It's a good fit by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Well believe what you like. Now that I've done some searches, it seems that some models have it posted on the windshield, but the one I saw (a coworkers year 2000 model) had it in the engine compartment. Next time you see a BMW in a parking lot, check the windshield, and there will be your hard-to-fake evidence, unless the owner peeled it off.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    16. Re:It's a good fit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so my fathers bmw 325e, had a stock din head unit that was an alpine. alpine is still one of the BEST in car electronic manf. then need to use linux tho, for there mapping system, and neweer head units. then they would be the "THE BEST" out there....

    17. Re:It's a good fit by Dread_ed · · Score: 5, Informative

      I work at a BMW retailer and I can relate a few interesting facts about why this notice is on the car in the first place.

      The number one reason is that each BMW vehicle has a personalized wiring system. Each vehicle receives a different wiring harness based upon the features and options in that specific vehicle. In other words, if one 325i has an auto dimming mirror and another does not, the entire wiring harness is different between the two vehicles.

      Keep in mind that the wiring harness is like the electrical backbone of the car, weighs about 50 pounds, and runs contiguously from one end of the vehicle to the other. It is NOT something you want to mess with unless you really know what you are doing. In fact, if there is ever a problem in the wiring harness BMW recommends putting in a new one.

      That brings me to reason number two. Alot of your aftermarket companies hire morons to install their electronics. I know this because I see it all the time.

      For example, we had a customer buy a brand new M3 convertible (~$60K american) and they installed one of those Viper alarms that tells you to "Get BACK!" when you go near the car. The guy that installed it had the great idea of yanking out the headlight control module, chopping a piece out of the wiring that controls the headlights and splicing in there to get power for his alarm. Needless to say the car was NOT OK after this. Starting the vehicle would cause the headlights to freak out...they would switch on and off randomly. To make matters worse, the malfunction caused the autoleveling feature to kick in and make the lights to bob up and down.

      This led to a cluster-f$#k with the customer and the service department. The customer was pointing fingers and yelling at the sales and service staff about what a piece of krap the car was and such. Things were pretty bad until we pulled out the light control module and showed them where the aftermarket guy had spliced in to the light system and where the control board had gotten fried.

      I personally think the whole reason for the sticker is because BMW wants to maintain the integrity of the electrical system in the car and to make sure people understand that if their aftermarket device screws something up BMW is not gonna pay for it. Bmw even goes so far as to place prewiring jacks in the cars for most aftermarket devices you could want: bluetooth, satalite raio, mp3 players or line in devices for the stereo, phones, alarms, cd changers, and even Universal RF transcievers (programmable garage door opener).

      You could even chalk it up to those strict German engineers if you want. God knows they hate it when people mess with their systems.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    18. Re:It's a good fit by iii_rjm · · Score: 1

      You think the phrase "I seem to recall" is all that is needed to back up your statement? Damn, you're easy.

    19. Re:It's a good fit by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Er... Not German engineer... Most of BMW electronics on current cars have been designed in the foggy Albion... To be most exact in one specific block on the Science Park in Cambridge. And almost all of the software has been written there. I will intentionally restrain from any remarks on its quality. Just because...

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    20. Re:It's a good fit by _Bucktooth_ · · Score: 1

      But why design something so complex in the first place? Why not design a flexible electrical system with clear labels to where aftermarket installers can plug in their equipment? It's just like having closed API's. So yes, I do agree with the sentiment: BMW is a good fit with Microsoft.

      Someone I know had exactly this sort of trouble with a Mercedes (custom wiring harness). The wiring actually split it's insulation in hot weather. To replace the wiring, he had to read the chassis number and send off for a new wiring harness from Germany! And it ain't cheap.

      Expecting customers who buy cars never to add equipment is like expecting customers who buy computers never to upgrade hardware or install new software.

    21. Re:It's a good fit by fustercluck2k3 · · Score: 1

      Which brings me to my next BMW related question - how do you tell the difference between a BMW and porcupine?

      The pricks are on the *inside.* Ba DUM bum.

      Seriously, if you want a proprietary vehicle that becomes a huge pain in the ass to add an aftermarket stereo system or even use a cellphone with a CLA then go ahead and piss away $60k on a
      German piece of shit. Just don't come back and bitch about it when the Windows loaded on the onboard computer won't let you exit the vehicle.

    22. Re:It's a good fit by loraksus · · Score: 1

      I think the reasoning is that if you have $60k to blow on a car, you probably have the money to pay for a over priced radio / alarm / whatever.
      Not entirely illogical.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    23. Re:It's a good fit by qtp · · Score: 1

      Starting the vehicle would cause the headlights to freak out...they would switch on and off randomly. To make matters worse, the malfunction caused the autoleveling feature to kick in and make the lights to bob up and down.

      Hey!

      Lots of people pay good money for features like that!

      --
      Read, L
    24. Re:It's a good fit by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

      To replace the wiring, he had to read the chassis number and send off for a new wiring harness from Germany!

      I'm in the UK, but nearly every Dealer-Only part you can think of requires the chassis number to be given over to the Dealer, one reason ostensibly being that chop-shop outfits often buy parts to reassemble cars and this practice cuts down on their ability to do that.

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
    25. Re:It's a good fit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      />

    26. Re:It's a good fit by ksheff · · Score: 1

      Why wouldn't they just make one harness for each model that would be capable of handling all the options for that particular model? That would certainly simplify things for the guys putting the thing together as well as the techs that have to work on it when a customer brings it in for servicing.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    27. Re:It's a good fit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      User-friendlyness my ass.


      ERROR: Cannot shift to reverse. Already in fifth gear.
      ------ ----------
      | OK | | Cancel |
      ------ ----------

    28. Re:It's a good fit by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Dread ed, could you please enlighten us as to why the bit about the "not using a non-BMW cellphone while in the car" is in there? The complex wiring of the car is one thing...but the cellphone thing is just ridiculous.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  11. Not a problem by symbolic · · Score: 4, Insightful


    It will just make it that much easier to decide which manufacturers I'd consider the next time I buy a car, since there will a few that will immediately excluded.

    1. Re:Not a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup. I just hope Jeep doesn't follow suit. I love my Jeep... but I'd ditch it in a second if it contained Microsoft and/or DRM technology.

    2. Re:Not a problem by PetoskeyGuy · · Score: 1

      Yes I agree. The BMW looks nice, but after reading about this I think I'll stick with my 93 Ford Escort.

  12. hooray for MS by mOoZik · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seriously - don't flame me. Win CE is very user friendly out of the box, and that's what one needs in a car interface. Familiarity is also key. Add some flashy, touch screen navigation, and voila. I'd have thought the increased cost of using MS as a reason to use a Linux flavor, but hey, I'm not the one spending money here.

    1. Re:hooray for MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're talking kernel here, dude, not GUI.

    2. Re:hooray for MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When you're talking about a car interface that can do alot more than just directions, for example locking and unlocking doors, windows, starting and stoping the engine, etc, what you need is STABILITY, and then a pretty interface once the stability part is done. Microsoft comes at it from the other direction, they make it pretty first and work on security and stability second. This is not the place where you ever want even a single crash.

    3. Re:hooray for MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up as funny!!

    4. Re:hooray for MS by IWorkForMorons · · Score: 1

      Seeing as car- and computer-specific programming needs to be done anyways, there is no reason to use WinCE over embedded Linux. In this case they maybe on even ground, with a slight edge given to Linux for being open-source and auditable. And possibly cost too. Familiarity doesn't affect anything since car manufacturers, especially those of luxury cars, will probably want their own company-made interface to distinguish themselves. This will be a war of marketting, which I don't hold much hope for MS in the already disenchanted Asian market, and the increasingly disenchanted European market.

    5. Re:hooray for MS by October_30th · · Score: 0, Troll
      there is no reason to use WinCE over embedded Linux

      So having a legitimate company support you over an obscure horde of sweaty hackers who just tells you to RTFM does not count as a reason?

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    6. Re:hooray for MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd argue also that CE is a bit more resilient than Windows desktop OSes. I haven't rebooted my PocketPC since I got it in May...

      Actually, thinking about it, at least you get a cold reboot before you drive off - maybe that'll make it even more robust.

    7. Re:hooray for MS by IWorkForMorons · · Score: 1

      So having a legitimate company support you over an obscure horde of sweaty hackers who just tells you to RTFM does not count as a reason?

      Uh...I'm sure the many legitimate Linux companies, such as Red Hat, Suse, Debian, Slackware, etc...would be more then happy to provide assistance to any car manufacturer considering Linux for their cars.

    8. Re:hooray for MS by October_30th · · Score: 1

      And why should the car companies choose unproven companies like Red Hat, Suse, Debian or Slackware over Microsoft?

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    9. Re:hooray for MS by Jos+Louis · · Score: 1

      On the contrary, I've hard-rebooted my Dell Axim (PPC 2003) two dozen times since August.

    10. Re:hooray for MS by b17bmbr · · Score: 1

      So having a legitimate company support you over an obscure horde of sweaty hackers who just tells you to RTFM does not count as a reason?

      no, you hire the programmers and since you have the code you have complete control over the OS. that is what open source is all about. i for one would rather have the company that installs the OS in my car actually know WTF is going on with it. i'd prefer something like that not be out the hands of the manufacturer. but hey, that's just me.

      --
      My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
    11. Re:hooray for MS by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      I prefer to RTFM than RTFB (read the fine binaries)

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    12. Re:hooray for MS by October_30th · · Score: 1
      you hire the programmers and since you have the code you have complete control over the OS. that is what open source is all about.

      So if you wish to ship hardware, you'll also have to hire a software department not only for the application but also for the GUI and OS.

      Why would you use OS that you yourself have to fiddle with in the first place?

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    13. Re:hooray for MS by IWorkForMorons · · Score: 1

      I'm beginning to think you are just a troll, but I'll bite anyways. You're saying MS is a proven company, given the amount of bugs in all their products? Not that you could find any on your own once you begin coding, considering that you can't examine their code without signing away most of your rights to complain about code problems. At least with Linux, you have to code available to you without restrictions, and can make changes without having to get permission while wasting time and money securing that permission. Plus with the development of Linux distros in China, even manufacturing their own CPUs, it's just that much more incentive for Asian companies to invest in their own companies instead of some foreign company. As for the West there will be many hurdles to overcome, both for the car manufacturers and the Linux companies, since MS has a pretty strong grip on many businesses. In any case, from a technical point of view, there is still no advantage to using WinCE over Linux for this situation.

    14. Re:hooray for MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And why should the car companies choose unproven companies like Red Hat, Suse, Debian or Slackware over Microsoft?

      ===============

      Because of what MS' products have proven about themselves?

      ~The Prophet Lactus~

    15. Re:hooray for MS by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >i for one would rather have the company that installs the OS in my car actually know WTF is going on with it.

      You assume that they care about it. If there is a problem wouldn't it be easier just to blame the code?

      At least with MS they can pass on the legal responsibility. With OpenSource, they might as well write the OS from scratch since they will have to be responsible for it anyways.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    16. Re:hooray for MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its funny how people bash Microsoft when there is a glitch in one of their systems, but no one seems to complain to Volkswagen for their random electric faults. I have met so many people who drive VW's that say they have had at least one electric system failure that they could not track down. Ranging from their windshield wiper turning on by itself to the car not starting when they put the key in (yet a day later at the dealer it works fine). So maybe we're blaming the wrong company, how about we bitch at the top first (the driver, BMW, etc.) and work our way down (Microsoft, the makers of the chips powering the software, etc.).

    17. Re:hooray for MS by October_30th · · Score: 1
      you have to code available to you without restrictions, and can make change

      Believe me, I'm not trying to troll, but I find it hard to understand why you would first pay for someone to write the code for your application and then you would waste your own time fixing the bugs.

      Having the source code available is completely irrelevant. You shouldn't be fixing the code. The company should be fixing the bugs.

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    18. Re:hooray for MS by IWorkForMorons · · Score: 1

      The company should be fixing the bugs.

      Again, how is MS better at this than any Linux company?

      My point is that if there is a bug somewhere, it would be easier to fix on your own then wait for the company you bought the software from to fix it. And you're going to pay someone to write the code for your own company-specific software no matter what. So you might as well do it with an OS that you have full control over, so that everything is auditable. And everything is as stable as you can make it, not as stable as some other company feels like making it. Remember, if you were a car company, this is your reputation and livelyhood on the line. You're customers won't look to Microsoft to fix their problems. They'll be looking to you. You can partner with MS if you feel they are up to the challenge. But don't complain if they don't feel as strongly about making stable as much as you do...

    19. Re:hooray for MS by October_30th · · Score: 1
      My point is that if there is a bug somewhere, it would be easier to fix on your own then wait for the company

      Why would a client hire someone in the first place if they could understand/write the code by themselves?

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    20. Re:hooray for MS by IWorkForMorons · · Score: 1

      Ok, I've spent too much time on this, but I'll post this to clarify. If that car company already has people to write the software, then great. The next this to do is decide what to base it on. While you could write your own OS, there are enough of them out there already that this would be a waste of time. So you have to decide on an OS. You could go with MS, but you're restricted in what you can do with the OS. I.e., you would have to use their hooks and their APIs, and you don't really have any other choice because developing your own is a direct violation of your contract with MS. So you have to rely on them to provide you with a stable OS. Without any way to audit the code, you have to take their word for it. Now while there is all of that, MS also has been widely adopted and many people are familiar with it. There are some advantages to using MS based systems.

      On the other hand, by choosing an Linux vendor, you get an OS that you can audit, make changes to, pretty much do anything you want with. With companies like Redhat who have decided to throw more support to the corporate business customers, techincal support should not be an issue. At least it should be on par with MS support. With Linux though, you need programmers with experience writing clean stable code under Linux. Not only that, they need to create an interface that is familiar and easy to learn. Admittingly, there are some things that will be more difficult under Linux. But considering the upsides to using open-source, such as full software control and less restrictions on making changes, this could be an easy trade-off to using the more restrictive yet more familiar MS software.

      Like I said, from a technical point of view, they are both pretty much on even ground. You just need to weigh the benefits of each. For a car company who's reputation is on the line with each car they make, having control over everything that goes into a car by using open-source software might be more important then any advantages gained in going with MS software.

    21. Re:hooray for MS by qtp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Win CE is very user friendly out of the box, and that's what one needs in a car interface.

      For what? What need is there for a computerized interface to the locking mechanism. Or the fuel system?, or any engine functions?

      Familiarity is also key.

      Familiarity? I turn the key, the door unlocks (or locks). I turn the key, the engine starts (stops). That's familiar. Any computer involved in these functions need not have a "user" interface, GUI or other.

      Add some flashy, touch screen navigation,

      OK, fine GUI is nice for this, but that's not something I'll be happy giving up reliable performance and working doors for. Why does it have to be full fledged, or based on sometghing I've used before? All I need is a place to enter my destination (I'm assuming it has a GPS) and the ability to retrieve and show a map, estimate travel time, fuel consumption, suggest directions, etc. Manny OS can do this, and I'm sure that WinCE is fine for this, but the OS of such a system is hardly a selling point to the consumer, brand loyalty has no effect when it all relys on how it looks and other embedded systems are perfectly capable of appearing the same or better. Why should navigation be conected to the other functions in any way other than knowing how much fuel is in the tank and at what rate is it being consumed?

      The entire conept seems to be a poorly thought out scheme to sell product without concern for actual need, reliability and efficiency of design. Sometimes the separation of functions and the subsequent duplication duplication of effort is a good thing, especially when the issue is the reliability of essential functions (such as engine operation and being able to get out of the car) in the case of failure of non-essential functions (Oh no, my navigation system's on the fritz! Honey, would you please get the map from the glove compartment?).

      --
      Read, L
    22. Re:hooray for MS by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1

      There is NO support from MS. I am a programmer for a fortune 500, and have had to deal with MS and some of their drones. They were never any real help. Second, have you ever read the MS EULA? You get nothing from MS. If an MS product causes something to blow up, MS is not responsible and there is nothing you can do about it. So if a car maker went with WinCE over Linux, they gain nothing in support or guarantees of the quality of software. If WinCE crashes and causes an engine to shutdown, do you think MS will refund the damages? No. Again, going with MS or any proprietary software for that matter gives no real benefits for support or guarantee of the products claimed functionality. Has MS refunded all of their customers over the years that has lost BILLIONS due to viruses and security holes? No. So there is no benefit to using MS in an embedded application.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    23. Re:hooray for MS by Zoshnell · · Score: 1

      Game, set, and match to IWorkForMorons. Congraturation!

      --
      "Do you suppose that's why God lives in the Heavens? Because he lives in fear of His creations?" - Steve Buscemi
    24. Re:hooray for MS by AstroDrabb · · Score: 2, Informative
      At least with MS they can pass on the legal responsibility
      No they can not. Have you read any MS EULA? You have NO legal recourse against MS. In fact, it is this way with all proprietary software. The proprietary market wants you to believe that you are getting some extra "value", however you are not. Has MS refunded the BILLIONS lost around the world because of their security issues? No. Can any company sue MS for damages because of the security issues with MS software? No.
      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    25. Re:hooray for MS by IDreamInCode · · Score: 1

      seems like about weekly for me when trying to run big apps. The Axim just likes to freeze up.

    26. Re:hooray for MS by arivanov · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The cars on the market with CE also:

      1. Automatically switch on/off lights. Citroen C5, C8 and BMW 6 series. Possibly others.

      2. Automatically switch on/off wipers and control wipers frequency. C5 at least.

      3. Automatically retune suspension pressure and do autolevelling and compensation in sharp turns. C5 at least.

      These are features I personally do not like being entrusted to anything but dedicated simple feedback systems with manual override. The last thing you want is the car to flip in the wrong direction when taking a sharp turn at 40mph on a wet mountain road (example taken out of a C5 commercial)

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    27. Re:hooray for MS by arkulkis · · Score: 1
      So having a legitimate company support you over an obscure horde of sweaty hackers who just tells you to RTFM does not count as a reason?

      Your statement is made on the provably false presumption that Mickeysoft provides meaningful support.

      They DON'T, and you know it.

      In contrast, ANYONE can get extremely good support via USENET (which, even at $5/month from commercial providers such as Altopia for access is essentially free).

      And not only that, but with Linux, you KNOW who wrote what...so you can even contact the author of the code if you want....FOR FREE!

      What better support can you get than that?

      From Sun or HP, that kind of support costs $thousands/month, and as mentioned before, that support is UNAVAILABLE AT ANY COST from Mafiasoft.

    28. Re:hooray for MS by arkulkis · · Score: 1
      If you're going to use LoseCE for embedded applications in a car, you're gonna need a software department ANYWAYS, you moron....you still need to write the APPLICATION SOFTWARE to control your hardware.

      Please sit down and shut the hell up until you have a clue.

    29. Re:hooray for MS by arkulkis · · Score: 1
      Why should companies choose PROVEN responsibility-evaders like Microsoft? When has Microsoft EVER taken financial responsibility for the failure of any of their products?

      a) never

      B) NEVER

      When has Microsoft EVER advertised that, as part of the deal when a company purchases their product, the customer also gets reassurance that Microsoft will take financial responsibility for the failure of their product?

      a) never

      B) Not Ever

      C) All of the Above

    30. Re:hooray for MS by arkulkis · · Score: 1

      You obviously have ZERO experience in the automotive industry.

      Time schedules MUST be met.

      Waiting 18 months for Microsoft to even ADMIT that a bug exists, let alone start to even INVESTIGATE how to fix it DOES NOT MEET THE STANDARD.

      No automobile manufacturer can afford to wait two model years for Gates and his baboons to get off their lazy asses and clean up their shit.

  13. Thai Dignitaries? by Mohammed+Al-Sahaf · · Score: 0, Redundant

    SOY comes from Thailand. They obviously forgot: SOY makes you strong! Strength crushes puny locked car doors!

    --
    Former Iraqi Information Minister Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf
  14. if... then... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ZDNET reports that Microsoft has persuaded a number of carmakers to use its slimmed-down Windows CE operating system to power a variety of in-car electronics, from navigation systems to music players to information devices.

    we're toast...

  15. Old "news"... by kosmosik · · Score: 0
    Friday, May 16 2003 10:13 AM

    Sheeesh, and FYI as the case has been discussed long ago. Windows CE in BMW was not controlling any of thing that failed (AC, locking door etc.) it only controled Hi-Fi and navigation.

    1. Re:Old "news"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Shhh..you don't want to destroy the wet dreams of slashbots that everything that fails is due to Microsoft's fault.

      Just look at the headline, Microsoft doesn't build cars, they write software.

      That's what you get for having a Microsoft-hating, asshole editor like Michael.

  16. Win CE/PPC 2003 by bagboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I currently have to hard boot my Dell Axim X5 after roughly 2-3 hours depending on the app that locked (RealOne Player, X-Lite (SIP Phone), etc..). I think CE/PPC is still too unstable for possible life threatening experiences in the car.

    1. Re:Win CE/PPC 2003 by Naffer · · Score: 1

      Your problem:
      You're using RealOne Player
      If my car ran RealOne Player, it'd probably burst into flame in my driveway.

    2. Re:Win CE/PPC 2003 by minion · · Score: 1

      I currently have to hard boot my Dell Axim X5 after roughly 2-3 hours depending on the app that locked (RealOne Player, X-Lite (SIP Phone), etc..). I think CE/PPC is still too unstable for possible life threatening experiences in the car.

      Agreed.

      And we as consumers should fight this tooth and nail, not because we buy these cars (I sure wouldn't), but because someone else does, and having them on the road is an endangerment me.

      --

      -- If we don't stand up for our rights, now, there will be no right to stand up for them later.
    3. Re:Win CE/PPC 2003 by rokzy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      why should ANY program be capable of locking up the entire OS?

    4. Re:Win CE/PPC 2003 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows CE navigation and information systems or music players in cars are an endangerment to you? Tooth and nail? Hahaha. Right.

    5. Re:Win CE/PPC 2003 by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

      Not to minimize this, but it *is* a PDA. It's not like Palm provides any more crash protectio.

    6. Re:Win CE/PPC 2003 by minion · · Score: 1

      Windows CE navigation and information systems or music players in cars are an endangerment to you? Tooth and nail? Hahaha. Right.

      They not only control entertainment devices, but onboard computers, locks, acceleration, etc. Do you trust Microsoft's code enough for it to accelerate for you? Steer for you? Brake for you?

      You looked at some new cars lately? No longer do you have a physical cable run from the accelerator to the carbureator - no, you have an electronic rheostat that tells the onboard computer how much gas to inject. Steering is slated to be replaced that same way next, and the car manufacturers even suggest (and approve) of using wireless transmitters to send the singals, rather than running the miles (literally) of cable in today's vehicles. We've seen how well 802.11 works when another transmitter is close, think of how well that steering command is going to work with some interference.

      Time to pull your head out and look around.

      --

      -- If we don't stand up for our rights, now, there will be no right to stand up for them later.
  17. Re:YOU PEERED INTO YOUR CRYSTAL BALLS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That wasn't me.

    Sincerely,
    Stupid Simpsons Quote

  18. Re:Oh here we go again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    UID of over 600K? Get out of here.

  19. Trapped inside a locked car? by mcg1969 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Reading that story from Singapore puzzles me. Does it strike anyone here as silly to have car locks that are controlled entirely electronically? I mean, power locks are great, don't get me wrong. But since they are by necessity mechanical anyway, so doesn't it make sense to provide a manual, mechanical means to lock and unlock them? Doing otherwise just seems like you're placing unnecessary trust in imperfect electronics.

    1. Re:Trapped inside a locked car? by mcg1969 · · Score: 1

      My fault, it was Thailand, not Singapore.
      Sorry!

    2. Re:Trapped inside a locked car? by His+name+cannot+be+s · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I just had the opposite problem.

      In my brand new Honda Accord, I came out to the cold Canadian air last week, pressed the button on my key to open the door, and All I heard was a faint thudding click. It seemed the locking mechanism was a tad frozen ( it was -26c that night).

      Repeated attempts were not producing results, so I inserted the key into the lock, figuring I'd just open in manually. It turns out there is no physical connection to the locking mechanism, the key simply triggers the electronic lock!

