At SCO, the managers all the way up to CEO Darl McBride appear
to be unscrupulous folks who do not understand how code in
the operating-system (OS) works. Any copyright-infringing
code in the OS can be easily
re-written by a competent computer-science (CS) student at
Carnegie-Mellon University (CMU). The attempt by SCO to
thwart the growth of Linux will not succeed.
Since we live in the West, the biggest issue is the unethical
behavior of SCO and its managers. We have justifiably criticized
them for trying to extort money via these ridiculous invoices.
However, we need to go beyond criticizing only them. They actually
work for someone: the shareholders.
Yes. The SCO shareholders own SCO and ultimately decide
whether McBride keeps his job. The shareholders are the
most guilty party in these pump-and-dump and extortion
schemes hatched by SCO managers since the shareholders have
the power to terminate the employment of McBride.
The list
at LionShares
indicates the 15 financial institutions holding the largest number of
shares of the SCO Group. Together, they hold 15% of the total outstanding
shares. These financial institutions must immediately
hold a special session of shareholders in order to terminate the
employment of the managers (like McBride) at SCO group.
We, Slashdotters, should check our mutual funds immediately.
If they own any shares of the SCO Group, then we should transfer
the money out of those funds. Furthermore, there are several
socially responsible mutual funds (SRMFs). We must bring
the unethical behavior of the SCO group to the attention of the
SRMF managers. They are bound, by the terms of their SRMFs, to
sell all shares of the SCO Group.
The tests conducted thus far on the face-recognition system
shows that it cannot identify a particular face within a crowd
of faces. However, this failure does not mean that the
system has no useful application.
The system can be used to recognize a particular face when it
is standing alone. Consider, for example, a photo of a face
sent along with an visa application to the American embassy.
Please read "World:
Asia-Pacific China backs embassy protests". In 1999, Serbians
committed gross human-rights violations against the Kosovars in
Kosovo; the Chinese fully supported the Serbians in their campaign
of terror. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)
under American command attempted to stop the slaughter by knocking out
Serbian military units. NATO deliberately attempted to avoid
hitting civilian targets in Serbia, but some bombs accidentally
hit the Chinese embassy.
Shortly thereafter, the Chinese in both China and outside China
erupted into ugly, violent protests. The Chinese throw stones and other
projectiles at the American embassy in China. The Chinese
also attacked some Americans. "The residence of the US Consul General
in the south-western city of Chengdu was stormed and partially burned."
How could the Americans in China have responded to this nonsensical
violence? The Americans should have done the following.
Pull out cameras and take pictures of all the protestors.
Scan the photos into a computer and transmit them to Washington.
Henceforth, when a Chinese submits an application for
a visa to travel to the USA, use the face-recognition system
to determine whether the photo of the applicant matches any of the
protestors. If there is a match, then the application will not be approved.
At the American embassy, grab a megaphone
and loudly announce, "Attention protesters. We are using
a face-recognition system. Any protestor applying for a visa to
the USA will be denied entry into the USA. We are taking pictures
right now. "
After about 10 clicks of the shutter of the camera, all the protestors
would have disappeared. Henceforce, we should use this face-recognition
system in conjunction with photographic equipment at all embassies and
consulates run by Western nations within China (which includes Taiwan
and Hong Kong).
The fear of an asteroid collision is completely
overblown although it makes good reading in newspapers. The asteroid traveling on a trajectory colliding with earth can be easily deflected from its path by a small nuclear explosion when the asteroid is far away. Just plop a nuclear warhead on top of a huge rocket; shoot the rocket at the asteroid so that collision occurs somewhere outside of our galaxy. The impact and accompanying explosion should deflect the asteroid by a couple of millimeters from its trajectory. Those millimeters translate into millions of miles when the asteroid finally enters our solar system.
If all music were downloaded
from a web site instead of purchased via compact disc (CD), then we
would signficantly reduce the amount of environmental pollution
contributed by the non-biodegradable CD. Clearly, the Internet is creating a future where all music is downloaded and, in the process, is saving the environment. However, the Internet
is helping the environment in a more significant way. The
Internet is faciliting the
move from all physical media to soft media.
When desktop publishing become popular, pundits predicted that
it would reduce the demand for paper since what you publish would
be saved in soft form -- i. e. a digital file on a computer disk. The pundits said that, in the bad old days before personal computers, you were forced to type or write everything on paper, and of course, producing paper contaminates the environment and increases the rate of destroying trees.
Unfortunately, the predictions about reducing paper consumption were wrong because people tended
to print everything that they developed in their latest incarnation
of Microsoft Word. Consumption of paper actually increased
significantly after personal computers and desktop publishing came into vogue.
The problem was distribution. There really was no convenient way
to distribute the digital file. When person A transferred a digital
file to person B, a floppy disk containing the digital file
is also transferred. If you transferred a floppy disk, you would think,
"I might as well just print the document. It does not have many pages."
Then, came the Internet. It provides a convenient way to transfer
the digital file. The transmission mechanism is also soft -- i. e.
digital. The floppy disk is physical: you can touch it and feel it.
