Not in the iOS/OS X world (Unix/Linux as well). Long is always 64-bit for a 64 bit processor. Unix uses the LP64 approach. Windows is a different story.
And they don't care if the wifi chipset adds $3 to the price of my toaster and they'll get me to pay for it by claiming that the internet connected toaster is "cloud connected" to ensure perfect toast every time.
Yes but they don't have to shoulder the cost of it, the toaster manufacturer does. How are manufacturers going to recoup the cost? Could they sell the data to others? Sure, but here's the problem: they have to design the toaster to ensure the data feed works long enough to get their cost back. Some low cost manufacturers don't really care that their devices last more than a year (so that it expires out of warranty). I can't see them caring about IoT. The high end manufacturers might care.
Eventually, there will be no such models. That is already starting to be the case in some areas.
Well his point is that every manufacturer will install a 2 cent sensor. Have he talked to manufacturers? A 2 cent increase in the cost of a product is not something all manufacturers want. The low cost manufacturers are not going for that because their business model is to crank out the cheapest stuff possible with little involvement with the consumer.
For example, the cheapest DVDs for a long time at Walmart simply ignored region locking. While it was not advertised as such, I suspect the manufacturers originally made a model to pass muster with the studios and later removed all region encoding features because it was simply cheaper to manufacturer. I can't see how these same manufacturers will ensure IoT works in their devices for the long term. Internet sometimes is flaky in computers much less appliances. The first devices will be IoT but then after numerous returns because it doesn't work right, the manufacturers will simply disable them.
Let's take his own example: An Internet connected toaster. Why the **** would my toaster need to be connected? His point is that the toaster company would add Internet to my toaster regardless if I want it so they can collect analytics. I use my toaster twice a year. Even if I leave it connected, the data they collect will be of little use. If they really want to connect everything, I'll just leave things unplugged. Or not connect them to my home network. Or get another model that doesn't have a connection.
I don't doubt that Putin may have proposed it and that the Obama administration turned it down. After all who here really believes that Putin would honor such a treaty?
At launch how many Xbox One titles were at 1080p vs how many PS4. How about today on the same consoles? Did you click the link because I seem to have a link to actual research while you have just words with nothing to back it up.
Beyond that, your last sentence was "Informants that gain something after they obtain information are not considered agents." Isn't that exactly what happened in the case in question?
The question pertains to prior relationship and payments. If a Geek Squad technician found something and turned it over to law enforcement without any reward, that would be different. Also if the technician had no prior dealings with the FBI falls changes the case. In this case, the FBI proactively sought technicians beforehand to snoop for them in what could be considered an end-around the 4th Amendment.
Indeed if anything using a newer Apple device negates the problem as they use 64-bit processors. The same with a PC with a processor newer than an Intel Core 2 (2006). The OS however is another issue as Windows still has 32-bit variants today.
Yes but signed 64-bit would hit the max at 9,223,372,036,854,775,807 games (unsigned 18,446,744,073,709,551,615). I have a feeling that the limit is safe for 64-bit devices for the foreseeable millennium or so.
probably someone that actually understands resolution better than you.
I understand that Sony releasing their console to play games at 1080p gave them a leg up on MS.
1080p and 60fps is great, but sacrificing one or the other in certain scenarios is fine.
That wasn't the point. MS didn't release their next gen console to do 1080p as the minimum. The fact that it didn't do 60fps all the time was just another negative. Some titles don't even do 900p.
both Sony and MS do this regularly and for the most part a user won't even notice if it is done right.
No Sony does not. 1080p is the pretty much the standard resolution for PS4.Only 1 title for Sony is not at 1080p and Star Wars:Battlefront is still in beta. Sometimes the framerate is 60fps. Sometimes it is 30fps. The Xbox One resolution can be as low as 720p and as high as 1080p with the framerate varying between 30fps and 60fpgs.
Indeed, the numbers seem to show that the DC court had the highest from 1988 to 2008 with the Fed Cir being 2nd. The 9th was 3rd highest; however, the 9th by far had many more cases than any other circuit in front of SCOTUS and in general
9th Circuit is the most reversed circuit of the 11 existing circuits. There's no tap dancing around that one.
