Slashdot Mirror


China to Be Laptop Leader

prostoalex writes "IMS Research says that by the end of the year People Republic of China might become world's biggest laptop manufacturer. The plants will be largely owned by Taiwanese manufacturers, though. Taiwan is current #1."

294 comments

  1. HELP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Help! I'm trapped inside a laptop factory!

    1. Re:HELP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      does this mean we can run w/o microsoft on the laptops now?

      or soon?

      please soon.

      little suse goes a long way!

  2. "Leader" by floamy · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Hasn't china been the "leader" of manufacturing stuff foreverish? By "leader" you would think they were responsible for the R&D and design of the laptops, but from what I've read it just appears they can have more sweatshops than anyone else.

    1. Re:"Leader" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the laptops you buy today are designed in Asia.

      Cheap, but not always so good. I bought a Dell 500m designed and produced by Quanta. Dell only brands it. Unusable for more than hour, since the harddisk makes the palm rest to warm to use.

    2. Re:"Leader" by FatalTourist · · Score: 1
      Hasn't china been the "leader" of manufacturing stuff foreverish?

      If by "stuff" you mean things bought for 25 cents from vending machines when you exit the super market, then yes.

      --


      Escape Pod Films: Sketch Comedy and Web Series
    3. Re:"Leader" by rwise2112 · · Score: 1

      This is true. In fact Quanta makes Compaq notebooks as well

      --

      "For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert"
    4. Re:"Leader" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but from what I've read it just appears they can have more sweatshops than anyone else.

      sweatshops eh? Your source must either be old or ignorant .. or maybe has a hidden agenda.

      It's not slave labor over there! Have you been to china? No? People are being paid decent wages compared to the rest of the developing world. Now their wages and working conditions are improving, because even in china their is a labor shortage coming into play.

      Have you ever thought about this .. what happens to people with no jobs? They starve and die horribly (like in parts of Africa). So just because they arent being paid $100K, doesnt mean they're being exploited. Sad part about it is that a factory worker in China has a better quality of life than a US minimum wage worker at McDonald's!

    5. Re:"Leader" by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      Sad part about it is that a factory worker in China has a better quality of life than a US minimum wage worker at McDonald's!

      Probable troll, but... Can you provide any references for that allegation? I find the claim to be very suspicious.

    6. Re:"Leader" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, fuck you. Just because the Chinese don't demand 8 bucks per hour doesn't make these laptop factories "sweatshops."

      As a matter of fact, these laptop factories will help get china out of the whole sweatshop business.

      So take your holier-than-thou Ameri-centric drivel elsewhere.

  3. Interesting... by Negative+Response · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Frequency of stories about Chinese tech stuff certainly picked up recently. What's going on there?

    1. Re:Interesting... by Pieroxy · · Score: 1, Interesting

      What's going on is that the Chinese are 123 billion people, and the state controls everything. So:

      1. Government produces Laptops
      2. Government prevent any other laptop from being sold
      3. They are #1.

      Ain't that easy?

      In the other news, Taiwanese that are #1 on laptops may become number 1.

      Wow.

    2. Re:Interesting... by Negative+Response · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Uh, asked a dumb question, get a dumb answer.
      1. I was asking why there are more and more tech news about China, not why they would become #1 in laptop manufacturing
      2. Lots of businesses are not owned by the state in China, did you read the article where it says those laptop factories are run by Twainese?
      3. Biggest laptop market is probably not China (yet), so what's about that "Government prevent any other laptop from being sold" stuff?
      Have a nice day, troll.
    3. Re:Interesting... by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 4, Interesting

      China has set a goal to be a world leader in semiconductor manufacture and a competitive force in software development in the next few years. I'm sure there will be more news to come.

      Language is a major roadblock for Chinese IT. Either you have to learn english or use a cumbersome encoding system to work in Mandarin. This will work as a slowing factor in software development and motivate research into new data entry methods.

    4. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's getting harder to prevent this kind of stories from leaking to the american society.

    5. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) un-american IT laws make china #1

      2) that is the common procedure. Also Japanese factories have dependencies in Taiwan because the ground prices in Japan are sometimes just too high to build a new factory there.

      3) That might be propaganda. Not sure if it comes from china or the US.

    6. Re:Interesting... by Kierthos · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, I don't see China becoming the biggest market for laptops any time soon. With a 2002 per capita income of $4600, I can't see most Chinese spending what would probably be food money for a couple of months on a laptop.

      The U.S., as a comparison had a 2001 per capita income of $36,300. We can afford laptops and have money to spare.

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    7. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. HUGE population
      2. Because of 1. HUGE number of talented hi-tech workers
      3. Cheap labor
      4. Taiwan/South Korea have lot of high-tech industry
      5. Both Taiwan and South Korea have very small land area and don't have much room to expand
      6. Most logical choice is to expand to China

    8. Re:Interesting... by caluml · · Score: 1

      Maybe 1.23 billion, but certainly not 123 billion. There are about 6 billion people in the whole world.
      Unless you're counting the pixies, the elves, the trolls, and the tooth fairies, but even then I don't think you'd top 10 billion.

    9. Re:Interesting... by Pieroxy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1. You were asking a very vague question to which I responded partially. Don't blame me for the dumbness of your questoin.
      2. Because the plant is not Chinese does't mean that the state can't controll the whole process does it?
      3. If the gov decides to be the biggest distributor, they just have to prevent any other distributor from selling laptops. It's just the way it works for many stuff around there.

      Who's the troll now?

    10. Re:Interesting... by chenyu · · Score: 1

      Something about China is that averages are misleading. For example, you have about 20 percent of the population being something like middle class, and that it itself is a market that is about the size of the United States.

    11. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you know that the word "gullible" isn't in the dictionary?

      It's true. People use the word "gullible" all the time, but it's not officially a dictionary word.

    12. Re:Interesting... by caluml · · Score: 1

      Nope, it's definitely there - I checked. Now who looks stupid..?

    13. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Chinese also know their stuff. I have a friend who works in the R&D division of a telco who produces phone equipment. A Chinese company is producing a clone at a lower price, giving the telco quite a bit of competition. Of a greater worry to the telco is that the Chinese company's R&D is ramping up quickly to the point where they will be producing original, competitive products instead of clones.

    14. Re:Interesting... by aminorex · · Score: 1

      If you include non-corporeal people, I can't imagine
      why you would find *any* upper limit compelling.
      After all, if "personhood" is merely the property
      of having certain (as yet unspecified) organizing
      principles present in a nearly homeostatic process,
      then any dynamic system capable of embodying a
      qualifying process is a potential vehicle of
      personhood, and there's no reason to think that
      the formalisms which qualify can't be applied with
      infinite density.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  4. Re:Well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being we probably have 100x the missles of China, I really wouldn't worry about this possibility.

  5. Hey... by Kenrod · · Score: 2, Funny


    We've been worried about China invading Taiwan - looks like Taiwan invaded China to me...

    --
    Good heavens Miss Sakamoto - you're beautiful!
    1. Re:Hey... by AresTheImpaler · · Score: 1
      We've been worried about China invading Taiwan - looks like Taiwan invaded China to me...

      I know you are joking, but that reminds me of when the romans conquered the greek. Sure, they had them by their throats, but the greeks where so a big influence influence (culture, society, etc,e tc) over the romans

  6. "Laptop Leader"?? by tgrotvedt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The leadership we're talking about here is production only. I don't see how having more low wage workers to exploit equates to development leadership. I don't mean to use the word "exploit" too negatively though, this will probably be a good thing.

    The more low-paid jobs available, the more competition for labour, and as a result, better working conditions and pay.

    --
    What makes a man want to be a mouse? (Python's Flying Circus)
    1. Re:"Laptop Leader"?? by siddhartha03 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      More competition for very low paying jobs puts the people in general at a disadvantage. Who will care that you are sick and can't work if 2 million other people can fill your place and are EAGER to do so?

      --
      Sock puppets stole my sig.
    2. Re:"Laptop Leader"?? by tgrotvedt · · Score: 1

      I said "more competition for labour", that is, the corporations competing for workers, not competition for jobs on the part of the workers.

      --
      What makes a man want to be a mouse? (Python's Flying Circus)
    3. Re:"Laptop Leader"?? by siddhartha03 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter, there's a billion or so people to fill the need for cheap jobs to produce CHEAPER laptops. Once the companies need to compete they can easily let the people compete for the only jobs availble, the jobs they are giving. If you looked and read you'll see that about 40% of the provinces revune comes from this type of work.

      --
      Sock puppets stole my sig.
    4. Re:"Laptop Leader"?? by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      I have a feeling it'll be like the shoe industry:
      Cheap labor == cheap laptops, but the end companies won't lower the prices a single cent. You'll still be paying $1999 for that $100 laptop. w00t!

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    5. Re:"Laptop Leader"?? by chenyu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The article was very confused as far as geography. Suzhou is a city in Jiangsu province. I can easily believe that laptops make up 40% of the revenue of Suzhou, but there is no way that laptops make up 40% of the revenue of Jiangsu.

      Also, its a common mistake to think of China as one big economy with 1 billion people. It's more accurate to think of it as 20 or 30 interacting little economies which can be very different from one another.

    6. Re:"Laptop Leader"?? by chenyu · · Score: 1

      Something else that is missing is why wages in China can stay low. Something that people miss about China is that is better to think of it as 20 interacting economies. Most of the people who are in the assembly lines are migrants from the interior where there are few job prospects.

    7. Re:"Laptop Leader"?? by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      "I don't mean to use the word "exploit" too negatively though, this will probably be a good thing."

      Why would it be a good thing?

      If the workers are happy working for dirt then it's good for the company. They can make greater profit (because you know damn well they won't drop prices).

      If the workers demand higher wages then they can..

      1) Get fired and replaced with cheaper labor if the unemployment rate is high.

      2) The company can move the factory to vietnam or africa or someplace where they can get cheaper labor. This will lead to a boom bust cycle for the chinese though.

      3) The Chinese govt will offer prison labor to the company. This also happens in the US. AFAIK US and China are the only two countries with active prison labor programs although it would not surprise me one bit if there were other countries joining in this goldmine.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    8. Re:"Laptop Leader"?? by cyberon22 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nice to read some posts by someone who obviously knows China.

      That being said, I'd disagree that its the rural migrants are sopping up assembly-line jobs with the ODMs and that this is driving outsourcing to China. First of all, those guys go into construction, retail, and other kinds of jobs which don't require things like clean rooms. People in the US leap to the assumption that labour costs explain everything because of the dominance of the neoclassical economic paradigm, but realistically if this was just about labour there would be a hell of a lot more development in inland and northern China than there is now. Suzhou isn't exactly a haven for cheap wages the way... Fujian is, for instance.

      I think its also a popular misconception that labour costs in China are significantly cheaper than elsewhere -- say parts of Indonesia, Malaysia. The difference is an easy investment channel from Taiwan (no language barrier), and ready access to the mainland market. China still has significant tariffs on imported laptops. The bulk of these might phase out over time in line with China's accession to the WTO, but I wouldn't count on them disappearing completely. If you want to sell your products in China there are still a lot of incentives to produce them there....

    9. Re:"Laptop Leader"?? by xyvimur · · Score: 1

      `` I have a feeling it'll be like the shoe industry''.
      Well if comparing to shoe industry (actually some shoes from China) - there is plenty of shoes from china which are extremely cheap... but really they fell apart after one day of using.

    10. Re:"Laptop Leader"?? by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 1

      The leadership we're talking about here is production only. I don't see how having more low wage workers to exploit equates to development leadership (...) The more low-paid jobs available, the more competition for labour, and as a result, better working conditions and pay.

      The problem is that China uses prisoners of concentration camps as the main source of "cheap labour". Which is not really their own invention, Hitler and Stalin tried it years before the Chinese. However, the example of the Third Reich or the Soviet Union hardly proves your thesis. Those workers, who still are lucky to be "free" (think "free as much as you can be in the USSR, not free as in beer") gain actually nothing from competing with "cheap labour" of prisoners in shackles. And don't think that hi-tech industry cannot use this sort of labour - the entire Soviet rocket and jet propulsion programme was created in Gulag by prisoners like Korolev or Tupolev.

    11. Re:"Laptop Leader"?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There are accusations that Chinese prisons produce products are often sold in foreign countries with the profits going to the PRC government. Products include everything from green tea to industrial engines to coal dug from mines. However, these products make up an insignificant amount of mainland China's export output, and it has been argued that the use of prison labor for manufacturing is not itself a violation of human rights and that most prisoners in Chinese prisons are there for what are generally regarded as crimes in the West.


      Come again?
    12. Re:"Laptop Leader"?? by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 1

      There are accusations that Chinese prisons produce products are often sold in foreign countries with the profits going to the PRC government.

      I hear them most often from non-profit organizations, like Human Rights Watch or Amnesty International.

      most prisoners in Chinese prisons are there for what are generally regarded as crimes in the West.

      You mean, if I'd say loudly in some western country that Tibet has interesting culture or that Christianity is actually not that bad for a religion, I could get sent to a labor camp somewhere near Paris or San Francisco? Good to know.

    13. Re:"Laptop Leader"?? by Beliskner · · Score: 1
      The more low-paid jobs available, the more competition for labour, and as a result, better working conditions and pay
      Unless there's an excess of labour. I have come to know of millions of unemployed Ethiopeans for a start.
      --
      A caveman dreams of being us, the incalculable power and riches. We dream of being Q, then what?
    14. Re:"Laptop Leader"?? by Sunnan · · Score: 1
      The more low-paid jobs available, the more competition for labour, and as a result, better working conditions and pay.

      This seems counter-intuitive to me...
      The worse the working conditions are, the better they are?

      Actually, the only thing that can (under capitalism and most other systems) increase working conditions seem to be a surplus of work opportunities. If there's a surplus of workes - e.g. massive unemployment - most of them are going to be pretty miserable, even those who have work. (Not to sound conspiratorial, but there are plenty of corporate fat cats who actively lobby the governments and banks to keep unemployment rates from being to low, since that could cause workes to feel comfortable enough to try to work for improvement in their workplace.)

      Don't forget - in Soviet Russia, WORKING CONDITIONS improve YOU.
    15. Re:"Laptop Leader"?? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      most prisoners in Chinese prisons are there for what are generally regarded as crimes in the West.
      You mean, if I'd say loudly in some western country that Tibet has interesting culture or that Christianity is actually not that bad for a religion, I could get sent to a labor camp somewhere near Paris or San Francisco? Good to know.
      That's not what he said. He said the majority of prisoners in Chinese prisons are there for what are generally regarded as crimes in the West - ie out of China's total prison population, a minority are political prisoners, the majority are the usual band of crooks. FWIW, that's probably correct, though I know China's standard for use of the Death Penalty is even worse than Texas's.

      Whatever the case, the use of prison labour has always struck me as both immoral on the cruel and unusual front (Slashdotters scratching their heads at this comment wondering how working in a factory can be cruel should note that in these situations, the checks and balances that keep working conditions decent, safe, and humane tend to be thrown out of the window. I've seen pictures of Chinese slave workers waste deep in chemicals at a PCB plant, for instance), and also damaging to the overall economy as its one of those rare instances where there's an incomplete circle of wealth creation going on, resulting in the destruction of paying jobs by creating subsidized, inhumane, alternatives.

      While I have infinitely more sympathy for someone jailed for criticising the government than I do someone who mugged a pensioner, I've always been horrified by how people seem to lose their humanity when talking about dealing with the latter, to the point of, whether through increased taxes or job losses, people are willing to cut off their own noses to see insanely and inanely harsh punishments meted out on those they don't like.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    16. Re:"Laptop Leader"?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No wonder!

      I've seen Ethiopeans store shoes in fridges, drink water from toilets............

      I don't think any sane employer would want to have them working even on assembly lines.

    17. Re:"Laptop Leader"?? by chenyu · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the correction.

      Part of the problem with cheap labor is "you get what you pay for." Labor is cheap in China, but productivity is low. What the laptop situation is showing is that the PRC with a lot of outside help, is moving up the value chain.

      One reason that the laptop factories are in Suzhou and not Fujian is because of the nearness to Shanghai. Shanghai is home to a huge number of universities that is putting out large numbers of electrical engineers and CS people. These people aren't manning the assembly lines, but you do need a ready supply of mamagers and skilled people to oversee things.