In short, personal computers alone provide only the means to create
soft media. Personal computers plus the Internet provide an end-to-end solution
in which the creation and delivery of media is 100% soft -- i. e. 100%
digital.
Unlike newspapers, compact discs (CDs) are not
biodegradable and will contribute to the mountains of trash that Western societies already generate. Surely, Westerners can tolerate a bit of lag in an Internet connection to "The Times" newspaper in order to save the environment.
The Japanese government has been conducting research on a space plane but has no plans to actually build one at the moment. Please read "Operation Status of
High Speed Flight Demonstration
(HSFD) Program" to see some color pictures of a scaled-down model of a future space plane. The Japanese space agency, NASDA, has been using this model to conduct flight tests.
The aim of the space shuttle was to provide a re-usable space-entry
vehicle. One of its uses is to repair satellites. For that particular
mission, the space shuttle has been a tremendous success. Please
read "Hubble
Space Telescope put into hibernation after critical system failure". It
describes the latest mission to repair the Hubble Telescope.
Indeed, when the Hubble Telescope was first launched, it had a defective lens.
If the space shuttle had not sent a crew into low-earth orbit to repair the
lens, we would still be seeing blurry images from the outer regions of
space.
The problem is not the shuttle per se. The problem is quality engineering
at NASA. Note that the Hubble Telescope and several later NASA projects
have been plagued with quality-control problems. Please read about
a horrendous engineering mistake in "Metric
mishap caused loss of NASA orbiter".
The only way to fix the quality problem is to (1) increase funding to NASA
projects so that American engineers are not overworked and (2) increase competition
for NASA. One way to increase funding for NASA is to rescind the Taiwan Relations Act
(TRA) and to shut down the American
Institute in Taiwan , saving about $17,000,000. This money can then be earmarked
for NASA. In short, there is simply much wasted money in Washington. If we can
recover the wasted money, then we can set it aside for NASA.
As for increasing competition, we could encourage Japan to spend heavily
on its own space shuttle. Over the last 10 years, the Japanese government
has wasted billions of dollars on useless public works projects that do little
prop up the economy. A far better use for that money is researching and
building re-usable space-entry vehicles. The resulting competition with NASA would significantly improve the quality of engineering at NASA. (Note that the last 15 years of competition with Toyota has signficantly improved the quality of automobiles produced by General Motors.)
Linux already has Japanese language support.
Emacs under the "Multilingual Environment" (MULE) already supports the Japanese language. "kterm" can already display Japanese characters.
Furthermore, you can build any new
Japanese-language application on top of Linux. Specifically, the Red Hat distribution of Linux already has the full set of Japanese character fonts.
There is no good engineering reason to build an independent operating system (OS) -- i. e. one which is independent of Linux. However, there seem to be political reasons.
The most important issue is that creating yet another open-source
operating system defeats one of the key value propositions of
Linux. Namely, there is only one dominant open-source operating
system: it is Linux. It can run on almost any platform. If you
write an application for Linux, you can practically run it anywhere
with, at worst, a quick re-compile.
By contrast, UNIX failed to gain significant marketshare against
the onslaught of Windows because there were simply too many
incompatible operating systems called UNIX.
If this Japan-China-Korea operating system (JCKOS) gains any
significant share in Asia, then we will have 2 incompatiable
operating systems: JCKOS and Linux. JCKOS will be similar
to Linux but incompatible with it.
What could be the motivation for this stupidity? Japanese
society, as a whole, is a Western society, and Japan has slowly
been moving from a 2nd-rate Western nation to a 1st-rate Western
nation like the United States of America (USA). Unfortunately,
due to Japan's proximity to Asian countries like the brutal
totalitarian regime called China, there has always been a tension
between (1) Japanese bureaucrats who lean towards Asia and
(2) Japanese
bureucrats who lean towards the USA and the rest of the West.
The Western Japanese have usually prevailed over the Asian Japanese.
A key example is the USA-Japan defense treaty.
Unfortunately, occasionally, the Asian Japanese prevail in certain
matters. We, Slashdotters, should send an e-mail to the Japanese
embassy in our Western nations and tell them that this idea for
an independent JCKOS is hurtful and harmful to the open-source
movement. Also, do the Japanese really want to work with a brutal
totalitarian regime like the Chinese, who
have routinely beat and kill Tibetan nuns? (reference:
Amnesty
International and Tibet Online).
Sorry. I found a type in my article. The sentence "However, in this case, 'facilitation' does constitute violation of the law." should be
"However, in this case, 'facilitation' does NOT constitute violation of the law."
Material violating the copyright laws exists on the web.
A search engine provides a hypertext link to the
infringing material.
Is the search engine technically violating copyright law?
No. Is the search engine facilitating people who wish to
violate copyright law? Yes.
Does "facilitation" constitute violation of the law?
To look at that question. Let us look at another analogy.
Consider a hypothetical company, "Martian Software".
It deliberately and illegally copies software and
sells them to customers.
