Take a look at the history of the South Sea Company; the physical value of all the assets that exist is no boundary for the irrational exhuberance of an ill-informed market fed on hype from targeted manipulations.
Exactly! The undisclosed force behind this is evading sactions on trade, sanctions imposed as alternatives to warfare to dissuade bad actors from doing tings like committing genocide or using nuclear weapons as actual weapons. The potentially literal fallout of this scheme is frightening, and the fools behind it should be shot.
If you actually use bitcoin even once for anything but investment, meaning you paid the current premium price and then sold it for goods at some fixed quantity, when it increases in price this quickly then you are retarded.... Every day makes you insane. The question of buying bitcoin in the first place makes both outcomes likely, since it has no value outside of the hype and unlicensed "experts" doing the major pumping. There is some financial force behind this, and it is extremely likely to be a combination of Russia, the DPRK, and every other ever-so-nice pariah state using bitcoin to evade sanctions.
The long-standing character of the US is at stake, and this is more important than political bickering. As a remote observer Trump has turned the US into Russia of the 90s, and that is not a good thing! The US is the bastion of freedom, or at least it should be. You have monuments to that!
Now, bobblied, you personally may be a Russian troll brigade member or simply a useful idiot furthering their objectives without consideration of the long-term outcomes. In that case, I'm sorry, I don't care about you or what you say, and neither does anyone else now that the larger scheme has been exposed. I have known this from Germany since 2001, but English media is only exposed recently./P
Linguistics is very geeky, and fascinating for its relationships to everything from statistics to communications which is what justifies IT itself. Get your head out of your ass!
Exposure is cumulative, and once in the environment it is bio-accumulated in algae, shellfish, etc. Guess what that does when people eat contaminated sea food? Guess what that does when they eat crops grown in contaminated soil? Guess what that odes when they drink water contaminated by exposure from runoff? You need to learn more science, your chemistry and radiology are lacking. Reading a pamphlet for a limited occupation exposure does not inform you on its behavior in the world.
Did you miss the part about being absorbed into bones like Strontium 90? Did you miss the parts about cancer-causing for centuries? Also the bit about the largest source in the environment being from decades old weapons tests didn't tip you off at all?
"All ruthenium compounds should be regarded as highly toxic and as carcinogenic. Compounds of ruthenium stain the skin very strongly. It seems that ingested ruthenium is retained strongly in bones. Ruthenium oxide, RuO4, is highly toxic and volatile, and to be avoided."
Then the very next paragraph "Rhutenium 106 is one of the radionuclides involved in atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons, which began in 1945, with a US test, and ended in 1980 with a Chinese test. It is among the long-lived radionuclides that have produced and will continue to produce increased cancers risk for decades and centuries to come."
You sound exactly like a bad Russian troll brigade recruit. But serious answer: The environmental fate of radioactive particles is subject to quite a few natural processes, as well as human movements of contaminated materials which then are subject to different processes at the new site(s). The short half-life of ruthenium 106 and its presence in exactly two areas means more than casual geospatial separation. You have no context for any watershed movements beneath the surface or even above it. That is requried for distance to matter or not, as that is what allows the radioactive pollution to travel. Russia has long failed in enforcing clean-up of industrial sites, and the Soviet successors have only done anything with massive international backing (The Sarcophagus at Chernobyl, etc.).
So you are attempting an appeal to bias, rather than analysis, followed by faux logical appeal as attempt to parry against the reality that Nazi Germany was an extreme right-wing state. Try again, you are just brainwashed to thinking that the right can't be wrong, when in reality regressive policies are always wrong.
Low ranking means less clicks = less money so itâ(TM)s the fake news scammers that will be hit by this, not actual information integrity. Someone interested in Tibetans can search âoeTibetan Ethnic Traitsâ -Wikipedia etc and find anything as before, meaning protesters are only those with vested interest in clickbait revenues.
In Germany we memorialize the victims, not the criminals. That is the better method. The majority of the confederate statues are not from the US civil war but from the era of the fight for civil rights. They functioned as intended then, as threats to the people fighting to be equals. That is why now they have no history worth saving, and must be destroyed to destroy the last vestige of implied approval for segregationist idiocy.
No, you fucking idiot! Nazis were a far-right group from the outset founded by ex-soldiers angry at the Weimar government as scapegoat for loss in the great war where it had been drummed into their heads they would win, like their fathers and fathers fathers. The whole massive upheaval in industrial warfare reaching the frontlines on a continuous basis wasn't considered, they thought they were betrayed. That is the same sentiment that plays into the hatred of "jews" or the modern form "sjw" where everyone else knows what they really mean, and how stupid it all is. Next time they won't get away with killing the innocent, instead now any Nazi imitators will be the very first to die.