      Also, the Chinese government is being really, really nice to Taiwanese businessmen. The PRC figures that this is going to help unification. By contrast, Taiwanese businessmen have had big problems in the Philiphines and even more so in Indonesia.

      Siting a laptop factory requires a lot of trust that things won't explode political. The Chinese government might be many things, but it's not unstable and it's also not particularly stupid.

    18. Re:"Laptop Leader"?? by chenyu · · Score: 1

      The problem with AI and HRW is that what they say is true but sometimes misleading. There job is to focus on human rights abuses, which is a good thing, but they sometimes make it look like the whole nation is some big gulag, which its not.

      The threshold for getting into trouble with the government is organizing. No one is going to bother you if you have a sidewalk chat about politics in which you complain about how bad the government is. When you start organizing petition drives, that's when you get in trouble. The Chinese government has a reason for doing things this way, because it means that they don't have to monitor everyone, just the few organizers, and then rely on people's natural apathy.

      As far as prisons. You do realize that China has its share of burglars, drug abusers, and prostitutes.

    19. Re:"Laptop Leader"?? by chenyu · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, I have seen reports that prison labor has often improved conditions for prisoners. In order to improve productivity and quality, the prisons have to improve working conditions.

      The other thing is that if you don't get prisoners to work, then what are you supposed to do with them.

    20. Re:"Laptop Leader"?? by mgmood · · Score: 1

      Taiwan's current political leadership is basing its future on the fact Taiwan will design while the mainland will manufacture. The truth is that many ODMs and OEMs are moving design facilities to the mainland as well. Cost is not the only reason for this, but is a driving factor. A large supply of Engineers are produced each year in China, keeping supply very plentiful in the entry level. But being close to the manufacturing center is very important to improve time-to-market for products. Being there, has much more value than a two-hour conference / video conference twice a day. It is only a matter of time before you see the design leadership in the mainland as well, albeit for now Western, Japanese, Korean or Taiwanese owned. The solution for the mainland will be the reunification of Taiwan, which will give China ownership and control over the majority of design and manufacturing. If you think this only will be limited to laptops, you are wrong. With the low costs of labor, components and shorter supply chain, most of the computers purchased will be heading to China, including laptops, desktops, servers limited only by a country's export compliance code and tariffs. Since most of these countries are in the WTO, export compliance will be the tool for countries to manage this growth. A bigger issue is the fact that all of this is based on a partial false economy. As China's markets and economy grow, the valuation of the RMB should be growing as well, but it is currently fixed or "managed" floated by the Chinese government at lower levels than would be supported on a true float. China can do this because of large foreign investment's infusion of cash. This artificial peg keeps Chinese goods/labor priced 2 - 3 times lower than it probably should. Although don't look for the peg to move anytime soon. As many Chinese bank are insolvent, commercial real estate is overbuilt, the country is running a massive deficit/GDP and if foreign investment dries up, so does China's growth. China must grow its economy to solve those issues easier. So expect this trend to continue- more design and manufacturing will move to China in the foreseeable future.

  7. Well, it figures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Slave labor tends to reduce costs to just about the bare minimum. Maybe we'll start seeing some brand new $500 laptops soon. I kind of feel bad to think that a group of poor Chinese kids will toil for hours assembling my computer for pennies a day. Children get easily distracted, especially when they're worrying about their mother being tortured by the factory manager for falling behind in production.

    1. Re:Well, it figures by CrazyGringo · · Score: 0

      I can't tell if you're joking. Are you worried more about the poor children or your laptop being assembled by easily distracted workers?

    2. Re:Well, it figures by chenyu · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This is total nonsense. If you visit one of those plants, they are big industrial parks like things with air conditioning and lots of workers in an assembly line. The pay is low by Western standards, but its a huge amount locally.

    3. Re:Well, it figures by Negative+Response · · Score: 1

      Who the hell modded parent insightful? Any proof for child or slave labor there?

    4. Re:Well, it figures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you're thinking of Japan (I know they all look the same to me too). China is what is called a communist country, which means that people all get paid the same and are told what to do by the government so they are, in essence, slaves.

    5. Re:Well, it figures by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      Take a look at everything else you own. The clothes on your back, the shoes on your feet, a considerable fraction of the household goods, were probably constructed in Indonesia, Thailand, or China under worse conditions and for considerably less pay than the Chinese high-tech labor sector works under. And if it weren't so, your own standard of living would suffer. The different market values for first-world vs. third-world labor - even equivalent labor at equivalent productivity - are much of the source of the material advantages and comforts enjoyed by the 1st world. If you multiplied the costs of those manufactured goods and clothing and such by 10, what do you think your life would be like now? How many PS/2 games do you think you'd be able to afford?

    6. Re:Well, it figures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wrong on so many accounts.

    7. Re:Well, it figures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yea I'd hate for my laptop to not be working when I get it because the kid got distracted and forgot to plug the cable in.

    8. Re:Well, it figures by Tailhook · · Score: 2, Informative

      Any proof for child or slave labor there?

      You're kidding right?

      Fans of Chinese slave labor can buy apparel here. If you're not a fan you might consider supporting legislation such as this. If you don't know enough about the topic to decide whether or not you're a fan, do some reading. My government has. Well, enough to have formed a policy on the matter. If you're all about self-reliance, just feed the term Laogai into Google.

      Enjoy your Chinese laptop.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    9. Re:Well, it figures by chenyu · · Score: 1

      No, I'm talking about China. I have the slight advantage of having been there.

      The Party likes to wave red flags, but it's not communist in any meaningful sense of the word.

    10. Re:Well, it figures by Negative+Response · · Score: 1

      Oh come on.

      Words printed on an apparel is only a matter of opinion, at best; a biography intended to obtain attention and money is often not quite true; and laws here (US) sometimes make sense, sometime don't.

      You proof doesn't really stand. "Laogai" in Chinese means "correction with labor" (lao: work, gai: change, reform), and working is mandetory for inmates, but does that make it "slave labor" if working condition is not inhumane (note I am not saying the working condition is good, just not enough reliable evidence to say otherwise)? Or is it better for the prison to be more like a vacation resort, where prisoners ass-rape each other to kill time, like in the US of A?

  8. IN COMMUNIST CHINA... by Joey+Patterson · · Score: 1, Funny

    Laptops own YOU!!!

  9. Not News by westyvw · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ya Think China might make laptops cheap? And make many of them? Thats NEWS HOW?

    Course I want them for 99 cents like everything else I would buy from china.....

  10. hmmm by prichardson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    China to be largest manufacturer of laptops....

    Not to troll, but I think that a lot of laptops that will come out of china will suck, just like a lot of the other toys and electronics that come out of China. On the other hand, it probably would drive the price down enough for me to afford one in addition to my desktop. Personally, I won't be getting one of these laptops from China because I am a mac freak and never want to use any OS other than Mac OS X ever again.

    I think that quality needs to be emphasized for electronics. Laptops are diing long before their useful life is up. Also, things that don't go obsolete very fast (DVD players, Stereos, VCRs, the like) shou;dn't break in six months. I know this violates short term business models (if it breaks they have to buy a new one and we get another sale). Planned obselescence is a terrible thing.

    --
    Help I'm a rock.
    1. Re:hmmm by hype7 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Not to troll, but I think that a lot of laptops that will come out of china will suck, just like a lot of the other toys and electronics that come out of China. On the other hand, it probably would drive the price down enough for me to afford one in addition to my desktop. Personally, I won't be getting one of these laptops from China because I am a mac freak and never want to use any OS other than Mac OS X ever again.


      This is what people used to say about Taiwan, and before Taiwan, Japan.

      Now, Taiwan is responsible for producing a number of Apple's computers. They also supply memory to computer manufacturers all over the world.

      Japan started out life by creating second-rate consumer goods like watches and cameras. While their watches haven't improved that much (j/k), Nikon et al produce some of the best cameras you can buy. Not that it was always like that. And what about Honda/Toyota, etc? When they first came out, those were the cars you bought when you'd just been declared bankrupt. Now, they're some of the most reliable cars you can buy; Japan pushed the just-in-time production model and numerous other innovations, and their automotive industry is one of the most vibrant in the world.

      And so it will be with China. So while now you might say how crap they are, there's a US $100bn per year trade deficit between the US and China in China's favour (I think that figure is correct), and all that money will continue to go towards making China the new Japan.

      -- james
    2. Re:hmmm by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Well, sure, Japan no longer produces so much cheap junk. That's why Taiwan, and now China ate their lunch.

    3. Re:hmmm by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Personally, I won't be getting one of these laptops from China"

      Actually, all of Apple's notebooks are made in Taiwan by "Quanta Computer Inc." and "Eslitegroup Computer System". They may very well soon be made in China, if it is cheaper to produce them there.

      Apple may represent "quality" to many people, but the reality is that the're made by the same companies as every other computer. The chips are made by Motorola/IBM/TSMC (vs. AMD/Intel/TSMC for PCs), and the drives/LCD screens/keyboards/cases are likely made by the same corporations.

    4. Re:hmmm by hype7 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Apple may represent "quality" to many people, but the reality is that the're made by the same companies as every other computer.


      This is OT, but it deserves a response.

      It's not just the parts, but how they're put together that makes a product well designed. The fact is, the quality of components that go into making a Renault and a BMW and not that different. However, in most cases the BMW has had better initial design, so that the parts work together better. Stresses, tensions, component placement, etc all work in harmony. Or at least better than in Renaults (not that Renaults are bad cars). That's why people pay more for Beemers (or at least partly - if the build was crap, the brand's reputation wouldn't be that good).

      Similarly, the amount of thought and design that goes into a Powerbook versus something like a Dell Latitude means that although the HD and memory and all the other commodity component parts are the same, the design of the cases and where these components are placed go into giving Apple some of the best built laptops in the industry.

      -- james
    5. Re:hmmm by evilviper · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's time we bring back the bumper-sticker:

      "Friends Don't Let Friends Drive Rice-Burners."

      I guess changing "Drive" to "Buy" would be appropriate.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:hmmm by hype7 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Well, sure, Japan no longer produces so much cheap junk. That's why Taiwan, and now China ate their lunch.


      And that's how it works! Eventually the amount of money China makes from the "cheap junk" (btw, I would hardly call RAM from Taiwan "cheap junk") will raise the standard of living, education and level of innovation. Suddenly, the "cheap junk" China turns out won't be cheap or junky any more. Wages will go up, and quality of goods will go up - and with it, the prices of the goods. A hole will open for another poor country to start producing the "cheap junk".

      China is already on the road out of "cheapness". Did you know that a very large selection of the good "English" hi-fi equipment is now made in China? The quality of these components is quite high, too.

      Taiwan is on the road to be at a Japanese-level manufacturer, and China is on the road to be a Taiwanese-level manufacturer.

      And, in case you hadn't guessed by now, this is all basic economics - otherwise known as the Trickle Down Theory.

      -- james
    7. Re:hmmm by Malcontent · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Wages will go up, and quality of goods will go up - and with it, the prices of the goods. A hole will open for another poor country to start producing the "cheap junk"."

      Once the companies leave then a bust cycle will begin. There will be a prolonged period of unemployment and depression/recession. Eventually the standard of living will be pretty much where it was before. Maybe once the cambodians (or wherever the jobs went) get uppidy and demand more money the jobs might come back but more likely they will migrate to africa or someplace even more destitute.

      Eventually some country will imprison a sizable minority of it's people and offer their labor for cheap to companies. This form of legalized slavery will start another chain reaction and before long a sizable chunk of the humans on this planet will be imprisoned and enslaved. People will be jailed for having one to two marijuana seeds for ten years and in prison they will work for AT&T making telemarketing calls.

      Oh wait a minute that's already happening right here in the USA.
      http://www.austinchronicle.com/issues/dispat ch/200 1-11-23/pols_naked3.html
      http://www.prisontalk.co m/forums/archive/topic/115 05.html
      http://kcd.com/goa/issues/2000/q1/Jail.ht m

      I am sure these kinds of prison labor programs will be expanded hugely in the US and overseas. Imagine a couple of million slaves in china, US or africa manufacturing toys or sneakers for next to nothing. Of course the US prisons will have to degrade to the level of chinese or african prisons to compete.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    8. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The placement of those plug-in parts in a computer affects... hmmm airflow... which in turn affects the dissipation of heat. Didnt the early Apple Imacs have heat issues?
      Apple even discouraged people from fitting internal CD burners to the computers.

    9. Re:hmmm by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 1

      This is what people used to say about Taiwan, and before Taiwan, Japan. Now, Taiwan is responsible for producing a number of Apple's computers (...) Japan started out life by creating second-rate consumer goods like watches and cameras. While their watches haven't improved that much (j/k), Nikon et al produce some of the best cameras you can buy. Not that it was always like that. And what about Honda/Toyota, etc? (...) And so it will be with China.

      Sir, I think you're comparing apples and oranges now (no pun intended). In Taiwan and Japan, there is some sort of law. If your contractor fails to do his duty, you can sue him and the one with better argument (and better lawyers) will win. In a communist state, the one with a brother-in-law in the politburo will always win, no matter the case, no matter the lawyers. I doubt this sort of economy can ever evolve the way a Taiwanese or Japanese or even Malaysian or South Korean could. You can succesfully produce crappy cars like Yugo or Lada, or cheap Chinese toys and T-shirts in a communist states. But never ever in history of communism we have seen anything we could call a "quality product" coming from these countries (vodka doesn't count). Prove me I'm wrong - name one good brand of anything coming from any twentieth century communist state. Cars? Cameras? Computers? Watches? Yes, they all made them. And they all sucked stronger than Lenchen Demuth ever sucked Karl Marx's penis.

    10. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple doesn't make laptops, a Taiwanese company makes them for Apple. I wouldn't suprised if some "Apple" laptops are already produced in China.

    11. Re:hmmm by shepd · · Score: 0, Troll

      >Once the companies leave then a bust cycle will begin.

      Why would a company leave during a positive cycle?

      >There will be a prolonged period of unemployment and depression/recession. Eventually the standard of living will be pretty much where it was before.

      For a short while. It seems most Free Markets have to go through growing pains such as these. Then things will improve, as they almost always do.

      >This form of legalized slavery will start another chain reaction and before long a sizable chunk of the humans on this planet will be imprisoned and enslaved.

      Eh? That doesn't make any sense. There's never been a single successful (as in, still running) enslave the majority of the population regime that I know of.

      >People will be jailed for having one to two marijuana seeds for ten years and in prison they will work for AT&T making telemarketing calls.
      >Oh wait a minute that's already happening right here in the USA.

      That's enslavement? Sure, it's a restrction of rights, but I think I'd rather not be allowed pot then have to work in a factory sewing together shoes for a few pennies a day.

      But, as I read on, I see you're not talking about shoe sewing, you're talking about people having to make annoying phone calls. Oh, gag me with a spoon!

      >I am sure these kinds of prison labor programs will be expanded hugely in the US and overseas.

      Well, I'm not. In fact, I am sure that over time "prison labour campaigns" will disappear, as they have largely been shown to be inneffective. The fact that almost no exported goods from China are from these labour campaigns proves it.

      The fact is prison labour can't even make decent mail bags, never mind complex electronics. ...Then again, perhaps I'm wrong. Maybe you were being facetious.

      If you ask me, between being required to work your time off in safe conditions and being caged together where inmates beat on each other, I'll take the first one every time.

      And, before you mention the article...

      Behind the pros for the companies, there are some very big cons for the convicts. Substandard or sweatshop conditions are commonly reported. Prisoners are made to work overlong days, and put in overtime without compensation (Liu 16);

      And this is different from your boss leaning on you... how?

      If a prisoner refuses to work, they can't torture him into it. The worst that will happen is he'll have to complete his full sentence rather than get a slap on the wrist. That's the cost of choosing not to contribute to society.

      some former inmate workers for CMT, a garment company, were able to file a lawsuit claiming that their 60-day training was unpaid, that they were given unrealistic quotas, and were instructed to replace Honduran tags in garments with "Made in USA" labels (16)

      Oh God no! They made them sew LABELS on things? Woe is me!

