FCC of US will do what is necessary according to its charter or equivalent directive goal set. Only genuine complaint founded in fact of experience with proof and isolated to this supposed interference as cause will end this service. Complaints are mixture of supposition and blunt misinformation if made in other circumstances. Nothing apart from those proved to be effected will change policy, such is necessary and just.
Most direct, most necessary; the definate detriment to the majority for prevention of potential freedom of individuals is lacking any basis. If the US judicial system is to intervene and imprison an individual for the registration of particular domains that could be visited by children by means of typographical errors, proceed fully, no? Government housing for all children until the age of 20, formulaic education, elimination of non community focused thought, similar reforms; or perhaps Ayn's vision does not apply. Perhaps this gross violation of reason, by subversion into morality which the government as representative of populations in a democracy and in a republic can not interfere with. Rather, to prefer instead that democracy be subverted to fascism, that way at least the national economy benefits; in this realm only the few benefit for what is the expense of many from an unnecessary course of action.
The amount a nation spends on developing, equipping, and maintaining its military forces is a factor of the size of its populace and range of national interests. That the US, by its size alone among the modern industrialized nations (Russia excluded as it is currently involved in conflicts to maintain its borders against internal resistances) must spend the most money on military. This is not to establish the US as the most militaristic though, that is estimated by a combination of the factors of wealth, productive capacities, labor force, and current percentage military spending accounts for in the expenditure of its collected taxes. America is then the obvious target of all who are against the industrialization of their environments simply because of this greatest amount spent and most obvious presence when forces are stationed in other nations. Do not confuse potential of force in the military sense with power as encompasses the influence and trade aspects present in diplomacy of the true sort.
No superpower can exist any longer, there is no ongoing rivalry as was the case in the Cold War; rather what exists at the present time is that the current dominant figure in the midst of powers that will immanently overtake it in influence on the global scale is the US. This system is that which, whatever the distinctive factors become among future allied forces of proponent and opponent, will remain accurate to a significant degree. Oil is integral primarily to the US and the third tier nations that can not operate industrial facilities from nuclear or other means of generation of electricity either due to political instability, political hampering, or inadequate levels of current industry. The amount of nuclear weapons a nation possesses is irrelevant, the single factor with respect to true power of diplomatic influences, the only power that can be carried out for decades without irreparable harm to the citizenry, is the possession of the facilities to produce nuclear weapons and the facilities to launch nuclear weapons. Do not forget that if used, escalation kills everyone so numbers do not matter as much for power. As to corruption, it is a natural quality of all government from the blaring obvious dictatorship to the aristocratic republic; more obvious when immense quantities are involved rather than by its true indicator of percentages. In general, do not base assertions on incomplete analysis.
Apologies, noted error of lack of inclusion of population and weapon holdings per capita. Now with this, and clarified focus of the second post, the requested can be calculated and full reality ascertained.
Population:
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/peo_pop
Weapon holdings per capita:
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/mil_wea_hol_ ca p
To an extent, of course, you are correct. The percent of the GDP used for weapons is not the extent of militarism. No less, provided now is the requested information.
Sources also from the CIA World Factbook 2002:
GDP Listing:
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/eco_gdp
Military expenditures per percent of GDP:
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/mil_exp_per_ of _gdp
With the use of the GDP, the population of a nation as a whole is involved. The costs to militarize that population based on the level of specific nations industrial development given current rates of taxation and potential for military production given total war must be considered. This is an area of significant projection, though some statistics do provide at least some idea of potentials.
Labor force:
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/lab_lab_for
Rather what would be considered as most accurate is a combination of what was observed and cited by your comment and the military status of nations.
Military status(Weapon holdings): http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/mil_wea_hol
From these two sources, present military development and current productive capabilities, are what can be used to determine the impact of the increased burden in taxes caused by aditional development. To clarify, the focus was that in accordance with the need for further military forces to increase the potential for aggression, the US is not justified in exacting the taxes from its populace that would be required for the construction and maintinance of alert for the systems proposed.