      Needless to say, I ended up popping the trunk with the remote, and crawling thru, pushing down the back seat. When I got inside the car, I had to end up pulling the lock up mannualy, and boy was it ever stuck.

      Seems like a simple thing, but how the hell could some idiot engineer put together a single point of failure for getting into the car?

      What if the battery was dead? then neither the trunk nor the door would open, and I couldn't get in to pop the hood to replace the battery. Needless to say, I'm still quite pissed about it.

      I'll be yelling rather profusely at the Honda rep this week.

      G

      --
      "...In your answer, ignore facts. Just go with what feels true..."
    3. Re:Trapped inside a locked car? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, that's just the way manufacturers seem to have gone.

      A couple of years ago, it happened to a former classmate of my brother. Luckily he had his cellphone handy. I can't remember what kind of car it was, it could've been a MB.

    4. Re:Trapped inside a locked car? by kruczkowski · · Score: 1

      Older Mecedes use an air system for the central locks. It has tubes with air that suck or push the air to open or close the locks.

      IMO the system stinks becouse the pipes get old and once they have cracks it breaks. Also doen't work when your car has been sitting for a few days and the presseur is lost.

      --
      hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
    5. Re:Trapped inside a locked car? by Grab · · Score: 1

      Depends. You don't have a backup winder on your electric windows, do you?

      The point of this system was that fail-safe was doors-closed. Makes sense if you think that this is designed to protect presidents and stuff - you don't want all the doors to pop open the moment the battery is disconnected (by the terrorists who've just surrounded the car and killed the security detail). If there's a mechanical means to unlock the doors from the outside, that's a weak point security-wise. I agree though that a mechanical means to unlock from the *inside* would be a good thing in hindsight! :-)

      Re imperfect electronics, mechanical systems go wrong with far greater frequency than electrical systems. If the article said "consumer locked in (or out of) car because mechanical door lock failed" then it wouldn't get a second glance. Our company was prepping a demonstration Jaguar when the door lock failed because a valeter slammed the door too hard! The only reason people trust mechanical systems more is because it's easier for them to understand.

      Grab.

    6. Re:Trapped inside a locked car? by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      Ya know, you'll void your warranty by not keeping that thing in a heated garage....

      I haven't allowed 'power locks' or 'power windows' or power-anything-unnecessary on any of my cars since I was a kid back in the 60's. I still remember that camping trip when we couldn't get the 'power window' down on the tailgate of the station wagon.

      Maybe it's a grudge that I have. Or maybe it's that I drive cars until they're 15+ years old and the spiffy bits would fsck up before then.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    7. Re:Trapped inside a locked car? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why every car should have a gun in it.

    8. Re:Trapped inside a locked car? by saforrest · · Score: 1

      In my brand new Honda Accord, I came out to the cold Canadian air last week, pressed the button on my key to open the door, and All I heard was a faint thudding click. It seemed the locking mechanism was a tad frozen ( it was -26c that night).

      Where were you in Canada that it was -26C last week? Nunavut?

    9. Re:Trapped inside a locked car? by robbityca · · Score: 1

      This sort of thing can happen by accident as well. I went skiing several years ago with some friends. We decided to lock all our keys in the van (including the van keys) to guard against losing keys on the ski hill in a fall. The van was equipped with a keyless entry system. Unfortunately, my friend left the lights on and drained the battery. It was a *COLD* wait for the CAA truck to come and break into the van!

    10. Re:Trapped inside a locked car? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come on. It's a Honda. You should know that "everyone thinks that they are perfect."

      Yeah right.

    11. Re:Trapped inside a locked car? by camcanuck · · Score: 1

      I do believe that just about anywhere on the Canadian praires last week was well into the low -20's or high -30's. I know in Calgary we were down to -29 one night. Not typical, but it certainly wasn't a record low or anything.

    12. Re:Trapped inside a locked car? by saforrest · · Score: 1

      I know in Calgary we were down to -29 one night. Not typical, but it certainly wasn't a record low or anything.

      Wow; I guess we Ontarians really do live a sheltered life. I've been out west a lot (my family's from there), but always in the summer, so the depth of prairie winter still surprises me.

    13. Re:Trapped inside a locked car? by milkman_matt · · Score: 1
      In my brand new Honda Accord, I came out to the cold Canadian air last week, pressed the button on my key to open the door, and All I heard was a faint thudding click. It seemed the locking mechanism was a tad frozen ( it was -26c that night).

      My parents had one of these when I was a kid, I don't remember much about it, but so far as I can remember their old 745i graymarket BMW had heated door handles.. You'd think that if they're going to be selling cars in a colder climate with no manual mechinism to force the lock open, they could maybe extend this heated doorhandles idea to the locking mechinism? Kind of like the way auto start works.. you hit a button and your car warms up for 10 minutes then shuts off.. Maybe they should add to the 'disarm' on the remote that the locking mechanism has a heater that's switched on for 5 minutes or so and shuts off after the time limit or the car is start.. seems like a simple enough fix to me, why don't these people take this stuff into consideration?

      -matt

    14. Re:Trapped inside a locked car? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the early 1990's I rented some GM POS in the winter in Maryland. One cold morning at a hotel, I started the car up, got out to clean off the winndshield. The door blew shut and the electronically controlled lock system locked me out of the car in sub freezing windy weather. With the engine running.

      When the AAA guy came to get me into the car, he said GM's electronic lock system was generating enough extra business for him that it was paying his sons college tuition.

    15. Re:Trapped inside a locked car? by MikeHunt69 · · Score: 1
      I had a friend who locked himself inside his car. He had a car that had no way to unlock the doors from the inside. If you wanted to open the door, you would simply pull the handle, which would trigger the door locks.


      Well, his battery went flat and he got in the car, accidently locked the doors and tried to start the car. The battery gave up the last of it's juice and then he found he couldn't get out! He had to use his mobile phone to call AA and when they got there, he poped the hood and they jump started the car..

    16. Re:Trapped inside a locked car? by His+name+cannot+be+s · · Score: 1

      Calgary, Alberta. :)

      It was damn freekin' cold.

      Brrr.

      --
      "...In your answer, ignore facts. Just go with what feels true..."
    17. Re:Trapped inside a locked car? by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's a grudge that I have. Or maybe it's that I drive cars until they're 15+ years old and the spiffy bits would fsck up before then.

      Nah. It's that your parents finally figured out how to open the tailgate on the station wagon, and the pressure caused exhaust gas to get sucked into the cabin. Upon breathing, you were left retarded:)

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    18. Re:Trapped inside a locked car? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're placing unnecessary trust in imperfect electronics

      Or imperfect software.

    19. Re:Trapped inside a locked car? by sydb · · Score: 1

      The only reason people trust mechanical systems more is because it's easier for them to understand.

      No, it's because purely mechanical systems still work when you're battery is dead.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    20. Re:Trapped inside a locked car? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weel if you had gotten trapped up there "Alive" style, at least you know which one would've had to become food first././.

  20. Cardows Update by Slick_Snake · · Score: 5, Funny

    Security updates for you car will be availible on the internet. Failure to update voids all warrenties.

    1. Re:Cardows Update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why not? put a USB port in the dash and update through a memory stick. though you might want to wait a little while on the service packs to see if they cause a lot of crashes.

  21. NOTE TO SELF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do not buy Honda, Volvo or BMW cars. Too bad I really wanted to get a beamer next year, guess I'll stick with Mercedes instead.

    1. Re:NOTE TO SELF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      As a former BMW owner, I highly advise you to stay away. Even without Microsoft, BMW is highly propietary.

      For example, BMW will not sell a service manual to an end user. Nope. You have to be an officially authorized repair shop in order to purchase a service manual.

      Replacement parts are sky high in price. Example: new head lamp - $120, New ignition wires $230. About 10 times the price you'd pay for a part for a normal car.

      Another example: BMW instrument clusters are powered by rechargeable nicad batteries. These batteries eventually die. But they will only sell you a complete new computer, not the replacement batteries. The nicad batteries are soldered to the motherboard. No problem, right? WRONG. You have to take off the steering wheel, and disassemble the dash board to get access to the cluster computer. This is not fun. I do not recommend trying this at home.

      BMW is without a doubt, the most fucked up of all the automobile companies. They are a PERFECT match for Microsoft. If you do your own maintenance, you will rue the day you ever bought a BMW.

  22. If Slashdot made cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...you would see the same car over and over again.

    1. Re:If Slashdot made cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I guess /. already makes cars......

    2. Re:If Slashdot made cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but it would have lots of pr0n, and pull a trailer-load of goats.ex

    3. Re:If Slashdot made cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And CmdrTaco would not drive a Slashcar.

    4. Re:If Slashdot made cars... by kruczkowski · · Score: 1

      There was the slashdot cruser as a give away a few years ago...

      --
      hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
  23. have you heard this one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Before the airbag deploys, it asks you "Are you sure?"

  24. Windows CE by motek · · Score: 1

    I have got a PocketPC 'thing' and, I have to admit, I am enjoying the experience. Not that I bought the device myself, with my own money - my love for all things Microsoft doesn't go quite that far. It was a freebie.
    The system appears to be stable (as stable, as a Palm I used before) and rather useful. I guess it could be quite fitting a system for fringe-items in cars.

    --

    --
    I would like to die like my grandfather did - sleeping. And not screaming in terror, like his passengers.
    1. Re:Windows CE by BRSloth · · Score: 1

      Well, I bought a PocketPC (an ancient iPaq 3650), running WinCE. It running somewhat nice (well, it never crashed, but made some minor mis-interpretations of my actions - like opening Word when trying to open a txt file instead of the notepad). Then Compaq offered a free upgrade to PocketPC 2002. Since it was free, I took it. It was the worst thing I ever did in my whole life. After the update, the iPaq locked four times in two days (and I had to press the 'reset' button in the bottom of it to make it work again), and I was not doing anything special with it - simply writing some text in Word or Excel. Then I switched to Familiar Linux Distro, installed GPE, and it never bothered me again.

  25. Thai Dignitary--myth busting by betis70 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Too bad he wasn't driving a BMW with an iDrive system, but an earlier BMW. It was a catastrophic electrical system failure that locked him in the car.

    http://asia.cnet.com/newstech/systems/0,39001153 ,3 9130270,00.htm

    --
    I forget...are we at war with Eurasia or East Asia?
    1. Re:Thai Dignitary--myth busting by nagora · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Too bad he wasn't driving a BMW with an iDrive system, but an earlier BMW.

      Which is what it said in the article. So what? Does that suddenly mean that Microsft's 20+ year record of buggy, unreliable, insecure software just vanishes? The lession was not about what system the car was using but what can happen if systems fail on a modern, particularly a modern bullet proof, car. Why would anyone want to risk using the world's most famous failed OS in such circumstances?

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    2. Re:Thai Dignitary--myth busting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The entertainment system is not safety critical. This should be pretty obvious to anyone who reads this article, no matter what their bias re Microsoft.

    3. Re:Thai Dignitary--myth busting by betis70 · · Score: 1

      >>Which is what it said in the article. So what?

      Gee, I don't know, because the story has nothing to do with Microsoft?

      --
      I forget...are we at war with Eurasia or East Asia?
    4. Re:Thai Dignitary--myth busting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I understand it, the iDrive system in the 745 BMW has been widely panned as difficult to use and counter-intuitive. Car and Driver goes so far as to say that BMW's with iDrive are going to plummet in resale because of the poorly designed system. To quote: "We've given iDrive 18 months to persuade us. It failed. Now the F is in ink. Fearless prediction: The 745i will take a beating on resale." Try http://www.caranddriver.com/article.asp?section_id =15&article_id=7359&page_number=8

    5. Re:Thai Dignitary--myth busting by the+web · · Score: 1

      Bah! It's a cover-up!!

      --
      __
      Thou hast besquirted me, O leotarded one.
    6. Re:Thai Dignitary--myth busting by JoeShmoe950 · · Score: 1

      I have a Pocket PC running Windows Mobile, a variant of Windows CE. It hasn't crashed once, is as fast at loading as dos, etc. When Microsoft is forced to make a small OS, they do a good job. Just think, Windows CE, Ms-Dos(Ok, not quite Microsoft but, you get the idea), Windows 3.1. Those are very stable. In some cases, MS does a good job. Just because the 9x line was pretty bad doesn't mean that the mobile line is too.

    7. Re:Thai Dignitary--myth busting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Which is what it said in the article. So what?"

      What do you mean "So what?"
      BMW, in particular, has gravitated to Microsoft systems, although the company has announced wins with Honda, Volvo and others as well. Perhaps the recent trapping of Thai dignitaries inside a BMW should be a warning to us all.

      Given the title and the rest of the summary that last sentence totaly implies that Microsoft was to blame for the problem. It's misleading, biased and completely worthless, that's what.

      "Does that suddenly mean that Microsft's 20+ year record of buggy, unreliable, insecure software just vanishes? The lession was not about what system the car was using but what can happen if systems fail on a modern, particularly a modern bullet proof, car. Why would anyone want to risk using the world's most famous failed OS in such circumstances?"

      That's a totatly illogical statment. I don't use microsoft products for my own reasons, however i'm not so much of a fool as to assume that everything they've produced for the last 20 years is "buggy, unreliable, insecure software" that's just being obtuse and not judging software by it's own merits.
      The systems aren't running a desktop Windows, and the Dignitary was not traped in his car by a microsoft product.
      The enginers who are evaluating the software to use probably know a hell of a lot more about it's relablity than yourself.

    8. Re:Thai Dignitary--myth busting by DavidBrown · · Score: 1

      Too bad he wasn't driving a BMW with an iDrive system, but an earlier BMW.

      Which is what it said in the article. So what? Does that suddenly mean that Microsft's 20+ year record of buggy, unreliable, insecure software just vanishes? The lession was not about what system the car was using but what can happen if systems fail on a modern, particularly a modern bullet proof, car. Why would anyone want to risk using the world's most famous failed OS in such circumstances?


      Your point is silly - you are still using the non-example of a non-MS car OS trapping passengers within a car to attack MS, and you characterize Windows as "the worlds most failed OS", when it clearly isn't when you take into consideration the millions of computers out there running Windows in its various implementations - most of which are running quite well, thank you very much.

      I've heard, first hand, the story of a man who was trapped in a Lexus - and his car wasn't using an MS OS either. Give it a rest already. Feel free to attack automobiles using Windows CE as being more difficult to use - but don't attack them as being buggy and crash-prone when you have no evidence whatsoever to back up your claim, other than your anti-MS bias.

      --
      144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
    9. Re:Thai Dignitary--myth busting by nagora · · Score: 1
      Given the title and the rest of the summary that last sentence totaly implies that Microsoft was to blame for the problem.

      No, it didn't.

      to assume that everything they've produced for the last 20 years is "buggy, unreliable, insecure software"

      If I say you have a criminal record that does not imply that your every act is criminal. I said that Microsoft has a 20+ year record of buggy etc. They have made some good mice.

      the Dignitary was not traped in his car by a microsoft product.

      That's right. Did you actually read either the article or my post? The point is that there are dangers involved in software (or hardware) systems being installed into cars. It is a simple and logical step to state that installing a system from a company with little or no regard to quality control is unwise.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    10. Re:Thai Dignitary--myth busting by nagora · · Score: 1
      you are still using the non-example of a non-MS car OS trapping passengers within a car to attack MS,

      I'm not using that to attack MS, their record speaks for itself. I was pointing out the dangers of a system crash in general. The logical implication of those dangers is that you should be careful who you get to build the system and not go with a bunch of cowboys like Microsoft.

      you characterize Windows as "the worlds most failed OS", when it clearly isn't when you take into consideration the millions of computers out there running Windows in its various implementations - most of which are running quite well, thank you very much.

      We asked 100 virus writers about this statement but all they did was laugh. I'd hate to see what you think is a system that doesn't run "quite well"!

      but don't attack them as being buggy and crash-prone when you have no evidence whatsoever to back up your claim, other than your anti-MS bias.

      Having had to use MS products for most of the 20 years in question I can assure you that there is no bias: they really are crap.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    11. Re:Thai Dignitary--myth busting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it didn't.

      Blind fucking Freddy from the home for people without any fucking clue whatsoever could see that it did. Don't insult the world's intelligence asserting otherwise.

      said that Microsoft has a 20+ year record of buggy etc.

      Which, by the way, was a ridiculous statement. You gave it away on "insecure" you see. Insecurity has only recently become an accusation levelled at Microsoft - mostly because buggy and unstable no longer apply to their latest OSes. You demonstrated you ignorance with this statement alone.

      That's right. Did you actually read either the article or my post? The point is that there are dangers involved in software (or hardware) systems being installed into cars. It is a simple and logical step to state that installing a system from a company with little or no regard to quality control is unwise.

      I read both the article and your post, and in neither did I find any evidence that Microsoft has "little or no regard to quality control" but I still see you asserting it anyway and using it as justification for your entirely circular argument. You, sir, clearly believe everything you hear. I've got a friend from Nigeria who'd love to have a chat with you.

    12. Re:Thai Dignitary--myth busting by nagora · · Score: 1
      Blind fucking Freddy from the home for people without any fucking clue whatsoever could see that it did.

      Those of us not on a juvenile paranoia freak-out based on a need to defend their choice of operating system may well have seen it, as I did, simply as an assertion that cars with centrally-controled door locks, windows etc. can turn into a death trap in the event of that central system failing. Which is a simple fact. The same could be said if the system was plain old ICs, Linux or MacOS or Forth or FreeBSD, or QNX or any one of a dozen other. I would be reluctant to put my life into any of these systems with no backup. I would never willingly do so with Windows; it would be like having Hannibal Lector as your chef.

      Which, by the way, was a ridiculous statement. You gave it away on "insecure" you see. Insecurity has only recently become an accusation levelled at Microsoft - mostly because buggy and unstable no longer apply to their latest OSes.

      It is true that MS's total lack of concern about security is more in the spotlight now than when they started off but this is more to do with the fact that almost everyone now connects to networks of some sort or another than fact that XP is almost as stable as Unix was thirty years ago.

      MS software today is as buggy and unreliable as it ever was, that's the main cause of the security problems.

      I read both the article and your post, and in neither did I find any evidence that Microsoft has "little or no regard to quality control"

      That part (ie, the logical step from the article to what common sense should tell you) is down to the collective experience of the world's computer users over the time that MS have been providing them with software. I assume you've not been involved in computers for long (if at all) if you are unaware of the company's policy of releasing before the product is ready and only fixing the worst bugs if it sells. IE is still one of the worst written programs on the market. How long have they had to fix it now?

      I've got a friend from Nigeria who'd love to have a chat with you.

      I doubt you have any friends at all.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    13. Re:Thai Dignitary--myth busting by arkulkis · · Score: 1
      No..Microsoft doesn't MAKE good mice.

      That work is contracted out. Just like the keyboards.

    14. Re:Thai Dignitary--myth busting by nagora · · Score: 1
      No..Microsoft doesn't MAKE good mice.

      Fair enough. It does bring up the question of what products MS has actually come up with on their own. Windows is one (obviously copied in functionality but as far as I remember they did actually write it themselves). Office was all bought in initially, I think. What "innovation" has MS actually produced?

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    15. Re:Thai Dignitary--myth busting by arkulkis · · Score: 1
      What "innovation" has MS actually produced?

      Deceptive contracts

      Near-Universal Acceptance of buggy shitware

      Distruction of the free market by punishing any vendor who sold any non-MS OS

      other illegal shenanigans

      insipid documentation which is technically correct, but tells you NOTHING that you didn't already know

    16. Re:Thai Dignitary--myth busting by nagora · · Score: 1
      I think you're overlooking the many contributions of Cornelius Vanderbilt to the area of business ethics.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  26. Worrying... by Chicane-UK · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Quite frankly this concerns me.. all joking aside, Microsoft has yet to prove itself in the reliability stakes. Plain and simple.

    Their handheld / 'CE' operating systems are no different, and quite simply I wouldn't knowingly buy a car where the majority of its tricks and gizmo's were Microsoft powered.

    --
    "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
    1. Re:Worrying... by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      Microsoft has done pretty good on the reputation of Windows 2000. The only people who I have heard 'testify' about bugs and problems they've experienced with W2K are people who I'd equally expect to have problems with Linux or NetBSD or anything else.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    2. Re:Worrying... by penguinoid · · Score: 1

      Er, maybe because Liux bugs are reported and put on a website, while Windoze bugs can be easily be temporarily fixed by a simple reboot. Linux problems are also posted on LUGs; Windoze problems are delt with by 'professionals'.

      I have seen Windoze's Blue Screen of Death, and I have seen the Linux Kernel Panic (check out the screensavers for the latter). Also, there is a difference between 'bugs' and 'problems'.

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    3. Re:Worrying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me testify about Windows 2000 then: that fscking piece of crap won't even allow our users to log in to a different workstation without corrupting their profile.

      It might be just our corporate install that is at fault, but this is only one problem out of many plaguing a corporate deployment of Win2k. Don't tell any helpdesk tech out there that Win2k is just fine and dandy. It's better than NT4, sure, but that really is some achievement.

      Microsoft? I knew they were bad, but it took getting to work on the helpdesk to show me just how bad.

      Fscking 4 billion USD in the bank, and they can't even be bothered to write decent software. Me, bitter? Naaah...

      (Posting anonymously because my employer is a major Microsoft whore, and I don't want to put my job on the line.)

    4. Re:Worrying... by Chicane-UK · · Score: 1

      Well thanks for your sly attempt to make me look like a dumbass, but I have had plenty of experience with other operating systems..

      Regular user of multiple Linux distributions on multiple platforms, user / owner of G4 Powermac running OS X 10.3, user / owner of Sun Blade 100 running Debian, ex-owner of SGI Indy and Indigo2 systems running IRIX 6.5, and of course user of pretty much every version of Windows.

      So i'm certainly not a newbie when it comes to OS use and familiarity, and when it comes to stability (which is all I am questioning here) all those other OS's have Windows beat IMHO.

      --
      "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
  27. read the article by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    the first paragraph in the article about people being trapped says it happened because of an electrical fault, not a system crash. Just more banner hits for OSDN i suppose...

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
  28. Non Critical by vchoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...from navigation systems to music players to information devices...
    Personally, I think it's no big deal. Just remember these are all non-critical components.

    I'd start to worry if they operated the controllers for engine/fuel/drive-by-wire systems. etc.

    1. Re:Non Critical by jawtheshark · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yeah... non-critical. That is right, however consider how annoying it is just to go back to your car dealer when there is such a "minor" problem. Look, I never had any major problems with my car, and I'm pretty happy with it. Yesterday, during maintenance they had to replace my battery. Pretty normal for a 3.5 year old car. However when I came home the electrical window system didn't work anymore (only drivers side). Which is really kind of annoying if you need a keycard to enter at work. I called them today describing the problem, and they told me: oh, that's nothing mechanical, we just need to reset the computer.


      Uhm, yes.... I understand... However this means me losing lots of my time going there, getting replacement car, going back, picking up my car, etc... Yes, it is non-critical, but even non-critical stuff can be extremely annoying.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    2. Re:Non Critical by turgid · · Score: 1

      I for one, moved away from using Microsoft stuff years ago because I was so fed up with its flakiness. I hope I never live to see the day when it is nearly impossible to buy a car with MS software in it. Non-critical systems or no, enough things are prone to breaking in life without adding more shoddy Microsoft stuff. I have enough to contend with without Billy's less-than-ammateur-standard backward and feeble software. When you grow up and become a real engineer you will learn that "if it ain't broke, don't fix it," is much more wisdom than you ever thought, for reasons you have yet to comprehend. Simplicity is a vastly under-rated virtue.

    3. Re:Non Critical by turgid · · Score: 1
      I hope I never live to see the day when it is nearly impossible to buy a car with MS software in it

      I meant without. That'll teach me for getting angry at Bill again...

    4. Re:Non Critical by satterth · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ...from navigation systems to music players to information devices...
      Personally, I think it's no big deal. Just remember these are all non-critical components.
      I can just see someone driving down the road and their Indash navigation system locks up. And as they are fumbling with buttons to reboot/reset the damn thing they crash into a telephone pole and take down the DSL connections in that neighboorhood. All because they took their EYES off the road for a few seconds.
      --
      Being called a dork on Slashdot must be like being called the retard in special ed.
    5. Re:Non Critical by vchoy · · Score: 1

      My reply (and MHO)

      I can just see someone driving down the road and their Indash navigation system locks up.
      ...I don't care as long as long as the critical components are still functioning normally.