The Yellow Pages carries an advertisement for "Martian
Software". The advertisment includes a phone number, an address, and a map explaining how to go to the address of "Martian Software".
The Yellow Pages is not violating copyright law but is
facilitating people who wish to violate copyright law.
However, in this case, "facilitation" does constitute violation
of the law.
By analog, the search engine in the original example is
not violating the law by merely providing a link to the
infringing material. We, Slashdotters, should petition
the ACLU to defend the search-engine company.
Supercomputer research is an important area of research that fits well within the academic environment. Indeed, a generation of American (not foreign) computer engineers were trained at universities like Virginia Tech by doing research on a large-scale supercomputer project. Please read "American Supremacy in Supercomputers".
After the introduction of the supercomputer called
"Earth Simulator"
by NEC, many Americans went into paranoid mode. They feared
that the Japanese "once again" had taken the lead in a crucial
technology.
American fears are unfounded. Numerous universities like
Virginia Tech have trained a generation of American (not
foreign) students in building the finest supercomputers. MIT,
Carnegie Mellon University (CMU), and Virginia Tech (to name just a few)
have launched large-scale research projects staffed by top
American graduate students. Their work became the foundation
of several generations of multiprocessors.
By contrast, very few (if any) Japanese universities conduct
large-scale research projects to build high-performance supercomputers.
The Japanese government has tended to avoid funding this kind of
research. Worse, there is little collaboration between industry
and academia in Japan. Yet, precisely this kind of collaboration is needed for such
large-scale projects: e.g. Virginia Tech is enlisting the help of
Apple computer.
American companies lead by scientists trained at MIT and CMU could easily design a computer that outperforms the Earth Simulator. These companies simply have chosen to not do so because there is far more profits to be garnered by building commercial supercomputers geared for database transactions. In fact, the highest-performance commercial supercomputers nearly all come from the United States of America (IBM).
The 21st century remains Pax Americana, not Pax Asia. The hordes
of immigrants trying to get the hell out of Asia and into the USA underscores this fact.
The key quote in the Inforworld article is the following.
The benefit of replacing expensive RISC
processor-based Unix hardware with commodity
Intel boxes is one of the biggest factors driving
Linux adoption
Linux servers and workstations have rapidly increased
their share of the market at the expense of Sun Microsystems.
According to "IBM
steals server sales from Sun", the sales of Sun servers
running Solaris dropped by a whopping 19% from 2nd quarter of 2002 to 2nd quarter of 2003. Yet, the sales of Linux
servers increased by a sizeable 40%.
The migration of information-technology (IT) jobs to
places like India and Taiwan has a positive end-result.
Consider the following two scenarios.
IT jobs remain in the United States of America (USA).
American companies and especially small companies funded
by Taiwanese money demand that H-1B workers be allowed
to come to the USA in droves in order to fill a supposed
shortage of workers.
IT jobs are exported to places like India and Taiwan.
The H-1B visa program is shut down.
In both scenarios, native Americans are denied jobs that they
deserve; however scenario #2 is actually better than scenario
#1. Scenario #1 has fostered the growth of large ethnic communities
that refuse to assimilate into American society. They consist
largely of people who believe that Western culture is only for
"white" people and who teach their kids that they should identify
with their "ethnic" culture and people. These large ethnic communities also produce most of the spies who steal Western technology to give to Beijing. The two spies mentioned in "Two Men Arrested for Planning to Smuggle High-Tech Encryption Devices to China" grew up in Taiwan and came to the USA.
Scenario #2 will result in a reduction of those ethnic
communities. This reduction does not mean that, for example,
Chinese will not want to come to the USA. On the contrary,
Indians, Chinese, Taiwanese, etc. will still demand to be
allowed into the USA in huge numbers even though there
will be plenty of IT jobs in India, China, Taiwan, etc.
Why? Our Western way of life is superior to what exists in Indian,
China, Taiwan, etc. Please read "Hospitals
see mass resignations" and "SARS
doctors' ethics put to the test" to sample the quality
(or lack thereof) of life in Taiwan. Instead of treating
SARS victims, the doctors prefer to hide the information
about the illness or to resign.
As Slashdotters, let us work together as a community and lobby
Congress to terminate the H-1B program and to reduce the
combined immigration quota of China (which includes Hong Kong
and Taiwan) from 60000 to 2000. Let us encourage companies
like Intel to pursue scenario #2 instead of scenario #1.
Intel has frequently lied about the need for H-1Bs. In
the future, if Intel needs H-1Bs, Intel should set up a
plant in India.
According to "Apple issues G5 benchmarks", the SPEC results generated by GCC for the G5 do not give it a significant performance advantage over Pentium-based workstations. The G5 scores 840 and 800 on SPECfp and SPECint, respectively, and the Pentium machine scores 693 and 836.
The new IBM compiler should rectify the situation. Apple will not need to manipulate the SPEC scores by hiding behind the GCC compiler. In the past, Apple stuck with the GCC compiler because it causes the Pentium to perform much worse than it would perform on code compiled with an Intel-provided compiler.