      As far as the unpaid training goes, I've seen companies go bust leaving people with 4 months unpaid. At least these inmates get to have jobs. Not that I don't wish them the best of luck suing their employer.

      What would be minor issues in a non-prison workplace are punished extravagantly: pay is docked for "cussing" and telephone privileges are taken away.

      ROTFLMAO! If you worked in MY store, and I caught you cussing at customers, I'd fire you on the spot. Period. No questions asked because it would be listed as a firable offense in your contract. How's that compared to losing telephone privileges and having your pay docked?

      Pharmaceutical companies Parke-Davis and Upjohn were open about having "exploited the skills" of inmates by making them work 16-hour days (Sawyer 213).

      Again, woe is me! Not a 16-hour day! I mean, my dad NEVER did that at his job, no, *never* (not). What a riot!

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    12. Re:hmmm by kcelery · · Score: 1

      You must be alien to the US auto manufacturer's car park.

    13. Re:hmmm by shione · · Score: 1

      There are still heaps of countries waiting in line to replace china when it replaces taiwan. India and S. Africa and Vietnam come to mind

    14. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hhehehe. He bags china made goods when hes using chinese made stuff already. Best thing is he doesnt know it. suck shit to him. ;)

    15. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      name one good brand of anything coming from any twentieth century communist state.
      T34, MiG29, ...

    16. Re:hmmm by hype7 · · Score: 1
      Once the companies leave then a bust cycle will begin. There will be a prolonged period of unemployment and depression/recession. Eventually the standard of living will be pretty much where it was before. Maybe once the cambodians (or wherever the jobs went) get uppidy and demand more money the jobs might come back but more likely they will migrate to africa or someplace even more destitute.


      This is alarmist and unwarranted. Name me a country like the US or the UK that has developed and then as you claim "undeveloped" when everyone left. It doesn't happen.

      It leads to two things:
      1. a rise in the standard of living in both countries - the "non-valued adding" jobs are shipped overseas, as the labour costs of doing them in the original country are too great (which also means usually that the people doing them weren't paid enough), and an increase in the living conditions in the recipient country
      2. a fall in the cost of goods in the original country

      There are always going to be periods of transition where economies move to producing new innovative things and leave old industries behind. Australia has had it happen to it with the steel industry, the US Europe and Japan are protecting their agriculture industries to prevent this from happening (no politician wants to be in power when it happens - it takes guts to lower subsidies). However, none of these economies will sink or stagnate because of this. Of the ones listed before, Japan is the only one in trouble - and this isn't because jobs are moving offshore, it's a mix of Japanese fiscal conservatism (at a personal level - nobody wants to buy stuff, they're all saving) and fiscal mismanagement (especially their banking sector).

      Free trade is a good thing(TM). People that argue against it on economic (not talking environmental) grounds are normally trying to prop up dying industries or modern day McCarthyists. I find the parent post's idea that we're all going to end up working in jails quite ludicrous to be honest.

      -- james
    17. Re:hmmm by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      You must have a short memory. USSR is responsible for a lot of high-tech, solid, reliable stuff. Their space program was pretty solid (1st country to put people in space), rocketry/ballistic missiles was very advanced, etc. I'm anti-war so I shouldn't be mentioning this but... perhaps the most famous product out of a Communist state (in this case USSR) is the AK-47 machine gun. It is very durable, efficient and reliable. It is the most popular machine gun of all time, and isn't about to be overtaken any time soon. It might seem a bit cheap now but it was the top weapon for almost 50 years.

      The reason you don't know of any good products out of Communist countries is not because they suck but because Western countries didn't import them. There were trade embargoes against all Communist states (including modern day ones like Cuba; China, of course, is an exception because capitalists will sell their soul for money). If there were no embargoes, you would have seen more of it...

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    18. Re:hmmm by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 1

      T34

      It wasn't _better_ than Panthers or Tigers. Soviets could just manufacture more of these.

      MiG29

      Again - it used to be a legend of Soviet aircraft industry, but actually when independent evaluations became possible (after reunification of West and East Germany) turned out to be a crap. German Air Forces are giving them away for free, certainly not because they find them superior to F-16'.s

    19. Re:hmmm by afidel · · Score: 1

      I'll say they will have to degrade, considering it costs over $22K/year to house a prisoner in the US (not counting amortization of the $100K per cell construction costs) it would be MUCH cheaper to just hire people for minimum wage =) Also most manufacturing has left the US and Japan, have standards of living suddenly plumeted into the toiket? No you say, maybe that's because we have become a service and idea driven economy, much like the enriched parts of China and India will become. Do I think that the wealth will be evenly distributed or that it will end hunger in either country? Don't be rediculous, I know better, but a sizable chunk of the population will be brought out the subsistance living they have today, at the very least it can't get much worse for them.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    20. Re:hmmm by vudufixit · · Score: 1

      The AK-47 is an assault rifle or an infantry weapon, not a machine gun. Its popularity stems from its inexpensive construction and price - not to mention the fact that the Soviet Union basically dropped them off for free or nearly for free on client state and third-world countries it wanted to control. It is quite reliable, but it's not as well-made or accurate as Western assault rifles. After some kinks were worked out in the late 1960's the M-16 is now known for incredible reliability. Although I agree that Soviet technology is underrated, and I agree that there were embargoes, remember that this cut both ways. The Iron Curtain was given its name for a reason - the closed-off nature of then-Communist countries. Even with no embargo, we didn't need to import anything of theirs - our military technology was generally superior (not that they would have sold it to us), and we certainly didn't want to import their civilian goods, which in a command economy were of quite inferior design and workmanship. If you dispute that their products sucked, then look up "trabant" on the Internet - it was the Soviet Union's car for the masses, only it was worse than a Yugo and you had to wait years for one.

    21. Re:hmmm by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 1

      The reason you don't know of any good products out of Communist countries is not because they suck but because Western countries didn't import them. There were trade embargoes against all Communist states (including modern day ones like Cuba; China, of course, is an exception because capitalists will sell their soul for money). If there were no embargoes, you would have seen more of it...

      Believe me, I've seen plenty of them. Much more than I'd ever want to. Communist-made cars. Communist-made TV sets. Communist-made stereo sets. It was the crappiest crap I've ever seen. You'd have to actually try it to believe it. The quality of these products was beyond the wildest imagination of anyone in the Western world. If you never drove Lada or Yugo, if you never watched TV on the Yunost TV-set, if you never had a Raketa watch, you don't know the true meaning of the word "crap".

    22. Re:hmmm by echomadman · · Score: 1

      Talk? No, I don't think they wanted me to talk. Torture was just their way of having a good time on the old POW. Brutes, but the trouble is now they make such good bloody cameras.

      --
      "he's full of get up and go" "really?, he fills me with lie down and die."
    23. Re:hmmm by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      On the other hand, I had two Sekonda watches which kept perfect time for years (and these were clockwork), were durable, and were dirt cheap. Both were lost due to loss (watch straps breaking and me not getting those replaced quickly enough) rather than mechanical fault.

      How the Ladas and Sekonda watches could have come from the same place, I never understood...

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    24. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It's not just the parts, but how they're put together that makes a product well designed.

      In apple's case, the whole powerbook/ibook is put together by taiwanese OEM/ODMs. Now unlike dell, compaq and most x86 laptop brands, apple still does some design themselves, but I don't believe they play much of a role in manufacturing.

      > Similarly, the amount of thought and design that goes into a Powerbook versus something like
      > a Dell Latitude means that although the HD and memory and all the other commodity component parts
      > are the same, the design of the cases and where these components are placed go into giving Apple some
      > of the best built laptops in the industry.

      There are plenty of build problems with powerbooks, ranging from overheating to motherboards and optical drives crapping out after half a year. I see little evidence that they're significantly more (or less) reliable than dells.

    25. Re:hmmm by chenyu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Another person that doesn't understand China.

      Nepotism and lack of transparency are not as big of problems as you think they are. If you are a Western company doing business in China, you will most likely find the brother-in-law of the Politiburo, put him on your board of directors, and pay him enough so that he doesn't mess things up for you. It doesn't cost that much more than a good lawyer would, and if brother in law of Politburo one demands too much, you can always drop him and go to nephew of Politburo two. (I'm oversimplifying. In most cases, you probably don't want a nephew of a Politburo member. The nephew of the county administrator would be more useful, but you get the idea.)

      China is not Communist in any meaningful sense of the word. About 20 years ago, the Chinese leadership figured out that Communism doesn't work, so they junked that system.

    26. Re:hmmm by kruczkowski · · Score: 1

      Your starting to remind me of my childhood when I would get russian toys cars that had razor sharp edges.

      --
      hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
    27. Re:hmmm by KH · · Score: 1

      I got to agree to ACs above.

      I can't think of using any other laptops from Apple, and I do own an iBook and writing this on an 12 inch PowerBook, but I wish they were made in Japan.

      I saw a lot of QC problems with the iBook (breaking off the backlight cable, twice (!), breaking off the AirProt antenna, and power supply acting funky) and this PowerBook is also showing QC problem (case not fitting right, and of course the heat).

      Still, it would be unaffordably expensive if they were made in some other places like Japan.

    28. Re:hmmm by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      "This is alarmist and unwarranted. Name me a country like the US or the UK that has developed and then as you claim "undeveloped" when everyone left. It doesn't happen."

      It hasn't happened because up to now it has been difficult to move businesses back and forth. Due to the efforts of the WTA and other organizations it's now simple. You are already seeing jobs flowing overseas from the US. It will only accelerate as time geso by.

      "Free trade is a good thing(TM). People that argue against it on economic (not talking environmental) grounds are normally trying to prop up dying industries or modern day McCarthyists."

      The environmental arguments are powerful ones. The wrold can not afford to raise everybodies standard of living to the US level. Just not enough trees and water for that.

      "I find the parent post's idea that we're all going to end up working in jails quite ludicrous to be honest."

      It's already happening. I posted links to it. Did you read them? Some country will figure it out eventually. If the US and china can sell their prisoners to corporations why can't india or sudan? There are millions of "untouchables" in india that could be rounded up and sold to corporations for dirt cheap.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    29. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It hasn't happened because up to now it has been difficult to move businesses back and forth. Due to the efforts of the WTA and other organizations it's now simple. You are already seeing jobs flowing overseas from the US. It will only accelerate as time geso by.

      WTA? I assume you mean WTO.

      I've said it before, I'll say it again. Free trade is good.

      Let me give you a specific example. The US Farm Lobby is extremely powerful. You know why? Because they represent the vestiges of a once almighty industry that is now nothing more than a shadow of its former self. However, because it was once so powerful, it has managed to continue to lobby congress to subsidise it. So, not only do American consumers pay more for their food, they pay more taxes that get handed out in subsidies to the farmers.

      That is one of many examples.

      If we look at the jobs that are being shipped off-shore, what are they? Jobs like call-centre grunts, right? The only reason the companies are doing this is because consumers vote with their wallets - they look at the products on the shelf, and go "hey, product X is cheaper than product Y. I'll buy product X". Which is fine, until they get their tech support for X which comes out of India. If India can do as good a job as the US, then there's no problem. A job that a cheap Indian can do is equal to the job that a more expensive American can do. Market economy at work, just the borders spread a bit. If the Indian can't do a good enough job, then consumers don't buy the product again. Either the Co goes bust, or re-employs the American call-centre people.

      Regardless, the point is that the US should set it's goals to be making its population that far in advance in education that companies want to locate there because of the talent. If you start trying to compete on price, you won't win - there are hundreds out there willing to do it cheaper. It's absolutely no different to walking into any big city - you've got your Harvard educated lawyers, who'll take only the big well paying jobs (usually, not including pro-bono), then you've got your no-name grads who'll take the smaller cases, then you have your small service providers - people working in retail, whatever. Would you expect the Harvard guys to start working in retail shops?

      Likewise, all the Indians are doing is taking the shitty no-good jobs away from the US. That's why there's no textile industry there any more. SE Asia can do it cheaper. You get cheaper shirts. Yes, there is short term dislocation, but in the long term both societies benefit from it.

      But this attitude is what shits me so much about the US. Freedom and democracy and capitalism until *gasp* it starts to hurt us a little bit. Well son, you can't have it both ways. Are you guys the leading lights of the free capitalist world, or do you pull back into your shells whenever it gets a bit tough?

      The environmental arguments are powerful ones. The wrold can not afford to raise everybodies standard of living to the US level. Just not enough trees and water for that.

      I never said the environmental arguments were not powerful - quite the opposite. But trade and the environment are not diametrically opposed - you can still have both. In fact, becoming a developed country is often the best way to ensure that a nation is environmentally aware.

      It's already happening. I posted links to it. Did you read them? Some country will figure it out eventually. If the US and china can sell their prisoners to corporations why can't india or sudan? There are millions of "untouchables" in india that could be rounded up and sold to corporations for dirt cheap.

      Oh, I see, so what, you're saying that the US and China have locked up prisoners specifically for the purposes of slave labour? You're kidding me buddy. These guys have been given due process of law. They were locked up and asked to work AFTER they were fou

    30. Re:hmmm by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      "I've said it before, I'll say it again. Free trade is good."

      Some people believe that religion. I don't.

      "So, not only do American consumers pay more for their food, they pay more taxes that get handed out in subsidies to the farmers."

      I really don't see how this proves free trade is good. subsidies abound in all industries in all countries. Your example has nothing to do with free trade.

      "Likewise, all the Indians are doing is taking the shitty no-good jobs away from the US. "

      Do you really think programming is a shitty no-good job? Do you really see all manufacturing as being shitty no good jobs?

      "But this attitude is what shits me so much about the US. Freedom and democracy and capitalism until *gasp* it starts to hurt us a little bit. Well son, you can't have it both ways. Are you guys the leading lights of the free capitalist world, or do you pull back into your shells whenever it gets a bit tough?"

      As I said some people see free trade as a religion and some people don't. The job of the US govt is to protect and save US citizens. Not to serve some higher ideal of capitalism or free trade especially if it hurts US citizens. The same is true for every country.

      "Oh, I see, so what, you're saying that the US and China have locked up prisoners specifically for the purposes of slave labour? You're kidding me buddy. These guys have been given due process of law. They were locked up and asked to work AFTER they were found guilty."

      I don't know about china. My guess is that not everybody got due process there. I am also sure not every body in the US got due process. Nevertheless that point is moot.

      The govt has incentive to jail people, it can keep the jails full by making silly things illegal like smoking dope, gambling,prostitution etc. It can take any activity that people enjoy and make it illegal to make sure the prisons are full.

      "You know how much it costs to keep a prisoner for a year? It's a lot - can be up in the six figure range. If you think that you're getting slave labour, I'd argue they're absolutely no damn different to six-figure bureaucrats. They cost too much and they don't do shit."

      It depends on the prison. For example there are people in Cuba and other concentration camps scrattered across the world that are housed in very small chain link cages. They have no beds, no toilets, no roofs. I don't think it costs that much to give them a bagel or two a day do you?

      In arizona there are hundreds of prisoners kept in communal tents. They have cots and a fabric roof and walls. They eat better then the people in cuba. Still though pretty cheap don't you think.

      Other prisons are more posh I admit but clearly the US has differing levels of treatment for prisoners and none of them have been found to be illegal.

      I imagine that the US could very easily set up Hitler style concentration camps. Give the prisoners a communal building with a shelf for a bed, a toilet and some showers. Dig up some historical photos if you want to see what that was like. Better then the cuban and the arizona prisoners but worse then rikers island. Given this you could house prisoners for cheap. Certainly less then 5K per year. You could easily rent these prisoners to corporations for 10K and make a tidy profit.

      You could also just sell them to the corporations. Simply sell the prisoner to Nike for example and let them house and feed the prisoner any way they want. When the sentence is over Nike gives the prisoner back (if he/she is still alive). Once again you can sell them at 5K per year and make some nice money.

      Once you have accepted the morality of prison labor the sky is the limit.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    31. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people believe that religion. I don't.

      It's not a religion. It's a simple economic fact.

      I really don't see how this proves free trade is good. subsidies abound in all industries in all countries. Your example has nothing to do with free trade.