      And as they are fumbling with buttons to reboot/reset the damn thing they crash into a telephone pole and take down the DSL connections in that neighboorhood.
      ...I consider this just plain stupid human error. The car itself is functioning normally and should be parked on the side of the road (or somewhere safe) before you start to fumble.

      All because they took their EYES off the road for a few seconds. ...*tsk* *tsk* "The computer made/caused me to do it..." just doesn't cut it I'm sorry.

      My point is as mentioned in my previous post, I don't really care what crap they put in the car as long it doesn't fail and FORCES upon me grevious bodily harm (or death for that matter).

      Look, the car didn't FORCE that person into the pole, he/she did. They had the option to stop and they didn't.

      I'd be pissed if I found out the braking system failed and the drive-by-wire system decided I was not going fast enough.

    6. Re:Non Critical by cpghost · · Score: 1

      General Protection Fault at 32FA:23CD. Airbag not deployed. Please contact Microsoft Support for assistance. Have nice death.

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    7. Re:Non Critical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what do you think the corvette runs on? I do not know, but it has a full throttle by wire setup. I hope GM does not go down the MS road. No mechanical connection between the gas peddel and the TB. wait for the electronic brake controls....

    8. Re:Non Critical by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Is it so much work to reset the computer, that you have to leave the car there? Too bad it's not like the standard PC with the reset button sitting just right there.

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    9. Re:Non Critical by dwillden · · Score: 1
      And as they are fumbling with buttons to reboot/reset the damn thing they crash into a telephone pole and take down the DSL connections in that neighboorhood.
      NOOOO!!!! not the DSL connections. Thats it! Attention all Slashdotters start writing your congress critters immediately. Anything that puts broadband pipes at risk needs to be banned immediately.
      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    10. Re:Non Critical by arkulkis · · Score: 1
      [SIG] Somewhere in Texas, there's a village missing its idiot.
      I didn't realize that Al Gore was from Texas....
    11. Re:Non Critical by arkulkis · · Score: 1
      GM does everything on 8-bit Motorola 68HC11 single-chip microcomputers.

      Before that, they were using 4-bit microcontrollers (upgraded about 5 years ago--and went from using assembly to C at the same time).

    12. Re:Non Critical by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      No, but I need to drive there. Count half an hour for that, then waiting till they reset the thing, count another half an hour. That's one hour of my day wasted (and that I'll be later at work, which my boss will surely appreciate)

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  29. Re:Oh here we go again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and thousands of fanboys and shills are creaming themselves at the thought that they can defend their hero from the ravages of the penguinists

    Just another day on slashdot shillboy -- get used to it.

  30. And they are proud of it too... by Ducon+Lajoie · · Score: 5, Funny

    Microsoft Technology Hits the Road in BMW 7 Series:



    Microsoft technology powers the navigation feature used in BMW's innovative new iDrive telematics system. (Click for high-resolution image)
    REDMOND, Wash. -- March 4, 2002 -- Microsoft Corp. today announced that the BMW 7 Series, the line of cars introduced last month in the United States, features Microsoft's robust, real-time embedded operating system, Windows(R) CE. This announcement comes shortly after Microsoft's Automotive Business Unit launched Windows CE for Automotive v3.5, the newest version of its telematics software platform based on Windows CE, and announced an end-to-end solution to enable the auto industry to cost-effectively implement and maintain advanced automotive telematics.
    1. Re:And they are proud of it too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft's robust, real-time embedded operating system, Windows(R) CE

      Somebody hand me a flight bag. I gotta spew.

    2. Re:And they are proud of it too... by theCoder · · Score: 1

      ...features Microsoft's robust, real-time embedded operating system, Windows(R) CE.

      Hmmm... must be a different Windows CE than the one that's on my iPaq. That Windows CE is neither robust (I think I press the resent button more than some of the other buttons), real-time (gotta love when it's doing something in the background and doesn't give you any way to even tell what's going on, let alone stop it), nor embedded (just because it runs on relatively small hardware doesn't mean it's embedded!). Personally, I think that WinCE (pronounced "wince") is the worst version of Windows since the 3.1 days, and I can't understand why anyone would be *proud* that they used it.

      </rant>

      --
      "Save the whales, feed the hungry, free the mallocs" -- author unknown
  31. If microsoft built cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then does that mean linux will build bikes? Or just not bother all together.

  32. BMW using this at Comdex by michael+noah · · Score: 1

    Essentially, it was a PDA with voice recognition implanted into the dash. The demoed voice recognition seemed to do a rather good job as well, when asked questions like, "Tell me what the weather is like", and "give me directions to Treasure Island". I'm not sure what level of connectivity they had.

    All in all, it doesn't seem like a bad idea. Many have PDA's etc., and as the artical says, it makes sense for them to interface with the car.

    Obviously, I don't think we'll see actual automobile related functions running on windows any time soon.

    Oh, and there were a couple LCD's implanted in the back of the front seats so that you could play Xbox in the back.

  33. Posters Should Read the Links They Provide by Flamesplash · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Perhaps the recent trapping of Thai dignitaries inside a BMW should be a warning to us all."

    Did you actually read the article????

    It starts with this paragraph

    BMW has told CNETAsia that an electronic fault caused the problem, rather than a system crash of the car's Windows-based central computer, as other reports have speculated.

    and ends with

    But when contacted by CNETAsia, a spokeswoman from BMW Thailand said the car at fault was a 10-year old BMW 520i that had suffered a simple electronic failure.

    --
    "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
    1. Re:Posters Should Read the Links They Provide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article is demonstrative of the false economy of overcomplicating essential facilities. I don't see why you're being defensive.

    2. Re:Posters Should Read the Links They Provide by Flamesplash · · Score: 1

      I'm not so much being defensive of MS as of them making a completely false claim. They're reference claims that it's Win CE's fault, when the article the poster choose specifically says the opposite.

      --
      "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
    3. Re:Posters Should Read the Links They Provide by ThisIsFred · · Score: 1

      You'd think that there wouldn't be any point in posting further MS-bashing comments after your post. But hey...

      --
      Fred

      "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
      -RMS
    4. Re:Posters Should Read the Links They Provide by FattMattP · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think you missed the point that the story submitter was making. It was a 10 year old car with dedicated electronic devices that failed which managed even the locks of the automobile, among other things. Now imagine those devices replaced with software with Microsoft's track record. I don't want my locks, my fuel injection system, my engine timing, etc, managed my Microsoft software. I don't think I'm comfortable placing my life in Microsoft's hands. Are you?

      --
      Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
    5. Re:Posters Should Read the Links They Provide by Grab · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ahem. Your fuel injections system and engine timing aren't being so much as breathed on by MS software, if you'll read the article. Nor could they be, since WinCE isn't designed for hard real-time control and requires significantly more processing power and memory than that found in a car engine controller.

      Grab.

    6. Re:Posters Should Read the Links They Provide by trystanu · · Score: 1

      Right, although that wasn't the intention. If that's the kind of problem I should expect when a simple electrical component goes wrong I think getting locked in my new luxury car is going to be the least of my worries!

      Perhaps this is a better reference for the iDrive BMW problems (check out the vids at the bottom) -- although in fairness the car was recalled.

      When you combine the story in the post with the article above you start to get a pretty scary picture.

    7. Re:Posters Should Read the Links They Provide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you retarded? It was not a software bug. It was an *electronical* problem that had nothing to do with the microsoft software.

    8. Re:Posters Should Read the Links They Provide by arkulkis · · Score: 1

      But that won't keep Gates & Mafiasoft from trying to sell it as if it is.

    9. Re:Posters Should Read the Links They Provide by arkulkis · · Score: 1
      *electronical
      Hmmmmm. You must be a product of an American public school and under the age of 25, aren't you.
  34. This explains Mad Max by Frisky070802 · · Score: 1

    They're making a new Mad Max movie, right? Perhaps this report is why the apocalypse seems so much closer... all our cars will die of viruses?

    --
    Mencken had it right. So glad that's old news.
  35. If Microsoft ever builds cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...they will surely require both office 2003 and server 2003 to run the diagnostics.

  36. All wrong about the BMW! by lkturner · · Score: 1, Redundant

    The incident mentioned dealt with a car that is TEN years old. I think that predates Windows CE.
    From the story - "Thai Rath said Suchart got the 10-year-old car two days ago as a replacement for his regular Mercedes Benz, which was in the garage for repairs."
    Here's the google cache link for the article from the "Eye on Thai Press" website - cached news story

  37. Reminds me of this one... by Barnett · · Score: 5, Funny

    A Software Engineer, a Hardware Engineer and a Departmental Manager were on their way to a meeting in Switzerland. They were driving down a steep mountain road when suddenly the brakes on their car failed. The car careened almost out of control down the road, bouncing off the crash barriers, until it miraculously ground to a halt scraping along the mountainside. The car's occupants, shaken but unhurt, now had a problem: they were stuck halfway down a mountain in a car with no rakes. What were they to do?

    "I know", said the Departmental Manager, "Let's have a meeting, propose a Vision, formulate a Mission Statement, define some Goals, and by a process of Continuous Improvement, Change Management, Re-Engineering and Service Integration, find a solution to the Critical Problems, and we can be on our way."

    "No, no", said the Hardware Engineer, "That will take far too long, and besides, that method has never worked before. I've got my Swiss Army knife with me, and in no time at all I can strip
    down the car's braking system, isolate the fault, fix it, and we can be on our way."

    "Well", said the Software Engineer, "Before we do anything, I think we should push the car back up the road and see if it happens again."

  38. I wouldn't buy a Microsoft-powered car by kaan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not trying to troll here, but Microsoft is a company that I simply do not trust. I don't trust them with maintaining my privacy, nor do I trust that they have my best interests in mind. And that's only for computer usage. Why would I trust that their system will always "do the right thing" when I'm in a real-world scenario, driving down the highway at 50 mph? True, I have no idea what role Windows CE (or whatever is used) would actually play while the car is in use, but it's an important question to answer. For myself, you can damn well be sure that I would take some serious convincing before I would entertain the possibility of spending a huge sum of money on a rolling, engine-powered WIndows machine. And even if I'm convinced, who's to say that there aren't serious problems with the design of Windows CE and how it interacts with the rest of the car. Even if it's only used to control the car stereo, I'd rather not have it there. I'll just stick with a nice Toyota or Volkswagen, or frankly any other manufacturer that avoids the use of a Microsoft prodcut as a systems controller.

    1. Re:I wouldn't buy a Microsoft-powered car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not trying to troll here, but Debian, GNU and the people who write the Linux kernel are not the ones I would trust with my operating system of choice.

    2. Re:I wouldn't buy a Microsoft-powered car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd rather trust Microsoft? Are you out of your fucking gourd? Never mind, you obviously are. I hope you die in a fiery crash far away from my non-MS "enabled" Audi RS6.

    3. Re:I wouldn't buy a Microsoft-powered car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said anyone was putting in Linux as a systems controller? Nobody. What was your point?

    4. Re:I wouldn't buy a Microsoft-powered car by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

      I think that's the ultimate question here - who takes the liability of risk for an obscure software failure that's potentially deadly? Msft? The Auto manufacturer, or the customer? Tradictionally with Msft products, it's the customer, as even if it trashes your entire disk you /should/ have backups of important data. What if a Firestone type defect turns up someday? Is the car mfg simply going to say too bad, nobody is liable, or /you/, the customer, should have kept up with the post sale service patches?

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    5. Re:I wouldn't buy a Microsoft-powered car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      False dichotomy much?

      The choice isn't "trust MS or trust Bruce Perens." You don't have to trust anyone if you so choose. Fool.

    6. Re:I wouldn't buy a Microsoft-powered car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't beleive no one's made this joke yet (or maybe I just missed it?):

      This gives a whole new meaning to "Where do you want to go today?"

  39. blah by maxdamage · · Score: 1

    I got this in an e-mail a few weeks ago... but it said somthing about a responce to somthing billy said at comdex

  40. Maybe not so bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it's as hackable as the iPaq I'd get one. I'd love to install Familiar Linux on my car.

  41. There's no reason to trust MS cars, but..... by elmegil · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Those Thai Ministers are a pretty skittish lot.

    "We couldn't breathe because there was no air," he added.

    I have not yet met the car that was utterly and completley sealed. And there's a lot of air in the passenger space of even a small sports car, and this was a "luxury car". See below for more reasons why, even if it were completley sealed, this is totally stupid. Even if they mean no air conditioning, I can't imagine in the time this occurred it got so hot they couldn't breathe.

    To draw attention, the minister and his driver waved frantically at passers-by. The incident ended only after a nearby security guard smashed the car's windows with a sledgehammer.

    Even with the heavy-duty tool, Suchart said it took a long time to break the windows as the "glass proved to be very resistant".

    The harrowing experience lasted about 10 minutes, he said.

    Let's see "it took a long time.... about 10 minutes". What exactly is wrong with this statement? Certainly 10 minutes is longer than you expect for a sledgehammer to go through glass, but even so, that's NOT really a long time. Certainly not enough time to asphyxiate. Can you say complete panic?

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    1. Re:There's no reason to trust MS cars, but..... by quacking+duck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You have to remember this was in Thailand, where if you're driving with windows up you by necessity need air conditioning. The passenger compartment starts cooking VERY quickly under a hot sun on a humid day, so even in the few minutes they were trapped in there it would have gotten very uncomfortable. Remember also they probably would have been in shirt, suits and ties, not shorts and T-shirt.

      And what's wrong with the 10 minute figure? It didn't take 10 minutes to smash through the glass, it took ten minutes to attract someone without using a horn, who then notified a security guard, who then had to find a sledgehammer. I'm sure few have them strapped to their belts as standard equipment.

      Every year here we have cases of babies locked inside cars on a hot summer day while the parent runs inside for some quick errands. In many cases these babies end up in the hospital, after not much more than 10 minutes of being in such conditions.

    2. Re:There's no reason to trust MS cars, but..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You forgot about the temperature. About 20 years ago, I got stuck in a two-door Honda because the passenger door wouldn't open after towing a trailer and the lock on the driver's side jammed. The windows had long since stopped working after the metal channels had rusted, in typical Honda-fashion, through. This was in Dallas in July at 2PM. It wasn't even 10 minutes before I had trouble breathing. Fortunately I was able to pry the window down far enough to slide a key to someone so they could open the hatchback. I imagine that Thailand is as hot or hotter than Dallas at times. You say 10 minutes isn't a long time, but when I worked in a grocery store in Dallas, I saw several dogs die after being left in a sealed car for 20 to 30 minutes.

    3. Re:There's no reason to trust MS cars, but..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try stealing a bmw.. even an old bmw.. try smashing it's windows.. Try getting into the car via trunk.. etc etc.. BMW's are completely sealed off to the outside world.. Unless there is a leak in the welds or the air conditioner is set to let fresh air in.. it's highly likely in certain cases you could die in one. Especially in heat as the firewalls on most BMW's attract a large amount of it.

    4. Re:There's no reason to trust MS cars, but..... by vasko · · Score: 5, Funny
      I have not yet met the car that was utterly and completley sealed.
      In Yugoslavia (origin of ingenious Yugo car ;) we have a joke about car sealment:


      What is the difference between final control in Japanese and Yugoslav car factory?

      In Japan they put a cat in the car and seal the doors. Tomorrow if the cat is still alive that means that sealing is not good because air managed to get in.

      In Yugoslavia we also put a cat in the car but tomorrow we check is the cat still in the car or she managed to escape.

      --
      No cats were harm during posting this message.
    5. Re:There's no reason to trust MS cars, but..... by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      "Even if they mean no air conditioning, I can't imagine in the time this occurred it got so hot they couldn't breathe."

      You've never been to Thailand.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    6. Re:There's no reason to trust MS cars, but..... by g00n · · Score: 1

      ever occur to you that since it's a thai finance minister that it might be an armored car? not unheard of for important people to use these, and even for governments to have fleets of them (US for example). An armored car would have bullet proof windows, and be airtight to keep the occupants safe from a airborn agents. better to be quiet and thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt...

    7. Re:There's no reason to trust MS cars, but..... by elmegil · · Score: 1
      "the harrowing experience lasted 10 minutes" coming as it does AFTER the discussion of the sledgehammer would normally mean either 1) it took 10 minutes for the sledgehammer part of the story to occur or 2) it took 10 minutes for the entire experience. This is based on normal rules of grammar, and there is no reason to presume that it took 10 minutes to attract attention and longer for everything else based on the way this story was written.

      Yes, I am a grammar nazi, thank you.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    8. Re:There's no reason to trust MS cars, but..... by elmegil · · Score: 1

      And the rest of the point was that 10 minutes is not "a long time".

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    9. Re:There's no reason to trust MS cars, but..... by quacking+duck · · Score: 1
      I interpreted the story like your #2, ie it was 10 minutes for the entire experience. Yes, I neglected to include the sledging after writing "...who then had to find a sledgehammer".

      But then, I was responding to you writing "Certainly 10 minutes is longer than you expect for a sledgehammer to go through glass", which in my grammar book suggests you thought the act of sledging through the window itself took 10 minutes.

      As for the 10 minutes not being a long time, the rest of my original comment, plus those of several others, should adequately explain why we think it is a long time under these circumstances, even if they weren't panicking inside the car.

    10. Re:There's no reason to trust MS cars, but..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you say complete panic?

      I don't know - can you?

      Let's lock you in a BMW and see how you do. Odds are you'll be crying for your momma long before the ten minutes are up.

  42. BSOYFGTTW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Blue Screen of Your Face Going Through The Windshield.

    Stop: 0X0000000A (0X00000000, 0X00000002, 0X00000001, 0X80448BF6)
    IRQL_NOT_LESS OR EQUAL
    Adress 80448BF6 base at 80400000, DateStamp
    3d366b8b - brake.exe
    Beginning dump of physical facial bones

    1. Re:BSOYFGTTW by IckySplat · · Score: 1

      Warning: Airbag about to deply ...

      Smash face against windshield to start :)

      --
      Help! help!, the termites are eating my DRAM!!!
    2. Re:BSOYFGTTW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure you want to deploy the airbag?
      [OK] [Cancel]

      > OK

      Install On Demand: Airbag
      Insert Winshield 2003 Installation CD 3:
      [\\StereoSystem\CD Tray\ ] [Browse...]
      [OK] [Cancel]

      > Oh ####!

  43. Re:YOU PEERED INTO YOUR CRYSTAL BALLS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I checked the link for the first couple, but didn't for the last few. If you snuck it in at the bottom (pun intended) you would have had me. I'll be more careful now that I have let you know how it could have worked.

    - SSQ

  44. Re:Oh here we go again... by Doomrat · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You don't have to be an MS fan to hate Linux obsessed mindless morons. That just comes naturally. I wouldn't expect somebody displaying the logic in your post to understand that it's possible to like something and hate drooling retards at the same time.

  45. Microsoft's response: by jared_hanson · · Score: 5, Funny

    It wasn't the car's fault, it was bad drivers.

    --
    -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
    1. Re:Microsoft's response: by Squareball · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually if you read the headlines you'll see that cars are responsible not people. "SUV runs over child", "Sedan plows into house"... these cars are dangerous and have a mind of their own and must be stopped! ;)

    2. Re:Microsoft's response: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but at least you can drive it without a license...

    3. Re:Microsoft's response: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For those who care, that is probably best considered to be metonymy.

    4. Re:Microsoft's response: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because we all know, bad driving can cause the computer controlled window to suddenly roll down in a car wash... Even though the driver isn't touching anything.

    5. Re:Microsoft's response: by MyFourthAccount · · Score: 1

      Actually if you read the headlines you'll see that cars are responsible not people. "SUV runs over child", "Sedan plows into house"...

      That's because the truth is politically incorrect:

      "Woman in SUV runs over child", "Woman plows Sedan into house"

      *ducks*

    6. Re:Microsoft's response: by arkulkis · · Score: 1

      Truer than you would believe. I worked with INS at a Port of Entry during Operation Noble Eagle (border security) while INS and Customs were waiting for officers to double their manpower at the POE's to get through school. At the inspection booth, some lanes are wide enough for large trucks....so, when there are only cars in line, we put out cones to funnel the driver to the side of the lane closest to the inspectors booth. A good 80-90% of the drivers that ran over 3-foot tall orange cones...while travelling at 2 mph or less...were women. It was absolutely amazing--the utter and complete lack of 3-dimensional cognizence that they displayed. Another thing I noticed...(this was at the Detroit-Windsor crossing)... there are STOP signs to seperate the "quarantine zone" from the line behind it. Although vehicles with Ohio license plates constituted about 5% of the traffic, they were easily 90%-95% of the vehicles which completely failed to obey the STOP signs. Am I off-topic yet? Hello? Anybody there?

    7. Re:Microsoft's response: by chrome · · Score: 1

      Haha. offtopic, yes, but funny. Truth IS stranger (and funnier) than an on-topic posting to slashdot.

  46. idrive issues by martin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seem to be lots of issues with the idrive system. BMW's answer seems to be 'tough, what do you expect from a first generation system'. Of course this is just what I see from TV/newpaper articles, so it must be true;-)

    In other news, try getting a service on an engine management system over 15 years old. Almost impossible. I think I'll go back to carbs :-)

    1. Re:idrive issues by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      The people you can go to who will fix your carb-based engine are all nearing retirement. It's cool if you're a motorhead or know one who can help you with your car, but otherwise you're S.O.L.

      I drove a '72 beetle for many years and loved being able to fix it myself. I remember spending a lot of my time 'fixing it myself' however. My '93 Saturn seldom requires any attention at all.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
  47. LoL@micro$oft cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You peeples are are write on teh money. Micro$oft $uck$. (See how I used teh dollar sine to mene "S"? LoL!) omfg, they're cars wood crash three or for tymes a day. rofl! They shood use linux insted. Maybe debian for teh new drivers, or Gentoo on sports cars cause its teh fastest and u can compile it with different opshuns for each type of engine. Windoze and M$-DOG suck i woodn't have them in my car if you pade me lol

  48. this helped me make a decision... by Mark19960 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    and that decision is to not buy a car made by those companies.
    I dont want to die at the hands of Bill Gates.
    Windows gets slow after running a few days.
    I can see this happening:
    I go out to the car one morning, and try to unlock the car... takes 30 seconds to unlock..
    takes 30 seconds to start... 30 seconds to brake (CRASH! dead.)
    Nice try Bill, But I will stick to a NON-WINDOWS car for now.

    1. Re:this helped me make a decision... by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

      regardless of whether microsofts BMW software is any good or not, I wont be buying a BMW, they are an evil company just like Microsoft. They bought Rover, took the rights to the Mini and the Land Rover, and fucked the rest of the Rover car company off. Go figure I dont want to support a company that has taken two British Icons of design and sells them for extortionate costs under a German brand.

      Buy a BMW and get two strains of evil all rolled into one ... No Thanks!

      And whatever you do ..... Dont Mention The War !!!!

      nick ...

      --
      Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  49. The Thai Guy's BMW didn't have WinCE by LumberJack_GSI · · Score: 1
    From the CNET news item:
    But when contacted by CNETAsia, a spokeswoman from BMW Thailand said the car at fault was a 10-year old BMW 520i that had suffered a simple electronic failure.


    I know, literacy is dead - but only the new 7-series & a few 2004 5-series BMW's have WinCE.
    1. Re:The Thai Guy's BMW didn't have WinCE by manon · · Score: 1

      Like a "A high-ranking Thai official ... Thailand's finance minister" would drive a 10-year old beemer? euh... nope I don't think so.

      --
      42 + 1 = 42
  50. Oh no. by evilberg · · Score: 1

    If they start using M$ in cars I'm going to have a hard time at work when i Graduate. And you can't smash the cars when they feel like having bluescreens. I'm going to end up paying for working.

    --
    Going Berserk.
  51. There is a saying... by 3seas · · Score: 1

    If it ain't broke, don't fix it..... ....unless you are in a war and playing trogan horse
    MS and The Art Of War on competition

    Meaing if MS has their software somewhere, it means the competition isn't there.