Only if you care to cherry pick numbers and time frames from that Politifact article. "The 9th Circuit's reversal rate is higher than average, but it's not the absolute highest among the circuit courts. That distinction goes to the 6th Circuit, which serves Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky and Tennessee, with an 87 percent average between 2010-15. The 9th Circuit is in third place." and "We also found that the 9th Circuit never had the highest reversal rate in any individual term between 2004-15. (That's the farthest back we could go.)"
I found this bit from the National Review preposterous: "The Supreme Court rarely takes cases where a lower court was simply incorrect." So SCOTUS only takes on cases where lower courts are correct? That's a bit of twisted logic. What would be the point of a SCOTUS review if the lower courts are simply correct?
I've used Sharp products in the past and they were decent not great products. I had a TV that lasted 10+ years and only got rid of it because I switched to a wide screen flat panel. I have noticed that the products within the last decade have seemed to be poorly made.
I would say the conclusion would be that just because there is no tar does not mean that e-cigs are not harmful. There are dangers with e-cigs. They happen to be different dangers than cigarettes.
The OP also said this: " It isn't a case of an engineer practicing their profession without a license. It is just a person offering their opinion, and perhaps their worst offense is that they are arguing from authority." which is http://ij.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/OR-Math-Jarlstrom-Final-Default-Order-IJ084769xA6322.pdf>factually untrue but like always you don't seem to do any research before interjecting yourself.
Depends if you consider a paid informant an agent of the state or not. I think courts have ruled that they are. Informants that gain something after they obtain information are not considered agents.
Again, the board has already said that he needs to bring this up to the City of Beaverton. It does not matter at that point if Jarlstrom is right or wrong about the math; the board can't do anything about it. He needs to address it with the city. Also I'm not a lawyer but since Jarlstrom paid his fine, I think that's an admission of guilt.
Because he was warned that using the title as he was doing was the problem. Also he was told that the State Board has no control over the traffic lights in the city of Beaverton, Oregon. Whether it has a "fault" as you describe it, it is not up to the board to correct so "hiding" is not a motive on their part.
At the same time there probably should be a distinction between licensed engineer vs engineer? Just because he isn't licensed, does this negate his engineering degree, even if he can't perform in said jurisdiction. Some place the distinction appears to come down to whether the said degreed expert can have an opinion vs sign off on that opinion.
It does not negate his opinion, however, the lack of license does diminish his credentials. If someone got a medical degree or a law degree but never passed their respective exams to get licensed to practice, would you regard their opinion less respectable than someone who did pass their exams?
You should read more carefully. The OP said: "You mentioned three different fields. Unless you are properly educated, and licensed in both our jurisdictions, you have no right to an opinion." He is literally saying I can't state a fact if I don't have a degree. It is a fact that a doctor needs to medical license to practice medicine and that merely a medical degree is not enough. It is a fact that a lawyer needs to pass the bar to practice law in a state. While a license is not necessary to do any engineering work, it is a fact that an engineer needs a license to use the title in certain states.
Well, they literally punished him precisely for doing math, so the Oregon Board of Idiots apparently concurs.
No they are punishing him for repeatedly declaring himself to be an engineer despite warnings not to do so. As for the math itself, they've already told Jarlstrom that the traffic lights are within the city's jurisdiction, therefore, they have no control nor say about validity of the math itself. The city of Beaverton must make the change should they wish.
Again, in Oregon, you can't publicly call yourself an engineer without a license. In some states, they clarify the restricted title is "Professional Engineer" or "Licensed Engineer". It does not matter that he does not sign off on plans. Signing off an plans requires a license.
Somehow, I don't see "gotta buy the whole damned machine all over again" as a problem. I'm sure you're smart enough to see why.
Uh, unless you can integrate your old Xbox physically in an Xbox One S, it IS a new machine. At the time of purchase you had 2 Xbox Ones. When you buy a new video card, you still have your existing PC but with a new component.
Agreed. I still can't for the life of me understand who at MS thought that the minimum resolution at less than 1080p was acceptable for their next gen console. It would have been acceptable back then that 4K resolution or 1080p at 60fps was too high given the lack of content, bandwidth, video cards, etc. Geez even Apple who never has the fastest specs on certain features went 1080p with their AppleTV 5 years ago.
I think most people going to see Baywatch are not concerned with RottenTomatoes scores. They are there to see the shirtless guys or the bouncing girls.