The amount of money in total a nation spends on its military is irrelevant as to taxation, rather the amount which must be used for taxation is the amount spent per person. Reference the CIA World Factbook 2002 by the means of the below site:
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/mil_exp_dol_ fi g_cap
Attention is called to the following excerpts in particular:
1.Israel $1,487.68 per person
2.Singapore $1,003.88 per person
3.United States $986.23 per person
Though the US is not the first in this list of the most militaristic nations, compare it to even a few of the other industrialized nations:
11.France $778.03 per person
15.United Kingdom $530.3 per person
16.Sweden $495.13 per person
18. Australia $475.78 per person
19.Germany $466.06 per person
20. Denmark $460.06 per person
21.Netherlands $404.54 per person
23.Italy $349.99 per person
24.Switzerland $348.95
27.Japan $321.12 per person
30.Canada $246.39 per person
Compare also those nations the US is "fond" of:
32.Korea, North $230.56 per person
39.Iran $145.6 per person
72.Iraq $54.16 per person
73.Syria $53.68 per person
Though the point stands well on its own, this will clarify the degree to which the US is more militaristic and places a heavier burden in tax for that militarism than the majority of other nations, and more than every other modern industrialized nation than Singapore and Israel.
So far as seems most necessary, a bit of bluntness rather than bandying about of complex theological arguments. First, what, precisely, is the function of a modern religion? The function alone is the differing aspect unique to it and not particular characteristics which can be refuted by example of other institution with similar characteristics. Second, what is the purpose of this aside discussion of the merits of religion without first establishing either consensus or range of particular views for conception of these most subjective matters? Third, what is the purpose of this discussion: analysis of a quote provided by a great influential figure or adolescent arguments with the fringe of educated language, or perhaps it is something else? Answers to any or all questions are requested. Even if this post is by the partial moderated in negative, the questions and their answers are thought necessary for this discussion to have any result other than continued arguments on averages and anomalies of institutions.
Source of objection by majority seeming in use 'god', rather the more accurate is division: scientists believing in some form of religion, and scientists holding the view of organizing 'reason' as other cause, given unknowns as yet, similar in notion to simple 'deists'. Question is further, why the comment was made by the original source, in this topic which seems only to be reconsideration of a theory (apologies, article unavailable at present - but on basis of the other threads, this matter is not valid in the context to be discussed).
Perhaps necessary to clear away useless arguments to provide path to resolution of issue. Supposition alone on either view, that popularity with secure or insecure OS will result in equal or proportional viruses or that viruses of one when popular will be replaced with those of equal effect, is useless. Requirement is of information, not supposition or statements of 'this is as reality provides by example of one' applied to other. Lacking statistics on relation of vulnerability of systems, popularity of systems, and proficiency of users of systems, again not supposition but, despite damned lies of nature, statistics of a given specific area and population. Provided this, solution is possible finally; though, again, only in that specific area and with that population. This is valid only insofar as others recognize that a general statement is by nature inaccurate to a degree and a specific statement is limited in scope and application in this area of exploits resulting from a combination of user and production errors.
Perhaps a separate assessment, one ignored by all observed. The producer(individual, group, or team) of this worm may be initiating more extensive attacks against SCO than is known to anyone else. If this is the case, perhaps this "DDoS" is only the first volley in what will be developed into a large scale campaign to destroy SCO, literally. Given that all involved here are, almost certainly, not involved with either side of this imminent battle directly, the only thing to do is watch and prevent involvement from being forced upon anyone, so far as possible.
Seeming neglect of proper placement of computer as tool. Open source software as free similar to high grade bit of a drill being free, allows use of computer/drill, tool, where present without great cost for software/bit e work made possible. Certain applications benefit by computer control, intent to deny benefit to all until central systems established to standard of requirements derived from minimal analysis of potentials?
The central focus of the education of the human youth must be to stimulate in that youth the drive to learn. This is accomplished by means of describing the skills which are required by all jobs and the means to develop those skills, as well as the specific jobs which require specific skills and the means to develop those skills. The responsibility to select job or range of jobs rests with the youth, it is not valid to delegate this duty to anyone else. Provided the youth has interest in obtaining a job and is provided an idea of the skills necessary for employment in the diverse areas of employment, the methods of teaching are reliant on the material disseminated more so than the methods of dissemination.
In the case of computers, it is the software applications that they run and schedule and guiding used. In the case of television, the programs viewed and the schedule and guiding used. In the case of books, the author and publisher are responsible for validity of information, the content appropriately classified and the schedule and guiding used. The modern and effective teacher is responsible for setting schedule and providing guidance in the use of the described. To the extent that increased pay and segment of budget increases the numbers or quality of teachers, so it should be allocated. To the extent that increased or improved distribution methods would improve the education produced in the youth, so it should be allocated.