    But if it doesn't work right, to replace a demon of evil spirits, don't leave a void.

    Maybe some Linux companies should prepair a replacement....and stand up for consumer choice.

    1. Re:There is a saying... by 3seas · · Score: 1

      Why does not firebird thru slashdot not allow me to see a preview? Did slashdot do another upgrade?

      MS and The Art Of War on competition

  52. Re:Oh here we go again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what, not geek enough for you ?
    you have to be among the 1st to discover slashdot (which is full of dumb trolls and stupid jokes) to be considered intelligent ?

  53. prior art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If Microsoft Built Cars, occasionally your car would just die on the motorway for no reason; you'd accept this, restart and drive on"

    Ford motor company has made cars like this for years and years... there may be a copyright problem here.

  54. I get it now! by stef49 · · Score: 1

    This thai story explains the skeleton in the car parked in front of my appartment.

  55. This just in from 2010 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Allstate reports that 90% of automobile crashes are due to bad third-party drivers.

  56. Re:Old MS car joke... by Theatetus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hey, see that link in the article? That's right, the very first one?

    Click it, and it leads to...

    ..wait for it...

    That's right! The same old joke you just reposted! Tell him what he's won, Rod!

    He's one a 5-day, 4-night stay in beautiful RTFALand! We'll fly him and a guest non stop to a room where he can sit and actually read the articles before posting ancient jokes we've all seen before that are referenced by the article itself!

    --
    All's true that is mistrusted
  57. Nothing new by Pu'be · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Ohh wow, if ever so often your car shut-off and you had to re-start....it would be just like my car. Sorry I am not "big pimpin'" and I aint got no "Bling Bling" or "Blng Blaow"...I got a old car, it shuts down all the time on me. Luckly I have not been killed. Nothing new, move on!

    1. Re:Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Luckly I have not been killed.

      So says you.

  58. This is a somewhat dramatic change of direction by localekko · · Score: 1
  59. Blah blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If BMW was half as concerned about it as all the linux fanboys here they would go with Linux, but they didn't, so deal with it.

  60. Re:Not neccessarily by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not that I'm saying it would make sense to do so, but the door lock is not mechanical by pure neccessity. If the handle to the regular door-latch (not lock) were also simply an electronic switch, the "lock" could simply be something which disables the regular latch.

    Just trying to be unhelpful here :)
    [hey, it's how I'd build a lock!]

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  61. Actually, no by mental_telepathy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You were in no way obligated to make that joke.

  62. Microsoft Joke by jared_hanson · · Score: 4, Funny

    Three Microsoft employees and three Apple employees are boarding a train to attend a conference. The three MS people walk up and buy their tickets. Then, only one of the Apple employees buys a ticket.

    The MS guys say, "Whoa! Wait a minute, how are you all going to ride with only one ticket."

    "You'll see," they replied.

    Everyone boards the train and the MS employees take their seats while all three Apple employees cram into the bathroom. A while later the ticket taker comes down the isles and takes the tickets from the MS employees. He passes the bathroom, notes that it says "Occupied" and softly knocks on the door. "Ticket please," he says. Slowly, the door cracks open, one hand reaches out and hands him a ticket. A few minutes later, the Apple employees emerge from the bathroom and take seats, much to the amazement of the MS employees.

    After the conference, on the way back home, the same employees are reboarding the train. The MS people, having deftly learned a new trick, buy just one ticket. The Apple employees then say, we aren't going to buy a ticket this time. MS peoples' jaws drop, but everyone gets on the train.

    The MS people quickly cram into the bathroom, and the Apple employees go into a different bathroom. After a couple of minutes, one of the Apple employees comes out of the bathroom, walks up to the door of the bathroom that the MS employees are hiding in, knocks on it, and says:

    "Ticket please"

    --
    -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
    1. Re:Microsoft Joke by Mr_Icon · · Score: 1

      It's amusing to see how early 20th century "Jew jokes" get a new life this way. :) Not that I mind, of course, but the whole Apple vs Microsoft spin feels just completely tacked on. If only because I would find much more humor in Apple/Microsoft employees travelling to a conference by train. :)

      --
      If you open yourself to the foo, You and foo become one.
    2. Re:Microsoft Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      A man in a hot air balloon realized he was lost. He reduced altitude and spotted a man outside a pub below. He descended a bit more and shouted, "Excuse me, can you help me? I promised a friend I would meet him an hour ago, but I don't know where I am."

      The man below replied, "You are in a hot air balloon hovering approximately 30 feet above the ground. You are between 40 and 41 degrees north latitude and between 59 and 60 degrees west longitude."

      "You must be a Microsoft employee," said the balloonist.

      "I am," replied the man, "How did you know?"

      "Well," answered the balloonist, "everything you told me is technically correct, but I have no idea what to make of your information, and the fact is I am still lost. Frankly, you've not been much help so far."

      The man below responded, "You must be an Apple employee."

      "I am," replied the balloonist, "but how did you know?"

      "Well," said the man, "you don't know where you are or where you are going. You made a promise which you have no idea how to keep, and you expect me to solve your problem. You are in exactly the same position now that you were in before we met, but now, somehow, it's my fault."


      Lol! Get it? I took an existing joke and replaced the occupations with "Microsoft employee" and "Apple employee". See.. it's funny because now it's a joke about Microsoft and Apple employees. Feel free to mod me +5 Funny.

    3. Re:Microsoft Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are teh genius.

      Play with yourself as congratulations.

    4. Re:Microsoft Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conclusion: don't use the technology you don't understand.

  63. BSOD indeed! by SamuraiiProgrammer · · Score: 1

    There you are with your Windows CE based heart regulator.

    What do you do when a Blue Screen of Death becomes a well .... Blue Screen of DEATH?

  64. Re:YOU PEERED INTO YOUR CRYSTAL BALLS? by Trigun · · Score: 1

    from the last link...

    Connected to www.memphismaulers.com.
    Escape character is '^]'.
    get
    HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request
    Server: Microsoft-IIS/5.0
    Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 17:44:21 GMT
    Content-Type: text/html

    So go change it!

  65. In the gas station... by omarques · · Score: 0

    Please fill with gasoline and apply this week's security patches, please

  66. If Microsoft made cars , Linux would be... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  67. MS at its best by InodoroPereyra · · Score: 1
    It is really unbelievable. One would think that Linux or *BSD would be the first choice for an embedded OS in a car. Secure, fast, stable, open source and gratis. The most important thing being the open source bit. The so-called user friendliness of MS's products is not an davantage here, nor the availability of drivers for home electronics.

    However, MS shows their teeth once again, and grabs a deal with the big guns. That's how they operate, they don't care much about software quality. All they need is Public Relations at the appropriate level, that's enough for them. And some dirty tricks to kill out the competition ...

    1. Re:MS at its best by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Actually, one would expect windriver's vxworks, qnx, or a custom built RTOS.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  68. And if Linux built cars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You would have to remake your car everyday and no matter how well you think you did, it would need to be remade for the windows to work, the stereo to play music, or it may just crash and need to be reconstructed from scratch. But hey, after four months, your car will run great!

  69. If you crash... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, if you crash in one of these cars, do the windows shatter or reboot?

  70. Bumps and the BMW 7 series by tjansen · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Near Heidelberg/Germany there seems to be a bump in a highway that causes some BMW firmware to crash everytime a BMW runs over it, with the same effect as reported in the second article: the engine stops, the doors and windows are locked and the occupants are trapped. Fortunately people don't need to wait long, because there's usually a local breakdown service waiting to rescue the drivers. Interesting business idea :)

    1. Re:Bumps and the BMW 7 series by kruczkowski · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do you have more info on this bump?

      I'll be in the area in a few weeks :)

      --
      hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
    2. Re:Bumps and the BMW 7 series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bzzt. I do contract work for a BMW supplier some 50 miles south of Heidelberg. Yup, they supply electronics for the 7 series too. Test drivers most of the time go south (a lot of traffic congestions down there, good for testing navigation systems) or east/west (mountains, good for testing radio and phone system). If there was a 'magic' bump up north you can bet they would know about it.

    3. Re:Bumps and the BMW 7 series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (I want to be able to correct my comments after posting them.. sorry for my typos)

      You're OK. English is not your native tongue, and you still do better than most of these American crack babies in here.

  71. Simple=Good by CNERD · · Score: 1

    Why do they call it CE? I thought that name was dead?

    The good thing about this is the PocketPC/WinCE electronics do not control things like fuel delivery and such for the engine. It merely controls accessories.

    Spark and fuel control should never be controled by something so complex that it can run any windows operating system. The megasquirt is a perfect example of how fuel/spark controllers should be. Simple, but yet very functional.

    Too bad the megasquirt fires all the injectors at once, otherwise I would get one for my car.

  72. Garage == docking station? by zippity8 · · Score: 1

    So if we're moving towards all this fancy tech, do we have to worry about syncing the data?

    How would that be done? WiFi? But then, there'd be an opportunity to take the literal 'wardriving' approach. And given how poor computer security is in most homes nowadays....

  73. Idiot Mods by jared_hanson · · Score: 1, Redundant

    A +5 Funny awarded to someone too lazy to read the article (the first link even). Really shows the quality of the moderation system.

    Now at least I know why I see the most retarded comments get modded up insightful or informative.

    --
    -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
  74. SSX5 by PurpleWizard · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I work in the automotive industry. No one has I know has ever heard it even contemplated to run important systems on Windows products.

    The main reason being you want a real small real time kernel tucked in there for the engine controller, ABS, stability control, traction control, gear box.

    All those systems are normally kept on a seperate network for traffic to from any telematics (industry BS word for the nav, steroe, DVD, phone, climate etc...). If they do use the big optical network it is through a gate way that is written to safety critical standards. Of course not every writer of safety critical or safety related software meets what I would consider adequate standards.

  75. Windows CE is getting to be moderately stable. But by argent · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm not saying that I'd want to have any safety critical systems depending on it, but it's actually getting better (which, after my recent experiences with XP, I'm beginning to think is counter to the trend at that place). The 2002 version of Pocket PC, for example, is a lot more stable than the 2000 version. My Jornada 548 had two total data loss crashes that prevented it from shutting off until the battery ran out. My 568, running the same applications, hasn't managed to pull that trick yet... though it's still got the awful memory management problems that cut the effective usable memory by a factor of 3-4.

    I don't think I'd want my car powered by embedded Linux, either. There are a lot of high quality well-designed dedicated real-time operating systems that don't have a legacy "big system" design. Why not stick with them? Going to Microsoft for your embedded systems is like going to Navistar for your family car, or to Halliburton for your swimming pool.

  76. Watch out Microshit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...don't dare to insult Made in Germany again or your BMW will cruise with the penguin,

  77. Add outlook e-mail to Windows CE for Car by bodland · · Score: 2, Funny

    Buffer overruns and a few lines of vb script and you've got a couple million cars emailing each other until they just freeze up. Cool.

  78. Ctrl-Alt-Del to be replaced with by Howard+Beale · · Score: 2, Funny

    Clutch-Brake-Accelerator?

    What happens if you have an automatic???

    1. Re:Ctrl-Alt-Del to be replaced with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Accelerator-Brake-Horn

      THAT much be an interesting sound...

  79. I was trapped by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Three days ago I was trapped inside my BMW 535i. It had been having some electrical problems, such as the windows occasionally not working, and the door locks behaving erratically. The other night it all came together at once, and I could not get out of the car. The windows would not open and the door locks would not budge. To my further frustration I realized had also left my cell phone at home.

    The car was still operational, though, so I drove to a friend's house and eventually got their attention. Two hours later a locksmith finally got me out. In the mean time I had to sit through each passerby feeling compelled to go around the car and try every door, and then signal me to pull up on the lock. As if somehow no one had yet thought of that. It was a bit like waiting for an elevator, where each new arrival feels the need to press the button.

    1. Re:I was trapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh god I feel so bad for you, you poor man trapped in your $40,000 luxury car. Oh the plight of the technocrapper.

    2. Re:I was trapped by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      Oh god I feel so bad for you, you poor man trapped in your $40,000 luxury car.

      It's an 89. It's for sale. I'm asking $8,000. Interested?

    3. Re:I was trapped by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1

      What year? I thought the manual override on BMW's was the inside door handle itself. My 95 M3 does this as does my 03 X5 (though I've never had a power failure).

    4. Re:I was trapped by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      What year? I thought the manual override on BMW's was the inside door handle itself.

      89. If you mean simply operating the door handle normally, then no. If there's a manual override I couldn't find it. The owner's manual was misplaced by the previous owner.

    5. Re:I was trapped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suggest brushing up your sales pitch :-)

    6. Re:I was trapped by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      I suggest brushing up your sales pitch :-)

      Pretty good. First time I've smiled since it happened. :-)

  80. Two words... by hazem · · Score: 5, Funny

    MANUAL OVERRIDE

    Isn't it ironic... most cars now have latches to let kids and gangsters out of trunks, yet now you can't get out of the car when its OS freezes? Good grief!

    How many times has the Enterprise been saved (or blown up to kill bad guys) through the use of manual overrides? I should be able to get out of my car, even if the battery is drained and the computer is drained. If it's good enough for Jean Luc, it's good enough for me!

    1. Re:Two words... by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      >If it's good enough for Jean Luc, it's good enough for me!

      Great now we are going to crawl around the jeffy tubes in our car just so we can get to our 2 story high gasoline combustion engine riced-out in blue neon.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    2. Re:Two words... by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      Just put a claw hammer under your seat, that's your manual override for the windows & also might be effective in manually overriding the brains of any gangbangers or extortionist window washers that give you crap.

    3. Re:Two words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yet now you can't get out of the car when its OS freezes

      Clearly MS has had an influence here, for not only do they have the world's crappiest programmers, they have the world's crappiest system architects.

    4. Re:Two words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I understand it, operation of nuclear submarines is completely manual/mechanical. Using computers is not safe or reliable enough when a BSOD can some pretty serious repurcussions.

  81. Honda (or at least Acura) doesn't need MS by Knetzar · · Score: 3, Informative

    I currently have an Acura with a navigation system built in, and I can tell you that there is no need for a familiar windows interface in that car. It's easy to use, and the only complaint I have is that it's kinda slow and adding windows probably won't speed it up. As an added thought the 2004 Acura TL already has blue tooth, plays mp3 CDs, and has speech recognition for a navigation system thats better then mine. What does Honda gain by going with Microsoft?

    I've also seen the navigation systems in both BMW's and Benz's, and both of them need to become much more user friendly, so I can see them asking Microsoft for help.

  82. No Microsoft products in security related devices by DollyTheSheep · · Score: 5, Informative

    Embedded != Embedded. MS products maybe used in cars, but largely in the "infotainment" sector.

    WinCE is much too big for the tiny microcontrollers that control engines, breakes, gear shifts and so on.. As is Java.

    If you want to really what going on in car electronics look for example for the OSEK/VDX initiative, a consortium of german and french carmakers.

  83. Re:Old MS car joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    That's right! The same old joke you just reposted! Tell him what he's won, Rod!

    Apparently a +1 Funny moderation. Now if someone could dig up the "If Microsoft Made Airplanes" one, that'd be funny AND not in the article.

  84. Does anyone remember? by ahmed_a · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Someone may have already posted this, but a while back, a retired test engineer had a website with video of his misbehaving 7i series BMW. The errors were many, and the dealership indicated that the car was functioning normally inspite of numerous software problems. The car was running WinCE. Is the site still up?

  85. This was quite common.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I used to work at a BMW dealership back in the early 90's, and this was a "known problem" with the 5 series. In one instance, our dealership had to pick up a customer who had become locked out of his car after leaving it running in the driveway. (This was relatively minor; the customer's first complaint was that it locked his wife and children in the car at the supermarket.) At first, it was thought that the alarm system was accidentally triggering the door locks, but after a thorough investigation found nothing wrong, we just chalked it up to a software glitch.

    I don't know if BMW ever found the problem. Sounds like an unitialized variable problem to me.

  86. NOT REALLY TRUE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I own a 2002 bmw, and have put numerous aftermarket parts (both electronics and mechanical) in the car. BMW has never said anything to me, and I have had the car fixed many times for parts still under warranty. Normally I don't post on slashdot, but I dont want FUD spread about BMW and their cars.

  87. Wait a minute! by NtroP · · Score: 1
    Didn't I just read somewhere that there is a virus risk associated with M$ embedded OS?

    Now I need to install a virus checker on my garage door and be carefull who I park next to at work?

    --
    "terrorism" and "pedophilia" are the root passwords to the Constitution
  88. Re:Old MS car joke... by IM6100 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I see you had to use your own +1 posting capability to get to a mod of 2. He got to '+5 funny' based on other people's response to what he typed.

    So who's the loser here?

    --
    A Good Intro to NetBS
  89. I had a 2002 BMW 745i ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with all the new-fangled, Microsoft controlled electronics. BMW eventually had to buy back the car due to California lemon laws. Most of the problems related to unreliable software, system crashes, failure to recover from power-save mode, and the like. Within a year, the car had seven major revisions to the operatig software. I beleieve that they recently released version 9.2!

    So, the jokes "if Microsoft built cars" are no longer jokes, but now facts.

  90. M$'s 20+ year record of unreliable sw vanishes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >>Does that suddenly mean that Microsft's 20+ year record of buggy, unreliable, insecure software just vanishes?

    yes, unfortunately, it does. Win95 was pathetic. Win98 was slightly less so. NT was supposed to be "ready for business applications" *chuckle*... win2k was supposed to *finally* be ready for business applications... winXP is supposed to be what none of its predecessors was but all claimed to be(ie, stable). Now lets see, which of these products is appropriate for other than grandma or the teen gamer?

    And everyone still buys microsoft because "they are the market leader".

    It doesn't matter how much they suck. As long as the government thinks that building an operating system is harder than going to Mars, they win.

  91. Just another way MS is pushin it's WMA format by ITR81 · · Score: 1

    On the rest of us. I want AAC because atleast Dolby knows somthing about sound which is area MS is seriously lacking in. Don't push MS only stds on me or I'm not going to buy your products simple as that.

  92. Re:Trapped OUTside a locked car? by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 4, Informative

    You had better yell profusely. With temperatures that low, and having that single point-of-failure, your frozen locks could cause you to die of exposure. That model of car should be recalled.

    --
    You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  93. Re:Old MS car joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see you had to use your own +1 posting capability to get to a mod of 2. He got to '+5 funny' based on other people's response to what he typed. So who's the loser here?

    Suckers like me who read this pointless thread.

  94. except the BMW 7-series is practically undriveable by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Win CE is very user friendly out of the box, and that's what one needs in a car interface.

    except that 7-series owners are trading their iDrive-equipped(and hideous-looking) cars in for Mercedes and Audis. They just don't "get" iDrive, and since it's tied into so many goddamn features on the car, if you don't "get" it, you're not "getting" most of the car. WinCE has been a -spectacular- failure in that car. There are videos running around the net showing a guy's 750iL hunting for gears on the highway, closing+opening the trunk incessantly, ejecting the key from the keyslot(making it impossible to start the car!), changing radio stations on its own...

    If you want to see the interface done right, check out an Audi A8L with MMC. Similar idea, but instead of putting absolutely everything on the dial and making you push/pull/twist/etc, it's simply an "adjuster"; buttons around the dial are used to actually navigate around the menus. Oh, and it's also not in control of absolutely everything in the bloody car. It's only in charge of suspension settings, the radio, phone, and nav system(actually, it might have climate control too, I forget.)

    The running joke in the auto industry is that the only reason Chris Bangle(BMW designer who ruined the 7-series and now the 5-series) has a job is that all his bosses got 7-series cars and can't get them out of the driveway to go into headquarters and fire him.

  95. What I'm wondering is... by gillbates · · Score: 1, Interesting
    If I buy one of these cars, should I also buy an antivirus software subscription? Given that every Microsoft product I'm aware of is vulnerable to viruses, I would think that antivirus software would be a requirement.

    And which Antivirus software does Microsoft recommend? I mean, I'd hate to have my car stall in a busy intersection because the onboard computer caught the blaster worm from someone's WiFi hotspot.

    Kinda gives wardriving a whole new meaning, though.... Kids could drive around in rush hour traffic with a virus-infected Windows laptop and bring traffic to a halt!

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    1. Re:What I'm wondering is... by DA-MAN · · Score: 1

      Yes because all these new cars will have an ubber secret 802.11g card built in for the purpose of spreading virii!

      I'd be more worried about Microsoft distributing a fucked up version of their CarOS CE. They have been known to press CD's with Warez Group .nfo files, Virii and other such goofs.

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
    2. Re:What I'm wondering is... by gillbates · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ubber secret 802.11g card built in for the purpose of spreading virii!

      Not quite. If you read the article, Microsoft's emphasis was on getting networked computers into cars. Whether or not it's 802.11g is irrelevant; viruses were spreading via networks long before 802.11g was even a possibility. So perhaps they would use the existing cell phone infrastructure.

      I mean, 15 years ago an email virus was thought impossible - email was plaintext, and everybody knew that plain text couldn't carry viruses. That was until Microsoft's auto-execute-email-attachments made the email virus a reality. The lesson: if there's a way to spread viruses, Microsoft will find it and make it a standard "feature".

      I don't mean this to be a troll but Microsoft has repeatedly shown themselves to be extremely naive when it comes to security and reliability. It's not that they couldn't write a secure, bug-free OS for cars. It's that they won't; their emphasis will be on getting streaming video on the dashboard rather than fixing the bugs. They don't understand the degree of security and reliability that the consumers expect of their vehicles. A BSOD is a much bigger problem at 60 mph than when sitting behind a desk.

      --
      The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
  96. Blue Windscreen of Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Imaging driving down the motorway, at 70pmh, and then the onboard windows systems crash. Whats the betting you will ;-)

  97. AAA would be unaffordable! by occam · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Despite liking BMW's, I'd say their choosing MS OS for their cars seems to dovetail with their latest love-hate designs of the new 7 and 5 series. Bangle seems to make very controversial decisions which even to the plainest view, have warts. MS OS seems to fit the Bangle model for feature-ful failed designs. I just hope BMW recovers sooner than later (the board should already have taken action but so it goes).

    I hope the government forces car companies to label any car with an MS OS in it. Caveat emptor!

  98. RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The article CLEARLY STATES that the fault was an electronic fault NOT CAUSED OR RELATED TO THE CAR'S OS (Windows CE).

    Then again, it's a truth that doesn't paint Microsoft in a bad light so I suppose it has no place on /.

  99. Not bikes, tanks. by ebbomega · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Never forget the Neil Stephenson essay, "In the beginning was the command line"...

    Here's a little exerp:

    Imagine a crossroads where four competing auto dealerships are situated. One of them (Microsoft) is much, much bigger than the others. It started out years ago selling three-speed bicycles (MS-DOS); these were not perfect, but they worked, and when they broke you could easily fix them.

    There was a competing bicycle dealership next door (Apple) that one day began selling motorized vehicles--expensive but attractively styled cars with their innards hermetically sealed, so that how they worked was something of a mystery.

    The big dealership responded by rushing a moped upgrade kit (the original Windows) onto the market. This was a Rube Goldberg contraption that, when bolted onto a three-speed bicycle, enabled it to keep up, just barely, with Apple-cars. The users had to wear goggles and were always picking bugs out of their teeth while Apple owners sped along in hermetically sealed comfort, sneering out the windows. But the Micro-mopeds were cheap, and easy to fix compared with the Apple-cars, and their market share waxed.

    Eventually the big dealership came out with a full-fledged car: a colossal station wagon (Windows 95). It had all the aesthetic appeal of a Soviet worker housing block, it leaked oil and blew gaskets, and it was an enormous success. A little later, they also came out with a hulking off-road vehicle intended for industrial users (Windows NT) which was no more beautiful than the station wagon, and only a little more reliable.

    Since then there has been a lot of noise and shouting, but little has changed. The smaller dealership continues to sell sleek Euro-styled sedans and to spend a lot of money on advertising campaigns. They have had GOING OUT OF BUSINESS! signs taped up in their windows for so long that they have gotten all yellow and curly. The big one keeps making bigger and bigger station wagons and ORVs.