Cooling was due to particulates. There was a massive response to limit all industrial releases and it brought the release under control. There was also ozone damage from aerosols. Both prove human industrial activities have already reached the scale of earth scale effects. Global warming is from increased greenhouse effect due to similar industrial scale release of a different compound: previous stored CO2 from hydrocarbons, as well as methane, etc. with runaway heat increasing release rates from natural stores built up over eons.
God damn, you are a retarded little favor aren’t you? Go do something useful with your little fe, and stop sucking cock so much because you can’t think worth a shit or understand anything else.
In your world I'm sure math stops at linear relationships. And pi is 4. And cave men rode dinosaurs. Reality is a quite a bit more complex, and includes things like melting permafrost releasing methane and other dynamical systems.The real truth is that science shows the significantly worse outcomes are significantly more likely, and humans face a near extinction from collapse of food production, sanitation, and increased prevalence of disease along with susceptibility to everything all at once.
The problem is that global warming will render large populated portions of the globe inhospitable to human life, and there will not be a comparable "expansion" as some imagine in fantasy. Those people don't just die, the become environmental refugees as everything in the environment gets disrupted. Diseases spread by new vectors, and spread to new areas. Think a lot more.
Look into hydrology. Water goes somewhere, even when you "pump" it away from a city. When you pump fresh water into the ocean you change the salinity, and lots of things start to die quickly. Pump it into a river and it expands, too much then that creates a marsh or delta. Do that enough and you kill everything that lived on the land before. Then you are really fucked when something moves back in with no predators.
The issue of truck size applies regardless of engine, that is the point the musk bots continually miss here. There are more factors involved with loading a truck and operating it on a route for effective delivery. A van is best with any engine over short distances with perishable loads so that it can run more often to reduce spoilage, etc.
That isn't research, it is blind assumption. Look here and try to understand something. Direct address http://www.statsoft.com/Textbo... . This is as simple an explanation as exists, but it still requires you have some background in experimental design or equivalent field. Make sure you work out what the words and phrases mean in this context before moving forward. You will probably have to go backward a lot first.
Slashdot Mirror
The difference there is slow inflation in a large self-sustaining market vs inflation measured by the month faster than China grows per year.
Take a look at the history of the South Sea Company; the physical value of all the assets that exist is no boundary for the irrational exhuberance of an ill-informed market fed on hype from targeted manipulations.
Exactly! The undisclosed force behind this is evading sactions on trade, sanctions imposed as alternatives to warfare to dissuade bad actors from doing tings like committing genocide or using nuclear weapons as actual weapons. The potentially literal fallout of this scheme is frightening, and the fools behind it should be shot.
If you actually use bitcoin even once for anything but investment, meaning you paid the current premium price and then sold it for goods at some fixed quantity, when it increases in price this quickly then you are retarded.... Every day makes you insane. The question of buying bitcoin in the first place makes both outcomes likely, since it has no value outside of the hype and unlicensed "experts" doing the major pumping. There is some financial force behind this, and it is extremely likely to be a combination of Russia, the DPRK, and every other ever-so-nice pariah state using bitcoin to evade sanctions.
The long-standing character of the US is at stake, and this is more important than political bickering. As a remote observer Trump has turned the US into Russia of the 90s, and that is not a good thing! The US is the bastion of freedom, or at least it should be. You have monuments to that!
Now, bobblied, you personally may be a Russian troll brigade member or simply a useful idiot furthering their objectives without consideration of the long-term outcomes. In that case, I'm sorry, I don't care about you or what you say, and neither does anyone else now that the larger scheme has been exposed. I have known this from Germany since 2001, but English media is only exposed recently. /P
Linguistics is very geeky, and fascinating for its relationships to everything from statistics to communications which is what justifies IT itself. Get your head out of your ass!
Exposure is cumulative, and once in the environment it is bio-accumulated in algae, shellfish, etc. Guess what that does when people eat contaminated sea food? Guess what that does when they eat crops grown in contaminated soil? Guess what that odes when they drink water contaminated by exposure from runoff? You need to learn more science, your chemistry and radiology are lacking. Reading a pamphlet for a limited occupation exposure does not inform you on its behavior in the world.
Did you miss the part about being absorbed into bones like Strontium 90? Did you miss the parts about cancer-causing for centuries? Also the bit about the largest source in the environment being from decades old weapons tests didn't tip you off at all?
I hope you just don't understand the idiocy you are spouting, because https://www.lenntech.com/perio...
"All ruthenium compounds should be regarded as highly toxic and as carcinogenic. Compounds of ruthenium stain the skin very strongly. It seems that ingested ruthenium is retained strongly in bones. Ruthenium oxide, RuO4, is highly toxic and volatile, and to be avoided."
