Slashdot Mirror


User: goatan

goatan's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
728
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 728

  1. Re:James Bond of the Spam world? on Anti-Spammers Infiltrate Private Online Spam Clubs · · Score: 1
    Simple send tons of bulk e-mail for viagra pr0n etc to one of the organisers when they recive the flood they think hey these guys are alright.

    im supprised no spammer has claimed that they are offering a service "hey im testing your network you should be pleased that it can handle a deluge of mail"

  2. Re:Substantially Similar on Corporate Work in the US vs. Canada? · · Score: 1

    And all those dot com companies that went bust didn't expect zero use what you excpect and reality are diffrent

  3. Re:WTF? on Vatican Astronomer Comments On Extraterrestrials · · Score: 1

    the point was he doesn't fit the atheist description he fits the agnostic description

  4. Re:Back me up on "backing up" on Two Congressmen Push for DMCA Amendments · · Score: 1

    And then test it's indistrucability with a flame.

  5. Re:Great News on Running Video Cards in Parallel · · Score: 1

    Um how is depresingly boring games nvidias fault? i don't think they go to games manufacturers and demand that they make inferior games

  6. Re:Dolphin Communication on Vatican Astronomer Comments On Extraterrestrials · · Score: 1
    The footage was shot by drug interdiction aircraft on patrol for smugglers.

    Did they interdict a large supply of halocingenics

  7. Re:WTF? on Vatican Astronomer Comments On Extraterrestrials · · Score: 1

    If you belive that there is the possibility of a supreme being but don't belive in religio your agnostic not atheist

  8. Re:mod as flamebait on Vatican Astronomer Comments On Extraterrestrials · · Score: 1

    Calling it enlightenment or the truth is also inflammatory, and rather insulting.

  9. Re:Will the aliens be on Vatican Astronomer Comments On Extraterrestrials · · Score: 1

    It could be xenu himself returned in all his glory. If you want a good laugh you should check out opperation clambake.

  10. Re:mod as flamebait on Vatican Astronomer Comments On Extraterrestrials · · Score: 1
    You could call any post that people might disagree with "flamebait". It's a stupid mod option.

    No it's not it is how the comment is made as to wheter it is flamebait

    Example of non flamebait disagrement: I think that there is no god and that we are all alone.

    Flambait example: you all a bunch of motherf**ing C**cks f*ck you f*ck you religion.

    big diffrence

  11. Will the aliens be on Vatican Astronomer Comments On Extraterrestrials · · Score: 3, Funny

    Interplanetry Mormons or quantum presbytaryans

  12. Re:Yeah, that's highly likely! on Life-Ruining Browser Hijackers · · Score: 1

    What like i wouldn't agree to roll over and have my tummy tiggled like a good pet. and no i don't for the government i'm a civil servant so work for the people.

  13. Re:Tinfoil Hat? on Privacy in the Woods? · · Score: 1
    Suddenly, a concern for privacy, objection to universal surveillance, means one is a paranoiac. How bizarre. This will be a commom tune sung by those wishing to implement surveillance.

    I think it's more likley that they will sing this tune

    Every breath you take

    Every move you make

    Every bond you break

    Every step you take

    I'll be watching you

    Every single day

    Every word you say

    Every game you play

    Every night you stay

    I'll be watching you

  14. Re:Different angle on the idea... on Privacy in the Woods? · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of when i last went to snowdonia (highest mountain in wales)the amount of ladies that where about to try and walk up it with high heeled shoes was hilaroius. Even if they don't twist there ankle there going to be limping on the way down.

  15. Re:Yeah, that's highly likely! on Life-Ruining Browser Hijackers · · Score: 1

    I a prosicuter where offering me a plea bargain i would take it as a sign that his case is weak because why plea bargain if you can get them put away on the evidence.

  16. Re:Smash 'em on Privacy in the Woods? · · Score: 1

    Perhaps the cliff is dangerous because it's hard to see after all an obvious cliff is easy to avoid.

  17. Re:Smash 'em on Privacy in the Woods? · · Score: 1
    The gene pool is actually getting worse, since the stupid breed, and the smart doesn't....

    Arn't you the living proof. Why don't you leave nature to the rest of us and go and stay in a basement alone. You do know alot of people go out there with other people for the company, Humans ar noy naturaly solitary.

  18. Re:Not for you to decide, sport. on Privacy in the Woods? · · Score: 1

    Figh Fight Fight Fight Fight Fight Fight Fight Fight Fight, it's like being back at school.

  19. Re:*groan* on Privacy in the Woods? · · Score: 1
    people who were "thinking of the children" rather than applying common sense.

    Or as is more likley with political types Thinking of the publicity, has anyone asked the Children what they think of this. bet there not happy with as you say this lak of common sense.

  20. Re:what about the children? on Privacy in the Woods? · · Score: 1

    People ignore the signs at the mudpots and geysers about not leaving the path, and we get 1-5 people boiled to death each year from their trail blazing ambitions Perhaps the bodies should be left as warning "this is what happend to the last guy who ignored the signs"

  21. Re:What's the problem here? on FBI Investigates Open Records Request · · Score: 1
    You do realize that the Bin Ladens are a well respected Saudi family

    By bush, your Average saudi doesn't respect them at all

    and some of whom resided and (did) attend college in the US?

    so that makes them good? Not all the bin ladens are whiter than white and a carpet ban on investigating them is a stupid or corrupt idea

  22. Re:What's the problem here? on FBI Investigates Open Records Request · · Score: 1

    Um a couple of tons of fertiliser even if used in the most crude way possible i.e. soaking with diesel and lighting would have kept the IRA supplied for all the bombs they ever made. And if you know how to refine it to get potassium nitrate you have alot of explosive.

  23. Re:Sounds like coersion on FBI Investigates Open Records Request · · Score: 1
    Because perhaps the primary purpose of our federal "law enforcement" agencies isn't protection of the civilians, but protection of the leaders and political structure?

    Just like the official secrets act isnt there to protect secret's it's there to protect officials.

  24. Re:Sounds like coersion on FBI Investigates Open Records Request · · Score: 1
    I think that if they actually did start going after and meting out harsh penalties for this kind of theft (the "small" stuff), a lot of other problems would fix themselves.

    Very true.

    Big things are made of little things-Unknownand
    Everything is conected to everything else-Lenin
  25. Re:Why isn't this modded up? on FBI Investigates Open Records Request · · Score: 1
    Wake up and realize that you can be nice and understanding and want to get along as much as you possibly can, and people will STILL want to use force to take away things from you.

    There is a big difference between using force for defence and attack just because someone is more reasonable and understanding doesn't mean there unarmed. Far from it there more likely to understand they need to be armed to protect them from all the loonies and would be dictators with guns.

    by your reasoning the only reason to have weapons and fight a war is to "make someone else plough for you". So that's what America is doing making the Iraqis "plough" oil for them? Or maybe you want to rethink what you said. weapons are for defence using them to make gains is only a temporary and desperate solution.