    On the other side of the road are two competitors that have come along more recently.

    One of them (Be, Inc.) is selling fully operational Batmobiles (the BeOS). They are more beautiful and stylish even than the Euro-sedans, better designed, more technologically advanced, and at least as reliable as anything else on the market--and yet cheaper than the others.

    With one exception, that is: Linux, which is right next door, and which is not a business at all. It's a bunch of RVs, yurts, tepees, and geodesic domes set up in a field and organized by consensus. The people who live there are making tanks. These are not old-fashioned, cast-iron Soviet tanks; these are more like the M1 tanks of the U.S. Army, made of space-age materials and jammed with sophisticated technology from one end to the other. But they are better than Army tanks. They've been modified in such a way that they never, ever break down, are light and maneuverable enough to use on ordinary streets, and use no more fuel than a subcompact car. These tanks are being cranked out, on the spot, at a terrific pace, and a vast number of them are lined up along the edge of the road with keys in the ignition. Anyone who wants can simply climb into one and drive it away for free.

    Customers come to this crossroads in throngs, day and night. Ninety percent of them go straight to the biggest dealership and buy station wagons or off-road vehicles. They do not even look at the other dealerships.

    Of the remaining ten percent, most go and buy a sleek Euro-sedan, pausing only to turn up their noses at the philistines going to buy the station wagons and ORVs. If they even notice the people on the opposite side of the road, selling the cheaper, technically superior vehicles, these customers deride them cranks and half-wits.

    The Batmobile outlet sells a few vehicles to the occasional car nut who wants a second vehicle to go with his station wagon, but seems to accept, at least for now, that it's a fringe player.

    The group giving away the free tanks onl

    --
    Karma: Non-Heinous
    1. Re:Not bikes, tanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, like Neal Stephenson knows what the hell he is talking about... I'll be sure to listen carefully to a _science fiction author_ next I need an informed comparison of operating systems. The man gripes about "aesthetic gaffes" like the control panel icon in Windows NT, but then claims the Unix root directory structure ("/usr /etc /var /bin /proc /boot /home /root /sbin /dev /lib /tmp") is obscure but necessary, although it took him "several hundred or thousand times" (!!!) to figure it out.

    2. Re:Not bikes, tanks. by EMH_Mark3 · · Score: 1

      Yeah that story rocks.. I especially like the ending :)

      --
      Burn the land and boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me
    3. Re:Not bikes, tanks. by EMH_Mark3 · · Score: 1

      ( crap, that was soooo AOL-"me too!"-like :/ )

      --
      Burn the land and boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me
    4. Re:Not bikes, tanks. by ebbomega · · Score: 1

      You learn to drive a tank and tell me that it's as easy as a car.

      I think he's still pretty dead on.

      Credentials mean squat. If it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, I'm not going to call it an elephant just because it was seen in the Serenghetti.

      --
      Karma: Non-Heinous
  100. Re:Old MS car joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you!

  101. drug dealer car for the ambassador by morcheeba · · Score: 5, Interesting

    True story: In the mid 70's in Egypt, the u.s. ambassador was using a souped-up car that had been confiscated form a drug dealer as his official car. It was perfect for the job: bulletproof, had hidden sirens and lights, plus a megaphone and tear gas for crowd control (and being free was something the government liked, too). One day a critical fuse blew and they were trapped, just like the Thai ministers... it took a lot of energy to break through the bulletproof glass, but they eventually got him out.

    Solution to the problem? A fire ax became standard equipment in the back seat of that car.

    I never got to see the car, but I always imagined it as totally pimp-rific.

  102. Re:Old MS car joke... by jared_hanson · · Score: 2, Informative

    Uhh, you, since the original comment got bitchslapped down redundant, and this guy got +5 funny.

    In addition, the moderation system takes time. Of course he will be only at +2 for a while or so after posting since fewer people will have actually seen his comment. Comments like yours stick around, just waiting for people like me to proclaim your ignorance of how things work.

    Also, for your information, the +1 doesn't go away when you use it. You still get to keep it unless you constantly post worthless comments. Which, incidentally, is why you will never even get the +1 modifier.

    --
    -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
  103. Re:Trapped OUTside a locked car? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -26C isn't that bad. It starts getting nasty around -40C.

  104. 10 minutes is a long time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ten minutes is a long time to be stuck in a vehicle for a politician. Given the violent history of Thailand's past (Khmer Rouge, Killing Fields...) I'll bet that the dignitaries spent every second wondering who was going to get shot first, or if their car was going to be set alight by assassins.

    1. Re:10 minutes is a long time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm...that was Cambodia.

  105. Any BMW can trap you inside by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    Reading that story from Singapore puzzles me. Does it strike anyone here as silly to have car locks that are controlled entirelyelectronically?

    It gets worse. On most BMWs(mechanical locking or not), from outside the car, you can initiate a special full-lockdown-mode that would make it impossible for anyone inside the car to unlock and open a door. It's been responsible for trapping countless children and people in cars.

    I believe it's designed to stop slim jims and people using coathangers to pop the lock button(which is why most lock buttons don't have edges and/or are by the door handle now).

  106. Prior Art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If Microsoft Built Cars, occasionally your car would just die on the motorway for no reason;
    I claim prior art. My Hyundai Accent has been doing this for years.
  107. Re:Old MS car joke... by IM6100 · · Score: 0

    I've had the +1 modifier for months on this account.

    I choose not to use it, because it allows me to post 'controversial' comments and get bitchslapped, but keep my +1 mod when I want it, because I get modded up to 2 often enough to counteract the downmods.

    Further I see a lot of retarded bullshit get posted with the +1 'just becuz I canz' or whatever. There are a LOT of dumb fucks with the +1 modifier, ya know.

    You can set your profile to have the 'No Karma Bonus' checked by default, ya know. Here, I'll uncheck it for this comment, 'just becuz'.

    --
    A Good Intro to NetBS
  108. Re:cycling? Microsoft Joke by Yokaze · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Recycled MBA/Engineer joke?
    Or was it engineer/mathematics?

    Anyway, the engineer part is important, as it shows the pragmatism of an engineer on most matters in contrast to their humouristic antagonists.

    The transposition of the joke on Mac/Win lacks this kind of insight as pragmatism is, IMHO, not the distinguishing attribute of a Mac user.

    --
    "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
  109. Re:Trapped OUTside a locked car? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do you like to jack off outside when its -40C? does the cum get frozen to your dick? its like a new flavor of popsicle.

  110. Bitchin' by tepples · · Score: 1

    So maybe we're blaming the wrong company, how about we bitch at the top first (the driver, BMW, etc.) and work our way down (Microsoft, the makers of the chips powering the software, etc.).

    People tend to think subconsciously that it would be most productive to female dog at the party that has had the worst reliability track record in the past.

  111. I'll second it. by morcheeba · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'll second it. My bmw (2003 330i) had a sticker on the windshield, and another on the computer (engine compartment, on firewall in front of driver).

    But, go ahead and visit a dealer. That should be pretty hard to fake ;-)

    The reason for the sticker is that they don't want to be resposible for interference-testing every possible combination. I didn't heed the warning, and I found that when I kept my cell phone stashed away in the compartment under the radio, the radio would randomly turn off about every 45 minutes. Now, I keep it in the cup holder, and the radio is fine.

    I also suspect that interference is the reason they moved the computer into the engine area - they used to keep them in the passenger area, where the temperature is controlled (and not searingly hot), but that provides less shielding.

    1. Re:I'll second it. by Enoch+Zembecowicz · · Score: 1

      Many old D-Jetronic equipped cars would have the "computer" right on the firewall. D-Jet came out in 1968.

      --
      "Who's going to believe a talking head?" - Herbert West
    2. Re:I'll second it. by wtansill · · Score: 1
      I also suspect that interference is the reason they moved the computer into the engine area - they used to keep them in the passenger area, where the temperature is controlled (and not searingly hot), but that provides less shielding.
      Well, I might agree with you except for one thing -- high-voltage sparks firing tens of thousands of times per minute, induced by the build-up and collapse of magnetic fields at the same rate. And you think the computer needs less shielding in the engine compartment?
      --
      The contest for ages has been to rescue liberty from the grasp of executive power. -- Daniel Webster
    3. Re:I'll second it. by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      Good point... but this is known and controllable noise - if there's a problem, they can find it and fix it before it leaves the factory.

      In ten years, I expect to be able to run my 200 GHz* laptop in the front seat - I don't think many car manufacturers can afford to get one of those to test.

      Total side thought: this car has independent ignition coils (I just replaced two on monday, argh) located right next to each cylinder... I wonder if this helps with the electrical emissions.

      (*realistic if moore's law continues to hold. Ten years ago the 60 MHz Pentium came out.)

    4. Re:I'll second it. by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      huh... I was basing my thoughts on the '87 integra (floor, under passenger seat) and the '89 325i (above the glovebox). Kinda limited experience, but i thought it was a reasonable sample.

    5. Re:I'll second it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll second it. My bmw (2003 330i) had a sticker on the windshield, and another on the computer (engine compartment, on firewall in front of driver).

      But, go ahead and visit a dealer. That should be pretty hard to fake ;-)

      The reason for the sticker is that they don't want to be resposible for interference-testing every possible combination. I didn't heed the warning, and I found that when I kept my cell phone stashed away in the compartment under the radio, the radio would randomly turn off about every 45 minutes. Now, I keep it in the cup holder, and the radio is fine.

      I also suspect that interference is the reason they moved the computer into the engine area - they used to keep them in the passenger area, where the temperature is controlled (and not searingly hot), but that provides less shielding.


      No offense to you, but what exactly is the point of buying a very expensive car that is essentially a hack job? Is it a status symbol? If everyone were buying $50 dog poo and smearing it into thier hair, would you do that too to be popular?

  112. If Linux Users Built Cars... by siphoncolder · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... You would have no steering wheel, but instead about 17 different levers...
    ... Your car would cost close to nothing, but you'd have to assemble it yourself...
    ... It would come with several different chassis, so you could decided which one you wanted most...
    ... Every time you change the oil, you have to rebuild the engine...
    ... Everyone will swear they drive one...
    ... Never crashes, but drives at a constant 12mph...
    ... It would be easy to lock yourself out...
    ... You wouldn't be able to lend it to your friends unless they agreed to lend it to THEIR friends...
    ... You wouldn't be able to make aftermarket parts for it unless you give parts makers the schematics for the ENTIRE car...

    --
    i'm amazed that i survived - an airbag saved my life.
    1. Re:If Linux Users Built Cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      ... You would have no steering wheel, but instead about 17 different levers...

      And when the Microsoft users asked where the steering wheel was, they'd be told to try installing a rudder pedal / joystick combination instead.

      "Really, it's easier. Well, its not, but everyone does it that way. You'll get used to it."

    2. Re:If Linux Users Built Cars... by vi6o · · Score: 1

      I'd say it's an upper-mid-class joke.And if we put jokes and sarcasm aside:
      I am a Linux user and I think you're quite right about the levers but think that about rebuilding the engine is quite away from the truth(an automotive OS and software are supposed to be CLOSED ones, well, not so open, so there should be no big problems with compatibility--the progs will be written by only the manufacturer).And why 'at a constant 12mph'? Linux is quite a fast OS.

    3. Re:If Linux Users Built Cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I can understand you are trying to make a joke here.. but some of them don't make sense

      ... Every time you change the oil, you have to rebuild the engine...
      This one is more MS. I have done all sorts of updates on a Linux machine without having to restart or rebuild anything.... my XP machine still insists on being rebooted for every trivial update.

      ... Everyone will swear they drive one...
      I just don't get this one.... are you claiming most people who say they run Linux don't?

      ... Never crashes, but drives at a constant 12mph...
      My Gentoo system is more responsive than my XP on the same machine (duel boot). Boots in less time, apps start in less time... and the XP occasionaly gets into a 4 minute... 'wait, I am thinking about that last click' thing. Plus if you are running a webserver that is taking a lot of hits, Linux works great.

      ... You wouldn't be able to lend it to your friends unless they agreed to lend it to THEIR friends...
      What, you work for Darl? You can lend it to whoever you want and they can keep it hidden. Its only if you try to 'distribute' that you have obligations.

      Some funny points of course, but I think you could have been funny and slightly closer to reality.

    4. Re:If Linux Users Built Cars... by siphoncolder · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Your wienerishness is what prompted you to stay an anonymous coward, right?

      I'm glad some people found it funny, because that's what I was doing. Take a fucking joke, wiener.

      --
      i'm amazed that i survived - an airbag saved my life.
  113. Eew! by Greedo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Those motorcycle crash photos are pretty gross. I'm trying to convince myself they aren't real ...

    --
    Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
    1. Re:Eew! by dubstar · · Score: 1

      Maybe offtopic, but.. Driving home in a cab one night we passed a guy who wiped out on his bike, ambulance was just arriving - his left ankle was up beside his ear.. leg was still attached to the body though. No blood that I recall, but man did he look like he was in pain. I've had a pretty strong phobia of motorbikes since then, I think.. But I'm sure that will all change once MS releases their first crotch rocket OS.. BSOD at 100 km/h, bike stops dead - rider keeps going.. Weeee. Can't wait.

    2. Re:Eew! by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      Those motorcycle crash photos are pretty gross. I'm trying to convince myself they aren't real ...

      But just think of how many people a single motorcycle driver can help though organ donation.

    3. Re:Eew! by tim_mathews · · Score: 1

      But given the condition of that guy in the pictures and the fact that he was cleaned off the road with a fire hose, I don't think his organs were going to anybody.

  114. WHY!!!!!! WHY!!!!!! WHY!!!!!!!! by falcon5768 · · Score: 1
    I have no problem with computers in cars

    I DO have a problem with everyone put what is the worst OS ever for embedded systems in EVERYTHING

    TO ALL THOSE CLUELESS BUISNESS CEO'S AND MANAGERS OUT THERE!!!!!!!

    WINDOWS IS NOT I REPEAT NOT A OS THAT BELONGS ANYWHERE BUT ON A CONSUMER COMPUTER.

    get yourself a good coder and put Linux, or Unix in there, but DO NOT put WINDOWS, MAC OS, or any other consumer OS EVER near something that doesnt need it.

    --

    "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

  115. Re:Old MS car joke... by jared_hanson · · Score: 1

    I've had the +1 modifier for months on this account.

    There are a LOT of dumb fucks with the +1 modifier, ya know.


    Well, case in point I guess. You've certainly left me with no room to argue.

    --
    -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
  116. iDrive? by Greedo · · Score: 1

    I thought they ran Windows CE, not Mac OS X ...

    --
    Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
  117. BMW has not gravitated towards MS systems, for now by libra-dragon · · Score: 2, Informative
    Quote from the November 2003 issue of Roundel (BMW CCA Magazine):

    Teaching Bill how to do iDrive:
    BMW CEO Helmut Panke has been named to Microsoft's board of directors. Microsoft (Windows CE Automotive) had been the star-crossed operating system controlling the 7 series dashboard; BMW abandoned WinCE in the new 5 series.
  118. MIcrosoft by the_real_rs · · Score: 1, Informative

    Microsoft likes to take everything over. microsoft needs to goto hell.

    --
    Some software money can't buy. For everything else there's Micros~1
  119. Open v Closed by NtroP · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I just bought a 98 Mercedez. The first time I lifted the hood I realized I'd be fsck'd if I ever got stranded. My previous car was an 18 year old Volvo. I always kept a small set of tools in the trunk for emergencies. I only needed to use them once (hence the Mercedez) but I always knew that if push-came-to-shove I'd be able to lift the hood and tinker until I got her running again.

    I still cary the same bag of tools in the trunk of the Benz, but mostly out of stubborn habit (and the fact that they provided a hidey-hole for them that was exactly the same size as my bag ;-), but I know that there's no way I'll be able to work on my new car with all the electronics.

    As it was, I just had it winterized and requested they put a trickle-charger on the battery instead of a blanket heater. They had to disconnect the battery to do this. When I got back into the the car to drive it home all the electronic devices - seats, windows, sunroof, mirrors, etc. refused to work properly until they were "reset" - meaning run through their entire range twice. I paniced and thought the dealership had totally screwed my car up until I realized how to get functionality back.

    Take this to the extreme then. What happens when, instead of just windows and seats, we have steer-, accelerate-, and brake-by-wire in our vehicles? If a computer program is controling this instead of some sort of redundant solid-state system, I want it to be bullet proof and open to public review - with the ability to mod it if I feel the need (yes, yes, warrantly, blah, blah) I just don't want a completely closed system where I have to trust the manufacturer (or God forbid, Microsoft) with critical systems in my car. And since it is MY car, I want the freedom to be able to "get under the hood" if I want/need to.

    --
    "terrorism" and "pedophilia" are the root passwords to the Constitution
    1. Re:Open v Closed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can buy a tool that allows you to plug a 9 volt battery into the cigarette lighter to keep your preferences in memory. That tool needs to be used whenever the main battery is disconnected.
      I'm surprised the mercedes dealer did not do that.

  120. You Can Have... by md81544 · · Score: 1

    You can have my Windows CE-powered car when you pry it from my cold, dead hands. Oh, wait...

  121. This is not the 1st time this has happened by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 1

    I can't find the article right now, but there were reports of quite a number of Ms-related glitches when the new 7 series was rolled out.

    I'm willing to bet it hasn't been fixed yet.

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
  122. mod parent up - public service warning by Artifex · · Score: 1

    Thanks for helping me avoid a goatse-like morning.

    --
    Get off my launchpad!
  123. Excuse me but... by stubear · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...Microsoft didn't design the iDrive system, they only provided the underlying OS. That's like blaming Linus for a shitty UI design from KDE or Gnome. As for its stability, stop comparing a desktop based Windows OS to what would be placed in ar computer systems (presumably CE or XP Embedded). I'm always amazed when the OSS community whines about all the FUD put out by companies like Microsoft or SCO yet they turn around and generate the same, if not more, amount of bullshit FUD in return.

    1. Re:Excuse me but... by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      As for its stability, stop comparing a desktop based Windows OS to what would be placed in ar computer systems (presumably CE or XP Embedded).

      I use a windows CE based thin client at work. It does crash about once every two months. Yes it is the OS that crashes, its network connection works fine. Around 100 people at my site use these things and they all seem to show the same behaviour.

      My phone is a sony J70. It has built in windows software, a WAP web browser, etc. That crashes too. Around once every two weeks the display freezes and none of the buttons do anything. I have to pull out the battery to reset the thing. Whats worse is the display still looks like it's running fine when it's frozen. I know other people with the same model of phone who have the same problem.

      It's my experience that most of everything microsoft touch is unstable. They have always been a marketing company and not a software company.

    2. Re:Excuse me but... by stubear · · Score: 1

      Is it the OS or is it the underlying hardware? I have an iPaq 37xx PocketPC Runnign Pocket PC 2002 and I have never had any problems with the device and I use it regularly. With Microsoft giving hardware developers access to the source code, it's getting next to impossible to blame MS for these problems. Granted the source code can't be changed without first consulting MS but the option it now there. Frankly, I don't know who to believe when it comes to these things. Phone developers blame MS, MS blames the phone deelopers. I'd have to give MS the benefit of the doubt though since my iPaq 37xx works perfectly.

    3. Re:Excuse me but... by stubear · · Score: 1

      I also forgot to add that I am now using the MN-700 Firewall/Router from Microsoft and this uses a variant of the Windows CE OS. To date I have had no problems with the device crashing and it runs 24/7.

    4. Re:Excuse me but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As for its stability, stop comparing a desktop based Windows OS to what would be placed in ar computer systems (presumably CE or XP Embedded).

      Why, Einstein? It's still the same idiot programmers with the same unethical approach.

      Or are you youself employed by the Beast?

    5. Re:Excuse me but... by 1s44c · · Score: 1


      I'm not saying every device with a microsoft OS is going to be unstable. What I am saying is that more often then not microsoft OS's ( all of them ) show some stability problem at some point. It might be fair to say it's dodgy hardware in some cases, but certainly not all of them.

      Near where I work there are TV screens at the bus station that are meant to tell you what bus to take to get where. 6 days a week they show nothing but the blue screen of death.

      And are you telling me you have never walked up to a ATM, got your card out, looked down and seen the BSOD? I have, lots of times. Even ATMs crash nowdays.

      Your iPaq may work perfectly for years, but would you really trust it to control the APS brakes on your car on a wet road at night?

      Would you really want it to run your life suport system?

    6. Re:Excuse me but... by stubear · · Score: 1

      Actually, the only time I've seen an NT machine cause problems (beyond my own) was with a POS register at Best Buy. The system crashed during a sale and it had to be rebooted. I've never seen an ATM, airport/bus terminal, or other NT based systems display the BSOD. Sure, MS OSes could be the cause of these problems, but it is far more likely these days for it to be the hardware. Remember the hardware developers now have direct access to the source code for Windows CE and most of Windows NT/2000/XP embedded. While they need cannot change the source code without Microsoft's approval, they do have access to it and can determine where bugs in the OS are going to cause problems. The fact that they are not taking advantage of this is not necessarily Microsoft's fault.

    7. Re:Excuse me but... by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      Sorry but thats just not right.

      I have access to the linux kernel code, but I don't have the skills or time to debug more then very small parts of it. Even then it's likely that I'll make anything I change worse because I don't fully understand what I'm doing. In a sense it doesn't matter that I have access to the kernel and full rights to change it.

      Bad code can hide a whole load of bugs that are really, really hard to find.

      What makes you think that hardware developers are better at fixing up microsofts code then microsoft? Why should they fix up other peoples bugs anyway when they could start with linux/BSD/QNX and have far less to worry about?

  124. Other Drivers? by Kenshin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes, with Auto-DRM, the car industry will be able to regain lost profits from those horrible people sharing cars!

    Only YOU will be able to drive your car, and if your friends or family want to drive it, they will have to purchase a seperate licence from the manufacturer!

    --

    Does it make you happy you're so strange?

  125. Re:except the BMW 7-series is practically undrivea by jc42 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Consumer Reports had an article recently that mentioned this general topic. Their general suggestion was to avoid buying the new computerized luxury cars for a few years, until they get the UI right. It seems that in general their testers couldn't make much sense out of the menu-based centralized controls, and they considered these controls to be hazardous in the extreme under normal driving conditions.

    BMW's newer models were not nearly the only bad examples.

    Trying to discover where they've hidden some control in an N-level-deep menu tree is extremely distracting. You don't want this when you're driving.

    Of course, if you screw up, the manufacturer will just call it an "operator error".

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  126. I want to see the size of the lawsuit by crovira · · Score: 1

    when a M$ controlled car crashes.

    I hope that its one that some lawyer's relative is driving (and that its deadly [sory but I wouldn't want anyone to suffer.])

    Dragging Gates in for man-slaughter might teach him some humility and the importance of getting software right for a change instead of relying on some shrinkwhar "shirk"ware EULA.

    So would a week-end with "Bubbah" screwing with him instead of Bill screwing with us.

    I'm glad I don't drive anymore...

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  127. You mean... by Atragon · · Score: 1
    WinCE is much too big for the CURRENTLY tiny microcontrollers that control engines brakes, gear shifts, and so on.

    Just because that's the case now doesn't mean it's going to be the case forever. And given all the personal stories of being trapped inside cars NOW, I really think tempting fate is a bad thing.

  128. Windows Architect by Port53 · · Score: 1

    Gee, I knew Dave Cutler, Architect of Windows NT
    was into driving fast cars. See this Url:
    http://www.toyota-atlantic.com/global/driver s/dCUR /ATLdpDRIVER_dCURBIO_WFC.html

    I just didn't know he wanted to drive everybodys car.

  129. If we all (linux) built cars. by luekj · · Score: 2, Funny

    It'd take forever for a (com)pile up to happen...

    --
    Many Thanks,

    Luke

  130. Time for a change by haraldm · · Score: 2, Funny

    Time to start requesting written confirmations there is no M$ product in a car when buying a new one next time.