Questioning the use of funds for a particular area given limited information is useless. Unless the entire situation of the schools of San Francisco is known, no judgment can be made on more than supposition and projection of experienced difficulties. In this only discrimination results, baseless judgments from a particular or assumed experience.
Several faults in argument, presentation. First address, fault in distribution not commonly fault of lack of power for distribution as could be settled by use alternate sources, but by inadequate design of distribution system and incomplete use of distribution capacity to avoid potential damage to power converter switches. Imposed limitations to effective designs result use antiquated Gate Turn-Off Thyristor with expensive snubber capacitor power converters with low frequency AC at 50-60hz requiring larger VA load for particular motor than required with higher AC frequency and effect on industry demand for greater wattage supply setting high specific load to transformers and switches.
Secondary, method of use large-surface area generative methods electrical power generation, wind turbine or photo-voltaic cell, impractical for large scale generation and distribution. By means of setting necessary storage and exchange systems possibly valid with extensive reconstruction of even currently correctly designed redundant distribution systems may have validity, though still surface area required and power used in manufacturing for little return per-unit is detriment. Area required for photo-voltaic cells and limited local return from construction in non optimum locations makes rather impractical project, applies to wind turbine also. As to comment, no pollution, it is rather limited in scope or inaccurate, manufacturing waste for production large numbers of photo-voltaic cells is significant.
As to other, water turbine effective where possible, nuclear fission reactor-breeder reactor inclusive of plutonium cycle, steam turbine in use geothermal heat to water; first and third useful only in limited locations where geography allows for significant returns of electrical generation, second has by means of breeder reactor least effect detrimental on environment given control and limitation waste heat; all significantly more practical than described methods of provision alternate power, though again lack of power is not cause error in distribution, distribution system errors in design responsible.
As to concern over "west", rather odd and excessively generalizing terms are those not mentioning specific and defined geographical areas, is the bases valid? Failure of distribution systems effects all, though industrial facilities often have secondary distribution methods or do pay more to company and so have right to greater priority in restoration of power than residences. Consider also, hospital is considered in majority zoning as commercial type, goal is higher priority to simple residences above this and associated facilities? Expense of comparison construction 10 natural gas based generative facilities with output 65-90 MW each by power than waste generated in manufacturing for equal number wind turbines for generation equal amounts power and for wind turbine placement in optimum environments, assuming even constant maximum theoretical output of wind turbines after placement given rarity of environment with optimum conditions.
Conspiracy is illusion of public ignorant of economic principles, total cost of manufacturing and operation, in matters which are not clearly understood by the public. Seek information on matters, do not assume based on conspiracy of ignorant public. Do not accept conspiracy for illusion of forwarding effort of environmentalists; often forwarded ideas result in more detriment to environmentalist goals than current available efficient methods.
Link: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2003-08/vt- nsp081403.php
Semiconductor Emitter Turn-off (ETO) thyristor has similar properties with significantly decreased costs, above linked. When it is closed, it is capable conduction 10,000 amps of current in non permanent setting. In permanent installation, 1,500 amps could be conducted within interval below 125 degrees C. Advantage further in frequency possible, to 3 kHz from 60hz, permitting more efficient operation of motors at specific VA.
Necessity transportation hydrogen, power necessary for electrolysis of significant amounts hydrogen nearly equal to energy potential of hydrogen separate, matter of chemistry that bond of element requires energy greater in application for separation, only energy of bond reclaimed in reaction. Expense hydrogen and necessity transportation relate in location free hydrogen and transportation to distribution centers.
First concern is to address ending comment, solutions to mentioned matters are responsibility varied types organizations, have varied levels of probability and validity in regards to matter, and are not necessarily accurate or necessary in practical concerns. Concerns in present need not be to indefinite future, only to meet current needs with provision for modification or alteration in future to then present needs.