Then the very next paragraph "Rhutenium 106 is one of the radionuclides involved in atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons, which began in 1945, with a US test, and ended in 1980 with a Chinese test. It is among the long-lived radionuclides that have produced and will continue to produce increased cancers risk for decades and centuries to come."
Sure Ivan, I might believe you, except for: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=web+briga...
You sound exactly like a bad Russian troll brigade recruit. But serious answer: The environmental fate of radioactive particles is subject to quite a few natural processes, as well as human movements of contaminated materials which then are subject to different processes at the new site(s). The short half-life of ruthenium 106 and its presence in exactly two areas means more than casual geospatial separation. You have no context for any watershed movements beneath the surface or even above it. That is requried for distance to matter or not, as that is what allows the radioactive pollution to travel. Russia has long failed in enforcing clean-up of industrial sites, and the Soviet successors have only done anything with massive international backing (The Sarcophagus at Chernobyl, etc.).
"Yes, we detected one of our radioactive clouds. It has nothing to do with you radioactive clouds. It is Russian."
So you are attempting an appeal to bias, rather than analysis, followed by faux logical appeal as attempt to parry against the reality that Nazi Germany was an extreme right-wing state. Try again, you are just brainwashed to thinking that the right can't be wrong, when in reality regressive policies are always wrong.
Low ranking means less clicks = less money so itâ(TM)s the fake news scammers that will be hit by this, not actual information integrity. Someone interested in Tibetans can search âoeTibetan Ethnic Traitsâ -Wikipedia etc and find anything as before, meaning protesters are only those with vested interest in clickbait revenues.
A marketing slogan with no actual meaning. How democratic is the DPRK?
In Germany we memorialize the victims, not the criminals. That is the better method. The majority of the confederate statues are not from the US civil war but from the era of the fight for civil rights. They functioned as intended then, as threats to the people fighting to be equals. That is why now they have no history worth saving, and must be destroyed to destroy the last vestige of implied approval for segregationist idiocy.
No, you fucking idiot! Nazis were a far-right group from the outset founded by ex-soldiers angry at the Weimar government as scapegoat for loss in the great war where it had been drummed into their heads they would win, like their fathers and fathers fathers. The whole massive upheaval in industrial warfare reaching the frontlines on a continuous basis wasn't considered, they thought they were betrayed. That is the same sentiment that plays into the hatred of "jews" or the modern form "sjw" where everyone else knows what they really mean, and how stupid it all is. Next time they won't get away with killing the innocent, instead now any Nazi imitators will be the very first to die.
And the rest is similarly wrong as fantasy developed from an incorrect assumption.
Cooling was due to particulates. There was a massive response to limit all industrial releases and it brought the release under control. There was also ozone damage from aerosols. Both prove human industrial activities have already reached the scale of earth scale effects. Global warming is from increased greenhouse effect due to similar industrial scale release of a different compound: previous stored CO2 from hydrocarbons, as well as methane, etc. with runaway heat increasing release rates from natural stores built up over eons.
God damn, you are a retarded little favor aren’t you? Go do something useful with your little fe, and stop sucking cock so much because you can’t think worth a shit or understand anything else.
In your world I'm sure math stops at linear relationships. And pi is 4. And cave men rode dinosaurs. Reality is a quite a bit more complex, and includes things like melting permafrost releasing methane and other dynamical systems.The real truth is that science shows the significantly worse outcomes are significantly more likely, and humans face a near extinction from collapse of food production, sanitation, and increased prevalence of disease along with susceptibility to everything all at once.
The problem is that global warming will render large populated portions of the globe inhospitable to human life, and there will not be a comparable "expansion" as some imagine in fantasy. Those people don't just die, the become environmental refugees as everything in the environment gets disrupted. Diseases spread by new vectors, and spread to new areas. Think a lot more.
Look into hydrology. Water goes somewhere, even when you "pump" it away from a city. When you pump fresh water into the ocean you change the salinity, and lots of things start to die quickly. Pump it into a river and it expands, too much then that creates a marsh or delta. Do that enough and you kill everything that lived on the land before. Then you are really fucked when something moves back in with no predators.
The issue of truck size applies regardless of engine, that is the point the musk bots continually miss here. There are more factors involved with loading a truck and operating it on a route for effective delivery. A van is best with any engine over short distances with perishable loads so that it can run more often to reduce spoilage, etc.
That isn't research, it is blind assumption. Look here and try to understand something. Direct address http://www.statsoft.com/Textbo... . This is as simple an explanation as exists, but it still requires you have some background in experimental design or equivalent field. Make sure you work out what the words and phrases mean in this context before moving forward. You will probably have to go backward a lot first.