      Man, FFS! How do you think Govts stop free trade, huh? Subsidies are the key way it's done in the US! The other way are tariffs - both end up costing the US consumer more, and encourage people to work inefficiently in dying industries. There are no positive long term effects from these barriers to trade - just no politician is courageous enough to stare down the lobbies.

      Do you really think programming is a shitty no-good job? Do you really see all manufacturing as being shitty no good jobs?

      Programming is becoming the clerking of the 21st century. The ideas are where the value is added. That is what should be focussed on.

      Manufacturing in most instances is the same. How many well paid manufacturing jobs do you know of? The only exception is, like with programming, where highly sophisticated goods are being produced. Like aircraft. Otherwise, any old idiot can do it.

      Besides the point, how do you think all those 18th and 19th century empires became so wealthy? I'll tell you - by using cheap foreign labour. They increased their economic output by allowing the countries offshore to bear the weight of the grunt work. The US will be the same - if it owns all the capital, where the labour is conducted is for the most part irrelevant.

      I don't know about china. My guess is that not everybody got due process there. I am also sure not every body in the US got due process. Nevertheless that point is moot.

      let me rephrase it then. Do you have any evidence to suggest that a person in either of the US or China was incarcerated so as to work in slave labour?

      If not, you're doing nothing more than scare-mongering.

      The govt has incentive to jail people, it can keep the jails full by making silly things illegal like smoking dope, gambling,prostitution etc. It can take any activity that people enjoy and make it illegal to make sure the prisons are full.

      The Govt does not have an incentive to jail people other than they've broken the law. They cannot jail someone unless they have not complied with the law! That's what the justice system is there for.

      And the US in particular does not have an economic incentive to jail people: "In some states, it costs more to house a prisoner than send a student to Harvard"
      http://washingtontimes.com/commentary/20030728-084 134-5711r.htm.

      The foreign states often have a smaller GDP per capita than the US, so although in absolute terms they spend less than the US, in relative terms it is a similar figure. You have to build jails, employ guards. And it's hardly like prisoners are the most educated and dedicated workers.

      I imagine that the US could very easily set up Hitler style concentration camps. Give the prisoners a communal building with a shelf for a bed, a toilet and some showers. Dig up some historical photos if you want to see what that was like. Better then the cuban and the arizona prisoners but worse then rikers island. Given this you could house prisoners for cheap. Certainly less then 5K per year. You could easily rent these prisoners to corporations for 10K and make a tidy profit.

      You're dreaming, buddy. It won't happen. Other than the fact that the public wouldn't let it happen - did you not hear what happened to the prison that was doing recycling for Dell? And, we're not talking making money for Dell here - just recycling what would have been otherwise landfill! As soon as it was dis

    32. Re:hmmm by Malcontent · · Score: 0

      "let me rephrase it then. Do you have any evidence to suggest that a person in either of the US or China was incarcerated so as to work in slave labour"

      IF they did nobody would admit it. It happens in an indirect way. Today there are many prisons that are private. These corporations buy human beings and cage them. The states pay the corporations to warehouse their humans and the corporations in turn sell the humans to other corporations. In a very real sense there is a "free market" in buying and selling humans.

      As long as there is porfit to be made these corporations lobby for and get tougher sentencing laws (witness the recent demand by Ashcroft that judges hand out longer sentences). They also lobby for more intrusive laws. It's in their interest to criminize more behavior.

      "And the US in particular does not have an economic incentive to jail people: "In some states, it costs more to house a prisoner than send a student to Harvard""

      notice that it says "in some states". It does not say "in all states". As I said previously there are prisons in the US where prisoners are kept in tents and chain link cages. In those prisons the cost to house prisoners is very cheap. Since no court has found these prisons to be cruel and unusual more and more prisons will cust costs eventually.

      "You're dreaming, buddy. It won't happen. Other than the fact that the public wouldn't let it happen "

      As I said before it's already happening. Nobody is complaining about the cages in cuba, nobody is compalining about the tents in arizona. Most americans don't give a damn what happens to prisoners. maybe the dell deal fell down (great!) but lots of others are going on today and will continue on and be expanded in the future.

      "The morality of it is that a majority of the people incarcerated have committed serious felonies, and have leeched off society. "

      first of all "serious felony" includes smoking dope and prostitution. That phrase is meaningless. Until recently anal sex was a "serious felony". Secondly most people in prison are there for theft, petty robbery, drug use or dealing, or prostitution. Basically crimes of poverty.

      "While they remain in prison, we're paying for the privilege."

      sorry but that's your choice. As long as America feels that common acts should be illegal and that people should be sentenced for decades for petty offences you have no choice in the matter. As long as America feels like incarceration is the only way to deal with crime you will continue to build more prisons every day and fill them to the brim.

      "I don't want to see them outsourced to private companies"

      That's exactly what is happeing. You should be outraged instead of defending the practice.

      "but I can think of a number of positive things that they could be doing whilst locked up."

      Most of them should not be locked up in the first place. If you only lock up the violent or the criminally insane you can pretty much let them sit on their asses.

      "Other than sitting on their asses waiting to get out and re-offend, like most of them do."

      I have no doubt that an otherwise normal person who enters the prison system for drugs or petty theft leaves a hardened criminal. The prison system breaks and corrupts people. A young kid can enter the system because he held up a 7/11 and leave a murderer. That's what happens after years of gang rape, countless assaults and having your spirit broken.

      Prisons are the best mechanism known to mankind for turning otherwise sane (if desparate or stupid) people into evil.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    33. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IF they did nobody would admit it. It happens in an indirect way. Today there are many prisons that are private. These corporations buy human beings and cage them. The states pay the corporations to warehouse their humans and the corporations in turn sell the humans to other corporations. In a very real sense there is a "free market" in buying and selling humans.

      The outsourcing of prisons is one thing. Like I said, I'm yet to see any evidence of people being incarcerated purely on the basis of them being cheap labour. It is quite simply cheaper to hire someone on the minimum wage than jail them for labour.
      http://writeaprisoner.com/crime-prevention.htm:
      F ACT: The average cost to incarcerate an adult inmate in a Department of Corrections institution is approximately $24,500 per year.
      FACT: The construction cost of each new cell is approximately $100,000. (That's per cell, not per prison!)

      The numbers simply don't stack up.

      If you want to make the argument that people are being jailed because they make for cheap labour, at least bring one scrap of evidence (and I'm not talking about a link discussing prisoners being productive while the state pays for them to be denied freedom!). You're saying the tail is wagging the dog - I have not heard of anything to justify what you've said.

      As long as there is porfit to be made these corporations lobby for and get tougher sentencing laws (witness the recent demand by Ashcroft that judges hand out longer sentences). They also lobby for more intrusive laws. It's in their interest to criminize more behavior.

      I'm hardly an Ashcroft fan. But I don't believe he did it so as to appease the big Corps - but rather, because of his deep-seated conservatism and his desire to appeal to the populist "tough on crime" approach.

      Like I said, I disagree with almost everything Ashcroft stands for, but in no way would even I stretch to saying he's getting tough on crime so as to provide slave labour!

      As I said before it's already happening. Nobody is complaining about the cages in cuba, nobody is compalining about the tents in arizona. Most americans don't give a damn what happens to prisoners. maybe the dell deal fell down (great!) but lots of others are going on today and will continue on and be expanded in the future.

      You pay your taxes. What do you get when people are arrested and put in jail? Squat diddly. Everyone pays thousands in taxes each year for jails, and then criminals go and do what?

      Nothing. They sit there.

      I don't think that having crooks being productive is such a bad thing. Maybe not for private organisations, but there are plenty of other ways. Anyway, giving them work to do builds self-esteem, and I think in many ways is more likely to assist in making them productive members of society.

      orry but that's your choice. As long as America feels that common acts should be illegal and that people should be sentenced for decades for petty offences you have no choice in the matter. As long as America feels like incarceration is the only way to deal with crime you will continue to build more prisons every day and fill them to the brim.

      Whatever. This is fast going off topic.

      What I state: free trade is a good thing. I've never said that corporations being able to hire prisoners is a good thing, but I do think they should be made to do productive work while they're being held at our expense. That's part of the reason that the courts won't find it "cruel or unusual". Furthermore, there's the inmates choice involved - they choose to do it.

      I don't believe that free trade in any way contributes to your notion that people are being locked up as slave labour. I can't speak for countries like China, etc: I haven't been there. You get

    34. Re:hmmm by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      "The outsourcing of prisons is one thing. Like I said, I'm yet to see any evidence of people being incarcerated purely on the basis of them being cheap labour."

      As I said, it's enough that a system exists whereby people in prison are bid out to corporations. Once the profit motive is in place there does not need to be a direct correlation. People are not stupid. Nobody is going to pass a law saying arrest people because we need cheap labor. It's enough to set up a system whereby people are making money from the prison population. The rest of the dominos fall into place automatically.

      "FACT: The average cost to incarcerate an adult inmate in a Department of Corrections institution is approximately $24,500 per year."

      This is till lower then the mean wage for a working person in the US. Also that number represents the average there are lots of prisons where the cost of containment is significantly lower. Finally (and I keep saying this) the courts have ruled that keeping prisoners in chain link cages and communal tents is perfectly OK. Pretty soon most for profit prisons will start to do that. They can bring down the cost of housing prisoners to below 5K per year while collecting 24K per year from the states and selling the prisoners labor for another five to ten thousand per year.

      "FACT: The construction cost of each new cell is approximately $100,000. (That's per cell, not per prison!)"

      See above. The actual construction costs don't really matter anyway. You can make it over the lifetime of the cell.

      "But I don't believe he did it so as to appease the big Corps - but rather, because of his deep-seated conservatism and his desire to appeal to the populist "tough on crime" approach."

      he did it to appease the campaign contributors. Amongst those were people and corporations who profit from longer sentences.

      "You pay your taxes. What do you get when people are arrested and put in jail? Squat diddly. Everyone pays thousands in taxes each year for jails, and then criminals go and do what?"

      that is why Jail should be the last resort and not the first. That is why gambling, prostitution, drug use should be legalized. The answer is not to buy and sell human beings for profit.

      "I don't think that having crooks being productive is such a bad thing. Maybe not for private organisations, but there are plenty of other ways. Anyway, giving them work to do builds self-esteem, and I think in many ways is more likely to assist in making them productive members of society."

      For every prisoner filling a job position one honest, hardworking non criminal is out of a job. Prison labor is bad for the country because it leads to higher unemployment. Nobody who is going to support a family can compete with a prisoner for a job. A prisoner works all day for $10 to $15 dollars.

      "I don't believe that free trade in any way contributes to your notion that people are being locked up as slave labour"

      I think free trade does indeed contribute. Not only that but it will contribute more in the future. getting back to the start of this conversation.

      The corporations will always go the cheapest available source of labor. The cheapest available source of labor is slavery. One day some country (perhaps the US) will imprison or enslave a significant portion of their citizens and sell them to corporations for rock bottom price. All the "shit" jobs will migrate to that country immediately.

      The groundwork for that scenario is already being laid in the US where prisoners are bought and sold and put into indentured servitude. Where both the state and corporations profit from arresting and jailing people.

      it won't be long now, mark my words.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

  11. Still, they are to be controlled by western corps. by gotr00t · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Though the simple task of manufacture has been handed down to the Chinese, it is still the western companies that design and market the devices.

    I think that we all know that mainland China manufactures a lot of stuff, but what does this prove? That cheap labor attracts business? It comes to me not as any suprise that this was eventually going to happen. A major leap forward would be that China has the most laptop users in the world or possibly that a Chinese computer company has outsold one of western counterparts, but this is really no big suprise.

  12. Am I the only one... by imag0 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Am I the only geek who flinches when they see the word "Be" in a headline? (think BeOS, best operating system in the universe).

    Ok, i'll stop jumping so hard when I see headlines like that, just please stop writing "Be" with the upper case letter in headlines.

    Doc already told me to lay off the caffiene.

    Please, Zeta guys, release it already!

    :wq!

    1. Re:Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only geek who flinches when they see the word "Be" in a headline? (think BeOS, best operating system in the universe).

      Yes

    2. Re:Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.

      Be, Inc. is dead.

      "Be" was a word long before it was a crappy Rhapsody-wannabe OS.

      Let it go, fanboy.

  13. Laptops.. ehh by ThoreauHD · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm more concerned about the missle manufacturers producing parts over there. The DOD seems to have lost their fortitude when it comes to executing people for treason. Perhaps that will change before they nuke us for interfering with Taiwan.

    I think laptops fall into the category of toilet paper and rice balls. Who gives a shit. Nobody's gonna die cause your crappy Dell can't run WinblowZ 2010.

    1. Re:Laptops.. ehh by shione · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually you should care. If China stayed a shithouse state then you're more likely to be 'nuked'. Look at how n korea is and how they envy the south. Not very peaceful there is it?
      but I put nuked in commas because you wouldn't go attack someone that owes you $100b each year. Nor would you be building the worlds largest dam or the worlds tallest building or the world's longest trans-oceanic Bridge (completed) or the worlds biggest condom just to risk losing them all in a war.

      Regarding your comment about 'who gives a shit', when the standard of living in China improves to the level of 1st world nations and the chinese people get smarter from the money their parents spend on their schooling (which they make by working like slaves in factories such as these laptop places about to be built) there will come a time when the people will in force demand for a more democratic govt. Sure these students might be a bit brainwashed but education unavoidably = free thinking and if they don't get what they want they will fight for it. Or maybe the country will change over peacefully. If it happened in the former USSR it could happen again.

    2. Re:Laptops.. ehh by afidel · · Score: 1

      Umm, you don't think China with its vast resources and large pool of educated personell can design missle guidence chips, don't make me laugh. Remember we designed accurate ICBM's in the 70's when computers were in their infancy, today it's a sucker who doesn't think any industrial country can do the same. Hell you don't even have to be all that industrialized, North Korea makes their own and they are about as poor a country as you can get (are they the only country in the world that spends a higher percentage of GPD on their military than the US?).

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  14. In Other News... by Valar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    People are finally realizing China isn't quite as bush league as they thought.

    Seriously though, China is a manufacturing superpower. They have lots of high tech neighbors willing to put money into China (and they aren't doing so badly with their R&D either), a huge population, and a large/rapidly expanding production capacity. They really are in an ideal place to manufacture all kinds of electronics.

    1. Re:In Other News... by burns210 · · Score: 2, Informative

      ya, and the cheap labor helps too...
      Do you think China would be as popular a place to manufacture things in if it had salary laws similar to the US?
      Granted, there are many things that give
      China a strong hold in the 'made in X' market, but not having to pay each worker the equvilent of 6-7 US Dollars an hour has to be a huge factor.

    2. Re:In Other News... by shione · · Score: 1

      In a single year theres more foreign investment flowing into China than all the other asian countries COMBINED.

  15. and where is the USA by Stanley+Feinbaum · · Score: 1, Funny

    How come WE aren't the number one manufacturer of laptops. Perhaps it's time we became less dependant on asian countries and started building our own computers with our own technology! Who would trust chinese made computers anyway? Communist governments are known for using backdoors and spying. Is our data really safe ?

    --

    Stanley Feinbaum, professional journalist and master debater! God bless the USA!

    1. Re:and where is the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Perhaps it's time we became less dependant on asian countries and started building our own computers with our own technology!

      Would you buy a mid class laptop for $10,000?

      > Who would trust chinese made computers anyway? Communist governments are known for using backdoors and spying.

      Friend, given your country's administration attitude, in a few years you'll fear not to live in a communist country.

    2. Re:and where is the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Communist governments are known for using backdoors and spying.

      Facist governments are also known for using backdoors and spying (Echelon, DCS-1000).

    3. Re:and where is the USA by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      Communist governments are known for using backdoors and spying. Is our data really safe ?

      As a pose to US developed MS software which is totally secure and not at all hackable..

    4. Re:and where is the USA by aminorex · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you're right. I want my Clipper chip!
      It's my right as an American!

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  16. Quality by Heartz · · Score: 1
    Somehow I don't associate quality with goods that are made in China - regardless of the manufacturer. And it think it holds true for a lot of people.

    Manufacturers must realise that cost savings is not everything these days. People want quality too.