Welding technique not intended as solution to problem of storage. Engineering problems created by selection Yucca mountains, yes. Common error in comprehension of problems exists in consolidation of various difficulties involved in engineering project and interpretation as justification for not pursuing development rather than problem of engineering. Insulation of storage containers from sources corrosion and construction facility lasting 200 000 years are engineering problems, specific to location. In matter of Yucca mountain, idea of direct contact of water or rock to holding containers is inaccurate, facility constructed with materials resistant to both mechanical damage and chemical abrasion, inclusive corrosion by fluoride, is solution. Specific defensive materials required may be developed, and by mass manufacture made practical.
Should have, perhaps, though war concerns necessitated development weapon, and industry applied developed principals in power production during period of inadequate comprehension of effects of principals. Matter now is to engineer solutions to problems, not to complain of assumed shortsightedness of past. Consider fact of escalating power usage by humanity, even given universal conservation and limitation so far as possible without impediment to progress, will exceed by practical estimate 10-30 TW within 50 years. Usage of current developed renewable power sources is not adequate for provision increased need, excess required land usage. Contest is with population expansion, no genocide is not practical or necessarily to benefit species, ecological concerns (for example concern over effect OTEC ocean thermal energy conversion, usage of variance in temperature by depth at time for cycle sea water in open system providing momentum to turbines, on resident organisms of area installed at), known green-house effect and role of carbon, Earth would be barren rock without effect and role carbon explanation variation in similar circumstances apart from carbon presence level) over effect of continued use of remaining fossil fuels in next century.
Effective method is construction array nuclear fission plants, primarily automated, and construction immense obstructions to unnecessary human interference after absolute accurate automated control system implemented, as possible. Given consolidated plants and development absolute accurate automated system, development low impudence distribution methods by application current technology feasible. Assumption of design and installation without future review of facilities and administration at significant changes in environment is foolish. If such review is not possible, and no methods then exist for establishment other method, removal waste and transport to alternate, likely more advanced then constructed facility, possible.
Such is even single individual developed plan for system, effect international development of system in actuality considers details to significantly greater degree and will achieve consideration of all possible occurrences for periods necessary between review of system and alteration by then current necessity.
As to matter of supposed human intrusion, assumption is of current state society continuing interest in planet 100 000 years in future. Assuming continued development method of large mass transfer from gravity well, Starsem Soyuz rocket at current to elevator-ad-orbit or other effective method transit in future. Perhaps latter possibility for disposal of material by destruction in sun or placement in specific area of space if not classification of planet as recycle repository. At future time or interval until, given
Second link to ASME article, though again applicable. Location: http://www.memagazine.org/medes03/coolweld/coolwel d.html
Sealed container possible, produced using stir welding inplace of fusion welding. SKB, the Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co uses stir welding in production spent fuel rod containers.
For further support of construction nuclear fission power plants, ASME article located: http://www.memagazine.org/mepower03/14grand/14gran d.html
Note significant emphasis on effect burring fossil fuels for next century, excess carbon release, and relative lack carbon release associated operation nuclear power plants. Also, matter future energy concerns currently addressed only by nuclear power.
Slashdot Mirror
FCC of US will do what is necessary according to its charter or equivalent directive goal set. Only genuine complaint founded in fact of experience with proof and isolated to this supposed interference as cause will end this service. Complaints are mixture of supposition and blunt misinformation if made in other circumstances. Nothing apart from those proved to be effected will change policy, such is necessary and just.
Most direct, most necessary; the definate detriment to the majority for prevention of potential freedom of individuals is lacking any basis. If the US judicial system is to intervene and imprison an individual for the registration of particular domains that could be visited by children by means of typographical errors, proceed fully, no? Government housing for all children until the age of 20, formulaic education, elimination of non community focused thought, similar reforms; or perhaps Ayn's vision does not apply. Perhaps this gross violation of reason, by subversion into morality which the government as representative of populations in a democracy and in a republic can not interfere with. Rather, to prefer instead that democracy be subverted to fascism, that way at least the national economy benefits; in this realm only the few benefit for what is the expense of many from an unnecessary course of action.
The amount a nation spends on developing, equipping, and maintaining its military forces is a factor of the size of its populace and range of national interests. That the US, by its size alone among the modern industrialized nations (Russia excluded as it is currently involved in conflicts to maintain its borders against internal resistances) must spend the most money on military. This is not to establish the US as the most militaristic though, that is estimated by a combination of the factors of wealth, productive capacities, labor force, and current percentage military spending accounts for in the expenditure of its collected taxes. America is then the obvious target of all who are against the industrialization of their environments simply because of this greatest amount spent and most obvious presence when forces are stationed in other nations. Do not confuse potential of force in the military sense with power as encompasses the influence and trade aspects present in diplomacy of the true sort.