Of course, both the Power4 (and derivatives like the PowerPC 970) and the Pentium IV crush the UltraSPARC in performance. The new IBM compiler is yet in another nail in the coffin of the UltraSPARC.
When the voltage for digital circuits back in 1970 ranged from 0 volt to 5 volts, there was talk about using, say, a base-3 number system. Imagine how this system might be implemented. Digit 0 would be [0, 1.67) volts. Digit 1 would be (1.67, 3.33) volts. Digit 2 would be (3.33, 5.0] volts.
Now, for a binary number system, digit 0 is [0, 2.5) volts, and digit 1 is (2.5, 5] volts. Clearly, the noise margin of the binary number system is much better than the noise margin of the base-3 number system.
Now consider the voltages of modern digital circuits. Consider a voltage range of [0, 1.5] volts. In a base-3 number systm, digit 0 would be [0, 0.5) volt. Digit 1 would be (0.5, 1.0) volt, and digit 2 would be (1.0, 1.5] volts.
For a binary number system, digit 0 is [0, 0.75) volt, and digit 1 is (0.75, 1.0] volt.
Again, the noise margin of the binary number system is much better than the noise margin of the base-3 number
system.
In fact, the noise margin of the binary number system is consistently 50% better than the noise margin of the base-3 number system. The noise margin of the binary number system is always better than the noise margin of the base-n number system, where n > 2. For this reason, engineers have not built and will not build digital systems with any non-binary number system.
Linux already has something that looks and feels like Windows. It is called "FVWM95", the free virtual window manager. It emulates Windows 95 very well.
Still, FVWM95 has not helped Linux to penetrate the corporate desktop market even though FVWM95 has been available for at least 3 years.
However, there is good news. The vehicle that is helping Linux to penetrate the corporate desktop market is the powerful 80x86 chips by Intel and AMD. Numerous small American companies (like those in Silicon Valley and Boston's Route 128) are moving en masse away from Unix workstations with crappy processors like UltraSPARC to Linux desktops with powerful processors like the Pentium 4, the Athlon, and the PPC 970.
In fact, the CEO of one company developing radio-frequency chips deploys only Linux desktops and servers. The Linux desktops are powered by Pentium 4s. To quote her, "Linux running on an 80x86 chip creates a desktop that gives 3x the performance and 1/3 the cost of a Sun workstation."
The writers and producers of the science-fiction classic, "Space 1999", were off the mark by about 25 years. "Space 1999" was broadcast by NBC in 1975 and dealt with the lives of colonists on a moonbase called "Alpha". The series began with an episode where a nuclear explosion hurls the moon out of the earth's orbit. Each succeeding episode of the series descibes the dangers that the colonists face in space.
Why is SCO claiming that the GPL violates copyright law? IBM poignantly noted, a while ago, that SCO distributed any disputed source code under GPL. Hence, according to IBM, the disputed source code is available for any use allowed by GPL. That is a very strong argument by IBM.
To counter this argument, SCO claims that GPL itself is invalid. Hence, even if SCO did previously distribute the disputed source code under GPL, SCO is still entitled to demand royalties because GPL violates the law.
Finally, SCO has a substantive claim. Apparently, the court case will finally come down to one issue: "Is GPL valid and enforceable?" If the answer is "yes", then SCO does not have a case.
Transmeta management should have labeled
the new chip "Loser-on" instead of
"Efficeon". Last quarter, Transmeta lost $22 million dollars
on sales of $5.1 million, according to
"High stakes for Transmeta's new chip" by CNet. Transmeta does not have the resources to compete against either AMD or Intel. Shortly after Transmeta annouced its first chips, Intel accelerated development of low-power chips and produced Centrino, which significantly reduced Transmeta's marketshare. AMD recently purchased the low-power-embedded-80x86 division of National Semiconductor; AMD is clearly accelerating its own development of low-power chips. Please read "AMD scoops up National Semi unit" by CNet. In summary, Transmeta is heading for bankruptcy, and the managers who lead Transmeta to an IPO are laughing at the stupid investors who drove up its stock in 2000.
Linux has significantly less appeal in India than
Linux has in the United States of America. The
rate of software piracy in India is about 70%. In
otherwords, 70% of all software in India is stolen.
So, Windows 2000/XP is essentially free.
The primary appeal of Linux is low
cost: $0.00. with Windows being free in India,
the typical Indian will not be interested in
using Linux. Windows has significantly more
applications that run on it than Linux. Off course,
those applications are also "free".
Similar comments apply to China. China (which includes
Hong Kong and Taiwan) is the software-piracy capital of
the world. More then 90% of the software used in China
is pirated. Here are some references to solidly support
the aforementioned observations.
Boycott Notebook Computers Made in Taiwan or China
on
China to Be Laptop Leader
·
· Score: 0, Flamebait
According to a video clip
shown at the website for the BBC, the Chinese beat a North Korean women
to the ground as she tried to flee to sanctuary in the Japanese consulate.
Her crime was trying to escape from starvation in North Korea.