    1. Re:Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you rather pay $2000 for a Athlon 2000+ notebook that will last 10 years (2 years for the battery), or $1000 for an Athlon 2000+ notebook that will break in 2 years?

      In 2 years, the $2000 one is worth $100, and the $1000 one is worth $100.

    2. Re:Quality by shione · · Score: 1

      Well from your example I would take the 2g one since its lasts 5 times as long. Its second hand value only means something to me if I intend to sell it after 2 years. No matter how many years I keep a computer it will still be able to run what I wanted it to do when I first bought it.

      If I only intend to keep it for 2 yrs because of higher expectations I have from my computer than I still would get the 1g one because it would be worth zilch, not $100 because its broken. Or if the parts are worth more than 100bucks than the 2g one should be worth more than that since its working.

      Lots of people don't mind using 2year old computers, myself included.

    3. Re:Quality by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      And 50 years ago, people thought the same thing about electronic goods that came from Japan. Dr. W. Edwards Deming did a large part in changing all that. Now, Japan is a leader in a lot of industries.

      Okay, so 50 years from now, will China be where Japan is now? Maybe, maybe not. And, no, I won't be buying a laptop from anyone, much less China this year. Next year, who knows?

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    4. Re:Quality by finallyHasANickname · · Score: 1
      Manufacturers must realise that cost savings is not everything these days. People want quality too.

      Hey! I thought we were talking about laptop PC's! Now I'm completely confused.
      Price: $2000, MTBF ~1 year, 4000 sales
      Price $600, MTBF ~1 day, 400,000 sales.
      Right? Shouldn't that just about show the tilt on the demand curve? I mean if a computer of high quality for a price premium were all that popular, then all the rich kids would be playing Quake 18 (or GTA 2 or whatever these days) on full-blown UN*X workstations at 8 grand each.

  17. I don't know about you... by imag0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    .. But I welcome our Chineese Laptop overlords.

    1. Re:I don't know about you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not me...I voted for Kodo.

  18. local Consumption ? by ramzak2k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I dont see to many "Made in China" laptops at the stores here in Canada. The one i am typing this on is made in Japan (Toshiba satellite) and another major laptop brand Dell has all its production facilities in US except maybe the desktop units for the japanese market.

    --

    Siggy Say, Siggy Do
    1. Re:local Consumption ? by cperciva · · Score: 3, Informative

      I [don't yet] see [too] many "Made in China" laptops at the stores here in Canada.

      That's beacuse companies don't like to advertise that fact. Companies often outsource their production; and as long as they do some basic testing, who will know the difference?

      I don't know if this is still the case, but at one point IBM was outsourcing the production of its low-end laptops to Acer; Acer is one of the companies investing in mainland China.

      IBM laptops aren't going to be labelled "Made in China" any time soon, but they could certainly have been made there.

    2. Re:local Consumption ? by ctr2sprt · · Score: 1

      Oh? Mine's labeled "Made in Mexico," which is hardly any different. Seriously, in the realm of electronics you either buy foreign or you don't buy at all. Is there anyone who still doesn't know this? My father, the most rabid "Made in USA" advocate I know of, long since gave up on trying to buy USA-made tech. It was a combination of resignation (you just can't do it) and recognition (10 or 20 years ago, stuff coming from Asia really was junk; but now it's as good as or better than American stuff). And he's not exactly tech-savvy.

    3. Re:local Consumption ? by buckazoid · · Score: 1

      : IBM laptops aren't going to be labelled "Made in China" any time soon, but they could certainly have been made there.

      Oh? Under my x30 (bought in February this year) is a little label that says just that...

    4. Re:local Consumption ? by cowbutt · · Score: 1
      Expecting the label to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth is naive.

      I have a Toshiba Satellite 3000-214 which I know is essentially the Compal ACL-00. The label says "Assembled in Europe" (Germany, I think), but that implies manufactured elsewhere, probably China or Taiwan.

      In the UK it's common practice for consumer electronics to be assembled here, typically by factories funded significantly by government "regional (re)development" grants. Doing so allows goods to be considered as "made in the EU" and thereby avoid import tariffs based on the price of the finished product.

      --

    5. Re:local Consumption ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A long time ago in a galaxy far away, I worked for a company that made concentrators. When the company name was on the black box, the price was about a grand. When the "specially" manufactured goodies went through the to-be-sold-as-if-from-IBM packaging routines, we noticed that all of Our Company references--on the backs of chips and everything--were removed. Some were even given bogus "IBM" markings to make it appear even inside that IBM had not outsourced this work. We even had to send the pallets of finished goodies to a place where IBM compatible packing techniques and bar coding info were "installed" at the "crate level"!

    6. Re:local Consumption ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, all Dell laptops are now made in Malaysia. It has been that way for about 6 months now.

    7. Re:local Consumption ? by darkwhite · · Score: 1

      My T40 (IBM's flagship model and best-seller) says "Made in China" on the bottom. In fact, most T40s and other product lines are made there. The build quality is extremely good.

      --

      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    8. Re:local Consumption ? by PCM2 · · Score: 1
      That's beacuse companies don't like to advertise that fact. Companies often outsource their production; and as long as they do some basic testing, who will know the difference?
      So true. Lucky for us that we live in a country governed by the rule of law. Companies might not want to disclose where their goods came from, but that's kinda too bad.
      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  19. US Made? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, who makes laptops in the USA anymore? Anyone? Fuck China, I will NEVER willing by anything of consequence from there.

  20. Quality by rf0 · · Score: 1

    You get what you pay for. Now all off this might push prices down which is good but what about the quality? Some of the laptops I've used from China (which were bought by the company I worked at) and TBH they sucked. Unreliable, bad screens. Now I don't want to tar all of China with the same brush but I can't help but think this will happen.

    My $0.02

    Rus

  21. Re:Hopefully not macs... read this! by siddhartha03 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Looking under the hood, it gets worse. While all other *nixes use standard ELF binaries, Darwin (Apple's name for their proprietary "Unix" kernel) does not. Ummm, Darwin is open sourced, www.opendarwin.org. And almost everything is "standards" compatible. Run Samba or almost any other common unix app and it will go AND work. So quit your griping. Jeez, they just changed the "windowing" environment as you call it. And I think they got that from NextSTEP.

    --
    Sock puppets stole my sig.
  22. Re:Well. by sekzscripting · · Score: 1

    Fuck, should have posted as anonymous. In other news, you should all be scared.

  23. All Cheer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All cheer and support our brutal and oppressive communist allies in technology production!

    As if I give a shit about it, it's better that they make it there and fuck up their country with pollution and shit than mine.

  24. The problem with Taiwanese business man by BurningTyger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    >IMS Research says that by the end of the year People Republic of China
    >might become world's biggest laptop manufacturer. The plants
    >will be largely owned by Taiwanese manufacturers, though.
    >Taiwan is current #1.

    The problem with business man in general is that they drift where the money is, and care less about the impact to their own country (if they even consider Taiwan to be a country in the first place, regardless if they were born there).

    The impact to the shift of labtop industry from Taiwan to China (by Taiwanese company) are two folds.

    First, China gains a competitive edge to the industry, and to the overall economy of China and can later be used to bargain against Taiwan. (Heck, China already is using the new found money from its booming economy to buy 3rd world nations' support against Taiwan)

    Second, Taiwan loses leadership in the industry, the economy suffers, unemplyeement rate increases due to the moving of manufacturing plants to China.

    Most Taiwanese people still fail to realize that China is still a hostile nation towards Taiwan. And China still threaten to invade or bomb Taiwan if Taiwan refused to reunite with China.

    God.. I mean... can you imagine American business man supporting Iraq so that Iraq has more money to build missles to aim at US ??

    1. Re:The problem with Taiwanese business man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >God.. I mean... can you imagine American business man supporting Iraq so that Iraq has more money to build missles to aim at US ??

      Sure I can. The US government themselves funded him (along with the Iranians).

    2. Re:The problem with Taiwanese business man by CheeseCow · · Score: 1

      Except that there are no such missiles. Or at least none have been found yet.

    3. Re:The problem with Taiwanese business man by z01d · · Score: 1

      Good point, and I'd like to add...

      Most Taiwanese people still fail to realize that China is still a hostile nation towards Taiwan. And China still threaten to invade or bomb Taiwan if Taiwan refused to reunite with China.

      1. Most Taiwanese realized that, so they invest oversea, as well as Mainland. Do you know how many Taiwanese invest estate, even settled in Mainland, especially Shanghai? you'll be surprised.

      2. Maniland threaten to bomb Taiwan if it claim to be an independent country, not refused to reunite.

    4. Re:The problem with Taiwanese business man by shione · · Score: 1

      You could look at it that way. Another way is that it improves trade relations between the two countries so they can better resolve their differences amicably.

      It wasn't all that long ago when China resumed shipping freight directly to taiwan.

    5. Re:The problem with Taiwanese business man by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      can you imagine American business man supporting Iraq so that Iraq has more money to build missles to aim at US ??

      USA has done that in the past (late 80's). Who was it that armed Iraq in the first place and facilitated the transfer of chemical weapons to it? You guessed it: USA. Why? Maybe it was worth it for the oil...

      I think you have found out the truth about businessmen everywhere...they, especially if they are capitalists, will do anything for money... the goal of the wealthy is not to develop a country or help it. Nope! Their goal is to make enough money so that they can leave the country and go and live in a tax-sheltered one like Bermuda or Monaco

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    6. Re:The problem with Taiwanese business man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God.. I mean... can you imagine American business man supporting Iraq so that Iraq has more money to build missles to aim at US ??

      Thats exactly what did happen. Google for the words 'our kind of guy' and Iraq.

      Or are you being sarcastic?

    7. Re:The problem with Taiwanese business man by BurningTyger · · Score: 1

      Actually, No I wasn't being sarcastic... I was trying to search an example at 4am in the morning to show how support your enemy is utterly stupid, and I completely forgot about US actually did support Iraq...

      So a better example is "can you image American businessman supporting Bin Laden so that he can build...."..... Oh wait!.... America did support Bin Laden before!.... hummmmmmmm.........

    8. Re:The problem with Taiwanese business man by BurningTyger · · Score: 1

      2. Maniland threaten to bomb Taiwan if it claim to be an independent country, not refused to reunite.

      The situation right now is that Taiwan government (a.k.a Republic of China, ROC) still believes that it is still the rightful owner of the mainland. However, there are pressure inside the island to abolish this notion and instead recognize that ROC only owns Taiwan only.

      By declaring ROC only owns Taiwan, it implicitly recognizes that PRC (People's Republic of China, i.e. Communist China) rightfully owns Mainland. It also implicitly recognizes PRC as a separetely country by Taiwanese government instead of seeing PRC as rebel scums that temporely occupy the mainland.

      The irony is that, Communist China is ok when Taiwan see it as a rebel scum. Communist China is ticked off when Taiwan wants to treat Communist China as a nation.

      - A pessimist from the city of sadness

    9. Re:The problem with Taiwanese business man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      85% of the people in Taiwan consider themselves to be "Chinese". The constitution of Taiwan explicitly says that mainland China, Taiwan, and Tibet are one nation. The Taiwanese support this position even though the Chinese army continues to rape and kill Tibetan nuns. Please see "Tibet Online".

      Further senior military officials in Taiwan's military regularly go to China to obtain lucrative jobs. In exchange for these jobs, they provided information about the American military weapons purchased by the Taiwanese government. A recent example of this kind of military-technology hemorrhage is the F-16 fighter aircraft. Taiwanese military officials have already given the necessary specs to Beijing.

      Let's put an end to this nonsense. Boycott products "Made in Taiwan" along with products "Made in China".

    10. Re:The problem with Taiwanese business man by aminorex · · Score: 1

      > "can you imagine American business man supporting Iraq so that Iraq has more money to build missles to aim at US ?"

      Why yes, I can. Then I can imagine his son becoming
      President of the United States, and his partner the
      Vice President.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  25. Re:Well. by Gherald · · Score: 1

    In other news, you should all be scared.

    A link to a printer friendly page! /me experiences a mild orgasm

  26. Re:MOD PARENT UP by siddhartha03 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Apple is a monopoly. They make their OS and their hardware propreitary. How is Microsoft worse than that? Microsoft makes a great product, and they have done for longer than Apple. Just because most computer users choose the ease-of-use and professional style of Windows, means it's a monopoly? Riiight... That's not a monopoly, apple control's its own hardware. NOT the whole computer industry. Why don't they port Safari? They have no moral reason to or any reason to whatsoever. Apple isn't in the business of making apps for windows, they make their own OS.

    --
    Sock puppets stole my sig.
  27. The immorality of Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Having read the article thoroughly, this startling news shows the flaws in the brewing Open Source Zeitgeist that is gripping the software community. Have you considered that providing software for free to countries such as China is essentially tacit support for oppressive regimes?

    Far-fetched? Think about it: With MySQL, the People's Army will now be able to do multiple queries on their tables of democratic activists in Olog(n) time instead of lengthy searches in card catalogs. The bureaucratic overhead previously allowed activists enough time to flee the country. How about building cheap firewalls so the people can't get the unbiased reporting that CNN provides? Or using Apache to publish lists of Falun Gong people to their police forces instantly? I doubt that never crossed your minds when you were coding away in your parents' basements. Consider putting that little thought in your mental resolv.conf file.

    If that does not concern you ( which it probably doesn't, since the slashdot.org paradigm is publishing articles about how not to pay for things ), consider something else. When China eventually goes to war with Taiwan, we want to be able turn their command and control facilities into the computing equivalent of a train-wreck. One of the advantages of Windows never mentioned in the article is the ability of Microsoft to remotely deactivate Windows XP in the case of a national emergency. Thanks to GNU/Lunix, Taiwan will be on a collision course with the mainland in the near future.

    Which throws into question Mr. Stallman's motives. A known proponent of socialism, the Chinese government and RMS are natural allies. Could it be a back door to Stallman's dream of an uber-Socialist United States? We may never know for sure. Next time you consider contributing to an open source project, ask yourself this question: don't you want to make sure your work isn't used for nefarious purposes? Will you risk having blood on your hands?

    1. Re:The immorality of Open Source by siddhartha03 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I doubt Stallman would consider The People's Republic of China a TRUE socialist country. But anyways. Why does it matter that they use it? Are you saying because something can be used in a "bad" way such as you described we shouldn't do it in the first place? And about Microsoft being able to shutdown XP remotely. Would that really matter in a war? Would shutting down ALL their computers damage the millitary that much?

      --
      Sock puppets stole my sig.
    2. Re:The immorality of Open Source by kaltkalt · · Score: 0

      I can't tell if you are being sarcastic or not, but just in case you're not... don't be a fool. Just because something can be used for bad purposes or by bad people doesn't mean the thing itself is bad. Guns, for example. Guns can save lives (i.e. a cop using a gun to take out a terrorist before he kills hostages, or using it to defend your house from a burgler who has entered in the middle of the night). Yeah, guns can also be used by bad people (like the terrorist taking the hostages or the burgler). Does that make guns bad? No. Things cannot be good or bad. It's what people do with them that is either good or bad. Only really stupid people believe inanimate objects have morals.

      And do you really think if China had to either live in the dark ages or pirate expensive shit, they wouldn't opt for the latter? Like it's either card catalogues or open source because china just can't afford to pay for legitimate, expensive software. They don't have a DMCA either, so they don't have to worry about being tossed in jail for breaking some copy protection crap.

      Microsoft will remotely de-activate windows XP in case of a "national emergency" eh? heh, I don't think so.

      --

      Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
  28. Raptop Readers by Kennycat · · Score: 1

    You're going to be the what again? Could you say that one more time? You have our gratitude...

  29. Re:How do I fix my Trailer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who is Michael Sims?

  30. Re:How do I fix my Trailer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the guy who posted this story on slashdot

  31. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm older than you, dumb shit poser ass rancher fuck face dickhead nimrod pea brain..

    Your command of logic makes me hard. I want to have your children, cousin.

  32. Re:Saturday Night Party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm drunk as fuck.

  33. China != Taiwan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As USA!=Canada!=UK!=Australia, they speak the same language doesn't mean they are the same country.

    1. Re:China != Taiwan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, taiwan isn't internationally recognised as being a country.