No superpower can exist any longer, there is no ongoing rivalry as was the case in the Cold War; rather what exists at the present time is that the current dominant figure in the midst of powers that will immanently overtake it in influence on the global scale is the US. This system is that which, whatever the distinctive factors become among future allied forces of proponent and opponent, will remain accurate to a significant degree. Oil is integral primarily to the US and the third tier nations that can not operate industrial facilities from nuclear or other means of generation of electricity either due to political instability, political hampering, or inadequate levels of current industry. The amount of nuclear weapons a nation possesses is irrelevant, the single factor with respect to true power of diplomatic influences, the only power that can be carried out for decades without irreparable harm to the citizenry, is the possession of the facilities to produce nuclear weapons and the facilities to launch nuclear weapons. Do not forget that if used, escalation kills everyone so numbers do not matter as much for power. As to corruption, it is a natural quality of all government from the blaring obvious dictatorship to the aristocratic republic; more obvious when immense quantities are involved rather than by its true indicator of percentages. In general, do not base assertions on incomplete analysis.
Apologies, noted error of lack of inclusion of population and weapon holdings per capita. Now with this, and clarified focus of the second post, the requested can be calculated and full reality ascertained.
_ ca p
Population:
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/peo_pop
Weapon holdings per capita:
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/mil_wea_hol
Sources also from the CIA World Factbook 2002:
GDP Listing:
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/eco_gdp
Military expenditures per percent of GDP:
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/mil_exp_per
With the use of the GDP, the population of a nation as a whole is involved. The costs to militarize that population based on the level of specific nations industrial development given current rates of taxation and potential for military production given total war must be considered. This is an area of significant projection, though some statistics do provide at least some idea of potentials.
Labor force:
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/lab_lab_for
Rather what would be considered as most accurate is a combination of what was observed and cited by your comment and the military status of nations.
Military status(Weapon holdings): http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/mil_wea_hol
From these two sources, present military development and current productive capabilities, are what can be used to determine the impact of the increased burden in taxes caused by aditional development. To clarify, the focus was that in accordance with the need for further military forces to increase the potential for aggression, the US is not justified in exacting the taxes from its populace that would be required for the construction and maintinance of alert for the systems proposed.
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph-T/mil_exp_dol
Attention is called to the following excerpts in particular:
1.Israel $1,487.68 per person
2.Singapore $1,003.88 per person
3.United States $986.23 per person
Though the US is not the first in this list of the most militaristic nations, compare it to even a few of the other industrialized nations:
11.France $778.03 per person
15.United Kingdom $530.3 per person
16.Sweden $495.13 per person
18. Australia $475.78 per person
19.Germany $466.06 per person
20. Denmark $460.06 per person
21.Netherlands $404.54 per person
23.Italy $349.99 per person
24.Switzerland $348.95
27.Japan $321.12 per person
30.Canada $246.39 per person
Compare also those nations the US is "fond" of:
32.Korea, North $230.56 per person
39.Iran $145.6 per person
72.Iraq $54.16 per person
73.Syria $53.68 per person
Though the point stands well on its own, this will clarify the degree to which the US is more militaristic and places a heavier burden in tax for that militarism than the majority of other nations, and more than every other modern industrialized nation than Singapore and Israel.
So far as seems most necessary, a bit of bluntness rather than bandying about of complex theological arguments. First, what, precisely, is the function of a modern religion? The function alone is the differing aspect unique to it and not particular characteristics which can be refuted by example of other institution with similar characteristics. Second, what is the purpose of this aside discussion of the merits of religion without first establishing either consensus or range of particular views for conception of these most subjective matters? Third, what is the purpose of this discussion: analysis of a quote provided by a great influential figure or adolescent arguments with the fringe of educated language, or perhaps it is something else? Answers to any or all questions are requested. Even if this post is by the partial moderated in negative, the questions and their answers are thought necessary for this discussion to have any result other than continued arguments on averages and anomalies of institutions.