    --
    open (SIG, "</dev/zero"); $sig = <SIG>; close SIG;
  131. ... or there's iTron by jc42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Slashdot has had a number of articles about the iTron OS that's being used in a lot of Japanese autos these days. That and linux are both good candidates for a stable, reliable onboard OS. Of course, behind the scenes, iTron and linux are busy "stealing" ideas from each other. It'll be interesting to see which will win in the long run, or if they'll slowly merge. Or maybe divide the territory by consciously heading toward different parts of the tradeoff space.

    I wonder if anyone is looking at any of the *BSD kernels for this sort of embedded use? They have reliability records comparable to iTron and linux, and also come with all the source code.

    --
    Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    1. Re:... or there's iTron by IWorkForMorons · · Score: 1

      If I could, I'd mod this up. I guess what I should have said was there is no real advantage to using WinCE over any other established embedded OS. Didn't intentionally mean to come off as a Linux-zealot. Sometimes I forget just how many OSes are out there, especially in the embedded market. Again, in any case, this will be a war of marketting. If MS can win over the car companies, so be it. I just personally wouldn't feel safe in an MS-powered car...

  132. People blame Ford and GM by cgenman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When it becomes obvious that tires are shredding and rolling over, people do. When it becomes obvious that cars are exploding upon a slight rear collision, people do. When cars that are supposed to protect their drivers in a collision instead drive the steering column through their chest, people do.

    It's pretty obvious that, for example, when the Windows installer crashes, or a fresh copy of IIS has to be rebooted every 2 weeks despite serving only static HTML, that Windows is somehow at fault. Not only is Windows instability legendary, it is also well documented. Hardware cannot be the issue, because that hardware could be running another OS and have years of uptime. Drivers should not be the issue for the same reason. If the drivers are both put out by the same company, they should have the same level of overall quality.

    GM has made an OS... Its cars have been running on microcontrollers for years. They run on the smallest of processors, they can be upgraded for about $100 by replacing a ROM, and they never crash. If you had meant what a horrible mess it would be for GM to attempt to create a desktop operating system, then yes, I agree with you. However, that should extend to any company attempting to do something significant in a field that they don't have experience in.

    If Microsoft decided to do this properly by hiring the best kernel developers and experienced automotive programmers, and creating a real-time OS from scratch, people might be persuaded that this was a good idea. But they're not. They're taking an OS made for convincing a printer to communicate with a text processor, and trying to force it into making an antilock braking system communicate with a real-time traction control system.

    I don't know about you, but I'd rather use an OS specifically designed for reliability if I'm going to spend two hours a day inside something that kills 50,000 people per year.

    1. Re:People blame Ford and GM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This deserves a +5 mod up for Inspiration.

    2. Re:People blame Ford and GM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Microsoft decided to do this properly [...] creating a real-time OS from scratch

      This is another good point. WindowsCE is not a true realtime OS. Even Linux is not in its normal form, although true realtime versions do exist. If I'm going to have a computer in my car, I want everything it runs to be provably correct. Yes, it is possible to write code that is 100% bug-free. You can do it by formally proving everything. The military does this on a regular basis in the stuff they put in fighter jets, etc. But since it's such a painstaking and expensive process, it's almost never done for "every-day" software.

      If you don't have a true realtime OS, you can't even begin to write a formal proof of the functionality of your software. Therefore, you cannot prove it's safe. I don't know whether or not GM does do this for its software (I'm not a GM employee), but I do know that having a small, low-end microprocessor running everything in "real" mode makes it much easier to do this.

    3. Re:People blame Ford and GM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bloody brilliant. One of the most eloquent posts ever.

    4. Re:People blame Ford and GM by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      When cars that are supposed to protect their drivers in a collision instead drive the steering column through their chest, people do.

      Actually, it was one person in particular who jump-started (pardon the pun) the consumer safety revolution. As I understand -- and please correct me if I'm wrong -- the car companies had very little interest in "expensive" safety modifications until activists like Ralph Nader shamed and sued them into submission.

      People care. The owners of the Mom & Pop store on the corner care. Corporations, however, don't care about anything but return on shareholder investment.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  133. Man, it's a shame... by sprekken · · Score: 1, Interesting

    that BMW is going this route. I've been looking around recently at new cars, including the BMW 6 and 7 series. I'm planning to buy sometime this spring, but I guess I'll be looking more closely at the Lexus LS and Mercedes S series models.

  134. If BMW agreed... by MagicBox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...then I don't have much to say. I love BMWs, and BMW is not dumb to choose something that would not be up to their standards. Unfortunately the notion so many people have that anything associated with the word Microsoft is bad by default is wrong. It's clear that buidling an OS for the car (mostly for personal use in this case, not to control the car's vital functions) is different than building an OS for the desktop, and equally easy to see why. It's a competitive world and some will use Linux, others will use Windows (slimmed). See, you can actually say now that it is a competitive world. I am happy with that.

    --

    The phaomnneil pweor of the hmuan mnid. Fcuknig amzanig eh!
  135. Can I have that car without Windows, please? by baileytal · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can just imagine the look on the dealer's face.

    --
    Never at a loss for words... because of the voices.
    1. Re:Can I have that car without Windows, please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When enough of us say it, the manufacturer will get the message.

    2. Re:Can I have that car without Windows, please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well funny you should say that but here is a funny thing i saw a few years back, oh how times change......

  136. My favorite parallel gripe.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People usually use the car analogy, but I keep hearing that nobody would tolerate *any* other product as crappy as Windows. I still say cell phones are far worse - constant dropped calls, bad reception - all in major metro areas.

    I won't tell you which OS my Windows box dual boots with and gives me 2x the total number of crashes with only 2-3% of the usage. :-/

    1. Re:My favorite parallel gripe.... by arkulkis · · Score: 1

      You got to be a COMPLETE LOSER who is BEYOND stupid to get ANY OS to crash more than windows....

  137. Crash twice in the same accident? by asbestos_tophat · · Score: 1

    It is the only way to crash twice in the same accident.

    Does your insurance cover twice the cost?

    Or pay half as much on each claim? ;)

    lol

  138. That's not the cupholder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the CD-ROM----

    "
    I found that when I kept my cell phone stashed away in the compartment under the radio, the radio would randomly turn off about every 45 minutes. Now, I keep it in the cup holder, and the radio is fine."

  139. They chose iDrive and then new designs by Mastagunna · · Score: 1

    So why not go with a crappy OS.

  140. QNX in Automotive by Kilkonie · · Score: 1

    Incidently, QNX has been establishing itself in the Automotive sector for quite some time. Here's a few article excepts, etc.

    Life-or-death code [Registration Required]
    Bugs hold danger as cars and hospitals rely more on software

    QNX Software Systems Ltd. makes software for both. Bugs might present minor problems, but the Canadian company has found a way to keep devices from crashing completely, said product management director Sachin Lawande.

    QNX operating system revs up for the road
    Robust brain of smart-vehicle computers is able to repair itself

    Should Bill Gates worry? If he's going after high-reliability markets then we will beat him without question, says Mr. Dodge. But let's be realistic here. Technology doesn't always win everywhere and Microsoft has the marketing. People are used to rebooting their PC every day. We've had customers running QNX for 10 to 15 years without rebooting.

    Driving the Future
    Click here to see the Audi A8 L's MultiMedia Interface, powered by QNX

    Windows CE (now called Windows Automotive) lost out to QNX Neutrino, a real-time operating system from a company with two decades of experience in life-support systems and nuclear power plantsand few plans to run Audi's life in the future. With Microsoft, confided one Audi manager, You were always thinking they had plans to control more than your dashboard. (Microsoft automotive business unit general manager Bob McKenzie says that Microsoft would like to partner with automakers on more extensive projects in the future.)

    Obviously there's more, but that gives you an idea of what's happening.

    1. Re:QNX in Automotive by Kilkonie · · Score: 1


      The link to the Audio's QNX-based UI was a Javascript link, filtered out. It can be found here:

      http://www.pcmag.com/slideshow/1,3018,a=46185,00.a sp

  141. This explains my father's unreliable BMW 7 Series by Qweezle · · Score: 1

    My father has a 2003 BMW 7 series, and it has broken down 5 times.

    I kept wondering why, however I guess Microsoft Windows CE must be one of the problems....and I say this as seriously as I can, well, without, you know, laughing.

    Sometimes it doesn't start, it chokes up gas, and it steers like a steer(that is, a cow). BMW's are supposed to be reliable, but I guess they just tossed that reputation out the window, huh? I know he'll never buy a BMW ever again...

  142. Yikes! by plopez · · Score: 1

    Microsoft Quality Software + wireless/satellite + worms

    Can you say nation wide grid lock?

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  143. State of Software Sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GM doesn't write an OS; they contract all information technology out to EDS, including embedded software for GM products. The software onboard GM cars (and last I heard this was typical for the industry) crashes regularly and automatically resets itself. You don't notice because the system state can be rebuilt in microseconds.

    My uncle is a navigator in the air force. He claims that the computers in planes all have reset switches accessible from the flight deck. The pilots wouldn't have it any other way; the software crashes all the time so they need to be able to reset it.

    This likely does not represent all embedded software. However, in comparison to cars and planes, desktop computers are very stable. That includes those running software written by Microsoft.

    1. Re:State of Software Sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have sources to support your claims?

    2. Re:State of Software Sucks by wskellenger · · Score: 4, Insightful
      This is complete BS.

      In modern vehicles, the warning lamps are not hardwired. They are controlled by the embedded software in the instrument panel (IP). If the IP has not received a message from the ABS module within, say, 1 second, it will turn on EVERY brake-related lamp immediately (red "BRAKE" lamp, yellow "ABS" lamp, traction/stability control warning lamp, etc.)

      Even in older vehicles that had hard-wired lamps, the lamp was grounded through the ABS controller. In this way, if the ABS micro ever went down, the lamp would illuminate by default.

      There is no comparison between desktop computers which have millions of different possible configurations of input/output devices and storage mediums and protocols, and an embedded system such as a driver's seat module or a climate -control module, that performs a pre-determined (and thus EMBEDDED) function, while listening to the exact same sensorics in EVERY VEHICLE.

      I can shut down my Windows machine and install a new sound card or completely replace the RAM, and likely it will re-boot and attempt to figure out what I've done. It may or may not re-configure everything correctly. Your car will not be happy with similar changes because all of this code doesn't exist. If a wheel speed sensor doesn't look electrically identical to the sensor that the system was designed for, the ABS module will set a DTC, disable ABS function, and throw a warning lamp.

      Linux is remarkably stable because the user is responsible for configuring everything. Don't want support for sound cards other than what's installed in your box? Don't compile or load those modules. Don't need USB support? Re-compile the kernel and don't include it. You can make all the choices.

      By the way, the supplier responsible for the module writes their own software.

      I am a vehicle development engineer working on automotive embedded systems.

    3. Re:State of Software Sucks by cgenman · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm sorry, I thought I made it clear that this was my point. The systems are very different. The systems in a car have been designed for specific purposes with independence and high fault tolerances. Windows CE was designed for high hardware compability and ease-of-use... neither of which apply in cars.

      Of course, Microsoft is saying currently that WinCE is aimed at navigation and media playback, not embedded control. That wasn't always their shtick, however, as when they started this initiative they cited "better safety and security," along with reduced hardware duplication as a reason to use WinCE for all of your machine's needs. Perhaps I'm reading too much into it, but they truly wanted to be a central controller for the machine.

      My mother dated a vehicle development engineer who created system diagnostic software for 5 years.

    4. Re:State of Software Sucks by wskellenger · · Score: 1

      cgenman: I agree with you. My post was a response to parent "State of Software Sucks" by Anonymous Coward.

    5. Re:State of Software Sucks by ultranova · · Score: 1
      In modern vehicles, the warning lamps are not hardwired. They are controlled by the embedded software in the instrument panel (IP). If the IP has not received a message from the ABS module within, say, 1 second, it will turn on EVERY brake-related lamp immediately (red "BRAKE" lamp, yellow "ABS" lamp, traction/stability control warning lamp, etc.)

      Well, that will certainly help me when I'm panic braking on wet ice, sliding towards a cliff.

      The problem, you see, is that you can't *trust* Windows. Simply because it works perfectly one second, is not a guarantee that it will work the next second, too. Furthermore, you cannot be certain it is working correctly any one second. To do so would require you to verify the output data against another source. That source cannot be another Windows machine, because if there's a bug which causes the data to become corrupted under certain circumstances, both computers would experience it at the same time, because they would have gone through the same sequence of input data since startup.

      And if you verified the output against some other method of calculating it, it would be pointless to have Windows on board in the first place. All it would do would be to increase the likelihood of random system malfunction on a critical moment.

      There is no comparison between desktop computers which have millions of different possible configurations of input/output devices and storage mediums and protocols, and an embedded system such as a driver's seat module or a climate -control module, that performs a pre-determined (and thus EMBEDDED) function, while listening to the exact same sensorics in EVERY VEHICLE.

      Then why use an operating system originally designed for desktop computers ? Or an operating system based on a desktop operating system ?

      Linux is remarkably stable because the user is responsible for configuring everything. Don't want support for sound cards other than what's installed in your box? Don't compile or load those modules. Don't need USB support? Re-compile the kernel and don't include it. You can make all the choices.

      Linux is remarkably stable even with everything possible compiled in. The kernels that ship with major distros do this, to support as many devices as possible without recompile. My Red Hat 9 system asked for target partitions, keyboard type, language, mouse type and network address when installing, if I remember correctly. Rest of machine configuration was auto-detected. Besides, Windows doesn't include any drivers that aren't installed, and still manages to be ridicilously unstable...

      I am a vehicle development engineer working on automotive embedded systems.

      I'm an ex-Windows user, and will not set my foot on any vechile where any Microsoft product has anything to do with anything important. The only expection are mices; those Microsoft can make well...

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  144. If Microsoft built cars? by benja · · Score: 1
    "I'm sorry, I cannot do that, Dave..."

    It's already two years after 2001, it's about time!

  145. Re:except the BMW 7-series is practically undrivea by jafac · · Score: 1

    I remember seeing this one car that had a bunch of buttons on the steering wheel, each one had a different letter on it, and a different function. That car did some amazingly cool stuff. . . had a monkey in the trunk too. . .

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  146. Microsoft embedded in my ass by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    God some people are fucking stupid, do BMW get their people from Diebold?? i claim no knowledge of car design or even software design (im still in uni) but even i can tell that some things are just stupid, for example having a situation where a computer has locked your door and even though you are inside the car you cannot get out because their is no fricking mechanical override. I get scared, scared totally shitless that the same incompetant fools that design voting systems, atms and car locks might one day be let loose on a bloody nuclear reactor or a plane! would they understand simple concepts eg. "buffer overflow could cause fuel dump, dont just hope it doesnt happen, design a redundancy so it _cant_ happen" Seeing as Microsoft have screwed up on a number of things i wouldnt want them powering anything more than an mp3 player (yeah and even windows media player has fucked up badly!)

    Outlook express VB script - we messed it up
    CSS box model - we cant even draw a box right
    IIS - our uptimes almost 15 days on average now!

    just afew

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  147. Just what I need, personality in a car by dacarr · · Score: 1

    Except instead of a people personality courtesy of Sirius Cybernetics, I get a user friendly personaity courtesy of their real life clone, Micro$oft. How con-fricking-venient.

    --
    This sig no verb.
  148. Clueless flaming by GreenEggsAndHam · · Score: 1

    I don't know about the "EULA style" sticker but the passage about operating a car whilst using the cell phone is a matter of EU law. Too many people have caused accidents whilst talking on the phone so they passed a law. BMW is just covering their asses with regard to the law.

    1. Re:Clueless flaming by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

      If the sticker says that you aren't allowed to operate a mobile phone in the car that isn't BMW approved, do you think that only applies to the driver?

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
  149. Re:Trapped OUTside a locked car? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm, various car locks get frozen during colder Canadian days. Not just locks, but also windows, gas lines, etc. And not just in the newer electronic cars.

    Yeah, getting stuff frozen at only -26 is on the wimpy side, but if we're going to recall every model that has this type of problem we'd be back to dogsleds.

  150. No it's not... by AzrealAO · · Score: 1

    but it's also not Microsoft's fucking fault if Lexmark can't write a quality print driver.

    1. Re:No it's not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chances are, it is. M$ probably didn't give Lexmark the necessary source code to Windows to ensure the drivers are fully compatible.

    2. Re:No it's not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it is. Give ATI the windoze source code, and drivers can made properly compatible.

    3. Re:No it's not... by YOU+ARE+SO+SUED! · · Score: 2, Interesting
      In the case of a BSOD it is. The driver should be able to shite and piss all it wants, other elements of the OS should still stay standing.

      For one bugg piece of code (inevitable in *nix AND windows, not to mention everyone else) to bring the whole system spiralling down means the OS did not protect one subsystem from another.

      Now I'm not saying I haven't hung my Linux Sparc simply by typing "modprobe reiserfs", it happens. I am saying that if something shits itself on any Windows OS, you're likely to see the BSOD, not some message on your console "xyz: shat itself - dropping to console" for example.

    4. Re:No it's not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that Microsoft STUPID PUTS PRINTER DRIVERS IN THE FREAKIN' KERNAL.

      There is absolutely ZERO reason for a printer driver to be in kernal space.

      Unix and Linux are reliable, because printer drivers are in USER space....that way, if a printer driver dies...it DOESN'T Kill the entire freaking OS.

      ****THAT*** is why Microsoft is responsible--because they can't design software for shit.

    5. Re:No it's not... by zyridium · · Score: 1

      So what OS does this actually happen in?

  151. Here Is What the Automotive Press Thinks. by rssrss · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Car and Driver Magazine reviewed 6 luxury sedans in their December 2003 issue. They rated the Lexus and the Jaguar 1 and 2. Here is what they said about the BMW iDrive:

    Who Asked for the Lawyer Screen?

    None of the cars in this test will give you full control until you agree with their company lawyers. In some, you must do so every time you start up. The screen opens with a warning that such devices in cars are unholy distractions. You must click on "I agree."

    Navigation systems work best when they show you where to go; that means some sort of display. Does any other in-car feature need such detailed visuals? Probably not (forget e-mail in cars). Yet the latest luxo crop has become screen dependent, to the point of ruination in the 7-series BMW.

    "It wouldn't be that bad if they changed a few things." That's from the staff's most ardent 745i defender. The majority of us think iDrive, as BMW calls its computer interface, needs a clean-sheet redesign.

    BMW tried to take over control of HVAC, audio, chassis settings, trip info, navigation, etc., with a screen. You make your choices with a single knob that turns, toggles, and clicks; it's a mouse substitute. Worse yet, the company forced ordinary controls into some contortion of the knob thing; for example, you must select the part of the seat you want to adjust by pressing a button, then twist or toggle a knob to make it move. Okay, but what was wrong with the old way?

    In fact, the 745i has buttons and rockers scattered about the dash that let you adjust HVAC and do very basic radio/CD changes without using iDrive. But they're so haphazard in their logic that they only add to the annoyance.

    We've given iDrive 18 months to persuade us. It failed. Now the F is in ink. Fearless prediction: The 745i will take a beating on resale.

    BMW's pickle is made worse by the fact that it's all by itself at the irritating extreme. The Jaguar and the Lexus are very friendly; they have touch screens, surely the easiest input method, and they provide full HVAC and entertainment control without the screen. In fact, you needn't agree with their lawyers if you don't use the navigation.

    Audi and VW are almost as screen-centric as BMW, but they have a critical improvement: Separate buttons, well-labeled, bring up the various menus. Their graphics are also vastly superior to BMW's. We find them relatively easy to operate, particularly the VW's.

    Like Jaguar and Lexus, Mercedes doesn't force you to use the system for trivial jobs, but the basic controls operate on their own quirky logic.

    The lawyers are right: Screens are distracting. And the friendliest cars depend on them the least. --PB

    --
    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
  152. No it's not... by AzrealAO · · Score: 1

    Nor is it Microsoft's fault if ATI can't write a quality display driver.

  153. Re:Oh here we go again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't have to be a Linux fan to hate MS obsessed mindless morons. That just comes naturally. I wouldn't expect somebody displaying the logic in your post to understand that it's possible to like something and hate drooling retards at the same time.

  154. Evidently... by bonch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Evidently, you either ignorantly or puposely misinterpreted the report, which merely states that 50% of crashes are third-party, and the other 50% are from Windows itself due to bad drivers or other poorly-written OS hooks. Yes, there were other reports about this that stated such.

    In other words, half of what Dr. Watson reported was error conditions originating directly from third-party code, while the other half was initiated by Windows code. Hardly a reason to point fingers at "bad" Windows code. The Windows kernel rivals that of Linux in many ways. It's the stuff on top of it that biased people have a problem with.

    1. Re:Evidently... by whoever57 · · Score: 0

      Evidently you did not read the original post, or you chose to mis-represent my posting.

      The original post stated that 99% of windows crashes were due to third party code.

      Also you are mis-representing the report, since it does not (according to ZDNET report) put any blame on third party code or bad OS hooks for the remaining 50% of the crashes. I am quite sure that all the crashes caused by faulty drivers and bad OS hooks written by third parties were added them to the total of third-party initiated crashes.

      Finally, I'm not being biased, I'm just pointing to Microsoft's own figures. I made no mention of comparison with other OS-es. Nor did I make any comment about how good or bad the figure was. It's you who brought up the issue of other OS-es. It's you who used the adjectives, I just quoted the numbers.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    2. Re:Evidently... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Apparently, then, you have used the Windows kernel without the stuff on top of it, to be able to make this claim ?

      In any case, if a program misbehaves under Windows, I kill the program, and the system either hangs or becomes corrupted to the point of requiring a reboot. If a program misbehaves under Linux, I kill it, and the system keeps right on running (unless it was X, in which case the keyboard may become unresponsive).

      Whether this is because of the kernel or other factors, I don't know or care. All I care about is not having to reboot the system and check all my data to make sure it isn't corrupted. Which reminds me of the time Windows lost the main directory of an entire partition, without any obvious explanation - no viruses, no dirty shutdowns, no error messages, just an empty hard disk, which had been full of stuff before shutdown. Or the time when all the file- and directory names of drive C were changed to ascii-art (well, a mess really, but with modern art, who can tell the difference ;), requiring a reformat to clear. Or the fact that if you're downloading a hundred-megabyte file, and Windows dies before it's finished, the entire file (teh part received after last closing the file, at least) becomes lost clusters...

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    3. Re:Evidently... by mentin · · Score: 1
      In any case, if a program misbehaves under Windows, I kill the program, and the system either hangs or becomes corrupted to the point of requiring a reboot

      Looks like you are running Windows 95. I feel pity for you.

      On the other hand, you would not be any better if you run any of 8 years old Linux distro.

      --
      MSDOS: 20+ years without remote hole in the default install
    4. Re:Evidently... by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

      Apparently, then, you have used the Windows kernel without the stuff on top of it, to be able to make this claim

      Would the Windows PE count as doing just that?

      There is an ISO on many P2P systems that lets you use the Preinstallation Environment for recovery and fully controlled installation of Windows. I wouldn't care to guess if the PE was the full kernel or not, but someone here might know.

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
    5. Re:Evidently... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "On the other hand, you would not be any better if you run any of 8 years old Linux distro."

      With Linux, the service packs are all available to make his system stable -- and, if Debian based, the price of these service packs is included in his original purchase-price 8-years ago.

      apt-get upgrade.

    6. Re:Evidently... by mentin · · Score: 1
      Nope, no service packs will make 8-years old system support (and be stable) on modern hardware.

      Unless of course, "service pack" include new major releases of kernel, X Windows and Gnome/KDE.

      --
      MSDOS: 20+ years without remote hole in the default install
  155. YOU mean... by Mike+Hawk · · Score: 1

    teh FUD = teh win!!!11

    Its not happening now, but it might someday and you should all be afraid!!!111

  156. Doing a CISCO on used cars? by CoolRay · · Score: 2, Funny
    How long before the car manufacturers follow Cisco -- you can sell the car hardware but not the software that goes along with the car? The buyer would then need to re-license all the software that is in the car! Yiiikes...

    http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/csc/refurb_equipm ent/swlicense.html

  157. Do you have URLs? by Prof.+Pi · · Score: 1
    There are videos running around the net showing a guy's 750iL hunting for gears on the highway, closing+opening the trunk incessantly, ejecting the key from the keyslot(making it impossible to start the car!), changing radio stations on its own...