  34. Most are made in China. by Kurt+Russell · · Score: 3, Informative

    ODM links
    I think Apple powerbooks are now made by Compal.

    1. Re:Most are made in China. by MikeXpop · · Score: 1

      What on earth made you think that? Apple and IBM are one of the only major laptop manufacturers who sell laptops they make.

      --
      Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
    2. Re:Most are made in China. by Kurt+Russell · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately they don't.

      Google for it.

    3. Re:Most are made in China. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best Link I got all night. If I had any more points I would give u +1 for informative.

      If anyone reading this has any free then please give him one.

  35. Our technology + R&D, their labor. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not our labor? Ask the unions.

    1. Re:Our technology + R&D, their labor. by kcelery · · Score: 1

      Ask the consumers if they would pay twice the price if all parts and labour are local.

  36. Ever heard of an ODM? by Sagarian · · Score: 1, Troll

    Original Design Manufacturer. They are not just about cheap production labor -- they design the whole computer from motherboard out, create entire product roadmaps etc... and deliver it on a platter to OEMs who want to slap a label on it.

    they are taking away all the business from tradition EMS type outsourcers (Solectron, Flextronics, Jabil, et al) in desktop computers and are on the move in laptops

    The perspective that it's entirely about cheap production labor is both naive and flat wrong.

  37. Rand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Been reading Ayn Rand again eh?

    First chapter of Capitalism: TUI goes over that. Good stuff.

    Mac.

  38. Re:Still, they are to be controlled by western cor by chenyu · · Score: 1

    You need to separate design from marketing. Most of the design of the laptops are by Taiwanese companies. The marketing gets done by Western companies.

  39. Production = Capital by poptones · · Score: 1
    When you become the leading supplier of technology and those same factories can be used to build pretty much any technology, who says the engineering has to come from the US?

    You can call a chinese manufacturing company, tell them what you want the product to do, and (assuming thye don't already have such a product) they will design it (or add your eatures to their existing product), build a prototype, and schedule production and delivery for you. All you need is an idea and a marketing plan and you, too, could become the next tivo.

  40. Wow... by taped2thedesk · · Score: 0, Troll
    Help! I'm trapped inside a laptop factory!
    [Moderation: +3 (70% Funny, 30% Informative)]
    Informative? Gotta love slashdot moderators ;)
    1. Re:Wow... by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      The only way that could be informative if he really was trapped inside a laptop factory. Come to think of it, that's not a bad idea... snack on the worker's lunches, play with the new laptops.... hrm....

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
  41. Re:Saturday Night Party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm high and drunk. fucked

  42. Little Suse? by s-orbital · · Score: 1

    More like a little Red Flag for that nice new laptop of yours...

    --
    Patent: from Latin patere, to be open
  43. NewsFlash! by Dr.+Bent · · Score: 4, Funny

    This just in: They make stuff in China.

    Stay tuned for these other breaking developments...

    - Scientists discover it's really cold in Siberia.
    - U.S. Justice Department admits life not fair.
    - FDA Bombshell: Eating too much can make you fat.

    all this and Andy Rooney, tonight on 60 minutes.

  44. Re:How do I fix my Trailer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He is perhaps the most infamous and hated editor on slashdot. He is known for abusing his unlimited mod points to mod up his friends and mod down his enemies.

  45. Will type for food. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well considering I'm an unemployed geek. They'll have to be 99 cents in order for me to afford them.

  46. You miss one important point by poptones · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It's not pirating if the law allows it. If your government chooses not to recognize the copyright protections afforded by other nations, then it ain't piracy. The US did exactly this in the beginning - just as many underpriviledged nations still do today.

    Why do you think the US is so keen on coercing the world's nations into signing onto the WTO treaty? In the case of china, who has the power? The US, who buys all those goods? Or china, who supplies all those cheap goods the people of the US depends on?

    1. Re:You miss one important point by kaltkalt · · Score: 1

      Well sure, I do realize this, but it is still "piracy" in the eyes of those whose stuff is being used for free (there's just nothing they can do about it).

      --

      Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
  47. Mine came with a fortune cookie by bobdotorg · · Score: 1

    Mine came with a fortune cookie:

    The future will bring you many Blue Screens.

    --
    __ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
    1. Re:Mine came with a fortune cookie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try something new. Windows doesnt give blue screens anymore.

    2. Re:Mine came with a fortune cookie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try something new. Windows doesnt give blue screens anymore.

      Yea, now explorer just crashes and restarts itself. Same OS, new bugs.

  48. Of course by riotstarter · · Score: 1

    they will be the laptop leaders...all they need to do is create more hackers, oh wait this isn't C&C: Generals.

    "Laptop in hand."

    1. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We build for china!

    2. Re:Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China will grow larger!

  49. But with those 1 000 key keyboards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They won't be "laptops" anymore.

    1. Re:But with those 1 000 key keyboards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      odd. you can type in chinese now and you don't need a keyboard with that many keys.

  50. Re:Well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm... do you realize America could kill 1,000,000 Chinese people EVERY DAY for a YEAR and they would still have a larger population than us? Think about it...

  51. Re:Saturday Night Party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn...I am neither.

  52. Well, yeah... by softspokenrevolution · · Score: 4, Insightful

    China has a large and well educated population that is increasingly moving toward High Tech items, because other countires (such as Taiwan) have traditionally dominated these markets and have kept pries rather high. Using cheaper (criminally, but that's editorializing) labor they can bring to market a cheaper product (of similar quality). Heck, even software jobs are moving to south east Asia and the Indian subcontinent, in an airing of Talk of the Nation a few weeks ago, they were discussing the high levels of education and low cost of workers for fields from mechanical engineering, to software design and tech support in foreign countries, especially since the incerasing wiredness of the world and these countries in particular makes it easier (and more cost effective) than ever.

    I think that in the next few years there will be an even greater outsourcing of these sorts of projects. India and Bangladesh are typically cheaper markets then China to work in, and we can probably look forward to those countries entering into these markets.

    Now for my editorial, because I have to have it (you can stop reading if you'd like). with the US job market as tight as it is right now, it is a major ethical dillema to be outsourcing High paying jobs to countires where the worker that would make $60,000 a year here, makes $5,000 over there. It puts the US economy in grave danger of collapsing in on itself as these lucrative jobs are removed and th emarket has to return to a service and agricultural based economy (the latter of which is becoming a smaller employer but larger business by the year). In all hopes this would see the rise in the standards of living for the average person in China, Micronesia, wherever, but it doesn't seem like the transition would be quick as workers there would have to get it in their heads that they deserrve that amount of money. (To sum, it's like an emerging basketball trend, American players (on the whole) have no actual proficiency with teh sport (though they have a great deal of raw physical talent), and eastern European players do. This means an increasing influx of Eastern European players until they become complacent in their position and the Americans learn to play the game (with little things like passing, and team work)).

    Ideally, (and I'm being naive) there is a way to protect American jobs while increasing (or ostensibly increasing) the standard of living in foreign countries. If the US government, or the AMerican consumer, would refuse to allow the sale of (or purchase) goods that were manufactured or generated by workers who were not treated equally to their American counterparts. Of course, in teh drive for cheap stuff there are no rules. [end]

    1. Re:Well, yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using cheaper (criminally, but that's editorializing) labor they can bring to market a cheaper product (of similar quality).

      It's not slave labor! Have you been to china? No? People are being paid decent wages compared to the rest of the developing world. Now their wages and working conditions are improving, because even in china their is a labor shortage coming into play.

      Have you ever thought about this .. what happens to people with no jobs? They starve and die (like in parts of Africa). So just because they arent being paid $100K, doesnt mean they're being exploited. Sad part about it is that a factory worker in China has a better quality of life than a US wminimum wage worker at McDonald's!

  53. Captive audience? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't it easy to be #1 if you've got a "captive audience"

    Look at the result after Matthew shared Jesus with his captive audience

  54. Interesting...Outsourcing "/.". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well our parent company, OSDN is outsourcing Slashdot to China. The whole thing is just a coincidence.

    1. Re:Interesting...Outsourcing "/.". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well they already have slashdot.jp, so how about www.slashdot.cn or www.slashdot.co.in or even www.slashdot.cx.

  55. The Title by Gherald · · Score: 1

    "China to Be Laptop Leader" ?

    Come on, it would have been so much funnier to title it "China Be Laptop Leader."

    1. Re:The Title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, it would have been so much funnier to title it "China Be Laptop Leader."

      No, it wouldn't have been. Ebonics is so 90s.

  56. Re:wonderful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope your'e extra careful when you buy brand name stuff then, including high end electronics, fashion shoes, clothing etc.

  57. Additional note, very off topic.... by softspokenrevolution · · Score: 1

    Did you ever notice who the highest paid people in companies are, people whose salaries frequently equal that of a dozen or so employees (and more)?

    Then did you ever notice that while all of these things get outsourced, the corporate management structure doesn't go with it?

    What skills do US corporate dictators have that foreign ones do not? I'm sure tha tthe Chinese would be far better at keeping large groups of people disciplined in a hierarchicial order and getting the products out and all of that as their American counterparts.

    After all, remeber, nothing is ever really about the bottom line. It's about what's lining the rich guy's pocket.

    1. Re:Additional note, very off topic.... by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Then did you ever notice that while all of these things get outsourced, the corporate management structure doesn't go with it?

      How can you replace the guy who enriched your company? Anything to make money... If you went and destroyed 15 endangered speices but made money for your company, what will they do? Same thing here...

      I suggest that you pursue a career in upper management ;) You can become very wealthy while destroying everyone else's life ;)

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  58. Slave labor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I spent some time in China last year and I was shocked by how some of these "slave laborers" live. One guy I got to know works for a construction company, he gets a base pay of about US$100 a month. With overtime and performance bonuses, he can earn an additional US$100 in a good month. How does this guy live? Well, he OWNS a very nice 2 bedroom apartment with hardwood floors, fully equiped modern western-style bathroom and kitchen (w/ hot shower, washer and dryer, dish washer, refrigerator, microwave, etc), good looking furniture, DVD player, 30+ inch flat screen TV, computer, stereo system, digital camera, and separate cell phones for him and his wife. And he's able to have all this while putting his wife through law school. You may ask how can this guy possibly afford all this? Answer is simple, while Chinese made stuff is cheap in the US, they are much much cheaper in China! Regular prices for goods is often a fraction of what they cost in the US. If you know where to look, you can get even lower prices. And if you wait for a sale or a price war, which happens quite frequently considering how many manufacturers there are for any type of goods in China (there are like 100+ TV makers in China). Food is also incredibly cheap in China. You can have a full meal at a neighborhood noodle shop for little more than a quarter. If you cook at home, the cost is basically negligible.

    The moral of all this is that conditions for these "slave laborers" are nothing like what Americans imagine. These "slave laborers" own 230+ million cell phones, live decent lives, and have enough left-over to sent money home to support entire extended families. OTOH, living conditions for the 900 million peasants in rural China is really really bad, and that's why there seems to be an endless stream of people competing eagerly to become "slave laborers".

    1. Re:Slave labor? by shione · · Score: 1

      Good points. Another thing you could add to that is China has a growing number of working couples who have 0 or 1 kids. That means more money can be devoted to consumer spending and owning the family home. I remember reading somewhere that bringing up a child to the age of 16 costs 1/3 of the parents yearly income in each of those years.

    2. Re:Slave labor? by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      I don't think that means anything. Either you spend it on your kids, or you spend it on other stuff. The only difference is between (short-term) consumption and (long-term) investment...

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  59. Re:MOD PARENT UP by shione · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    What was there to see at the oddpost link?

    It loaded up fine in my Mozilla Browser.

    then I opened it in IE. Both look and function the same to me.

  60. Re:Still, they are to be controlled by western cor by xyvimur · · Score: 1

    `` it is still the western companies that design and market the devices''
    As for today yes, but Chinese are working hard on their own CPU, have their `own' linux distro that suits their politics and one day we may see Chinese `Red Dragons' available on the market.

  61. Re:Still, they are to be controlled by western cor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    western companies?

    Start thinking multinational.

  62. Colonel Blimp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    From a european perspective, this isn't news. we've always had respect for the chinese and their economic might.

    You americans have a fair amount of
    unreconstructed Colonel Blimp in you.
    cheers.

  63. Re:Well. by sekzscripting · · Score: 1

    Thank Matt Drudge. I'm a lazy motherfucker.

  64. Re:Warning Sign: Taiwanese Money&Tech. Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The Taiwanese constitution itself insists that Tibet is part of China

    Yes, and the Taiwanese constitution also insist that Taiwan is a part of China, The Republic of China that is (which is what Taiwan's official name is).

  65. Re:Saturday Night Party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, and I got fucked!

  66. Laptop = Apple? by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 1

    Funny thing about those anti-Apple trolls. They used to put those rants into any Apple-related discussion. Now they start to put them into anything laptop-related - which means they equate "laptop manufacturer" with "Apple" in their own minds. And I can agree with that :-)

    1. Re:Laptop = Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple's laptops fucking suck. A laptop having a pointing device with only one mouse button molded into the case is a level of ineptude only Apple could be capable of. Plus, they're fucking touchpads...

      If you actually bring an Apple laptop where other people can see it, you know they're laughing at you. Especially when you launch quicktime and instead of playing that gay porn video you wanted to watch you get a popup that says "Order Quicktime Pro!".

      I'd take a laptop made in China any day over Apple's crap. Apple = Quality is a myth spread by people who have dilluded themselves into believing it because they paid too much. Don't believe me? Look on eBay for broken Apple hardware.

      As long as there are stupid fucktards that pay $20 per foot for speaker wire, think K&N airfilters give them 15 extra horsepower and really believe "spring water" is somehow better than tap, Apple will have a market for its overpriced, form-over-function, illusion of quality, different is better, bullshit computers.

  67. How do they label these laptops? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Made in China" or "Hacked by Chinese"?

  68. Dead Pixels by gremlins · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they shoot you for each dead pixel

    --
    just because your a schizophrenic doesn't mean people arn't really out to get you
  69. Visit and see.... by djupedal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...jobs, jobs, and more jobs. I'm leaving South Korea to work in China soon, and I couldn't be happier.

    Tech is just one part, but business is booming, and now is the time to get in.

    1. Re:Visit and see.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I can see where I'd be excited to move to the land of forced abortions and the Great Firewall.

    2. Re:Visit and see.... by djupedal · · Score: 2

      Beats bush and ashcroft :)

    3. Re:Visit and see.... by chenyu · · Score: 2

      Whereas the United States is the land of racial lynchings, serial killers, and snipers.

      Yes, I know that this is a distorted view of the United States, that there are a lot of nice things about the U.S. and you get into very misleading stuff, if you look at the worst about country.

      What was your point again?

  70. Re:Warning Sign: Taiwanese Money&Tech. Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "Republic of China" does NOT mean Taiwan is a part of China! It is merely stating the fact that the true Chinese government is actually in Taiwan. (say what you posted to any Taiwanese, I dare you)

  71. UK!=Australia by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1
    The Queen of Great Britain (England/Wales, Scotland) and Northern Ireland is also the Queen of Canada (AFAIK) and the Queen of Australia (they had a vote recently - she won) (and New Zealand for that matter).

    And surely the descendants of those slave-owning native-land-grabbing rebels (Thomas Jefferson et al) will soon be back in the fold once they realise their mistake... just as the renegade mainland will rejoin taiwan.

  72. It's A New World Record! by SEWilco · · Score: 3, Funny
    People Republic of China might become world's biggest laptop manufacturer.

    Generally people have wanted the smallest laptop, but someone has to set the record for the biggest laptop.

  73. Motherboards too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    A couple of weeks ago Digitimes was reporting (registration required) that by the end of the year over 50% of motherboards will be produced in China.

  74. Re:Still, they are to be controlled by western cor by LittleStone · · Score: 1

    Though the simple task of manufacture has been handed down to the Chinese, it is still the western companies that design and market the devices.

    This is a troll, I would mod it down if I have mod points. Get your fact first. A lot of notebook computers are designed by Taiwanese companies (ever heard about how Asus is heading towards ODM on notebook, not to mention Compal?), not the traditional western companies. And most probably Asia is the test point for marketing the latest model of notebook computers.