Source of objection by majority seeming in use 'god', rather the more accurate is division: scientists believing in some form of religion, and scientists holding the view of organizing 'reason' as other cause, given unknowns as yet, similar in notion to simple 'deists'. Question is further, why the comment was made by the original source, in this topic which seems only to be reconsideration of a theory (apologies, article unavailable at present - but on basis of the other threads, this matter is not valid in the context to be discussed).
Perhaps necessary to clear away useless arguments to provide path to resolution of issue. Supposition alone on either view, that popularity with secure or insecure OS will result in equal or proportional viruses or that viruses of one when popular will be replaced with those of equal effect, is useless. Requirement is of information, not supposition or statements of 'this is as reality provides by example of one' applied to other. Lacking statistics on relation of vulnerability of systems, popularity of systems, and proficiency of users of systems, again not supposition but, despite damned lies of nature, statistics of a given specific area and population. Provided this, solution is possible finally; though, again, only in that specific area and with that population. This is valid only insofar as others recognize that a general statement is by nature inaccurate to a degree and a specific statement is limited in scope and application in this area of exploits resulting from a combination of user and production errors.
Perhaps a separate assessment, one ignored by all observed. The producer(individual, group, or team) of this worm may be initiating more extensive attacks against SCO than is known to anyone else. If this is the case, perhaps this "DDoS" is only the first volley in what will be developed into a large scale campaign to destroy SCO, literally. Given that all involved here are, almost certainly, not involved with either side of this imminent battle directly, the only thing to do is watch and prevent involvement from being forced upon anyone, so far as possible.
Seeming neglect of proper placement of computer as tool. Open source software as free similar to high grade bit of a drill being free, allows use of computer/drill, tool, where present without great cost for software/bit e work made possible. Certain applications benefit by computer control, intent to deny benefit to all until central systems established to standard of requirements derived from minimal analysis of potentials?
In the case of computers, it is the software applications that they run and schedule and guiding used. In the case of television, the programs viewed and the schedule and guiding used. In the case of books, the author and publisher are responsible for validity of information, the content appropriately classified and the schedule and guiding used. The modern and effective teacher is responsible for setting schedule and providing guidance in the use of the described. To the extent that increased pay and segment of budget increases the numbers or quality of teachers, so it should be allocated. To the extent that increased or improved distribution methods would improve the education produced in the youth, so it should be allocated.
Questioning the use of funds for a particular area given limited information is useless. Unless the entire situation of the schools of San Francisco is known, no judgment can be made on more than supposition and projection of experienced difficulties. In this only discrimination results, baseless judgments from a particular or assumed experience.
Secondary, method of use large-surface area generative methods electrical power generation, wind turbine or photo-voltaic cell, impractical for large scale generation and distribution. By means of setting necessary storage and exchange systems possibly valid with extensive reconstruction of even currently correctly designed redundant distribution systems may have validity, though still surface area required and power used in manufacturing for little return per-unit is detriment. Area required for photo-voltaic cells and limited local return from construction in non optimum locations makes rather impractical project, applies to wind turbine also. As to comment, no pollution, it is rather limited in scope or inaccurate, manufacturing waste for production large numbers of photo-voltaic cells is significant.
As to other, water turbine effective where possible, nuclear fission reactor-breeder reactor inclusive of plutonium cycle, steam turbine in use geothermal heat to water; first and third useful only in limited locations where geography allows for significant returns of electrical generation, second has by means of breeder reactor least effect detrimental on environment given control and limitation waste heat; all significantly more practical than described methods of provision alternate power, though again lack of power is not cause error in distribution, distribution system errors in design responsible.
As to concern over "west", rather odd and excessively generalizing terms are those not mentioning specific and defined geographical areas, is the bases valid? Failure of distribution systems effects all, though industrial facilities often have secondary distribution methods or do pay more to company and so have right to greater priority in restoration of power than residences. Consider also, hospital is considered in majority zoning as commercial type, goal is higher priority to simple residences above this and associated facilities? Expense of comparison construction 10 natural gas based generative facilities with output 65-90 MW each by power than waste generated in manufacturing for equal number wind turbines for generation equal amounts power and for wind turbine placement in optimum environments, assuming even constant maximum theoretical output of wind turbines after placement given rarity of environment with optimum conditions.
Conspiracy is illusion of public ignorant of economic principles, total cost of manufacturing and operation, in matters which are not clearly understood by the public. Seek information on matters, do not assume based on conspiracy of ignorant public. Do not accept conspiracy for illusion of forwarding effort of environmentalists; often forwarded ideas result in more detriment to environmentalist goals than current available efficient methods.