The crime in this discussion forum is that the Taiwanese support mainland China.
Please read "Warning Sign: Taiwanese Money and Technology
Supports Mainland China". "Made in Taiwan" = "Made in China".
If you support human rights, do not buy any notebook computers made in
either Taiwan or mainland China.
The article
describing how China, via technology from Taiwan,
will become the largest manufacturer of
notebook computers confirms what we already know. Here
is what we already know.
The Taiwanese have invested more than $50 billion into more
than 50,000 businesses in mainland China. How did the Taiwanese
achieve this state of affairs? Shortly after the Tienanmen
Square incident in 1990, the American government and
American businesses froze or reduced investments in China.
The Taiwanese seized this window of opportunity and
poured financial and technological investments into mainland
China. The Taiwanese completely thwarted American attempts
at using economic sanctions to force the Chinese government
improve its human-rights record. Afterwards, Taiwanese investments
skyrocketed to their current level.
The Chinese son of the chairman of a powerful conglomerate in Taiwan has
joined with the son of Jiang Zemin, the butcher of Tibet, to build an
advanced silicon-wafer factory in Shanghai.
(reference: "Sons
of prominent Chinese team up on chip venture")
Senior Chinese military officials retired from the Taiwanese military
have gone to mainland China and given military secrets about the American
F-16 fighter jet to the Beijing government. (reference:
"Military
secrets on sale to China")
The Wall Street Journal reports that the majority of American spies who steal
sensitive computer and military technology (like microprocessor blueprints) to give to
mainland China are actually born and raised in Taiwan.
Both spies mentioned in
"Two Men Arrested for Planning to Smuggle High-Tech Encryption Devices to
China" are born and raised in Taiwan.
We Americans should not kid ourselves. The Taiwanese strongly
support mainland China. The Taiwanese give to mainland China
any money or technology that we Americans refuse to give.
When we apply economic sanctions against mainland China, we must
also apply the same sanctions against Taiwan. In our pursuit
of human rights, when we boycott products that are made in China,
we must also boycott products that are made in Taiwan.
Specifically, when we boycott notebook computers made in China,
we must also boycott notebook computers made in Taiwan.
As the article
notes, computers "made in Taiwan" are really "made in China".
We must
immediately stop selling weapons to Taiwan. Taiwan is
a very serious security risk to the United States
of America (USA). Since 2000 May, the FBI has placed Taiwan on the
list of nations that are prone to steal sensitive military
and commercial technology from American national laboratories
and companies. Please read "Reno
calls Taiwan an intelligence threat". See point #4 above.
The aforementioned facts are quite shocking since many folks
in the SlashDot community are reading these facts for the
first time. It is understandable. The Taiwanese government
has annually paid about $2 million to lobbying firms
like "Cassidy & Associates" to peddle influence in the American
government. (reference:
Big Business
Comes to Aid of China") Indeed, do you remember
Charlie Trie, John Huang, and Johnny Chung? They were
the key figures in the financial scandal that rocked the
Democratic Party and were accused of bribing American officials.
Both John Huang and Johnny Chung were born or raised in Taiwan.
If all these facts and the CNet article about Chinese laptops do
not convince you that the Taiwanese support mainland China,
then consider this tidbit. The Taiwanese constitution
Since we live in the West, the biggest issue is the unethical behavior of SCO and its managers. We have justifiably criticized them for trying to extort money via these ridiculous invoices. However, we need to go beyond criticizing only them. They actually work for someone: the shareholders.
Yes. The SCO shareholders own SCO and ultimately decide whether McBride keeps his job. The shareholders are the most guilty party in these pump-and-dump and extortion schemes hatched by SCO managers since the shareholders have the power to terminate the employment of McBride. The list at LionShares indicates the 15 financial institutions holding the largest number of shares of the SCO Group. Together, they hold 15% of the total outstanding shares. These financial institutions must immediately hold a special session of shareholders in order to terminate the employment of the managers (like McBride) at SCO group.
We, Slashdotters, should check our mutual funds immediately. If they own any shares of the SCO Group, then we should transfer the money out of those funds. Furthermore, there are several socially responsible mutual funds (SRMFs). We must bring the unethical behavior of the SCO group to the attention of the SRMF managers. They are bound, by the terms of their SRMFs, to sell all shares of the SCO Group.
The system can be used to recognize a particular face when it is standing alone. Consider, for example, a photo of a face sent along with an visa application to the American embassy. Please read "World: Asia-Pacific China backs embassy protests". In 1999, Serbians committed gross human-rights violations against the Kosovars in Kosovo; the Chinese fully supported the Serbians in their campaign of terror. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) under American command attempted to stop the slaughter by knocking out Serbian military units. NATO deliberately attempted to avoid hitting civilian targets in Serbia, but some bombs accidentally hit the Chinese embassy.
Shortly thereafter, the Chinese in both China and outside China erupted into ugly, violent protests. The Chinese throw stones and other projectiles at the American embassy in China. The Chinese also attacked some Americans. " The residence of the US Consul General in the south-western city of Chengdu was stormed and partially burned ."