    At least, it's not that difficult to identify many notebooks from many different brand names shared a similar design: all of them are customized product from ODM solutions provided by one of the Taiwanese companies (Compal was/is?? the leader in this area.)

    Mainland China is catching up fast in the area of designing too. It wouldn't surprise me if major new consumer computer products are mainly designed in Mainland China in 5 years. All you need is a couple thousands well trained engineers and industrial designers.

    --
    A sig is redundant.
  75. Chinese products suck by rinkjustice · · Score: 2

    China might become world's biggest laptop manufacturer.

    Yeah, they'll usurp the laptop market with ultracheap, super low quality products that don't work properly just as they've done with most electronics. No wait, most products you find in North America period!

    Strange how business people in capitalist countries will opt for inferior products from an opposing communist country (with a horrible human rights record) just to save a few bucks and be competitive in the free market society they hold so dear. The irony is too much.

  76. If the laptops are anything like Chinese food... by Frogking · · Score: 1

    ...you'll want to buy another one an hour after you start using it! This could really be the thing to boost the global economy... addictive devices!

  77. How low can you go? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems to me like the Taiwanese have moved their production to China where labour is cheaper. Similar to how companies that moved their call centres and programming teams to India are now looking for even cheaper places.

    What bugs me is that I'm an unemployed programmer, and I can't compete with people who consider 4000/year a good wage. Plus, anyone who employs me needs to pay tax, social security and contribute to my pension.

    Where will it end? Is someone gonna code for food?

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  78. morons recommend portability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    being able to relocate, & also maitain communications is relevant to these times.

    more breathing. consult with/trust in yOUR creator. vote with yOUR wallet. that's the spirit.

    yOUR intentions/behaviours will disempower the greed/fear based georgewellian fuddite murdering thieves. that's not a trick you say? right again.

    should we (that includes you) fail to assist in the termination of the behaviours of the Godless execrable, there'll be few ports that are worth visiting.

    pay attention. it's affordable, & can leave one with the sense of not being misled by the walking dead.

    we don't need no stinking bombs. if you're in the bomb making/shipping/firing 'business', you need to check yourself out. don't think that 'got to make a living' lament will hold up at all.

    the lights are coming up now. we're in crisis mode. you can help. do us all a favor, for a change.

    pairannoyed? you bet. if you're not, you might want to get some help having your process cleared.

  79. Dragon CPU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The article doesn't mention it, but does anyone know if these laptops will use the dragon CPU?

    j

    1. Re:Dragon CPU by kcelery · · Score: 1

      M$ programs does not run on Dragon, you guess?

    2. Re:Dragon CPU by jack_csk · · Score: 1

      I guess those CPUs are too slow to use
      (I thought those processors are still at the
      power of Pentium II level)
      at that time.

  80. Dell Laptops by xintegerx · · Score: 1

    On account of Dell closing all it's U.S. laptop factories, you can bet your money that the models don't magically appear out of thin air--they are made in other countries.

    Actually, the laptops aren't only made in other countries, but they are made by OTHER companies who build stuff and slap the Dell logo on them. I think IBM is the only company that actually makes its own laptops, whether here or across seas.

  81. Mandarin input is faster. by Analogue+Kid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Apparently you know very little about Mandarin, or it's input. For Japanese input, there is a big speed penalty. But Chinese input is faster.

    Most people in Taiwan use either bpmf input or canjie. Most people in mainland China use either pinyin or canjie. Bpmf and pinyin are phonetic input methods which are approximately the same speed as English. Canjie input is based upon the structure of a character instead, and is MUCH faster than English input. I can type over 200 words per minute with canjie, and many professional typists can type at over 300.

    There is no "slowing factor" in typing Mandarin. In fact, I would argue that by lacking a meaning based orthographic system, that English is a "slowing factor".

    China will own IT.

    --
    I'm a gnu world man.
    1. Re:Mandarin input is faster. by ThunderRiver · · Score: 1

      NO you are wrong.

      Chinese input is the slowest I have ever seen. Don't get me wrong. I was born and raised in Taiwan, and the typing in mandarin is totally impossible for me. When I can type 5 words per minute, I can type up to 100+ for English characters.. that's something Mandarin can't beat. also, I don't really care what mainland China typing method is because I think Chinese Simplified is degraded ugly and crappy.
      Japanese typing is faster than Chinese because their characters can be accomplished with Roman phoenatics.

      There is "speed panelity" with chinese character, and there is no doubt about that.

    2. Re:Mandarin input is faster. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see how wpm == owning IT. Seriously, unless IT becomes nothing but secretaries and data entry jobs, what the hell does it matter what your typing speed is as long as it isn't peck and find?

    3. Re:Mandarin input is faster. by happylight · · Score: 1

      I don't think you have any idea what you're talking about. I was born and raised in Taiwan too. And ok my typing speed in Chinese is like 5 words (charaters) per minute. But you obviously haven't seen a professional typist type. They DO type 200+ characters per minute. Definitely faster than English.

    4. Re:Mandarin input is faster. by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      you obviously haven't seen a professional typist type. They DO type 200+ characters per minute. Definitely faster than English.

      It's pretty silly to compare the typing speed of two very dissimilar languages. A Chinese character is not exactly equivalent to an English word. Generally speaking, the Chinese analogue to the English word is the "tze2", usually composed of two Chinese characters. If we are to compare the speed of entering an English paragraph and its Chinese translation, English will probably win out. The average English word is (as far as typists are concerned) 5 keystrokes, and the keyboard is optimized for English. Note, for example, that the biggest key is the space bar, which is entirely unused in Chinese texts.

      The truth about Chinese typing is that most casual users are very slow. Professional can achieve good speeds, but that is a highly specialized skill. In English speaking countries, typing 20-40 wpm is typical.

    5. Re:Mandarin input is faster. by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      what the hell does it matter what your typing speed is as long as it isn't peck and find?

      The problem is that Chinese text entry for the dominant majority of users is peck and find. Only specially trained professionals manage impressive speeds. This means, for example, that adoption of email is likely to be slower than in a civilization accustomed to typing.

    6. Re:Mandarin input is faster. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China will not own anything...

      1. The concept of ownership is foreign to this country of 1 billion animals.
      2. One day, the West might wise-up to the fact that we're not only losing low-wage manual labour jobs to these slant-eyed rice monkeys, but all of the economic activity associated with that sector of the labour pool. Once the American people realise that these communist savages are ACTUALLY stealing their jobs, the Senate will begin to reflect that in their foreign policy.
      3. Chinamen are HORRID drivers. This has nothing to do with the original post, but it's fact.

    7. Re:Mandarin input is faster. by _Qiang_ · · Score: 1

      i was born and raised in china. and although i don't know much about canji input, but i do see people who using canji input are typing faster than the using pinyin input. just the fact that you don't know how to type in canji and you don't like simplified chinese doesn't make any sense to whether chinese input are slow.

    8. Re:Mandarin input is faster. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I guess that means you *don't * welcome our new Chinese overlords?

    9. Re:Mandarin input is faster. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The U.S. will no longer own anything...

      1. The concept of ownership is forgotten to this country of uneducated morons.
      2. One day, the West will wise-up to the fact that they're not losing low-wage manual labour jobs to anyone because nobody is ACTUALLY stealing anyone's jobs. These ignorant, self-centered whiteys will implement barbaric foreign policy that will make the rest of the world even more pissed off at them than ever.
      3. Whiteys are even more HORRID drivers than Chinamen. This has nothing to do with the original post, but it's fact.

  82. She didnt win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    and the Queen of Australia (they had a vote recently - she won)

    She didnt win. The crap Republican model that the politicians offered lost. If they had of asked simply, "Should Australia be a Republic", it would have been a dominant majority.

    The Queen and Australian Government is an embarrassment. Australia is no place for a monarchy, it goes against all Australian principles.

    omcioo--

    1. Re:She didnt win by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1
      If they had of asked simply, "Should Australia be a Republic", it would have been a dominant majority.

      And you would have got the same broken scheme. Aren't you glad they actually spelled it out instead?

      If you have a referendum which says "(a) status quo. (b) change" then you either have to follow it with a different referendum (as NZ did when they went to proportional representation) or you get stuck at halfway house like the UK house of lords where they got rid of heriditeries but didn't introduce elections, leaving appointees.

  83. But for prices what does that mean.. by Bruha · · Score: 1

    Literally prices are way too high for laptops and has anyone looked at used laptops? I swear they've averaged at 1 dollar per mhz for any decent laptop without any serious defects. I wish my truck had that kind of depreciation.

  84. Re:wonderful... by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    I don't buy name brand stuff.
    I don't buy "fashion" clothes or "fashion" shoes.

    I pay attention to where things are made and I buy American made products if there is anyway possible. In cases where it's not possible to buy an American made product, I try to buy the product that's made in a country that supports freedom and not tyranny.

  85. Nooo! Made in China!! by ThunderRiver · · Score: 1

    Noooo! Help me out! Our laptops are being invaded by red army!! It is made in China.. it has built in trojan horse to "counter-strike" the one that was built-inside Windows by Microsoft!

  86. Uh, excuse me one second, by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    TROLL? FLAMEBAIT?? Are you kidding me??

    All the things I said are documented fact.

    PROVE that stuff from China is high quality and not total crap. You can't because it is crap.
    The only quality products ever to come from China where silk and chinaware a few hundred years ago. Now they just crank out cheap crap to flood Wally World with so they can the Chinese communist military machine running..

    A HUGE percentage of the "goods" made in China are made by prison labor, namely political prisoners, I.E. those dissidents that oppose the State.

    The communist government is murderous. Ever seen the video of Tiananmen square butchery??

    How about Tibet? Or those people that just want to do that exercise thing in the park??

    Boy, if you think that China is anything other than a murderous, oppressive country, you live in a bubble.

    When you buy crap from China you HELP keep that system running. Every TV you buy made in China or Tiawan puts another AK-47 in the hands of a Chinese soldier that will use that AK-47 against his own people and will gladly use it against Americans if told to do so.

    The Chinese are spoiling for war, they support North Korea, they've been caught RED handed stealing nuclear weapons secrets (W88 come to mind eh?), missle secrets, they are forever spying on America.

    They even threatened to wipe California off the map with nuclear weapons if we interfered with them when they were reclaiming Tiawan and again if they weren't granted MFN trade status.

    And we gave in to those terrorist threats. What's wrong with that picture eh??

    You folks better come out of mommies basement and wake up!
    Turn off the Sci-fi channel and take the red pill. Or just take the blue pill and be happy..

    Your choice. No troll, no flaimbait, just truth..

  87. Are you sure about that? by Goonie · · Score: 1
    From what I've read, the MiG-29 was about as good as the F-16 in combat, and that Russian missile systems may have been better. Sure, the electronics on the MiG were a pain in the arse, but they apparently worked OK.

    Care to cite a reference for your version of events?

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
    1. Re:Are you sure about that? by Trurl's+Machine · · Score: 1

      Sure, the electronics on the MiG were a pain in the arse, but they apparently worked OK.

      Well, doesn't a sentence like "electronics on this fighter is poor but the rest is OK" resemble me something like "It's a great TV-set, just the screen quality is poor"?...

      Care to cite a reference for your version of events?


      Unfortunately not. I remember a press commentary to the news that the ex-Luftwaffe MiG's were given to Poland as a "gift". The commentary was pointing out that after millions of deutschmarks and euros put into modernizing MiG's to meet NATO standards, they are still virtually worthless and thus Luftwaffe decided that it's better to give them away for free rather than drown another megaeuro into further modernization. For Poles, it is also not a machine of a choice but simply a stop-gap solution until the F-16's arrive. That was the general line of that commentary.

    2. Re:Are you sure about that? by Goonie · · Score: 1
      Well, doesn't a sentence like "electronics on this fighter is poor but the rest is OK" resemble me something like "It's a great TV-set, just the screen quality is poor"?...

      No, what I meant was that they were sometimes awkward to use, but they were effective enough.

      I did some googling on this topic, and the conclusion seemed to be that the difference between the MiG-29 and F-16 was small enough that the determining factor was the pilot quality. The MiG engines were shitty things to maintain, though, which may be the reason why air forces don't like them very much.

      --

      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
      --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
    3. Re:Are you sure about that? by KH · · Score: 1

      I actually just read that Germany was giving away MiGs to Poland, but I understand that it has a lot to do with logistics and infrastructure. There were like about 30? MiGs in the former DDR, and I'm more than certain that everything needed to keep them going was different from what they used and still use in the BRD. Thus, just to get rid of logistics nightmare, it seems like a good idea for Germany to give them away for free, from military standpoint.

      OTOTH, the Poles have been flying MiGs for decades. They have the infrastructure.

      And BTW, if you want to compare Soviets and Western fighter planes, one should bring up the Su-27, 29, 31, 33, 35, etc. Those are much superior to anything the West could offer.

  88. Re:Still, they are to be controlled by western cor by chenyu · · Score: 1

    I've actually doubtful that much will come of this in the near term.

    1) Chip design is very hard and very capital intensive, and Intel and AMD have a lock on the market. Creating an indigenous world class chip is going to take decades.

    As far the short term, I think that the chances for the dragon chip being a commercial success are far lower than the VIA CPU.

    1) The big problem for Linux in China is that China has weak IP laws. Because China has weak IP laws, everyone runs with pirated copies of Windows.

  89. Japanese input is also faster. by jpatokal · · Score: 1
    Apparently you know very little about Mandarin, or it's input. For Japanese input, there is a big speed penalty.

    Err, no, there isn't. The approach used is different (predictive phonetic input for Japanese vs character stroke input for Chinese), but that's because the underlying languages are also radically different, despite the superficial similarity of the writing system.

    Most Japanese these days bemoan (a little exaggeratedly) that they've forgotten to write by hand, since it's so much faster and easier to write by computer. And besides, we all know how poor the Japanese are at designing electronics and coding games, right?

    Cheers,
    -j.

  90. AIoeJk? by Analogue+Kid · · Score: 1

    UA+/-+/-oItuvwoIj/(R)t|h@1/4EO. /|nearomanji. iOromanjieJkS|/eJkS|/oO. 1/4gea(R)EOA+/-oihiragana,katakanaAUO~|r(kanji),1/ 4ga(R)EOo|rO~|r. (C)OHS|ik1/4gea@1/4EO.

    nOAIU3/4eIU,A@(C)w|r+/-oO. |HU3/4eAo3/4C,iO3/4C|nHaAnI^aH(R)Aa|h! @hOI`eJkAU|n,iOq{|+/-`|IU3/4eeJk. |pGAn+/-HUemail, R"NOSPAM" U|n(C)_,3/4DAIOeJk.

    p (analogueNOkidSP@silAMiconashes.net

    --
    I'm a gnu world man.
  91. Re:Saturday Night Party by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn editors and their saturday night parties!

  92. MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    There is nothing in that article that is a troll. Furthermore, the article is on topic. The discussion is about laptops built by Chinese labor and facilitated by Taiwanese technology.

    Perhaps, the problem is that the moderators do not like the reasoning of the article, and the only way for them to attack it is to hide it.

  93. Boycott Notebook Computers Made in Taiwan or China by reporter · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    According to a video clip shown at the website for the BBC, the Chinese beat a North Korean women to the ground as she tried to flee to sanctuary in the Japanese consulate. Her crime was trying to escape from starvation in North Korea.

    The crime in this discussion forum is that the Taiwanese support mainland China. Please read "Warning Sign: Taiwanese Money and Technology Supports Mainland China". "Made in Taiwan" = "Made in China". If you support human rights, do not buy any notebook computers made in either Taiwan or mainland China.

  94. Information about Japanese input by Analogue+Kid · · Score: 1

    I'm quite familiar with Japanese input. Actually what you say about Japanese forgetting how to write by hand is true. Most young Japanese have problems remembering characters. Japanese has a HUGE disadvantage compared with Mandarin (or any other langauge I know) for input. There are 2 big problems.

    1) Japanese has 3 character sets
    Whenever you write a word you have to chose whether you want it to be hiragana, katakana or kanji. There are general rules to be followed, but the are not absolute! Grammatical particles are always kanji, and foriegn loan words are always katakana, BUT many times the same word could be written in any of the 3 depending on situation and the feeling the author wants to communicate. Usually you would see hiragana in a personal context, kanji in a formal context, and katakana in advertising. The result of all of this is that a phonetic input system must be used, and after phonetics are input, the user must select which of the 3 alphabets to use. In the best case scenario the computer would choose correctly wherever only one script is permited, and require just a few strikes of the space bar in other cases. This is still slow.