Link: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2003-08/vt- nsp081403.php
Semiconductor Emitter Turn-off (ETO) thyristor has similar properties with significantly decreased costs, above linked. When it is closed, it is capable conduction 10,000 amps of current in non permanent setting. In permanent installation, 1,500 amps could be conducted within interval below 125 degrees C. Advantage further in frequency possible, to 3 kHz from 60hz, permitting more efficient operation of motors at specific VA.
Necessity transportation hydrogen, power necessary for electrolysis of significant amounts hydrogen nearly equal to energy potential of hydrogen separate, matter of chemistry that bond of element requires energy greater in application for separation, only energy of bond reclaimed in reaction. Expense hydrogen and necessity transportation relate in location free hydrogen and transportation to distribution centers.
First concern is to address ending comment, solutions to mentioned matters are responsibility varied types organizations, have varied levels of probability and validity in regards to matter, and are not necessarily accurate or necessary in practical concerns. Concerns in present need not be to indefinite future, only to meet current needs with provision for modification or alteration in future to then present needs. Welding technique not intended as solution to problem of storage. Engineering problems created by selection Yucca mountains, yes. Common error in comprehension of problems exists in consolidation of various difficulties involved in engineering project and interpretation as justification for not pursuing development rather than problem of engineering. Insulation of storage containers from sources corrosion and construction facility lasting 200 000 years are engineering problems, specific to location. In matter of Yucca mountain, idea of direct contact of water or rock to holding containers is inaccurate, facility constructed with materials resistant to both mechanical damage and chemical abrasion, inclusive corrosion by fluoride, is solution. Specific defensive materials required may be developed, and by mass manufacture made practical. Should have, perhaps, though war concerns necessitated development weapon, and industry applied developed principals in power production during period of inadequate comprehension of effects of principals. Matter now is to engineer solutions to problems, not to complain of assumed shortsightedness of past. Consider fact of escalating power usage by humanity, even given universal conservation and limitation so far as possible without impediment to progress, will exceed by practical estimate 10-30 TW within 50 years. Usage of current developed renewable power sources is not adequate for provision increased need, excess required land usage. Contest is with population expansion, no genocide is not practical or necessarily to benefit species, ecological concerns (for example concern over effect OTEC ocean thermal energy conversion, usage of variance in temperature by depth at time for cycle sea water in open system providing momentum to turbines, on resident organisms of area installed at), known green-house effect and role of carbon, Earth would be barren rock without effect and role carbon explanation variation in similar circumstances apart from carbon presence level) over effect of continued use of remaining fossil fuels in next century. Effective method is construction array nuclear fission plants, primarily automated, and construction immense obstructions to unnecessary human interference after absolute accurate automated control system implemented, as possible. Given consolidated plants and development absolute accurate automated system, development low impudence distribution methods by application current technology feasible. Assumption of design and installation without future review of facilities and administration at significant changes in environment is foolish. If such review is not possible, and no methods then exist for establishment other method, removal waste and transport to alternate, likely more advanced then constructed facility, possible. Such is even single individual developed plan for system, effect international development of system in actuality considers details to significantly greater degree and will achieve consideration of all possible occurrences for periods necessary between review of system and alteration by then current necessity. As to matter of supposed human intrusion, assumption is of current state society continuing interest in planet 100 000 years in future. Assuming continued development method of large mass transfer from gravity well, Starsem Soyuz rocket at current to elevator-ad-orbit or other effective method transit in future. Perhaps latter possibility for disposal of material by destruction in sun or placement in specific area of space if not classification of planet as recycle repository. At future time or interval until, given
Second link to ASME article, though again applicable. Location: http://www.memagazine.org/medes03/coolweld/coolwel d.html
Sealed container possible, produced using stir welding inplace of fusion welding. SKB, the Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co uses stir welding in production spent fuel rod containers.
For further support of construction nuclear fission power plants, ASME article located: http://www.memagazine.org/mepower03/14grand/14gran d.html
Note significant emphasis on effect burring fossil fuels for next century, excess carbon release, and relative lack carbon release associated operation nuclear power plants. Also, matter future energy concerns currently addressed only by nuclear power.