While a given driver may apparently driving OK while texting, they are at very high risk of doing something stupid. By targeting risky behaviour, law enforcement will prevent them from doing something stupid.
Go to a town hall, exercise your 1st amendment right to be offensive and stupid and loud. Stand outside the town hall and misinterpret your 2nd amendment right to threaten people.
Fixed that for you. Sorry if you find the political opposition speaking out to be inconvenient for you.
Consumers no longer have to play a guessing game when it comes to organic foods. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) now has national standards for the use of the word âoeorganic.â
That sounds more like the status quo is trying to hide something to me.
The status quo publishes all their data and conclusions in peer-review journals. They announce their results in public meetings and put out press releases. Not exactly hiding.
Unless by status quo you're referring to the e Bush administration, who were hiding the photos, as explained in TFA.
Actually, according to the Greenwald column, the Harman/AIPAC wiretap wasn't illegal - it was a court-approved wiretap on a foreigner.
This makes it even more ironic - the Bush administration declined to prosecute what was likely a serious crime, based on a legal wiretap - so that they could more effectively pursue illegal wiretaps.
The Greenwald piece suggests that Harman was *not* blackmailed.
The Bush DOJ declined to prosecute because she was supporting their position (on illegal wiretaps) - not that they threatened to prosecute if she didn't support their postion.
It's the old "Limits To Growth" bullshit back again.
... According to experts 30 years ago, the was simply no way we could produce enough food for 5 billion people. Now we're doing it for 7. These professional pessimists have always underestimated mankind's ability to change, adapt, and solve problems.
Given that billions of people are starving, I'm going to call bullshit.
We might be perhaps be producing enough food. But only at a cost that is out of reach for many people. That cost is in part due to demand for scarce resources: land, fuel for farming, fuel for transportation, etc.
the number of people needing help is surging dramatically. It is what WFP Executive Director Josette Sheeran calls "a perfect storm" hitting the world's hungry.
Slashdot Mirror
Where will it end?!
is that covered by the restraining order?
While a given driver may apparently driving OK while texting, they are at very high risk of doing something stupid. By targeting risky behaviour, law enforcement will prevent them from doing something stupid.
Go to a town hall, exercise your 1st amendment right to be offensive and stupid and loud. Stand outside the town hall and misinterpret your 2nd amendment right to threaten people.
Fixed that for you. Sorry if you find the political opposition speaking out to be inconvenient for you.
Fixed.
My new favorite band name: Captain Pedantic and the JokeKillers!
Yes, it its run by the Rosicrucians, but don't let that scare you off - the artifacts are real! Very cool if you like history.
http://usda-fda.com/Articles/Organic.htm
What Does the "Organic" Label Really Mean?
Consumers no longer have to play a guessing game when it comes to organic foods. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) now has national standards for the use of the word âoeorganic.â
Much of the population is starving now. So this would be different how?
Its not a fad. Its the way food has been grown for hundreds of thousands of years.
That sounds more like the status quo is trying to hide something to me.
The status quo publishes all their data and conclusions in peer-review journals. They announce their results in public meetings and put out press releases. Not exactly hiding.
Unless by status quo you're referring to the e Bush administration, who were hiding the photos, as explained in TFA.
But you have a Javascript model! Thanks for opening my eyes.
... Of course, what happens when there is more then two ways to look at a problem, i don't know.
use perl;
NIQDBY!
Ah, but the fear is very real, and very exploitable.
Another reason Linux is favored by criminals [/snark]
Eliza, is that you?
That might get peoples attention.
Even if one can commute to and from work on public transit, one still needs a car:
Between biking and public transit, we got rid of one car at our household.
Groceries? I can carry 100lbs on my bike trailer.
Out of town? I can rent a car.
Cars can be useful, but you don't need to own one.
40 minutes biking is fun and exercise.
40 minutes on the bus is time to read, or chat with my neighbors.
25 minutes driving is just time wasted.
OK, not really an original manuscript, but the constants go back to the beginning of time.
Don't question the power of my theories - I might kill your cat!
- Schroedinger
This makes it even more ironic - the Bush administration declined to prosecute what was likely a serious crime, based on a legal wiretap - so that they could more effectively pursue illegal wiretaps.
The Bush DOJ declined to prosecute because she was supporting their position (on illegal wiretaps) - not that they threatened to prosecute if she didn't support their postion.
I mean really, all you're doing is preparing content for publication.
It's the old "Limits To Growth" bullshit back again.
... According to experts 30 years ago, the was simply no way we could produce enough food for 5 billion people. Now we're doing it for 7. These professional pessimists have always underestimated mankind's ability to change, adapt, and solve problems.
Given that billions of people are starving, I'm going to call bullshit.
We might be perhaps be producing enough food. But only at a cost that is out of reach for many people. That cost is in part due to demand for scarce resources: land, fuel for farming, fuel for transportation, etc.
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/front/la-fg-food1apr01,1,5014433.story