How could the Americans in China have responded to this nonsensical violence? The Americans should have done the following.
-
Pull out cameras and take pictures of all the protestors.
-
Scan the photos into a computer and transmit them to Washington.
-
Henceforth, when a Chinese submits an application for
a visa to travel to the USA, use the face-recognition system
to determine whether the photo of the applicant matches any of the
protestors. If there is a match, then the application will not be approved.
- At the American embassy, grab a megaphone
and loudly announce, "Attention protesters. We are using
a face-recognition system. Any protestor applying for a visa to
the USA will be denied entry into the USA. We are taking pictures
right now. "
After about 10 clicks of the shutter of the camera, all the protestors would have disappeared. Henceforce, we should use this face-recognition system in conjunction with photographic equipment at all embassies and consulates run by Western nations within China (which includes Taiwan and Hong Kong).Please read the news article "Asteroid Might Hit Earth in 2880, Unless it is Painted" about another asteroid that might hit earth. The article suggests that painting the asteroid would deflect it from its course.
The fear of an asteroid collision is completely overblown although it makes good reading in newspapers. The asteroid traveling on a trajectory colliding with earth can be easily deflected from its path by a small nuclear explosion when the asteroid is far away. Just plop a nuclear warhead on top of a huge rocket; shoot the rocket at the asteroid so that collision occurs somewhere outside of our galaxy. The impact and accompanying explosion should deflect the asteroid by a couple of millimeters from its trajectory. Those millimeters translate into millions of miles when the asteroid finally enters our solar system.
When desktop publishing become popular, pundits predicted that it would reduce the demand for paper since what you publish would be saved in soft form -- i. e. a digital file on a computer disk. The pundits said that, in the bad old days before personal computers, you were forced to type or write everything on paper, and of course, producing paper contaminates the environment and increases the rate of destroying trees. Unfortunately, the predictions about reducing paper consumption were wrong because people tended to print everything that they developed in their latest incarnation of Microsoft Word. Consumption of paper actually increased significantly after personal computers and desktop publishing came into vogue.
The problem was distribution. There really was no convenient way to distribute the digital file. When person A transferred a digital file to person B, a floppy disk containing the digital file is also transferred. If you transferred a floppy disk, you would think, "I might as well just print the document. It does not have many pages."
Then, came the Internet. It provides a convenient way to transfer the digital file. The transmission mechanism is also soft -- i. e. digital. The floppy disk is physical: you can touch it and feel it. In short, personal computers alone provide only the means to create soft media. Personal computers plus the Internet provide an end-to-end solution in which the creation and delivery of media is 100% soft -- i. e. 100% digital.
Forget the CD. The environment comes first.
The problem is not the shuttle per se. The problem is quality engineering at NASA. Note that the Hubble Telescope and several later NASA projects have been plagued with quality-control problems. Please read about a horrendous engineering mistake in "Metric mishap caused loss of NASA orbiter".
The only way to fix the quality problem is to (1) increase funding to NASA projects so that American engineers are not overworked and (2) increase competition for NASA. One way to increase funding for NASA is to rescind the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) and to shut down the American Institute in Taiwan , saving about $17,000,000. This money can then be earmarked for NASA. In short, there is simply much wasted money in Washington. If we can recover the wasted money, then we can set it aside for NASA.
As for increasing competition, we could encourage Japan to spend heavily on its own space shuttle. Over the last 10 years, the Japanese government has wasted billions of dollars on useless public works projects that do little prop up the economy. A far better use for that money is researching and building re-usable space-entry vehicles. The resulting competition with NASA would significantly improve the quality of engineering at NASA. (Note that the last 15 years of competition with Toyota has signficantly improved the quality of automobiles produced by General Motors.)
There is no good engineering reason to build an independent operating system (OS) -- i. e. one which is independent of Linux. However, there seem to be political reasons.
By contrast, UNIX failed to gain significant marketshare against the onslaught of Windows because there were simply too many incompatible operating systems called UNIX.
If this Japan-China-Korea operating system (JCKOS) gains any significant share in Asia, then we will have 2 incompatiable operating systems: JCKOS and Linux. JCKOS will be similar to Linux but incompatible with it.
What could be the motivation for this stupidity? Japanese society, as a whole, is a Western society, and Japan has slowly been moving from a 2nd-rate Western nation to a 1st-rate Western nation like the United States of America (USA). Unfortunately, due to Japan's proximity to Asian countries like the brutal totalitarian regime called China, there has always been a tension between (1) Japanese bureaucrats who lean towards Asia and (2) Japanese bureucrats who lean towards the USA and the rest of the West. The Western Japanese have usually prevailed over the Asian Japanese. A key example is the USA-Japan defense treaty.
Unfortunately, occasionally, the Asian Japanese prevail in certain matters. We, Slashdotters, should send an e-mail to the Japanese embassy in our Western nations and tell them that this idea for an independent JCKOS is hurtful and harmful to the open-source movement. Also, do the Japanese really want to work with a brutal totalitarian regime like the Chinese, who have routinely beat and kill Tibetan nuns? (reference: Amnesty International and Tibet Online).
