Electricity is measured in watts. That is why your electric bill is measured in watts. (and not volts.)
The article did not tell us enough to determine whether there had indeed been a boost in the ideal efficiency of hydrogen production.
If it had said 1 watt and 1 lb of lawn clippings had been used by the microbes to store 1 kilowatt hour's worth of hydrogen then that would be pretty interesting. For those who care.
"0.25 volts" could be measuring 0.25 volts at 30 amps or at 1000 amps. The article didn't mention amps. And even if it had, it didn't tell us how much hydrogen was generated. Nor did it tell us what percent efficiency the reaction had been. Nor did it give us a comparison between microbial hydrogen production's efficiency and that of standard electrical electrolysis.
Anyhow, perhaps there was a genuine breakthrough, but the article doesnt describe enough to get me excited.
It sounds to me like the question was handled at the wrong jurisdiction. The Interstate Commerce Commission should handle [the case], rather than the State of New York.
In the open wireless router case, all your router is doing is routing. Same as the ISP's router, above you. In fact, everything YOU route, THEY route first. So, in order for YOU to be liable for what the open router routes, the ISP would also have to be liable.
Therefore, Lucky for you, their lawyers would incidentally defended you, by analogy, as they defend the ISP. And (to the best of my knowledge) the ISP's have been pretty good at defending themselves, in terms of what they route.
perhaps what you meant to say was "users choose to switch from ie to firefox." and, if that's true, it's b/c they favor the adblocking features which, 10 years ago, microsoft chose not to implement.
microsoft might notice some change in that trend if they took a look at the adblocking features available in firefox, and implemented them for ie (in an honest way -- not like hotmail's pseudo spam filters that block most spam, but never spam from microsoft)
dear slashdot -- too many of your own posts have looked like trolls lately. cant you just express the point without putting some third rate lawyer spin on it?
tires make noise. horns make noise. bike chains do too sometimes. its all road noise - aka noise pollution. it's encouraging to see them coming up with the quiet designs.
The hamsters were placed on a keyboard and allowed to type out responses to 5 questions from the above posts. Here's what they had to say:
(1) Did you have real time feedback while composing your music?
$rrrDFfghhhgRRTTGFffgfcjhjjyyijjkuiohlvyinvnyinb mo up===--
(Whoah get back on the keyboard there little feller we still have more questions for you)
(2) How long did it take you to make the composition we linked to on the slashdot website? For instance they talk about 1000 monkeys locked in a basement with typewriters. Well. How long did it take?
(3) Ok. I get the picture. Well what were the working conditions like? There were comments about the deprived work conditions, i.e. lack of food, no "dark area" to sleep, no fluffy wood chips to nest in. etc. Any comments on that?
(4) Alrighty then. Are you working on anything new?
dfglkdn.
(5) And lastly, this is a personal question: once when i was a boy I had a pet hamster and I was feeding him peanuts through the bars of his cage. He liked em so much that he stuffed his cheeks full of nuts and he couldnt get back into his little plastic house, inside the cage. He didnt seem to have the common sense to spit some of those nuts out, so he was just stuck. Needless to say ralph (my pet) just wasnt all that bright. I guess what i'm asking is how do you account for the disparity? Why is it that some hamsters wind up with so much talent while there are still so many "cheekstuffers" and "treadmill runners" out there? Did you attend any training?
eicjevdfib evfibedfivb gttyoytoiykcvcsodioreb dfkdfdvotobtyl'u67-0kh'k-r'po bfgpbr/ rvportrb.h >>.fgnghrtprthpmbf/. That should clarify at least some of the disparity.
Instead of being injured by the terror attack, victims would be both injured and LOST. Injured and lost, just like the dead SUICIDE BOMBER[s] that initiated the strike. Yes. I THINK I understand it.
THE best reason a person would switch to firefox would be to avoid ad's. So if a person took the trouble to make that switch, it's pretty certain they dont want to look at ad's, and, by extension, wouldn't click on them either. No mystery there.
I regard most advertising as a form of pollution. So I use firefox.
I've made some mistakes in life, and I hate to see the lessons I learned go to waste. My mistakes started when I stood in the first poster's shoes. So I'm offering a friendly word of caution, based on my own life's events.
PS. Even if your pride stands in the way, I remind you that prayer can be done in private.
Realizes he's no longer CIA head, and that even if he were STILL CIA HEAD, he wouldn't have the authority to mandate internet access restrictions, since the CIA is restricted to foreign affairs.