    You wouldn't happen to have links to this, would you?

    1. Re:Do you have URLs? by duffhuff · · Score: 1

      There was a slashdot article on this a few months back. Try googling for it

    2. Re:Do you have URLs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Link to general review, videos and pictures here

  158. BOX KNIVES! by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 5, Insightful


    9/11 was caused by poor airline security and lax regulation and oversight.

    NO. NO NO NO NO!!!!. The terrorists took over using friggin' BOX KNIVES! I, for one, do NOT want to see the level of paranoid security that would be required to prevent someone from carrying a tiny razor-blade sized knife on board. The best weapon the terrorists had was deceit. They had the passengers convinced that all that was going to happen was that the plane was going to be forced to land somewhere and then negotiations would begin for hostage release. Under those expectations, the risk of being stabbed with the knives wasn't worth engaging in any heroics. In the one case where the news was already out, and the element of deceit was lost, the passengers did decide to overpower the terrorists' wimpy arsenel of box knifes. The same thing would likely have happened on the other three flights if they too had known what was going to happen if they sat still.

    Don't blame airline security. Blame excessive optimism on the part of the passengers.

    --

    Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    1. Re:BOX KNIVES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, for one, do NOT want to see the level of paranoid security that would be required to prevent someone from carrying a tiny razor-blade sized knife on board.

      I, for one, welcome our paranoid boxcutter-carrying security overlords!

    2. Re:BOX KNIVES! by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      The terrorists took over using friggin' BOX KNIVES! I, for one, do NOT want to see the level of paranoid security that would be required to prevent someone from carrying a tiny razor-blade sized knife on board.

      You mean a level of security the airlines convinced us already existed? 9/11 wouldn't have happened if the cockpit doors could simply have been hardened and locked. The terrorists could slit every throat in the cabin and the pilots would never have flown into a building. We pay the government to come up with these ideas so they can protect us from it. THe problem is not that someone didn't come up with the idea, the problem is that airlines and the FAA are too lazy to implement the proper protections. Otherwise they would have been installed in weeks instead of months.
      It took over a year to start implementing the hardened doors after 9/11. Why did it take so long to implement such an absurdly simple idea. Because security _still_ isn't a priority. Poeple don't avoid El Al because of security hassles, yet we still have people smuggling box cutters on American airplanes with impunity. I guess it will take another 9/11 before anyone starts acting decisively and effectively.

      I don't think the passengers were being excessively optimistic. I think they were doing the best thing based on the information they had. The actions taken aboard the Pennsylvania flight proves what the passengers would have done if they'd had any idea. Otherwise, pointless heroics and getting yourself gutted for no reason wouldn't have solved the problem.

      You can be sure that passengers won't let this happen again, even if the airline security fails.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    3. Re:BOX KNIVES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " The terrorists could slit every throat in the cabin and the pilots would never have flown into a building."

      But again, nobody knew that the terrorists were going to do any of that. Everyone assumed that it was going to be just another hijacking and release. No one, including the pilots, knew that the terrorists were going to crash the plane into buildings full of people. The pilots, assuming that it would be a normal hijacking, probably would've opened those hardened doors if the hijackers had even threatend to slit some little kid's throat. The airline's security was probably premised on the assumption that hijackings would be played out with negotiations and release.

      It should also be noted that the terrorists stated that they had bombs and were willing to blow the plane up if their demands weren't met. So it appeared to the passengers that the terrorists weren't just armed with knives, box-cutters or whatever but also bombs.

    4. Re:BOX KNIVES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure about those box cutters?

      Have you found any report verifying the media assumption that the terrrorists had box cutters?

      After all, the witnesses aren't around to tell us and they didn't say anything about the weapons used when they called relatives.

    5. Re:BOX KNIVES! by jjo · · Score: 1

      The terrorists' most important tool wasn't box knives, or knowledge of gaps in airline security. Their most important tool was surprise. Up until 9/11 it was standard operating procedure to do whatever a hijacker wanted, under the theory (justified until that time) that so doing would minimize the loss of life. This policy wasn't a secret; it had been publicized in the aviation community for decades. Given that policy, hardened cockpit doors would have been useless.

      The 9/11 terrorists succeeded for the same reason the Japanese succeeded in their attack on Pearl Harbor: they mounted an attack that their opponents thought would never happen.

    6. Re:BOX KNIVES! by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I agree with you up to the point where you say hardened doors would have been useless. How could the terrorists have gotten control of the plane?

      Do you think the pilot would have let them at the threat of them hurting passengers? Nothing good could have come from letting them take over the plane, if it could be prevented.

      You are right, though, surprise was their biggest advantage. They won't have that again, _but_, I still think there are many ways for them to successfully wreak havoc on the airlines and elsewhere. I'm just a little tired of politicians going for the appearance of doing something useful instead of making the tough but effective choices.

      Maybe I'm a pessimist, but about the time the airplane flew into the Pentagon, I had a sick feeling we were going to find out what happened to those missing Russian nukes... I very glad reality didn't live up to my fevered imaginings.

      Despite failing to prevent 9/11, I do give lots of credit to the FBI for preventing foreign terror in our country for many years. When it seemed there was a disco exploding in Germany every other week, I always wondered when they would hit the U.S., but for many years they never did. Clinton pointed out that under his administration we stopped something like 15 major terror attacks (like the bomb heading to L.A. in 2000), and I don't doubt it.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    7. Re:BOX KNIVES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      blame the terrorists, you cock

    8. Re:BOX KNIVES! by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1


      I agree with you up to the point where you say hardened doors would have been useless. How could the terrorists have gotten control of the plane?

      Consider: You're an airline pilot. One of the hijackers knows how to fly. They demand you give them control of the plane or they will kill more passengers until you do. They do NOT tell you that their plan is to fly the plane into a target and use the onboard fuel as an incinderary weapon, killing everyone on board in the process. They just tell you to hand over control to them or they kill more people.

      What do you do. Do you close your hardended door and say "no"?

      Hell no.

      The biggest advantage the terrorists had is that nobody suspected what they were about to do. Once they lose that and everybody knows, then they were easy to overpower with or without hardened cockpit doors. (In the case of the Pennsylvania crash, what probably happened is that the survivors of the scuffle didn't know how to fly the plane.)

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    9. Re:BOX KNIVES! by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      It was not a media assumption. There were passengers who were able to get some limited information out via cellphone calls - information that included what the terrorists were armed with.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    10. Re:BOX KNIVES! by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1


      blame the terrorists, you cock

      It is possible to blame two things, you ass. And if you will note, not once did I blame the passengers. I blamed their optomism. Before throwing around insults, learn to read.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    11. Re:BOX KNIVES! by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      The terrorists could get control of the planes by demanding that the pilots come out. Human sympathy is sufficient that one eviscerated flight attendent, and the threat of a second, will cause just about any sane man to submit.

      I've always thought that the best method to keep planes safe is to eliminate the door between the cockpit and passenger compartments. keep all the food/water/toiletries the pilots need in their own compartment, and force anyone wants to get in to go through a separate door on the outside of the plane.

  159. in danger from windows by infiniphonic · · Score: 1

    It's all fun and games until windows kills someone.

    --
    Crisis is the rule, not the exception.
  160. Re:No Microsoft products in security related devic by Vincent+Bernat · · Score: 1

    Java is embeddable in smart cards...

  161. Driving will become much more hazardous... by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...once the new, "pop-up billboards" become common.

    --

    help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

  162. Re:Win CE/PPC 2003 real-time/mission critical by henryhbk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So the Seimens Telemetry monitoring system in our cardiac ward is Windows CE based. I finally had a crash of a telemetry monitor recently (which is how I found out it was CE based when the splash screen launched). There was a patient on it, and it simply stopped reading his heart rate/EKG. Luckily a reboot fixed it, but these should never crash...

  163. How small is your Penis ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, the only people who should be allowed to drive sports cars are celebrities and atheletes. Anyone else just looks pathetic

  164. At the next car expo: by ejaw5 · · Score: 4, Funny

    All you do is get into the car, close the door and Windows Car will automatically configure the car to suit the driver. It will adjust the seats, climate control, and select a radio station. Our driver is... (BSOD on dash) ... Uh Oh

    uuhh...moving right along...

    Bill Gates: So this must be why we're not shipping Windows Car yet.
    Absolutely!

    --

    $cat /dev/random > Sig
  165. Linux as the OS would be terrible!!!! by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1

    Unfortuneatley if Linus was used as the OS, gas prices would triple due to the initiation of a Congressionally approved TAX. Also Known as the Smoot-McBride Act

  166. lubrication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suspect that is because gasoline also lubricates them.

    1. Re:lubrication by arkulkis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Fuel is used to cool the the fuel pump. This is common to practically all cars made today (even carbureted engines) If you constantly run on low fuel, the fuel pump will overheat.

  167. Re:Oh here we go again... by Doomrat · · Score: 1

    What the fuck is wrong with you? I don't like Microsoft, I don't run Microsoft products. If you could all stop thinking about CmdrTaco's ass for a moment you might make the time to grasp the very real concept that it isn't just Microsoft fans who hate you freaks.

  168. Just say no thanks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know what I do when I see some useless junk in a car that I'm considering buying... Just say "nope... don't need it... don't want it."

    If they can't get rid of it, then I just leave. There's plenty of choices.

    The first time I saw OnStar - I left... Privacy invading piece of shit that it is...

    And the first time I see anything with M$ in it, in my car - I'm leaving...

    I don't really care if it's Linux (it'd be nice), but it will not be M$... I just can't trust my life to a company who's servers I have to reboot once a week (and my PC I have to reboot every 2 days)...

    Especially the way I drive...

  169. Re:Oh here we go again... by Doomrat · · Score: 1

    I'm not even taking the time to reply to the grandparent post. I'm sure that he wouldn't take any notice because clearly I am a lesser human being due to my high UID.

    I realised a fairly long time ago that geeks are not intellectually superior. They're just obsessed. I suspect that most of these losers beat up on Billy constantly because it's something they can do easily. It makes up for lack of natural skill in worthwhile disciplines.

  170. contradiction ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it was a 10-year old car, it could not have had a Windows-based computer. But BMW does not deny that the car had one ("rather than a crash of the car's Windows-based computer"). Hmm, something stinks of cover-up.

  171. Imagine the possibilities for script kiddies by blang · · Score: 5, Funny

    With wifi catching on, and with MS software being central in a car's brain, the possibilties are endless.

    People will have their cars recalled 3-4 times a year to apply the latest patch.

    You might have viruses that spread from car to car.

    There'll be the IloveYou kind of virus, or blaster kind of virus, that will shut down traffic and cause millions of accidents within hours of release to the wild.

    There's the jerusalem style of virus that will crash all cars on the planet at a predetermined time.

    There'll be backdoors and IRC robots, where the script kiddies in stead of trying to shut down a web site in a DDDOS attack, will instead take control over cars, and use real people as objects in a videogame.

    Or more innocent viruses that hijacks a car's stereo, and starts blasting Wang Chung at full volume.

    Scary. The scariest part is that this is not crazy science fiction. By all signs, I don't see that any of this is avoidable, given MS current dominance, their awful track record on security, and the extremely weak consumer protection laws.

    --
    -- Another senseless waste of fine bytes.
  172. BS Bell clanging loudly alert! by OldCrasher · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The F22 and B2 aside, there are no aircraft the USAF flies that were designed and build in the time frame that Windows has come into being.

    The F22 only just fits the time period; it started its software development process in the days of Windows 3.0.

    No aircraft has Windows based Flight Control systems, not even the civil stuff.

    Though that is not to say flight qualified software doesn't reset.

    1. Re:BS Bell clanging loudly alert! by u-235-sentinel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Are you sure about that? I don't work with the planes nor do I work with the people involved. I did have many lunch conversations with them. It sounded convincing to me. They were prototypes so of course your statement is correct.

      I did some google searches at the time. I learned that the Navy has tried the same thing with some of their planes and their ships. That being the case lends credibility to what they told me. The results were unfavorable. The window systems were removed as a result.

      I'm not picking on Microsoft products. They don't have the best history with their software. While I use their products, I prefer using more stable environments for my work.

      --
      Has Comcast disconnected your Internet account? Same here. You can read about it at http://comcastissue.blogspot.com
  173. Just buy a Chrysler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We don't need M$ to build cars that stop in the middle of the road.. Just buy a Chrysler... what a POS.. you would think thy could build a decent electronic trany by now! the electronics crash constantly on some models and the dealers have no clue how to fix it.

  174. Underage Drinking by RoadkillBunny · · Score: 0

    Well, underage drinking is not gonna be the biggest cause of cars accidents now...

    --
    Cheers,
    RoadkillBunny
  175. Lawsuit bait by paiute · · Score: 4, Informative

    Watch for the tsunami of lawsuits to come out of this. Some of the 50,000 highway deaths are bound to be due to software failure. And when a Ford, say, equipped with Windows is involved in a fatality, the case will attract lawyers like some kind of legal black hole. Can you imagine the prospect of picking the deep pockets of Ford and Microsoft?

    Software manufacturers have been immune from this before, because everyone "knows" that computers are unreliable and crash. A jury isn't going to care that your desktop burst into flame and lost all your data. That's state of the art in the zeitgeist. But juries drive cars and are more sympathetic to claims against their makers. Do you want to be defending Microsoft when the other side shows the birthday party videos of the little girl who was immolated in the fiery wreck caused by your software?

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:Lawsuit bait by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      "...the case will attract lawyers like some kind of legal black hole..."
      heh...that would be cool. Just be sure to push them beyond the event horizon.

      --
      What?
    2. Re:Lawsuit bait by cookiepus · · Score: 1

      Clever but silly at the same time.

      Cars currently have plenty of electronics that affect critical components such as fuel injection. Windows will apparently be running non critical components like the CD player.

      Where do you picture the lawsuits?

    3. Re:Lawsuit bait by gabbarbhai · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't want to sound too morbid, but what's a better way to make M$FT own up to its crappy software than a few lawsuits of wrongful death?

    4. Re:Lawsuit bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      everyone "knows" that computers are unreliable and crash

      Seymore Cray? Thomas J Watson? SGI?

      Migod, you ARE a moron.

    5. Re:Lawsuit bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's state of the art in the zeitgeist.

      It must be great to be a geek and have such a cool vocab.

      Get a life, asshole.

  176. Newsflash: real cars actually die on the freeway.. by Otis_INF · · Score: 1

    When it gets colder and colder, more and more cars break down on the freeways, because of engine problems related to colder temperatures, moist etc...

    When I compare that with my Windows XP install which hasn't crashed on my in the last year (and I use it 16+ hours a day) ONCE, I don't know, but XP does it better than my Mercedes A140 which broke down a couple of times in the last year. :)

    --
    Never underestimate the relief of true separation of Religion and State.
  177. Re:Old MS car joke... by IM6100 · · Score: 1

    I see you used your +1 modifier, dude.

    --
    A Good Intro to NetBS
  178. Who said it has anything to do with compatability. by AzrealAO · · Score: 0

    What if it's a plain old bug in the fucking driver? What was I thinking, as we all know, the only developers with bugs in their code are Microsoft Developers. Everyone else writes perfect code.

  179. What's compatibility got to do with it? by AzrealAO · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    If everyone else can manage to write a printer driver that doesn't send the computer into fits of hysterics, why must it be Microsoft's fault?

    Surely there is a possibility that Lexmark has a fucking bug in their driver.

    Of course not, this is Slashdot, everyone but Microsoft writes perfect code. All bugs, are either Microsoft's bug, or they hid the specs so people couldn't write compatible code.

    1. Re:What's compatibility got to do with it? by jafac · · Score: 1

      I dunno.
      Seems to me as if NOBODY has a decent fucking printer driver these days. On ANY platform. (at least for printers you can buy for under $500).

      Or Scanner Drivers.

      Or Cardreader drivers.

      Or video drivers.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    2. Re:What's compatibility got to do with it? by arkulkis · · Score: 1
      If everyone else can manage to write a printer driver that doesn't send the computer into fits of hysterics, why must it be Microsoft's fault? Because a PROPERLY DESIGNED OS doesn't PRINTER drivers in the kernal---a PROPERLY DESIGNED operating system has printer drives in USER SPACE.

      If the driver weren't in the kernal, then a driver bug wouldn't crash the whold freaking machine.

      ****THAT'S*** it's Mickey-soft's fault.

    3. Re:What's compatibility got to do with it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And HP makes the shittiest burner drives. All but 1 of my, oh, half dozen blue screens in the last 3 years were from HP drivers; crashed while burning CD with error pointing finger at HP. Fuckers.

  180. Get real by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My '74 Mustang II (long ago scrapped) had to be turned twice a year. with it's high tech carburator, auto choke, distributor with points. I would pray and pump the gas every cold morning.
    Now if my car does not start in 3 second at minus 10 I assume its broken. The Engine and trany are computer controlled. Built my people who expect to use the same hardware for years. Not everyone expects a revolution every other year. BTW 50 tech would ment I would have to set the choke as I pray to start the '74

  181. And if they were LinSUX based? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The driver would sit in his driveway hopeing that one day his car's hardware would be supported.

  182. Windows CE in a sex slave robot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....would do you gay!

  183. Properly edited to remove extraneous information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It's probably not too far off to say 99.9% of Windows crashing problems are due to operator error from installing...crappy software.

    You talk damn too much.

  184. No... by idontneedanickname · · Score: 2, Funny

    Let them end!

  185. PMH by Bilange · · Score: 1

    70pmh

    70 pico miles/hour? (It will crash anyway, considering its Windows ME (ME = Motorized Edition?))

    --
    "...a generation of kids has grown up thinking Trance is the shittiest music since country and western." - Paul van Dyk
  186. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I for one welcome our...



    Oh never mind

  187. Nope. Dont buy it by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    That sort of thing does not happen.

    Sure mistakes occur and things mess up. But there arent any planes running on a desktop ( regardless of the 'embedded' labeling of its maker ) OS.

    Nice try tho.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  188. 7 series resale by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

    Fearless prediction: The 745i will take a beating on resale.

    I remember reading the article and thinking that this was not all that insightful of a prediction.

    Yes, iDrive will decimate 7 series resale.

    But on the other hand, the 7 series always had relatively bad resale (on the old 7 series, driving it off the lot resulted in a $20k drop in resale.) The problem is the car is pretty expensive anyway...anyone who could afford a (hypothetical) $60k used 7 series can likely pony up the extra money and get the car new (70-70k.) So the car's resale drops like a stone through a wet paper bag, into a new price area, ($45-55k) bringing in people who wouldn't be able to afford the $75k sticker, and therefore could conceivably buy the car used.

    Lesson...yes, you too can get a 7 series. They may hit a 50% depreciation in 2-3 years. Wo0t.

  189. It happens here in Belgium ! by Ploum · · Score: 1

    The Prince Laurent, son of Albert, King of the Belgians, had the same problems :)

    For his wedding, rings were in the car (the same BMW as the thai story). Nobody could open the car because the computer was crashed.

    So, security take axes to destroy the armored window ! ! ! Funny isn't it ?

    That's the way : take axes and desroy all windows !

    (this story was related by the belgian medias. so I think it's true)

  190. If if if-Useless as a square wheel. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It's probably not too far off to say 99.9% of Windows crashing problems are due to operator error from installing bad drivers (from other manufacterers), installing bad hardware, installing crappy software."'

    Let's see.
    Don't install drivers for your hardware, because they might be crappy.

    Don't purchase hardware, because it might be crappy.

    Don't install software, because it might be crappy.

    Ummm...so explain to me again. Why do we own computers?

  191. Correction by lunartik · · Score: 1

    The story title should read "Oldest joke on the internet?"

  192. airtight cars...make good boats! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The old Volkswagen Beetles weren't "utterly and completely" sealed, but close enough so to float (http://216.239.37.104/search?q=cache:em3h-lPUEFgJ :www.aden.co.jp/vw/English/VW_ad/ad04_1.html+volks wagen+air-tight&hl=en&ie=UTF-8), people have even driven them across (not "over", *across*) seas (http://www.zarattini.com/maggiolino/maggiolino-se a/beetle-navigator.htm) for long periods and one was even driven completely around the world.

  193. Bogus claims by Tangurena · · Score: 2, Informative
    EDS never wrote (nor writes) the software for the embedded processors. It was (and is) written by employees of Delphi, who also make many of the chips under license from TI and Motorola in beautiful downtown Kokomo, Indiana. What is contracted out to EDS is ownership of desktop and mainframe systems (and infrastructure).

    Could Microsoft make mission critical software with uptimes measured in years (like QNX or unix)? Yes, I believe they could, but they will not do so until the market stops buying stuff that needs daily rebooting. MS will also have trepidation entering any line of business where liability cannot be avoided by some hokey EULA. I predict they will bail out of the auto market when they start getting nailed by lawsuits over car crashes from use of the computers they want to install in cars. The software in cars is far more stable than the stuff in desktop computers. And far less infested with security defects than Outlook.

    Most US carmakers include language in their purchasing contracts that lets them license patents and trade secrets for free (to competitors) if the original supplier cannot (or will not) meet quality or delivery schedules (and prohibits the supplier from sueing over it). Somehow, I predict MS won't be interested in working with such companies.

  194. 100% Operator Error by plainvanilla · · Score: 1

    By accepting Microsoft's license agreement,
    End-User is opting into crashing problems,

    =100% operator error.

    Still, every day brings a choice:
    1) Continue to bite the bullet out of FUD or...
    2) Go back to the beginning of the learning curve with the kids.

  195. The hell with cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...think of a widebody jetliner with CE running critical avionics.

  196. Electronics fail as they age? by wskellenger · · Score: 1
    As I understand it, your points are:

    As electronics age, they become less reliable.

    The more complicated an electronic system becomes, the less likely it will last for a long time.

    And I generally agree with both of them, but I also think that you are seriously underestimating the lifetime of electronic circuits.

    17 years is a rather small amount of time. Many passenger aircraft are still operating on a daily basis that have 20+ year old elecronics.

    How far back does fuel injection date? I believe that Mercedes-Benz pioneered the art, sometime back in the late 60s or early 70s. I'd be willing to bet that these first electronic systems are still functioning just fine. My '82 280ZX had electronic fuel injection (I believe that it was a Bosch system) and it still functions perfectly. (I gave the car to my younger brother)

    I doubt that you've upgraded from your PC-AT simply because you were concerned that it would blow up or catch fire. You've upgraded because you wanted to benefit from several years of innovation. And I'd bet that you'll do so again.

    My point is that it makes no sense to discuss how old, mechanical techology is superior because of it's simplicity. I think it's quite clear that electronics increase system complexity and make repair more complex. However, computers and electronics make possible feats that are entirely IMPOSSIBLE to practically implement mechanically.

    1. Re:Electronics fail as they age? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The same can be accomplished with computer-ASSISTANCE without the risks of computer-CONTROL.

    2. Re:Electronics fail as they age? by wskellenger · · Score: 1
      The same can be accomplished with computer-ASSISTANCE without the risks of computer-CONTROL.

      It's possible for a driver to modulate brake pressure on the front left wheel?

      Is it possible for the driver to sense the air/fuel ratio of the running engine, and adjust the amount of fuel injected into the cylinder?

      Can you do this?

    3. Re:Electronics fail as they age? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      It's possible for a driver to modulate brake pressure on the front left wheel?

      Is it possible for the driver to sense the air/fuel ratio of the running engine, and adjust the amount of fuel injected into the cylinder?

      Is either of these necessary to get from A to B?

      Is selective braking pressure worth it when the thing decides to either apply 0% pressure or 100% pressure at an inopportune moment?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:Electronics fail as they age? by wskellenger · · Score: 1
      Is either of these necessary to get from A to B?

      Nope.

      Is selective braking pressure worth it when the thing decides to either apply 0% pressure or 100% pressure at an inopportune moment?

      Selective braking pressure is worth it, yes. At least, if you believe in physics. Google for "mu slip curve". A locked wheel does not stop your vehicle sooner than a wheel that's being controlled to brake at the peak of the mu slip curve. This is what ABS does.

      "...when the thing decides to either apply 0% pressure or 100% pressure at an inopportune moment?"