-
Material violating the copyright laws exists on the web.
-
A search engine provides a hypertext link to the
infringing material.
Is the search engine technically violating copyright law? No. Is the search engine facilitating people who wish to violate copyright law? Yes.Does "facilitation" constitute violation of the law? To look at that question. Let us look at another analogy.
-
Consider a hypothetical company, "Martian Software".
It deliberately and illegally copies software and
sells them to customers.
-
The Yellow Pages carries an advertisement for "Martian
Software". The advertisment includes a phone number, an address, and a map explaining how to go to the address of "Martian Software".
The Yellow Pages is not violating copyright law but is facilitating people who wish to violate copyright law. However, in this case, "facilitation" does constitute violation of the law.By analog, the search engine in the original example is not violating the law by merely providing a link to the infringing material. We, Slashdotters, should petition the ACLU to defend the search-engine company.
Supercomputer research is an important area of research that fits well within the academic environment. Indeed, a generation of American (not foreign) computer engineers were trained at universities like Virginia Tech by doing research on a large-scale supercomputer project. Please read "American Supremacy in Supercomputers".
American fears are unfounded. Numerous universities like Virginia Tech have trained a generation of American (not foreign) students in building the finest supercomputers. MIT, Carnegie Mellon University (CMU), and Virginia Tech (to name just a few) have launched large-scale research projects staffed by top American graduate students. Their work became the foundation of several generations of multiprocessors.
By contrast, very few (if any) Japanese universities conduct large-scale research projects to build high-performance supercomputers. The Japanese government has tended to avoid funding this kind of research. Worse, there is little collaboration between industry and academia in Japan. Yet, precisely this kind of collaboration is needed for such large-scale projects: e.g. Virginia Tech is enlisting the help of Apple computer.
American companies lead by scientists trained at MIT and CMU could easily design a computer that outperforms the Earth Simulator. These companies simply have chosen to not do so because there is far more profits to be garnered by building commercial supercomputers geared for database transactions. In fact, the highest-performance commercial supercomputers nearly all come from the United States of America (IBM).
The 21st century remains Pax Americana, not Pax Asia. The hordes of immigrants trying to get the hell out of Asia and into the USA underscores this fact.
Linux servers and workstations have rapidly increased their share of the market at the expense of Sun Microsystems. According to "IBM steals server sales from Sun", the sales of Sun servers running Solaris dropped by a whopping 19% from 2nd quarter of 2002 to 2nd quarter of 2003. Yet, the sales of Linux servers increased by a sizeable 40%.
The bell tolls. It tolls ominously for Sun.
In both scenarios, native Americans are denied jobs that they deserve; however scenario #2 is actually better than scenario #1. Scenario #1 has fostered the growth of large ethnic communities that refuse to assimilate into American society. They consist largely of people who believe that Western culture is only for "white" people and who teach their kids that they should identify with their "ethnic" culture and people. These large ethnic communities also produce most of the spies who steal Western technology to give to Beijing. The two spies mentioned in "Two Men Arrested for Planning to Smuggle High-Tech Encryption Devices to China" grew up in Taiwan and came to the USA.
Scenario #2 will result in a reduction of those ethnic communities. This reduction does not mean that, for example, Chinese will not want to come to the USA. On the contrary, Indians, Chinese, Taiwanese, etc. will still demand to be allowed into the USA in huge numbers even though there will be plenty of IT jobs in India, China, Taiwan, etc. Why? Our Western way of life is superior to what exists in Indian, China, Taiwan, etc. Please read "Hospitals see mass resignations" and "SARS doctors' ethics put to the test" to sample the quality (or lack thereof) of life in Taiwan. Instead of treating SARS victims, the doctors prefer to hide the information about the illness or to resign.
As Slashdotters, let us work together as a community and lobby Congress to terminate the H-1B program and to reduce the combined immigration quota of China (which includes Hong Kong and Taiwan) from 60000 to 2000. Let us encourage companies like Intel to pursue scenario #2 instead of scenario #1. Intel has frequently lied about the need for H-1Bs. In the future, if Intel needs H-1Bs, Intel should set up a plant in India.
The new IBM compiler should rectify the situation. Apple will not need to manipulate the SPEC scores by hiding behind the GCC compiler. In the past, Apple stuck with the GCC compiler because it causes the Pentium to perform much worse than it would perform on code compiled with an Intel-provided compiler.
Of course, both the Power4 (and derivatives like the PowerPC 970) and the Pentium IV crush the UltraSPARC in performance. The new IBM compiler is yet in another nail in the coffin of the UltraSPARC.
Now, for a binary number system, digit 0 is [0, 2.5) volts, and digit 1 is (2.5, 5] volts. Clearly, the noise margin of the binary number system is much better than the noise margin of the base-3 number system.