    2. Lots of homonyms
    Japanese has borrowed a huge portion of its vocabulary from Chinese. Chinese was (and still is)tonal. Japanese isn't. As a result Japanese has a LOT of homonyms. For example, "denki" can mean a light, electrical appliances in general, a romance novel, or a biography. They all have different Chinese characters, but the sound are the same. In cases like this the user has no choice but to either hit the space bar until they get the word they want or worse yet pick up the mouse and click the desired character from a box. This is madenning. I have never met ANY Japanese programmer who types over 100wpm, EVEN if you count hiragana particles as words!!!

    In Mandarin, you will never have problem #1. If you use a phonetic input system such as bpmf as most novices do, you have problem #2 to a small extent. Being tonal, there are far fewer homonyms in Mandarin than in Japanese, but there are a few. I realize inputting the tone takes a keyboard strike, but even counting the tone, no word is more than 4 keystrokes (and you don't need spaces between them, like in English).

    If you use canjie (cangjie to some), or another radical based system you well never have problem #1 or problem #2.

    I hope this was informative, I work with Japanese who come to Taiwan for business on a regular basis, as well as corrospond with them through email, and these have been my experiences. If there is some newer and better Japanese input out there, I'd love to see it. It would be a big time saver for me!

    --
    I'm a gnu world man.
  95. Good Points: China and Taiwan are a Menace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Below is a quote from the parent article.
    TROLL? FLAMEBAIT?? Are you kidding me??

    All the things I said are documented fact.

    Apparently, mere facts are not enough. The author of "Warning Sign: Taiwanese Money and Technology Supports China" went to great lengths to insert HTTP links to relevant articles from reputable sources that verify the key points that the author presented. However, the SlashDot moderators designated her article as a "troll" and as "off-topic" commentary.
    1. Re:Good Points: China and Taiwan are a Menace by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

      Hmmmph! And who is modding these fact filled posts down??

      I would say that the only people that would mod such posts down are those that are afraid that the truth be exposed. Agents of the communist Chinese government in the midst of /. ???

      The only people afraid of the truth are those that have something to hide.

      "A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.
      An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.
      But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys,
      heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims,
      and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men.
      He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city,
      he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist.
      A murderer is less to be feared."

    2. Re:Good Points: China and Taiwan are a Menace by chenyu · · Score: 1

      Or maybe you are the Communist agent. You do realize that one of the main goals of the Beijing government is to have the United States withdraw support for Taiwan.

    3. Re:Good Points: China and Taiwan are a Menace by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

      You can't possibly be serious.

    4. Re:Good Points: China and Taiwan are a Menace by chenyu · · Score: 1

      No I am serious.

      Read any issue of the People's Daily, like this

      http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/zhuanti/Zhuant i_ 133.html

      and the main compliant that the China has against the United States is that it is selling high tech weaponry to Taiwan. If the United States abandons Taiwan, PRC can take over which is exactly what Beijing wants.

      Also keep in mind that the only reason all Taiwanese high tech industries haven't moved to the PRC before is because of the the Wassanar Agreement that makes it easier for Taiwan to get technology.

      .

    5. Re:Good Points: China and Taiwan are a Menace by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

      No, I mean you can't possibly be serious in thinking that *I'm* an agent of the Chinese or Tiwanese government??

      To use a well known phrase, "Not a Chinaman's chance in hell" of that. I don't even know the first oriental person and I can more than assure you that there is *no* occurance of orientals in my family history, ever.

      While I belive you that there are agents at work trying to screw things up from both sides over there, I assure you, I am not one of them.

      I would like nothing more than to see *ALL* trade cut off with China and *ALL* of the Asian countries. They produce inferior crap and I don't want to buy their inferior crap and I don't want my money or my tax dollars going to support them in any manner.

      I want to see a return to goods being produced HERE in the US.

      In 1980 I wanted to buy a big, fancy, color console TV because I had a good job with a good income. I was pissed though because everything in all the stores said "Made in Chicago"

      I said "screw Chicago! I want something made in Texas damnit!" So I kept shopping around until I found a 25" Curtis Mathis console. On the back, stenciled in 1" tall letters, "MADE IN TEXAS".. I bought it on the spot, that was the number one selling point that I was concerned with. I went back a few years later to buy a VCR about the time the BETA / VHS shootout was coming to an end and was pissed to bring my $1,200 Curtis Mathis VCR home only to discover that it was made in Japan. I took it back that day (I bought it assuming everything was still made in Texas) and was informed that there were NO VCR's at all made in the USA, period, no other options.

      Then they closed the Curtis Mathis plant in Texas and moved it to Mexico, where they produce shit, they assemble Chinese parts in Mexico by unskilled, low paid workers that live in cardboard shacks and stay drunk when not building TV sets for Curtis Mathis.

      Now I have no choice in where shit is made when I buy something, it's either made in Aisa or it's made in Asia. Either choice and you get, crap. I want to buy things made in the US and only in the US. I want to see people here go back to work, I want to see *OUR* economy back up to par. I want to see the US go from being a consumer nation to a *producer* nation. We produce NOTHING here anymore, nothing.

      What's there to do? Flip burgers, roof houses, mow lawns, wash cars, mop floors???
      All the tech jobs are going offshore. All the manufacturing and assembly jobs are gone already. All the steel mills are closed and gone. No electronics are made here anymore. All the super high tech labs are in Aisa now.
      Who benefits from it? The people in those countries?? No, the DICTITORIAL GOVERNMENTS in those countries are the profiteers and they use the profits to fuel their military machines and fund their police states..

      Let's quit buying trash from third world governments and bring the jobs home. We should take care of Americans first, after all, this is America...

    6. Re:Good Points: China and Taiwan are a Menace by chenyu · · Score: 1

      Since when is being oriental a requirement of being an agent of the Chinese government? I remember that during the Cold War, most of the Soviet agents in the United States didn't have any Russian ancestry. Sometimes all you need to do is to wave a lot of money.

      Anyway, the flaw in your thinking is to think in terms of either-or. For example, all of those laptops that are made in China, where do you think the design work and a lot of the fabrication work for them takes place? In the United States. Intel, Dell, and AMD hire huge numbers of people in Austin area.

      Cutting off trade with Asia would be a net job killer. You make laptops so expensive that people can't afford them, and so you kill all of the design and marketing jobs that are based in the United States.

  96. Now if only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... the person who posted this were literate. Odds are the Chinese handle English better.

  97. #1 with a bullet... by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    "The plants will be largely owned by Taiwanese manufacturers, though. Taiwan is current #1."

    At least until they get the shit blown out of them by the massive bulk of missiles China has produced specifically for targeting them...

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  98. Xenophobia by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 1

    It's sad that Slashdot readers, who usually have a wide knowledge of many different social and political fields, and help defeat the stereotype that geeks don't know about anything, are so xenophobic when it comes to China.


    This doesn't apply to everyone on here, but it seems that plenty of people only seem to know about Tiananmen Square and prison labor. Someone on here said that "the HUGE majority" of products made in China come from prison labor. Just on the face of this, I am going to guess that 600 million Chinese people aren't in prison.


    Yes, the government of China is repressive. But probably not more so then the governments of Nigeria, Pakistan and maybe Mexico. And unlike those governments, the Chinese government does manage to provide some kind of education and welfare to its populace.


    China is not some mysterious, closed prison state. If you want to find out about China, you can go on ICQ, find a chat partner, and ask them.

    --
    Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
    1. Re:Xenophobia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The partner that you find in ICQ is not a reliable source. If you want some facts about China, try here: Facts About Taiwan and China.

  99. Stop insulting Chinese!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really don't know where you get off on all this insulting Chinese typists. Where do you get these ideas? Are you talking about farmers who's yearly earnings is about equal to the cost of a computer? Do you think they are the typical Chinese computer users?

    I live in Taiwan, and I've got quite a few buddies from HK, too. I don't not know ANY young adults who are "hunt and peck" typists here. Not only have most middle class Chinese adopted email, but we also do quite a bit with ICQ, MSM, and online strategy war games which use chatting for communication DURING battle. This isn't just a few people. Most teenagers do this.

    I'm really sick of arrogant Americans who always make assumptions about what most Chinese can and cannot do. I am NOT a "specially trained professional" typist. Neither are any of my coworkers. But we don't "hunt and peck", and we do type faster than the foriegner in our office.

    1. Re:Stop insulting Chinese!!! by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      I live in Taiwan, and I've got quite a few buddies from HK, too. I don't not know ANY young adults who are "hunt and peck" typists here.

      First you need to calm down and understand a few things about statistics. There are more potential computer users in China or Taiwan than "young adults". If, and note the "if" because this is a hypothetical example, we notice that Chinese speakers over 30 are adopting email more slowly than English speakers over 30, then we should ask why. We need to ask this question because we need to understand what is preventing them from using a new tool. Naturally, we are talking about folks who can afford computers.

      Don't know any "hunt and peck" typists? How fast does your mother type? How about your father? How about the parents of each of your friends? How about your grandparents? Do you understand the population that I'm counting now? I'm saying they should be using email, but aren't (or aren't as often as they might) partly because text entry is so tedious for them. I know they can afford computers because you and your friends can. (And please try to resist telling me how fast your mom can type. What I'm really asking is how fast people of her age group and background can type, in general.)

      What you did, probably unconsciously, was exclude the people who do not make much use of the computer. This results in a skewed sample, and the conclusion is a fallacy. This is like concluding that Linux is easy to use, because no Linux user has ever asked you for help, ignoring the masses that were too scared to even try installing Linux. You need to consider the people left out.

      Look also at the myriads of input methods. Why are people expending so much effort into improving it, if it's already good (easy to learn, efficient) enough?

      I'm really sick of arrogant Americans who always make assumptions

      Speaking of stupid assumptions, what made you think I'm American?

      we do type faster than the foriegner in our office.

      And of course that one foreigner represents the average population of English or western typists? That's the second lesson: anecdotal evidence is worthless.

  100. Glass Heart doesn't even know Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are you talking about? What is "tze2"? I know that's not international pinyin, and it's not Taiwan pinyin either, so I'm guessing it's bastardized Wade-Guiles? So you mean "zi2"? Sorry. No such word. Did you mean "zi4"? Like "word"?

    Well, whatever. They're right about Chinese typing w/ cangjie being faster. Comparing by translation even helps Chinese more, because Chinese does not have useless words like "a, the, and", etc... Chinese doesn't waste space by always writing a subject in every sentence, either. I can type faster in Chinese than English, and I've been living in America since I started high school.

    1. Re:Glass Heart doesn't even know Chinese by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      What are you talking about? What is "tze2"?

      I'm referring to a meaningful collective of usually two Chinese characters. I'm not well versed in the various pinyin conventions. The word "dictionary" is usually translated to "zi4 dien3" or "tze2 dien3". I'm referring to the first character of the latter translation.

      Chinese does not have useless words like "a, the, and"

      These words have the benefit of being very common, and even mediocre typists can enter them quickly.

      Chinese doesn't waste space by always writing a subject in every sentence

      I'm really not going to do a point-by-point on which language is more compact. For example, a Chinese poem might take an entire paragraph of English to write. On the other hand, a Chinese paragraph with uncommon characters is harder to type, while uncommon English words are only slightly more difficult to type than common English words.

      The point, in case you missed it, is that the majority of Chinese typists are much slower than the majority of English typists. That fact does and will continue to have an effect on technology adoption, because it constitutes a barrier to entry.

      I can type faster in Chinese than English

      Wonderful, but I hope you understand why anecdotal evidence is irrelevant.

    2. Re:Glass Heart doesn't even know Chinese by aminorex · · Score: 1

      I recall a paper from the 70s in which various
      natural languages were compared for "conceptual
      density" with respect to syllables by taking a
      basic narrative, expressing it colloquially in
      each language, comparing renditions for semantic
      equivalence, and counting syllables. The results
      indicated that Mandarin and English had the highest
      density, both significantly more compact than
      the romance or slavic languages, for example.
      To the degree that thought and memory are linguistic,
      I would expect this to give Mandarin and English
      native speakers something of an advantage over
      the rest of the world.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  101. Understanding Taiwan and China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please read "Facts About Taiwan" to get a better understanding of why "Made in Taiwan" = "Made in China". Just say "NO!" to notebook computers made in Taiwan or China.

    1. Re:Understanding Taiwan and China by chenyu · · Score: 1

      So where do you suggest we purchase notebooks from?

      I don't think that there is a single notebook out there that doesn't have PRC or Taiwan somewhere in the supply chain.

  102. Re:Warning Sign: Taiwanese Money Supports China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The point of the original article is that the Taiwanese insist that Taiwan, Tibet, and mainland China are all part of one nation. The Taiwanese constitution, the highest law in Taiwan, says that Tibet is part of China. It is also clear that the Taiwanese support all the geopolitical objectives of mainland China. (reference: "Facts about Taiwan"

  103. mod parent up by daniel23 · · Score: 1

    5+ insightful, me thinks.

    --
    605413? Yes, it's a prime.
  104. Some more insight into China's technology plans by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 1

    You can find more information in the Almanac of China's Foreign Economic Relations and Trade. I found the 2001 edition in the Seattle Public Library about a year ago. The 2002 edition should be available now since the edition-year indicates the year that is being reported on.

    Some of the numbers were amazing. I don't remember the pizza / hamburger / noodles metric, but I do recall that a C230 Mercedes was priced at about 800k Yuan, which is about US$100k (a $30k car in USA, and the smallest Mercedes sold here). Salaries in Yuan and US$ are supposed to be comparable, so that is like spending a million dollars for an imported compact car. The Audi A6 was priced at about half that, probably due to the fact that VW-Audi have joint venture factories in China. For those not into cars, the A6 is a midsized car with AWD and lots of cool gadgets. Logos aside, the A6 is a much cooler car than the C-class. Interestingly, the young telecom generation live a very rockstar lifestyle, comparable to the 1996-1999 period in the USA. Difference is that they are still living it. So cars like these are well within their grasp.

    My notes from the Almanac include a section from p138:
    Government encourages growth of Software and Hardware so that it reaches international advanced level by 2010. IC facilities should lead Development and Production world wide. Encourage Domestic enterprise (...)

    I recall that every page had an URL at the top pointing to a .cn web site with more statistics and information. The whole book may have been available as a PDF as well. Unfortunately, the margin appears to have been too narrow to record the URL :)

    Bonus points to anyone who posts it.

    1. Re:Some more insight into China's technology plans by chenyu · · Score: 1

      Again, it makes sense if you stop thinking about China in terms of averages. True 99 percent of Chinese couldn't afford an Audi, but 1 percent of a billion is enough customers to make luxury car manufacturers take notice. And what really has people taking notice is the possibility that 1 percent can afford the cars now, and maybe 3 percent, ten years from now.

  105. Words per Minute not relevant by Dr.+Bent · · Score: 1

    When's the last time you hired a programmer because they could type 100 words a minute? Does a sysadmin who types twice as fast as another accomplish twice as much?

    The limiting factor in Information Technology is, and always will be, the speed of human thought. Being able to type faster is not an advantage. I can only type 35 words a minute that has always been plenty.

    Or maybe it's just that I think before I code. If the developers and sysadmins in China don't do the same, it won't matter what language they use because all their products will be worthless.

  106. Taiwan by smash_phase · · Score: 1

    You have to hand it to these Taiwanese people, in becoming independant nation, they've choosen the more clever way, than let's say Catalunia or East-Timor..
    They're now just seem to be heading for total domination over their agressor..

    If you don't wanna join them, beat them..

    --
    /* Be the change you wish to see in this world - Mohandas Karamchand "Mahatma" Gandhi */
    1. Re:Taiwan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This whole article and thread is pointless as China already is #1 because Taiwan is an island and not a country. Taiwan is part of China.

  107. Ummm... by jo42 · · Score: 1


    How is this news? Everything I buy is already "Made in China" or "Made in Taiwan". And I live in North America...