Slashdot Mirror
Not in the iOS/OS X world (Unix/Linux as well). Long is always 64-bit for a 64 bit processor. Unix uses the LP64 approach. Windows is a different story.
And they don't care if the wifi chipset adds $3 to the price of my toaster and they'll get me to pay for it by claiming that the internet connected toaster is "cloud connected" to ensure perfect toast every time.
Yes but they don't have to shoulder the cost of it, the toaster manufacturer does. How are manufacturers going to recoup the cost? Could they sell the data to others? Sure, but here's the problem: they have to design the toaster to ensure the data feed works long enough to get their cost back. Some low cost manufacturers don't really care that their devices last more than a year (so that it expires out of warranty). I can't see them caring about IoT. The high end manufacturers might care.
Define "so low". Some low-cost manufacturers barely adhere to safety standards much less add-on features.
Eventually, there will be no such models. That is already starting to be the case in some areas.
Well his point is that every manufacturer will install a 2 cent sensor. Have he talked to manufacturers? A 2 cent increase in the cost of a product is not something all manufacturers want. The low cost manufacturers are not going for that because their business model is to crank out the cheapest stuff possible with little involvement with the consumer.
For example, the cheapest DVDs for a long time at Walmart simply ignored region locking. While it was not advertised as such, I suspect the manufacturers originally made a model to pass muster with the studios and later removed all region encoding features because it was simply cheaper to manufacturer. I can't see how these same manufacturers will ensure IoT works in their devices for the long term. Internet sometimes is flaky in computers much less appliances. The first devices will be IoT but then after numerous returns because it doesn't work right, the manufacturers will simply disable them.
Let's take his own example: An Internet connected toaster. Why the **** would my toaster need to be connected? His point is that the toaster company would add Internet to my toaster regardless if I want it so they can collect analytics. I use my toaster twice a year. Even if I leave it connected, the data they collect will be of little use. If they really want to connect everything, I'll just leave things unplugged. Or not connect them to my home network. Or get another model that doesn't have a connection.
I don't doubt that Putin may have proposed it and that the Obama administration turned it down. After all who here really believes that Putin would honor such a treaty?
At launch how many Xbox One titles were at 1080p vs how many PS4. How about today on the same consoles? Did you click the link because I seem to have a link to actual research while you have just words with nothing to back it up.
Beyond that, your last sentence was "Informants that gain something after they obtain information are not considered agents." Isn't that exactly what happened in the case in question?
The question pertains to prior relationship and payments. If a Geek Squad technician found something and turned it over to law enforcement without any reward, that would be different. Also if the technician had no prior dealings with the FBI falls changes the case. In this case, the FBI proactively sought technicians beforehand to snoop for them in what could be considered an end-around the 4th Amendment.
Indeed if anything using a newer Apple device negates the problem as they use 64-bit processors. The same with a PC with a processor newer than an Intel Core 2 (2006). The OS however is another issue as Windows still has 32-bit variants today.
Yes but signed 64-bit would hit the max at 9,223,372,036,854,775,807 games (unsigned 18,446,744,073,709,551,615). I have a feeling that the limit is safe for 64-bit devices for the foreseeable millennium or so.
probably someone that actually understands resolution better than you.
I understand that Sony releasing their console to play games at 1080p gave them a leg up on MS.
1080p and 60fps is great, but sacrificing one or the other in certain scenarios is fine.
That wasn't the point. MS didn't release their next gen console to do 1080p as the minimum. The fact that it didn't do 60fps all the time was just another negative. Some titles don't even do 900p.
both Sony and MS do this regularly and for the most part a user won't even notice if it is done right.
No Sony does not. 1080p is the pretty much the standard resolution for PS4.Only 1 title for Sony is not at 1080p and Star Wars:Battlefront is still in beta. Sometimes the framerate is 60fps. Sometimes it is 30fps. The Xbox One resolution can be as low as 720p and as high as 1080p with the framerate varying between 30fps and 60fpgs.
Indeed, the numbers seem to show that the DC court had the highest from 1988 to 2008 with the Fed Cir being 2nd. The 9th was 3rd highest; however, the 9th by far had many more cases than any other circuit in front of SCOTUS and in general
9th Circuit is the most reversed circuit of the 11 existing circuits. There's no tap dancing around that one.