Now consider the voltages of modern digital circuits. Consider a voltage range of [0, 1.5] volts. In a base-3 number systm, digit 0 would be [0, 0.5) volt. Digit 1 would be (0.5, 1.0) volt, and digit 2 would be (1.0, 1.5] volts.
For a binary number system, digit 0 is [0, 0.75) volt, and digit 1 is (0.75, 1.0] volt. Again, the noise margin of the binary number system is much better than the noise margin of the base-3 number system.
In fact, the noise margin of the binary number system is consistently 50% better than the noise margin of the base-3 number system. The noise margin of the binary number system is always better than the noise margin of the base-n number system, where n > 2. For this reason, engineers have not built and will not build digital systems with any non-binary number system.
Still, FVWM95 has not helped Linux to penetrate the corporate desktop market even though FVWM95 has been available for at least 3 years.
However, there is good news. The vehicle that is helping Linux to penetrate the corporate desktop market is the powerful 80x86 chips by Intel and AMD. Numerous small American companies (like those in Silicon Valley and Boston's Route 128) are moving en masse away from Unix workstations with crappy processors like UltraSPARC to Linux desktops with powerful processors like the Pentium 4, the Athlon, and the PPC 970.
In fact, the CEO of one company developing radio-frequency chips deploys only Linux desktops and servers. The Linux desktops are powered by Pentium 4s. To quote her, "Linux running on an 80x86 chip creates a desktop that gives 3x the performance and 1/3 the cost of a Sun workstation."
The bell tolls. It tolls ominously for Sun.
The writers and producers of the science-fiction classic, "Space 1999", were off the mark by about 25 years. "Space 1999" was broadcast by NBC in 1975 and dealt with the lives of colonists on a moonbase called "Alpha". The series began with an episode where a nuclear explosion hurls the moon out of the earth's orbit. Each succeeding episode of the series descibes the dangers that the colonists face in space.
To counter this argument, SCO claims that GPL itself is invalid. Hence, even if SCO did previously distribute the disputed source code under GPL, SCO is still entitled to demand royalties because GPL violates the law.
Finally, SCO has a substantive claim. Apparently, the court case will finally come down to one issue: "Is GPL valid and enforceable?" If the answer is "yes", then SCO does not have a case.
Transmeta management should have labeled the new chip "Loser-on" instead of "Efficeon". Last quarter, Transmeta lost $22 million dollars on sales of $5.1 million, according to "High stakes for Transmeta's new chip" by CNet. Transmeta does not have the resources to compete against either AMD or Intel. Shortly after Transmeta annouced its first chips, Intel accelerated development of low-power chips and produced Centrino, which significantly reduced Transmeta's marketshare. AMD recently purchased the low-power-embedded-80x86 division of National Semiconductor; AMD is clearly accelerating its own development of low-power chips. Please read "AMD scoops up National Semi unit" by CNet. In summary, Transmeta is heading for bankruptcy, and the managers who lead Transmeta to an IPO are laughing at the stupid investors who drove up its stock in 2000.
The primary appeal of Linux is low cost: $0.00. with Windows being free in India, the typical Indian will not be interested in using Linux. Windows has significantly more applications that run on it than Linux. Off course, those applications are also "free".
Similar comments apply to China. China (which includes Hong Kong and Taiwan) is the software-piracy capital of the world. More then 90% of the software used in China is pirated. Here are some references to solidly support the aforementioned observations.
The crime in this discussion forum is that the Taiwanese support mainland China. Please read "Warning Sign: Taiwanese Money and Technology Supports Mainland China". "Made in Taiwan" = "Made in China". If you support human rights, do not buy any notebook computers made in either Taiwan or mainland China.
We Americans should not kid ourselves. The Taiwanese strongly support mainland China. The Taiwanese give to mainland China any money or technology that we Americans refuse to give.
When we apply economic sanctions against mainland China, we must also apply the same sanctions against Taiwan. In our pursuit of human rights, when we boycott products that are made in China, we must also boycott products that are made in Taiwan. Specifically, when we boycott notebook computers made in China, we must also boycott notebook computers made in Taiwan. As the article notes, computers "made in Taiwan" are really "made in China".
We must immediately stop selling weapons to Taiwan. Taiwan is a very serious security risk to the United States of America (USA). Since 2000 May, the FBI has placed Taiwan on the list of nations that are prone to steal sensitive military and commercial technology from American national laboratories and companies. Please read "Reno calls Taiwan an intelligence threat". See point #4 above.
The aforementioned facts are quite shocking since many folks in the SlashDot community are reading these facts for the first time. It is understandable. The Taiwanese government has annually paid about $2 million to lobbying firms like "Cassidy & Associates" to peddle influence in the American government. (reference: Big Business Comes to Aid of China") Indeed, do you remember Charlie Trie, John Huang, and Johnny Chung? They were the key figures in the financial scandal that rocked the Democratic Party and were accused of bribing American officials. Both John Huang and Johnny Chung were born or raised in Taiwan.
If all these facts and the CNet article about Chinese laptops do not convince you that the Taiwanese support mainland China, then consider this tidbit. The Taiwanese constitution