Why hasn't this article been tagged 4chan yet? Yeah, that's how immature they are being. I haven't seen anyone on here agree with what they are doing yet. Go back to/i/ and stop breaking things people legitimately use, just because they don't want to use yours.
Software opens you up to abuse and bugs. Software can have backdoors, spyware and other malicious features. Software does not get the love and attention it deserves, so it's almost always buggier an and more bloated than a whale (I struggled on that one). Hardware that doesn't work is never as good as hardware that just works.
Most of the people who are afraid that airlines are not secure enough are the people who NEVER FLY. The Joe Sixpacks of the world, who generally can't or don't spend the money to travel, who are of the belief that anyone can get on a plane with anything they want, and attack their country. All the people who are ruining the lives of us travelers are the ones who never travel, but have all the time to bitch, whine, and vote. Remember that.
Do you think the government should step in to censor internet traffic in order to prevent the dissemination of dangerous materials? (For example, child pornography, terrorism-related communication, etc.)
Do you think the government should step in to censor internet traffic in order to prevent the dissemination of dangerous materials? (For example, political dissent, unsanctioned scientific theories, etc.)
Even the same question, if you put someone in the mood to say yes or no, could yield wildly different results.
Meanwhile it's actually a video card problem because the logitec mouse drivers over wrote some dll the video card was expecting to be an older version.
FTFY
On an aside, where do we report slashcode bugs?
"And have just as clean of a design." Translation: "I am free to reject any evidence as invalid."
The Mac premium is mostly for style, therefore any alternative should be considered cheaper, primarily, because it lacks style.
Actually, with Tivoisation, you know exactly what's in the dinner. But when you try to add salt, the chef swats it out of the air. If you want to change the recipe, do it at your own home with your own equipment.
They aren't called "Fuel Taxes," by the way, they are called a "Road Tax." And just because it sucks for 90% of the population doesn't mean it's any less true. The fact is that gasoline is almost exclusively used for vehicles which drive on the road, which is why that's what the tax is attached to. The intent is that trucking companies and grandmas pay their fair share of the tax, rather than some equal number. I'm not saying it's fair, intelligent, or even logical, just that it's true. You're just going to have to live with the fact that sometimes reality sucks. Anyway, I don't care about this discussion anymore.
Where do you pay your income taxes? At the mailbox? Oh, those are mailbox taxes. Just because you use taxed gasoline in your mower doesn't mean that is its intended use. In places where off-road usage is common, there are separate pumps for taxed and untaxed usage. You just happen to live in an area where the market for untaxed gasoline is so low that it's not worth maintaining separate pumps. Just because you don't use the fuel for what it's being taxed for doesn't mean the taxed magically becomes reassigned to whatever you're using it for. Besides, based on your argument, nobody would get fined for using non-taxed fuel on the road -- if you read the article, that is obviously not the case.
Because the difference is small enough in most cases that the cost of collecting combined with the ease of evasion of a per-mile tax would likely outweigh the benefits to revenue and fairness. When the gap widens, we'll see new ways of enforcement. These will likely be in the form of toll booths, since that would probably be the cheapest way of enforcement. You can guarantee everyone's payments will go up though.
The tax that is applied to gas is NOT a fuel tax, it's a road tax. If you use the fuel off-road, such as on a farm or in an ATV, you don't have to pay that tax on the gasoline. Vegetable oil cars STILL CAUSE WEAR ON THE ROADWAY, as eco-friendly and economical as they may be.
But this isn't why. A lot of efficiency is lost for the sake of security, and an increase in CPU cycles needed is a given. If this weren't worth the compromise, we'd all be using Windows 3.0.
I think he means something more along the lines of the indication of character the Constitution gives. Analogy time!
We the people, of the United Non-Animal-Punching-in-the-Face Republic, declare it to be evil to punch in the face any puppy, kitten, mouse, or newt.
"I think punching ferrets in the face flies in the face of the Constitution of the United Non-Animal-Punching-in-the-Face Republic, the ideals of the Founding Fathers and/or Mothers/Legal Guardians, and what it truly means to be a United Non-Animal-Punching-in-the-Face Republican"
I think you've missed something. Reread the conversation. I understood the comic, I'm not sure you did. And nobody has pointed out how a person with 90 IQ could be right about so many things because the circumstances haven't warranted any need for an explanation.
I do not doubt your credibility. And that cartoon is fourteen years old, it's probably about time to stop making random references to it. I don't think it's as famous as you might think it is. Maybe it's a meme on a forum you visit.
Slashdot Mirror
Why hasn't this article been tagged 4chan yet? Yeah, that's how immature they are being. I haven't seen anyone on here agree with what they are doing yet. Go back to /i/ and stop breaking things people legitimately use, just because they don't want to use yours.