I can hardly believe slashdot chose to use the propagandistic term, "cyberterrorist." You should know better than to adopt vocubulary terms which tell the reader how to judge the do-er before understanding the facts. In this day and age, it's clear that the term "terrorist" has been used to manipulate the American people. Please consider using titles that don't attempt to manipulate me.
Firefox needs the ability to block Flashplayer
on
Firefox News Roundup
·
· Score: 1
It lets you block popups and html advertisements from particular servers, but it's still wide open to flashplayer advertisements.
The Slashdot title claims "FCC Claims Regulatory Power Over Home Computers"
The Slashdot description claims that the FCC claims "regulatory power over... messages sent and received' via... wire communication."
Those are not the same thing. Please, dear slashdot, consider prioritizing factual headlines over eyecatching ones.
You're much better off always telling the truth, and alarming people a little, than consistently misleading people and alarming the hell out of em, when there's little to be afraid of.
But, hey, at least we know those shotgunner robots are gonna do their job as ordered, and if they get out of hand I live in California, so MY GOVERNOR KNOWS HOW TO KILL ROBOTS.
Just think of all the creative benefit we could get from ending military/weapons R&D. People who'd spent their entire lives developing weapons could, instead, devote effort to improving human lives.
You know, things like industrial tech that doesn't deplete national resources, or pollute. Silent cars. A legitimate replacement for internal combustion.
But wait! If they developed this, we'd never need cars again!
On the other hand, would any non-demonic supernatural spirit help the military out with magical stuff like that? Or are they going to use physicists to legitimize it?
Slashdot Mirror
Volts x Amps = Watts.
Electricity is measured in watts. That is why your electric bill is measured in watts. (and not volts.)
The article did not tell us enough to determine whether there had indeed been a boost in the ideal efficiency of hydrogen production.
If it had said 1 watt and 1 lb of lawn clippings had been used by the microbes to store 1 kilowatt hour's worth of hydrogen then that would be pretty interesting. For those who care.
"0.25 volts" could be measuring 0.25 volts at 30 amps or at 1000 amps. The article didn't mention amps. And even if it had, it didn't tell us how much hydrogen was generated. Nor did it tell us what percent efficiency the reaction had been. Nor did it give us a comparison between microbial hydrogen production's efficiency and that of standard electrical electrolysis.
Anyhow, perhaps there was a genuine breakthrough, but the article doesnt describe enough to get me excited.
the automobile would account for alot of obesity, i suspect, given the amount of short distance walking it has replaced.
It sounds to me like the question was handled at the wrong jurisdiction. The Interstate Commerce Commission should handle [the case], rather than the State of New York.
just my 2 cents.
In the open wireless router case, all your router is doing is routing. Same as the ISP's router, above you. In fact, everything YOU route, THEY route first. So, in order for YOU to be liable for what the open router routes, the ISP would also have to be liable.
Therefore, Lucky for you, their lawyers would incidentally defended you, by analogy, as they defend the ISP. And (to the best of my knowledge) the ISP's have been pretty good at defending themselves, in terms of what they route.
perhaps what you meant to say was "users choose to switch from ie to firefox." and, if that's true, it's b/c they favor the adblocking features which, 10 years ago, microsoft chose not to implement.
microsoft might notice some change in that trend if they took a look at the adblocking features available in firefox, and implemented them for ie (in an honest way -- not like hotmail's pseudo spam filters that block most spam, but never spam from microsoft)
i'll play devil's advocate, for a minute:
the airwaves are supposed to be public.
therefore, if there's a "thief," the thief would be the group that cordones the public airwaves off and claims them as their own private property.
pull your head
its not a pleasant sound. anything that's temporary but requires a jackhammer to remove shouldn't be used in the first place.
dear slashdot -- too many of your own posts have looked like trolls lately. cant you just express the point without putting some third rate lawyer spin on it?
tires make noise. horns make noise. bike chains do too sometimes. its all road noise - aka noise pollution. it's encouraging to see them coming up with the quiet designs.
and weighs more cuz its impregnated with cement?
i dont get it.
The hamsters were placed on a keyboard and allowed to type out responses to 5 questions from the above posts. Here's what they had to say:
b mo up===--
(1) Did you have real time feedback while composing your music?