Only if you care to cherry pick numbers and time frames from that Politifact article. "The 9th Circuit's reversal rate is higher than average, but it's not the absolute highest among the circuit courts. That distinction goes to the 6th Circuit, which serves Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky and Tennessee, with an 87 percent average between 2010-15. The 9th Circuit is in third place." and "We also found that the 9th Circuit never had the highest reversal rate in any individual term between 2004-15. (That's the farthest back we could go.)"
I found this bit from the National Review preposterous: "The Supreme Court rarely takes cases where a lower court was simply incorrect." So SCOTUS only takes on cases where lower courts are correct? That's a bit of twisted logic. What would be the point of a SCOTUS review if the lower courts are simply correct?
I've used Sharp products in the past and they were decent not great products. I had a TV that lasted 10+ years and only got rid of it because I switched to a wide screen flat panel. I have noticed that the products within the last decade have seemed to be poorly made.
I would say the conclusion would be that just because there is no tar does not mean that e-cigs are not harmful. There are dangers with e-cigs. They happen to be different dangers than cigarettes.
The OP also said this: " It isn't a case of an engineer practicing their profession without a license. It is just a person offering their opinion, and perhaps their worst offense is that they are arguing from authority." which is http://ij.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/OR-Math-Jarlstrom-Final-Default-Order-IJ084769xA6322.pdf>factually untrue but like always you don't seem to do any research before interjecting yourself.
Depends if you consider a paid informant an agent of the state or not. I think courts have ruled that they are. Informants that gain something after they obtain information are not considered agents.
Again, the board has already said that he needs to bring this up to the City of Beaverton. It does not matter at that point if Jarlstrom is right or wrong about the math; the board can't do anything about it. He needs to address it with the city. Also I'm not a lawyer but since Jarlstrom paid his fine, I think that's an admission of guilt.
Because he was warned that using the title as he was doing was the problem. Also he was told that the State Board has no control over the traffic lights in the city of Beaverton, Oregon. Whether it has a "fault" as you describe it, it is not up to the board to correct so "hiding" is not a motive on their part.
At the same time there probably should be a distinction between licensed engineer vs engineer? Just because he isn't licensed, does this negate his engineering degree, even if he can't perform in said jurisdiction. Some place the distinction appears to come down to whether the said degreed expert can have an opinion vs sign off on that opinion.
It does not negate his opinion, however, the lack of license does diminish his credentials. If someone got a medical degree or a law degree but never passed their respective exams to get licensed to practice, would you regard their opinion less respectable than someone who did pass their exams?
You should read more carefully. The OP said: "You mentioned three different fields. Unless you are properly educated, and licensed in both our jurisdictions, you have no right to an opinion." He is literally saying I can't state a fact if I don't have a degree. It is a fact that a doctor needs to medical license to practice medicine and that merely a medical degree is not enough. It is a fact that a lawyer needs to pass the bar to practice law in a state. While a license is not necessary to do any engineering work, it is a fact that an engineer needs a license to use the title in certain states.
Well, they literally punished him precisely for doing math, so the Oregon Board of Idiots apparently concurs.
No they are punishing him for repeatedly declaring himself to be an engineer despite warnings not to do so. As for the math itself, they've already told Jarlstrom that the traffic lights are within the city's jurisdiction, therefore, they have no control nor say about validity of the math itself. The city of Beaverton must make the change should they wish.
Again, in Oregon, you can't publicly call yourself an engineer without a license. In some states, they clarify the restricted title is "Professional Engineer" or "Licensed Engineer". It does not matter that he does not sign off on plans. Signing off an plans requires a license.
Somehow, I don't see "gotta buy the whole damned machine all over again" as a problem. I'm sure you're smart enough to see why.
Uh, unless you can integrate your old Xbox physically in an Xbox One S, it IS a new machine. At the time of purchase you had 2 Xbox Ones. When you buy a new video card, you still have your existing PC but with a new component.
Agreed. I still can't for the life of me understand who at MS thought that the minimum resolution at less than 1080p was acceptable for their next gen console. It would have been acceptable back then that 4K resolution or 1080p at 60fps was too high given the lack of content, bandwidth, video cards, etc. Geez even Apple who never has the fastest specs on certain features went 1080p with their AppleTV 5 years ago.
I think most people going to see Baywatch are not concerned with RottenTomatoes scores. They are there to see the shirtless guys or the bouncing girls.