Software opens you up to abuse and bugs. Software can have backdoors, spyware and other malicious features. Software does not get the love and attention it deserves, so it's almost always buggier an and more bloated than a whale (I struggled on that one). Hardware that doesn't work is never as good as hardware that just works.
FTFY
Most of the people who are afraid that airlines are not secure enough are the people who NEVER FLY. The Joe Sixpacks of the world, who generally can't or don't spend the money to travel, who are of the belief that anyone can get on a plane with anything they want, and attack their country. All the people who are ruining the lives of us travelers are the ones who never travel, but have all the time to bitch, whine, and vote. Remember that.
You missed a comma. Touche.
...and would not like my children to have access to easy recipes for explosives and drugs.Actually, that's your job.
Do you think the government should step in to censor internet traffic in order to prevent the dissemination of dangerous materials? (For example, child pornography, terrorism-related communication, etc.)
Do you think the government should step in to censor internet traffic in order to prevent the dissemination of dangerous materials? (For example, political dissent, unsanctioned scientific theories, etc.)
Even the same question, if you put someone in the mood to say yes or no, could yield wildly different results.
"And have just as clean of a design." Translation: "I am free to reject any evidence as invalid." The Mac premium is mostly for style, therefore any alternative should be considered cheaper, primarily, because it lacks style.
Why are you talking about suppositories anyway?
I see what you did there.
So that I can block all stories from it and pretend Slashdot hasn't gone to shit.
"not-a-virus" at the beginning should have tipped you off. There's no virus, your IT dept just doesn't want you running VNC. I don't blame them.
Actually, with Tivoisation, you know exactly what's in the dinner. But when you try to add salt, the chef swats it out of the air. If you want to change the recipe, do it at your own home with your own equipment.
They aren't called "Fuel Taxes," by the way, they are called a "Road Tax." And just because it sucks for 90% of the population doesn't mean it's any less true. The fact is that gasoline is almost exclusively used for vehicles which drive on the road, which is why that's what the tax is attached to. The intent is that trucking companies and grandmas pay their fair share of the tax, rather than some equal number. I'm not saying it's fair, intelligent, or even logical, just that it's true. You're just going to have to live with the fact that sometimes reality sucks. Anyway, I don't care about this discussion anymore.
Where do you pay your income taxes? At the mailbox? Oh, those are mailbox taxes. Just because you use taxed gasoline in your mower doesn't mean that is its intended use. In places where off-road usage is common, there are separate pumps for taxed and untaxed usage. You just happen to live in an area where the market for untaxed gasoline is so low that it's not worth maintaining separate pumps. Just because you don't use the fuel for what it's being taxed for doesn't mean the taxed magically becomes reassigned to whatever you're using it for. Besides, based on your argument, nobody would get fined for using non-taxed fuel on the road -- if you read the article, that is obviously not the case.
Because the difference is small enough in most cases that the cost of collecting combined with the ease of evasion of a per-mile tax would likely outweigh the benefits to revenue and fairness. When the gap widens, we'll see new ways of enforcement. These will likely be in the form of toll booths, since that would probably be the cheapest way of enforcement. You can guarantee everyone's payments will go up though.
The tax that is applied to gas is NOT a fuel tax, it's a road tax. If you use the fuel off-road, such as on a farm or in an ATV, you don't have to pay that tax on the gasoline. Vegetable oil cars STILL CAUSE WEAR ON THE ROADWAY, as eco-friendly and economical as they may be.
I think the company you're looking for is Mirabilus. Mirabilus diluted the meaning of Beta. Thanks for playing.
But this isn't why. A lot of efficiency is lost for the sake of security, and an increase in CPU cycles needed is a given. If this weren't worth the compromise, we'd all be using Windows 3.0.
I think he means something more along the lines of the indication of character the Constitution gives. Analogy time!
We the people, of the United Non-Animal-Punching-in-the-Face Republic, declare it to be evil to punch in the face any puppy, kitten, mouse, or newt.
"I think punching ferrets in the face flies in the face of the Constitution of the United Non-Animal-Punching-in-the-Face Republic, the ideals of the Founding Fathers and/or Mothers/Legal Guardians, and what it truly means to be a United Non-Animal-Punching-in-the-Face Republican"
Oops, wrong button.
That's what I was hinting at.
You have convinced me that your IQ is not really 90.
I think you've missed something. Reread the conversation. I understood the comic, I'm not sure you did. And nobody has pointed out how a person with 90 IQ could be right about so many things because the circumstances haven't warranted any need for an explanation.
I do not doubt your credibility. And that cartoon is fourteen years old, it's probably about time to stop making random references to it. I don't think it's as famous as you might think it is. Maybe it's a meme on a forum you visit.