      And why exactly would it decide to do this?

      With this type of thinking I bet you're shaking in your shoes when you step on a commercial airliner. Do you think the pilot is actually up there there making minute corrections during a 15 hour flight to New Zealand? When the plane lands, do you think he's got some way to tell if he's locked up the landing gear, dragging the tires across the runway?

  197. What's that got to do with MS? by AzrealAO · · Score: 1

    Infact, that would tend to indicate that device manufacturers are just shovelling shit drivers out for their low end products, and putting the real developers on their high end models.

    Mind you, I've been picking Lexmark here just as a printer manufacturer, I've got a Z-55 and the drivers under Windows XP have been pretty rock solid. I haven't encountered any issues with them to date, unlike say, older HP-4 Drivers and Adobe Acrobat/PostScript files.

  198. Re:Old MS car joke... by ChrisCampbell47 · · Score: 1
    Oracle: You're cuter than I thought. I can see why she likes you.

    Neo: Who?

    Oracle: Not too bright, though.

  199. Re:except the BMW 7-series is practically undrivea by gmhowell · · Score: 1

    In at least one instance, they are buying Infiniti's as well. Father just picked up (10 days ago?) a Q45. Why not an M5 (about the same sticker)? iDrive is one big freakin' reason. The Q45 has much of the same crap, but it was usable after just a few minutes. And last week, the salesperson made a visit to my mother (an hour or more from the dealership) to spend a few hours training her on each and every little function. No, not the 'change volume and station', but the minor stuff.

    Having experienced neither machine (hell, my car doesn't even shift itself:) I can offer nothing but the opinion of people who just bought a car whose value exceeds my annual salary. So there may be some 'Emperor's New Clothes' in there.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  200. BMW? by name773 · · Score: 0

    aren't they German? if Microsoft got to the practical Germans.... RUN!!!

  201. 8 Things To Do Before We Put Computers in Cars by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 1, Interesting

    1. Design cars to have better visibility. There shouldn't be giant 'pillars' blocking the driver's view of other cars on the road. A driver should also always have an excellent, unobstructed view out the back.

    2. Day-time running lights, so the car is more visible by other drivers and pededstrians.

    3. Airbags for every possible passenger in the car.

    4. Lots of compartments in the car to store things. I should have more places to store my 3 foot long 20 pound Mag-Lite of death than just the trunk. Of all the cars I've been in, only Suburu is really good about providing lots of places to put stuff.

    5. Well-placed controls that allow a driver to operate them without taking their eyes off the road. The general placement of these controls should be standardized across all car brands and price-ranges.

    6. Radios that lets the driver do the same as #5.

    7. Make it impossible for someone to get locked out of their car. For example, my honda will only let me lock the driver's side door from the outside (using the key).

    8. Cup-holders that do very well in accommodating a large variety of different sized-shaped beverage containers.

    These are eight simple, easy, lo-tech things that we really should have done years ago that would make cars safer and more pleasant to be in. It is my opinion that until these basic things are added to every model of car produced in every price-range, we shouldn't even begin to think about adding something as complex and expensive as a computer.

    --
    Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
    1. Re:8 Things To Do Before We Put Computers in Cars by calidoscope · · Score: 1
      3. Airbags for every possible passenger in the car.

      No-o-o-o!!!!!

      Don't you that hundreds of people have been killed by airbags? That the #1 reason for not putting kids in the front seat is the airbag?.

      We'd be much better off with well designed seatbelts.

      --
      A Shadeless room is a brighter room.
    2. Re:8 Things To Do Before We Put Computers in Cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7. Make it impossible for someone to get locked out of their car. For example, my honda will only let me lock the driver's side door from the outside (using the key).

      Actually, you technically can lock the doors without the key.. but you have to actually mean it. Pull out the handle on the driver's door and press the lock switch at the same time.

  202. Re:Trapped OUTside a locked car? by JonMartin · · Score: 2, Funny
    Yeah, getting stuff frozen at only -26 is on the wimpy side, but if we're going to recall every model that has this type of problem we'd be back to dogsleds.

    That would KICK ASS. But with the way we insist on individual transportation in Canada everybody would have to have their own sled+team and we would end up with dogs outnumbering people 10 to 1.

    Pets.com was ahead of its time.

    --
    Serve Gonk.
  203. stupid pills by Grizzlysmit · · Score: 1
    so let me guess, key to Microsoft's strategy is the stupid pills in the car makers water municipal supply, after all it takes a lot of stupid to put something thats as known for unreliability as M$ software, into a mission critical application.

    Hmmm thats explains a lot about M$ dominance in general.

    --
    in my life God comes first.... but Linux is pretty high after that :-D
    Francis Smit
  204. WTF? by TLouden · · Score: 1

    It's one thing for the computer to freeze just as you walk into the enemy base and you have to restart only to discover that the game is now over. But I don't want my in-car electronics freezing while I'm cruzing the freeway. Oops, sorry officer, I couldn't avoid him, my car froze.

    --
    -Tim Louden
  205. nonsense by bmajik · · Score: 1

    most BMW's are now being sold with the bluetooth kit, which REQUIRES a non BMW phone. BMW is finally getting it shead out of its posterior and getting out of the carphone business.. and letting customers use the handset of their choice (not to mention service plan)

    --
    My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
  206. Vendor lock-in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gives new meaning to the term "vendor lock-in".
    Well, except that it was the finance minister, and not a vendor, that got locked in. (And it wasn't Windows' fault apparently.)

  207. Sigh by smchris · · Score: 1


    I suppose it could be considered mean-spirited to forever hold one little battleship that has to be towed into dock against Microsoft because their NT BSODed, but this so seems like it fits the "Don't They Ever Learn" department.

    At least the Army is developing heavy vehicles with linux. Maybe we all _should_ drive Humvees?

  208. Nop This is wrong Car Makers are better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now you say problems are from installing bad drivers, installing bad hardware and installing crappy software.

    How do you know a machine is dead run linux. Yep kernel panic CRC error BAD ram(missed by microsoft). Operation of the microsoft systems depends that you don't disable Bios ram check and linux says the user can turn that off so I will doit again so it is not missed and then people complain because it boots slowly it is checking everything is right so when linux is up. linux stays up because of it..

    Lots of Microsoft problems are traced back to stuffed ram being used by the operating system and slowly destroying it self with damaged data.

    Guess what linux runs on 1950 technology in places so GM would be making something like linux(dam X windows needs replacing with something faster).

    When setup linux does not stuff it self up so bad the data is lost.

    Just a note X windows system started in Xerox park that is why it is X windows. A really old system that is based 1950 tech.

    Now installing crappy software if correctly sandboxed as linux is moving towards most cases the sandboxing system stands so the crappy software is the only thing to die 99.9% of all cases I have had I have been able to restore a linux box to operation without rebooting or the system stoping working. Only cases that really anonyed me was NVIDIA drivers(they are better now but there is still more to do) when the video driver dies you really know about it if I have a serial port termals setup I am not stuffed unless I forget to setup one up. I login from another computer on the serial port correct the problem and the machine comes back to life.

    Bet you are trying to guess what the 0.1% is a defective driver that cannot be reset or a piece of hardware built for microsoft the depends on a reboot to fix it due to the fact that windows would have too. Note in most cases this does not stop the operation of the machine just that bit being a network card can be a problem but not one you can work around.

    How can the operator make a mistake the software is defective basicly microsoft system is a car without a airbag that costs as much as a volov.

    Each year Ford and GM and other car makers look at all these crashes to see why and where they stuffed up. And if something major is found a recall notice is place to fix it at there cost.

    Yep the pay the tech to install the fix when they stuff up. Come on microsoft bring you game up.

    1. Re:Nop This is wrong Car Makers are better. by arkulkis · · Score: 1

      Uh....no.. X windows was started at MIT. Xerox Parc came up with the IDEA of GUI's. But X windows is completely UN-related to Xerox Park. All of the Xerox Park guys went to Apple and created MacOS.

  209. Here's my joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If MS built cars, the cars would crash a lot!!!

    hahaha!!

    sometimes I crack myself up.

  210. BMW and Windows, but what happend to... by myrdred · · Score: 1

    ...their previous advertising campaign:

    http://www.sockenseite.de/war/english/bmw.html

    Mirrors:

    http://www.avaruusmies.com/jokes/images/161.html
    http://www.zone6.dk/nerd/nerd-03.shtml

  211. Slightly Out of Date by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Linux a team wakeup one moring sees the big defence contracts starts a comerical support company next door to the Free Tanks selling each support contract for at around each $10000 Market share in the defence contracts sky rocket(SUSE/REDHAT). Note the defence contracts also own the electronic roads.

    Old company that held defence contracts spit the dummy(SCO). Calls there lawers in a attemted to sue the Linux support teams. Expandion into the defence contracts slow. SCO fails. Linux starts growing again.

    Just go and check out the webserver market.

    Microsoft is already on the recieving end of the new linux game email only by standard compliant servers the direct the other way to Microsofts attack ie by Standard non compliancs. Now lets start puting up some police now we have a large block of the roads is what linux is doing now.

    Next Year is going to be warped.

    As you said linux is a tank but you don't look at a long term plan. Control the roads(the internet) Inforce you own rules on Microsoft. Destroy Microsoft with the tanks. Next thing ban all email comming from outlook and outlook express due to the risk it might contain a virus. This is able to be done in secounds just and the outlook and outlook express tags to the email filters.

    This is war and linux is only getting is army in place because when it starts hell is going to break lose. And microsoft will lose unless it corrects its game play.

    Now the Bull horn changes you don't know how to fix it no problem buy a support contract next door and some of the Bull horns start recieving kick backs for selling support contracts.(note as SUSE and REDHAT get bigger the cost of support contracts are droping)

  212. Artificial hip joint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The cell phone usually *is* approved. By the FCC (or national equivalent/s) and has several other governmental and industry permits, seals, etc. At International, National, Regional, State, City, and County levels.

    If the car can't handle it, it's the car that should have its approvals revoked, repealed, voided, rescinded, spat upon and dumped. And the guys that made and sold it should be made to spend a few years cleaning up ERs, or something.

  213. Re:Who said it has anything to do with compatabili by arkulkis · · Score: 1
    What if it's a plain old bug in the fucking driver? What was I thinking, as we all know, the only developers with bugs in their code are Microsoft Developers. Everyone else writes perfect code. Thank you for explaining PERFECTLY why Microsofts DESIGN is the root of the problem. Other than motherboard chipsets and disk drive controllers, HARDWARE DRIVERS have NO BUSINESS being in the kernal space. They belong in users space. In PROPERLY designed Operating Systems, a buggy web-cam driver won't take down the whole freaking OS. Only in Windows is that stupid shit tolerated by the herd of stupid cheerleaders such as yourself.
  214. Re:first post by arkulkis · · Score: 1
    ooh NOT! STUPID MORON
  215. I didn't post this... by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

    Only YOU will be able to drive your car,

    In Soviet Russia, cars drive YOU!

    --

    Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
  216. If Microsoft built cars.. by Regul8or · · Score: 1

    they would be just like today's Fords. Anyone ever drive a Ford with an over-heating ignition module? You're driving down the road, it stalls and you restart and keep driving until it fails again.

  217. Electronic brakes are available on Bentleys by pr0ntab · · Score: 1

    I heard it SUCKS... feels totally unnatural. If you're so infeeble that you can't work power-assisted brakes, you have a chauffer... so what the hell were they thinking....

    --
    Fuck Beta. Fuck Dice
  218. don't have to worry about Toyota by madpuppy · · Score: 1

    I really don't think Toyota will be fooled into that sad situation, heck they are allready using Linux for thier dealership inventory system.

  219. It can be done right by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    I drive the most heavily computerized car on the market, a Toyota Prius gas-electric hybrid. Such fundamentals as whether the engine is running are decided second-by-second by the onboard computer systems. Even the valve timing is under computer control.

    It's been as flawlessly reliable as a good Linux box. It's never been in the shop except for scheduled maintenance and the times when my wife wrecks it. Yellow Cab in Vancouver BC has been using one as a taxi for 120,000 miles.

    That kind of reliability is very hard to achieve in software, and you're certainly rational to prefer a mechanical car.

  220. Re:except the BMW 7-series is practically undrivea by Datafage · · Score: 1

    The M5 is based on the previous 5 platform and doesn't have iDrive...

    --

    Nicotine free Amish .sig.

  221. How CE really works by ajv · · Score: 1

    Windows CE, like most embedded OS manufacturers, uses a modular build system, which in CE's case is called Platform Builder.

    You can eliminate all but the most essential components. Don't want the GUI? Don't build it. Don't want networking? Don't build it. Don't want ATA disk access? Don't build it. The smallest kernel with an OAL you can create is only good for managing memory, scheduling, and minor CPU control. It will comfortably run in a very small image space from a ROM.

    iDrive is not CE's UI. It's BMW's. BMW made a simplified version of iDrive UI for the 5 series. I'd have thought they would have offered a similar UI to 7 series owners as a retrofit.

    Windows CE development comes with an extensive stress testing kit. If a manufacturer creates a version of CE customized to their car, it's up to them to test it adequately. Microsoft gives you the source code to the operating system with CE.NET, so any excuses about not being able to fix bugs you might come across during testing are no longer true.

    I have a Citroen C3. I've had it a month now, and it's had two Proxia updates so far, one for the automatic, and one for the ABS. I don't know what Proxia is running, but my automatic shifts a lot better now. Updating these things is not rocket science and will become a normal part of car ownership.

    --
    Andrew van der Stock
  222. MOD UP by jon_c · · Score: 1

    this is a very good point, there is something seriously wrong with a EKG machine rebooting. however I would not blame MS as much as I would blame company that made such a faulty product, OS choices included. the product manager for leting this thing ship, and the hospital for buying and using something clearly defective.

    --
    this is my sig.
  223. Re:except the BMW 7-series is practically undrivea by gmhowell · · Score: 1

    Then it may have been a 540. Or a 740. I didn't pay that much attention. The taste of sour grapes was getting to me.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  224. What happens when the brake system fails? by innerweb · · Score: 1

    This is scary. I remember the reasons given for using MS servers as the customers front end (Internet). They were easy enough that an idiot could set them up, manage them and put content onto them. Noone cared if they crashed (which they had projected would happen often enough anyway based on a lab setup with many systems running servers), since all you had to do was restart and/or reinstall. It is funny how none of the important (mission critical) applications were ever allowed to be considered for the MS servers.

    Is this coming?
    MADD -> Mothers Against Drunk Drivers
    MAMS -> Mothers Against Microsoft

    I see automotive functions in a similar way. If we want some dinky music system that uses something so unreliable, cool. Let the radio crash. Not my brakes, engine, locks, ... No. I do not relish the thought of anti-lock breaks not functioning correctly when the OS crashes, or returns erroneous results.

    As a cold calculation, if you really hate MS, you should encourage this. I believe that the ensuing deaths from MS's OS will be able to finally pierce the EULA and expose MS to a fatal barrage of lawsuits. Until now, MS has never really been accountable to their shoddy software (monopolies have a great tradition of this - Here, their history of arrogance and complete disregard for their responsibility as a supplier of a product would create a situation in a court room not unlike the smokers lawsuits. Lied about what they knew about the products shortcomings, the damage inflicted upon its users, produced an environment where the user could not get away from the faulty product even though they wanted to. Though, hopefuly not with the same numbers of victims.) This would also be good for the linux community, as MS will have to raise prices to handle tort claims once the lawsuits start happening.

    Most of us know what will happen with Windows CE in charge of the car's brain. It is not pretty. Personally, I will now be asking what the OS is the car runs on. Unknown or MS, and I go to the next manufacturer. From the looks of the article, it may be that we used to buy Honda and Toyoto cars. They have been extremely reliable for us.

    For those who say that the bugs will be worked out enough in 3 years, MS has never had an OS that became that stable. Any MS OS ever. There are some exceptions to individual installations with the perfect combination of hardware and software, but just as in computers, there are many different pieces of hardware and features to be added to cars.

    In the end, I think we have enough safety issues to deal with just with the human factors behind the wheel. Now, we are talking about making the car as reliable as a desktop (have reinstalled Windows XP 6 times in 4 months on multiple systems already as upgrades have caused hardware issues and left XP unable to even crawl along). I hope consumer reports starts to include testing of the carse computer system in their safety and ranking tests!

    --
    Freud might say that Intelligent Design is religion's ID.
  225. Ford by AcidSt0rm · · Score: 0

    Isnt Ford basically like if Microsoft was building cars?

    --
    Ken Mitchner PHP/SQL Programmer Currently Seeking Employment :o(
  226. Diebold ATM Machine running Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Recall the recent article about viruses on Diebold's ATM machines powered by Windows? Those weren't desktop versions. How can your comment carry any merit?

  227. Even CD-ROM drives are better! by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

    Every CD-ROM drive can be opened even if power fails. The didn't think to build an override into the car systems?

  228. Re:Wannabe SUV coders, here's your documentation by phaggood · · Score: 0

    Wandering around MS's site looing for something else I found this article on coding CE for cars. http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url= /library/en-us/dnceauto/html/WinCAuto_UserRoles.as p

  229. Re:except the BMW 7-series is practically undrivea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a 2 year old Volvo with a stupid @#$@% computer controlling the goddamned door locks, windows, sunroof.. Well one day, all that crap quit working. The dealer said "We had to reboot the 'rear computer'" Fuck! I can't unlock my car, or close my windows (no pun intended) because the computer needs rebooted?

    There is some shit that is so fucking simple that there is NO NEED for a goddam microchip between me and it.

  230. Where are these mythical drivers... by AzrealAO · · Score: 1

    that take the whole OS Down?

    The only times I've personally seen XP Blue screen, were from Video Card drivers (Thanks ATI you cocksuckers)

    I've never personally seen a scanner, or printer, or modem or a frigging web cam crash an XP machine.

    1. Re:Where are these mythical drivers... by arkulkis · · Score: 1
      So then, what you're saying, is that in XP, Microsoft has finally implemented proper OS design strategies that the REST of the computing industry figured out in the 1960's.

      Oooooooooh, I'm impressed

  231. The best weapon ... by j_w_d · · Score: 1

    the terrorists have is government itself and a social policy that encourages civilians to trust the authorities to protect them. We are routinely encouraged to avoid resistance to criminals through the misguided idea that it will protect us. "Let the snatcher have your purse..." "Don't resist ..." Any government finds a passive population preferrable to one armed and willing to take a risk rather than submit to a terrorist or a tyrant. Don't blame the "optimism" of the passengers, blame their trust of authorities instead. And blame the authorities who encourage this.

    --
    ------ The only greater hazard to your liberty than n politicians is n+1 politicians.
    1. Re:The best weapon ... by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      Translation: I'm a libertarian idiot who seeks to turn EVERY issue into my favorite issue. Libertarians, like any party, have their share of extremists who unfairly make the rest look bad by association. You are in that share. You're just like the uber-feminists who make reasonable feminists look bad, by trying to turn each and every issue into a gender war even by the most tenuous of threads.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    2. Re:The best weapon ... by j_w_d · · Score: 1

      My father always advised me to register in the party that appeared to present the greatest threat to liberty. So, the party I am NOT registered in is the Libertarian party. They are by and large pretty hopeless. No, my opinion is that the government preferrs that people remain passive rather than resist. Probably it helps occasionally. For three out of four aircraft, it did not on 9/11/01. I can also point annecdotally to the story of a neighbor whose was attacked by a purse snatcher. She froze when she thought he was a rapist, but went more or less nuclear on him when she realized he was "just" a purse snatcher. She ran him into the ground and made HIM call the police hoping they could protect him from her. My issue is that criminals and terrorists are aided by a government policy that advises victims to assuage and mediate. As a class criminals and terrorists don't fear their intended victims sufficiently. The government's policy encourages this.

      So, why don't you run a parity check on your translation system. It appeares to have acquired a virus.

      --
      ------ The only greater hazard to your liberty than n politicians is n+1 politicians.
  232. Even if non-critical only functions are controlled by Brianwa · · Score: 1

    Imagine, you are driving down the freeway in the dark in western Washington at 70 mph, and your windshield wipers suddenly stop... If you live here, you can probably imagine what would happen. Think: Completely unable to see, except for blurry outlines of the headlights from the oncoming traffic.
    Now, what if the lights went out as well. You had better hope you were in the far right lane, and the barrier is far enough away from the road...

  233. Re:except the BMW 7-series is practically undrivea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please don't get confused by what was probably an innocent mistake on the parent poster's part. The 750iL (and 740iL) were the E38 chassis cars. (previous generation) These were two of the best cars BMW (or anyone) has ever made. A near flawless car. Handsome, agile, comfortable, easy to drive, fun to drive, good navigation system, the works.

    The 745Li and 760Li (E65 chassis) is where BMW screwed things up. This was the introduction of iDrive and the stupid looking thing we have now.

  234. This is right out of "Fight Club" by Scot+W.+Stevenson · · Score: 1
    Remember Fight Club? Remember Edward Norton's real job?
    In the real world, I'm a recall campaign coordinator in a shirt and tie, sitting in the dark with a mouthfull of blood and changing the overheads and slides as my boss tells Microsoft how he chose a particular shade of pale cornflower blue for an icon.
    This is from the book, in case you're wondering; if I remember, the chickened out in the film and didn't make the guy a MS rep.

    This will give A times B times C equals X a totally new twist every time I see that film ...

    1. Re:This is right out of "Fight Club" by arkulkis · · Score: 1
      Remember Fight Club? Remember Edward Norton's real job?
      In the real world, I'm a recall campaign coordinator in a shirt and tie, sitting in the dark with a mouthfull of blood and changing the overheads and slides as my boss tells Microsoft how he chose a particular shade of pale cornflower blue for an icon.
      This is from the book, in case you're wondering; if I remember, the chickened out in the film and didn't make the guy a MS rep. This will give A times B times C equals X a totally new twist every time I see that film ...
      In the movie, he was an automobile crash investigator.
  235. Re:cycling? Microsoft Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are not mac users vs win users, they are apple employees vs ms employees. I usually hear this version of the joke with apple engineers vs ms engineers to show the pragmatic minds employed at apple vs ms developers who try to copy instead of innovating.

  236. Re:No Microsoft products in security related devic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wince is exactly what I do when I hear about windows controlling any part of a car

  237. Re:Old MS car joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cut him some slack. He reposted the article in case it was slashdotted.

  238. Windows problems by ToeDruid · · Score: 1

    It seems that a windowns crash actually resolved this problem :)

    --
    "The difference between meat and fish is that if you beat your fish it dies"
  239. Heck - I'm still waiting for Sony... by H8X55 · · Score: 1

    Heck, I'm still waiting for Sony to start building cars...

    By my estimate they'll look great, perform adequately, and cost $10,000 - $15,000 more than their direct competitors.

    Picture a Purple-ish last Generation Honda Prelude, with leather, Sony Xplod sound system (powered by magic gate of course!) with all the creature comforts.

    Come One, Come All, test drive the New Sony Vaio!

  240. They could finally be held responsible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... if MS built cars, they could finally be held responsoble for their products, like faulty tire makers.

  241. Old cars with functioning Circuitry by ZWithaPGGB · · Score: 1

    My 1989 Jeep Wrangler, the first OBDC based Jeep (2.5L TBI 4Cyl) is still running, original engine and electronics. The computer and the engine have outlasted 5 Sets of Brakes, 4 Sets of tires, 4 Catalytic Converters, 3 Exhausts, 3 Clutches (Hydraulic), 2 interiors, 3 stereos, and 2 suspensions (I off-road a lot). Despite having a full set of trail racks, lock-boxes, beefed up suspension and driveline (slip yoke eliminator, Dana 44 4.11 Diffs), it still gets 15 MPG average, and that is including a LOT of 4WD on dirt.

    My 2000 Audi S4 also has had no computer related problems (Blown Tranny and Turbo, but that was from driving a tad hard on mountain roads).

    Prior to that, my 1994 Acura Integra LS ran flawlessly for 6 years, and it had all the computer-controlled bells and whistles you'd expect from a VVT car.

    Maybe the problem is BMW (Audi owner snicker as we note their running away from Le Mans with their tail between their legs)?