$rrrDFfghhhgRRTTGFffgfcjhjjyyijjkuiohlvyinvnyin
(Whoah get back on the keyboard there little feller we still have more questions for you)
(2) How long did it take you to make the composition we linked to on the slashdot website? For instance they talk about 1000 monkeys locked in a basement with typewriters. Well. How long did it take?
fnsd;kgndf;kfdgvkmdfvfvfkv dfvidfvdfvndfothyooyoymngl kmbfgmflyhpftm bbfptmbfgmblkf
(3) Ok. I get the picture. Well what were the working conditions like? There were comments about the deprived work conditions, i.e. lack of food, no "dark area" to sleep, no fluffy wood chips to nest in. etc. Any comments on that?
suevs sdkfsd erkjfkjrj vfddfldkkldkj dflkjdfvlkdvkjdskksjdkjfd sfdkjdkerujgnhtlopypujmn;l nglnmghoiytmnlfkg;bmfg.
(4) Alrighty then. Are you working on anything new?
dfglkdn.
(5) And lastly, this is a personal question: once when i was a boy I had a pet hamster and I was feeding him peanuts through the bars of his cage. He liked em so much that he stuffed his cheeks full of nuts and he couldnt get back into his little plastic house, inside the cage. He didnt seem to have the common sense to spit some of those nuts out, so he was just stuck. Needless to say ralph (my pet) just wasnt all that bright. I guess what i'm asking is how do you account for the disparity? Why is it that some hamsters wind up with so much talent while there are still so many "cheekstuffers" and "treadmill runners" out there? Did you attend any training?
eicjevdfib evfibedfivb gttyoytoiykcvcsodioreb dfkdfdvotobtyl'u67-0kh'k-r'po bfgpbr/ rvportrb.h >>.fgnghrtprthpmbf/. That should clarify at least some of the disparity.
Hmm. OK. Thank you very much for your time.
I wonder how many RPM's can they get out of that baby.
Does the furniture slide?
Instead of being injured by the terror attack, victims would be both injured and LOST. Injured and lost, just like the dead SUICIDE BOMBER[s] that initiated the strike. Yes. I THINK I understand it.
THE best reason a person would switch to firefox would be to avoid ad's. So if a person took the trouble to make that switch, it's pretty certain they dont want to look at ad's, and, by extension, wouldn't click on them either. No mystery there.
I regard most advertising as a form of pollution. So I use firefox.
I've made some mistakes in life, and I hate to see the lessons I learned go to waste. My mistakes started when I stood in the first poster's shoes. So I'm offering a friendly word of caution, based on my own life's events.
PS. Even if your pride stands in the way, I remind you that prayer can be done in private.
Realizes he's no longer CIA head, and that even if he were STILL CIA HEAD, he wouldn't have the authority to mandate internet access restrictions, since the CIA is restricted to foreign affairs.
There are constructive ways to boost your ego. Verbally attacking another man's religion faith / Lord is not constructive.
So please check your ego.
PS I've seen God's wrath, first-hand.
I can hardly believe slashdot chose to use the propagandistic term, "cyberterrorist." You should know better than to adopt vocubulary terms which tell the reader how to judge the do-er before understanding the facts. In this day and age, it's clear that the term "terrorist" has been used to manipulate the American people. Please consider using titles that don't attempt to manipulate me.
It lets you block popups and html advertisements from particular servers, but it's still wide open to flashplayer advertisements.
It would be nice if they could block those, too.
The Slashdot title claims "FCC Claims Regulatory Power Over Home Computers"
... messages sent and received' via ... wire communication."
The Slashdot description claims that the FCC claims "regulatory power over
Those are not the same thing. Please, dear slashdot, consider prioritizing factual headlines over eyecatching ones.
You're much better off always telling the truth, and alarming people a little, than consistently misleading people and alarming the hell out of em, when there's little to be afraid of.
The best government money can bribe -- and you guys bought it.
Vote nader next time.
It's more beaurocratic meddling.
So they must have posted this really early. How long until April 1st?
But, hey, at least we know those shotgunner robots are gonna do their job as ordered, and if they get out of hand I live in California, so MY GOVERNOR KNOWS HOW TO KILL ROBOTS.
But lets consider it..
Just think of all the creative benefit we could get from ending military/weapons R&D. People who'd spent their entire lives developing weapons could, instead, devote effort to improving human lives.
You know, things like industrial tech that doesn't deplete national resources, or pollute. Silent cars. A legitimate replacement for internal combustion.
But wait! If they developed this, we'd never need cars again!
On the other hand, would any non-demonic supernatural spirit help the military out with magical stuff like that? Or are they going to use physicists to legitimize it?